Selasa, 22 November 2011

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


New assembly law undermines Constitution, says Ambiga

Posted: 21 Nov 2011 08:31 PM PST

(The Malaysian Insider) - Bersih 2.0 chief Datuk Ambiga Sreenevasan slammed today the proposed new law on peaceful assembly for giving greater powers to the home minister and the police to curb dissent and undermine the Federal Constitution.

In a statement today, the prominent lawyer accused the government of failing to keep up with international standards and creating instead the illusion that Malaysians now have greater freedom as provided by the country's supreme law.

"This Bill restricts our rights as much as possible.  It gives unfettered powers to the minister and the police to further restrict the freedom to assemble.  It impinges on free speech.  In short, it will stymie legitimate dissent in ourcountry," Ambiga charged.

"Furthermore freedom of assembly includes peaceful street protests. By excluding this as a right altogether the Federal Constitution is once again undermined," she said.

Ambiga moved to punch holes in the Peaceful Assembly Bill tabled this morning, saying it was worse than the existing and unconstitutional section 27 of the Police Act 1967 it was to replace.

"This right is one of the most basic and indispensable of the fundamental freedoms necessary for the functioning of a democratic society and is provided for in the Federal Constitution," she said and cited from a 2004 Royal Commission on the Police led by former Chief Justice Tun Mohammed Dzaiddin Abdullah to prove her point.

The vocal human rights activist urged the government to immediately withdraw the proposed law if it was sincere to prove correct Datuk Seri Najib Razak's reformist stand on making Malaysia the "best democracy".

The prime minister promised a raft of reforms in his Malaysia Day address on September 15, including the repeal of the controversial Internal Security Act (ISA) and doing away with annual permits for the print media, saying he wanted to give Malaysians more freedom.

The former Malaysian Bar president cautioned that voters will be watching the MPs to see who supported the proposed law in the run-up to the 13th general election, widely expected to be called early next year.

But the Bar Council's current constitutional law committee chief, Syahredzan Johan, took a slightly different stance.

READ MORE HERE

 

Muhyiddin defends Umno and Govt

Posted: 21 Nov 2011 05:13 PM PST

(The Star) - Umno has not kept quiet and has started to improve its image after the 2008 election debacle.

Responding to scathing attacks against the party by former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin said: "I am sure he still loves Umno and wants to see it strong and able to defend its position as the Government.

"But to say that we have not taken steps to strengthen the party and overcome challenges since the 2008 general election is not true."

Muhyiddin, who is deputy Umno president, said this at a press conference after presenting the Ilham Desa national awards here yesterday.

He was commenting on remarks made by Dr Mahathir during an interview with Mingguan Malaysia that Umno currently lacked good credible leaders and was a pale shadow if its former self.

He also alleged Umno had not made any improvements since the last general election.

Defending the party and the Government, Muhyiddin said Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak had introduced a national transformation programme.

"He (Najib) understands what the people want and there is growing support - although not strong enough yet," said Muhyiddin, adding that the party would continue to engage with the leadership and other component parties of the ruling Barisan Nasional.

In KUALA LUMPUR, Umno secretary-general Datuk Seri Tengku Adnan Tengku Mansor said the party, under Najib's leadership, had done many things to improve and overcome its problems.

 

Assembly Bill bars those below 15

Posted: 21 Nov 2011 04:52 PM PST

The Peaceful Assembly Bill also allows the police to dictate the terms in order to preserve security and public order.

(Free Malaysia Today) - The much-awaited Peaceful Assembly Bill was tabled in Parliament this morning and among others prohibits children below the age of 15 from participating in public assemblies.

The bill, which allows the police to determine the terms in order to maintain public order, stresses that children cannot be recruited or be allowed to attend such events.

Those who flout these rules will be slapped with a fine not exceeding RM20,000.

Under the Restrictions and Conditions clause, the bill proposes that district police chiefs or OCPDs be empowered to impose restrictions and conditions with regard to an assembly.

To preserve security and public order, the OCPD may determine the date, time, duration and manner of assembly.

The OCPD may also place restrictions based on the concerns and objections of parties with vested interests and on any other matters that the police deem fitting and necessary.

The bill was tabled by Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Mohd Nazri Abdul Aziz in the Dewan Rakyat for the first reading together with a bill to amend the Police Act 1967, namely Section 27 which stipulates that a police permit is required for an assembly.

Among the salient points of the Peaceful Assembly Bill are:

READ MORE HERE

 

Pakatan sees red over instigation charge

Posted: 21 Nov 2011 03:59 PM PST

Opposition leaders took a swipe at deputy minister Razali Ibrahim for claiming that the opposition poisoned the minds of Indonesians with regard to the Malaysian football team.

(Free Malaysia Today) - Pakatan Rakyat leaders are seeing red over the accusation that they posioned the Indonesian fans to vent their fury on the Malaysian football team.

The accusation was made by Youth and Sports Deputy Minister Razali Ibrahim in Parliament yesterday after Barisan Nasional MP Mohamed Aziz asked why Indonesians were hostile towards the Malaysian football team during the SEA Games.

Miffed, PKR Youth chief Shamsul Iskandar Akin said Razali's statement showed that BN leaders were bankrupt of ideas.

"If they think properly, they will understand that Indonesians don't like us due to our cruel policies that affects the lives of migrant Indonesian workers," he said.

Shamsul said Malaysia's immigration laws were biased against migrant workers and harsh as illegal immigrants caught were often whipped by the Malaysian authorities.

"And they often don't get paid, have their passports seized by errant employers and forced to pay bribes to authorities. Obviously, their brothers in their homeland are angry with us," he added.

What about the horses?

DAP vice chairman M Kulasegaran said Razali should learn the difference between loyalty to the country and political differences between rival parties.

"He should show proof to back his claims. However, I believe he is just trying to deflect people's attention from the scandals plaguing his ministry," added the Ipoh Barat MP.

The Youth and Sports Ministry was reprimanded by the Auditor-General in his 2010 report for the former's RM5 million purchase of 18 horses for an event.

However, it was later found that the horses were unfit for the event and could not adapt to the Malaysian weather.

Kulasegaran said when he asked about the horses in Parliament, the deputy minister replied that Pakatan would do the same if it was in power.

"He's just devoid of ideas," said the DAP leader.

On the Indonesians' hostility, Kulasegaran said for some reason Indonesians seemed to lack sportsmanship and felt that they were better than the Malaysian team.

"And their organisers are unable to control their crowd. Winning and losing is part of any game and our team seems to understand this better than our neighbours," he added.

READ MORE HERE

 

‘Democracy may be affected by auto voter registration’

Posted: 21 Nov 2011 02:27 PM PST

(Bernama) - KUALA LUMPUR: The government does not plan to amend the Federal Constitution to enable Malaysians to be registered automatically as voters upon reaching the age of 21.

Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister's Department VK Liew told the Dewan Rakyat today that this method had its weaknesses and could pose problems if implemented.

He said that due to the high mobility rate, most Malaysians now did not live at the address originally registered in their identity card and did not register the address change.

"If automatic registration is implemented and if there is a general election, it is feared that the voter turn-out will be low because many will not be able to return to the address registered to cast their vote, and indirectly affect the democratic process practised.

"Based on this, the government has no plan yet to register voters automatically," he said when replying to Dr Marcus Mojigoh (BN-Putatan) who wanted to know the government stand on the issue.

Liew said 842,726 new voters were registered in 2007, 155,420 in 2008, 279,270 in 2009 and 819,489 in 2010.

- Bernama

S’wak is full of rubbish

Posted: 21 Nov 2011 02:19 PM PST

By Patrick Lee, FMT

Sarawak holds the national record of having the most rubbish dumps in the country.

With a grand total of 63 landfills, the East Malaysian state has nearly twice as many midden heaps compared to the second runner-up, Johor (37).

According to the November 2011 'Malaysian Economic Monitor: Smart Cities Report', 49 of Sarawak's landfills were still running, with 14 of them no longer in operation.

This accounted for more than 21% of the country's 296 landfills, despite the state constituting for only 8.7% (2.471 million) of Malaysia's entire population (28.334 million).

Its neighbour, Sabah followed closely behind with 19 operational landfills, with two of them no longer running.

In comparison, Pahang, Perak and Selangor had 32, 29 and 22 total landfills respectively. Kuala Lumpur on the other hand did not have any operational landfills, although it did have seven non-operational landfills.

The only state or federal territory that was not included in the list was Putrajaya.

According to the report, Malaysia chose landfilling as a way to get rid of its waste "95% to 97%" of the time. The rest of Malaysia's trash, it said, was either incinerated, recycled or dumped illegally.

The World Bank criticised this as a "business-as-usual" way about things, and warned that landfills across the country were dangerously filling up.

"The life expectancy of operating landfills is critically low. It is estimated that 42% of landfills have already surpassed their design capacity or are expected to exceed capacity within the next five yeas," it said.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Jamil Khir says misquoted over constitutionality of gays

Posted: 21 Nov 2011 02:06 PM PST

By Lisa J Ariffin, The Malaysian Insider

Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Datuk Seri Jamil Khir Baharom today denied calling it unconstitutional for a person to be homosexual in Malaysia, and said he was misquoted.

"Not the Constitution, I said Sections 377(a), (b), (c) and (d), it's not the Constitution; I think it was misquoted," said Jamil, who is in charge of Islamic affairs and head of the Malaysian Department of Islamic Development (Jakim), in clarifying that he was referring to the Penal Code.

Yesterday, Utusan Malaysia reported Jamil as saying it was unconstitutional for a person to be homosexual in Malaysia, without backing up his claims with any provision.

There are no provisions in the Federal Constitution that directly mention the sexual preference of individuals.

"Section 377 prohibits sexual relations between two men," he explained to reporters today following the opening ceremony of the World Universities First Zakat Conference 2011 here.

"That's why it can be brought to court," Khir said.

Jamil's remarks yesterday were in response to a question about the banned "Seksualiti Merdeka" event, during an interview with Umno-owned Utusan Malaysia.

In it, the minister said Malaysians had a responsibility to unite and stop any promotion of homosexual, lesbian or bisexual practices.

Jamil said his understanding of the event was that its organisers wanted "freedom" of sexual orientation for lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transexuals (LGBT).

"This is a deviation from society's norms. We should help them go back to the right path, not acknowledge their practices," he added.

READ MORE HERE

 

Palm oil industry muscling out orang utans

Posted: 21 Nov 2011 12:21 PM PST

By Michael Kaung, FMT

KINABATANGAN: About 300 orang-utans have vanished from the Lower Kinabatangan in the east coast of Sabah over the last seven years due to the fragmenting of the forests they live in, according to wildlife experts.

Dr Marc Ancrenaz, scientific director of HUTAN – Kinabatangan Orang-utan Conservation Programme (KOCP) – there is unmistakable evidence that the orang-utan population in Sabah is declining.

"What we are seeing with our latest surveys within the Lower Kinabatangan is a clear population decline of the orang-utans in this area," he said.

He hoped that such issues would add urgency to events such as the Roundtable for Sustainable Oil Palm (RSPO) discussions which open here today.

"The biggest threat to the orang-utan and other wildlife populations in Sabah today is fragmentation.

"What this means is that agriculture development primarily oil palm has created small islands of forest, which are isolated and completely surrounded by human-made landscape.

"Because it is difficult for wildlife to move from one forest patch to the next, this situation leads to inbreeding and eventual population decline, which is what we are witnessing today in the Lower Kinabatangan," said Ancrenaz.

Wildlife experts and environmentalists want the oil palm industry to rectify the situation rather than just paying lip service to rehabilitation efforts which are being carried out by local communities.

"We can still improve the situation for the Lower Kinabatangan's orang-utan and other wildlife by actually replanting and planning for actual wildlife corridors or patches of forest to support wildlife movement between protected or forested areas," said Ancrenaz.

Urgent need for trees

While singling out Wilmar/PBB Oil for praise for replanting 382 hectares with 50 meters on the banks of the river, he said other big corporations where mostly riding on the coat-tails for such endeavours.

"We mostly see signboards and newspaper articles but when you go to the ground you find that in reality it is all talk and no viable replanting is taking place," said Ancrenaz.

He suggested that the money the government is spending for oil palm promotion such as the recent allocation of RM24 million for the Malaysian Oil Palm Council could instead be used for establishing real corridors and patches of forest in the Lower Kinabatangan.

"While there are many reforestation programmes taking place within the Lower Kinabatangan, the best known being the work by MESCOT-KOPEL in Batu Putih, we need oil palm companies to start planting back corridors along the riverbanks in particular.

"This will not only help wildlife but also improve the water quality for local communities living along the river."

The situation is so grim in the Lower Kinabatangan that converting remaining forested areas as small as even 10 hectares will have a negative effect on the long term survival of the orang-utan population.

"If oil palm companies want to contribute to orang-utan conservation today, they have the opportunity to do so in the Lower Kinabatangan by stopping what little land conversion they are still planning to do carry it," said Ancrenaz.

READ MORE HERE.

Let’s see where the RM4 billion goes

Posted: 21 Nov 2011 12:18 PM PST

By Luke Rintod, FMT

KENINGAU: While Chief Minister Musa Aman's RM4 billion Sabah budget for 2012 may be getting rave reviews from 'certain' quarters, United Borneo Front however can only see the huge chasm between 'what is planned and what is delivered' by the ruling Umno-led Barisan Nasional government.

A senior leader with UBF Dr Nicholas James Guntobon views the RM4 billion state budget for 2012 as 'window dressing' and tired replay of Musa's past promises and pledges.

In playing down the grand talk that the state budget received when it was unveiled by Musa last Friday, Guntobon, who is UBF coordinator for Liawan, Keningau, said yesterday that a thorough examination of Sabah's past budgets showed that the "ruling BN has no policy on economic development".

"Performance-wise, the economy boom in Sabah is actually driven by the high price of commodity, nothing to do with the efficiency and leadership of the current CM.

"The high rating by RAM, the auditor-general and the ISO certificate are all not conclusive evidence of excellent performance whatsoever.

"Rating agencies are known for their unreliability," he said alluding to the 3-star RAM rating of Sabah's economic perfromance.

He reminded that even US-based rating agency Moody gave global financial services firm, Lehman Brothers, top marks but it was declared bankrupt in 2008.

"RAM, unlike Moody is locally-based, run and perhaps even financed through domestic consultancy contracts and if we dare go deeper possibly we will find out that its pay is derived from taxpayers money by cronies and relatives of those in power."

Guntobon credits the 4% economic growth in Sabah to government spending through federal stimulus packages as well as the high commodity prices.

Why no foreign investments?

Musa, who is also Sabah Finance Minister, presented the state biggest ever budget with a promise to eradicate poverty, cut unemployment and further develop the state.

But according to Guntobon, Musa has been saying the same thing since winning the last elections and in presenting past budgets about how he is going to redistribute wealth from booming economy to all Sabahans.

"Sabah now is still the third poorest economically, the Umno cronies are getting richer and the number of poor people in Sabah remains the highest.

"They get poorer because prices of basic goods have increased with the fuel price hike. We can list out a long list of BN's and this chief minister's failures if necessary.

"The ruling BN has no policy on economic development and this speaks volumes why there is not much foreign direct investment," he said.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Lawyer: Homosexuality not unconstitutional

Posted: 21 Nov 2011 12:14 PM PST

By Stephanie Sta Maria, FMT

PETALING JAYA: A senior lawyer has disputed a government decree that homosexuality is unconstitutional and instead said that the federal constitution in fact leaves the matter open to debate.

Yesterday Minister in the Prime Minister's Department, Jamil Khir Baharom, declared homosexuality as unconstitutional and cited sections 377 (a), (b), (c) and (d) of the Penal Code which refer to carnal intercourse against the order of nature.

Jamil's statement was subsequently backed by fellow Cabinet Minister, Nazri Aziz, who referred to Article 3 of the Federal Constitution which states that Islam is the religion of the federation.

Nazri explained that if certain acts fall within the constitution but go against Islam they are deemed inapplicable in Malaysia.

But Alex De Silva from the law firm Bodipalar Ponnudurai De Silva (BPD), told FMT that there is no provision within the federal constitution that specifically states that homosexuality is an offence or that it should be banned.

"Article 3 states that Islam is the religion of the federation but other religions may be practised in peace and harmony in any part of the federation," he recited.

"It enshrines the special position of Islam in Malaysia. It's not meant to be interpreted as such that any practice that goes against it is unconstitutional."

De Silva pointed out that if that was the case then the consumption of pork and alcohol would also be unconstitutional since both go against Islam.

"As for the Penal Code, section 377 makes it an offence for two persons to engage in carnal intercourse," he said. "The two persons could be of the same sex or even of the opposite sex. It does not specify homosexuals."

"In any event, being guilty of an offence under the Penal Code does not make the offender "unconstitutional". It merely means that the offenders may be guilty of an offence and is liable to be charged and if found guilty to be sentenced."

READ MORE HERE

 

Umno needs help for voter support, party leaders admit

Posted: 21 Nov 2011 12:09 PM PST

By Shazwan Mustafa Kamal and Clara Chooi, The Malaysian Insider

Umno needs to be "calculative" and befriend as many groups and organisations as possible to gain voter support in time for the upcoming polls, party leaders have said.

Top Umno leaders said the party could not afford to be "picky" about which groups to align itself with, and that everything must be done with only one goal in mind: winning the next election.

Some appeared to agree with remarks made by former Umno president Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamed, who said the party could not afford to make enemies of groups like Perkasa if it wanted to regain crucial Malay votes.

"We need to be calculative with whom to associate ourselves with; the criteria is those who can bring more support to the party," Tangga Batu MP Datuk Idris Haron told The Malaysian Insider.

"Anything we do must have a political dividend."

The Umno supreme council member said there was no point ignoring or marginalising certain groups when these could help Umno gain voter support, especially among the Malays.

"We cannot be too particular. What is important is that we win the elections," he added.

Kota Belud MP Datuk Abdul Rahman Dahlan said that Umno had over the years proven that it fought for not just the Malays but for other races as well.

"Umno is the single largest party and it's the backbone of the government. So whatever we say will impact the nation," he told The Malaysian Insider.

The Umno leader said that although Malays should always be prioritised, the party needed to be mindful of its actions as these could affect the future of Barisan Nasional (BN).

"We are friendly to everybody," said Abdul Rahman.

 

READ MORE HERE

New law replacing ISA will include detention without trial: Minister

Posted: 21 Nov 2011 12:01 PM PST

(The Malaysian Insider) - The new law which will replace the Internal Security Act 1960 will still provide for detention without trial, Home Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein said today.

He said countries such as United States, United Kingdom and Australia also practised detention without trial in the fight against terrorism. The US has the Patriot Act while UK and Australia have the Anti-Terrorism Act, he added.

Hishammuddin said there are some Malaysians being detained by the US in Guatanamo without trial for many years now.

The minister also said that Barisan Nasional, as the ruling government, would be responsible and abide by all new laws to be implemented in the interest of public well-being.

Pakatan: ISA replacement ‘old wine in new bottle’

Posted: 21 Nov 2011 11:59 AM PST

By Shazwan Mustafa Kamal, The Malaysian Insider

Repealing the Internal Security Act (ISA) would be pointless if its replacement law will still include detention without trial, Pakatan Rakyat (PR) leaders have argued.

Home Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein said yesterday the ISA substitute will continue to provide for such arbitrary detention.

He cited countries such as the United States, United Kingdom and Australia as examples of governments that exercised detention without trial in the fight against terrorism, naming the US's Patriot Act as well as the UK and Australia's Anti-Terrorism Acts.

"This is a shameful attempt at inserting 'old wine into new bottle'," Nurul Izzah Anwar told The Malaysian Insider.

"This announcement confirms many fears we have had regarding the prime minister's political will in implementing his reform pledges to the Malaysian public on September 15, 2011, changes are merely rebranding exercises."

The PKR vice-president charged that Barisan Nasional would only accord Malaysians limited civil, political and human rights, with disregard to the Federal Constitution.

Another PKR leader, Datuk Kamarul Baharin, said Hishammuddin's announcement proved the government was not earnest in reforming the archaic laws.

"Like old wine in a new bottle. What's the point then? Najib is not sincere in abolishing the laws.

"There should be no such thing as detention without trial. Every person should be accorded to a fair hearing, innocent until proven guilty," he told The Malaysian Insider.

The Teluk Kemang MP said if PR were in power, they would make sure the replacement laws were actual reforms and not "half-baked" attempts at rebranding the current legislation.

 

MORE TO COME

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Moving towards a civil society

Posted: 21 Nov 2011 05:51 PM PST

The strength of our society lies in its ability to safeguard human dignity and nobility, to build a land fair and happy, just and caring and living by humanitarian ideals.

The present state of education is not on the right footing. There is a lack of vision to translate the noble values and world view in organising the present reality. Malaysian society should be a thinking society. In the present modern society, the concern of many education programmes is on the ability to acquire skills which enable an individual to command more commercial rewards.

Datuk Nik Mustapha Nik Hassan, The Star

AT a time when our country is doing well, the Government should not lose sight of a more fundamental goal, that is, to develop Malaysians into a civil society.

The enhancement of human dignity, the establishment of liberty, the eradication of society's ills, the revitalisation of our heritage and cultural empowerment which reflects intellectual and artistic achievements are some of the goals to be met by our Government.

This is very much in line with the kind of society as envisaged in the Quran, "... a land fair and happy, and a Lord Oft-Forgiving", a prosperous and blessed nation, just and caring, and living by humanitarian ideals.

In our efforts to develop our society, our path to economic prosperity should always be a holistic and multi-dimensional approach.

We should be aware that the strength of society lies in its ability to safeguard human dignity and nobility.

Humanitarian ideals should be the guiding principles in developing society in all spheres of our endeavours, including economic activities. In fact, for a nation to sustain its economic performance, social strength plays a determinant part.

Ibn al-Qayyim, a great Muslim scholar, rightly commented that the basis of shariah is the wisdom and welfare of the people in this world as well as the hereafter. This welfare lies in complete justice, mercy, well-being and wisdom.

Anything that departs from justice to oppression, from mercy to harshness, from welfare to misery and from wisdom to folly, has nothing to do with shariah.

This view is shared by al-Ghazali who taught that the very objective of shariah is to promote the welfare of the people, which lies in safeguarding their faith, life, intellect, posterity and property. Whatever ensures the safeguard of these five aims serves public interest and is desirable.

In our move towards a civil society, we must be convinced that society's competitiveness and development capability can be realised through holistic achievement.

In line with the views of al-Ghazali, a number of priorities should be given attention in policy formulations, be it education, economic, culture and others.

The education system should be able to develop Malaysians who have attachment to moral requirements. In Islam, the purpose of education is to create a good individual who possesses a holistic world view based on divine guidance, good and productive character, very participative in social development and, above all, be willing to uphold truth, justice and cooperate with others.

This requires our curricula at all levels of education to be conducted along an integrated approach for all subjects.From the Islamic point of view, all subjects have to relate to the noble values of truth, justice and benevolence.

The present state of education is not on the right footing. There is a lack of vision to translate the noble values and world view in organising the present reality.

Malaysian society should be a thinking society. In the present modern society, the concern of many education programmes is on the ability to acquire skills which enable an individual to command more commercial rewards.

The acquisition of professional qualifications and skills should be promoted. Professionals should be individuals who can appreciate and understand the social development and cultural practices of society. In a developing society like ours, we must be able to mobilise every individual to participate and contribute at his optimum level to the social welfare of society.        

In the present materialistic society, the move towards a mechanistic society is becoming very apparent. Schools and universities are giving emphasis to the technical aspect of knowledge.

In the economic discipline, for example, we are producing technical economists who are concerned only with the technical tools to analyse economic phenomena. Most curricula do not give enough consideration to subjects which develop critical thinking among graduates on social requirements.

A continuous effort must always be focused on ensuring a social harmony in our multiracial society. The strategy for social development should be along the spirit of mutual cooperation.

We take pride in being able to practise tolerance and have mutual respect for one another. Every positive element in the culture of every race should be adopted in our national policies to foster better relationship.

In order for us to move towards further advancement, social stability is fundamental. Cooperation based on the spirit of justice should be the rule of the game. Through social harmony, we can ensure a guarantee for every individual right and security in our society.

We must ensure that economic prosperity should benefit our present generation. In this regard, the authorities should work seriously and effectively in achieving a low cost of living economy.

Housing and transportation expenses must be reviewed for lower pricing.

These two items form the bulk of the people's expenses. Continued efforts in re­­f­­orming, deregulating and libe­ralising the economy are indeed welcome.

The sincerity and willingness of the authorities to improve these sectors will be the starting point for our economic stability and advancement. We should also safeguard our posterity.

The commitment by the authorities to develop Malaysians into a civil society reflects a noble intent.

The road to this success is certainly wrought with challenges, but alternatives are not available to achieve that success in life – creating a noble civilisation.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


MyConsti PENANG Event: 'Perjuangan Mahasiswa': The UUCA and the Federal Constitution

Posted: 21 Nov 2011 06:08 PM PST

2.00pm on 27 November 2011

Dewan Bandar, Padang Kota Lama /Town Hall, Esplanade. George Town, Penang

 

Domestic Defense Act (DSA) 2012

Posted: 21 Nov 2011 12:43 AM PST

When asked about the differences between the ISA and the DDA the Home Minister said that the initials are different for starters and that Malaysians should no longer be wary of the ISA (because it will cease to exist). 

By TAKDENAMA NEWS REPORT. MMXI.

Breaking News. Malaysia.

The Malaysian Home Minister, Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein, today stated for a fact that the new law to replace the Internal Security Act 1960 will still provide for detention without trial.

He said detention without trial was also being practised in some countries in the fight against terrorism, such as the Patriot Act in the United States and Anti-Terrorism Act in the United Kingdom and Australia.

On Sept 15, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak in his Malaysia Day special address announced that the ISA would be repealed and two new suitable laws formulated to preserve peace, harmony, stability and prosperity in the country.

One of the new laws shall be named the Domestic Defense Act (DDA) that will provide for security measures under the existing law to protect the government from internal attacks.

When asked about the differences between the ISA and the DDA the Home Minister said that the initials are different for starters and that Malaysians should no longer be wary of the ISA (because it will cease to exist).

"The DDA will provide for a detention period (without trial) to be determined by me or my cousin whereas the ISA had a fixed maximum detention period of two years only." This means that the new law will empower the government to detain an individual indefinitely without having to go through the mundane process of reapplying for such detention to be extended every two years. The Home Minister said that this is done to save costs as every reapplication takes time, effort and money, as the documents have to be completed in triplicate.

The Home Minister also said that the new law would also incorporate notice to families of the detainees and the process of making appeals. "The Government of Malaysia will inform the family members of those who are detained (without trial) the period of detention and where the detainee will be incarcerated (Kamunting)."

As for making appeals, the GOM will charge each appeal a minimum RM100,000 (in cash only) for processing the appeal documents (which must be in triplicate).

The Home Minister said that a special counter will be set up in his office in Putrajaya to process these appeal applications but warned that no receipts will be issued. "We are cutting costs on paper."

When asked whether the existing ISA detainees be released once the old law has been repealed the Home Minister replied, "Yes. We will release all existing ISA detainees immediately once ISA has been repealed by Parliament. However we shall be re-detaining these people under the DDA."

Is MCA staunchly anti-Islam?

Posted: 21 Nov 2011 12:32 AM PST

Of course Chua is going all out to oppose and insult Hudud because, if he had embraced Islam, he would have been stoned to death for cheating on his wife and family.

By Jackson Ng, Retired Journalist

WHAT a sick joke and a mismatch! The MCA is organising a forum themed "Hudud and Its Implications on Non-Muslims in Malaysia" on Dec 4.

And of all the people, the adulterer and MCA president Chua Soi Lek, will deliver the keynote address as well as the closing remarks.

In the first place, is Chua a Muslim? Has he converted? Does he really understand Hudud? What makes him an authority of Hudud? Is the word "zina" in his dictionary?

Of course he is going all out to oppose and insult Hudud because, if he had embraced Islam, he would have been stoned to death for cheating on his wife and family.

Chua and non-Muslims have no standing to oppose the practice of Muslims and Islam. The Muslims also have no right to oppose the practice of other religions.

It is only the rampant exploitation of race and religion by skewered politicians, especially those from Barisan Nasional (BN), Malaysians are kept emotionally at their edge. That is exactly what the BN wants. Instil fear on everyone to serve its long adopted divide-and-rule political strategy.

With all the degrading and insulting remarks coming from MCA, Chua and his cronies, where are the defenders of Islam?

Where are the likes of Perkasa and Umno? Are these two self- proclaimed champion pretenders of "Malaysia is an Islamic state" endorsing MCA's stand? If so, then the Muslims in Umno do not really believe in Islam and Hudud. As Umno cannot come out to insult Islam and Hudud, it is thus allowing MCA to do it.

To allow a tainted-politician like Chua to even touch on Islam and Hudud is an insult to the Malays. He has no standing and integrity to question the sacred religion and its laws. What is he going to say and how is he going to respond if the Malays start telling Christians and Buddhists how they should practice their religion?

Isn't the issue as simple as that? For those who continue to espouse that Hudud will affect us, you can continue to argue the issue this way and Malaysians will never reach a consensus. Expressing fear is not a fact. The expressed fear is due to skewered implementation of the law, so don't blame the law. Blame the enforcement and the idiots exploiting and abusing their power. Blame the government that you elected for allowing all this to happen.

Malaysia is a multi-racial nation and unity hinges on religious and race tolerance. In the first place, religion and race should never have been politicised.

Politics should just be based on social and economic development for the country. It is the bad intentions of politicians who craze for power who are responsible for the country's current shameful state of affairs – injustice, corruption and erosion of the democratic rights of Malaysians.

With Umno allowing MCA and the pornstar to belittle the sacred values of Hudud as an Islamic criminal law, thereby insulting Islam, am I wrong to say MCA is staunchly anti-Islam?

If so, what is Umno and Perkasa doing about it? Have their tongues been severed?

 

Will this be a new GLC and cash cow for the Barisan government?

Posted: 20 Nov 2011 02:54 PM PST

Government rushing to set up National Healthcare Financing Authority

The Barisan Nasional government is working round the clock to set up the National Healthcare Financing Authority, and this body is likely to start operations in the first half of 2012.

This move will spell bad news for all of us Malaysians because it will now be mandatory for all of us who are getting an income to pay premiums to the NHFA if we want medical treatment in private and government hospitals and also at private clinics.

Despite paying the premiums, we will have to fork out more money because the premiums only cover very basic treatment. The question is what will happen to people who do not have an income or no longer have an income? Where will they get their medical treatment?

There are more questions: Is there a possibility that this body be turned into a government-linked company?

Another question is: Could this new company be led by a Barisan crony? If this is so, then we are likely to be doomed because the possibility of money being abused is great judging from the way other GLCs are run. We have seen too many cases of the top management receiving salaries and perks that take up a huge percentage of the operations cost.

With all of us paying premiums each month, the NHFA stands to get millions of ringgit and this is a lot of money at the Barisan government's disposal. There is a possibility of this new GLC being their latest cash cow.

To discuss this issue and the consequences of having the NHFA at the public forum called "Reforming the Malaysian Healthcare System: Is there a need?" on Nov 27 at YMCA, Jalan Macalister in Penang from 1pm to 6pm.

 

Dr Mujahid Yusof Rawa

Member of Parliament – Parit Buntar

 

Which do you fear more? Hudud or Islamic State?

Posted: 19 Nov 2011 09:31 PM PST

MCA supports Barisan Nasional (BN)-Umno's declaration that Malaysia is an Islamic state. Okay. Malaysia is an Islamic state. Doesn't a real 100% Islamic state include hudud, an Islamic criminal law?

By Jackson Ng, Retired Journalist

I WAS motivated to write this piece by a news portal reader who wrote this comment:

"Malaysians. You choose. DAP works with PAS. MCA works with Umno. So, what's the difference? The difference is that the MCA is always selling out the Chinese. MCA supports BN-Umno's declaration of Malaysia as an Islamic state. But DAP only harps on Hudud which only affect Muslims, not Malaysia. Anything beyond this are all just fears and speculations. You fear Hudud but don't fear Islamic state?
What a load of garbage by BN supporters!"

He or she makes a lot of common sense. We can argue all we want until the cows (Oops! Did I say anything wrong?) come home over hudud and Islamic state and will never reach a consensus because Malaysia is a multi-racial country.

There is much logic and common sense in what the reader wrote.

MCA supports Barisan Nasional (BN)-Umno's declaration that Malaysia is an Islamic state. Okay. Malaysia is an Islamic state.

Doesn't a real 100% Islamic state include hudud, an Islamic criminal law?

So, there you have it. Are non-Muslims in Malaysia still free from hudud under Umno, the dominant force in BN? And, Deputy Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin has said he is Malay first, Malaysian second and that Malaysia is not yet ready for hudud. This means, Muhyiddin and Umno will implement hudud when the time is right.

Malaysians, wise up. There is no difference in hudud whether under the BN or Pakatan. Hudud is hudud. It is a criminal law for Muslims.

So, logically it does not affect non-Muslims. To express fear or otherwise is just speculation and will lead Malaysians nowhere.

But, Muhyiddin's stand is more dangerous to 1Malaysia than anything else if one is to assess his statement very, very carefully.

Ponder and answer the following questions related to Muhyiddin and Umno yourself:
- "I am Malay first, Malaysian second" – isn't he a racist? Shouldn't the DPM and PM-in-waiting be a Malaysian instead of a racist? Has PAS ever called others pendatang? PAS champions Islam, not race. Race and religion are two very different matters;

- " … Malaysia is not yet ready for hudud" – when is ready? (My reading is that Umno will be ready to implement hudud when it has two-thirds control of Parliament. This also applies to PAS);

- Compare DAP in Pakatan Rakyat and MCA in BN; which is more subservient or subdued in the two coalitions?

For the past year, many sensitive religious and race issues have been engineered by Umno to split Malaysians so that the Malays will only support Umno. PAS and PKR have publicly come to the defence of non-Muslims and Malaysians in general when an issue spun by Umno got too hot and ridiculous, while all other BN component parties had remained mum. You don't agree?

Actions and facts do not lie. Fabrications cannot stand because they don't have backbones to support.

Open letter to Dato Seri Zamzamzairani Mohd Isa, Group Chief Executive Officer, Telecom Malaysia Bhd

Posted: 19 Nov 2011 09:21 PM PST

How did you manage to obtain approval to construct a huge tower right next to a resevoir? Isn't the vinicity around a sensitive and essential service/utility a secured site strictly off-limit to unauthorised personnel? I will not speculate on how you managed it though I have my own opinion.

By Bobby Chiah

2 November 2011

Dato Seri Zamzamzairani Mohd Isa
Group Chief Executive Officer
Telekom Malaysia Bhd
Level 51, North Wing
Menara TM
Jalan Pantai Baru
50672 Kuala Lumpur.

 
Dear Dato Seri,
 
I am writing to you on behalf of 196 families residing in Kipark Selayang Condominum located in Bandar Baru Selayang.

Directly opposite our condominum separated only by a narrow road is a hillock with a resevoir located near to its summit.

At the beginning of May this year, during the May 1st. extended holidays you rushed through the construction of a huge telecommunication tower right next to the resevoir itself.

This tower, despite its great height and situated on elevated ground, is still at eye-level to the top half of our building and, furthermore, is practically sited at our doorstep.

If this base station is allowed to be fully operational, it will emanate and blanket our entire building with high and extremely hazardous electromagnetic fields (EMFs) 24/7, day in day out, year in year out. Its insidous reach will penetrate every nook and cranny of the entire building and no residents, especially the children who are more susceptible, can escape from its harmful effects.

Fortunately, we have an Ahli Parlimen, Y.B. Tuan  William Leong Jee Kean, whom, on our appeal, promptly issued a stop work order to Majlis Perbandaran Selayang on 18 May 2011.

However, today, 2 November 2011, work has resumed on the site and is the reason I am writing this open letter to you.

Firstly, how did you manage to obtain approval to construct a huge tower right next to a resevoir? Isn't the vinicity around a sensitive and essential service/utility a secured site strictly off-limit to unauthorised personnel? I will not speculate on how you managed it though I have my own opinion.

I also wonder whether Dato Seri really practises Corporate Social Responsibilities (CSR). Because if you do, how could you knowingly put 196 families, excluding those living in nearby houses, in harm's way?

Various studies have shown that EMFs can cause brain tumors, leukemia, birth defects, miscarriages, chronic fatigue, headaches, cataracts, heart problems, stress, nausea, chest pain, forgetfulness, cancer and other health problems.

Some experts are convinced that the threat is very real.

For instance :-
 
1. Dr. David Carpenter, Dean of the School of Public Health, State University of New York believes it is likely that up to
    30% of all childhood cancers come from exposure to EMFs
 
2. The Enviromental Protection Agency (EPA) warns " There is reason for concern and advises prudent avoidance.
 
3. Martin Halper, the EPA's Director of Analysis and Support says " I have never seen a set of epidemiological studies
    that remotely approached the weigh of evidence that we are seeing with EMFs. Clearly there is something there.
 
4. In November 1989, the U.S. Department of Energy reported that " It has now become generally accepted that
    there are, indeed, biological effects due to field exposure."
 
5. In March 1990, the EPA recommended that EMFs be classified as a Class B carcinogen - a "probable human
    carcinogen and joined the ranks of formaldehyde, dioxins and PCBs; and
 
6. Last but not least, in the 31 May 2011 report by International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) it states
    " IARC has classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B)
    based on an increased risk for glioma a malignant type of brain cancer associated with wireless phone use.
    (Please refer to The Star report " Cellphones increase brain cancer risk." of 2 June 2011.
 
And, here, we are not talking about emission from a tiny cellphone but from a huge base station that will be thousands of times stronger and infinitely much much more potent.

Furthermore, it is an acknowledged fact that properties in the vicinity of a telecommunication tower, especially a huge one, will see their values plummet.

As it is, we are already facing threats from an existing telecommunication tower to the side of the hillock. We definitely are not going to accept further endangerment from your base station; more so when it is situated right at our doorstep.

So, unless Dato Seri is willing to subject your own family and neighbours to the same calamity you so intend to force onto us, please stop work immediately and, better still, dismantle the monstrosity ASAP.
 
Yours sincerely,
Bobby Chiah
 
c.c. YAB Tan Sri Dato' Sri Abdul Khalid bin Ibrahim
      Dato Menteri Besar Selangor
      By copy of this letter we fervently hope that YAB Tan Sri Dato' Sri, who have been kept abreast of this issue right from the
      beginning, will exercise his authority to permanently enforce the stop work order.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

On 3 June 2011, I attempted to post a similar open letter to Dato Sri Zamzamzairani Isa via "The Star". Disappointingly but NOT unexpectedly they refused to publish it.

I did not pursue the matter further because by then, due to the prompt and decisive intervention of our  Member of Parliament, Y.B. Tuan William Leong Jee Keen, who issued a stop work order on 18 May 2011, work had ceased.

Before I proceed further, I like to put on record our appreciation and thanks to Y.B. Tuan William Leong. We are indebted to him.

The hiatus, unfortunately, did not last long for today, 2 November 2011, work has resumed. Mountings were fixed on the tower in readiness for the installation of multiple transmission discs; in direct violation of the stop work order.

You are our last resort and we hope you will let us bring to public's awareness our predicament by posting my letter in your website. We believe that, unless their callous attitude and lack of corporate social responsibilities are exposed to public's odium and shame, they will not willingly abandon the project. To them might is right.

I also want to expose the complicity of Majlis Perbandaran Selayang (MPS). They claimed that they gave approval to Telecom to erect the huge tower on that site, despite its close proximity to a high density residential buliding, was because the residents did not object or complain.

This is a blatant lie. In reality, we were intentionally kept in the dark and lied to. When work first started, when asked, we were told they were only carrying out repair works on the pipes from the resevoir. We now know they were actually laying the foundation for the tower.

They then waited until the extended Labour Day holidays when we have no access to MPS to erect the tower. Work was carried out at superspeed. Despite its great height, it practically sprung up overnight like Jack's beanstalk. By the end of the three days holidays it was almost 100% completed!

The reason for the haste is quite obvious.They were banking on the assumption that once completed those affected will lose heart to protest. This strategy may have worked well for them in the past but, for this instance, they did not foresee the tenacity of a 68 year old grandfather, me.

Someone once told me that there is no greater love than grandparents' love. To be frank, I used to be a bit sceptical about that. But, after this, I know for a fact that when it comes to protecting my two granddaughters aged 4 and 6, to ensure that they will be able to live a long and healthy life and not to be cut down by a brain tumor or other forms of cancer, I will not hasitate to take on any goliath no matter how powerful or connected.

I will fight them with any means fair or foul. In short, I will be relentless.
 
Regards,
Bobby Chiah

MT Responses

Posted: 19 Nov 2011 06:52 AM PST

Hi Pete,

With my comment under your article "Let's get it straight", I was trying to put across a subtle, subliminal message but, judging by the responses, I obviously failed big time to hit the target.  I will be more direct in future!

My underlying message was: "All Malaysians must strive to bury religious and racial differences and work at becoming fulltime Malaysians".  After all, peaceful cooperation is a two-way street, and blaming each other for the jams will get everybody nowhere!  

Anyway, please allow me to elaborate, based on the way I see things from an interested outsider's perspective:

1. UMNO have deliberately kept the religion/race cards in constant play (and today, even more so), solely to ensure that (i) Malays are always driven to vote for UMNO and (ii) non-Malays will be confused as to the intention of the Malay elements of the opposition parties, so that retaining UMNO will seem a far safer option to non-Malays than voting for the unknown, possibly far worse political scenario.  In this, UMNO is conducting an extremely Machiavellian game, knowing full well what it is doing.  

2. As all past visitors to Malaysia will tell you, for so many reasons Malaysia used to be a great place to visit, the principal reasons being (a) the wide variety of cultures and food to be experienced across the length and breadth of the country, (b) the ease of travel and communication, (c) the cleanliness and attention to beautiful landscaping everywhere, and (d) the politeness and respect with which Malaysians used to treat not only each other but foreigners too.  All those attributes within Malaysia combined to create a society possessing an exquisitely unique flavour, which I can only describe as "Malaysianess".  All foreign visitors to Malaysia will know exactly what I mean by that – Malaysia's southern neighbour is nice enough, but Singaporeans just don't seem to generate the spontaneous warmth that at one time existed everywhere in Malaysia, plus Malaysians generally dress so much more colourfully than Singaporeans and aren't, well, boring……..

3. Having said that, today Malaysia is not as nice, safe or friendly as it once used to be.  The warmth at the Immigration Department coming by road from Singapore has disappeared completely, almost as if visitors from the south are no longer welcome.  Taxi drivers in KL constantly bitch about the GOM in general and about the discrimination shown to non-Muslims and non-Malays in particular, the courtesy level shown to foreigners has dropped considerably, the streets aren't anywhere near as safe to walk along as they once were (in some of the less salubrious areas you can almost feel the resentment in the air against those with money), and some former tourist spots in KL seem to have been deliberately abandoned and left to become run-down (particularly in the predominantly Chinese and Indian areas).       

4. In the process of deliberately playing the religion/race cards, UMNO have carefully avoided making "Malaysianess" the desired objective, contrary to what they should have been doing for the past 50+ years.    

5. The Malaysian people should not let UMNO get away with having deliberately trashed "Malaysianess".  In fact, it seems as though UMNO specifically concentrated on fomenting strife between (i) Islam and other religions and (ii) Malays and other ethnic groups.  Malaysians themselves must therefore urgently resurrect "Malaysianess" from its half-burial if they are to stand any chance at all of voting UMNO out in the next GE!

6. To achieve the goal of resurrecting "Malaysianess", all Malaysians (including the current opposition politicians) must, regardless of ethnic and religious differences, start to develop trust in each other and work together to openly discuss the framework for the fair and just society that is so much needed in Malaysia.  If ordinary Malaysians in the street (non-politicians) cannot begin to trust those with different religions or cultures to be committed to building a better Malaysia for all, then there will be no political change through the ballot box possible within the next 100 years!  So the concept of "Malaysianess" must be worked at very hard if it is to stand any chance of succeeding – it won't work if it is only a half-hearted attempt!

In my view, whole-heartedly adopting "Malaysianess" doesn't mean burying the differences between the various religious and ethnic groups - it means accepting those differences and showing compassion towards (and complete tolerance of) all others who don't follow your religion, customs or whatever, and recognising in word and deed that all Malaysians are equal in every respect.

My above comments are driven by the fact that, of all the countries in the world, Malaysia probably still stands the best chance of demonstrating that Islam is perfectly capable of offering all its citizens equal opportunities and equal justice in a well developed country that would be the envy of most others, including those supposedly well developed countries in the west.  However, right now Indonesia is doing its best to show the world what Islam can do, and it is making great headway ("Look At Us Now!").  Malaysia ought to be able to get there far faster, because it has the very useful advantage of the English language at its disposal!

Sadly, the main thrust of the responses to my previous comment is that, at best, Malaysian Muslims can't be trusted by the rest of Malaysian society to do the right thing, and that my comment is therefore somehow "theoretical".  However, I consider that there is nothing "theoretical" about building national unity!  It has to be done, or else society will disintegrate!  In particular, if something is not done quickly to redress the negative perception about Malaysian Muslims (or to put the situation right if, indeed, that perception is indicative of the way things really are now going inside Malaysia today), then I fear that Malaysia has some extremely tough times ahead.  This will mean that Indonesia will be allowed to stand far taller than Malaysia, despite Malaysia's magnificent Twin Towers and its very unique but currently eclipsed "Malaysianess".  

Nobody but Malaysians can resurrect "Malaysianess" – Malaysians must become re-united through their own efforts!  But, sadly, right now I can't see anybody at all recognising the need to promote "Malaysianess", let alone someone dedicated to driving those unification efforts.  That is a pity, because I am confident that there must be many moderate Malaysian Muslims who are sitting on the fence because they are ashamed of the discrimination they see at play by the GOM, but who are afraid of changing their allegiance because of the anti-Malaysian Muslim rhetoric they see every day, especially in the comments posted in MT. 

And just because ordinary Malaysians didn't create the religious and racial problems currently being faced in Malaysia, it doesn't mean that they can afford to sit there and do nothing, as if it isn't their problem.  It bloody well is their problem, because UMNO made sure it is!    

Anyway, now perhaps you can see why I tell my Malaysian friends here in Abu Dhabi (regardless of their ethnic background or which religion they follow) that, if they are not willing to close their eyes to religious and racial differences in Malaysia and embrace "Malaysianess" whole-heartedly, they themselves are therefore part of the problem and can't ever expect a solution for the religious and racial divide that they themselves help to perpetuate!

Warmest regards to you and Marina,

Wally

 

BN’s disgusting international standards

Posted: 18 Nov 2011 10:32 PM PST

The Barisan Nasional (BN) government sure has a funny way of recognising international achievers. It kicks them out of office when they start performing with international standards.

By Jackson Ng, Retired Journalist

REMEMBER how Tan Sri Robert Phang was ousted as an advisory panel member of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission?

Phang was one of the pioneer members of the panel upon the formation of the MACC. However, his outspokenness has been a thorn to the corridors of power.

Unlike the majority of the "Yes Man" MACC panel members who chose to accept their appointment but remained muted throughout their tenure, Phang spoke up against corruption and abuse of power.

Phang openly took on the likes of Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Datuk Seri Nazri Abdul Aziz, former Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Musa Hassan (for alleged abuse of power and conspiracy with the underworld) and those who benefitted from the multi-billion ringgit Port Klang Free Zone (PKFZ) financial scandal.

Phang's ouster in the MACC panel was sparked when he took on the all-powerful Attorney-General (A-G) Tan Sri Gani Patail.

That was too much for Phang to chew as Gani's office can decide whether to prosecute an accused, with or without evidence; with authentic or fabricated evidence as Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's Sodomy I and II hearings have revealed thus far.

And all Phang did was to call on Gani to rebut allegations linking him to high-profile but shady corporate figures who allegedly paid for his haj trip. The allegations were backed by documents.

Of course there were many other allegations against the A-G but the documentary evidence posted in the public electronic domain was just too embarrassing and overwhelming.

So what happened?

Gani ordered a probe on allegations of corruption, posted ANONYMOUSLY in a blog, which eventually led to nowhere and Phang was cleared by the MACC.

Phang had voluntary quit as a MACC panel member to facilitate the investigations against him and to uphold the integrity of the MACC.

After Phang was cleared, he was not reappointed to the MACC panel.

Boring? Hold your horses man! Read on and I can assure you that it is becoming both amusing and disgusting.

What I find most amusing is the fact that Phang was recently the recipient of the Socially Responsible Company (SRC) Awards 2011's Master Class Awards in Anti-Corruption.

So what's the big deal, you may ask?

Well, the SRC 2011 Awards are sanctioned by:

* The United Nations;
* The United Nations Global Impact; and
* Audited by McMillan Woods.

And, now for the best laugh! The award presentation, organised by JCI Malaysia and hosted by JCI E-Metro KL, was supported by:

* Malaysia's Prime Minister's Department;
* Malaysia's Youth and Sports Ministry; and
* Malaysia's Human Resources Department.

The Barisan Nasional (BN) government sure has a funny way of recognising international achievers. It kicks them out of office when they start performing with international standards.

Phang better watch his next step and not be too delighted with the UN-recognition or the BN government will start treating him like a public pariah.

What am I talking about? Look how the BN government is treating former Bar Council president and Bersih 2 leader Datuk Ambiga Sreenevasan.

For those suffering from amnesia (especially those from BN-Umno), U.S. first lady Michelle Obama and U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton awarded Ambiga the Secretary of State's Award for International Women of Courage at the US State Department on March 11, 2009 in Washington, DC.

The awards were given to eight women from around the world who have shown leadership while struggling for social justice and human rights.

There you have it, Malaysians. The BN government sure have strange ways to reward or recognise talent and international achievers.

Protecting cow breeders who use public funds allocated for beef production to buy multi-million-ringgit condominiums is international standard and supreme achievers.

 

PAS cooking up a lot religious nonsense

Posted: 18 Nov 2011 03:57 PM PST

DANIEL JOHN JAMBUN

Which Christian can help being angered by the accusation by PAS' problematic Hasan Ali that Christian missionaries are using eight ways to proselytize Muslims - one of which included using a rather far-fetched 'solar-powered handheld talking Bible.' He also said that Christians were setting up welfare groups that handed out financial and other forms of assistance to single mothers, the poor, the elderly and others with inducements including daily provisions, capital for business purposes and other aid.

It is no surprise then that he got a proper tongue lashing from Islamic scholar, Mohd Asri Zainul Abidin, for insulting both Muslims and the Islamic faith, and from Rev. Thomas Philips, the vice chairman of inter-faith group The Malaysian Malaysian Consultative Council of Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Sikhism and Taoism (MCCBCHST) who said, "Talk is cheap. Where is the proof. There are more than ample laws to punish those that try to proselytize Muslims so if Hasan Ali has evidence, put it on show. Don't just accuse."

I would like to remind Hassan, that his pro-Islamist party is the number one source of religious intolerance in Malaysia. In fact PAS was the original group that forced the once liberal Umno to become a religious extremist organization as well because it felt the need to compete to get Malay support since the 1970s. This was the biggest wrong turn in the history of the nation which has now become a country with little tolerance, in which racial groups have been so polarized that religious debates and mutual attacks are happening in a daily basis nowadays. What a shame!

Why is PAS so eager to make the Christian its enemies? Isn't it enough that Perkasa has been attacking Christians to make the Christians appear to be the political devil in the country? Why is Hassan complaining about solar-powered Bibles? I have never seen, nor even heard of such a Bible, but let me tell Hassan this: If there is such a Bible, then I am very glad because now there is a new portable Bible which can help Christians keep up with the holy book while they are on the move, and without having to flip through the pages. And why would such a Bible a problem to Muslims? What about the electronic Al-Quran which is in the market to help Muslims read the holy book whole traveling? Are the Christians complaining about that? No! I would say, congratulations to the Muslims!

For Hassan's information, although I have never seen a solar-powered Bible, there are already many portable Bibles everywhere now. Anyone can install a complete Bible text even in handphones. If you want the easier to read versions with larger fonts, there are other that can be uploaded into i-Pads and laptops. There are also thousands of websites in the Internet where the Bible is available in its many versions, in all languages of the world, including in Indonesian. But why should such a situation be a problem to Muslims when the Al-Quran is also available in many languages in the internet, including in the English and Malay languages. I myself have even glanced through these but id didn't bother me at all. I didn't feel that I was being proselytized, so why should the Muslims in PAS be so sensitive that they have to attack the Christians for having electronic Bibles? And why blame us if the Internet is full of Bibles and evangelism materials?

And let's please understand that the meaning of the word proselytize comes both ways. Both Christians and Muslims are commanded by their holy books to proselytize others, but in Malaysia we are not allowed to proselytize Muslims, so we obey the law. But what is the point if we are still accused of proselytizing Muslims whether we do it or not? And we Christians all know that the Muslims are free to proselytize us, and as law-abiding citizens, we try to live with this unfair situation. But because we so obedient, groups like PAS and Perkasa are now expecting more from us: (a) Perkasa has demanded that Christians be not allowed to become teachers, (b) We are not allowed to use our own national language for our religious services, (c) We are not allowed to use around 30 words in our religion, especially "Allah" which unofficially can be used in Sabah and Sarawak but not in the Peninsular – a most stupid decision!, and (d) and Baru Bian in Sarawak had just claimed that Christian pre-schoolers in Sarawak are being taught Muslims prayers.

PAS also needs to answer one very critical question about the sensitive matter of conversions: What if a Malay converts according to his own wish without any effort to proselytize him from anybody? Will PAS still be saying it is all the fault of Christians in Malaysia? What of the person was converted by studying Christian materials in the Internet or from books he bought from the bookstores? Does this mean that the Christians in Malaysia must now brace themselves the horror of  PAS coming into power because they will be arrested and jailed in case some Muslim becomes Christians, even though the Christians have nothing to do with the conversion?

They want to step over our heads and make all sorts of accusations against Christians such as (a) We are supposed to be trying to convert Muslims, (b) We want to have a Christian Prime Minister in the country, and now (c) We are spreading electronic Bibles. What other sins will we be accused of next, I wonder.

Some people forget that we Christians have equal rights as Malaysians! We contribute to the development of the country, and we pay our taxes too. In fact more than 80 percent of the taxes in Malaysia are paid by non-Muslims! But when we build our churches or do evangelism work, we have to come up with our own money, while the Muslims have can use part of the taxes to build their mosques.

I just want to ask Hassan Ali a few more questions: If PR ever rules the country, is PAS going to create laws to suppress Christians even worse than what is happening now? Is the party going to ban all electronic Bibles?  Will the party ban all kinds of social and welfare programs from being carried out by Christian organizations? And in view of the strange behavior that Hassan Ali is showing the public right now, is he saying that PAS doesn't need the votes of Christians? I look forward to his response. And I can assure him this won't be the last he will hear from me on the issue!

 

HAPPY BIRTHDAY YB Nurul Izzah Anwar

Posted: 18 Nov 2011 03:25 PM PST

Many happy returns of the day

ROSMAH'S US$55,000 BRACELET

Posted: 17 Nov 2011 10:35 PM PST

http://i893.photobucket.com/albums/ac131/admin-s/2011-11-15195811_resized.jpg

I was in Beijing on 16th for a meeting at the Shangri-la Hotel, Zizhuyuan Road, Beijing and walked into a pearl shop at the hotel foyer with a friend who wanted to buy a bracelet for his wife. He picked up this beautiful diamond bracelet only to find out that it cost US$55,000. The sales girl then pointed us towards a photo on the wall and said that the President's wife bought the same bracelet. And it was none other than Rosmah.

By Ah Cheong

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Mahasiswa tubuh Bebas tuntut hak

Posted: 21 Nov 2011 03:53 PM PST

Bebas dipengerusikan Muhammad Safwan Anang Talib manakala Haziq Abdullah Abdul Aziz sebagai jurucakap.

Penubuhan Bebas disokong 10 persatuan mahasiwa termasuk Solidariti Mahasiswa Malaysia (SMM), Majlis Perwakilan Mahasiswa Nasional (MPMN) dan Persatuan Mahasiswa Islam Universiti Universiti Malaysia (PMIUM).

Selain kebebasan akademik, NGO pelajar universiti itu juga menuntut kebebasan dalam penyertaan politik termasuk menguruskan pilihan raya kampus.

Perjuangan Bebas berdasarkan  dua prinsip sebagai asas kebebasan berakademik :

. Bahawa ahli akademik, sama ada di dalam atau di luar bilik kuliah, memiliki kuasa yang tidak terbatas untuk mempersoal, menguji idea dan mengeluarkan kenyataan kontroversi dan tidak popular tanpa mengira sama ada pendapat tersebut bercanggah atau tidak dengan pendapat umum.

. Institusi akademik tidak berhak untuk mengekang kebebasan akademik dalam kalangan kakitangan universiti atau menggunakan praktis kebebasan akademik sebagai sebab untuk mengenakan tindakan tatatertib.

Mansuhkan Auku

Ini bermakna Bebas menuntut kerajaan memansuhkan Akta Universiti Kolej Universiti (Auku) dan Akta 174.

Katanya, peruntukan-peruntukan dalam Auku 1971 (pindaan 2009) dan Akta 174 membunuh aktivisme mahasiswa Malaysia.

"Ia juga  mencabuli hak-hak asasi manusia khususnya mahasiswa," kata Bebas  dalam satu kenyataan media hari ini.

Bebas menuntut hak kebebasan berakademik bagi para ilmuan.

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Rally in support of MyOverseasVote and Bersih

Posted: 21 Nov 2011 05:24 PM PST

Six Malaysians, who are all based in Britain, have applied to the KL High Court to compel the EC to amend its regulations to allow Malaysians overseas to register as Absent voters. As the EC regulations stand, only Civil Servants and students who are overseas are allowed to vote with a Postal ballot. All other Malaysian citizens who wish to vote have to return to Malaysia to cast their ballot. The lawsuit aims to put an end to this discriminatory and arbitrary rule.
 
Permission for Judicial Review was granted by Judge Rohana Yusuff on the 14th November. Constitutional Lawyers Edmund Bon and Edward Saw appeared for the Applicants. The campaign is supported by the MyOverseasVote campaign. Independent Lawyers from the Bar Council, MyOverseasVote and the Malaysian Centre for Constitutionalism & Human Rights were present to hold a watching brief. The Substantive hearing is fixed for January 3rd, 2012.

READ MORE HERE

 

Anti-apostasy law – the legal dynamics

Posted: 21 Nov 2011 03:40 PM PST

First of all, article 11 of the Federal Constitution guarantees the right of every person to profess and practise his religion. Freedom of religion, as this article guarantees, is deemed to be so important and universal so much so that the Federal Constitution guarantees it for every person in Malaysia as opposed to just her citizens.

By contrast, freedom of speech and expression, the right to assemble and the right to form associations are only guaranteed for Malaysian citizens. Such is the universality and fundamentality of freedom of religion that every person within Malaysia is guaranteed of that right.

The right to practise a religion is absolute. That right is not limited to the right to choose a religion but also the right to practise the religion of choice in accordance to the person's belief and faith. In other word, under our Federal Constitution, one can not only choose a religion of his or her choice, but also to practise his or her religion freely, without any mullahs, monks, priests or prophets, real or otherwise, telling him how to do this and that.

Being so, anti-apostasy laws would run foul of article 11 as soon as it is passed. It is a non-starter. In legal jargon, it is void ab initio.

There are only two very narrow restraints which the Federal Constitution allows in so far as freedom of religion is concerned.

Firstly, laws may be passed to control or restrict the propagation of any religious doctrine or belief among Muslims. This means, a law may be passed for example, to prohibit anybody or group from propagating Christianity to Muslims. This provision however, does not allow any law to be passed to prevent a Muslim from leaving Islam or to punish Muslims for doing so.

Secondly, any person is not allowed to practise his or her religion in any way which may be contrary to any general law relating to public order, public health or morality. This simply means that if your religion requires you to slaughter five pigs at Dataran Merdeka every Friday at precisely 12.30pm, you cannot do so even though article 11 says you are free to practise your religion. Similarly, if your religion requires you to have sex with your daughter and your wife at the same time, you are not allowed to do so, although of course, it is open to you to argue that you may do so spiritually and not physically. (excuse me, I have to laugh…hahaha).

So, that's about it. Quite how the proponents of anti-apostasy laws are planning to overcome this Constitutional hurdle to their beloved anti-apostasy laws is beyond me. I suppose, they would also seek to amend the Federal Constitution along with the anti-apostasy laws.

Assuming the Constitutionality issue is overcome, then comes the jurisdiction clanger. This is what I normally refer to as the judicial ping-pong or pass-the-bucket.

You see, in the United States, United Kingdom, Australia or anywhere else in the civilised world, every arm of the country's administration would defend it's jurisdiction and powers so fervently. Of course here in Malaysia, our judiciary, in the form of the highest Court of the land, ie the Federal Court, have always done it's darndest best to disclaim its jurisdiction and powers. It's almost funny really.

Whenever cases involving Islam come to our Federal Court, it will, without fail hold that it does not have the jurisdiction or power to hear such cases because they involve matters concerning Islam. Never mind the fact that the matter also involves serious and multiple Constitutional issues which have far-reaching consequences and ramifications on our society and nations. As long as the word Islam appears of the Court papers, the Federal Court will tremble in its pants and disclaim jurisdiction.

Sometimes, the Federal Court will cling to some technicalities in order to refuse hearing such hot potatoes of a case. See Shamala and the skirt of technicalities, as an illustration of this.

The oft-relied Constitutional provision for this disclaimer of jurisdiction is of course article 121 (1A), which says that our Courts shall have no jurisdiction in respect of any matter within the jurisdiction of the Syariah Courts.

So, assuming anti-apostasy laws are passed and a man is going to be charged for being an apostate. The first question is, in which Court is he supposed to be charged?

He cannot be charged in our civil Courts. Because quite simply, our civil Courts will say whether or not that man is an apostate would depend on whether he has really left Islam and that would be a matter for the Syariah Court to deal with. So, our civil Court will gladly disclaim jurisdiction.

And so, our guy would then have to be put in the black maria and driven to the Syariah Court. Okay, hold on to your seat guys, this is going to be one hell of a ride.

He is then produced before a Kadhi/Syariah Judge and charged. The charge might read as follows:

"Bahawa kamu, Jakim bin Jais, telah didapati tidak sembahyang Jumaat sebanyak tiga kali berturut-turut dan telah dengan itu keluar dari agama Islam dan dengan itu telah melakukan kesalahan di bawah seksyen 3 Akta Anti-Apostasi."

("That you, Jakim bin Jais, has been found not to perform the Friday prayer for three consecutive times and accordingly you have left the religion of Islam and accordingly has committed an offence under section 3 of the Anti-Apostasy Act.")

So far so good.

READ MORE HERE

 

More Big Boobs By Taib! – Expose

Posted: 21 Nov 2011 02:34 PM PST

Explaining the significance of the praises lavished on Sarawak and Malaysia by the Oxford Busines Group, the Chief Minister's own website claimed that the publication "provides in-depth detail on Sarawak's current economic outlook and what the future holds for the state".

However, the Editorial Director of these reports is none other than a former Editor of the UK's most ridiculed porn rag, the Daily Sport, which closed earlier this year.

Peter Grimsditch was sacked 4 years after having launched the Sport for the UK 'Porn King', David Sullivan in 1988. He was also sacked as Editor of another low-brow red top, the Daily Star, and is now based in the Middle East. 

From editiing porn to finance PR – Peter Grimsditch

Another 'boob' by Taib?

The revelation raises question marks over the economic focus and expertise of the publication that are not satisfactorily answered by the qualifications of its predominantly youthful staff:

"They are mostly in their 20′s and they get posted for a couple of months to do the business", explained one senior executive of a respected economic publication in the Middle East, where OBG have also started operating.

"It is basically what one calls an 'Advertorial'.  They write sympathetic positive stuff about the subject matter. The purpose is obvious, which is to give the best possible spin and encourage investment.  The State will then quote the report".

Oxford Business Group Report was launched with fanfare by Taib

 

READ MORE HERE.

War of words show Umno is badly in disarray

Posted: 21 Nov 2011 05:37 AM PST

And one can bet the Umno assembly will be of torrid interest to all Malaysians, especially for the majority who are without physical access to the meeting. For the past 54 years, it is the Umno delegates attending the assembly who get to decide who will be the prime minister of Malaysia – with impunity.

By convention, the Umno president also becomes the prime minister of Malaysia and this is why the party has so fiercely fought off a two-party system, trying all ways and means to kill off the Pakatan Rakyat led by Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim.

However, now that the opposition is already well ensconced in the Malaysian psyche, perhaps for the first time the Umno president will not be the prime minister of Malaysia any more. Why? Because the Umno-led BN coalition faces a real risk of losing power in the coming GE-13, which is why there is so much interest in this Umno assembly, where the mindset of the party chieftains and grassroots will play a large part in determining the immediate future of the country.

When the 'minority rules'

Umno's past stranglehold on power has always been a case of the minority super-ceding the majority, and contradictory to the stance of "majority rules", which ironically is always touted by ex-premier Mahathir Mohamad when justifying his Malay Supremacy politicking.

It is against such a setting that the latest comments by Mahathir Mohamad has caused such a stir. Not so much as to what was said but rather, that this is the truth that UMNO has refused to accept or address through the years since the 2008 elections. UMNO has chosen to surround itself within an imperialist bubble that has isolated its leaders from the reality on the ground.

This bubble is evident in the various policy decisions that have been announced, only to incite public outcry and then quickly retracted. Thus, to be told that UMNO is weak goes against the very nature of this imperialist bubble. This is why Mahathir's words hit home squarely and painfully.

"Umno became badly damaged when Tun Abdullah Badawi took over. Because he prioritised his family and there were so many corruption allegations. And everyone knew about his son-in-law's involvement," Tun Mahathir said, referring to Umno Youth chief Khairy Jamaluddin.

"This damaged Umno has been inherited by Datuk Seri Najib Razak for him to fix. Umno needs time before it can become stronger. "But Najib is busy and does not have enough time."

PM in absentia

Indeed, Najib Razak has been busy. At a time when the nation needed its leader to address its woes and to provide a measure of understanding; he has been absent – relegating his duties to his underlings who have provided conflicting statements that have not done much good for the citizens of Malaysia.

So it was that instead of addressing Mahathir's comments head on, Najib left it to his cousin and Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein to rebut the grand old man of Umno, rather than take on the task himself and speak up for his own administration.

Hisham, also an Umno vice president, told reporters "this is not something unique to Umno. I do not deny that this will hamper our process… but we are going through a revision and transformation."

The Home Minister tried to put a good face on it by saying it was not unusual for Mahathir to throw out challenges and ideas for the party ahead of a general assembly, and that members would need to rise to the occasion. Hisham also unwitting revealed one of the grouses Mahathir has with Najib – his cowardice in getting a mandate of his own rather than rely on the power he inherited after ousting predecessor Abdullah Badawi.

"This will answer a part of Tun (Mahathir's) concerns," said Hisham, insisting that Najib was already in the process of getting the party ready for the upcoming general election.

Najib has failed to arrest the slide in Umno

But Hishammuddin's reply was as usual weak and in fact does not refute Mahathir's comments. It merely confirms the latter's assessment of Umno. The revision and transformation of Umno had been promised since the days of Abdullah Badawi, and further emphasized when Najib Razak assumed the premiership of Umno. Yet, three years down the road, Umno has not improved. Instead, it has regressed into a state of exclusiveness – branding itself as more ultra-Malay and no longer a progressive and moderate political party.

Factions and infighting within the party divisions contributed to Umno's failure in the 2008 elections and it looks like more of the same in the coming GE-13. Mahathir was right in his assessment, Umno is in disarray and Umno has not acknowledged this.

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved