Khamis, 28 Julai 2011

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Doc goes on hunger strike

Posted: 27 Jul 2011 06:33 PM PDT

Dr Michael D Jeyakumar's wife reveals that the PSM leader will go on a hunger strike until all the six are charged or freed.

(Free Malaysia Today) - Detained PSM leader Dr Michael D Jeyakumar has started a hunger strike since this morning until all the six party activists held under the Emergency Ordinance are released or charged, said his wife today.

R Mohana Rani, who had tried to change her husband's mind, said the police have not budged from their original stand despite the PSM six cooperating during interrogation.

"He (Jeyakumar) believes that the police and government have their own agenda and aims.

"He has given his full cooperation since being remanded," she told FMT, adding that her husband signed three reports, including a 45-page report in Penang where he was first arrested.

Now, the authorities had prepared an 80-page report, but Jeyakumar decided not to sign it as he considered the investigation futile.

Apart from the Sungai Siput MP, the others under detention are PSM deputy president M Sarasvathy, central committee members Choo Chon Kai and M Sukumaran, Youth chief R Saratbabu and Sungai Siput branch secretary A Letchumanan.

They were arrested in Kepala Batas on June 26 while distributing leaflets calling on the public to support Bersih 2.0′s demands for free and fair elections. The authorities later accused them of waging war against the King.

They were then re-arrested on July 2 under the EO which allows the police to detain suspects for up to 60 days.

Meanwhile, PSM secretary-general S Arutchelvan could not confirm if Jeyakumar had started his hunger strike.

READ MORE HERE

 

Explain, Bersih 2.0 tells ‘bad boy’ Tian

Posted: 27 Jul 2011 03:40 PM PDT

Tian Chua finds himself in the hot seat following a Bersih 2.0 video of him charging at the FRU.

(Free Malaysia Today) - PKR vice-president Tian Chua has been asked to explain a video clip that clearly showed him leading a charge at the FRU during the Bersih rally on July 9.

The clip (below) showed the crowd facing off with the police at the KL Sentral tunnel moments before multiple rounds of tear gas were fired at them.

Tian Chua was seen standing in the front while the Bersih 2.0 leaders were seen urging the crowd to move back.

Then Tian Chua counted down from three to one and led a charge straight at the FRU who fired at them.

The clip was uploaded by Bersih 2.0 steering committee member Haris Ibrahim on his blog earlier today. The blog post entitled, "Confirmed: Tian Chua was a bad, bad boy!" demanded an explanation from the Batu MP.

"Tian Chua, you have some serious explaining to do," Haris wrote.

"You showed disrespect to the Bersih 2.0 leadership that was present there, especially (Bersih 2.0 chairperson) Ambiga (Sreenevasan) and you were leading the rally.

"More importantly you took it upon yourself to alter a peaceful rally to one of aggression, and in doing so, put many out there at risk to life and limb," he said.

Tian Chua declines to comment

When contacted, Tian Chua declined to comment on the video and repeated his earlier statement that he would only respond to an official police charge against him.

"I don't think it it appropriate for me to comment on this video clip," he said. "If the police have evidence then they should charge me and I will defend myself in court."

The clip however was included in the police version of the Bersih rally.

That version was screened to the media last week during which the police pointed out that Tian Chua had provoked them into firing the tear gas.

"I'm very troubled by the video," Haris told FMT.

"When I saw the line of FRU on that day I suggested to Ambiga that we ask the crowd to sit and that the Bersih 2.0 leaders peacefully approach the FRU.

"I didn't hear the countdown nor the call to charge. All I heard was the sound of shooting. Two days later eye-witnesses told me about Tian Chua's actions, I read FMT's report of the police screening and I recently received this video clip," he said.

Bersih 2.0 leaders condemned the police for the unprovoked firing but an upset Haris pointed out that Tian Chua's actions now exonerated the FRU and validated police claims of crowd aggression.

READ MORE HERE

uFWduXFANAI 

 

MCLM candidate steps down

Posted: 27 Jul 2011 03:03 PM PDT

Haslinah Yacob bows out of MCLM due to a clash of priorities and unpreparedness for politics.

(Free Malaysia Today) - The Malaysian Civil Liberties Movement (MCLM) has lost one of its four candidates for the 13th general election after Haslinah Yacob withdrew her candidacy last month.

Haslinah, who was introduced as MCLM's third candidate in January, was the movement's first female candidate and was scheduled for deployment with the others in March.

The 49-year-old former Awam president was reportedly handpicked by MCLM president Haris Ibrahim for her dedication to grassroots and advocacy work on women's rights and empowerment.

FMT understands that she was slated to contest in Wangsa Maju where she would have faced incumbent Wee Choo Keong.

However, Haslinah decided that she was unprepared for the political arena and informed the movement that she was pulling out last month.

"I made the mistake of taking on two new things this year; the candidacy in January and the opening of a women's shelter in April," she told FMT.

"Suddenly I found myself being stretched too thin and I was overwhelmed by the demands from both sides. I had to ask myself which one took priority and it was the shelter."

Haslinah also admitted that she belatedly realised the challenges that came with starting from scratch in an unfamiliar constituency.

A decade of social work had taught her that making inroads into the grassroots was a lengthy process and speeding it up in time for the general election was simply not feasible.

"It was a a very difficult decision but I truly felt that I would be short-changing MCLM and my constituency if I went ahead," she said. "I believe someone else would be able to better serve the constituents at this point."

"I'd also like to make it clear that this has nothing to do with MCLM and I continue to support the movement and its ideology a hundred percent.

"It was a personal decision and yes, I'm very disappointed with myself."

READ MORE HERE

 

‘Respect Sabahan nativity’

Posted: 27 Jul 2011 11:59 AM PDT

 

(FMT) - LAHAD DATU: Children from Chinese-native parents in Sabah are decrying the National Registration Department's (NRD) unwillingness to specify their mixed ethnicity in their MyKad applications.

Sources here said the NRD required Sino-Kadazans or Sino-Dusuns to choose between Chinese, Kadazan, Dusun or Murut ethnicity for their MyKads.

NRD is insisting that the community use the generic term "Sino-Native" in the documentation.

The policy has angered the mixed Chinese-native community in the state.

They have refused to subscribe to the NRD ruling and are demanding that their particular native groupings be recognised.

Kadazan, Dusun or Murut communities are inherent to Sabah.

Sensing an implosion following a recent complaint by a Chinese association in Ranau, Sabah deputy chief minister Yee Moh Chai said it was not right for the federal government to deny Sabahans of mixed parentage their nativity.

"In Sabah by virtue of its traditions, customs and beliefs everyone recognises the existence of Sino Kadazan, Sino Dusun and others because inter-marriages here are norm.

"They exist and you cannot deny it. If a Sino Kadazan wants to be known as Sino Kadazan then we must respect it.

"If it is a fair system that we want in this country, then NRD should only register the people's name minus the particulars like race and religion. It (documents) should only state their nationality as 'Malaysian".

"If you want other particulars to be included then you must include all categories and not be selective, " he said recently.

'Right treatment'

Yee said as far as Sabah was concerned there were many things that were being done here and that was not done in other parts of Malaysia.

"I think they (peninsula) must recognise and learn from us in terms of harmony and living together. It is the 1Malaysia ideology promoted by the Prime Minister," he added.

 

READ MORE HERE.

PR says no to 'problem-ridden', 'costly' biometric system

Posted: 27 Jul 2011 10:29 AM PDT

 

(Harakah Daily) - Pakatan Rakyat today rejected the Election Commission's plan to introduce biometric system in the coming general election, saying the system was not only too costly, but has no check and balance as well as fraught with problems of implementation.

In a joint statement signed by PAS's election director Dr Hatta Ramli, DAP International secretary Liew Chin Tong and PKR strategic director Rafizi Ramli, PR however pointed out that the move, which drew instant approval from prime minister Najib Razak, had vindicated allegations of phantom voters and multiple voting.

"The EC's move to propose the implementation of biometric system to stop the problem of phantom voters and multiple voting proves that Barisan Nasional cannot deny the voice of the people who participated in Bersih 2.0 rally," read the statement.

However, the statement said the biometric system would only exacerbate the problem of fraud in the electoral roll, adding that it would face multiple technical and system security issues.

The PR's stand echoes PAS's earlier stand rejecting the biometric system due to fears that it was more prone to fraud and manipulation as only a handful would have access to its software.

PAS president Tuan Guru Abdul Hadi Awang (left) had argued that the biometric system would not solve the issue of phantom voters and overlapping registration, and described the move as not practical.

"PAS reiterates its stand to push the EC to use indelible ink when voting to filter out phantom voters and voters who could vote many times in an election," Hadi said.

Inconsistencies

Hadi pointed out EC's inconsistencies for rejecting the proposal for automatic registration of voters yet being prepared to work with the National Registration Department to apply the biometric system.

 

READ MORE HERE.

PM announces 7th NKRA - tackling rising living costs

Posted: 27 Jul 2011 09:59 AM PDT

 

By Azril Annuar, The Sun

PUTRAJAYA (July 27, 2011): Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Abdul Razak announced today the seventh National Key Result Area (NKRA) – to tackle the rising costs of living.

Najib said the cabinet made the decision as the government does not want the people to suffer from the rising cost of living which has already begun affecting them.

"When we first came up with the first six NKRA two years ago, there was no global phenomena on the rising cost of food items. The first six NKRA were initiated after studies were conducted on what the public wanted and needed.

"Now that the phenomena on the rising costs of living have become an issue impacting the lives of everyday Malaysians, we have to respond to alleviate the burden and suffering of our people," he said, at a press conference held at his office today.

Najib said the 1Malaysia clinics, the 1Malaysia chain of sundry shops and the Tukar programme will now be part of the seventh NKRA.

"Pemandu's expertise will be utilised to help the various agencies and ministries involved in items, food items or services concerning the public. It will also be involved in organising labs with the ministries," he added.

One of the steps to be taken by the government is to study the supply chain and look at what can be done to "liberalise" it.

"Perhaps we will allow for more imported goods and items to add to the market supply. Secondly, we could also open up unused empty fields for food production. We might also find a cheaper alternative on livestock feed," he added.

Najib said the newest NKRA will not only cover food items but also other necessities.

The first six NKRA are: reducing crime index; poverty eradication; improving urban public transport, combating corruption, education and improving infrastructure in rural areas.

Earlier, he held a dialogue session with a number of iconic figures tasked to engage the public in the 1Malaysia Online Roundtable discussion.

"It was a very productive discussion. They brought up important suggestions for our consideration. We'll try to respond accordingly. They also want to be involved in the follow through process later.

"One of the benefits of this discussion is that we're able to get and feel the pulse of the people," Najib said, adding certain ideas and suggestions raised might be used in the formulating of government policies.

Amongst those attending the dialogue were football pundit Serbegeth Singh, celebrity host Aznil Nawawi, ISIS CEO Datuk Dr. Mahani Zainal Abidin and celebrity Lisa Surihani.

On the recommendations made by the Royal Commission of Inquiry regarding the late Teoh Beng Hock's case, Najib said: "We will make operational changes to the Malaysian Anti Corruption Commission (MACC) in terms of the training. It's been stated that the training is inadequate and we will strengthen it.

"Management of witness will adhere to a new set of guidelines and also with respect to the three who have been named in the report, it's up to MACC and police to make further investigation and the Attorney General to decide on the next course."

During the discussion, Najib said he will be cheering Harimau Malaya on their grudge rematch tonight against Singapore at Dewan Wawasan in Kubang Pasu, Kedah with around 10,000 members of the public.

He apologised to National Football Team Coach K. Rajagobal for not being able to make it to the game at Stadium Nasional Bukit Jalil.

"We have a big group here and they're listening to our conversation and they are behind you and Harimau Malaya. I'm sure you'll be able to rise to the occasion and the country is behind you all the way.

"I'm sure you have some things (planned) to overcome our two goal loss," he added.

RCI + inquest = ‘big, big mess’

Posted: 27 Jul 2011 09:42 AM PDT

 

By Teoh El Sen, FMT

PETALING JAYA: The Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI) into Teoh Beng Hock's death, which released its findings in a report last Thursday, has created a "big legal mess" by generating more questions than answers, said prominent human rights lawyer Malik Imtiaz Sarwar.

Malik, who represented the Selangor government during the inquest and RCI, said rather than serving its original function to bring a closure to the issue, there are now different conclusions by the RCI and inquest.

"What has resulted is a big, big, mess. We have now a coroner's decision and a RCI's, which are saying different things. In law, the coroner's findings is the determinative one," the National Human Rights Society president told FMT.

Malik said the three Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) officers – Negri Sembilan MACC director (then Selangor MACC deputy director) Hishamuddin Hashim and two enforcement officers Mohd Anuar Ismail (then the investigating officer) and Mohd Ashraf Mohd Yunus, who are being internally investigated for allegedly driving Teoh to suicide – would most probably make the same argument (that the RCI finding is inferior to a court finding) if they were brought to court.

"Both findings (RCI and inquest) are inconsistent. The inquest ruled out a suicide and said there were insufficient evidence to come to a finding of homicide. It also accepted that there were pre-fall injuries on Teoh, but the RCI totally ignored all that," said Malik.

Malik said before the Selangor government and lawyers of Teoh's family decided to pull out of the RCI, they suggested and raised concerns over the "dual" findings that would eventually emerge but their arguments fell on deaf ears.

"The RCI then should have stood down until the outcome of the revision (on the inquest) had been done away with. Or, the Attorney-General should have withdrawn his application to revise the inquest decision to push for a suicide finding and all parties to start off on a clean slate. But that was never decided on," he said.

"At the end of the day, the A-G, who recommended for both a revision and most probably also advised the government to hold the RCI, was asking for two different sides," he said.

"Also, the RCI decided to ignore all the evidence in the inquest and reboot the whole case… and it seems that somehow everyone got a second chance to restate their case. They (the commissioners) should not have done that; (RCI chairman) James ( Foong) could have found a way to include the coroner's findings," he added.

'There's no certainty'

Malik expressed his disappointment that the RCI now gave rise to more uncertainty than definitive answers.

"Where do things stand right now? There's no certainty. What we have now is a whole mess of uncertainty," he said.

"Has the RCI served its function? From the very beginning, the decision not to hold a RCI before an inquest was ill-conceived, and having a RCI as a knee-jerk reaction to public anger was also not well-thought out," he said, adding that the original intention of having a RCI was because of public anger and lack of confidence in the inquest's findings.

"The RCI was more of a political resolution rather than a legal one," he said.

 

READ MORE HERE.

BN MPs want more funds ahead of polls

Posted: 27 Jul 2011 09:38 AM PDT

KUALA LUMPUR, July 28 — Barisan Nasional (BN) lawmakers have told coalition leaders that the government must ensure more funds trickle down to their constituencies instead of concentrating on big-ticket projects like the Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) construction in Kuala Lumpur if the ruling coalition wants to receive a strong mandate in the next general election.

The Malaysian Insider understands that the matter was raised during a meeting on Monday night between 100 BN federal lawmakers and Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin.

The lawmakers argued that if Putrajaya could set aside funds for the MRT project, a similar amount should be given to generate economic benefits in more constituencies.

While the BN representatives said they "understood" the purpose of the MRT project, some of them felt that development projects within "rural" constituencies should be given top priority.

MPs who attended the briefing told The Malaysian Insider that many had voiced out concerns that further announcements and implementation of "mega" projects would pose a financial constraint in funding to constituencies.

It is understood that some BN leaders present at the meeting had requested an extra RM1 million in allocation of funds on top of the estimated RM1 million usually allocated annually and signed by the district officer of a particular constituency.

"There was a general feeling that it (MRT project) is costly, and that the money could be used for the time being for constituencies for smaller projects. One MP needs millions to do a project in his or her constituency," a BN source told The Malaysian Insider.

There is controversy over the estimated cost of the MRT project, which some reports have pegged to be as high as RM50 billion, although the authorities have said the cost cannot be finalised until the MRT alignment is confirmed.

But Umno MP Datuk Abdul Rahman Dahlan stressed that while BN MPs were very frank with their suggestions during the meeting, none of them voiced out any disagreement with the MRT project.

"Everyone present that evening understood what the MRT was for; questions and points were just raised to strengthen arguments to allow more allocation... it's only as far as MPs who serve in rural areas feel that development projects in their own areas should have been given priority. They were quite frank in giving their input.

"It was not about objection towards MRT, it was about more about wanting more funds to spend on a constituency. They are just saying that the money could have instead been used in rural areas, but the government has a different view about the economy," he told The Malaysian Insider.

 

READ MORE HERE.

 



Tussle over UDA’s plans for Pudu Jail

Posted: 26 Jul 2011 06:39 PM PDT

(The Malaysian Insider) - The Urban Development Authority efforts to trim its debts and raise money for its affirmative action programmes is being hampered by politics with the Finance Ministry stalling on the UDA Holdings board's recommendation of a China-based company to redevelop the Pudu Jail land.

The Malaysian Insider understands that the government is facing pressure and lobbying from politically-connected local companies who are keen on taking part in the deal.

UDA Holdings has recommended China-based Everbright International Construction Ltd as its partner for the redevelopment of the 8-hectare Pudu Jail site.

Sources say that the shortlisting process has been completed and Everbright's bid is in excess of RM2 billion, three times the value of the land.

"This is 30 per cent higher than the next best bid," a source told The Malaysian Insider.

The Edge reported yesterday that the finance ministry is due to decide from a shortlist of five companies in yet another defining moment for the agency that was formed after race riots in 1969 to ensure Malays have a bigger stake in the urban economy.

But the highly-placed source said that UDA's board has alreadyselected the best bid and are waiting for the go-ahead from the finance ministry.

"There is no more shortlist. The finance ministry is trying to delay in hopes that the Chinese firm will pull out because it's not worth the hassle. But they are having trouble finding a good reason to reject the bid as the board has decided on the best offer," the source said.

The Najib administration last week rejected UDA's sale of 3.56 acres of prime land in downtown Kuala Lumpur to 54 per cent Bumiputera-owned Nadayu Properties Bhd, formerly known as Mutiara Goodyear Development Bhd, for not having sufficient Bumiputera holding.

The decision over the Pudu Jail site will be yet another test of Datuk Seri Najib Razak's commitment to economic liberalisation.

UDA had come under fire recently from Malay hardliners in Umno, Perkasa and Utusan Malaysia for allegedly abandoning the Bumiputera agenda by not appointing Bumiputera joint-venture turnkey investors for the proposed Bukit Bintang City Centre (BBCC) on the Pudu Jail site located on prime land in the heart of the capital's Golden Triangle.

READ MORE HERE

 

Muslim women barred from working as GROs in Kuantan

Posted: 26 Jul 2011 06:36 PM PDT

 

(Bernama) KUANTAN: Muslim women will be barred from working as guest relation officers (GROs) or waitresses in entertainment outlets in the state capital from next year.

Kuantan Municipal Council (MPK) president Datuk Zulkifli Yaacob said the decision was unanimously approved at the MPK full council meeting Wednesday and the enforcement date would be determined later.

He said the decision was prompted by a call from the Pahang Islamic Religious Department (Jaip) to forbid Muslims from working at entertainment premises that served alcoholic drinks.

"A study found that 85 percent of employees of entertainment premises in the capital are Malays, who are Muslims, and they are exposed to alcoholic drinks.

"In addition, it contributes to the negative perception of Islam. Although Muslim GROs might not be drinking, but they had to serve alcoholic beverages to their customers," he told reporters after chairing the MPK full council meeting here.

Zulkifli said raids jointly conducted by Jaip, the Customs, police, the Immigration Department and the MPK found that many employees of entertainment outlets, including Muslims took alcoholic drinks.

"The MPK will also step up joint operations against Muslims drinking alcoholic drinks in public," he added. - Bernama

Teoh’s death: ‘Four new leads for police’

Posted: 26 Jul 2011 06:33 PM PDT

By Teoh El Sen, FMT

PETALING JAYA: DAP adviser Lim Kit Siang yesterday urged police to re-open investigations into the death of former political aide Teoh Beng Hock based on four new "leads" that the recently released Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI) report revealed.

Lim, the Ipoh Timor MP, said police should be investigating Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) officers for perjury based on the report's finding that named most of the MACC officers as "liars".

"Apart from two brave and truthful souls from Selangor MACC – Azeem Hafeez Jamaluddin and Azian Umar – the report virtually dismissed the rest as a pack of liars led by (then Selangor MACC deputy director) Hishamuddin Hashim, the "mastermind" of the massive and unjustified operation which resulted in Teoh's death," he said.

(Azian and Azeem were lauded as brave in the report as their testimony had supported the finding that MACC officers had been instructed to lie by their superiors.)

Lim said the report's "most scathing… indictment of the character and testimony" of the officers is "fertile source for the formulation of multiple perjury charges against Hishamuddin and other MACC officers in giving false testimony at the RCI". Under Section 193 of the Penal Code, this provides for a maximum sentence of seven years jail and fine on conviction.

Lim, speaking at the "Teoh Beng Hock Royal Commission Inquiry Report – Where is the promised truth?" forum last night, challenged Attorney-General Abdul Gani Patail to arrest and charge Hishamuddin based on the following paragraph in the report:

"The evidence adduced showed that the MACC officers were prepared to go to great lengths to lie. One glaring example is that of Hishamuddin, a very senior officer, who was overall in charge of
operations on that fateful 15th evening and spilling over into the early hours of the morning of the16th. In testimony before us, he was adamant in his stand that he had no knowledge whatsoever that complaints of assault and use of force had been lodged against the officers under his charge with the police. However, his lie was exposed with startling clarity when DSP Kamaruddin Ismail from the Selangor police produced a letter written by Hishamuddin himself in 2008 responding to police inquiries in relation to the complaints of assault and related abuses of power that had been lodged against MACC officers under his command."

Lim said that based on this paragraph alone, a charge could be framed against Hishamuddin.

'A pack of liars

He added that the RCI could not have been more condemnatory of Mohd Anuar Ismail, who was appointed investigating officer of the operation by Hishamuddin.

Lim quoted another paragraph from the report, which said:"Anuar lied about the role he played in order to cover up for HH. And on top of these factors, he was a trusted senior officer of Hishamuddin who was prepared to sacrifice himself for Hishamuddin…"

Calling MACC Selangor officers "a pack of liars" (apart from Azeem and Azian), Lim said the RCI report findings meant that "they had lied all the way from the initial police investigations into Teoh's death to the inquest and the RCI about what happened to Teoh on the fateful days of July 15 and 16, 2009″.

 

READ MORE HERE.

EC no. 2 grilled in public over 'powerless' claim

Posted: 26 Jul 2011 02:40 PM PDT

(Harakah Daily) - "We are powerless" and "we don't make decisions" summarise the explanation by Election Commission deputy chairman Wan Ahmad Wan Omar yesterday's packed public dialogue organised by Malay daily Sinar Harian at the Shah Alam headquarters of its publisher Karangkraf.

Titled "What next after July 9", the forum, moderated by NGO activist Wan Saiful Wan Jan, also featured Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia's Shamsul Amri Baharuddin.

Giving his reasons on why the EC could not fulfill Bersih's eight demands for electoral reforms, Wan Ahmad was at pains to emphasise that the Commission was not a law-making body and as such was powerless to amend laws. Several times during his explanation, the audience jeered at him, prompting the organising committee members to appeal for calm.

Wan Ahmad described the EC as an "election management" body.

"The most we can do is to propose the law to the AG (Attorney General) Chambers. The law drafted by AG Chambers will go to Parliament for debate.

"The government in power, anyone who rules the country, will have the advantage to determine the policy of the government," he told in response to questions on EC's reluctance to positively respond to Bersih.

Passing the buck to the Attorney General, Wan Ahmad, who many times referred to the audience as "Pakatan Rakyat" much to the chagrin of the moderator, said any party that wished to push for electoral reforms must approach the "right person".

  "So you please understand the process of law making in the country," he added.

Asked by Wan Saiful whether the problem was with Barisan Nasional as the federal government, Wan Ahmad only attracted more jeers from the crowd when he said it was the government's right as it had been voted by the people.

"If you all become the government also, you all will do the same thing," he remarked, before quickly adding that EC should not viewed as enemy.

Pressured by the crowd's response, Wan Ahmad than went on the offensive:

"You do not understand that the EC operates under many other laws like the Police Act, the Sedition Act. Don't push the blame on us... maybe those present are not ready for a discussion like this."

'EC should not act like BN'

Ambiga meanwhile refuted claims that Bersih 2.0 was an opposition outfit, and said that it had earlier invited all political parties to play a role in the movement.

"Had the government (parties) come aboard, there would be a wonderful discussion between all parties, but they chose not to. That's their decision. The opposition chose to come abroad and support us and I am grateful for their support.  

"Not just opposition, other NGOs, ordinary Malaysians... If you look at the profiles of the people who were out there (in July 9 rally),  the ordinary Malaysians have been the supporters of Bersih.

"Why is everyone treating the opposition like they are not rakyat Malaysia? I don't understand. They are also rakyat Malaysia," she stressed.

"So, who is staying out and who's in? That's my question," asked Ambiga.

Ambiga also chided Wan Ahmad for accusing Bersih of treating the EC as an enemy.

"Datuk Wan, you said we are treating EC as the enemy. I think you are treating us as the enemy," she replied to applause from the crowd.

Ambiga added that EC should be above partisan politics and not behave like it was Barisan Nasional.

"I think that's where the problem is," she quipped.

"No power"

On the claim that EC was powerless to push for electoral reforms, she cited clauses from the Federal Constitution which stated that EC was a powerful body.

Ambiga said that Article 115 (2) spelt out that public authorities must cooperate and assist with the EC in discharging its duties.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Is BN injecting ‘voters’ into Sarawak?

Posted: 26 Jul 2011 02:17 PM PDT

 

By Joseph Tawie, FMT

KUCHING: Is the infamous 'Project M' which legitimised illegal immigrants by the thousands in the 1990s in Sabah making its way to Sarawak?

Is Umno-Barisan Nasional using the current amnesty programme as a cover for a surreptious plan to consolidating its grip for good in the state?

According to sources here, the April state polls had forced Umno-Barisan Nasional to take stock of opposition influence in the rural and rural interiors of Sarawak.

In the past BN had seen Sarawak and Sabah as its 'fixed deposit' and was convinced that as long as these states delivered the seats, Putrajaya will remain with BN.

However in the April 16 state polls, opposition mustered an unprecedented 45% of the overall votes and that shook BN's confidence.

Political analyst Bridget Welsh, in a post-polls analysis, had noted that much of the swing occurred in the rural Malay heartland. BN buckled further under this shocking revelation.

Sarawak DAP, upbeat over its 12 state seat victory in the April polls especially in mixed constituency, immediately declared that it was going to contest in the rural areas in the next election further stoking BN's fears.

Already word is that BN will lose 10 parliamentary seats including four in the rural areas in the coming general election.

Project M tip-off

That, added a DAP source, is however only if the field is level, and a recent developement is worrying DAP.

Sarawak DAP secretary Chong Chieng Jen claims he's been tipped-off about a possible move by the federal government to introduce the 'Project M' in Sarawak.

"I have received information last month that the BN government is planning to introduce the 'Project M' in Sarawak.

"I hope my information is not correct.

"Nevertheless, we in the opposition will monitor the situation regularly and check the list of new identity card holders with the National Registration, and voter registration with the Election Commission.

"We know the situation in Sabah. Because of the 'project M' local Sabahans have now become foreigners in their own state as more and more immigrants are given Malaysian identity cards.

"That is why its population has surged. This must not happen in Sarawak," said Chong.

He pointed out that this strategy had allowed the federal government to grab back Sabah from the opposition Parti Bersatu Sabah (PBS) in 1994.

"PBS ruled Sabah for nine years after toppling the Berjaya government in 1985.

"That problem is still haunting Sabah until this day," he said, adding that Sabah's immigration problems have gone beyond the point of redemption.

Putarajaya at all cost

FMT recently reported that plans were allegedly afoot in Sabah to legitimise yet another 50,000 illegals.

Sources told FMT that 20,000 of them were to be retained in Sabah while 30,000 were allegedly meant for pockets outside of the state.

Rumours are that Umno wants these newbies to be placed in Kedah, Terengganu and Johor – the last two believed to have a 50:50 chance of falling to Pakatan Rakyat.

According to sources in Sabah, Umno president Najib Tun Razak is desperate to keep Sabah and Sarawak.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Punish Bersih or risk losing support, Utusan warns BN

Posted: 26 Jul 2011 02:06 PM PDT

By Melissa Chi, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, July 27 — The Barisan Nasional administration must penalise the outlawed Bersih 2.0 movement and the people behind it or risk  losing electoral support for its perceived weakness, the Umno-owned Utusan Malaysia said today.

"The government needs to learn from this incident. To ensure peace and public safety, the authorities should immediately act against the troublemakers. Don't waste the support of more than 4,000 non-governmental organisations and individuals who have lodged police reports against Bersih.

"The delay in taking action against the organisers and supporters of the illegal rally on July 9 can erode the people's support because the government is seen as unable to implement the law. So, do not send the wrong message to the people, (that you are) afraid to take any action against the opposition leaders and Bersih organisers," the Malay-language daily wrote in an editorial today.

Inspector-General of Police (IGP) Tan Sri Ismail Omar announced two days ago that Bersih 2.0 marchers arrested during the July 9 rally will be charged soon for taking part in what the authorities have classified as an illegal assembly, with the police confident of wrapping up investigations this week.

Police arrested nearly 1,700 people, including Bersih 2.0 chief Datuk Ambiga Sreenevasan, and Pakatan Rakyat leaders during the rally for electoral reforms.

Ismail was cited as saying two days ago by state news agency Bernama that his men were still looking into the issues played up by various individuals, saying that there are some who continued to make statements that did not portray the actual situation that day.

"Police chief Tan Sri Ismail Omar had said that a thorough investigation regarding the rally is expected to complete this week. But more importantly is that immediate action is taken, including charging those who were involved.

"As long as there is no legal action against the Bersih organisers who had triggered chaos in the capital city recently, it will seem like they are free to continue to spread accusations during their political talks," the editorial continued.

City police obtained a court order banning 91 individuals from entering Kuala Lumpur on July 9, while almost 200 were picked up prior to the rally.

The police have released all those arrested except for six Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM) members, including Sungai Siput MP Dr Jeyakumar Devaraj, who are being detained under the Emergency Ordinance for allegedly attempting to wage war against the Yang di-Pertuan Agong.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Kuan Yew warns of two-party system pitfalls

Posted: 26 Jul 2011 12:00 PM PDT

By Shannon Teoh, The Malaysia Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, July 27 — Singapore's influential founding father Lee Kuan Yew has spoken out against a two-party system, warning that it could cause weak governments even as opposition parties make gains and democracy flourishes across Southeast Asia.

 

The former prime minister of the island republic said in a recent interview with China Central Television (CCTV) that the progress made by Singapore since it was established in 1965 should not be taken for granted or that "what has been achieved is always secure", adding that poor governance would cause it to "spiral downwards."

"I believe once you have weak, ineffective government, the whole progress you have made will spiral downwards. But the majority of people believe it is secure for them, so now they have ideas about the West, two-party system," Lee said.

Singapore's general election in May saw its opposition make record gains, claiming six of 87 seats as the ruling People's Action Party saw its popular support drop by nearly seven percentage points to 60 per cent.

Developments across the region, especially Lee's former countrymen in Malaysia denying Barisan Nasional (BN) its customary two-thirds of Parliament in 2008, are said to have stirred up a political awakening on the island.

Years of mass popular protests have also toppled a military-backed regime in Thailand while Indonesia has blossomed into a global giant after democratic reforms in the late 1990s.

In the interview, Lee noted that Singaporeans now desire a "First World Parliament," which was the slogan of the opposition Workers' Party that took six seats at the May 7 polls.

"Their argument is simple. A First World country must have a First World Parliament. A First World Parliament must have a First World opposition. Then you can change dice. I think if ever we go down that road, I'll be very sorry for Singapore,' he said.

 

READ MORE HERE.

The ghosts of Mahathirism

Posted: 26 Jul 2011 11:02 AM PDT

 

By Stanley Koh, FMT

Is Mahathirism back with a vengeance?

Recent events do make it seem like the Najib regime has decided to adopt the former prime minister's authoritarian style in saving its flagging political fortunes. It has resorted to using draconian laws and shameless propaganda in the face of an awakening electorate and increasing exposures of its misdeeds.

The government seems to have ignored the strong signal given by the 2008 election result that Malaysians want more democratic space. And what was Bersih 2.0's July 9 rally if not a reaffirmation of that demand?

But instead of using the occasion to promote his much-vaunted liberalist image, Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak seemed to have done what Dr Mahathir Mohamad would have done—crush them and damn what the world says.

After May 13, 1969, Mahathir ominously proclaimed: "There is not going to be a democracy in Malaysia. There never was and there never will be." He was speaking then as a critic of the government, but during his 22-year tenure as prime minister, he seemed to have applied himself to ensuring that his prediction would be realised.

Khoo Boo Teik, in his Paradoxes of Mahathirism, wrote: "Certainly Mahathir did not balk at using authoritarian means to restore his control over mass dissent in October 1987. Then he professed to lament the irresponsibility of misfits who had abused his liberalism, not unlike how, after May 13, 1969, he spoke of the immaturity of the people as an obstacle to the full practice of democracy."

The Mahathir era witnessed the full exploitation of repressive laws, notably the Internal Security Act and the Police Act. The latter law requires police permits for public gatherings. This condition was stringently enforced against opposition groups but ignored for government parties. Things have not changed.

Mahathir's government amended the Societies Act in 1981 and the Official Secrets Act in 1986 to constrict further the arena of public debate. It also consistently exploited its two-thirds majority in Parliament to make constitutional amendments aimed at strengthening its political position.

Money politics

It was also during the Mahathir era that the Malaysian judiciary lost its independence and respectability. Mahathir tried to keep whittling away at that independence even in the last years of his tenure. In 1999, he was quoted as suggesting that the judiciary needed further reform because judges "tend to favour" the opposition.

The practice of "money politics" deepened its roots during the Mahathirism era. Scholars Graham K Brown, Siti Hawa Ali and Wan Manan Muda wrote in their research paper on Policy Levers in Malaysia: "Initially, under the guise of the 1971 promulgated New Economic Policy, the regime developed a fearsome machinery for dispensing patronage to supporters of the government. This money politics involves both state and private funds the BN parties control between them, a massive corporate empire that operates on the individual, corporate and even state level. The abuse of public funds is often unabashed."

 

READ MORE HERE.

Ambiga wants non-partisan committee for electoral reform

Posted: 26 Jul 2011 10:51 AM PDT

 

By Shazwan Mustafa Kamal, The Malaysian Insider

SHAH ALAM, July 26 — Datuk Ambiga Sreenevasan today proposed that the Election Commission (EC) set up a special committee to discuss issues concerning electoral reform following public outcry over the existing electoral system.

 

The Bersih chairman said that the committee should comprise both Barisan Nasional (BN) and Pakatan Rakyat (PR) representatives as well as representatives from NGOs.

"Is the EC prepared to set up a committee to look into all issues, and maybe in three months' time come up with a report on how the electoral roll can be set up?" she asked today during a public forum with EC deputy chairman Datuk Wira Wan Ahmad Wan Omar.

But Wan Ahmad did not once respond to her suggestion throughout the entire forum, choosing instead to reiterate that the EC carried out its duties accordingly and should not be held responsible over the implementation of any reform demands.

"The EC is open to suggestions. We will invite all parties to hear the suggestions, and also any NGOs who are truly 'ikhlas' (honest)," he said.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Ahead of polls, Najib’s last card is the budget

Posted: 26 Jul 2011 10:47 AM PDT

By Shannon Teoh, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, July 27 — With less than two years left of Barisan Nasional's (BN) mandate, hopes of an opportune time for federal polls are slim for Datuk Seri Najib Razak as dissent grows and the economy remains sour.

Politicians from both sides of the divide told The Malaysian Insider that with a cash-strapped Treasury struggling to maintain subsidies in the face of surging inflation, the prime minister should announce an election budget at the end of the year and dissolve Parliament soon after.

Analysts also believe that while heightened racial rhetoric has recovered some Malay support for the ruling coalition, it is a zero-sum game that is delivering centrist voters to Pakatan Rakyat (PR).

"We should have a good budget first. Tun Abdullah Badawi didn't have such a budget and then called an election," said Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz, referring to the former prime minister who was forced to step down a year after BN recorded its worst showing ever in Election 2008.

PKR deputy president Azmin Ali agreed, pointing out the economy was still lagging behind Putrajaya's six per cent growth target, only recording 4.6 per cent GDP growth in Q1 and is expected to remain under five per cent until June 2011.

"In two years, things can't get much better. But the question is with the government already short of funds, what can BN promise in its next budget?" the Gombak MP told The Malaysian Insider.

Political analyst Khoo Kay Peng went further, saying "things are going to get worse for Najib."

"There is no point waiting. The economy is going to be tougher in 2012 and meanwhile, no logical government will allow the likes of (Malay rights group) Perkasa and Utusan Malaysia to run rampant. It shows that Umno ultras are asking for a bigger slice of the pie. Najib is losing the middle ground," he said.

Pulai MP Datuk Nur Jazlan Mohamed said this was due to the ease with which issues could be politicised post-Election 2008.

"It doesn't matter what is the timing. Whenever it is, the opposition will just play up an issue for votes. Najib should just ensure the party machinery is ready because from now to 2013, nothing much is going to change," the Umno division chief said.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


A Sister's Grief

Posted: 27 Jul 2011 07:15 PM PDT

At the "BERSIH 2.0 Crack-Down: "EO Another ISA" Forum" last night, it must have been difficult for Dr Prema Devaraj, younger sister of Dr Jeyakumar Devaraj, to recount the memories of the ordeal following the detention of EO6. Not many could have pulled it through but Prema did - beautifully! Her face, though weary, did not belie the grief within her. The sea of faces looking right at her must have given her the inner strength she needed to speak so movingly.

On that fateful night, she recounted how there were only ten supporters waiting outside the Kepala Batas Police Station and she wished that there could have been more that evening to cry for their release - the volume of support might have rattled the police.

Dr Prema went on to present the biodata of the EO6 - all of whom had one thing in common - their earnest and sincere effort to bring about social equality, gender equality and the eradication of poverty via various programmes.

Who are the EO6?

1. Sarat Babu
Born on 12.11.86, Sarat Babu is a local activist in Kampung Chepor and has been active in the cause since 2004. He is one of the founder members of Alaigal, working in the Bercham. Babu was a coordinator in Perak for JERIT and was a tutor for 6 years. He is a part-time law student in Universiti Malaya. Recently, Babu was selected as Youth Chairman of Socialist Party of Malaysia (PSM)

2. Chon Kai
A Penangite, Chon Kai has been an activist since his university days at USM. He is a member of the Central Committee of Parti Sosialis Malaysia and the former coordinator in SUARAM Pulau Pinang. Chon Kai is a full-time activist in PSM and has been the Coordinator of PSM's international relations, Editor of Akhbar Berita Sosialis (Socialist News Daily) PSM in Mandarin which is published once every two months not forgetting that he composed many songs about the leftist struggle.

3. Letchuman
Letchumanan, treasurer of the PSM Sungei Siput branch, is in his 40's. Married to Selvi, they both have two children - Devan and Poorni. Both are well brought up and top scorers in their school. The son of a rubber tapper, Letchu, has been proactively organized evening classes for neighbouring children in the Heawood plantation. He has been active in empowering workers to stand up for their rights. You can read about him HERE.

4. M Sugumaran
M Sugumaran is the liaison member of PSM Perak, coordinator for May Day program and often the negotiator with police when a demonstration takes place in Perak. He is married to Pushpa and they both have three children. He is also the Sungei Siput branch chairman.

According to Arutchelvan, Secretary-General of PSM, "when Sugu was arrested on 2 July, he spoke to me through the phone. He said, "I am Ok, please make sure someone will take my mother to the hospital".

5. Sarasvathy Muthu
Sarasvathy Muthuhas been involved in activism since she was 17. She started working for Young Christian Workers (YCW). Two years later, she organized textile and food industry workers in Jelapang and Tasek factory level and also the state level to form a union body involved in picketing and strike. From then, she has travelled to various parts of SEA to represent Malaysia at conferences. Saras is actively involved in women's groups networks such as AWAM and WDC in discussing the challenges of the female working community
As a full time activist in Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM), Saras contended in the 2008 elections for DUN Jelapang. Even though she lost,she has been servicing the constituency with a big heart.

6. Dr Michael Jeyakumar Devaraj

You can read more about him in my post on The Gentle MP of Sungei Siput.

According to the latest news HERE, Dr. Jeyakumar is on a hunger strike. There will be a candlelight vigil tonight at 8p.m. Speakers' Square, Esplanade in Penang. Please come and show your support. 

Dr Prema expressed her appreciation to the three lawyers (all ladies) who were there to help EO6 when they were detained on July 2nd, namely Lim Kah Cheng, Karen Lai and Agatha Foo. They were released and shortly thereafter re-arrested. Handcuffed but with heads held high, they were taken in a convoy of cars to Bukit Aman KL.

She expressed her disappointment and outrage at the totally unnecessary and excessive use of force by the police. According to Dr Prema, the six of them are such gentle and dedicated activists that they would have taken the bus at their own expense to go to Bukit Aman if they had been summoned. There was no need to use taxpayers' money to transport them in so many cars. She explained that her brother was driven to KL in one car with FOUR other policemen and the others in different cars.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Confirmed : Tian Chua was a bad, bad boy!

Posted: 27 Jul 2011 02:54 PM PDT

You showed disrespect to the Bersih 2.0 leadership that was present there, especially Ambiga, and were leading the rally.

Most importantly, you took it upon yourself to alter a peaceful rally to one of aggression and, in so doing, put many out there at risk to life and limb.

Please do not keep silent on this, Tian Chua.

READ MORE HERE: http://harismibrahim.wordpress.com/2011/07/28/confirmed-tian-chua-was-a-bad-bad-boy/

EARLIER POST: Tian Chua, have you been a bad, bad boy?

 

Malaysian refugee swap spells human rights disaster

Posted: 27 Jul 2011 02:29 PM PDT

This deal from both Australian and Malaysian perspectives seems mind boggling. For Australia, if the policy is not implemented properly and human rights of refugees are seen to be abused then Julia Gillard's Labor government will face political disaster. For Malaysia, it's out of character with its long-term foreign policy of limited engagement and could embarass the nation by putting a global spotlight on Malaysia's terrible human rights record.

How the refugee deal fits in with Malaysia's foreign policy strategy

The current Malaysian prime minister, Najib Razak has a clear strategy when it comes to foreign policy. Firstly, to improve his personal international profile to compensate for declining domestic popularity. And secondly to directly improve Malaysia's economic fortunes by convincing international investors & entrepreneurs to invest in Malaysia.

But there are serious implications to Najib's strategy. Malaysia is very gradually moving away from its long-held position of non-alignment and limited engagement towards a tighter alliance with the US and two of its closest allies in the region – Singapore and Australia.

Under Najib, Malaysia's relationship with the U.S., Australia and Singapore is the closest ever. The number of difficult deals that Najib has delivered with these countries has made him appear to be an important asset.

One perspective is that Malaysia has opted to resolve the refugee matter at the bilateral level rather than through regional (Bali process) or multilateral (UN) channels. But also the refugee swap deal falls into this broader trend of raising Najib's international profile.

A puzzling policy

But what is puzzling is the fact that Najib would accept this trade-off between a higher profile for himself among government leaders for public humiliation. It is inevitable that due to the intense media scrutiny around this deal, Malaysia's atrocious human rights record will be put under the spot light.

If this is the principle reason Malaysia signed such a deal, then whose objectives were really being considered – Najib's personal needs or the country?

Another theory is that the generous payments from the Australian government maybe trickling in to companies related to the ruling regime. The Australian government will need to make public who are the beneficiary companies from this deal.

READ MORE HERE

 

The Technology of Trust

Posted: 27 Jul 2011 12:07 PM PDT

Who is to say otherwise?

The recent announcement by the Elections Commision to use biometric systems at the polls was instantly met with criticism and scepticism. The EC claims that the biometric system is a "fool-proof" system, while opposing parties went on to question the competence of the EC in deploying, maintaining and securing such a system.

For me, the technical merits of this, or in fact, any system is rather irrelevant. One may argue that there are several known methods of circumventing a fingerprint reader. Or that the records of voters are unreliable, etc. If we continue along this path, we soon find that 'biometric system' is just a pair of words with no absolute definition. Without a detailed set of definitions, open to peer review, it could mean just about anything the EC wants it to mean. 

Then there's the matter of implementation. Who is to know if the voting process is being carried out exactly to specifications? What safeguards are there against deviation and fraud? Who makes the observations and certifications?

It all comes down to trust. If there is no trust in the people who run the system, it doesn't matter how 'fool-proof' the technology is. For example, there are cryptographic algorithms available these days that are statistically impossible to crack;  yet, people get busted and data gets stolen all the time. Not because of any technical failure, but because the people who were trusted with the keys gave in.

Read more at: http://www.jaykayenn.com/2011/07/the-technology-of-trust/

 

Pusat Pentadbiran Negeri Sabah adalah Sabah for Sabahans …..?

Posted: 27 Jul 2011 12:04 PM PDT

Reading some facebook walls postings, I suppose a good number of common Sabahans are not exactly thrilled with the proposed Pusat Pentadbiran Negeri Sabah awarded to Bina Puri Group. Was there any public tendering? Never mind that.

That RM388 million project accounts for 16% of its total order book of RM2.4 billion, which is a real durian runtuh.

This is the Bursa Malaysia announcement:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.bursamalaysia.com/website/bm/listed_companies/company_announcements/announcements/index.jsp

BINA PURI HOLDINGS BHD
Date Announced : 21/07/2011

Description : Cadangan Pusat Pentadbiran Negeri Sabah, Teluk Likas, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah (Fasa 1– Kerja-kerja Pembangunan)

Announcement Details/Table Section :

The Board is pleased to announce that Bina Puri Sdn. Bhd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Bina Puri Holdings Bhd. has accepted the letter of award from the Director of Public Works, Headquarters in Kota Kinabalu, Sabah on 13 July 2011 for the project known as "Cadangan Pusat Pentadbiran Negeri Sabah, Teluk Likas, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah (Fasa 1 – Kerja-kerja Pembangunan)" for a contract sum of RM388,737,737.00. The duration of the construction period is 30 months.

With the above award, the Group's current unbuilt book order stands at RM2.40 billion as at to date. In 2011, the Group had managed to secure new projects worth up to about RM500.00 million as at to date.

The contract is expected to contribute positively to the earnings of Bina Puri Group for the financial year ending 31 December 2011.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sabahans might wonder about the state's significant oil and timber revenue, and look at the conditions of the roads, hospitals, employment opportunities as well as other more down to earth and direct indication of their well-being.

Maybe Sabahans do not desperately need another state government office with the mystery of rapidly increasing registered Sabahans is still unanswered.

Is Sabahans getting back its deserved share of its natural resources? Who are behind Bina Puri anyway? Are they a Sabahan owned, Sabahan run concern?


The Chairman of Bina Puri Group is Dato' Ir Wong Foon Meng

According to the profile page of its 2010 annual report and accounts:-

"He was elected as a State Assemblyman in Terengganu* in 1995 and subsequently appointed as a member of the State Executive Council (EXCO). He was appointed as Senator and elected as Deputy President of the Senate of Parliament of Malaysia in 2004. He was then elected as the President of the Senate from July 2009 until April 2010"

* as a MCA candidate

In the Chairman's statement touching on "Business Outlook and Prospects", Dato Wong has this comment :

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"….the world economy experienced the worst effects of the global financial crisis in the first half of 2009, ……. As a highly open economy, the Malaysian economy was similarly significantly affected ….

Against this backdrop, coupled with the Government's growth impetus policies that included the roll-out of RM9billion in infrastructure projects, including a provision of RM4.7 billion for roads and bridges projects and RM2.6 billion for water supply and sewerage services, the Bina Puri Group will benefit accordingly"

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What the Chairman is saying, to this reader, is that when there is a world economy crisis hitting Malaysian soil, instead of taking measures to cut cost and leakages, raise the competitiveness of the nation, strengthen the safety nets for citizens, the BN administration will further increase the deficit budget, causing higher national debts and award more contracts to selected parties.

Understandably, the projects that prop up the Group are significantly public projects funded by tax payers. Was there any public tendering? Oh do shut up!

> 60% of the Group's revenue is derived from public project
Affordable housing in Sandakan....at a profit to a Semenanjung developer, perhaps


According to the Group Managing Director, Senator Tan Sri  Datuk Tee Hock Seng  in his  Review of Operations,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

"HIGHWAY CONCESSION

The construction of the 33 km KL-Kuala Selangor Expressway (LATAR Expressway) linking Kuala-Lumpur at Templer's Park in the district of Gombak with the township of Ijok in the district of Kuala Selangor on the West Coast of the peninsular, has now entered into the final stage of construction and is on target to be fully operational in mid of 2011.

The Group is optimistic that the LATAR Expressway will contribute positively to our earnings from year 2016 onwards. With this project under our belt, the Group will strive to work at similar models which would contribute to recurring income"

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So we Malaysians better brace ourselves for more toll then. Looks like Bina Duri is really doing well in Semenanjung Malaysia and expanding across the South China Sea.

Read more at: http://wangsamajuformalaysia.blogspot.com/2011/07/pusat-pentadbiran-negeri-sabah-adalah.html

 

The Battle Has Just Begun

Posted: 27 Jul 2011 09:49 AM PDT

By the time I arrived, the darkness of the night was reminiscent of the solitary confinement cells. Did they know night from day? Or how long they had been there? Deep within, I knew that this candlelight vigil and forum "BERSIH 2.0 Crack-Down: "EO Another ISA" Forum"* would be different from the rest because of the impact of the BERSIH 2.0 rally.

Shortly after 8p.m. the crowd from the function room gathered under the porch, lit their candles and made their way silently and solemnly to the gate. Wordlessly and without any leader, we gathered there. With hands raised high, the flickering flames of our candles refused to be snuffed out by the gentle breeze or the falling raindrops aptly symbolizing the cry in our hearts for their release and for electoral reform in our nation.

Led by Seok Hwa of Suaram, cries of "Hidup Rakyat" and "Bebaskan EO6" filled the night as the crowd grew in size. A few members from the crowd stepped forward to speak up for those in detention and also about the issue at hand - the repressive legislation enforced even though there is absolutely no emergency situation.

After the vigil came to an end, the crowd walked back to the function room animatedly, spirits revived and hearts entwined. Filled to the brim, some had to stand at the back and others in the corridors in a feverish fervour for truth and details about the background and facts of the six civilians and events related to Bersih 2.0.

Nora Murad, Executive Director of Amnesty International Malaysia (AIM), introduced the first speaker of the evening, Dato' Dr Toh Kin Woon, a civil society activist and Bersih 2.0 Steering Committee Member. In his trademark crisp and articulate voice with a faint British accent, Dato' Dr. Toh stated firmly that whilst the events leading to the arrest of the EO6 and Bersih 2.0 rally brought out the worst of the elite in the government and institutions, it also showed up the best of the rakyat .

He emphasized that all BERSIH 2.0 wants is fair elections. People are frustrated that despite a barrage of calls for electoral reforms, these have largely been unheeded. The time has come for the rakyat to galvanize support for a clean and just electoral system. Until and unless we have this outcome, we will not have a full-functioning democracy and there can be no chance of a full-blown two-party coalition in this country.

The moment the announcement of the Bersih Rally was made, the worst of the state was displayed. Steering Committee 2.0 Chairman Dato' Ambiga Sreenevasan was demonized, scolded and condemned by the mass media friendly to the ruling elite - mobilized for purposes of attempting to victimize the people involved, in particular - the PSM.

Dato' Dr. Toh reminded the audience that no weapons were found during the arrest and yet EO6 were accused of wagging war against the King and for propagating communism even on though July 31, 1960, the Malayan Government had declared the end of the State of Emergency. And this is also in spite of the fact that our country has close ties with China.

Consequently, what we have seen would be the worst features of the state as seen in how chemical-laced water was fired at the crowd. Undeniably, the State and the public institutions concerned have certainly degenerated to a very worrisome state till people have lost confidence in the police and the judiciary whose professionalism and political partisanship are continuously being questioned.

Had the authorities given their approval from the onset, the walk would have been a non-event. Had our PM reacted by saying that he also wants clean and fair elections and sat down and talked with the BERSIH 2.0 Steering Committee, things would have turned out differently. Had the Coalition received the permit to hold the rally at Stadium Merdeka, the international media would not have had a field day reporting on it negatively. The reaction from the authorities has been nothing short of combative arrogance in the use of force and power to crush dissent. Had they not been so threatening, the crowd might not have been so big to want reason and rationality from the leaders to talk sense to the people.

He went on to explain that the PSM was targeted simply because they have been taking a very consistent stand against the government on many issues including GST, elimination of poverty, social equality etc. It was a simple decision to nip the problem in the bud lest cronies be threatened so they had to be belligerent in their stand and treatment of the group.

July 9th brought out the best in Malaysians and the best in Malaysia because thousands overcame the fear factor despite fears being generated and yet, they came and they dared to defy, to be brave enough to unite, to stand up to fight an oppressive government.

From this experience, it is clear that civil society has an important role in engendering change and progress in our country.  BERSIH 2.0 has shown us how a multi-front coalition of 60+ legally registered NGOs can draw the attention of authorities to be a force to be reckoned. For sure, civil society can help create more democratic space for public dissent.

 

READ MORE HERE.

TBH inquisition reveals racist underpinnings

Posted: 26 Jul 2011 06:48 PM PDT

These ingredients together created a scenario where it is difficult to escape the implications that our independent public institutions, like the Malaysian Anti Corruption Commission, are neither independent nor public.

It is unsettling to see the MACC operate as a tool of the state. It could be even more unsettling if there was perversion in the MACC's function such that it resembles the interrogation unit of the secret police as found in some autocracies.

A deconstruction of events leading and consequent to the deadly outcome is necessary to assess the repercussions of Teoh's tragedy.

Mind and methods of MACC

Firstly, all the deliberate obfuscation and obstructions put up against the fact-finders seeking the truth of Teoh's death implies a collusion to serve the interest of the executive branch. This type direction seemingly coming from high levels is an indication of a political landscape where the state is the party. So has our ruling party Umno become now indistinguishable from the state?

MACC investigation into Ean Yong Hian Wah, the DAP Seri Kembangan assemblyman who was Teoh's employer, commenced amidst Barisan Nasional hopes that it could take over Selangor following its successful toppling of the Pakatan government in Perak. Was the initial investigation and subsequent campaign of harassment by the MACC started at Umno's behest?

Kicking into action through selectively targeting DAP, the federal agency put the party assemblymen under the microscope. At the same time, the elephant in the room – former Selangor Menteri Besar Mohd Khir Toyo with his unexplained wealth and stunning 'Bali castle' for all to see – somehow escaped notice.

The difference in treatment against mere witnesses from the opposition ranks and suspects from within establishment circles is stark. This is demonstrable from the vast discrepancy in the sum for which Ean Yong (RM2,400 order for national flags) and Khir (millions to buy land and build mansion) were respectively investigated.

Further contrast is clearly seen in the varied harshness of the process – "aggressive, relentless, oppressive and unscrupulous interrogation" according to the RCI report on Teoh. A comparison between the two cases as well as drawing the necessary inferences will reveal the racial discrimination, on top of the political bias practised by the MACC.

Unless the agency is detached from state (read Umno) control and made answerable to an independent body – and Parliament be given oversight – it will continue to function as a political appendage of the party in power and not in any circumstances to regain public trust.

Everything under Umno umbrella

Secondly, the RCI ruling on Teoh Beng Hock runs contrary to the more compelling evidence suggesting murder. Its conjectures are weak speculation and too far-fetched for arriving at a finding of suicide whereas on the other hand homicide cannot be dismissed.

The issue of distrust re-emerges when the commissioners are seen as aligned to the powers that be. In the court of public opinion, the judiciary and public prosecutors are part of the Umno-dominated power axis or have been co-opted by the authorities (synonymous with Umno).

Previously, a royal commission had put forward concrete proposals, including the establishment of an Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission (IPCMC) for the purpose of reforming the police force. The recommendations contained in the extensive RCI report have been largely ignored to date.

Yet another set of conclusions from a different RCI on the VK Lingam judge fixing has dissipated into thin air.

In the face of the aborted attempts at reform and NFA (no further action), the public is entitled to query the symbiotic relationship between Umno and judiciary and police. Does the 1party control the bench and the men in blue?

Inversely, do the police being in possession of sensitive intelligence hold certain levers to control key Umno personalities? Or else how do we explain the police top brass thumbing their nose at the implementation of the IPCMC?

Recently we had the royal commission with terms of reference to enquire into MACC investigative procedures. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that the RCI recommendations will once again be more of the same morass. What traditionally arise from these so-called royal commissions are cosmetic changes (e.g. moving the MACC interrogation room to the basement), and the inevitable stonewalling on cleaning up the outfits.

After all, Selangor MACC deputy director Hishamuddin Hashim who was the field mastermind behind the torture of Beng Hock was even promoted to MACC director in Negri Sembilan.

The state-party nexus between those officials in government pay and Umno is more often than not reflected in the arrangement 'you do our bidding, we cover your back'. It is this mutual protection racket that helped obliterate incriminating traces of what really happened the night of Teoh's death. Instead of promoting the rule of law, such destructive living in each other's pocket only promotes lawlessness as evidenced in the brutish behaviour of the MACC inquisitors.

How the long-drawn saga eventually panned out is not only causing immense anguish to the Teoh family and heaping insult on the memory of the deceased but has also inflamed public anger.

READ MORE HERE

 

RM14.5bn golden yacht story ‘fake’: Motorboat website

Posted: 26 Jul 2011 03:37 PM PDT

The yacht story had initially looked genuine as the golden yacht was featured on the website of UK designer Stuart Hughes. The yacht 'History Supreme' is apparently a gold-plated Baia 100, a model introduced by Baia Yachts of Italy in 2008.

But basic journalistic tenets were apparently ignored. The golden yacht story was picked up by half the UK press (and elsewhere) and "reported faithfully, without a call to Baia to check the story's authenticity", claims Motorboat and Yachting deputy editor Stewart Campell.

The images that were circulated appeared to have been taken from the Baia Yachts website and 'photoshopped'. The Baia Yachts sales manager Mario Borselli confirmed to Motorboat and Yachting that the story was fake. "We will write him a letter asking him to take them down, but we are not thinking to go legal. It's such a stupid story it's not worth it… I can't believe people would believe someone would be so stupid to commission this boat."

READ MORE HERE

 

Tengku Razaleigh & Friends

Posted: 26 Jul 2011 03:20 PM PDT

I was not invited to the launch but imposed myself by calling the organisers and asking if I could attend. Fortunately, they were gracious about it and I was there together with some 200 others being fêted with speeches about how rotten things have become and what needs to be done. I was seated next to Nurul Izzah Anwar and that was special too. I have always liked her very much and being able to have a friendly chat with her about politics after many months was memorable.

There was a lot of speculation about Tengku Razaleigh's game plan or motive behind launching Amanah. Some say it's his way of keeping his hope of becoming the next PM alive. Others are less kind, and say he is clutching at straws to keep himself relevant at a time when his influence within UMNO is fast receding.

I am inclined to see the action of Amanah's promoters as noble and sincere. They want to remind people that we must not abandon the principles upon which this nation was founded. They seem to be saying that we must not try to reengineer or remodel this country on new imperatives, forgetting along the way all that has kept this nation together for so long. The call is for a more decent and trustworthy Government — who can dispute the relevance of that?

I would prefer Tengku Razaleigh to be more explicit and direct about his plans. In this country there is no middle path that one can take and still hope to make an electoral impact, which is necessary especially if one is looking at effecting a political transformation. One is either with BN or with Pakatan Rakyat.

Kita is a new political party that is willing to take a different and more risky route, but our "business model" is different. We focus on issues that have divided us like the NEP, religious freedom, the secular state, democracy, etc, and other similarly sensitive issues because we feel that addressing and understanding them are key to our future stability. Our manifesto touches on all these issues that BN and Pakatan shy away from. But these issues do not win elections in the short term. I do not believe Tengku Razaleigh and his friends are going to articulate them and be ideological in the way that we are.

Amanah, I am sure, will be pragmatic in their approach and this is why I was somewhat surprised that its promoters did not endorse the Pakatan Rakyat platform, at least on substantive issues. This will give them the momentum and the enthusiastic crowds on their nationwide tour. Otherwise, who will listen to them but a handful of smart urbanites, who are probably already converted to their line of thinking? Supporting Pakatan does not mean we subscribe to all of their policies or approve of all their leaders. But making Pakatan stronger will transform the political dynamic, which hopefully will bring some positive changes.

READ MORE HERE

 

Apocalypse begins

Posted: 26 Jul 2011 01:55 PM PDT

 
On Sunday, the news broadcast was filled with falsity and half-truths – one of which is that this country is rated one of the safest and most peaceful in the world. By whose measure, I wonder, in the face of so much murder, death, robbery and violence?
 
The credit for maintaining the peace should go to the brave 'rakyat' who, unarmed, faced water cannon and tear gas on their peaceful march. The government of the day deserves nothing for sending its minions to taunt, provoke and injure the populace. Instead, it deserves condemnation for oppressing the marginalised and those who defend them, imprisoning the innocent on questionable pretexts – and resurrecting bogeys and zombies, the undead that haunt those currently in power. Little do they realise that their monsters may turn on them.
 
Who would think that our country would descend to this? The rot has been secretly spreading all these 50-plus years of our apparent independence. Covert repression is taking place with each wave of threatened political instability over the years. Now, bursts its skin like an over-ripe fruit in the process of decay. The rotten, stinking, putrefying, maggot-infested sludge seeps out of pores and cracks in sticky black streamlets to pollute every corner of the country.

In this tragic-comedy, who will have the last laugh? This is the most unnatural country where innocuous actions are seen as crimes – the wearing of clean yellow T-shirts with the word "Bersih" on them and the possession of banners, pamphlets and flags, and images of long dead communist leaders. Where, indeed, are we heading?

Some are still afraid of shadows; how much longer can they use that as an excuse to do nothing? They, whose main concern is only for their own well-being, exist only for the present, not for the future. When they die, their fears will die with them and their existence will stop there. No achievements to speak of, no contribution to peace made, just the end of a mediocre life.
 
The winds of change are swiftly gathering gale force, but where will this twisting cloud in all its terrible power take us?

READ MORE HERE.
 

DSAI and Sodomy Three

Posted: 26 Jul 2011 01:15 PM PDT

Most times I shake my head in wonderment at the gullibility of men…and women. I am an equal opportunity kind of guy – men and women have equal rights to being gullible. No gender bias here! The defining criteria that elevates you from being a moron to being a "thinking" being is the ability to comprehend what is being said to you. Most dogs understand "SIT", "STAY" and even, though albeit reluctantly "NO". Now there are people out there who has taken the trouble to visit my blog (for that I am grateful!) in order to agree to disagree with what I put in the public domain. What I disagree is the disagreeable way they choose to disagree with me. I tend to measure others by the manner I measure myself. Let me explain.

When I am surfing the net I will only linger to read anything if the first few lines agree with me. If I continue to read something that disagree with me I do so because I want to see whether what is being said will move me to have a different perspective of the issue at hand. Sometimes it does and if it moves me I will write to say so. If it does not then I take it as "lesson learnt." The feed back I get these last few weeks from my writings on DSAI has some defining characteristics. In the main they are abusive, eloquent in their description of my private and public persona and firm in their desire to die not for country, bangsa and religion…but for DSAI! Good for DSAI bad for me!

Let us not dwell to much on me…I am the messenger not the story. And the story that needs to be told is one that most of us already know. We know and yet we are hoping against hope that DSAI is not the person most of us already know he is!

But a few truths about me and I will try to say this in plain language so that what I said will not be construed (opps I better use a simpler word here)…so that what I said will not be misinterpreted as being something else.

First: I have never ever received a single ringgit from UMNO/BN to write what I write. Now some of you will interpret that as me confessing that I did received a few cents NOT exceeding one ringgit from UMNO/BN – I will leave that to the imagination of others to interpret if that is what I intended to convey!
 

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Police report made by Blog House Tony Yew against 5xmom and her religion

Posted: 27 Jul 2011 11:58 AM PDT

Blog House Malaysia is supposedly the online media watchdog for the Media Consultative Council, claiming to defend bloggers on their site. Bloggers pay a membership fee for their services. Is Tony Yew now telling all bloggers that Blog House Malaysia will not tolerate a person's random thoughts? 

By Lilian's friend (at least, I'd like to think so)

A police report was made against a videographer attached to the Penang government over her tweet allegedly related to the Bersih 2.0 rally on July 9. Utusan had claimed she was inciting the Christians.

The Investigating Officer from Brickfields and a cyber crime personnel will be going to Penang to take her statement at the IPD DTL police station around 5.30 pm on Thursday 28 July 2011.  

The videographer, Lilian, had sent a personal tweet in her protected, private Twitter account. This is what she wrote:

I think all Christians shud march for all the persecution they had done to us and our Lord. Dont you think so? I go sleep now, bye-bye. :)

As soon as she sent this off, a person by the name of Tony Yew who is the Secretary of Blog House Malaysia demanded she retract what she had said because he claimed she was mixing politics with religion. She replied on Twitter:

Oh really? What? Where?

However, there was no response from him on Twitter. Instead, he made a police report against her. Blog House Malaysia is supposedly the online media watchdog for the Media Consultative Council, claiming to defend bloggers on their site. Bloggers pay a membership fee for their services. Is Tony Yew now telling all bloggers that Blog House Malaysia will not tolerate a person's random thoughts?
 
Tony Yew appears to have intentionally ignored the fact that it was written at night, in a flippant manner. Then, he did not give her the chance to clarify her statement if he had indeed misunderstood it.
 
Of course, Utusan Malaysia had to publish the story where the original Tweet with "I think" and the "Don't you think so? I go sleep now, bye-bye :)"  being omitted, sensationalising her statement to seem like she was trying to gather supporters for her thoughts. 

This is what she said when she wrote to me:

1. My tweets are protected and Tony Yew whom I have added into my account has abused it
2. I never intend to incite as one can see I started my Tweet with 'I think'.  It is a private thought and done in a random way, with general references
3. As a Catholic Christian, I care for all segment of societies
4. I never condemn anyone in my Tweet
5. This is my conviction to my religion. The freedom and belief which are protected under Malaysia Constitution.
6. I believe in peace and harmony
7. I am a Malaysian and love the country
8. The Bible never teach me to hate nor incite

Therefore, the accusation that I am inciting is false.  

Her case has not gone to court yet, and I hope it will not reach that stage. Are our private thoughts at stake now? I think we all feel the mainstream media is always twisting facts. Are they now proving that it is in fact true?

 

709 Rally - Significance and Implications

Posted: 27 Jul 2011 09:44 AM PDT

By Friends of SUARAM (FOS) Working Committee, Johore

Despite all forms of deception, destruction and intimidation and eventually an all-out suppression by the ruling clique of the UMNO-dominated Barisan Nasional Government, 709 rally cum "walk for democracy", was successfully held in Kuala Lumpur City Centre, the heartland of Malaysia. It was a remarkable achievement resulting from a high-degree collective wisdom and correct leadership of Bersih 2.0 leaders, coupled with the extremely huge response and courageous participation of the people.

The Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein deployed a large number of fully-armed FRU (riot squads) to block with barbed wire all streets leading to the Merdeka Stadium. Thousands of police were instructed to arrest people, and to disperse any public gathering of people. Only a few thousand demonstrators managed to break through the barricades and successfully entered the area surrounding Merdeka Stadium.

Since a peaceful assembly could not be held in the historic and ideal venue chosen by Bersih leaders, more than 50,000 disgruntled participants had no alternative but to take to the streets.

Bersihl eaders, including Ambiga and others, in defiance of the restriction order issued by the Court, entered Kuala Lumpur City Centre, braving the possibility of being prevented from entry, or of being arrested. They were eventually stopped and arrested on the way to attend the rally.

The "memorandum of 8-point demand for electoral reform" could not be submitted to Agong on that day as a result of the brutal suppression by Barisan Nasional government headed by Najib, Bersih 2.0 had no choice but to appoint another date to submit the memorandum to Agong.

709 rally cum "walk for democracy" was unexpectedly turned into a public demonstration that boosted popular morale. It signified a strong demand for reform of the parliamentary election system as well as for political democracy, after a period of 54 years since Independence. It reflected the unity and co-operation among all ethnic communities, particularly the 3 major communities (Chinese, Malay and Indian).

The rally can be interpreted as a severe criticism levelled at the racist blackmail and attack launched by hegemonistic UMNO ruling clique.It took place simply because of UMNO-dominated BN ruling clique stubbornly brushing aside Bersih 2.0's "8-point demand" for electoral reform, which is justified, legitimate and appropriate.

The situation was aggravated by Najib going back on his own word, disallowing the rally to be held in Merdeka Stadium. Instead, he gave the green light to the police to resort to brutal repression of those taking part in the rally, including the Bersih leaders.

The "709 Bersih rally" can be aptly described as a popular movement of the three ethnic communities launched for the purpose of achieving electoral reform for clean and fair elections.

It was a mass struggle unprecedented in the history of Malaysia. The occurrence of this historic event followed by its development is of great significance and of far-reaching implications for democracy and human rights movement in Malaysia. The implications are as follows:-

1. The people realised the unreasonable and deceptive nature of the"rules of the game" of parliamentary elections.

The "709 Bersih rally" has brought to light the following points:

(1) The past 54 years of practical experience in parliamentary elections since Independence, has taught the broad masses that the "rules of the game" (i.e. election rules, election system and procedures) designed by the British government, and implemented by the UMNO-dominated Alliance and the present Barisan Nasional government are unreasonable and deceptive in nature.

(2) The people, through their personal experience in life, have realised that the continuing existence and implementation of the "rules of the game" of parliamentary elections, favouring the ruling clique of the day, would never bring about a popularly-elected government, genuinely representing and protecting the interests of the people.

(3) The broad masses have, through the past 54 years of untold suffering, realised that the UMNO hegemonistic ruling clique is the root cause of all racial discrimination, corruption, abuse of power, polarization of wealth and poverty, and social disharmony. The BN component parties (MCA, Gerakan, SUPP and MIC especially) are merely accomplices and lackeys of UMNO's ruling clique. They are working hand in glove against the people;

(4) A large proportion of the populace have also realized that, in order to have a better life, the UMNO hegemonistic ruling clique which has ruled our country for 54 long years, must at an opportune time be booted out of the political arena.

2. Daring to put up popular struggle is the answer to the UMNO's racist blackmail

It is common knowledge that the BN ruling clique never fails to engage in political blackmail with racist overtones (resorting to lame excuses to intimidate the people ) whenever the Rakyat rise on any occasion to demand justice.

In September 2000, after being pressured by Suqiu (the electoral demands made by the Chinese community touching on various national issues). The then Prime Minister Dr. Mahathir decided to settle accounts with the Suqiu Committee not long after the General Election. He summoned leaders of the Suqiu Committee headed by Mr Kuek Hian Hiang of Dong Jiao Zong (the United Chinese School Committees' & Teachers' Associations) to his office. He administered threats to them, pressurizing them to back down on their demands.

Meanwhile, MCA and Gerakan leaders coaxed and threatened the leaders of the Suqiu Committee and other Chinese community leaders into setting aside their demands, or risked facing racial backlash.

At the same time, the UMNO Youth was stirring up racial sentiments by vowing "to burn down the Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall"and shouting slogans like "the Chinese Malaysians go back to China", etc. The UMNO ruling clique headed by Dr. Mahathir practised "white terror" by way of clamouring that "Suqiu has infringed upon the Malay special privileges" and "Suqiu has caused social unrest". By resorting to such "white terror", the government succeeded in thwarting the Suqiu movement.

In 1987, the current Prime Minister Najib was the UMNOYouth chief cum Minister for Culture, Youth and Sports. 1987 was the year when the government created a political turmoil when it assigned non-mandarin speaking school administrators to Chinese schools.

Najib, in his capacity as the UMNO Youth chief, convened a 10,000-strong rally. A banner bearing the slogan "to soak the Malay keris in Chinese blood" ("Basahkan Keris Dengan Darah Cina") was conspicuously displayed in the rally. In the same rally, Najib delivered a speech highly charged with racist sentiments while waving a keris in his hand.

He has now denied having uttered such seditious words as "to soak the Malay keris in Chinese blood" after assuming the post of prime minister (refer to the Chinese news reported by Merdeka Review at http://www.merdekareview.com/news.php?n=9969). But when Bersih 2.0 announced its intention to hold the 709 rally at the Merdeka Stadium, Najib openly supported Melaka chief minister Ali Rustam in mobilizing members of the Malay martial art organization known as PESAKA (Malaysian National Federation of Silat) to take part in the so-called "patriot" rally led by UMNOYouth on 9 July, allegedly to protect the National Palace. Ali Rustam claimed that PESAKA had a total membership of 4000,000.

Najib utilized the state machinery (mainly institutions resorting to violence and mass media owned or manipulated by the government) and the racist organization PERKASA to unleash an atmosphere of "white terror" against the people of various communities, in an attempt to frighten them into distancing themselves from the Bersih movement. But such sinister plot failed miserably.

The success of Bersih 2.0 rally goes to show that daring to put up popular struggle is the answer to the UMNO's racist blackmail. In the face of the determined action taken by Bersih leaders and the participants of the rally, the racist political blackmail of the UMNO ruling clique has met with total failure.

3. 709 Bersih rally fostered greater awareness as well as unity and cooperation among all ethnic communities

709 Bersih rally has been the biggest popular struggle for human rights and democracy in Malaysia for the past 54 years since Independence. It was estimated that more than 50,000 people from various ethnic groups participated in the rally (mainly the three major ethnic groups - Malays, Chinese and Indians - and other minority groups like Ibans and Kadazans). They were believers of different faiths (largely Muslims, Hindus, Christians, Buddhists, etc.) and were from all walks of life (workers, farmers, petty traders, professionals, businessmen, academics, artists, political parties, retirees, etc.).

The huge crowd of people from different directions, and from all nooks and corners, converged towards the direction of Merdeka Stadium in a peaceful and orderly manner. They were chanting "Hidup Bersih! Hidup Reformasi! HidupRakyat!", expressing their strong desire for reforms. Some of them were seen wearing yellow Bersih T-shirts; some had yellow Bersih 2.0 head banners; while some others were waving national flags. No one was carrying any offensive weapon and such like. Banners which were normally displayed in rallies, but they could hardly be seen in 709 Bersih rally.

Those who took part in the peaceful march were however demonized by the UMNO ruling clique as a mob out to create commotions. They were crudely handled with violence by fully-armed anti-riot squads. Tear gas canisters and chemical-laced water cannons were used against them.

In the crackdown, a total of 1,667 persons, including the Bersih chairperson Ambiga and several opposition leaders, were arrested, making the number of arrests a record high in history. The mass arrests drew public criticisms from all quarters. Because of that, the police were forced to release all the detainees within a day. It was indeed an embarrassment to the police force.

It is to be noted that an overdose of tear gas released by the police resulted in the collapse and death of Baharuddin Ahmad, a participant of the rally. The anti-riot squad fired tear gas canisters and water cannons into the compounds of Tung Shin Hospital and Chinese Maternity Hospital. The police action was merely for the sake of giving chase to the participants who sought refuge in the hospitals.

The anti-riot squad totally disregarded the safety of the patients, pregnant women as well as babies in the hospitals. Such repressive actions were immediately severely condemned by the public, and there was heated public discourse on the Internet.

To allay public discontent, health minister Liow Tiong Lai convened a media conference with directors of Tung Shin Hospital. He declared that "Tung Shin Hospital and patients did not suffer any injury or damage". That was a futile attempt to justify the government's crackdown. The health minister even went to the extent of claiming that "the police were merely sending the injured to the hospital". He went further to argue that "there would not have been such untoward incident if there were no Bersih rally". All these allegations are sheer nonsense!

The truth always prevails. 11 doctors (some of them were from the two hospitals concerned) issued a joint statement founded upon their personal experiences in the rally, served to rebut Liow's false allegations. Numerous articles and photos depicting police brutality were uploaded on the Net. All this constitutes irrebuttable evidence of the repressive actions taken by the government and the police force.

The spirit of being fellow Malaysians prevailed in the rally. In the face of violent crackdown, participants of the rally rendered assistance and support to each other, regardless of ethnicity. They marched towards the common goal. It was an invaluable experience and educational process for the Rakyat. It laid the spiritual and material foundation for the struggle on a larger scale for human rights and democracy in the future.

Therefore, 709 Bersih rally is of far-reaching implications favourable to the inter-racial unity and cooperation among thevarious communities. This is undeniable.

4. 709 Bersih rally shows NGOs the right direction tomarch forward

The launching of "709 Bersih rally" cum "Walk for Democracy" eventually developed into a widespread "709 Public Demonstration". The Bersih chairperson Ambiga and its steering committee have demonstrated theiroutstanding leadership.

They won the full confidence and the overwhelming support of the Rakyat. This led to the success of the rally, making it possible for us to move a step forward towards democracy in this country. Ambiga showed her exceptional quality of perseverance and courage in leading Bersih 2.0. She proved herself a shining exemplary leader in civil society.

Bersih 2.0 is a coalition of 62 legitimate NGOs (also known as "civil society"). It strives for clean and fair elections. Bersih 2.0 is neither a political party nor a subsidiary of any political party. Bersih 2.0 is to carry on with its struggle for clean and fair elections. It does not exist for the purpose of winning seats in legislative assemblies or seizing power on behalf of any political party.

Thus, it is neither subjugated to any political party nor taking orders from any political party. Bersih 2.0 leaders will only act in the interests of the Rakyat, relying on the consensus among civil society groups, and on the final policy decision of the steering committee. Bersih will maintain its independence and autonomy as an NGO coalition.

The non-partisan stand adopted by Bersih 2.0 while acting in the interests of the people, was well-received by the people, irrespective of ethnicity, class and religion, and it was also welcomed by various political parties. Bersih 2.0 rally was subsequently turned into a "709 Public Demonstration". This is because the position taken by Bersih 2.0 was in accord with the aspirations and interests of the people regardless of ethnicity, class or creed. It also gained the support of various political parties.

In brief, a number of factors contributed to the success of Bersih 2.0 rally, and therefore, the fruit of success ought to be shared and enjoyed by all and sundry.

Without doubt, Bersih 2.0 has clearly defined its position, that is, to fight for "clean and fair elections".

PSM (Malaysian Socialist Party) launched a 3-day political publicity campaign (from 24 to 26 June) on "Udahlah tu----Bersaralah! BN". The home ministry tried to equate such publicity campaign with Bersih 2.0's electoral reform movement. This was obviously a mischievous attempt on the part of the government to confuse the people, designed to create a wrong impression that Bersih 2.0, like PSM, was calling for "the immediate overthrow of the BN government".

The home ministry, through the police, invoked the Emergency Ordinance to detain MP Dr. Michael Jeyakumar Devaraj and 5 others, accusing them of "waging war against Yang Di-Pertuan Agong" and "reviving communism", simply because of the red T-shirts bearing portraits of MCP leaders (i.e. Chin Peng and Abdullah CD) found in their bus. The whole episode is ridiculous to the extreme!

The undeniable fact is: On 4 March 2005, Chin Peng,the leader of the Malayan Communist Party (MCP) had, in his "10-point statement", said: "we have taken the oath of allegiance and loyalty to Yang DiPertuan Agong" "we have agreed to give up violence and armed struggle and everything". Prior to this, in 1989, MCP had laid down arms, destroyed all weapons, disbanded its armed forces, and signed the "Haadyai Peace Accord" jointly with the Malaysian government.

The detention of Dr Jeyakumar and 5 other members is no doubt a heavy blow to PSM. To some extent, it has tarnished the image of Bersih 2.0. It is detrimental to Bersih's call for electoral reform.

"Bersih! Bersih! Hidup Bersih!" was the unanimous slogans chanted throughout the Bersih 2.0 rally on July 9, where no flag or slogan of any political party was seen. The slogans used reflected the common aspirations of the Rakyat for clean and fair elections.

Rakyat have given a thumbs-up to the Bersih 2.0 rally. The Bersih 2.0 rally is a mature and successful public demonstration. To sum up, 709 rally has no doubt far-reaching implications conducive to the healthy development of civil society in this country.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved