Sabtu, 6 April 2013

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


More goodies from BN manifesto

Posted: 06 Apr 2013 12:11 AM PDT

Barisan Nasional chairman Najib Tun Razak promised all these carrots if BN is voted back to power.

G Vinod, FMT

BUKIT JALIL: Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak tonight unveiled the Barisan Nasional manifesto – and more goodies spilled out of his bag.

Najib, who is BN chairman, promised a slew of these goodies to the people should BN be voted back to power.

Addressing a capacity crowd of 50,000 at the Bukit Jalil Indoor Stadium here, Najib promised that he would increase Bantuan Rakyat 1Malaysia (BR1M) from the existing RM500 to RM1,200 to each household if voted back to power.

Also present were Cabinet ministers, former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad and former MIC president, S Samy Vellu.

Najib also promised a cash aid of RM600 to unmarried Malaysians.

"And I will ensure BR1M aid is given yearly," Najib said, to thunderous applause.

On top of that, he also promised to increase Bantuan Buku 1Malaysia to school students from the existing RM150 to RM300 annually.

He also took a leaf from the Pakatan Rakyat's manifesto launched on Feb 25: he announced that the BN government would also embark on a Pan Borneo highway project and reduce car prices in the next five years.

While Pakatan said it would build the highway linking Kuching, Kota Kinabalu and Kudat, Najib had other ideas in mind.

In his Pan Borneo Highway project, Najib plans to link the 2,300km highway from Sematan to Serudung, Sarawak.

He also promised to add more exits along the North-South Expressway.

"We will also extend the East Coast Highway from Kuala Krai-Kota Baru to Gambang, Segamat," said Najib.

On reducing car prices, he promised to reduce car prices by between 20 and 30% in the next five years.

Pakatan, however, has promised to abolish the excise duty gradually to allow more people to own cars.

Among other promises in the BN manifesto are:

  • Place non-Muslim affairs under the purview of a Minister in the Prime Minister's Department.
  • Increase non-Bumiputera participation in the civil service and government-linked companies (GLC).
  • Reduce Internet broadband subsripction fee by 20%.
  • Give tax exemptions to those setting up childcare centres and early childhood progamme centres.
  • Build one million affordable houses, with 500,000 being built under the 1Malaysia People Housing Programme (PR1MA).
  • Ensure houses built under PR1MA are priced at least 20% lower than the market value.
  • Abolishing stamp duties for first-time house buyers who purchase a residence worth less than RM400,000.
  • Expand bus, monorail and integrated taxi services in towns and cities.
  • Increase the number of individual taxi permit holders.
  • Make English a must pass paper for SPM examination.
  • Convert Tamil schools to fully aided facilities if requested by the school administration.
  • Free Internet service at public higher learning institutions.

READ MORE HERE

 

Mahathir draws thousands in Selangor rally

Posted: 05 Apr 2013 07:45 PM PDT

Thousands of Malaysians turned up on Saturday, April 6, 2013, for a rally in Selangor to listen to former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad (above) lobby for support for ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) coalition.

Yong Yen Nie, Straits Times

SHAH ALAM, Selangor - Thousands of Malaysians turned up on Saturday for a rally in Selangor to listen to former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad lobby for support for ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) coalition.

Tun Dr Mahathir, 87, clearly has not lost his star power as the thousands came to a field in Shah Alam, the capital city of this opposition-held state, in the heavy rain to hear him speak.

"I am here to help save Selangor," he said to loud applause. "Selangor is the richest state in the country and we should hold power in such states."

Dr Mahathir had also campaigned before a crowd of thousands in Johor Baru recently as the BN sought to consolidate support there after the opposition Pakatan Rakyat (PR) sent its top stars to stand in the southern state.

The former premier, who retired in 2003, is seen to be backing current Prime Minister Najib Razak in this election as he attempts to wrest back power in the four states won by PR five years ago.

"I am confident that Najib will fulfill the promises," he said. "Give the victory to BN and Insya-allah (God-willing), Selangor will be safe."

Asked by reporters later about his active campaign, Dr Mahathir said he was doing his rounds to thank the people who had supported him when he was PM.

He is also expected to campaign in Kedah where his youngest son Mukhriz Mahathir is seen as a front-runner to be its menteri besar, should the BN regain the state.

Dr Mahathir's support would come as a relief to PM Najib whom he has criticised several times in recent years.

His harsh criticism of then-Prime Minister Tun Abdullah Badawi in the run-up to the 2008 general elections was seen as a factor in swaying voter sentiment against the BN.

He remains an iconic leader to many, especially among the Malays.

 

2,000 throng Perkasa final rally

Posted: 05 Apr 2013 07:25 PM PDT

Former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad was among the crowd who gathered in a show of strength against Pakatan Rakyat.

Leven Woon, FMT

SHAH ALAM: Some 2,000 people including former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad and Selangor Barisan Nasional leaders today gathered in a Perkasa rally here, which called for the ouster of Pakatan Rakyat state government ahead of a crucial general election.

Dubbed by the organiser as its final rally before the polls, the rally drew many BN supporters who donned the coalition signature blue T-shirt or Perkasa red T-shirt.

When Mahathir arrived at 3.30pm at a school field, the crowd waved the BN flags enthusiastically and chanted "Hidup Tun".

"With this kind of spirit, I am confident that come the 13th general election, Pakatan will be finished off here," declared Perkasa deputy president Zulkilfli Noordin.

READ MORE HERE

 

Downfall is expected within six months if Pakatan Rakyat rules: Ko Youn

Posted: 05 Apr 2013 03:32 PM PDT

Ko Youn: In this election, if Pakatan Rakyat wins more parliamentary seats than the BN, once PAS threatens to form a coalition government with Umno, PAS president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang would then be the Prime Minister, instead of PKR adviser Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. If that happens, Pakatan Rakyat will split.

Soong Phui Jee, Sin Chew Daily

The DAP, PKR and PAS do nor have common ideologies and policies. The reason for the three parties to form Pakatan Rakyat is to confront with their common enemy, the BN. Once the BN is defeated, the reason of unity will no longer exist and their conflicts will then surface, eventually leading to secession, said Gerakan Deputy President Chang Ko Youn.

Chang believes that even if Pakatan Rakyat is able to seize Putrajaya in the upcoming general election, it would face a downfall within six months due to secession. The political situation would then be reshuffled.

During an interview with Sin Chew Daily, Chang said that the real kingmaker among the three component parties of Pakatan Rakyat is PAS. Just like the situation in Perak after the 2008 general election, PAS, with only six state seats, was offered advice to cooperate with Umno.

"In this election, if Pakatan Rakyat wins more parliamentary seats than the BN, once PAS threatens to form a coalition government with Umno, PAS president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang would then be the Prime Minister, instead of PKR adviser Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. If that happens, Pakatan Rakyat will split," he said.

Malay and Indian votes have returned to the BN

Chang advised that Chinese voters should think calmly as the BN's policies over the past four years have been greatly different from those in 2008.

He pointed out that many Chinese are demanding changes and want to change the government. However, Malay and Indian voters do not have the resonance.

"Malay votes have returned to the BN due to a number of religious issues while Indian voters are disappointed with Pakatan Rakyat as the promises made in 2008 were not delivered. As a result, the DAP recently announced a 14-point manifesto in Johor as a supplementary to the Pakatan Rakyat's manifesto being announced a month ago. However, it cannot help in reversing the Indian's voting trend," Chang said.

Big challenge for Najib to win Chinese support

Chang said that the transformation plans launched by Datuk Seri Najib Razak have benefited many Indians and the greatest challenge for Najib now is how to win Chinese confidence.

He hopes that the route taken by Najib over the past four years can convince the Chinese and has made the Chinese feel that only the BN can provide them the sense of security. He also hopes that the Chinese will not decide their future with the 2008 general election's sentiment. Supporting Najib's transformation plans will benefit the Chinese.

 

GE13: Hindraf only focuses on Indians, says PKR man

Posted: 05 Apr 2013 03:19 PM PDT

(The Star) - Pakatan Rakyat has a strong chance of retaining the Bukit Melawati state seat despite Hindraf's intention to contest there, said outgoing assemblyman M. Muthiah of PKR.

Although Hindraf's candidacy could lead to a split in votes, he said Hindraf would not be able win the hearts of all Malaysians as the movement only focused on the well-being of the Indians.

"Pakatan does not use the race card to win votes. We do what is best for the people and that is how things are supposed to be," he said when contacted.

Hindraf announced on Thursday that it would contest in three parliamentary (Kota Raja, Kuala Selangor and Kelana Jaya) and five state seats (Sri Andalas, Ijok, Sri Muda, Bukit Melawati and Seri Setia) in Selangor.

 

GE13: Dissent within PKR over Teluk Kemang seats

Posted: 05 Apr 2013 03:17 PM PDT

(The Star) - PORT DICKSON: PKR leaders here are at loggerheads over candidates for the Teluk Kemang parliamentary and state seats.

The party's Teluk Kemang division chief and outgoing Port Dickson assemblyman M. Ravi and state PKR chairman and outgoing Teluk Kemang MP Datuk Kamarul Baharin Abbas (picture) have submitted different candidates for state seats in the Teluk Kemang constituency.

It is also learnt that Ravi has recommended Badrul Hisham Shaharin and another member, Datuk M. Nadarajah, to contest the Teluk Kemang parliamentary seat.

However, Kamarul's camp has recommended that he be considered to defend the Teluk Kemang seat while state vice-chief V. Aridass contest for the Port Dickson state seat.

Kamarul's name was also proposed for the Ampangan state seat, causing unhappiness in the Seremban division, which had nominated its deputy Dr Rafaie Mohamad.

The outgoing Ampangan PKR representative, Rashid Latiff, has decided not to seek re-election.

"Kamarul is also tipped to contest in Ampangan because if the Opposition takes over Negri Sembilan, he will then be the obvious choice for Mentri Besar," said a source.

In KUALA TERENGGANU, PKR is disputing state PAS commissioner Abdul Wahid Endut's announcement that the party will contest seven out of eight parliamentary seats in the state.

"This is a decision that has been agreed within Pakatan Rakyat," said Abdul Wahid at a press conference on Thursday.

Terengganu PKR chief Azan Ismail, however, said nothing had been finalised.

 

GE13: Jui Meng accepts there is no seat for him in polls

Posted: 05 Apr 2013 03:15 PM PDT

(The Star) - Johor PKR chief Datuk Chua Jui Meng, whose two-week leave created a ripple within the Opposition, finally said he accepted the fact there might not be seat for him to contest in the general election.

"I had a house, and that house was Gelang Patah. And now I don't have a house to go to.

"The party has sought to look for other houses to fulfil PKR's quota of 12 parliamentary seats but no doors have been opened to me," he said.

Chua admitted that his supporters in Gelang Patah were disappointed with the recent announcement that DAP adviser Lim Kit Siang would stand as the Opposition candidate there.

However, he said the disappointment would be temporary and added that he would cooperate with PAS and the DAP "whether I stand in the election or not".

Speaking at a packed press conference in the PKR headquarters here yesterday, Chua said he had no problems with the DAP and would work with it for the sake of Pakatan's campaign in the GE13.

When asked about his relations with his DAP counterpart in Johor Dr Boo Cheng Hau whom he had openly clashed with in the past Chua put on a brave front and said there was no quarrel to begin with. He instead heaped praise on Dr Boo.

"Dr Boo is a bright young leader. I wish him all the best and he has a bright future ahead of him," he said.

Dr Boo had in February accused Chua of being behind "vicious attacks" against Johor DAP and called for him to be removed as state PKR chief.

Chua had retaliated by urging Dr Boo to be "more mature, humble and patient". Both had reportedly been eyeing the Gelang Patah seat and Chua had said then that it was Dr Boo and not himself who had stated any intention to contest there.

Chua yesterday also admitted that he went on two-weeks leave but was tight-lipped over the reason.

However, there was speculation that it was because he was disappointed with the PKR leadership for conceding the Gelang Patah seat to the DAP.

 

NY jeweller clears Rosmah on ring purchase

Posted: 05 Apr 2013 03:02 PM PDT

The US$8 million diamond ring was not purchased by Rosmah Mansor nor Maira Nazarbayev. It was sold to another client in June 2012, says Jacob & Co.

K Kabilan, FMT

International jewellery maker Jacob & Co from New York has confirmed Rosmah Mansor's denial that she had purchased from them a diamond ring worth millions of ringgit as alleged by a PKR leader in 2011.

Philip Nassimi, the director of fine jewellery of Jacob & Co, also backed Rosmah's version of events that a diamond ring was indeed shipped under her name to Kuala Lumpur, but that was for the purpose of showing the ring to Maira Nazarbayev, whose son is engaged to Rosmah and Najib Tun Razak's daughter.

Speaking in a video interview posted by popular blogger Raja Petra Kamarudin on his site Malaysia-Today, Philip (photo below) said the 30.11 carat – natural fancy blue, grade cushion diamond – valued at US$8 million, was shipped to Kuala Lumpur for "exhibition and inspection purposes only, and not for sale".

"It was sent so that Maira Nazarbayev who was residing as a guest at the prime minister's residence can view the ring," he said in a 3.49-minute video.

He added that the ring was shipped under Rosmah's name as US laws only allow for such items to be shipped to a local person with a local address (in Malaysia).

He said the ring, after being viewed by Maira, was shipped out of Kuala Lumpur soon after and reached New York in May 2011.

"The said ring was not purchased by Rosmah nor Maira… it was sold to another client in June 2012," added Philip.

He also said that Maira was a highly valued customer of Jacob & Co for about 10 years.

"She is a well respected client of this firm," he said.

He, however, did not state if Rosmah was a client of the jeweller, or if she had made any other purchases with them.

The video was released by Malaysia Today late yesterday and is believed to be recorded last month.

READ MORE HERE

 

US jeweller backs Rosmah’s denial of RM24m ring buy

Posted: 05 Apr 2013 02:56 PM PDT

Ida Lim, TMI

American jeweller Jacob & Co has come out to refute allegations that Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor bought a RM24 million diamond ring from it in 2011, lending credence to the latter's attempt to shake off criticisms over her spending habits.

In a YouTube video uploaded by blogger Raja Petra Kamarudin yesterday, an employee from the New York-based jewellery firm said the wife of Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak had only inspected the ring, which was later sold to an unnamed client in June last year.

"It was shipped for exhibition and inspection purposes only, not for sale, to the attention of Maira Nazarbayev in care of Madam Rosmah Mansor (picture)," Philip Nassimi, the director of fine jewellery at Jacob & Co said in the video, referring to the mother of Rosmah's future son-in law.

Opposition leaders have been using the ring controversy to back their allegations that the wife of the country's chief executive has been abusing her position to reap riches and finery for herself.

In the deep interior of Malaysia's Malay-majority constituencies, CDs, pamphlets and glossy photographs showing Rosmah and the RM24 million ring have been distributed since 2011, years ahead of the coming 13th general election.

But according to Nassimi's video interview, the 30.11-carat blue-grey diamond ring worth US$8 million (RM24.8 million) was shipped from New York to Malaysia on April 15, 2011, but was returned to Jacob & Co on May 13, 2011, and was never purchased by Rosmah.

In the video, shipping documents and a US Customs and Border Protection paper were shown to prove that the ring was indeed shipped out of Malaysia and then back to the American firm.

Nassimi said Rosmah's name appeared on the shipping documents only because the jewellery firm was required to address the item to a Malaysian as Nazarbayev is not a citizen of the country.

"The reason why on the house airway bill it was mentioned Madam Rosmah Mansor's name was because in order to ship a valuable into Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, it had to be shipped in care of a local Malaysian, not a foreigner."

He also said: "Due to the fact that Maira Nazarbayev was residing as a guest in the prime minister's residence, the item had to be shipped in such a manner." 

Nassimi said Nazarbayev is a highly-respected VIP client with almost 10 years of dealings with the firm, adding that another VIP client had bought the ring, but declined to name the individual.

"This ring was not purchased by Madam Rosmah nor Maira Nazarbayev," he concluded in the video that was over three minutes long.

READ MORE HERE

 

April 27 or April 28 or some say Polling Day is in May

Posted: 05 Apr 2013 02:45 PM PDT

Carolyn Hong, Straits Times

MALAYSIA'S Election Commission (EC) is expected to announce next Wednesday the dates for nomination and polling, now that the last two state assemblies - Penang and Kedah - have been dissolved to pave the way for a general election.

The EC will also set the date for advance voting for security personnel who will be on duty on Polling Day, EC secretary Kamaruddin Mohamed Baria said in a statement yesterday.

The law gives the EC 60 days to hold a general election following the dissolution of Parliament, which took place on Wednesday, but analysts expect polls to be held on the last weekend of this month, or early next month at the latest.

In the last four elections, from 1995 to 2008, Nomination Day was held between nine and 11 days after Parliament was dissolved - and always on a weekend. Going by that, nomination would be around April 13 or 14 this time, but the timeframe might be too tight to allow that now.

Observers now suggest that nomination could be around April 16 or 17, with polling still possible on the widely touted April 27 or 28.

Some suggest the first weekend of next month as another possibility.

Several new electoral measures will be introduced, such as the use of indelible ink, overseas voting and advance voting.

The EC has already come under fire because its website crashed, unable to handle the flood of traffic from overseas Malaysians trying to register at the last minute to be postal voters.

Even though the candidate lists have not been finalised yet, politicians have already started campaigning around the country.

The opposition Pakatan Rakyat met yesterday to try to sort out tussles between component parties over its list.

"We hope next week, (the list will be) finalised," said Parti Islam SeMalaysia (PAS) secretary-general Mustafa Ali after the meeting yesterday.

Opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim said yesterday that he will defend his long-time seat of Permatang Pauh in Penang, putting an end to his earlier hints that he might move to a seat in Perak to lead the opposition charge there.

He was quoted by The Star in Penang as saying that he wanted to be with his loyal voters and supporters in the parliamentary constituency.

He had hinted earlier that he might move to Perak - much like how Democratic Action Party veteran MP Lim Kit Siang is moving to Johor to galvanise voters there.

Barisan Nasional (BN) has also swung into action, with Prime Minister Najib Razak launching several high-profile projects in Cyberjaya, which lies within the constituency of the administrative capital of Putrajaya, held by BN.

PAS vice-president Husam Musa is tipped to contest that seat.

BN will launch its manifesto today, and is expected to release its candidate list next week.

KL election fever sparks volatility

Posted: 05 Apr 2013 02:40 PM PDT

Investors move funds to Malaysia in bid to profit from market turbulence

Alvin Foo, Straits Times

THE regional spotlight has been cast on Malaysia stocks amid rising election fever triggered by the dissolution of Parliament on Wednesday.

That attention looks set to surge in the coming weeks as investors try to profit from the likely rise in volatility.

Overseas interest has already been gaining pace.

Last month, foreigners bought a net RM4.7 billion (S$1.9 billion) worth of Malaysian stocks - the highest since at least October 2009.

Analysts attribute this surge to institutional investors upgrading their Malaysia country allocation from "severe underweight" to "slight underweight".

These investors believe that election risks are mostly priced in while valuations in other Asean markets seem relatively rich.

"We would not be surprised if investors took money out of other Asean markets which have done well, and re-allocate to Malaysia," noted Deutsche Bank.

Market experts say the sudden surge in fresh funds may be caused by investors switching from Malaysian fixed income to stocks.

The hint of election-sparked market turbulence was evident on Wednesday after Prime Minister Najib Razak dissolved Parliament.

Malaysian stocks plunged as much as 3.1 per cent during the day before ending flat, with volatility soaring to a one- month high.

During the last election, in 2008, trading was suspended for an hour on March 10 - the first session following the dramatic poll results - to impose calm.

Panic selling drove the Kuala Lumpur Composite Index (KLCI) down 9.5 per cent that eventful day - its worst one-day showing since a 21 per cent meltdown during the Asian financial crisis on Sept 8, 1998.

Analysts expect uncertainty ahead with most tipping the elections to be held near the end of this month.

TA Securities noted: "Trading post-dissolution of Parliament is expected to stay choppy, with selling on strength and buying on dips likely to contain the index within a range."

It added that any rally attempts towards the 1,699 record high seen in January will likely be met with strong profit-taking and selling interest. The KLCI is trading around the 1,685 mark.

It advised investors to cash out from overvalued blue chips and buy these back on weakness after the dissolution, since a win by ruling coalition Barisan Nasional (BN) could spark a rally.

CIMB analyst Terence Wong urged investors to stay on the sidelines as election risks could weigh down the market.

He noted the selling pressure during the Sarawak state election in 2011 due to widespread concern about the poll outcome.

"This time, the stakes are even higher, and therefore, the impact could be magnified," he added.

CIMB's pre-election preference is to stay defensive and look at high-yielding, non-cyclical sectors such as brewery, real estate investment trusts and utilities.

Mr Wong said: "Post-election, we are likely to turn more bullish."

The spotlight is now on politically sensitive stocks.

Deutsche analyst Joe Liew predicts a "status quo" election outcome, tipping BN to keep about 60 per cent of parliamentary seats.

Deutsche's top five election buys are CIMB Group, Maybank, Tenaga, UEM Land and Gamuda, noting that these stocks are trading at valuations below historical averages.

GE13: Palanivel rules out Samy as polls candidate

Posted: 05 Apr 2013 10:47 AM PDT

http://www.danielykl.com/blog/wp-content/3d3835ee33faa9f63039d2127353dac1.jpg 

(The Star) - Former MIC president Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu has been ruled out as one of the candidates for the nine parliamentary and 19 state seats allotted to the party.

Party president Datuk Seri G. Palanivel said although the party had yet to finalise its candidates, Samy Vellu was not one of them. However, he said Samy Vellu had been working hard in the Sungai Siput constituency, which he lost to Dr Michael Jeyakumar in the 2008 election.

"He will not be a candidate. It is not right of the media to speculate that Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu will be a candidate," he said yesterday.

Samy Vellu, who is Special Envoy for Infrastructure for India and South Asia, had earlier been quoted by online portals as declaring himself to be a "winnable candidate" for the Sungai Siput seat should he be picked to contest there.

Palanivel said discussions were ongoing over candidates for several state seats.

During the party's central working committee meeting on Thursday evening, Palanivel said MIC was happy that it was allowed to re-contest all the parliamentary and state seats it had contested in the 2008 general election.

Palanivel, who is also a Minister in the Prime Minister's Department, is expected to contest in Cameron Highlands, while Datuk S.K. Devamany, who is MIC vice-president, is tipped to contest the Sungai Siput seat.

MIC deputy president Datuk Seri Dr S. Subramaniam is set to defend the Segamat seat while another party vice-president, Datuk M. Saravanan, currently Deputy Federal Territories and Urban Wellbeing Minister, will defend his Tapah seat. 

Samy Vellu mad with Palanivel and deputy for misconstruing his statement

Posted: 05 Apr 2013 10:45 AM PDT

http://1-ps.googleusercontent.com/h/www.themalaysianinsider.com/images/uploads/mugshots/400x276xsamyvellu400px5.jpg.pagespeed.ic.6YF8gNRrWp.webp 

(The Malaysian Insider) - Former MIC president Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu is incensed with party president Datuk Seri G. Palanivel and his deputy Datuk Seri Dr S. Subramaniam over the "winnable candidate" issue.

He believed they misconstrued his declaration on Wednesday — the day Parliament was dissolved — when he stated he was a "winnable candidate" for the Sungai Siput parliamentary constituency, in reply to a reporter's question.

In response to Palanivel's earlier statement that Samy Vellu (picture)would not be contesting in the coming general election, the latter said he had not made a request to Palanivel to be nominated for the seat.

"Palanivel and Dr Subramaniam have misunderstood my statement at a media conference during the handing over of donations to the families of the slain warriors of Lahad Datu, Sabah in Bukit Aman.

"It is true that I told the reporters that I had no doubt I was a winnable candidate, but that doesn't mean that I had requested Palanivel that I wanted to re-contest in Sungai Siput," he said in a statement yesterday.

Samy Vellu said he was saddened over their statements as the statements did not reflect his true intentions.

"They (Palanivel and Dr Subramaniam) should have called me first to find out what transpired at the media conference (in Bukit Aman) before shooting off their mouth," he said, adding that the duo had shown immaturity in politics by "jumping the gun". 

Read more at: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/samy-vellu-mad-with-palanivel-and-deputy-for-misconstruing-his-statement/ 

GE13: UM student, 23, to challenge Najib for Pekan seat

Posted: 05 Apr 2013 10:43 AM PDT

http://starstorage.blob.core.windows.net/archives/2013/4/5/nation/MohdBukhairy.jpg 

(The Star) - A 23-year-old Universiti Malaya student will challenge Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak for the Pekan parliamentary seat in the 13th general election.

Gerakan Mahasiswa PRU13 (GM13), a coalition of student groups, will field political science student Mohamed Bukhairy Sofian as an independent candidate.

He said the group was fielding a candidate as a call to reform Malaysia's higher education system.

"We want to highlight our manifesto and bring these policies to Parliament.

"We will not sideline the issues affecting the local residents (in Pekan) as well," he said during a press conference here on Friday.

Mohamed Bukhairy is a member of the UM student representative council, as well as the chairman of the Nasional Students Representative Council.

Solidariti Mahasiwa Malaysia (SMM) chairman Muhammad Safwan Anang said the manifesto had been forwarded to both the ruling and opposition parties last month, but has yet to receive a response from either side.

The student manifesto outlines eight main points, including full autonomy for local universities, academic freedom, free education at the tertiary level, and that students are allowed to manage their own affairs.

When asked whether he was confident about winning, Mohamed Bukhairy said, "I will do my best... the point is to try." 

After Hindu insult, Zulkifli Noordin says ‘keling’

Posted: 05 Apr 2013 10:41 AM PDT

http://1-ps.googleusercontent.com/h/www.themalaysianinsider.com/images/uploads/2013/april2013/540xNxzulkifli-youtube-screencap.jpg.pagespeed.ic.zTU80gQyRJ.webp 

(The Malaysian Insider) - Independent lawmaker Datuk Zulkifli Noordin has been captured on Youtube uttering the word "keling", which Indian Malaysians find racially offensive, just days after an earlier video deemed religiously-insensitive went viral.

The latest video clip was posted yesterday and showed the controversial Kulim-Bandar Baharu MP at a public event in the Ampang suburb on March 6, purportedly weighing in on the conspiracy theories surrounding the 2006 murder of Mongolian interpreter Altantuya Shaariibuu and the private detective hired to tail her, P. Balasubramaniam who died of heart attack last month.

"Ada badigol Baghdad ni percaya, entah keling mana bawa kitab Hindu dia, 'saya ada tengok, saya ada bukti'. Keling ni bawa kitab Hindu sumpah, dia percaya (There are these Baghdad fools who believe this keling from nowhere who brings his Hindu holy book, saying, 'I have seen, I have proof'. This keling brings and swears on his Hindu holy book, he believes)," he said, using a derogatory word in the Malay language to refer to Malaysians of Indian ancestry.

The two-and-a-half minute clip uploaded by a Youtube user identified as "Chandra Lawan Tetap Lawan" appears to be an extract of a slightly longer video first posted by Malay news portal KLPos.com, which was also uploaded to Youtube, under the title "PAS Gadai Kalimah Allah [PAS pawning Allah]".

Read more at: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/after-hindu-insult-zulkifli-nordin-says-keling/ 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Time to elect servant leaders

Posted: 05 Apr 2013 03:24 PM PDT

It is obscene that our poverty income level is set at around RM800 for an average family of 4.5 persons. We would seriously like to see politicians and their families live on RM800 a month. Many of our leaders live on RM800 a day! A meaningful assessment of poverty in our country will place the poverty income level at RM1,500-2,000 for a family of 4-5 persons. From government figures, this would mean that 30 per cent of our population are still living in poverty.

Amar-Singh HSS and Lim Swee Im, TMI

Most of us are tired of politicians. In a real and honest world a politician is one who represents the people, a very high calling, a noble profession. These are individuals willing to sacrifice much to represent the average person on the street. They are willing to forego their own interests to meet the needs of the many. They are prepared to speak up when injustice is done and to make decisions which benefit the majority of the people. These are the persons we elect, not just the party they represent, but persons of integrity.

Unfortunately, the reality is that politicians have become self-serving individuals out to get as much power and material gain as possible. Willing to subvert basic human rights and compromise on vital issues just to meet party or personal needs.

The shame of Malaysia is that despite the vast riches of our land and more than 50 years of independence, the average person is still poor. The authorities want to continue to show nice statistics on poverty reduction but those of us who work on the ground know the immense struggles of the people in the bottom 20 per cent of our society. 

Our transformation plans are great for the rich and upper-middle class but are not going touch the poor. The poor in Malaysia are neglected and thrown crumbs while the rich and powerful continue to exploit them. The gap between the bottom 20 per cent and the top 20 per cent of our population has widened considerably in the past 50 years. It is obscene that our poverty income level is set at around RM800 for an average family of 4.5 persons. We would seriously like to see politicians and their families live on RM800 a month. Many of our leaders live on RM800 a day! 

A meaningful assessment of poverty in our country will place the poverty income level at RM1,500-2,000 for a family of 4-5 persons. From government figures, this would mean that 30 per cent of our population are still living in poverty.

It is sad that only a tiny minority of our leaders can be said to inspire us with their lives. The majority live such lavish lifestyles that it is impossible to identify with them or appreciate that they are working for the people. That they are helping their family and friends is without a doubt. It is almost impossible to find a poor politician in power or a poor family member of a politician. That a single son of a leader can have RM1,000 million in assets is mind boggling.

In our time there are few leaders who inspire us, Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuck, the King of Bhutan (and his father before him), Nelson Mandela and Aung San Suu Kyi stand out as examples. 

At his installation as leader, Khesar said these remarkable words: "Destiny has put me here. I will protect you as a parent, care for you as a brother and serve you as a son. I shall give you everything and keep nothing. This is how I shall serve you as King." And, unlike our local leaders, he has lived by these words. A man of humility and one who serves, not lords it over the people; a true "servant leader".

We are not pessimistic but realistic about our situation, a situation that is not unique to Malaysia. But we are writing to ask that we move forward. Away from working for the poor in the community only when the elections are around the corner. Away from communal politics and self serving interests.

READ MORE HERE

 

The end of Machiavellianism (WITH CHINESE TRANSLATION)

Posted: 04 Apr 2013 06:27 PM PDT

I believe that many doubts have been cleared with Najib's recent declaration (that BN won't cling on the power should they lose). The people should now be able to vote as they please without feeling threatened and stressed. And since BN has made its promise, PR should in turn make the same promise that if they lose in their states they will ensure a smooth transfer of power (especially to control some of their fanatical, over-obsessive supporters who have the potential of causing troubles).

Original text by Tay Tian Yan, Asst. Chief Editor, SinChew Daily
Translated text by Gilbert Yeoh-Tan

"Should Barisan National lose in the coming election, will they surrender their power peacefully?"

For a long time, this problem has acted like the scalpel that is left in the body of the patient after a surgery; The patient can swear that something is wrong with his body, and the surgeon can find no word to explain the situation.

If we are to remove the scalpel, we need to undergo another surgery with attached risks. And if we don't, the patient will feel the ongoing pain with possible future complications.

This is a very obvious taboo in Malaysia's politics. Nonetheless, this problem needs to be exposed to the light of democracy.

Just like many, I have more than once discussed this topics on several occasions. To tell you the truth, many will say 'no, BN will not,' whereas I am the few (maybe the only one) who will say "Yes, BN will."

Many think that BN will take all the necessary steps, including playing dirty tricks, to remain in power. According to a friend who is 'very experienced' in Malaysian politics, he stated without hesitation that BN's power in Malaysia, if not exceeds, equals that of Communist Party of China (CPC) in China. CPC is a tri-combination party, politics, and military powers, whereas BN is a penta-combination of party, politics, military, police, and economy powers. 

He further argued that BN will not want to lose this cross-layer power that can in turn allow BN to win more political power even without election.  This argument is based on Machiavelli's theory on powers, in which he theorized that the thirst for power would overwhelm all others and that in order to grab power politicians will do anything necessary.

This is indeed a dreadful and dangerous theory.

Many people, including politicians, may not know who Machiavelli is; some might even think that  Machiavelli is a kind of Italian pasta. But, for some, Machiavelli's gene and ideas have already deeply rooted in their belief system without them knowing.

I myself am not a Machiavellianism  partisan. Ever since I first started immerging myself in politics I have been resistant towards that theory. If Machiavellianism holds true, we would not have seen  philosophers such as Robespierre, Baron de Montesquieu, John Milton  etc. leading the fight for democracy and political freedom.   

And I have always believed in the power of democracy and the function of election. The people make their final decision through election, and no authorities, including that from those who command powers, can overrule that final decision.

Democracy in Malaysia has a somewhat solid foundation. Though our election system is far from perfect, after half a century of trial, it still commands certain credibility and is an important cornerstone of our democracy. 

For those who wish to challenge the people's power, they must be prepared to pay a heavy price. Just look at what Arab's spring did to the autocratic Hosni Mubarak of Egypt and Ben Ali of Tunisia; though once being very powerful, they too had to bow in front of people's power.

Furthermore, Malaysia is an open country that involves heavily in international trading. So, should the government overturn the election result they will hurt the economy.  And for those who benefit financially from their political powers, this will be a blow that they cannot withstand.

Hence, I believe that Machiavellianism has already left Malaysia's politics sometime ago with the stepping down of Mahathir.

For over 50 years Malaysia has been a civil government with minimal interference from the military, and this tradition must not be changed. Perhaps it is Anwar's lack of confidence in our democracy system that makes him naming several retired military figures as PKR candidates in the coming election, but I think that this is absolutely unnecessary.

I believe that many doubts have been cleared with Najib's recent declaration (that BN won't cling on the power should they lose). The people should now be able to vote as they please without feeling threatened and stressed. And since BN has made its promise, PR should in turn make the same promise that should they lose in their states they will ensure a smooth transfer of power (especially to control some of their fanatical, over-obsessive supporters who have the potential of causing troubles).

Only when both parties can make and deliver the promise will the people be free of doubt, and only by then can we take a step closer to a better democracy.

********************************************

郑丁贤‧马基维里的终结

"一旦国阵输了大选,它是否会和平交出政权?"

一向以来,这个问题,彷佛是医生动手术之后,在病人体内留下手术刀。

病人觉得不对劲,医生又难以启齿。

要取出来,得多动一次手术,不无风险;不取出来,难受之外,还要面对并发症。

这俨然是大马政治的一个禁忌。

然而,终究要摊开来,照一照民主的阳光。

我和许多人,过去多次在各种场合辩论这个题目。

不瞒你说,多数人都认为"不会",而我是认为"会"的少数,或是唯一。

多数的辩者认为,国阵会尽一切的手段,包括非和平的行径,来捍卫它的政权。

一位政治阅历算是丰富的朋友振振有词说,巫统的权力组织接近中国共产党,甚至有过之无不及。中共是党、政、军的三合一,而巫统是党、政、军、警、经(济)的五合一。

这种一层叠一层的权力交错,使巫统不能失去权力,而也有能力通过非选举手段,巩固执政权。

这种观点,是以马基维里的权力理论为基础,权力的需求高于一切,政治人物为了权力,可以不择手段来达到目的。

这是一种可怕而危险的政治论述。

尽管许多人,尤其是从政者,搞不清楚马基维里是一种意大利面,还是一个意大利政治理论家;但是,马基维里的基因,却已经活潜伏在他们的价值系统。

我不是马基维里的拥护者,从接触政治理论开始,就很抗拒这种论述;如果大家都追随马基维里,那么,今天的世界应该还停留在独裁威权的时代,不会有卢骚、孟德斯鸠、弥尔顿带领民主和自由思想的诞生。

而我总是相信民主的力量,以及选举的功能。人民通过选举的决定,是最后的决定;没有其他力量,包括强势权力,可以抗拒。

大马的民主已经有一定的基础,选举制度虽然不完美,但经过半世纪的考验,有一定的公信力,也是民主进程的基石。

任何一方要否定人民力量,肯定要付出更加惨重的代价;像是茉莉花事件的人民起义,强悍如埃及的穆巴拉克,突尼西亚的本阿里,也必须俯首。

更何况,大马是一个对外开放的国家,经济依赖对外贸易和外来投资;一旦否定选举,将导致经济上的重创;而对既得利益者而言,这是他们不能承受的打击。

马哈迪之后,马基维里在大马的传人也应该告终。

大马独立超过半世纪,向来是文人政府掌权,没有军队和武力介入,这种深厚传统不容改变。

或许安华对民主缺乏信心,而引进了几位退休军方将领出任公正党的候选人,实在是没有必要。

随着纳吉的宣布,疑惑获得了解答,人民能够在没有压力,不受威胁的情况下,凭自由意志来投票。

国阵做出了承诺,同样的,民联执政的州属,如果发生政权更迭,也要确保和平转移;特别是阻止狂热分子的冒进和破坏。

双方作出承诺,信守承诺,人民解开了这个心结,民主就跨进一步。

 

Pakatan out to create a bigger tsunami

Posted: 04 Apr 2013 04:16 PM PDT

There are about 37.7 per cent Chinese votes in Perak and most of them support Pakatan Rakyat. However, Pakatan Rakyat needs to fight for the 48.59 per cent Malay votes to win the state and more parliamentary seats. And Anwar is the ace to attract Malay votes.

Lim Sue Goan, Sin Chew Daily

Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim said he intends to leave Penang and contest in Perak, showing that Pakatan Rakyat has made a careful deployment for the focal states in the west coast of Peninsular Malaysia.

There was an announcement earlier saying that DAP parliamentary leader Lim Kit Siang will leave Perak to contest in Johor. The move was intended to create a momentum and set off a tsunami from the southern peninsula. And there must be important leaders in the north to make the deployment sound.

If Pakatan Rakyat is able to seize Johor, PAS vice-president Salahuddin Ayub is expected to be the candidate for state mentri besar.

Pakatan Rakyat has no preferred chief minister candidate in Malacca. In Negri Sembilan, however, PAS and the PKR have their respective preferred candidates, namely Seremban PKR deputy chief Dr Mohamad Rafie Abdul Malek and PAS central committee member Dr Rosli Yaakob.

Although there was a rumour earlier saying that PKR president Datin Seri Wan Azizah Wan Ismail would contest in Selangor, she later decided not to contest for any seats. However, PKR deputy president Azmin Ali will continue contesting in Selangor.

After Lim Kit Siang left Perak to contest in Johor, Anwar shifted to contest in the state to stabilise the situation and fight for Malay votes, with an attempt to take revenge on the BN for seizing the state administration in February 2009.

There are about 37.7 per cent Chinese votes in Perak and most of them support Pakatan Rakyat. However, Pakatan Rakyat needs to fight for the 48.59 per cent Malay votes to win the state and more parliamentary seats. And Anwar is the ace to attract Malay votes.

If Anwar contests in Perak, he can help improve the winning odds of some parliamentary seats. With more parliamentary seats, there will be a greater chance to seize Putrajaya.

It is generally predicted that since Anwar is going to contest in Perak, PKR would then be Pakatan Rakyat's leading party in the state. If Pakatan Rakyat is able to win the state, the mentri besar should then be a PKR member. However, it is impossible for PAS grassroots to give up the post.

In the Perak regime change, the relationship between former state Mentri Besar Datuk Seri Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin and the Malay Ruler has changed and thus, it is difficult for him to be the mentri besar again.

In Penang, half of the total voters are Chinese. It is not a big problem for Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng to keep the regime.

In Kedah, Mentri Besar Datuk Seri Azizan Abdul Razak's performance is poor and has been receiving resistance from the state's grassroots. Therefore, it is rumoured that PAS would field its vice-president Datuk Mahfuz Omar to contest in Kedah to pave the way for the replacement of the mentri besar.

Pakatan Rakyat also has preferred mentri besar candidates in Perlis and state PAS deputy president Mohd Anuar Tahir receives the greatest support.

In a recent interview with Sin Chew Daily, Lim Kit Siang predicted that Pakatan Rakyat would be able to seize another two state regimes in the 13th general election, namely Negri Sembilan and Perlis.

Therefore, the focal states in the west coast of peninsula, together with Kelantan, Pakatan Rakyat is trying to build a "Great Wall" and if they are linked together, it might trigger a larger tsunami.

One thing that should not be forgotten is that during the 2008 general election, Anwar and Pakatan Rakyat leaders focused their election campaign activities in the west coast of the peninsula in the last few days before polling day and it resulted in a tsunami, causing a regime change in Selangor, Perak, Penang and Kedah, while winning 10 of the 11 parliamentary seats in Kuala Lumpur.

And now, Pakatan Rakyat is using the old trick with more energetic candidates and a more sophisticated deployment.

It seems like Pakatan Rakyat's plan to seize Putrajaya is not limited to an empty talk. The election campaign is expected to be more and more exciting.

 

Pakatan still can't shoot straight on dissolution day

Posted: 04 Apr 2013 03:54 PM PDT

CYNICAL fools hounded and pounded the Prime Minister for years with inane and insane bunk on why he should dissolve the Dewan Rakyat prematurely – to the Opposition's advantage of course.

Nevertheless, the misanthropic guesswork that preceded yesterday's dissolution was diabolical: Opposition leaders goaded the PM to announce D-Day on almost every quarter since 2011, hoping an earlier snap election could convert their March 8, 2008 concessions into bigger gains.

Azmi Anshar, NST

But Datuk Seri Najib Abdul Razak dismissed the contemptuous bait-and-switch tactics by focusing on an unstoppable momentum to further advance the nation's socio-economic fortunes that has defined his administration.

So, it was easy for him to ignore the Opposition hogwash that whined incessantly about a dissolution that didn't arrive to their convenience and one that went beyond the emblematic March 8 date.

But when he finally did yesterday, it was Najib's sentimentality that guided the decision – the live telecast to announce Parliamentary dissolution also marked the fourth anniversary of his swearing-in as PM. Who would have thought?
 
Nevertheless, the misanthropic guesswork that preceded yesterday's dissolution was diabolical: Opposition leaders goaded the PM to announce D-Day on almost every quarter since 2011, hoping an earlier snap election could convert their March 8, 2008 concessions into bigger gains.
 
When Najib refused to even nibble their bait, the opposition denounced him "cowardly" but when it was obvious that Najib would look beyond March 8, his March 8 snub was "shameless."
 
Despite the constitutionality of his actions, Najib still endured claims of illegitimacy, no less than by the biggest cynic of them all, Lim Kit Siang.
 
Lim's sneers was hypocritical: if illegitimacy and not legality was the imperilled issue, then he should have ensured that the Pakatan Rakyat state governments of Penang, Kedah, Kelantan and Selangor dissolve on March 8 as a mark of "virtuous principle."
 
Was it a surprise that he didn't? Lim blasé argument that Najib had lost moral legitimacy and credibility after March 8 was as flaccid as his jowls. Wouldn't the status of his son the Penang chief minister and the other Pakatan mentris besar be just as morally illegitimate and incredible?
 
The response to Lim's cynical calculation was whooping incredulity that recognised Lim's familiar theatrics cannoning off cynical hyperbole in sound-bite loops that repeats itself to fit his self-preservation.
 
Like his son, Kit Siang would forever – even if he unthinkably ever held Federal power – assumed the bunker mentality of paranoid victimology that suspects lurking dissenters in every nook and corner desperate to sack them from their hypocritically dynastic high horses.
 
However, in the father-son tag team, their paranoia is actually valid: everywhere you go, conscientious DAP state and branch leaders have rebelled so greatly that Guan Eng will now realise that  Penang is no walkover and Kit Siang risks political seppuku in Gelang Patah.
 
But why would Lim Kit Siang and son, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim and his Pas' ilk, these people bray for rule of law, hyperventilate at the thought of a Government optimising its five-year constitutional tenure? 
 
Simple: this longest stint recorded is as long as the rope that the PKR, DAP and Pas used to hang themselves as they bicker, backstab and undercut in such juxtaposing bedlam, chronicled assiduously in 30 ways by Anwar's former lawyer, Datuk Zulkifli Noordin, in his blog.
 
Just a sample of Zulkifli's censure of Pakatan's daft potboilers leads to another cynical theme: anything less than the takeover of Putrajaya will deem GE13 as being fraught with fraud and irregularity. 
 
Anwar and his minions have harped on the idea of uncontrollable street demonstrations if Pakatan fails to grab Putrajaya on the delusion that majority of Malaysians will vote for them.
 
In the euphoria of that delusion, Pakatan entered into a paradox of sorts when they proclaimed in their Hail Mary general election manifesto that they will ensure a free and fair election once they win Putrajaya. 
 
Hold on! If they win, then wouldn't the general election conducted by the Election Commission be more than fair! So why keep carping on a fraud poll?
 
Other than Pakatan implying that they will win elections which themselves rigged, such incontinent self-flattery is the textbook excuse to justify their continued existence even after the majority voted them out fair and square.
 
But for the likes of Pakatan Rakyat's scandal-prone, infirmed, cynical and uncouth leaders, losing objectively and equitably is a nightmare that will truly expose their Orwellian characters and hurtle them down the road to oblivion and, heaven forbid, retirement.
 
 

Anwar needs 20 seats, will Sabah deliver?

Posted: 03 Apr 2013 03:39 PM PDT

The only person standing between Anwar Ibrahim and the Prime Minister's chair is Musa Aman.

Selvaraja Somiah, FMT 

Today, the only state which stands between Anwar Ibrahim and the Prime Minister's chair is Sabah.

And the person who can "stop" Anwar from becoming the Prime Minister is Sabah Chief Minister Musa Aman.

Anwar needs at least 20 parliamentary seats out of the 25 in Sabah for him to achieve his dream of becoming Malaysia's seventh premier.

But Musa controls the bulk of the parliamentary seats in Sabah. In the 2008 general election, he steered the Barisan Nasional coalition to win all but one parliamentary seat and that too without calling in any central leader from the party to the campaign trail.

Anwar-led Pakatan Rakyat and its major and minor cohorts in the media have carefully indulged in systematic campaign to character assassinate Musa.

One of the easiest slurs to assassinate the character of the person is by branding him corrupt and a womaniser.

But the argument that Musa is corrupt is shallow and the opposition front is aware of this fact.

Historically, corruption in Malaysia has always been connected to both government and opposition. Both sides are equally corrupted. But they repeatedly use the corruption card for obvious reasons.

In the present day, using the same card to discredit Musa has become over-played, and if we allow such divisive politics to succeed, we can only shudder at the future of this nation.

Victorious Musa

According to a Pakatan strategist, the coalition is pulling no stops and has created an entire "stop-Musa" machinery by roping in all sorts of activists, media persons and disgruntled Umno Sabah elements.

But if Sabah BN wins a majority of the state seats and Musa is returned as chief minister, then let no doubt remain that this will be the biggest danger to Pakatan and local players Sabah Progressive Peoples Party (SAPP) and the State Reform Party (STAR).

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


PRU 13 dan Masa Depan Negara Malaysia

Posted: 05 Apr 2013 11:10 AM PDT

http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/malaysian.jpg 

Melalui nota ini, saya menyeru kepada semua, terutamanya saudara Islam supaya kita menarik nafas sedalam-dalamnya sejenak dan menempatkan satu ruangan kecil dalam hati anda untuk melakukan perkara berikut tanpa mengira faham politik anda.

Mohamed Kamaruddin

Alhamdulilah kerana Allah memperkenankan doa kita supaya Parlimen dibubarkan dengan segera untuk membolehkan PRU13 dilaksanakan. Kini, penantian rakyat Malaysia sejak lebih 1 tahun berlalu telah berakhir pada hari Rabu 3 April 2013. Syukur!

Kalau diikutkan hati, tak mahu menoleh ke belakang. Senario Negara bergelumang dengan najis politik, umpat mengumpat, dedah mendedah, caci mencaci, dan semua yang sejenis dan sealiran dengannya mengecilkan semua usaha baik, murni, ikhlas, betul, benar – setiap hari. Sikap dan tabiat buruk yang ditunjukkan dan diiklankan oleh pihak dewasa warga politik menjadi satu matapelajaran baru bagi generasi anak-anak yang berusia bawah 17 tahun. Merekalah pemimpin Negara Malaysia pada masa yang akan datang. Sungguh cemerlang warga politik Malaysia melakar generasi politik masadepan Negara. Ya Allah, lindungilah Negara Malaysia kami dari kemurkaanMu.

Satu ketika dahulu, tahap silaturahim dan kejiranan amat tinggi. Kita boleh duduk semeja diwarung meneguk teh dan kopi, kita masih boleh berjalan bersama menuju surau dan masjid untuk bersama menyembah dan sujud kepada Allah Yang Maha Esa. Kini ianya hanya dikenang sehinggakan rakan jemaah saf di kiri dan di kanan pun menjadi pilihan. Nafsu politik memperkaumkan ummah dan berjayalah mereka yang merasakan diri mereka adalah Juara Politik!

Kini, pembubaran Parlimen telah berlaku sepertimana yang dicita-citakan. Kita kini akan menghadapi tiga situasi genting iaitu:

1. Hari untuk Penamaan Calun
2. Hari untuk Pengundian dan Keputusan Pilihanraya
3. Hari untuk Penubuhan Kerajaan Baru

Hari Penamaan Calun adalah sama seperti hari pengenalan musuh politik sementara hari pengundian dan keputusan pilihanraya serta hari penubuhan kerajaan baru akan menentukan halatuju masa depan Negara.

Melalui nota ini, saya menyeru kepada semua, terutamanya saudara Islam supaya kita menarik nafas sedalam-dalamnya sejenak dan menempatkan satu ruangan kecil dalam hati anda untuk melakukan perkara berikut tanpa mengira faham politik anda. Ruangan berkecuali ini adalah untuk meletakkan usaha murni dalam keindahan Islam bahawa kita semua adalah bersaudara. Gerakkanlah diri kita sendiri untuk melakukan perkara-perkara berikut, ajak dan pelawalah saudara yang lain untuk bersama melakukannya. Mudahan Allah akan melimpahkan Rahmat dan Kasih Sayang Nya kepada kita. Perkara yang akan kita lakukan adalah seperti berikut:

1. Selepas sesi Penamaan Calun, kita semua ke surau atau masjid untuk membaca Surah Al Yasiin diantara Maghrib dan Isya dan berdoa semoga Allah akan memilih calun politik yang terbaik untuk kita kerana Dialah Yang Maha Pemilih. Kita juga berdoa supaya

Allah mengekang nafsu amarah semasa berkempen dan Allah merencanakan perancangan pengundian yang terbaik mengatasi semua perancangan pengundian kotor oleh mana-mana pihak. Sesungguhnya Allah Maha Perancang.

2. Sehari sebelum sesi pengundian, kita semua kembali ke surau dan masjid untuk sekali lagi membaca Surah Al Yasiin diantara Maghrib dan Isya dan berdoa semoga proses pengundian akan berjalan lancar dengan baik, berdisiplin, selamat, beretika dan bertertib. Hari yang berikutnya iaitu selepas mengundi, kita beramai-ramai ke surau dan masjid untuk bersama-sama sekali lagi membaca Surah Al Yasiin diantara Maghrib dan Isya dan berdoa semoga Allah mempermudahkan proses pengiraan undi dan seterusnya pengumuman keputusan pilihanraya tanpa sebarang insiden yang tidak baik.

3. Keesokan pagi harinya, kita sudah tentu mendapat berita keputusan pilihanraya. Oleh itu kita sekali lagi menuju ke surau dan masjid untuk membaca surah Al Yasiin selepas solat subuh dan berdoa semoga proses penubuhan kerajaan baru selepas PRU13 akan dipermudahkan serta memohon kepada Allah supaya silaturahim semua rakyat Malaysia dipereratkan semula untuk membolehkan kita hidup aman sentosa.

Bagi mereka yang bukan berugama Islam, mereka boleh melaksanakan apa sahaja yang bersesuaian dengan agama pegangan mereka. Keutamaannya ialah walaupun kita semua melalui waktu kekalutan, nilai baik dalam diri kita masih ada dan mengerti bahawa esok tak sama dengan hari ini dan kehidupan perlu diteruskan.

Tempoh yang singkat dari sekarang sehinggalah penubuhan kerajaan perlu dihayati oleh semua rakyat. Oleh kerana kita sebagai manusia yang lemah tidak berupaya mengekang azab dan siksaan Allah, marilah kita bersama kembali kepada Allah untuk Allah memberikan apa yang terbaik untuk kita.

Pangkahan kita hanyalah suatu usaha kerdil kita, pangkahan Allah lebih PASTI!

Allahuakbar.

 

Kematian Sugumar: Surat Terbuka Kepada Bakal Perdana Menteri Malaysia

Posted: 05 Apr 2013 11:05 AM PDT

https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTJvjbZ-JS_SGBxgihgAW2wc802x1ItDivqy71USI4iA0DqJoMt 

Despite the long list of custodial deaths, very few policemen are criminally charged much less found guilty of any offence. 
 
Eric Paulsen, Co-founder & Adviser Lawyers for Liberty
 
Kehadapan Perdana Menteri,

Kami menulis kepada Perdana Menteri sebagai pertubuhan hak asasi manusia Malaysia, yang prihatin terhadap kematian Mendiang C. Sugumar pada 23 Januari 2013.

Tidak syak lagi, Perdana Menteri pasti akan bersetuju bahawa keadaan kematian beliau cukup mengerikan dan sangat serius; Mendiang Sugumar telah dikejar oleh sekumpulan anggota polis berpakaian seragam; beliau dengan cepat dikuasai dan digari. Namun dalam proses tersebut, segerombolan samseng menyerang dan melucutkan pakaian beliau sehingga bertelanjang dan seorang anggota polis melumur muka beliau dengan serbuk kunyit. Meskipun beliau telah tertiarap mengadap ke bawah di atas tanah, dengan tangan bergari ke belakang, seorang anggota polis memijak leher beliau, sehinggalah beliau berhenti bergelut. Beliau meninggal dunia dan tiada usaha dibuat untuk memulihkan beliau atau tiada sebarang rawatan perubatan yang diberikan kepada Mendiang. 
 
Kini, PDRM telah membuat dakwaan luar biasa bahawa mereka tidak bertanggungjawab di atas kematian Mendiang serta mendakwa tiada anggota mereka yang terlibat dalam sebarang kesalahan jenayah. Ini kerana menurut PDRM, laporan bedah siasat menunjukkan Mendiang Sugumar meninggal dunia akibat serangan jantung. Ianya tidaklah menghairankan disebabkan PDRM memiliki sejarah dahsyat melindungi dan menafikan pertanggungjawaban, lihatlah contohnya, kematian dalam tahanan Mendiang A. Kugan dan kematian tembakan polis Allahyarham Aminulrasyid, remaja berusia 15 tahun.

Dalam mengharungi jalan panjang sejarah daripada kemerdekaan politik sehinggalah kepada Malaysia yang moden dan demokratik, kita seolah-olah kehilangan arah haluan dan telah membenarkan berlakunya keganasan institusi kerajaan dalam paparan awam, untuk pihak berkuasa bertindak sewenang-wenangnya dengan kekebalan undang-undang dan tanpa keadilan. Peristiwa tragis menyayat hati ini mencemarkan nama baik Malaysia dan merupakan peringatan sangat penting tentang seberapa jauh lagi hasrat Malaysia yang kita cita-citakan itu.

Telah lebih dua bulan berlalu semenjak Mendiang Sugumar dibunuh pada siang hari, secara terang-terangan ketika di bawah penahanan polis. Mayat beliau masih tersimpan di rumah mayat Hospital Serdang, sementara menanti upacara pengkebumian yang belum selesai dan yang paling diperlukan bedah siasat kedua yang telah disekat oleh pihak berkuasa pada setiap peringkat pentadbiran.

Kami berasa amat duka cita kerana terlalu sedikit simpati yang dihulurkan atau maklum balas daripada pihak berkuasa dan ahli-ahli politik yang membentuk kerajaan. Walaupun kematian Mendiang Sugumar diperjuangkan terutamanya dikalangan parti-parti pembangkang dan masyarakat sivil, perkara ini tidak perlu dipersoalkan. Malahan, pihak berkuasa sepatutnya menangani kematian beliau bukannya sekali lagi, dengan membuta-tuli menyokong pasukan polis. 

Beberapa kematian dalam tahanan polis telah berlaku pada tahun ini, antaranya, Chin Te, Mohd Ropi dan M. Ragu yang turut ikut menyertai senarai sangat panjang dan tragis menyayat hati, iaitu senarai mereka yang telah meninggal dunia dalam tahanan PDRM.

Menurut Kementerian Dalam Negeri, dari tahun 2000 sehingga Februari 2011, seramai 156 orang telah ditemui mati dalam lokap atau tahanan. Tetapi terlalu sedikit pertanggungjawaban, ketelusan atau sebarang penyiasatan sebenar oleh pihak mahkamah, polis, Pejabat Peguam Negara dan hospital yang menyediakan bantuan perubatan dan melakukan bedah siasat.  Daripada 156 kes ini, 85 (atau 54.5%) diklasifikasikan sebagai Tiada Tindakan Lanjut (No Further Action), apakah maksudnya hal ini?

Sebarang kematian dalam jagaan atau tahanan polis sepatutnya perlu diperhatikan secara serius. Namun demikian, institusi-institusi negara yang penting ini dalam kebanyakan kes, jika tidakpun kesemua kes, memilih untuk meremehkan, menutup, mengabai atau bahkan membuat dakwaan keterlaluan terhadap kematian-kematian ini. Ianya menyebabkan institusi terbabit hilang wibawa dan keyakinan orang ramai. Walaupun senarai panjang kematian dalam tahanan ini, terlalu sedikit anggota polis yang didakwa atas kesalahan jenayah, apalagi lebih sedikit lagi yang didapati bersalah atas sebarang kesalahan.
 
Oleh yang demikian, kami membuat rayuan ini dengan harapan bahawa sebagai bakal Perdana Menteri seterusnya, kamu akan membetulkan ketidakadilan yang berleluasa ini dan membenarkan keluarga Sugumar mendapat keadilan dan melakukan upacara penutup kematian beliau. Untuk hal ini berlaku, institusi-institusi negara mesti dibebaskan daripada campurtangan politik yang tidak wajar supaya institusi-institusi ini dapat berfungsi secara merdeka dan saksama seperti mana-mana negara demokratik moden lainnya.

Akhirnya, kami berharap Perdana Menteri yang baru juga akan menyokong penubuhan Suruhanjaya Bebas Aduan dan Salah Laku Polis (IPCMC) yang pastinya akan berganjak lebih jauh lagi dalam mencegah kematian dalam tahanan dan meningkatkan keyakinan awam.

Terima kasih

Yang Benar,

Eric Paulsen
Pengasas Bersama dan Penasihat
Lawyers for Liberty

-----------------

Sugumar's Death: An Open Letter to the Next Prime Minister of Malaysia

Dear Prime Minister,

We are writing to you as a Malaysian human rights organisation concerned with the death of C. Sugumar on 23 January 2013.

As you would no doubt agree, the circumstances surrounding his death were appalling and very serious: he was chased by a group of uniformed policemen; he was quickly overpowered and handcuffed but in the process, a mob assaulted and stripped him naked and a policeman also smeared his face with turmeric. While he was facing down on the ground with his hands cuffed to his back, a policeman stepped on his neck until he stopped struggling. He died and no attempt was made to resuscitate him nor was any medical attention given to him. 

The PDRM have now made the incredible claim that they are not responsible for his death nor have any of their personnel committed any criminal offence because the post-mortem showed Sugumar died from a heart attack. This is not surprising as PDRM do have a terrible history of cover up and denial of responsibility, see for example, the death in custody of A. Kugan and fatal police shooting of 15-year-old Aminulrasyid.

In the long road from political independence to a modern democratic Malaysia, we seem to have lost our way and have allowed such a public display of state violence, to pass with impunity and without justice. This tragic incident is a serious blot and reminder on how far we are from the Malaysia we aspire. 

It has been more than two months since Sugumar was killed in broad daylight while under police custody. His body still lies at the Serdang Hospital morgue, suspended between pending funeral rites and a much required second post-mortem that has been blocked at every stage by the authorities. 

What further saddens us is that there has been so little sympathy or response from the authorities and the politicians that make up the government of the day. Even though Sugumar's death was mainly championed by the opposition and civil society – this should not have mattered – and the authorities should have addressed his death instead of blindly supporting the police once again.   

Several deaths in custody have already occurred this year, among them Chang Chin Te, Mohd Ropi and M. Ragu who have now joined a very long and tragic list of people who have died in PDRM custody.

According to the Home Ministry, from 2000 to February 2011, 156 people were found dead in police lock-up or custody but yet there is little accountability, transparency or any real investigations by the courts, police, Attorney-General's Chambers and hospitals which provide medical assistance or conduct post-mortems. Out of these 156 cases, 85 (or 54.5%) were classified as "No Further Action" (whatever does this mean?). 

Despite the obvious seriousness of any death in custody, these important state institutions in most, if not all of these cases, chose to downplay, cover up, ignore or even make outrageous claims over these deaths – causing these institutions to lose credibility and public confidence. Despite the long list of custodial deaths, very few policemen are criminally charged much less found guilty of any offence. 

We therefore make this appeal with the hope that as the next Prime Minister, you will correct this grave injustice and let Sugumar's family have closure over his death. In order for this to happen, state institutions must be freed from improper political interference so that they are able to function independently and impartially like in any modern democratic state. 

Lastly, we hope that you will also support setting up the Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission (IPCMC) which will certainly go a long way in preventing custodial deaths and enhancing public confidence.

Thank you.

Sincerely,
Eric Paulsen
Co-founder & Adviser
Lawyers for Liberty

 

Talk is Cheap Daw Aung San Suu Kyi

Posted: 05 Apr 2013 10:51 AM PDT

http://cdn.theweek.co.uk/sites/theweek/files/styles/theweek_gallery_main_image/public/rohingya_muslim_crying.jpg 

Defending one's life when threatened with death is not violence. These Rohingyas are at the receiving end, maybe it's time ASSK stops playing politics and start speaking as a true statesperson and an agent of change and reconciliation. 

Win Lwin 

I felt an urge to write an opinion piece about Aung San Suu Kyi as communal riots were occurring in the Rakhine State but I thought I should give 'The Lady' time to prove me wrong. The time has since passed and the optimistic wish that she would prove me wrong is nothing but a waste of time.

With the communal violence in Rakhine still smoldering, we are now in the midst of another targeted violence against the muslim minority; the cloak of deception behind which Aung San Suu Kyi , the Burmese government and by large the majority of the Buddhist population is now lifted and their racist ways are in the full glare of her people and the world.

The Rakhine massacre and displacement of tens of thousands of people began after the rape of a Buddhist girl by 3 muslim men allegedly. These men were arrested but a vigilante group comprising of Buddhists murdered a bus full of muslims who were no way connected to the alleged rapists besides professing to the same religion in retaliation for the rape.

What followed next is common knowledge to all except to the Buddhist Burmese who have blood on their hands; rapes, targeted killings and systematic eviction of the Rohingyas from their homes and lands by mobs of Buddhist Arkanese while the government security elements looked away or tacitly agreed to what was being done to the Rohingya community.

As the world gasped in horror; Aung San Suu Kyi was globetrotting and basking in the international limelight. Questions after questions were directed at her about the ongoing killings and displacement of these Rohingya Muslims back home but she side stepped the questions by talking about the rule of law.

After a long silence she then says she had not spoken about violence because she wanted to promote reconciliation between the Buddhist and Muslim communities. The fact that she used the words Muslim and Buddhist communities prove that she is fully aware this is not an issue about alleged illegals from Bangladesh but a religious conflict that has been simmering for decades. She has blown the issue in broad daylight by acknowledging that this is an issue between Muslims and Buddhists and has got nothing to do with borders and implementation of the law. She has unwittingly shot herself in the foot by making such a statement.

"But don't forget that violence has been committed by both sides. This is why I prefer not to take sides. And, also I want to work toward reconciliation between these two communities. I am not going to be able to do that if I take sides".

Defending one's life when threatened with death is not violence. These Rohingyas are at the receiving end, maybe it's time ASSK stops playing politics and start speaking as a true statesperson and an agent of change and reconciliation.

What she has failed to realize is that she already has taken sides when she speaks about how monks were insulted by Muslims allegedly without speaking about killings of innocent Rohingya children, women and men by Buddhist dominated mobs.

A monk is not above the law; a monk is also a human with weaknesses and as it is quite clear, a vast majority of them in Burma are racists. A man in monk attire who commits a crime is nothing but a man who has committed a crime and a criminal at best. Unless ASSK makes such a statement, she is nothing but a person who preaches democracy, equality, freedom and other democratic ideals for her race and religion only and no one else. She preached idealistic things but failed to explain to the people that an idealistic way of thinking is quite far from the realities of life. She has hoodwinked herself and the people.

She has failed to live up to her own ideals which she articulately propagated during her incarceration. Was it all rhetorical or a mask to hide the real ASSK?

With the Buddhist population so blinded by their hatred for people and a religion they have little or no idea about, with aggressions perpetuated against Muslims in other parts of Burma increasing, ASSK feels it is prudent to maintain her silence. Is this silence out of desperation not to lose her political base or is this silence an insight to her own racist way?

Her silence is irresponsible and the correct phrase to describe her silence is 'criminal'. This silence on her part has also made her a collaborator in the displacement and deaths of countless Muslims in Burma. She too has blood on her hands.

This is a woman who was given the 'Noble Peace Prize' for standing up for democracy and freedom for Burma but from my recollection, the idea of nominating her as a candidate for this prestigious prize was not for her fight for such things but because her husband felt it prudent that bestowing such a prize on her will discourage the government from harming her. Of course, my comment is debatable to say the least.

I personally feel, this prize was prematurely given to her even if did protect her from harm. After all, many have been tortured and killed for the fight for democracy and freedom; what makes her so special besides who her father was? Her political stand presently is nothing noble and certainly brings shame to the award conferred on her.

I am sure many will think this to be rantings of a person who does not know ASSK; but who really knows what she is thinking and who she really is? Politics is perception and my perception of her is that of a racist who is out to canon herself politically for her own interest or that of her own race and religion at the cost of innocent Muslim men, women and children.

"The kind of seed sown will produce that kind of fruit. Those who do good will reap good results. Those who do evil will reap evil results. If you carefully plant a good seed, you will joyfully gather food fruit", Dhammapada.

In ASSK's case, she is enjoying the rock star status and the chants of people calling her Amma (mother) and Daw Suu ( Daw – used to addressed some with respect ); while people are dying all around her. How is she planting a good seed? She is not planting any seeds, she is just harvesting the fruits as the result of seeds of hatred that the government planted a long time ago towards the Muslims and other minorities in the minds of the Buddhist population. She saw an opportunity to nurture an evil seed to gain political mileage. I have no doubt, the Muslims of Burma will continue to be treated as outsiders and as a pariah community for at least 3 generations to come.

The young boys and girls in Burma whose age is between 7 to 10 are already brainwashed to hate Muslims. That leaves the teenagers, young adults, middle aged adults and seniors who are already tainted by racist ways for many more years. Where is the hope for Muslims to enjoy democracy and freedom in Burma when the very person who is leading the fight herself is a racist and a bigot?

I personally see a very uncertain future of the Muslims in Burma; what hope is there when the very person who speaks about the rule of law, democracy, freedom and equality is in fact propagating all these democratic values for her own race and religion but no one else.

I say a prayer every night with the hope that ASSK will once again garner my respect and support but I remain a pessimist in light of her silence and indifference to the suffering of the Muslim community of Burma who have paid with their lives and blood to support her.

 

A Burmese in Diaspora,

Win Lwin

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Sabahans’ (new) dilemma

Posted: 05 Apr 2013 07:10 PM PDT

In 1994, Herman Luping in his seminal work, "Sabah's dilemma", wrote about the dilemma faced by Sabahans in maintaining state autonomy and independence under the Federation of Malaysia. Sabah leaders wanted to safeguard the state's regional rights but the federal leaders viewed this as an attempt to override the power of the central government. Just as Sabahans are prepared to vote in the upcoming 13th Malaysian General Election, they are facing with a new kind of dilemma – which party to vote to rule Sabah for the next term. Sabahans have shown that they are capable of voting out a party that they dislike. A case in point is USNO (United Sabah National Organisation) in 1975. Despite USNO's leader Mustapha Harun's iron fist rule, Sabahans voted in unison to oust him from power. In 1985, Sabahans bravely voted against the mighty BERJAYA (Sabah People's United Front) in favour of PBS (Sabah United Party). Back then, Sabahans had a clear choice: BERJAYA to replace USNO, and PBS as an alternative to BERJAYA. Now, despite the desire of Sabahans to see change in the political landscape of the country, they have to make a hard choice between the complacent Sabah BN whose leaders lack the tenacity to address the Sabah issues and the fractious opposition coalition led by Pakatan Rakyat (People's Pact/Alliance) consisting of PKR (People's Justice Party), DAP (Democratic Action Party), PAS (Pan Malaysian Islamic Party), and UBF (United Borneo Front) comprising STAR (State Reform Party) and SAPP (Sabah People's Progressive Party).

In a survey conducted by Merdeka Centre, more than 70 percent of the respondents in Sabah were satisfied with the performance of Prime Minister Najib Razak. It is undeniable that Najib's popularity is contributed by his transformational leadership style and his pragmatic policies (despite their many flaws). Unlike Najib, however, Sabah BN leaders lack pragmatism in addressing the Sabah issues. Not many Sabahans in the rural areas understand what Najib is trying to do. Sabah BN leaders seem to lack the fervour to materialise Najib's transformational plan. Many Sabahans are also unhappy with the lackadaisical attitude of Sabah BN leaders in tackling the perennial illegal immigrant issue. Due to the inertia shown by BN, Sabahans have no choice but to look for the alternative. In 1999 and 2004, Sabahans rejected PKR as it was then a newcomer in Sabah politics. In 2008, Jeffrey Kitingan helped increase PKR's popularity. Even though Jeffrey is known for his infamous reputation as "katak" (political frog a term used for elected representatives to switch parties), he managed to "re-package" the Borneo Agenda to rally Kadazandusun support for PKR. Despite PKR's failure to win any seat, its popular votes increased substantially in most of the constituencies.

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved