Ahad, 14 Ogos 2011

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


DAP, PKR still wary over church raid despite PAS’s stand

Posted: 13 Aug 2011 06:11 PM PDT

(The Malaysian Insider) - DAP and PKR leaders refrained today from openly supporting PAS's stand on a controversial church raid by Islamic authorities, revealing the continuing uneasiness among the Pakatan Rakyat (PR) parties over religious issues.

When contacted by The Malaysian Insider today, some leaders chose to decline comment while others would not openly state their support or rejection of the Islamist party's statement yesterday.

The leaders told this news portal that speculation at this point would be premature as the details of the raid and the investigation by the Selangor Islamic Religious Department (Jais) on reports of proselytisation have yet to be publicly revealed.

PAS decided after its political bureau meeting yesterday to back Jais if the agency should find concrete proof that Christians were proselytising to Muslims at the Damansara Utama Methodist Church (DUMC) in Petaling Jaya.

"I think let's wait for the report first. We don't know the details," said DAP advisor Lim Kit Siang, before choosing not to speak further on the topic.

Lim had earlier lambasted PAS's Datuk Hasan Ali, the Selangor state executive councillor for religious affairs, when the latter issued a statement justifying the raid by claiming proof of proselytisation had been found.

The DAP veteran then accused the Islamist party leader of breaking ranks with the Selangor state government as his statement appeared to contradict that of Mentri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim who had said he regretted the incident.

Selangor's Islamic enactments allow the religious authorities to act against non-Muslims if they are found guilty of proselytising to Muslims.

When contacted, DAP Socialist Youth chief Anthony Loke also declined comment today and said he would refer the query to Selangor DAP chief Teresa Kok, a devout Christian and a state executive councillor in the Selangor administration.

DAP national publicity secretary Tony Pua would not expressly declare his support for PAS's firm stand but pointed out that its deputy president, Mohamad Sabu, had said the party would back Jais only if proof of proselytisation was found, adding this was "expressing the obvious".

"Mat Sabu (Mohamad) said if there if proof of proselytisation — which is indeed restricted by our Constitution — his call for the relevant parties to be charged accordingly is only expressing the obvious; nothing more, nothing less," he told The Malaysian Insider.

Pua stressed, however, that Jais' investigation must be done in accordance with the law and pressed for the agency to apologise if it finds that it had made a mistake.

READ MORE HERE

 

‘Pakatan leaders stopped MBPJ from seizing DUMC’

Posted: 13 Aug 2011 04:54 PM PDT

Blogger Papa Gomo makes the claim based on a document allegedly leaked from MBPJ.

(Free Malaysia Today) - Pro-Umno blogger Papa Gomo has claimed that Pakatan Rakyat leaders had interfered to stop Petaling Jaya City Council's (MBPJ) shutting down the Damansara Utama Methodist Church (DUMC) last Thursday.

The seizure operation was supposed to be conducted by MBPJ's security and enforcement division.

DUMC has been in the limelight since Aug 3 when Selangor religious department (JAIS) interrupted  a dinner held at the church following allegations that efforts to proselytize the Christian faith to Muslims were under way.

Papa Gomo's claim was substantiated with a report purportedly from MBPJ's enforcement and security division on its operation to seize the hall.

The report stated that on Aug 11 at 10.30am, the enforcement and security division had to call off its operation to seize DUMC after receiving a telephone call at 10.58am from Selangor senior exco Teresa Kok who queried about the seizure. The report added that Kok requested the operation to be called off.

The report also claimed that PAS' Shah Alam MP Khalid Samad had similarly urged the MBPJ to cancel the seizure operation at 11.07am.

Papa Gomo also claimed that according to the leaked report, another Selangor exco, DAP's Ronnie Liu  had allegedly warned that personnel from the security and enforcement division woud be transferred out if they continued with the operation.

The report claimed that at 11.40 am, there were more instructions from the top, including from PKR's Elizabeth Wong, to cancel the operation and the police was also notified abut the cancellation.

The two page report has the word 'Sulit' (confidential) stamped on its top right corner but does not carry MBPJ's letterhead.

Catch-22 for PAS

According to Tulang Besi's conspiracy theory, "If PAS opposed JAIS' raid on Damansara Utama Methodist Centre, the Islamist party would be shunned by the Muslims.

"And if PAS supported JAIS, then it would lose credibility among the non-Muslim crowd."

READ MORE HERE

 

Islamic groups ask Jais to act against proselytisation

Posted: 13 Aug 2011 03:46 PM PDT

 

By Melissa Chi, The Malaysian Insider

Islamic non-governmental organisations (NGO) have demanded immediate action from the Selangor Islamic Religious Department (Jais) against those who tried to convert Muslims.

"We urge the Jais and the other authorities to immediately take action and if there were efforts to convert Muslims from holding their faith as claimed by the National Fatwa Council Chairman and former Chairman of the National Fatwa Council.

"We are united and committed to defending the faith of Muslims held in this country from the encroachment in accordance with the position of Islam as a religion of the Federation of Malaysia Constitution and the provision of the existing laws including enforcing the law of apostasy," the group of NGOs said in a statement today, as a result from the roundtable discussion organised by Ikatan Ilmuan Malaysia (ILMUAN).

The NGOs were referring to the recent raid of a dinner at the Damansara Utama Methodist Church (DUMC) in Petaling Jaya. The authorities have denied that a raid had been conducted at DUMC, preferring instead to claim that they had merely inspected the premises that August 3 after receiving complaints that Muslims were attending the function.

The discussion, "Ummah faith issues: What should our attitude be and what is our role?" was held yesterday at the Selangor state executive councilors housing complex.

The NGOs added that they uphold and support the efforts of any party to strengthen Muslims' faith through education and welfare programmes and will demand empowerment programmes including the return of adequate assistance to religious schools.

The group also demanded that the relevant bodies with Islamic trust properties to act efficiently to help marginalised Muslims so that their life are "protected and secure" and that the issues related to the faith of Muslims are not manipulated and distorted by the newspapers to give political advantage to a certain party until it undermines the solidarity of Muslims.

"We stressed that issues relating to the faith of Muslims are very sensitive issues that could affect racial harmony, thus calling on all parties not to act against the stipulated law.

"We urge the institutions governing the affairs of Muslims are submitted to those truly qualified and respected so that these institutions are seen as absolutely authoritative," they said.


READ MORE HERE.

With Penang in mind, move to unseat Tsu Koon gathers pace

Posted: 13 Aug 2011 03:32 PM PDT

 

By Jahabar Sadiq, The Malaysian Insider

Tan Sri Dr Koh Tsu Koon is going to get taste of what Sarawak Chief Minister Tan Sri Abdul Taib Mahmud got in the run-up to polls in the east Malaysian state — the constant drumbeat of politicians and the media asking him to retire from politics. 

The view in Putrajaya is that the mild-mannered Gerakan chief should step down as head of the Barisan Nasional (BN) component party before the coming general elections if the coalition is to have any chance of wresting back Penang from Pakatan Rakyat (PR). 

While Tsu Koon (picture) has not been dogged by allegations of corruption and abuse of power as Taib Mahmud, he is viewed as indecisive and a symbol of the BN leadership which was rejected by the voters in 2008. 

BN chairman and Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak has spoken behind closed doors on the need to rejuvenate the Gerakan leadership with younger talent and acknowledges that BN component parties need new talent if inroads are to be made in Penang, where DAP's Lim Guan Eng is a formidable opponent. 

In its latest issue dated August 13, international weekly The Economist dubbed Penang "the first custom-made city of globalisation" and credited Lim for boosting the port city's revival by axing a racial special treatment economic policy in the state to create a more level-playing field that appeals to foreign investors. 

"He has become the first governor in Malaysia to open up all state tenders to competition. This has entailed dismantling the special preferences for ethnic Malays that have underpinned the BN's rule since the early 1970s," the influential magazine on business and international affairs said of the Penang chief minister and his economic reforms. 

"Adapted to the national stage, such policies could transform the way that the Malaysian federal government conducts business," it added. 

The international praise for Lim is seen as an indictment of Tsu Koon's rule of the island state, which began prospering under his mentor, the late Tun Lim Chong Eu, before the Princeton graduate took over as chief minister from 1990 to 2008. 

In what is likely to be a recurring theme, Umno-owned Mingguan Malaysia urged Tsu Koon today to consider his position as chief of Gerakan, with the paper's Awang Selamat saying that the Minister in the Prime Minister's Department was only concerned with publicity and appearing in photographs with national leader. 

The commentator said that his ministerial position appeared to be wasted on him because he had not used the profile to galvanise Gerakan in Penang or chart a plan to regain the state. 

Still, using the media to push out a seasoned politician is a strategy fraught with minefields. In the run- up to Sarawak elections, Najib tried to nudge a politically liable Taib by getting him to say that he would not lead the state for the full term.

 

READ MORE HERE.

London riots: police debate how far they should go to regain control

Posted: 13 Aug 2011 12:15 PM PDT

Police in Hackney during the riots
Police in Hackney, north London, on Monday night. The Metropolitan Police's deputy assistant commissioner Stephen Kavanagh said the force was not "namby-pamby". Photograph: Kerim Okten/EPA

The Guardian, UK

He expanded on the reason not to fire baton rounds: "We had people as young as 11 being arrested for looting last night. Do we genuinely want to see the police of London using that type of tactic on 11-year-olds? We have to be very careful about what we use and how we're using it."

Pictures of officers standing and watching as youths smashed and looted shops have puzzled the public

The biggest outbreak of rioting to hit Britain in living memory has led to debates within the police service about how far forces should go to regain control of the streets. Pictures of police officers standing and watching as youths smashed and looted shops have puzzled the public.

But Steven Kavanagh, the Metropolitan police deputy assistant commissioner, denied those images were a sign of the force being soft on rioters: "The Met is not namby pamby," he told the Guardian.

He added: "The face of policing has changed, 25-30 years ago it would have been a different response, we'd have gone to baton rounds and water cannon straight away. Now we are more measured."

He said the police faced contrasting demands from the public: "There are two extremes, the hang 'em and flog 'em brigade, and those who say these are frustrated youngsters."

Twenty-five years ago, Kavanagh said, officers might have "let anger get the better of themselves", and go wading in, but he said there was now a more disciplined approach, with officers not charging in as they were "holding the line" to protect firefighters putting out blazes that threatened life.

With police numbers stretched beyond anything experienced in living memory, another source said commanders had to make tough choices. "Sometimes you will let offences take place because you can't afford to lose two to three officers for every arrest. The priority is not to protect property but to protect life. There will be no order to be soft."

At a Scotland Yard press conference Kavanagh said the Met was considering using baton rounds. But there is huge debate among the police leadership about the wisdom of such a move.

Kavanagh said of the option of using the devices: "The Met does not wish to use baton rounds but if it gets put into a position that it needs to protect the people and the property and the lives of Londoners, [then] we will do so."

He expanded on the reason not to fire baton rounds: "We had people as young as 11 being arrested for looting last night. Do we genuinely want to see the police of London using that type of tactic on 11-year-olds? We have to be very careful about what we use and how we're using it."

Another source said that it would be too early to use baton rounds: "They are for use when there is mortal danger, such as at Broadwater Farm. Here, we're in mortal danger of losing control of the streets and of shops being looted. It would be disproportionate."

Baton rounds can only be "deployed", or, given to officers to use, on the direct orders of the commissioner of the Metropolitan police. They have never been fired on the British mainland. Outside London, a chief constable is required to authorise their deployment.

Specially trained officers attached to C019, the elite firearms unit, fire the single baton rounds from devices that look like shotguns.

Brian Paddick, Scotland Yard's former deputy assistant commissioner, who has trained in the deployment of baton rounds, said: "If you believe you are losing control of the situation, it is a legitimate tactic. They are quite effective in dispersing crowds. The advantage is you can put a lot of distance between you and the crowd. The downside is, if you hit someone in the wrong place you can kill them."

One senior officer, involved in drawing up plans to quell riots in his area, said he would favour authorising use of baton rounds if they were needed. "When you've got a big crowd who are intent on over-running your officers, I don't see the big deal in using them. You can withdraw or use baton rounds, which are more under your control than using dogs. I don't see it as crossing a Rubicon for British policing – it's much better than a baton charge where you can't control the level of violence officers use."

Paddick explained how the devices would be used in London: "There is a public-order commander on the ground who sends a message to the commissioner that all conventional means to contain the crowd has failed. The commissioner then gives the designated senior officer authority to use them. "When the DSO, having been given the authority, believes the situation is beyond conventional means, they can then be used."

Baton rounds were issued to officers at the Broadwater Farm riots in Tottenham, London, in 1985, but were not used.

Paddick said the weapons had been issued, every year for at least the last 10 years, for the Notting Hill carnival, in London. "It is there, if there is a riot and conventional tactics can't contain the violence."

For police the scale and intensity of the recent riots are creating a need for new thinking, in a race against time to quell the unrest. One source said: "It is beyond the experience of anything we have experienced. If a bomb goes off we know what to do. This is as highly challenging as anything could be."

 

Pua threatens to sue Najib, Nazri for Tajuddin Ramli bailout

Posted: 13 Aug 2011 12:08 PM PDT

By Clara Chooi, The Malaysian Insider

DAP MP Tony Pua threatened legal action against Datuk Seri Najib Razak and Datuk Seri Mohamed Nazri Aziz today, saying they would be sued for negligence if Putrajaya fails to recover the billions in debts owed by Tan Sri Tajuddin Ramli. 

The Petaling Jaya Utara MP predicted the directive ordering all government-linked companies (GLC) to withdraw their suits against the former Malaysia Airlines (MAS) chairman would likely see him escaping scot-free. 

"If the current Attorney-General is unwilling to consider the above action against the Prime Minister due to the complete lack of independence of the former's office, Najib can be assured that full, open and transparent investigations will be carried out by the Pakatan Rakyat (PR) government against his misdeeds should we secure victory in the next General Election," Pua warned in a statement today. 

"This is to ensure that those who have knowingly and negligently caused losses to the government's coffers will be held accountable and will not be let off unpunished," he added. 

The DAP national publicity secretary demanded an assurance from both PM Najib and Nazri, a senior Cabinet minister, that Tajuddin would be made to settle a bulk of his debts to the GLCs and reminded them that it involved taxpayers monies. 

He said if the GLCs heeded the directive and withdrew all civil suits against Tajuddin before a settlement is achieved, the companies would no longer have any avenue to claim any compensation or damages from the tycoon. 

"This is because they would not be able continue with the existing suit against Tajuddin once they are withdrawn. 

"At the same time, because the claims were for actions which occurred more than six years ago, the GLCs will not be able to initiate new legal actions against Tajuddin as it would be time-barred," Pua (picture) said. 

An out-of-court settlement with the GLCs, he added, would grant Tajuddin little or no incentive to settle any of his debts once the suits are withdrawn.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Now is not the time for police to use water cannon and baton rounds

Posted: 13 Aug 2011 12:02 PM PDT

David Cameron with police
David Cameron has announced that ministers have drawn up plans to allow police to deploy water cannon at 24 hours' notice. Photograph: Jeff J Mitchell/PA

Although I understand the enthusiasm of politicians and communities for robust measures, excessive force will destroy our model of policing in the long term. What we must hang on to in all of this is the British model of policing, premised on human rights and the minimum use of force. We police with consent and must be professional, proportionate, fair and justifiable to the public at all times.

By Hugh Orde (The Guardian, UK)

 

Such tactics should only be used in very specific circumstances and we will not rashly deviate from the British model of policing

One of the greatest strengths of British policing is that operational decision-making is conducted not by politicians, but by professional chief police officers who have spent their whole career in policing. While David Cameron today referred to some of the more extreme measures available to us, they are not new, and responsibility for their deployment remains entirely a matter for chief officers. There can be no confusion here at all; it is a fact that we cannot be ordered to police in a certain way but we will be held robustly accountable for what we choose to do or not do.

As one of only two officers in the country to have ordered the use of water cannon and baton rounds in public-order policing, my professional judgment is it would be the wrong tactic, in the wrong circumstances at this moment. Both require an extremely precise situation. The use of water cannon, while logistically difficult, works against large stationary crowds throwing missiles at police or, as I witnessed in Northern Ireland, at other communities. It achieves distance between police and unlawful crowds that is often vital.

Utilising baton rounds, an even more severe tactic, is fundamentally to protect life. When I ordered their use, again in Northern Ireland, my officers were being attacked by blast bombs and live fire. I would always use both with a heavy heart, but it is always an issue of proportionality.

What we have seen so far from these riots, involving fast-moving and small groups of lawless people, is a situation that merits the opposite end of public-order policing.

This morning, myself and members of police forces around the country had the opportunity to share with the home secretary the tactics that are working and the evidence is that fast arrests, rapid processing of prisoners through the court system, making sure the correct charges are being placed and collecting appropriate evidence through proper, investigative practice, is working. Baton rounds and water cannon were not mentioned once.

Although the policing of disturbances in London on Monday has been widely criticised for lack of arrests, we have learned and moved on quickly from it.

Indeed, events on Monday posed unique difficulties for the deployed 6,000 officers – more than have ever policed an event in London. Making arrests at that time, although some did occur, would not have been sensible; we needed cops on the street to keep the peace and preserve life. We can deal with property loss and damage post-event, and while foresight is not always a commodity afforded to the police, part of any deal is that the police will have to explain themselves to the public.

What we have seen so far is not soft policing, and although I understand the enthusiasm of politicians and communities for robust measures, excessive force will destroy our model of policing in the long term. What we must hang on to in all of this is the British model of policing, premised on human rights and the minimum use of force. We police with consent and must be professional, proportionate, fair and justifiable to the public at all times.

 

 

A hard sell, but new allies want it to work

Posted: 13 Aug 2011 10:37 AM PDT

 

(NST) - The trouble with that is, proclaiming that MAS and AirAsia are now friends doesn't actually make anyone believe that they can be.

ON Friday, at an interview, AirAsia Bhd co-founder Datuk Kamarudin Meranun brandished his newly-obtained Malaysia Airlines photo ID.

It was comical, as he was wearing his trademark AirAsia cap in the photo.

"Unique what... MAS photo ID with AirAsia cap. That's the spirit of the collaboration," he joked with partner Tan Sri Tony Fernandes.


Nothing brings the reality of the MAS-AirAsia partnership closer than seeing the tag.

As a deal, the share swap between Khazanah Nasional Bhd and Tune Air Sdn Bhd has sparked a lot of talk, most of it negative.

A lot of the scepticism stems from the fear of the unknown.


After all, how many times in the history of Corporate Malaysia have you heard of a cry for help from the government's investment arm, Khazanah Nasional Bhd? The answer is, never.

So when the seemingly invincible Khazanah Nasional did a share swap with the founders of its one-time-foe AirAsia, obviously a lot of people went, "Hmm ..something MUST be up".

It could be, though, that Khazanah Nasional was probably at the end of its tether with MAS. Two restructuring efforts and five managing directors later, MAS was again not making money.

No one wanted to hear about all the reasons why the national carrier was not making money. They just wanted for it to make money.

So when MAS said it had made about RM240 million in profit (after an expected RM300 million compensation from Airbus for the delay in the delivery of the A380) and upstart AirAsia announced a billion ringgit in earnings for last year, it probably got Khazanah Nasional seriously thinking.

Never mind that low-cost flying is currently king and that AirAsia was never encumbered by the legacy issues that MAS had. Khazanah Nasional must have been green with envy.

And desperation makes for strange bedfellows, doesn't it?

So on Aug 9, 2011, we witnessed the signing of a deal that made AirAsia and Malaysia Airlines, for all intents and purposes, "friends". More unbelievable still, Khazanah Nasional was the friend that introduced them.

The trouble with that is, proclaiming that MAS and AirAsia are now friends doesn't actually make anyone believe that they can be.

We could all be pleasantly surprised though.

The AirAsia and MAS partnership might work for the very simple reason that both Khazanah Nasional and AirAsia want to make it work.

Who would have thought that Khazanah Nasional would agree to a deal that hadn't had all its i's dotted and t's crossed yet?

And who would have thought that Fernandes and Kamarudin would ever swap AirAsia shares for MAS'?

There's more, too.

MAS' new executive committee and the Joint Collaboration Committee for the MAS-AirAsia partnership had meetings last week. The former's was held at MAS' headquarters, while the latter's was held at AirAsia's.

"It was different. MAS has a really nice boardroom with teak wood and all, and they have a VIP bathroom. Here (in AirAsia) we use the same one as everyone else," Kamarudin quipped.

Datuk Azman Yahya, who is the chairperson of the Joint Collaboration Committee, even joined Kamarudin to perform Friday prayers at the nearby mosque.

On the same day, MAS' new chairman Tan Sri Md Nor Yusof had a walkabout at the LCCT, with Fernandes by his side.

Trivial details perhaps, but telling of the working partnership to come.

As important were the MAS executive committee decisions that no expense would be spared in rebuilding the MAS premium brand and that there should be work to harness the talent that MAS has.

Two very important decisions for an airline that has been obsessed with cost cuts and seen enough management changes that staff morale is so low, it's almost in negative territory now.

Are there more issues to be thrashed out? Most definitely.

Could there be a fallout? Who knows.

What matters is that whether it's an AirAsia, MAS or Khazanah Nasional cap that you prefer, let's hope that there is a common goal. Growth for MAS, AirAsia, Khazanah Nasional and ultimately, the country.

Work with EC to ensure best possible result at the polls

Posted: 13 Aug 2011 10:27 AM PDT

 

(The Star) - THERE are different ways for political parties to approach an election as an exercise in democracy and a competitive event.

One is to engage fully and in good faith in the obligatory processes involved.

The other is to withhold full participation for whatever reason, while pointing accusing fingers at official agencies involved in the election process.

This unproductive course is often accompanied by confrontational campaigns aimed at official processes and procedures.

It typically precludes suggestions and recommendations, even by way of constructive criticism of any perceived shortcomings.

However, voters of all political persuasions deserve better from those who would offer themselves as public representatives.

It is not good enough to try and score political points pre-election by condemning electoral conditions without doing anything meaningful about it.

In this, a test case concerns the attitude and response of political parties towards the Election Commission (EC).

The commission is a politically neutral body tasked with carrying out an election, and all political parties are obliged to work with it to that end.

Ultimately, it is what it does and what others allow it to be.

If some parties insist on not working fully with it, then it can hardly be blamed for seeming to work closer with others who do.

It is incumbent on all parties to give their utmost cooperation in the period leading up to an election.

It is no good to act as if the EC were somehow already a partisan force, and then complain that it appears partisan or is biased.

Let not any presumed partisanship be regarded as a fait accompli, only to encourage a self-serving, self-fulfilling prophecy for those out to discredit the EC.

For its part, the EC cannot be accused of merely sitting on its laurels.

It is, for example, set to remove some 12,000 names of voters aged 90 and above from the electoral roll.

This is among the ways to minimise, if not excise altogether, the prospect of phantom voters lurking in the roll.

All parties should surely have an interest in ensuring that the EC functions efficiently and appropriately.

And ensuring that surely requires the full and active participation of all parties.

That way, everyone can be sure that whatever the election outcome, the result will be for the best.

Umno to counter Pakatan Hari Raya blitz with grassroots campaign

Posted: 13 Aug 2011 09:57 AM PDT

By Shazwan Mustafa Kamal, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 14 — Umno leaders has dismissed Pakatan Rakyat's (PR) pre-election campaign strategy for Hari Raya, expressing confidence that their grassroots strength alone is enough to curb their political foes from influencing people during the festive occasion. 

The federal opposition revealed recently that it planned on campaigning for the Malay vote ahead of the next general elections by distributing specially-prepared information kits, pamphlets and CDs to rural folk in kampungs during Hari Raya. 

The plan, according to PR leaders like Azmin Ali would be to trumpet PR's reform agenda in areas they believe has limited access to information. PR leaders have said they would make full use of the Hari Raya holidays to participate in "balik kampung" programmes aimed at spreading the "PR word". 

Umno leaders remain unimpressed by PR's plans, and will launch a counter-offensive grassroots campaign to rebut any allegations brought by the opposition. The same leaders have also claimed that PR's pre-polls strategies were "not new" and that Umno had already utilised similar campaign tactics in the past. 

"The difference between Pakatan and Umno is that they are just planning these campaigns now. We have already been engaging with people on the grassroots level throughout the year. Our major concern is that the information given by Pakatan on current issues like Bersih and the economy is misleading...therefore we have our own networking system all set up and ever ready to go," Umno MP Datuk Abdul Rahman Dahlan told The Malaysian Insider. 

Umno's advantage over PR, claimed the Kota Belud MP was its grassroots machinery — where the party has over 20,000 branches throughout the entire country with the exception of Sarawak. 

"Umno has an established networking system, whether there is elections or not. We have over 20,000 branches in the country, even in areas where the MP or assemblyman is from MCA or MIC. Even in Pakatan Rakyat stronghold areas like Jelutong, we have our own branches- to make the dissemination of information and campaigning smooth. 

"Go to almost any part of Malaysia and you will find an Umno branch, even in opposition strongholds. This is because we are ready, when Pakatan makes a mistake or fails to attend to the needs of their constituents, we will take up that responsibility," said Abdul Rahman. 

The Barisan Nasional (BN) backbencher said that Umno cemented BN's manifestos through localised programmes like community gotong-royong events as well as local cooking classes organised by the Malay party. 

"We have our fact sheets and CDs as well. What PR is doing is not rocket science...Azmin himself used to be an Umno guy, most of Pakatan's strategies are our (Umno)'s inventions," added Abdul Rahman.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Tsu Koon slams Ezam’s ‘jihad’ threats

Posted: 13 Aug 2011 12:01 AM PDT

(The Malaysian Insider) - Senator Tan Sri Dr Koh Tsu Koon slammed today his Barisan Nasional (BN) colleague Umno Senator Ezam Mohd Nor's threat to wage war against those who try to proselytise Muslims.

The Minister in the Prime Minister's Department in National Unity and Performance Management said in a statement that Ezam's threats had sent out the wrong message and could damage the coalition's reputation.

"Senator Ezam Nor's open threat to burn two online news portals (Malaysia Kini and Malaysian Insider) is uncalled for, unwarranted and unacceptable, further fanning emotions in the controversy arising out of JAIS' (Selangor Islamic Affairs Department) action against DUMC (Damansara Utama Methodist Church)," Koh (picture) said.

The Gerakan party president said Ezam has his right to express his views about defending Islam and his concern about alleged proselytisation of Muslims which is now being investigated.

"If he thinks that reports in the online news portals were not correct and proper, he should present cogent arguments against them, present relevant facts and solid evidence, or even take legal action.

"Unfortunately, instead of using his intellect and influence to argue and counter whatever he did not agree with, he allowed himself to be overtaken by emotions and sentiments which have evoked negative reaction of others," Koh said.

Ezam vowed yesterday to wage war against those who try to proselytise Muslims, in a highly-charged assembly where he also defended the state Islamic religious authorities' raid on a dinner at a church last week.

The former PKR leader and a group of demonstrators rallied after Friday prayers here in support of the Jais over its raid at the DUMC in Petaling Jaya on August 3. Among those present was Kulim MP Zulkifli Noordin.

READ MORE HERE

 

Punish if proselytisation proven, PAS tells Jais

Posted: 12 Aug 2011 06:55 PM PDT

 

By Clara Chooi, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 13 – PAS finally declared its official stand today on the recent church raid in Petaling Jaya, saying the Selangor Islamic Religious Department (Jais) must take immediate action if it finds proof that Christians were proselytising to Muslims there.

 

Its leaders said the decision is in accordance with PAS's position as a party founded on Islamic principles, adding that under no circumstances would it compromise on religious matters.

"PAS is an Islamist party. Our Constitution states Islam is our foundation and the Quran.

"So PAS's priority is to defend the sanctity of Islam, there is no compromise when it comes to upholding the faith," deputy president Mohamad Sabu told reporters after the party's political bureau meeting here this evening.

MORE TO COME

Umno deputy minister wants referendum law, lower voting age

Posted: 12 Aug 2011 05:10 PM PDT

By Melissa Chi, The Malaysian Insider

Higher Education Deputy Minister Datuk Saifuddin Abdullah said today Malaysia should have laws allowing for referendums, adding that the Election Commission (EC) should also lower the voting age to 18.

There is now no law to hold referendums, which is a direct vote in which an entire electorate is asked to either accept or reject a particular proposal.

"It is about time we had legislation for referendums. I think the government of the day, whichever party, should get approval not just from the Parliament, but from the people as well, on big or fundamental issues," he said at the Electoral Reform and Purification of Democracy Forum organised by the Malaysian Islamic Youth Movement (Abim) and the Abim Lawyers Group (GPA).

Other panellists were Professor Dr Redzuan Othman, Universiti Malaya's dean of the Literature and Social Science Faculty, and Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs (Ideas) director Wan Firdaus Wan Fuaad.

Saifuddin, an Umno supreme council member, also said there should be an increase in civil society participation in the democratic process.

He said the problem now was that the state was still "condescending and does not trust civil society".

"I agree with automatic registration for 18-year-olds to vote, if not for the 13th general election, there should be a roadmap leading towards this goal. If needed, we should change the law or the Constitution to make it easier for the people to vote," he said.

The current minimum age for voting is 21.

He had previously urged PR and BN lawmakers to start "the ball rolling" by forming a caucus in Parliament for such a cause.

The Temerloh MP also said: "Just because BN had never lost doesn't mean that the election is clean, and vice versa just because there is a constant change in government doesn't necessarily mean the election is fair. We cannot be so simplistic in that thinking."

 

READ MORE HERE.

Bersih 2.0: Najib never specified Shah Alam in stadium offer

Posted: 12 Aug 2011 05:08 PM PDT

By Clara Chooi, The Malaysian Insider

Election watchdog Bersih 2.0 disputed Datuk Seri Najib Razak's claim yesterday that he had specifically offered "a stadium in Shah Alam" for its July 9 rally.

Steering committee member Maria Chin Abdullah reminded the prime minister today that he had never named a stadium when he made the offer to the coalition just days before the mammoth event.

"That offer only came from Selangor Mentri Besar (Tan Sri) Khalid Ibrahim, not from the PM. Najib never said which stadium... he only said a stadium. Perhaps we were expected to read his mind," she told The Malaysian Insider when contacted this afternoon.

Maria Chin (picture) was commenting on Najib's statement to the press yesterday that he had specifically offered Bersih 2.0 use of a stadium in Shah Alam to hold its rally and had never retracted the offer.

"We are regretful that the offer made by the government (to Bersih) to have its gathering in a stadium in Shah Alam was not accepted by the (rally) organisers.

"This offer was never denied or retracted by the government. We wanted to avoid any untoward incidents from happening," he had said.

Maria Chin recalled that the stadium offer was made following the Yang di-Pertuan Agong Tuanku Mizan Zainal Abidin's surprising decree on July 3, calling for all warring parties to reach a mutual agreement over Bersih 2.0's electoral reform demands.

A check on media reports of the sequence of events in the run-up to the tumultuous July 9 rally revealed that Najib had not expressly named any stadium in Shah Alam when he made the offer.

In one media report on July 3, Najib was quoted as saying: "We are willing to provide a stadium for them to rally but why choose to protest in the streets. The government is not against them rallying in a stadium from morning until night. Just don't hold street protest as it is very risky to the nation."

 

READ MORE HERE.

Polls panel to remove inactive voters above 90

Posted: 12 Aug 2011 12:09 PM PDT

By Farrah Naz Karim, NST

PUTRAJAYA: Those above 90 years of age and are considered to be "inactive" will be struck off the electoral roll.

Under this approach of cleaning up the roll, which is updated every three months, the Election Commission has removed some 12,000 names to date.

EC chairman Tan Sri Abdul Aziz Yusof said the National Registration Department would be the one to assess if the individuals under the category should be rendered as such.

He said the NRD would, among others, study their transactions and movements as well as correspondence before classifying them as inactive.

However, he said in cases where those struck off the list reappeared, the EC would re-upload their names on the roll.

The commission's database, which mirrors that of the NRD, does not allow removal of names unless it was done by the department, which could only do so when families of the deceased come forward to report the death.

However, under the EC's own initiative, names of those above the age of 120 are automatically removed.

The EC is also in the midst of removing 469 names that were found to be duplicated in the latest roll.

On allegations that the commission had been adding permanent residents in the electoral role, he said the opposition, especially Pas had been referring to an out-of-date database and the NRD's website.

"The individuals who they are accusing us of upgrading to become citizens just to be put in the electoral roll are qualified citizens. Many of them had been permanent residents for over 20 years and were finally granted citizenship," he told the media before the breaking of fast at the EC headquarters.

Aziz said the commission would meet up with the NRD soon to iron out any hiccups.

On preparations for the general election, he said a committee to look into all aspects of the polls had been set up.

Aziz also said returning officers for the various constituencies had also been identified.

"We are in the midst of ascertaining the needs of each of the areas.

"There are logistics, personnel and budget issues that we are looking at," he said, adding that the EC would be ready if a general election was called, even in the very near future.

'Rally and riot, which part did you misunderstand?'

Posted: 12 Aug 2011 12:03 PM PDT

(Harakah Daily) - PAS today took to task deputy Inspector General of Police Khalid Abu Bakar for attempting to liken the riots in British cities to the massive Bersih rally in Malaysia on July 9.

The party's deputy information chief Nizar Jamaluddin questioned whether Khalid had problem understanding the difference between a 'riot' and a 'rally', which was something planned and accompanied by the organiser's request for cooperation from the police.

WORLDS APART ... (Top): Bersih participants on July 9 queueing up at a store in the city centre to buy refreshments. (Bottom): Looters at a store during the riots which engulfed several British cities.

"That statement (by Khalid) is utterly wrong because we did not riot, but participated in a peaceful rally that took the NGOs months of planning, " the Bukit Gantang member of parliament and former Perak Menteri Besar told Harakahdaily.

Khalid had earlier remarked on his Facebook that the riots in London and surrounding cities were proof that street protests could lead to "nightmares".

Nizar however stressed that the riots there, the worst social unrest in Britain in recent times, were also attributed to widespread unemployment and rising prices of goods.

On the other hand, Bersih, he said, was solely to seek electoral reform.

"In London, the riots erupted suddenly ...there was no planning and there was no one to take responsibility.

"In Malaysia, we have responsible NGOs, we have a leader and the rally was discussed with authorities over a long period before it finally took place," added Nizar.

'Our police more cruel than Britain's'

READ MORE HERE

 

Hindraf’s UK lawyer Imran Khan deported

Posted: 12 Aug 2011 11:58 AM PDT

By Athi Shankar, FMT

GEORGE TOWN: Hindraf Makkal Sakti's UK-based lawyer Imran Khan was deported back to United Kingdom upon his arrival at Kuala Lumpur International Airport at 1.50pm on Friday.

London-based Hindraf chairman P Waythamoorthy said Imran Khan, a prominent British human rights lawyer, was forced by the Malaysian authorities to fly back to England at 2am on Saturday, 12 hours after he was refused entry to the country.

"The authorities deemed Imran as a threat to Malaysia's security," said Waythamoorthy told FMT today.

Throughout his ordeal, Imran was kept stranded at the immigration checkpoint. Imran was originally scheduled to leave the country only on Aug 18. His colleague, G Suresh however was allowed entry.

Waythamoorthy said Hindraf was appalled by the excessive and unwarranted act of the Malaysian police and Home Ministry to deny entry to an internationally-renown human rights lawyer.

He also slammed the government's act of branding Imran as a security threat. This is "absolute nonsensical and cheap stunt."

The deportation confirmed Hindraf's fear that the Putrajaya administration would do a 'Bourdon' on Imran and his colleague upon their arrival in Malaysia.

French human rights lawyer William Bourdon was deported by the government when he was here to give a speech pertaining to the billion-dollar Scorpene submarine scandal last month.

"The refusal of entry to Imran in essence means that as far as the Malaysian Indians are concerned or their cause, the government can act in authoritarian ways against the rule of law," slammed an upset Waythamoorthy.

Following orders

The Hindraf leader said that upon his arrival at KLIA, Imran had presented himself at the immigration counter.

Imran then informed the female officer that he was in Malaysia to meet his clients, who wish to engage him on a class action suit against the former colonial, United Kingdom government.

The officer checked in her list of "wanted" persons and immediately told Imran that his request to entry was being refused.

Upon insistence, Imran then met senior immigration officers who could not give any valid reason for refusing his application to enter Malaysia.

"All that the senior immigration officer could say was that he had no problems giving Imran entry.

"But the officer said his decision to bar Imran from entry came from the top most office of special branch in Bukit Aman and the Home Ministry.

"The officer added that the police deemed Imran as a threat to Malaysia's security," said Waythamoorthy.

He said Imran's deportation showed that the government has something serious to hide, thus it makes arbitrary decisions pertaining Malaysian Indian issues.

He said Imran was coming to Malaysia to represent his clients from the underclass segment of the ethnic Malaysian Indian community.

Meeting will take place tomorrow

Imran was to meet his clients, or potential clients, on Sunday morning at the Klang Hokkian Hall to consider them as co-claimants for the British, which Waythamoorthy plans to re-file soon.


READ MORE HERE.

GLCs upset with Nazri for misleading explanation in Tajuddin Ramli saga

Posted: 12 Aug 2011 11:26 AM PDT

By Debra Chong, The Malaysian Insider

Several government-linked companies (GLCs) are perturbed by Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz's attempts to justify Putrajaya's intervention into ongoing lawsuits against Tan Sri Tajuddin Ramli and claimed the de facto law minister was giving out misleading information.

A source close to several parties named in the lengthy series of suits and counter-suits involving Tajuddin pointed out that the former poster boy for Bumiputera entrepreneurship had lost his RM13 billion countersuit against national debt restructuring company Danaharta in 2009.

Among several documents obtained by The Malaysian Insider, a High Court judgment on December 7, 2009 showed trial judge Anatham Kasinather had awarded a total sum of RMRM589,143,205.57 to Danaharta, its two subsidiaries and its four managing directors named as Datuk Azman Yahya, Datuk Abdul Hamidy Hafiz, Datuk Zukri Samat and Datuk Kris Azman Abdullah.

The same trial judge had also dismissed Tajuddin's RM13 billion countersuit against Danaharta and its agencies a month earlier on November 12, 2009.

The source related that the GLCs and their directors were stunned with disbelief at Nazri's reasoning that an out-of-court settlement was the best solution to save the federal government billions of ringgit in legal claims.

"Nazri misled the public when he said 'Our total claims by the companies against Tajuddin are only half a billion ringgit. That is why we said we should sit down and talk'. His claim that Tajuddin has the bargaining power and that the GLCs were disadvantaged is nonsense. The RM13 billion against Danaharta was also plucked from thin air," the source told The Malaysian Insider yesterday on condition of anonymity.

"Tajuddin was the only one who owed money and Danaharta did not owe him anything," the source said and quizzed: "So what is there to negotiate?"

Federal Court judge Tan Sri Md Raus Sharif has been put in charge of managing the ongoing slew suits involving a total 38 parties, including Danaharta and Malaysia Airlines (MAS), due to Tajuddin's appeal after losing his counter-claim.

 

READ MORE HERE.

A-G must still prosecute Tajuddin, says Mat Zain

Posted: 11 Aug 2011 07:12 PM PDT

By Shannon Teoh, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 12 — A former senior cop has called for charges to be brought against Tan Sri Tajuddin Ramli saying the withdrawal of civil suits against the former Malaysian Airline (MAS) chairman does not indemnify him against criminal culpability.

Datuk Mat Zain Ibrahim told The Malaysian Insider today that Putrajaya's decision to settle with Tajuddin out of court and directive to government-linked corporations to drop their cases against the latter did not mean that two police reports and another made to anti-graft enforcers were nullified.

"Even if MAS and other GLCs were to drop all civil claims against Tajuddin, they have no or power to indemnify Tajuddin from criminal liabilities. For that matter, no minister or even the Attorney-General has the authority.

"In fact, police have recommended that several criminal charges be preferred against Tajuddin and few others," the former Kuala Lumpur criminal investigation chief said.

Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz told The Malaysian Insideryesterday that he had written to GLCs earlier this month seeking for them to withdraw their suits, worth at least RM2 billion, to buy time for all concerned parties to reach a "win-win" agreement and put an end to the prolonged financial saga involving Tajuddin.

He said the matter was referred to Second Finance Minister Datuk Seri Husni Hanadzlah, who then directed him to pen the letter, noting that Tajuddin's case was scheduled for case management in court yesterday.

"Since it involved the law and I am the minister in charge of law, Husni told me, why don't you look into this. It is not a cloak-and-dagger move... we knew this would come out somehow and there is nothing to hide. I wrote that letter using my letterhead," said Nazri.

Mat Zain added today that MAS has lodged at least three reports against Tajuddin and the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) has "made it known to public that their investigation on Tajuddin is still ongoing."

"It is also within public knowledge that sometime in March 2007, the former Director of Commercial Crime Investigation Department Datuk Ramli Yusuf had briefed then prime minister Tun Abdullah  Badawi on police investigations based on MAS's reports.

"The billion ringgit question is why our Attorney-General is still reluctant. I am sure Tan Sri Gani Patail is fully aware that he cannot indemnify Tajuddin's criminal liabilities despite the fact that they are in some ways connected," he said.

Mat Zain, who led the police probe into former deputy prime minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's black eye incident in 1998, said that as only the A-G could initiate criminal proceedings, it was up to Datuk Seri Najib Razak to step in and inquire into Gani's conduct.

He has repeatedly attacked Gani for his failure to prosecute several high profile cases and called for the prime minister to axe the A-G.

READ MORE HERE 

 

Nazri says Tajuddin intervention could save Putrajaya billions

Posted: 11 Aug 2011 06:57 PM PDT

Nazri said that to defend himself, Tajuddin, who is facing millions in legal claims for allegedly causing MAS to suffer losses in excess of RM8 billion during his tenure, had made a whopping RM13 billion counter-claim.

(The Malaysian Insider) - Datuk Seri Mohamed Nazri Aziz has rebuked those who have questioned his authority in intervening in the Tan Sri Tajuddin Ramli's civil cases, insisting today that the move could save the government billions in legal claims.

The minister in the Prime Minister's Department disagreed that he had overstepped boundaries with a letter earlier this month telling all government-linked companies to withdraw their suits against the former Malaysia Airlines (MAS) chairman, claiming he had done so in his role as a "facilitator" for the government.

Nazri also told detractors to check their facts before spewing insult against him, saying, "I know what I am doing."

He accused DAP publicity chief Tony Pua of practising double standards for saying the minister should be placed under the Emergency Ordinance for issuing the letter, asking the leader why he had not urged the same when other Pakatan Rakyat (PR) leaders attempted to intrude on government affairs.

"I want to ask him (Pua): When (PAS president Datuk Seri Abdul) Hadi Awang asked the Damansara Utama Methodist Church (DUMC) and Jais (Selangor Islamic Religious Department) to see him and explain the recent church raid, why did he not rebuke Hadi?

"Because what power does Hadi have in doing so? He is not the mentri besar of Selangor and neither is he the minister for religious affairs. So why the double standards, Tony?" Nazri told The Malaysian Insider.

Similarly in the controversy over the Kedah government's ban on entertainment outlets during Ramadan, Nazri said DAP chairman Karpal Singh had no business ordering the businesses to stay open.

"On my part, I spoke to the second finance minister and he told me why don't I explore this issue and that I may be the facilitator to urge these GLCs to sit down with Tajuddin to come up with an amicable solution. So what power did I abuse?" he asked.

Nazri said that to defend himself, Tajuddin, who is facing millions in legal claims for allegedly causing MAS to suffer losses in excess of RM8 billion during his tenure, had made a whopping RM13 billion counter-claim.

READ MORE HERE

 

Bersih twist to church raid saga

Posted: 11 Aug 2011 06:20 PM PDT

An email is circulating claiming that the controversial JAIS raid could be more about politics than religion.

(Free Malaysia Today) - Amidst the simmering tension over the controversial raid on a church by Islamic authorities, a conspiracy theory has surfaced linking the incident to the Bersih 2.0 rally.

An email being circulated alleged collusion between Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein and Selangor exco for religious affairs Hasan Ali, one of those in PAS supportive of a unity government with Umno.

The email claimed that the minister wanted to teach the Christian community a lesson for backing the July 9 street protest, which dealt a massive blow to Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak's administration.

Last Wednesay, the Selangor Islamic Religious Department (JAIS) together with the police raided the Damansara Utama Methodist Church (DUMC) after receiving complaints that Muslims were present at a dinner event there.

JAIS later clarified that it was not a raid but an inspection done to check if there was proselytizing of Muslims by Christians. The matter is being investigated under Section 4 of the Non-Islamic Religious Enactment 1988.

Organisers of the dinner had denied the allegation, stating that the event was to raise funds for a HIV/AIDS campaign.

While Selangor Menteri Besar Khalid Ibrahim had expressed regret over the incident, his exco Hasan defended JAIS and the latter was backed by PAS Youth.

'MCA and Umno leaders told in advance'

However, the email claimed that the raid had little to do with attempts to convert Muslims to Christianity but "had everything to do with Bersih 2.0."

It alleged that DUMC's pastor Daniel Ho hosted Bersih 2.0 chairperson Ambiga Sreenevasan and members of the polls watchdog's committee the week before.

"Since last week Hishammuddin has been in touch with Hasan through their proxies on finding a way to teach Ho and the Christian community a lesson for supporting Bersih…

"Hishammuddin wanted to show that he was not afraid to take anyone on. That is why the police could not produce a warrant or JAIS produce a copy of the complaint.

"Hishammuddin has always thought of himself as above the law and is the law," read the email.

It also claimed that Umno and MCA leaders were informed in advance of the raid and advised to prepare statements to condemn Pakatan Rakyat over the matter.

"This is an effort to conceal the link between Hishammuddin and Hasan," stated the email, adding that the home minister and Umno considered Bersih 2.0 as the biggest threat to their political future.

"Any support for Bersih 2.0 therefore must be nipped in the bud. The accusation of attempts to proselytize Muslims by the DUMC church is just a distraction from the actual truth," it added.

READ MORE HERE

 

Senator Ezam threatens to 'burn down' news portals

Posted: 11 Aug 2011 06:16 PM PDT

(Malaysiakini) - Umno Senator Mohd Ezam Mohd Noor said today he will wage war in defence of Islam, including burning two online news portals, which he claimed to be agents against Islam.

NONE"We are saying here that we will launch an all-out war to defend our faith if they (anti-Islam elements) do not stop (and) use their agents - Malaysiakini and Malaysian Insider - which were biadap (rude) towards the Selangor Islamic Affairs Department (Jais).

"Malaysiakini, Malaysian Insider, we are giving you a very last warning. Our warning is a serious one. If you do not stop this rubbish, we are going to burn you down!" Ezam (left) declared.

The former ally of PKR supremo Anwar Ibrahim - now the opposition leader's bitter foe - blamed the news portals for "Jais' woes" for their coverage of the Selangor religious enforcement body's raid at the Damansara Utama Methodist Church (DUMC) compound last week.

Ezam issued his threats at a highly-charged rally of some 200 people inside the compound of the Selangor state mosque in Shah Alam.

NONEAlso present were Kulim Bandar Baru MP Zulkifli Nordin and Umno Youth exco member Lokman Noor Adam (right), who was clad in a red Patriot T-shirt.

Zulkifli, also a former ally of Anwar, echoed Ezam's warning, calling on Muslims working in the news portals to "repent".

"I see representative from Malaysiakini and Malaysian Insider here, I would like to tell them, particularly Muslims, to repent.

"You are being barua (running dogs) of propagandist and enemy of Islam. Don't be running dogs of kafirs (infidels) that go against us," he said.

The group, armed with banners, chanted "Long Live Islam" and "Takbir" as they protested against apostasy among Muslims.

One banner read "Faith Sale, Islam Sale" with a picture of Shah Alam MP Khalid Samad's head protruding out of a toilet bowl. Another banner read "Ban English-language Bibles".

Ezam has 'big' problems with non-Muslims

Several of the protesters donned masks of state exco leaders while displaying placards, one of which read "(Selangor Menteri Besar) Khalid Ibrahim is head priest".

Earlier, Ezam launched a broadside against those he deemed disrespectful against Islam, in which he placed prominent figures in the Selangor state government in the same group.

NONE"We have no problem with non-Muslims. But we have big problems with non-Muslims who are disrespectful to us and our religion, we have big problems with non-Muslims who proselytise among Muslims.

"We have big problems with them more so if they are government excos - Ronnie Liu, Teresa Kok, Xavier (Jeyakumar), Elizabeth Wong, we have big problems with you. You better stop before we go all out," he said.

Later, Zulkifli reaffirmed his support of the raid by Jais on DUMC, claiming that there was evidence that showed the dinner event, at which 12 Muslims were present, intended to proselytise.

"We urge the authorities to take action against DUMC. According to our information, the church is illegal and has not been approved," he said.

Zulkifli added that he and like-minded protestors will be lodging police reports against DUMC throughout the state from tomorrow onwards on top of seeking an audience with the sultan to urge action be taken against proselytising.

 

‘No approval to operate as a church’

Posted: 11 Aug 2011 06:10 PM PDT

The land occupied by DUMC in Section 13 is gazetted for industrial use and not for religious purposes, says MBPJ.

(Free Malaysia Today) - The Damansara Utama Methodist Church (DUMC) does not have an approval to operate at Dream Centre in Section 13, a Petaling Jaya City Council (MBPJ) official said.

"When DUMC submitted an application for an approval for the building premises, it stated that its purpose was for the use of a community hall," said MBPJ's Zainun Zakaria.

"You need to be specfic as to its activities," she added.

She said that the land that the church stands on now was gazetted for industrial use and not for religious purposes.

Zainun also dismissed a SMS circulating yesterday that the MBPJ was about to seal off the premises, saying it was false.

The SMS was circulated to the media yesterday. A pro-Umno blogger claimed today that he received it from a source in MBPJ.

MBPJ deputy mayor Puasa Mohd Taib also yesterday denied there was such an operation being planned.

When contacted, a church spokesman said that many accusations have been levelled at the church and the current one had "half truths".

Derek Fernandez, a lawyer and MBPJ councillor, however, said that while a church does not require an operational permit, it nevertheless needs to be registered as one.

"An approval from MBPJ is needed. It is vetted by the sustainable development committee under the planning department. It also has to go through the state executive committee," said Fernandez.

He added that the sustainable development committee is chaired by the mayor and consists of councillors, technical departments and also external agencies.

Fernandez said that all buildings need a certificate of fitness, proper zoning, land title, besides paying the quit rent.

"But if it is operating as a church, and the letter of approval says, 'community hall', it has flouted the Town and Country Planning Act and could be fined. Strictly speaking, the premises could even be sealed off.

"An approval is needed if you want to operate a church in a place zoned as a commercial area," said Fernandez.

"However, MBPJ has no problem with churches in shoplots as the state recognises the difficulty in finding a place of worship for non-Muslims. They're usually approved," he added.

'Impose a moratorium'

Fellow councillor Mak Khuin Weng said that the local authority usually does not enforce land usage rules strictly.

"Where DUMC is located now, the land titles in that area are for industrial use, meaning for factories only. Having said that, the government has never enforced these land usage rules strictly.

"If we were to be strict, not only will the church suffer but also the commercial areas around Section 14 and Section 19.

"There are food courts and even a college operating on land for industrial use. So, you can't say you want to take action against DUMC but not against others," he said.

Mak said that even the numerous bridal studios in SS2 operating from residential houses would also have to be shut down.

The number of places of worship springing up in shoplots and factory areas can be attributed to a larger problem, and one that has been going on since the state was under the BN government.

READ MORE HERE

 

DAP: Nazri abusing his power

Posted: 11 Aug 2011 03:03 PM PDT

Nazri has no power to order GLCs to stop suing ex-MAS boss Tajuddin Ramli, the DAP said.

(Free Malaysia Today) - The DAP has attacked Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Nazri Abdul Aziz for ordering government-linked companies (GLCs) to cease suing a former Malaysia Airlines (MAS) executive chairman Tajuddin Ramli.

PJ Utara MP Tony Pua ticked off Nazri for using his influence as a minister to let Tajuddin off the hook.

"Such an instruction from a minister's office, especially one with no authority of the various GLCs including MAS, Telekom and Prokhas (formerly Danaharta) is… highly improper and at worst an illegal and corrupt practice," he said in a press statement.

He said that this move allowed Tajuddin to get away with billions of ringgit in debt, withou having to suffer any consequences.

According to a Malaysian Insider report, Nazri said that he had issued a directive for all GLCs aggrieved by Tajuddin to withdraw their suits earlier this month.

Denying that it was a bailout, the minister said that the move was an attempt to reach a "win-win" situation between Tajuddin and the various GLCs.

Quoting Nazri, Pua said: "…the finance ministry has agreed to settle all civil claims against Tan Sri Tajuddin Ramli and others to be withdrawn immediately in view of the fact that the government and the finance ministry have agreed that the said cases will be settled out of court."

Complete mockery

This reasoning did not sit well with Pua. GLCs, he said, had their own board of directors to deal with problems, adding that Nazri had no right to be giving instructions to them.

"His directive to these GLCs made a complete mockery of corporate governance in these companies, and will only turn away local and foreign investors," Pua said.

He said that Nazri could be investigated under Section 2(1) of the Emergency (Essential Powers) Ordinance.

READ MORE HERE

 

Use new laws to stop merger, govt urged

Posted: 11 Aug 2011 02:04 PM PDT

 

By Joseph Tawie, FMT

KUCHING: The government must intervene and stop the merger between Malaysia Airlines (MAS) and AirAsia because such a deal would not benefit the people and would only lead to a monopoly in the air transport industry, Sarawak DAP said.

Party secretary Chong Chieng Jen said "ultimately the consumers will lose out".

"The government must stop the merger. We have the Anti-Trust Act or the Competition Act which will take effect on Jan 1, 2012.

"The Act will protect consumers against market abuse from cartel activities and monopolies or from unscrupulous trading practices of cartel and monopoly business.

"The government can use the Competition Act to prohibit the monopoly. As a shareholder in MAS, the government has every right to stop the merger, and yet the government is not stopping it," he said.

Chong, who is Bandar Kuching MP, said the whole merger exercise "is wrong".

According to him, if the Barisan Nasional allows this deal to go through, it simply means that it "is not serious in protecting the right of the consumers".

Chong also urged the people not to believe claims by Transport Minister Kong Cho Ha that the merger may not result in an increase in airfares.

"Even though he has told us not to worry, his promise will amount to nothing. In the end, the airfares will be increased and we the consumers will be at the losing end.

'Not a merger'

"I urge the government not to proceed with the merger in the interest of consumers," said Chong, who is also Kota Sentosa asemblyman.

Asked whether Sarawak government should support his call as Sarawakians will suffer most, Chong said: "All governments that have the interest of the people at heart should oppose monopoly in the air transport industry."

READ MORE HERE.

Putrajaya ditches FBC Media as image experts after exposé

Posted: 11 Aug 2011 11:01 AM PDT

 

By Jahabar Sadiq, The Malaysian Insider

Putrajaya has now ended its contract with British publicity firm FBC Media after an embarrassing exposé last week revealed Malaysian leaders routinely appeared in paid-for interviews on global television programmes.

The Malaysian Insider understands that the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) terminated FBC Media's contract in the past week, just months after another public relations firm, APCO Worldwide from the United States, met an ignominious end for alleged links to Israel.

"The contract with FBC Media is over. PMO has enough people to handle publicity locally and abroad," a source told The Malaysian Insider.

FBC Media's dealings with the Malaysian government came to light after supplementary supply Bills showed vast payments made for a "Global Strategic Communications Campaign".

The records showed that between 2008 and 2009, RM57.7 million was paid by the Prime Minister's Office to FBC Media for the campaign.

Despite FBC Media's contract, veteran newspaper editor Datuk A. Kadir Jasin's also revealed that Putrajaya has some 11 press aides working for Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak against the three who served Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad in his 22 years in power.

FBC Media has also been linked to Najib's predecessor Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi and Sarawak Chief Minister Tan Sri Abdul Taib Mahmud, who apparently paid US$5 million (RM15 million) for public relations services that included television programmes and professional bloggers to burnish his image before the April 16 state polls.

Global broadcasters have been scrambling to contain potential damage after the allegations of impropriety surfaced following the expose by whistleblower Sarawak Report, which linked the interviews and other programmes produced by FBC Media as having been paid millions of ringgit by the ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) coalition to shine its international image.

US-based broadcaster CNN denied last week it was paid to interview Najib during his visit to London last month but questions remain about the role played by its anchor John Defterios after the latter's FBC Media programme "World Business" was axed early this month by rival network CNBC.

The spotlight is on the relationship between FBC Media — the British publicity firm led by media giant Alan Friedman with Defterios still listed as its group president — and broadcasters like CNBC, CNN and the BBC.

As a result of the allegations, the BBC has also said it will suspend programmes produced by FBC Media and investigate the company.

Influential Washington-based news website Politico.com said FBC Media is listed in lobbying reports as having paid tens of thousands of dollars to Washington-based lobbying firm APCO in recent years to lobby on behalf of the Malaysian government.

CNN's denial comes on the heels of rival CNBC's decision to drop its flagship show "World Business", which has similarly been alleged to have been paid to feature Najib in its prime-time news slots last month after his administration cracked down on a civil rally pushing for cleaner and more honest elections.

Both interviews were conducted by Defterios which has raised eyebrows over his appearance on the rival channels as well as questions over a conflict of interest to his unclear ties with FBC Media.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Explain Tajuddin Ramli ‘bailout’, TI-M chief tells Putrajaya

Posted: 11 Aug 2011 01:57 AM PDT

(The Malaysian Insider) - Transparency-International Malaysia (TI-M) president Datuk Paul Low questioned the Najib administration's decision to settle all out-of-court suits between government-linked-companies (GLCs) and Tan Sri Tajuddin Ramli, saying today Putrajaya has a duty to protect the public's interest.

He was responding to The Malaysian Insider's report earlier today, citing de facto law minister Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz's directive to all GLCs, including Danaharta and Malaysian Airlines (MAS), to drop all claims against Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad's poster boy for Bumiputera entrepreneurs as the Ministry of Finance (MOF) has agreed to settle the payment.

"When they say settle something, exactly what does it mean? Nobody knows how it's to be settled or how much, on what basis and justification? Is the government paying on behalf of the GLCs? Is it a bailout? Who are parties involved?

"Who instructed Nazri? Was it the Finance Ministry, the Cabinet or the prime minister? We don't know," Low told The Malaysian Insider when contacted.

He reminded the ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) federal government that it was accountable for spending taxpayers' money.

He said the government could not simply step into a legal dispute that involved a public-listed company, even if it had government ties; and added the government must show how the country and the public benefitted from such a decision.

"This arrangement does not reflect well on the government. In good governance, the buck stops at the CEO, or the board of directors. The government has to answer," he added.

The head of the local anti-graft watchdog urged Putrajaya to come clean on the decision, noting that it was a "test of good governance" for the ruling political coalition.

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


AirAsia Must Eradicate The Corrupt Umno/BN Culture Of MAS

Posted: 13 Aug 2011 10:31 AM PDT

By Mariam Mokhtar

In MAS, MH stands for Malaysian hospitality which many of us know is highly overrated; MH might as well stand for Malaysian humbug. Or Malaysian hanky-panky.

A once proud airline is now a shadow of its former self. It is run by the corrupt and the incompetent - all puppets of the government. If the MACC were a responsible outfit, MAS would not be in the position it is today and many MAS senior managers, and government ministers, past and present would be languishing in jail.

The new MAS-AirAsia merger is shrouded in secrecy. Tony Fernandes is just a public front and assumes the rôle of pilot in this move.Someone else has charted the route for him. Who is that person?

One thing is certain. There is talk about solving the operational issues in MAS. Will Tony be able to alter an Umno/BN culture that has been allowed to corrupt all levels of the airline's hierarchy?

This Umno/BN culture is mired in controversy. MAS, like other GLCs, is haemorrhaging money. Attempts to stem this outflow have been unsuccessful.

Would any CEO of MAS be as daring as Peter Hill, the British CEO of Sri Lankan Airlines, who stood up against the Sri Lankan president Mahinda Rajapaksa in 2007?

Rajapaksa, together with his family and several officials, was in the United Kingdom to witness the passing out parade of Rajapaksa's son from the Royal Naval College, Dartmouth. When Rajapaksa demanded that 35 seats be reserved for his entourage to return to Colombo, Hill refused to bump passengers off the flight from London. Hill may have been the passengers' hero but his work permit was rescinded.

Unfortunately, the work culture that exists in MAS is symptomatic of our government's performance. Some dishonest MAS staff allegedly "steal" from the airline. Perhaps they are taking their cue from the government officials or from previous chairmen. Perhaps they see this as part of their perks and benefits. Cost cutting has reduced many allowances which they once enjoyed.

One stewardess who declined to be named, said that she had lost track of all the items she took from the plane and according to her, "everyone did it". In an attempt to justify her actions, she blurted, "What about the millions the chairmen have 'stolen'?" She is wrong. It is billions. Not millions.

How many politicians and their spouses have used their influence to obtain free flights or bullied airline staff for upgrades for themselves, their officials, friends or relatives?

How many times have we heard of a spouse of a leading politician wasting tax payers'money on transporting her shopping via MAS and MAS Air Cargo?

How many genuine passengers have been victims of alleged over-booking by MAS when it is well known that government officials were offered preferential seats over normal fare-paying passengers?

It is also well known that MAS practices two sets of rules: one for Malaysians and another for westerners. One Malaysian mother and child were bumped off one flight to the UK. Under EU rules, cancellation of the flight meant they were due compensation. Only her teenage son was offered compensation because he had an English name. The mother was refused compensation despite pointing out the discrepancy to the senior managers in London.

In one European airport, it is alleged that some members of staff have protected their long-term positions by fraternizing with senior politicians and VVIPs. In most companies, employees would not be allowed to remain in one posting indefinitely, but not, apparently, in this location.

Another person alleges that it is common knowledge that a member of staff would use influence to perform "dodgy" upgrades for friends or people of influence and later be rewarded with "gifts". Others allege, too, that this person removes items from the aeroplane on a regular basis. Cheese, toilet rolls, toiletry bags, duvets and blankets from First and Business Class may not be classed as the crime of the century, but it is theft all the same.

The modus operandi appears to be to wait till the flight and cabin crew, have left the aeroplane. The security staff must be complicit in these thefts. Could there be hanky-panky with food and fine wines from the Golden lounge?

One wonders why work colleagues have remained silent about the alleged petty theft. Are the senior station managers in these postings incompetent or in collusion? Perhaps theses managers don't want to deal with the problem.

Co-workers are probably afraid of whistleblowing because they fear they will be known as troublemakers. They wonder, "Can the system be trusted or will they will be identified and crucified?"

Like the Malaysian public and corrupt politicians, employees are reluctant to report irregularities because they do not see much hope of redress.

Perhaps the worst sort sycophancy is the one which is ignored by all because it involves VVIPs.

In one European airport, it is alleged by many that some MAS employees turn up, even when they are not officially on duty, to attend to the VVIPs. This is no charitable act or selfless dedication to duty. The rewards are high. Cash and expensive, small personal electrical items are the norm but the most prized of all is a title.

When even the bodyguards of the VVIPs proudly display their designer labels, which lowly worker can fail to be impressed?

Which junior employee would refuse a title in exchange for making sure personal baggage and the truckloads of luxury goods are safely loaded onto the plane? Who dares ensure that the customs at KLIA will tax these items?

It wouldn't take a genius to trace the titles that are dished out to MAS employees at some of the overseas airports which are frequented by VVIPs. And it would surprise no-one that even those in menial positions in the airline, can acquire Datukships.

The equilibrium at work must be disturbed as it is alleged that those conferred titles are known to be generally work-shy, are late for work, despite occasionally reporting for extra duty for VVIPs.

It is baffling that these employees are allowed, allegedly, to have a stake, either directly or indirectly, in companies which provide airline services which are in conflict with MAS cargo services.

Will Tony address the staff, who only attend to VVIPs and celebrities who give them benefit in kind? This is a form of bribery and theft from the airline, reminiscent of Umno political tactics.

Will he put pressure on those in charge of complaints? VIPs get their complaints seen to promptly. Others may take months. The truly unlucky customers have theirs swept under the carpet by lazy station managers.

So what else is going on? Tony should whip the corrupt and inefficient MAS work-culture back into shape and the MACC should investigate these irregularities. Then again, pigs might fly.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Stop lying!

Posted: 13 Aug 2011 10:43 AM PDT

By Tan Sri Robert Phang

1. The public outrage over Nazri Aziz's letter dated 8th August is justified. It is unprecedented and wrong for the Minister in the Prime Minister's Office to direct all Government-Linked Companies (GLCs) to withdraw their civil suits against former MAS Chairman, Tajuddin Ramli. I find it very appalling that a Minister of Nazri's seniority and status can direct GLCs to withdraw their claims against Tajuddin Ramli which means allowing him to get away with billions of ringgit in debt or RAKYAT MONEY.

2. Nazri's immediate back pedaling by attempting to say that his letter was only an "advice" and not a"directive" or "instruction" by itself shows that Nazri knew that he had made a grave error. Now that Malaysia Today has posted Nazri's letter, it clearly shows that Nazri had lied. To make a mistake is one thing, but to lie in order to cover up for that mistake makes it worse.

3. Another aspect I find deplorable is the lethargy and disinterest shown by Attorney-General Gani Patail and the MACC in prosecuting Tajudin Ramli. This contrasted sharply with the swift manner in which the MACC investigated me after I criticized AG Gani Patail for his involvement and Haj Trip with a crony of Tajudin, one Shahidan Shafie. Based on just a false allegation in an anonymous blog, I was subjected to an immediate investigation by the MACC.

4. I was also publicly humiliated when I was only conditionally cleared in a press statement issued on 31st May 2011 by the MACC Operations Evaluation Panel (OEP) Chairman, Dr. Hadenan Abdul Jalil. I have since demanded the MACC to give me an unconditional and unequivocal clearance. I have yet to receive the MACC's reply.

5. If the MACC can be so speedy to act against me, why is the MACC showing hesitation to act against Tajudin Ramli? There are overwhelming evidence against him available in the public including the report made by the former Director of Commercial Crimes, Ramli Yusuff, to former PM Abdullah Badawi? All these smack of a cover-up.

6. Nazri's action is also an abuse of power in asking for GLC legal work to be passed to a legal firm. Who are the lawyers of this legal firm that they should be given preference over other more eminent lawyers in the country? Are they Nazri's associates and is he receiving gratification for this? If so, the MACC should investigate and prosecute Nazri under section 2(1) of the Emergency (Essential Powers) Ordinance No. 22/1970. Nazri should also be prosecuted under the MACC Act as follows:

MALAYSIAN ANTI-CORRUPTION COMMISSION ACT 2009 Offence of using office or position for gratification

23. (1) Any officer of a public body who uses his office or position for any gratification, whether for himself, his relative or associate, commits an offence. (2) For the purposes of subsection (1), an officer of a public body shall be presumed, until the contrary is proved, to use his office or position for any gratification, whether for himself, his relative or associate, when he makes any decision, or takes any action, in relation to any matter in which such officer, or any relative or associate of his, has an interest, whether directly or indirectly.

(3) For the avoidance of doubt, it is declared that, for the purposes of subsection (1), any member of the administration of a State shall be deemed to use his office or position for gratification when he acts contrary to subsection 2(8) of the Eighth Schedule to the Federal Constitution or the equivalent provision in the Constitution or Laws of the Constitution of that State.

7. I therefore call on the MACC to show some courage and investigate this matter. Otherwise, the MACC will forever not regain the public's trust after Teoh Beng Hock and Ahmad Sarbaini had died over what the public perceived to be due to the harsh treatment by the MACC over much less serious allegations of corruption. Let its not be said that the laws of this country favor the strong over the weak.

8. Since this is the Muslim holy month of Ramadan, I ask Nazri Aziz, who is always known to be courageous in a "jantan" way, to apologise to the Malaysian public for insulting our intelligence in this incident. Nazri needs to do so before he drags the whole administration of PM Najib Razak into public anger and odium. The government can least afford these sort of scandals with the elections being just around the corner.

 

Profusion of Ah Longs a sign of economic woes

Posted: 12 Aug 2011 10:32 PM PDT

All so-called anti-poverty actions are just ad-hoc programs. Solve this and this, and wait for the next one to surface! The government is confused because it doesn't have the financial capability to solve the problem and it doesn't understand all the factors affecting the economy.

By Daniel John Jambun 

The decision by the Government Employees Co-operative Society Berhad (Kopeks) recently to settle debts owed by its members to Ah Longs to the hefty tune of RM500,000 made one wonder if Kopeks is not actually encouraging its members to go into debt, because it could easily bail them out anytime when the situation becomes critical. The bailout was a precedent that set a bad example of co-operative fund management.

It also reminded us how bad the economic situation in the Sabah is right now. If government servants can go into serious debt in spite of earning salaries, imagine the situation for those without jobs, and those in the rural areas who have to live off the land just to keep body and soul together. In this period of high inflation even those with salaries are in fact living below the poverty line.

If we still need to be convinced about the dire situation the people are facing, just let's note that the recent job fair organized by the BN got a surprising response of 30,000! And these only involved those who could afford to come. Many didn't even bother to come because they knew it was not worth the effort and cost to go.

Part of the reasons for the state's poverty is the high unemployment rate among young school leavers and graduates. Many graduates actually survive by opening and operating kueh stalls, even taking on odd jobs. So the repeated advice to youths not to be choosy with jobs is actually a lot of nonsense knowing these young people, out of sheer desperation, are even going by the tens of thousands to Kuala Lumpur, Johore and Singapore to earn money.

High unemployment in Sabah has also caused the existence of sandwich families, which the government has admitted to be very high in number. The term "sandwich family" can be defined, from my own observation, as the case of parents who have to house and feed their children who are already married and have their own children because of joblessness. Many families are not even having any celebration when their children get married because they are so cash-strapped!

There is an ongoing, hidden depression going on in Sabah. They have suffered so long but have partly resigned to their fate knowing they is nothing they can do. The government has simply failed them. A fifty-ringgit note doesn't last very long, doesn't buy a lot these days. People have very little savings and for those who struggle to make ends meet, the money runs out long before payday.

What is more depressing is that we all know the government has not an iota of a  plan to solve the problem; all so-called anti-poverty actions are just ad-hoc programs. Solve this and this, and wait for the next one to surface! The government is confused because it doesn't have the financial capability to solve the problem and it doesn't understand all the factors affecting the economy - globally or locally. So they have become experts in coming up with lame explanations and playing the blame game, like they blame youths for being unemployed because "they are choosy". What a load of nonsense!

So in desperation, the people who need to settle their financial problems have to resort to Ah Longs, or loan sharks. And loan sharks come to fill up the market because there is a huge need for their service. A profusion of loan sharks, the rise of MLMs, get-rich-quick schemes and gambling businesses are a clear indication of serious economic problems in any country. People need a way out to escape financial pitfalls and hope to fulfill their dreams by buying lottery tickets as a way to comfort their troubled souls. The latest way to become rich overnight today is to find the tokek lizard and make millions overnight!

I would challenge the BN government to undertake a statistical survey of the situation and give us the accurate figures for unemployed secondary school leavers and graduates, the number of sandwich families and the grand total of amounts they spend from their parents' income, the number of Sabahans who are working in the Peninsular and Singapore, and most importantly to give an economic blueprint for Sabah to solve unemployment and poverty in the short term.

Or is the government itself too cash-strapped to undertake these surveys?

How much does it cost to pay IDS to do them compared to providing for some road buildings in which the cost are doubled of tripled for the benefit of some political bosses? How much money has been stashed overseas, robbing us of economic trickle-down effects? We can only imagine the terrible losses we have suffered and our children will suffer in the future because of our government's corruption and mismanagement!

What happened to the RM29 million health clinic probe?

Posted: 12 Aug 2011 10:26 PM PDT

The probe was completed last year but little birds in MCA have revealed that the probe papers, with about 28 letters and documents attached, had found the way to the MACC. Why is the MACC sitting pretty on the case with such mounting evidence is anyone's guess. But we don't really need a genius to tell us why.

By Lee Kee

No amount of money spent on public relations will regain the public's confidence in the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) until it displays true justice and independence from the powers that be.

The MACC's selective persecution and prosecution is so glaring to the public that only a mongoloid will believe it is a truly anti-graft agency.

And, please don't rate its administration with Hong Kong's ICAC (Independent Commission Against Corruption). It's insulting.

The Teoh Beng Hock tragedy continues to hog the limelight and public anguish had yet to die down after more than two
years shows it is futile to defend the MACC.

Teoh's death was caused by the MACC. Whether its officers were directly or indirectly responsible, it is still unclear because of the cover ups.

The public cannot stomach the fact that the MACC found it just to grill Teoh aggressively as a witness against his boss, a Selangor DAP executive councillor, over the purchase of Malaysian flags costing about RM2,000 plus for the Merdeka celebration.

However, there are many cases which have resulted in millions, if not billions, of ringgit in losses to the government (read taxpayers).

The infamous Port Klang Free Zone financial scandal is the biggest, running into billions of ringgit.

Unfortunately, there is also another case involving MCA bigwigs running into millions but the MACC is just sitting on it.

Health Minister Liow Tiong Lai had in 2009 ordered a probe into the purchase of land for Klinik Kesihatan Taman Ungku Aminah in Johor Baru (on Lot 44148, PTD71027 HS (D) 239701 Mukim Pulai, Johor Bahtu – about 7.448 acres).

Until today, Liow has evaded and refused to clarify what has happened to the probe? Why the silence?

Is Liow covering his MCA porn president Chua Soi Lek's arse? Or are there other reasons?

The probe was completed last year but little birds in MCA have revealed that the probe papers, with about 28 letters and
documents attached, had found the way to the MACC.

Why is the MACC sitting pretty on the case with such mounting evidence is anyone's guess. But we don't really need a genius to tell us why.

A special purpose vehicle for the scam, Kurnia Heights Sdn Bhd, was set up to buy the land at about RM8 million plus and
subsequently, the same land was sold to the Barisan Nasional (BN) government (read Health Ministry) at a grossly inflated
value of RM29 million.

The directors and shareholders of Kurnia Heights have family ties to a Dato' Tee Siew Keong, the political secretary to the
then Health Minister, Dato' Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek.

The probe papers revealed highly suspicious circumstances surrounding the transactions. Consider the following:
The project was initially identified and initiated by the Health Ministry through its Bahagian Perancangan dan Pembangunan and Pejabat Kesihatan Johor Bahru from April to July 2005;

Kurnia Heights shareholders included a Phua Tai Kiang, a brother-in-law of Dato' Tee Siew Keong's wife, Datin Lee Choon Guek, the political secretary of then Health Minister Dato' Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek;

Kurnia Heights acquired a power-of-attorney after it signed a sale and purchase agreement with the original land owners, the Lee family of Maha Global Sdn Bhd for a sum of about RM8 million plus. The documents show a redemption sum of about RM4.065 million paid to the charge bank, RHB Bank Bhd, and about RM3.048 million paid to Maha Global directly with the usual
upfront deposit. The land was subsequently sold to the Barisan Nasional government (again read taxpayers) for an astonishing RM29 million! Kurnia Heights is seen to have made a clean profit of RM19 million from the sale and purchase transactions;

Kurnia Heights is clearly a special purpose vehicle set up for the purpose of the land transaction as it did not have the cash reserve and assets to be able to transact such a large amount. No bank loans were taken by Kurnia Heights to finance the purchase. The company merely relied on the power-of-attorney to deal on behalf of Maha Global as against the BN government;

Kurnia Heights obviously had prior and inside knowledge of the intended acquisition of land by the Government before the power-of-attorney and land purchase from Maha Global took place. The timing of the transactions i.e between the date of the purchase of land, which happened in October 2005, and the date of the gazette of land acquisition (and change from private
school status to polyclinic). Only persons such as the Minister and senior officers in the Health Ministry have such intimate information;

There is no reason for an "investment holding" company such as Kurnia Heights to purchase the land which is restricted to private school use, before the gazette by the Government, unless it has prior and inside information that the Government had already decided to buy the land;

The person by the name of Tee Yok Ong, who is a relative but is not a director or shareholder of Kurnia Heights was authorised to collect the cheque from the Government on behalf of the company;

There were suspicious reports from Jabatan Penilaian dan Perkhidmatan Harta (JPPH) that indicated the land was over-valued; and

Despite objections raised, the instruction to pay Kurnia Heights was given, as documented.

Malaysia will surely be bankrupted in no time by the corrupt if the BN government is allowed to continue with such practices.

Ultimately, the rakyat or taxpayers will have to bear the consequences.

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


UMNO - Lebih memberi masalah dari menyelesaikannya

Posted: 13 Aug 2011 05:18 PM PDT

Di dalam keghairahan untuk mementingkan keuntungan peribadi ini maka segala nilai-nilai murni dalam sesuatu sistem politik itu akan secara beransur-ansur luntur dan akan wujud krisis keyakinan yang merbahayakan negara dan rakyat.

Najib sedang menghadapi masalah yang sama, iaitu masalah mewarisi pusaka kepimpinan yang sudah tersedia lemah dan ternoda. Najib sendiri merupakan seorang 'untested leader' kerana beliau naik ketahap tertinggi parti dan negara kerana permainan 'play save' dan tidak pernah bertanding di dalam mana-mana jawatan yang beliau pegang. Lagi pun beliau adalah pemimpin yang wujud melalui pengaruh keluarga sebagai anak bekas Perdana Menteri.

Sehingga beliau duduk di kerusi PM ini beliau tidak pernah di cabar dan tercabar dan beliau hanya mendapat segala-galanya melalui pengaruh Tun Razak itu sahaja. Itulah sebabnya beliau hanya menyelesaikan masalah politik negara dengan sentimen tanpa 'idea' yang bernas untuk menyelesaikan masalah secara politik yang baik dan 'conclusive'.

Beliau menyelesaikan masalah dengan membeli sokongan tetapi beliau membelinya dengan premis politik yang salah. Palanivel dilantik menjadi ahli jemaah Kabinet semata-mata kerana hendak memujuk kaum India bagi menghadapi pilihanraya yang akan datang. Tindakan Najib hanya menumpukan untuk undi pilihanraya tanpa memikirkan consequence yang akan timbul dari tindakan beliau itu.

Najib adalah seorang 'elected representative' tetapi beliau di kerumuni oleh 'rejected representative'.. Dengan perlantikan Palanivel di dalam Kabinet Najib telah menambah seorang lagi Menteri yang mewakili 'rejected rep' ini. Sharizat Jalil dilantik di dalam Kabinet walaupun beliau dikalahkan oleh Nurul Izzah Anwar dan Koh Tsu Koon yang tertewas dengan majoriti yang besar di Batu Kawan telah dilantik ke dalam Kabinet.

Melantik Palanivel itu ialah untuk mendapatkan sokongan kaum India yang telah berpecah mengambil tempat di dalam parti-parti lain samada dalam parti Kerajaan atau parti pembangkang. Wakil mereka di Parlimen sudah ramai walaupun kaum India hanya kaum yang kecil di dalam negara ini. Kaum India merupakan kaum yang saya hormati di dalam politik kerana mereka membina kepimpinan mereka di dalam banyak parti.

Tetapi MCA yang sekarang ini masih mempunyai 15 ahli Parlimen tidak pula diwakili dalam Kabinet oleh Presidennya Chua Soi Lek. Raja Nong Chik dan beberapa orang yang lain yang tidak pernah dipilih oleh rakyat dijadikan Menteri Kabinet. Jawatan Menteri itu di jadikan sebagai umpan untuk mendapat sokongan dari pihak dan kumpulan tertentu dan perlantikan mereka bukan di dasarkan kepada kebolehan dan disokong rakyat yang ramai.

Kita sudah tidak terkejut jika ada lagi individu yang di anggap penting untuk menampal yang koyak dan menyambung yang putus akan dilantik menjadi Menteri.

Janji Najib untuk mengecilkan saiz kabinet setelah Pak Lah melantik 32 orang ahli jemaah kabinet dahulu hanya tinggal janji. Akhirnya beliau telah melantik 41 orang ahli kabinet (termasuk duta yang bertaraf Menteri) dan ini merupakan rekod dalam sejarah negara sebagai barisan kabinet yang paling besar. Amerika Syarikat yang merupakan 52 kali ganda besar keluasan negaranya dari Semenanjung Malaysia dan 12 kali ganda jumlah penduduknya hanya mempunyai 21 orang ahli kabinet mereka.Perlu diingat Amerika Syarikat adalah negara demokrasi dan ekonomi terbesar dunia dan negara itu tidak memerlukan 40 orang Jemaah Kabinet.

Sebagai sebuah kerajaan kita mempunyai pemimpin-pemimpin yang terlalu rendah sahsiahnya. Sahsiah seseorang itu selalunya terbentuk dari didikan yang diterima mereka dari guru-guru dan ibu bapa mereka. Sekarang kita hari-hari mendengar kata-kata yang tidak bermoral dan sahsiah dari penyokong-penyokong kerajaan dengan menggunakan kata-kata kesat apabila ada pihak yang berpandangan politik tidak sehaluan.

Bagi mereka, UMNO sahaja parti yang semua umat mesti sokong. Jika tidak mereka (penyokong UMNO) tidak gemar dengan orang lain mereka akan menggunakan istilah kotor seperti anjing, babi celaka dan sebagainya. Bagi mereka ini tidak mahu mendengar perkara yang tidak sedap. Mereka hanya mahukan pujian dan dukungan tetapi mereka tidak menjaga sahsiah diri dan politik mereka. Kelaukuan mereka memalukan dan diperhatikan oleh rakyat secara terangan. 

READ MORE HERE

 

MAS-Air Asia swap: A shroud of mystery

Posted: 13 Aug 2011 05:09 PM PDT

After undergoing fairly lengthy tests, it turns out I've been asthmatic for quite many months. Having undergone the treatment, I am feeling much better now. Not fully recovered, but physically better.

A word of advice: Never underestimate that common COUGH.


As much as I am yearning to comeback fighting on the MAS issues, I will have to pace myself. For one, I will have to analyse what was the meaning behind the meaning of Tun Dr Mahathir's supportive words for the swap excercise. He hoped MAS can learn how to reduce cost.

Thus I'll not start going Tora! Tora! Tora! to blast every other insider input I get but to compile and review the various views already expressed on the issue. A friendly, elderly and wiser advise told me to remain supportive of Dato Najib.

We'll start with Miriam Mokhtar's column on FMT here minus the caustic sarcasm part on Tan Sri Tajuddin Ramli. That issue will be covered differently. Remember that this blog was the one to debunk the RM8 billion slanderous claim on Tajuddin.

Not forgetting her terrible treatment of Pehin Seri Taib Mahmud leading to the Sarawak State Election in April 2011, the gist of Miriam's column provide a background view of this issue. She expressed the concern of opposition politicians like Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim and Dr Dzulkifli Ahmad on matter of competitiveness, monopoly and business fairplay.

After all, the Government embarked on an Airline Rationalisation Plan in 2005 to promote competition within local aviation industry but not saved from being shrouded with intrigue.

--------------------------------------------------------
Why is the MAS/AirAsia merger necessary? Was it to help MAS or AirAsia? No one really knows as this deal is shrouded in mystery.
------------------------------------------------------
READ MORE HERE

 

Malaysian Insider’s sinister agenda to divert away from ‘share-swap deal’

Posted: 13 Aug 2011 05:02 PM PDT

Suspiciously, looks like Kalimullah "Riong Kali" Hassan playing his cards to deflect the issue away.

The Malaysian Insider the past few days felt that it was important to highlight the current suit and counter suit between Danaharta and former Malaysia Airlines, TRI and Naluri Chairman Tan Sri Tajuddin. They were compelled to skew the on-going civil case, even to a point of false reporting and getting quotations meant to demonise a onetime power Malay business baron.

They even got quotations from the Opposition, to show the ruling party's patronage on certain business personalities is still very much alive, just like former-abuse-of-power-convict Anwar "Mat King Leather" Ibrahim's immediate charge against then Dato' Seri Dr Mahathir Mohamad when the former was sacked as Deputy Prime Minister on 2 September 1998, 'cronyism'.

The case was about complications of a business loan spinning into a very vicious cycle and eventually turned bad. A straight forward term loan was raised by Tajuddin as a 'privatisation project to improve financial and profitability of Malaysia Airlines'. Many also want to be believe that then he was asked to take over Malaysia Airlines from Bank Negara in 1994 for RM 1.792 billion. The taking-over of Malaysia Airlines shares from Bank Negara alone was a story which has a very interesting history to it.

The RM 1.792 billion was raised via a term loan syndicated through RHB Bank. The collateral of the loan then was 130 million of TRI shares, 309.6 million of Naluri shares and 45.2 million of Promet Langkawi shares.

Then came the Asian financial crisis of 1997/8. Business was bad and Tajuddin and his group was cash strapped. His loan defaulted. It became non-performing loan.

As an after math of the 1997/8 Asian Financial crisis, RM 90 billion worth of loans defaulted and became non performing loans (NPLs). Government of Malaysia set up Danaharta to take-over these NPLs from the financial institution so that they could move on. Instead, Danaharta would do its best to either supervise a recovery plan to for turn-around and make these NPLs productive or recover the most from these NPLs, which include liquidating it.

An extract of a Bank Negara presentation in 2005:

•Pengurusan Danaharta Nasional Berhad ("Danaharta") was established by the Malaysian Government in June 1998 to address the non-performing loans ("NPLs") problem plaguing the banking system during the Asian financial crisis.
•The NPL resolution agency, euphemistically known as the national asset management company ("AMC"), was established as a pre-emptive measure to avert a failure in the banking system.
•Danaharta's objectives are:
–to remove NPLs from the banking system to allow banks to concentrate on their core business of lending to viable borrowers (completed in March 2001)
–to maximise recovery from its NPL portfolio (ongoing till 2005)

So, Danaharta took over these loans from the banks at 30sen from the nominal RM 1.00 value. After a series of discussion which involved the Government of Malaysia, Tajuddin entered into a Settlement Agreement with Danaharta on 8 October 2001.

Considering Danaharta took over the balance of Tajuddin's loan amounting to RM 942 million for RM 300 million, it was agreed that the repayment tranche was broken into four:

READ MORE HERE

 

Imam digantung kerana sertai Bersih 2.0

Posted: 13 Aug 2011 12:32 PM PDT


Beliau Hassan Md Said, imam masjid Kampung Ladang sudah berkhidmat selama 14 tahun.

Menurut surat yang ditandatangani Pengarah Jabatan Agama Johor, Elias Hasran, penggantungan Hassan bermula pada tarikh 2 Ogos lalu sehingga 2 November 2011.

Tanpa menyatakan kesalahan Hassan dengan jelas, surat itu hanya menyatakan tindakan penggantungan itu kerana Hassan "melanggar beberapa arahan Majlis Agama Islam Johor melalui Pejabat Kadi Daerah Johor Bharu.

Selain penggantungan sebagai imam tersebut, Hassan juga disekat dari mendapat surat tauliah sebagai Pegawai Amil Zakat Fitrah bagi penduduk Kampung Ladang biarpun lulus kedua-dua ujian saringan yang dijalankan.

Difahamkan, sewaktu beliau ingin mengambil tauliah tersebut pada masa yang telah ditetapkan, pegawai JAJ yang bertugas menyatakan penangguhan pemberian tauliah kepada beliau dan terpapar dalam senarai nama penerima tauliah bahawa namanya telah ditandakan merah.

Lebih merumitkan, Hassan juga telah dinafikan haknya untuk menerima elaun bantuan dari Persatuan Nelayan Kampung Gelang Patah yang sepatutnya diterima oleh semua ahli persatuan sejak sekian lama yang bernilai RM 350.

Pada hari himpunan Bersih 2.0 Julai lalu, Hassan adalah antara 1600 peserta himpunan yamg ditangkap pihak polis.

Beliau ditangkap ketika memasuki bandar Kuala Lumpur kira-kira jam 11 pagi iaitu sebelum himpunan sebenar bermula kira-kira jam 2 petang.

Read more at: http://bloglistpolitik.blogspot.com/2011/08/imam-digantung-kerana-sertai-bersih-20.html

Mainstreaming the lunatic fringe?

Posted: 13 Aug 2011 09:54 AM PDT

And many a time, these public expressions have without exception insulted the intelligence of the average Malaysians, irrespective of ethnic and religious backgrounds.

What's equally disturbing is that such articulation has caused hurt, pain and even outrage among the people who have been subjected to these irrational outbursts from the lunatic fringe. 'Lunatic fringe' here refers to the fanatical, extremist or irrational members of society who seem to be on the rise lately. Perkasa and other groups of similar disposition come to mind immediately.

This political posturing of the lunatic fringe could possibly pose a threat to our ethnic relations as well as national security.

And yet de facto law minister Nazri Aziz insists irrationally that Malaysia's political landscape has changed so drastically that what was taboo or "sensitive" a few years ago is now acceptable to Malaysians.

"Sensitive matters are now being discussed in the open," he told The Malaysian Insider (20 May 2011) recently. He added, "When something is mentioned all the time, it becomes less sensitive and this is a good thing because then things can be mentioned but people will not take offence of it."

Nazri's statement was made in the context of the recent claim by certain blogs and subsequently quoted by the irrepressible and irresponsible Utusan Malaysia that the Christian community in Malaysia was involved in a conspiracy to replace Islam with Christianity as the official religion of the federation. This matter, as it turned out, became easy fodder for groups such as Perkasa to publicly express their dismay and disgust and to agitate – although armed with no iota of evidence!

Freedom of expression or freedom to incite?

The minister's 'explanation' seems to imply that freedom of expression and of the press is in full swing in contemporary Malaysia. Is this really so?

I don't think so. If anything, this so-called freedom of expression has been applied by the powers that be in a very selective manner. When was the last time Malaysians were encouraged, let alone permitted, to publicly discuss pertinent but 'sensitive' issues such as religious conversion that has implications on a couple's children, meritocracy, the brain drain, institutional racism, the NEP; history text books and the ISA, to name but a few?

Anyway, to follow the minister's argument to its logical conclusion, does freedom of expression provide the licence to the citizenry to mouth racist remarks that could well spark ethno-religious uneasiness or even conflict in multi-ethnic and multireligious Malaysia? Have the authorities subscribed to the creed that freedom of expression includes the right to cause hatred among ethnic and religious communities?

If so, wouldn't this new political philosophy run counter to and make a mockery of Prime Minister Najib Razak's recent plea at Oxford University for moderates from all religious communities to join hands in promoting justice, freedom, hope, compassion and goodwill (The Malaysian Insider, 17 May 2011) ? Or was that mere PR spiel for the international crowd?

If the Najib administration is serious about reining in the extremist and irrational elements in our midst, one would have thought that he and his cabinet ministers would have reprimanded and condemned the wild utterings of the lunatic fringe. Of course, we're not suggesting that the federal government make use of such undemocratic legal tools as the ISA, but at the very least Malaysians expect him to make a public statement to categorically denounce such extremist expressions.

 

READ MORE HERE.

The Malaysia Airlines (MAS) Story: Of Plunder, Abuses and Lies

Posted: 12 Aug 2011 11:51 PM PDT

It is clear to me that the plunder of MAS 10 years ago when Tajuddin Ramli controlled 29% of its shares is about to repeat itself with the entry of Tony Fernandes as MAS's new 20% shareholder. And Tony Fernandes did not even have to pay for these shares. All he did was to swap shares with Khazanah. For every 2 shares in MAS, Tony gave Khazanah only 1 share in AirAsia.

That AirAsia will gain from having Khazanah as a shareholder is clear. They will now have "government" muscle to achieve what they could not before. But let me leave that to the financial analysts to comment and write about.

The so-called "Global Settlement" or Bailout?

I have previously written about the "Global Settlement" that the government-linked companies (GLCs) are forced to enter with former Malaysia Airlines Chairman, Tajuddin Ramli. This Malay tycoon plundered the national carrier to the bones. Yet, to this day he lives in absolute luxury in his ranch at Kuang, which he pretentiously calls Ar-Raudhah or the Garden of Paradise.

That Tajuddin is immune from prosecution should not come as a surprise. This was already to be expected when Malaysia Today exposed that Tajuddin's proxy, Shahidan Shafie, had gone to Haj as part of AG Gani Patail's family.  In case readers have forgotten,please see the official Tabung Haji document below:

Shahidan's name had also surfaced in court documents when the "Global Settlement" was first flouted in court. Read paragraph 4 of this document (below) that appeared in various  blogs last year. At that time, I had already known that Shahidan is also close to Nazri Aziz and other UMNO leaders. This was convenient to allow Tajuddin to still cut deals without being seen.

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Nik Aziz sokong larangan bacaan al-Quran guna pembesar suara

Posted: 13 Aug 2011 06:14 PM PDT

Mursyidul Am PAS (gambar) itu berkata perbuatan itu tidak mengambil kira sensitiviti masyarakat setempat sehingga boleh menyusahkan mereka dan seseorang Islam harus menghormati masyarakat sekeliling dengan tidak membuat bising, walaupun dengan membaca al-Quran menggunakan pembesar suara.

Sehubungan itu, dipetik Bernama Online, beliau menyokong tindakan Jawatankuasa Fatwa Negeri Pulau Pinang yang melarang bacaan al-Quran menggunakan pembesar suara pada waktu subuh.

"Kita (umat Islam) hanya dibenarkan melaungkan suara ketika azan untuk mengerjakan solat.

"Oleh itu, saya tidak bersetuju jika masjid menggunakan pembesar suara sehingga menjejaskan orang lain yang sedang tidur atau sakit," katanyaselepas melancarkan Koperasi Rakyat Kelantan Berhad (KRKB) di sini, hari ini.

Beliau ditanya mengenai tindakan Kerajaan Pulau Pinang melarang penggunaan pembesar suara semasa mengaji al-Quran pada waktu subuh di masjid dan surau di negeri itu.

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved