Rabu, 21 Disember 2011

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Change in government, not change of government (UPDATED with Chinese Translation)

Posted: 18 Dec 2011 10:52 AM PST

Pakatan Rakyat needs to know that we are not stupid or naïve and we know what is going on. This does not mean we will not support them and will instead support Barisan Nasional. But Pakatan Rakyat will have to earn our support and not take us for granted or assume that we are fools. This is the message we have to send to Pakatan Rakyat.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

Three days ago I completed my Oxford course, Philosophy of Religion. I will know in two weeks or so whether I passed or not. On 1 February 2012, my new course, Age of Revolution, will commence. This course is about the transformation and reformation (meaning: revolutions) in Europe from the period of the French Revolution to the First World War.

I have two textbooks to read, which I am already halfway through, and even before I start the course I can already see many parallels with what happened more than 200 years ago with what is happening today.

The article below, Talk to us, not talk at us, by Thomas L Friedman, which was published in the New Straits Times, makes interesting reading. This article also summarises some of what I have read thus far.

Basically, (pre-empting what my course is going to reveal), many of these revolutions are bottom-up rather than top-down events. Another 1,000-page book I read a couple of months ago about the French and Russian Revolutions appear to reveal the same thing.

Furthermore, it revealed that revolutions are started by the masses and not by political leaders (and succeeds only when critical mass is reached) but are eventually hijacked by politicians. For example, Trotsky, Lenin, Stalin, etc., did not mastermind the revolution. They grabbed power once the revolution started. In fact, some of the so-called leaders were actually in exile outside Russia and came home to take over once the revolution succeeded in ousting the government (remember Khomeini as well?).

Another point would be about the transformation or reformation itself. What the people seek is change. And the route they chose is to change the government. But in the end they did not actually see change. Hence the title of my article today: Change in government, not change of government.

And that is what we should seek. We should learn from more than 200 years of history. And the lesson is: we may see a change of government but that does not mean we are going to see a change in government. This is what I normally call old wine in a new bottle.

Can we be assured that by changing the government we will see change? Can a change of government guarantee us a change in government? Can more than 200 years of history be wrong?

Well, just look at the so-called changes of recent times such as in Iran in 1979. Did the US see change with Obama at the helm? Did Britain see a change when they kicked out Labour last year?

Look at Egypt. The people took to the Tahrir Square to force a change of government. But they did not see a change in government. So now they are taking to the Tahrir Square again and the killings are continuing, barely a few months since the last revolution.

And this is the history of the French Revolution as well. We always talk about the French Revolution of 1789. But how many of you know that that is actually the First French Revolution. And that revolution was a disaster. There was more anarchy and chaos after the revolution. They needed a second revolution to address the errors that the first revolution brought. But no one talks about the Second French Revolution of 60 years later (in fact, many are not even aware of this second revolution).

I am not gungho about Pakatan Rakyat. That does not mean I am gungho about Barisan Nasional either. It is just that I am not gungho about all politicians who use the people to change governments and then grab power and perpetuate what the old government did.

Over the next few months I am going to demonstrate why we need to focus on a change in government and not a change of government. I am going to reveal the excesses and transgressions of those who are offering themselves as the saviour of the nation.

My purpose in doing this is not to frustrate a change of government. Certainly, ABU must happen. So we need a change of government for that to happen. But we must not only remove Umno (and its cohorts in Barisan Nasional). We must also ensure that the spirit of Umno is removed as well.

Why would we want a new government that perpetuates the spirit of Umno? Is this not what Britain is currently facing? And why do you think the British voters are going back to voting for Labour in the by-elections barely a year into a new government? My own area in Manchester fell back to Labour in the recent by-election.

I have evidence of some very troubling shenanigans in the states currently under Pakatan Rakyat control. And what I see is basically a continuation of the spirit of Umno. But are you, like me, also concerned about this? Or would you rather we close our eyes (and our minds) to all this and pretend that nothing is wrong?

As I said, more than 200 years of history has taught us how changing the government without focusing on a change in government can bring about disastrous results. We have more than 200 years of history (plus what is currently going on in Egypt) to learn from.

Pakatan Rakyat needs to know that we are not stupid or naïve and we know what is going on. This does not mean we will not support them and will instead support Barisan Nasional. But Pakatan Rakyat will have to earn our support and not take us for granted or assume that we are fools. This is the message we have to send to Pakatan Rakyat.

And if Pakatan Rakyat continues to be just like Barisan Nasional in the states they are running, how can we trust them as the new federal government? Will we need to do a Tahrir Square Version 2.0 later after voting them into Putrajaya?

That is what we wish to avoid. So Pakatan Rakyat has to accept the whacking. It is better we whack them now than the voters whack them at the ballot box.

I know there will be allegations of selling out, turncoat, Trojan horse and whatnot. But that is how they normally respond when we whack the opposition leaders. They regard criticising the opposition leaders as if we are insulting Prophet Muhammad. But then the opposition leaders are not Prophet Muhammad and above criticism. This, they need to learn and we shall teach them this lesson how much it may hurt.

***************************************

Talk to us, not talk at us
By Thomas L Friedman, New Straits Times

THE historian Walter Russell Mead recently noted that after the 1990s revolution that collapsed the Soviet Union, Russians had a saying that seems particularly apt today: "It's easier to turn an aquarium into fish soup than to turn fish soup into an aquarium".

Indeed, from Europe to the Middle East, and maybe soon even to Russia and Asia, a lot of aquariums are being turned into fish soup all at once. But turning them back into stable societies and communities will be one of the great challenges of our time.

We are present again at one of those great unravellings -- just like after World War 1, World War 2 and the Cold War. But this time, there was no war. All of these states have been pulled down from within -- without warning. Why?

The main driver, I believe, is the merger of globalisation and the information technology revolution. Both achieved a critical mass in the first decade of the 21st century that has resulted in the democratisation -- all at once -- of so many things that neither weak states nor weak companies can stand up against.

We've seen the democratisation of information, where everyone is now a publisher; the democratisation of war-fighting, where individuals became super-empowered (enough so, in the case of al-Qaeda, to take on a superpower); the democratisation of innovation, wherein start-ups using free open-source software and "the cloud" can challenge global companies.

And, finally, we've seen what Mark Mykleby, a retired Marine colonel and former adviser to the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, calls "the democratisation of expectations" -- the expectation that all individuals should be able to participate in shaping their own career, citizenship and future, and not be constricted.

I've been struck by how similar the remarks by Russians about Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, who just basically reappointed himself president, are to those I heard from Egyptians about Hosni Mubarak, who kept reappointing himself president.

The Egyptian writer Alaa al-Aswany said to me that Egyptians resented the idea that Mubarak would just hand power to his son Gamal as if the Egyptian people "were chickens", who could be passed by a leader to his son.

Last Sunday, a New York Times article from Moscow quoted the popular, imprisoned Russian blogger Aleksei Navalny as saying: "We are not cattle or slaves. We have voices and votes and the power to uphold them."

"The days of leading countries or companies via a one-way conversation are over," says Dov Seidman, the chief executive officer of LRN and the author of the book How.

"The old system of 'command and control' -- using carrots and sticks -- to exert power over people is fast being replaced by 'connect and collaborate' -- to generate power through people."

Leaders and managers cannot just impose their will, adds Seidman. "Now you have to have a two-way conversation that connects deeply with your citizens or customers or employees."

Netflix had a one-way conversation about raising prices with its customers, who instantly self-organised; some 800,000 bolted, and the stock plunged.

Bank of America had a one-way conversation about charging a US$5 (RM16) fee on debit cards, and its customers forced the  bank to reverse itself and apologise.

Putin thought he had power over his people and could impose whatever he wanted and is now being forced into a conversation to justify staying in power. Coca-Cola repackaged its flagship soft drink in white cans for the holidays. But an outcry of "blasphemy" from consumers forced Coke to switch back from white cans to red cans in a week. Last year, Gap ditched its new logo after a week of online backlash by customers.

A lot of CEOs will tell you that this shift has taken them by surprise, and they are finding it hard to adjust to the new power relationships with customers and employees.

"As power shifts to individuals," argues Seidman, "leadership itself must shift with it -- from coercive or motivational leadership that uses sticks or carrots to extract performance and allegiance out of people to inspirational leadership that inspires commitment and innovation and hope in people".

The role of the leader now is to get the best of what is coming up from below and then meld it with a vision from above. Are you listening, Mr Putin?

This kind of leadership is especially critical today, adds Seidman, "when people are creating a lot of 'freedom from' things -- freedom from oppression or whatever system is in their way -- but have not yet scaled the values and built the institutional frameworks that enable 'freedom to' -- freedom to build a career, a business or a meaningful life."

One can see this vividly in Egypt, where the bottom-up democracy movement was strong enough to oust Mubarak but now faces the long, arduous process of building new institutions and writing a new social contract from a democracy coalition that encompass Muslim Brothers, Christian liberals, Muslim liberals, the army and ultraconservative Muslim Salafis.

Getting all those fish back and swimming together in one aquarium will be no small task -- one that will take a courageous and special leader. Help wanted.
 

Updated with Chinese Translation at: http://ccliew.blogspot.com/2011/12/blog-post_21.html

 

Between friends, comrades and acquaintances (UPDATED with Chinese Translation)

Posted: 14 Dec 2011 12:18 PM PST

Opposition supporters demonstrate a very low level of maturity. They allow their thinking to be clouded by emotions. We need to be pragmatic. Support the cause by all means. The cause is what matters. But leaders are dispensable. Leaders come and go. The cause remains.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

Back in the days when I used to do business (that would be pre-1995) I had a 'guiding light'. I do not do business with people I socialise with and I do not socialise with people I do business with. I keep my friends and my business acquaintances separate.

I did, however, break that rule a number of times. I did business with some friends and each time I got screwed big time. I lost quite a bit of money and that was when I got so disgusted I decided to call it quits in 1995 and thereafter focused fulltime on my real passion, writing. Well, only friends can screw you because only friends are able to exploit your trust.

I suppose the saying 'the surest way to lose a friend is to lend him money' holds true here. That is why whenever a friend wants to borrow money I just give him a portion of what he asks for and tell him that it is a gift, not a loan. And then I just write off the amount. Better that than you never get the money back and lose a friend in the process.

The same goes for political comrades. I separate the 'rakan seperjuangan' (comrades of the same struggle) from friends. Of course, there are exceptions to the rule. For example, Haris Ibrahim, the President of the Malaysian Civil Liberties Movement (MCLM) is both a comrade and a friend (plus my lawyer as well). But (Sam) Haris, as I said, is the exception.

Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad is my friend. But he is not my rakan seperjuangan though. Dr Mahathir's struggle is to ensure that Umno stays in power while mine is ABU (Anything But Umno).

I know, at this point some of you are going to start foaming at the mouth and scream: how can I regard Dr Mahathir as a friend after what he did to Malaysia? Well, as I said, we differ on ideology but that does not mean I can't take him as a friend, and vice versa.

When I was detained under the Internal Security Act (ISA) in September 2008, Dr Mahathir made a public statement condemning my detention. He was most upset that the government detained me, whom Dr Mahathir said, is just a Blogger and not a threat to national security.

When the court released me in November 2008, Dr Mahathir phoned me. He wanted to know how I was and, understandably, I was pleased that the ex-Prime Minister took the trouble to phone me on the day of my release.

No one else phoned me, not one of the opposition leaders, not even Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim (Ronnie Liu and Saari Sungib did come to see me though). They could not be bothered about me although I was detained because I was doing the work of the opposition. Dr Mahathir, however, phoned me to ask how I was. Under those circumstances how can I not regard Dr Mahathir as a friend?

Another person who spoke up for me when I was detained was Datuk Zaid Ibrahim. In fact, Zaid not only spoke up for me but he even resigned from his post as Minister in protest of my detention. Name me one Barisan Nasional minister who would resign from his/her post out of protest for detaining his/her friend. Most would rather distant themselves from their friend to ensure their political survival. Zaid, instead, sacrificed his political career for a friend.

Again, just like many can't understand why I regard Dr Mahathir as a friend, they also can't understand why I support Zaid, whom they regard as a traitor to the opposition cause. Nevertheless, while I regard Zaid as my friend, I refused to join his political party (which hurt his feelings, I know).

When I had to leave the country to avoid a third detention under the ISA, Zaid flew to Manchester to meet me. He even took me to a football match at the Old Trafford (Manchester United versus Sunderland). When I flew to Bangkok in January this year, Zaid came over to meet me and to buy me dinner. Last week, he, again, flew to Bangkok to meet up with me and to spend some time with me.

The other friends who went to Manchester (three times over three years) to meet me were Tan Sri Sanusi Junid and Mat Sabu of PAS. Mat Sabu even slept in my house and his purpose for going to Manchester was for no other reason other than to meet me and to spend time with me.

Sanusi Junid even phoned me on Hari Raya day to wish me 'Selamat Hari Hari'. I am not a rakan seperjuang of Sanusi. Just like Dr Mahathir, Sanusi's perjuangan is Umno and mine is ABU. But he calls me on Hari Raya day to wish me 'Selamat Hari Raya' while none of the opposition leaders would do that (or even members of the Selangor Royal Family).

Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz and quite a number of Umno leaders are my friends. Many Umno Bloggers are my friends. A few of the MCA, Gerakan and PPP leaders are also my friends. All these people meet me when they are in the UK and also phone me from time to time.

Okay, I have talked about Dr Mahathir, Zaid, Sanusi, Mat Sabu, Nazri Aziz and all those others. You are probably by now wondering: what about Anwar Ibrahim? What is Anwar to me?

Well, Anwar is the Opposition Leader. So I support Anwar because I am pro-opposition and Anwar is the Opposition Leader. But he is not my friend. He is not my friend because he has not demonstrated friendship like Dr Mahathir, Zaid, Sanusi, Mat Sabu, Nazri Aziz, etc., have.

But that is all Anwar is to me, my rakan seperjuangan, nothing more. And don't expect me to demonstrate loyalty to Anwar as a friend would because he has not shown me that he is my friend like Dr Mahathir, Zaid, Sanusi, Mat Sabu, Nazri Aziz, etc., have.

Some say I am too critical towards Anwar. Actually, I have been holding back. You have not seen how critical I can be if I really wanted to. I do not want to go all out to criticise Anwar because too many people will take this criticism as a sell out or an act treacherous to the opposition cause.

The trouble is: people expect me to suck Anwar's dick to prove my loyalty to the opposition cause. Why must the opposition cause be tied to Anwar? The opposition cause is the opposition cause and Anwar is Anwar. They are two different issues and should not be packaged as one issue.

This, many can't seem to understand. They think that since you support the opposition then you must also support Anwar. I support PAS as well. Does that mean I must also support Hasan Ali? Can't I oppose Hasan Ali while supporting PAS?

Opposition supporters demonstrate a very low level of maturity. They allow their thinking to be clouded by emotions. We need to be pragmatic. Support the cause by all means. The cause is what matters. But leaders are dispensable. Leaders come and go. The cause remains.

The million-dollar question is: is Anwar the only Malaysian out of 28 million Malaysians who can lead the opposition? I think not. You mean out of 28 million Malaysians we can't find a replacement to Anwar? How come Anwar has been made so indispensable?

Anwar is most likely going to jail. He is most likely going to jail because he may be convicted of sodomy. Never mind if Anwar is or is not guilty or whether Anwar is a victim of a political conspiracy. That no longer matters. What matters is, who is going to lead the opposition once Anwar goes to jail?

Surely we are not serious about storming the Sungai Buloh Prison to break down the walls to free Anwar from jail and make him Prime Minister, like what Azmin Ali said? That's not how Prime Minister's are appointed in a parliamentary democracy.

Let's get real. We need someone to lead the opposition. And once Anwar is sent to jail it will have to be someone new. Personally, if you ask me, I would choose Nurul Izzah. But that is my personal opinion and my opinion may be clouded and not the best choice. Anyway, I am entitled to my personal opinion even if I may be wrong.

In closing, let me just say that I choose my own friends and no one is going to tell me who I can take as my friends. Yes, I know that many in the opposition resent the fact that I take Dr Mahathir, Sanusi, Zaid, Nazri Aziz, etc., as my friends. Well, tough! There is nothing you can do about that.
 

Translated into Chinese at: http://ccliew.blogspot.com/2011/12/blog-post_15.html

 

Can Najib walk the talk?

Posted: 12 Dec 2011 12:26 PM PST

Some friends from the mainstream media have met up with me in Bangkok to explore the possibility of doing such an interview. But they are not sure whether their government-controlled newspapers will censor the interview. I told them I will agree to the interview only on condition, and that is it is not one-sided and censored. But they are not sure whether their editors can agree to this.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

We are hearing a lot of politically correct sound-bytes coming from Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak. Of course, not many, not even those in Umno, believe what he is saying. They know it is all a lot of political talk, mere rhetoric. But it sure sounds good nevertheless.

I would like to throw Najib a challenge, to allow him to demonstrate his goodwill, that what he is saying is sincere and that he is genuine in what he is saying. And he can do this by giving me space in the mainstream media. After all, if he can give the hardcore Umno Bloggers space (like visits to the submarine), why can't he also give me space -- if what he is saying is true and not just political talk?

There will of course be one condition. They must not pick and choose from what I say, as what they did in my TV3 interview in February this year (which was aired only in April, close to the Sarawak state elections). They must publish the entire text of my interview.

Secondly, the interview must be in English, not in Bahasa Malaysia. This is to avoid any distortion to what I say (again, like in the TV3 interview). My Bahasa Malaysia is not as good as my English and the way I express myself in Bahasa Malaysia (that is, in the Terengganu East Coast manner) can be misinterpreted if you do not come from Terengganu.

I promise, I will be very critical of the opposition (and with the current developments in the opposition with so many opposition leaders demonstrating their warlord and godfather egos they deserve criticism). However, I shall also be critical of the government and Umno (and this is the part I want published and which should be published if what Najib is saying has any credibility).

Is Najib prepared to allow the mainstream media to do this? Let's see.

Some friends from the mainstream media have met up with me in Bangkok to explore the possibility of doing such an interview. But they are not sure whether their government-controlled newspapers will censor the interview. I told them I will agree to the interview only on condition, and that is it is not one-sided and censored. But they are not sure whether their editors can agree to this.

Some of the issues they wanted to talk about were regarding my perceived fallout with the opposition and Anwar Ibrahim. In fact, they wanted to meet me to ask me whether such a fallout actually exists and if so, why? I told them if they want the answer to that question then it would have to be asked in a formal interview and it must be published. I am not about to satisfy their curiosity by giving them a private, off the record interview.

That's all I want to say today. I am in the final week of my course and I have a lot of papers to complete so this week I have no time for cheong hei (long-winded) articles. Next week, once my course has ended, we can indulge in my normal three-page articles.

Till then I await the response from Najib's boys. Do they have the guts to engage me? If they don't then Najib's so-called openness and reforms is nothing but pure bullshit.

Till later.
 

Mixed signals

Posted: 11 Dec 2011 09:08 AM PST

So what is it that these Muslims want? Do they want Islam or do they want to get rich? Islam is demonised. Muslim leaders like Nik Aziz are demonised. They scream that leaders like Nik Aziz are not compatible to development. Maybe Nik Aziz is a good Muslim but he does not know how to make the people rich. And at the end of the day getting rich is what matters.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

The first impression one gets about Islam is that Muslims like to show off. The piety of a Muslim is measured by the public demonstration he or she exudes.

A good Muslim is one who dresses the Islamic way -- a person who wears a tudung or purdah, white skullcap, Arab robe, etc. A person who goes to Mekah every year to perform the umrah or haj is a good Muslim. A person who can utter verses of the Quran or quotes from the Hadith in Arabic from memory is a good Muslim. A person who organises usrahs (religious classes) in his/her home and invites friends over to listen to sermons by renowned or famous preachers/scholars is a good Muslim. A person who not only prays five times a day in the privacy of his/her home but goes to the mosque to participate in congregational prayers is a good Muslim. A person who donates to the local orphanage is a good Muslim.

And the list goes on. It is all about what you demonstrate publicly for all and sundry to witness. And the more public demonstrations you conduct the more you will be considered a pious Muslim.

A good Muslim is also one who does not participate in un-Islamic activities. And this will include not participating in Christmas parties, New Year parties, Valentine's Day events, etc. In fact, wedding anniversaries, birthday parties, National Day celebrations, Labour Day events, etc., are also western or un-Islamic activities, although Muslims somehow do not appear to have any problems with these.

Muslims get extremely upset when Muslims leave Islam to become Christians, Hindus or Buddhists (I do not know of any Muslims who leave Islam to become Jews though). They will threaten bloodshed to those Christians, Hindus or Buddhists who proselytise to Muslims. In fact, the Federal Constitution of Malaysia clearly forbids Christians, Hindus or Buddhists from proselytising to Muslims.

It is not that Muslims can't leave Islam to, say, become atheists. In fact, many do and we actually have a large number of Muslims who are Muslims in name only but not in spirit. It is just that you must leave Islam quietly without making a public demonstration of it.

If you want to leave Islam just don't tell anyone. Leave Islam in your heart. Don't announce it. Then Muslims would not get upset. It is, again, all about public demonstrations. Don't show you have left Islam. Pretend you are still a Muslim. Then Muslims will not get upset although they know that you are actually no longer a Muslim in your heart but are pretending to still be a Muslim.

Of course, if any Christian, Hindu or Buddhist were to convert to Islam, we have to make a big show of it. The whole world must be told. In fact, the world will be told that these people reverted, not converted, to Islam. This is because everyone is considered a Muslim before they came into this world. So, if you become a Muslim, you have reverted and not converted to Islam.

Most Muslims will say they are Muslim first and Malay second (some will also say they are Malay first and Malaysian second). Islam is the number one priority followed by all other things.

But here is where we begin to see the contradiction. And this contradiction is no slip of the tongue but the fault of the mind. It is just the mindset of the Muslims revealing itself. And what is revealed is the insincerity and hypocrisy of the Muslims. It shows the Muslims for what they really are, all talk.

Let me give you one example. I consider Tok Guru Nik Aziz Nik Mat a most sincere and devoted Muslim, someone whom I respect immensely. In fact, he is sometimes a bit too sincere for my liking, which makes him a bad politician. Nik Aziz will say what is in his heart, which may not be the politically correct thing to do (in politics you must know how to bluff, pretend, play to the gallery, and say what the people want to hear).

But do the Muslims sing Nik Aziz's praises? Nik Aziz is a perfect Muslim. So why condemn him?

Well, they condemn him because, according to these Muslims, Kelantan has not developed in the 21 years that Nik Aziz was its Menteri Besar. In fact, they shudder at the thought of Nik Aziz becoming Malaysia's Prime Minister (which is very surprising if these people are really as good a Muslim as they pretend to be since Nik Aziz is a perfect Muslim).

So, what is the priority here? Is it Islam or is it development? Do they want a perfect Muslim society or do they want a rich society?

It appears that, at the end of the day, a perfectly run state is one where we all become rich. If getting rich is more important than living in a perfect Islamic society then why worry if Muslims leave Islam? Are not the most advanced and richest societies the non-Muslim societies? In fact, Muslim societies are very backward.

So what is it that these Muslims want? Do they want Islam or do they want to get rich? Islam is demonised. Muslim leaders like Nik Aziz are demonised. They scream that leaders like Nik Aziz are not compatible to development. Maybe Nik Aziz is a good Muslim but he does not know how to make the people rich. And at the end of the day getting rich is what matters.

Muslims are sending mixed signals and it is confusing those who are not Muslims. On the one hand they scream about Islam, and about not allowing Muslims to leave Islam, and about banning rock concerts, and about persecuting and jailing gays, and whatnot. On the other hand they condemn good Muslim leaders because they are not able to make us rich.

If getting rich is what is important then all we need to do is to put aside Islam and let all hell break loose. Malaysia's neighbour, Thailand, is very successful because it does not allow religion to get in the way of business. Thailand is the number one tourist destination because Islam does not dictate what the Thais do. Come join me in Bangkok and I will show you what I mean (in the event you are still blur).

If Nik Aziz were to allow in Kota Bharu what they do just across the border in Golok, Kelantan would be the richest state in Malaysia, in spite of having no oil/gas.

I mean, what else can Kelantan offer? The location of the state puts it in a most disadvantageous situation. There is no way you can develop the state because of where it is located. But if Kota Bharu were to be turned into a twin-city of Golok, the new vice centre of Malaysia, then everyone will get rich. But of course we would have to put Islam aside for that to happen.

Umno ruled the state for 12 years from 1978 to 1990. Are you telling me that the state did any better when under Umno? Even when under Umno it still needed federal government money to develop the state. So what else is new?

It has nothing to do with Nik Aziz. Even if Najib became the Menteri Besar of Kelantan, and without federal government money, the situation would be no different.

The bottom line is, when Muslims scream about Islam it is all a public demonstration. It is just a show of piety. At the end of the day the priority is still money. And that is why these Muslims whack Nik Aziz, because it is about money and not about Islam.
 

Is Najib prepared to go all the way?

Posted: 10 Dec 2011 08:45 AM PST

How can we develop Malaysians with intellectual abilities unless we are prepared to set aside boundaries and religious dogma and allow Malaysians to think and express their thoughts with no holds barred?

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

Najib: Intellectual capital crucial for Malaysia's development

(Bernama) - Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak underlined the importance of developing the country's intellectual capital, saying that even if the country produces one or two geniuses, the impact to the nation would be tremendous.

Speaking at the opening of an exposition organised by Permata on Saturday, Najib said intellectual prowess of individuals should be nurtured from the beginning, particularly when they were at the age of two to five.

The prime minister said the government allocated nearly 25 per cent in each budget to develop education and provide training in the effort to develop the country's human and intellectual capital.

He acknowledged however that there was a gap in this effort, saying that those in the "top most of the intellectual pyramid" -- namely those with genius tendencies averaging about one per cent or less -- had not been given sufficient attention previously.

"We have ensured that those at the bottom and middle of the pyramid are given ample opportunities but those at the peak, children who have extraordinary IQ, have not had any specific programme."

"If we don't nurture this one per cent, then our society will stand to lose these great potentials. If we can produce just several geniuses, the impact to the country will be very big indeed," he said.

He added that if these groups were left without being given any assistance, they might only be "one or two gems" emerging from them.

"However, if we have a holistic programme, such as the Permata programme, there may be hundreds if not thousands of these children will eventually emerge as gems for our country," he said.

Najib said: "We help those who are weak and those with disabilities; we also help those who are capable; let's not forget to help those with extraordinary capabilities."

Stressing a point, Najib who is Permata programme committee chairman, said there were countries with less resources like Japan and South Korea but emerged as major economic powerhouses because of their ability to develop their intellectual capital and high-performance work ethics.

"There are also countries with rich natural resources but becoming a fail state or remain backward because of their failure to develop their intellectual capital," he said.

**********************************

The above is probably the most sensible thing Najib ever said since he became Prime Minister and I absolutely agree with what he said. The issue here is: how far is Najib prepared to go? Is he prepared to go all the way?

To be able to develop the intellectual abilities of Malaysians and to see the emergence of geniuses it would involve removing the shackles from the minds of Malaysians. Malaysians must be allowed to think and to express themselves with no holds barred. There must not be any sacred cows, whether it is religion or whatever.

As it stands now, there are too many limitations and boundaries. Malaysians are not free to think what they want to think and to express what they think. This is particularly so when it comes to matters involving Islam. Muslims are not allowed to have a free mind. They can only think and talk whatever it is that religious dogma allows.

You are not allowed thoughts of your own. Your thoughts must reflect only what is allowed. And you will be punished if you have any other thoughts and if you express these thoughts that may run contra to religious dogma.

Yes, to breed intellectual minds and to give birth to geniuses, you cannot imprison the minds of the people. Even if what they think and say is opposed to what you think, it must be allowed.

Can JAKIM, JAIS, JAWI, etc., tolerate this? They wont even allow Muslims to celebrate Valentine's Day or wear a Santa Clause hat. How do we develop the minds of Malaysians like this?

There are just too many dos and don'ts. And there are more don'ts than dos. This stifles the minds of Malaysians and curtails intellectual growth.

How can we develop Malaysians with intellectual abilities unless we are prepared to set aside boundaries and religious dogma and allow Malaysians to think and express their thoughts with no holds barred?
 

When the mouth moves faster than the brain

Posted: 09 Dec 2011 06:14 PM PST

Ibrahim Ali and those of his ilk need to come into the modern world. They have to extricate themselves from this imaginary world of Hang Tuah and Taming Sari and all that bullshit. The English do not live in the world of King Arthur and Excalibur. It is time the Malays did the same.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

ISA a weapon for Malays like Taming Sari, says Ibrahim Ali

(The Malaysian Insider) -- Datuk Ibrahim Ali has likened the Internal Security Act (ISA) to the legendary keris, Taming Sari, describing the law as a "weapon" to protect Malay special rights from being challenged.

"The Taming Sari keris, a weapon for the Malays, is gone."

"Where is our Taming Sari if we wish to safeguard Malay interests in future?" the Perkasa chief said at the Najib Razak Seminar held at the International Islamic University Malaysia (UIA) here.

The Taming Sari is the legendary keris owned by Malay warrior Hang Tuah, which was said to confer upon its owner the power of invincibility.

Ibrahim stressed that the spirit of the ISA, which allows for detention without trial, must live on in new replacement laws so police have the tools to handle issues that threaten Malaysia's multi-religious society.

He cited the recent rise in challenges to Malay hegemony, including the "Allah" issue, the Bersih rally, and an incident where a pig's head was thrown into a surau, as examples of "sensitive issues" that could lead to racial strife.

************************************

This is what you get when Malays live in an imaginary world. I wonder whether the English would talk about King Arthur's legendary magical sword, Excalibur, which is supposed to make the owner invincible. 

"The Excalibur sword, a weapon for the English, is gone. Where is our Excalibur if we wish to safeguard English interests in future?" laments England's version of Ibrahim Ali.

"We need detention without trial to safeguard English interests and protect Christianity from the Muslims who are flooding England and are threatening the rights and privileges of the English."

"Muslims currently represent less than 10% of the population and yet they are screaming and foaming at the mouth asking for halal food to be sold in the supermarkets and asking for more Shariah courts."

"Unless we have detention without trial the Muslims will overrun England and once they reach 10% of the population they will act like they own the country. The Muslims are too demanding and the English are being pushed aside as the Muslims dominate British society."

Yes, if an Englishman starts screaming like Ibrahim Ali, people would regard him as a nutcase. Furthermore, he would be arrested and sent to jail for the crime of racism.

Does Ibrahim Ali ever look at himself in the mirror as he practices his speeches? And if he does, what does he see? Can he see his mouth moving faster than his brain?

Of late, Malay-Muslim leaders are uttering a lot of embarrassing statements. How can detention without trial serve Malay interests or protect Malay interests? I just can't see the relevance. When I was in Kamunting the majority of the detainees were Malay-Muslims. They were not enemies of Islam. In fact, they were people who were alleged to be extremist Muslims, people who were detained because of their work for Islam.

In short, Muslims are the victims of detention without trial, not the so-called enemies of Islam.

Ibrahim Ali and those of his ilk need to come into the modern world. They have to extricate themselves from this imaginary world of Hang Tuah and Taming Sari and all that bullshit. The English do not live in the world of King Arthur and Excalibur. It is time the Malays did the same.

Zulkifil Nordin, Ibrahim Ali's gang member, has also made a most interesting confession (see below). I thought there was such a thing as lawyer-client privileges. Apparently, Zul has never heard of such a thing. I wonder where he obtained his law degree from? Can he be disbarred for this?

Anyway, Zul confessed that he used Islam for political gain. So, what else is new? Isn't this what many Muslims seem to be doing? Zul has just come out into the open to admit what most of us already know, and that is Islam is just a political tool and most Muslims talk about Islam when it suits them and will caste aside Islam when it suits them better.

Is it any wonder that many view Muslims as a joke?

************************************

Member of Parliament for Kulim-Bandar Baru, Datuk Zulkifli Noordin has admitted to have deceived renowned cleric Syeikh Dr Yusuf Qardawi into issuing a fatwa supporting the sodomy II case involving Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim and his aide, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan.

"We have made a mistake…we admit making the mistake. I was among those who made the mistake, and I must meet up with Syeikh Yusuf Qardawi to make amendments. Because…we wish to inform (that) it was true we had deceived Syeikh Yusuf Qardawi into believing that Anwar had been slandered," he said.

As Anwar's lawyer, Zulkifli had prepared biased questions to elicit the fatwa from Dr Yusuf Al Qardawi in 2009. According to him, he was responsible in preparing the questions, which sided Anwar and hiding the truth about the complainant, Mohd Saiful. 

 

How far is MCA prepared to go?

Posted: 07 Dec 2011 10:39 AM PST

It is time that MCA learned you can't play the race and religion card without something happening. Then, when the MCA headquarters building in Jalan Ampang is burned to the ground and the MCA leaders are killed in their homes, just like what happened in Indonesia, maybe the MCA people will shut the fuck up and not continue to play the race and religion card.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

(Bernama) - The Kelantan Pas government has admitted having built only one mosque in the state, the Sultan Ismail Petra Golden Jubilee Mosque, from its own funds during its 21-year rule in Kelantan.

State Economic Planning, Finance and Welfare Committee deputy chairman, Abdul Fatah Harun said all the other mosques in Kelantan had been built by the federal government.
 
"The Golden Jubilee Mosque, better known as the Chinese Mosque, was built with state government funding, without a single sen coming from the federal government," he told Bernama, here, today.
 
As for mosques in the other mukim (sub-districts), he said the state government was only responsible for giving allocations to carry out repairs and renovations.
 
Abdul Fatah was responding to the state opposition's (Barisan Nasional) claim that the Pas government had not built even one mosque since ruling Kelantan for over 20 years.
 
They had been built by the federal government or the BN government that ruled Kelantan from 1978 to 1990.

***************************

(The Star) - MCA has continued with its call that PAS must include its intention to implement its own brand of hudud law in its manifesto for the next general election.

The Islamic party must be fair to voters so they could be fully informed about their choices before making their decision, said MCA Young Professionals Bureau chairman Datuk Seri Chua Tee Yong.

"Voters deserve the right to know what kind of Government they are voting in," he told reporters.

"Previously, Pakatan Rakyat also declared that the implementation of hudud law was not possible. How are PAS and PKR going to explain this?"

"They choose not to respond to these type of issues to keep their marriage of convenience alive," he said.

***************************

Aren't you tired of hearing all this talk about Islam and Hudud? I don't know about you but I am. And that's because that is all it is, all talk. And this seems to be the problem with the Muslim world. It is all talk and no action.

Corruption, abuse of power, no respect for fundamental liberties and human rights, and much more, appears to be a predicament for mostly so-called Muslim countries. They talk and talk but they do the opposite of what they talk.

Now MCA has joined the bandwagon. They want Pakatan Rakyat to state its stand on the Islamic law of Hudud. Why is MCA so kaypoh? What business is it to these bloody kafirs? Islam has nothing to do with these bloody kafirs.

Why don't the 15 MCA Members of Parliament raise this matter in Parliament? If Malaysia is as democratic as they say it is then raise this matter in Parliament. After all, MCA has 15 members represented in Parliament. Raise this matter in Parliament and ask the Barisan Nasional-controlled government to pass a bill in Parliament to amend the Federal Constitution of Malaysia to remove Islam as the religion of the Federation.

Article 3(1) of the Constitution says that Islam is the religion of the Federation. MCA should ask Parliament to repeal this and remove Article 3(1) of the Constitution that says that Islam is the religion of the Federation. Once Islam is no longer the religion of the Federation then no longer can anyone talk about implementing Islamic laws in Malaysia.

It's no use for MCA to shout like mad dogs outside Parliament. Go to Parliament and shout. Shout loud and clear. Tell the government that Islam should no longer be the religion of the Federation and that Article 3(1) of the Constitution should be repealed.

Malaysia, since it is a Secular State, should not have Islam as the religion of the Federation. This is a contradiction. And once Article 3(1) has been repealed there will be no more talk about Hudud or any other Islamic laws being implemented.

What is most interesting to note is that the PAS-led Kelantan State Government built only ONE mosque in the state over 21 years since 1990. Even then it was a 'Chinese' mosque. No 'Malay' mosques were built. All the mosques that were built were built either by the Federal Government or by the State Government during the time that Barisan Nasional was in power from 1978 to 1990.

Does this not sound odd? PAS, which is being accused of trying to Islamise the country, built only ONE mosque over 54 years since 1957 -- one mosque in more than half a century.

Hello MCA! MCA is part of Barisan Nasional. And the Barisan Nasional government, which MCA is a member of, built all the mosques in Kelantan over 54 years since 1957. The Pakatan Rakyat government built only one mosque, and even that it was a 'Chinese' mosque.

MCA is very devious. They are trying to raise anti-Islam sentiments. They are trying to use Islam to turn the voters against Pakatan Rakyat. But the truth is MCA does not want to ask Parliament to repeal Article 3(1) of the Constitution whereby Islam is the religion of the Federation. And all the mosques in Kelantan, save one 'Chinese' mosque, were built by the Barisan Nasional government, which MCA has been a member of since Merdeka in 1957.

It is time that MCA learned you can't play the race and religion card without something happening. Then, when the MCA headquarters building in Jalan Ampang is burned to the ground and the MCA leaders are killed in their homes, just like what happened in Indonesia, maybe the MCA people will shut the fuck up and not continue to play the race and religion card.

Yes, I know, this is not MCA's fault. MCA is just playing the role of Umno's running dog in raising anti-Islam sentiments because Umno themselves can't do it since they claim to be the largest Islamic party in the world.

Well, then MCA has to pay the price for being Umno's running dog. And the price will be a very heavy price to pay indeed when blood flows on the streets. And I have no problems with this because you can't fry the egg unless you first break the shell. So, many shells need to be broken to fry the eggs.

The bottom line is: there is no such thing as a peaceful or bloodless revolution. And we need a revolution to see changes in Malaysia. And if MCA continues with this Islam hate-campaign we may yet see the revolution that we need to be able to see changes in Malaysia.

So carry on, MCA! What you are doing may just be what we need for the good of the country. We need a catalyst. And the MCA Islam hate-campaign may be that catalyst.

Bodoh punya MCA! Don't you know that fire burns and that when you play with fire it may burn you as well?

 

The selfish, ugly Chinaman (UPDATED WITH CHINESE TRANSLATION)

Posted: 05 Dec 2011 04:58 PM PST

The Malays have to wake up and wise up to one hard fact. To the Chinese it is all about money. And as long as money flows like water in Bangkok that is all that matters. Should the Malays sacrifice so much, fighting for the Chinese and Indians, when what they are fighting for is not appreciated and instead the Malays are mocked for their efforts?

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

One of our Chinese readers, lakian, posted the comment below. I have not edited it and you can see that he probably obtained his education in a Chinese school because you have to read his comment many times to understand even a little bit of what he is trying to say.

Anyway, the gist of what he is saying is that politics should be left for the Malays to sort out amongst themselves and the Chinese and Indians do not care a damn who runs Malaysia, and in what way it is run, as long as the Chinese are left alone to make money. The Malays can go kill each other as long as he is concerned and this is no business of the Chinese or Indians.

Now read this: 'We won't surrender an inch'. Clearly this has been targeted at the Chinese and Indians.

It makes we wonder why the hell do we even bother about the political situation in Malaysia. If the Chinese and Indians do not care then why should the Malays bother? After all, it is the Chinese and Indians and not the Malays who are facing discrimination and persecution.

I have noticed many similar comments in the past. The Chinese have made it very clear that their only concern is money. And as long as they can make money then nothing else matters.

Some Chinese have even commented that they are not concerned about corruption because it is easier to do deals when there is corruption. The Chinese can make money even easier when they can bribe their way through life.

If this is the way the Chinese and Indians think, and if politics have nothing to do with the non-Malays, then the Malays should reconsider their stand. Is it worth for the Malays to go out of their way to fight for equality and an end to racial discrimination if the Chinese and Indians do not really care about such matters?

The Malays have to wake up and wise up to one hard fact. To the Chinese it is all about money. And as long as money flows like water in Bangkok that is all that matters. Should the Malays sacrifice so much, fighting for the Chinese and Indians, when what they are fighting for is not appreciated and instead the Malays are mocked for their efforts?

If there is one thing I can't stand is to be mocked. And if this is the reward we get from the Chinese and Indians then they can fight their own fight. I would gladly step back and not get involved and will persuade the other Malays to do the same. And don't blame me if I decide to call it a day and save myself further trouble.

****************************

another may 13 is needed without or no racial it is solely between the malays themself.the fight or the cut slaughter and whatever are only for the sake of called malays supremacy,the umno said malays right and pkr called rakyat right.they are afterall are malays.for the chinese as said long time ago,they don't care no bother and no concern who the hell is the government and also what the fcuk the umno or pkr fighting for.chinese are opportunistic beneficiarier.they are only interested in what they can take fron the corner.the project not matter whether 2nd handed or even fourth handed.they can still make money what to say just that merely slim profit.chinese are always the group of hard working but envied hatred enthnic in all over the world.usa,canada,australia......even in the carnivalised africa,middle east.indian are the pathetic sandwiched group due to their own character,atitude or simply they are beggar style.they are conspirative minded wanting to use their tactic to control to use the malays killing malays.dominant example mr mamakutty.
all in all may 13 is needed for the future of these malays own community.they should make this very vital disolution whether they want power or they need food!they want rhetoric VIP but starving in their kitchen or otherwise.for chinese,indian and others,there will be no different cos they are infact struggling to starve to hunger inorder to live under this already oppressive and suppressive areana.
so malays friend,believe umno is giving the pride or snapping you ass is your own concern.do not use your own parang to snap your own anus. -- lakian
 

READ THE CHINESE TRANSLATION HERE

 

We need another ‘May 13’ (UPDATED WITH CHINESE TRANSLATION)

Posted: 04 Dec 2011 07:09 AM PST

The Barisan Nasional government is built on a house of cards. And houses of cards tend to not last and will fall when least expected. The general elections give this appearance of legitimacy. It gives us the illusion that we have a democratically elected government in power. But that is all it is, an illusion.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

There may be no doubt that Barisan Nasional will win the next general election and will get to form the federal government yet again. The question remains, however, as to whether Barisan Nasional can win on a level playing field and will they win because they really do have the peoples' support or for entirely different reasons.

This is what is troubling the Barisan Nasional leadership. They are not too concerned about the winning part. They are confident enough that they can win by hook or by crook. And they know they will need to do so by hook and by crook. What is of concern to them is that unless it is by hook and by crook they have a slim chance of winning.

I suppose anyone who wins through fraud and knows that he or she can only win through fraud would not rest easy. They would get very little satisfaction from that type of win. Even though they would be consoled by the fact that they won, they would nevertheless be quite restless about the win.

The Barisan Nasional leaders know that if it were on a level playing field they would be out of power. If they gave the opposition equal airtime on radio and television and did not impose such stringent rules and procedures for ceramahs, the government would have been changed long ago. If Malaysian elections were based on one-man-one-vote and within 15% or 20% variance between constituencies and the postal voting system was abolished plus overseas Malaysians were allowed to vote, that would be the end of Barisan Nasional.

We know that Barisan Nasional lost the election. Barisan Nasional knows that it lost the election. The United States government knows that Barisan Nasional lost the election -- if you had been reading the Wikileaks reports that Malaysia Today has been publishing this last half-year or so. There is no one who does not know that Barisan Nasional lost the election. And everyone knows that the official results showing that Barisan Nasional won the election is a sham and not a reflection of the real situation.

And that is why the Umno leaders have been making all sorts of statements over the last weekend during the Umno general assembly. They know that the reality of the situation is they are out of power. They know that the only reason they are still in power is because they had to use by hook and by crook methods to win. And they know that, to continue to stay in power, they have to continue applying by hook and crook methods in the coming election.

The Barisan Nasional government is built on a house of cards. And houses of cards tend to not last and will fall when least expected. The general elections give this appearance of legitimacy. It gives us the illusion that we have a democratically elected government in power. But that is all it is, an illusion.

So we need to break this illusion. We need to smash it to pieces. And the only way to do that is to not allow elections to be held until and unless we see electoral reforms and a level playing field.

Over the next few months we need to galvanise support from the rakyat to block, by hook or by crook (the methods being employed by Barisan Nasional), elections from being held. If a 'Malaysian Spring' needs to be triggered then a Malaysian Spring it will have to be.

The time for idle talk and empty rhetoric is over. I have heard and read a lot of things. So many comments by readers were posted in Malaysia Today. But now we have to walk the talk. Now we have to brace ourselves and prepare for hard times.

We need another 'May 13'. But this 'May 13' is not a race war. It is not Malays versus non-Malays. It is the rakyat versus the establishment. It is the ruled versus the ruler. It is the bourgeois masses versus the ruling elite.

Are you ready for this? Or are you all talk and hot air? Yes, many things have been said. But this is all being said anonymously and hidden behind the computer keyboard. Talk is easy. Talk is cheap. How far are you prepared to walk that talk?

Unless we are prepared to bite the bullet then we might as well stop talking. Just let Barisan Nasional continue to rule Malaysia. If we really want a change of government then we must be prepared to face all consequences. And the consequences must be the elections must be blocked until and unless electoral reforms are in place even if that has to result in bloodshed.

Now let us see if Malaysia Today's readers are mere empty talk and bullshit!

Anyway, stayed tuned for further announcements.

**************************************

We want a strong government, says Najib

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak said Barisan Nasional (BN) and Umno want to form a strong government in the next general election.

"Whatever constitutes the definiton of a strong government, this is what we want. A two-thirds (majority) is something which is ideal but what is important is a strong government," he said at a news conference at the end of the 2011 Umno General Assembly, here.

He was responding to a question whether he would be happy with a two-thirds majority or a simple majority for the BN in the election.

He added that a strong government could be formed from a working majority or a two-thirds majority.

Najib, who is Umno president, also said that the BN was capable of winning the four opposition-ruled states in the coming election but said that he would not want to underrate the opposition. -- Bernama

**************************************

Muhyiddin outlines seven winning ingredients

Umno deputy president Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin today outlined seven ingredients that would ensure Umno and the Barisan Nasional's (BN) victory at the polls.

"I think there is no magic ingredients to ensure Umno and Barisan National's victory in the general election other than implementing our focus over the next few years.

"We have to work hard to ensure the party's victory, then God willing, our party will succeed," he said when winding up the debate at the Umno General Assembly 2011 here today.

The ingredients are unity, loyalty, service, sacrifice, hard work, acceptance and submission, he added.

The deputy prime minister said the most important ingredient was unity in line with Umno's slogan.

"To win, unity is important as I have mentioned at the Wanita, Youth and Puteri assemblies. It is important that we have unity of hearts, minds and objective, and all these translated into unity in our resolve," he said.

He also reminded party members not to cause new problems, including resorting to back-stabbing and sabotage.

The deputy prime minister said secondly, Umno members must be loyal and should not take action that could be deemed not toeing the line.

"Do not do anything against the party's ethics and damage the party during this important and challenging time," he said.

Muhyiddin said thirdly, Umno members must serve wholeheartedly to the party and should not be calculative in performing their tasks.

"We are in a critical moment. We need to double our efforts as the president had said 'business is not as usual'. Do not take the same approach without taking into account the changing times and environment," he said.

Fourthly, he said all Umno members must be willing to sacrifice for the party regardless of time, energy and thinking without expecting any reward.

For the fifth ingredient, he said everyone in the party must strive for victory in the election as hard work would guarantee success.

"Umno members must be good team players just like in a football team. A good striker should play upfront, a goalkeeper should play as a goalkeeper and not becoming a striker or vice-versa.

"And what is most important is not to score own goals. This is a taboo in football as well as in the election, do not score own goals," he added. -- Bernama

CHINESE TRANSLATION

 

Been chilling out

Posted: 02 Dec 2011 08:24 PM PST

Sorry I haven't been writing much the last couple of days. I've been chilling out and catching up with friends in sunny Bangkok. Furthermore, I am working on my final paper for my course, which ends this month. The last few months I've been busy with my essays on Philosophy of Religion, a course run by Oxford. Will then take a short break before my new course on European History starts on 1st February 2012.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


It's not just about marriage between 2 men

Posted: 21 Dec 2011 09:11 AM PST

He deserted his family and they had to pick up his sizeable debt

What's most condemnable about what Ariff did was that he left his family in the lurch. He left them to pick up his sizeable debt, and subjected them to pain, public embarrassment and ridicule. Petronas recently issued a summons to his family demanding the repayment of Ariff's education loan, a whopping RM890,000.

By Chok Suat Ling, New Straits Times

BE careful what you post on the social media. No-nos would include how many cows you had milked on Farmville, photos showing the layout and exact location of your home, and in the case of criminals, the luxury cars you had stolen.

It is also ill-advised to put up photos of yourself inebriated at a party on the day you had called in sick from work, and those of yourself getting married abroad to someone of the same gender when on the run from a study  sponsor.

Too far-fetched? Believe it or not, people have done all the aforementioned, and more.

Last week, photos of a 28-year-old Malaysian man surfaced on social media and blogs. The former medical student was in a state of wedded bliss in Dublin, Ireland, flushed with happiness, with his arm draped around his equally gay and gleeful spouse. Other photos show the couple locking lips, and in various poses typical among the just married.

The former student, Ariff Alfian, was resplendent in Malay traditional costume. His Caucasian partner was equally well turned out. It wasn't a grand wedding, but what made the entire combo of photos extraordinary was that the man and "wife" were of the same gender.

That, of course, sent many into a tizzy in Malaysia. A number spewed venom, the way they also did when transsexual Fatine Young married a British man in 2009, when Mohd Ashraf Hafiz Abdul Aziz wanted to change his name to Aleesha Farhana, and when Elton John performed in Genting Highlands.

Indeed, issues related to transgenders and homosexuality remain extremely sensitive in this country. But Ariff's case is not just about that. Many have, however, not been able to look beyond the "marriage".

What's most condemnable about what Ariff did was that he left his family in the lurch. He left them to pick up his sizeable debt, and subjected them to pain, public embarrassment and ridicule.

Petronas recently issued a summons to his family demanding the repayment of Ariff's education loan, a whopping RM890,000.

The former student of University College Dublin, Ireland, began studying medicine in 2003 but extended his studies for a few more semesters in 2008. He was suspended for failing to pay his academic fees that year when Petronas refused to sponsor the additional expenses of over RM160,000 a year.

Ariff's father had advised him to continue his studies in Malaysia but he refused and returned to Dublin, cutting off contact with his family. The retiree has been looking for his son since and had made eight trips to Dublin, in addition to lodging a missing person's report with the police, Wisma Putra and the Irish and Malaysian embassies.

It appears that while there are parents who neglect their children, we are also not short of cases involving thoughtless, self-centred children. The many young Malaysian girls who eloped to Lombok without a word to their parents and families to marry Indonesian men are among them. Some of these girls later realise the folly of their ways, plead to return home, and have to be rescued by their parents and Umno Youth. Other examples abound.

There are even legends about such children. A famous one revolves around Si Tanggang, a poor boy who left his village to become a sailor. He went around the world in a ship and later stopped by his village for food and water. His poor mother, who was left to fend for herself for years, was excited to see her son again. But she was heartbroken when he pretended not to know her.

Si Tanggang was cursed and cast as a rock in his own ship, a story which was published in storybooks and turned into a movie. People in Muar, Johor claim it's a true story and that the incident happened in Kampung Bukit Treh, located some 10km from town. Whether fact or fiction, the story is about filial piety, and underscores the importance of being grateful to our parents.

Adult children such as Ariff may think they can pretty much do as they please -- which they can, to a degree -- but it's never okay to scandalise our nearest and dearest, cause them grief, and then leave them to pick up the pieces.

 

Listing of FGV- looking our for settlers interests

Posted: 21 Dec 2011 09:01 AM PST

SAKMONGKOL AK47

I am more interested in establishing credibility in a proposition, idea or plan. Accordingly I am not fixated over an idea nor feel xenophobic on having to change my position if necessary, in the interest of achieving credibility. For example, while I am not immediately taken in by the idea of listing Felda Global, the rational economist in me accepts that it makes good business and economic sense to restructure Felda's business to unlock value. I

think, even while some of us differ in our views, this principle of restructuring, reorganizing, changing in order to arrive at better value, is acceptable. Also I am not averse to having experts run and operate the business. Example- KPF is the investment entity in Felda Holdings. The members of KPF get dividends, handouts, charity, assistance etc. they are able to enjoy because the commercial entity, Felda Global Ventures Sdn Bhd does the business for them. KPF's and the interests of others- public spirited individuals, minders (paid or unpaid) are to ensure the managers of the business do their work efficiently and create shareholder value.

Except that, I will always be circumspect about the term 'unlocking value'. Translate that into action and practice, what does the term mean? This term 'unlocking value' has taken different meanings in the context of business in Malaysia. It can mean anything. In the sad case of MAS for example, unlocking value has meant the sale of assets and the management of balance sheet bypassing managing the operations of the business.  The truth is, a business depends more on managing its operations.

My understanding in unlocking value is however somewhat more basic- it means you produce more per acre if you are in the business of planting something, you get better price, you produce better quality, produce new products, become more productive, keep costs down. It's a bricks and mortar view of how an economic enterprise operates. You operate the real economy. Goods and services. It's the business operations.

As an analyst or investor I will look at these variables and parameters. At the same time, I have this cynical bias- no business unit can sustain profit on paper shuffling and share manipulations without the support of the business fundamentals. I am always suspicious at the managing balance sheet approach. You want to arrive at a clean balance sheet; you manage the assets and liabilities. You are fixated at the over consuming idea of having more value at assets over liabilities.

In felda's case that means to me, making sure plantations produce more and high quality yields, marketing, managing more efficiently and so forth. Creating prosperity through share manipulations, IPO and the stuff are initial spurts. What comes later- working on the fundamentals is what sustains long term benefits.

A close friend sent me a text. He says he doesn't understand why I oppose the FELDA Global ventures (FGV) listing. Don't I empathize with FELDA settlers? The indirect owners of the 880,000 hectares of palm oil trees are going to enjoy a windfall and you are objecting?  Settlers are passive investors through their cooperative. The business and commercial aspects of the business has always been handled by Felda Global Ventures SB. That is the organization that operates and manages the business. Doesn't it make good business and economic sense to restructure the business into a single entity and create upstream and downstream business entities?

The most important element of this business in my mind is the land area. Now, these 880,000 hectares comprise of what? The land already owned by settlers or land not already owned by settlers or both? Since 1990, Felda doesn't enlist settlers anymore. Land not already owned by settlers or were not given out were all placed under Felda Plantations. These are not operated by settlers. They are run directly by Felda through their plantation business units.

READ MORE HERE

 

First it's cronyism, now race creeps in

Posted: 21 Dec 2011 08:33 AM PST

Penang deputy CM's disciplinary hearing will show how DAP handles its 'godfather-warlord' conflict

Karpal was referring to K. Mangleswari, who is also among three women named by Ramasamy as potential DAP candidates for the coming election. It seems that Karpal's attack on Mangleswari has opened a can of worms within the Indian community.

By Sharanjit Singh, New Straits Times

THE Penang DAP is in for  turbulent times as the race for positions in the party heats up, with allegations of  cronyism being hurled against state leaders.

The attempt to put a lid on the simmering feud between two top leaders in the state has been disrupted by protests, including one in Klang, Selangor, over the weekend.

The latest protest by a group of about 15 people was not widely reported, but what they did definitely had an explosive effect.

The group, claiming to represent three Indian non-governmental organisations, had gathered to demand an apology from Seri Delima assemblyman R.S.N. Rayer and Bagan Dalam assemblyman A. Tanasekharan.

They claimed that the duo had offended Penang Deputy Chief Minister P. Ramasamy by alleging that he had begged for the post.

Pertubuhan Naam Tamilar Malaysia chairman G. Ramesh reportedly said Rayer should retract his statement and apologise as his comments had affected the integrity of the Tamil people.

They also burnt a picture of Rayer before dispersing.

What happened in Klang has infuriated party leaders, who are concerned that racial and ethnic politics are being dragged into the spat involving Ramasamy, Rayer, Tanasekharan and also party chairman Karpal Singh.

"The issue concerning Penang DAP leaders has got nothing to do with race or ethnicity, but we are suddenly finding it being turned into one," said a party insider.

Party insiders also said many leaders were taken aback by the sudden rise to prominence of an unknown woman lawyer. She is now a commissioner in the state Hindu Endowment Board.

Those present at the recent Penang DAP convention would recall how even Karpal seemed to be at a loss at why the woman was being actively promoted.

"Who is this Mangleswari?" he thundered in his speech.

Karpal was referring to K. Mangleswari, who is also among three women named by Ramasamy as potential DAP candidates for the coming election. It seems that Karpal's attack on Mangleswari has opened a can of worms within the Indian community.

Members and state elected representatives are seeking answers regarding the creeping culture of cronyism in the state DAP.

Sources say Ramasamy is set to come under the hammer on the Mangleswari issue as well as his infamous statement that "godfathers in the DAP must be gotten rid of" -- an obvious reference to senior leaders like Karpal.

Karpal had made it clear that he had no issue on being referred to as a "godfather", but it was the other part of Ramasamy's statement which got under his skin.

"It is clear-cut insolence for Ramasamy to even suggest that the party forget the contributions of a leader like Karpal to the DAP.

"That is why the whole issue exploded and Ramasamy must now be prepared to answer why he has been acting like a warlord," a source said.

DAP leaders are worried that such issues are cropping up at a crucial stage when the party should be concentrating on the bigger battle ahead.

It is common knowledge that some incumbents are trying to hold on to their seats while new faces go all out to be selected by getting close to certain leaders.

It remains to be seen how the party leadership is going to handle the issue, but some clues will be forthcoming when the disciplinary committee sits to hear out a complaint against Ramasamy, and more are expected to be filed soon.

 

Rifts Appearing in Malaysia's Islamic Party

Posted: 21 Dec 2011 08:29 AM PST

Selangor conservative leads a revolt against modernizers

Both Hasan Ali and Nasharudin have been causing tension in the party virtually since the coalition took over the leadership of the state of Selangor in 2008 elections that shocked the Barisan Nasional. From his spot on the executive committee, Hasan sought to ban beer in the urban, relatively liberal state. He has also taken adamant positions against Christians.

Asia Sentinel

Strains are building in Malaysia's Parti Islam se-Malaysia, the formerly conservative Islamic wing of Pakatan Rakyat, the three-party opposition coalition headed by the embattled Anwar Ibrahim, over the party's fundamentalist roots.

The growing split could have ominous implications for the coalition's ability to take on the Barisan Nasional, or ruling national coalition, in elections thought to be scheduled as early as March.

Anwar himself has been distracted by a year-long court drama in which he has been accused by a former aide of sexual perversion. The prosecution and defense staged their final arguments last week and the case is now scheduled to be decided by High Court Judge Mohamad Zabidin Mohamad Diah sometime in the next weeks. The trial has remained a major preoccupation for Anwar, taking time and focus away from his efforts to keep a fractious coalition together.

An UMNO source – with obvious relish – told Asia Sentinel that PAS is "imploding." However, other sources say that while the squabble is troublesome, party commitment to the more moderate line remains intact.

"It's a bit premature to say PAS is imploding," said a source with connections to both UMNO and PKR. "The mainstream media of course are highlighting the differences in PAS but within PAS itself, they seem to be okay."

The controversy began in June when rank and file members staged a dramatic revolution at the party's annual congress, electing secular leaders and abandoning the rural-based party's traditional call to convert the country into an Islamic state.

The largest party in Anwar's coalition, PAS had long turned off urban Malays and other ethnic minorities, particularly the Chinese, with its demands for observance of strict conservative Islamic laws. Given the size of its membership and its potential to take votes away from the United Malays National Organization, the country's biggest political party, PAS unity and support are crucial to the opposition coalition.

At the party congress, newer, urban followers of PAS, having fled both the racial stridency and endemic corruption of UMNO and the disorganization of Anwar's PKR, in June elected a slate of officers headed by Mohamad Sabu, a galvanic public speaker from Penang and former member of Anwar's Parti Keadilan who was twice detained under the country's Internal Security Act.

Sabu led the moderates' charge, winning the party deputy presidency and crucially defeating a minority of conservatives seeking to lead a splinter group to link up with UMNO. Salahuddin Ayub, Husam Musa and Mahfuz Omar, elected as moderate vice presidents, completed a leadership team reflecting the party's changing membership and leaving the Islamists out in the cold.

The strains have been there ever since. However, the controversy broke into the open earlier this month, with Kuala Lumpur's pro-government mainstream media playing up comments by Hasan Ali, a member of the Selangor PAS executive committee saying he and his allies would seek to "bring the party back to the Islamic path, and claiming support particularly from Nasharudin Mat Isa, a former PAS deputy president who was supplanted by the new moderate team.

Later this week, Harun Taib, the head of the PAS Dewan Ulama, or council of religious leaders, announced it would support the two dissidents, who were called "fake members" by the party's new mainstream leaders. Harun in turn, without naming names, called the Sabu faction "new immigrants who appeared to have no qualms deviating from the party's core principles."

Both Hasan Ali and Nasharudin have been causing tension in the party virtually since the coalition took over the leadership of the state of Selangor in 2008 elections that shocked the Barisan Nasional. From his spot on the executive committee, Hasan sought to ban beer in the urban, relatively liberal state. He has also taken adamant positions against Christians. Both he and Nasharuddin paid for their conservatism during the June elections that brought Mat Sabu and his allies to power.

READ MORE HERE

 

Hasan, Nasha dan Saari dipanggil beri penjelasan

Posted: 21 Dec 2011 08:24 AM PST

(Harakah Daily) - PAS hari ini memutuskan untuk memanggil bekas Pesuruhjaya Selangor, Datuk Dr Hasan Ali, bekas Timbalan Presiden PAS, Ustaz Nasharudin Mat Isa dan Ketua Penerangan PAS Selangor, Saari Sungip untuk memberikan penjelasan berhubung beberapa isu berbangkit mutakhir ini yang dilihat membazir masa parti.

"Penjelasan ini mesti dilakukan, supaya parti tidak lagi perlu membazir masa melayan pertikaian yang timbul akibat kecil hati terhadap sesuatu kesilapan yang kecil, ego berlebihan dan keengganan sesetengah pihak menerima keputusan parti dan jamaah," kata Ketua Penerangan PAS Pusat, Datuk Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man dalam satu kenyataan hari ini.

Melihat situasi pilihanraya umum yang semakin hampir, PAS kata Tuan Ibrahim tidak akan bertolak ansur dalam sebarang sabotaj sama ada dari dalam mahupun luar yang mengganggu persiapan akhir parti.

"Semua ahli mesti memainkan peranan sebagai team player untuk memastikan jamaah bergerak dalam keadaan baik dan harmoni.

Seluruh tumpuan kerja mesti difokus kepada persiapan akhir ini daripada melayan karenah-karenah segelintir pemimpin yang ada berbeza pandangan terhadap dasar parti yang dijamin arahnya oleh Majlis Syura," tegas Pesuruhjaya PAS Pahang itu dipercayai membalas kenyataan Hasan yang mempertikai dasar-dasar parti yang diputuskan muktamar dan Majlis Syura.

Menggunakan media lawan milik Umno, Utusan Malaysia, Hasan, yang juga ahli jawatankuasa PAS Pusat mempertikaikan dasar "Membangun Negara Berkebajikan" yang menjadi tema PAS sekarang ini.

Bagi Hasan, PAS sepatutnya kekal dengan dasar negara Islam yang telah menjadi perjuangan asal PAS.

Membalas hujah Hasan, Tuan Ibrahim menerangkan bahawa PAS ialah sebuah parti jamaah yang berdemokrasi, segala keputusan bukanlah keputusan individu tapi keputusan jamaah.

"Apabila keputusan telah dibuat, dan Majlis Syura telah mengesahkan bahawa keputusan tersebut selari dengan dasar Islam, setiap ahli PAS perlu bergerak pada arah yang sama untuk membawa parti mencapai matlamat yang disasarkan dan memenangkan Islam," tegas beliau.

Dalam kenyataannya itu, Tuan Ibrahim turut mengingatkan ahli-ahli PAS kepada ungkapan 'apa yang ada ialah hari ini, yang lepas tidak akan datang kembali, yang depan tidak menentu lagi.

"Oleh itu, pendamkan dendam, buangkan kekecilan hati, ketepikan kepentingan individu  dan kembalikan fokus dan bergerak ke depan untuk memenangkan parti," nasihat beliau.

 

Blogger lodges report against Taiping MP

Posted: 21 Dec 2011 08:17 AM PST

MACC to investigate allegation against DAP politician

(New Straits Times) - A BLOGGER has lodged a report against  member of parliament for Taiping, Nga Kor Ming (DAP), over his alleged involvement in fixing a tailoring contract in 2008.

Ahmad Sofiyan Yahya, who blogs in www.sekupangdua.blogspot.com, lodged the report at the Perak Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) headquarters in Meru Raya, near here.

The 47-year-old from Pengkalan Pegoh said he was disappointed with Nga for failing to address the allegation, which he had raised in his blog, of the politician's alleged involvement in fixing the contract involving tailor-made lounge suits for the city councillors here.

"Nga had accused me in a Malaysiakini report of making up stories and challenged me to report the matter to the MACC if I had any evidence. I am taking up his challenge."

Ahmad Sofiyan said he had received documents, which allegedly revealed abuse of power in the awarding of a tailoring contract to sew and supply lounge suits, and had posted them on his blogsite.

He said the city council here had already decided to award the contract to Goodman Tailor on April 3, 2008, but changed its mind following Nga's intervention.

"The documents, which I received, showed the state government (then under Pakatan Rakyat) recommending Ethan and Elton to supply and sew the lounge suits.

"According to the tender list, Ethan and Elton was the last name on the list of bidders while Goodman Tailor was at the top of the list."

He said a check with the Companies Commission of Malaysia showed that one of the directors of Ethan and Elton was Wong Seow Ching, who is Nga's wife.

At the time, Nga, who is also Pantai Remis state assemblyman, was in charge of the local government's portfolio.

"I also found out that Ethan and Elton was registered on April 23 after Nga was appointed state executive councillor," said Ahmad Sofiyan, adding that the documents could be viewed on his blogsite.

Meanwhile, MACC investigations director Datuk Mustafar Ali said the body would investigate any issues involving corruption even in the absence of an official report.


Pakatan to hold final convention in January before polls

Posted: 21 Dec 2011 08:02 AM PST

(The Malaysian Insider) - Pakatan Rakyat (PR) will hold next month what will likely be the pact's last national convention before a widely-expected general election, and use the meet to iron out its polls strategy.

The Malaysian Insider understands the convention will take place in Kedah on January 14. Previous conventions were held in the PR-ruled states of Selangor and Penang.

The national convention aims to smoothen the working relationship between the three component PR parties — PKR, PAS and DAP — while also focusing on the opposition's game plan against the ruling Barisan Nasional (BN).

"We plan to focus on a more detailed and cogent articulation for our vision and offer to all Malaysians. The plan is to refine our various plans for Malaysia, if given the chance to govern at federal level," Lembah Pantai MP Nurul Izzah Anwar told The Malaysian Insider.

The PKR vice-president said the focus of the convention would be very specific — PR leaders will prepare its members for polls by briefing them on what issues to tackle when speaking to potential voters.

She said the federal opposition would ensure that its future manifestoes or plans would be geared towards attracting young voters.

"We have various documents to date, ranging from Buku Jingga, 100 day plan, the opposition leader's Malaysian Economic Agenda, and the notable successes from PR governed states," she explained.

Nurul Izzah also said PR would use the convention to drive home the point to their members that they should be well-informed about on-going scandals concerning BN leaders.

"Granted, scandals — especially BN's success at making Malaysia a haven for black money laundering — are important highlights to cement reasons for change at the federal level," she said.

But she stressed the point that PR will explain to voters is that they have a solution and a team of leaders who will reduce wastage and corruption should the opposition take over Putrajaya.

READ MORE HERE

 

Prove blogger’s claims are false, rep urged

Posted: 21 Dec 2011 07:58 AM PST

(The Star) - Pantai Remis state assemblyman Nga Kor Ming has been urged to prove his innocence over allegations made by a blogger on a tailoring contract awarded to his wife's company.

Perak MCA secretary Datuk Tan Chin Meng said Nga had merely claimed that the documents, which surfaced in the blog, were forged but did not deny the contents.

"On one hand, Nga claimed that the documents were forged, but on the other hand, he did not deny the contents of the blog," he said in a press statement issued here yesterday.

He suggested that the Perak DAP secretary lodge a police report over the allegations.

"If the documents were indeed forged, then Nga should lodge a police report to allow investigations to begin, which will prove his innocence," he said in a statement yesterday.

According to the blog, Nga's wife won a tailoring contract to make lounge suits for Ipoh city councillors shortly after Pakatan Rakyat took over the Perak Government.

The minutes of the Ipoh City Council meeting revealed that Ethan & Elton, of which she was a director, was the highest bidder, charging RM650 per suit compared to the lowest price offered by Goodman Tailor at RM450 a suit.

The blog claimed that a contract for 24 lounge suits was awarded to Goodman Tailor on April 3, 2008, but was later given to Ethan & Elton at the suggestion of the then state government.

"It is curious that a company which was set up shortly after Pakatan Rakyat took over the Perak Government can win a contract even though its bid turned out to be the highest," Tan said.

He noted that Nga was a member of the state exco in charge of education, local government, housing and public transport at the time, adding that he owed the public an explanation.

"Nga should explain the suspicious circumstances of how his wife's company won the tailoring contract," Tan added.

Blogger Ahmad Sofiyan Yahya, who writes under the Sekupang Dua blog, lodged a report with the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission over Nga's alleged involvement in the tailoring contract.

"Nga has accused me of making up evidence in a report on Monday and to live up to his challenge, I am now lodging a report against him," he said here yesterday.

Ahmad Sofiyan added that he had received the documents after Pakatan Rakyat took over Perak.

Nga said the allegations were "totally unfounded" and reserved the right to file a defamation suit.

 

Police report lodged against protesters

Posted: 21 Dec 2011 07:57 AM PST

(The Star) - Sekretariat Suara Keamanan Mahasiswa lodged a police report against Solidariti Mahasiswa Malaysia for taking down a flag bearing Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak's image in front of the Umno headquarters at the Putra World Trade Centre.

Suara Keamanan chairman Muhamad Mukhlis Maghribi said the action has provoked and caused discomfort among Malaysians, especially graduates.

"We urge the police to investigate whether SMM is registered under the Registrar of Societies or the Universities and University Colleges Act 1971," he said after lodging a report at the Patani Road police station here last night.

On Saturday, some 200 students marched under the SMM banner to push for the abolition of the UUCA and other laws they considered restrictive.

The protesters ended their march in front of the Umno headquarters and briefly took down a flag bearing Najib's image and replaced it with an SMM flag.

 

Wong: Hasan’s apostasy comments his opinion

Posted: 21 Dec 2011 07:56 AM PST

(The Star) - State executive councillor Elizabeth Wong says there will be no action taken against fellow state exco Datuk Dr Hasan Ali over his recent remarks about apostates in Selangor.

"His comments were made in a personal capacity and not as an executive councillor," Wong told reporters after the weekly state executive council meeting here yesterday.

"The state government has found no report, so far, of Hasan making such statements in his capacity as a state executive councillor.

"As a PAS member, yes, he has made those comments.

"Therefore, the state government will not be taking any action against him. It is an internal party matter," added Wong, who is state Tourism, Consumer Affairs and Environment committee chairman.

Dr Hasan, who is in trouble with PAS leaders over his stand on the alleged shift in the party's struggle, had reportedly said on Tuesday that his research team, Unit Selamatkan Aqidah, had found 41 apostates in Petaling Jaya and was continuing to collect more data on the issue.

 

Hasan: PAS has lost sight of the Malays

Posted: 21 Dec 2011 07:54 AM PST

(The Star) - Embattled PAS leader Datuk Dr Hasan Ali has continued his tirade against the party, saying that it has lost sight of the Malays since coming under the Pakatan Rakyat banner.

He said PAS had veered away from its fundamental role as a defender of Islam.

"In the rush to take over Putrajaya, we may end up forgetting our core group of supporters the Malays," he said in an hour-long interview on TV3's Soal Jawab.

Dr Hasan said the party's current crop of leaders reflected an imbalance in representation between the ulama and professional groups.

He added the ulama-professional ratio in the party's leadership when he first joined the party stood at around 70:30, but it was now the other way round with professionals forming the majority on the party's powerful central working committee.

Dr Hasan, who is the Selangor state executive councillor in charge of Islamic affairs, Malay customs, infrastructure and public amenities, said this situation "will influence" the party's direction, as professionals were prone to rationalising options as opposed to the ulama group's tendency to stay true to Islamic principles.

Dr Hasan added that a victory for Pakatan and by extension PAS in the next general election would be meaningless under the current arrangement if nothing was done to uphold the place of Islam, the Malays and the royal institution, three issues which he said formed the core of his political struggles.

Dr Hasan sidestepped a question on whether or not he would leave PAS as widely speculated, choosing instead to quote a verse from the Quran to say that he left it to Allah to decide.

He said he "loves" his party, but hinted at keeping his options open as he was now mired in a "volatile situation".

Dr Hasan, and former deputy president Nasharudin Mat Isa, have been under fire from party colleagues over the past several weeks.

There is speculation that both will be dropped by the party in the national polls.

The pair have also been slammed by top leaders for proposing that PAS revive unity talks with arch-rivals Umno, with some even saying Dr Hasan is free to leave the party and join Umno.

 

DAP mum on PAS debacle

Posted: 21 Dec 2011 07:53 AM PST

(The Star) - Selangor DAP leaders are shying away from the latest controversy surrounding PAS, saying it is the Islamic party's internal issue.

They have refused to be drawn into the in-fighting despite the DAP and PKR being labelled by former Selangor PAS chief Datuk Dr Hasan Ali as the "stumbling blocks" in the PAS Islamic state agenda.

"I do not want to be dragged into the dispute between him (Dr Hasan) and the others in PAS," said Selangor DAP chairman Teresa Kok when asked by The Star for her views on the PAS feud.

"So, I choose not to comment."

On Tuesday, Dr Hasan had said he had wide support in PAS for the party to return to its original struggle of forming an Isla- mic state.

The 64-year-old Selangor executive councillor blamed the party's alliance with the DAP and PKR for the shift towards setting up a welfare state. He said the alliance was causing a lot of dissent within PAS.

The party's influential Dewan Ulama has thrown its support behind Dr Hasan and former deputy president Nasharudin Mat Isa, who lamented that PAS was no longer seen in its Islamic image.

 

Jamil wants Islamic units meet on sexuality, apostasy

Posted: 21 Dec 2011 07:50 AM PST

(The Malaysian Insider) - Datuk Seri Jamil Khir Baharom has called for a meeting of the various state Islamic religious departments to determine how to address cases of apostasy, homosexuality, and trans-sexuality among Muslims.

"I have asked Jakim to arrange the meeting soon so that we can inform the people about the law and on its enforcement to resolve the issues," the minister in charge of Islamic affairs was quoted in a Bernama Online report today.

The minister was referring to the Control and Restriction of the Propagation of Non-Islamic Religion to Muslims Enactment, which is applicable in all states aside from Perak, the Federal Territories, Penang, Sabah and Sarawak.

It is unclear how the enactment pertains to homosexuality, which is not an offence per se under any Malaysian law.

Jamil is outspoken on issues of sexuality, having previously been reported by Utusan Malaysia as saying that being homosexual was "unconstitutional". He subsequently said he was misquoted and that he meant homosexuality was against the Penal Code.

The minister had also criticised Seksualiti Merdeka — the sexuality awareness event that was banned recently despite having run unhindered in previous years — for promoting "a deviation from society's norms".

Jamil said Malaysians had a responsibility to unite and stop any promotion of homosexual, lesbian or bisexual practices.

In today's report, he also spoke of a need to inform the public that proselytising to Muslims was an offence in states where the aforementioned enactment was applicable.

 

 

Season to be jolly – and afraid for M’sian Christians

Posted: 21 Dec 2011 07:41 AM PST

For the minority religious group, there is a sense of unease in the wake of rising tensions with Muslims authorities.

"We've had to be very careful about whom we help, and how we go about doing it because authorities are paying more attention to church activities," said a pastor who requested anonymity due to his work among the poor and homeless of Kuala Lumpur.

Julia Yeow, Free Malaysia Today

In every mall and along every main street in Malaysia's capital, elaborate decorations and loud, blaring carols bring about festive reminders of the season to be jolly.

But beneath the blinking lights and merry making, many Christians will be celebrating Christmas with an undeniable sense of unease due to rising tensions with Muslim authorities.

Malaysia is a secular state as defined in its constitution, but Islam is the official religion and is embraced by 60 percent of the population. Minority Christians make up about 10 percent, followed
by Buddhists, Hindus and people of other faiths.

Religious violence is rare in the multicultural society, but minority religious groups have complained that their right to practise freely is increasingly threatened by a Muslim-dominated
government.

Christians have always had to be "cautious" in dealing with the government, said Sam Ang, secretary-general of the National Evangelical Christian Fellowship, the country's largest evangelical group.

"I think there is definitely a sense of Christians feeling threatened much more now, although not so much physically."

He said the authorities often misinterpret the law according to their own convenience.

"There is always a risk. That is why churches would be wise to always exercise caution," he said.

An emotional thing

But one major church apparently threw caution to the wind on Aug 3 when it allowed an organisation with Muslim members to use its premises for a celebration.

Islamic religious officers raided the church during the dinner, and later claimed efforts were being made to convert the Muslims who were present.

The Damansara Utama Methodist Church (DUMC) denied the allegations and called the raid illegal. It said accusations of conversion attempts were false and malicious.

Christian leaders condemned the raid, saying the authorities showed no proof or warrant to enter the church premises.

The incident also sparked outrage among Muslim groups that demonstarted against what they claimed were aggressive conversion efforts by Christians. They called on Muslims to "take all necessary actions" to protect the sanctity of Islam.

In response, the Christian community was placed on alert for fears of a repeat of violent attacks on at least eight churches last year, including one that was gutted by a firebomb.

"Religion is such an emotional thing that I find it hard to be at ease during this season," said Vivienne Pal, a 33-year-old Christian.

"I'm constantly aware that things can get out of hand in a blink of an eye."

READ MORE HERE

 

In Malaysia, corruption is a team effort

Posted: 21 Dec 2011 07:37 AM PST

It's difficult for a leadership brought up within a corrupt system to correct things.

These teams are running wild in this government. This government is suffering from a serious credibility problem. Every purchase, contract and project that it dishes out is never free from suspicions of financial improprieties. Every damn business decision involving, for example, even government-linked companies or any companies linked to the government is not above shiftiness.

Mohd Ariff Sabri Aziz, Free Malaysia Today

Why does our country find it so objectionable to kick out the crooks and the stupid?

For corruption to take place, you must have two important elements – you must be a crook and mental dud.

It will therefore take paramount political will by a leadership and a messianic zeal to stem corruption to succeed. In our country, the only answer is a change in leadership.

As former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad said, the whole country, from top to bottom, is corrupt.

I take that to mean, Dr Mahathir also includes the prime minister.

Money changing hands – that's bribery plain and simple. The businessmen who pay the aides to the prime minister and deputy prime minister monthly allowances, engages in bribery.

The politician who pays Najib's people to always say good things about the former so that he continues to be minister or chief minister, does a bribery number.

Where the money involved runs into hundreds of millions and even billions, the bribery reaches a more sophisticated level.

Manipulating records and numbers

In one of my conversations with The Oracle of Syed Putera (who incidentally is the alter ego of former economic adviser Daim Zainuddin), I asked: "How was it that the double-tracking project originally given to China Railways and which was endorsed by the federal Cabinet was rescinded?

"How did it come to the state, when Cabinet revised its earlier decision and in light of new 'data and information', the project was taken away from China Railways and given to China Harbours?

"Who provided new data and information? Who directed the provider of the information to submit new evidence?"

Any layman would think, China Harbours is a company expert in doing harbours and China Railways in rail lines. The proper thing is to give it to China Railways.

The Oracle was very matter-of-fact when he replied: "Because huge sums of money have changed hands."

He must have meant the manipulation of facts and figures and methods to allow the switch in decisions.

Appointing a project management consultant that deducts points from the track record of China Harbours to make it look unqualified and extolling the virtues of another competitor, is corruption of a more sophisticated level.

It means that the level of corruption here in Malaysia takes a network of like-minded people to work. In Malaysia corruption is a team effort.

READ MORE HERE

 

Mahasiswa itu poyo

Posted: 21 Dec 2011 07:32 AM PST

Gelaran 'mahasiswa' bukanlah gelaran istimewa yang mempunyai hak atau seolah-olah masyarakat terhutang budi untuk mendengar suara golongan ini.

"Poyo" adalah satu perkataan yang digunakan oleh golongan remaja terutama di sekitar Lembah Kelang (dan kawasan sekitarnya) untuk menerangkan rasa kegelian, menyampah ataupun apa-apa perkara yang membuatkan seseorang itu merasa hendak muntah.

Zaidel Baharuddin, Free Malaysia Today

Assalamualaikum dan salam sejahtera wahai para pembaca sekelian.

Minggu lepas saya telah menimbulkan amarah beberapa golongan kecil yang memakai tudung berlipat-lipat sambil berbual dalam gaya pertuturan Amerika dan British berselit beberapa perkataan Arab.

Minggu ini pula saya membangkitkan kemarahan golongan pelajar universiti yang menggelarkan diri mereka sebagai mahasiswa. Namun kali ini tidak seperti sebelumnya, FMT telah menutup kemudahan untuk memberi komen maka tidaklah sakit kepala saya membaca sumpah seranah serta cercaan orang yang tidak dikenali di serata Internet.

Pastinya anda sudah tidak sabar lagi untuk mengetahui mengapa saya menggelarkan golongan yang menggelarkan diri mereka sebagai mahasiswa sebagai poyo, maka apa tunggu lagi.

Sebelum kita meneruskan perbincangan kita pada hari ini adalah baik sekiranya saya menerangkan takrifan yang digunakan dalam karangan ini, pastinya ada para pembaca yang budiman pasti tertanya-tanya apakah itu "poyo"?

"Poyo" adalah satu perkataan yang digunakan oleh golongan remaja terutama di sekitar Lembah Kelang (dan kawasan sekitarnya) untuk menerangkan rasa kegelian, menyampah ataupun apa-apa perkara yang membuatkan seseorang itu merasa hendak muntah.

Antara perkataan ganti yang juga boleh digunakan adalah seperti poser, menggelabah ataupun "tak boleh belah".

Contoh penggunaan perkataan poyo adalah seperti berikut: "Poyo sial gaya rambut adik kau ala-ala Justin Bieber itu" ataupun "Kite xske sgt ngan die taw, gediks sgt dpn boy cute tue, poyo giler babs, muntah wei." Untuk pengetahuan para pembaca sekelian, contoh kedua itu ditulis dalam bentuk bahasa SMS.

Manakala mahasiswa pula ialah perkataan gelaran yang diberi kepada penuntut universiti dan dalam konteks Malaysia, mahasiswa biasanya adalah gelaran kepada penuntut universiti kerajaan yang berminat untuk bertanding Majlis Perwakilan Pelajar (MPP).

Sesungguhnya saya juga merupakan bekas graduan Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, dari Fakulti Kejuruteraan Eletrik, fakulti yang paling membosankan dari segi aktiviti masa lapang pelajar dan pada waktu saya belajar, merupakan pemegang rekod jumlah peratusan keluar mengundi paling rendah sewaktu pilihan raya kampus.

Kempen yang mengecewakan

Jadi dapat dilihat dari sini sebenarnya saya tidak mempunyai masalah dengan pelajar universiti tetapi saya hanya mempunyai masaalah dengan yang menggelarkan diri mereka sebagai mahasiswa kerana pertamanya saya tidak nampak apa sangat yang maha tentang siswa ini dan keduanya biasanya mereka yang menggelarkan diri mereka mahasiswa adalah mereka yang saya selalu lihat sebagai poyo.

Saya yakin, pastinya ada pelajar universiti yang menggelarkan diri mereka mahasiswa tidaklah

sepoyo mana, pastinya mereka merupakan orang yang mesra, baik hati dan disukai ramai, namun dari segi pengalaman dan pengamatan penulis yang telah belajar di universiti kerajaan selama lima tahun diikuti dengan beberapa golongan mahasiswa tertentu maka dengan sedihnya saya terpaksa menyatakan, setiap kali saya mendengar perkataan mahasiswa, perkara pertama yang datang atau muncul dalam minda saya ialah kepoyoan yang menghampiri tahap polis angkasa gaban (peribahasa moden).

Sewaktu saya menuntut di universiti dahulu, seringkali saya berdepan dengan orang yang bersemangat berceramah tentang "suara mahasiswa", "kepimpinan mahasiswa" ataupun "kuasa mahasiswa".

Pada mulanya saya menolak tepi slogan-slogan ini kerana saya berpendapat kebanyakan mereka yang sibuk memperjuangkan perkara-perkara ini adalah dari aliran sastera yang mempunyai banyak masa untuk menjalankan aktiviti sampingan. UTM yang ketika itu terkenal dengan gelaran Universiti Tendang Menendang kerana tahap kegagalan yang tinggi di kalangan pelajar jurusan kejuruteraan, saya lebih risau untuk mengumpul markah bagi memastikan saya boleh meneruskan pengajian pada semester hadapan.

Boleh dikatakan tiga tahun pertama saya di universiti bagi saya "kuasa mahasiswa" adalah perkara kedua dan saya lebih risaukan tentang "kuasa aruhan elektromagnet" dan bagaimana mengiranya dengan tepat.

Namun setelah saya menjadi seorang pelajar kanan, yang mana kini markah saya boleh dikatakan lebih stabil (tidak tinggi, teruk juga tapi susahlah nak kena tendang) maka saya pun sedikit berminat apabila dikatakan tentang "kepimpinan mahasiswa".

Sebagai seorang siswa yang maha, banyak juga yang saya tidak berpuas hati dengan kepimpinan universiti, masyarakat, negara dan juga dunia sejagat.

Namun yang paling saya tidak puas hati adalah isu-isu yang berkait rapat dengan saya sebagai seorang siswa yang maha dan saya merasakan melalui "suara mahasiswa" dan "kepimpinan mahasiswa" bolehlah saya mempunyai saluran dan wakil untuk menyuarakan suara dan hasrat saya kepada pemerintah universiti.

Maka apabila sampai masa waktu pemilihan saya pun telah nekad untuk keluar mengundi kerana mahu wakil yang boleh menyuarakan suara saya, selain dari hadiah cabutan bertuah dari fakulti kepada mereka yang mengundi kerana HEP (Hal Ehwal Pelajar) telah mendesak FKE (Fakulti Kejuruteraan Eletrik) untuk meningkatkan peratusan keluar mengundi.

Malangnya, apabila saya mendengar kempen dari mereka yang mempunyai aspirasi (bukan pro aspirasi) untuk menjadi perwakilan, saya merasa kecewa.

Saya berharap yang mereka akan memperjuangkan perkara-perkara seperti meningkatkan kualiti pensyarah, menambah kemudahan kepada pelajar seperti "water cooler", tentang yuran pengajian, hal-hal akademik, hal biasiswa, untuk memberi input tentang matapelajaran dan kurikulum pengajian kepada pihak pentabir universiti dan perkara-perkara sedemikan.

READ MORE HERE

 

Hasan Ali : Kalau datang dulu nampak mukanya, kalau nak pergi biarlah nampak belakangnya

Posted: 21 Dec 2011 07:28 AM PST

ASPAN ALIAS

Beberapa orang rakan meminta saya membuat sedikit komen tentang apa yang berlaku dalam PAS yang berkait dengan isu Hasan Ali dan Nasharudin Mat Isa. Saya pula berpendapat itu adalah isu dalam PAS dan Nasharudin telah menyatakan yang beliau akan terus setia dengan PAS. Tetapi mereka mahukan komen pendek saya tentang Hasan Ali, Exco kerajaan Selangor yang menyatakan yang PAS telah menyimpang dari perjuangan asalnya.

Oleh kerana PAS bukan parti saya maka saya tidak dapat memberikan komen yang tepat kerana saya tidak pernah berada di dalam parti itu. Oleh kerana tidak tahu apa sebenarnya yang berlaku dalam parti itu saya tidak mampu untuk memberikan komen. Saya mungkin boleh memberikan sedikit sahaja komen mengikut apa yang saya nampak dan dengar dan komen saya hanyalah berdasarkan kepada 'apa yang terbit, itulah yang saya tuai'.

Saya telah mendengar tentang Hasan Ali ini sejak beberapa lama dahulu. Beliau begitu resah berada dalam PAS kerana beliau telah dijadikan umpan oleh pihak yang berseteru dengan PAS agar PAS menjadi lemah. Beliau adalah orang yang kuat untuk menemukan PAS dengan UMNO untuk penyatuan orang Melayu Islam tetapi usaha beliau itu tidak pergi ke mana-mana kerana keseluruhan ahli PAS telah memberikan 'stand' yang tegas melalui muktamar parti itu yang bekerjasama dengan UMNO itu tidak berhasil.

Hasan di katakan agak 'obsess' dengan usaha menyatukan UMNO dengan PAS dan keputusan PAS tidak melayani cadangan UMNO untuk PAS bersatu dengannya. Ramai berpendapat kecenderungan Hasan untuk mendapat keuntungan peribadi beliau merupakan penyebab mengapa beliau mengambil stand 'middle left' dalam perhubungan di antara PAS dengan UMNO. Keuntungan yang di rasakan akan di perolehi oleh beliau jika PAS bekerjasama dengan UMNO ialah jawatan yang baik seperti MB dan lain-lain, lebih baik dari apa yang beliau sandang sekarang ini.

Bagi pendapat saya secara peribadi, Hasan patut meninggalkan sahaja PAS dan tidak berdolak dalik dengan susunan kata-kata yang mudah dibaca orang. Bak kata perbilangan, ramai boleh 'menyelam air dalam tunggak' Hasan itu. Hasan mesti faham dalam keadaan sekarang hanya ada dua posisi yang di ambil oleh individu yang bermain politik; iaitu duduk di sana atau duduk di sini. Politik hari ini memerlukan pendirian yang jelas kerana bagi pihak yang tidak berpuas hati dengan keadaan kepimpinan negara, mereka tidak mahu berketuakan mereka yang tidak di sini dan tidak di sana.

Bagi pihak yang menentang arus mereka mahu melihat pemimpin yang jelas mahu melihat pimpinan hari ini di ambil alih oleh pihak alternatif. Sebaliknya bagi mereka yang mahu mempertahankan pimpinan yang ada mereka perlu jelas duduk di sebelah pihak yang mempertahankan pimpinan itu dengan jelas dan nyata. Mereka yang cuba bermain politik mengikut jalan tengah pada masa ini pasti akan menghadapi masalah besar.

READ MORE HERE

 

Poor English skills, race quotas in way of Malaysian prosperity, says ST

Posted: 20 Dec 2011 07:40 PM PST

(The Malaysian Insider) - Malaysia's shortage of skilled, English-speaking workers along with ethnic-based quotas that complicate hiring practices will hamper the country's economic momentum despite a rise in foreign investment, Singapore's Straits Times said today in an editorial about the Najib administration.

The newspaper, which is considered to be a reflection of the establishment voice in Singapore, said the Najib administration must follow through with its current reform efforts.

However, further economic reform "may" only be possible if Datuk Seri Najib Razak strengthens his grip on the ruling Barisan Nasional's (BN) lynchpin, Umno, through a "solid endorsement" from voters in the coming polls, senior writer Bruce Gale said in the story appearing in the newspaper's Op-Ed page today.

He said although official numbers show that foreign investment in Malaysia had risen markedly this year, the country continued to lag behind its neighbours.

Gale said this was likely the result of the dearth of skilled, English-speaking workers and race-based quotas that "complicate hiring practices", both of which he described as fundamental problems that have led the country into the middle-income trap.

"Several measures foreshadowed last year have either stalled or yet to fully materialise. Chief among these is the promise that ethnic quotas would be further relaxed," he added.

But, Gale noted that abandoning race-based quotas was a move that would meet strong resistance from within Umno.

The writer also commended "reformist" Najib's market-oriented changes as enshrined in the New Economic Model (NEM), pointing to a World Bank report in October on the ease of doing business that showed Malaysia moving up five notches in the bank's global ranking.

Gale cited another report from consulting firm AT Kearny earlier this month, which placed Malaysia among the world's top 10 most attractive destinations for foreign direct investment.

This year's figures, he said, also showed that total investment approvals in Malaysia until October stood at RM26.4 billion — fast approaching the previous peak in 2007 of RM29.5 billion.

READ MORE HERE

 

PKR reveals new ‘proof’ in World Bank row

Posted: 20 Dec 2011 07:27 PM PST

PKR says that a World Bank loan was sought through the National Economic Action Council, of which Mahathir was the chairman.

(Free Malaysia Today) - PKR today continued with its attack on Dr Mahathir Mohamad by showing alleged new evidence to prove its claim that the former premier had asked for loan from the World Bank during the 1999 financial crisis.

PKR strategic director Rafizi Ramli said in a statement today that a World Bank report coded "PID6999″ showed Mahathir asking for loans to support his administration's National Economic Recovery Plan (NERP).

The loans were sought through the National Economic Action Council (NEAC) under the tenure of Mahathir's strongman Daim Zainuddin. Mahathir was the chairman of NEAC.

Daim was the NEAC's secretary and was also the director of the Economic Planning Unit that answered to the former prime minister himself.

The World Bank report read:

"In view of these circumstances in July 1998, the government announced a National Economic Recovery Plan to bring the economy back on a positive growth path.

"One of the six strategic objectives of the National Economic Recovery Plan is to continue the country's equity and socio-economic agenda which had been instrumental during the past two decades, in maintaining social stability in the country.

"In line with this objective, the government has proposed a plan of action to mitigate the adverse social impacts of the crisis which threaten to reverse the gains made in the past. The government has approached the (World) Bank for help in strengthening this plan and implementing it through a Social Protection Project"

'Asked for and not offered'

The NERP was introduced as a blueprint to steer Malaysia out of the Asian financial crunch in July 1998.

The report stated that Malaysia had first sought the loan on July 26, 1998. It further stated that the World Bank assessment team had departed for Malaysia on Nov 30. The negotiation began Feb 1, 1999.

Rafizi said the report clearly stated that the aid was "asked for and not offered".

In his blog posting yesterday, Mahathir maintained that he had never written any letter requesting for loan from the World Bank.

READ MORE HERE

 

Islamic state not in PAS constitution

Posted: 20 Dec 2011 04:29 PM PST

The founder of the PAS Supporters Club points out there is a clause for the Islamist party to form a welfare state.

(Free Malaysia Today) - The concept of an Islamic state is not enshrined in the PAS constitution, says a PAS official.

Therefore, the party should stop championing the concept unless it is willing to amend its founding political principles to accommodate the governance policy, modelled after theocracy nations such as Iran.

PAS Supporters Club founder Hu Phang Chaw urged the supposedly warring factions in the Islamist party to revert to the party constitution to settle their present dispute.

When PAS was formed in 1951, there was no element of an Islamist state inserted in the 11 clauses of its constitution.

Instead, there is a clause for PAS to form a welfare society and to uphold the Federal Constitution, Hu said in an interview.

Both the PAS and federal constitutions were written based on references and feedback from the United Nations, he added.

PAS needs to go back to its roots and original struggle to revive its political objectives, or risks the possibility of fracturing into splinter parties again, such as in the early 1980s, Hu said.

He added that the non-Muslim component in the party is watching in disbelief that the party leaders are tearing apart all the political goodwill it has earned since 2004 despite its Islamist leaning.

Ideological divide

There is nothing wrong about a welfare state, as for any country to be a success, political parties must often treat the interest and security of its citizenry as of paramount importance, he said.

Segments of society are rebelling against the Barisan Nasional (BN) now because, although the coalition had previously championed the people's cause and brought about stability, it seemed to have lost its way now – bogged down with alleged corrupt practices, nepotism and cronism, Hu said.

The outcome is the economy has become weak despite whatever growth projections various quarters may be espousing, Hu said, adding that many now subscribe to the belief that the rich are getting richer while the poor are getting poorer.

Hu was commenting on the dispute and concerns raised over remarks by former Selangor PAS commissioner Hasan Ali, former deputy president Nasharudin Mat Isa together with a host of other party personalities such as PAS Youth head Nasharuddin Hassan Tantawi and his deputy Nik Abdul Nik Abdul Aziz.

To illustrate the ideological divide in PAS, pundits are describing the present disagreement as between the progressive faction, who are influenced by visionary Turkish leader Recep Tayyip Erdogan, and the old school of ulamas, who control PAS' decision-making bodies such as the syura council and the central committee.

Hu advises all PAS leaders to stop the dispute and refer to the party constitution to end their debate about welfare and Islamic state.

"Prepare for the 13th general election and show unity if one still loves the party instead of squabbling," Hu said.

READ MORE HERE

 

Dr M, in India we have bad roads but true democracy

Posted: 20 Dec 2011 04:26 PM PST

Last week, Dr Mahathir gave a speech in India which stirred one Indian activist to retort in an open letter to the doctor.

We want to become a nation with a system that treats all its citizens as equal unlike your country that officially accords special rights to Malay Muslims calling them first-class citizens while relegating thousands of people of Tamil, Chinese and other ethnic origins.

By Siddharthya Swapan Roy, Free Malaysia Today

Dear Dr Mahathir,

A couple of days back I woke up to newspaper reports which quoted you as saying that India's democracy is a hindrance to its development and, if we did away with the nuisance of democracy, we will become developed.

Well, sir, it is heartening to see your concern about India's future, especially now that our own elected government has orphaned us. To read that someone from the outside cares about our development sounds so very nice.

But you see, sir, your (apparently) good intentions notwithstanding, your advice to Indians is, well how should I put it… ill-advised.

I'm not really sure if you know much about the history of our nation. Don't get me wrong.

Going by facts like the general absence of news from Malaysian newspapers; the absence of anything but song and dance in your electronic media; the absence of bookstores that sell knowledgeable books (for example, ones from which you can learn about history and not how to get rich in six steps); the abundance of malls and the stark absence of libraries; the abundance of coaching centres that can make masseurs, air hostesses and a host of quick-fix technicians and the relative absence of centres of higher learning especially in the social sciences; and, above all, the fact that this insanely consumerist and hedonist Malaysia was made under your tutelage, makes me doubt your knowledge of the history of India or any nation for that matter.

So allow me to apprise you of the story of our independence.

We won independence from colonial rulers waging a long and tortuous battle. A battle that sought to replace a discriminatory, unjust and violent regime that had enslaved huge populations with one which was based on the principles of liberty, equality and fraternity.

India was home then, as is now and as will always be, to an immense diversity of people who spoke different tongues, prayed to different Gods, wore different clothes and had different political beliefs. These diverse people said to each other that – we, despite our differences, will strive to live and flourish together and make a sovereign nation which will be democratic, socialist and secular.

We did not anywhere say that we want to be Malaysia or for that matter China or the US.

In India, no one is above the law

We want to become a nation with a system that treats all its citizens as equal unlike your country that officially accords special rights to Malay Muslims calling them first-class citizens while relegating thousands of people of Tamil, Chinese and other ethnic origins.

Despite the fact that they have known no other land than Malaysia as their own, you denigrate them with the tag of being second-class citizens.

We try to work towards having a system wherein a person will grow according to his merit and hard work earning what she or he has rightfully earned.

You may be surprised to know that here in India making cartels based on identity, even if under the name of a holy cow called "Bumipuetra" or son of the soil is looked down upon by most of us.

Here, promoting the selective interests of one's self or that of his kin is called corruption and nepotism and not, as you call it, development.

We are in fact fighting tooth and nail to arrest the scourge of corruption and (you'll be shocked to know) get the guilty punished.

Here in India no one is above the law and many a times powerful public figures go to jail for being corrupt or subverting the law.

Now that we are at it, sir, I'm sure it would be interesting to know what the minorities of your country have to say – especially the jailed and beaten ones – about the development-democracy debate.

In fact, sir, your idea of development is largely at odds with many of us here.

Development is no substitute for values

What you did to the tropical forests and water bodies of Malaysia (that is, raze vast acres of them into oblivion to make way for big-buck oil palm plantations and piggeries and so on) would cause huge outrage among many of us who are looking for sustainable development.

We are yet to be unanimously convinced that making cemented roads – however broad, lining them with buildings, even if glass-covered and glossy, and putting cars on them, however fast – is a substitute for our valued bio-diversity.

Many of us are very convinced that displacing huge populations of native people for useless things like racing tracks is a blot on the word "development".

There are many of us who find it a shameful and cruel hypocrisy that while your country has abundant and openly advertised sex tourism, it still whips women for being licentious!

READ MORE HERE

 

Malaysia’s record of engagement with the World Bank

Posted: 20 Dec 2011 04:22 PM PST

CPI

Members of the public may be interested to know the details of engagement between the World Bank and Malaysia, especially given what many view as Dr Mahathir Mohamad's recent attempt to rewrite the history of this engagement during his tenure as prime minister from 1981 to 2003.

The Malaysian policy on public access to the documentation of this engagement is severely restricted under the Official Secrets Act.

Fortunately, the World Bank's public disclosure policy is much more open and transparent, and thus the conduct of the said engagement can be seen from the details provided which are accessible through the bank's website.

Besides the current contentious issue of loans provided to the country during Dr Mahathir's administration, bank assistance has been in the way of grants and trust funds provided by donor countries (Malaysia although a middle income and relatively rich country by many standards is still recipient of official funding assistance from abroad) as well as advisory and analytical work assistance. 

GRANTS AND TRUST FUNDS

READ MORE HERE

 

‘I’m not involved’: Shahrizat says it again

Posted: 20 Dec 2011 04:20 PM PST

Quizzed on the latest revelation by PKR concerning a luxury condo in Singapore, the minister says that she is merely the wife of the NFC chairman.

(Free Malaysia Today) - Shahrizat Abdul Jalil today dodged questions on the latest RM10 million Singapore condominium revelation by PKR and reiterated her non-involvement in the National Feedlot Centre (NFC) scandal.

Bombarded with questions from reporters at a charity event here, the women, family and community development minister again said she has no ties with the national cattle farming project apart from being "the wife" of its chairman.

"I've said it before… legally and professionally, I am not involved in the NFC. I am just the wife of the NFC chairman. Don't all women and families have husband," she said.

In the latest assault against the Umno Wanita chief, PKR leaders claimed yesterday Shahrizat had used taxpayers' money meant to finance the NFC to purchase a luxury condominium in Singapore.

The unit was purchased under her family's name.

Although the paper trail to prove that the purchase was made using NFC cash was not available, PKR leaders said the presence of several of Shahrizat's private businesses in the island state allegedly connected to NFC's funds was strong enough to suggest a link.

MORE TO FOLLOW

READ MORE HERE

 

RM34 million for ‘scrap metal’ helicopters

Posted: 20 Dec 2011 02:51 PM PST

(Free Malaysia Today) Opposition DAP wants to know why Sabah Air leased its helicopters for RM1 if it was in the red.

TAWAU: Sabah's two new Eurocopters, totaling RM34 million, are stiring a lot of dust in the state without even spinning their rotors.

Sabah DAP chairman Jimmy Wong has latched on the Auditor General's latest report that targets Sabah Air Aviation Sdn Bhd's purchase of the Eurocopter AS 355 NP for RM13 million and Eurocopter EC 145 for RM21 million.

Wong said the whole deal is a scandal and the helicopters are "scrap metal".

State Assistant Minister for Infrastructure Development, Pang Yuk Ming while defending the purchase of the aircraft, has however been struggling to explain why they have not been used.

In the latest twist, Wong accused Sabah Air Aviation chairman Yusof Kassim, and its chief executive officer Manu Sasidharan of rushing to Kuala Lumpur to get the "operations specification certificate" for the two helicopters only after questions were raised about the aircrafts' air-worthiness.

Wong claimed both these officials had met with civil aviation authorities in Putrajaya on Dec 6.

Wong said that this proves that the two new helicopters are faulty. He said that without the documents, Sabah Air Aviation cannot use the aircraft for any part of their business.

"I was informed that the AS 355 NP does not have this certification and that its airworthy certification was not renewed since it expired about a month ago.

"The AS 355 NP is therefore not allowed to fly any passenger with an expired airworthy certificate. The chopper may only fly under special conditions such as for flight testing to qualify for the airworthy certificate renewal.

"If this is true, how dare Sabah Air Aviation invite me on Dec 16 to fly in the AS355NP?" Wong asked.

Aircraft for CM

The Sabah DAP chief also questioned why the EC145 bearing the registration mark '9M-CMD' had a "VVIP seats configuration" and if it was exclusively for the CM's travel.

"Is it true that "9M" signifies aircraft registered in Malaysia and the remaining three alphabets is a special registration mark. I am told that Sabah Air specially selected 9M-CMD to signify the Chief Minister Department," said Wong.

He said Sabah Air should provide the original copy of the "operation specification certificate" with the EC 145 registration '9M-CMD' and AS355 NP registration '9M-MOH'.

Read more at: http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/2011/12/21/rm34-million-for-scrap-metal-helicopters/

 

Mahathir is cause of 1997 Financial Crisis Thru Mismanagement

Posted: 20 Dec 2011 02:25 PM PST

Mahathir is NOT an Economist and had NEVER faced such a Financial Crisis BEFORE. Therefore, Mahathir did not know the solution.

By Dr Robert Chan

In 1995, World Bank, IMF and Economists warned Mahathir Mohammad the Prime Minister that if Malaysia did NOT manage its economy and finance properly, it would suffer the same fate as Mexico whose peso plummeted very seriously.

Instead of finding out WHY and HOW to prevent the situation, Mahathir immediately rebutted and scolded them by saying that they were jealous of Malaysia's development and economy and they were trying to embarrass us.

In 1997, when the Financial Crisis hit us, we were all shocked. Mahathir did not know what had happened and therefore did not know what to do.

Mahathir and his Ministers were confused by the various statements that they made. Apparently, Mahathir spent billions to support the currency ringgit but was unsuccessful.

When US Secretary of Treasury, Robert Rubin came, his advice was sought. Robert asked Daim and Mahathir to reduce interest rates. Daim is only a Lawyer and a businessman. He is no great Economist. IF Mahathir and Daim claim that they are experts in Economics and Finance, I would like to give them a Test - Theory and Viva.

Professor Paul Krugman wrote an open letter to Mahathir asking him to implement the Exchange Control.

Finally, the value of the Malaysian currency RM fell by more than 50% from RM2.50 to RM3.80 to USD.

Mahathir is NOT an Economist and had NEVER faced such a Financial Crisis BEFORE. Therefore, Mahathir did not know the solution. He took advice. Rumours in KL said Nor Mohamed Yaacop was responsible for the loss of US$10 billion in currency trading!!! Ask the Bankers and his classmates in University of Malaya. Malaysians became poorer by more than 50% because the idiotic Prime Minister Mahathir was stubborn.

So what so great about Mahathir???

When I was in Britain there was a Debate where Nobel Prize Winner Milton Friedman, Margaret Thatcher British PM and etc participated in discussing the Economy of Britain. Milton Friedman and Margaret Thatcher both said, "You cannot spend money you have not earned."

Even a normal housewife knows that. She will run on a budget. A housewife is given a certain sum of money a month by her husband to manage the family and house. If she over-spends, she will be scolded by her husband. Most of the time, the housewife will spend less than what was given so she has some money for rainy days!!! A normal housewife can manage the economy better than Prime Minister Mahathir.
 
Mahathir the Prime Minister ran current accounts deficits for several years with little reserves.
Mahathir blamed everybody except himself.
Mahathir had to find a scapegoat and he pointed his finger at George Soros.
Mahathir is good at finding scapegoats!!!

When Malaysia was in the midst of this Financial Crisis 1997-8, he led a huge delegation to Argentina. WHAT FOR??? He should have stayed at home to LEARN ABOUT THE CRISIS, its causes and its remedies. But he did not care!!! If a Japanese PM did that, he would be forced to resign.

Mahathir did NOT treat the people with respect. His attitude is, "I can spend the peoples' money any way I like. What can you do? I am the PM. I have the power."
 
Mahathir travelled around the world more frequently than the US President or any leader of his time, using the nation's money. Mahathir also went to Antartica and Vladivostock!!! He can justify anything.
 
After retirement, he admitted the 1997-8 Financial Crisis was the biggest headache he ever had as PM.
 
When I went to Argentina for a holiday, I was told by some Argentinians that our Prime Minister, Ministers and businessmen had bought properties in Argentina.
 
Is that the reason WHY Mahatir (after retirement) flew to Argentina using a "private jet"??? Whose private jet was that???
 
Mahathir is an arrogant and stubborn person.
Mahathir built the crooked half bridge without first getting Singapore to agree and sign the Agreement.
Now the half bridge, hanging in the air, is rotting in the sun.
Mahathir wasted RM350 million of the peoples money. But he doesn't care.
He always said he did not care.
See how stubborn and idiotic he is.
Mahathir is an irresponsible Prime Minister.
 
The RM350 million could be used to build 3500 homes for the poor Malays. These homes could accommodate about 18,000 people. Are Architects and Engineers taught in Universities HOW to build crooked half bridges??? I don't think it is in their curriculum. I think it is unethical for Architects and Engineers to build HALF bridges. Who made the MONEY from building the HALF bridge???
 
Mahathir built the RM600 million Convention Hall in Putrajaya for the OIC Meeting. Now it is hardly used. Such a waste of money!!! Why doesn't Mahathir use the KLCC Convention Hall or PWTC Halls or other big Halls in KL?
 
Because Mahathir just doesn't care.
Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved