Jumaat, 4 November 2011

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Pakatan against option to teach Science and Maths in English, says Nik Nazmi

Posted: 04 Nov 2011 04:15 AM PDT

(The Star) - Giving schools the option of teaching Science and Mathematics in English is not part of Pakatan Rakyat's policy although DAP wants it, PKR communications director Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad said.

He said that while it was understood that there was a need for students to master English and to receive quality education, PPSMI was not the way to achieve these objectives.

"Pakatan's policy is clear on the matter and should be left at that until and unless the Pakatan leadership decides otherwise," he said.

On Monday, the DAP was reported as urging the Education Ministry to give the option to schools to teach Science and Mathematics in English, where the majority of the parents chose to do so.

Nik Nazmi said that Pakatan was against PPSMI because the best way to educate children is through the national language understood by everyone.

"Educating students in a language that is foreign to them would benefit the English-speaking students at the expense of the rest, thus widening inequality," he said, adding that Pakatan supported the effort to improve the teaching of English through improving the quality of English teachers and the syllabus.

He also said that Malaysia's performance dropped significantly in the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study 2007 (United States) after the implementation of PPSMI.

Nik Nazmi said that PPSMI was not mentioned in the Common Policy Framework or Buku Jingga, which binds PKR, PAS and DAP.

He pointed out that PPSMI, which was implemented in 2003, resulted in Science and Mathematics teachers who had a poor command of English being forced to teach in the language, thus affecting the quality of their teaching.

"As a result, non-English speaking households had the added burden of coping with teachers who were unable to properly teach the two subjects," he said.

 

Dr M pushes for referendum on PPSMI

Posted: 04 Nov 2011 02:23 AM PDT

(The Malaysian Insider) - Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamed asked for a referendum to decide if English should be used to teach science and mathematics, as pressure mounted on the government to reconsider its policy reversion to Malay.

"Perhaps we should do a referendum," he told reporters today at the sidelines of the Third World Chinese Economic Forum here.

Dr Mahathir also said that a survey should be done on whether a gap is emerging between the rich and the poor due to access to English.

"If we do a survey for example whether it is true that rich people are sending their kids to schools that use English but the poor have to go to schools provided by the government that teach in Malay"

Mahathir said that it was never too late to backtrack on the decision to abolish the policy and revert to English.

"These are man made laws," he said. "It is not God's law. It can be repealed. There is no such thing as a fixed law that cannot be changed forever."

The former prime minister also stressed that he was not being unpatriotic for pushing for mathematics and science to be taught in English noting that Malaysians have to be ready to deal with scientific discoveries which were often written up in English.

"I am as much a nationalist as anybody else," he said. "I advocated the use of Malay long before many of those people (who are against English) were born. But I realise the practicality of it. We have to master scientific knowledge if we want to develop this country. That is why despite the fact that many of my old friends are against me, I still stand by it."

Mahathir added that using English as a medium of instruction for science in the multi-racial, multi-lingual nation would be beneficial.

"I believe PPSMI is good for Malaysia whether for Malays, Chinese or Indians," he said.

READ MORE HERE

 

Bar Council HQ vandalised with red paint

Posted: 03 Nov 2011 08:12 PM PDT

Calling the act irresponsible and cowardly, council chief says incident is connected to its support for the Sekualiti Merdeka festival.

(Free Malaysia Today) - Red paint was splashed at the front entrance of the Malaysian Bar Council headquarters in Kual Lumpur about 1am this morning and the council is convinced that it is related to its support for the Seksualiti Merdeka festival.

Bar Council president Lim Chee Wee said: "It's an irresponsible and cowardly act. We have information it is connected to the Seksualiti Merdeka festival, as pamphlets criticising the festival were found at the scene.

"Such a reaction to the event is deplorable and must be condemned. Those who hold a different viewpoint on the festival should be civil and engage in discussion and dialogue."

The council has been supportive of the festival which celebrates the rights of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) community to freedom of expression.

An annual feature since 2008, the festival has drawn much criticism this year with right-wing group Perkasa and Islamic party PAS being two of the most vocal detractors.

They alleged that Seksualiti Merdeka promotes unnatural lifestyle. Even Deputy Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin weighed in and called the event "immoral".

READ MORE HERE

 

"Bickering Politicians Will Benefit Enemies of Islam"

Posted: 03 Nov 2011 08:08 PM PDT

(Malaysian Digest) - Muslim politicians that are always at loggerheads with each other was one of the reason why the western secular ideas can easily influenced this country, said PERKID president ustaz Masridzi Sat (photo).

altHe said that the western ideas such as excessive human rights and homosexuality can easily get into this country as the Muslim politicians who are supposed to guard the constitution and the religion was busy fighting with each other over their political stance.

"They are busy fighting with each other that they appear weak to the eyes of the enemies of Islam," said Masridzi.

"Seksualiti Merdeka is the example of what can happen if politicians are focusing more towards their political agenda rather than guarding the religion and the laws.

"The enemy of Islam will take full advantage of it, because they think that we are weak," he added.

altMasridzi met by Malaysian Digest during a peaceful asembly organized by PEMBELA at the Sultan Salhudin Abdul Aziz Shah mosque compound.

He also said that the event who is hiding behind the name of human rights should have been opposed since the event did not acknowledge the basic rights of the Muslims who reject homsexuality.

"Seksualiti Merdeka promotes homosexuality, something that is forbidden by Allah, as a Muslim in an Islamic country like Malaysia, we also have full rights to reject such immoral event," he said.

He said events like Seksualiti Merdeka will affect the community as well as promoting immoral way of life especially for people who have limited interactions with different gender.

 

It's not a pride parade, say organisers

Posted: 03 Nov 2011 05:47 PM PDT

(New Straits Times) - The organisers of Seksualiti Merdeka yesterday claimed that the event was not aimed at promoting homosexuality but to champion rights of lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transgenders (LGBT).

The event's co-founder, Pang Khee Teik, said it "is not a pride parade" but a series of talks, forums, workshops, art, theatre and music performances, interactive installations, and film screenings organised by a coalition of Malaysian non-governmental organisations (NGOs).

Pang said the event was aimed at stopping discrimination, harassment and violence towards one's sexual orientation and gender preference.

It is organised by a coalition of Malaysian NGOs including the Malaysian Bar Council, Suara Rakyat Malaysia (Suaram), Empower, PT Foundation, United Nations and Amnesty International.

"We hope to create a platform for the community. Some people say this is Western influenced but that is not true as the LGBT community exists across the world and we even have a small population in our country."

Pang explained that keeping quiet had not helped the community as many were subjected to high levels of hostility and violence.

Bar Council president Lim Chee Wee said all human beings should be treated equally.

"Individuals have the right to make their own choices in sexual orientation and gender identity in the spirit of equality."

The Malaysian Bar's stand is embodied, in particular, in the first three principles of The Yogyakarta Principles on the Application of International Human Rights Law in relation to sexual orientation and gender identity, which are; the right to the universal enjoyment of human rights, the rights to equality and non-discrimination and the right to recognition before the law.

"In Malaysia, the LGBT community has long been treated as 'outsiders' as they face numerous hardships, including a lack of personal safety due to harassment by civil and Syariah authorities, living in fear of prosecution for the private acts of consenting adults, and constantly facing public discrimination and denigration."

PT Foundation acting executive director Raymond Tai said their primary focus was on HIV prevention and care and support for the community most affected by HIV.

 

PAS reiterates its stand against PPSMI

Posted: 03 Nov 2011 05:42 PM PDT

(The Star) - PAS has reiterated that it is against the teaching of Science and Mathematics in English.

PAS vice-president Datuk Mahfuz Omar said former Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad had introduced the Teaching of Science and Mathematics in English (PPSMI) in 2003 to help improve the command of English among students but the policy had failed to achieve this.

"The teaching of the subjects in English did not help improve students' ability to speak well in English," he said.

Mahfuz added that currently the emphasis on teaching English was mainly on reading and writing and little on speaking, and for this reason the subject should be improved and upgraded to include speaking ability.

He also said that the teaching of the two subjects in Bahasa Malaysia was also acknowledging it as the national language and the medium of teaching.

 

 

Ultimatum to Shahrizat: Answer charges or else

Posted: 03 Nov 2011 04:53 PM PDT

Opposition group visits National Feedlot Centre's farm in Gemas.

(Free Malaysia Today) - PKR strategic director Rafizi Ramli claims he has more information than already revealed about Shahrizat Abdul Jalil's involvement in the National Feedlot Centre (NFC) and has threatened to expose them unless she responds to allegations made in recent days.

Rafizi visited the NFC farm here yesterday, a day after he alleged in a press conference that most of the beef produced by the centre is supplied to luxury restaurants owned by the family of Shahrizat, the Minister for Women, Family and Community Development.

Agriculture Minister Noh Omar had earlier confirmed that members of her family manage the luxury restaurants.

"We want to know how much exactly was spent for this farm," Rafizi said after his visit.

"How many head of cattle are bred here and how many are slaughtered per day?"

He posed the questions in front of more than 70 people outside the farm. Most of them were journalists and publicity officials of opposition parties.

"Based on the information I have, they are supposed to breed 60,000 cows per year but I learnt that only 8, 000 cows were produced over a period of three years" he said.

Rafizi was accompanied on his visit by five Negeri Sembilan state assemblymen—Mohd Taufek Abdul Ghani (PAS-Paroi), M Ravi (PKR-Port Dickson), Aminuddin Harun (PKR-Sikamat), P Gunasekaran (DAP-Senawang) and Ng Chin Tsai (DAP-Temiang). Also in his delegation was Fariz Musa, the chief coordinator of Jingga 13, a PKR-linked NGO.

READ MORE HERE

 

Govt warned of more workers protests ahead

Posted: 03 Nov 2011 03:47 PM PDT

(Harakah Daily) -- Nov 4: Malaysian Trades Union Congress has told the government to brace for more protests if it ignored opposition to the amendment on Contractor of Labour to Employment Act 1955, passed by parliament on October 6.
The amendment, which allows investors to hire Malaysians as contract workers instead of permanent staff, has drawn wide criticism from MTUC, who described it as a form of slavery practised during British rule.

The union also said the amendment would not benefit workers, instead, Malaysian workers would be exploited.

Human Resources minister S Subramaniam however defended the amendment, claiming it would enable a more systematic monitoring of labour outsourcing agencies, especially in isolated locations.

PAS deputy president Mohamad Sabu, who earlier joined some 250 workers in Shah Alam yesterday (pic), said the amendment was illegal as it did not take into account the rights of employees in the country.

"With the amendment, every employer will prefer hiring only contract workers to avoid higher costs.

"We know that contract workers will not have Employees Provident Fund and SOCSO deductions, so they do not have to bear these costs," said Mat Sabu, who also warned that employees would be deprived of safety assurances at workplace.

"And this would greatly affect the affected employees and their family if anything were to happen."

The nationwide protests led by MUTC kicked off 5pm nationwide yesterday at 20 spots.

MUTC president Syed Shahir Syed Mohamad who attended the Shah Alam gathering said the huge turnout was a signal to the government to take the matter seriously.

"We will continue to hold protests for as long as the government remains silent," he said.

Bersih 2.0 urges foreign monitors for GE13

Posted: 03 Nov 2011 03:42 PM PDT

By Kean Wong, The Malaysian Insider

CANBERRA, Nov 4 — Bersih 2.0 chairman Datuk Ambiga Sreenevasan has challenged the Najib administration to invite international observers for the next general election to demonstrate its confidence in free and fair elections, saying that a Mahathir-era precedent would easily enable this to recur.

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak has set up an all-party parliamentary select commission to look into demands for electoral reforms, including the eight listed by Bersih 2.0 for its July 9 rally.

"If you say the (electoral) system is OK, get international observers. Prove it to us," Ambiga urged the Malaysian government, in an address at a packed Australian National University (ANU) law school theatre filled with students, lawyers and policy officials.

 "Bring in the international observers, let them observe our elections. That's my call to the Malaysian government.

"If you say your system is fine and that it doesn't need (electoral) reform before the 13th general election, I dare you to bring in international observers. And let them determine if our elections are free and fair," said the Bersih 2.0 leader, who received a rock-star welcome at her ANU lecture.

Ambiga's appearance at the ANU law school here this week concluded her lecture tour of Australia following several earlier engagements in Melbourne and Sydney.

She also held a raft of meetings in Canberra with Australian political leaders from various parties and met with foreign policy officials in the parliamentary zone, highlighting Bersih 2.0's campaign for electoral reform and its eight key demands.

Her speech recounting the July 9 demonstrations in Kuala Lumpur and in over 30 cities worldwide, and her explanation of Bersih 2.0's campaign for democratisation, was frequently interrupted by applause.

She was also mobbed afterwards by students and other Malaysians eager to photograph and record their meeting with her in Canberra.

The ANU organisers said hundreds from around the world had logged on to watch Ambiga's talk and the discussion afterwards on a livestreaming service over the Internet, and a few questions from viewers abroad were answered by the Bersih 2.0 leader in the lecture hall.


READ MORE HERE.

 



 

Dr M says Najib can save PPSMI

Posted: 03 Nov 2011 03:41 PM PDT

(The Malaysian Insider) - LANGKAWI, Nov 4 — Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad said today that Datuk Seri Najib Razak can stop his deputy Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin from scrapping the Teaching of Science and Mathematics in English (PPSMI) policy that was introduced by the former prime minister before he stepped down in 2003.

Dr Mahathir, who is still widely influential in Umno after serving as PM for 22 years, said the current prime minister should do so for the good of the country.

Dr Mahathir introduced the PPSMI policy before he stepped down in 2003. — File pic
Muhyiddin, who is also education minister, is due to announce the "soft landing" reinstatement of Malay as the medium of instruction for science and maths (MBMMBI) this evening.

The deputy prime minister said yesterday the government's controversial decision to scrap PPSMI was final in response to lobby groups such as the Parent Action Group for Education (PAGE).

PAGE chairman Datin Noor Azimah Abdul Rahim had bluntly said Barisan National (BN) risks losing votes in the upcoming general election if it continues to bar students from learning science and maths in English in schools.

MORE TO COME HERE.

Smooth transition

Posted: 03 Nov 2011 11:59 AM PDT

By Mastami Mustaza, NST

KUALA LUMPUR: The Education Ministry will address today all issues on the teaching of Science and Mathematics in English policy (PPSMI), which will put to rest all uncertainties, said its minister, Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin.

The deputy prime minister said he would explain in great detail, addressing parents' worries, including a smooth transition from PPSMI to the successor policy, MBMBI, or Memartabatkan Bahasa Melayu dan memperkasakan Bahasa Inggeris (Uplifting Bahasa Melayu and strengthening English language).

Muhyiddin said this after meeting participants of SMR HR Group's English teachers project at the Gardens Hotel here.

He said the decision to abolish PPSMI was made in 2009 and that as far as the ministry was concerned, this was final.

In the wake of comments expressed by certain quarters calling for flexibility in the medium of instruction, he said the government would not bow to pressure from "small groups".

He said the majority of Malaysians understood and accepted why the policy was discarded in favour of one dignifying Bahasa Melayu and strengthening English language use.

"When the abolition of the PPSMI was announced in 2009, there was no negative reaction.

"It was then brought to the cabinet and later, Parliament, and everyone agreed, including the opposition. Now, there are groups opposing it," he said, adding that his ministry was not in the habit of making hasty decisions or politically motivated ones.

Instead, decisions were made in the best interests of the people and the nation.
Also, the government had collated extensive data on the implementation and progress of PPSMI.

Muhyiddin said there was no more room for negotiation on the subject and described the Parent Action Group for Education (Page) as being "out of date" for refusing to soften its stance.

He said the government acknowledged that English was an important communications tool in a globalised world.

"The question is whether the best way of teaching English was through Science and Mathematics or by bringing in professionals. I think this is the best approach."

He said in terms of MBMBI, the government's focus was on improving the learning and teaching of English in schools.

Many initiatives have been made, such as designing a new curriculum and adding new content, improving the support system and infrastructure in schools, with language laboratories to be expanded to all primary and later, secondary schools.

He said even as the debate on PPSMI dragged, this showed how serious the government was on the teaching of English in Malaysia.

To reporters' questions on the stance of Barisan Nasional component parties, MCA and MIC, supporting PPSMI, Muhyiddin said they had agreed with its abolishment in cabinet.

On the issue pertaining to Section 15(5)(a) of the University and University Colleges Act (UUCA) 1971, Muhyiddin said this was for the Higher Education Ministry to decide, in particular, whether to appeal against the Court of Appeal's ruling.

However, he said if Higher Education Minister Datuk Seri Mohamed Khaled Nordin needed advice, he could bring it to the cabinet meeting today.


Ministry Sets Up Committee To Study Marine Park Department Purchase

Posted: 03 Nov 2011 11:36 AM PDT

(Bernama) PUTRAJAYA -- The Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment has set up a committee to identify elements of non-compliance or negligence in the issue of equipment procurement by the Marine Park Department which was allegedly much higher than the market price as reported in the 2010 Auditor-General's Report tabled recently.

According to a statement issued by the ministry here on Thursday, the committee was chaired by the ministry's principal division secretary (management services) Junaidah Kamaruddin.

"The committee will conduct a detailed investigation by taking into consideration clarifications by officers involved before deciding the next course of action," the statement said.

According to the statement, the purchase was made in one lump sum for a unit of aluminium boat for the use by the department.

"The overall procurement totaled RM7,513,429.05 including design, construction, testing and supply of the boat and not the specific procurement of equipment such as binocular, LCD TV, laptop, CCTV and radar as reported.

"The items stated were accesssories in the boat and were part of the package in the acquisition of the boat," the statement said.

Meanwhile, to ensure the issue does not recur as well as for purpose of improving procedure, the ministry is requiring that a fair price and market study should be carried out for each item including those categorised as accessories.

The directive applies irrespective of whether the procurement of supply or work is carried out in one lump sum.

Departments are also required to get the involvement of officers from the ministry when they are implementing the procurement project, according to the statement.

Court decision a pleasant surprise

Posted: 03 Nov 2011 11:31 AM PDT

By Azmy Sharom, The Star

Higher education is not merely about going to the lecture theatre and mugging for your exams. It is about expanding your horizons, taking responsibility for your actions and acting on your convictions.

THE Court of Appeal's decision on the Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) Four case, which declared in a majority 2-1 decision that Section 15 of the University and University Colleges Act (UUCA) is unconstitutional, was a very pleasant surprise indeed.

The four students from UKM were initially charged by their university for "expressing support for a political party". This is an offence under Section 15 of the UUCA.

They were accused of this primarily for being present during a by-election campaign in Selangor.

The question before the court was whether Section 15 impinged on the students' constitutional right of expression.

One of the reasons that the dissenting judge used in his decision to not question the validity of the UUCA was that his lordship was of the opinion that it was not up to the court to question the harshness of the UUCA.

I respectfully disagree, for what is being questioned is not the harshness of the law, but the constitutionality of the law.

The thing about our Constitution is that all the protections they give us usually have a proviso.

The proviso generally being that Parliament can make laws which limit our rights if it is in the inte­rest of public morality, order and national security.

For years and years, our courts have often times simply accepted repressive laws made by Parliament without actually questioning whether these laws are constitutional or not because the Govern-ment said that it was necessary for national security or public order or morality.

In effect, there was a tendency to allow the party with a majority in Parliament to do what it wanted.

This is derogating responsibility. It is not enough to simply accept the word of the Government when it says "this law is for national security".

There should be an examination of it to see whether it really is for national security.

Without that examination, any old law can be made.

There will be no limitation on the lawmakers and what we will end up with is a system of governance where there is no real protection of our rights.

That is why it was so exciting to see the two judges in the UKM Four case clearly stating that any law made has to be scrutinised to ensure that its constitutionality is based not merely on the form of the law but also its substance.

In this particular case, they held that preventing students from expressing support for a political party is in no way a threat to national security, public order or morality.

The decision is made not only by taking a legalistic approach but is also one based on common sen-se.

After all, a person above the age of majority is free to enter into contracts, get married, be the head of a corporation, vote, be Prime Minister, etc, and yet by virtue of being a student they can't express support for a political party. This does not make any sense.

Furthermore, how can supporting a perfectly legal organisation be considered dangerous?

The stand of the Government as well as the dissenting judge is that the UUCA is there to prevent students from getting involved in politics and thus being distracted from their studies.

This too does not make sense. Having been a student myself and having taught them for 21 years, let me assure you that young people can get distracted from their studies by a million and one things and chances are unless you are some serious political nerd, politics is not going to be on that list.

We might as well ban students from playing online games if we are so concerned about their focus on studying.

Higher Education Minister Datuk Seri Mohamed Khaled Nordin was also reported as saying that if it is considered that a student's constitutional right of association is more important than his studies, then we can do away with UUCA.

Again, I have to disagree. This argument is far too simplistic.

When we restrict a person's fundamental freedom, whatever that freedom might be, we are stifling their ability to develop.

Higher education is not merely about going to the lecture theatre and mugging for your exams.

It is about expanding your horizons, taking responsibility for your actions and acting on your convictions.

You can't do this if you are kept chained by repressive laws.

But it is still too early to rejoice this victory for fundamental liberties in general and academic freedom in particular.

The case might still go to the Federal Court and who knows what their decision will be.

Neither is this case reason to say our judiciary is independent.

What this case does show is that there are individual judges in our courts who understand and appreciate constitutionalism, there are lawyers willing to argue for this principle and there are young men and women in our student body brave enough to stand up for their rights.

There's still much to be done, but for the moment this is reason enough to cheer.

OWC not letting off steam over ban on its sex guide

Posted: 03 Nov 2011 11:30 AM PDT

By Wong Pek Mei, The Star

PETALING JAYA: The Obedient Wives Club (OWC) may burn or dispose the club's controversial sex guide book, its national chairman in Malaysia Fauziah Ariffin said.

The decision follows the Home Ministry's announcement banning Seks Islam, Perangi Yahudi Untuk Kembalikan Seks Islam Kepada Dunia (Islamic Sex, Fighting Jews to Return Islamic Sex to the World) with immediate effect.

"The book is just pocket-sized. If the authorities say we cannot keep it, we will just obey ... put it away or burn it," she said in an SMS yesterday.

However, she said it was ultimately up to the members to decide what they wanted to do with it.

Fauziah was unfazed by the ban, saying that the members already knew that every book published by them would be banned.

"We stopped publication after the first (batch) so we won't appeal (to the Home Ministry) or consider legal action.

"Let the public be the judge as we have made society aware that wives have to be obedient to husbands and make their intimate relations lively in order to strengthen their marriage," she added.

Fauziah said all the books had been distributed and read by members before the book was banned, adding that the books sold like pisang goreng panas (hot cakes).

"It has received positive feedback. Many married couples that had problems in their sex lives said the knowledge the book provided had improved and even solved their problems," she claimed, adding that more than 40 books had been printed.

The ministry warned that those found in possession of the book could be fined up to RM5,000.

Those found reproducing the book for the purpose of offering it for sale could be jailed up to three years or fined not exceeding RM20,000, or both.

The book was written by Hatijan Aam, the OWC founder.

The club was formed by Global Ikhwan Sdn Bhd, an organisation founded by former members of the banned al-Arqam.

Police move against Seksualiti Merdeka sparks heated debate between groups

Posted: 03 Nov 2011 11:23 AM PDT

By Steven Daniel and Farah Fazanna Zulzaha, The Star

KUALA LUMPUR: Police have banned Seksualiti Merdeka with immediate effect, sparking a heated debate among supporters and detractors of the movement that fights for freedom of sexual orientation and gender identity.

While some groups felt that the ban was another case of censorship in Malaysia, others were of the view that their religion did not condone same-sex relationships.

In announcing the ban, Deputy Inspector-General of Police Datuk Seri Khalid Abu Bakar said: "We are not against the people's right to freedom of speech or human rights.

"However, if the event creates uneasiness among the vast majority of the population, it may result in disharmony, enmity and threaten public order."
Ensuring peace and order: Khalid (right) and Internal Security and Public Order director Datuk Salleh Mat Rasid speaking to the media at the conference in Kuala Lumpur yesterday.

Seksualiti Merdeka, an annual event held since 2008, had planned a series of activities to last until Nov 13 at the Annexe Gallery here.

With the theme "Queer Without Fear", the programme included workshops, book launches, an art exhibition and performances.

Khalid urged the people not to attend the events as they could be picked up for questioning, adding that stern action would be taken against those who defied the ban.

"The decision to issue the ban was made after taking into account the views expressed by many individuals as well as protests from non-governmental organisations, including lslamic and non-Islamic religious bodies.

"We have to step in promptly to prevent any untoward incident," he told a press conference here yesterday.

Khalid said two reports were lodged on Tuesday against the event organiser.

He said police had started investigations and identified at least 10 campaign organisers, including former Bar Council president Datuk S. Ambiga.

"We will record their statements in the next few days," he said, adding that the case would be investigated under Section 298A of the Penal Code and Section 27A(1)(c) of the Police Act.

He stressed that the organiser did not apply for a permit to hold the event.

Khalid also expressed his disappointment at the Bar Council for supporting a movement that was promoting issues against the country's laws.

Seksualiti Merdeka has described itself as "Malaysia's only festival celebrating the human rights of people of diverse sexual orientations and gender identities".

It is organised by a coalition of NGOs, artists, activists and individuals.

Seksualiti Merdeka co-founder Pang Khee Teik said he was saddened by the ban.

"We are only asking to be accepted by society and that the public hear our side of story," he said, referring to the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transsexual communities.

He stressed that the event was not illegal as they would only hold forums, talks and workshops.

"It is not even a gay parade," he said.

"The event has been held annually and there has been no chaos until this year," he said, adding that they were not promoting a lifestyle but only trying to make society understand them.

event held since 2008, had planned a series of activities to last until Nov 13 at the Annexe Gallery here.

With the theme "Queer Without Fear", the programme included workshops, book launches, an art exhibition and performances.

Khalid urged the people not to attend the events as they could be picked up for questioning. "The ban was made after taking into account the views of individuals as well as protests from non-governmental organisations, including lslamic and non-Islamic religious bodies.

"We have to step in promptly," he said at a press conference here yesterday.

Khalid said two reports were lodged on Tuesday against the event organiser.

He said police had started investigations and identified at least 10 campaign organisers, including former Bar Council president Datuk S. Ambiga, adding that the case would be investigated under Section 298A of the Penal Code and Section 27A(1)(c) of the Police Act.

He stressed that the organiser did not apply for a permit to hold the event.

Seksualiti Merdeka has described itself as "Malaysia's only festival celebrating the human rights of people of diverse sexual orientations and gender identities".

It is organised by a coalition of NGOs, artists, activists and individuals.

Seksualiti Merdeka co-founder Pang Khee Teik said he was saddened by the ban.

"We are only asking to be accepted by society and that the public hear our side of the story," he said, referring to the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transsexual communities.

"It is not even a gay parade," he said.

A simpler term for it is bribery

Posted: 03 Nov 2011 11:21 AM PDT

By  Mohd Ariff Sabri Aziz, FMT

The 2012 Budget was indeed the most unique. Never before has a budget been turned into a huge CDM – cash dispensing machine.

Money in our hands is a welcome relief and pain remover; but it's not a responsible way of managing a country's budget.

Personally speaking, this is the most irresponsible budget that I have ever heard.

The capital market is mentioned only in passing as though some phone calls were made to leading bankers in Malaysia to give some inputs on the capital market.

Hence, just a cursory almost textbook mention that our ratio is strong and better than the world average.

So? How does that translate into accessibility of the small medium enterprises (SMEs) to the capital market? How do we ease imports of capital goods into the country to build capacity?

Isn't the theme of this budget "transformation"?

Finance Minister-cum-Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak's budget for 2012 is RM232 billion. Of this, RM180 billion will be spent as opex (operating expenses).

That's money to be spent on operating the economy – paying salaries, servicing existing loans and so on.

Can that be the transformative ingredient?

Entrenching the rent-seeking mentality

Now, as I understand it, to transform an economy, we must have capacity.

We all know we need to spend on building capacity, capabilities, skills and technology. But these now are uncertain given that even allocation for education is being reduced.

We are simply held back from transforming because we hold back on building capacity and capabilities.

We are preaching that in this world, we DO have free lunches.

We are entrenching the rent-seeking mentality which is that things can be had for free and without efforts, as long as we install a benevolent, despotic and overbearing government.

Ignore their bullying; ignore their excesses.

Because what is important is that impoverished people can be made a happy and contented lot once a year when the budget is announced.

Let people think that budget time is when the giant ATM machine is taken out.


READ MORE HERE.

Disabled group upset over ‘terrible’ action

Posted: 03 Nov 2011 11:18 AM PDT

(FMT) - PETALING JAYA: The banning of the "Seksualiti Merdeka" festival by the police yesterday has earned the scorn of disabled rights activist Anthony Thanasayan.

Anthony, the Petpositive (Malaysian Animal Assisted Therapy for the Disabled and the Elderly Association) president said that an event such as Seksualiti Merdeka greatly affected the disabled people as well.

"It is a handicap to be disabled. It is a double handicap to be also gay," said Thanasayan, who has counselled many homosexuals, both abled bodied and disabled.

"People forget that the disabled, including the deaf and blind, are human too. Sexuality transcends the able-bodied or disabled. They are always advised not to think about sex. For many of us,
our genitalia still work; besides, sexuality is not limited to your genitalia," said Thanasayan, who is wheelchair-bound himself.

Thanasayan said it is much worse for a disabled person who has sexual confusion to find help, and this could even lead to those who are not homosexual to turn gay in the process.

"This is because the disabled have limited chances to explore their sexuality, whereas an able-bodied person has more chances. Out of desperation, I have seen cases where a man goes into a relationship with an uncle, or brother because they have no other options," he said.

Thanasayan, who is also a councillor with the Petaling Jaya City Council (MBPJ), said that an event such as Seksualiti Merdeka allows everyone – abled-bodied as well as the disabled – to know themselves and this is vital for a good relationship or marriage.

"I went to the Seksualiti Merdeka event and I am so happy, because finally I see some people who can approach such issues with maturity, without discrimination," he said.

"But today I see everything has crumbled. This (banning Seksualiti Merdeka) is a terrible step for Malaysia and would earn the derision of other more forward-looking countries. This kind of action is always based on ignorance; it will promote prejudice. Thus, this will increase the frustration of those in the minority community, and can also lead to suicidal tendencies," said Thanasayan.

 

READ MORE HERE.

In Kelantan, hudud to be bellwether for Malay votes

Posted: 03 Nov 2011 11:17 AM PDT

By Shazwan Mustafa Kamal, The Malaysian Insider

KOTA BARU, Nov 4 — PAS's success or failure in implementing hudud in Kelantan will serve as an indicator of Malay voter support there ahead of a general election expected to be called soon, politicians here say.

The Islamist party has repeatedly blamed the federal government for the failure to enforce the law, enacted in Kelantan back in 1993, when it first received objection from then-Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad.

Dr Mahathir had previously written to Kelantan Mentri Besar Datuk Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat in 1993 to inform him that the state did not have the right to introduce hudud, which prescribes stoning, whipping and amputation as punishment for criminal offences.

But the state government recently announced the formation of a hudud technical committee, reaffirming its commitment to see that the legislation is eventually enforced in Kelantan.

State government leaders have said the newly-formed committee would study the possibility of the law being enacted without having to amend the Federal Constitution or existing syariah laws.

"The time for talk is over. It is now time for action, time to see it through," Nik Aziz told reporters last week after attending a public function on the outskirts of Lubok Setol near Rantau Panjang.

The Kelantan MB said hudud would be able to address a multitude of issues affecting Muslims including the issue of apostasy.

But the Kelantan Umno leadership has come out and attacked the state government for its "rushed" plans to enact such laws, claiming that it was a last-ditch attempt in garnering support among the Malay electorate, who make up 95 per cent of the population in the state.

"They are now resorting to the hudud committee because they know Malays in Kelantan are angry about hudud. PAS wants to implement it before the next elections to soothe Malays, to keep to a promise they have made years ago," said Umno leader Datuk Che Alwi Ahmad (picture).

The state opposition leader said PAS had painted a wrong picture about hudud to non-Muslims by highlighting only the punishments and not about the fairness of the system.

"Hudud is about fairness to the victim, it is not just about punishment; it has already been enforced in Malaysia partially over the years with punishments like caning and death, it's just that the extreme ones like amputation is not there.

"I support hudud. Umno supports hudud. We'd be crazy not to, as Muslims, it's just that it can only be implemented when everyone here understands about it," he told The Malaysian Insider in an exclusive interview recently.

But PAS state leaders have brushed aside the allegations that the hudud issue was aimed at gaining Malay support, and maintained that it has always been consistent in its push for Islamic law.

"PAS's struggle has always been about establishing an Islamic way of governance through policies, law. Hudud is a part of it. It is not an election ploy, that is why there is no time frame.

"The technical committee has been set up because law experts have recently found the possibility that we can bring in the laws without having to amend the constitution," state executive councillor Datuk Mohd Amar Nik Abdullah told The Malaysian Insider.

READ MORE HERE.

Najib: My daughter was not in Perth

Posted: 03 Nov 2011 12:10 AM PDT

(The Malaysian Insider) - Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak said today that his daughter was not present in Australia during the Commonwealth Heads of Government (CHOGM) meeting in Perth which he attended.

He was responding through Twitter to allegations that his daughter was on a A$60,000 (RM 193,869) shopping spree in the Western Australia state when Najib was attending the meeting for leaders of states.

Najib also clarified  to Bernama Online that his wife, Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor, and daughter did not buy jewellery, and asked people to stop spreading rumours and lies.

Australian newspaper came out with the controversial report, saying "the first lady known to have bought A$150,000 worth of WA (Western Australian) pearls".

The report did not name the person specifically.

The prime minister is performing the haj currently with Rosmah in Saudi Arabia.

 

‘Seksualiti Merdeka a collateral damage’

Posted: 03 Nov 2011 12:07 AM PDT

The festival organiser thinks government agencies are all out against Bersih's Ambiga and Anwar Ibrahim.

(Free Malaysia Today) - Seksualiti Merdeka festival organiser, Pang Khee Teik, believes that the police ban against the festival was because it was to be officiated by Bersih 2.0 chairman S Ambiga and that they have been made a collateral damage.

"I think it is because of Ambiga. It is being politicized," said Pang when met at the Burmese refugees fund-raising dinner function at the Annexe, Central Market.

"The government agencies are using every opportunity to rouse sentiments against Ambiga and (Opposition Leader) Anwar Ibrahim.

"We are mere collateral damage," said Pang.

He said this in response to the ban against the festival by Deputy Inspector General of Police, Khalid Abu Bakar.

Earlier today the DIG said that the police will take action under Section 27 A (1) (C) as well as 298 A of the Penal Code to prevent any functions relating to the programme.

Seksualiti Merdeka is an annual festival highlighting issues faced by lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transsexuals since 2008.

Pang also accused the government of ignoring the innocent and marginalised segments of the community.

He stressed that the festival was an avenue to hear out the plight of the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transsexual community.

READ MORE HERE

 

Govt has RM40b untapped cash reserves, says Husni

Posted: 02 Nov 2011 07:08 PM PDT

By Chong Jin Hun, The Edge

KUALA LUMPUR : The government has some RM40 billion of untapped cash reserves which it could use to sustain Malaysia's economic growth in the event of a global economic slowdown, according to Second Finance Minister Datuk Seri Ahmad Husni Mohamad Hanadzlah.

Husni said the reserves included the government's trust fund of about RM30 billion, another contingency fund of some RM4 billion, and Kumpulan Wang Amanah Negara which have around RM5 billion.

"We have the reserves," he told reporters on the sidelines of the MIA-AFA conference yesterday.

Husni said the government had asked the country's accountant general to review the usage of its RM30 billion trust fund, of which a portion was "dormant".

He also noted that Malaysia would achieve a 5% to 6% GDP growth this year.

Husni also said the government plans to sell more government-owned land to the private sector to raise more funds for the country's development. The move is expected to add RM1.2 billion to the government's projected revenue for 2012.

According to him, the real estate assets included small plots of land, which the government did not plan to utilise within the River of Life project enclave. These plots of land are about three to seven acres "We have identified the land and we plan to monetise the assets," Husni said.


Husni (centre) shaking hands with MIA president Datuk Mohd Nasir Ahmad while AFA president Abdul Rahim Abdul Hamid looks on.
The River of Life project, an entry point project under the Greater Kuala Lumpur/Klang Valley National Key Economic Area, aims to transform the Klang and Gombak River into an iconic waterway by 2020.

According to the Economic Transformation Programme (ETP) website, the River of Life project involves river cleaning, beautification, and development. Beautification works will also be undertaken along a 10.7km stretch of the Klang and Gombak river corridor, hence, the anticipation that land value around the area would rise.

In March 2010, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak had said several government-owned tracts along Jalan Stonor, Jalan Ampang and Jalan Lidcol in Kuala Lumpur had been identified to be tendered out for development by the private sector.

Najib had said it would be wasteful if these sites were not developed, and the government would have to bear the cost of maintaining these assets.

The government had also established a joint venture with the Employees Provident Fund to develop 3,000 acres within the Rubber Research Institute of Malaysia (RRIM) enclave in Sungai Buloh into a new hub for the Klang Valley.

Under the government's latest budget, policymakers have earmarked RM232.8 billion for the coming year, of which RM181.6 billion has been allocated for operating expenditure while the balance RM51.2 billion is for development.

The government's revenue is expected to increase 1.9% to RM186.9 billion in 2012 from RM183.4 billion in 2011. Based on the estimated revenue and expenditure, the government's budget deficit in 2012 is anticipated to improve to 4.7% of gross domestic product (GDP) compared with 5.4% in 2011.

Malaysia's GDP is forecast to grow between 5% and 5.5% in 2011, and expand further by between 5% and 6% in 2012, spurred by private consumption and investment.

The country's private and public investments are expected to grow 15.9% and 7% respectively in 2012, helped by higher foreign direct investment, implementation of the ETP and Second Rolling Plan projects under the Tenth Malaysia Plan.

To further spur domestic growth, the government will implement a RM6 billion Special Stimulus Package via Private Financing Initiative in 2012. Under the scheme, several public projects will be undertaken including the upgrading and maintenance of schools, flood mitigation programmes, and construction of public houses such as housing for fishermen and low-income group.

According Husni, the RM6 billion package would be spent and serve as a buffer to ensure the country's economic growth was sustainable.

He said policymakers would use the money to further spur the country's economy even in the absence of a global recession.  However, in the event the broader landscape sees a protracted slowdown, the minister said the funds would help sustain the country's economic strength, which hinged largely on domestic consumption and investment, besides public spending.
"We are concerned about growth and inflation," Husni said.

Malaysia performs below average in International Bribe Payers Index

Posted: 02 Nov 2011 07:07 PM PDT

By Alyaa Alhadjri, The Sun

PETALING JAYA (Nov 2, 2011): Malaysia managed a 7.6 score out of 10 in the Transparency International 2011 Bribe Payers Index released today, below the global average of 7.8.

The index, with a score of 10 indicating the perception that companies are unlikely to engage in bribery while doing business abroad, placed Malaysia in 15th position together with Hongkong, Italy and South Africa.

It is based on a survey of 3,000 business executives from developed and developing countries for the index which ranks 28 leading international and regional exporting countries by the likelihood of their firms to bribe abroad.

The countries represent almost 80% of global value in their total outflow of goods, services and investments.

According to the survey, the Netherlands and Switzerland (both with a score of 8.8) shared the honour of having companies which were perceived to be most unlikely to pay bribes abroad.

However, companies from Russia and China, with a combined investment of US$120 billion overseas last year were seen to be most likely to pay bribes.

"One of the key findings of the survey is that bribery between companies across different sectors is seen to be just as common as bribery from firms to public officials," said Transparency International-Malaysia (TI-M) president Datuk Paul Low, who launched the report here yesterday in conjunction with the report's global release.

He noted that the problem is most prevalent in the public works, contracts and construction sector.

"While previous surveys had shown that Malaysian companies were increasingly refraining from bribery in their overseas business, Malaysia's score for this year indicates that more can be done to improve its standing," said Low.

"With the tightening of anti-bribery legislations in many countries, there are higher risks for offenders to be caught and charged for corruption," he warned.

Low said TI-M has, as such, urged the government to:

>> diligently implement the United Nations Convention Against Corruption, including the criminalisation of bribery;

>> strengthen regulatory framework on the private sector to meet international accepted practices of good governance and ensuring compliance through a corporate
integrity system which includes enforcement of anti-bribery policy;

>> amend current legislation to allow prosecution of a company when its employee is prosecuted for corrupt practices; and

>> to impose strong deterrent fines against offenders.

Low urged the government to show strong political will, without fear or favour, to fight corruption, both locally and internationally.

Police reportedly ban gay festival in Malaysia

Posted: 02 Nov 2011 07:05 PM PDT

By Sean Yoong, AP

KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia (AP) — Police ordered gay rights activists in Muslim-majority Malaysia on Thursday to scrap an annual arts festival aimed at fighting discrimination, news reports said.

The "Sexual Independence" festival has been held under low-key circumstances in Kuala Lumpur since 2008, but growing awareness about the event is leading to criticism by politicians and religious leaders.

This year's five-day festival — starting Nov. 9 at a private arts center and themed "Queer Without Fear" — planned to feature musical performances of "queer anthems sung by fierce local singers and drag divas who know what it means to love out loud and proud," organizers said.

But after criticism by the deputy prime minister and plans by several Muslim nongovernment groups to protest, police reportedly ordered the event to be canceled, local media said.

The Malaysiakini independent news website quoted national deputy police chief Khalid Abu Bakar as saying the festival represented "a threat to public order." The Star newspaper said Khalid warned of "strong action" against anyone violating the ban.

Khalid could not immediately be reached for comment, and other police officials declined to comment.

Earlier Thursday, Deputy Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin had described the event as "inappropriate" and a "waste of time," according to the national news agency, Bernama.

Gay rights activists did not immediately respond to the event's reportedly being banned. Earlier Thursday, they said the festival was meant to counter widespread homophobia in this socially conservative Asian nation, where a young gay man received death threats last year after posting a YouTube clip defending his sexuality.

"Asking us to keep quiet is asking us to take your abuse with a smile ... it's time to put a stop to all the hate and misunderstanding and abuse," festival spokesman Pang Khee Teik said in an online statement posted before the event was reportedly banned.

This year's program also included plans for talks on sexuality issues, a poster exhibition and a makeup workshop by a drag queen. One session is titled "Defense Against The Dark Arts: Homophobia 101."

Media censorship rules forbid movies and song lyrics that promote acceptance of gays, while a decades-old law makes sodomy punishable by 20 years in prison, though it is seldom and selectively enforced.

The festival's sponsors and supporters include the Malaysian chapter of Amnesty International, the country's main grouping of lawyers and other human rights organizations.

Anwar on highway's RM2b increase, bridge over land

Posted: 02 Nov 2011 07:04 PM PDT

(Harakah Daily) - Nov 3: The delayed completion of the Jabor expressway which forms part of the East Coast Highway caught the attention of Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim (pic), who revealed that the cost for its construction had ballooned by more than RM2 billion, from the original RM3 billion to RM5 billion.
The project, which started in 2007, was supposed to be completed last year.

"This is extremely disappointing and should not have happenned because it involves public money which must be spent appropriately," said Anwar in parliament yesterday.

Taking to task the Public Works Department and other relevant ministries over the delay and the cost increase, Anwar anticipated problems over the collection of toll for the highway.

"Until now, we still do not know who will operate the toll and who will hold the concession," said the Permatang Pauh member of parliament.

The former Finance minister also described as "not smart" the government's project to build a bridge over land in Kemaman, Terengganu, costing some RM174 million, RM70 million higher than the original price tag.

"This is just another strange project by UMNO-BN to build bridges on land and with much higher cost than the original pricing," he added.

Muhyiddin: Seksualiti Merdeka is ‘immoral’

Posted: 02 Nov 2011 07:03 PM PDT

By Teoh El Sen, FMT

KUALA LUMPUR: Deputy Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin has dismissed the ongoing "Seksualiti Merdeka" programme as "totally non-beneficial" to Malaysians.

Speaking on behalf of the government and Umno, Muhyiddin said: "I don't know what our country can gain from this.

"Umno and the government feel that something like that is totally not beneficial at all.

"I don't understand why they are holding this. Does it have any hidden political agendas?

"But for Malaysians, they would have to judge for themselves. For a large number of us, it should not be done, it is a waste of time," he told reporters here today.

Muhyiddin, the Umno deputy president, said that Malaysia had clear guidelines and legislations outlawing "unnatural" sexual activities such as sodomy.

"We are a free country but there are limits.

"The organisers can say this is a free country and they can do anything but there are limits.

"In Malaysia, when we talk about human rights, we are signatory to the United Nations Human Rights convention.

"Malaysia has the Federal Constitution and its laws, we also have religion and our cultural values," he said.

Not in line with Islam

Muhyiddin said what Seksualiti Merdeka was advocating was not in line with the various religions, including Islam and Christianity.

"In the Islamic context, this is not in line with our religion, it is an immoral (songsang) activity that does not meet our customs, even the Christians also say that they are against," he said.

The Seksualiti Merdeka festival, which celebrates the rights of the lesbian,gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) community has been held annually since 2008.

 

READ MORE HERE.

MAS-AirAsia share swap under probe for insider trading

Posted: 02 Nov 2011 07:00 PM PDT

By Shannon Teoh, The Malaysian Insider

The share swap between Malaysia Airlines (MAS) and AirAsia is being probed by Bursa Malaysia and the Securities Commission (SC) for insider trading.

The finance ministry said today that investigations were still ongoing despite the two airlines agreeing to the deal nearly three months ago.

"It will take time because it involves so many accounts and a huge value. So we need to separate those that are genuine and those with inside information," Deputy Finance Minister Datuk Awang Adek Hussin told Parliament today.

Shares in budget airlines AirAsia had traded for as low as RM3.14 on June 23 and was finally traded at RM3.92 before being suspended on August 8 before the swap was announced.

It later dipped below RM2.80 on October 26.

National carrier MAS was suspended at RM1.60 but climbed to RM1.90 following the deal.

Awang Adek also said there was no need for either company to file any announcement with Bursa if there was no material development prior to the deal as the matter was considered private and confidential.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Mixed-messages over Pakatan’s application

Posted: 02 Nov 2011 05:48 PM PDT

Pakatan says that their application to the Registrar of Societies was still pending and questioned ROS director general's statement that a fresh application was needed.

(Free Malaysia Today) - Pakatan Rakyat and the Registrar of Socities (ROS) are at cross-purposes when it comes to registration of the political coalition.

Pakatan says their application is stilll pending while ROS director general Abdul Rahman Othman says there has been no fresh application after pro-tem chairman Zaid Ibrahim left PKR last November.

Abdul Rahman had earlier made a statement that a fresh application was needed from Pakatan.

But Pakatan today said that they have been in touch with an officer within the ROS who has said that their application made right after Zaid's departure was still pending approval.

"As soon as Zaid left, we elected (Tumpat MP and PAS central committee member) Kamaruddin Jaafar to replace Zaid and submitted a new application.

"We have been in touch with ROS chief assistant director of the societies registration division on the issue of a 'fresh application'.

"The feedback that we received was that ROS and the Home Ministry were still looking into our application on the aspect of law," PKR secretary general Saifuddin Nasution told a press conference today.

He added that Pakatan had kept in touch with their contact person in ROS every three to four weeks up till early this month, always getting a similar reply.

Other members of the pro-tem committee who were at today's press conference were DAP's Anthony Loke and PAS' Hatta Ramli.

READ MORE HERE

 

Australian government pressured to act on Assange

Posted: 02 Nov 2011 05:34 PM PDT

(AFP) - SYDNEY: Lawyers and the mother of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange today ramped up pressure on the Australian government to step in and ensure he gets a fair trial in Sweden.

Assange, who is an Australian citizen, lost a bitter legal battle yesterday to block his extradition from Britain to Sweden to face questioning over allegations of rape and sexual assault.

Two judges at the High Court in London rejected arguments by Assange, whose anti-secrecy website has enraged governments around the world, that his extradition would be unlawful.

Assange now has 14 days to take the case to the British Supreme Court and his legal counsel Geoffrey Robertson called on the government to intervene if the extradition goes through.

"I think Canberra may have to do something about it," he told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation.

"It's got a duty to help Australians in peril in foreign courts. It didn't do anything for David Hicks and that was something of a disgrace," he said, referring to the Australian formerly detained at Guantanamo Bay.

"As far as Julian Assange is concerned, Sweden doesn't have bail, doesn't have money bail for foreigners, so he's likely to be held in custody."

Robertson added that he does not believe the 40-year-old WikiLeaks founder, who has previously blasted Canberra for not doing enough to protect him in the fallout from the leaks, will face a fair trial in Sweden.

"He's going to be tried in secret, and this is outrageous by our standards and by any standards," he said.

Assange has strongly denied the rape allegations, claiming they are politically motivated and linked to the activities of WikiLeaks. He has been under virtual house arrest since he was first detained in December.

He has expressed fears that his extradition to Sweden would lead to his transfer to the United States to face as yet unspecified charges of spying.

His mother told Australian media today she believes her son will go to Sweden to fight the charges as long as the Australian government brokers a deal to ensure he will not be extradited to the US.

Christine Assange said Canberra must follow its own diplomatic and legal advice that her son was in "clear and present danger" and seek written guarantees he would not be rendered to the US.

"If that was to take place I believe Julian would go to Sweden and not resist it. His concern is that he'll be rendered on," she said.

Asked about the matter as she arrived in the French resort town of Cannes for the G20 summit, Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard said a statement may be issued later.

"So we'll get briefed and understand fully what's happened here and make a statement if necessary," she said.

 

 

MAS-AirAsia deal not violating anti-trust law: Rafidah

Posted: 02 Nov 2011 04:02 PM PDT

(MySinChew) - KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 2 (Bernama) -- AirAsia X Bhd chairman, Tan Sri Rafidah Aziz, said the tie-up between MAS and AirAsia Bhd will not result in monopolistic practices between the two carriers following their share-swap exercise.
She also said the share-swap would not result in any behaviour that would violate anti-trust laws.

"We (AirAsia and MAS) are guided by strict anti-trust laws overseas and in Malaysia when the competition laws come into force next year.

"We'll never be able to do anything that violates any anti-trust laws," she told a media briefing on the Malaysia-Europe Forum's Roundtable here today.

The Malaysian Competition Commission is currently reviewing the possible impact of the MAS-AirAsia collaboration on the local market, and would advise both airlines on all possible areas.

She said the collaboration may result in cost-cutting for both airlines and it would be beneficial for passengers and customers as they could give better services.

Rafidah said the MAS management must continuously hold dialogues with all levels of its workforce through its unions.

"This is to explain in detail what's happening and what's going to happen, particularly to the employees, and the areas of cost-saving which will translate into benefits," she said.

The Malaysian Airlines System Employees Union (MASEU) has expressed dissatisfaction over the explanation given by the management on the collaboration.

MASEU had decided to write to Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak and wanted to meet him to convey their views and opposition to the collaboration.

It was also reported recently that the International Transport Workers' Federation (ITF) has urged the Malaysian government to ensure that workers' rights were preserved in any future collaboration between the two airlines.

The report said an agreement between the two airlines was reached without union consultation.

In a letter dated Oct 19 to Najib, ITF general-secretary, David Cockroft, outlined concerns that a share-swap and collaboration between MAS and Air Asia could lead to the erosion of workers' rights.

This could include the right of ITF affiliate MASEU to represent and collectively bargain on behalf of MAS workers.

Malaysia bans steamy 'Islamic sex guide': report

Posted: 02 Nov 2011 03:53 PM PDT

(AFP) - KUALA LUMPUR — Malaysia has banned an "Islamic sex guide" by a controversial group that reportedly urges Muslim men in polygamous marriages to have group sex with their wives, a report said Thursday.

The book was published by the Muslim "Obedient Wife Club", which was formed earlier this year and has sparked controversy with its radical suggestions on sex and marriage in conservative, Muslim-majority Malaysia.

The Home Ministry has banned the book, titled "Islamic Sex, Fighting Jews to Return Islamic Sex to the World" with immediate effect, The Star daily reported.

It cited Abdul Aziz Mohamad Nor, a top official in the ministry's publications division.

Abdul Aziz was quoted as saying the book, the existence of which was first reported last month, was banned because of the wife club's links to the outlawed group Al-Arqam.

Some people from the Obedient Wife Club and related organisations are former members of Al-Arqam, a Malaysian-based Islamic sect that was banned in the country in the 1990s as a deviationist cult.

Those found in possession of the book face fines of 50,000 ringgit ($15,800) while anyone caught reproducing it can be jailed up to three years, The Star reported.

Abdul Aziz could not immediately be reached by AFP.

The wives' club caused a stir earlier this year by calling on women to be "whores in bed" to prevent their men from straying and pursuing divorce.

Malaysian media reports have said the book suggests Muslim husbands have sex with all their wives simultaneously.

One chapter, "How Sex Becomes Worship," reportedly contains unusually explicit sexual descriptions for a Malaysian publication, such as a tutorial on breast-fondling.

AFP has not seen a copy of the book.

Open discussion of sex is frowned upon in Malaysia, which regularly bans books deemed to be obscene or offensive to Islam.

Club organisers have previously said the book was exclusively for its members and was not intended for general distribution and thus should not be banned.

Poetic justice for Guan Eng

Posted: 02 Nov 2011 03:50 PM PDT

By Jeswant Kaur, FMT

The recently released Auditor-General's Report comes as poetic justice for Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng in particular and Barisan Nasional's nemesis, Pakatan Rakyat in general. The report is full of praises as to how the state has successfully improved its financial position.

According to the report, Penang last year improved its financial position over 2009.

"The audit analysis found that consolidated funds of 2010 had improved compared to previous years and is at the highest level compared to the previous five years," the report stated.

Lim took over the state's top post in 2008 after DAP, a member of the Pakatan coalition, nudged Gerakan out in the 12th general election and took charge of Penang.

In the three years, despite all brickbats from his BN counterparts, Lim remains steadfastly focused on improving the state's performance. The result? Words of praise by the auditor-general.

Still, like all hardworking people, Lim faced and continues to experience stinging criticism from Umno and BN which have left no stone unturned in belittling and condemning his efforts in transforming Penang for the better.

With the latest Auditor-General's Report validating Penang's achievements, the state under Lim's leadership promises hope, of ensuring that Penangites continue to enjoy progress.

As far as the report goes, Penang has "passed" with flying colours. The state has been lauded where implementation of projects is concerned. The report has hailed the state's performance as "very good", with 99% of the 9,003 projects successfully carried out.

The Auditor-General's Report adds: "The state is recommended to make sure revenue collected is put into the correct account and continue its efforts to increase revenue and maintain its prudent spending to ensure a better financial position."

It urges the state to continue with its efforts to collect arrears in student loan repayment, rental of properties, land tax and other taxes. These arrears totalled RM78.78 million at the end of 2010.

On development under the Ninth Malaysia Plan, the AG rates the state's performance as satisfactory, with Penang spending 77.8% of the allocated RM1.01 billion.

BN green with envy

There is no denying that the thumbs-up given by the Auditor-General's Report to Penang has caused the federal government under the aegis of the BN coalition to turn green with envy.

While the Lim administration has received straight "As" for its good management of the state, it is otherwise for three companies owned by Johor which performed badly.

The Auditor-General's Report said the three companies – YWJ Citra Holdings Sdn Bhd, Johor Skills Development Centre Sdn Bhd and Kumpulan Pendidikan YPJ Sdn Bhd – were found to be unsatisfactorily managed with two companies facing losses.

It will do BN good to buck up and emulate Penang in delivering nothing but the best to the rakyat, instead of resorting to gutter politics, using the dirtiest means possible to force their opponents out.

For Lim, in the 36 months that DAP has been helming Penang, much trial and tribulations have come his way, both professionally and personally.

Personal attacks on Lim came about when pro-Umno blogs had a fortnight ago accused his 16-year-old son of outraging the modesty of a female classmate which resulted in him being transferred to another school.

The bloggers also claimed that Lim had paid the girl's family RM200,000 to keep the issue under wraps. The accusations, however, turned out to be baseless after the girl was found to be a 21-year- old chess champion from Hong Kong named Anya Corke who has since issued a statement denying the incident.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Muhyiddin: Decision on PPSMI final

Posted: 02 Nov 2011 03:47 PM PDT

By Shazwan Mustafa Kamal, The Malaysian Insider

The government's decision to scrap the use of English for science and mathematics (PPSMI) in schools is final, Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin said today.

In a response directed towards the Parent Action Group for Education (PAGE), the deputy prime minister said there would be no more negotiations on the matter as the government had already decided to do away with the policy in 2009.

"It was already decided by the Cabinet back in 2009, after many levels of discussion, was passed in Parliament and even the opposition supported it. There was no negative reaction back then, I don't know why it's being brought up.

"Maybe they (PAGE) ketinggalan zaman (behind the times.) The government will not bow down to the demands of small groups like this," Muhyiddin (picture) said today, in reference to demands made by the pro-English lobby group earlier this week.

PAGE chairman Datin Noor Azimah Abdul Rahim had bluntly said Barisan National (BN) risks losing votes in the upcoming general election if it continues to bar students from learning science and maths in English in schools.

"The matter is closed. Full stop. Some people can push and demand all they want, we are a democracy, but the government's decision is final," Muhyiddin said.

The education minister said he will make a detailed announcement tomorrow regarding the government's plans to smoothen the transition process from PPSMI to the MBMMBI (Upholding the Malay Language and Strengthening Command of English) policy.

MORE TO COME

AirAsia received RM249m subsidy for rural flights

Posted: 02 Nov 2011 01:51 PM PDT

By Shannon Teoh, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 3 — AirAsia was paid RM249 million in public funds to subsidise the budget carrier's rural flight services in Sabah and Sarawak between August 2006 and September 2007, the government said today.

Deputy Transport Minister Jelaing Mersat also told Parliament that when Malaysia Airlines (MAS) took over the routes from the low-cost airline's subsidiary Fly Asian Xpress (FAX) in October 2007, "they needed less than half the amount of subsidy."

"Between August 1, 2006 and September 30, 2007, the subsidy paid to FAX was RM249 million.

"MASwings only needed less than half the subsidy as it is more organised and uses newer aircraft which cost less to maintain," the Saratok MP said.

The return of the rural air services (RAS) routes to MAS after just 14 months had raised concerns of whether it would affect the national carrier's turnaround plan under then chief executive Datuk Seri Idris Jala.

But then Transport Minister Tan Sri Chan Kong Choy had said that it would continue subsidies of RM60 million per year to retain low fares.

Pendang MP Datuk Mohd Hayati Othman said in Parliament today that the government overpaid RM65 million in subsidies to FAX, which was later restructured to AirAsia X, a long-haul budget service, as it ended its RAS prematurely.

The PAS man also claimed that MAS had to spend RM35 million to modify seven aircraft to ply the rural routes in Sabah and Sarawak.

MAS's poor financial performance of late had resulted in the share swap with AirAsia on August 9.

It saw state investment arm Khazanah Nasional taking a 10 per cent stake in Asia's top budget carrier in exchange for a 20.5 per cent stake in MAS.

This allowed AirAsia boss Tan Sri Tony Fernandes to sit on the MAS board, ostensibly to help turn the ailing airline around.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Anwar predicts ‘Malaysia Spring’ in next polls

Posted: 02 Nov 2011 01:46 PM PDT

By Clara Chooi, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 3 — Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has predicted the coming of a "Malaysia Spring" in the next general election, confidently telling US newswire Bloomberg in an interview that Pakatan Rakyat (PR) will wrest Putrajaya from Barisan Nasional (BN).

"We're taking over the government at the rate we're going," he was quoted as saying in the interview carried today on the newswire.

Anwar is confident five decades of BN rule will end in the next polls. — File pic
The opposition leader, who is facing the prospect of possible conviction for the second sodomy charge in his career, cited the Bersih 2.0 rally on July 9 as a sign of growing support towards PR.

The march for free and fair elections, organised by the election watchdog group, drew thousands of protestors to streets of the capital but turned chaotic at midday when police launched tear gas canisters and water cannons to disperse the crowd. Over 1,500 arrests were made.

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak and his administration's reformist image took a beating in the international media after the authorities embarked on a widespread clampdown, before and during the July 9 Bersih rally.

With talk that his handling of the rally would result in a voter backlash, Najib moved to recoup his losses by forming a parliamentary select committee for electoral reforms, promising to look into Bersih 2.0's demands.

The prime minister also later announced a raft of reforms aimed at increasing civil liberties, including the repeal of the controversial Internal Security Act (ISA) and amendments to other security and press laws.

Anwar said today that with support shown by protestors in the rally, the opposition would still make gains even if he is convicted for sodomy, adding the trial outcome was already a "foregone conclusion".

Five decades of BN rule, he insisted, will end in the next polls.

Anwar told Bloomberg that PR anticipates winning more than 40 per cent of the votes in BN strongholds Johor and Pahang, recapturing majorities in the five states it won in 2008, and making significant gains in Negri Sembilan and Terengganu.

READ MORE HERE

 

Nazri: Govt paid FBC Media to repair image abroad

Posted: 01 Nov 2011 05:46 PM PDT

(The Star) - The Government engaged FBC Media (UK) to improve Malaysia's image abroad which was damaged due to remarks made by the Opposition, said Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Datuk Seri Mohamed Nazri Aziz.

He criticised Opposition leaders for making disparaging comments about the country internationally, which had damaged the country's reputation.

"If they do not bad mouth the government by feeding lies to the international media, we do not have to pay any money to repair our image," he told Datuk Mohamed Aziz (BN-Sri Gading) in Parliament.

Nazri said the use of FBC Media did not breach any local laws.

"We were informed that the company was now under investigation for conflict of interest by broadcasters for making editorial programmes without declaring that it had commercial interest with some programmes it had featured.

"This may be an offence of UK broadcasting and ethic guidelines but they did not commit any criminal offence during our engagement," he told Dr Mohd Hatta Md Ramli PAS-Kuala Krai) during Question Time.

Nazri said that the government paid FBC Media 19.6mil Euros (RM83.304mil) for three years of services since 2007.

Nazri also revealed that the Government spent RM323,268.19 on a two-day trip to Turkmenistan by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.

Five memorandum of understanding (MoU) were signed to strengthen existing bilateral relations.

 

Pakatan: GST won’t save Malaysia from bankruptcy

Posted: 01 Nov 2011 05:41 PM PDT

(The Malaysian Insider) - The federal opposition said today that implementing a goods and services tax (GST), as suggested by Datuk Seri Idris Jala, will not stop Malaysia from going bankrupt as "it is like throwing money into a pocket with holes."

Pakatan Rakyat (PR) lawmakers told a press conference that it was government wastage, corruption and mismanagement that caused national debt to jump to 53 per cent of GDP.

"The operating expenditure has more than doubled from RM89 billion in 2005 to RM182 billion next year. Until you stitch the hole in the pocket, throwing more money will only make the hole bigger," said DAP publicity chief Tony Pua.

Idris, who is the minister in charge of Putrajaya's Performance Management and Delivery Unit (Pemandu), repeated yesterday his warning that Malaysia could be bankrupt within a decade if it spends borrowed money on operational expenditure such as subsidies.

"If our economy grows less than four per cent ... and we don't cut our operating expenditure, if we borrow at 12.5 per cent, if our annual debt rises to 12.5 per cent and our revenue does not grow, then it will happen," the senator said.

He also accused the Opposition of forcing the government to delay GST as "every time the government wants to do it the Opposition makes life difficult for them, saying that they will lose votes."

But Pua pointed out today that the government did not need more money as revenue has nearly doubled from RM99 billion in 2005 to RM187 billion projected in Budget 2012.

"The issue of GST does not arise. Bankruptcy will be due to wastage," said PAS research chief Dzulkefly Ahmad.

READ MORE HERE

 

Husni dismisses debt fears, says government has enough funds

Posted: 01 Nov 2011 05:39 PM PDT

(The Malaysian Insider) - Datuk Seri Husni Hanadzlah said today that the government could still fund its spending as it has large reserves including some RM30 billion in trust funds which are under review.

This comes as concerns rise over whether the government was at risk of going bust due to spending outstripping revenue.

The second finance minister also said that the RM407 billion national debt that grew 12.3 per cent last year was still manageable as it had yet to breach critical thresholds such as revenue to debt service ratio.

Husni said that the government has asked the Accountant-General to review trust funds worth more than RM30 billion.

"These funds were for various programmes but some are dormant," he told reporters at the sidelines of the MIA-AFA Conference here today. "We have huge reserves."

The minister also said that the government had more than RM4 billion in contingency funding, RM5 billion in Kumpulan Wang Amanah Nasional, approximately RM1.2 billion in land assets that could be monetised and that it had plugged loopholes in tax collection and has been conservative in estimating its revenue.

Husni said that the national debt was still below the critical level of 55 per cent of GDP and that its loan payment to national revenue was at 10 per cent which was below the "prudent" level of 15 per cent.

He also pointed out that external loans were well below the RM35 billion limit and the debt serving ratio for external loans was at about two per cent.

"It is well within our capability," he said.

READ MORE HERE

 

Bahasa Malaysia has no global economic value

Posted: 01 Nov 2011 05:30 PM PDT

Whats the point of flagging Bahasa Malaysia when our economy is weak?

(Free Malaysia Today) - Sarawak opposition has called on the federal government to be both sensible and practical in dealing with the issue of Bahasa Malaysia as a useable national language.

Drawing attention to Sarawak's multi-dialectical communities, state DAP secretary general Chong Chien Jen said it was disappointing to see the government's 'overzealousness' about pushing the Bahasa Malaysia agenda.

Said Chong: "From a Sarawakian perspective it is a stupid move…in Sarawak, Bahasa Malaysia, English and native languages are used alongside each other.

"This is written in our Malaysia Agreement…there is no issue.

"We understand Bahasa Malaysia is our national language. It is important, but we have to also understand that the country is not an island. We are playing in global fields," he said.

No economic value

He said from an economic point of view the move would be detrimental to the country in the long run.

"When the economy is weak, you cannot be overzealous about Bahasa Malaysia.

"If our economy is strong, not only our people will start to learn Bahasa Malaysia, foreigners will also start learning the language.

"Just like China now where a lot of foreigners are learning Mandarin because her economy is strong," he said alluding to Malaysia's public debt and the frail global economy.

READ MORE HERE

 

Greek govt heading for meltdown

Posted: 01 Nov 2011 05:28 PM PDT

(Agencies) - ATHENS: Greece's government appeared headed for meltdown ahead of a confidence vote after Prime Minister George Papandreou called a referendum on the country's EU debt deal.

The shock announcement sparked a call for early elections and a defection that left Mr Papandreou's parliamentary majority on a knife edge, while shares plunged 6.92 per cent.

Adding to the chaos, Greece's foreign minister cancelled meetings with three foreign ambassadors, while Finance Minister Evangelos Venizelos was hospitalised with an inflamed appendix.

Amid the political upheaval,Venizelos – a former party rival of Mr Papandreou – appeared to distance himself from the referendum bombshell on Tuesday when sources close to him said he was unaware of it.

The assertion was at odds with an impassioned speech  Venizelos gave in parliament on Monday in support of the move.
An emergency cabinet meeting was under way amid reports that even a ministerial walkout was possible as protests mounted against the government's austerity policies.

The semi-state Athens News Agency said  Venizelos made a flurry of phone calls to European and International Monetary Fund officials to brief them on developments.

Papandreou, fighting to keep the country's troubled economic rescue on track, will travel to Cannes, France, on Wednesday where G20 leaders are holding a summit on Thursday and Friday.

He will attend a working dinner with host Nicolas Sarkozy of France, German Chancellor Angela Merkel, European council chief Herman Van Rompuy, EU commission chief Jose Manuel Barroso, eurozone head policymaker Jean-Claude Juncker, new ECB chief Mario Draghi and IMF managing director Christine Lagarde.

In a phone call with Ms Merkel on Tuesday, Papandreou insisted that the referendum would "strengthen" Greece in the eurozone and globally, his office said.

His call for a referendum was meant as a bid to secure approval of his disputed economic policies without early elections.

But the gambit backfired when a former deputy minister defected, reducing the ruling party's majority in the 300-seat parliament to 152 deputies.

Papandreou had faced increasing dissent within his own party over the tougher austerity policy monitored by the EU and the IMF that has sparked general strikes and widespread protests, many of them violent.

Although the EU deal agreed last Thursday after marathon talks in Brussels included an agreement to write off 100 billion euros of debt owed by Greece, the Athens government still has to implement a painful package of austerity measures to get its hands on bailout funds.

 

Kita is dreaming, says Kedah DAP

Posted: 01 Nov 2011 05:26 PM PDT

Kedah Kita retorts: So were DAP and PKR in 2008.

(Free Malaysia Today) - Kedah DAP today dismissed Kita as an irrelevant party in the state and predicted that its candidates for the general election will lose their deposits.

State DAP chief Lee Guan Aik said his Kita counterpart, Zamil Ibrahim, was daydreaming when he spoke yesterday of scoring upset wins in the coming election.

He said Zamil was "ignorant of political realities" and "Kita candidates are going to lose their deposits."

Zamil, whom FMT contacted for a response, said Kita was only doing what Pakatan Rakyat parties did before the 2008 election.

"Pakatan did not expect to win then, but it won," he said. "What's wrong in daydreaming then? Their daydream of forming the state government became a reality. Why not ours?"

Lee, who is the state assemblyman for Kota Darulaman and DAP's only representative in the Kedah legislature, said Kedah voters did not even know what Kita stood for.

"Kita has a long way to go yet to win over the people," he said. "But they have their right to say what they want to say. Nothing wrong in daydreaming."

Yesterday, at a function to introduce Kedah Kita's election manifesto, Zamil said his party was looking forward to replacing PKR and DAP in the state government.

He claimed that the two parties never had a firm political presence in Kedah and won in 2008 only because of a "political tsunami".

Kita is eyeing six parliamentary and 12 state seats in Kedah.

Claiming that both Barisan Nasional and Pakatan were besieged by internal political problems in the state, he said "Kita can fish in trouble waters."

Lee said Kita could not get anywhere near DAP's political background and service record in the country.

"Our political longevity is second only to PAS," he said, referring to DAP's 44 years of existence as a political party.

READ MORE HERE

 

Malaysian companies among the worst ‘bribers’

Posted: 01 Nov 2011 05:07 PM PDT

A Transparency International (TI) survey finds that Malaysian companies are most likely to bribe to get businesses.

(Free Malaysia Today) - Malaysia is ranked 15th when it comes to companies most likely to pay bribes when doing business abroad, a survey suggests.

Malaysia, Hong Kong, Italy and  South Africa were in 15th place out of 28 countries in a poll of 3,000 business executives conducted by anti-corruption group Transparency International (TI).

Companies from Russia and China are the most likely to pay bribes and were the top two 'bribers'.

The Netherlands and Switzerland came top, while the UK ranked eighth, just ahead of the US and France.

Bribery was reportedly most common to win public sector works and construction contracts.

"It is of particular concern that China and Russia are at the bottom of the index," said TI in its report.

"Given the increasing global presence of businesses from the countries, bribery and corruption are likely to have a substantial impact on societies in which they operate and on the ability of companies to compete fairly in these markets."

Other major developing economies came much higher up the rankings. India was 19th, while Brazil, in 14th place, was one spot ahead of Italy.

The report called for more international action to outlaw companies from paying bribes in foreign countries.

"G20 governments must tackle foreign bribery as a matter of urgency," said Huguette Labelle, chair of TI, who said that more resources must be dedicated to investigations and prosecutions.

Linked to corrupt governments

Russia, which came bottom of the league, was seen by TI as a particularly challenging case.

"Unfortunately… there are no islands of integrity in Russian public and business life," said TI Russian director, Elena Panfilova.

Survey respondents were asked to say how likely companies from each of the foreign countries were to offer back-handers.

Bribe-paying was seen as much more common by businessmen from countries whose governments were also considered to have the least integrity, according to a separate "corruption perceptions" survey carried out by TI last year.

The sector most affected by bribery was public procurement – where companies compete to win contracts from governments for everything from waste collection to road building.

READ MORE HERE

 

How many ministers’ children are studying abroad?

Posted: 01 Nov 2011 01:53 PM PDT

By Joseph Tawie, FMT

KUCHING: The opposition in Sarawak are backing a call for a referendum to find out how many federal cabinet ministers, their deputies and those involved in education policy-making are sending their children overseas to study where the medium of instruction is in English.

The Sarawak opposition parties have also urged the government "to be practical" about the issue.

According to Sarawak PKR chief Baru Bian, many Sarawakian parents along with party members wanted to know where the ministers sent their children to study and how many were sent abroad.

"There is a suggestion by certain quarters that there should be a referendum among the federal ministers where and which schools they are sending their children to.

"I support this suggestion so that we know where they send their children to. Are they sending their children overseas to learn English?

"With this referendum, then we can see whether these ministers are sincere or they just want to make it (using Bahasa Malaysia to teach mathematics and science) just a political issue," he said.

Bian was responding to Education Minister Muyiddin Yassin's announcement that starting next year all schools will start using Bahasa Malaysia as a medium of instruction to teach mathematics and science.

De-politicize education

Bian, who is the Ba'Kelalan assemblyman, said that both as a parent and a party member he wants the education policy de-politicised.

"As a father and a PKR leader, we would like to make a stand regarding the change of education policy as announced by the Education Minister that the teaching of Mathematics and Science should be changed back to the use of Bahasa Malaysia.

"An earlier indication from the school was that that they were given option. But now the use of Bahasa Malaysia to teach mathematics and science is absolute and without any option.

"Looking at the history of our Education Ministers, each one of them would come with a different kind of policy when he took over the ministry, resulting in very inconsistent educational policies.

"Our stand is that you should stick to one policy only as changing it mid-term is really making it worse for our people," said Bian.

He added that the government, it appeared, had not learnt from the past.

As the country is approaching the 13th general election, he said: "It is irresistible conclusion, as a lawyer would say, that the minister is using it as a political issue to gain political mileage.

"As a minister for all races, he should not use it as a political issue. It is not fair to other people," he said.

 

READ MORE HERE.

ETP on track but vision some distance away

Posted: 01 Nov 2011 01:50 PM PDT

By Teoh El Sen, FMT

KUALA LUMPUR: The government's Economic Transformation Plan (ETP) is on the right track but the light at the end of the tunnel is still some distance away.

The ETP was incepted one year ago and the Performance Management and Delivery Unit (Pemandu) chief Idris Jala is pleased with the results, so far.

"Things are looking okay… we're on the right trajectory, we've not achieved our 2020 vision just yet… on track but we can't declare victory. We must remember this is not a sprint, but a marathon," the minister in the Prime Minister's Department said at a briefing of ETP's one-year anniversary at Bukit Kiara yesterday.

Idris said some RM10 billion have been invested into projects under the ETP over the past one year, which was 64% of the RM15 billion in investments committed for 2011. Another RM5 billion is expected by the end of 2011.

He also said that Entry Point Projects (EPPs) were progressing well and a total of 70 out of the 131 EPPs, or 53%, have taken off.

"As some EPPs have multiple projects, we now have 97 projects which are in various stages of implementation," he said.

The ETP aims to transform Malaysia into a high income nation by 2020.

According to the 2010 Auditor-General's Report, the national debt rose by 12.3% at RM407billion. The economy grew by 7.2% last year, while the fiscal deficit maintained public debt at over 50 per cent of GDP for the second year running.

Positive progress

Despite saying that "progress was encouraging", Idris also said that GDP growth stood at 4.4% and was "not as rosy as we would like" as under the ETP, the growth should be at 6% per year.

"However, because the 2nd half of 2011 is expected to grow to 5% and that the previous year's growth was at 7.4%. We are still at about 6% in two years," he said.

Of the ETP's 2011 Gross National Income (GNI) target of RM494 billion, RM288 billion was reached so far; of the RM83 billion private investment target, RM51.2 billion was achieved while the targeted 684,000 jobs created, about 50% have been achieved.

"We are hitting all of them just about right… this is a positive progress after just 12 months. By being focused on the 12 key growth areas, the country's private sector's confidence in the local economy has also increased," he said, adding that the final target for 2020 was to achieve RM1.71 trillion in GNI, RM1.4 trillion in commited investments and 3.3 million jobs.

Not happy being Mr Average

Idris also said that the only thing he regretted about the ETP was that it was not implemented 10 years earlier.

"If we started 10 years ago, we would have made it… 10 years ago we were not focused and we tried to do everything under the sun. It's like Usain Bolt trying to be a champion in sprint but also wants to be the best at long jump, marathon. If you try to be best at everything and lose focus, you'll just be MrAverage," he said.

Idris said a lesson learnt from neighbouring countries trying to go into high-income nation was that an economic plan needed focus.

During question and answer session, Idris said that the plan to cut subsidies was still in place.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Reforming the A-G’s Office

Posted: 01 Nov 2011 01:37 PM PDT

By Zaid Ibrahim, FMT

Abdul Gani Patail has been the Attorney General (A-G) for many years now. He assumed office at an early age, and it is his good fortune that Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad (who was prime minister at the time) liked him.

During my short stint working with him, I found him cooperative and a hardworking civil servant.

Abdul Gani will probably remain A-G for a while more, even though he has received a lot of flak and criticism. Some are justified, and some are not.

The list of cases and complaints is too long for me to recite here but everyone knows that no one has been brought to book for the MAS scandal that caused losses of billions of ringgit.

Everyone knows that those responsible for the death of Teoh Beng Hock, and Ahmad Sarbaini Mohamed have not been held accountable. Everyone remembers the "no further action" against those implicated in the judge-fixing (i.e., the Lingam Videotape) scandal.

There are many other cases involving high-profile personalities who were acquitted or had their charges dropped without the public being given satisfactory explanation of why those cases were not successful.

This happened in the 2007 prosecution of Tan Sri Eric Chia for criminal breach of trust. It happened again in the 2009 prosecution of former Land and Cooperative Development Minister Tan Sri Kasitah Gaddam for corruption and cheating.

It happened again this year in the high-profile case against Constable V Navindran, who was charged with causing grievous hurt to A Kugan who died in the Taipan police lock-up two years ago.

The person who holds the office of AG must be one who make himself transparent and accountable. He must not be the the type who is reluctant to engage with the public. He must not remain below the radar, a personality trait common among those who like fishing.

Its true that he is the chief legal adviser to the government and the Prime Minister, and in a sense its true that for as long as his employer is happy with him, why should he care about what the public thinks.

But he is wrong to take this attitude. He is no ordinary civil servant. He is ex-officio the Public Prosecutor with powers conferred to him by the Federal Constitution.

Malaysian Attorneys-General assume a dual role: they are simultaneously the legal adviser to the government and the Public Prosecutor.

Taking responsibility

As Public Prosecutor the A-G is entrusted with making sure that the criminal justice system works well and functions with integrity and fairness. As a legal adviser, the A-G makes sure that the activities of the government are legally defensible.

The A-G works for the government of the day to make sure that all government actions are in accordance with the law – a good legal adviser will also put his or her foot down when the government transgresses the law.

This is easier said than done when there are politicians in the Cabinet who place politics first and law second. Usually the AG will relent in such situation.

However as a Public Prosecutor, the A-G works not for the government but for the public at large.

He serves the public in providing a justice system that serve them well. As Public Prosecutor, the A-G is a public institution empowered by the constitution with all the discretionary powers in the world to charge or not to charge anyone for any offence or crime.

He is the barometer by which we measure our success as a country governed by the Rule of Law.

Unfortunately whist he is responsible for the well being of the justice system in the country, he has no control over other stakeholders.

He has no say in how the police force should be managed. He has no say in how the investigation team could be improved. He has little say in the efficiency of the court system.

He has to accept the quality of politicians managing the country. So its not fair to blame him soley for the weakness and defects in the overall administration of justice in the country.

Still he has to assume some responsibility. When a public official has such wide discretionary powers, he or she must exercise them with care, based on established principles and with integrity and fairness.

This is where the A-G must be transparent, must engage with the public, and must provide reasons for all his or her actions and decisions.

The A-G cannot say "it's my power and that's the end of the matter". The A-G is a public institution and, as such, must be held accountable and answerable to the public.

I tried to convince former prime minister Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi that the A-G's post should be made a political position and that the incumbent must be made a Cabinet member.

The Attorney General, in my view, must be prepared to stand in Parliament and be held fully accountable. I was of, course, unsuccessful in pursuing this.

Are the politicians ready?

Making the A-G a political position does not mean that the A-G's Office automatically becomes somehow "better" than if it were non-political.

The character and personality of the person appointed as A-G would still be the most important factor, but as a political office the incumbent would not be able to escape enquiry and questioning in Parliament.

 

READ MORE HERE.

 

Parliament debates docking a month from PM’s pay

Posted: 01 Nov 2011 01:33 PM PDT

By Shannon Teoh, The Malaysian Insider

Speaker Tan Sri Pandikar Amin Mulia allowed MPs to debate today a motion to dock Datuk Seri Najib Razak's salary by RM22,826.65, or the equivalent of a month's wages.

He said that although it was purely politically-motivated, he would allow the motion to be debated based on precedent.

"Government backbenchers were allowed to debate a motion to dock the Opposition leader's salary in the past. If I don't allow this, then I will be accused of double-standards," he said.

PKR vice president Chua Tian Chang had filed the motion last week to approve the government's 2012 Budget with an additional provision to dock the prime minister's salary.

The Batu MP had said that "this is akin to a motion of no-confidence in the prime minister's leadership and administration."

When tabling the motion today, he cited reasons such as the increase in national debt to over 51 per cent of GDP; the deaths of former DAP aide Teoh Beng Hock and Customs officer Ahmad Sarbaini Mohamed while in Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission custody; and the clampdown on the July 9 Bersih rally for electoral reform.

MORE TO COME HERE.

Putrajaya says FBC media helped attract FDI, tourism

Posted: 01 Nov 2011 01:31 PM PDT

By Shannon Teoh, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 2 — The government said today image consultants FBC Media helped raise the standing of Malaysia as a tourism and investment destination during the RM94 million three-year deal that began in 2007.

Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz told Parliament that the London-based media company, which is facing bankruptcy, "supported the efforts of government leaders and ministers" to burnish the country's image overseas.

"The communications strategy was important in raising the standing of Malaysia as a tourism and investment destination," the Padang Rengas MP said in reply to a parliamentary question by Kuala Krai MP Hatta Ramli.

Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz told Parliament today, "The communications strategy was important in raising the standing of Malaysia as a tourism and investment destination." — file pic
In 2006 Malaysia drew 17.5 million tourists who spent an estimated RM38 billion, figures that rose to 24.6 million tourists spending RM56.5 billion last year.

Malaysia has also attracted RM21.3 billion worth of foreign direct investments (FDIs) in the first half of this year alone, compared to RM29.3 billion last year and just RM5.7 billion in 2009 as the global financial crisis hit the country hard.

FDI in 2008 was RM24.1 billion.

FBC, whose contract ended last year, is being investigated by the UK's communications industry regulator, the Office of Communications (Ofcom), and US broadcaster CNBC for producing news content on Malaysia without revealing that Putrajaya was also its public relations client.

PAS election director Hatta had also questioned why Malaysia had contracted a company that has gone into administration — a legal term that allows a company facing bankruptcy to carry on business — "now that Malaysia is no longer paying it millions of ringgit."

"Don't we already have embassies and Matrade (the national trade promotion industry) offices in these markets?" he asked.

Nazri replied that most staff in these offices were only posted in a country for a few years at a time, resulting in networking and contacts being made on a short-term basis.

"So in the UK, it is better to use a firm from the UK," he said.

The Malaysian Insider had reported that Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak has contracted a series of public relations strategists, including APCO Worldwide, to burnish both his personal image and that of his government's locally and worldwide.

APCO's time in Malaysia was marked by controversy after the opposition alleged the public relations firm was linked to Israel.

The most recent hire are members of the team behind former British PM Tony Blair's "New Labour" campaign who were reported to have started work to reinvent Najib as a moderate reformist.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Sack Musa, LDP reiterates

Posted: 01 Nov 2011 01:46 AM PDT

Sabah's Liberal Democratic Party is convinced that 'someone' paid a group of individuals to disrupt its Sandakan assembly recently.

(Free Malaysia Today) - Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) deputy president Senator Chin Su Phin has reiterated that the party could no longer cooperate with Sabah Chief Minister Musa Aman.

"The LDP will not compromise and we will continue to fight until the Chief Minister is replaced," said Chin despite a call by Deputy Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin on Sunday for all Barisan Nasional (BN) component parties to support Musa.

"He (Musa) is too much and has been using his power to suppress those who do not follow his instructions," said the outspoken senator who appeared to lay the blame for an incident during the party's 22nd general assembly in Sandakan on Sunday at the door of Musa.

The incident was sparked by a group of about 100 people who gathered outside the hall shouting and clapping and mocking the event.

They also barged into the hall and began shouting and clapping each time the name of someone was mentioned causing much confusion.

The group appeared unconcerned by the presence of senior BN leaders including Muhyiddin, Musa, Umno vice president Mohd Shafie Apdal and Umno secretary-general Tengku Adnan Mansor who were all there as guest of the LDP.

"The Deputy Prime Minister saw the incident himself and he knows what was going on.

"He also said that problems within the Sabah BN must be resolved immediately.

"We want to make our stand to the Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak that we in LDP can no longer cooperate with the Chief Minister.

"It cannot be denied that the lack of cooperation among the state BN component parties is due to one person

"The LDP will not compromise and we will continue to fight until the Chief Minister is replaced," Chin said.

READ MORE HERE

 

Dr. Mahathir to sign MoU at business conference

Posted: 31 Oct 2011 09:53 PM PDT

(Mizzima) – During former Malaysian Prime Minister Dr. Mahathir Mohamad's three-day visit to Burma, which will start on Wednesday, he is likely to sign a memorandum of understanding on investments in Burma, according to Sein Win Hlaing, a member of CEC of the Union of Myanmar Federation of Chambers of Commerce and Industry (UMFCCI).   

At the invitation of UMFCCI, the former Malaysian prime minister will visit Burma and attend a Burmese-Malaysian investment forum to be held at Traders Hotel in Rangoon from 1:30 p.m. until 4:30 p.m. on Wednesday  

Sein Win Hlaing told Mizzima the business trip is sponsored by UMFCCI.  

In 2003, Dr. Mahathir Mohamad handed over power after 22 years in office. During his tenure, Malaysia emerged as one of the Asian economic "tigers." Critics said his government was notorious for brutally suppressing the political opposition. 

 

Assange faces day of judgment in London court tomorrow

Posted: 31 Oct 2011 07:10 PM PDT

(AFP) - WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange faces a day of reckoning Wednesday when the High Court in London delivers a ruling on whether he will be extradited to Sweden to face questioning over rape allegations.

The 40-year-old Australian, whose whistleblowing website has enraged governments around the world, has been fighting a bitter legal battle ever since he was arrested in London last December on a European arrest warrant.

The High Court will announce at 0945 GMT whether it will uphold a ruling in February by a lower court that Assange should be sent to face questioning by Swedish authorities over claims of sexual assault against two women.


The enigmatic WikiLeaks boss has been living under strict bail conditions at the mansion of a supporter in eastern England, including having to wear an electronic ankle tag and observe a strict dusk-to-dawn curfew.

The long-awaited decision, which has been deferred since the High Court heard Assange's appeal in July, is not necessarily the final chapter in the saga, but it will be difficult for either side to lodge an appeal.

Depending on the verdict, either Assange or the Swedish authorities can theoretically take the case a step further to the Supreme Court in London, the highest legal authority in the land.


"If you fulfil certain criteria you may get permission to appeal to the Supreme Court," a spokeswoman for the office of the Judiciary of England and Wales told AFP.

But leave to appeal can only be granted by either the High Court or the Supreme Court, and then only if it there is a point of law of general public importance.

Assange denies the allegations and claims they are politically motivated.


His legal team, led by top human rights lawyer Gareth Peirce, was not available for comment ahead of the ruling.

Assange shot to fame last year when WikiLeaks released tens of thousands of classified diplomatic files allegedly obtained by a US serviceman who is now in prison in the United States.

The move infuriated Washington as many of the files related to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, while others contain frank and sometimes embarrassing assessments of world leaders made by US diplomats.

But Assange also achieved a different kind of notoriety when the allegations of sexual assault were made against him by two Swedish women in August 2010.

In the last hearing in July, lawyers representing Swedish prosecutors rejected claims that a rape allegation against Assange, made by one of the women, would not be valid under English law.

Swedish lawyers accused Assange's legal team of "winding English law back to the 19th century" with their definition of consent.

Assange's lawyers have also claimed that the European warrant under which he was arrested was invalid because he is only wanted for questioning and has not been charged by Swedish authorities.

In an autobiography published in September despite his efforts to halt the project, Assange repeated his denial of the rape allegations.

"I did not rape those women and cannot imagine anything that happened between us that would make them think so, except malice after the fact, a joint plan to entrap me, or a terrifying misunderstanding that was stoked up between them," he wrote in the 250-page book.

"I may be a chauvinistic pig of some sort but I am no rapist, and only a distorted version of sexual politics could attempt to turn me into one." WikiLeaks is meanwhile struggling for survival.

Assange said last month the site had been forced to suspend publishing classified files after its funding was blocked could have no option but to shut down by the end of the year.

It has seen its funding plunge by 95 percent due to an "arbitrary and unlawful financial blockade" mounted by companies including Visa and MasterCard since December last year, Assange said.

Fuel subsidies to cost RM15.9b for 2011, says MOF

Posted: 31 Oct 2011 06:42 PM PDT

(The Malaysian Insider) - The government will spend RM15.9 billion in petrol and diesel subsidies in 2011, Deputy Finance Minister Datuk Donald Lim Siang Chai told Parliament today.

This is a significant increase from the RM9.6 billion spent last year, more than 50 per cent up.

Lim said the government was looking out for the people, easing their financial burden through these subsidies, The Star reported.

He said however that they needed to be careful that only those in need benefitted from the subsidies.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Michelle Yeoh and the new James Bond

Posted: 03 Nov 2011 04:58 PM PDT

The famed actress is rumoured to be mulling an election debut and has been gracing functions organised by the Perak MB.

Of course, Malaysian politics is not complete without the "virgin" drama queen, Ummi Hafilda. She regularly dishes out defamation suits against people she was once infatuated with. Like a stalker who cannot accept rejection, she has the habit of popping up wherever Anwar is canvassing, to delight the crowds with her "golden showers".

Mariam Mokhtar, Free Malaysia Today

Last month, there was a ripple of excitement when rumours of a new Bond spoof surfaced in Malaysia. According to sina.com, the former Bond girl, Michelle Yeoh wants a starring role in GE-13.

Michelle needs no introduction. Her new co-star introduces himself with the quintessential charm of his predecessors, "My name is Bond, Jibby Bond."

Just like the original Bond movies, Malaysia's Bond spoof will also be action packed. There will be the thrill of the opposition thwarting the cheating of BN. There will be sabotage and dawn raids of back-door voters replacing legitimate ones.

There will be car chases as election observers follow lorries carrying ballot boxes from rural outposts to the counting stations. And there will be drama when exploding ballot boxes are dumped from helicopters into rivers, as they are flown from the Sarawak longhouses into town.

Extremists will demonstrate to intimidate the peace-loving public and to complete the effect, marauding groups of Rela members will look like private armies on the loose in our towns and cities. Didn't Prime minister Najib Tun Razak promise "blood, sweat and lives to defend Putrajaya"?

If it is true that Michelle is to participate in GE-13, she need only look as far as Putrajaya for her supporting cast. The whole Cabinet of actors, masquerading as senior politicians, is available. Even Umno diehards realise that politics in Malaysia is a world of make-believe, perhaps a tragicomedy.

BN is short of creative solutions to solve Malaysia's many woes. It cannot handle issues ranging from the economy to English in schools. It is short of good policies. However, BN excels in mock up trials and sex-videos.

If the Malaysian judiciary thought we will be titillated with semen stained briefs and other sordid details, they are mistaken.

The Cabinet thinks it excels in producing porno movies. What they have produced in the past only induces sleep. Even 15-year-olds can write better scripts and perform better sex-scenes.

Malaysian politics has been reduced to this: "Is it him in the video? No-lah, the belly's too big. Rubbish, the watch on his wrist proves it's him."

Of course, Malaysian politics is not complete without the "virgin" drama queen, Ummi Hafilda. She regularly dishes out defamation suits against people she was once infatuated with. Like a stalker who cannot accept rejection, she has the habit of popping up wherever Anwar is canvassing, to delight the crowds with her "golden showers".

Which party will she join?

So it begs the question, why is Yeoh making her political debut in this general election? Was she put up to it by her father, the MCA stalwart of Ipoh? He is Yeoh Kian Geik, who is alleged to be a good friend of the Perak Sultan and denies that his daughter harbours political ambitions.

Yeoh senior said, "I don't think she will. She's never mentioned it to me. But I will ask her."

Perhaps introducing Michelle as a political candidate is another "cool" idea which originated from Alistair Campbell, the slippery and much hated publicity man who was once former British premier, Tony Blair's press secretary. Campbell is alleged to be "sexing-up" and giving Najib and his failing party, a new makeover.

So which party will Michelle join or will she contest as an independent?

Ipohites claim that Michelle is always seen at Menteri besar Zambry Abdul Kadir's functions but was not spotted at any, which ex-MB Nizar Jamaluddin arranged. Does this expose her loyalties?

If she were to join MCA, will the wags in Ipoh's coffee shops joke that MCA has both a porn star and a Hollywood superstar? Will this double act increase the number of people voting MCA/BN?

Will Ng Yen Yen, the vice president of MCA sanction the proposal? Perhaps she has.

This way, Michelle will divert attention from Yen Yen's excessive spending on tourism advertisements, her disastrous Malaysia tourism facebook campaign and her costly travel to promote Malaysia.

Michelle's career is not reported to be on the decline so why does she have to enter Malaysian politics? Will she be prepared for the back biting, scandalous revelations and airing of dirty linen in public? Even the bitching that must happen on the backlot of the film studios cannot compare with our dirty Malaysian politics.

Jean Todt, Michelle's husband was Malaysian ambassador of tourism. Many people were angry about this.

It was revealed in parliament that Todt's ambassadorial fee was RM593,400, the couple enjoyed RM388,000 worth of Malaysian holidays and that their flights alone cost RM360,000. Why choose a foreigner to promote Malaysia?

Why does MCA feel it has to resort to sex and glamour to reach out to the public? The line-up of "hot-chicks" at the recent MCA assembly is reminiscent of a karaoke bar, beer promotion or "naughty-house".

Will we, in the near future see the ex-Bond girl and Malaysia's own Jibby Bond 007, clad in tight leather, abseiling into the assembly hall?

READ MORE HERE

 

Mahathir, Taib like-minded culprits

Posted: 03 Nov 2011 04:55 PM PDT

Sarawak's PBB is a mirror image of Umno and like Umno, it wants to stay in power indefinitely.

Also during his tenure, the country saw massive borrowings from financial institutions and the public fund board like the Employees Provident Fund (EPF), a free fall of the ringgit currency, the hijacking of the independence of the judiciary, unfair power-sharing formula with other component parties, the curbing of the anti-corruption agency's powers and the suppression of the opposition and the human rights.

Awang Abdillah, Free Malaysia Today

The Barisan Nasional coalition concept was actually mooted by certain Sarawak leaders who had lived through the experiences of the Sarawak Alliance Party during its 1966 crisis and the fragile position of Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu (PBB) while under the Sarawak coalition government in the early 1970s.

In the 1974 Sarawak election, the BN entity had helped to strengthen the performance of its Sarawak partners when it won 30 seats and Sarawak National Party (SNAP) which was in the opposition won 18 seats.

Following that election, the BN government faced yet another crisis when SNAP threatened to destabilise the coalition.

The federal-level BN quickly stepped in and helped to diffuse the crisis by negotiating for SNAP to enter into the BN fold in 1976.

Despite these hiccups, the overall BN concept of a multi-party alliance had worked at the time.

Unfortunately over the years and taking advantage of the federal BN protection, the domineering power of PBB at state level began to breed bad elements of bad governance.

The chief minister then, Abdul Rahman Yaakub, began to issue timber licences to his family members and cronies.

The Malays felt the PBB policies had marginalised them.

Domineering policies

Consequently, a new party, Parti Pajar, was formed demanding the removal of the chief minister.

The BN federal government at that time was under prime minister Hussein Onn.

Being a man of clean character, he eventually forced Abdul Rahman to step down in 1981.

Rahman's nephew Taib Mahmud took over from him the same year.

From 1981 onwards, the grand alliance under the BN brand started to show its true colour.

Events in Sarawak and Peninsular Malaysia began to slowly take a very ugly turn.

PBB and Umno, being the backbone of BN parties in Sarawak and the Peninsula respectively, started to adopt domineering politics to establish their political and economic hegemony over the state and the country respectively.

Like Sarawak, the federal government has sacrificed good governance and replaced it with massive abuses of power and corruption.

Elements of bad governance began to flow far and deep into all corners of the political and economic systems of the country.

Mahathir's Umno

The abuses of power and corruption began to get worse by the day .

The major abuses of the Dr Mahathir Mohamad-led government were the award of mega projects and businesses to family members , henchmen and cronies worth billions of ringgit.

Also during his tenure, the country saw massive borrowings from financial institutions and the public fund board like the Employees Provident Fund (EPF), a free fall of the ringgit currency, the hijacking of the independence of the judiciary, unfair power-sharing formula with other component parties, the curbing of the anti-corruption agency's powers and the suppression of the opposition and the human rights.

Eventually, Umno established itself as the most powerful party in the country.

Mahathir believed that when Umno is powerful nothing can stop it from doing whatever it wants to do.

But what seemed to have escaped Mahathir is the fact that when an organisation has absorbed too much political and economic power beyond its abilities to handle it, it creates within its system a race to sustain and garner more power.

Umno divided

A power struggle from within began to take shape in the mid-80s, which eventually split the party down the middle.

In 1988, a faction led by Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah emerged to challenge Mahathir's leadership. The party crisis eventually led to the de-registration of Umno.

In 1998, another power struggle emerged. A strong faction led by former deputy prime minister Anwar Ibrahim began to challenge Mahathir.

This time, Anwar, who was the former deputy Umno president, managed to form his own party called Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR). It formed a pact with other opposition parties, PAS and DAP , and called themselves Pakatan Rakyat.

The results of the 2008 general election has changed the fate of Umno drastically.

In the 12th general election, the voters punched Umno on the head.

Now Umno seems to come to the realisation that not only has it lost so much power but it is now fighting for its own survival.

All kinds of desperate measures have come into play to arrest the decline.

READ MORE HERE

 

A queer case of Umno wrath

Posted: 03 Nov 2011 04:50 PM PDT

There is little the non-Malays can seek solace in when it comes to calling Malaysia their motherland. They are repeatedly reminded not to become too comfortable.

It is no secret that the country's polls have been nothing but dirty, with vote buying, rigging and money politics being the norm. When the July 9 rally demanded a clean-up, the event was declared illegal and the entity Bersih 2.0 banned and its chairperson, lawyer Ambiga Sreenevasan branded a traitor. Some pro-Umno characters went so far as to threaten her with gang-rape. Was the "power that be" worried for Ambiga's safety? Not at all!

Jeswan Kaur, Free Malaysia Today

Homophobic, pro-Malay and swear by Barisan Nasional – these are the pre-requisites that will make life comfortable in this country. If, however, you profess otherwise, be prepared to face the worst, as experienced by those who dare stand up for the truth.

When Article 153 of the Federal Constitution which guarantees Malay rights was debated by the non-Malays, blood shed was threatened by the ultra-Malays. The voices of the extremists were joined by leaders like Hishammuddin Hussein, now the home minister, who waved the Malay dagger or keris during the Umno general assembly, making it loud and clear that non-Malays better keep their mouths shut.

Even former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad has warned the non-Malays to tread carefully, never forgetting that they owe it to the Malays for having Malaysia as their home.

When the non-Malays complained that the azan or the Muslim call for prayer was too loud for comfort, they were again threatened with violence.

Needless to say, there is little the non-Malays can seek solace in when it comes to calling Malaysia their motherland. They are repeatedly reminded not to become too comfortable on the very land they have been calling home for years.

Also warned to tread carefully in their home country is the LGBT community (gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender). The scenario in Malaysia is such that the LGBT community must best remain invisible and any attempt to make their presence felt will be dealt with severely, as is now the case with the Seksualiti Merdeka event.

The Seksualiti Merdeka festival, which celebrates the rights of the LGBT community, has been an annual programme since 2008, taking place at the Central Market's Annexe Gallery. This year's event, themed "Queer Without Fear" kicked off on Nov 2 and was to go on until Nov 13.

NGOs and political parties including PAS and Perkasa have strongly opposed the event, calling it a celebration of homosexual and transgender lifestyles.

In short, there are "conditions" if the non-Malays and the LGBT are to call Malaysia their "tanah tumpah darahku" or homeland.

Truth is always feared

When on July 9, the rakyat assembled on the streets to participate in Bersih 2.0′s "Walk for Democracy" to call upon the Barisan Nasional government to reform the electoral system, this call for the truth was haphazardly and viciously thwarted.

It is no secret that the country's polls have been nothing but dirty, with vote buying, rigging and money politics being the norm. When the July 9 rally demanded a clean-up, the event was declared illegal and the entity Bersih 2.0 banned and its chairperson, lawyer Ambiga Sreenevasan branded a traitor. Some pro-Umno characters went so far as to threaten her with gang-rape. Was the "power that be" worried for Ambiga's safety? Not at all!

Now, it is the LGBT community's turn to face the wrath of the pro-Umno and BN loyalists. Ultra-Malay set-up Perkasa decided to pen down its objections against Seksualiti Merdeka in black and white before passing it off to the Inspector-General of Police Ismail Omar.

And Perkasa also wants Ambiga, who was due to officiate at the event on Nov 9, to be arrested.

Obnoxious parliamentarians like Bung Mokhtar (Kinabatangan MP) and Zulkifli Noordin (Kulim-Bandar Baru MP) deviated from the original agenda of the day and turned to condemning Seksualiti Merdeka.

Said Bung Mokhtar: "Lately, there is the issue of Sexualiti Merdeka, which Ambiga supports. Your Honour, I am asking for this activity to be blocked. It involves wild relationships that will damage the country and nation. It is planting the seeds for the emergence of wilder relationships."

Zulkifli had this to say: "This is an event that supports unnatural sex. On top of that, it is supported by Ambiga, who is the Selangor Caliph who spearheaded the illegal rally of Bersih. I hope the Dewan and the home ministry will reject this."

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


I am not allowed

Posted: 03 Nov 2011 09:30 PM PDT

My existence is not allowed. Somehow, the person that I am - and I have to assume, the person that we all are for people the likes of me - have been reduced to no more than a threat. Somehow, I am a threat to a religion I do not practice, a threat to a nation I have no intention of harming, a threat to a culture I participate in and therefore shape. I am to be dealt with by the strong arm of the law, in the harshest of terms because I am not allowed.

By Leroy Luar

In response to the atrocity that has befallen my friends in Seksualiti Merdeka, I present this story of what happens to a dream deferred.
   
   About dreams, whispers of promises,
      For dreams I've wept, I've bled,
         Daydreamer, foolish one,
            You are not allowed.
   From wooden bowl the silver spoon feeds,
      Slogans, soundbites and catchphrases,
         Yes you can! Malaysia Boleh!
            Daydreamer, silly one,
               You are not allowed.
   Pen to paper, from the ether onto stone,
      Make your mark, make yourself known,
         You'll be envied, maybe feared, always remembered,
            Daydreamer, delusional one,
               You are not allowed.
   I am shadow, I am shame,
      From you I cower, I run,
         For you I shudder, I hide,
            I don't exist, neverconceived, neverborn,
               Daydreamer, obedient one,
                  You are not allowed.
 
I had dreams of being a great Malaysian author. I yearned to someday bring fame and pride to the nation as several other Malaysians already have. I can name some of these people that I look up to:

  • Tan Twan Eng, author of 'the Gift of Rain' long listed for the 2007 Man Booker Prize.
  • Tash Aw, author ot 'the Harmony Silk Factory' and 'Map of the Invisible World', winner of the 2005 Whitbread Award and longlisted for the Man Booker Prize for the same year.
  • Preeta Samarasan, author of 'Evening is the Whole Day' and owner of the most beautiful soul I have seen in a person.

 

I mean, look at these people. They are wildly talented and rightfully recognised for their immense contributions to the annals of Southeast Asian literature. I dreamed of someday joining the pantheon of these gods, share the same airspace with them. In wanted to be just like them. No 'scientific experiments' in space, I dreamed of being the read deal. In short, I wanted to be a great Malaysian, recognised for verifiable excellence in my chosen field of expertise.

Dreams will remain just that if no effort was put into the making of those dreams into reality. We've been told as much since the very first day we stepped foot into school. "Apakah cita-cita anda?" (What is your ambition?) became an all but consuming obsession in the matter of our nurturing. Naturally, things were no different for me. Like everyone else with a dream, I put time into honing my skills in narrative crafting. Practice makes perfect they said and I was determined to make things fall into place.

A couple of years ago, I won a micro-fiction writing competition alongside a group of other talented writers. What may look like a small achievement to others was to me the pebble that may be responsible for bringing down a mountain. Earlier this year, I made the shortlist in the 2011 Commonwealth Short Story Competition; the only Malaysian in this year's shortlist and the first in five years to receive this privilege. When told of the news, I thought to myself 'Greatness is possible, I am not untalented." 

However, as of several hours ago, I am no longer master of these dreams of greatness. Greatness, it appears, is not possible. Not for me and for people the likes of me anyway. To put it simply, I am not allowed. I attempt to refine this statement: greatness is not that which I am not allowed to achieve, it is I - the person this pronoun refers to - that is not allowed. My existence is not allowed. Somehow, the person that I am - and I have to assume, the person that we all are for people the likes of me - have been reduced to no more than a threat. Somehow, I am a threat to a religion I do not practice, a threat to a nation I have no intention of harming, a threat to a culture I participate in and therefore shape. I am to be dealt with by the strong arm of the law, in the harshest of terms because I am not allowed.
 
Oh, I had dreams of greatness and all the signs so far indicated that I had every potential to achieve this very greatness I am told should define my existence. I had dreams of being a great Malaysian.
 
I had those dreams, I really, truly did.
 
I don't anymore.
 
I am a child to a country that does not want me. I am an orphan, I am abandoned.
 
I hope you're happy.

Nazri talking through his hat!

Posted: 03 Nov 2011 09:22 PM PDT

It is extremely disturbing that the Minister for Law has shown scant respect for the judicial process by not taking the Court decision seriously. His dismissive remarks mock our judiciary and he himself comes across as a bumbling clown.

By P. Ramakrishnan, President Aliran

Nazri has given expression to the saying, "Talking through the hat!" That was what he was doing when he rather foolishly commented on the majority decision of the Court of Appeal which ruled in a landmark case that Section 15(5)(a) of the Universities and University Colleges Act was unconstitutional.

In spite of the Court of Appeal's ruling, for the Minister of Law to insist that "it does not invalidate the Act" and to dismiss the Court's decision as "an opinion in passing" is appalling and shocking, exposing his alarming ignorance of the judicial process.

Section 15(5)(a) has been invalidated as unconstitutional by the Court of Appeal ruling – which means that the provisions of that section are no longer applicable and cannot be enforced. That section, as a result of the Court's decision, is void and invalid.

It is a binding decision and cannot be dismissed merely as "an opinion of the Court" without any consequence. Until and unless the Federal Court overturns or sets aside this ruling – thus upholding the High Court decision – no power on earth professing the democratic tradition can ignore this decision. It is as simple as that!

It is extremely disturbing that the Minister for Law has shown scant respect for the judicial process by not taking the Court decision seriously. His dismissive remarks mock our judiciary and he himself comes across as a bumbling clown.

"This is law, passed by us as lawmakers. There must be separation of powers," he thundered. If he respects the separation of powers, then he must not poke his nose where it does not belong!

The judiciary has an inherent independent authority conferred by the Federal Constitution to "act without fear or favour (and) discharge their grave responsibility of pronouncing judgment on the validity of executive and legislative acts and on the meaning of any provision of the federal and state constitutions …" as clearly expounded by the late Tun Mohamed Suffian.

According to Tun Suffian, Courts have the power to pronounce on the validity of legislative acts and to interpret the Constitution.

When great minds have given their considered opinion, it is futile to split hairs.

Perhaps Nazri, as he is prone to be so vocal, can help us in clarifying what is deemed as a contradiction.

Is there a contradiction in the UUCA in that it doesn't seem to be applicable to all the university students?

Why is it that the UUCA is only applicable to students of local universities? Why are students of overseas universities exempted from this Act?

And the more pertinent question is: Why do almost all nations espousing democratic traditions refrain from subjecting their university students to such restrictions as spelt out in our UCCA?

How is it that Umno Club members comprising overseas students are permitted to attend the Umno General Assembly regularly? Aren't they also violating the provisions of this Act which state no student shall express or do anything which may reasonably be construed as expressing support or sympathy with or opposition to any political party in or outside Malaysia?

These Umno Club members openly express their support for Umno and by doing so, don't they fall foul of this Act? Or is it a case of selective application?

Now that the Court had ruled, these Umno Club members henceforth can legitimately attend Umno General Assemblies, something that was not right previously.

UUCA ruling a great legal milestone

Posted: 03 Nov 2011 09:16 PM PDT

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhCQd3VBOdosBPbNX5X9VvScLH4lyCqjxtUkluZM3bEiJ4GxThtE3QG6UOOxBOBfxkWBfj_KTIWuKOV5Dbz9yxZVsnO71276qhp9W22GkimmeRorQZazk94f-Egi8R0bVl5ULZfGt13exeb/s200/Daniel+John.jpg

For decades now, our freedom of thought and speech has been curtailed so much that many Malaysians are suffering from the disease of blindly obeying and mindlessly believing what certain leaders are telling them. Isn't it any wonder that not many people are daring enough to oppose certain mental manipulations by leaders, kowtowing and nodding their heads as if they are in a deep state of hypnosis?

By Daniel John Jambun

I cannot help feeling extremely elated that last Monday by a three-judge panel made a ruling that a provision in the Universities and University Colleges Act (UUCA) 1971 which restricts students from expressing in support of, or opposing any political party, is unconstitutional. This is history in the making, to say the least!

 

I also feel that the remarks by one of the three-man panel of judges, Datuk Mohd Hishamuddin Mohd Yunus Yunus, are worth repeating here, and even be carved onto stone for future generations to read and excite over, as much as today's generations still gloat over the Magna Carta (the Great Charter) which was presented to King John of England by a group of his subjects, the feudal barons, in 1215, with the warning that if the king refused the charter, they would depose him. The Magna Carta was later passed into law to limit the power of the King.

 

Hishamuddin stated unequivocally that Section 15(5)(a) of the UUCA was irrational as it impeded "the healthy development of the critical mind and original thoughts of students, the objective of which higher education institutions should strive to achieve. Universities should be the breeding ground of reformers and thinkers, and not institutions to produce students trained as robots. Clearly the provision is not only counter-productive but repressive in nature. Freedom of expression was one of the most fundamental rights that individuals enjoy and that right was also recognized in numerous human rights documents such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. It is fundamental to the existence of democracy and the respect of human dignity. Freedom of speech is accorded pre-eminent status in the constitutions of many countries…"

 

How should the country's ruling political leaders react to this ruling by the nation's court of appeal? If any member of the political elite decides to appeal the ruling, if that is possible under the law, such an appellant would have to answer to Hishamuddin's rationales that he was "at a loss to understand in what manners a student, who expresses support for, or opposition against, a political party could harm or bring about an adverse effect on public order or public morality. Are not political parties legal entities carrying out legitimate political activities? Most university students were of the age of maturity where they could enter into contracts, sue and be sued, can marry and become parents and undertake parental responsibilities, vote in general elections if they were 21 years of age. Yet lies herein the irony that they were told that legally they cannot say anything that can be construed as supporting or opposing a political party."

 

I would also add that if we open and operate many universities with hundreds and millions of ringgits to educate our young people, why tell them they are not, will never be, intelligent enough to make any judgment about what's right and wrong as long as they are students and scholars? How will they write short analyses and theses in which they are required to make mature evaluation of political and national governance issues as causes, and connect these evaluations to socio-economic consequences? Are university students supposed to refrain from making the right analyses for fear that they would be going against Section 15(5)(a) of the UUCA? What kind of thesis would it be that is biased and dishonest, and what kind of university graduate would it be who can't even tell what's right and what's wrong because the government had told him he couldn't support or oppose any political thinking? How ridiculous can a law be!

 

I have thought all this while that we are supposed to have universities to develop the country through the creation of generations of intellectuals who will take over the country, not a bunch of graduates who fear the government and when they become leaders will also make the same silly rules to gag future students. I believe that if we succeed in spending millions upon millions of ringgits to produce puppets and robots, our country will simply go down the drain, like what is already happening to us now!

For decades now, our freedom of thought and speech has been curtailed so much that many Malaysians are suffering from the disease of blindly obeying and mindlessly believing what certain leaders are telling them. Isn't it any wonder that not many people are daring enough to oppose certain mental manipulations by leaders, kowtowing and nodding their heads as if they are in a deep state of hypnosis? Since their time in primary schools, they have been brainwashed, through the Ministry of (Dis)Information, that the government is right all the time, and that the people's duty is just to believe and obey. And worst, we are still being made to believe that the opposition is lying, day-dreaming, making empty promises they can't keep, can't do anything to help the people, just a bunch of noise makers and irritants, even deluded and evil leaders who will cause chaos and disasters if they take over the government! But are the people frightened of the opposition? Hardly, judging from the recent Sarawak general election and the 2008 political tsunami!

 

We can pose more and more question on this and will only make this anti-intellectual provision more and more ridiculous. What we need to realize is that, all this while the institutions of higher learning are places where students and professors are muted and curtailed from performing their duties to produce generations of critical, creative, innovative and pro-active leaders in all spheres of national activities. Section 15(5)(a) was actually included in the UUCA because the government feared, and still do fear, students from becoming too smart and eventually lean towards the opposition. But they forget that truth can't be hidden forever, and university students will eventually know who is actually lying to them. With or without Section 15(5)(a), they will still voice out their feelings one way or another, and this is more dangerous to the government because they will be working undercover and discreetly.

 

 

The BN should understand that they are borrowing time from the next generation of leaders, which are the present students. The future belongs to the new generation, not to the present ruling elites. As I see it, the present leaders are succeeding very well in destroying the future, and the future leaders will have a very hard time trying to repair a lot of damages which are being done and will be passed on to them. If the BN is sincere about wanting to do the right thing, it would now let students participate fully in the political process, to say what they want to say. The future is already their responsibility NOW, not later! Khalil Gibran was right when he wrote of children: "...they have their own thoughts. You may house their bodies but not their souls; For their souls dwell in the house of tomorrow, which you cannot visit, not even in your dreams." If you try to shut them up, they will one day shut you up. It's as simple as that!

Ultimatum from the Rakyat to Barisan Nasional: Call Snap Polls before Electoral Reforms and be ...

Posted: 03 Nov 2011 06:06 PM PDT

The latest information, from reliable insider sources, is that, upon his return to Malaysia on 6th November, 2011, Najib will, on 11th November, 2011, seek and obtain His Majesty's consent to the dissolution of Parliament whereafter, the Election Commission will fix 1st December, 2011 as the date for nomination of candidates and 10th December, 2011 as polling day.

The world has, in recent times, witnessed People Power triumph over dictatorships in several nations.

In Malaysia, on 9th July, 2011, thousands descended on to the streets of Kuala Lumpur to demand reforms to our nations electoral process, long fraught with irregularities that render the citizens participation in governance illusory.

Yet, even as the government led by Dato Seri Najib Tun Abdul Razak established a Parliamentary Select Committee to look into the matter of reforms to the electoral process, public statements are constantly issued by members of the government, including the Prime Minister himself, that the 13th general election is imminent.

The latest information, from reliable insider sources, is that, upon his return to Malaysia on 6th November, 2011, Najib will, on 11th November, 2011, seek and obtain His Majesty's consent to the dissolution of Parliament whereafter, the Election Commission will fix 1st December, 2011 as the date for nomination of candidates and 10th December, 2011 as polling day.

On behalf of the rakyat, political, non-governmental orgnanisation and civil society leaders will hold a press conference to issue a final ultimatum to Najib, UMNO and Barisan Nasional as to the consequences they must be prepared to face if they proceed to call for snap polls before our electoral process is reformed.

Details of the press conference are as follows :

Date : 5th November, 2011

Time : 2.30pm

Venue : Kuala Lumpur & Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall

We would appreciate if you could send your journalist to cover the event.

For clarification, please contact the following numbers :  (1) +6012-2070534   (2) +6017-6688404

 

Has Muhyiddin performed a “coup” against Najib and other non-UMNO Cabinet Ministers

Posted: 03 Nov 2011 04:33 PM PDT

Has the Deputy Prime Minister and Education Minister, Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin done a "coup" against the Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib Razak and other non-UMNO Cabinet Ministers and parties including MCA, MIC and Gerakan in unilaterally and arbitrarily without Cabinet authority declaring as "final" the decision to discontinue the PPSMI policy on the teaching of mathematics and science in English and slamming shut the door of a review?

The Prime Minister had promised before the Sarawak polls in April this year that the government would consider using dual languages as the medium of instruction for mathematics and science in schools, and it is precisely because of such an undertaking that the leaders/Ministers from non-UMNO Barisan Nasional parties have come out publicly in support of the principle that parents should be given the option of deciding on continuing with PPSMI in selected schools.

Although Muhyiddin had dismissed calls from the top MCA and MIC leadership that the government allow schools the option to retain PPSMI, declaring that representatives from both MCA and MIC (which would include Gerakan) in the Cabinet had agreed to its abolition in 2009, the Deputy Prime Minister should explain why he had singly, uniaterally and arbitrarily overriden the powers of the Cabinet to review the 2009 decision - and whether Muhyiddin had the full approval and agreement of Najib to make such a "final" decision on PPSMI when the Prime Minister is away from the country?

In any event, if the non-UMNO Cabinet Ministers and parties, such as MCA, MIC, Gerakan and the Sarawak and Sabah Barisan Nasional parties, want to have a full and thorough review of the Cabinet's 2009 decision on PPSMI so as to allow parents the option to continue with the PPSMI in certain schools, who is Muhyiddin to singly, unilaterally and arbitrarily bar them from doing so?

Has the Deputy Prime Minister any such powers to subject the non-UMNO BN Ministers to such control when even the Prime Minister would not have such powers?

Lim Kit Siang

 

We oppose the ban on Seksualiti Merdeka

Posted: 03 Nov 2011 12:09 AM PDT

Sisters in Islam

Sisters in Islam (SIS) strongly disagrees with the police's blanket ban on Seksualiti Merdeka. We see this as yet another pattern of censorship and banning of freedom of expression, association and the free circulation of ideas in Malaysia.

We are also concerned at how the ban is going to be enforced by the police force. Was there, for example, a court order to ban the festival? How exactly do the police intend to follow through this "ban"?

While we understand that there are Muslims opposed to ideas of respecting gender and sexual diversity, as a Muslim women's organisation, SIS disagrees with the methods used to stifle these ideas.

We ourselves have been subjected to police reports simply for questioning syariah criminal procedures on women, and our publication discussing the impact of religious extremism on Muslim women was once banned by the authorities. We regret that Seksualiti Merdeka has fallen prey to the same kind of state intimidation and harassment.

We call on fellow Muslims to exercise compassion and wisdom in dealing with the issues brought up by Seksualiti Merdeka. We also call on the authorities to ensure the safety and security of all those involved in this, especially Seksualiti Merdeka's organisers, volunteers and supporters.

 

Dr M, before you look East, you should have looked after your backside first! Part #2

Posted: 03 Nov 2011 12:01 AM PDT

Todak

Dear Tuan IkwanZ,

Without any malice to you, please allow me to defend my statements on which you have commented in my article Dr M, before you look East, you should have looked after your backside first!

Yes, if you were PM in the 80s and if you had sweet old buddy like Singaporean Rin who probably showed up with Japanese businessman Kumei, I have no doubt whatsoever that you would have done precisely like Mahathir. I don't know if you are a businessman, but Mahathir never was, apart from selling pisang goreng and nasi lemak during his school-going days (so he claimed, to augment his pocket money). So when a Chinaman and a Japanese Sōgō shōsha man came to "advise" him on advancing his "Look East" policy, Mahathir naturally took that as Gospel truth, could not go wrong.

The only time Mahathir tried his hand on big time business (before he became a PM) was when he was Minister of Trade and Industry (MCA Datuk Lew Sip Hon as his deputy). Ill-advised by con-master Marc Rich, Mahathir tried to corner the tin market on the LME (London Metal Exchange). While he got his fingers badly burned, Malaysia lost something like a hefty RM800 million when the American GSA released physical tin stock and the tin price collapsed.

Mahathir thought he had learned his lesson not to trust any Westerner the like of Marc Rich (a Jew). So with Rin and Kumei, he regained self confidence especially then as PM, the Lord of all he surveyed. If his buddies told him Mitsubishi, then it was Mitsubishi, nothing else. That was how the choice of techno partner was made for our national car, never through a process of due diligence and evaluation of all possible qualified candidates.

However, I must agree with you that Mitsubishi is a huge conglomerate with interests in Oil & Gas, Heavy Industries, Banking, etc, and Mahathir's visit to all these works must have greatly impressed him. But for the automobile industry, Toyota leads in sales volume and technology (Lexus is hard to beat) and Honda in design (the Pininfarina of the East).

About a decade ago, Mitsubishi along with Nissan Motors almost collapsed financially. Had it not been for the strength and financial backing of Big Brother diversified Mitsubishi Group, it would have succumbed to a same fate like Nissan which was taken over by Renault of France.

Applying the Malaysian analogy, Sime Bank disappeared, but Sime Darby is still going strong. So now, Tuan IkhwanZ, I hope you will agree with me just sedikit sahaja that Mitsubishi was a wrong choice while our other ASEAN member, Thailand got their acts right, Toyota and Honda. If Mahathir had chosen Toyota, today Proton does not need to scout the world for a partner; Volkswagen would come a-begging to us.

Now, Tuan IkhwanZ, let us take a slow boat to China. First, I must clear with you that I do not indulge in racial bias and religious sentiments. We have to recognize facts for what they are, devoid of racial and religious paintwork. 

You said, "China back then (in the 80s + 90s) was nothing; it was when China was granted WTO membership in 2001 that the country started flourishing. So prior to that, which country would you want to focus on for trade? Certainly not China."

These were your words, but unfortunately, factually wrong again. A little man by the name of Deng Xiao Peng who was not even the President or Prime Minister of Communist China, was the person who pulled the strings of the Chinese Government and drew open "The Bamboo Curtain" to the world in the 2nd half of decade 1970s. The Sleeping Dragon then awakened, and started to move at great leaps forward. The first western company to invest in China was Swiss lift manufacturer, Schindler. Today Schindler's lift and elevators are seen all over China, Hong Kong and Asia, and exported back to Europe. Volkswagen would have been insolvent had it not for their new market in China. Nowadays FDIs poured into China, with success upon success of all who branched into China. While writing this piece, I just saw on CNN that China's 1st unmanned spaceship has docked with its own space station today, one more up for China.

The WTO had no choice, but to hand the membership status to China on a silver plate in 2001. At any rate, the WTO membership and the US "most favored nation" status are nothing more than political apparatus to strangle countries whose ideology is not in line with theirs. The "most favored nation" crap was a joke if you ask me.

And finally, Tuan IkhwanZ, without being racial, let me tell you that all the Chinese around the world without exception, are by nature, capitalists. They adopted and welcomed the Communist system because the Nationalist Chinese Government was corrupted beyond repair, so they looked to Karl Marx and Lenin for change. Even today, Communist membership within China account for less than 10% of the population (80 million members only).

Therefore, it boils down to one simple characteristic of the Chinese race. Everywhere you go, you'll find Chinese only interested in business, trade and money which give them survival. Politics is least in their mind; to the Chinese any body can rule over them but that body must allow them free and fair business opportunities. They only join the voice of descent if Government policies affect their business adversely. Those in good stead like Francis Yeoh, Tan Kay Hock, Vincent Tan, Lee Kim Yew, etc., etc don't make noise, for reasons you should know. 

Can we do something here in Malaysia for the ethnic Chinese Malaysians?

By now, you may be wondering what ethnic race I belong to. I am not telling, but I suggest you refer to the legendary tale of "Singapura Dilanggar Todak", that may give you a clue.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Self cannibalization: the latest political tool to win at all costs

Posted: 03 Nov 2011 09:41 PM PDT

Anthony Loke reveals yet again elector roll irregularities"
On the right: if all complaints are raised, fee of RM8,320 is payable. More waste of money, it seems.

On line version here:

From an inspection of the recently released 2011 Q3 supplementary electors roll, Anthony Loke, the MP for Rasah, discovered that:
·         110 voters were transferred into Temiang state constituency , bearing addresses of 16 vacant houses in Taman Bukit Zamrud, Seremban
·         Some of the vacant houses have "for sale/rent" signs hanging at the gate
·         6 females and 1 male were transferred to address no. 126, Taman Bukit Zamrud . Apart from one aged around the twenties, the rest were more than 50 years old. Among the 7, 2 were taken from Paroi, 2 from Jempol and 1 from Senawang
·         Majority of the transferred voters are Indians, with some Chinese as well.
The above makes interesting reading.
Obviously this is not the work of Pakatan Rakyat. The motive is obvious, moving voters into one of Pakatan's constituency as signs of a snap election reaches fever pitch.

Mission schools: cheated by the system they trusted

Posted: 03 Nov 2011 09:34 PM PDT

"A Senior Physician" in a letter to Malaysia Today concerning Assunta Hospital, blames church leaders for allowing mission schools to have deteriorated under government hands. He is too harsh on the church. The source of the deterioration lies in the rapacious, dishonest and corrupt politicians that have been elected to power for 40 years, and an electorate willing to put their trust in men and women of no honour.

In his letter, he said:

" … the Bishop and the Catholic mission may not know anything about this state of affairs. They usually leave it to the trustees while they concentrate on getting donations for the hospital. Church leaders and the clergy live a life of prayer and a belief that God will take care of their problems.
 
This may explain what happened to the Catholic schools. They used to be premier schools for the whole country. It was not only a source of pride to the Catholic mission, it could have been a method to influence the minds of future leaders of the country. Unfortunately the church never moved with the times and the political changes that swept across the country. Now schools such as SFI, SJI and SXI are relics of a grand past and lie almost forgotten and decaying where they once stood."

The open question was then whether the Brothers and Sisters who taught and administered the mission schools would follow along and become absorbed into the teaching service, so that they could continue to teach and be in charge of the administration of the schools.That is hardly the case. Mission schools were incorporated into the Malaysian educational system after much debate. The essence of the matter at that time (in the 1960s) was, in my recollection, that the church agreed after much discussion to allow the schools to become sekolah jenis kebangsaan — but retaining ownership and not transferring the land and the buildings to the government — in order to receive government financial support.

It was eventually decided that the Brothers and the Sister would not join the education service, but would remain on the Board of Governors of the schools and thus supervise the administration of the schools this way. One factor would have been to obviate any potential church-state conflict.

Over the years members of the La Salle Brothers and the Sisters of the Holy Infant Jesus have agonised over that decision, as their schools steadily decayed in standing, suffered abuse and desecration, and became political tools, notwithstanding that many Malaysian leaders and members of royal houses were themselves educated at mission schools of the 1950s-70s.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fWlSYZyzg-I&feature=player_embedded

To my mind, the church relied on two factors in making the decision to let the government run their schools and to stay out of the education system:

• They trusted the honesty and goodwill of the Prime Minister, Tunku Abdul Raman, that the schools would be cared for, and that the government in all sincerity, merely wished to relieve the church of the financial burden

• They trusted in a system of government that seemed to be based on democratic principle and one that would honour promises made.

They were wrong to trust any one individual. Politicians come and go. They were naive to believe the succeeding politicians would honour the word of another.

It should have been possible to put trust in the system. Institutions of the system and the civil service that goes with them, remain while politicians come and go. They are designed to be a bulwark of the common citizen against the dishonest politician.

Read more at: https://uppercaise.wordpress.com/2011/11/03/mission-schools-cheated-by-the-system/

PPSMI: The Language of Politics

Posted: 03 Nov 2011 09:26 PM PDT

With Muhyiddin Yassin slamming the door shut on PPSMI, the debate continues to rage on within both Barisan Nasional and Pakatan Rakyat alike. PKR comes out to support the abolishment, whereas the DAP wants to give parents the choice.

PAGE, the English rights action group is submitting 7,000 petitions in favour of the teaching of maths and science in English to the Prime Minister. Gerakan is also whispering that they would prefer that parents have the choice. How did we get into this place in the beginning?

The implementation of PPSMI created controversy back in 2003, but if one were to gauge the results of the 2004 General Elections which swept Barisan Nasional back to power with the biggest majority in their history, there is little evidence to suggest that the implementation of this policy was detrimental.

After a while, we hear praise for the government policy being forward thinking from different sections of the society. The mainstream media also ran pieces about English competency amongst teachers, and how many had struggled to cope with the teaching of the subjects in English. Obviously, this did not reflect well on the federal government, who then spent millions on books, training courses and computer software to train the teachers to become competent.

I strongly suspect that the decision to reverse the policy to teach maths and science in English is based more on the fact that the teachers did not want to make the additional effort to learn English, rather than poor results, especially in the rural areas. At times, one hears stories as to how children who can speak better English than their teachers would proceed to torment and taunt them for their poor command of the  language.

Malaysian parents are by-and-large extremely concerned about their children's education, in order for their children to secure their future, both socially and financially. We had the Education Ministry boast of the best UPSR results in history not too long ago, but obviously dissatisfied, the government has decided that teaching maths and science in Malay once again would further raise the standards.

With the General Election fast approaching, the Deputy Prime Minister is obviously intent to prevent what are traditional Barisan strongholds fall to the Opposition. He has cleverly observed that because heritage and pride are something deeply emotional, he waves the flag of "I'm Malay first, Malaysian second" despite this being in direct contradiction with Najib's 1Malaysia. Therefore touting the fact that he is a nationalist and defender of the race, he gets rid of PPSMI to raise up the Malay language once again.

Read more at: http://dougtan.blogspot.com/2011/11/ppsmi-language-of-politics.html

 

Saya tidak percaya DS Rosmah membeli belah di David Jones. It's a low class shopping mall for her

Posted: 03 Nov 2011 05:28 PM PDT

'Apparently' cerita ini di buat oleh sebuah akhbar berpengaruh di Western Australia dan Najib menafikannya melalui twitter beliau dan beliau berkata ini adalah fitnah yang sengaja di ada-adakan oleh akhbar tersebut.

Najib juga menafikan berita yang isteri kesayangan beliau Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor membeli intan berlian di Australia dan isteri beliau tidak pun pergi ke pusat membeli belah itu. Saya pun hendak juga tahu bagaimana akhbar tersebut tahu jumlah AUD60000 itu telah dibelanjakan oleh anak perempuan Najib.

Saya tidak tahu samada perkara ini benar atau pun tidak kerana saya tidak mengikuti perkembangan isu ini. Tetapi saya di minta untuk mengulas tentang isu yang di bawa oleh akhbar Western Australia ini.

Saya tidak berminat sebenarnya untuk mengulas kerana membeli belah secara besar-besar ini adalah satu persepsi yang sinonim dengan DS Rosmah ini dan saya tidak langsung mahu mengambil tahu tentang isu ini lagi. Kalau DS Rosmah dan anak perempuan beliau membeli belah sekali pun itu tidak menghairankan lagi bagi rakyat negara ini.

Saya tidak menjangka yang anak DS Rosmah boleh membelanjakan sejumlah wang yang begitu kecil di tempat yang dikatakan anak beliau membeli belah itu. Pusat membeli belah David Jones itu tidak lah sehebat pusat membeli belah di New York kerana tempat itu hanya lah pusat membeli belah yang biasa sahaja.

Kalau pun keluarga Najib hendak membeli belah mereka tidak akan membuat shopping di tempat itu. Pusat membeli belah itu tidak sampai 'standard compliance' bagi Rosmah atau anak beliau itu. Saya tidak percaya Rosmah atau anak beliau akan membelanjakan wang di sana kerana tempat itu tidak setaraf dengan kemampuan berbelanja untuk keluarga ini.

Tempat itu hanya untuk orang seperti kita membeli belah sahaja…tempat kita hendak membeli sepasang dua stokings, coli-coli dan seluar dalam dan panty wanita sahaja. Rosmah dan anak beliau tidak akan masuk kedalam pusat membeli belah yang tidak ada 'standard' itu. Saya yakin itu merupakan fitnah atau akhbar tersebut tidak tahu yang tempat membeli belah itu bukan setaraf dengan tempat-tempat DS Rosmah membeli belah.

Saya berpendapat untuk mempercayai Rosmah boleh pergi ke tempat shopping itu memang satu perkara yang mustahil. AUD 60,000 bukan jumlah untuk dikaitkan dengan DS Rosmah. Itu terlalu kecil bagi ahli keluarga ini.

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


‘Kebebasan hak asasi manusia tidak mutlak’

Posted: 03 Nov 2011 05:10 PM PDT

Pesuruhjayanya, Dr Abd Rani Osman merangkap Adun Meru hari ini berkata bahawa kebebasan hak asasi manusia tidak bersifat mutlak dan adalah berdasarkan panduan yang ditunjukkan dalam al-Quran dan sunnah Rasulullah, Nabi Muhammad.

"Panduan ini sambil menggalakkan kebebasan berfikir ini, meletakkan batas-batas tertentu supaya manusia tidak terlanjur dari matlamat ciptaannya sendiri dan rosak sehingga mendatangkan kerosakan di dunia dan akhirat," kata Dr Rani semasa sidang media di pejabat perhubungan PAS Selangor pagi tadi.

Menurut beliau, hak asasi manusia dalam Islam adalah hak untuk menghayati dan memenuhi peranannya sebagai khalifah Allah di muka bumi ini.

"Ini meliputi hak bersuara, menentang kezaliman, hidup bebas dengan kehormatan tanpa ancaman ditahan tanpa perbicaraan dan sebagainya."

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved