Selasa, 20 Disember 2011

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Change in government, not change of government (UPDATED with Chinese Translation)

Posted: 18 Dec 2011 10:52 AM PST

Pakatan Rakyat needs to know that we are not stupid or naïve and we know what is going on. This does not mean we will not support them and will instead support Barisan Nasional. But Pakatan Rakyat will have to earn our support and not take us for granted or assume that we are fools. This is the message we have to send to Pakatan Rakyat.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

Three days ago I completed my Oxford course, Philosophy of Religion. I will know in two weeks or so whether I passed or not. On 1 February 2012, my new course, Age of Revolution, will commence. This course is about the transformation and reformation (meaning: revolutions) in Europe from the period of the French Revolution to the First World War.

I have two textbooks to read, which I am already halfway through, and even before I start the course I can already see many parallels with what happened more than 200 years ago with what is happening today.

The article below, Talk to us, not talk at us, by Thomas L Friedman, which was published in the New Straits Times, makes interesting reading. This article also summarises some of what I have read thus far.

Basically, (pre-empting what my course is going to reveal), many of these revolutions are bottom-up rather than top-down events. Another 1,000-page book I read a couple of months ago about the French and Russian Revolutions appear to reveal the same thing.

Furthermore, it revealed that revolutions are started by the masses and not by political leaders (and succeeds only when critical mass is reached) but are eventually hijacked by politicians. For example, Trotsky, Lenin, Stalin, etc., did not mastermind the revolution. They grabbed power once the revolution started. In fact, some of the so-called leaders were actually in exile outside Russia and came home to take over once the revolution succeeded in ousting the government (remember Khomeini as well?).

Another point would be about the transformation or reformation itself. What the people seek is change. And the route they chose is to change the government. But in the end they did not actually see change. Hence the title of my article today: Change in government, not change of government.

And that is what we should seek. We should learn from more than 200 years of history. And the lesson is: we may see a change of government but that does not mean we are going to see a change in government. This is what I normally call old wine in a new bottle.

Can we be assured that by changing the government we will see change? Can a change of government guarantee us a change in government? Can more than 200 years of history be wrong?

Well, just look at the so-called changes of recent times such as in Iran in 1979. Did the US see change with Obama at the helm? Did Britain see a change when they kicked out Labour last year?

Look at Egypt. The people took to the Tahrir Square to force a change of government. But they did not see a change in government. So now they are taking to the Tahrir Square again and the killings are continuing, barely a few months since the last revolution.

And this is the history of the French Revolution as well. We always talk about the French Revolution of 1789. But how many of you know that that is actually the First French Revolution. And that revolution was a disaster. There was more anarchy and chaos after the revolution. They needed a second revolution to address the errors that the first revolution brought. But no one talks about the Second French Revolution of 60 years later (in fact, many are not even aware of this second revolution).

I am not gungho about Pakatan Rakyat. That does not mean I am gungho about Barisan Nasional either. It is just that I am not gungho about all politicians who use the people to change governments and then grab power and perpetuate what the old government did.

Over the next few months I am going to demonstrate why we need to focus on a change in government and not a change of government. I am going to reveal the excesses and transgressions of those who are offering themselves as the saviour of the nation.

My purpose in doing this is not to frustrate a change of government. Certainly, ABU must happen. So we need a change of government for that to happen. But we must not only remove Umno (and its cohorts in Barisan Nasional). We must also ensure that the spirit of Umno is removed as well.

Why would we want a new government that perpetuates the spirit of Umno? Is this not what Britain is currently facing? And why do you think the British voters are going back to voting for Labour in the by-elections barely a year into a new government? My own area in Manchester fell back to Labour in the recent by-election.

I have evidence of some very troubling shenanigans in the states currently under Pakatan Rakyat control. And what I see is basically a continuation of the spirit of Umno. But are you, like me, also concerned about this? Or would you rather we close our eyes (and our minds) to all this and pretend that nothing is wrong?

As I said, more than 200 years of history has taught us how changing the government without focusing on a change in government can bring about disastrous results. We have more than 200 years of history (plus what is currently going on in Egypt) to learn from.

Pakatan Rakyat needs to know that we are not stupid or naïve and we know what is going on. This does not mean we will not support them and will instead support Barisan Nasional. But Pakatan Rakyat will have to earn our support and not take us for granted or assume that we are fools. This is the message we have to send to Pakatan Rakyat.

And if Pakatan Rakyat continues to be just like Barisan Nasional in the states they are running, how can we trust them as the new federal government? Will we need to do a Tahrir Square Version 2.0 later after voting them into Putrajaya?

That is what we wish to avoid. So Pakatan Rakyat has to accept the whacking. It is better we whack them now than the voters whack them at the ballot box.

I know there will be allegations of selling out, turncoat, Trojan horse and whatnot. But that is how they normally respond when we whack the opposition leaders. They regard criticising the opposition leaders as if we are insulting Prophet Muhammad. But then the opposition leaders are not Prophet Muhammad and above criticism. This, they need to learn and we shall teach them this lesson how much it may hurt.

***************************************

Talk to us, not talk at us
By Thomas L Friedman, New Straits Times

THE historian Walter Russell Mead recently noted that after the 1990s revolution that collapsed the Soviet Union, Russians had a saying that seems particularly apt today: "It's easier to turn an aquarium into fish soup than to turn fish soup into an aquarium".

Indeed, from Europe to the Middle East, and maybe soon even to Russia and Asia, a lot of aquariums are being turned into fish soup all at once. But turning them back into stable societies and communities will be one of the great challenges of our time.

We are present again at one of those great unravellings -- just like after World War 1, World War 2 and the Cold War. But this time, there was no war. All of these states have been pulled down from within -- without warning. Why?

The main driver, I believe, is the merger of globalisation and the information technology revolution. Both achieved a critical mass in the first decade of the 21st century that has resulted in the democratisation -- all at once -- of so many things that neither weak states nor weak companies can stand up against.

We've seen the democratisation of information, where everyone is now a publisher; the democratisation of war-fighting, where individuals became super-empowered (enough so, in the case of al-Qaeda, to take on a superpower); the democratisation of innovation, wherein start-ups using free open-source software and "the cloud" can challenge global companies.

And, finally, we've seen what Mark Mykleby, a retired Marine colonel and former adviser to the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, calls "the democratisation of expectations" -- the expectation that all individuals should be able to participate in shaping their own career, citizenship and future, and not be constricted.

I've been struck by how similar the remarks by Russians about Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, who just basically reappointed himself president, are to those I heard from Egyptians about Hosni Mubarak, who kept reappointing himself president.

The Egyptian writer Alaa al-Aswany said to me that Egyptians resented the idea that Mubarak would just hand power to his son Gamal as if the Egyptian people "were chickens", who could be passed by a leader to his son.

Last Sunday, a New York Times article from Moscow quoted the popular, imprisoned Russian blogger Aleksei Navalny as saying: "We are not cattle or slaves. We have voices and votes and the power to uphold them."

"The days of leading countries or companies via a one-way conversation are over," says Dov Seidman, the chief executive officer of LRN and the author of the book How.

"The old system of 'command and control' -- using carrots and sticks -- to exert power over people is fast being replaced by 'connect and collaborate' -- to generate power through people."

Leaders and managers cannot just impose their will, adds Seidman. "Now you have to have a two-way conversation that connects deeply with your citizens or customers or employees."

Netflix had a one-way conversation about raising prices with its customers, who instantly self-organised; some 800,000 bolted, and the stock plunged.

Bank of America had a one-way conversation about charging a US$5 (RM16) fee on debit cards, and its customers forced the  bank to reverse itself and apologise.

Putin thought he had power over his people and could impose whatever he wanted and is now being forced into a conversation to justify staying in power. Coca-Cola repackaged its flagship soft drink in white cans for the holidays. But an outcry of "blasphemy" from consumers forced Coke to switch back from white cans to red cans in a week. Last year, Gap ditched its new logo after a week of online backlash by customers.

A lot of CEOs will tell you that this shift has taken them by surprise, and they are finding it hard to adjust to the new power relationships with customers and employees.

"As power shifts to individuals," argues Seidman, "leadership itself must shift with it -- from coercive or motivational leadership that uses sticks or carrots to extract performance and allegiance out of people to inspirational leadership that inspires commitment and innovation and hope in people".

The role of the leader now is to get the best of what is coming up from below and then meld it with a vision from above. Are you listening, Mr Putin?

This kind of leadership is especially critical today, adds Seidman, "when people are creating a lot of 'freedom from' things -- freedom from oppression or whatever system is in their way -- but have not yet scaled the values and built the institutional frameworks that enable 'freedom to' -- freedom to build a career, a business or a meaningful life."

One can see this vividly in Egypt, where the bottom-up democracy movement was strong enough to oust Mubarak but now faces the long, arduous process of building new institutions and writing a new social contract from a democracy coalition that encompass Muslim Brothers, Christian liberals, Muslim liberals, the army and ultraconservative Muslim Salafis.

Getting all those fish back and swimming together in one aquarium will be no small task -- one that will take a courageous and special leader. Help wanted.
 

Updated with Chinese Translation at: http://ccliew.blogspot.com/2011/12/blog-post_21.html

 

Between friends, comrades and acquaintances (UPDATED with Chinese Translation)

Posted: 14 Dec 2011 12:18 PM PST

Opposition supporters demonstrate a very low level of maturity. They allow their thinking to be clouded by emotions. We need to be pragmatic. Support the cause by all means. The cause is what matters. But leaders are dispensable. Leaders come and go. The cause remains.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

Back in the days when I used to do business (that would be pre-1995) I had a 'guiding light'. I do not do business with people I socialise with and I do not socialise with people I do business with. I keep my friends and my business acquaintances separate.

I did, however, break that rule a number of times. I did business with some friends and each time I got screwed big time. I lost quite a bit of money and that was when I got so disgusted I decided to call it quits in 1995 and thereafter focused fulltime on my real passion, writing. Well, only friends can screw you because only friends are able to exploit your trust.

I suppose the saying 'the surest way to lose a friend is to lend him money' holds true here. That is why whenever a friend wants to borrow money I just give him a portion of what he asks for and tell him that it is a gift, not a loan. And then I just write off the amount. Better that than you never get the money back and lose a friend in the process.

The same goes for political comrades. I separate the 'rakan seperjuangan' (comrades of the same struggle) from friends. Of course, there are exceptions to the rule. For example, Haris Ibrahim, the President of the Malaysian Civil Liberties Movement (MCLM) is both a comrade and a friend (plus my lawyer as well). But (Sam) Haris, as I said, is the exception.

Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad is my friend. But he is not my rakan seperjuangan though. Dr Mahathir's struggle is to ensure that Umno stays in power while mine is ABU (Anything But Umno).

I know, at this point some of you are going to start foaming at the mouth and scream: how can I regard Dr Mahathir as a friend after what he did to Malaysia? Well, as I said, we differ on ideology but that does not mean I can't take him as a friend, and vice versa.

When I was detained under the Internal Security Act (ISA) in September 2008, Dr Mahathir made a public statement condemning my detention. He was most upset that the government detained me, whom Dr Mahathir said, is just a Blogger and not a threat to national security.

When the court released me in November 2008, Dr Mahathir phoned me. He wanted to know how I was and, understandably, I was pleased that the ex-Prime Minister took the trouble to phone me on the day of my release.

No one else phoned me, not one of the opposition leaders, not even Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim (Ronnie Liu and Saari Sungib did come to see me though). They could not be bothered about me although I was detained because I was doing the work of the opposition. Dr Mahathir, however, phoned me to ask how I was. Under those circumstances how can I not regard Dr Mahathir as a friend?

Another person who spoke up for me when I was detained was Datuk Zaid Ibrahim. In fact, Zaid not only spoke up for me but he even resigned from his post as Minister in protest of my detention. Name me one Barisan Nasional minister who would resign from his/her post out of protest for detaining his/her friend. Most would rather distant themselves from their friend to ensure their political survival. Zaid, instead, sacrificed his political career for a friend.

Again, just like many can't understand why I regard Dr Mahathir as a friend, they also can't understand why I support Zaid, whom they regard as a traitor to the opposition cause. Nevertheless, while I regard Zaid as my friend, I refused to join his political party (which hurt his feelings, I know).

When I had to leave the country to avoid a third detention under the ISA, Zaid flew to Manchester to meet me. He even took me to a football match at the Old Trafford (Manchester United versus Sunderland). When I flew to Bangkok in January this year, Zaid came over to meet me and to buy me dinner. Last week, he, again, flew to Bangkok to meet up with me and to spend some time with me.

The other friends who went to Manchester (three times over three years) to meet me were Tan Sri Sanusi Junid and Mat Sabu of PAS. Mat Sabu even slept in my house and his purpose for going to Manchester was for no other reason other than to meet me and to spend time with me.

Sanusi Junid even phoned me on Hari Raya day to wish me 'Selamat Hari Hari'. I am not a rakan seperjuang of Sanusi. Just like Dr Mahathir, Sanusi's perjuangan is Umno and mine is ABU. But he calls me on Hari Raya day to wish me 'Selamat Hari Raya' while none of the opposition leaders would do that (or even members of the Selangor Royal Family).

Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz and quite a number of Umno leaders are my friends. Many Umno Bloggers are my friends. A few of the MCA, Gerakan and PPP leaders are also my friends. All these people meet me when they are in the UK and also phone me from time to time.

Okay, I have talked about Dr Mahathir, Zaid, Sanusi, Mat Sabu, Nazri Aziz and all those others. You are probably by now wondering: what about Anwar Ibrahim? What is Anwar to me?

Well, Anwar is the Opposition Leader. So I support Anwar because I am pro-opposition and Anwar is the Opposition Leader. But he is not my friend. He is not my friend because he has not demonstrated friendship like Dr Mahathir, Zaid, Sanusi, Mat Sabu, Nazri Aziz, etc., have.

But that is all Anwar is to me, my rakan seperjuangan, nothing more. And don't expect me to demonstrate loyalty to Anwar as a friend would because he has not shown me that he is my friend like Dr Mahathir, Zaid, Sanusi, Mat Sabu, Nazri Aziz, etc., have.

Some say I am too critical towards Anwar. Actually, I have been holding back. You have not seen how critical I can be if I really wanted to. I do not want to go all out to criticise Anwar because too many people will take this criticism as a sell out or an act treacherous to the opposition cause.

The trouble is: people expect me to suck Anwar's dick to prove my loyalty to the opposition cause. Why must the opposition cause be tied to Anwar? The opposition cause is the opposition cause and Anwar is Anwar. They are two different issues and should not be packaged as one issue.

This, many can't seem to understand. They think that since you support the opposition then you must also support Anwar. I support PAS as well. Does that mean I must also support Hasan Ali? Can't I oppose Hasan Ali while supporting PAS?

Opposition supporters demonstrate a very low level of maturity. They allow their thinking to be clouded by emotions. We need to be pragmatic. Support the cause by all means. The cause is what matters. But leaders are dispensable. Leaders come and go. The cause remains.

The million-dollar question is: is Anwar the only Malaysian out of 28 million Malaysians who can lead the opposition? I think not. You mean out of 28 million Malaysians we can't find a replacement to Anwar? How come Anwar has been made so indispensable?

Anwar is most likely going to jail. He is most likely going to jail because he may be convicted of sodomy. Never mind if Anwar is or is not guilty or whether Anwar is a victim of a political conspiracy. That no longer matters. What matters is, who is going to lead the opposition once Anwar goes to jail?

Surely we are not serious about storming the Sungai Buloh Prison to break down the walls to free Anwar from jail and make him Prime Minister, like what Azmin Ali said? That's not how Prime Minister's are appointed in a parliamentary democracy.

Let's get real. We need someone to lead the opposition. And once Anwar is sent to jail it will have to be someone new. Personally, if you ask me, I would choose Nurul Izzah. But that is my personal opinion and my opinion may be clouded and not the best choice. Anyway, I am entitled to my personal opinion even if I may be wrong.

In closing, let me just say that I choose my own friends and no one is going to tell me who I can take as my friends. Yes, I know that many in the opposition resent the fact that I take Dr Mahathir, Sanusi, Zaid, Nazri Aziz, etc., as my friends. Well, tough! There is nothing you can do about that.
 

Translated into Chinese at: http://ccliew.blogspot.com/2011/12/blog-post_15.html

 

Can Najib walk the talk?

Posted: 12 Dec 2011 12:26 PM PST

Some friends from the mainstream media have met up with me in Bangkok to explore the possibility of doing such an interview. But they are not sure whether their government-controlled newspapers will censor the interview. I told them I will agree to the interview only on condition, and that is it is not one-sided and censored. But they are not sure whether their editors can agree to this.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

We are hearing a lot of politically correct sound-bytes coming from Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak. Of course, not many, not even those in Umno, believe what he is saying. They know it is all a lot of political talk, mere rhetoric. But it sure sounds good nevertheless.

I would like to throw Najib a challenge, to allow him to demonstrate his goodwill, that what he is saying is sincere and that he is genuine in what he is saying. And he can do this by giving me space in the mainstream media. After all, if he can give the hardcore Umno Bloggers space (like visits to the submarine), why can't he also give me space -- if what he is saying is true and not just political talk?

There will of course be one condition. They must not pick and choose from what I say, as what they did in my TV3 interview in February this year (which was aired only in April, close to the Sarawak state elections). They must publish the entire text of my interview.

Secondly, the interview must be in English, not in Bahasa Malaysia. This is to avoid any distortion to what I say (again, like in the TV3 interview). My Bahasa Malaysia is not as good as my English and the way I express myself in Bahasa Malaysia (that is, in the Terengganu East Coast manner) can be misinterpreted if you do not come from Terengganu.

I promise, I will be very critical of the opposition (and with the current developments in the opposition with so many opposition leaders demonstrating their warlord and godfather egos they deserve criticism). However, I shall also be critical of the government and Umno (and this is the part I want published and which should be published if what Najib is saying has any credibility).

Is Najib prepared to allow the mainstream media to do this? Let's see.

Some friends from the mainstream media have met up with me in Bangkok to explore the possibility of doing such an interview. But they are not sure whether their government-controlled newspapers will censor the interview. I told them I will agree to the interview only on condition, and that is it is not one-sided and censored. But they are not sure whether their editors can agree to this.

Some of the issues they wanted to talk about were regarding my perceived fallout with the opposition and Anwar Ibrahim. In fact, they wanted to meet me to ask me whether such a fallout actually exists and if so, why? I told them if they want the answer to that question then it would have to be asked in a formal interview and it must be published. I am not about to satisfy their curiosity by giving them a private, off the record interview.

That's all I want to say today. I am in the final week of my course and I have a lot of papers to complete so this week I have no time for cheong hei (long-winded) articles. Next week, once my course has ended, we can indulge in my normal three-page articles.

Till then I await the response from Najib's boys. Do they have the guts to engage me? If they don't then Najib's so-called openness and reforms is nothing but pure bullshit.

Till later.
 

Mixed signals

Posted: 11 Dec 2011 09:08 AM PST

So what is it that these Muslims want? Do they want Islam or do they want to get rich? Islam is demonised. Muslim leaders like Nik Aziz are demonised. They scream that leaders like Nik Aziz are not compatible to development. Maybe Nik Aziz is a good Muslim but he does not know how to make the people rich. And at the end of the day getting rich is what matters.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

The first impression one gets about Islam is that Muslims like to show off. The piety of a Muslim is measured by the public demonstration he or she exudes.

A good Muslim is one who dresses the Islamic way -- a person who wears a tudung or purdah, white skullcap, Arab robe, etc. A person who goes to Mekah every year to perform the umrah or haj is a good Muslim. A person who can utter verses of the Quran or quotes from the Hadith in Arabic from memory is a good Muslim. A person who organises usrahs (religious classes) in his/her home and invites friends over to listen to sermons by renowned or famous preachers/scholars is a good Muslim. A person who not only prays five times a day in the privacy of his/her home but goes to the mosque to participate in congregational prayers is a good Muslim. A person who donates to the local orphanage is a good Muslim.

And the list goes on. It is all about what you demonstrate publicly for all and sundry to witness. And the more public demonstrations you conduct the more you will be considered a pious Muslim.

A good Muslim is also one who does not participate in un-Islamic activities. And this will include not participating in Christmas parties, New Year parties, Valentine's Day events, etc. In fact, wedding anniversaries, birthday parties, National Day celebrations, Labour Day events, etc., are also western or un-Islamic activities, although Muslims somehow do not appear to have any problems with these.

Muslims get extremely upset when Muslims leave Islam to become Christians, Hindus or Buddhists (I do not know of any Muslims who leave Islam to become Jews though). They will threaten bloodshed to those Christians, Hindus or Buddhists who proselytise to Muslims. In fact, the Federal Constitution of Malaysia clearly forbids Christians, Hindus or Buddhists from proselytising to Muslims.

It is not that Muslims can't leave Islam to, say, become atheists. In fact, many do and we actually have a large number of Muslims who are Muslims in name only but not in spirit. It is just that you must leave Islam quietly without making a public demonstration of it.

If you want to leave Islam just don't tell anyone. Leave Islam in your heart. Don't announce it. Then Muslims would not get upset. It is, again, all about public demonstrations. Don't show you have left Islam. Pretend you are still a Muslim. Then Muslims will not get upset although they know that you are actually no longer a Muslim in your heart but are pretending to still be a Muslim.

Of course, if any Christian, Hindu or Buddhist were to convert to Islam, we have to make a big show of it. The whole world must be told. In fact, the world will be told that these people reverted, not converted, to Islam. This is because everyone is considered a Muslim before they came into this world. So, if you become a Muslim, you have reverted and not converted to Islam.

Most Muslims will say they are Muslim first and Malay second (some will also say they are Malay first and Malaysian second). Islam is the number one priority followed by all other things.

But here is where we begin to see the contradiction. And this contradiction is no slip of the tongue but the fault of the mind. It is just the mindset of the Muslims revealing itself. And what is revealed is the insincerity and hypocrisy of the Muslims. It shows the Muslims for what they really are, all talk.

Let me give you one example. I consider Tok Guru Nik Aziz Nik Mat a most sincere and devoted Muslim, someone whom I respect immensely. In fact, he is sometimes a bit too sincere for my liking, which makes him a bad politician. Nik Aziz will say what is in his heart, which may not be the politically correct thing to do (in politics you must know how to bluff, pretend, play to the gallery, and say what the people want to hear).

But do the Muslims sing Nik Aziz's praises? Nik Aziz is a perfect Muslim. So why condemn him?

Well, they condemn him because, according to these Muslims, Kelantan has not developed in the 21 years that Nik Aziz was its Menteri Besar. In fact, they shudder at the thought of Nik Aziz becoming Malaysia's Prime Minister (which is very surprising if these people are really as good a Muslim as they pretend to be since Nik Aziz is a perfect Muslim).

So, what is the priority here? Is it Islam or is it development? Do they want a perfect Muslim society or do they want a rich society?

It appears that, at the end of the day, a perfectly run state is one where we all become rich. If getting rich is more important than living in a perfect Islamic society then why worry if Muslims leave Islam? Are not the most advanced and richest societies the non-Muslim societies? In fact, Muslim societies are very backward.

So what is it that these Muslims want? Do they want Islam or do they want to get rich? Islam is demonised. Muslim leaders like Nik Aziz are demonised. They scream that leaders like Nik Aziz are not compatible to development. Maybe Nik Aziz is a good Muslim but he does not know how to make the people rich. And at the end of the day getting rich is what matters.

Muslims are sending mixed signals and it is confusing those who are not Muslims. On the one hand they scream about Islam, and about not allowing Muslims to leave Islam, and about banning rock concerts, and about persecuting and jailing gays, and whatnot. On the other hand they condemn good Muslim leaders because they are not able to make us rich.

If getting rich is what is important then all we need to do is to put aside Islam and let all hell break loose. Malaysia's neighbour, Thailand, is very successful because it does not allow religion to get in the way of business. Thailand is the number one tourist destination because Islam does not dictate what the Thais do. Come join me in Bangkok and I will show you what I mean (in the event you are still blur).

If Nik Aziz were to allow in Kota Bharu what they do just across the border in Golok, Kelantan would be the richest state in Malaysia, in spite of having no oil/gas.

I mean, what else can Kelantan offer? The location of the state puts it in a most disadvantageous situation. There is no way you can develop the state because of where it is located. But if Kota Bharu were to be turned into a twin-city of Golok, the new vice centre of Malaysia, then everyone will get rich. But of course we would have to put Islam aside for that to happen.

Umno ruled the state for 12 years from 1978 to 1990. Are you telling me that the state did any better when under Umno? Even when under Umno it still needed federal government money to develop the state. So what else is new?

It has nothing to do with Nik Aziz. Even if Najib became the Menteri Besar of Kelantan, and without federal government money, the situation would be no different.

The bottom line is, when Muslims scream about Islam it is all a public demonstration. It is just a show of piety. At the end of the day the priority is still money. And that is why these Muslims whack Nik Aziz, because it is about money and not about Islam.
 

Is Najib prepared to go all the way?

Posted: 10 Dec 2011 08:45 AM PST

How can we develop Malaysians with intellectual abilities unless we are prepared to set aside boundaries and religious dogma and allow Malaysians to think and express their thoughts with no holds barred?

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

Najib: Intellectual capital crucial for Malaysia's development

(Bernama) - Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak underlined the importance of developing the country's intellectual capital, saying that even if the country produces one or two geniuses, the impact to the nation would be tremendous.

Speaking at the opening of an exposition organised by Permata on Saturday, Najib said intellectual prowess of individuals should be nurtured from the beginning, particularly when they were at the age of two to five.

The prime minister said the government allocated nearly 25 per cent in each budget to develop education and provide training in the effort to develop the country's human and intellectual capital.

He acknowledged however that there was a gap in this effort, saying that those in the "top most of the intellectual pyramid" -- namely those with genius tendencies averaging about one per cent or less -- had not been given sufficient attention previously.

"We have ensured that those at the bottom and middle of the pyramid are given ample opportunities but those at the peak, children who have extraordinary IQ, have not had any specific programme."

"If we don't nurture this one per cent, then our society will stand to lose these great potentials. If we can produce just several geniuses, the impact to the country will be very big indeed," he said.

He added that if these groups were left without being given any assistance, they might only be "one or two gems" emerging from them.

"However, if we have a holistic programme, such as the Permata programme, there may be hundreds if not thousands of these children will eventually emerge as gems for our country," he said.

Najib said: "We help those who are weak and those with disabilities; we also help those who are capable; let's not forget to help those with extraordinary capabilities."

Stressing a point, Najib who is Permata programme committee chairman, said there were countries with less resources like Japan and South Korea but emerged as major economic powerhouses because of their ability to develop their intellectual capital and high-performance work ethics.

"There are also countries with rich natural resources but becoming a fail state or remain backward because of their failure to develop their intellectual capital," he said.

**********************************

The above is probably the most sensible thing Najib ever said since he became Prime Minister and I absolutely agree with what he said. The issue here is: how far is Najib prepared to go? Is he prepared to go all the way?

To be able to develop the intellectual abilities of Malaysians and to see the emergence of geniuses it would involve removing the shackles from the minds of Malaysians. Malaysians must be allowed to think and to express themselves with no holds barred. There must not be any sacred cows, whether it is religion or whatever.

As it stands now, there are too many limitations and boundaries. Malaysians are not free to think what they want to think and to express what they think. This is particularly so when it comes to matters involving Islam. Muslims are not allowed to have a free mind. They can only think and talk whatever it is that religious dogma allows.

You are not allowed thoughts of your own. Your thoughts must reflect only what is allowed. And you will be punished if you have any other thoughts and if you express these thoughts that may run contra to religious dogma.

Yes, to breed intellectual minds and to give birth to geniuses, you cannot imprison the minds of the people. Even if what they think and say is opposed to what you think, it must be allowed.

Can JAKIM, JAIS, JAWI, etc., tolerate this? They wont even allow Muslims to celebrate Valentine's Day or wear a Santa Clause hat. How do we develop the minds of Malaysians like this?

There are just too many dos and don'ts. And there are more don'ts than dos. This stifles the minds of Malaysians and curtails intellectual growth.

How can we develop Malaysians with intellectual abilities unless we are prepared to set aside boundaries and religious dogma and allow Malaysians to think and express their thoughts with no holds barred?
 

When the mouth moves faster than the brain

Posted: 09 Dec 2011 06:14 PM PST

Ibrahim Ali and those of his ilk need to come into the modern world. They have to extricate themselves from this imaginary world of Hang Tuah and Taming Sari and all that bullshit. The English do not live in the world of King Arthur and Excalibur. It is time the Malays did the same.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

ISA a weapon for Malays like Taming Sari, says Ibrahim Ali

(The Malaysian Insider) -- Datuk Ibrahim Ali has likened the Internal Security Act (ISA) to the legendary keris, Taming Sari, describing the law as a "weapon" to protect Malay special rights from being challenged.

"The Taming Sari keris, a weapon for the Malays, is gone."

"Where is our Taming Sari if we wish to safeguard Malay interests in future?" the Perkasa chief said at the Najib Razak Seminar held at the International Islamic University Malaysia (UIA) here.

The Taming Sari is the legendary keris owned by Malay warrior Hang Tuah, which was said to confer upon its owner the power of invincibility.

Ibrahim stressed that the spirit of the ISA, which allows for detention without trial, must live on in new replacement laws so police have the tools to handle issues that threaten Malaysia's multi-religious society.

He cited the recent rise in challenges to Malay hegemony, including the "Allah" issue, the Bersih rally, and an incident where a pig's head was thrown into a surau, as examples of "sensitive issues" that could lead to racial strife.

************************************

This is what you get when Malays live in an imaginary world. I wonder whether the English would talk about King Arthur's legendary magical sword, Excalibur, which is supposed to make the owner invincible. 

"The Excalibur sword, a weapon for the English, is gone. Where is our Excalibur if we wish to safeguard English interests in future?" laments England's version of Ibrahim Ali.

"We need detention without trial to safeguard English interests and protect Christianity from the Muslims who are flooding England and are threatening the rights and privileges of the English."

"Muslims currently represent less than 10% of the population and yet they are screaming and foaming at the mouth asking for halal food to be sold in the supermarkets and asking for more Shariah courts."

"Unless we have detention without trial the Muslims will overrun England and once they reach 10% of the population they will act like they own the country. The Muslims are too demanding and the English are being pushed aside as the Muslims dominate British society."

Yes, if an Englishman starts screaming like Ibrahim Ali, people would regard him as a nutcase. Furthermore, he would be arrested and sent to jail for the crime of racism.

Does Ibrahim Ali ever look at himself in the mirror as he practices his speeches? And if he does, what does he see? Can he see his mouth moving faster than his brain?

Of late, Malay-Muslim leaders are uttering a lot of embarrassing statements. How can detention without trial serve Malay interests or protect Malay interests? I just can't see the relevance. When I was in Kamunting the majority of the detainees were Malay-Muslims. They were not enemies of Islam. In fact, they were people who were alleged to be extremist Muslims, people who were detained because of their work for Islam.

In short, Muslims are the victims of detention without trial, not the so-called enemies of Islam.

Ibrahim Ali and those of his ilk need to come into the modern world. They have to extricate themselves from this imaginary world of Hang Tuah and Taming Sari and all that bullshit. The English do not live in the world of King Arthur and Excalibur. It is time the Malays did the same.

Zulkifil Nordin, Ibrahim Ali's gang member, has also made a most interesting confession (see below). I thought there was such a thing as lawyer-client privileges. Apparently, Zul has never heard of such a thing. I wonder where he obtained his law degree from? Can he be disbarred for this?

Anyway, Zul confessed that he used Islam for political gain. So, what else is new? Isn't this what many Muslims seem to be doing? Zul has just come out into the open to admit what most of us already know, and that is Islam is just a political tool and most Muslims talk about Islam when it suits them and will caste aside Islam when it suits them better.

Is it any wonder that many view Muslims as a joke?

************************************

Member of Parliament for Kulim-Bandar Baru, Datuk Zulkifli Noordin has admitted to have deceived renowned cleric Syeikh Dr Yusuf Qardawi into issuing a fatwa supporting the sodomy II case involving Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim and his aide, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan.

"We have made a mistake…we admit making the mistake. I was among those who made the mistake, and I must meet up with Syeikh Yusuf Qardawi to make amendments. Because…we wish to inform (that) it was true we had deceived Syeikh Yusuf Qardawi into believing that Anwar had been slandered," he said.

As Anwar's lawyer, Zulkifli had prepared biased questions to elicit the fatwa from Dr Yusuf Al Qardawi in 2009. According to him, he was responsible in preparing the questions, which sided Anwar and hiding the truth about the complainant, Mohd Saiful. 

 

How far is MCA prepared to go?

Posted: 07 Dec 2011 10:39 AM PST

It is time that MCA learned you can't play the race and religion card without something happening. Then, when the MCA headquarters building in Jalan Ampang is burned to the ground and the MCA leaders are killed in their homes, just like what happened in Indonesia, maybe the MCA people will shut the fuck up and not continue to play the race and religion card.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

(Bernama) - The Kelantan Pas government has admitted having built only one mosque in the state, the Sultan Ismail Petra Golden Jubilee Mosque, from its own funds during its 21-year rule in Kelantan.

State Economic Planning, Finance and Welfare Committee deputy chairman, Abdul Fatah Harun said all the other mosques in Kelantan had been built by the federal government.
 
"The Golden Jubilee Mosque, better known as the Chinese Mosque, was built with state government funding, without a single sen coming from the federal government," he told Bernama, here, today.
 
As for mosques in the other mukim (sub-districts), he said the state government was only responsible for giving allocations to carry out repairs and renovations.
 
Abdul Fatah was responding to the state opposition's (Barisan Nasional) claim that the Pas government had not built even one mosque since ruling Kelantan for over 20 years.
 
They had been built by the federal government or the BN government that ruled Kelantan from 1978 to 1990.

***************************

(The Star) - MCA has continued with its call that PAS must include its intention to implement its own brand of hudud law in its manifesto for the next general election.

The Islamic party must be fair to voters so they could be fully informed about their choices before making their decision, said MCA Young Professionals Bureau chairman Datuk Seri Chua Tee Yong.

"Voters deserve the right to know what kind of Government they are voting in," he told reporters.

"Previously, Pakatan Rakyat also declared that the implementation of hudud law was not possible. How are PAS and PKR going to explain this?"

"They choose not to respond to these type of issues to keep their marriage of convenience alive," he said.

***************************

Aren't you tired of hearing all this talk about Islam and Hudud? I don't know about you but I am. And that's because that is all it is, all talk. And this seems to be the problem with the Muslim world. It is all talk and no action.

Corruption, abuse of power, no respect for fundamental liberties and human rights, and much more, appears to be a predicament for mostly so-called Muslim countries. They talk and talk but they do the opposite of what they talk.

Now MCA has joined the bandwagon. They want Pakatan Rakyat to state its stand on the Islamic law of Hudud. Why is MCA so kaypoh? What business is it to these bloody kafirs? Islam has nothing to do with these bloody kafirs.

Why don't the 15 MCA Members of Parliament raise this matter in Parliament? If Malaysia is as democratic as they say it is then raise this matter in Parliament. After all, MCA has 15 members represented in Parliament. Raise this matter in Parliament and ask the Barisan Nasional-controlled government to pass a bill in Parliament to amend the Federal Constitution of Malaysia to remove Islam as the religion of the Federation.

Article 3(1) of the Constitution says that Islam is the religion of the Federation. MCA should ask Parliament to repeal this and remove Article 3(1) of the Constitution that says that Islam is the religion of the Federation. Once Islam is no longer the religion of the Federation then no longer can anyone talk about implementing Islamic laws in Malaysia.

It's no use for MCA to shout like mad dogs outside Parliament. Go to Parliament and shout. Shout loud and clear. Tell the government that Islam should no longer be the religion of the Federation and that Article 3(1) of the Constitution should be repealed.

Malaysia, since it is a Secular State, should not have Islam as the religion of the Federation. This is a contradiction. And once Article 3(1) has been repealed there will be no more talk about Hudud or any other Islamic laws being implemented.

What is most interesting to note is that the PAS-led Kelantan State Government built only ONE mosque in the state over 21 years since 1990. Even then it was a 'Chinese' mosque. No 'Malay' mosques were built. All the mosques that were built were built either by the Federal Government or by the State Government during the time that Barisan Nasional was in power from 1978 to 1990.

Does this not sound odd? PAS, which is being accused of trying to Islamise the country, built only ONE mosque over 54 years since 1957 -- one mosque in more than half a century.

Hello MCA! MCA is part of Barisan Nasional. And the Barisan Nasional government, which MCA is a member of, built all the mosques in Kelantan over 54 years since 1957. The Pakatan Rakyat government built only one mosque, and even that it was a 'Chinese' mosque.

MCA is very devious. They are trying to raise anti-Islam sentiments. They are trying to use Islam to turn the voters against Pakatan Rakyat. But the truth is MCA does not want to ask Parliament to repeal Article 3(1) of the Constitution whereby Islam is the religion of the Federation. And all the mosques in Kelantan, save one 'Chinese' mosque, were built by the Barisan Nasional government, which MCA has been a member of since Merdeka in 1957.

It is time that MCA learned you can't play the race and religion card without something happening. Then, when the MCA headquarters building in Jalan Ampang is burned to the ground and the MCA leaders are killed in their homes, just like what happened in Indonesia, maybe the MCA people will shut the fuck up and not continue to play the race and religion card.

Yes, I know, this is not MCA's fault. MCA is just playing the role of Umno's running dog in raising anti-Islam sentiments because Umno themselves can't do it since they claim to be the largest Islamic party in the world.

Well, then MCA has to pay the price for being Umno's running dog. And the price will be a very heavy price to pay indeed when blood flows on the streets. And I have no problems with this because you can't fry the egg unless you first break the shell. So, many shells need to be broken to fry the eggs.

The bottom line is: there is no such thing as a peaceful or bloodless revolution. And we need a revolution to see changes in Malaysia. And if MCA continues with this Islam hate-campaign we may yet see the revolution that we need to be able to see changes in Malaysia.

So carry on, MCA! What you are doing may just be what we need for the good of the country. We need a catalyst. And the MCA Islam hate-campaign may be that catalyst.

Bodoh punya MCA! Don't you know that fire burns and that when you play with fire it may burn you as well?

 

The selfish, ugly Chinaman (UPDATED WITH CHINESE TRANSLATION)

Posted: 05 Dec 2011 04:58 PM PST

The Malays have to wake up and wise up to one hard fact. To the Chinese it is all about money. And as long as money flows like water in Bangkok that is all that matters. Should the Malays sacrifice so much, fighting for the Chinese and Indians, when what they are fighting for is not appreciated and instead the Malays are mocked for their efforts?

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

One of our Chinese readers, lakian, posted the comment below. I have not edited it and you can see that he probably obtained his education in a Chinese school because you have to read his comment many times to understand even a little bit of what he is trying to say.

Anyway, the gist of what he is saying is that politics should be left for the Malays to sort out amongst themselves and the Chinese and Indians do not care a damn who runs Malaysia, and in what way it is run, as long as the Chinese are left alone to make money. The Malays can go kill each other as long as he is concerned and this is no business of the Chinese or Indians.

Now read this: 'We won't surrender an inch'. Clearly this has been targeted at the Chinese and Indians.

It makes we wonder why the hell do we even bother about the political situation in Malaysia. If the Chinese and Indians do not care then why should the Malays bother? After all, it is the Chinese and Indians and not the Malays who are facing discrimination and persecution.

I have noticed many similar comments in the past. The Chinese have made it very clear that their only concern is money. And as long as they can make money then nothing else matters.

Some Chinese have even commented that they are not concerned about corruption because it is easier to do deals when there is corruption. The Chinese can make money even easier when they can bribe their way through life.

If this is the way the Chinese and Indians think, and if politics have nothing to do with the non-Malays, then the Malays should reconsider their stand. Is it worth for the Malays to go out of their way to fight for equality and an end to racial discrimination if the Chinese and Indians do not really care about such matters?

The Malays have to wake up and wise up to one hard fact. To the Chinese it is all about money. And as long as money flows like water in Bangkok that is all that matters. Should the Malays sacrifice so much, fighting for the Chinese and Indians, when what they are fighting for is not appreciated and instead the Malays are mocked for their efforts?

If there is one thing I can't stand is to be mocked. And if this is the reward we get from the Chinese and Indians then they can fight their own fight. I would gladly step back and not get involved and will persuade the other Malays to do the same. And don't blame me if I decide to call it a day and save myself further trouble.

****************************

another may 13 is needed without or no racial it is solely between the malays themself.the fight or the cut slaughter and whatever are only for the sake of called malays supremacy,the umno said malays right and pkr called rakyat right.they are afterall are malays.for the chinese as said long time ago,they don't care no bother and no concern who the hell is the government and also what the fcuk the umno or pkr fighting for.chinese are opportunistic beneficiarier.they are only interested in what they can take fron the corner.the project not matter whether 2nd handed or even fourth handed.they can still make money what to say just that merely slim profit.chinese are always the group of hard working but envied hatred enthnic in all over the world.usa,canada,australia......even in the carnivalised africa,middle east.indian are the pathetic sandwiched group due to their own character,atitude or simply they are beggar style.they are conspirative minded wanting to use their tactic to control to use the malays killing malays.dominant example mr mamakutty.
all in all may 13 is needed for the future of these malays own community.they should make this very vital disolution whether they want power or they need food!they want rhetoric VIP but starving in their kitchen or otherwise.for chinese,indian and others,there will be no different cos they are infact struggling to starve to hunger inorder to live under this already oppressive and suppressive areana.
so malays friend,believe umno is giving the pride or snapping you ass is your own concern.do not use your own parang to snap your own anus. -- lakian
 

READ THE CHINESE TRANSLATION HERE

 

We need another ‘May 13’ (UPDATED WITH CHINESE TRANSLATION)

Posted: 04 Dec 2011 07:09 AM PST

The Barisan Nasional government is built on a house of cards. And houses of cards tend to not last and will fall when least expected. The general elections give this appearance of legitimacy. It gives us the illusion that we have a democratically elected government in power. But that is all it is, an illusion.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

There may be no doubt that Barisan Nasional will win the next general election and will get to form the federal government yet again. The question remains, however, as to whether Barisan Nasional can win on a level playing field and will they win because they really do have the peoples' support or for entirely different reasons.

This is what is troubling the Barisan Nasional leadership. They are not too concerned about the winning part. They are confident enough that they can win by hook or by crook. And they know they will need to do so by hook and by crook. What is of concern to them is that unless it is by hook and by crook they have a slim chance of winning.

I suppose anyone who wins through fraud and knows that he or she can only win through fraud would not rest easy. They would get very little satisfaction from that type of win. Even though they would be consoled by the fact that they won, they would nevertheless be quite restless about the win.

The Barisan Nasional leaders know that if it were on a level playing field they would be out of power. If they gave the opposition equal airtime on radio and television and did not impose such stringent rules and procedures for ceramahs, the government would have been changed long ago. If Malaysian elections were based on one-man-one-vote and within 15% or 20% variance between constituencies and the postal voting system was abolished plus overseas Malaysians were allowed to vote, that would be the end of Barisan Nasional.

We know that Barisan Nasional lost the election. Barisan Nasional knows that it lost the election. The United States government knows that Barisan Nasional lost the election -- if you had been reading the Wikileaks reports that Malaysia Today has been publishing this last half-year or so. There is no one who does not know that Barisan Nasional lost the election. And everyone knows that the official results showing that Barisan Nasional won the election is a sham and not a reflection of the real situation.

And that is why the Umno leaders have been making all sorts of statements over the last weekend during the Umno general assembly. They know that the reality of the situation is they are out of power. They know that the only reason they are still in power is because they had to use by hook and by crook methods to win. And they know that, to continue to stay in power, they have to continue applying by hook and crook methods in the coming election.

The Barisan Nasional government is built on a house of cards. And houses of cards tend to not last and will fall when least expected. The general elections give this appearance of legitimacy. It gives us the illusion that we have a democratically elected government in power. But that is all it is, an illusion.

So we need to break this illusion. We need to smash it to pieces. And the only way to do that is to not allow elections to be held until and unless we see electoral reforms and a level playing field.

Over the next few months we need to galvanise support from the rakyat to block, by hook or by crook (the methods being employed by Barisan Nasional), elections from being held. If a 'Malaysian Spring' needs to be triggered then a Malaysian Spring it will have to be.

The time for idle talk and empty rhetoric is over. I have heard and read a lot of things. So many comments by readers were posted in Malaysia Today. But now we have to walk the talk. Now we have to brace ourselves and prepare for hard times.

We need another 'May 13'. But this 'May 13' is not a race war. It is not Malays versus non-Malays. It is the rakyat versus the establishment. It is the ruled versus the ruler. It is the bourgeois masses versus the ruling elite.

Are you ready for this? Or are you all talk and hot air? Yes, many things have been said. But this is all being said anonymously and hidden behind the computer keyboard. Talk is easy. Talk is cheap. How far are you prepared to walk that talk?

Unless we are prepared to bite the bullet then we might as well stop talking. Just let Barisan Nasional continue to rule Malaysia. If we really want a change of government then we must be prepared to face all consequences. And the consequences must be the elections must be blocked until and unless electoral reforms are in place even if that has to result in bloodshed.

Now let us see if Malaysia Today's readers are mere empty talk and bullshit!

Anyway, stayed tuned for further announcements.

**************************************

We want a strong government, says Najib

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak said Barisan Nasional (BN) and Umno want to form a strong government in the next general election.

"Whatever constitutes the definiton of a strong government, this is what we want. A two-thirds (majority) is something which is ideal but what is important is a strong government," he said at a news conference at the end of the 2011 Umno General Assembly, here.

He was responding to a question whether he would be happy with a two-thirds majority or a simple majority for the BN in the election.

He added that a strong government could be formed from a working majority or a two-thirds majority.

Najib, who is Umno president, also said that the BN was capable of winning the four opposition-ruled states in the coming election but said that he would not want to underrate the opposition. -- Bernama

**************************************

Muhyiddin outlines seven winning ingredients

Umno deputy president Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin today outlined seven ingredients that would ensure Umno and the Barisan Nasional's (BN) victory at the polls.

"I think there is no magic ingredients to ensure Umno and Barisan National's victory in the general election other than implementing our focus over the next few years.

"We have to work hard to ensure the party's victory, then God willing, our party will succeed," he said when winding up the debate at the Umno General Assembly 2011 here today.

The ingredients are unity, loyalty, service, sacrifice, hard work, acceptance and submission, he added.

The deputy prime minister said the most important ingredient was unity in line with Umno's slogan.

"To win, unity is important as I have mentioned at the Wanita, Youth and Puteri assemblies. It is important that we have unity of hearts, minds and objective, and all these translated into unity in our resolve," he said.

He also reminded party members not to cause new problems, including resorting to back-stabbing and sabotage.

The deputy prime minister said secondly, Umno members must be loyal and should not take action that could be deemed not toeing the line.

"Do not do anything against the party's ethics and damage the party during this important and challenging time," he said.

Muhyiddin said thirdly, Umno members must serve wholeheartedly to the party and should not be calculative in performing their tasks.

"We are in a critical moment. We need to double our efforts as the president had said 'business is not as usual'. Do not take the same approach without taking into account the changing times and environment," he said.

Fourthly, he said all Umno members must be willing to sacrifice for the party regardless of time, energy and thinking without expecting any reward.

For the fifth ingredient, he said everyone in the party must strive for victory in the election as hard work would guarantee success.

"Umno members must be good team players just like in a football team. A good striker should play upfront, a goalkeeper should play as a goalkeeper and not becoming a striker or vice-versa.

"And what is most important is not to score own goals. This is a taboo in football as well as in the election, do not score own goals," he added. -- Bernama

CHINESE TRANSLATION

 

Been chilling out

Posted: 02 Dec 2011 08:24 PM PST

Sorry I haven't been writing much the last couple of days. I've been chilling out and catching up with friends in sunny Bangkok. Furthermore, I am working on my final paper for my course, which ends this month. The last few months I've been busy with my essays on Philosophy of Religion, a course run by Oxford. Will then take a short break before my new course on European History starts on 1st February 2012.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Suspicious Secrecy From the Swiss!

Posted: 20 Dec 2011 11:24 AM PST

SARAWAK REPORT

Taib did not get the response that he wanted from the Swiss Government yesterday.  But he did buy some time.

In answer to questions from MP Maya Graf in the Bern Federal Parliament, the Swiss Finance Minister, Evelyn Widmer Schlum, fell back on traditional Swiss secrecy!

The country's financial regulators FINMA would not be able to publicise the findings from their investigations into Taib's assets, Widmer-Schlumpf explained, owing to Swiss confidentiality laws.

She announced that FINMA has "no possibility, nor the right" to disclose any information on its findings to the public. Rather, it "will inform the directly affected persons only" on the results of its investigations.

Those interested parties are, presumably, Taib himself and the Malaysian Government.  But what about the people of Sarawak, who have lost billions in revenue owing to the Chief Minister's handouts of public property, concessions and contracts to his own companies and to his family?

Still on the hook!

Swiss Finance Minister, Evelyn Widmer-Schlumpf

While this cryptic response has infuriated campaigners, who had been given to understand that Switzerland's new drive for more openess in its banking system would bring swift and clear answers, it has done little to help Taib.

The reply that would have benefitted the Chief Minister, of course, would have been a straight confirmation of his own declaration earlier in the year, after the investigation was announced, that he had no assets in Switzerland at all!

Indeed, Sarawak's billionaire politician had laid his reputation on the line by standing up in his own state assembly and announcing:

 "Let me state categorically that I have no secret Swiss bank account, nor assets or investments of any description. None whatsoever".[Taib Mahmud statement]

The Swiss Finance Minister has refused to corroborate this statement.  Instead her reply seems to give the strong impression that there ARE interested parties who need to be informed of the results of this investigation!

How long are his secrets safe?

Maya Graf – Green MP, Swiss Parliament

Campaigners are hardly going to allow the situation to rest there.  The Swiss, who have been trying to wipe clean their reputation as a country that made itself rich off the back of Nazi gold and the ill-gotten gains of the world's worst dictators, are in the middle of a national argument over ending its obsessive banking secrecy.

The Finance Ministry may be on the side of conservatism, however the former President Micheline Calmy-Rey, who ordered the enquiry, made clear that she was in favour of openess  and yesterday the Green MP Maya Graf said:

"I am disappointed that the Swiss government is hiding behind the Swiss banking secrecy and thus helps promote corruption in countries with weak governments.  There is no point in complaining about the destruction of the world's tropical rainforests as long as Western countries assist corrupt families like the Taibs enrich themselves by cutting down the forests."

It is not the sort of endorsement that Taib would have wished for from Switzerland and it is a clear sign that the story is by no means finished as campaigners step up their noise on this matter.  The Sarawak-focused Bruno Manser Fund demanded:

"How can it be that our authorities will inform a corrupt potentate but not the public on the findings of their investigations?"[BMF press release]

Taib will know that the longer an issue is bottled up, the bigger the bang when it is finally un-corked!

READ MORE HERE

 

Sabah has right to deny visitors entry

Posted: 20 Dec 2011 11:16 AM PST

But lawyers in Sabah want the state government to explain why it denied fellow lawyer Haris Ibrahim entry into Sabah

(Free Malaysia Today) - The Sabah Law Association (SLA) said the Musa Aman administration is 'not obliged' to give a reason for denying non-Sabahans entry into the state.

Whilst saying it is the 'state's right', SLA cautioned that the 'powers' were potentially draconian and wide-reaching and must be judiciously and fairly exercised.

The association was commenting on the state government's decision to bar fellow lawyer Haris Ibrahim, the president of the Malaysian Civil Liberties Movement (MCLM), from entering Sabah on Dec 6.

"Although the state is not obliged to provide reasons for or to justify its decision, we would urge the state government to issue its own statement as to its reasons for doing so in order to avoid the impression that the power was exercised capriciously or to comply with the wishes of the powers-that-be outside of the state.

"Compliance with outside forces surely cannot protect, enhance or promote our constitutional rights," it said in a statement yesterday.

The association added that it was speaking out as the decision to bar Harris gave rise to concerns as to the legality of the action of the state government.

"Although the legality of the decision of the state government is beyond reproach for reasons as follows such decisions ought to be made carefully and ought not to be made frivolously or for reasons which do not further or protect the interest of the state.

"The decision of the state government to bar Harris Ibrahim entry to the state was under Section 65(1) of the Immigration Act 1959/1963," it said in a statement.

"The Sabah Law Association is of the view that the exercise by the state authority of its rights under the Immigration Act is not just an executive act under an ordinary legislation but is an act pursuant to the constitutional rights accorded to the East Malaysian States under Part VII of the Immigration Act.

READ MORE HERE

 

Under attack, PAS maintains Islamic agenda party priority

Posted: 20 Dec 2011 11:14 AM PST

(The Malaysian Insider) - PAS leaders have denied claims by two renegades that the party has abandoned its Islamic agenda, with its deputy president Mohamad Sabu pointing out that an Ulama panel oversees its policies.

National leaders from the Islamic party denied the accusations made by Datuk Dr Hasan Ali, a senior Selangor government member, and Nasharudin Mat Isa, the former party secretary-general, that PAS was deviating from its Islamic struggle, and have, in turn, alleged the two leaders were frustrated over their inability to secure top posts within the party.

Hasan, the ex-Selangor PAS commissioner, has also demanded his party's top leadership settle the thorny question of establishing Malaysia as an Islamic state with its Pakatan Rakyat partners now rather than later.

The Gombak Setia assemblyman charged that the party had deviated from its original fight, pointing to the shift to push the concept of a "Negara Berkebajikan" at the party's annual general meeting earlier this year.

Similarly, Nasharudin had, during the weekend, told Umno-owned Berita Minggu that the PAS leadership should not be too preoccupied with the party's political goals while abandoning its Islamic ones.

He said that PAS was no longer seen as "consistent" with its Islamic image and that it could not afford to continually chop and change "terminologies" to suit its political direction.

"Any decision within the party is ultimately decided by the Syura Council, which is led by the Ulama. How can PAS be deviating from Islamic principles when the Syura Council decides all party matters?" Mohamad Sabu (picture) told The Malaysian Insider yesterday.

"If he (Hasan) has any objections, he should make his views known to the central working committee," he added.

PAS central working committee member Khalid Samad echoed Mohamad's views, saying that the concept of "Negara Berkebajikan" does not contradict the Islamic state agenda.

READ MORE HERE

 

Taib hits the roof at ‘daring’ reporter

Posted: 20 Dec 2011 11:08 AM PST

It appears the chief minister is not entirely unaffected by the allegations of corruption against him.

(Free Malaysia Today) - Is Chief Minister Taib Mahmud, whose US$1.46 billion wealth made global media headlines, beginning to feel the heat at home?

Already stacked against him are a series of local and international reports of alleged corruption and abuse of power.

Topping the list is the most recent and globally published report submitted by a group of international and Malaysian non-governmental organisations on the alleged corruption committed by him.

The allegations, it appears, are affecting him after all if his violent reaction to a reporter's question last weekend was any indication.

Taib was officiating at a function at the Kuching Waterfront last Saturday when a reporter asked for his comment regarding the report submitted by the group of international NGOs.

Turning on the reporter, an angry Taib demanded to know the identity of the reporter who had "dared" to ask him that question.

"Who is the reporter (who dared to ask)?" Taib was overheard asking while his bodyguards identified the reporter and allegedly pushed the newsman.

Luckily for him the other journalists quickly rushed to help him.

Reporters barred

When they saw Taib was so angry, the reporters left and boycotted the function.

"It is obvious that the chief minister is haunted by allegations of alleged corruption against him," said a senior reporter.

Last Thursday, Taib refused to see pressmen after his weekly Cabinet meeting.

For the past 30 years, it had been a traditional practice for Taib or other Cabinet ministers to meet and brief the press of government projects or programmes.

But this time, Taib not only refused to see the reporters but also barred them from entering the Wisma Baba Malaysia building that houses the ministerial complex.

New report handed to MACC

Meanwhile, Sarawak PKR deputy chairman Zulrusdi Bin Haji Mohamad Hol yesterday handed over a report containing allegations of corruption allegedly committed by Taib to the state director of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) at Wisma Iskander.

The report was received by a lady officer of the commission.

READ MORE HERE

 

Year that was for the protester

Posted: 20 Dec 2011 11:01 AM PST

The silly season is already on us and no doubt will be a fractious and prolonged one going into 2012.

While the Government responded to the Bersih demands by establishing the Parliamentary Special Committee on electoral reforms, at the same time the so-called Peaceful Assembly Act – aimed at curbing any other rallies like Bersih – was passed.

Marina Mahathir, The Star

IT'S the end of the year and, like everyone else, I'm going to try and summarise what made it an interesting year indeed.

Time magazine named The Protester as its Person of the Year in 2011.

I couldn't agree more, because really few people have made an impact on society than protesters this year.

From the protesters in Tunisia, Egypt, Bahrain, Libya and Syria to the Occupy Wall Street protesters and its many offshoots, these largely peaceful protests have forced things to change in their societies.

In the Middle East, corrupt and authoritarian leaders have been forced to step down. In some, it's still an ongoing battle.

Of course, these steps towards democracy are not perfect. Nor are the results.

But that's democracy for you.

Just because people don't know what they want is no reason to dismiss democracy.

It is the fact that they finally have choices is the triumph, after so many years of not having any.

For those who insist on equating the London riots with the Arab Spring, do get your facts right.

The former was not about changing an authoritarian government for a more democratic one, nor was it meant to be peaceful.

The latter was a peaceful demand for change; the violence came from the government response.

If you want to equate the London riots with the Syrian government's response, perhaps it would be more accurate.

Time magazine has mostly recognised the Arab, Spanish and American protesters in their essay.

But perhaps they should have also looked eastwards.

I think the Bersih rally goers, protesting peacefully for clean and fair elections, are also deserving of the award.

For the first time, ordinary Malaysians went out to demand what should be their right, to be able to vote fairly.

Young and old of all races and religions, Malaysians marched to protect this basic human right. And were demonised because of it.

While the Government responded to the Bersih demands by establishing the Parliamentary Special Committee on electoral reforms, at the same time the so-called Peaceful Assembly Act – aimed at curbing any other rallies like Bersih – was passed.

In any case, it is delusional to think that curbing protests will curb rebellious thoughts. These will continue to thrive in 2012, that's for sure.

Perhaps 2011 was also the year of the Strong Woman.

On the international scene, not one but three women won the Nobel Peace Prize this year: President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf of Liberia, Leymah Gbowee, also of Liberia, and Tawakkol Karman of Yemen, the youngest-ever recipient.

It's interesting that all of these women are rebellious women, who refused to accept the established, and patriarchal, way of doing things.

Instead, they found their own way, and worked for peace in their countries.

Malaysia, too, has its share of strong women. Datuk Ambiga Sreenevasan is the prime example of someone who has had to withstand personal attacks from all quarters like no other person has had to in our country, yet still carries on with her strong principles.

Let it never be said that she lacks courage.

For women to get ahead, it really is imperative that they have the sort of integrity and display the sort of ethical behaviour that we often find lacking in men.

This year is, of course, also the year of the Obedient Wives Club, hardly a great leap forward for womankind.

Nevertheless, the OWC knew exactly how to get publicity for their causes.

And, I suspect, despite the sniggers over their sex manual, there are many who actually agree with their basic premise, that a good wife is one who blindly obeys her husband even when she doesn't feel like it.

Finally, this year has been a bad year for justice and equality.

Children born less than six months after their parents married are considered illegitimate, thus forcing them to bear the sins of their parents.

Even if legitimate, children can be married off at even 10 years old, surely a blight on our society if we are to consider ourselves progressive.

Muslim women still don't have the same rights as their non-Muslim sisters when it comes to marriage, property and inheritance.

And people of different sexual orientations are not regarded as full citizens.

I'd like to be optimistic about 2012 but that does not look likely.

The silly season is already on us and no doubt will be a fractious and prolonged one.

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, folks!

 

How much is too much democracy?

Posted: 20 Dec 2011 09:59 AM PST

Mahatir Mohammed's prescription for India, with respect may, paradoxically enough, turn out to be a remedy worse than the disease. Indeed, it may prove fatal for the health of our federal democracy.

Mahathir Mohammed, the respected former Prime Minister of Malaysia and now an elder Asian statesman diagnosed some of the ills that seemingly afflict democracy in India. He recently addressed a gathering of national leaders, leading citizens, intellectuals and media personalities in the capital at a Leadership Summit organized by a leading national daily. The deliberations at the summit were broadcast live throughout the country.

He has ascribed most of the current "problems" facing us to the reason that we have "too much democracy". He added that we need a "strong" Central leadership to overcome the present difficulties and restore some "order" so that unhindered progress can take place. The overdose of democracy holds back India from emerging as one of the leading players on the world stage.

Mahathir's diagnosis is negated by recent experience of the modern nation states the world over and the lessons of history. One does not have to delve deep into history to draw the appropriate lessons from it. The last century itself is replete with examples of nations that broke up and disintegrated because they limited the practice of democracy in order to enforce "discipline" and attempted to bring about rapid economic growth.

India is a federal republic with one of the most liberal forms of democracy. The Constitution was aptly described by Pt. Nehru, one of its main architects as a strong federation during normal times but with provision for converting it into a unitary structure in times of emergency. The Founding Fathers were visionaries with great foresight. They realized that for a multi-ethnic, multi-religious and multi-lingual society, a federal structure was the only viable form of government.

A liberal democracy is the bedrock of federalism. The history of twentieth century world that we live in brings home this stark lesson to all of us. Nation upon nation, all federal republics that limited democracy in favour of "strong" central leadership broke apart and could not survive as unified states. Ethnic and linguistic minorities and regions seceded, often violently and at great human cost. Paradoxically, a "strong" central leadership invariably proved counter-productive.

The example of former Soviet Union is a well-known. Also falling in the category of failed states are former Republic of Yugoslavia, Indonesia and nearer home, former East and West Pakistan. All these were federal republics that experimented with variants of democracy. They convinced themselves that somehow too much democracy is not good for their people and it must be limited for people's own sake. The leader knows best what is good for his "subjects".

Thus, both the Soviet Union and Yugoslavia practised 'socialist democracy' or 'democratic centralism'. Admittedly, the ideology was suffused with idealism, all in the name of "the people" and their beloved fatherland. Full guarantees were extended to all minorities and regions-but only on paper. Believe it or not, the Constitution of the former Soviet Union had conceded even the right of "secession" to the various ethnic regions.

Indonesia similarly experimented with "guided democracy". The central leadership imposed their will on far-flung islands comprising several dozen major linguistic and tribal groups, with deadpan uniformity. They had virtually no voice, not to talk of role in governance. They were completely alienated from the central leadership. One cannot say with certainty if the final act in the Indonesian tragedy has played itself out. It may yet break up further.

Pakistan's case is all too well known to merit detailed analysis. The Army Generals who overthrew a civilian government experimented with "basic democracy" as they felt that universal adult franchise was a luxury that Pakistan could ill-afford. Democracy was limited to selected individuals who were supposed to be literate in the 3Rs. The federal unit of East Pakistan was reduced to the status of a poor cousin. Like Indonesia, Pakistan's tragedy may be still unfolding, looking to the situation in the federal unit of Baluchistan and other federal provinces.

A "strong" central leadership is the soul mate of limited democracy. And such leadership almost invariably passes on to the armed forces of the modern nation state. The generals and the air marshals assume charge in the name of "order and discipline". They have an in-built disdain for the "bureaucratic state" and the "bumbling democracy". They buy themselves a one-way ticket to power till such time as the state collapses under their heavy boots.

The aforesaid are but some of the few examples of large federal states that experimented with limited democracy and failed. The malady does not discriminate, and seems to afflict smaller states as well. It appears to be endemic to the region. Sri Lanka has just survived a brutal civil war and is barely intact. Afghanistan is a house divided against itself between the Pashtuns and the Uzbecks, held together for the time being against the common threat from Taliban.

Burma is apparently a paper entity and a geographical fiction as a nation. Some of the longest civil wars of the last century, largely forgotten by the outside world have spilled over to the present century. The state is fighting its own minorities who have, de facto, carved out for themselves their own sub states-the Kachins, the Karens and the Shans. Their respective territories are 'no go' zones save for the Burmese military in large numbers.

Among these disintegrated and disintegrating states one can witness the solitary splendour of a standing and functioning federation with a liberal democracy. There are no prizes for guessing the right name. And this has been possible as the basic democratic structure of the state has not been disturbed, whatever the provocation. Not that we have not been afflicted with our own set of centrifugal forces. But we have contained them through dialogue and discussion. A liberal democracy is the most resilient form of government.

Unity in Diversity is the lofty principle of the Indian society and a federal democracy is its actual form. A limited democracy and its counterpart of "strong" leadership is the antidote. The latter tries to impose a certain Uniformity in Diversity which has proved to be a recipe for disaster. This is the abiding lesson of the history of the last century.

Much is made of the fact that Indian democracy is much too "noisy" for orderly progress and a marketable brand. But the argument overlooks the fact that debate and discussion are the essence of good governance, as conflicting ideas and varying opinions get churned and what emerges is often the optimum solution. As someone rightly said, what may sound noise today is the music of democracy in the long run. Solzhenitsyn was right-the only alternative to debate and discussion is the Gulag.

Mahatir Mohammed's prescription for India, with respect may, paradoxically enough, turn out to be a remedy worse than the disease. Indeed, it may prove fatal for the health of our federal democracy.

(The author is a retired IAS officer)

 

MAS probes graft claims in cargo unit, boss put on leave

Posted: 20 Dec 2011 09:44 AM PST

(The Malaysian Insider) - Loss-making Malaysia Airlines (MAS) is investigating allegations of kickbacks in its cargo unit which has led to MAS Airlines Cargo (MASkargo) managing director Shahari Sulaiman to go on leave since early last month, sources said.

The Malaysian Insider understands that an internal investigation report has been sent to the MAS board although the unprofitable flag carrier has not lodged a police report over the issue.

"It is related to kickbacks in MASkargo and the board already has a report on the matter," a source told The Malaysian Insider.

The source added new managing director Ahmad Jauhari Yahya and the top management have been going through the books for all divisions in the national carrier that has posted losses of some RM1.2 billion in the three quarters of the current financial year. MAS is not expected to make profits until 2013 despite a new business recovery plan.

"They are cleaning up the company. This is just the start," he added.

However, it is not clear why MAS has not lodged a police report over the alleged kickbacks in MASkargo, which made a record pre-tax profit of RM142 million in 2010.

The Business Times had reported that Shahari has been away since early November 2011 after fresh allegations about problems in the cargo unit.

The new MAS board had begun looking into all aspects of the airline operations after a share swap between the national carrier and Asia's biggest budget carrier, AirAsia in early August. It is understood that investigations started and a domestic inquiry was done but fresh allegations revived the probe.

MAS had told Business Times early this month that "Encik Shahari Sulaiman, managing director of Malaysia Airlines subsidiary MASkargo, is currently on leave.

"In his absence Encik Mohd Yunus Idris, senior vice president Global Sales & Government Affairs MASkargo, is overseeing thedaily operations of the subsidiary," it said in response to queries on the matter.

READ MORE HERE

 

Fatwa panel to discuss the use of indelible ink

Posted: 20 Dec 2011 09:41 AM PST

A new test and decree necessary

(New Straits Times) - THE National Fatwa Council will hold a special muzakarah (meeting) to decide on the usage of the new indelible ink in the next general election.

Its secretary Datuk Othman Mustapha said they have yet to receive an official application from the Election Commission for their view on whether the ink's use was allowed in Islam.

He said once the meeting was concluded and a decision was reached, they would then issue a fatwa (decree) on the matter.

"We are waiting for the application from the EC. We are ready to hold the meeting as soon as we receive the test result.

"This matter will be given priority as it is important to the country's electoral process," said Othman, adding that he would discuss the matter with council chairman Professor Emeritus Tan Sri Dr Abdul Shukor Husin.

Othman was responding to a statement by EC chair-man Tan Sri Abdul Aziz Mohd Yusof on Monday that a sam-ple of the new ink had been sent to the Chemistry Department for test-ing.

Aziz also said that the results would then be submitted to the Department of Islamic Development Malaysia (Jakim).

Othman, who is also Jakim's director-general, said the special meeting was necessary as the new ink was slightly different from the one which they had declared as 'halal' in 2007.

"Previously, we issued a fatwa on the use of indelible ink for the 2008 general election, that its use was not against Is-lamic rules and did not interfere with a Muslim's 'ibadah'.

"However, the Election Commission is said to be using a slightly different type for the next general election, thus the need for a new test and fatwa to be issued."

Othman said the discussion would focus on the ink's ingredients -- whether it contained non-halal substances and whether it would hinder water from contacting the skin.

"These two are the major issues that will be discussed to determine if the ink's use will be according to Islamic rules, as Muslims can't use products which contain non-halal substances, and that it must also not interfere with ablution requirements," he added.

Meanwhile, the Chemistry Department's deputy director-general (policy) Ismail Talib said they were analysing the indelible ink.

"Our experts are conducting analysis on the ink and the results will be submitted to the relevant authorities soon."

However, he declined to divulge the expected date for the tests to be completed.

 

Dr M saved nation, says Najib

Posted: 20 Dec 2011 09:37 AM PST

Malaysians can thank ex-PM by making Vision 2020 a reality

(New Straits Times) - IT was an unfounded accusation by some quarters to say that former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad had sought aid from the World Bank during the 1997 financial crisis, said Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak.

Najib said he knew Dr Mahathir well and the latter would never have handed over Malaysia to the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

"I can support Dr Mahathir on this. Mind you, it's a sin to tell lies," he said at Dr Mahathir's 86th birthday celebration last night.

Najib was referring to the opposition's claims that Dr Mahathir had sought a loan from the World Bank and there were documents to prove it.

He said Dr Mahathir had "saved the nation" during his tenure. "He (Dr Mahathir) has done a lot for this country. If I am to list everything he has done, it will take me right through the night until morning.

"To put it in a nutshell, three significant achievements during his premiership have made Malaysia what it is today.

"One, Vision 2020; two, putting Malaysia on the right track to becoming a developed nation; and three, instilling self-belief in us and giving us the confidence to believe we can do anything (Malaysia Boleh) if we put our minds to it."

Najib said the best gift Malaysians could give to Dr Mahathir, in return for his contributions, would be to make Vision 2020 a reality.

"That is why we have implemented many programmes, including the ETP (Economic Transformation Programme), to ensure we achieve Vision 2020."

Still, Najib said the nation had to cross "the bridge (general election)" soon. "We hope to cross this successfully."

Dr Mahathir said he introduced the slogan "leading by example" and stood by it when he chose to have his by-pass surgery in Malaysia instead of seeking medical treatment abroad.

"I am blessed to have led this nation for 22 years. I have been tasked to lead and once we are entrusted to do this, we have to do it well. Politicians should accept criticisms to be effective leaders.

"With the extra time I have, I hope I can continue contributing to the nation's development."

Present were Najib's wife Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor and Dr Mahathir's wife Tun Dr Siti Hasmah Mohd Ali.

Najib later launched the Mahathir Distinguished Internship Programme, which is for postgraduates, young academicians or professionals below 35 years to learn about Dr Mahathir. International applicants are welcomed.

Those interested can call the secretariat of the Malaysian Professors Council at 03-88706308, 88706309 or 887063311.

Successful applicants are expected to work full time at the Perdana Leadership Foundation during their internship.

They will receive a a salary, and housing and transportation allowances.

 

BN man pockets RM1m in Salcra dividends

Posted: 20 Dec 2011 09:24 AM PST

While hundreds of Salcra landowners have seen pittance in dividends, a local politician has laughed all the way to the bank.

(Free Malaysia Today) - A prominent Barisan Nasional (BN) politician in Bau, some 150km from here, has allegedly received at least RM1 million in dividends from Sarawak Land Custody and Rehabilitation Authority (Salcra).

Disclosing this today, a PKR Mas Gading division leader, Boniface Willy Tumek, said: "He is the single biggest recipient of dividends from Salcra's Bratak and Undan estates in Bau.

"It means that the BN politician has a big acreage of land in these two estates to be able to receive RM1 million.

"It means he has been buying up land at low cost from poor people when they are at their weakest point."

Tumek said a seldom mentioned tragic fact about Salcra's plantation is that substantial land parcels in these estates have passed hands, from the original landowners (who were supposed to benefit from these schemes) to financially comfortable people.

He pointed out that one hectare of oil palm would earn RM2,466 per year but it was a meaningless amount.

Tumek said that nobody talked about this aspect in Salcra oil palm estates.

Salcra was conceived with the aim of helping to develop the native customary rights (NCR)land of the natives to help eradicate poverty among the rural people.

Selling to support children

But this has not been the case.

"The rich and the people of means are taking advantage of the poor people whose lands in the estates are bought at low prices when the people are most vulnerable.

"This usually happens in the beginning of the year when students are about to go to university, especially during those times when Unimas (Universiti Malaysia Sarawak) was not in existence yet.

"When you talk about going to universities, they are all in Peninsular Malaysia; so you talk about airfares and all kinds of expenses and the kampung people do not have this type of money.

"I have personal experience. I was approached by someone from Kampung Stungkor in 1988.

"He had a piece of land in the Salcra estates which he wanted to sell to me because he needed the money to send his daughter to a university.

"I thought long and hard about it. In the end, I decided not to take it, because I know it was morally wrong for me to take advantage of his predicament or misfortune at the time when they were most vulnerable.

"I told him that I would like very much to help him but I could not do it and advised him that if he was really in need of the money then he should go somewhere else, which, of course, he did.

"This is what is happening. This has happened and will continue to happen to the poor who are being taken advantage of," he said.

READ MORE HERE

 

Isu agenda Melayu sejak dari dulu sampai sekarang- Melayu tidak kemana juga

Posted: 20 Dec 2011 09:14 AM PST

ASPAN ALIAS

Agenda Melayu! Itulah isu yang tidak lekang di mulut pemimpin UMNO sejak tiga dekad dahulu. Semasa perlaksanaan DEB dahulu pun tidak begitu kuat pemimpin-pemimpin UMNO menyebut tentang isu agenda Melayu ini. Sekarang di mana-mana pemimpin-pemimpin terbesar negara bercakap tentang agenda Melayu tetapi Melayu masih dalam keadaan ketinggalan dan kerana itu isu itu masih mahu dihidupkan terutamanya dalam menghadapi PRU yang semakin hari semakin hampir ini.

UMNO masih mengharapkan yang isu ini akan dapat menyatukan orang Melayu di bawah ketiak UMNO kononnya untuk menyempurnakan agenda Melayu. Kalau agenda Melayu sudah begitu lama di nyanyikan oleh kepimpinan Melayu UMNO, bagaimana orang Melayu terutamanya yang terlingkung dalam kumpulan generasi muda masih mahu mempercayainya?

Oleh kerana itu ada kemungkinan yang ketinggalan orang Melayu dalam semua bidang sekarang ini merupakan isu yang sangat 'expedient' bagi pimpinan UMNO untuk menyatukan mereka. Lagi ketinggalan Melayu ini lagi untung bagi parti UMNO yang sudah begitu selekeh ini untuk meneruskan kuasa.

UMNO seolah-olah tidak mahu Melayu ini maju kedepan kerana jika Melayu sudah maju maka UMNO akan hilang isu untuk menyaingi parti-parti lain yang kian hari kian mendapat sambutan dari rakyat yang rata-rata sudah menggunakan akal anugerah Tuhan untuk menilai dan berfikir untuk memilih yang mana yang baik dan yang sebaliknya.

Saya menyebut ini kerana yang menjadi mangsa di atas keghairahan UMNO untuk terus berkuasa ini menjadikan orang Melayu mangsa kepada nafsu UMNO untuk terus berkuasa. Orang Melayu masih dalam ketakutan kerana mereka terpedaya dengan cara UMNO yang suka menakut-nakutkan mereka (orang Melayu). UMNO sudah menjadi zalim kerana menekan bangsanya sendiri dan memundurkan pemikiran mereka sehingga mereka tidak boleh bergerak untuk memajukan diri mereka (Melayu).

Apabila orang Melayu mempunyai sedikit pandangan yang berbeza, UMNO akan mengungkit kononnya jasa-jasa yang telah diberikan UMNO kepada mereka itu harus dibalas dengan memberikan sokongan walaupun mereka merompak dan menyamun. Kita sedih dengan kelemahan bangsa kita dalam hal ini walaupun setengah dari mereka telah belajar jauh di antara dunia tetapi mempunyai pemikiran yang masih dijajah dengan kumpulan penjenayah politik dan ekonomi seperti UMNO ini. Nampak sangat sikap pemimpin-pemimpin UMNO yang mereka tidak suka kepada bangsanya yang berfikir.

Menakut-nakutkan orang Melayu merupakan satu-satunya cara untuk menyatukan orang Melayu pada pandangan UMNO. Isu yang digunakan oleh UMNO bagi menakutkan orang Melayu ialah Pakatan Rakyat, jika berkuasa akan menghilangkan kedaulatan Raja-Raja Melayu. Jika PR memerintah orang Melayu akan di kafirkan oleh DAP dengan mengkristiankan orang Melayu. Jika PR memerintah, DAP dan komponen PR akan melenyapkan orang Melayu kononnya.

UMNO sudah ketandusan idea untuk menjawab perbahasan dalam banyak isu politik. UMNO hanya tinggal dengan taktik gertak menggertak serta melakukan pembelian undi dan melakukan penipuan dalam pilihanraya nanti seperti yang mereka lakukan selama ini. Taktik yang lain ialah dengan menghina dan menggunakan kata-kata kesat yang tidak bertemadun dan beragama. UMNO seolah-olah sedang menghadapi penyakit gila talak dan tidak keruan lagi.

Mencarut-carut di alam cyber sekarang ini sudah menjadi pakaian penyokong-penyokong UMNO untuk berkempen bagi menegakkan benang basah mereka. Mereka tidak sedar manusia sekarang sudah lebih tinggi tamadunnya. Memaki hamun dan mencarut itu hanya membayangkan betapa 'desperado' nya UMNO masa kini dan memaki hamun itu hanya dilakukan oleh mereka yang sengkek sahaja.

Kita sudah mengiktiraf bahawa jika sesebuah parti itu memenangi pilihanraya seperti itu ia merupakan satu kemenangan yang tidak 'legitimate'. Tetapi UMNO tidak peduli dengan isu 'legitimacy' ini. Yang penting berkuasa terus menerus. PM Najib secara terbuka telah berkata yang UMNO akan lakukan apa sahaja untuk mempertahankan Putrajaya. Bagi UMNO yang penting ialah kuasa bukannya untuk bertanggungjawab kepada rakyat.

UMNO menekan orang Melayu dengan isu sensitif seperti yang saya sebutkan di atas. Lagi takut orang Melayu lagi untung kepimpinannya. Jadi UMNO hanya membina sifat penakut kepada orang Melayu sahaja kerana jika orang Melayu takut dengan isu rasis yang di gembar gemburkan olehnya lagi berpeluang mereka untuk berkuasa dan melakukan perkara-perkara yang merosakkan orang Melayu lagi.

READ MORE HERE

 

PAS rubbishes claim of DAP eyeing Selangor MB post

Posted: 20 Dec 2011 09:08 AM PST

(Harakah Daily) - PAS and DAP have hit out at their opponents for claiming that DAP was eyeing the Menteri Besar's post in Selangor should Pakatan Rakyat be returned to power in the state in the coming polls.

At a press conference, Selangor PAS commissioner Dr Abdul Rani Osman, his deputy Khalid Samad and state DAP chairman Teresa Kok dismissed the allegation as another of UMNO's scare tactics among the Malay electorate.

"The question of Selangor Menteri Besar's post does not arise as we are all satisfied with Khalid Ibrahim's performance and there is no plan to replace him.

"We are confident that through our cooperation and support for each other which we have shown so far, Selangor's performance will improve, not the other way," said Rani, who is also Meru state assemblyman.

Saying no one in PR had brought up the matter, Rani called on UMNO to "stop spreading lies".

Rani added that it was unfortunate that DAP, despite being a multi racial party, had been portrayed by UMNO as an anti-Malay party.

As such, he noted that DAP, eager to prove such allegations as false, had proposed to PR that it field candidates in Malay majority constituencies in Selangor.

"I hope the people can be protected from UMNO's racial political game," he added.

Meanwhile, PR Selangor announced that seats allocation would remain the same, with DAP contesting 15 seats, PKR 21 and PAS 20.

 

Mahathir says it again: "Wasn't me"

Posted: 20 Dec 2011 09:06 AM PST

(Harakah Daily) - Following PKR's claim that the post-Anwar Ibrahim administration of Dr Mahathir Mohamad had applied for World Bank loans, the former prime minister has repeated his denial by giving details of the loans approved by the global financial body.

"I had just criticised the World Bank, then I ask money from them for what? I would be stupid," was his immediate reaction to the claim by Anwar during a speech that Mahathir had not been walking the talk in his criticism of World Bank and International Monetary Fund, two bodies he frequently associated with his one-time heir apparent during the 1997-99 economic crisis.

Explaining further, Mahathir said he had refused to seek IMF or World Bank help during the crisis "because the so-called help would worsen the financial situation.

"Instead, in 1998 Malaysia imposed currency control which helped it to recover," said Mahathir of his now famous currency pegging, which he claimed helped bring Malaysia out of trouble during the peak of the monetary crisis.

Mahathir claimed that it was Anwar, the then Finance minister, who signed the US$300 million loan with World Bank for the three programmes recently named by PKR's strategic director Rafizi Ramli.

Rafizi had earlier pointed out that Mahathir's Economic Planning Unit prepared papers for the loan since July 26, 1998.

"The agreement was signed by the government, whose prime minister and Finance minister at the time was Mahathir, at a time when Anwar Ibrahim was in jail with a bad back and a black eye. His involvement would have been impossible," he said.

The loans were said to be for the Fund for Food Programme, Higher Education Loan Fund and Microcredit Programme.

However, Mahathir said all the loans negotiated with the World Bank in 1997 and June 1998 were stopped in 1999 following Anwar's sacking and arrest, and pointed out that Malaysia continued to recover in the absence of the loans.

Further countering PKR's claims, Mahathir said it was Anwar who implemented IMF's policies even without taking its loans.

The former UMNO strongman cited how Anwar "raised interest rates, reduced the period for declaring loans non-performing from 6 months to 3 months, reduced budget allocation to ministries so as to achieve a budget surplus etc."

"Although he did not oppose currency controls, his appointees as Governor and Deputy Governor of Bank Negara refused to implement the policy and resigned. Tan Sri Zeti was then appointed as Governor of Bank Negara Malaysia," wrote Mahathir on his blog.

He again challenged his former deputy to take an oath on the Qur'an.

"I am prepared to swear that I never asked for loans from the World Bank," he added.

 

I'm spending a week on a friend's boat in Phuket

Posted: 20 Dec 2011 08:37 AM PST

I am updating this from the high seas, a guest of my friend who owns a boat in Phuket. We are now sailing out to Phi Phi Island and will be spending a week on the boat. This is how I have to suffer a life in exile. 

Marina, no worse for the rocking and reeling.

The Boat Lagoon Resort in Phuket.

Our sleeping quarters.

The 54-footer catamaran.

Phi Phi Island.

 

Will BN recapture Selangor?

Posted: 20 Dec 2011 08:16 AM PST

The situation is quite dire for Pakatan as it has taken no steps whatsoever to counter Umno's lies and propaganda.

The Pakatan state government is either disinterested in strategy or plain ignorant as to what is going on in the Malay heartland. Umno's party workers are diligently doing home visits and their task is made easier as it is reinforced by the mainstream media, the only media which penetrates into the rural areas.

Selena Tay, Free Malaysia Today

There have been grassroots reports that Umno party workers have been campaigning in the Malay rural heartland in Selangor by telling the rural folk two simple lies. The first is that if Pakatan Rakyat wins the 13th general election, DAP will "Christianise" the country and turn Malaysia into a republic like Singapore.

The second big lie spread by the Umno campaigners is that PKR's revelations on the (National) Feedlot (Corporation) issue are all baseless. Of course, all these are falsehoods by Umno campaigners and it reveals that Umno's desperation has already come to the fore.

Nevertheless, this is a very effective two-pronged attacking method employed by Umno in capturing the hearts and minds of the Malays so that they will give their vote to Barisan Nasional (BN).

So far, the Pakatan Selangor state government is either oblivious to Umno's campaign or is in the dark about it as no steps whatsoever have been taken to counter Umno's lies and propaganda.

If the Pakatan Selangor government does not take any action to reach out and explain the truth to the people, then all is lost as the polls could be held as early as February next year.

In reality, the situation in Selangor is quite dire for Pakatan. There is no use harping on "Merakyatkan Ekonomi Selangor" when Umno's propaganda in regard to DAP and the Feedlot issues are taking root.

Ground reports have revealed that the Malay rural folk are starting to believe that DAP wants to turn Malaysia into a republic and PKR's revelations on Feedlot are nothing but malicious lies to tarnish Shahrizat Abdul Jalil's reputation.

With the Malay support in the kualas and the hulus swinging to Umno, it is going to be a very difficult task for Pakatan to hold on to Selangor. This is a fact as there are many seats in the rural areas compared to the urban areas. A 5% vote swing by the Malays to Umno is enough for BN to recapture Selangor.

The statistics itself clearly illustrates the difficulty Pakatan is facing. There are 10 state assembly seats in Selangor where Pakatan won with a less than 10% majority in 2008.

They are Bukit Melawati, Cempaka, Teluk Datuk, Sekinchan, Damansara (wherein all five of these seats were won with a less than 5% majority), Ulu Kelang, Bukit Antarabangsa, Kota Anggerik, Lembah Jaya and Selat Kelang.

There are eight parliamentary seats in Selangor which were also won by less than 10% majority. They are Hulu Selangor, Kuala Selangor, Hulu Langat, Kuala Langat (all of which were won by less than 5% majority), Gombak, Ampang, Selayang and Kelana Jaya.

Hulu Selangor has already been recaptured by BN when MIC's P Kamalanathan defeated PKR's Zaid Ibrahim in the Hulu Selangor by-election in April last year.

READ MORE HERE

 

Dr M says took, but never sought, World Bank loans

Posted: 20 Dec 2011 07:54 AM PST

(The Malaysian Insider) - Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad said today that Malaysia has taken World Bank loans since 1958, but the former prime minister said he had never personally written a letter or verbally requested for such funds.

Writing on his blog today, Dr Mahathir also accused Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim — whom he had appointed finance minister and deputy prime minister — of implementing policies of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to tighten conditions for bank loans and cutting government expenditure during the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis.

Dr Mahathir conceded, however, that Anwar had not opposed his decision to impose capital controls that helped Malaysia stem capital flight.

Instead, he said the Bank Negara governor and deputy governor at the time — whom he called Anwar appointees — refused to implement capital controls and resigned.

Dr Mahathir has been engaging in a verbal war over the past week with Anwar and PKR leaders over their respective roles and actions during the Asian Financial Crisis.

The former premier issued a challenge last week to Opposition Leader Anwar over allegations of a purported letter that the former had written to the World Bank to appeal for funds during the financial crisis.

PKR has since produced World Bank records showing that Dr Mahathir's administration had accepted financial aid numerous times from May 18, 1982 to Malaysia's post-financial crisis period of March 30, 1999.

This includes three loans for projects inked six months after Anwar was sacked as deputy prime minister in September 1998.

Dr Mahathir said today any claim that he wrote to the World Bank was baseless. He added that Malaysia had borrowed from the World Bank since 1958.

The last negotiation for loans, he said, was in 1997, but the funds were not disbursed until 1999.

READ MORE HERE

 

Hasan Ali says gathering proof of Christian proselytism

Posted: 20 Dec 2011 07:51 AM PST

(The Malaysian Insider) - Bent on proving Christians were converting Malay Muslims in Selangor, Datuk Hasan Ali said today his research unit has found 41 apostates in Petaling Jaya and will continue to collect more "profound" data to back his case.

The state executive councillor in charge of Islamic affairs told reporters the 41 apostates were mostly women aged between 30 and 60-years old who were from low-income households.

He postulated that the figure was likely only the tip of the iceberg, with the actual number being much bigger.

"It could be hundreds, maybe even thousands," he said.

"No one has gathered information and made the statistics," he added, saying he had set up two-and-half  months ago a research unit he called "USA", short for "Unit Selamatkan Akidah (Faith Rescue Unit)", to collect the data and persuade the apostates to return to Islam.

"We are helping them, hoping they will come back to Islam," he said.

The ex-PAS state commissioner appeared taken aback when challenged to prove his theory by a foreign news reporter who pointed out that the so-called apostates could have voluntarily embraced Christianity and were not induced to do so as alleged.

"Are you a Malaysian?" he asked. When she answered no, he explained that there were state laws against the propagation of religions other than Islam to Muslims.

When asked if he had pushed for the prosecution of Christian groups or individuals allegedly involved in proselytising their religion to Muslims, Hasan told reporters that he was researching for more "profound evidence".

This latest disclosure, after a controversial August 3 raid by Selangor Islamic authorities (Jais) on the Damansara Utama Methodist Church (DUMC) in Petaling Jaya, risks further strain to already tense Christian-Muslim ties.

READ MORE HERE

 

Dr M: ‘I was the most feared PM’

Posted: 20 Dec 2011 07:47 AM PST

(The Malaysian Insider) - Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad today admitted he was considered Malaysia's most-feared prime minister, and attributed this to his character and personality.

"What is my legacy? I was the most feared prime minister," Dr Mahathir said during a special gala dinner celebrating his 86th birthday here.

"When Tun Hussein Onn appointed me as deputy prime minister, some were saying how could this ultra-Malay be chosen as deputy prime minister?" he said.

The former prime minister later added that the most enduring mark of his tenure as PM was the absence of communal violence.

"The legacy I am most appreciate when I was PM was that there was no racial riots... even under a Malay extremist like me," he said candidly.

Dr Mahathir said he had learned to take criticism in his stride, and advised other politicians to do the same.

"Politicians have to accept the fact that they can be criticised. They have to stomach it; I do. Sometimes I even criticise others," he said to bouts of laughter from the audience.

 

Response to the Alumni of Yayasan Selangor

Posted: 20 Dec 2011 07:34 AM PST

MAKLUM BALAS BERHUBUNG PENUTUPAN SERTA PERPINDAHAN PELAJAR ASRAMA YAYASAN SELANGOR  KUALA LUMPUR (AYSKL)

En. Aina Hanim bin Lokman
Presiden
Persatuan Alumni Asrama Yayasan Selangor (PAYS)
No.8, Jalan SS 17/3
47500 Subang Jaya
Selangor Darul Ehsan
 
 
MAKLUM BALAS BERHUBUNG PENUTUPAN SERTA PERPINDAHAN PELAJAR ASRAMA YAYASAN SELANGOR  KUALA LUMPUR (AYSKL)
 
Dengan hormatnya merujuk surat tuan PAYS/2011/003/mb bertarikh 1 Disember 2011.
 
2.         Sebagaimana sedia maklum, kawasan sekitar Asrama Yayasan Selangor Kuala Lumpur sedang pesat membangun selari dengan pembinaan sistem jaringan MRT. Persekitaran ini tidak sesuai dan tidak kondusif bagi pelajar-pelajar menginap dan menjalani kehidupan di asrama serta mengikuti pembelajaran di kelas.  
 
3.         Yayasan Selangor telah menjalankan soal selidik dan sesi dialog bersama ibu bapa dan pelajar. Maklum balas dan pandangan hasil aktiviti tersebut dapat dirumuskan seperti berikut :-
 
3.1       80 % bersetuju untuk sama ada berulang alik ke sekolah asal, bersekolah di sekolah pilihan ataupun ditempatkan di sekolah / sekolah asrama harian terpilih
 
3.2       20% bersetuju untuk kekal di Asrama Yayasan Selangor Kuala Lumpur
 
4.         Perancangan dan keputusan yang dibuat oleh pengurusan Yayasan Selangor berdasarkan pertimbangan yang teliti dengan mengambil kira semua aspek bagi memastikan kelangsungan pendidikan pelajar-pelajar tajaannya. Langkah-langkah yang telah diambil adalah:
 
4.1       Mengekalkan pelajar-pelajar yang akan menduduki peperiksaan awam seperti Peperiksaan Penilaian Menengah Rendah dan Peperiksaan Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia pada tahun 2012
 
4.2       Menawarkan kepada pelajar-pelajar lain (Tingkatan 2/2012 dan Tingkatan 4/2012) beberapa alternatif; antaranya:-
4.2.1    Penempatan di sekolah / sekolah asrama harian terpilih di sekitar Kuala Lumpur dan Selangor 
 
4.2.2    Penempatan di sekolah sedia ada dan berulang alik dari rumah
 
4.2.3    Penempatan pilihan pelajar/ ibu bapa
 
4.2.3    Penempatan di Asrama Yayasan Selangor Kuala Lumpur (AYSKL) untuk tempoh setahun (2012)
 
4.3       Menawarkan beberapa insentif tambahan bagi memastikan hak istimewa pelajar-pelajar tajaannya terjamin
 
5.         Pada awal penubuhan Yayasan Selangor, pelajar-pelajarnya ditempatkan di asrama Yayasan Selangor dan bersekolah di sekolah-sekolah kawalan sekitar Kuala Lumpur dan Petaling Jaya. Pada tahun 2012, Yayasan Selangor telah mengembangkan sayap Rancangan Khas Pendidikan Yayasan Selangor dengan menambahkan penajaan untuk pelajar-pelajar yang berulang dari rumah ke sekolah. Pelajar-pelajar ini juga menikmati kemudahan kelas bimbingan, program kecemerlangan akademik dan program kepimpinan, tawaran biasiswa bagi yang berkelayakan serta pemantauan akademik yang berterusan. Jumlah asrama daerah juga turut bertambah daripada 9 kepada 17 buah sekolah yang menempatkan pelajar Yayasan Selangor.

6.         Yayasan Selangor juga turut membantu membaiki kemudahan prasarana dan infrastruktur untuk sekolah-sekolah daif persendirian di Selangor. Yayasan Selangor telah menaja pelajar-pelajar di Maahad Tarbiyah Islamiah Al-Ansar di Berjuntai Bestari dan Pusat Pengajian Pondok Bustanul Ariffin, Kampung Labohan Dagang, Banting, Selangor. Tajaan ini adalah dari segi tajaan makan/minum, kemudahan pengangkutan ke masjid untuk solat Jumaat dan pembayaran bil utiliti. Disamping itu, Yayasan Selangor turut memberi sumbangan kepada program yang berteraskan pendidikan kepada rumah anak-anak yatim, NGO, PIBG Sekolah, program SPIES dan sebagainya. Program-program CSR juga dirangka untuk membantu anak-anak yatim, miskin dan golongan yang perlu dibantu serta diberi program secara berpusat.
 
7.         Pada tahun 2012, Yayasan Selangor akan mengkhaskan pinjaman pelajaran kepada pelajar-pelajar di peringkat sijil dan diploma dalam bidang kemahiran. Pinjaman pelajaran ini akan memberi peluang kepada remaja yang kurang cemerlang akademiknya dan golongan generasi tercicir (lost generation) untuk belajar dalam bidang kemahiran. Setelah menamatkan pengajian diharap pelajar-pelajar ini mendapat pekerjaan yang sesuai dan menjadi insan yang berguna.

8.         Sehubungan dengan itu, Yayasan Selangor telah memperuntukkan pinjaman pelajaran bagi tahun 2012 iaitu sejumlah RM782,000 untuk pelajar INPENS. Peruntukan tersebut melibatkan RM430,000 untuk pelajar-pelajar baru dan RM352,000 untuk pelajar yang sedia ada. Pembiayaan ini menunjukkan bahawa Yayasan Selangor serius dalam usaha untuk memberi peluang pendidikan kepada pelajar-pelajar kemahiran supaya mereka mendapat pendapatan yang lumayan suatu hari kelak dan seterusnya membayar kembali pinjaman tersebut.

9.        Yayasan Selangor sentiasa berusaha kuat untuk mengumpul pendapatan dan dana. Punca pendapatan ini adalah dari hasil sewaan ruang pejabat dan kediaman, projek usahasama, mengusahakan ladang kelapa sawit, pelaburan jangka pendek dan panjang, penyewaan kem-kem bina semangat dan PLKN dan sebagainya. Yayasan Selangor telah berjaya menjana pendapatan sendiri untuk perbelanjaan tadbir urus syarikat dan menjalankan aktiviti pendidikan dengan menaja pelajar-pelajar di asrama mahupun menaja pelajar-pelajar di menara gading dan program-program modal insan.  Yayasan Selangor dalam usaha menjana lebih pendapatan agar lebih ramai pelajar dapat ditaja dengan projek pembangunan semula bangunan Yayasan Selangor di Bukit Bintang, Kg.Baru, pembangunan tanah di Presint 7 Shah Alam dan pembangunan tanah di Kampung Pandan.

10.          Seluruh warga kerja Yayasan Selangor berazam untuk berusaha keras demi memenuhi tanggungjawab sosial sebagai pemangkin membentuk generasi berilmu dengan menawarkan akses pendidikan samarata kepada rakyat  Selangor walaupun berdepan dengan pelbagai rintangan. Yayasan Selangor akan terus menjana dana untuk disalurkan kepada pelajar-pelajar dari peringkat sekolah pondok sehingga ke menara gading.

11.       Yayasan Selangor juga telah memperuntukkan RM350,000 pada tahun 2012 untuk menaja 50 orang pelajar peringkat Asasi di UNISEL dan pada tahun-tahun seterusnya.
 
 12.      Pembelian rumah banglo berdekatan dengan SMK Assunta, SMK Sri Aman, SMK Bukit Bintang dan  SMK La Salle (semuanya terletak  di Petaling Jaya) tertakluk kepada kelulusan Jabatan Pendidikan Selangor untuk dijadikan Asrama Harian.

13.       Yayasan Selangor juga sedang menunggu keputusan dari pihak Jabatan Pendidikan Wilayah Persekutuan bagi mengisi 260 tempat kosong di asrama SMK Victoria  untuk menempatkan pelajar tajaan Yayasan Selangor di SMK Victoria, SMK St John, SMK Aminuddin Baki dan SMK (L) Methodist.  

14.         Yayasan Selangor tidak pernah lupa jasa dan pengorbanan Allahyarham Dato' Harun Idris. Aspirasi beliau tetap akan diterjemah dengan pendekatan yang berbeza selaras dengan situasi semasa. Mulai tahun 2012, Program Rancangan Khas Pendidikan Yayasan Selangor akan dikembangkan di setiap daerah dengan  mengambil pelajar sama ada ditempatkan di asrama mahupun berulang dari rumah.
 
15.         Sewajarnya PAYS bertindak membantu Yayasan Selangor melaksanakan perancangan pendidikan khusus untuk rakyat Selangor dan bukannya sebagai kumpulan pendesak yang bertindak secara melulu. PAYS boleh menggunakan pendekatan yang lebih sesuai dan tidak menjadikan perkara ini sebagai isu politik yang menjatuhkan imej Yayasan Selangor di mata masyarakat. Yayasan Selangor amat kesal atas sikap PAYS yang seumpama `Kacang Lupakan Kulit'.
 
16.       Adalah lebih bijak dan befaedah jika PAYS berganding bahu bersama Yayasan Selangor untuk memohon  dari Jabatan Pendidikan Negeri Selangor dan Wilayah Persekutuan agar segera meluluskan permohonan membuka Asrama Harian di Petaling Jaya dan di SMK Victoria. Itu adalah  lebih baik dari menggigit tangan pihak yang pernah membantu anda dan membuat bising tanpa arah tujuan.
  
Sekian, terima kasih.
 
Yang benar,
 
 
ILHAM BIN MARZUKI
Pengurus Besar
Yayasan Selangor

 

Police to call witnesses in Penang CM's officer assault

Posted: 20 Dec 2011 07:30 AM PST

(Bernama) -- Police will call several eye witnesses, including M. Satees, who is the former special aide to Deputy Chief Minister II P.Ramasamy, to investigate the case where a man was alleged to have caused hurt to a female officer at the Chief Minister's Office.

Timur Laut police chief ACP Gan Kong Meng said the 24-year-old female officer had lodged a police report alleging that she had sustained injuries after being slapped in the face by the man.

The incident, which took place in Jalan Tun Syed Sheikh Barakbah at the Esplanade here yesterday, was believed to have been caused by misunderstanding.

Gan said the case was being investigated under Section 323 of the Penal Code and the police had ruled out political motives. Satees was reported to have resigned from the post after the incident.

 

Malaysia’s World Bank loans

Posted: 20 Dec 2011 07:22 AM PST

Dr Mahathir Mohamad

The accusation that I wrote to the World Bank asking for loans is baseless. But Malaysia had been borrowing project loans from the World Bank since 1958.

The last negotiations for the loans were made in 1997. These were for projects in:

a) Education sector US$244 million (RM756 million)

b) Social sector US$60 million

c) Technical sector US$100 million

The currency crisis also began in 1997. Naturally the loans were not approved until 1999 when the crisis was over. The usual sequence is for application for a loan to be made, followed by negotiations. Approval would be given by the bank later.

The World Bank wanted Malaysia to request for loans to tide over the crisis like the other countries affected by currency trading. The loans would be conditional upon Malaysia following IMF advice on economic management. It is well-known that Malaysia refused to seek IMF or World Bank help because the so-called help would worsen the financial situation. Instead, in 1998 Malaysia imposed currency control which helped it to recover.

In June 1998 (before currency control and while Anwar Ibrahim was still Minister of Finance) a loan for US$300 million was signed with the World Bank for:

a) Fund for Food Programme

b) Higher Education Loan Fund

c) Microcredit Programme

By 31st March 1999 a loan of US$100 million was signed for Technical Assistance and for overcoming Y2K problems. However, this loan was stopped after drawing down US$11.94 million.

Of the US$244 million Education Project which was approved in March 1999, payment was ordered to be stopped after US$216.7 million was drawn down.

Of the Social Sector loan of US$60 million, approved in March 1999, only US$600,000 was drawn down before it was stopped.

As the whole world knows, Anwar was reported in the press and foreign magazines for implementing the IMF policy without the IMF loans. He raised interest rates, reduced the period for declaring loans non-performing from six months to three months, reduced budget allocation to ministries so as to achieve a budget surplus, etc.

Although he did not oppose currency controls, his appointees as governor and deputy governor of Bank Negara refused to implement the policy and resigned. Tan Sri Zeti Akhtar Aziz was then appointed as Governor of Bank Negara Malaysia.

As stated above, Malaysia stopped the draw down on loans negotiated with the World Bank in 1997 and June 1998. This did not stop Malaysia from recovering from the crisis.

At no time did I write a letter or verbally request for loans from the World Bank. If Anwar can show evidence that I did, he should. Failing that he should swear on the Quran in a mosque that he knows what he says is true. I am prepared to swear that I never asked for loans from the World Bank. — chedet.co.cc

* Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad was prime minister from 1981 to 2003

 

Facebook Hits 70% Penetration Rate in Malaysia

Posted: 20 Dec 2011 07:17 AM PST

(Forbes) - There were a total of 9.5 million Facebook users in Malaysia on January 01, 2011. And last week, the total has surpassed the 12 million mark. As of today, the estimated total of Facebook users in Malaysia stands at 12,060,200.

Currently, the total Internet users in Malaysia is 17.5 million. That means the Facebook penetration in Malaysia is now just a whisker shy of 70%.

From January 2011 to December 2011, the Facebook user base has been growing at an average rate of 26%. The growth rate is markedly reduced compared to the last year's rate of 87% (March 2010December 2010). The growth rate is expected to decline further in 2012, with the increasing level of Facebook penetration in this country, continuing privacy concerns, onset of Facebook lethargy, and onslaught of emerging new online time sucks.

Online Graphing
Source: Facebook

 

Senate stamps approval on assembly bill

Posted: 20 Dec 2011 06:48 AM PST

Opposition senators fail to stop the passing of the law in a voting by division system.

(Free Malaysia Today) - Opposition senators failed to stop the Peaceful Assembly Bill 2011 today after a majority of Dewan Negara members voted in its favour in a voting by division system.

The voting system, which was requested by the opposition, saw 30 members supporting it while eight others dissented.

Earlier, when tabling the bill, Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Liew Vui Keong said the bill allows citizens the rights to gather peacefully and without weapons, with certain conditions deemed necessary to maintain public safety and order.

"The bill is the way forward towards strengthening the rule of law and upholding fundamental rights in Malaysia, in particular, the rights to gather peacefully and without weapons," he said.

The bill was approved by the Dewan Rakyat on Nov 29 with six amendments.

One of the amendments, involving Clause 9(1), allows organisers of assemblies to notify the police only 10 days before the event and not 30 days as in the original bill.

Clause 12(1) was amended to shorten from 48 hours to 24 hours the period for the police to respond to the organisers' notification of an assembly.

Clause 12(2) was also amended to shorten from five days to 24 hours the period for the vested party to make an objection to the police over the notice of assembly.

The period for the police to respond to the objection was also shortened, from 12 days to five days, as per an amendment to Clause 14.

READ MORE HERE

 

World Bank row: Najib backs Dr M

Posted: 20 Dec 2011 06:46 AM PST

Mahathir would not have surrendered the country to the controls of the IMF, says the prime minister.

(Free Malaysia Today) - Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak today dismissed as "nonsense" accusations that former premier Dr Mahathir Mohamad had sought loans from the World Bank.

He said it was Mahathir's leadership that steered Malaysia out of the 1998 financial crisis, adding that he was also known for his distrust towards the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

"Any accusation that he (Mahathir) had written a letter (requesting aid from the World Bank) is nonsense," Najib said in his speech at a gala dinner honouring the former premier here.

"Tun Dr Mahathir saved the economy in 1999… he would not have surrendered the country to the controls of the IMF under any circumstances," he added.

Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim had tried to turn the table against his archrival, claiming that Mahathir had personally asked for aid from the World Bank and produced documents to back his claims.

Anwar had always been portrayed as a "Western agent" by the former prime minister who justified his allegation by pointing to the former's alleged request for IMF aid.

Mahathir retaliated by demanding that Anwar produce the supposed letter. PKR responded by furnishing World Bank records showing the Mahathir administration accepting financial aid from May 18, 1982 to the post-financial crisis period of March 30, 1999.

This included three loans for projects inked six months after Anwar was sacked as deputy prime minister in September 1998.

Mahathir stands by his version

In his blog posting today, Mahathir maintained that he had never written any letter requesting for loan from the World Bank.

He said Malaysia had been taking loans from the World Bank since 1958, with the last being in 1997.

The funds, however, were only disbursed in 1999, which explained the records produced by PKR.

Mahathir reiterated his allegation that Anwar had favoured IMF policies which he said were detrimental to Malaysia's sovereignty.

READ MORE HERE

 

Behold the Perkasa fatwa on indelible ink!

Posted: 20 Dec 2011 06:43 AM PST

Mr Syed hints that the indelible ink is un-Islamic, despite it being used in populous Muslim democracies such as Pakistan and Bangladesh, or more recently in Tunisia, or even in the seat of Islamic learning, Egypt, where the first fairly transparent elections were recently held and saw the strong support of Islamist parties. Perhaps now, the halal-ness of the Islamists' victory is questionable.

Abdar Rahman Koya, Harakah Daily 

UMNO's right-wing offshoot Perkasa never fails to live up to its image, providing yet another comic relief.

Last July, the group threatened to disrupt the huge Bersih rally for electoral reforms in the capital, only to admit that dozens, perhaps less than a dozen, of its members turned up to loiter around the Lake Gardens.

This time, the group is incensed by the decision of the Election Commission to implement the indelible ink rule on voters at the coming polls.

While not a single Muslim ulama, not even the bearded and "nur (light)-upon-thy-face"-type UMNO young ulama, had ever questioned the permissibility of the ink being applied on Muslim fingers, Perkasa has come up with what is perhaps the first 'fatwa' to suggest that the ink is not permitted under Islamic laws.

The Islamic background of its secretary general Syed Hasan Syed Ali is unclear, other than the fact that his name carries the title 'Syed' usually reserved for the Prophet's lineage, though one can never tell on which side of the Quraysh clan (to which the Prophet belonged) this particular gentleman hails from. After all, some of the Prophet's strongest adversaries had been his own blood relatives. That said, here in Malaysia there are many "Friday Syeds", you know, those born on a Friday and therefore a 'Syed'!

Mr Syed (left) hints that the indelible ink is un-Islamic, despite it being used in populous Muslim democracies such as Pakistan and Bangladesh, or more recently in Tunisia, or even in the seat of Islamic learning, Egypt, where the first fairly transparent elections were recently held and saw the strong support of Islamist parties. Perhaps now, the halal-ness of the Islamists' victory is questionable.

Says Mr Syed: "It is a disgrace that a more advanced country than these developing countries wants to use indelible ink in the general election.

"We are not like Somalia, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Cambodia and other backward nations that do not have sophisticated identification, that only use handwritten papers as their identity documents. What a shame," fumes the 'First World' born Mr Syed.

Interestingly, Mr Syed makes this derogatory view of his Muslim brethren on the same day the Malaysian parliament passes a bill that restricts any attempt by citizens to gather peacefully, unlike their counterparts in the more advanced countries for which Mr Syed has taken pains to become a part of.

The latest fatwa by Perkasa, meanwhile, to be fair, is not a "do-what-I-command" type of edict. It shows that Perkasa's 'Shariah committee' (from which we presume this opinion by Mr Syed may have been based), is not made up of intolerant and self-righteous Islamic scholars out to impose their interpretation of Islam on others without trying to qualify their edicts with gentle exhortation as required by Islam.

According to Mr Syed, the indelible ink rule is a conspiracy to discourage Malay-Muslims from coming out to cast their ballots.

"There is a big possibility that I myself will not come out to vote if the indelible ink ruling is implemented," says Mr Syed, walking the talk and showing leadership by example. So far, his Islamicity remains as solid as the rock at Bukit Malawati.

"And there is a possibility that a big number of Perkasa members will not come out to vote. Who will be the loser when Perkasa and Malays refused to vote?" he asks.

Valid question. Let's see. Judging by Perkasa's own claim of its membership, that would either mean hundreds of thousands of pious Malay-Muslims out to defend their race and religion not lining up at polling centres, or a dozen or so prefering to spend polling day at the Lake Gardens.

Meanwhile, Perkasa has spoken.

The ulama of the Muslim world should now wake up from their slumber. From the universities of Madinah through the study halls of Qom to the ivory towers of Al-Azhar, it looks like Perkasa is set to be the talk among Islamic scholars, thinkers and intellectuals.

Lo and behold! The coming days and weeks will tell us whether the ulama of the Muslim world are ready to admit their mistakes, confess their sins, and seek forgiveness from the global Muslim Ummah for not questioning the indelible ink and for allowing millions of Muslim voters to have the devil's paint on their fingers.

 

‘Corrupt’ deputy minister under probe

Posted: 19 Dec 2011 06:48 PM PST

MACC, however, did not indicate it is investigating two aides working under Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak and his deputy Muhiddin Yassin.

(Free Malaysia Today) - The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) has confirmed that it is investigating allegations of corruption against Deputy Finance Minister Awang Adek Hussin.

Awang Adek along with Advance Maintenance Precision Management Sdn Bhd and Gerbang Perdana managing director Yahya Abd Jalil were allegedly involved in covert dealings.

Details of these dealings were recently revealed by an anonymous blogger, "The Whistleblower 711" on his blogsite.

Also disclosed were the names and transactions between Yahya and two aides working under Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak and Deputy Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin respectively.

In a statement issued to FMT yesterday, MACC said that it was aware of the contents of the blog and was investigating the allegations against Awang Adek.

The statement, however, failed to mention whether MACC was invetigating Najib and Muhyiddin's aides.

Top-level informants

On Sunday, FMT reported "The Whistleblower711′s" allegations implicating, and naming, the deputy minister and the two aides.

The blogger claimed to have top-level informants who had named the three government officials and claimed that they had been "bought" by one businessman for the purpose of obtaining contracts from the federal government and its agencies.

The author claimed that the businessman, who is also an Umno leader in Johor, had been channellling several thousands of "monthly contributions" to the government officials.

Proof of these contributions was published in the blog in the form of scans of several cash deposit slips, together with serial numbers.

These were alleged to be the personal accounts of the government officials.

The author claimed that the modus operandi of the businessman was to issue and cash out the cheques at a well-known bank.

Then a deposit, of either a partial or full amount, would be put into the personal accounts of the government officials.

"MACC would like to stress that all allegations or accusations related to any corruption offences, either received or obtained proactively by MACC will be acted upon as provided under Section 29(3) of the MACC Act 2009 (on powers to investigate)."

READ MORE HERE

 

Hasan Ali: Saya bukan duri dalam daging, tapi PAS tergelincir landasan

Posted: 19 Dec 2011 06:21 PM PST

(The Malaysian Insider) - Sambil menegaskan beliau bukan "duri dalam daging" bagi PAS, Datuk Dr Hasan Ali mahu parti itu kembali ke landasan asal penubuhan supaya perjuangannya terus konsisten dengan usaha memartabatkan Islam yang sebenar.

Exco kerajaan negeri Selangor ini turut menegaskan, PAS sekarang seperti tergelincir dari landasan asal perjuangan akibat kekurangan golongan ulama dalam barisan kepimpinannya.

"PAS sekarang sudah dipenuhi dengan golongan profesional dan akademik yang bersifat sekular berbanding sebelum ini yang menyaksikan parti ini dikuasai golongan ulama.

"Saya berjuang bagi memastikan matlamat PAS diletakkan kembali di landasan asalnya bagi memastikan semangat perjuangan Islam itu kembali menjadi teras dalam perjuangan PAS," katanya pada sidang media di kediamannya di sini, hari ini.

Menurut Hasan, pihaknya mempunyai bukti penyokong PAS semakin berkurangan kebelakangan ini akibat persekitaran sedemikian.

"Penyokong mula menarik diri dari PAS, mereka bukan seperti lembu yang dicucuk hidung, mereka adalah insan yang berbudaya, bertatasusila dan beragama dan terbukti mempunyai kekuatan intelektual dan laras berfikir yang matang dan mesti dihormati," katanya mempertikaikan dakwaan Setiausaha Agung PAS Datuk Mustafa Ali baru-baru ini bahawa dirinya terlibat menghasut penyokong PAS bahawa parti komponen Pakatan Rakyat itu tidak lagi memperjuangkan Islam.

Jelas Hasan, beliau menghormati peranan golongan profesional  dalam parti, tetapi adalah lebih baik sekiranya mereka turut sama berjuang mengembalikan parti kepada matlamat asal perjuangan menegakkan teras Islam.

"Perjuangan saya turut mendapat respons positif Mursyidul Am PAS Datuk Nik Aziz Nik Mat, Ketua Dewan Ulama PAS Pusat Datuk Harun Taib dan Ketua Dewan Pemuda PAS Nasrudin Tantawi, mereka menyokong usaha saya meletakkan semula PAS di landasan awal," katanya lagi.

READ MORE HERE

 

Perkasa: Melayu tidak akan keluar undi jika SPR guna dakwat kekal

Posted: 19 Dec 2011 06:16 PM PST

(The Malaysian Insider) - Perkasa menolak keputusan Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya (SPR) yang semalam mengumumkan akan menggunakan dakwat kekal pada pilihan raya umum ke-13 atas alasan orang Melayu tidak akan keluar mengundi selain mendakwa ia bertujuan mengurangkan peratusan pengundi kalangan kaum itu kelak.

Sehubungan itu, Setiausaha Agung Perkasa Syed Hassan Syed Ali berkata, pihaknya yakin penggunaan dakwat kekal akan membawa negara ke belakang.

Selain itu kata beliau, Perkasa percaya ramai pengundi Melayu tidak akan keluar mengundi jika penggunaan dakwat kekal diteruskan.

Semalam SPR mengumumkan bahawa semua pengundi wajib dicalit dengan dakwat kekal dan sekiranya mereka enggan berbuat demikian, maka pengundi terbabit tidak akan diberikan kertas mengundi.

Langkah itu seiring dengan syor jawatankuasa pilihan khas Parlimen berhubung penambahbaikan proses pilihan raya.

"Adalah memalukan negara yang jauh lebih maju dari negara-negara membangun lain mahu menggunakan dakwat kekal dalam pilihan raya umum.

"Malaysia bukan negara seperti Somalia, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Kemboja dan lain-lain negara mundur yang rekod pengenalan diri masih tidak canggih, yang menggunakan kertas biasa dengan maklumat peribadi tulisan tangan. Memalukan," katanya.

Syed Hassan juga mendakwa Perkasa percaya gesaan untuk penggunaan dakwat kekal adalah daripada pihak yang sebenarnya tidak mahukannya juga tapi oleh kerana ia cara untuk membuatkan orang Melayu dan Islam tidak mahu keluar mengundi.

"Siapa yang untung jika orang Melayu tidak keluar mengundi? Saya sendiri kemungkinan besar tidak akan keluar mengundi jika kekal dengan penggunaan dakwat kekal.

"Dan, kemungkinan ramai ahli Perkasa tidak keluar mengundi juga. Siapa yang akan terasa rugi jika ramai ahli Perkasa dan orang Melayu lain tidak keluar mengundi?" katanya.

Oleh itu kata beliau, kerajaan perlu berfikir dengan sebaik-baiknya keputusan penggunaan dakwat kekal pada pilihan raya umum ke-13.

READ MORE HERE

 

Tindakan Hasan Ali musnah diri

Posted: 19 Dec 2011 06:10 PM PST

Pesuruhjaya PAS Selangor Dr Abdul Rani Othman mengingatkan Hasan yang merupakan idola beliau untuk terus muhasabah diri.

(Free Malaysia Today) - PAS Selangor menyifatkan tindakan Exco Hal Ehwal Islam negeri itu, Datuk Dr Hasan Ali hanya menghancurkan diri sendiri apabila terus menyuarakan kekecewaan peribadinya ke atas parti kepada umum.

Pesuruhjaya PAS Selangor Dr Abdul Rani Othman mengingatkan Hasan yang merupakan idola beliau untuk terus muhasabah diri.

Katanya, Hasan perlu menunjukkan sikap lebih terbuka ekoran tidak menerima pencalonan yang mencukupi daripada cawangan untuk mempertahankan kerusi Dewan Undangan Negeri (Dun) Gombak Setia.

Menurut Abdul Rani, beliau ada menghubungi Hasan namun sehingga hari ini tiada sebarang maklum balas daripada pemimpin PAS tersebut.

"Sepatutnya kita tanya diri sendiri apa silap kita. Saya yang baru jadi Adun di Meru, ada orang Umno tegur dan beritahu silap saya. Hasan lebih tahu Gombak Setia, beliau patut tanya apa salah diri sendiri.

"Saya ada mesej untuk tawarkan beliau jawatan sebagai ahli perhubungan PAS Negeri. Tapi bagi SMS, hubungi beliau pun tiada jawapan.

Saya minta untuk jumpa namun dapat tahu beliau akan buat sidang media.

"Saya ingatkan Hasan Ali agar dapat muhasabah diri. Apa yang beliau lakukan hanya merosakan diri sendiri. Sedangkan parti (PAS) ada kekuatan sendiri. Apa yang beliau lakukan hanya memberi kesan minimal pada parti," katanya dalam sidang media di Pusat Khidmat Ahli Parlimen Shah Alam hari ini.

READ MORE HERE

 

Be a better leader, critics tell Ramasamy

Posted: 19 Dec 2011 06:00 PM PST

They say the DAP peace deal does not resolve the problems Penang Indians face

(Free Malaysia Today) - A group of DAP grassroots leaders have asked Deputy Chief Minister II P Ramasamy to review his leadership skills, claiming that he appears detached from problems plaguing the Indian community.

The group consists of veteran and young members of branches within the mainland parliamentary constituencies of Bagan, Bukit Mertajam and Batu Kawan. They are all Indians, but they preferred not to be named out of respect for the peace deal that DAP has worked out to end Ramasamy's open spat with party chairman Karpal Singh.

In separate interviews with FMT, they said Indians in the state had benefited little from Penang's achievements since DAP took the reins of the state administration in 2008. As a result, they added, many Indians who voted for Pakatan Rakyat candidates in the last election were now reverting to Barisan Nasional.

Several of them said Ramasamy probably meant well, but was hampered by inexperience, ignorance or the lack support from his aides. They said some of the aides appeared ignorant and arrogant to the grassroots.

They complained that the state had yet to fulfil some of its promises to the Indian community.

"Where is the macro-economic master plan for Penang Indians?" said one.

They alleged that state agencies had not given enough jobs to Indians or provided them with affordable housing.

"Indians are unable to shake off their perception of feeling marginalised. Our graduates do not feel welcome in state-linked companies or in the public sector."

They said BN parties were taking advantage of the situation. One of the critics cited the case of a young graduate who managed to get a job with a state agency only after seeking the intervention of a MCA divisional leader.

Another critic acknowledged that Ramasamy's office did provide funds to Tamil schools but said the officials seemed unaware that some parent-teacher associations had channelled the money to MIC-linked functions.

READ MORE HERE

 

PRU-13: Pakatan S’gor kekal ‘status quo’

Posted: 19 Dec 2011 05:56 PM PST

DAP akan bertanding 15 kerusi, PKR (21) dan PAS (20), sama seperti pada PRU 2008, kata Teresa Kok.

(Free Malaysia Today) - Pakatan Rakyat negeri Selangor bersetuju untuk mengekalkan 'status quo' dalam pembahagian kerusi Dewan Undangan Negeri (Dun) bagi menghadapi Pilihan Raya Umum ke 13 (PRU-13).

'Status quo' yang dipersetujui bersama ialah DAP akan bertanding 15 kerusi, PKR (21) dan PAS (20), sama seperti pada PRU 2008, kata Pengerusi DAP Selangor, Teresa Kok pada sidang media di sini hari ini.

Menjawab mengenai dakwaan rancangan DAP untuk mengambil kerusi Menteri Besar, Teresa menjelaskan bahawa parti yang menang paling banyak kerusi akan diberi keutamaan dan dari 56 kerusi Dun Selangor itu, DAP hanya bertanding 15 kerusi berbanding PKR dan PAS.

"Saya rasa hairan mengapa timbul kata DAP mahu kerusi Menteri Besar, dan daripada pengaruh di Selangor tidak mungkin perkara itu terjadi. Pihak yang menang paling banyak kerusi yang akan diberi keutamaan.

"Tiada perbincangan siapa akan jadi Menteri Besar. Calon (Menteri Besar) pun masih belum boleh ditentukan. Itu pun sekiranya Tan Sri Abdul Khalid Ibrahim tidak mahu menjadi calon dan sebaliknya hanya mahu bertanding kerusi parlimen sahaja," jelas beliau.

READ MORE HERE

 

PKR: Dr M bent on lying

Posted: 19 Dec 2011 05:51 PM PST

PKR claims that it has proof that Mahathir took a loan from the World Bank during the financial crises.

(Free Malaysia Today) - PKR today showed more "evidence" that former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad was lying when he claimed that he did not take any loan from the World Bank to ride out the financial crisis of 1999.

This time, PKR strategy director Rafizi Ramli produced a document from Budget 2010 which listed the nation's foreign debt amount.

"And item 4452 of the document clearly shows that the government took a loan from the World Bank in 1999 for a project termed as Social Sector Support," said Rafizi.

The statement also indicated that Malaysia still owed the World Bank a sum of RM701,040 as of Dec 31, 2008.

Rafizi said that this clearly shows that Mahathir had lied and is continuing to lie by denying his government had ever obtained loans from the World Bank.

On Friday, Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim alleged that Mahathir, despite labelling the former as an agent of the West, had written to the World Bank in 1999 seeking financial aid.

Subsequently, PKR revealed three documents pertaining to a US$60 million loan taken by the Malaysian government from the international bank, when Mahathir denied the claims and challenged Anwar to swear on the Quran over the allegation.

READ MORE HERE

 

Shahrizat’s family owns luxury condo in S’pore?

Posted: 19 Dec 2011 05:34 PM PST

PKR alleges the Umno leader's husband had purchased a unit worth RM10 million last year and questions the source of the funds

(Free Malaysia Today) - Women, Family and Community Development Minister Shahrizat Abdul Jalil's family owns a luxury condominium worth RM10 million in Singapore, PKR alleged today.

Speaking at a press conference at the party headquarters, PKR secretary-general Saifuddin Nasution said that the 2,282 sq ft unit at Anthony Road, Orchard Scotts, was purchased in January 2010, and is registered under her husband Mohamad Salleh Ismail and their children.

However, there is no evidence to suggest that funds to purchase the luxury unit came from the RM250 million in soft loans given by the government for the National Feedlot Corporation (NFC) project.

Also present at the press conference were PKR women chief, Zuraida Kamaruddin, its chief of strategy Rafizi Ramli and PAS central committee member Dzulkefly Ahmad.

Shahrizat and Mohamed Salleh, who is the NFC executive chairman, came under fire from MPs from both sides of the political divide when it was revealed in the 2010 Auditor-General's Report that the NFC was "in a mess".

The opposition alleged that Shahrizat's family had misappropriated the RM250 million of public funds meant for the project to purchase land and luxury items such as a car and condominium units in Bangsar.

They further claimed that the beef produce from the project was channelled to restaurants belonging to Shahrizat's family.

The project was mooted during the reign of then prime minister, Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, to reduce the nation's beef import by 40% by enhancing local beef produce.

Meagre ministerial salary

Saifuddin, who is also Machang MP, said Shahrizat could not have purchased the condominium unit in Singapore with her meagre ministerial salary.

"And her husband, although being Technology Park Malaysia's head, would not have been able to afford it as well as it's not a business entity. So where did the funds come from?" asked Saifuddin.

READ MORE HERE

 

Political frogs thriving within BN, claims Mawan

Posted: 19 Dec 2011 05:26 PM PST

The Sarawak Progressive Democratic Party president claims there are mischievous hands at work within his party.

(Free Malaysia Today) - The turmoil within Sarawak Progressive Democratic Party (SPDP) has not ebbed and its president William Mawan's confession that "political frogs" are "thriving within BN" has further fuelled speculations of covert hands stirring discord within the party.

A jittery Mawan, under pressure to keep his party intact, said: "Their (political frogs') presence is worrying because they are thriving within the BN fold. It is difficult for me to contain it."

Mawan did not name the new breed of 'political frogs' but it is obvious he was referring to some leaders and supporters of Parti Rakyat Sarawak (PRS) which is led by senior state minister, James Masing.

There is no love lost between Mawan and Masing. Both are fighting to win over the confidence of the Dayak community.

Mawan said that these "political frogs" seemed to have dual personalities.

"They would support Barisan Nasional (BN) during the parliamentary election, but would fight against the ruling coalition during the state election.

"I stumbled upon them during the April 10 state election when known supporters of the BN candidate in Julau turned against me.

"I do not know what kind of political ideology these individuals are upholding nor do I know how to deal with them," he told his supporters at Rumah Tuat Bunya in Nanga Wak, Pakan

Mawan snubbed leaders

During the state polls, Mawan was challenged by a Sarawak National Party (SNAP) candidate Jamal Abdullah @ Tedong Ak Gunda.

Jamal was the only candidate, out of 26 SNAP candidates, who did not lose his deposit. Jamal secured 2,741 votes against Mawan's 3,938.

Had Jamal the financial resources and a properly organised campaign, he may have caused an upset in this SPDP stronghold.

Mawan, it is learnt, had snubbed many PRS leaders in his bid to stay in power.

One of them is allegedly Julau MP Joseph Salang Gandum.

Mawan allegedly ignored Salang during the April state election.

The Pakan and Meluan state seats which are controlled by SPDP are within the Julau constituency.

Salang, who is Information, Communication and Heritage Deputy Minister, is tipped to defend his seat in the coming general election.

Like in the 2008 parliamentary election when Mawan and his supporters did not campaign for Salang, it is very likely they will not campaign for him in the next general election.

READ MORE HERE

 

Hasan mahu Saari dirujuk ke Lembaga Disiplin

Posted: 19 Dec 2011 05:23 PM PST

Kenyataan Adun Hulu Kelang itu mengenai penggugurannya di kerusi Gombak Setia merupakan punca kepada tercetusnya polemik.

(Free Malaysia Today) - Bekas Pesuruhjaya PAS Selangor Datuk Dr Hasan Ali menggesa agar Ketua Penerangan PAS Selangor Saari Sungip dirujuk kepada Lembaga Disiplin parti kerana mengeluarkan kenyataan berhubung senarai calon PAS untuk Pilihan Raya Umum 13 (PRU13).

Katanya, kenyataan Ahli Dewan Undangan Negeri (Adun) Hulu Kelang itu mengenai penggugurannya di kerusi Gombak Setia merupakan punca kepada tercetusnya polemik sehingga menyebabkan pergeseran antara pemimpin parti.

"Saya ingin menyarankan supaya pimpinan tertinggi parti mengambil tindakan disiplin terhadap Ketua Penerangan PAS Selangor.

"Beliaulah yang mula menyemaikan bibit perpecahan dikalangan ahli dan penyokong parti. Tindakan beliau jelas tidak menguntungkan parti," katanya dalam sidang media dirumahnya di sini hari ini.

Hasan yang juga Exco Hal Ehwal Agama Islam, Adat-Adat Melayu, Infrastruktur dan Kemudahan Awam Selangor sebaliknya menegaskan bukan dirinya yang menjadi punca kepada timbulnya isu ini, tetapi Saari.

"Saya ingin tegaskan kepada ahli dan penyokong PAS dan kepada sesiapa sahaja bahawa saya bukanlah pihak yang menimbulkan polemik ini.

"Sebaliknya isu ini timbul hasil daripada pengumuman yang dikatakan tidak kena masa dan tempatnya oleh Ketua Penerangan PAS

Selangor mengenai pencalonan nama saya," katanya.

Sehubungan itu, beliau menggesa agar satu siasatan terperinci dibuat ke atas proses pencalonan dan keputusan akhir bilangan pencalonan yang diterimanya di kawasan Gombak seperti yang dibuat oleh PAS kawasan itu.

"Siasatan ini dicadangkan bagi melenyapkan sebarang spekulasi yang timbul berkaitan dengan pencalonan saya," katanya.

READ MORE HERE

 

So, this is Malay leadership

Posted: 19 Dec 2011 09:52 AM PST

I've said this before, and I'll say it again: not all Malays deserve to get the help that the NEP brings. I would hazard a guess that most Malays who live in exclusive neighbourhoods in KL do not need the Bumiputera housing discount, or government scholarships for their offspring. 

Farah Fahmy, The Malaysian Insider

If our politicians are to be believed, the Malays are under threat these days. Our religion, culture and power are steadily under attack from all and sundry. Everyone has it in for us, from Christians to the Chinese. We are even warned about a so-called "Malaysian Spring" being orchestrated by "anasir-anasir Barat" (and quite possibly, the Jews, who of course, have always had it in for us).

"We won't surrender an inch," said the Melayu champion-in-chief (who also finds the time to be our prime minister) during a speech to Pekida recently. Malays, we were told, will never be oppressed in our own land so long as Umno is in power.

Well, glory be. I'm sure there are many others who can sleep more soundly at night knowing that there are so many out there making sure we Malays are not stripped of our position and power in our land.

But ... hang on a minute.

The last time I checked we Malays, along with the other Bumiputeras, make up about 60-odd per cent of our country's population. Islam is not just our country's official religion, it is also the religion professed by about 60 per cent of our people. Not only are we and our religion in the majority, but let's see, we Malays also make up most of, oh, the civil service, police, army, ruling class and politicians. 

Of course, you can say that there are plenty of Malays who still need help. This, I don't dispute. I've seen rural poverty in our country, where people still live without basic amenities like constant water supply and proper toilets. I've also seen urban poverty, with families living in small, low-cost flats in the outskirts of KL making do with the little that they earn.

Yet poor Malays aren't the only ones who need help. There are also plenty of poor people, non-Malays, who deserve help. My brother was once approached by a young Indian man late one evening. He had just arrived from Kulai and asked my brother for help; my brother pointed him in the direction of the nearest kedai mamak.

I've said this before, and I'll say it again: not all Malays deserve to get the help that the NEP brings. I would hazard a guess that most Malays who live in exclusive neighbourhoods in KL do not need the Bumiputera housing discount, or government scholarships for their offspring. 

Are we really throwing away our "power" and "position" if we amended the NEP so that it excluded rich Malays and was open to all of our country's poor, regardless of their race? Yes, Datuk Najib, we've "willingly shared power with the non-Malays" since Merdeka, but why keep harping on the past? Why not share with us your vision for the future?

I should have expected it, but I'm disappointed all the same. Is this what Malay leadership is about? Is there such a dearth of good Malay leaders in Umno that only scare tactics will do? Where is the vision about what the Malays can achieve? Why is no one inspiring us to be better? Why, in fact, is there no Malay leader out there who has the guts to say enough is enough, we Malays will never reach our full potential if we keep harping on about the help that we need? Why is no one honest enough to say that not all Malays are equal, and the haves should no longer receive a handout?

READ MORE HERE

 

I am not part of a plot: Guan Eng

Posted: 19 Dec 2011 09:41 AM PST

(The Sun Daily) - DAP secretary-general Lim Guan Eng today refuted suggestions that he was part of a plot to topple national chairman Karpal Singh.

He said such allegations were ridiculous and that he would not comment on such matters.

"It is ridiculous so I won't comment," he said after he was asked about the issue during a press conference.

It was reported that Penang Gerakan chairman Datuk Dr Teng Hock Nan and Penang People's Progressive Party (PPP) chairman Datuk Dr Loga Bala Mohon had speculated that there was a hidden hand involved in the recent squabble between Karpal and deputy secretary-general Dr P Ramasamy.

Karpal and Ramasamy were involved in a bitter spat following the latter's comment that the party should get rid of "godfathers" within its ranks.

The comment was made in reaction to Karpal's comment that the party did not allow warlords to do whatever they like. This statement was made in response to Ramasamy's announcement in a Tamil paper that he and certain Indian members would be standing in the general election, although the party leadership had yet to make any decision on the matter.

The dispute was resolved after a correction was issued by a Tamil newspaper chief editor for inaccurate reporting on the statement that sparked the row.

Lim also told Teng not to meddle in DAP's internal affairs saying that such speculation was a means to distract the people from the problems faced by Gerakan.

Earlier, Lim, who is also Penang Chief Minister, had declared open the state's first "Friendship Park" in Lebuh Farquhar.

He lauded the opening of the 0.228ha site as a step forward in greening Penang.

He said the park would be used to commemorate visits by foreign mayors via a tree-planting exercise whenever one visited Penang, while the other site in Padang Kota Lama would be reserved for visiting heads of state.

The Penang Island Municipal Council (MPPP) took about two months to complete the RM120,000 landscaping works and have planted 50 variegated Bucida Molineti trees, and a further 30 Bucida Molineti trees.

 

Former DAP leader pushed me, says lawyer

Posted: 19 Dec 2011 09:39 AM PST

(The Star) - A lawyer told a Sessions Court that a former DAP grassroots leader pushed and kicked him outside a courtroom in Northam Tower here.

Lee Khai said the incident involving him and Teh Hock Yong occurred on Nov 29, 2006, on Level 2 of Northam Tower, where the High Courts were located at the time.

Lee Khai, 43, was representing Penang Wanita MCA chief Tan Cheng Liang in a defamation suit against Teh on that day

"The case was called up for mention on the day of the assault. After I left the courtroom, I was approached by reporters seeking details pertaining to the case," said Lee during cross-examination yesterday.

"I was asked by a reporter if Teh was in court. I had not noticed him inside the courtroom, but at that moment I saw him standing a few feet away behind the reporters," said Lee.

Deputy Public Prosecutor Mohd Faisal Md Noor then asked Lee if he had met Teh before.

Lee said he was not sure if he had met him before, but had recognised him from newspaper reports.

Lee said he walked back to Teh to hear what he had to say to repor­­­­ters.

"Instead, he pushed me and I lost my balance and fell on the left side of my body," said Lee, adding that Teh also kicked him.

Teh's offence under Section 323 of the Penal Code carries a maximum one year's jail or a fine not exceeding RM2,000 or both upon conviction.

Magistrate Siti Salwa set Jan 19 and 20 for further hearing.

 

Anwar merely blowing hot air

Posted: 19 Dec 2011 09:35 AM PST

Chew Lian Keng 

Opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim only knows how to make empty promises, and his most recent promise to shut down the Lynas rare earth plant in Kuantan if Pakatan Rakyat takes over the federal government is merely lip service as Pakatan Rakyat is unable to honour their promises.

Before the 2008 General Elections, Anwar had paid a visit to Kampung Buah Pala and had promised to prevent their village from being demolished. He told the people there that as long as Pakatan Rakyat gains control of Penang, regardless of whether it is DAP or PKR, they will appoint a Chinese as the Penang Chief Minister and that within 2 weeks of taking office, a representative will come to Kampung Buah Pala to look into their problems.

The video of Anwar making such promises has been widely circulated, but in the end, Kampung Buah Pala was demolished anyway despite pleas from the villagers.

Anwar likes to simply make promises, but at the end of the day, these promises are not fulfilled and some have even been proven fake such as when Anwar had declared that Pakatan Rakyat will be able to take over the federal government on September 16, 2008. In the end he became the laughing stock of the political community.

Also, when PAS criticized Anwar for saying that Lim Kit Siang can be the Deputy Prime Minister, he quickly retracted his statement.

This shows that Anwar only makes promises for his own political purposes, thus he does not put too much focus on achieving what he has promised, and when the time comes, Anwar will abandon the voters and his promises to them.

Cancelling the Lynas contract is easier said than done, as thousands of issues must be looked into first.

Therefore, the people must consider Anwar's promises and decide if he is really concern for the people or is he merely blowing hot air.

CHEW LIAN KENG is MCA Youth Federal Territory Chairman

 

PETRONAS tamat taja Ariff Alfian

Posted: 19 Dec 2011 09:23 AM PST

(Berita Harian) - PETRONAS menamatkan penajaan Ariff Alfian Rosli, bekas pelajar yang didakwa berkahwin dengan pasangan sejenis di Dublin, Ireland, berdasarkan keputusan dan pencapaian akademik tidak memuaskan yang melanggar syarat perjanjian pinjaman.

Dalam satu kenyataan media yang dikeluarkan semalam, Jabatan Perhubungan Media, Bahagian Hal-Ehwal Korporat Kumpulan PETRONAS, syarikat itu memutuskan sedemikian pada Januari 2009.

PETRONAS sekali gus mengesahkan Ariff Alfian adalah bekas pelajar tajaannya di bawah skim Pinjaman Pelajaran Boleh Ubah Petronas bermula September 2001 untuk mengikuti kursus A-Level dan seterusnya melanjutkan pengajian peringkat ijazah perubatan di United Kingdom.

"Setelah menamatkan kursus A-Level, Ariff Alfian memohon dan diterima memasuki University College Dublin. Sepanjang tempoh pengajian di Dublin, Ariff Alfian tidak pernah menghadiri sesi perbincangan berkala dengan Penasihat Pelajar PETRONAS dan tidak membalas sebarang emel serta panggilan telefon walaupun banyak usaha dibuat untuk berhubung dengan beliau."

"PETRONAS sudah mengadakan beberapa perbincangan berkaitan perkembangan akademik dan penajaan beliau dengan bapa beliau, Rosli Haron. Salah satu perbincangan ini bertempat di Dublin dan dihadiri sendiri oleh Ariff Alfian dan bapanya," menurut kenyataan itu.

Bagaimanapun, menurut kenyataan itu lagi, Pegawai Penasihat Pelajar PETRONAS sentiasa berhubung dengan Kedutaan Malaysia di Dublin apabila menyedari Ariff Alfian tidak pulang ke Malaysia selepas penajaannya ditamatkan, kerana bimbang terhadap keselamatan dan status beliau di Ireland.

Pada Mei 2009, PETRONAS mengeluarkan notis tuntutan bayaran balik pinjaman berkenaan kepada Ariff Alfian dan penjaminnya mengikut peraturan serta syarat perjanjian yang sudah ditetapkan dan juga dipersetujui oleh kesemua pihak.

"Sehubungan itu, perbincangan juga sudah diadakan dengan penjamin pada pertengahan tahun ini mengenai pembayaran balik pinjaman berkenaan. Sehingga kini, PETRONAS masih belum menerima sebarang maklum balas mengenai perkara itu, walaupun surat peringatan sudah dihantar pada 6 Disember lalu.

"Adalah penting bagi PETRONAS menerima pembayaran balik pinjaman ini untuk dimasukkan semula ke dalam dana penajaan pengajian tinggi bagi keperluan bakal pelajar tajaan PETRONAS pada masa hadapan," menurut kenyataan itu.

 

Neither DAP nor PAS respects Azmin

Posted: 19 Dec 2011 08:50 AM PST

PKR must find within its ranks a leader they can trust implicitly.

And so I tell Anwar this: "If I know that PAS and DAP will not accept Azmin as leader of PKR, is it not time that you take cognizance of their stand and fall into line with this consensus too?"

CT Ali, Free Malaysia Today

Last week, I wrote that PKR must ready itself to lead the opposition Pakatan Rakyat with or without Anwar Ibrahim. The operative word I said was "ready itself".

There are now within PKR three people who can do this (lead PKR): Azmin Ali, Saifuddin Nasution Ismail and Nurul Izzah Anwar.

Three candidates without any common ground between them that would enable them to work together as one for the good of PKR and Pakatan Rakyat.

So PKR must choose one.

First we talk about Azmin. Azmin is Anwar's choice.

I am not going to go into Anwar's reason for doing so because my business is not to second-guess him.

My business is to tell Anwar and you all why we should or should not agree with what Anwar wants to do.

Remember what I have said before: "Where does our responsibility to Anwar end and our responsibility to PKR and Pakatan start?"

It starts when I believe that Anwar has made a decision that will harm PKR and Pakatan.

Anwar must defer to views

When Anwar chose to endorse Azmin overtly or covertly, then PKR and we will have to decide if what he did was right.

My stand is very simple. PAS will not accept Azmin as leader of PKR. DAP will not accept Azmin as leader of PKR.

You and I should defer to the wisdom and experience of Tok Guru (Nik Aziz Nik Mat), Abdul Hadi Awang, Lim Kit Siang and Karpal Singh.

And so I tell Anwar this: "If I know that PAS and DAP will not accept Azmin as leader of PKR, is it not time that you take cognizance of their stand and fall into line with this consensus too?"

"To do otherwise would only harm what you want for PKR and Pakatan Rakyat. It is enough that PAS said in no uncertain terms that Zaid Ibrahim is back within Pakatan Rakyat's fold. Now will they have to tell you that they want Azmin out?"

Second comes Saifuddin

Saifuddin is a good man loyal to Anwar. What we can hope for is that his loyalty to Anwar will see him do what is best for PKR no matter what his personal preferences are.

I doubt that he will have the stomach to immerse himself totally in the cut and thrust of PKR's politics but if push comes to shove, Saifuddin will do what is best for Anwar.

And what is best for Anwar is a strong and cohesive PKR!

We are now left with Nurul Izzah. And what a choice she is for us! Nurul Izzah is a riot of possibilities.

Let's look at her pluses.

She carries the goodwill of many of our young people and that of many women in Malaysia with her decision to go into politics.

The others will give her room to develop politically and are not overly critical of her too tentative foray into Malaysian politics – but the clock is ticking.

Her greatest strength is the potential and promise she exudes to do good in politics.

But has she got what it takes to do what her father has done in the face of adversity?

Does she have the ability to stand and fight when all is lost and what is left is only belief in yourself to do what you know is right?

Will she stand up to Azmin and Saifuddin if they stand in her way?

Nurul Izzah is still to be tried and tested in the cut and thrust of politics as it is done in Malaysia.

READ MORE HERE

 

Pekida: There’s no IC scam

Posted: 19 Dec 2011 08:47 AM PST

(The Star) - A Sabah businessman has warned that any attempt to probe claims of foreigners getting dubious identification documents would cause a backlash.

Datu Mohd Akjan Datu Moha­­m­mad said any investi­ga­tion thro­­­ugh the formation of a Royal Com­mission of Inquiry (RCI) would lead to misunderstandings, hatred and disunity among the ethnic groups in the state.

Speaking as Islamic Welfare and Sermon Organisation of Malaysia (Pekida) Sabah chairman, Mohd Akjan said the group believed the repeated calls for such a probe were selfish and politically-motivated acts to undermine and incite hatred against the present Barisan Nasional-led government.

"All these are being done without any consideration for the sentiment of the ethnic groups in Sabah," said Mohd Akjan who caused an uproar a year ago by accepting an offer to become the 33rd Sultan of the southern Philippine province of Sulu.

He said the ethnic communities here, including the Bajau, Suluk, Bugis, Chinese, Indians, Pakistanis and Arabs had obtained their citizenship through legitimate means.

Mohd Akjan said the Govern­ment had the prerogative to issue citizenship to those who had fulfilled the various criteria and requirements stipulated in the Federal Constitution.

A Sabah MCA division has called for an RCI to probe widespread allegations of foreigners getting identification documents through dubious means.

In making the call, Penampang MCA deputy chief Robert Chin Swee Ming said the issue was linked to Sabah's population explosion over the past decades.

Chin said Sabah's population experienced an abnormal growth from 648,000 in 1970 to more than 2.6 million or 301% in 2000 compared with Sarawak's growth of 106% from 976,000 during the same period.

 

Dr Hasan and Khalid to face media and explain ongoing feud

Posted: 19 Dec 2011 08:45 AM PST

(The Star) - It promises to be a hot day in PAS with two opposing factions set to present their case to the media today as an ongoing feud reaches a new high.

The controversial Datuk Dr Hasan Ali, a Selangor executive councillor and former state par­ty commissioner, is sche­duled to meet the media at his home in Taman Tun Dr Ismail at 11am.

At about the same time, PAS central committee member and Shah Alam MP Khalid Samad (pic) will hold court with the media on issues involving Dr Hasan.

Khalid, a staunch critic of Dr Hasan, will be accompanied by several Selangor Pakatan Rakyat leaders.

Dr Hasan was initially expected to meet the media yesterday to respond to allegations levelled against him by secretary-general Datuk Mustafa Ali and others in the party in relation to his proposal for PAS-Umno unity talks.

Dr Hasan said that he intended to put everything in the "right perspective", stressing his loyalty to PAS.

Despite his criticisms, Khalid said that Dr Hasan should remain in the party and urged the latter to be a team player.

Mustafa has reiterated the party's stand that PAS was not inte­rested in unity talks with Umno and that Dr Hasan was never entrusted to pursue such an agenda.

For Dr Hasan, maintaining his stance is unlikely to earn him more support beyond the handful who are on his side such as Youth chief Nasrudin Hassan and former deputy president Nasharudin Mat Isa.

The question now is whether or not the party's top leadership will finally decide if they should act against Dr Hasan for going against the party line, and what the latter says today is expected to have a big impact.

 

Boo Chang asks party to clear allegations instead of attacking him

Posted: 19 Dec 2011 08:43 AM PST

(The Star) - Former PKR division leader Lim Boo Chang wants PKR to answer his allegations about the party's poor governance instead of attacking him personally over his decision to exit the party last week.

Lim, who quit as the Bukit Gelugor PKR division head and Penang Municipal councillor last week, said among the reasons he quit the party was his misgivings over the controversial RM300mil subterranean Penang Interna­tional Convention and Exhibition Centre (sPICE) project.

"I am also upset over the alleged interference of the state government in the administration of MPPP," he added.

Instead, Lim said he was lambasted with claims by state PKR leaders that he was only interested in contesting a seat in the next general election.

"Let me stress here that I left PKR because they failed to function effectively as a political organisation.

"It is not about me wanting a seat in the next election," he said.

Lim said it was his division that nominated him to contest either the Sungai Nibong state seat or the Nibong Tebal parliamentary seat.

On claims that he was a "serial" party hopper, Lim said he was a victim of circumstances.

"I am a principled person who leaves a party if I feel quitting is the best option when the party is no longer able to be honest with itself."

Lim, 56, a former Gerakan vice-president, quit to join MCA before joining PKR in 2007.

In 2009, he defeated Batu Uban assemblyman S. Raveentharan for the Bukit Gelugor PKR division chairman's post and was a two-term Datuk Keramat assemblyman under Gerakan and MCA.

"PKR has fallen into the trap of growing-up pains.

"The steep learning curve is difficult for them, but they are not helping themselves."

He claimed that the internal level of politicking in PKR was more intense than Barisan Nasional.

 

Frog drawing stirs curiosity

Posted: 19 Dec 2011 08:42 AM PST

(The Star) - A pencil drawing of a frog was found at the place where former PKR member Lim Boo Chang was believed to have sat as Penang Municipal Councillor at the City Hall building in Esplanade.

However, Lim, who sent his resignation letters to PKR president Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail and Penang Municipal Council president Patahiyah Ismail on Wednesday, said he was not bothered by it.

A group of reporters saw the drawing after covering a full council meeting yesterday and approached Patahiyah, who denied that the council was responsible for it.

"We do not know who put or drew the frog but it has nothing to do with the council," she said.

Croaking loud: The frog drawing found at the seat supposedly used by Lim.

Lim, who used to be in Gerakan before moving to MCA and subsequently PKR, applied to re-join Gerakan on Thursday.

When contacted, Lim said he was not bothered about what had happened in the council.

"I am no longer a councillor and not in control of what has happened.

"I am also not interested in what happened during the meeting," he said.

 

Chua Soi Lek: there are only 20% Chinese-majority seats

Posted: 19 Dec 2011 08:36 AM PST

(The Star) - Barisan Nasional is the better choice to serve the Chinese community, Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek said.

The MCA president said that although Barisan was not perfect, the Prime Minister had a clear direction in developing the country through transformation programmes, unlike the Opposition coalition.

"There are fewer than 46 Chinese-majority seats in this country.

"Even if we win all the seats, it is impossible to form a government.

"We must work with other parties including Malay-based parties," Dr Chua said, urging the people to choose Barisan.

He was addressing about 5,000 people, a majority of whom were Chinese, at a dinner organised by the Muhibah Kimlan Association here on Sunday night.

He said Pakatan Rakyat, led by PAS, was only interested in making Malaysia a theocratic nation governed by hudud laws.

"The people think Pakatan is led by Anwar (PKR advisor Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim).

"But in actual fact it is PAS which leads the coalition, because it has more experience, resources and a larger membership," Dr Chua said.

He also said the Chinese should throw their support behind the Government's Economic Transfor­mation Programme (ETP).

"The ETP is primarily led by the private sector, which will definitely affect the Chinese community," said Dr Chua.

He added that the Government had achieved at least 90% of its foreign investment target in 2011.

The dinner was held to celebrate the completion of the association's new headquarters here.

Dr Chua also announced a donation of RM200,000 from MCA to the association's development fund.

 

'Anwar running out of ammo'

Posted: 19 Dec 2011 08:16 AM PST

(New Straits Times) - Opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim should resign from politics if he is adamant on attacking former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, said an independent member of parliament.

Bayan Baru MP Datuk Seri Zahrain Mohamed Hashim said Anwar, who is Parti Keadilan Rakyat de facto leader, had ran out of ammunition in his latest attempt to smear the former Umno president.

"Anwar should stop dragging the people and the country (through the mud) in settling his grudge against Dr Mahathir, who retired from politics long ago.

"What Anwar is doing is politicising a non-issue.

"He is manipulating the minds of the people, especially young voters, who do not know the true history of what had happened during the economic crisis," said Zahrain yesterday.

He said if Anwar wanted to settle his grudge and if he really had evidence, then he should have taken Dr Mahathir to court.

 

Hasan to reveal plans today

Posted: 19 Dec 2011 08:14 AM PST

(New Straits Times) - Former Selangor Pas commissioner Datuk Hasan Ali is expected to reveal his future plans within the party today.

He called for a press conference at noon in his home here in the wake of run-ins with the party leadership.

The standoff started when it was reported that he was the only politician to be awarded a Datukship by the Selangor sultan in conjunction with his birthday.

Just two days before the award ceremony, Selangor Pas information chief Shaari Sungib said Hasan might not be nominated to defend his Gombak Setia state seat as the latter had not received enough nominations from the party branches.

Following this, Hasan declared that he was loyal only to Allah.

He said that by championing Islam, the Malay struggle and defending the institution of Malay rulers was the bigger agenda.

Hasan said that he was prepared to take up an offer from Umno president Datuk Seri Najib Razak to mediate in efforts to bring Pas and Umno together.

 

Mat Sabu’s trial postponed

Posted: 19 Dec 2011 08:13 AM PST

(New Straits Times) - The Sessions Court yesterday postponed to Jan 30 the trial of Pas deputy president Mohamad Sabu charged with criminal defamation against policemen and their families who were attacked by communists in Bukit Kepong more than 60 years ago.

Judge Ikmal Hisnan granted the postponement pending a defence application at the Penang High Court to strike out the charge.

The application is scheduled to be heard at the High Court on Jan 30.

Deputy public prosecutor Yusaini Amer, who represented the prosecution,   did not object to the application.

Lawyer Amirul Fairuzzeen Jamaluddin, who represented Mohamad,   popularly known as Mat Sabu, 57, said  outside the court that the case should not proceed as it involved the deceased — namely policemen and their family members.

"The trial will create adverse implications on the interpretation of history, resulting in a long-term polemic,"   said Amirul.

Mat Sabu   arrived at the court complex about 9am  accompanied by his lawyers.

He is charged with criminal defamation against 25 policemen and their families who were attacked by communists in Bukit Kepong.

In the massacre at the Bukit Kepong police station, communists killed 13 policemen, six Home Guards, three women and a child.

Mat Sabu  is alleged to have committed the offence during a rally in front of a kindergarten at the Pas education centre at Padang Menora in Tasek Gelugor, Penang, on Aug 21.

 

Calon PRU-13 tak boleh tarik diri

Posted: 19 Dec 2011 08:05 AM PST

Masa sejam selepas penamaan calon kemuka bantahan turut dimansuh

(BERITA HARIAN) -- Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya (SPR) memutuskan seseorang yang sudah dicalonkan tidak lagi diberi tempoh tiga hari untuk menarik diri melainkan pegawai pengurus pilihan raya sendiri membatalkannya kerana calon berkenaan tidak layak berdasarkan peruntukan Perkara 48 Perlembagaan Persekutuan. 

Pengerusi Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya (SPR), Tan Sri Abdul Aziz Yusof, berkata keputusan itu adalah antara 10 perkara yang disyorkan dan dipersetujui dalam perjumpaan antara SPR dengan Jawatankuasa Pilihan Khas Berhubung Penambahbaikan Proses Pilihan Raya di Pulau Pinang pada 15 Disember lalu.

"Selaras keputusan itu, tempoh sejam selepas penamaan calon yang diperuntukkan bagi calon mengemukakan bantahan berhubung kelayakan pencabar masing-masing juga dimansuhkan di bawah pindaan Peraturan-Peraturan (Perjalanan Pilihan Raya) Pilihan Raya 1981," katanya pada satu sidang media, di sini, semalam.

Mengenai dakwat kekal, beliau berkata dakwat kekal 'silver nitrate' akan digunakan pada Pilihan Raya Umum Ke-13 (PRU13).

Abdul Aziz berkata, dakwat itu adalah berlainan dengan dakwat kekal yang disyorkan pada Pilihan Raya Umum 2008, tetapi tidak digunakan ketika itu selepas keberkesanan kaedah itu dipersoalkan pelbagai pihak.

Beliau berkata, dakwat kekal yang mengandungi 'silver nitrate' itu telah dihantar ke Jabatan Kimia pada 9 Disember untuk diteliti kandungan dan kesesuaiannya digunakan di negara ini dan seterusnya akan dihantar ke Majlis Fatwa Kebangsaan untuk memastikan ia sesuai digunakan orang Islam.

"Dakwat itu juga dihantar ke Kementerian Kesihatan untuk memastikan ia tidak menjejaskan kesihatan pengguna secara umum," katanya.

Beliau berkata, sekiranya contoh dakwat kekal yang dipilih ini tidak sesuai, SPR ada banyak lagi negara sumber sebagai alternatif, termasuk pengeluar dakwat kekal yang diiktiraf selamat dan suci dicalit pada jari pengundi beragama Islam, yang tidak membatalkan wuduk atau sembahyang.

"SPR kini sedang buat persiapan dari segi perolehan untuk mendapatkan dakwat kekal dan menguruskan latihan selepas peraturan berkaitan dipinda kerana SPR perlu sediakan tatacara penggunaan dakwat kekal ini," katanya.

Bercakap mengenai pengundi awal pula, beliau berkata ia hanya dikhususkan untuk anggota tentera dan Pasukan Gerak Am (PGA) dengan pasangan masing-masing serta polis.

"Pasangan anggota polis tidak dibenarkan mengundi awal kerana dianggap tidak akan menghadapi kesulitan mengunjungi pusat mengundi," katanya.

Abdul Aziz menjangkakan, undian awal ini akan membabitkan lebih 200,000 anggota pasukan keselamatan yang layak manakala hanya sebilangan kecil saja menggunakan undi pos dan pihaknya sedang mempertimbangkan sama ada kemudahan yang sama boleh dipanjangkan kepada pihak lain seperti kakitangan SPR serta anggota media.

Beliau berkata, pindaan Peraturan-Peraturan (Perjalanan Pilihan Raya) Pilihan Raya itu, termasuk pengundian awal, penggunaan dakwat kekal dan memansuhkan kebenaran untuk calon menarik diri atau membuat bantahan, hanya perlu dibentangkan di Dewan Rakyat dan diluluskan tanpa dibahas kerana hanya membabitkan peraturan, bukan undang-undang.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved