Rabu, 28 November 2012

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Shahrizat slams news portals, says God is with Utusan

Posted: 27 Nov 2012 11:00 PM PST

The Wanita Umno chief goes on a tirade against 'unfair' news portals, but sings praises for Utusan over its sincerity.

Anisah Shukry, FMT

Shahrizat Abdul Jalil said today that Malaysian news portals give "unfair and irresponsible coverage" of Barisan Nasional, whereas God is with Malay daily Utusan due to its "sincerity".

"There are pros and cons to social media, but the cons is that it has no limits. They speak without responsibility, especially news portals," said the Wanita Umno chief in her winding-up speech at the Umno general assembly today.

"I don't need to elaborate on that. [The news portals] use the word 'Malaysian' in their name, am I right? What is this… if you use the word 'Malaysia', then you must write with pride, honour and dignity!" she cried.

She was likely referring to news portals such as Free Malaysia Today, MalaysiaKini and The Malaysian Insider, which have often been accused of being "pro-opposition" due to their critical stance towards the ruling government.

Shahrizat today claimed that a common "trick" used by news portals was to write provocative headlines that lead people into trouble.

"How can it be like that? You want to fight for democracy, am I right? Come on… even in the media, pro-opposition news portals, you have to be fair to everyone.

"If you have pride in your profession, do it."

On the other hand, she said she "saluted" Umno-owned Utusan and its board member Abdul Aziz Ishak for its "sincerity in championing religion, the nation, the country and the people".

"I notice that Utusan has always been targeted ceaselessly. Why does this happen? The opposition keep suing them, people do all sorts of things to Utusan…

"But Utusan remains steady because it is sincere in championing religion, the nation, the country and the people. I salute Utusan," said Shahrizat, without a trace of irony in her voice.

"Do not be afraid. Why? Because, ultimately, God is with Utusan."

She reminded the people in the hall that while "the pen is mightier than the sword", there was a Malay saying that roughly translates to "a knife can eat its owner".

"Remember that. Do not target Utusan so much. Because Utusan has its own soul," declared Shahrizat.

READ MORE HERE

 

Deepak says he paid Najib's family for land deal

Posted: 27 Nov 2012 05:41 PM PST

NONE

Deepak said the transfer was made possible after he "contributed heavily" to Najib's family.

Nigel Aw, Malaysiakini

Businessperson Deepak Jaikishan claimed that he paid the family of Najib Abdul Razak an undisclosed sum for the premier's intervention to allow him to come in as a party in a Defence Ministry project deal.

According to Deepak, he stitched a deal with a Selangor Umno leader's company where he would participate as a third party in the proposed project.

This began, Deepak explained, with a privatisation agreement in 2005 where the company was tasked to work on a Defence Ministry project in Putrajaya.

In exchange for the estimated RM100 million project, which the company was to build at its own cost, the company would be paid RM20 million by the government and would acquire 223.3 acres of government land in Klang.

However, Deepak said the politician did not have the credit-worthiness at that time to secure a land bond of RM72.5 million necessary for the project and had therefore approached him for help.

The deal, he added, would require him to secure the RM72.5 million land bond and top it up with RM23 million in cash payments to the company.

In return, Deepak said the politician's company was to give him ownership of the said property, which is a piece of prime land adjacent to the now booming Setia Alam township.

najib abdul razak in perth chogm 1The names of the politician and the company involved have been withheld pending their reply to Malaysiakini's request for comments.

"She couldn't get the government to agree that the land bond be issued to a third party because under privatisation, the company that gets the privatisation (project), the land must remain under their name.

"So, I organised a meeting for her to meet (Najib), at that time our defence minister, to allow this land be transferred to a third party company," he said.

Deepak said the transfer was made possible after he "contributed heavily" to Najib's family.

Below is the excerpt of Malaysiakini's interview with Deepak:

Malaysiakini: You mentioned earlier that there were bribes involved in this project?

Deepak: Okay, I think as far as the dealings with the politician were concerned, is was a business deal. But yes, as I mentioned - I wouldn't use that word that you used just now - but we had to contribute heavily to ensure that we get the approval from the defence minister at that time.

Contribute to whom?

A close family of his (Najib) lah. I will elaborate at later sessions.

Why the deal?

We couldn't procure the land to be given to a third party otherwise.

It happened around 2007?

Correct.

Can you disclose how much?

Not this session.

Is it a substantial amount of money involved?

Yes.

How big is the amount?

Maybe we go to the next question.

For clarity, this "contribution" is with regards to the meeting that you mentioned just now, set up between the politician and the then defence minister?

Correct.

The contribution is in terms of money and not material?

Financial.

Najib expressed 'no opposition'

Deepak noted that "a third-party scenario should not happen in normal circumstances", but was only made possible with Najib's help.

He claimed that he possessed the minutes of the meeting in which Najib expressed "no opposition" in approving the third-party land transfer.

The revelation comes following a land dispute in which Deepak's company had not received the promised land from the politician, despite, he said, having held up his end of the bargain.

"He (Najib) is well aware (of this dispute) but I don't see any action coming out. I don't see him carrying the responsibility of solving this matter," he said.

Deepak has filed a legal suit in the Kuala Lumpur High Court and a police report on the matter was lodged in July.

The carpet trader had yesterday told Malaysiakini that he regretted helping a female friend in the case involving private eye P Balasubramaniam.

 

I am a winnable candidate in PRU 13 : Shahrizat

Posted: 27 Nov 2012 04:39 PM PST

(The Kuala Lumpur Post) - Wanita Umno chief Shahrizat Abdul Jalil, who was forced to quit as a minister following the NFC scandal, is still harbouring hope of being fielded as a candidate in the next general election.

Despite the prospects appearing bleak, she downplayed the uncertainty of her political future, saying that she was only focusing on delivering the votes for Umno, FMT reports.

Observers believe that the RM250 million scandal had raised doubts if the former minister would be picked to run in the polls while her future as Wanita chief was also said to be under threat.

Shahrizat, however, said it was ultimately up to Umno president and prime minister Najib Tun Razak to decide on her candidacy.

"I don't see why I shouldn't offer myself as a candidate (but) what is important is that I am focusing on delivering the votes to Umno.

"And only, maybe, by doing this the president will see my importance," she told reporters after opening the wing's annual general assembly at the Putra World Trade Centre here.

In her speech earlier, Shahrizat said Wanita vowed to be the backbone of the party's election machinery as Umno was set to face a strong opposition in what would be its toughest election to date.

But even Umno insiders claimed that support for her in Wanita was withering after some, including her influential predecessor Rafidah Aziz, described her as a liability to the wing.

Divided Wanita

Shahrizat was forced to step down as minister after her family members were accused of swindling taxpayers' money meant for a national cattle breeding project but she had so far maintained that she had no direct link to the issue.

Najib was forced to intervene and contain the split when what was seen as a move to unseat her became stronger at the height of the scandal.

The issue was subsequently declared "resolved" after a closed-door meeting was held between Najib and the wing with Shahrizat's critics coming out saying they would give their full support to their chief.

In her speech today, Shahrizat, who was defeated by PKR vice-president Nurul Izzah for the Lembah Pantai parliamentary seat in 2008, again called for unity among the party grassroots.

She also echoed this year's prevailing sentiment of unity as Umno would face a strong opposition in the upcoming polls.

Najib had said that only a united Umno could prevail against its opponent in a signal that the division within the party was real and the prospect of sabotages, blamed for the party's dismal performance in the last polls, could ruin its chances again.

Barisan Nasional lost five states and its customary parliamentary two-thirds majority in the 12th national polls.

 

Ex-IGP says ministers meddle with investigations

Posted: 27 Nov 2012 04:19 PM PST

Musa suggested that his professed refusal to pander to politicians had cost him his job.

Tan Sri Musa Hassan today accused Cabinet ministers and politicians of regularly trying to interfere with police investigations and arrests when he was serving as Inspector-General of Police ― a practice that continues even now.

Musa, who retired as IGP in September 2010, did not name the politicians but suggested at a press conference today that his refusal to indulge them had resulted in the government's decision not to renew his contract.

He also took aim at his successor, Tan Sri Ismail Omar, suggesting the latter was a yes-man who is bowing to politicians' influence.

"There are certain misgivings from police officers who said that they received instructions not from (their police superiors) but from the Home Ministry.

"Even the ministry can issue instructions now ... Who is in control now?" Musa asked at a press conference here.

Musa then quoted Section 4(1) of the Police Act, which states that police orders must only come from the IGP, who will be liable for such instructions.

READ MORE HERE

 

Shahrizat: May 13 could repeat if Umno weak

Posted: 27 Nov 2012 04:16 PM PST

Clara Chooi, The Malaysian Insider

The spectre of May 13 was raised once again today at the opening of the Wanita Umno general assembly here, as the wing's leader Datuk Seri Shahrizat Abdul Jalil used the bloody racial clash to encourage delegates to work harder for Umno's victory.

The politician warned told nearly 1,000 delegates at the Putra World Trade Centre (PWTC) here that a weak Umno would spread uneasiness among the Malay community and possibly invite the same racial conflict that caused the bloodshed during the 1969 tragedy.

"Do we want to such a terrible situation repeated in our country? Of course we do not," she said according to the text copy of her opening address to those gathered at Dewan Merdeka here.

Shahrizat said Umno must overcome five key challenges to strengthen itself ahead of the coming polls, including fighting off its foes in PAS, attracting more young voters and ensuring that the Malays continue to hold political power.

"If we no longer have power, then the country's political stability will be affected.

"I fear that this could lead to a racial tension that could invite the same tragedy of May 13, 1969," she said.

Shahrizat's words today, although not verbally delivered to Wanita Umno delegates here, appear to contradict the message of moderation that the party leadership has been preaching prior to the assembly, Umno's final milestone before national polls are called.

But despite this, the Wanita Umno chief, who is still embroiled in the year-long controversy over her alleged link to the multimillion ringgit National Feedlot Centre (NFC) scandal, dedicated many parts of her speech to warning Malaysians and party members against allowing the federal opposition to take Umno's seat in government.

She likened the situation to a disease, saying that it could spread and become dangerous if left to fester.

This will result in a "frightening" outcome where Umno becomes a party deemed as no longer relevant in the country.

"These effects are very frightening, particularly if we are no longer strong. Therefore, we must suitable steps to overcome this," she said.

Among others, Shahrizat said the Malay economy must be strengthened, reiterating Wanita Umno's request that the government ensure the community controls at least 50 per cent of equity.

She added that the government has also made effort to ensure that it takes care of the people's livelihoods by people-centric initiatives such as the RM500 cash handouts under the Bantuan Rakyat 1 Malaysia (BR1M) to lower income households.

On Wanita Umno, Shahrizat offered the wing's commitment to ensure that the party's election machinery is in place across the country.

She pointed out that the wing forms the backbone of the ruling party and plays a crucial role in ensuring that the party's messages reach its targets on the ground.

Shahrizat later urged delegates to rise to their feet and pledge their allegiance to Umno president Datuk Seri Najib Razak.

 

Anwar’s lawyer offers to help hair salon

Posted: 27 Nov 2012 04:06 PM PST

Sankara Nair believes the by-law is unconstitutional and is willing to challenge it.

Alyaa Azhar, FMT

A lawyer who was involved in Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim's sodomy trials is now offering himself to challenge the Kota Baru Municipal Council's by-law, which prohibits a female to cut a man's hair and vice-versa.

Sankara Nair said he was willing to take up the case as "I believe the by-law is clearly unconstitutional".

Last week, E-Life Salon, a hair dressing salon based in Kota Baru, was issued a fine by the Kota Baru Municipal Council when one of its female hairdressers "was caught cutting" the hair of a male client.

Actions of the municipal council have come under fire from several quarters including non-governmental organisations and the MCA. MCA has long argued that hudud imposed by the PAS-led Kelantan government would affect non-Muslims.

"The Kota Baru Municipal Council's by-law is clearly unconstitutional because it takes away the freedom of non-Muslims. I am willing to pursue this case pro bono," he told FMT.

"The issue is abominable and PAS should keep to its words; it should not impose such rulings on non-Muslims," he said.

He hoped the owner of the hair salon involved would contact him as he is willing to work with the owner to challenge the by-law.

Sankara shot to prominence by being one of the leading spokesmen during the two sodomy trials Anwar faced. The first was in 1999 while the second was early this year.

 

Debate with Anwar ‘a waste of time’

Posted: 27 Nov 2012 03:44 PM PST

MCA president Dr Chua Soi Lek and MIC secretary-general S Murugesan say there is no need for a debate between the prime minister and opposition leader.

RK Anand, FMT

Barisan Nasional leaders have dismissed the need for Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak to engage in a debate with Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim.

Advising the premier not to waste time on this matter, MCA president Dr Chua Soi Lek urged Najib to focus on the economic growth of the nation instead.

"There is no need for the prime minister to debate with Anwar. His policies such as the Government Transformation Programme and Economic Transformation Programme are clear.

"These initiatives have been implemented and are bearing fruits. It is Anwar who remains untested," he told FMT.

Accusing the opposition of stirring and spinning an old issue, Chua said these debates do not result in constructive solutions.

The MCA leader also dismissed the comparison drawn with the US presidential debates given that Najib was fond of talking about US President Barack Obama.

"Ours is not a presidential election like in the US… it is a party election and the candidate stands on behalf of the party," he said.

Chua also rubbished claims that Najib was afraid to debate with Anwar.

"There is no question of fear. These debates are just unnecessary. I debated with [DAP secretary-general] Lim Guan Eng twice but what did we achieve? I just wasted my time," he said.

On Monday, Bersih co-chairperson S Ambiga had urged Najib to debate with Anwar in order to allow voters to determine which political coalition was best qualified to govern the nation.

She said Bersih would initiate a public petition to pressure the prime minister, who had declined to debate with Anwar stating, among others, that it was not part of the Malaysian culture, to accept the
opposition leader's challenge.

According to Ambiga, a debate between the top two leaders was vital since the coming general election was being described as the most important in the nation's history.

Contradictions in Pakatan Rakyat

Yesterday, Guan Eng and Anwar's daughter, PKR vice-president Nurul Izzah, criticised Najib for dodging the debate.

READ MORE HERE

 

Is ex-IGP Musa going Pakatan’s way?

Posted: 27 Nov 2012 03:41 PM PST

The former police chief holds a press conference with two NGO leaders, who are closely linked to the opposition.

Teoh El Sen, FMT

As the general election draws closer, strange things are beginning to unfold.

This afternoon, former inspector general of police Musa Hassan held a press conference here flanked by NGO leaders closely linked to the opposition.

This has fuelled speculations that the ex-top cop would be joining the Pakatan Rakyat coalition soon.

The press briefing was organised by a new NGO called the Malaysian Crime Watch Task or MyWatch, which is chaired by R Sri Sanjeevan. Also present was POWER NGO chief S Gobi Krishnan, who acts as adviser of MyWatch.

Gobi Krishnan is also PKR's national strategy and political bureau secretary. Sri Sanjeevan has been known to be a harsh critic of the police and a KITA leader in Negeri Sembilan.

The focus of the press conference was on the tackling of crime and Musa was announced as a patron of MyWatch today.

READ MORE HERE

 

Shahrizat still harbours hope of contesting

Posted: 27 Nov 2012 03:37 PM PST

The Wanita Umno chief says the prime minister will decide on her candidacy and adds that her primary focus now is to deliver the votes for Umno.

Syed Jaymal Zahiid, FMT

Wanita Umno chief Shahrizat Abdul Jalil, who was forced to quit as a minister following the NFC scandal, is still harbouring hope of being fielded as a candidate in the next general election.

Despite the prospects appearing bleak, she downplayed the uncertainty of her political future, saying that she was only focusing on delivering the votes for Umno.

Observers believe that the RM250 million scandal had raised doubts if the former minister would be picked to run in the polls while her future as Wanita chief was also said to be under threat.

Shahrizat, however, said it was ultimately up to Umno president and prime minister Najib Tun Razak to decide on her candidacy.

"I don't see why I shouldn't offer myself as a candidate (but) what is important is that I am focusing on delivering the votes to Umno.

"And only, maybe, by doing this the president will see my importance," she told reporters after opening the wing's annual general assembly at the Putra World Trade Centre here.

In her speech earlier, Shahrizat said Wanita vowed to be the backbone of the party's election machinery as Umno was set to face a strong opposition in what would be its toughest election to date.

But even Umno insiders claimed that support for her in Wanita was withering after some, including her influential predecessor Rafidah Aziz, described her as a liability to the wing.

Divided Wanita

Shahrizat was forced to step down as minister after her family members were accused of swindling taxpayers' money meant for a national cattle breeding project but she had so far maintained that she had no direct link to the issue.

READ MORE HERE

 

Malaysia ‘dog’ chant riles Singapore fans

Posted: 27 Nov 2012 03:33 PM PST

(AFP) - SINGAPORE:  Singapore fans have been left feeling angry and hurt after being labelled "dogs" by Malaysian spectators during their weekend AFF Suzuki Cup win, a report said on Wednesday.

Video posted on YouTube shows thousands of Malaysian fans chanting "Singapore itu anjing" (Singapore are dogs) during Sunday's group game in Kuala Lumpur, when Singapore beat the defending Southeast Asian champions 3-0.

Singapore's New Paper, describing the chant as "vile", said footage of the incident had been viewed nearly 200,000 times online.

"Frankly, we are angry and hurt. But we were the minority… there were just about 1,000 of us there," one fan told the newspaper.

Another said: "You had more than half the stadium calling us dogs. How else would we feel?

"The chants started even before the Singapore team went onto the pitch to warm up."

Tensions are often high at matches between the Asian neighbours, whose regional teams play each other in the Malaysian Cup.

"They can't even beat 'dogs' in soccer, so what does that make them?" commented one Facebook user, according to the New Paper.

 

French Lawyers Seek Malaysian PM Najib to Testify in Sub Scandal

Posted: 27 Nov 2012 12:16 PM PST

Highly doubtful that is going to happen, though

(Asia Sentinel) - Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak and his onetime close friend Abdul Razak Baginda are the "priority witnesses" in an investigation into bribes and kickbacks amounting to about €150 million in the sale of Scorpene submarines to the Malaysian Ministry of Defense, French lawyer Apoline Cagnat told a press conference in Singapore today. 


Cagnat is a member of the Paris-based firm headed by William Bourdon, which has been retained by the Malaysian human rights NGO Suaram in a probe by the French judiciary. 

Cagnat told a briefing for Malaysian parliamentarians in Singapore that, of the seven witnesses submitted by Suaram and accepted by the French judiciary, Najib and Razak are the most important. 

It is highly unlikely, however, that the French authorities probing the scandal would be able to persuade the head of a sovereign state, especially one who is suspected of helping to facilitate the transfer of kickbacks to the United Malays National Organization, the biggest party in the ruling national coalition, to testify. It is also difficult to imagine what they would be willing to add to the dialogue about the case if indeed they were called to testify. And, although threats of subpoenas have been made in the past, there was no indication in Cagnat's comments that they are being issued. 

Nonetheless, "I hope the judges manage to interrogate them," Cagnat told reporters. Cagnat gave her press conference in Singapore after Suaram said it was unable to obtain an assurance from the government that it would guarantee the security of the French lawyers, who had been asked by Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim to brief parliament on the case. The speaker of the parliament, Amin Mulia, said he wouldn't allow the briefing to take place in Parliament's compound. 

The other five witnesses are the current Defense Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi , Setev Shaariibuu, the father of murdered Mongolian national Altantuya Shaariibuu, private investigator P Balasubramaniam, Boustead Holdings Bhd group managing director and deputy chairperson Lodin Wok Kamaruddin, and Jasbir Singh Chahl, said to be Razak's right-hand man but who fell out with the onetime security consultant and threatened suit because he reportedly didn't get a big enough share of the commission paid on the submarines. 

Bourdon himself was bundled out of Malaysia by immigration authorities in July of 2011 after giving details of the alleged scandal in a speech in Penang to hundreds of people at a fundraiser to continue his investigation. Scheduled to give two more speeches in Malaysia, Bourdon was taken off a flight at Kuala Lumpur International Airport and was put on another plane out of the country over his protests. 

Bourdon and Suaram have been battered by both the mainstream press, which is largely government-owned, and an army of bloggers who say the scandal has been overblown and that no trial had been ordered by French authorities. Neither Bourdon, Suaram nor Asia Sentinel, which has reported extensively on the case, have ever said a trial was imminent. But the investigation is continuing and investigating magistrates have been appointed by the French courts. Two investigating judges, Serge Tournaire and Roger Le Loire, were appointed in March to investigate the case. They have broad powers to investigate independently and can call witnesses and conduct international surveys. 

French police acting on a request from Bourdon's legal team raided the headquarters of the state-owned defense giant DCN and its subsidiaries and came up with a wealth of detail that enmeshed former French Foreign Minister Alain Juppe, former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad, current Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak and a host of others in the scandal, as well as top officials with DCN. 

Read more at: http://asiasentinel.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=5002&Itemid=164 

 

Nik Aziz admits ‘oversight’ in gender policy on hair-cutting

Posted: 27 Nov 2012 11:51 AM PST

http://starstorage.blob.core.windows.net/archives/2012/11/28/nation/pas-appear-nikaziz-n4.jpg

Warm greeting: Nik Aziz shaking hands with PAS Supporters Assembly Council member Lau Chin Chua at his official residence in Kota Baru. 

(The Star) - After several days of public outcry over the Kota Baru Municipal Council's gender policy on hair-cutting, the Kelantan Government appears to have softened its stand on the issue.

However, it has yet to decide whether to revoke the municipal by-law that prohibits women and men hairstylists from attending to customers who are of the opposite gender, regardless of whether they are Muslims or non-Muslims.

"I will bring it up at the state exco meeting to be confirmed before making any official stand on the issue," Mentri Besar Datuk Nik Aziz Nik Mat said yesterday.

"First and foremost, we must up-hold the Syariah-based laws. Insya Allah(God willing)," he said, responding to questions on whether he would consider the appeals by hair salons to either scrap or review such by-laws.

"It is possible because they (those who object) are non-Muslims.

"Islam allows them to practise their culture, as long as it is not in violation of the (Islamic) religion."

Nik Aziz, who is PAS spiritual adviser, was speaking to reporters ahead of a meeting with five officials from the PAS Supporters Congress to discuss the controversy at the Mentri Besar's official residence here.

Also present was state PAS Dewan Ulama chief Datuk Mohamad Daud, also known as Mat Iraqi.

"We have to hold on to Islamic principles because Islam makes it simple for humans, not the other way around.

"That is why I invited Mat Iraqi to the meeting for a discussion with the congress," said Nik Aziz, admitting that there was an "oversight" by the authorities in not considering the consequences of Syariah-based by-laws on non-Muslims.

"Maybe it is because no other government (in Malaysia) has yet to implement this system," he said.

Salon operators had reportedly been slapped with compound fines ranging from RM250 to RM300 since the Kota Baru Municipal Council enforced its hair by-law.

Congress adviser Jeff Lee Weng Chun said they wanted Nik Aziz to exclude non-Muslims from the by-law.

"We, on behalf of the non-Muslims, want to appeal to Tok Guru (Nik Aziz) to review the laws as hair salons now are not like what they were 20 years ago," he said.

In KUALA LUMPUR, PAS president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang said the Kelantan Government did not intend to implement any Islamic "moral" laws on non-Muslims.

This was proven with the introduction of the Syariah Criminal Code (11) Enactment, which did not apply to non-Muslims, he said.

"PAS views seriously the fears of non-Muslims over the unisex hair salon issue in Kelantan," he said in a statement read out by PAS vice-president Salahuddin Ayub.

"The party central committee has been informed by the Kelantan Government that it is ready to consider suggestions from non-Muslim groups on the best ways of solving this problem based on the concept of freedom of religion for non-Muslims," Abdul Hadi said.

He said the Kelantan Government had to carry out its responsibility based on the mandate given by the people to ensure the moral purity of Muslims was preserved.

"PAS is committed to solving any problems through discussions," he said.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Rosli Dahlan’s RM50 Million Trial: A Classic Case of Justice Denied

Posted: 27 Nov 2012 11:21 PM PST

With this in mind, I am posting my latest piece on his Rm50 million trial so that this saga will not escape our attention. As usual, the media has distorted his story.–Din Merican

————————————————–

November 16 2012 was a glorious day for Dato Ramli Yusuff as Polis DiRaja Malaysia (PDRM) gave him a full honour farewell complete with a General's salute by a mounted Guard of Honour and a retreat in a PDRM's ceremonial open top Land Rover in full regalia in the best traditions of the Police Force. The Government seems to have found peace with Dato Ramli.

Thus, I was surprised when I found out that his lawyer and good friend, Rosli Dahlan, is still fighting the MACC and the Government. That can only mean that Rosli did not settle with the government. That can only mean that Rosli has been left out in the cold. I recalled that until now Dato Ramli has yet to file any law suit against the government, the A-G Gani Patail or even against Musa Hassan whom Ramli had repeatedly accused of conspiring to cause his downfall.

In the meantime, I noted with amusement that Musa Hassan now appears to have joined the Opposition bandwagon by attacking PDRM and current IGP Ismail Omar for rigging the country's crime statistics. And today, Musa Hassan accused Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein of interfering with the Police Force. I don't know what Musa is up to but he is certainly living up to his name Musa the Musang, or Musa the cunning fox.

So, I got a bit confused when I read reports from the mainstream newspapers that Rosli had lost his case when his claim was struck out like this report from The Star:

READ MORE HERE

 

Why ideals are a must in life

Posted: 27 Nov 2012 04:53 PM PST

This is quite a common accusation, one that has been thrown at me in the past, and added to the fact that I work in a university, that old chestnut of making my living quarters in an ivory tower often comes into play as well.

My comments on university rankings not being the be all and end all when selecting where to study was dismissed as wishful thinking.

I was told in no uncertain terms that parents will look at rankings to choose a university for their children.

Oh, incidentally, for the sake of accuracy, in my last column, I should not have said Leeds was higher ranked than Nottingham. They are not. I should have said Sheffield, or Manchester or Durham instead.

And at a talk where I said "meaningful public participation should occur in developmental and environmental issues", again I was painted as some trippy hippy freak who really should just sit quietly in a VW van listening to Hendrix and burning incense. Frankly, this sounds like a very enticing idea.

However, all these barbs (admittedly they were thrown at me in a gentle and humorous manner) got me thinking. Why do I bother with these ideals? No one seems to care any way. The world is a hard, calculative and oft times, a cruel place. Pragmatism, not idealism, will ensure survival, both literally and metaphorically.

I guess this is true, if mere survival is what one aspires for. I can't buy into this thinking though. Yes, when one is floating in the clouds of principles and ideals, one may lose track of the realities of the world and one's ideas become no more substantive and useful as "insignificant fluff". But pragmatism without the overarching and necessary restraints of idealism is dangerous, too.

If we live our lives without aspirations, then what is to prevent the strong and the crass to rule? Without a higher ideal, then so many things become utterly pointless.

A case in point is the Asean Human Rights Declaration. Personally, I view this document as something positive. It has its problems, and I shall deal with them later, but within the context of Asean.

It is important because for decades the issue of human rights was not really part of the Asean agenda. It was only in the Asean Charter of 2007 did the countries of Asean formally recognise human rights as an essential value. And now, we have this declaration which spells out the human rights that in principle Asean agrees has to be protected.

I say "in principle" because the Asean Human Rights Declaration is, in international law parlance, a "soft law".

By this, it is meant that it is merely a statement of principle, it is not a binding law as say a treaty is. Therefore, legally it would be rather difficult to insist that the Asean governments comply with this declaration.

This does not mean that they do not have a moral responsibility and it is up to the people of Asean to keep pressing their governments to respect the Declaration and to make the necessary domestic legislation to give legal weight to these "soft law" principles and make them hard.

Surely our erstwhile leaders did not sign the declaration for fun.

They agreed to these principles, so let's make sure they live up to them.

Aside from the lack of legal obligation, another criticism of the Declaration is that it appears to provide loopholes for its signatories.

For example, Article 7 begins with the emphatic statement that "all human rights are universal, indivisible, interdependent and interrelated".

So far so good, but it closes with "the realisation of human rights must be considered in the regional and national context bearing in mind different political, economic, legal, social, cultural, historical and religious backgrounds".

The following article continues in this vein and states "the exercise of human rights and fundamental freedoms shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition for the human rights and fundamental freedom of others, and to meet the just requirements of national security, public order, public health, public safety, public morality, as well as the general welfare of the peoples in a democratic society".

Suspicious, is it not? Signatories of this document have left themselves a method of avoiding their responsibilities.

READ MORE HERE

 

BN government never stood by the rakyat in the Bukit Merah – Papan Controversy.

Posted: 27 Nov 2012 12:25 PM PST

Apparently by not having the rakyat's welfare at heart, the Minister of the Science, Technology & Innovation Ministry (MOSTI), Maximus Ongkili has forsaken the "prime duty" of the regulatory authorities that the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) had proposed. 

The IAEA, which was invited by the government during the Bukit Merah and Papan controversy made many recommendations, and one of them was the "prime duty" which the regulatory authorities should "adhere": 

"there is one principle to which all should adhere: regulatory authorities (Government) should be effectively separated from implementing organization (ARE), since … the prime duty of regulatory authorities is to protect Man and the environment, ensuing the … radiation doses to Man do not contravene the recommendations of the ICRP  regulation." 

Contrary to what the IAEA had recommended, the Federal and the State Government, in the case of the  Papan and Bukit Merah controversy, chose to sideline the welfare of the rakyat and sided with the giant  conglomerate – Mitsubishi Chemical, Japan. 

Likewise in Ongkili's case, by ignoring the rakyat's welfare, he had deviated from the "prime duty of (the) regulatory authorities… to protect Man and the environment".  

Unmistakably, the proof is in his unambiguous expressed statement which he said: "the onus is on them (anti-Lynas group), not on me, to say that decision of the board is not correct. So give me additional information to point to the fact that it was not a wise decision." (Ongkili's interview with Malaysian Insider, April 15, 2012)

Read more at: http://singchyeblog.blogspot.com/2012/11/bn-government-never-stood-by-rakyat-in.html 

 

Is Green Walk a death knell for MCA?

Posted: 27 Nov 2012 11:52 AM PST

 

Number Facts 1

In the past when Barisan Nasional was at their peak , we also can see a large numbers of people attending all the DAP and pro opposition ceramah that can made up to easily 10 000 crowds in most area and DAP still lost in most of the previous General Election .

 

Number Facts 2

Most of MCA Mega Dinner is having a range of 5000 – 15 000 people in each division that the organized. Did MCA ever claim that this mega dinner with such a huge number of crowd is sign of MCA will be winning in General Election or in another way Pakatan Rakyat is currently losing their strength to win in the next General Election ?

The total number of series of MCA Mega Dinner by now easily will reach 100 000 Malaysians and in this case MCA only claimed that they are recovering and way stronger than before. MCA will never take the numbers political game for granted to brag that it is a sign of their early victory.

 

Number Facts 3

In 1998 Reformasi there are easily way larger and bigger protest than all the current BERSIH and LYNAS rally added up all together but then again it never indicates the weakness of MCA performance in 1998 General Election .

 

Double Standard Political Benchmark

If a strength and weakness of any particular political party is just based on the impact of a protest then Stanley Koh should also include the 1500 NGO Rally with Barisan Nasional PWTC will also be the strength of the latest Barisan Nasional political strength?

Please do not forget that if we want to play numbers game , then 1500 NGO is a way bigger NGO compare to HIMPUNAN HIJAU as part of the only NGO in the entire country. If we are talking about number games then it will be 1 (PR) vs 1500 (BN).

What about the recent 2000 single mother protest against Selangor Pakatan Rakyat government that had cheated and manipulated them with their empty promise after taking over the state? If the political bench mark as simple as protest is equals to death knell for any political party then can we consider a list of protest against Selangor Pakatan Rakyat government after Mac 2008 is a sign of a death knell for Pakatan Rakyat? 

Read more at: http://1sya.com/?p=3890 

 

Importance of local government elections

Posted: 25 Nov 2012 03:51 PM PST

For the Prime Minister to promise the ending of an unpopular project if his party is elected into power beggars belief when it is the local authority which was appointed by his very own party which gave the approval in the first place.

Then for the MCA to chip in by saying that the Pakatan state government was at fault for not stopping the project themselves is akin to a thief saying the theft is the fault of the victim because he did nothing to stop it happening.

But then, this level of ridiculousness is to be expected. Let's look at something a bit more constructive than the shamelessness of some politicos.

For me, this whole fiasco serves as greater proof that there has to be a complete overhaul of our local governments.

Firstly we need to bring back local government elections. The current system of appointment of councillors by the state government is simply not democratic.

There is also the danger of councillors being beholden to the ones who appointed them.

Instead they really should be beholden to the people who live in the area.

Furthermore, although I know there are many local authorities and councillors who work very hard and make themselves accessible to their "constituents", what is truly needed is the institutionalising of a system where they are structurally answerable to the people.

There are far too many cases of local authorities acting in a high handed manner simply because they know that ultimately there is very little that the ordinary folk can do. The argument that you indirectly select your local government by the state government you vote for does not hold water.

This is because the job of the state government is very different from the job of the local government. There are broader political and policy issues that come into play when choosing your state representative. A local representative need not even be affiliated with any party.

What people want are councillors who are dedicated and work hard on local issues. State-wide, let alone national issues, does not come into the equation of tree trimming, drain clearing and garbage collection.

READ MORE HERE

 

Pluralism: The new bogey

Posted: 25 Nov 2012 11:26 AM PST

THERE is a new threat against Muslims in Malaysia and its name is pluralism. No less than Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak himself has flagged pluralism as an "enemy of Islam" and grouped it together with the other bad words, "LGBT" and "liberalism".

My Name is Khan promotional poster (source: Wiki Commons)

My Name is Khan promotional poster (source: Wiki Commons)

Not to be outdone, some Muslims, who have been described as scholars, recently declared the spread of pluralism in Malaysia as "worrying", as if it were some kind of pandemic that needed to be controlled. Even popular Bollywood star, Datuk Shah Rukh Khan, has been accused of promoting pluralism through his rather inspiring and endearing movieMy Name is Khan.

But just what kind of threat does pluralism pose to Malaysian Muslims? And if it's such a clear and present danger to the majority of the population, what are other nations, which also experience cultural and religious diversity, doing about pluralism that we may learn from them?

Pluralism 101

Just what is pluralism anyway?

According to Harvard University's Pluralism Project, there are four components to pluralism. Diana L Eck writes that diversity alone is not pluralism. There needs to be an "energetic engagement with diversity" for pluralism to exist. "Today, religious diversity is a given, but pluralism is not a given; it is an achievement," she writes, adding: "Mere diversity without real encounter and relationship will yield increasing tensions in our societies."

Second, it's not about tolerance, which is tenuous, but "the active seeking of understanding across lines of difference". Eck argues that tolerance "does nothing to remove our ignorance of one another" and warns that in today's world, "our ignorance of one another will be increasingly costly".

Thirdly, pluralism is not relativism. Rather it is the "encounter of commitments". What does this mean? It means that proponents of pluralism don't need to leave their identities and commitments behind. It's about "holding our deepest differences, even our religious differences, not in isolation, but in relationship to one another."

And finally, pluralism's foundation is dialogue. That means both speaking and listening in a way that involves "give and take, criticism and self-criticism" so that the process can reveal both "common understandings and real differences".

More sheep than Muslims

Seen in this light, it's no wonder that institutions such as Harvard University in the US have embarked on initiatives to promote, rather than reject, pluralism. Indeed, the motivation for undertakings such as the university's Pluralism Project has been the radically changing religious and cultural landscapes that have emerged in the US because of immigration. The project's mission statement is "to help Americans engage with the realities of religious diversity".

Helen Clark (source: Wiki Commons)

Helen Clark (source: Wiki Commons)

The US isn't the only place in the world where a predominantly white, Christian population views diversity as a gift that can be channelled for greater good by promoting pluralism. In a country where there are likely more sheep than Muslims, Helen Clark's administration lent support to a project by the New Zealand Diversity Action Programme that resulted in the Statement on Religious Diversity. Among others, the statement "encourages education about diverse religious and spiritual traditions, respectful dialogue, and positive relationships between government and faith communities". And just like in the US, New Zealand was spurred by the increasing religious and cultural diversity arising from migration from Asia, Africa and the Middle East.

More Muslims than sheep

In Malaysia meanwhile, there are clearly more Muslims than sheep. In fact, the Malay Muslim population in Malaysia is what the white Christian population is in countries like the US and New Zealand. More importantly, unlike the US and New Zealand, we've always lived with religious and cultural diversity. Our society didn't suddenly see a dramatic shift in demographics that led to citizens feeling befuddled about the appearance of mosques, temples, gurdwaras and churches.

Sheep (Todd Huffman | Flickr)

Sheep (Todd Huffman | Flickr)

And yet, what do we do about our plurality? From prime minister to so-called religious scholars to Muslim youth groups, we hear a clear and resounding rejection of pluralism. Here's what they're saying when they cast pluralism as the new bogey in town: "No" to engagement. "No" to dialogue. "No" to active understanding. "No" to equal and respectful relationships with others.

In other words, "No" to what we've been historically and culturally since, at the very least, Malacca became a trading port in the 15th century. And "No" also to what we have already achieved which developed countries are only now trying to acquire. In fact, let's just demolish one of the bedrock of Malaysian life.

Seen in this light, we shouldn't be at all surprised that there were attempts to denigrate Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim through the distribution of leaflets in Slim River this month that condemned the Opposition Leader as a believer of religious pluralism. He's not the only one. Two years ago, PAS spiritual leader Datuk Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat was attacked at an Islamic seminar for attending a function at a Buddhist temple.

Read more at: http://www.thenutgraph.com/pluralism-the-new-bogey/ 

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Ambiga, this is Malaysia, not the United States

Posted: 27 Nov 2012 04:10 PM PST

FMT LETTER: From Harbhacan Singh, via e-mail

From calling for free and fair elections, Bersih co-chairperson Ambiga Sreenivasan has now gone one step further by calling PM Najib Tun Razak to debate with Anwar Ibrahim.

Free and fair elections have always been her concern but one was doubtful about her real intentions, especially when her most recent Bersih rally was organised as if to give Anwar a platform to project him as a national democracy hero. Anwar and Ambiga both proved they could only bring chaos and disruption to public safety, and not free and fair elections.

Ambiga's act of poking her nose into the 'extinct' issue of a debate between Najib and Anwar seems to give a completely opposite picture of her purpose. Is she politically motivated? It wasn't quite clear all the while but now it seems obvious that she is trying her luck.

She has not admitted that she harboured political motives or that she wishes to be a candidate in the forthcoming elections. But poking her nose into such a debate, if it ever takes place, will be highly political. And therefore she has a political agenda!

Of course as a citizen, she has every right to take part in politics and stand for elections but she must first come clean. She must make her intentions known from the beginning, not hide that face from the domestic and global public.

That is the honest way. She must avoid using the back door to politics. She must boldly come through the front door. As the saying goes, she must come with clean hands.

Having said that, what will a debate between Najib  and Anwar achieve? It simply does not make sense because Malaysia is not the United States of America where two Presidential candidates debate each other and use that opportunity to expound their theories, beliefs and philosophies.

This is done so that the people can compare the two and then make an informed decision as to whom to vote for. But in the case of Malaysia, this is not the practise or culture. Why then is Ambiga so fond to copy the Western culture?

If she thinks the Western system is much better, then will she suggest we change to an election system similar to the US Presidential election, where surely Najib will sweep to victory given his vast popularity among Malaysians as compared to Anwar.

Is Ambiga trying to tell Malaysians to pick the best debater as PM or the one who is the best in making and implementing promises and policies that will really benefit the rakyat? Anwar is no doubt a good debater, but he is a typical chameleon, one who claims to have changed! Yes, he changed from an ultra-Malay, ultra-Islam to what? A pretender? An actor?

Even if Najib agrees to a debate, why should he debate Anwar? It is certainly a fact now that Anwar is not the sole PM candidate of Pakatan Rakyat. PAS members loyal to PAS (and not the 'Erdogans' who prefers to be loyal to one who's not their party leader) wanted their president Hadi Awang to be the PM should Pakatan Rakyat win GE13.

We may not be surprised if tomorrow DAP comes with its own proposal that Lim Kit Siang should be the PM if Pakatan Rakyat wins. This is likely to happen because in reality Pakatan Rakyat parties never have an agreed set of policies apart from the shady Buku Jingga which has no mention on how each and every pledge will be implemented. They are still divided over many fundamental issues. PAS wants to implement hudud, DAP is opposed to this.

So, should Najib really debate with all the PM wannabes or focus on his work and duties to the rakyat? Really, Ambiga should first ask herself what are her credentials for calling for such a debate? Who is she to choose who should debate who?

Who is she to pick Anwar as Pakatan Rakyat's PM candidate for the debate? Is this debate part of her free and fair elections call? She obviously has succeeded only in exposing her political ambitions!

 

DAPSY strongly disagrees with the stance of PAS Youth to seek a ban on the Elton John concert ...

Posted: 27 Nov 2012 04:00 PM PST

DAPSY wishes to state our strong disagreement with PAS Youth for their attempt to pressure the authorities to ban the Elton John concert in Genting Highlands.

While we respect their freedom of opinion, DAPSY feels that taking such a step will only provide fodder to Barisan Nasional and the mainstream media to continue to paint a negative picture of PAS Youth as a backward and regressive youth movement. This will surely not help Pakatan Rakyat to convince Malaysians that we are a progressive and moderate coalition of parties that are ready to replace BN as the federal government.

PAS Youth's reason that allowing Elton John to perform in Malaysia will lead to the rise of homosexuality and other social ills due to his sexual orientation is both simplistic and unacceptable. Those who are attending the concert are there to watch him perform and enjoy his music, they are not there to show support nor be influenced by his sexual orientation.

Banning a concert is not the solution to tackle Malaysia's social ills. PAS Youth should focus more on educational and awareness campaigns instead of imposing its views and values on young people.

Therefore, DAPSY calls on PAS Youth to cancel its plan to protest against the concert and change its approach in addressing and tackling social problems. DAPSY fully support the staging of the concert as planned and sees no reasons why the authorities should withdraw the permit for the concert.

-LOKE SIEW FOOK-

 

Surat ICAC tidak membersihkan nama Dato' Seri Musa Aman, perlu isytihar penyumbang RM40 juta

Posted: 27 Nov 2012 11:55 AM PST

http://i967.photobucket.com/albums/ae159/Malaysia-Today/rafizi_ramli.jpg 

Saya menegaskan pendirian saya bahawa surat yang disebut oleh Dato' Abdul Rahman Dahlan itu tidak membersihkan nama Dato' Seri Musa Aman, sebaliknya menguatkan pandangan bahawa ICAC terpaksa menghentikan siasatan kerana tidak mendapat kerjasama pihak berkuasa Malaysia. 

Rafizi Ramli, Pengarah Strategi Keadilan 

Saya merujuk kepada laporan oleh Clara Chooi yang disiarkan pada 27 November 2012 oleh The Malaysian Insider bertajuk "ICAC Letter Shows Musa Aman Cleared of Graft Last December".

Laporan itu memetik kenyataan Dato' Abdul Rahman Dahlan, Ahli Parlimen Kota Belud bagi pihak Dato' Seri Musa Aman bahawa kes telah ditutup oleh ICAC Hong Kong berdasarkan satu surat yang dihantar secara peribadi kepada Dato' Seri Musa Aman.

Berdasarkan laporan tersebut, saya ingin menegaskan beberapa fakta berikut:

1.      Surat yang diutuskan oleh ICAC itu sekali-kali tidak menyatakan bahawa Dato' Seri Musa Aman dibersihkan dari tuduhan rasuah, atau membayangkan bahawa ICAC yakin Dato' Seri Musa Aman bersih dari rasuah seperti yang cuba diwar-warkan oleh Umno/Barisan Nasional.

2.      Surat itu hanya memaklumkan bahawa berdasarkan maklumat-maklumat yang ICAC perolehi setakat itu, ICAC mengambil keputusan untuk tidak meneruskan siasatan terhadap Dato' Seri Musa Aman.

Jika Dato' Seri Musa Aman tidak bersetuju dengan fakta-fakta ini, maka wajarlah beliau mendedahkan kandungan keseluruhan surat tersebut, bukannya menggunakan Dato' Abdul Rahman Dahlan untuk menyampaikan secara lisan sahaja kepada wartawan.

Keputusan ICAC untuk tidak meneruskan siasatan berdasarkan maklumat-maklumat yang mereka perolehi setakat itu menimbulkan lebih banyak persoalan. Ia juga menguatkan pandangan beberapa pihak bahawa ICAC tidak mendapat kerjasama sepenuhnya dari pihak berkuasa Malaysia untuk meneruskan siasatan kerana mereka tidak mempunyai kuasa menyiasat dan mengumpulkan bukti.

Oleh yang demikian, mereka bergantung sepenuhnya kepada Peguam Negara dan Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (SPRM) untuk mendapatkan bukti.

Kenyataan Ketua Pendakwaraya Hong Kong, Kevin Zevros baru-baru ini bahawa pihak berkuasa Hong Kong mengambil keputusan untuk menghentikan siasatan berdasarkan maklumat pihak berkuasa Malaysia mengesahkan bahawa tangan ICAC terikat dari meneruskan siasatan.

Oleh yang demikian, saya menegaskan pendirian saya bahawa surat yang disebut oleh Dato' Abdul Rahman Dahlan itu tidak membersihkan nama Dato' Seri Musa Aman, sebaliknya menguatkan pandangan bahawa ICAC terpaksa menghentikan siasatan kerana tidak mendapat kerjasama pihak berkuasa Malaysia.

Saya dan pasukan dari KEADILAN (YB William Leong, YB Hee Loy Sian dan YB Chang Lih Kang) sedang giat mengumpulkan bukti termasuk penyata-penyata kewangan dan urusniaga di Hong Kong untuk dilaporkan kepada ICAC agar siasatan baru dibuka, seperti persetujuan dengan ICAC baru-baru ini.

Rombongan kami akan menemui ICAC pada 11 Disember 2012 dalam kunjungan yang kedua.

Saya juga menggesa Dato' Seri Musa Aman supaya tidak terus mengheret Umno ke dalam permasalahan peribadi beliau. Cara terbaik untuk membersihkan nama beliau adalah dengan mengisytiharkan secara terperinci maklumat sumbangan RM40 juta yang diterima beliau, termasuklah:

§  Siapa yang menderma/memberi sumbangan?

§  Apa hubungan penderma/penyumbang ini dengan beliau dan Umno?

§  Apa kontrak-kontrak atau konsesi yang pernah diberikan kepada penderma/penyumbang ini?

§  Di mana wang itu disimpan dan atas nama siapa?

Saya percaya maklumat-maklumat di atas bukan sahaja dituntut oleh rakyat Malaysia, malah turut ditanya oleh pimpinan Umno sendiri.

Apabila Umno/Barisan Nasional menyerang pimpinan KEADILAN bersabit sumbangan (termasuklah isu bas jelajah Merdeka Rakyat dan penggunaan jet peribadi), pimpinan KEADILAN yang terbabit dengan segera mengisytiharkan butiran penyumbang, supaya rakyat dapat menilai sendiri sama ada berlaku unsur salah guna kuasa.

Sikap yang sama perlulah juga ditunjukkan oleh Dato' Seri Musa Aman, jika beliau benar-benar yakin tidak ada unsur rasuah dan salah guna kuasa di dalam kes sumbangan RM40 juta kepada beliau/Umno seperti yang didakwanya.

Kegagalan beliau berterus terang akan terus memanjangkan kes ini dan saya akan terus menumpukan perhatian untuk mendapatkan maklumat dan bukti baru untuk dibentangkan kepada rakyat.

Sebab itu, saya tidak sedikit pun merasa tergugat dengan ancaman tindakan undang-undang seperti yang disebut oleh Dato' Abdul Rahman Dahlan. Saya yakin saya hanya menjalankan tanggungjawab sebagai seorang rakyat dan bersedia untuk mempertahankan kes yang saya bawa di mahkamah pada bila-bila masa.

Persoalannya: Apakah Dato' Seri Musa Aman bersedia untuk bertemu di mahkamah dan mendedahkan butiran penderma-penderma beliau di mahkamah seperti mana bersedianya saya?

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Cerita sebenar Deepak Jaikishan kawan Rosmah

Posted: 27 Nov 2012 05:06 PM PST

Deepak J Tekwani, pengarah kepada Carpet Corporation menghubungi Harakahdaily untuk memberikan cerita sebenar di sebalik hubungan beliau dengan keluarga Datuk Seri Najib Razak.

Dalam pertemuan berdepan kira-kira setengah jam di sebuah hotel terkemuka itu, Deepak menceritakan apa sebenarnya hubungan beliau dengan keluarga Perdana Menteri khasnya Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor, isteri Najib.

Ia bermula apabila Rosmah menjadi pelanggan kedai karpet beliau di Jalan Tunku Abdul Rahman. Selepas itu hubungan mereka baik dan Deepak diperkenalkan kepada Najib.

Ketika itu, Najib adalah Menteri Petahanan.

Namun persahabatan mereka berakhir apabila Deepak diminta menolong keluarga Najib ekoran akuan bersumpah (SD) yang dibuat oleh penyiasat persendirian P Balasubramaniam.

Ia berakhir apabila Bala tidak berpuashati dan Deepak dipersalahkan oleh keluarga Najib.

"Cara dia bertindak bukan sebagai kawan yang menolong kawan, tetapi dia hantar 50 orang penguatkuasa datang ke ofis saya, rumah, dan kilang saya dengan niat memberi amaran untuk saya tidak mendedahkan perkara sebenar & menutup cerita sebenar SD," cerita Deepak kepada Harakahdaily.

Ikuti pendedahan siapa Deepak Jaikishan sebenarnya melalui temubual wartawan Harakahdaily dengan beliau.

Apa tujuan saudara mahu bertemu dengan Harakah (daily)?

Saya tertarik dengan pertanyaan Harakah (daily) minggu lepas, siapa saya (Deepak Jaikishan). Saya sebenarnya terlibat dalam perniagaan karpet dan perniagaan hartanah.

Saudara dikaitkan dengan Datuk Seri Najib. Sebenarnya bagaimana hubungan saudara dengan keluarga beliau?

Hubungan...saya memang kenal Datuk Seri dan Puan Seri. Saya sebagai pembekal karpet dan terlibat dalam perniagaan. Kalau ada peluang bisnes, kita mintak sokongan dari pihak beliau.

Sudah lama hubungan itu. Bagaimana saudara kenal dia?

Ia hanya bisnis karpaet. Mungkin 2004 atau 2005, Datin Seri (Rosmah) datang ke kedai kita di Jalan Tunku Abdul Rahman. Dia datang kedai beli karpet, so kita berkenalan dari situlah. Kamudian Datin Seri perkenalkan kepada suami dia. Masa itu dia (Najib) adalah Menteri
Pertahanan.

Bisnes apa yang saudara buat dengan dia?

Mungkin tidak sesuai saya dedahkan hari inilah. Mungkin sessi lain. Sebab saya hanya mahu jawab apa yang saudara tanya dalam akhbar saudara. Apa hubungan saya dengan mereka. Bisnis saja, tidak ada yang bukan-bukan. Ia hanya bisnis sahaja. Dia isteri orang, tidak ada yang bukan-bukan, tidak baik. Ia benar-benar bisnes sahaja.

Ada laporan dalam Malaysiakini yang saudara berkata, ia hubungan kakak adik sahaja, tanpa lain-lain?

Ya boleh dikatakan begitu.

Pada pandangan saudara, kenapa saudara dipopularkan sangat?

Saya pun rasa. Dulu tidak ada macam itu. Mungkin kesalahan saya bila saya tolong dalam kes Bala (P Balasubramaniam). Semasa kita dengan tidak sengaja terlibat dalam kes Bala untuk menolong keluarga Perdana Menteri. Masa itulah nama kita naik.Sememangnya kita tidak suka, kita suka low profile.

Sebelum ini tidak ada apa-apalah?


Takda, kita senyap-senyap buat bisnes kita. Di Malaysia, kalau kita high profile bukan senang kita nak buat bisnes.

Macamana pulak saudara terlibat dalam kes Bala. Ia menjadi persoalan kepada orang ramai?


Ini kes mahu tolong kawan. Pada kita dia kawan yang setialah. Jadi kita tolong. Contohnyalah, saya dengan saudara dekat kolam renang. Saya tidak tahu berenang. Tetapi saya lihat saudara jatuh ke dalam kolam dan tenggelam. Jadi saya pun masuk dalam kolam untuk menolong saudara. Jadi saya rasa pada masa itu, kita saja yang ada dan kita diminta menolong. Kita bukan terlibat secara langsung. Lawyer pun lawyer dia (keluarga PM), kita saja tolong koordinat. Reporter pun dia yang panggil. Kita fikir ketika itu ada kawan yang terdesak minta pertolongan. Dia pun dah ada hubungan baik dengan kita.  Kita tak anggap perkara ini akan menyusahkan kita dan melibatkan kita secara langsung dalam kes Altantuya inilah.

Maksuk Encik Deepak, saudara baik dengan Bala ke, saudara tolong Bala ke atau...

Saya tolong keluarga Datuk Seri Najib.

Saudara memang kenal Bala?

Saya tidak kenal secara langsung, ada kenalan melalui komuniti yang sama, perkara ini terjadi. Saya dipanggil waktu tengah malam, "You boleh tak selesaikan masalah ini...its a big problem". Saya pun ada seorang saudara yang kenal dia (Bala), seorang anggota polis juga. "Tanya dia boleh tak you uruskan orang ini, minta dia jumpa wakil keluarga Datuk Seri." Dia setujulah. Kita perkenalkan dia. Kita bukan terlibat dengan apa-apa proses lain, kita tidak terlibat.

Jadi selepas itulah nama saudara menjadi popular?

Ya ini memang kesalahan kitalah. Kalau perkara ini terjadi sekali lagi, saya tidak boleh berenang, saya tengok saudara tenggelam, saya akan biarkan tenggelamlah. Saya tak boleh nak tolonglah sebab manusia tidak mengenang budi.

Adakah selepas itu hubungan dengan Bala bermasalah?

Sebenarnya dia (Bala) bukan marah dengan kita. Dia marah orang yang telah janji dengan dia. Bukan saya.

Apa berlaku kepada hubungan saudara dengan Datuk Seri selepas itu?

Saya rasa selepas semua inilah, apabila ia sudah terdedah, kita telah dianggap bersalah kerana tidak dapat memuaskan semua kehendak Bala. Sebenarnya bukan kita yang terlibat dalam masalah ini, bukan kita yang terlibat dalam kes Altantuya. Kita pada malam itu menolong saja tetapi dipersalahkan kerana tidak dapat memenuhi kemahuan-kemahuan Bala. Bala ini bekas Pi. Seminggu cerita itu, seminggu lagi cerita ini. Kita tidak mahu terlibat dengan semua itu. Kita orang bisnes tidak mahu terlibat dengan dunia James Bond inilah.

Apa berlaku selepas itu. Saudara dilihat senyap sedikit selepas itu?

Kita pun mahu cerita ini senyap tetapi tidak begitu. Saudara juga terlibat bangkitkan lagi cerita ini. Saya rasa kes ini tidak akan senyap sehingga kes Altantuya selesai dengan adil. Bagi saya, dunia ini dikuasai oleh Tuhan Yang Maha Esa. Saya rasa selagi kes ini tidak selesai, perkara ini tidak akan terhenti. Kita tidak bersalah, tangan kita bersih. Kita tidak mahu dikaitkan dengan benda yang libatkan kes-kes yang sebegini kejam, Kita nak bercakap benar dengan semua orang. Memang satu masa dulu kita telah menolong kawan tetapi kita tidak bersalah. Kita tak terlibat dan tidak ada motif untuk melibatkan diri.

Selepas apa yang berlaku dengan Bala, adakah masih baik dengan keluarga Datuk Seri?


Sebenarnya, selepas perkara ini berlaku, mereka telah mengambil tindakan cuba mensenyapkan saya. Cara dia bertindak bukan sebagai kawan yang telah menolong kawan, tetapi hadiah yang dihantar adalah hantar 50 orang penguatkuasa kerajaan datang melawat, masa kes Bala terdedahlah. Jadi kita pun tahulah pada ketika itu, Najib is sitting Prime Minister. Dihantar pula 50 orang penguatkuasa datang dan angkut lima enam lori.

Jadi apa tindakan saudara?


Kita tunjuklah ketidakpuasan hati kita, perniagaan kita terjejas. Kalau you anggap saya sebagai kawan, you besar atau kecil, kawan tetap kawan, kita mesti tolong. Kalau tidak boleh tolong, jangan susahkan. Jangan makan kawan. Jadi tindakan yang dibuat untuk kawal situasi dengan hantar 50 penguatkuasa untuk menyeyapkan kita, supaya kita senyap, jangan cakap. Kita tahulah, ini bukan kawan. Kalau macam ini, baik hari itu bagi dia tenggelam.

Apa tindakan selepas itu?


Kita duduk diam-diam. Yang hangus tidak boleh diganti. Jadi sekarang saja nak bersihkan nama saya. Kita pun tak libat bisnes dengan mereka lagi. Dah dua tahun tidak libat lagi bisnis dengan dia tetapi masih cerita ini keluar. Bagi saya cerita ini tidak akan selesai sehingga Altantuya dibicarakan dengan adil dan mendapat hak dia. Kita tidak mahu dilibatkan. Sangat jelas  penglibatan kita pada malam itu hanya tolong kawan dan SD itu sendiri dibuat oleh peguam mereka.

 

180 NGO tempatan, pemerhati Asean pantau PRU13

Posted: 26 Nov 2012 03:45 PM PST

Timbalan Pengerusi SPR Datuk Wan Ahmad Wan Omar berkata, pihak SPR telah mengadakan pertemuan dengan NGO tempatan berkenaan dari seluruh negara bagi membincangkan syarat-syarat pelantikan dan rangka kerja pemantauan.

Katanya, NGO yang dikenal pasti itu merupakan pertubuhan bebas yang tidak memihak kepada mana-mana parti politik.

"SPR telah mengenal pasti enam NGO di Semenanjung, sembilan di Sarawak dan tiga di Sabah. Pelantikan dan pemilihan NGO akan dimuktamadkan minggu depan Kesemua NGO ini perlu mematuhi syarat yang ditentukan serta dikehendaki menandatangani Aku Janji Kerja.

"Namun, ia terpulang untuk NGO sama ada menerima syarat pelantikan SPR atau menolak lantikan itu," katanya ketika ditemu bual dalam rancangan Hello Malaysia yang disiarkan secara langsung menerusi saluran televisyen BernamaTV di sini, semalam.

Wan Ahmad berkata SPR akan memberi taklimat kepada semua petugas NGO itu mengenai bertanggungjawab mereka dan proses perundangan dan perjalanan pilihan raya demi kepentingan masa depan negara.

Katanya, SPR memberi kelonggaran kepada NGO tempatan berkenaan untuk membuat pemantauan dari tempoh pembubaran Parlimen hingga keputusan pilihan raya serta membuat laporan berasas kepada fakta, dan bukannya sekadar andaian, persepsi  atau dengar cakap.

"Jika kita mendapati mana-mana pihak yang melanggar peraturan-peraturan syarat-syarat Aku Janji, atau berkempen untuk mana-mana pihak atau menemuramah pengundi,  maka SPR akan menamatkan pelantikan itu," jelas beliau.

Langkah timbal balik

Bagi pemerhati negara Asean pula, Wan Ahmad berkata langkah SPR untuk mengundang negara jiran sebagai pemerhati antarabangsa merupakan satu langkah timbal balik dan menghormati langkah negara jiran yang menjemput Malaysia untuk memerhati serta memantau pilihan raya di negara masing-masing.

Katanya, negara jiran seperti Thailand, Indonesia, Kemboja, Myanmar dan Filipina akan dijemput sebagai pemantau dan akan menjalankan tugas itu secara profesional, memahami proses pilihan raya dan menghormati undang-undang negara ini.

Katanya, SPR sebelum ini turut menghantar seorang pegawai untuk menyertai delegasi pemerhati Malaysia semasa Pilihan Raya Myanmar tahun lalu.

Ahad lalu, akhbar tempatan memetik Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak berkata Malaysia bersedia membawa beberapa pemerhati Asean untuk pantau pilihan raya umum ke-13 supaya mereka akan lihat ia berjalan ikut Perlembagaan, undang-undang negara dan kesahihan keputusan rakyat tak boleh dipertikaikan.

Wan Ahmad berkata: "Pemerhati dalam negara tetap menjadi pilihan utama kerana rakyat negara kita yang berhak memerhati, memantau, membuat laporan serta mengadakan sidang media untuk memberitahu kepada rakyat, apa yang diperhatikan semasa pilihan raya umum ke-13 kelak".

Beliau berkata langkah menjemput pemerhati dari negara Asean untuk memantau pilihan raya umum di Malaysia bukan bermakna "apabila kita mengundang kerajaan lain untuk pantau proses pilihan raya yang ditentukan oleh rakyat, ia seolah-olah membenarkan orang luar ceroboh kedaulatan negara kita".

Mengenai pendirian SPR terhadap permintaan Ketua Pembangkang Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim mengundang kerajaan Australia untuk memastikan pilihan raya di negara ini bebas dan bersih, beliau berkata:

"Pendirian SPR sebenarnya jelas. Memang tidak wajar sama sekali kita menjemput kerajaan asing datang campur tangan dalam urusan menentukan proses pemilihan kerajaan di negara kita. Ini adalah kerana Malaysia bukan pertama kali menjalankan pilihan raya dan bukan sebuah negara yang baru mendapat kemerdekaan."

READ MORE HERE

 

Exco Pas Kedah persoal Karpal

Posted: 26 Nov 2012 04:48 AM PST

@font-face p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal div.Section1

Pengerusi Jawatankuasa Kerajaan Tempatan, Bekalan Air, Sumber Air Dan Tenaga negeri, Datuk Phahrolrazi Zawawi berkata, meskipun air itu anugerah tuhan, penjagaan sumber alam itu termasuk untuk mengekalkan kawasan tadahannya melibatkan perbelanjaan.

"Yang syarikat air caj bekalan air itu macam mana? Ini bukan soal dagang, soal sekarang kena bayar, (atau) tidak kena bayar.

"Perbadanan Bekalan Air Pulau Pinang bagi percuma ke? Itu untuk air yang dirawat. Yang ini air mentah tetapi hutan kena jaga, penguatkuasaan kena buat dan melibatkan kos," katanya ketika dihubungi Utusan Malaysia di sini hari ini.

 

 

Seorang Exco kerajaan Negeri Kedah hari ini melontarkan persoalan kepada Karpal Singh apakah bekalan air yang disalurkan kepada rakyat di Pulau Pinang percuma berikutan permintaan Pengerusi DAP itu agar negeri tersebut tidak memperdagangkan sumber semula jadi kerana air satu anugerah tuhan.

Pengerusi Jawatankuasa Kerajaan Tempatan, Bekalan Air, Sumber Air Dan Tenaga negeri, Datuk Phahrolrazi Zawawi berkata, meskipun air itu anugerah tuhan, penjagaan sumber alam itu termasuk untuk mengekalkan kawasan tadahannya melibatkan perbelanjaan.

"Yang syarikat air caj bekalan air itu macam mana? Ini bukan soal dagang, soal sekarang kena bayar, (atau) tidak kena bayar.

"Perbadanan Bekalan Air Pulau Pinang bagi percuma ke? Itu untuk air yang dirawat. Yang ini air mentah tetapi hutan kena jaga, penguatkuasaan kena buat dan melibatkan kos," katanya ketika dihubungi Utusan Malaysia di sini hari ini.



Artikel Penuh: http://www.utusan.com.my/utusan/Dalam_Negeri/20121127/dn_02/Exco-Pas-Kedah-persoal-Karpal#ixzz2DMcmaCHh
© Utusan Melayu (M) Bhd

Seorang Exco kerajaan Negeri Kedah hari ini melontarkan persoalan kepada Karpal Singh apakah bekalan air yang disalurkan kepada rakyat di Pulau Pinang percuma berikutan permintaan Pengerusi DAP itu agar negeri tersebut tidak memperdagangkan sumber semula jadi kerana air satu anugerah tuhan.

Pengerusi Jawatankuasa Kerajaan Tempatan, Bekalan Air, Sumber Air Dan Tenaga negeri, Datuk Phahrolrazi Zawawi berkata, meskipun air itu anugerah tuhan, penjagaan sumber alam itu termasuk untuk mengekalkan kawasan tadahannya melibatkan perbelanjaan.

"Yang syarikat air caj bekalan air itu macam mana? Ini bukan soal dagang, soal sekarang kena bayar, (atau) tidak kena bayar.

"Perbadanan Bekalan Air Pulau Pinang bagi percuma ke? Itu untuk air yang dirawat. Yang ini air mentah tetapi hutan kena jaga, penguatkuasaan kena buat dan melibatkan kos," katanya ketika dihubungi Utusan Malaysia di sini hari ini.



Artikel Penuh: http://www.utusan.com.my/utusan/Dalam_Negeri/20121127/dn_02/Exco-Pas-Kedah-persoal-Karpal#ixzz2DMcmaCHh
© Utusan Melayu (M) Bhd

 

PAS bantah konsert Elton John

Posted: 25 Nov 2012 03:35 PM PST

Nasrudin Hassan Tantawi

Katanya, kerajaan haruslah melaksanakan tanggungjawab dengan lebih peka dan menghalang segala faktor yang menyebabkan peningkatan berlakunya gejala sosial di negara ini.

"Kerajaan nampaknya tidak sedar terhadap gejala sosial yang melanda negara sedangkan konsert sebeginilah yang menjadi punca kepada kerosakan remaja seperti pergaulan bebas, gejala arak, dan  ditambah lagi dengan kemunculan pengamal seks sejenis.

"Konsert sebegini boleh membawa kemudaratan dan saya sendiri tidak dapat bayangkan bagaimana masalah sosial remaja di negara ini dapat dikurangkan sekiranya pihak berkuasa tidak menyekatnya dari awal," katanya ketika dihubungi The Malaysian Times (TMT) di sini hari ini.

Nasrudin berkata, pihaknya akan menyerahkan bantahan terhadap penganjuran konsert tersebut kepada kerajaan meskipun pihak penganjur berkeras untuk meneruskannya.

"Kami akan menggunakan pendekatan menyerahkan memorandum bantahan terhadap konsert tersebut kepada pihak kerajaan. Ini adalah salah satu langkah yang kami ambil untuk menghalang peningkatan gejala sosial di negara ini daripada terus meningkat.

"Apa pu, kami akan teruskan dengan kerja-kerja dakwah kami dan sentiasa memberi peringatan kepada semua umat Islam terutama golongan remaja agar tidak melibatkan diri dengan gejala-gejala yang mengheret diri ke lembah maksiat," jelasnya.

Penganjuran konsert itu turut dibantah Ahli Parlimen (PAS) Shah Alam, Khalid Abdul Samad yang berpendapat bahawa konsert itu tidak sewajarnya dianjurkan kerana ia bakal menyebabkan berlakunya masalah pergaulan bebas.

Khalid Samad

Katanya, PAS sememangnya tidak membantah masyarakat untuk berhibur namun kami semenangnya tidak menyokong aktiviti golongan lesbian, gay, biseksual dan transgender (LGBT).

"Konsert sebegini sememangnya tidak wajar diadakan agar golongan muda tidak terpengaruh dengan budaya yang ditonjolkan. Walaubagaimanapun, konsert ini bukan anjuran PAS, dan kami akan mengambil langkah yang sewajarnya supaya masalah sosial di negara ini terus meningkat," ujarnya.

Tahun lalu, Pemuda PAS turut menghalang konsert rock Elton yang diadakan di tempat yang sama atas alasan penyanyi itu adalah gay namun konsert itu tetap diteruskan dan mendapat sambutan hangat dari semua golongan masyarakat.

Untuk rekod, Elton terkenal dengan lagu hits seperti Candle In The Wind, Rocket Man, Levon dan Your Son" telah mendirikan rumah tangga dengan rakan homeseksualnya David Furnish pada 21 Disember 2005, selepas kerajaan Britain membenarkan perkahwinan sejenis.

 

Bukan PAS, yang gelicir orangnya

Posted: 24 Nov 2012 03:00 PM PST

Telah timbul isu PAS dikatakan tergelincir dari dasar Islamnya dan kepimpinan ulama gara-gara dikatakan setelah ditembusi oleh para parasit.

Justeru itu PAS telah ditohmah mulai leka mengtamakan untuk berkuasa dari memajukan politik  dakwahnya sambil meningkatkan dakwah politiknya.

Tetapi menjelang muktamarnya dari 15 hingga 18 November  2012 nampak adanya gelombang orang yang keluar dari PAS. Yang ada ialah gelombang orang menyertai PAS oleh orang-orang yang bersara dari perkhidmatan kerajaan dan orang-orang Umno yang bersara dari partinya. Antara yang bersara dari Umno itu Tamrin Ghafar Baba dan Tan Sri Kadir Shaik Fadzir. Kadir tidak mendaftar jadi PAS, tetapi hati dan jasadnya sudah bersama PAS.

Mungkin yang dikatakan PAS tergelincir dari pimpinan ulama kerana Mohamad Sabu yang bukan ulama telah mengalahkan dua calon ulama dalam pertandingan jawatan Timbalan Presiden dalam Muktamar sebelum ini.

Ia tidak cukup untuk mengatakan ulama telah dipinggirkan kerana sistem kepimpinan PAS bertunggakkan kepada Majlis Syura Ulama, pimpinan bersama Tok Guru Nik Abdul Aziz dan Dr. Harun Din. Wibawa Mursyidul Am dan Presidennya yang ulama belum tercabar.

Pemilihan Mohamad Sabu belum menjadikan status kepimpinan ulama terlucut. Seperti Iran, Presidennya boleh ulama dan boleh juga bukan ulama. Pernah bukan ulama menjadi Presiden seperti Bani Sadr, Rajai seorng guru matamatik dan Ahmadenejad sekarang. Ia juga pernah ada Presiden ulama seperti Ayatullah Ali  Khaminae, Hojatul Islam Mashimi Rafsanjani dan Khatami. Tetapi tidak pernah Iran terlucut dari pimpinan ulama.

Dua kerajaan negeri pimpinan PAS sekarang — Kelantan dan Kedah — berMBkan ulama. Benar MB Perak dulu bukan ulama tetapi ia disebab ulama yang berstatus pemimpin kalah dalam pilihanraya.

Adapun kerjasama dalam Pakatan Rakyat bersama PKR dan DAP dibuat mengikutkan lunas siasah syariyah yang diluluskan oleh  Majlis Syura Ulama. Kerjasama politik atau tahaluf siasi sudah PAS jalani sebelum Anwar Ibrahim dipecat dari Umno sejak tahun 1985 menjelang PRU 1986. Uztaz Ibrahim Libya yang terkenal keras itu sebelum terbunuhnya tidak menentang tahaluf itu kerana ia diputuskan mengikut kaerah siasah syariyah.

Politik PAS itu ada turun naiknya, tetapi tidak pernah ia tergelincir dari pejuangan Islamnya. Ketika ia berada dalam kerajaan BN telah merasa sedap dengan nikmat kerajaan, tetapi PAS mengambil langkah sedia  ditendang dari mengikut arahan Hussein Onn dan Dr Mahathir. Ia kembali kepada perjuangan tulinnya.

PAS telah selamat dari tergelincir tetapi dari semasa ke semasa, orang ada yang tergelincir. Hatta dua orang yang pernah menjadi Presidennya tergelincir — Haji Ahmad Fuad dan Dato Asri. Sejak pimpinan Dr. Burhanuddin Alhilmy hinggalah ke zaman Ustaz Haji Abdul Hadi ada yang bertaraf pimpinan tergelincir baik tergelincair dari parti mahupun pemikiran Islam yang dibawa PAS.

Sebagai sebuah parti yang terbuka ia disertai oleh semua lapisan rakyat yang berbagai latarbelakang pendidikan. Maka tidak terlepas ia dari  dibolosi oleh orang yang dikatakan parasid. Tetapi para parasit yang tidak dapat menjadikan dirinya benar-benar PAS, maka satu demi  satu telah gagal menjadi ahli yang baik.

Ada parasid yang melarikan diri dan ada juga yang disuruh lari. Mereka juga tergelincir. Jika jenis itu belum hari, mereka juga akan tergelincir pula.

PAS pernah berkawan dengan Tengku Razaleigh, Rais Yatim dan Datuk Harun Idris. Mereka juga tergelincir. Tetapi PAS tetap seperti ketika ia ditubuhkan dulu.

 

Najib: Pilihan raya umum ke-13 Disember ini?

Posted: 24 Nov 2012 12:22 PM PST

Beliau yakin walaupun musim tengkujuh, jentera parti politik yang bertanding mampu menghadapi sebarang kemungkinan. 

"Kalau hujan atau banjir, boleh naik sampan, naik bot," katanya dengan nada berseloroh ketika ditanya sama ada PRU-13 akan diadakan dalam masa terdekat atau Parlimen akan dibiarkan terbubar dengan sendirinya. 

Beliau berkata demikian dalam temubual eksklusif bersama para pengarang Bernama dan Utusan Malaysia sempena Perhimpunan Agung Umno 2012 di pejabatnya di Parlimen baru-baru ini. 

Najib, yang juga Presiden Umno, bagaimanapun tidak menolak kemungkinan pilihan raya boleh diadakan pada tahun depan jika ia tidak diadakan pada bulan depan. 

"Kalau bulan Disember tak ada pilihan raya umum, tahun depanlah. Melainkan kita buat bulan Disember ini," katanya. 

Najib mempunyai masa hingga 28 April tahun depan untuk membubarkan Parlimen bagi memberi laluan kepada PRU-13 sebelum Parlimen terbubar dengan sendirinya, dan Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya wajib menetapkan tarikh pilihan raya dalam tempoh dua bulan selepas itu

 

Najib garis lima sebab Umno/BN perlu diberi mandate besar dalam PRU13

Posted: 24 Nov 2012 12:15 PM PST

Datuk Seri Najib Razak, yang juga Pengerusi BN dan Presiden Umno berkata sebagai sebuah parti berpengalaman, Umno selaku parti tunjang dalam BN sentiasa memacu dan menggerakkan pelbagai idea dan transformasi ke arah masa depan negara yang gemilang berbanding pakatan pembangkang yang masih kabur mengenai perkara itu. 

Selain itu, Umno dan BN turut merupakan satu pakatan yang terikat kepada dasar-dasar yang disokong secara bersama dan tidak ada percanggahan sama ada dari segi dasar mahupun ideologi, dan ini berbeza dengan parti lawan yang seringkali mengeluarkan pendapat yang bertentangan walaupun atas soal-soal asas dan fundamental, katanya. 

"Ketiga, kita mempunyai 'track record' pencapaian yang terbukti dan tidak boleh disangkal dalam mengurus negara di mana kita juga telah dapat meyakinkan rakyat bahawa peta jalan ke hadapan adalah berdasarkan kemampuan kita untuk melaksanakannya selama ini. 

"Maknanya, keyakinan rakyat bahawa kemampuan kita untuk melaksanakan agenda negara iaitu transformasi besar yang ingin kita perlihatkan," katanya dalam temubual eksklusif bersama para pengarang Bernama dan Utusan Malaysia sempena Perhimpunan Agung Umno 2012 di pejabatnya di Parlimen baru-baru ini. 

Najib berkata sebagai sebuah kerajaan, Umno dan BN memiliki kekuatan moral yang kukuh dan sentiasa berpegang kepada janji di mana setiap janji yang dibuat dipastikan supaya ditunaikan serta tidak akan membuat janji yang tidak mampu dipenuhi. 

Beliau berkata janji kerajaan BN adalah jelas untuk kepentingan rakyat dan sentiasa ditunaikan berdasarkan prinsip janji ditepati berbanding janji pakatan pembangkang yang bertujuan memperdaya pengundi demi memenuhi matlamat untuk menakluki Putrajaya. 

Pengerusi BN berkata sebab terakhir yang perlu diberi perhatian ialah rakyat tidak perlu menggadai masa depan dengan menyerahkan negara kepada parti yang tidak boleh menjanjikan masa depan lebih baik ketika kredibiliti mereka juga dipertikaikan. 

"Masa depan kita, masa depan anak-anak kita terlalu mahal untuk diperjudikan, sebaliknya dengan Barisan Nasional tahap keyakinan lebih tinggi... ini dapat dilihat dari segi prestasi pasaran dengan kemasukan pelabur-pelabur dari dalam dan luar negara," katanya. 

Mengenai mengapa orang Melayu tidak menggunakan agama sebagai asas penyatuan seperti yang dilakukan kaum lain, Najib berkata: 

"Orang Melayu telah dikelirukan dengan hasutan dan fitnah yang bertalu-talu terhadap pemimpin Umno dan Umno itu sendiri, walaupun dakyah-dakyah tersebut merupakan serangan politik dan tidak ada asasnya." 

Najib berpendapat orang Melayu juga terpedaya dengan imej luaran seperti label parti yang dikatakan parti Islam dan rupa pemimpin yang mereka anggap lebih Islamik. 

Beliau berkata sepatutnya sesebuah parti itu dinilai dari segi pengisian dan agenda yang boleh meninggikan perjuangan dan syiar Islam, dan Umno telah membuktikan parti itu dapat memperjuangkan tuntutan Islam berdasarkan Maqasid Syariah. 

"Sejak dulu lagi kita perjuangkan Islam, bermula dengan Perlembagaan, pembentukan institusi-institusi Islam serta program-program Islam yang kita telah wujudkan dan martabatkan seperti perbankan Islam," katanya. 

Ditanya harapan beliau kepada para perwakilan selepas tamat perhimpunan kali ini, Najib berharap seluruh warga Umno yang hadir dapat menghayati mesej yang diterapkan seterusnya menterjemahkan dalam bentuk tindakan serta sikap masing-masing. 

"Umpamanya, banyak penegasan akan dibuat tentang bagaimana mereka harus mendepani cabaran PRU-13 dan bagaimana kita harus meletakkan persediaan kita secara mantap bukan sahaja dari segi persiapan fizikal seperti bilik gerakan, bantuan material dan sebagainya tetapi juga dari segi semangat dan sikap untuk meletakkan kemenangan pilihan raya sebagai yang perlu diutamakan dan tidak ada apa-apa perhitungan yang lain meskipun sesuatu itu memang sangat dihajati oleh kita," katanya. 

Beliau juga berharap perwakilan yang berbahas mampu mengupas, menjawab dan menangkis sebarang isu nasional serta tohmahan yang dihalakan kepada parti.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved