Isnin, 15 Ogos 2011

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Comparing Bersih to UK riots shallow, says Umno leader

Posted: 14 Aug 2011 07:43 PM PDT

By Boo Su-Lyn, The Malaysian Insider

Deputy Higher Education Minister Datuk Saifuddin Abdullah contradicted his Umno colleagues today and said it was "shallow" to liken the July 9 Bersih rally to the last week's UK riots.

The outspoken Umno supreme council member added that such an argument reflected badly on Barisan Nasional (BN).

"You can't give shallow excuses because the new social consciousness will be asking you, 'What? Bersih is equal to riots in UK?" Saifuddin told The Malaysian Insider today.

"Why they do it is different, the people who join are different, the way they do it is different," he said when comparing the differences between the Bersih rally and the recent riots in the United Kingdom.

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak reportedly said last Friday that the riots in the UK justified the clampdown on the massive July 9 rally for electoral reforms.

Home Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein told Malaysians last Thursday to be thankful that the Bersih rally did not end up becoming violent like the riots in London and other major English cities.

Today, Saifuddin also pointed out that the students who demonstrated in the UK last November were not looters, drawing further distinctions between demonstrations and riots.

"The demonstration... is against the (university) fee hike. They're not looters; they're not hooligans," said the Temerloh MP.

Saifuddin had previously criticised the government for failing to discuss terms with Bersih 2.0 electoral reforms movement before the July 9 rally here, warning that Najib would suffer a political backlash from the rally.

The recent London riots had spread across Britain with reports of youths looting shops and torching cars and buildings.

Community leaders there said the violence in London, the worst for decades in the multi-ethnic capital of 7.8 million people, was rooted in growing disparities in wealth and opportunity.


READ MORE HERE.

Malaysia vowed to improve refugee lot

Posted: 14 Aug 2011 07:36 PM PDT

By Michelle Draper, Sydney Morning Herald

Immigration Minister Chris Bowen says assurances Malaysia would improve its treatment of asylum seekers was a crucial factor behind the government's controversial people-swap deal, legal documents show.

In an affidavit filed but not yet read in the High Court, Mr Bowen said he took into account a range of advice from Malaysian officials, his department and the United Nations refugee agency UNHCR before deciding to send asylum seekers to Malaysia.

The full bench of the High Court will next Monday hear a legal challenge brought by refugee lawyers against the federal government's proposal to send asylum seekers to Malaysia in exchange for processed refugees.

In his affidavit, Mr Bowen said after eight months of discussions with Malaysian officials he formed a view the country had made a "significant conceptual shift" about its treatment of asylum seekers.

He said Malaysia had begun to improve the protections offered to refugees and asylum seekers and was also considering granting asylum seekers work rights.

"The understanding that I formed from my conversations with the Minister of Home Affairs and other Malaysian officials was that the Malaysian government was keen to improve its treatment of refugees and asylum seekers," he said in the affidavit.

Mr Bowen also said he had met with United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees officials and understood the refugee agency considered the arrangement had benefits and would be workable.

He had taken advice from his department which "reassured me that Malaysia did provide basic support and protection to asylum seekers," the affidavit said.

Refugee lawyer David Manne, who is representing 42 asylum seekers facing deportation, said the affidavit's contents were contentious.

"At the heart of it is the process by which the minister ... declared under Australian law that Malaysia is a place that is suitable to send asylum seekers to because it has adequate procedures, protections and human rights standards in place," Mr Manne told reporters outside the High Court in Melbourne, following a directions hearing for the matter.

"That is a matter of considerable controversy in the case, it is one of the key questions in this case," he said.

Mr Manne said it remained to be seen whether the new evidence in the affidavit was consistent with previous commonwealth evidence provided in the case.

It also emerged in Monday's hearing that the Australian Human Rights Commission will intervene in the case on behalf of a 16-year-old unaccompanied boy facing deportation to Malaysia.

The government's controversial people-swap deal was put on hold last week after refugee lawyers convinced the High Court to order an injunction against the first deportations of 16 asylum seekers.

The full bench of the High Court will hear the case next week before making a ruling as to whether the government's proposal is lawful.

Under the Gillard government's people swap deal, Australia will send 800 asylum seekers to Malaysia in exchange for 4000 processed refugees.

Labor MP breaks ranks on Malaysia deal

Posted: 14 Aug 2011 07:28 PM PDT

 

By ABC News

A Labor MP has broken ranks with the party over the Federal Government's Malaysia solution for the first time since the deal was signed, saying it cannot guarantee the safety of asylum seekers.

Anna Burke, the member for Chisholm in Victoria, told the ABC's Lyndal Curtis on News 24 she has concerns about Australia's asylum seeker swap deal with Malaysia on a personal level.

Her comments come as the full bench of the High Court prepares to hear a legal case next week challenging the Malaysian swap deal.

The Christmas Island centre is now holding more than 200 asylum seekers slated for transfer to Malaysia, but a High Court injunction on behalf of a group of asylum seekers has put the process in limbo.

Ms Burke says she has been to Christmas Island and there needs to be a proper debate about the issue.

"I am concerned that we can't really guarantee the safety of the 800 people [being sent to Malaysia]," she said.

"That is my personal concern and I have expressed that in caucus.

"I think we have to have a more rational debate about this asylum seeker crisis. I personally think Manus Island is basically going back to something we said we wouldn't do, which is the Pacific Solution."

Ms Burke first expressed her concerns in June and is not the only Labor MP to speak out against the deal.

Melissa Parke, the Federal MP for Fremantle, also said in June that she could not support a deal that was not backed by the United Nation's refugee agency.

High Court challenge

The legal stoush challenging the swap deal with Malaysia will go before the full bench of the High Court next Monday.

Lawyers are challenging the arrangement on behalf of 42 asylum seekers, who formed the first group that was to be sent to Malaysia.

The High Court injunction has prevented their transfer for the past two weeks.

Federal Immigration Minister Chris Bowen has given an affidavit to the court setting out how he came to the conclusion that he could legally send asylum seekers to Malaysia.

Frog and snake now political pawns

Posted: 14 Aug 2011 05:34 PM PDT

 

By G Vinod, FMT

PETALING JAYA: The slanging match between Malays rights group Perkesa and other political parties is putting the frog and the snake in a bad light.

The apolitical frog and snake have now being held up as a symbols of hatred by both Perkasa and the MIC.

Bukit Bintang MIC division chief S Ananthan brought a frog to the MIC annual general meeting last month, claiming that it represents Perkasa chief, Ibrahim Ali.

Yesterday, Perkasa members torched several copies of The Star for offending Muslims by including non-halal delicacies in its "Ramadan Delights" column.

And for good measure, they also burned rubber snakes in retaliation against Ananthan's frog stunt.

"He brought a frog, so we brought snakes to represent the community," Perkasa Youth chief Irwan Fahmi Ideris said in an online news portal.

But today Ananthan thanked Irwan for relating the snake with the community.

"The Chinese and Indians believe snakes are divine creatures. So thank you, Irwan, for calling us divine," he said.

 

Blatantly racist

Ananthan is angry because no action has been taken against Ibrahim for being so blatantly racist and inciting racial tension.

He told FMT that since the authorities are keeping silent, the movement obviously enjoyed immunity from criminal charges.

"With many reports lodged against it, the police are reluctant to clamp down on Perkasa. This shows Umno is behind the movement," said Ananthan.

He warned the Umno leadership that its indifference towards Perkasa's tirades would only alienate the Chinese and Indians further from the ruling coalition.

"The Malay votes are already split among Umno, PAS and PKR. You need the Chinese and Indians," said Ananthan.

DAP Selangor legal bureau chief V Ganabatirao echoed Ananthan's sentiments, saying that BN would pay a high price in the polls for its tacit support of Perkasa.

'Uncivilised behaviour'

"While the six PSM members were detained for no reason, the home ministry and the police seem to be powerless against a small group like Perkasa," said Ganabatirao.


READ MORE HERE.

What’s Firefly’s role after tie-up?

Posted: 14 Aug 2011 05:26 PM PDT

 

By Kang Siew Li, The Sun

PETALING JAYA (Aug 14, 2011): The unprecedented tie-up between Malaysia Airlines (MAS) and rivals AirAsia and AirAsia X last week has thrust the future of Firefly – the budget carrier of the national airline – into the limelight.

Even Firefly's top executives are in the dark over the role the budget carrier will play in this tie-up although there is talk of the airline exiting the low-cost segment.

Senior executives from MAS and AirAsia have so far only said MAS will focus on premium travel, AirAsia on the short-haul low-cost segment and AirAsia X the medium- and long-haul budget segment under the comprehensive collaboration framework (CCF).

"Firefly's resources would be refocused to launch a new regional full service airline operation," MAS chairman Tan Sri Md Nor Yusof had said at the press conference, but did not elaborate.

"What does regional mean? Will it (Firefly) cover countries in Asean, Asia or Asia-Pacific? Will it continue to operate a mix of turboprops and jets or only turboprops? Will it be like Silk Air, the full service regional airline wing of Singapore Airlines?" asked an industry observer.

When contacted by SunBiz, Firefly managing director Datuk Eddy Leong said he doesn't know.

"I don't know yet. Until we are asked to do something else by MAS's new executive committee (set up to oversee the management of the airline until a new managing director is appointed), our operations must proceed as normal," he said.

Firefly began its operations in 2007, initially operating turboprops from Subang before expanding into jet aircraft operation out of the KL International Airport (KLIA) early this year. It currently operates a fleet of 10 ATR 72-500 turboprops, four Boeing 737-800s and one 737-400.

The rise of Firefly has intensified the competition and rivalry between MAS and AirAsia, and has hurt yields for AirAsia, especially on routes from KLIA to Kuching and Kota Kinabalu.

Maybank Investment Bank believes that Firefly's jet operation days are numbered and that its turbo-prop operations will be rebranded as a full service regional service.

"There will only be one full service carrier (MAS) and one low-cost carrier (AirAsia) in Malaysia, while AirAsia X will focus on being a medium-to-long haul low-cost carrier," the research firm said in a report.

"There will be a clear demarcation of clientele and the business overlap will be reduced to benign. MAS's short-haul full service carrier business may be undertaken through a new subsidiary by the name of Sapphire, and MAS has the flexibility to re-designate capacity, assets and resources from Firefly to Sapphire," it added.

Some analysts believe that Firefly will exit the low-cost segment by the first quarter of next year, thereby reducing the overall competitive pricing pressures and be positive for yields.

However, Standard & Poor's aviation analyst Shukor Yusof said it would not make sense for MAS's new management to hive off its budget business into a new subsidiary.

"Why? I can't think of a reason why you would want to remove a unit that is showing promise and actually making profits. The Firefly brand is doing quite well. I would seriously question the rationale behind completely removing Firefly from the present operations," he told SunBiz.

Shukor believes that Firefly would still do well with its fleet of turboprops, offering premium travel in the Asean region.

"After all, it was created in the first place to fly domestically and to Singapore. It should not be a problem," he said.

"There's still a lot of uncertainties as a result of the (MAS-AirAsia) partnership. There are many questions that have yet to be answered, but in due course they will have to explain how they are going to rationalise not just the fleet and the operations, but the staff," he added.

Anwar to enter defense on Aug 22

Posted: 14 Aug 2011 05:21 PM PDT

(Malaysian Digest) - The High Court today has set next Monday for Opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to enter his defense on a sodomy charge.

The court also allowed his legal team a chance to interview six more witnesses.

Justice Mohd Zabidin Mohd Diah said Anwar will have to enter defense next Monday no matter what the outcome of the interview.

 "Whatever the outcome of the interview, come Monday you will have to enter defense," said Zabidin.

Only 19 have been interviewed so far by Anwar's legal team from 25 names which included Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak and his wife Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor who both had refused to be interviewed on the reason that the move was politically motivated.

On May 16, Mohamad Zabidin ordered Anwar to enter his defense after ruling that the latter's former aide, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan, the complainant in the case, was a truthful and credible witness.

Anwar, 63, pleaded not guilty in the Sessions Court on Aug 7, 2008, to committing carnal intercourse against the order of nature at the Desa Damansara Condominium in Bukit Damansara between 3:10pm and 4:30pm on June 26 of the same year.

Earlier nearly 20 people from Gerakan Anti Liwat 2.0 (Geli) protested outside the Jalan Duta Court demanding Anwar who is also the Permatang Pauh MP to not continuously delay his sodomy trial.

The group was seen chanting out "reformasi", "dilarang meliwat" (sodomy not permitted), "sekiranya meliwat kena tangkap dengan polis" (sodomites must be arrested), "sekiranya meliwat masuk penjara" (sodomites must be jailed) and "hancur liwat" (eradicate sodomy) as Anwar arrived at the court.

Members of the group also brought banners written with "Justice for Saiful", "We Will Be With You Forever', "Justice Delay Justice Deny", "Selamatkan Malaysia Dari Peliwat 2.0" Save Malaysia from Sodomite 2.0), and "Mahkamah (Keadilan) Dipermainkan Peliwat 2.0" [Court (Justice) Got Played by Soodomite 2.0].

 

‘Only three states for BN-Umno’

Posted: 14 Aug 2011 04:39 PM PDT

Barisan Nasional has lost 80% of the younger generation voters.

(Free Malaysia Today) - Former Finance Minister Daim Zainuddin is pessimistic about the future of Barisan Nasional. He believes that BN can say its comfortable but only in Johore, Malacca and Pahang.

But even in Pahang, a few parliamentary seats will slip out of BN's grasps as with a few more state seats.

But overall, Daim believes Pahang will remain under BN, according to his alter ego The Oracle of Syed Putra, with whom I recently conversed.

And if I am at liberty to translate the body language of The Oracle, Daim is also pessimistic about the political fortunes of Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak.

I am sure that I've heard the same disconcerting vibrations from former premier Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad himself.

The Oracle said Daim's exhortations to the two top leaders (Najib and deputy prime minister Muhyiddin Yassin) to go down and meet up with the cawangan (division) people is unheeded.

"Meeting with Ketua Bahagians can be a misleading source of information, they will tell of everything good and what they have done with a view of getting re-elected.

"But you need to go down to the basics – listen to the views in the raw (yourself). If possible exclude the ketua bahagians.

"But they (Najib and Muhyiddin) haven't done this.

"The PM is busy with his overseas trip. The DPM will not move lest whatever actions he takes will be misconstrued as upstaging the boss.

"And that can cause some internal upheavals in Umno," said the Oracle.

Losing battle

Speaking further the Orcale said Umno and BN have lost their influence over the younger generation.

Eighty percent of the younger voters are not going to vote for the BN.

I asked the Oracle if he thought Umno could win the battles in cyberspace?

And this is what he said: "Just look at the articles being spewed by the Umno cyber troopers.

"Some of them are stuck with the idea that the PM of Malaysia is still Dr Mahathir and so their articles will be tailored to suit the positions taken by Dr Mahathir.

"You watch – Dr Mahathir hasn't spoken his true mind (yet) about the Najib administration.

"Once he does that all hell will break loose," he said adding that one reason for Mahathir's 'silence' is the restraint counselled by Daim.

The majority of the Umno cybertroopers are spewing hate articles all the time with the expletives and vitriol.

Will these engage the fence-sitters; those independent minded thinking would-be voters?

READ MORE HERE

 

‘Evil’ BN injected voters into Sibu

Posted: 14 Aug 2011 03:59 PM PDT

 

By Joseph Tawie, FMT

KUCHING: Sarawak DAP has accused the Barisan Nasional (BN) of resorting to "evil means" in order to recapture the parliamentary seat of Sibu, which the opposition won in last year's by-election.

It alleged that the BN had employed dirty tactics such "injecting" or increasing normal and postal votes and registering non-citizens as voters in an attempt to take back Sibu in the by-election last May.

In the polls, DAP chairman Wong Ho Leng snatched the seat from BN-Sarawak United People's Party (SUPP) by a small margin of 398 votes.

"We have managed to find out in Sibu that there was an unexplained and sudden increase of voters in certain areas as well as the registration of non-citizens as voters.

"We found that there were many voters who were registered in the electoral rolls, but their names did not appear in the database of National Registration Department (NRD).

"For the record, Dudong has 27 individuals registered in the electoral rolls, but their names were not found in the NRD head office.

"In Pelawan, the number was 21 and Nangka had 36. For other areas we are going to check the national registration database and match it with the electoral rolls," Wong said after chairing the Sate DAP committee meeting yesterday.

He said the Election Commission (EC) must explain the discrepancy.

"The EC must explain why these individuals were being registered in the electoral rolls. Did it mean that the non-citizens have been registered as voters?

"We also want to know the unexplained increase of voters in Nangka which saw an increase of 497 voters…

"This is disproportionate to the increase in other constituencies like Bukit Assek where we saw a decrease of 50 voters, Dudong with an increase of 291, Bawan Assan 121 and Palawan 345," said Wong who is the State assemblyman for Bukit Assek.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Ambiga tells of her ‘lawyerly revolt’

Posted: 14 Aug 2011 03:46 PM PDT

By Clare Rewcastle Brown, FMT

Over the weekend, Bersih 2.0 chairman Ambiga Sreenivasan drew a big draw in London, bringing enthusiastic audiences to a fund-raising dinner and to listen to speeches.

The Bersih 2.0 rally had produced an excellent sympathy turnout over here in July, with several hundred marchers clad in yellow making the walk from the Malaysian High Commission over to Trafalgar Square.

The time difference between the two regions made the London event especially poignant, because by the time it got going news had already come through about what had happened to friends back home.

This weekend was the first chance for many to receive a first-hand account of what took place and from the leader of the event herself.

Ambiga manages a rare combination. She is a highly formidable female, but also warm and engaging.

She laid out with clarity and objectivity why she had led her lawyerly revolt.

For us who had been so far away it was a welcome analysis.

Bersih's concerns had been sparked off by their observation of the Sarawak state election, she explained.

To their horror they witnessed "the dirtiest election ever" with "out and out vote buying", "intimidation", "phantom votes" and all the paraphernalia of rigged elections.

The fact that modern technology meant there was solid, recorded evidence of plenty of cheating meant that, in Ambiga's view, the Election Commission had a constitutional duty to investigate and take action.

However, to her dismay the Election Commission did nothing.

EC's wilful ignorance

As a former leader of the Malaysian Bar Council, Ambiga couches her arguments in the language of the law and not politics.

Throughout (her speech), she made clear that her core concerns are about the abuse of legality and of Malaysia's constitution.

She explained how Bersih had appealed to all political parties on the issue, but that support had come only from the opposition.

Yet, her most withering criticism was directed towards officials of the Election Commission for their persistent attacks on the opposition and their refusal to investigate fraud.

"The Election Commissioners just don't understand that under the constitution they are supposed to be independent of the government," she sighed.

There can be nothing more frustrating for a lawyer than such wilful ignorance by those who have responsibility for upholding the rule of law.

 

READ MORE HERE.

EC insincere in cleaning up electoral rolls, says PAS

Posted: 14 Aug 2011 03:43 PM PDT

 

By Lisa J Ariffin, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 15 — The Election Commission (EC) has no intention of cleaning the existing electoral roll with its statement that there are no clean voter lists across the world, PAS information chief Datuk Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man said today.

He added that EC chairman Tan Sri Abdul Aziz Mohd Yusof's remark "there is no clean electoral roll in the world" is similar to the Malay folklore figure Pak Pandir who said "not only our children will pass away, other people's children will also pass away".

"This statement reflects the real attitude of the EC, which has no direct intention to favour the people and vigorously clean the existing electoral roll," Tuan Ibrahim said in a statement.

He noted that the EC had been obstinate about denying its weaknesses over the years but pressure from the opposition has led it to acknowledge there are deficiencies in the electoral roll.

But Tuan Ibrahim said the confession is far from sincere with Abdul Aziz blaming "technical errors that occurred during the process of the National Registration Department (JPN) profiling".

"The electoral roll has about 12.3 million voters and there would be mistakes here and there, the whole world will have the same problem ... there is no perfect electoral list in the world," Abdul Aziz had said.

"All that's happened was not planned by the EC. The EC will not simply allow voters to vote twice. Sometimes, it goes wrong during the profiling (by JPN). We will check if it's in the wrong place, if so, we will throw it out," Abdul Aziz said amid a backlash from evidence presented by the opposition such as registered foreign voters, overlapping names, phantom voters and names of voters not present on the JPN list.

"EC's confession is clear why Bersih 2.0 was held, and now people are seeing its results," said Tuan Ibrahim, who is also Pahang PAS commissioner.

He added that although the EC and Umno continue to portray the Bersih 2.0 rally negatively, people have started to open their eyes and see how dirty the election system is with thousands of foreigners given voting rights so easily.

 

READ MORE HERE.

MAS, TR deals price of Dr M’s failed privatisation plans, says PAS

Posted: 14 Aug 2011 03:40 PM PDT

By Yow Hong Chieh, The Malaysian Insider

PAS has called the MAS-AirAsia share swap and the Cabinet's "off-site" settlement of lawsuits against the national carrier's former executive chairman Tan Sri Tajuddin Ramli the "manifestation" of Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad's failed privatisation programmes.

PAS vice-president Datuk Mahfuz Omar said the two recent headline-grabbing stories linked to Malaysia Airlines System Bhd (MAS) were the "two greatest symbols" of the former prime minister's alleged policy of privatising state-owned companies for the benefit of cronies.

"These two are greatest symbols of cronyism and corruption along the lines of 'who do you know' and 'you help me I help you'," he told reporters here.

Mahfuz pointed out even though Dr Mahathir has been in retirement for seven years now, the loss of competition in the airline industry resulting from the share swap and the potential out-of-court settlement with Tajuddin meant the people were still paying the price of the Umno strongman's 22 years in power.

He said MAS had once been an airline "owned by the people" whose service was on par with Singapore Airlines and Cathay Pacific before it was allegedly bled by Tajuddin after the latter took control of the ailing state carrier in 1994.

"Ownership was transferred from the people to an individual, Tajuddin, who lost RM8 billion with no accountability even though there was an effort to charge him," he said.

The government regained control of MAS in 2001, but not before the airline allegedly incurred losses in excess of RM8 billion as a result of Tajuddin's dealings.

According to a report to the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC), a major contributor to the record losses under Tajuddin was the relocation of MAS's cargo operation in Amsterdam and Frankfurt to a single hub in Hahn, Germany, where the airline was forced to enter into a disadvantageous aircraft lease contract with a company which was later linked to Tajuddin's family.

The Malaysian Insider had reported that Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz issued a letter earlier this month telling all GLCs that the government was settling their claims with Tajuddin out of court.

Tajuddin is facing billions in legal claims against him, following accusations by MAS in 2002 that he had caused the carrier to suffer losses in excess of RM8 billion.

Nazri's letter had called for "all civil claims against Tajuddin and others to be withdrawn immediately in view of the fact that the government and the Finance Ministry have agreed that the said cases will be settled out of court."

 

READ MORE HERE.

 

MACC probe uncovers 6P scammers

Posted: 14 Aug 2011 01:38 PM PDT

By Tim Leonard & Azril Annuar, The Sun

The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) probe into the 6P amnesty programme has uncovered a syndicate headed by a 'Datuk' which is believed to have raked in millions of ringgit from unsuspecting foreigners.

A senior MACC investigations officer disclosed that the probe found that thousands of foreigners had each paid the syndicate members between RM300 and RM2,000 purportedly to ensure they are granted amnesty and legalisation.

"To convince the foreigners, the syndicate members showed photographs of those who had purportedly received amnesty after paying the specified amount," said the official.

It is believed that more than 10,000 foreign workers all over the country have fallen prey to the syndicate, whose members go around claiming to be officials appointed by the authorities and wear 'government' accreditation tags.

The MACC official revealed that the syndicate members had also collected money from foreign women involved in the flesh trade, and had offered them 'amnesty' for between RM300 and RM2,000.

"We have found several leads on how the 6P programme is being manipulated and abused by unscrupulous individuals misusing the government's name," the official said.

MACC director of investigations Datuk Mustafar Ali was unavailable for immediate comment but is expected to issue a statement later this week on the developments of the 6P amnesty probe.

The Immigration Department is currently conducting the 6P programme to register and identify all legal and illegal foreign workers in the country.

The first phase – the registration of foreign workers – is ongoing until Aug 31 and the second phase which is legalisation and amnesty, will kick off next month.

Illegal foreign workers registering with any one of the 336 appointed agencies are required to pay RM 35 for registration in the first phase, and RM 300 for legalisation in the second phase.

Last week, Home Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein had welcomed the probe by MACC and urged the anti-graft body to take stern action on those abusing the 6P amnesty exercise.

Hishammuddin said an investigation was important to eradicate corrupt practices and cripple syndicates who are out to exploit the situation at the expense of the illegal foreign workers despite the government's directive to charge not more than RM35 per head, for registration purposes.

Meanwhile, Home Ministry secretary-general Tan Sri Mahmood Adam said today that agencies appointed to facilitate biometric registration of illegal foreign workers who have already charged them the legalisation fee of RM300 per worker, will be required to refund the money should a worker's legalisation process fail.

He said as the legalisation process will only start in September, only the RM35 registration fee is applicable for now.

"These unscrupulous agents should not have started charging the workers the legalisation fee yet," he told theSun.

"Legalisation has not started yet, why are they already charging these poor people? What happens if these (illegal foreign) workers fail in applying for the legalisation process? These agents must return the money to them."

"What guarantee do these agents have that these workers can secure a job and be legalised in the first place? They might be sent back to their country of origin," said Mahmood, who reiterated that registration and legalisation process at immigration offices are free of charge.

Asked to comment on the 600 biometric registration machines reportedly found to have been tampered with by a number of agencies last week, Mahmood said he had no update yet on the investigation as it was the weekend.

AirAsia boss poised to take over QPR today

Posted: 14 Aug 2011 12:36 PM PDT

By Boo Su-Lyn, The Malaysian Insider

AirAsia chief Tan Sri Tony Fernandes is close to taking majority control of English Premiership football club Queens Park Rangers (QPR) today.

UK newspapers The Financial Times and the Guardian reported today that the owner of Asia's largest low-cost airline hopes to conclude a deal to buy a 51 per cent stake in the West London club from Formula One motor racing chief Bernie Ecclestone.

The Financial Times said Indian steel magnate Lakshmi Mittal, who already owns a 33 per cent stake in QPR, will acquire the rest of Ecclestone's 62 per cent share.

The Guardian also reported former Brazil coach and captain Dunga claiming that the Premier League club owed him £750,000 (RM3.75 million).

AirAsia recently finalised a share swap with MAS, where the former's main shareholder Tune Air Sdn Bhd will swap 10 per cent stake in the budget carrier for 20.5 per cent share of the ailing flag carrier.

 

READ MORE HERE.

DAP wants SC action over Tajuddin suits

Posted: 14 Aug 2011 12:25 PM PDT

 

By Shannon Teoh, The Malaysian Insider

The DAP has called on the Securities Commission (SC) to act against GLCs which have been ordered to drop billion-ringgit civil suits against Tan Sri Tajuddin Ramli for failing to reveal all material developments in their claims against the former Malaysia Airlines (MAS) chairman.

Party publicity chief Tony Pua said in a statement today that Putrajaya's directive to withdraw their claims should have been immediately disclosed on Bursa Malaysia as "the litigations involved billions of ringgit in claims and counter-claims which are surely material to the finances of these companies."

"The board of directors of these companies must also immediately state their immediate position vis-à-vis the letter from Nazri to allow investors, particularly the minority shareholders, to weigh their investment options," the Petaling Jaya Utara MP said.

The Malaysian Insider had reported that Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz issued a letter earlier this month telling all GLCs that the government was settling their claims with Tajuddin out of court.

Tajuddin is presently facing billions in legal claims against him, following accusations by MAS in 2002 that he had caused the carrier to suffer losses in excess of RM8 billion.

Nazri's letter had called for "all civil claims against Tan Sri Dato Tajuddin Ramli and others to be withdrawn immediately in view of the fact that the government and the Finance Ministry have agreed that the said cases will be settled out of court."

"For your information the government has given me the mandate to act for the government in this matter," it added, directing these companies to hand over their cases to Datuk Hafarizam Harun, who has handled other high-profile cases for Umno such as the constitutional crisis over its takeover of Perak in 2009.

But after his letter surfaced, Nazri defended the administration's move, saying it would not spell a debt bailout for Tajuddin but was merely a suggestion to the GLCs to work out an out-of-court settlement with the former MAS chairman.

 

 

READ MORE HERE.

After two years as PM, Najib losing middle ground

Posted: 14 Aug 2011 12:20 PM PDT

By Shazwan Mustafa Kamal, The Malaysian Insider

Datuk Seri Najib Razak risks drifting further away from the centre if he does not deliver on his reform initiatives and continues to "pacify" right-wingers, analysts have warned.

Pundits have charged that Najib has been moving away from a centrist position since taking office as prime minister in 2009, saying his indecisiveness in carrying out policies mirrored that of his predecessor Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi.

Delayed economic reforms, the New Economic Model's (NEM) watered-down emphasis on competitiveness in its final version, coupled with Najib's (picture) poor handling of the July 9 Bersih are instances where the PM has been accused of placating the demands of right-wing groups as well as members within Umno.

"In the long run Najib is moving to the right, and is running a big risk. Not everyone supports right-wing sentiments.

"There is credence to the arguments that Najib is drifting away from the centre. Despite his proposals for reform and overtures to the non-Malay community, these are still in traction," said Merdeka Center director Ibrahim Suffian.

Ibrahim believes that not much has changed since Najib introduced his government transformation programmes, pointing out that the results have not "trickled down" to the public.

The polls expert stated that economy was the ultimate determining factor as to future voter support, and that turbulent economic times would not bode well for the PM.

"It is in part driven by necessity, Najib is trying to protect his current support, he can't push for reforms at the expense of Malay support base within Umno," Ibrahim added.

Using the recent Bersih 2.0 rally as an example, Ibrahim said Najib should have taken a more moderate position and allowed space for dissent by listening to the election watchdog.

"He has to be seen as a prime minister for all Malaysians," said Ibrahim.

The Malaysian Insider understands that Najib has fallen out with several key advisers over the government's security crackdown during the rally. A few liberal advisers have been sidelined while those with right-wing sentiments feel the prime minister should take a harder line.

Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (Unimas) academic Dr Faizal Hazis concurred with Ibrahim's views, saying that although Najib had promised a "moderate, centrist" government administration, there was a lack of will on the part of Najib to carry through his plans.

"In trying to placate all parties, Najib is drifting away from the centre.

"There is no strong will to see the initiatives through, especially on the part of Umno," Faizal told The Malaysian Insider.

The simplest example, said the academic was Najib's refusal recently to state whether he was a proponent of his own two-year-old 1 Malaysia policy that espouses being "Malaysian first" — for fear of contradicting his deputy Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin.

 

READ MORE HERE.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Malaysia in the Era of Globalization #78

Posted: 14 Aug 2011 11:15 PM PDT

http://img194.imageshack.us/img194/3554/bakrimusa.jpg

M. Bakri Musa

Rare indeed is an exposition that compares and contrasts accepted and well-tested concepts and principles of modern economics and banking with traditional Islamic understanding of the subject.

 

Chapter 9: Islam in Malay Life

Reform in Islam

Islamic Economics

The success and vitality of the modern economy is based on the availability of credit. It is credit that makes the economic world spin smoothly. "Credit is the vital air of the system of modern commerce," observed Daniel Webster. "It has done more, a thousand times, to enrich nations, than all the mines of all the world." A plaque on Wall Street, the heart of American capitalism, declares, "Credit: Man's Faith in Man." Credit is predicated on the promise that it will be repaid.

Shakespeare's words in Hamlet, "Neither a borrower, nor a lender be: For loan oft loses both itself and friend…." is only true if we do not repay our loans and the gratitude that goes with them. Indeed not repaying our debts can give rise to even worse consequences, as victims of the mafia and triads will testify. Even threats of defaulting can be devastating, as Argentina is now discovering.

Ancient Muslim traders must have had a system of credit and promissory notes; they could not be hauling their gold and silver bullions on their caravans, risking robbery. The hang-up today's Muslims (and also others) have on the issue of credit rests on the related question of interest (riba) and usury.

The usual argument that interest is sinful arises because of the connotation of extortion. If a father needs money to buy food or medicine for his children, yes it is indeed sinful to charge him any interest at all for the money. If the recipient is truly needy, then simply donate the money. That is the basis of zakat or tithe, one of Islam's five pillars. If I charge the poor soul an exorbitant interest rate (usury) and if he fails to repay me (as he surely would), do I then break his leg, mafia style? That would not only be sinful but also criminal. You need not wait till Judgment Day to be punished; you go to jail right here on earth, and deservedly so. Nor can I make him my slave to pay off his debt. Slavery and indentured labor have long been banned.

On the other hand, if I have some spare funds that I do not need right away (for example, savings for my children's education) and an entrepreneur could use that capital to start his business, I see no reason why I cannot be rewarded for letting him use my idle money. After all my money is like any other property I own. If he uses my car, for example, I can charge him a rental fee, so why cannot I charge him a similar "rent" (which is what interest is) for the use of my money?

Another way of looking at it, my lending him money is comparable to my providing him a service. Therefore I should be suitably compensated for that, just as surely as had I repaired his hernia. Besides, my lending serves the greater society, not just the two of us. His company would employ workers and produce useful goods. Had I kept my money under my mattress, nobody would benefit.

There is no question that riba is prohibited in Islam. It says so clearly in the Qur'an as well as in the various ahadith. The crux of the issue is to the actual meaning and intent of that ancient Arabic word. Words have a way of acquiring different meanings with time. Earlier I alluded to the term "poet," which was highly pejorative during the prophet's time. Likewise, what riba meant to the ancient Bedouins cannot be simplistically and literally be transferred to all forms of costs of capital in modern economics. One simple reason is that many of these modern financial instruments were non-existent in the prophet's time. There was no such thing as venture capital or corporate bonds in ancient times.

Another reason for the prohibition of riba is that Islam prohibits "making money on money," which interests and other forms of the costs of capital imply. One can, however, make money by trading on goods and services, and Islam encourages this. The distinction between money and tangible goods is that the former has no "intrinsic value," thus trading on it is equivalent to gambling. The value of money is what society puts on it. While this is true for paper money, it is not necessarily so for gold and silver, Islam's ancient currencies. Those precious commodities do have intrinsic industrial values quite apart from their aesthetic (thus acquired) ones. Silver for example is an important ingredient in film imaging. And gold is useful in certain precision engineering as well as in pharmaceuticals.

For modern Islamic scholars to simply equate riba to all forms of interests is unwarranted. As I will show shortly, there are conceptual differences in the various forms of costs of capital (interest) and that, stripped of its mystery, trading on capital (money) is no different from trading in other goods and services.

Going to my earlier example, how I charge that entrepreneur for the cost of renting my property (capital) is a separate issue. I could for example, share in the risk, that is, seek part control of his company. This is the basis of modern venture capital. When his company is successful, I would sell my shares and recoup my principle plus the "rent" or profit of my money, thus rewarding me for my earlier savings. If I do not want to take the risk of losing my principle, I could pre-sell my shares for a preset price to another willing individual. In this way if the company becomes very successful he gets a bigger reward, if it fails then he takes the risk. This after all is the basis of share options. These are all manifestations of the costs of my money, that is, interest. Or to use my preferred term, reward on savings and investments.

Alternatively I could claim a percentage of the final product. This is common in rural Malaysia where farmers would "rent" their idle rice fields in return for a portion of the harvest. The landowner may decide not to get the harvest and would prefer to sell his share back to the farmer and merely collect the cash. Whatever it is, there is a cost for the use of capital, in this case, his land. You may label this cost in whichever way: interest, stock options, dividends, part ownership, share of harvest, or whatever.

Muslim theologians have no difficulty grasping and agreeing to this concept of borrowing as the lender shares the risks with the borrower. This in contrast, in their view, of putting money is a simple savings account where the depositor bears no risks of losing his money (capital). That is only a matter of degree. There is a small risk, but thanks to modern safeguards banks today are very safe. But back in the early 20th Century in the West and in many Third World countries today, you risk losing your precious money should the bank goes belly up. Indeed many Third World citizens today (including many Malaysians) see an unacceptable risk in their local banks and thus put their money in foreign banks. Similarly, many an investor had lost their capital investing in Third World Railroad bonds.

Thus when an investor seems to invest his funds "passively," in reality it is far from that. He has to be prudent and investigate the risks and balance the rewards. Even in choosing a bank, not only has he to be careful to choose one that gives the best returns (interests) but also one that is safe, convenient, an offers superior services. All these require diligent evaluations. There is no such being as a passive investor. Thus we could look upon interest as rewards for the diligence of the investor.

Viewed another way, interest or costs of capital may be considered as profits on the trading of that capital which happens in this case to be money, instead of land or rice.

In the ordinary trading of goods and services, there is a fair and right price, determined by the free market of willing buyers and sellers. But if one party monopolizes a commodity and starts hoarding it in order to exact an exorbitant price to rake in the maximum profit, than that is rightly considered illegal (and sinful). America has elaborate antitrust and other laws to prevent business collusion and other anti-competitive behaviors.

Similarly in the trading of capital (money), there is a legitimate cost beyond which it becomes not only exorbitant but creates other serious consequences. Usurious (excessively high) interest rates are bad not only for individuals but also for society. They will extinguish all economic and business activities. There is no redeeming social or economic value in that. The economy would simply collapse.

Malaysia was smart enough not to heed the advice of the IMF during its recent [1997] economic crisis to jack up interest rates to levels that would cripple an already ailing economy, just to support the currency and satisfy the IMF bureaucrats. The bane of many Latin American countries is that their interest rates are so high that they choke off all economic activities.

It is interesting that in the current economic crisis in America triggered by the bust in the housing market, its central bank has purposely kept the interest rate very low.

The voluminous Islamic literature on interests and credits can be divided into two categories: one, usually written by religious scholars who are well versed in Islamic literature but woefully ignorant of modern economics; two, works of competent economists but whose knowledge of Islam consists of selective quotations of the Qur'an and hadith to support their positions. Rare indeed is an exposition that compares and contrasts accepted and well-tested concepts and principles of modern economics and banking with traditional Islamic understanding of the subject. The reason for this is that few economists are well grounded in Islamic learning, and fewer still are religious scholars who also understand modern economics. The ulama's versions are long on erudite recitations of the Qur'an, hadith, and traditions. They strain to create qualitative differences between various terms which, stripped of their semantic gymnastics, are nothing more than a continuum on the risk-versus-returns spectrum.

The few notable exceptions to this sorry state of affairs are the contributions of Rice University's economist Mahmoud El-Gamal. He readily admits to not being an Islamic scholar but he has the advantage of at least being a native-born Arabic speaker and thus can read the original Islamic texts and relate those terms and practices into their modern counterparts.

Next: Dealing With the Concept of Interest

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


A morning session with The Oracle of Syed Putera-Final Part

Posted: 14 Aug 2011 05:36 PM PDT

Just a bit before we move on. The whole deal involving AA-MAS reminds me of the carving out of spheres of influence between the superpowers of 18 and 19th century. The English got Malay peninsula, The Dutch got the East indies. They signed a treaty. In a very similar way, this government of ours, allowed the airline industry to be carved out between what they currently assessed at the poster boys. MAS will be assigned to compete in the premium sector while AirAsia is effectively given the monopoly to do the LCC. What about Firefly. We haven't heard a spokesman from this outfit being given a fair airing have we?  I am sure they will have a thing to say.

I have also written about the role of CIMB in this deal. I have cited its record in the deals involving Synergy Drive and the split between Telekom Malaysia and Axiata. In this MAS-AA I am told, CIMB played the role of match maker simpliciter. That is its claim, the public may choose to adopt a different view because its difficult for the public to accept that CIMB, the merit driven, results focused bank does something for altruistic reasons.

As I said, we shall leave the issue for a moment. We shall come back later.

Now, for my final installment of my one morning with the Oracle.

How many states does TDZ indicate can BN remain comfortable I asked? This is a dreaded question admittedly because what Tun Daim said in the past has proven to be prescient. Everyone wants Tun Daim to say something optimistic.

But the Oracle says, his friend remains pessimistic. He can only say, among the states where BN can say its comfortable are Johore, Melaka and Pahang. Even in Pahang, a few parliamentary seats will slip out of BN's grasps as with a few more state seats. But overall, Daim believes Pahang will remain under BN. why does he mention Pahang in particular, I asked.

Because Tun daim knows you are from Pahang and may he knows you would want to know what's to become of Pahang.

But didn't Tun Daim write a very optimistic and encouraging article in Utusan Malaysia  a few months ago? I asked.

Yes, said the Oracle. I did discuss that article with Tun Daim and didn't I also show you the transcript of that article to you the last time?

You did, said I. you will observe said the Oracle- that Tun Daim wrote the article with so many caveats and qualifications. BN and especially UMNO can win if they do this and that. Its leaders must go to the ground, walkabouts in Subang, in Petaling Steet and in Kg Pandang are not sufficient; people can see through the superficialities and forced smiles and staged walkabouts. Yes people feel good at that time at seeing the PM and his entourage, but after that what – after they are brought back to the realities of thinking about what's happening in this country.

The oracle mentioned of TUn Daim's exhortations to the 2 top leaders of BN to go meet up with the cawangan people. Meeting with Ketua Bahagians can be a misleading source of information, they will tell of everything good they have done with a view of getting reelected. You need to go down to the basics-listen to the views in the raw. If possible exclude the ketua bahagians.

But they haven't done this. The PM is busy with his overseas trip. The DPM will not move lest whatever actions he takes will be misconstrued as upstaging the boss. That can cause some internal upheavals in UMNO.

And you also will notice that UMNO and BN have lost its influence on the younger generation. 80% of the younger voters are not going to vote for the BN.

READ MORE HERE

 

Can we have a lawyer as the next Chief Justice please?

Posted: 14 Aug 2011 04:17 PM PDT

We have had too many CJs who were administrators and judicial spokespersons for political masters. Small men holding high positions bring shame to the judiciary and to the country.

I pray that Ariffin will be a suitable CJ. The Ariffin that I know would bring comfort. He is a good lawyer and has a sufficient dose of humility in him to be interested inthe business of dispensing justice, especially to the minority and the oppressed. Any idiot can decide in favour of the rich and the powerful – it takes a special Chief Justice who can adequately distance himself from the levers of power, and have the courage to defend the rights of ordinary Malaysians. I hope Ariffin will bring integrity, decency and independence to the Bench once again. High positions can change many of us, but I hope it will not be like that with Ariffin.

As for the present CJ, Tun Zaki Azmi, I wish him a happy retirement. His pronouncements in some cases have bordered on the absurd. His pronouncement that a receiver and manager can have two principals – that is the company (borrower) and the bank (debenture holder) – is mind-boggling. He is more suited to be UMNO's lawyer or Chairman of UMNO's conglomerates than a Chief Justice. When he resigned as Deputy Chairman of UMNO's Disciplinary Board following the burning of his own marriage certificate, he said he did not want to tarnish the good name of the Board. Clearly, he cared more for UMNO than the judiciary, since he then accepted the post of a Federal Court judge when Pak Lah offered it to him.

During the Federal Court hearing of S. Shamala's conversion case, when the Court of Appeal referred several important constitutional points of law for determination, he denied them the answers. Instead, he told the lawyer that the questions posed to the Court were political. The Court of Appeal had sought answers to questions of law concerning the position of several Syariah Court Enactments. It also questioned whether the unilateral conversion of a minor to Islam by Shamala's husband was constitutional – these questions are clearly legal in nature, and are also constitutional issues of great importance. The ramifications may be political, but it is not the Chief Justice's job to manage political fallout.

 

READ MORE HERE.

The Return of Daim Zainuddin's Monopoly Game

Posted: 14 Aug 2011 03:34 PM PDT

And Mahathir was freaking comfortable with such person. Furthermore Mahathir and Daim were intimate friends from the same village in Alor Setar. Daim was so influential during Mahathir's administration that Musa Hitam, Deputy Prime Minister, couldn't get Mahathir's attention when Musa commented about Daim's dealings in awarding huge projects to his cronies such as Tajuddin Ramli, Halim Saad, Wan Azmi, Samsuddin Hassan, Rashid Hussain, Amin Shah and others.

Daim, the Mr Moneybags of UMNO, can easily become the richest man in Malaysia if his wealth is openly declared. During his day as the Finance Minister, Daim persuaded Mahathir for absolute power in running the Economic Planning Unit and the nation's Treasury. In short projects were awarded directly to "preferred" companies aka cronies. As Finance Minister, Daim practically ordered banks to lend money to any companies he desired. Daim and his cronies also profited tremendously from shares allocated from company listing (IPO) on the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange.

At one time Daim Zainuddin was so powerful (and greedy) that his boss, Mahathir, was speechless when confronted by not only Chairman of Japan's banks but also former Britain's Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher that Daim Zainuddin's demand on the quantum of commissions was simply outrages. Daim was so influential politically and monetary that he can influence the ups and downs of the local stock exchange. Eventually Mahathir had to relieve Daim Zainuddin of his position lest the PM wish the whole world to know about the irregularities.

Of course Daim Zainuddin was linked to many scandals over his journey in wealth accumulation. Daim was allegedly illegally acquired 40.7% of UMBC in 1984 while he was already Finance Minister. He also owned substantial stake via nominees in previously Development & Commercial Bank, Rashid Hussain Berhad, Bank of Commerce, United Asian Bank, Southern Bank, and Ban Hin Lee Bank before their mergers in the 1990s when he was still Finance Minister.

Daim's name is also linked in the RM8 billion controversial electrified double-tracking railway project spanning from Gemas to Johor Baru. It seems CREC (China Railways Engineering Corp.), a Chinese company that has Daim Zainuddin's finger-prints and was awarded the Letter of Intent, is fighting tooth and nail with Najib's administration because the PM wanted the project to be awarded to another company. Najib's crony and golf buddy Tan Kay Hock was allegedly asking RM500 million commission of which RM200 million was for Najib's family.

One of his cronies, Tajuddin Ramli, recently created havoc when he exposed that it was former prime minister Dr. Mahathir Mohamad and former finance minister Tun Daim Zainuddin who instructed him to buy shares in Malaysia Airline System (KLSE: MAS, stock-code 3786) to help Bank Negara (Central Bank) recover from foreign exchange losses in 1994. And now another (Daim) crony tycoon Halim Saad who was bailed out in the 1997/1998 Asia financial crisis is making headlines in the local stock market.

Halim Saad

Halim Saad controlled now defunct Renong Group which in turns owned PLUS and UEM Group Berhad. Both PLUS and UEM are now owned by Khazanah. It was reported that Halim and Daim are the man behind Asas Serba, a company which proposed to tale over 25 toll expressways in the Peninsular Malaysia. Asas Serba has offered 20% cut in toll rates in its RM50 billion bid for the acquisition as a carrot to lure the ruling government to accept the proposal. Politically this is attractive since the government could cheer the voters while the government could save RM114 billion (from 2010 until 2038) in a lopsided agreement that allows the concessionaires to raise toll rates every 3-years.

The contender was from Syed Mokhtar Albukhary, one of Najib's many cronies, who is offering RM45 billion to take over all assets of highway concessions with a 10% toll reduction across the board. The proposal also includes a promise not to increase toll rates in the remaining years of the concession. The whispers on the street were that Syed Mokhtar is already monopolize the nation's sugar (that's right, Robert Kuok no longer the Sugar King) and rice industry so should the same person be crowned the Highway King as well?

 

READ MORE HERE.

 

 

 

Cut Waste? Who Is Wasting Resources?

Posted: 14 Aug 2011 01:34 AM PDT

After reading this report, I am compelled to cut to the chase the talk about cutting waste at government hospitals.

Despite soaring health care costs, the Health Ministry has found that a substantial amount of medicine dispensed by government hospitals goes unused or expired.

According to the report, Datuk Eisah A. Rahman, the ministry's senior director of pharmaceutical services, the medicine returned to the pharmacy at various hospitals for the first half of the year was:

  • RM128,818 at Kuala Lumpur Hospital

  • RM82,436 at Sarawak General Hospital

  • RM27,899 at Seberang Jaya Hospital in Penang

  • RM53,769 at Tuanku Fauziah Hospital in Perlis

  • RM190,616 at Tuanku Ja'afar Hospital in Seremban

  • A TOTAL OF RM483 538 from just FIVE HOSPITALS!!!

The ministry is collating data from the other government hospitals. Eisah said the current figures alone reflect the amount of medicine wasted adding that it would be a substantial amount for all the hospitals.

There are 135 hospitals in the country with the ministry spending RM1.6bil on medicine in 2010, an increase of 14.48% from the previous year.

Whilst I applaud Datuk Eisah A. Rahman's courage in making this disclosure, I am quite aghast that it is only now that the public know about this wastage. Why did it take so long for the ministry to take the bull by its horns by implementing the "return medication programme" only last year?

It is most worrying that one reason behind the campaign was to help reduce the possibility of the prescription drugs being misused by others.

Isn't there some sort of stock check system whereby the relevant staff can ensure there is no wastage or misuse? Surely there exists some sort of recording system for the medical supplies and that orders must only be made and approved when existing supplies are about to be exhausted. Does this report reveal more than meets the eye?

One wonders about the size of the cumulative figure for the whole country in ONE year and for the last TEN years. And also, to compare the figures for this wastage per year and assess its proportion in relation in the total expenditure. It is important that the Minister of Health explain how he is going to handle this situation to ensure history is not repeated! More importantly, that the rakyat's money is used prudently FOR THE RAKYAT and NOT for illegals!!!

Who will take responsibility for the state of affairs? What measure will be implemented to avoid such wastage? And, who is the one wasting resources?

What on earth is happening to Health Care in Malaysia? For sure, a major restructuring is needed especially in:

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


DAP is NOT Joining BN

Posted: 14 Aug 2011 04:11 PM PDT

 

By Lim Kit Siang

The media has been abuzz following the Sin Chew Daily interview with Minister in the Prime Minister's Department, Nazri Aziz and his notion that DAP should join the Barisan Nasional.

The question of DAP joining the Barisan Nasional to replace MCA does not arise at all.

DAP is not a Chinese party fighting for Chinese rights but a Malaysian party fighting for the rights of all Malaysians whether Chinese, Malays, Indians, Ibans, Kadazans or Orang Asli as common Malaysian citizens who are entitled to an equal place under the Malaysian sun.

DAP leaders have toiled and sacrificed for their political beliefs in the past 45 years, persecuted and prosecuted in court, detained under the Internal Security Act for as long as four year and nine months, jailed and disqualified as MP and barred from elective office for five years for standing firm and steadfast on a matter of principle to fight for the rights of all Malaysians transcending race and religion – all these sacrifices not just for the DAP to replace MCA in the Barisan Nasional.

Right from the beginning, the vision and commitment of DAP leaders is for a Malaysia where all Malaysians, regardless of race or religion, can unite in a common Malaysian patriotic endeavor to form an efficient, clean and transparent government to build a just, democratic, progressive, prosperous and competitive Malaysia.

DAP must always act not just for the Chinese but for all communities in Malaysia.

Only a new politics and a new national compact, breaking completely away from the politics of "divide and rule" along ethnic lines, subordination of public interests to private greed resulting in destruction of independent national institutions, rampant corruption and cronyism where privatization has become piratisation and NEP an instrument to foster Umnoputras in the name of bumiputras, can save Malaysia.

DAP is fully committed together with PAS and PKR to ensuring Pakatan Rakyat success in 13th general elections to restore the constitutional rights assured to all Malaysians regardless race and religion and bring about fundamental changes so that a new start could be made to fully develop Malaysia's potentials particularly our human resources and talents to be a united, successful and great Malaysian nation.

 

SC: Reprimand Them!

Posted: 14 Aug 2011 12:52 PM PDT

 

By Tony Pua

Despite the nationwide furore over the directive given by Minister in Prime Minister's Department, Nazri Aziz to all Government Linked Companies (GLCs) to withdraw from civil suits against Tajuddin Ramli, none of the GLCs which are listed on Bursa Malaysia have made any public announcement over the matter.

According to The Malaysian Insider, the directive from the Nazri, who claimed to have the mandate of the Government said that:

This is to inform you that the government of Malaysia and the Finance Ministry has agreed to settle all civil claims against Tajuddin Ramli and others to be withdrawn immediately in view of the fact that the government and the Finance Ministry have agreed that the said cases will be settled out of court… For your information the government has given me the mandate to act for the government in this matter.

Nazri's letter also directed the lawyers acting for the GLCs and Danaharta to hand over their cases to the firm of Hasfarizam Wan and Aisha Mubarak, a well-known UMNO lawyer.

Such a directive from the Minister dated 8th August to public-listed entities should have been immediately disclosed on Bursa Malaysia as the litigations involved billions of ringgit in claims and counter-claims which are surely "material" to finances of these companies.

The Board of Directors of these companies must also immediately state their immediate position vis-à-vis the letter from Nazri to allow investors, particularly the minority shareholders to weigh their investment options.

The listed companies involved include Telekom Malaysia Bhd, Axiata Group Bhd, CIMB Bank Bhd, Atlan Holdings Bhd and Malaysia Airlines Bhd (MAS). None of these companies have issued any announcements pertaining to the matter as at the time this statement is issued, nearly a week after the government directive was given.

The failure to disclose material developments on a timely basis may subject the company and/or its director and officers to penalties under the Listing Requirements and the Securities Industry Act, including a fine not exceeding RM1 million, a suspension of trading of the company's securities; and/or the delisting of its securities.

The Securities Commission (SC) must act without fear or favour and reprimand these listed companies for failing to make the necessary disclosures to protect the public and shareholder's rights. SC must also require these companies to publish the Government's directive in full to ensure that investors are not confused by "hearsay" over the exact content of the letter.

The blatant interference by the Government will also rock investors' confidence in our stock markets as it becomes questionable if the Board of Directors will act in the best interest of these companies, or will be nudged to comply with arbitrary government decrees.

SC which has worked hard over the years to improve Malaysia's reputation for poor corporate governance since the Asian financial crisis especially over the then RM3.2 billion bail out of Halim Saad, must not allow this incident to reverse the progress it has achieved.

 

Stop lying!

Posted: 13 Aug 2011 10:43 AM PDT

By Tan Sri Robert Phang

1. The public outrage over Nazri Aziz's letter dated 8th August is justified. It is unprecedented and wrong for the Minister in the Prime Minister's Office to direct all Government-Linked Companies (GLCs) to withdraw their civil suits against former MAS Chairman, Tajuddin Ramli. I find it very appalling that a Minister of Nazri's seniority and status can direct GLCs to withdraw their claims against Tajuddin Ramli which means allowing him to get away with billions of ringgit in debt or RAKYAT MONEY.

2. Nazri's immediate back pedaling by attempting to say that his letter was only an "advice" and not a"directive" or "instruction" by itself shows that Nazri knew that he had made a grave error. Now that Malaysia Today has posted Nazri's letter, it clearly shows that Nazri had lied. To make a mistake is one thing, but to lie in order to cover up for that mistake makes it worse.

3. Another aspect I find deplorable is the lethargy and disinterest shown by Attorney-General Gani Patail and the MACC in prosecuting Tajudin Ramli. This contrasted sharply with the swift manner in which the MACC investigated me after I criticized AG Gani Patail for his involvement and Haj Trip with a crony of Tajudin, one Shahidan Shafie. Based on just a false allegation in an anonymous blog, I was subjected to an immediate investigation by the MACC.

4. I was also publicly humiliated when I was only conditionally cleared in a press statement issued on 31st May 2011 by the MACC Operations Evaluation Panel (OEP) Chairman, Dr. Hadenan Abdul Jalil. I have since demanded the MACC to give me an unconditional and unequivocal clearance. I have yet to receive the MACC's reply.

5. If the MACC can be so speedy to act against me, why is the MACC showing hesitation to act against Tajudin Ramli? There are overwhelming evidence against him available in the public including the report made by the former Director of Commercial Crimes, Ramli Yusuff, to former PM Abdullah Badawi? All these smack of a cover-up.

6. Nazri's action is also an abuse of power in asking for GLC legal work to be passed to a legal firm. Who are the lawyers of this legal firm that they should be given preference over other more eminent lawyers in the country? Are they Nazri's associates and is he receiving gratification for this? If so, the MACC should investigate and prosecute Nazri under section 2(1) of the Emergency (Essential Powers) Ordinance No. 22/1970. Nazri should also be prosecuted under the MACC Act as follows:

MALAYSIAN ANTI-CORRUPTION COMMISSION ACT 2009 Offence of using office or position for gratification

23. (1) Any officer of a public body who uses his office or position for any gratification, whether for himself, his relative or associate, commits an offence. (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), an officer of a public body shall be presumed, until the contrary is proved, to use his office or position for any gratification, whether for himself, his relative or associate, when he makes any decision, or takes any action, in relation to any matter in which such officer, or any relative or associate of his, has an interest, whether directly or indirectly.

(3) For the avoidance of doubt, it is declared that, for the purposes of subsection (1), any member of the administration of a State shall be deemed to use his office or position for gratification when he acts contrary to subsection 2(8) of the Eighth Schedule to the Federal Constitution or the equivalent provision in the Constitution or Laws of the Constitution of that State.

7. I therefore call on the MACC to show some courage and investigate this matter. Otherwise, the MACC will forever not regain the public's trust after Teoh Beng Hock and Ahmad Sarbaini had died over what the public perceived to be due to the harsh treatment by the MACC over much less serious allegations of corruption. Let its not be said that the laws of this country favor the strong over the weak.

8. Since this is the Muslim holy month of Ramadan, I ask Nazri Aziz, who is always known to be courageous in a "jantan" way, to apologise to the Malaysian public for insulting our intelligence in this incident. Nazri needs to do so before he drags the whole administration of PM Najib Razak into public anger and odium. The government can least afford these sort of scandals with the elections being just around the corner.

 

Profusion of Ah Longs a sign of economic woes

Posted: 12 Aug 2011 10:32 PM PDT

All so-called anti-poverty actions are just ad-hoc programs. Solve this and this, and wait for the next one to surface! The government is confused because it doesn't have the financial capability to solve the problem and it doesn't understand all the factors affecting the economy.

By Daniel John Jambun 

The decision by the Government Employees Co-operative Society Berhad (Kopeks) recently to settle debts owed by its members to Ah Longs to the hefty tune of RM500,000 made one wonder if Kopeks is not actually encouraging its members to go into debt, because it could easily bail them out anytime when the situation becomes critical. The bailout was a precedent that set a bad example of co-operative fund management.

It also reminded us how bad the economic situation in the Sabah is right now. If government servants can go into serious debt in spite of earning salaries, imagine the situation for those without jobs, and those in the rural areas who have to live off the land just to keep body and soul together. In this period of high inflation even those with salaries are in fact living below the poverty line.

If we still need to be convinced about the dire situation the people are facing, just let's note that the recent job fair organized by the BN got a surprising response of 30,000! And these only involved those who could afford to come. Many didn't even bother to come because they knew it was not worth the effort and cost to go.

Part of the reasons for the state's poverty is the high unemployment rate among young school leavers and graduates. Many graduates actually survive by opening and operating kueh stalls, even taking on odd jobs. So the repeated advice to youths not to be choosy with jobs is actually a lot of nonsense knowing these young people, out of sheer desperation, are even going by the tens of thousands to Kuala Lumpur, Johore and Singapore to earn money.

High unemployment in Sabah has also caused the existence of sandwich families, which the government has admitted to be very high in number. The term "sandwich family" can be defined, from my own observation, as the case of parents who have to house and feed their children who are already married and have their own children because of joblessness. Many families are not even having any celebration when their children get married because they are so cash-strapped!

There is an ongoing, hidden depression going on in Sabah. They have suffered so long but have partly resigned to their fate knowing they is nothing they can do. The government has simply failed them. A fifty-ringgit note doesn't last very long, doesn't buy a lot these days. People have very little savings and for those who struggle to make ends meet, the money runs out long before payday.

What is more depressing is that we all know the government has not an iota of a  plan to solve the problem; all so-called anti-poverty actions are just ad-hoc programs. Solve this and this, and wait for the next one to surface! The government is confused because it doesn't have the financial capability to solve the problem and it doesn't understand all the factors affecting the economy - globally or locally. So they have become experts in coming up with lame explanations and playing the blame game, like they blame youths for being unemployed because "they are choosy". What a load of nonsense!

So in desperation, the people who need to settle their financial problems have to resort to Ah Longs, or loan sharks. And loan sharks come to fill up the market because there is a huge need for their service. A profusion of loan sharks, the rise of MLMs, get-rich-quick schemes and gambling businesses are a clear indication of serious economic problems in any country. People need a way out to escape financial pitfalls and hope to fulfill their dreams by buying lottery tickets as a way to comfort their troubled souls. The latest way to become rich overnight today is to find the tokek lizard and make millions overnight!

I would challenge the BN government to undertake a statistical survey of the situation and give us the accurate figures for unemployed secondary school leavers and graduates, the number of sandwich families and the grand total of amounts they spend from their parents' income, the number of Sabahans who are working in the Peninsular and Singapore, and most importantly to give an economic blueprint for Sabah to solve unemployment and poverty in the short term.

Or is the government itself too cash-strapped to undertake these surveys?

How much does it cost to pay IDS to do them compared to providing for some road buildings in which the cost are doubled of tripled for the benefit of some political bosses? How much money has been stashed overseas, robbing us of economic trickle-down effects? We can only imagine the terrible losses we have suffered and our children will suffer in the future because of our government's corruption and mismanagement!

What happened to the RM29 million health clinic probe?

Posted: 12 Aug 2011 10:26 PM PDT

The probe was completed last year but little birds in MCA have revealed that the probe papers, with about 28 letters and documents attached, had found the way to the MACC. Why is the MACC sitting pretty on the case with such mounting evidence is anyone's guess. But we don't really need a genius to tell us why.

By Lee Kee

No amount of money spent on public relations will regain the public's confidence in the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) until it displays true justice and independence from the powers that be.

The MACC's selective persecution and prosecution is so glaring to the public that only a mongoloid will believe it is a truly anti-graft agency.

And, please don't rate its administration with Hong Kong's ICAC (Independent Commission Against Corruption). It's insulting.

The Teoh Beng Hock tragedy continues to hog the limelight and public anguish had yet to die down after more than two
years shows it is futile to defend the MACC.

Teoh's death was caused by the MACC. Whether its officers were directly or indirectly responsible, it is still unclear because of the cover ups.

The public cannot stomach the fact that the MACC found it just to grill Teoh aggressively as a witness against his boss, a Selangor DAP executive councillor, over the purchase of Malaysian flags costing about RM2,000 plus for the Merdeka celebration.

However, there are many cases which have resulted in millions, if not billions, of ringgit in losses to the government (read taxpayers).

The infamous Port Klang Free Zone financial scandal is the biggest, running into billions of ringgit.

Unfortunately, there is also another case involving MCA bigwigs running into millions but the MACC is just sitting on it.

Health Minister Liow Tiong Lai had in 2009 ordered a probe into the purchase of land for Klinik Kesihatan Taman Ungku Aminah in Johor Baru (on Lot 44148, PTD71027 HS (D) 239701 Mukim Pulai, Johor Bahtu – about 7.448 acres).

Until today, Liow has evaded and refused to clarify what has happened to the probe? Why the silence?

Is Liow covering his MCA porn president Chua Soi Lek's arse? Or are there other reasons?

The probe was completed last year but little birds in MCA have revealed that the probe papers, with about 28 letters and
documents attached, had found the way to the MACC.

Why is the MACC sitting pretty on the case with such mounting evidence is anyone's guess. But we don't really need a genius to tell us why.

A special purpose vehicle for the scam, Kurnia Heights Sdn Bhd, was set up to buy the land at about RM8 million plus and
subsequently, the same land was sold to the Barisan Nasional (BN) government (read Health Ministry) at a grossly inflated
value of RM29 million.

The directors and shareholders of Kurnia Heights have family ties to a Dato' Tee Siew Keong, the political secretary to the
then Health Minister, Dato' Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek.

The probe papers revealed highly suspicious circumstances surrounding the transactions. Consider the following:
The project was initially identified and initiated by the Health Ministry through its Bahagian Perancangan dan Pembangunan and Pejabat Kesihatan Johor Bahru from April to July 2005;

Kurnia Heights shareholders included a Phua Tai Kiang, a brother-in-law of Dato' Tee Siew Keong's wife, Datin Lee Choon Guek, the political secretary of then Health Minister Dato' Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek;

Kurnia Heights acquired a power-of-attorney after it signed a sale and purchase agreement with the original land owners, the Lee family of Maha Global Sdn Bhd for a sum of about RM8 million plus. The documents show a redemption sum of about RM4.065 million paid to the charge bank, RHB Bank Bhd, and about RM3.048 million paid to Maha Global directly with the usual
upfront deposit. The land was subsequently sold to the Barisan Nasional government (again read taxpayers) for an astonishing RM29 million! Kurnia Heights is seen to have made a clean profit of RM19 million from the sale and purchase transactions;

Kurnia Heights is clearly a special purpose vehicle set up for the purpose of the land transaction as it did not have the cash reserve and assets to be able to transact such a large amount. No bank loans were taken by Kurnia Heights to finance the purchase. The company merely relied on the power-of-attorney to deal on behalf of Maha Global as against the BN government;

Kurnia Heights obviously had prior and inside knowledge of the intended acquisition of land by the Government before the power-of-attorney and land purchase from Maha Global took place. The timing of the transactions i.e between the date of the purchase of land, which happened in October 2005, and the date of the gazette of land acquisition (and change from private
school status to polyclinic). Only persons such as the Minister and senior officers in the Health Ministry have such intimate information;

There is no reason for an "investment holding" company such as Kurnia Heights to purchase the land which is restricted to private school use, before the gazette by the Government, unless it has prior and inside information that the Government had already decided to buy the land;

The person by the name of Tee Yok Ong, who is a relative but is not a director or shareholder of Kurnia Heights was authorised to collect the cheque from the Government on behalf of the company;

There were suspicious reports from Jabatan Penilaian dan Perkhidmatan Harta (JPPH) that indicated the land was over-valued; and

Despite objections raised, the instruction to pay Kurnia Heights was given, as documented.

Malaysia will surely be bankrupted in no time by the corrupt if the BN government is allowed to continue with such practices.

Ultimately, the rakyat or taxpayers will have to bear the consequences.

"Questions for Muslims"

Posted: 12 Aug 2011 07:03 PM PDT


By John Doe
 
Soul-searching Questions:
The only pre-requisite would be, that you have read the complete Koran.
Download the free PDF versions which are freely available, or else, download the numerous mp3 versions if you are too lazy to read the words of the Entity which created the World, and the Planets, and the Quasars, and the Black Holes, and the Warp Holes, and the DNA, and the most important one by Allah of course, is.... JAIS. The 114th Book of the Koran is dedicated to JAIS. In fact, it is titled "JAIS".
SET "A"
Is the Koran the word of Allah?
Is the word of Allah infallible?
Is every single word in the Koran directly from Allah?
Can Muslims choose to obey some and not other rules as dictated in the Koran?

SET "B"
What is Syariah Law?
Is the 
Syariah Law the decree of Allah?
Is this Law absolute?
Can the Syariah Law be changed?
If the 
Syariah Law is absolute and the decree of Allah, then why are no two Muslim countries having the same Syariah Law?
How many Allah's are there, if that's the case?
Does Allah have different Laws for different people?
If he indeed does, and the multiple versions of Syariah Laws prove just that, then move to a country which has more relaxed Syariah Laws. Allah is apparently more Merciful there.
Who is JAIS?

Set "C"
Is Allah fair?
Is Allah just?
Why does Allah condemn some to stoning but not others?
If you believe that every single letter of the Koran should be followed, then Stoning should be brought back.
(And Razak Baginda should be stoned first, because he admitted to adultery with Altantuya.)
Rosmah should be the First Lady to be stoned. Why? Because she does not wear the Jilbab.
And we have all seen her ankles.
Hishamuddin stoned himself with beer. (yes, most of us have seen that picture too)
Has JAIS arrested Hishamuddin yet?
Has JAIS arrested Hishamuddin's daughter yet, for producing porn?
Is Hishamuddin bashing his head on the wall after reading this?
Did he damage the wall?
Can JAIS arrest him for vandalism then?

Set "D"
How literal should we follow the Koran?
Every word? Some words? Or whatever JAIS says?
Who determines that JAIS is the absolute authority on what Allah said 1,400 years ago?
Can JAIS show us the Allah-Human SMS, or e-mail MT the Certificate from Allah?
Who is JAIS again?

Set "E"
If JAIS cannot verify that they are indeed the authority for Allah, then why are their Laws different from the mUddle East?
Why are there only fines, and "re-education" in Malaysia and NOT stoning-to-death?
Where did hand-cutting come from?
When was the last Hand cut after Friday Prayers in Malaysia?
When is the next Hand-Cutting Ceremony?
Why do the Malaysian Police still have their hands?
Why does UMNO members still have their hands?
Should they all not have been cut off because of corruption?
Who is JAIS again?

Set "F"
Does Allah defend people?
Do people have to defend Allah?
Who is JAIS again?
 
JAIS...Keep quiet.

A Meek Attempt?

Posted: 12 Aug 2011 11:38 AM PDT

 

By Tony Pua

The Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak's meek attempt to explain the withdrawal of civilian suits against Tajuddin Ramli as an "off-site" solution epitomises the former's complete lack of political will to fight patronage, rent-seeking and cronyism in Malaysia. In fact, the "off-site" solution by Najib suggests some secret rendezvous between the two parties to thrash out a handshake deal by subterfuge.

In his oft-quoted speech to foreign investors at the launch of his landmark New Economic Model (NEM), Najib said that "we can longer tolerate the behaviour of rent-seeking and patronage". However, the crude and blatant attempt to direct all Government Linked Companies (GLCs) to withdraw their multi-billion suits against Tajuddin to reclaim outstanding debts as well as other alleged misendeavours when he was the Chief Executive of Malaysian Airlines System (MAS) leaves a bad taste in the mouth.

The directive proves beyond doubt that Najib is not only failing to live up to his NEM promise, he is doing the complete opposite. The Prime Minister is more than tolerating behaviour of rent-seeking and patronage, he is protecting the richest cronies who have benefited from the largese handed down by the Barisan Nasional government.

In one of the most outrageous bail outs in Malaysian history, the Malaysian government paid RM1.79 billion to acquire MAS shares belonging to Tajuddin's corporate vehicle at RM8.00 per share despite its market price then being only RM3.62 per share. In addition, gross mismanagement by Tajuddin since 1994 has resulted in MAS suffering billions in losses and was laden with RM9.5 billion in debt.

Despite MAS debts being whittled down via a "asset unbundling" exercise where Penerbangan Malaysia Bhd (PMB) was set up to acquire all MAS aircrafts and their associated debts, MAS never really recovered from Tajuddin's maladministration with its share price today struggling below RM1.80 per share.

The attempt by Najib to withdraw all suits againts Tajuddin, and to even replace all the lawyers independently appointed by the GLCs with a well-known UMNO lawyer smacks of letting Tajuddin getting away scot free.

Is Najib trying to tell us that when the respective GLCs including MAS, Telekom Malaysia, Prokhas (formerly Danaharta), many of which are listed, were poorly advised and did not know what they were doing when they filed their suits againts Tajuddin?

Is the Government telling us that the existing panel of appointed lawyers, including some renown names, were wrongly advising the GLCs to claim billions of ringgit in debt and damages from Tajuddin? Were their advice so bad that they must be replaced wholesale by an UMNO lawyer?

Given the billions of ringgit in rakyat's money involved, the Government must be completely transparent in its actions and not sweep everything under the carpet. The public interest in this case is paramount and must be protected at all cost.

Najib must immediately withdraw the directive to GLCs to drop the suits againts Tajuddin because it is improper, an abuse of power and a corrupt practice to protect a billionaire crony. The Government must instead make public the case against Tajuddin to prove the Prime Minister's determination to eradicate rent-seeking behaviour, political patronage and cronyism.

Did Minister in Prime Minister's Department Nazri Aziz really finish law school?

I have asked yesterday for the Minister in the Prime Minister's Department, Nazri Aziz to be investigated under Section 2(1) of the Emergency (Essential Powers) Ordinance No. 22/1970 where "Any member of the Administration, Parliament or State Legislative Assembly or any public officer who commits a corrupt practice shall be liable to a term of imprisonment of 14 years or a fine of RM 20,000 or both."

A "corrupt practice" in this case is defined as "any act done by a member…in his capacity as such member…whereby he has used his public position or office for his pecuniary or other advantage…"

When questioned on the above, Nazri retorted that I was "practising double standards".

Nazri told The Malaysian Insider, "I want to ask him (Pua): When (PAS president Abdul Hadi Awang asked the Damansara Utama Methodist Church (DUMC) and Jais (Selangor Islamic Religious Department) to see him and explain the recent church raid, why did he not rebuke Hadi? Because what power does Hadi have in doing so? He is not the mentri besar of Selangor and neither is he the minister for religious affairs. So why the double standards, Tony?"

I'm completely shocked by the absurdity of the analogy used to accuse me of being hypocriticaland practising double standards.

Firstly, PAS President Abdul Hadi Awang did not ask DUMC and JAIS to see him. Hadi asked to see them to better understand the recent controversy at DUMC.

Secondly, PAS President did not give any directive to JAIS, a government body – whether to withdraw from investigation the alleged offences or to take action against any party.

Thirdly, even if Hadi did in effect express an opinion on the issue, one way or another, it does not constitute a directive especially since Hadi is not a "member of the Administration" who is able to exercise the powers of his public office over JAIS.

On the other hand, Nazri as a Minister is clearly a "member of the Administration" who has "used his public position or office" to unduly exercise improper influence over the actions of Government Linked Companies (GLCs) by-passing the GLCs Board of Directors, possibly to obtain "pecuniary or other advantage…"

It is the exact same law used to find Anwar Ibrahim guilty of alleged abuse of power in 1999 where he was sentenced to jail for 6 years. Anwar, while holding the post of Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance, was found guilty of having "committed corrupt practice" by giving alleged directives to two police officers.

If there is a relevant analogy at all, it has to be with the former Deputy Prime Minister's case. The comparison between his actions and that of the PAS President is that between night and day, which raises the question of whether Nazri is qualified to take on the role of Minister in-charge of law.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved