Ahad, 29 Mei 2011

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Anwar shouldn’t unilaterally decide on Sabah, S’wak CM

Posted: 27 May 2011 04:53 PM PDT

 

He dosen't seem to realise that people in Sabah and Sarawak prefer their chief ministers to be elected by democratic means

The people in Sabah and Sarawak prefer the chief minister to be elected by democratic means and decided by the respective governors in accordance with the constitutional provisions. Any departure from this would be an exercise in illegality, and ultimately, futility.

Joe Fernandez, Free Malaysia Today

De facto Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) chief Anwar Ibrahim  attributes his poor showing at the April 16 Sarawak state elections  to, among others, the idea of a Dayak chief minister.

Anwar was  entertaining an online news portal's TV network earlier this week on his monumental failures in Sarawak, as in Sabah earlier. Like his equally naïve interviewers, he didn't seem to know whether he was coming or going on Sarawak.

Anwar's take was that the Malays in Sarawak were put off by the idea of a Dayak chief minister and refused to award even one seat to the party.

He claimed that the minority Malays, only 20 per cent of Sarawak, accused him of promoting the idea of a Dayak chief minister at their expense. Anwar, it appears, tried to unsuccessfully reason with them that the Dayaks were in a majority in Sarawak and therefore the chief minister should come from that community.

For those unfamiliar, Sarawak Chief Minister Abdul Taib Mahmud is a Melanau and therefore a Dayak.

The difference is that unlike the great majority of Dayaks who are Christian if not pagan, Taib is a Muslim.

However, he has a Christian paternal grandfather and as many Christian relatives as Muslim ones. He also avoided talking about Islam like the plague since he knew that the Dayaks were watching him like a hawk.

Taib even blasted the recent seizure of bibles in Malay print in Kuching as "stupid".

It was enough to secure the release of the bibles.

Interestingly, no Sarawak Malay has ever been chief minister of the state.

All four chief ministers so far have been Dayak, Taib and his predecessor and maternal uncle Abdul Rahman Yakub being Muslim, and the first two being Christians i.e.

Stephen Kalong Ningkan and Penghulu Tawi Sli, both Iban Dayaks from the Sarawak National Party (SNAP).

The Ibans, the biggest community in Sarawak, failed as chief ministers, because of opposition from the other Dayak communities i.e. Bidayuh, Orang Ulu and Melanau.

The Sarawak Malays are in no position to object to a chief minister on the grounds that he's Dayak or a non-Muslim.

To digress a little, the Sarawak Malays are in fact Bidayuh living on the coasts of the Kuching division and Ibans along the coast of the other division who converted to Islam.

The Brooke dynasty referred to them as Malays after the fashion of the colonial British who used it as an umbrella term to describe various ethnic groups in Peninsular Malaysia.

Also, it's unlikely that the Dayaks will ever support the idea of a Sarawak Malay being chief minister of the state. If one is thrust on them, he won't last in the tumultuous politics of Dayak country.

It's more likely that a Sarawak chief minister would continue to come from among the non-Iban Dayaks – the creed is not in question – and this would ensure political stability in the state. If a Sarawak Malay wants to be chief minister he should not deny his Dayak heritage.

PKR's emphasis on a Dayak CM, in any case, led to allegation among the Sarawak Malays that such a candidate would turn the state into a Christian one, according to Anwar.

The de facto PKR chief is like a "bull in a china shop" raising a preposterous non-issue. He naively treads, like all Peninsular Malaysians, where even devils and angels dare not.

Sarawak is Anwar's second monumental blunder in Malaysian Borneo after Sabah.

In Sabah, Anwar thundered that there was no way he would have Jeffrey Kitingan as the Sabah PKR chief". Jeffrey, who has many Musli relatives, was accused openly by Anwar of being a racist and harbouring a hidden Christian agenda, whatever that means.

Anwar was playing politics where he should not be doing so.

Jeffrey pushed for the idea that the Sabah PKR chief should be democratically elected by the division chiefs and not appointed by the party headquarters (read Anwar) in Kuala Lumpur.

Anwar would have none of it and wanted a Muslim to head Sabah PKR although the majority of the members were non-Muslim Dusun, including Kadazan (urban Dusun), and Murut.

Anwar's excuse is that the Muslims, no doubt the illegal immigrants with MyKads included, were now in a slight majority in Sabah.

Baru Bian seen as stooge for Anwar

He decided unilaterally that the Sabah chief minister should be Muslim.

He does not seem to realise that the local Muslims in Sabah were not a homogenous community and were further divided into Dusun Muslim – Ranau, Bisaya and Orang Sungei, among others – Bajau, Suluk, Brunei Malay, Irranun, Banjar, and Cocos-Keeling, among others.

In "compensation", Anwar decided also unilaterally that the chief minister of Sarawak would be Dayak and Christian.

He went on to appoint Baru Bian, an Orang Ulu Christian, as Sarawak PKR chief.

No one in Sarawak accepts Baru because he was not elected but thrust on the membership by the party headquarters (read Anwar).

That's one reason why PKR failed to interest the people of Sarawak on April 16.

Baru was seen as a proxy and stooge for Anwar and Peninsular Malaysians.

Jeffrey's stand in Sabah, meanwhile, was that if the division chiefs in Sabah elected a Muslim head, so be it.

Anwar did not want to risk elections and deal with the possibility of a non-Muslim head.

Eventually, Jeffrey left amidst accusations that he was the King of Frogs, a label he has explained, and interested only in party posts and positions and in being number one and chief minister.

Jeffrey's explanations that his politics was all about the people, the issues, principles, policies and priorities, and not posts and positions, were pooh-poohed by Anwar and drowned out by the propaganda barrage from party headquarters.

Sabah Deputy Chief Minister Joseph Pairin Kitingan thinks that Anwar made many promises to Jeffrey, all of which he had no intention of keeping, made use of him to build up the party in Sabah and eventually played him out.

If anyone is obsessed with the ethnicity and faith of the chief ministers of Sabah and Sarawak respectively, it's politicians from Peninsular Malaysia. They don't seem to realise that Peninsular Malaysia – Malay, Chinese, Indian – is no political model for Sabah and Sarawak.

READ MORE HERE

 

WIKILEAKS: ‘Anwar lacked Dr M’s clout in tackling Islam’

Posted: 26 May 2011 02:31 PM PDT

 

A leaked 1997 diplomatic cable shows that the US had backed Dr Mahathir's version of moderate Islam but felt that Anwar was too soft to handle the religious conservatives.

Following the messy beauty contest incident, Mahathir had then announced that by early 1998, the government would unify syariah laws at the federal level, thus sharply curbing the autonomy of local religious authorities.

K Kabilan, Free Malaysia Today

 

The US embassy here had given its tacit approval to Dr Mahathir Mohamad's hardline approach against Muslim conservatives in Malaysia as it was in line with the "US interests and values", revealed a leaked US confidential cable from 1997.

However, the US diplomats were highly concerned if Mahathir's successor as prime minister could cope with the growing Muslim conservatism.

They were specifically worried if Anwar Ibrahim, who was Mahathir's deputy at that time, had the "political position or the desire to take on Muslim conservatism as vigorously as Mahathir has done".

"Moreover, Anwar, if he does become the next PM, will not have Mahathir's almost unquestioned authority. Thus, for political reasons he may be reluctant to take strong stands that upset the vocal religious constituency," they added.

And they concluded that in the long run, the "growing proportion of Malays in Malaysia's ethnic mix will probably lead inexorably to the further Islamisation of Malaysian society".

The details were revealed in a cable sent by the then US ambassador in Malaysia John R Malott to the US State Department in Washington on Dec 23, 1997.

The confidential cable was leaked by whistleblower site WikiLeaks exclusively to FMT today.

The year 1997 was a critical year for Malaysia as Mahathir was facing a major financial crisis. He was also facing problems with haze and the country's zealous religious officials, added the cable.

Mahathir takes charge

The cable said several incidents involving "zealous Islamic authorities" have angered Mahathir during this period. They include:

  • a proposal by a unit within the education ministry to introduce compulsory Islamic civilization studies for all students. This proposal was then broadened to become Asian civilization following protests and Mahathir's intervention.
  • the arrest of three Malay women by the Selangor religious authorities for taking part in a beauty contest.
  • an open warning by the Sarawak religious authorities against Muslim men from taking part in a bodybuilding competition.

Following the messy beauty contest incident, Mahathir had then announced that by early 1998, the government would unify syariah laws at the federal level, thus sharply curbing the autonomy of local religious authorities.

"Theoretically, the government's plan for standardisation of syariah law will require the agreement of the states' ruling sultans, but such constitutional niceties have rarely delayed the PM before.

"The 'unification' of syariah law early next year is already a fait accompli and conservative clerics know it, but don't like it," added the cable from the ambassador.

The cable further stated that Mahathir then in his keynote address at the Umno meeting in September 1997 had called on Malays to reject extremism and noted the results of sectarian violence in Bosnia and the Middle East.

The confidential cable added that Mahathir also criticised Muslims who put more stock in outward appearances (such as traditional clothes and beards for men and headscarves for women) than in leading a moral lie.

"Such a speech might sound sensible enough to Western ears, but by all accounts it was a disaster with the largely Malay audience, including Deputy PM Anwar, sporting traditional dress and goatees and most of the women, including Anwar's wife, wearing headscarves," it stated.

Malott said that Mahathir's "attack" on "extremist" Islam soon saw a fiery reaction from conservative Muslims, including the Selangor mufti who had apparently labelled the prime minister as an apostate.

"Reportedly, Friday sermons at many mosques have included both oblique and direct criticism of the government. The police confirmed publicly that anonymous 'poison pen' literature criticising the PM is circulating at mosques," added the US cable.

The Selangor mufti, who had denied ever calling Mahathir an apostate, was replaced by the state religious authorities on the grounds that the state needed a mufti whose views "were acceptable to all" and that a replacement was needed due to the mufti's advanced age.

This prompted the US embassy to point out that the age reasoning was curious as "the PM himself has repeatedly stated that he will not step down, though he is one year older than the mufti".

Anwar will lack authority

The US cable stated that Mahathir's moves to modernise Islam made even the moderates feel anxious over the tone and direction taken by the prime minister.

However, the top US diplomat felt that Mahathir "consistently advocates a moderate Islam squarely in line with US interests and values".

"The PM, for better or worse, is not afraid to take on anyone, including conservative Islamic groups that generally have negative views toward the US.

"Mahathir is also important as a voice of moderation within the international Islamic community," added the secret cable.

The cable then went on to describe how Anwar, labelled as Mahathir's "good conscience", "has not proven he has either the political standing or the desire to take on conservative Islam".

Malott, who was a firm Anwar loyalist following his sacking as the deputy prime minister in 1998, felt that Anwar who started off as a Muslim activist seemed loath to confront his former Muslim associates.

"Anwar's reaction to the beauty pageant incident, which happened while the PM was out of the country and Anwar was in charge, was much less vigorous."

Malott said that "Anwar, if he replaces Mahathir, will not have his predecessor's almost unquestioned authority".

"Thus, for political reasons he may be reluctant to take strong stands that upset the vocal religious constituency," Malott added in the cable.

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Anwar believes Pakatan is ready even without him

Posted: 28 May 2011 11:32 PM PDT

He said Pakatan was already a solid united pact with potential young successors including Azmin who he said may be brash in his "stunts" but more than capable to lead.

(free Malaysia Today) - Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim is confident in Pakatan Rakyat's second tier of leadership and discounted the notion that the pact will collapse in his absence.

Speaking at a closed door dialogue session with young professionals here, the PKR de facto leader said the pact was armed with young and more than capable leaders that can take Pakatan forward should he be convicted and jailed for sodomy.

"Once you're prosecuted you're already damned," he said laughingly to some 150 people who attended the forum.

Anwar is currently facing trial for allegedly sodomising his former aide, a charge he claimed was engineered by Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak and wife Rosmah Mansor.

Anwar's persona, attributed to his charisma and moderate liberal politics, is seen as the binding force in the Pakatan coalition rife with infighting.

The top leadership appears to be gelling well but much of their ideological differences remain conveniently buried for now and Anwar's possible incarceration would possibly break Pakatan.

Whether or not the bloc is ready for future without Anwar remains unknown. While it is likely that Anwar has identified his successor, Azmin Ali who is now PKR deputy president who happens to be his blue-eyed boy, observers say the latter lacks the calibre to lead and hold Pakatan together.

But the opposition leader claimed Pakatan was already a solid united pact with potential young successors including Azmin who he said may be brash in his "stunts" but more than capable to lead.

"Sometimes when the (current) leadership is too strong, we tend to not see the potential of second tier leaders," he said, referring to rising political starlets like PKR strategic director Rafizi Ramli and communications director Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad who is also Seri Setia assemblyman.

He said this in reply to a youth during the forum who urged Pakatan to move away from its dependency on political icons and based their struggle more on ideologies.

Anwar added that differences and open spat in Pakatan was part and parcel of a democracy which he said the ruling Barisan Nasional coalition was bankrupt of.

"Do you see any quality MPs in Umno or BN? Sometimes when I'm in Parliament and I look at them (sighs)," he said, drawing laughter from the audience.

READ MORE HERE

 

Anwar claims Dr M threatened him before sacking

Posted: 28 May 2011 11:28 PM PDT

The supposed threat was highlighted in book by writer Ziauddin Sardar.

(Free Malaysia Today) - Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim claimed he was threatened by former premier Dr Mahathir Mohamad who told him to voluntarily step down a day before his sacking as the deputy prime minister in 1998.

The PKR de facto leader further alleged that Mahathir had offered him financial compensation. Should he reject, he would be charged, the Permatang Pauh MP added.

"Mahathir told me… you have wife, a family, its better if you resign voluntarily, if not charges will be brought against you," he told some 150 people who attended a closed-door dialogue with young professionals here.

The supposed threat was highlighted in book by writer Ziauddin Sardar. The audience during the question and answer session asked Anwar if this was true to which the opposition leader replied:

"It's true because I told him (Ziauddin). I also went against Dr Mahathir, and was wrongfully imprisoned and subsequently beaten half to death."

Despite the ordeal, Anwar told the audience that he held no grudges against his former mentor, and forgave him for what happened.

"He is old and senile. Leave him alone lah," he said jokingly in reply to a question by an audience who wanted to know what would he do to the former premier if he becomes prime minister.

Anwar was sacked in 1998 and charged with sodomy and power abuse, charges he claimed were high level conspiracy to topple him.

He was later convicted and jailed for both offences but was eventually freed  in September 2004.

READ MORE HERE

 

SAPP angered by DAP ultimatum

Posted: 28 May 2011 11:25 PM PDT

DAP veteran Lim Kit Siang is accused of being insensitive and arrogant for saying that only Pakatan will be able to bring change to Sabah.

(Free Malaysia Today) - A public tiff has broken out between the local opposition in Sabah and the Pakatan Rakyat national coalition ahead of possible snap general election that may be called this year.

The Sabah Progressive Party (SAPP) has rapped PR leaders for being arrogant  for taking a "you are either with us or against us" approach with the local party ahead of the next general election.

SAPP vice president Dullie Marie, said the party was upset with a speech by DAP stalwart Lim Kit Siang at a Harvest Festival celebration organized by Sabah DAP on Friday where he called on the local party to join PR.

Lim had said that SAPP was being unrealistic in being independent in its bid to topple the BN government at state and national level.

His comments angered SAPP president Yong Teck Lee and several senior leaders who were present at the occasion. In an immediate response earlier, Yong expressed surprise and regret over Lim's remarks which he (Yong) described as harsh.

In a scathing statement issued here today, Dullie who is also SAPP Putatan chief too was of the opinion that Lim was being insensitive and arrogant for saying that only PR would be able to bring change to Sabah.

"He (Lim) completely ignored the existence of local parties. Lim should remember without Sabah and Sarawak there won't be a Malaysia today.

"I would like to remind Lim Kit Siang and other leaders from Semenanjung, they should be more sensitive of what they say. We are all Malaysians and we have grown mature with time. We believe change must be made by Sabahans themselves. PR leaders should refrain from imposing colonist mentality on Sabahans," he reminded.

While attributing Lim's display of arrogance to DAP's victory in the recent Sarawak state election, Dullie contended that being a veteran politician, Lim should know the rationale behind the voting trend among the Chinese there.

He also reminded Lim on the fact that the natives of Sarawak still rallied behind and gave their votes to Barisan Nasional (BN) despite various exposures made by the opposition before and during the election campaign period because the Sarawakians aspired to protect their autonomy.

READ MORE HERE

 

Umno comes up with module to treat dropped candidates

Posted: 28 May 2011 05:37 PM PDT

(Bernama) -- A module will be formulated to "treat" disappointed Umno members who are not chosen as election candidates, said Umno Vice-President Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi.

He said if left untackled, the situation could be disadvantageous to the party.

Ahmad Zahid, who has been tasked the responsibility to create the module, said in the past they (candidates not selected) spent the initial days of the election campaign period to pacify sulking supporters instead of focusing on meeting voters.

The module would be put into practice in an election dry run that Umno would be conducting soon, he said, adding that he had been appointed by Umno's Supreme Council to chair and coordinate dry runs in each of the parliamentary and state constituencies.

"I will determine the module to ensure the party machinery is set up early in each constituency and no sulking is involved," he told reporters opening Titiwangsa Umno's annual delegates meeting at the Putra World Trade Centre (PWTC), here today.

Ahmad Zahid, who is also Defence Minister, said the culture had to stop immediately as it could be regarded as sabotage when it was more important for Umno members to focus on elections.

 

Only Malays and Bumis entitled to scholarships, says Umno-linked group

Posted: 28 May 2011 04:46 PM PDT

(Malaysiakini) - Only Malays and bumiputera have the right to receive government scholarships, said Umno-linked pressure group Gagasan Anti-Penyelewengan Selangor (Gaps) today.

"Is it a fact that all Malaysians have a right to a scholarship? The federal constitution only states that the Malays and bumiputera have the right to receive a scholarship," said Gaps president Hamidzun Khairuddin (left) in a statement.

"This constitution is made by the Reid Commission, not by the Malay leaders," he added, shifting the blame from the majority community to the five-member Commonwealth panel that drafted the nation's constitution in 1956.

Hamidzun was responding to MCA president Chua Soi Lek's comments on the PSD scholarship fracas carried by a news portal yesterday, where the latter's report said, "MCA told the prime minister today top SPM students should be given scholarships to study abroad despite Putrajaya's claim that it did not make any such promise."

Referring to "some members of the ruling party and opposition who are very racist and chauvanistic", Hamidzun lashed out at Chua in particular ,saying the chief of the second largest BN component party should amend the constitution if he disagreed with the issue.

"If Soi Lek disagrees, he should amend the constitution drawn up by Lord Reid. Soi Lek should be more objective in his leadership," said the Gaps leader.

All races equal but...

"Soi Lek also needs to learn to be a leader for all Malaysians, and not just the champion of his race," added Hamidzun.

BN parties for going in circles over the issue every May to June, year in, year out, he noted that each party fought only for the rights of their own respective communities.

"Gaps believes the issue should be resolved definitively, so that it would not become an annual polemic that does not benefit the rakyat," he said, ticking off BN parties for the widening income gap and the increasingly racial politics in the country.

"Enough of Do Xiang Zhong, Perkasa and Hindraf respectively being the spokespersons of their respective races. They excel in the field," said the Gaps leader.

Oblivious to the obvious contradictions, Hamidzun concluded that "political leaders should be broad minded... and defend the rights of all races based on the constitution."

Yesterday Chua had, according to the news report, announced after meeting with the PM over the prickly JPA scholarship issue that he had told the premier a number of failed scholarship applications by top scoring non-Malays should be reviewed and given overseas scholarships. Najib had promised he would "look into the controversy".

 

A Rolls Royce for anyone who finds a man resembling Anwar

Posted: 28 May 2011 04:42 PM PDT

(The Star) - Find a man resembling Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim and you can drive home a vintage Rolls Royce and with RM10,000 cash in hand.

That is the offer made by Kedah Kita chief Zamil Ibrahim to anyone who can find a person who looks like Opposition leader Anwar.

"The Rolls Royce (Silver 111, 6700cc) is mine, and the cash offer is made by someone who wants to remain anonymous.

"We are doing this to put an end to the prolonged saga following Anwar's claim that even if people say that the man in a sex video may look like him, it is not his tummy,'' he said.

Datuk T, comprising businessman Datuk Shazryl Eskay Abdullah, former Malacca Chief Minister Tan Sri Abdul Rahim Thamby Chik, and former Perkasa treasurer-general Datuk Shuib Lazim had, on March 21, revealed the existence of a video showing a man resembling Anwar having sex with a woman.

Anwar had lodged a police report claiming that he was not the man in the video and that it was part of a political conspiracy to topple him.

Zamil believes his offer can help throw light on the matter.

"The public are confused. I believe Anwar can finally clear his good name if we can help him find a man who looks like him, walk like him, and even smile like him,'' Zamil said.

Zamil also added that he would invite Eskay, Kita president Datuk Zaid Ibrahim and senator Ezam Moh Noor to sit in a panel to identify Anwar look-a-alike.

"The three of them were very close to Anwar. They can tell who looks exactly like Anwar,'' he said.

Several bloggers had also vouched to run naked around KLCC if a man resembling Anwar could be found.

 

I Didn't Expect Kit Siang To Ridicule SAPP In Public - Yong

Posted: 28 May 2011 10:03 AM PDT

(Bernama) - KOTA KINABALU -- Sabah Progressive Party (SAPP) president Yong Teck Lee said he was surprised by the harsh way DAP supremo Lim Kit Siang attacked SAPP.

"As a matter of fact, Sabah DAP chief, Jimmy Wong Sze Phin, had called and SMSed to invite me to the DAP Kaamatan (harvest festival) celebration (Friday). In reciprocating, I invited Wong as a guest to my house and we had a nice chat on politics.

"We agreed that it was important that we build mutual confidence between SAPP and DAP, to meet Lim Kit Siang at the DAP harvest festival and exhibit goodwill so that the future relationship between SAPP and DAP can be improved," he said in a statement, here yesterday.

Yong, a former Sabah chief minister, said as a guest at the DAP function, he did not expect to be issued a public ultimatum by Kit Siang in a harsh manner that put him and his colleagues in an embarrassing situation and their party ridiculed in public.

"Lim caught all of us by surprise by his harsh tone, the abrasive way in pinpointing me by name and ridiculing SAPP.
   
"My immediate feeling was that, after their super victories in the April Sarawak state elections, Lim Kit Siang's DAP has already become super confident of taking over Putrajaya and the Sabah state government at the coming general elections" said Yong in an immediate reaction to Lim's speech in which he (Lim) had issued an ultimatum for SAPP to join Pakatan Rakyat (PR) on the grounds that "only PR can beat Barisan Nasional (BN)".

Yong said he wondered if it was because Lim now felt that DAP did not neeed anybody else, as Pakatan alone could beat the BN, then why the need to demand SAPP to join Pakatan.

The SAPP president recalled that at the DAP rally on September 16, 2008 at Kian Kok School in Kota Kinabalu, Lim had called for a Pakatan-plus coalition with SAPP.

"This means that SAPP need not be a member of the fledgling Pakatan," he said.

Yong had also spoken at that "916" DAP rally which took place a day before SAPP left the Barisan Nasional.
  
"Has Lim now unilaterally dropped his own Pakatan-plus formula?," asked Yong.

However, Yong said he still remained hopeful that SAPP's relationship with PKR, DAP and PAS could improve further before the general elections.

"I only hope that the super confidence of DAP leaders will subside in the coming months and realise that their promise of 416 (April 16) change of Sarawak government failed miserably because the "416 change" turned into a "416" Taib victory," he added.

 

Shine a light on problem procedures

Posted: 28 May 2011 10:01 AM PDT

(The Star) - THE kerfuffle over irregularities in scholarship awards by the Public Service Department (PSD) continues to wend its way through the public consciousness.

There should be no doubt about the very pressing and public interest nature of these irregularities. At stake are not just issues of news interest but also public welfare and the national interest.

Before closure can be achieved, there must be transparency about the whole selection process. Vital questions include: How many irregularities have there been, why did they arise, how deep do they go, when did they all begin and who are involved?

The misallocation of scholarships has revealed official procedures as haphazard, inconsistent and incongruous or wholly incompatible with stated official policy.

The seriousness of the implications cannot be underestimated because of their negative impact on both national human resource capacity and the nation's administrative credibility.

As more missteps are revealed, there is more for those responsible to answer for. Consequently, more issues have surfaced.

Among these is the requirement for students who have qualified and been selected to undergo an interview. If they have already been deemed suitable and deserving, why extend the bureaucratic process when the PSD's own human resources can be more meaningfully applied elsewhere?

Also, at least 66 deserving students did not get the course they had chosen and another 102 who had applied for degree courses were given diploma courses instead. Full and satisfactory explanations are needed for such glaring discrepancies.

Surely such procedures should constantly be streamlined and minimised instead of devising additional obstacles to impede and disable our most promising young people?

Students who have worked hard and done well should be rewarded accordingly, particularly by investing in the nation's productive capacities. Nobody should work to disappoint or discourage promising young talent.

A risky multiplier effect is also at work, with each succeeding generation seeing what the generation before has had to go through, and reacting pre-emptively.

Young people can see that the conduct of such bureaucratic procedures so far is typical of a chronic Third World country.

A spring-cleaning of sorts is thus in order. But rather than sweep anything under the carpet, it is time to check around the floorboards and hang out any problem rug to dry, then beating it soundly.

PKR off the blocks in battle to keep Selangor

Posted: 28 May 2011 09:46 AM PDT

By Shannon Teoh, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, May 29  – In the small towns and villages of Malaysia's biggest state, PKR politicians are already on the hustings to defend their tenuous hold on power in Selangor even though elections do not have to be called until early 2013.

At a recent rally, about 1,000 locals were gathered in and around a small hall in rural Kampung Bukit Changgang, where just 10km away, huge commercial planes take off and land at the Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA).

One of the biggest airports in the world, it spans over 100 square kilometres and has a capacity of 35 million passengers and 1.2 million tonnes of cargo per year.

But in Bukit Changgang near Banting, it is 9pm on a Monday night recently and the only shops open are the stalls around the ceramah, which can only be found after driving through kilometres of roads without streetlights.

Kuala Langat MP Abdullah Sani Abdul Hamid is talking up Pakatan Rakyat's (PR) promises of subsidies, abolishing tolled roads and increasing allowances for civil servants under its Buku Jingga pledge if it takes over Putrajaya.

The PKR leader tells the crowd that Barisan Nasional (BN) was busy talking about "video, video, video, mani, mani, mani (semen, semen, semen)," referring to the sex video and sodomy allegations against Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

"But they don't talk about money," he says before listing alleged abuses of power by BN.

The Malaysian Insider asked a stall owner selling drinks earlier that evening what was the main issue for him heading into a general election expected this year.

He simply rubbed two fingers against his thumb and said, "We're all looking for rezeki (livelihood)."

PKR launched its Jelajah Selangor Tawan Putrajaya (Jelas) series of ceramahs at the beginning of the month and has since blitzed 16 different venues in its first three weeks.

But at least three-quarters have been held in what state information chief Shuhaimi Shafiei terms "enemy territory."

"We believe that the seats already won by PR in 2008 will see a status quo. So we are going into the five seats that BN won," he told The Malaysian Insider, naming Sabak Bernam, Tanjong Karang, Sungai Besar, Sepang and Pandan as the targeted seats.

The plan to sweep all of Selangor's parliamentary seats in a general election expected to take place within the year is ambitious.

Among the BN incumbents are a current and two former Cabinet ministers, including former MCA president Datuk Seri Ong Tee Keat, who is MCA's only MP in the Klang Valley.

But Shuhaimi, who is in charge of the Jelas campaign, is confident as BN's majorities in these highly-populated seats range from as low as 989 votes to 5,009.

PKR state chief Azmin Ali also told The Malaysian Insider that the state government, which his party leads, will not dissolve the state assembly if elections are called this year.

This will relieve PR of having to micro-manage the 56 state seats and concentrate on the main prize — Putrajaya.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Where voters outnumber local population

Posted: 28 May 2011 04:40 AM PDT

(Bernama) - The Election Commission (EC) has been urged to monitor state and parliamentary constituencies where registered voters outnumber the local population, to prevent any irregularity.

Umno vice-president Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi said Umno had detected a questionable pattern of voter registration in certain areas that was likely to favour the opposition.

He claimed this was happening in places like Penang where those living on the island were purposely registered as voters on the mainland.

Speaking to reporters after opening the Kota Melaka Umno divisional meeting here today, he said: "It appears that the same strategy is being used in Perak, Selangor, Negeri Sembilan and Malacca."

"Only voters from the constituency involved should be allowed to vote there, not those who are turned into phantom voters," he stressed.

He said Umno was prepared to present evidence of the opposition's scheme to the EC for further action.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


No political party is entitled to defend Putrajaya

Posted: 28 May 2011 05:27 PM PDT

Putrajaya is no private property of any political party, but a public asset that belongs to all Malaysians. So no one is entitled to talk about defending Putrajaya, unless the country is facing an invasion by a foreign power.

Kim Quek

There is something disturbing in Premier Najib Razak's repeated and frantic calls to defend Putrajaya. The latest, when he was addressing youth at the World Youth day gathering in Putrajaya on May 28.

After asking the youth "Will you defend Putrajaya with me?", and getting a positive answer, he then shouted: "Defend Putrajaya! Defend Putrajaya! Defend Putrajaya!"

His equally paranoid call on an earlier occasion was during the recent 61st Umno general assembly when he shrieked: "Even if our bodies are crushed and our lives lost, brothers and sisters, whatever happens, we must defend Putrajaya".

Any novice to this country must have imagined that Malaysia must be facing an imminent foreign invasion, otherwise, why should its prime minister be exhorting so earnestly for the defence of its administrative capital?

But we Malaysians know that this is not a case of foreign invasion, but a reflection of the sick mentality of the incumbent political power which has ruled this country without interruption for more than half a century.

Umno has held on to its hegemony for so long that it cannot differentiate between what belongs to the party and what belongs to the people.

Putrajaya is no private property of any political party, but a public asset that belongs to all Malaysians. So no one is entitled to talk about defending Putrajaya, unless the country is facing an invasion by a foreign power.

In fact, Umno is only a guest tenant to Putrajaya, invited by the people to administer the country for a stipulated period. Upon termination of that term of office, the landlord, who is the people, will invite bidders, who are the political parties, to tender their bids for the next term of office. The successful bidder will then be invited to take tenancy in Putrajaya and run the federal government for the next term.

Hence, there is nothing for Umno to defend, except the transient power which ends upon expiration or termination of the term.

It is totally out of order for Najib to talk about defending Putrajaya, least of all its defence with blood and dead bodies.

How would Americans think, if President Obama calls for the defence of Washington DC when facing his adversary in the next presidential election? Surely they would be thinking their President has gone mad! And if he goes on to talk about shedding lives, l bet many will begin to faint.

The concept of lordship over the administrative capital as exclusive private domain by any political power is so alien to the principles of democracy that none would even dream that it could ever be uttered by a contestant for political power.

But in Malaysia, Najib seems to be mighty proud for staking that claim over Putrajaya and for being roundly applauded for doing that.

This is how far Najib and Umno have strayed from the original democratic ideals with which our fore fathers had founded the nation! 

Not only is Umno obsessed with clinging on to political power as an exclusive right and a personal death-or-live battle, but even the people's mindset have been so conditioned by Umno's lengthy hegemony that, many fail to see Najib's political posture as an appalling affront against the fundamental tenets of our constitution – that the people are the masters, not the ruling power.  

Worse than his claim over Putrajaya, is Najib's inherent threat to resort to extra constitutional  means - violence and bloodshed as intimated by Najib – to retain power when facing electoral defeat or potential defeat. Such act, if transpired, is clearly treason to our people and our Constitution. And the latter is the binding contract among the various communities upon which they had jointly achieved the country's Independence.

Malaysians must therefore ponder deeply whether they can entrust their fate to a political power that does not hesitate to tear up the Constitution and defy the people's choice, when facing an unfavourable electoral outcome.

On a separate note, we must strongly condemn BN's exploitation of the youth gathering event in Putrajaya to launch its political propaganda. This festival, organized at great public expenses, is supposed to be a celebration of youth, and therefore a non-political event. But BN has turned it into a BN political platform where it volleyed vicious attacks against its political opponents. This is but another one of many instances of BN's rampant abuse of authority and public funds to advance its parochial political interests, and therefore another important consideration for the people to ponder when weighing the comparative trustworthiness of the existing contestants for political power.

 

Can we take a break from all the posturing?

Posted: 28 May 2011 05:24 PM PDT

Everyone claims to be talking and speaking on behalf of the rakyat but can we be sure? One need not be politically savvy to begin to suspect that politicians, most of the time and most of them, are actually speaking for themselves. They are talking to you with an eye on your vote; if we are lucky, we matter.

Zainul Ariffin, NST

WHETHER it is fuel prices, electricity tariffs or toll rates, every argument is accompanied by the shrill cry of politicking. To paraphrase Bob Dylan, everyone is talking but no one is listening.

We are in a soapbox climbathon, the higher one clambers than one's opponent and the more outrageous the message, then, presumably, more people will listen.

I wish for a time when people could just argue, debate or disagree without having an eye on the political prize. We should all be outraged at this endless intrusion into our peace and quiet but for some of us, we cannot have enough of it.

Everyone claims to be talking and speaking on behalf of the rakyat but can we be sure? One need not be politically savvy to begin to suspect that politicians, most of the time and most of them, are actually speaking for themselves. They are talking to you with an eye on your vote; if we are lucky, we matter.

We are their raison d'etre? Without us and our problems, they are nothing. No?

But, of course, I am being cynical and I am thinking of the most opportunistic of the lot and the blatantly obtuse who cannot imagine that we can see through their acts.

The latest brouhaha (why do I always feel that the word seems to suggest people losing their heads and we should all laugh at them?) being the Public Service Department scholarships row.

It is a matter of principle that the best should be rewarded. I understand that and agree that every single citizen is important. Yet, everyone claims to be unjustifiably maligned by the policy.

While everyone is avoiding the word "race" publicly and is instead championing "meritocracy", we should not skirt the issue and point out that it is the awarding of scholarships to "ineligible" Bumiputeras that is the issue here.

It is obvious that this becomes a racial issue when Chinese or Indian political parties, or those dominated by them, take up the issue and suggest that members of their communities have been denied.

Are the MCA, MIC -- which are part of the government and have always been able to resolve issues quietly within the confines of Barisan Nasional -- and DAP raging at the PSD while posturing to the Chinese and Indian communities?

One could understand the realpolitik behind this strategy but there are also risks.

The Malays and Bumiputeras may see the protest as a racist thing, too, especially when it is insinuated that many of the recipients are presumed to be unworthy or are incapable of getting such awards without help.

Personally, I feel it is fine and dandy to argue that the best should be rewarded. It is even acceptable to be outraged if there were inconsistencies in the policy.

But should we all be held hostage by a policy that is likely to be flawed in its interpretation -- are the scholarships purely for straight A+ students or deserving ones?

The former required no interpretation except for the string of A+s, while the latter would try to strike a balance between a middle-class child, who was primed for examinations with tuition and prep classes, and the rural or underprivileged kid who had to rely on his wits to get where he was.

Furthermore, the scholarship policy is also challenged by the availability of resources.

Say all those with A+s were to be awarded scholarships, what would happen if the number was ridiculously high, especially when our schools are turning into hothouses of high scorers?

There is only a certain amount of money available to send our brightest abroad. Even if one rages about the unfairness of it all, one can't fight economic reality. Some people will be disappointed.

It must now be clear to everyone that the arguments are never over the availability of scholarships but, specifically, scholarships for abroad.

I had suggested this a few years ago when the same controversy over PSD overseas scholarships came to the fore -- it is now an annual thing, too, along with the outcry over places in medical schools, etc, which are soon to follow -- that the government should only fund postgraduate studies abroad. It is not only cheaper but would rid us of this annual circus.

All students, especially the best ones, should be enrolled in local universities. This will also serve as a signal that our universities are for our best. But this idea is a non-starter since as a society, we put extra currency in foreign degrees, even when they come from schools that are suspect.

Equality or fairness? Should all candidates with straight A+s be treated equally? The demand for equality may not result in fairness, which itself is a major opinion splitter since what is considered fair?

One must understand that scholarships are not only to reward high performers but are also an instrument of social restructuring. There are Malays and Bumiputeras, as there must be Chinese or Indians, who should be awarded scholarships because they would go a longer way towards getting them and their families out of their present situation.

This goes along the universal value of fairness -- the have-nots should be given a leg up. They should be given priority over those who qualify purely on academic performance.

If we were into cliches and admittedly rather racist demographics, then the children of Felda settlers or estate workers, or fishball mee sellers must surely be given priority over others. But yet many of them will be disappointed. Resources are finite.

We should not be making excuses if we are true to this cause of fairness. Yet ambiguities must be cleared and transparency should be the rule of the day.

But when we argue out loud, in the media especially, we are forced to adopt some posturing. For we are not discussing but instead flexing our muscles, or what we think are muscles, not at our opponents but our intended audience.

By posturing, we are trying to telegraph the message that we are fighting for justice, against friend or foe, and we are fighting for you.

This is not a good way to begin consultation since even if one were to get what one wished for, it would leave a bitter taste in the mouth of others. Posturing makes it difficult for anyone to come down from his position, lest he be seen a loser.

It requires a clear head and it would take a lot of confidence and stamina to resist posturing, especially when it is tempting to reap the quick rewards of public approval.

The PSD scholarship issue has been turned into a test case for some and for others, the posturing is getting rather out of hand. There must be a better way to resolve the issue. Stand down. We need a respite from never-ending politicking.

 

Can Pas really compromise?

Posted: 28 May 2011 05:21 PM PDT

By promising this, the DAP debunked suspicions that it was going to place more Malay candidates in Perak to allow its representative to become the menteri besar of the state which it failed to do in 2008 despite having the most number of seats among the PR components.

Shamsul Akmar, NST

If it were the days of yore, it is doubtful Datuk Zaid Ibrahim-led Parti Kesejahteraan Insan Tanah Air (Kita) would dare to offer a Rolls Royce to anyone who can produce an (Datuk Seri) Anwar Ibrahim look-alike.

Then, at a time when Malays believed in the existence of hantu raya, the equivalent of the West's doppelganger, the evil double, Kita and Zaid would definitely end up without or one Rolls Royce less.

Back in present times, when beliefs in the supernatural are usually met with watery smiles if not outright derision, Kita's offer is made to mock Anwar and his supporters who firmly believe he is not the man in the sex video recording.

In present times when science can evoke past crimes and solve them, surely the mystery of the sex video recording should have been resolved by now using video and imaging experts for the accusers to prove that it is Anwar, or for Anwar to disprove that it is him.

While the majority of Malays are still trapped in the debate on whether it was Anwar or otherwise, the DAP, partner of Anwar-led Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) had not been sitting idle nor been dragged into the debate extensively.

It has taken definitive measures to reach out to the Malays, promising to field more candidates from the community in the general election and set up Roketkini, a Malay language news portal.

These efforts are meant to get more Malays to join the DAP which in effect will shed the party's Chinese chauvinistic image.

More interesting is the announcement by the party's central executive committee to endorse Perak DAP's support for the reappointment of Pas' Datuk Seri Mohamed Nizar Jamaluddin as menteri besar if Pakatan Rakyat (PR) recaptures the state.

By promising this, the DAP debunked suspicions that it was going to place more Malay candidates in Perak to allow its representative to become the menteri besar of the state which it failed to do in 2008 despite having the most number of seats among the PR components.

This is due to the provision in the Perak state constitution, which requires the menteri besar to be a Malay Muslim, hence, the elevation of Nizar to the coveted post despite Pas having the smallest number of seats within PR.

Even then, it was something the DAP had shown its displeasure at.

By endorsing Nizar before the election is called, the DAP has shown "good faith" to Pas and in effect convinced the Malays in Perak that even if the DAP wins the biggest number of seats and has Malay candidates to take up the menteri besar's post, it is not going to insist on its "right".

With one stroke the DAP has portrayed itself as magnanimous to both the Malays and Pas.

If Nizar and especially Pas, did not feel grateful to the DAP in the last general election when Nizar became the menteri besar because the DAP did not have much of a choice, this time around, they will have to be grateful. Of course the whole thing is still hypothetical as Nizar needs to win his seat first and PR needs to win the state.

But even if both or either loses, the gratitude that Pas must feel towards the DAP should know no bounds.

Yet, in politics, anything forfeited must result in gains.

The DAP will definitely gain much from this magnanimity -- it can be assured of Pas' support if it fielded Malay candidates.

In the past, it would be difficult for Pas, for that matter any Malay, to give their support to DAP's Malay candidates because these candidates would have been seen to be Malays who had compromised their Malay and Islamic values.

In fact, much as it is easier for Pas and other Malays who opposed the Barisan Nasional and Umno to vote for DAP's non-Malay candidates, to vote for DAP's Malay candidates conjures a different consideration.

In the past, one of the problems faced by Pas in working with or supporting the DAP is that the latter is secular and opposed to Pas' Islamic pursuits.

Likewise, DAP had always been reluctant to work and support Pas because it is theocratic and wanted an Islamic state.

But in the last couple of general elections, Pas was prepared to work and support the DAP on the struggle for common and universal values while the issues of Islamic state and secularism were avoided.

Even though DAP remains avowedly secular, Pas' preparedness to dilute its Islamic pursuits had allowed both to work together.

But now, the question of supporting DAP's Malay candidates throws open the issue of whether Pas can support Malays who would surely be secular and opposed to an Islamic state and everything else that comes along with it.

This is on the basis that any Malay who joins DAP must surely subscribe to the party's principles that are based on secularism and opposed to anything theocratic, in this context, the Islamic state.

If Pas' objection to working with Umno is centred on the latter's alleged secularism, how is Pas going to reconcile with supporting DAP Malays who have to be committed secularists and opposed to its Islamic state?

The manner Pas has evolved, such matters seem to be only of consequence in a distant past, making some Malays, including from its own midst, to wonder whither its direction, something it will have to grapple with sooner than later.

Meanwhile, DAP is definitely on a roll.

 

Some food for thought for Christian leaders in BN

Posted: 28 May 2011 04:49 PM PDT

On the overall, what we have witnessed is a case of serious bullying, intimidation, insult and moral degradation as Christians. The word tolerance and mutual respect no longer exist in the minds of many politicians and NGO leaders. The pleadings of Christian leaders for understanding and offer of dialogues between the faiths for the sake of interracial and interreligious harmonies have been totally ignored. Because of this, the Christian leaders in BN have been pushed to the corners and they have been fighting back quite bravely. 

DANIEL JOHN JAMBUN

Since the last two years alone we have seen how the freedom of speech and religion have been severely curtailed in Malaysia. And of late the debate and altercations in religious matters have escalated to an extreme proportions, no thanks to extremist statements by several firebrand leaders, and to the inaction by the authorities.

Up to now the Christian leaders in the Barisan Nasional have been very tolerant, speaking out quite loudly when necessary but not sufficient to bring the whole matter to a critical level. But to recap, what we have gone through include:

 

(1) The silly instruction to remove crucifixes from churches when a Muslim dignitary comes to visit "because the Christian symbols are offensive to Muslims" (so why not remove the whole church building as well, and why come at all?),

 

(2) Church burning,

 

(3) Arguments about the acceptability of Malay Bibles which have been in use in Sabah and Sarawak long before the creation of Malaysia,

 

(4) Unauthorised confiscations of Bibles and Christian book at airports,

 

(5) the banning of movies, including innocent cartoon movies like The Prince of Egypt (which by the way is about Moses, the prophet for Judaism, Christianity and Islam),

 

(6) The defacing of Malay Bibles with serial numbers and conditions of their use ("…for use by Christians only" – so what if some Buddhists, Hindus, Taoists, and pagans are interested to read and study the Bible?),

 

(7) The quarrel about the use of the name "Allah" in which the Christians won the court case, but was appealed and is now deliberately stalled in the court to deny justice to Christians),

 

(8) The double standard on the use of the name "Allah" (permitted in Sabah and Sarawak but forbidden in the Peninsular, so a person carrying the Malay Bible on a flight to Kuala Lumpur will suddenly become a criminal the moment the aircraft enters the peninsular air space – should he or she be forced to throw the Alkitab out of the aircraft window before landing?),

 

(9) Datuk Ibrahim Ali said there is no such thing as a Malay Christian, and he may be right if he is talking about Malaysia, but there are 300 million Malayo Polynesians in the Malay archipelago, in Polynesia and Micronesia and they belong to many religions, including Christianity (e.g. in Indonesia), and Hinduism (in Bali),

 

(10) We have been subjects to incessant bullying and threats, the extreme case being Ibrahim Ali swearing to be willing to be bathed in blood in a jihad against Christians),

 

(11) We have been trapped into a nonsensical accusation of trying to install a Christian Prime Minister, no thanks to the dishonest and conspiratorial actions of two bloggers and the Utusan Malaysia which sensationalized the rumor into a supposedly legitimate news),

 

(12) We have been highly discriminated as Christians in the civil service, especially in the armed forces and in teaching profession, because Malaysia wants these two sectors to be overwhelmingly dominated by Malays, and now they want to send 80,000 teachers to Sabah and Sarawak, so say goodbye to Borneonisation!),

 

(13) The Herald, a Christian newspaper has been under threats of having its publishing permit suspended for using "Allah" and publishing news which are deemed anti-Islam.

 

On the overall, what we have witnessed is a case of serious bullying, intimidation, insult and moral degradation as Christians. The word tolerance and mutual respect no longer exist in the minds of many politicians and NGO leaders. The pleadings of Christian leaders for understanding and offer of dialogues between the faiths for the sake of interracial and interreligious harmonies have been totally ignored. Because of this, the Christian leaders in BN have been pushed to the corners and they have been fighting back quite bravely.

 

Tan Sri Bernard Dompok, for example has been championing Christian rights, by saying that the Bahasa Malaysia belongs to all Malaysians, including Christian Malaysians and they have the right to use it in worship. He had also said there is nothing wrong with having a Christian Prime Minister, because after all the religion of the Prime Minister has never been made a condition in the Malaysian Constitution. The fight for Christians by other leaders in the recent controversy with confiscation of Bibles and conditions for their release was admirable and deserve our accolades.

 

But still the problem continues. There has been some quiet for a while but it might be the discomforting quiet before another storm. The campaign to formant hatred and to stoke anger against Christians have tested our patience and no noticeable intervention has been forthcoming from the Prime Minister, which is very, very disappointing. We know this is because of the Umno's dilemma; they worry that by seeming to support Christians, BN will lose a lot more Malay votes. We can bet this is not the end of it. There will be more attacks later, especially after the next general elections, if the BN comes back to power.

 

Because it is already a problem which has already become endemic, the BN Christian leaders must now think very hard about their positions in BN, and where they are headed for as leaders. Obviously, their role as members of the BN elite group, and their opportunities to speak at the highest level in the land have been insufficient. They have been ignored and  treated as negligible. As such they must reevaluate their stances in the BN, and to stand back some distance and to see the BN situation as an outsider, and understand as clearly as possible what is really going on, what is really rotten in Malaysia. That way, they will be able to see the truth to help them make the ultimate decision whether or not to continue in BN or not.

 

Keep in mind that the Christian issue is not just religious but also cultural, historical and spiritual, by which all aspects of our lives are involved for our ultimate destinies. Ask, how long can BN go on the way things are going in Malaysia now? Why not join forces under a new umbrella to create change and to get us to go back to what the Constitution originally intended for us?

 

They need to remind themselves that as Christians we are guaranteed protection by several provisions in the national Constitution, as follows:

 

Article 3 (1): Islam is the religion of the Federation; but other religions may be practiced in peace and harmony in any part of the Federation.

 

Article 8 declares that "all persons are equal before the law and entitled to equal protection of the law," but states that this article "does not prohibit . . . any provision or practice restricting office or employment connected with the affairs of any religion, or of an institution managed by a group professing any religion, to persons professing that religion."

 

Article 10 states that, subject to proper requirements, (a) "every citizen has the right to freedom of speech and expression, (b) all citizens have the right to assemble peaceably and without arms; and (c) all citizens have the right to form associations."

 

Article 11 (1): Every person has the right to profess and practice his religion, and subject to Clause (4), to propagate it. But too bad, these provisions seem to have become meaningless for Malaysian Christians!

 

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Make sure your youth is really a youth, BN

Posted: 28 May 2011 02:11 PM PDT

I doubt these grandfathers really know what are the problems faced by the youth these days.

By A Malaysian Youth Voter

 

Dear Barisan Nasional,

in last general election March, 2008, it has been proven that Barisan Nasional no longer has the influence in voicing out the concerns of the youth in our country.

Barisan Nasional has almost completely lost out in the battle of the votes from the youth in our country. We can see that BN tried to organise many programmes but why still are they not acceptable by the youth?

To me, most of these events are superficial in nature and mostly attended by people who are no longer considered youth.

What really is "youth" (Belia) in the minds of Barisan Nasional leader?

But I doubt Barisan Nasional would answer that as their youth leaders and members are those who are no longer "YOUTH" themselves.

The age limit of youth in Barisan Nasional is 45 years old......some at that age can even be a grandfather. I doubt these grandfathers really know what are the problems faced by the youth these days.

In the case of Pakatan Rakyat, PKR has already said that their youth means those 35 years and below. Worse case like DAP would be 40 years old. It is quite obvious why Pakatan Rakyat always has the edge over Barisan Nasional when it comes to tackling issues concerning the youth, like the recent JPA scholarship fiasco. They know the problems of the youth.

I'm actually not a member of Barisan Nasional or even Pakatan Rakyat. But as a Malaysian, I would hope that the party now controlling the government would do something to ensure Youths are represented by the Youth.

If BN still think that Youth means those 40 years plus, then it is better for Barisan Nasional Youth to close shop.

We will know what to do in the coming general election.

An Evening with Art Harun & Raja Petra Kamarudin

Posted: 28 May 2011 01:00 AM PDT



7.00pm, Tuesday, 31st May 2011 (with dinner)

Holiday Villa Hotel
37 Leinster Gardens
London W2 3AN

Art Harun, Malaysian lawyer and blogger, "believes that he is a failed government experiment, abandoned and left alone to roam the streets after all remedial efforts yielded no positive results. He calls himself a Non-Governmental Organisation (NGO), practices law for a living and tries very hard to play the guitar, sing, race cars and writes the occasional column for The Malaysian Insider to stay alive".
 
Really, Art gives himself too little credit. As a defender of free speech and a fierce critic of the abuse of the 'Special Position' accorded by Article 153, Art Harun is indeed very respectable failure.

Incidentally, Art was in the team of lawyers who made Malaysian legal history by successfully 'breaking out' Raja Petra Kamarudin from the Kamunting Detention Centre.

Raja Petra should need no introduction - recently returned to the UK after he almost walked into the Malaysian Embassy one evening in Bangkok - had he not been refrained by wife Marina and two lawyer friends. 

It has been a year since RPK emerged in London for a public speaking engagement. With yet another lawyer present, will this be another night of drama with the Authorities? Let's hope not – dinner beckons at 7.00pm.

£15 per person; pay at the door.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


UMNO- self-induced rigor mortis

Posted: 28 May 2011 05:09 PM PDT

Let's clear one thing first. This is the source of many of UMNO's problems. Some people assigned to themselves the right to determine who should or shouldn't be in UMNO. They then judge others in terms of their thinking and criteria. Pak Lah or any others can't measure up to Mahathir in many aspects. But they are not necessarily inferior to Mahathir. They are different. They must be judged on objective terms, not the subjective standards of one Mahathir.

Najib doesn't seem to do things anything right according to Mahathir. The old man is so stressed up and suffers physical debilitations.

The problem worsens to become person-centric. One person determines and defines UMNO. Inevitably, the right to be in or out of UMNO depends on loyalty to individuals and not on the political ideals, ideas, shared vision and so forth.

The problems become multiplied many fold, when UMNO 'farms' out the responsibility of sieving and determining leadership material to hired hands outside the party. These are the intellectual hacks and overrated audio visual and print media practitioners who arrogate to themselves the ultimate discretion of how should UMNO behave.

Hence there are people who think UMNO is the personal kingdom of some people and that the issues of these individuals exist to inherit the kingdom of UMNO.

What has UMNO become then? It becomes an organization feudal in nature where its leadership depends on being from the right loins. The leadership in UMNO is therefore no different from the method of ascribing extraordinary abilities by being conceived from a buloh betong, materializing from a cow's vomit or suddenly beamed from across the terrestrial highs to bukit si guntang Mahameru.

From thereon, the majority of UMNO suckers pledged eternal loyalty to the blue blood.

This is the earliest symptoms of the inability of UN+MNO to manage success. For over the years, UMNO attracts a multitude of thoughts, aggressive and independent minded individuals, a vibrant ward of supporters, personalized political inclinations as success unavoidably do, that its continuity and longevity, depends ultimately on the ability to manage all that diversity.

This, the current crop of leadership spawned unfortunately during the Mahathir years failed to do. UMNO has generally failed to spawn 'elastic' leadership that is capable of adapting. Instead it has led to the emergence of a leadership hell-bent on preserving freakish control and one opposed to internal transformation.

I can only answer by asking why shouldn't I be in UMNO? UMNO isn't the property of the present crop of UMNO leaders. Some of them are there because of some unexpected happenstance. They have the right 'bins'. You are bin somebody, therefore you are leadership material. This is a fundamental defect of UMNO's leadership. Which I will continue to offer criticisms.

Secondly, I believe I have done nothing wrong to be the guest of the disciplinary committee. Finally, there are of course many good things that UMNO has facilitated, whenever there was good leadership.

READ MORE HERE

 

Delusional Standards in Education

Posted: 28 May 2011 02:21 PM PDT

In the materialistic world that we live in, one can see that greed has reared its ugly head in many areas of our lives. Propelled by an excessive desire to possess wealth and goods, greed blinds many in their pursuit of wealth, status, and power - usually at the expense of lives and other social costs.

For instance, in the current row over the PSD scholarships, many are barking up the wrong tree. Far beyond the debate about the distribution of scholarships to local and foreign universities, the core issue is the declining standards of education in Malaysia. How many actually question why it is so easy to score distinctions and why there is the ridiculous introduction of A* in the grading system?

Our youth are being led by their noses, lulled into thinking that they are good when they receive their result slips when the grade is meaningless compared to standards years ago. Take a look at the current syllabus for English and Sejarah. Compare the literature component with that which was taught five years ago and you would be shocked by the disparity in standards! Compare the sejarah syllabus with what was taught in the 1970's and one can safely conclude that our youth are not being educated properly.

Tragically, many just look at their own needs and desires. That is understandable because it is survival for the fittest. So they attend tuition classes, memorise answers, abandon critical thinking skills, participate in extra-curricular activities just so they have the edge in scholarship application etc etc and lose sight of what it means to be educated, to be nurtured because such processes are ABSENT in our system.

How many of our elected leaders actually realize that the education system is the key to the nation's development? How many actually lobby to RAISE standards by making it MORE difficult to score? How many actually scrutinize the way examinations are being planned, prepared - especially with regards to marking schemes, syllabus content and pedagogical skills?


In the 1970's, we had the MCE and it was tough to score. Only a handful in each state could score straight A's unlike the current ridiculous trend. And those in my cohort who scored straight A's at MCE and HSC levels, are now Associate Professors/Professors at Harvard University, University of Edinburgh and other Canadian/Australian/American/British universities. In my contact hours with college students, I have been appalled by the horrible scenario whereby 10A students, even 12A1 JPA scholars cannot string a proper sentence.

Recently, I was asked to help three adults - one a PhD student from a local university, another a Dean's List winner from another local university and the third - a graduate in Human Resources.  I was horrified when I discovered they could not write a simple essay about themselves and was absolutely appalled at their inability to make sentences simply because they had no idea of the difference between a noun, an adjective, a verb or an adverb. I only had three sessions with them and that was enough to give me migraines, heartaches and deep disappointment at the realization of how deep was the rot and how impossible is the uphill climb to make things right in our education system that has gone so wrong.

Some examples of their work:
The PhD student wrote: 4a) Beautify (V) – My dad beautified the garden with the new buy Christmas tree.

The Dean's Award winner wrote: d) considerately (Adv) - He is considerately scolding me by raising up his voice.
The other 25 year old graduate wrote: 4)Competitively(adv)-Rapidly growing in technologies had make the industry competitively. 

Shocking, isn't it? Sadly, not only are they unable to write properly, they cannot articulate themselves orally as well. Sighs.

Read more at: Delusional Standards in Education

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved