Isnin, 4 Julai 2011

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


A Deplorable Abuse of Power

Posted: 03 Jul 2011 10:58 AM PDT

http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Dr-Michael-Jeyakumar-Devaraj.jpg

By William Leong

The Barisan Nasional Government by detaining Dr Jeyakumar Michael Deveraj, Member of Parliament for Sungai Siput together with five others under the Emergency Ordinance has committed a deplorable abuse of power.

The Emergency (Public Order and Crime Prevention) Ordinance has been used as a shortcut by police to detain persons suspected of criminal offences when there is insufficient evidence to convict them in a court of law. The EO itself is therefore an unjust law as it allows a person to be detained indefinitely without trial. It is now used not against persons suspected of committing crimes but for political purposes. The detention of these persons under the EO is therefore all the more reprehensible for this reason.

Dr Jeyakumar and the others namely; M Saraswathy, Choo Chon Kai, M Sukumaran, A Letchumanan and Sarat Babu were detained on the ground that they were promoting Bersih 2.0. Bersih 2.0 is a rally organized by a non-government organization calling for clean and fair elections. It is a call to ensure that the electoral system is not manipulated. A government is not democratically elected just because the motions of carrying out elections are held.

When elections are manipulated to defeat the will of the people then the very essence of democracy is nullified. Bersih 2.0 is held to call on the Election Commission to ensure that the government to be elected by Malaysians will be done by those who are doing the voting and not those who are doing the counting. All political parties who uphold democracy should support Bersih 2.0. However Barisan Nasional has not only objected to the call for clean and fair elections but has used the police as a tool to stop the rally. Unless this is rectified immediately the police force will be seen to be an instrument for political oppression.

It is wrong to take away the liberty of an innocent person without just cause. It is evil when it is done for the purpose of maintaining in power a regime that has lost its popular support. If the Barisan Nasional is confident of its popular support then there is no cause for stopping the Bersih 2.0 rally.

I call on the Barisan Nasional Government and the Police to release Dr Jeyakumar and the others immediately. Failure to do so will mean that the Government has used the law not for the purpose of maintaining the security of all its citizens but to maintain itself. Such conduct by a government amounts to the repression and oppression of its citizens.

I wish to remind the Barisan Nasional Government that history shows us that all repressive regimes can only maintain a grip on power for a limited time. A Government that seeks to cling on to power through electoral fraud and police repression has no moral authority to govern and is illegitimate. The limits of an oppressive regime are prescribed by the endurance of the people oppressed and the tipping point is reached sooner than later.

The action taken in the past few days to arrest and detain those wearing yellow or who referred to Bersih 2.0 in their speeches have caused the people to think that the Government has lost its mind. The thought that so many innocent people are being punished without just cause is intolerable. It is hoped that sanity and good sense will prevail and the Barisan Nasional Government reconsiders its position, permit the Bersih 2.0 rally to be held peacefully and release all those arrested.


WILLIAM LEONG JEE KEEN is MP for Selayang

The lines are finally drawn

Posted: 03 Jul 2011 10:49 AM PDT

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhVdvVhWlDAve3xhYxxys6zusGh7B2lE0cdarc1Q69IMiXlUW9F7v4SValIN8K64xiJy9GioO90hQANH4CG8RmOvnRrA-n_9y6og8E18Ah4qxXeFPl81dLkFsikR_bHeLn8R32yZj9iO8-a/s1600/Bersih+2.jpg

A lot of people will say that this is a last resort action to deter Malaysians from participating in the forthcoming rally. Many more will say that this is done to justify the eventual mass arrests on the streets come Saturday the 9th, especially when the foreign press are looking and reporting about it. Could the real reason be that the government is using this rally as a line marker?

By tekak mendalam

The government is not dim-witted when they decided to outlaw BERSIH as much thought must have been placed into making this drastic decision. This is not the militant Hindraf demanding cash compensation but an independent election watchdog organization.

A lot of people will say that this is a last resort action to deter Malaysians from participating in the forthcoming rally. Many more will say that this is done to justify the eventual mass arrests on the streets come Saturday the 9th, especially when the foreign press are looking and reporting about it. Could the real reason be that the government is using this rally as a line marker?

In the weeks leading up to this rally, the local media have been coerced to label those involved in this rally as communists and outlaws. Additionally, many reports were published in the mass media whereby the pro-Ketuanan Melayu factions are signifying this assembly as a rallying point for non-Bumiputras to take over the country, ignoring the fact that many of the Rakyat supporting this rally are Bumiputras themselves. 513 is once again touted and Kerismuddin is now hard at work polishing his crooked shaft for his much-repeated performance again. Could these pro-Ketuanan Melayu factions be under direct instructions from the Fourth Floor to reignite race politics, as the remaining option, in face of the forthcoming general elections?

The possibility of Pakatan Rakyat forming the next federal government is very real and BN knows it. Kelantan, Penang, Selangor and Kedah are all almost a shoo-in. So is Perak after the last BN debacle there as Perakians do have long memories. Perlis, Terengganu, Melaka and Negeri Sembilan are half chances as the registered voters there would have known that they possess a viable option now (as proven in 2008). Only Johor and Pahang remain as the last BN strongholds in West Malaysia. Is BN running scared? Will MCA and MIC be following the footsteps of PPP? Bet on it.

BERSIH is a rally for fair elections whereby a candidate wins at the polls because the voters voted him in and not because of phantom voters, missing poll boxes, postal votes or setting up a military camp there. For a standing government to be hostile against it means that they are against fair elections and why would a political party be against it unless they had retained power through unfair methods? Permit me to rephrase that, "A standing government that utilizes its authority and power to ensure success at the polls through illegal means and manipulation will definitely be against fair elections". It is the terror of losing this power to the Opposition that makes them utilize all resources to ensure that they retain power.

Additionally, it is also the fear of being investigated and eventually charged for past crimes and corruption should they lose at the polls that these people are going all out to prevent the Opposition from taking over, and by whatever means at their disposal and regardless of the consequences. Retaining power remains the one and only priority.

If you look at the Opposition party, you will become aware that they are very quiet at this stage in time when the rally is only a week away. They led the last BERSIH rally hand-in- hand in the frontlines. What about BERSIH 2.0? The reason might be instilled in the fact that the federal elections are around the corner and automatic disqualification for being arrested will not do them any favor since Simpang Renggang or Kamunting are far from their constituencies. Pakatan candidates will henceforth not do BN a favor by participating and hence precipitating a Mamak II as in 1987 aka Ops Lalang.

The government is even scared shitless as this rally is eventually and ultimately led by the common Rakyat, regardless of race, creed and religion, and not the Opposition politicians. It substantiate that their traditional "tried and tested" official party policy of separating the voters into race camps are no longer functioning well and this could spell a losing proposition in the next general elections, a risk they are not willing to partake in, and consequently the sledgehammer. By depicting this rally as an overt action instigated by the communists and outlaws, they are once again trying to separate the Malaysians, as their rigid "divide and conquer" mentality comes into play assisted by the 14th BN coalition member who will use the Emergency Ordinance (EO) to make mass arrests – a less complicated process as making arrests under the ISA would require the Home Minister to sign all the warrants (and he can't bloody well put down his crooked shaft, right?).

The question now is whether the rally will go on (or not) but the damage is already done. Either way, BN will lose something here but permitting the BERSIH rally to happen might prove to be the lesser damage in the next general elections. However, who am I to tell them otherwise? Maybe the Agong can…

 

Malaysians abroad calls for end to repressive crackdown in Malaysia

Posted: 03 Jul 2011 01:00 AM PDT

PRESS RELEASE- Bersih 2.0 Global Solidarity Network

The events unfolding in Malaysia in the lead up to a rally calling for electoral reform on 9 July 2011, by Bersih 2.0, a civil society coalition,  have jarred a nerve with many Malaysians living abroad.

In the wake of the government crackdown, over the last week, of the legitimate rights of the Malaysian people to peacefully demonstrate, a Bersih 2.0 Global Solidarity Network has sprung up with co-ordinated action and support developing in Australia, the United Kingdom, Taiwan, Switzerland, Austria and United States to date.

Global solidarity walks and demonstrations have been planned on the 9th of July 2011 in London, Taiwan, Sydney, Melbourne, Cranberra, Brisbane, Adelaide, Perth, Los Angeles, San Francisco, New York and Washington in the pursuit of clean and fair elections in Malaysia.

Since the 24th of June 2011, more than 100 activists have been arrested or questioned by police for their role and participation in activities related to the mass rally calling for electoral reform on the 9th of July 2011. Most recently, on the 2nd of July 2011, six people arrested on the 25th of June 2011 in Penang were re-arrested under the Emergency Ordinance a law which allows for indefinite detention without trial.

We believe the incidents above are clearly politically motivated and are aimed at intimidating the Bersih 2.0 organisers, political activists and the wider public from going ahead with the planned rally on the 9th of July.  This crackdown shows an utter disregard for freedom of peaceful expression and assembly, a right which is guaranteed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and  under Article 10 of the Malaysian Constitution. We believe by continuing these scare tactics, the Malaysian government is seriously damaging the country's reputation abroad.

There remains a growing concern that the government and associated right wing groups such as PERKASA and PERKIDA might attempt to orchestrate violence at the peaceful rally and use it as an opportunity to arrest many human rights activists and opposition leaders under Malaysia's notorious Internal Security Act that allows for indefinite detention without trial.

We call on the Malaysian government to:
•    Release all activists who have been arrested immediately and unconditionally and drop all unfounded charges against them;
•    Ensure all those detained have access to lawyers, their family members and any medical care they may require;
•    Stop the use of repressive laws such as the Emergency Ordinance, Police Act and Sedition laws to criminalize peaceful political activities;
•    Respect the right to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly
•    Conduct itself in a manner that is befitting of a member of the UN Human Rights Council and in doing so earn the respect of the international community and the Malaysian people it serves.

Please take positive action and attend a solidarity walk near you.

Bersih 2.0  Australia

Canberra's Update:


Event Page - https://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=164833410249161
Date: 9th July
Venue: Parliament Front Entrance

Time: 12.30pm

If you need transport, please be at Davey Lodge at 12.00pm. Please wear yellow and bring cameras along with you to capture this historical moment. Apart from the photo session, we will be having a small picnic with the organizers so may bring some simple things to share (chips, biscuits, fruits, soft drinks, etc)

***********************************************************
Sydney's Update:

Event page - http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=125777650841738

Date: 9th July

Venue: Sydney CBD Town Hall

Join us to support BERSIH. For democratic, for clean & fair elections, for a better Malaysia.

***********************************************************
Melbourne's Update:

Event page - http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=197771980273705

Date: 9th July

Venue: Federation Square

Time: 1.30pm

***********************************************************

Perth's Update:

http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=193179104064996

Date: 9th of July

Venue: Malaysian Consulate-General, 252 Adelaide Terrace, Perth, Australia

Time: 1.30pm

***********************************************************
Adelaide's Update:

Fan Page - http://www.facebook.com/pages/Bersih-20-Adelaide/247082418638582?sk=wall
Event page - http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=234301723260692

Date: 9th of July

Venue: Victoria square, Adelaide (opposite hilton adelaide, near the victoria water fountains)

Time: 2pm

FELLOW MALAYSIANS WHO ARE INTERESTED IN BRINGING IN CHANGE ARE MOST WELCOME TO JOIN!!

***********************************************************
Brisbane's Update:

Event Page - https://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=115134585242627

Date: 9th July

Venue: Brisbane Square

Time: 11.00am

Let's join us to support BERSIH. For democratic, for clean & fair elections, for a better Malaysia.

***********************************************************

Hobart's Update:   NEW EVENT!

Event Page - http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=196553820393667

Date: 9th July

Venue: Parliament House Lawns, Salamanca Place, Hobart

Time: 1.30pm

***********************************************************

Bersih 2.0 London

Date : 9th July 2011

Time: 12-2pm

Location :  Meet Malaysian High Commission, Belgrave Square at 12pm sharp
                  (nearest Tube Station Hyde Park Corner)
                  12.20-2pm Solidarity Walk ending at Trafalgar Square

http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/pages/Bersih-20-UK-Walk/111909382231134

***********************************************************

Bersih Taiwan

Date : 9 Julai 2011

Time : 2.00pm

Location :  The National Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall, Liberty Square,Taipei
...
Please try to wear yellow clothing and bring your umbrella
請各位身穿黃色衣服,並攜帶雨具。歡迎大家自行攜帶符合集會主題的訴求工具(如海報、大字報、布條等)

以下為當日的主要流程,另外我們也歡迎提供對流程的意見:

1. 向出席者説明主辦此次集會的目的與意義
2. 念訴求
3. 輪番演講(如莊迪澎先生)
4. 現場交流
5. 出席者簽備忘錄(將交到馬來西亞駐台辦事處)

http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=192990560751119

************************************************************

Bersih 2.0 USA

San Francisco's update

Date: 9th July 2011

Time: 9.30-12.20pm

            Location : Chrissy Field Picnic Area (near Warming Hut), Presidio, San
            Francisco

http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=213741041997443

************************************************************

Los Angeles Update

Date : 9th July 2011

           Time  : 10:00 - 13:00

           Location : Pershing Square, Downtown LA  532 South Olive Street
                            Los Angeles, CA

http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=113221532103019&ref=ts

***********************************************************
New York City Update

Date :  9th July 2011
            Time : 10:00 - 13:00

           Location  : Consulate General of Malaysia , 313 East 43rd Street ,New York, NY

http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=181904048529782

***********************************************************
Washington

Date : 9th July 2011

Time  : 14:00 - 17:00

Location : Embassy of Malaysia, Washington ,3516 International Court Northwest, Washington, DC

http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=222120537822082

**********************************************************

Bersih 2.0 Paris

Date : Saturday 9th July 2011
Time : 2-4pm
Place: Place du Trocadéro, 75016 Paris
Metro: Trocadéro (lines 6 and 9)

http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/event.php?eid=166717446726635

************************************************************

Background

Despite the Malaysian government working hard to sell Malaysia as a tourist destination and being a member of the UN Human Rights Council, it remains clear that its dismal human rights record leaves much to be desired.  The Malaysian people continue to find their civil liberties and basic human rights curtailed on a daily basis by a range of repressive laws. Corruption and a lack of government accountability and transparency continue to be seen as real problems by many Malaysians.
 
One of the biggest threats to developing a mature democracy in Malaysia is the impediments to free and fair elections. Malaysia's elections are frequently marred by gerrymandering, money politics, phantom voters, voter buying, rigging and various other fraudulent practises. Malaysia's Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak has in two recent by-elections been caught on video offering millions of ringgit to voters in exchange for their votes.

In 2005, the Coalition for Clean and Fair Elections (Bersih 2.0) was formed. It is comprised of Malaysian civic and human rights organisations campaigning for electoral reforms and independent monitoring of elections in the country. Bersih 2.0 plans to hold a mass rally on 9 July 2011 to demand, among others, fair access of all political parties to the media, reform of the discriminatory postal ballots system and a revision of the electoral roll to address irregularities for the upcoming 13th General Elections to be held in mid-2012. A similar rally in 2007 attracted over 40,000 supporters and was conducted in a peaceful and organized manner. It was re-launched in 2010 as BERSIH 2.0, still with eight (8) basic demands, which including (1) cleaning up the electoral roll (2) Reform the postal ballot (3) Use indelible ink (4) Minimum 21 days campaign period (50 Free and fair access to media (6) Strengthening public institutions (7) Stop corruption (8) Stop dirty politics.

On the 25th of June 2011, 30 activists from the Parti Sosialis Malaysia were arrested by the police in Kepala Batas, Penang. They were accused of 'reviving the communist ideology' and have been remanded under Section 122 of the Penal Code for "waging war against the King.

On the 27th of June 2011, the chairperson of Bersih 2.0, Datuk Ambiga Sreenevasan and poet Datuk A. Samad Said were summoned to the Dang Wangi police station. Both are being investigated under Section 27(5) of the Malaysian Police Act for organising an "unlawful assembly" and Section 27(5) of the Sedition Act.
 
On the 29th of June 2011, police officers from the Selangor State Headquarters raided the office of the the Bersih 2.0 Secretariat without a warrant. They arrested 7 people and confiscated laptops, cameras as well as materials prepared for the rally including t-shirts, leaflets, banners and placards.  On the 30th of June 2011, police arrested four people in Ipoh, including a member of parliament and state assemblyman, while they were meeting voters wearing yellow clothes, the official colour of the Bersih movement. On the 2nd of July, six of those arrested were charged under the Emergency Ordinance, a law that allows for indefinite detention without trial.


Press contact :
Josef Roy
Tel : ++ 44 (0) 794260804

Yolanda Augustin
Tel : ++ 44 (0) 7894319056

Email: bersih2.0global@gmail.com
 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Bersih 2.0 berusaha menghadap Agung

Posted: 03 Jul 2011 03:23 PM PDT

Menurut kenyataan yang dikeluarkan oleh sekretariat Bersih 2.0, "Kami akan berkomunikasi dengan Yang Dipertuan Agung sebelum membuat keputusan akhir."

Pagi ini Pengerusi Bersih 2.0, Datuk Ambiga Srevanasan bertemu dengan bekas Perdana Menteri, Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi.

Ini adalah bertujuan untuk menyelesaikan situasi sekarang, kata satu kenyataan yang dikeluarkan Sekretariat Bersih melalui Twitter mereka.

Petang semalam Yang Dipertuan Agung, Tuanku Mizan Zainal Abidin mengeluarkan titah agar diadakan rundingan antara pihak Bersih dan kerajaan.

Baginda juga mengarahkan kerajaan agar melaksanakan segala amanah yang diberikan rakyat secara adil dan bijaksana serta menyelesaikan masalah dengan rundingan.

Titah ini dikeluarkan baginda seminggu menjelang perhimpunan Bersih 9 Julai ini dengan kira-kira 100 orang sudah ditangkap kerana dikaitkan dengan perhimpunan itu.

Timbalan Ketua Polis Negara pula telah mengeluarkan kenyataan pintu rundingan sudah ditutup dan akan menahan pihak yang terlibat dengan perhimpunan ini.

Menurut Tuanku Mizan, baginda mengikuti dengan teliti akan perkembangan cadangan Kumpulan Bersih untuk mengadakan perarakan dan perhimpunan beramai-ramai yang bertujuan untuk menyerahkan memorandum kepada Beta selaku Yang di-Pertuan Agong, dan bagaimana pihak kerajaan menangani isu ini khususnya agensi-agensi dan jabatan-jabatan yang terlibat.

Bantah tahan PSM

Sementara itu, Bersih 2.0 dalam kenyataannya mengecam keras tindakan polis menahan enam pemimpin Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM) yang ditahan di bawah Akta Dharurat.

"Ia sama seperti ditahan di bawah ISA," kata satu kenyataan Bersih 2.0.

Semalam, Setiausaha Agung Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM) S. Arutchelvan (gambar) membuat laporan polis terhadap Menteri Dalam Negeri Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein, Ketua Polis Negara Tan Sri Ismail Omar dan timbalannya Datuk Khalid Abu Bakar kerana melemparkan tuduhan palsu terhadap lima aktivis parti itu termasuk Ahli Parlimen Sungai Siput Dr Michael Jeyakumar.

Selain Michael, turut ditahan di bawah Ordinan Darurat adalah  M Saraswathy, Choo Chon Kai, M Sukumaran, A Letchumanan dan Sarat Babu.

Kesemua mereka ditahan di bawah Seksyen 3 (1) Ordinan Darurat (Ketenteraman Awam Dan Mencegah Jenayah) 1969 yang membolehkan ditahan selama 60 hari tanpa perbicaraan.

Kata Arutchelvan (gambar), sebelum ini kesemua mereka ditahan di bawah Seksyen 122 Kanun Keseksaan iaitu dakwaan melancarkan perang ke atas Yang di-Pertuan Agong namun telah dibebaskan daripada tuduhan itu.

"Kemudian semalam polis membuat tangkapan semula di bawah Seksyen 3 (1) Ordinan Darurat kerana kononnya terdapat sebab-sebab untuk mempercayai yang mereka  telah bertindak mengikut apa-apa cara yang memudaratkan ketenteraman awam.

"Ini adalah tindakan salah guna kuasa di mana polis bersembunyi di belakang undang-undang zalim ala ISA (Akta Keselamatan Dalam Negeri). Polis dan KDN (Kementerian Dalam Negeri) juga tahu bahawa ISA tidak lagi popular sehingga terpaksa mengunakan undang-undang darurat yang ramai orang tidak mengetahuinya," katanya dalam laporan polis itu.

Tegas Arutchelvan, Ordinan Darurat digunakan ke atas individu yang melakukan jenayah berat dan bukan berunsur politik.

"Mereka berenam ini adalah tahanan politik pertama dituduh di bawah Ordinan Darurat yang masih digunakan di zaman tidak ada darurat.

"Maka tujuan sebenar Ordinan Darurat digunakan adalah untuk menghindar orang dari menyertai perhimpunan aman Bersih 2.0. Semua alasan dan kenyataan lain adalah tipu muslihat dan agenda memperbodohkan rakyat," katanya.

Minggu lalu kesemua mereka ditahan berhubung Himpunan Bersih 2.0 bersama 25 yang lain.

 

Baju BERSIH - 17 Ahli PAS Jasin Ditangkap Di Kompleks PAS Jasin

Posted: 02 Jul 2011 08:39 PM PDT

Antara yang ditahan ialah Ketua Dewan Pemuda PAS Negeri, Yuhaizad Abdullah, Ketua Penerangan PAS Kawasan Jasin, Fauzi Maelah, Adnan Abu, Ali Mahadi, Abd Hannan, Ibrahim Talib, Ust Hasri, Ust. Sofi, Azizan Anuar, Tn Hj Samsudin dan beberapa ahli PAS Jasin.

Polis bertindak masuk ke perkarangan Pejabat PAS Jasin di Simpang Kemendor dekat sini kira-kira jam 1.00 petang sebaik sahaja selesai Seminar PAS Ganti Umno yang dianjurkan oleh PAS Kawasan Jasin yang bermula pada jam 9.00 pagi.

Seramai 30 orang anggota polis yang berpakaian preman telah merampas kira-kira 200 helai baju Bersih 2.0.

Sementara itu beberapa orang polis yang beruniform yang lain menunggu di luar.

Dalam pada itu kesemua ahli PAS yang ada di perkarangan pejabat tersebut dihalang dari meninggalkan pejabat tersebut sehingga tangkapan dibuat.

Semua kenderaan diperiksa, nama tuan punya kenderaan dan nombor telefon masing-masing diambil.

Sehingga kini dilaporkan pihak polis belum menyatakan secara khusus di atas kesalahan apa yang dikenakan terhadap mereka yang ditahan.

 

Lucutkan kerakyatan Ambiga, desak Pesaka

Posted: 02 Jul 2011 04:27 PM PDT

Presidennya Datuk Seri Ali Rustam berkata perkara ini diputuskan sebulat suara ahlinya kerana bimbang hasrat Ambiga yang ingin meneruskan perhimpunan pada 9 Julai depan akan menyebabkan tercetusnya kembali 'peristiwa 13 Mei'.

"Tak siapa yang untung dalam hal ini. Sebelum terlambat, Ambiga perlu hentikan.

"Biar hilang sorang, jangan hilang ramai orang," katanya dalam sidang media selepas mempengerusikan mesyuarat tertutup bersama guru-guru silat Pesaka seluruh negara di Kelab Sultan Sulaiman di sini hari ini.

Ali yang juga Ketua Menteri Melaka berkata Ambiga perlu bertanggungjawab sepenuhnya terhadap sebarang kemungkinan yang akan berlaku.

"Kalau berminat nak ikut cara negara lain, jadilah rakyat negara lain," katanya.

Tindakan tegas

Beliau turut mempersoalkan tindakan pihak berkuasa yang tidak mengambil tindakan tegas terhadap Ambiga dan penganjur yang katanya jelas akan menggugat kestabilan negara.

"Kerajaan serba salah, nak tengok dulu orang bertempur. Apalah gunanya kalau dah huru-hara baru nak ambil tindakan," katanya sinis.

READ MORE HERE

 

4 juta ahli silat jadi 'perisai negara'

Posted: 02 Jul 2011 08:49 AM PDT

Ketua Menteri Melaka yang juga Presiden PESAKA, Datuk Seri Mohd Ali Rustam, berkata sebagai sebuah gerakan yang berpaksi dan mendaulatkan perlembagaan negara, PESAKA akan sentiasa memastikan Malaysia aman dan makmur.

"Kami tidak akan berkompromi dengan mana-mana pihak yang cuba atau berniat menghina dan menafikan lima prinsip Rukun Negara yang terkandung dalam perlembagaan iaitu kepercayaan kepada Tuhan, Kesetiaan kepada Raja dan Negara, Keluhuran Perlembagaan, Kedaulatan Undang-Undang serta Kesopanan dan Kesusilaan.

"Pada masa sama, kami makin tidak berpuas hati serta tercabar dengan kebiadapan Pengerusi BERSIH, Datuk S Ambiga yang sejak dulu berterusan menghina Melayu dan Islam sehingga berani merancang perhimpunan haram.

"Justeru, PESAKA memberi amaran keras kepada Ambiga supaya menghentikan rancangan menganjurkan perhimpunan haram, Sabtu ini atau berdepan kemungkinan berlakunya kekacauan melampau seperti 13 Mei 1969," katanya selepas menghadiri perjumpaan dan mesyuarat bersama guru-guru silat Malaysia di Kelab Sultan Sulaiman, Kampung Baru di sini, semalam.

Turut hadir, Ahli Dewan Perguruan PESAKA yang juga Pengasas Pertubuhan Seni Silat Lincah Malaysia (PSSLM), Tan Sri Omardin Mauju dan 211 guru silat lincah seluruh negara.

Omardin pula berkata, jika Ambiga berdegil ingin meneruskan perhimpunan haram itu, PESAKA berjanji akan bertindak dan melakukan apa saja untuk memastikan kestabilan negara terpelihara.

"Ambiga perlu bertanggungjawab 100 peratus atas segala implikasi atau kejadian buruk yang bakal berlaku kepada rakyat dan negara akibat perhimpunan haram itu," katanya.

Sementara itu, Persatuan Persatuan Peniaga dan Penjaja Lorong Tuanku Abdul Rahman (TAR) menyerahkan memorandum kepada Ketua Polis Negara, Tan Sri Ismail Omar bagi membantah perhimpunan haram di Ibu Pejabat Polis (IPD) Dang Wangi di sini, semalam.

Persatuan yang menaungi lebih 2,000 peniaga di sekitar Jalan TAR sebulat suara menolak perhimpunan itu diteruskan kerana boleh menjejaskan sumber pendapatan mereka.

Pengerusinya, Che Kamarudin Ibrahim berkata, demonstrasi jalanan bukan saja melumpuhkan kerancakan ekonomi malah merugikan golongan penjaja, peniaga dan negara.

Sebelum penyerahan memorandum itu, kira-kira 1,000 tandatangan peniaga dan orang awam berjaya dihimpunkan bagi menyatakan bantahan perhimpunan haram di kawasan terbabit.

Satu laporan polis turut dibuat di IPD sama bagi mendapatkan jaminan keselamatan daripada pihak polis jika perhimpunan itu diteruskan, Sabtu ini.

 

‘Ambiga jangan fikir kuat’

Posted: 02 Jul 2011 08:40 AM PDT

Perdana Menteri berkata, majoriti rakyat, termasuk lebih 20,000 yang hadir pada Majlis Bersama Rakyat di padang Sekolah Kebangsaan Sri Aman dekat sini, menentang sebarang tindakan pihak terbabit untuk mencetuskan kekecohan di ibu negara sehingga boleh menjejaskan keamanan dan ekonomi negara.

Katanya, sebagai Pengerusi Barisan Nasional (BN) dan Presiden UMNO, beliau boleh mengarahkan ahli-ahli parti untuk berdepan dengan kumpulan tersebut tetapi tidak berbuat demikian kerana mengambil kira kesan buruk yang mungkin berlaku.

Katanya, jika kacau-bilau berlaku, keadaan itu akan menjejaskan kestabilan ekonomi dan menjejaskan perjuangan pemimpin BN terdahulu dalam membangunkan negara sehingga maju ke tahap ini, tetapi hendak dirosakkan oleh Ambiga.

"Jadi, Ambiga janganlah fikir kuat sangat, kita kenal siapa Ambiga. Kita tidak akan tunduk kepada Ambiga sama sekali, kita akan perjuangkan yang benar. Kita simpan kuku kita dulu, kita jangan hunus keris kita sebab kalau ambo (saya) bagi isyarat, semua boleh pakat-pakat turun.

"Kita jangan (turun), sebab kita tidak mahu ada perbalahan terbuka dalam negara sebab bila ada demonstrasi jalanan, mungkin ada orang yang tidak boleh kawal perasaan, boleh timbul huru-hara dalam negara.

"Kita sudah payah bina negara, pemimpin dulu kerja sampai mati nak bangunkan negara, nak jadi Malaysia negara contoh, pemimpin dulu banyak berjasa sebab itu kita hidup dalam negara aman damai. Tapi Ambiga nak rosakkan ini semua," katanya berucap pada Majlis Bersama Rakyat itu di sini, hari ini.

Turut hadir, Menteri Perdagangan Antarabangsa dan Industri yang juga Pengerusi Badan Perhubungan UMNO Kelantan, Datuk Seri Mustapa Mohamed; Menteri Pertahanan, Datuk Seri Dr. Ahmad Zahid Hamidi; Menteri Pelancongan, Datuk Seri Dr. Ng Yen Yen; Timbalan Menteri Kewangan, Datuk Dr. Awang Adek Hussin dan Ketua UMNO bahagian, Zawawi Othman.

Menurut Perdana Menteri, matlamat perhimpunan haram itu bukan untuk membersihkan pilihan raya, kerana ternyata Pas boleh memerintah Kelantan lebih 21 tahun dan pembangkang menang di lima negeri pada pilihan raya umum lalu.

Katanya, keadaan itu menunjukkan demokrasi di negara ini adalah lebih baik dan tidak sama seperti di negara Asia Barat seperti Mesir, di mana parti memerintah memenangi 95 peratus kerusi dalam pilihan raya dan memerintah selama 30 tahun.

Justeru, beliau pelik dengan tindakan Timbalan Presiden Pas, Mohamad Sabu yang sanggup bersekongkol dengan Ambiga dalam gerakan itu bagi merosakkan keamanan negara.

Ini kerana katanya, Ambiga merupakan orang yang cuba mengganggu-gugat Islam, dan UMNO serta BN mesti menegakkan kebenaran.

"Apa sudah jadi dengan pemimpin Pas," soalnya sambil mengingatkan rakyat dalang paling besar di sebalik perhimpunan itu, Ketua Pembangkang, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

Dalam pada itu, beliau yang melihat angin perubahan sedang bertiup di Kelantan, menyatakan janji BN untuk membawa pembangunan ke negeri ini sekiranya rakyat Kelantan memberi mandat kepada parti itu.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Debunking the Bersih 2.0 critics

Posted: 03 Jul 2011 07:02 PM PDT

A number of political commentators have criticised Bersih 2.0 in the news media and blogs. Among these critics are Chandra Muzaffar, Anas Zubedy, Ahirudin Attan (Rocky's Bru) and Mahathir Mohamad.

Their comments would have been welcome if they were honest and holistic assessments of Bersih 2.0. It would have been nice to see the use of sound reasoning. Instead we have faulty argument upon faulty argument, in article upon article.

This is regrettable not just for the dubious ethics with which personal political interests are advanced. It is also unfortunate because the trusting reader becomes confused as to what is true or false and becomes prone to accepting questionable statements and conclusions as truthful.

Misleading arguments and suggestions should not be left standing without a challenge. Here I show seven types of faulty arguments that have been made against Bersih 2.0 and comment on specific examples. It is hoped that the reader would be able to identify them on his own in the future, and be inspired to debate the critic to discover the truth or the best way forward for a given policy.

A. The middle ground

In dealing with what they see as a problem, the critics usually begin with an appeal to the middle path or 'third way'. This is in spite of the fact that a middle ground might fly in the face of logic. They propose a fallacious kind of give-and-take — sacrifice a wheel or two here so as to keep a radiator or fan belt running there. This makes no sense when, for a policy choice or reformist action to truly work or have its intended effect, like a car you need to retain all of its necessary parts. Have yourself a very effective Bersih 2.0 rally, says one commentator, but do it in the pits of Putrajaya where no one hears you (Anas Zubedy in 'Bersih 2.0 — is there a third alternative?', The Malaysian Insider, June 23). Why rally, asks another commentator, when you can have dialogue with the Election Commission and national government — the very same parties that had four years since the first Bersih rally of 2007 to improve the electoral system but did very little (Chandra Muzaffar in 'Understanding the context', The Star, July 3).

The progressive option is not about having Bersih 2.0 or not having it. The progressive option is to reach an immediate agreement for commencing the reform of electoral processes, failing which a Bersih 2.0 march would proceed to inspire change through other mechanisms such as the ballot box. The Agong's call for negotiations should be seen in this positive light. The government should take this as a golden opportunity to wrest the advantage. There is still time for half a week of intensive dialogue between Bersih, the Election Commission and the government to reach an agreement on reform action before 9 July.

B. Exaggeration

The critics also commonly play up unsubstantiated dangers and costs (e.g., by appeal to threat) and play down benefits and mitigating facts (the ignorance of counterevidence). Consider the following commentators' statements pertaining to physical injury and business cost.

"In the first Bersih demonstration on November 10 2007, a number of people were injured. There were similar casualties in the Hindraf demonstration… in the same year." (Chandra Muzaffar)

He reports not how many people were injured (10, 100 or 1,000), what kind of injury was sustained (scratches and scrapes or bullet wounds) and why (whether due to Bersih or Hindraf demonstrators quarreling among themselves or they were hurt as a result of unnecessary, heavy-handed police action). There is also a failure to properly discuss the desirability of the freedom to express fair demands and upholding democratic principles given the risk of scrapes, bruises and such.

It is also difficult to ascertain whether the commentator is sincere in his concern for the marchers and others nearby. Assuming that the planned march goes ahead, he does not ask for the authorities to fully cooperate with the Bersih 2.0 organisers to ensure safety and order. He does not ask of the police to refrain from possibly hurting the marchers. He does not suggest to the authorities to control or remove potential troublemakers such as Perkasa and their 'war general' Ibrahim Ali who openly threatened chaos. The commentator did not even encourage a peaceful, celebratory atmosphere.

"Traders and taxi drivers in the affected areas will inevitably suffer a loss of income. Here again, the past is a good teacher. In previous demonstration in Kuala Lumpur, people in various walks of life had to pay the price." (Chandra Muzaffar)

"Merchants and business organisations need sales during the weekends to survive and make a profit to continue providing employment to the thousands under their care. We cannot afford to lose millions of ringgit every time the rakyat gather to voice concerns."
(Anas Zubedy).

Certain traders and taxi drivers might lose their regular daily income for that day fully or partially, but others at slightly different locations in Kuala Lumpur could benefit. The above two commentators refuse to see that benefits could also accrue to the shuttle-bus, energy, merchandise and food and beverages businesses as a result of there being a mass concentration of consumers about town.

There are also those benefits that are unquantifiable in monetary terms: the camaraderie between participants of different races and beliefs; the greatly broadened public awareness about the importance and urgency of electoral reforms; and the sense of empowerment people feel about being able to shape their collective destiny in pressuring reluctant national institutions to peacefully push through needed electoral improvements.

To be complete about it, there are other costs in the form of inconveniences to the public as a result of congestion. But these are not different to the price that Malaysians pay day in and day out when trapped in traffic jams and when having to shove about to board infrequent, jam-packed commuter trains. 

It is difficult to imagine the catastrophic net business costs assumed by the second commentator as a result of a couple of hours of orderly marches (endangerment to "thousands" of jobs and losses running "in the millions"). Businesses have ample time to plan and prepare for contingencies, if any (Bersih announced the march many weeks ago). Businesses could also imagine that it is a public holiday. Would they complain so loudly about having to close shop if the sudden death of a monarch imposes an immediate one-day public holiday and road closures for processions?

C. Scaremongering

If middle-ground diplomacy and mild exaggeration do not compel the desired outcome, scare tactics might be used. Abusive ad hominems, straw-man attacks and deliberate omissions can be combined to make the following type of political statements:

"Anwar… [a] deeply flawed politician… the de facto leader of Bersih… wants to become prime minister… and will resort to any means to achieve his ambitions"; "PAS and DAP are also driven by the desire to gain power through the quickest route. For them also the end justifies the means." (Chandra Muzaffar)

Observe the manipulation of emotion by using subjective statements such as "deeply flawed" and speculation ("will resort to any means"). There is little concern for providing evidence. We have also partial reporting; only opposition political parties are mentioned when all Malaysians, including the ruling Barisan Nasional supporters, were invited to join the Bersih march to advocate and demand for electoral reforms. The above commentator also ignores the fact that all rational political parties do seek power, and they do wish to attain it with the least possible cost or resistance, without recourse to violent acts or breaches of trust.

"If the stadium option had materialized, certain elements in Bersih, it is alleged, would have turned the stadium to a Tahrir Square, with demonstrators camping there day and night for weeks on end." (Chandra Muzaffar)

Here we see the non-reporting of sources ("it is alleged"). Alleged by whom and upon what basis, we are not told. An honest commentator would just say he "fears" or "has a gut feeling that there might be" long-standing protests. Moreover, asserting a Tahrir Square scenario is, on its own, a domino fallacy (i.e., the unproven assumption that a particular event is the first in a series of steps that will inevitably lead to some specific, undesirable consequence).

READ MORE HERE

 

Exposed ! – The Bearded Blogger Behind The Dirty Tricks Campaigns

Posted: 03 Jul 2011 11:05 AM PDT

Trevino claims he was a speech-writer for George Bush and he is a founder of the popular Republican blog, Red State.  His outspoken, far-right views have provoked controversy in the US, where he has been striving to make a name for himself via the internet.  

Those provocative views are, however, unlikely to appeal to his Malaysian clients in BN, who, nevertheless, have clearly being paying him and his associates to defame their political enemies and boost their own publicity.

"My red hair and pale skin IS my passport!"

 

For example, many people found Trevino's tirade against being forced to go through standard border checks particularly obnoxious.   In a series of outbursts on Twitter he proclaimed that the US Border Patrol were "fools" and "bureaucrats" for bothering to look at his papers, because he was white.

He expressed his views with such offensive arrogance that the story provoked nearly 900 angry comments when it was reported in the online Huffington Post.


READ MORE HERE.

Mohon Ulama Muda UMNO jawab perkara ini!

Posted: 03 Jul 2011 10:39 AM PDT

 
How to Deal with Present Day Rulers and Systems?
Reproduced by crediting: Muhammad Awais Tahir

This blog post is a part of a series of articles : "How to Deal with Present Day Rulers and Systems", which is an academic effort to understand the sayings of Allah's Messenger on the topic.

CATEGORY 5 - PROPHECIES REGARDING RULERS WHO WILL NOT FOLLOW AND IMPLEMENT ISLAM & ORDER OF NOT OBEYING THEM OR HELPING THEM OR SERVING THEM

HADITH # 16

حدثنا عبد الله حدثني أبي ثنا عبد الصمد ثنا حرب بن شداد بصري ثنا يحيى يعني بن أبي كثير قال عمرو بن زينب العنبري أن أنس بن مالك حدثه أن معاذا قال : يا رسول الله أرأيت إن كان علينا أمراء لا يستنون بسنتك ولا يأخذون بأمرك فما تأمر في أمرهم فقال رسول الله صلى الله عليه و سلم لا طاعة لمن لم يطع الله عز و جل

Anas bin Maalik (May Allah be pleased with him) narrate that M'uaz bin Jabal said, "O Messenger of Allah! If rulers come on who do not follow your Sunnah, and not take your order, so what do you order us regarding them?" Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him) said, "There is no obedience for the one who does not obey Allah".

Reference: Masnad Abu Y'ala (Hadith # 4046), Masnad Ahmed (Hadith # 13248), Sh'uaib Arnaoot says that its chain can be called Hasan, al-Albani authenticated in Aj Jami' As Sagheer, Haithmi says it contain 'Amr bin Zunaib and I don't know him, rest of the narrators are Saheeh.  Ibn Hibban considered 'Amr bin Zunaib to be trustworthy.

LESSONS FROM THIS HADITH

There is no obedience to rulers who leave the Sunnah of Prophet Muhammad and don't rule according to Qur'an, because "There is no obedience for the one who does not obey Allah".

HADITH # 17
عبد الله بن مسعود أن النبي صلى الله عليه و سلم قال سيلي أموركم بعدي رجال يطفئون السنة ويعملون بالبدعة ويؤخرون الصلاة عن مواقيتها فقلت يا رسول الله إن أدركتهم كيف أفعل قال تسألني يا ابن أم عبد كيف تفعل لا طاعة لمن عصى الله

Narrated Ibn Mas'ud: The Messenger of Allah said: "Some men will rule over you after me. They will kill the Sunnah and act based on bid'ah. And they will delay Salat beyond its time".

I (Ibn Mas'ud) asked: "If I meet them, what should I do?" The Messenger of Allah said: "You are asking me, O son of Umm Abdullah, what to do? There is no obedience to the one who disobeys Allah!"

Reference:  Sunan ibn e Majah (Hadith # 2975), authentiacated by al-Albani in Saheeh Sunan ibn e Majah, and As-Saheeha.

LESSONS FROM THIS HADITH

Someone who is an enemy of Sunnah, and is innovating his own religion, and ruling according to it, it is so obvious that he is not to be followed, that Prophet Muhammad asked Ibn Mas'ud in surprise, "You are asking me, O son of Umm Abdullah, what to do?" and then again he repeated the rule "There is no obedience to the one who disobeys Allah!"

HADITH # 18
أخبرنا أبو عبد الله الصفار ثنا محمد بن إبراهيم الأصبهاني ثنا الحسين بن حفص عن سفيان عن أبي حصين عن عبد الرحمن بن بشير الأنصاري قال : أتى رجل فنادى ابن مسعود فأكب عليه فقال : يا أبا عبد الرحمن متى أضل و أنا أعلم ؟ قال : إذا كانت عليك أمراء إذا أطعتهم أدخلوك النار و إذا عصيتهم قتلوك

Abdur Rahman bin Basheer al-Alansaari reported that a man came and called Ibn e Masud (May Allah be pleased with him), so he turned towards him, so the man said, "O Abu Abdur Rahman ! When will (the ummah) go astray and how will I know? He said, "When there will be on you rulers, if you follow them, they will lead you to hell-fire and if you disobey them they will kill you"

Reference: Mastadrak al-Haakim (Hadith # 8424), the Hadith is mawquf, Ad-Dahabi authenticated it in his Talkhees.  There is a similar narration in Masnaf Abu Shaiba (Hadith # 38389) and Masnaf Abdur Razzak (Hadith # 37234), with slight difference in wording: "if you follow them, they will lead you astray…"

LESSONS FROM THIS HADITH

Rulers will force us to enter a system, which will lead us to hell-fire, and if we try to revolt against them, they will crush us by their power; this is when the Ummah will go astray.  Furthermore, there is a silent approval of rebellion against these rulers in the saying of Ibn Mas'ud (May Allah be pleased with him).

HADITH # 19
سيلي أموركم من بعدي رجال يعرفونكم ما تنكرون وينكرون عليكم ما تعرفون فمن أدرك ذلك منكم فلا طاعة لمن عصى الله عز و جل
"Some men will rule over you after me, who will show you what is not pleasing to you, and will dislike what is pleasing to you, whosoever from you reaches that time, then there is no obedience to the one who disobeys Allah"

Reference: Mastadrak al-Haakim (Hadith # 5530), hakim says it is according to the condition of the two shaikhs. Authenticated by al-Albani in As Saheeha (Hadith # 590).  Narrated by 'Ubada bin Saamit (May Allah be pleased with him).

LESSONS FROM THIS HADITH

It is not mentioned explicitly in this hadith but as the advice "then there is no obedience to the one who disobeys Allah" matches with the last two ahaadith, perhaps the disliked acts mentioned are not ruling according to the law of Allah.
 

Kuat tidak semestinya menang, lemah tidak semestinya tewas

Posted: 02 Jul 2011 09:09 PM PDT

Ada pihak yang memberitahu yang kerajaan akan meneruskan penangkapan secara besar-besaran terhadap mereka yang bersimpati dengan Bersih semasa Najib tiada di dalam negara dan tidak tahulah samada berita itu benar atau sebaliknya. Apa yang dihasratkan oleh Bersih untuk meminta semua pihak bersama termasuk UMNO dan BN mengadakan rally itu telah dimomokan oleh pihak kerajaan sebagai perusuh dan pengancam keamanan dan tindakan memomokan itu semata-mata kerana takut kehilangan kuasa yang sangat besar nikmatnya itu.

Akhirnya tujuan untuk mengadakan rally secara aman itu telah menjadi isu anti establishment yang dicipta oleh pihak politik kerajaan itu. Hasilnya pihak kementerian dalam negeri telah mengharamkan pertubuhan Bersih ini dan itu mengusik banyak pihak dan rakyat. Penangkapan yang sebegitu ramai oleh pihak Polis itu telah menggunakan ordinan dharurat 1969 dan tidaklah diketahui apa kesudahan yang akan kita hadapi.

Hanya kita berdoa dan sentiasa berfikir secara rasioanl bagaimana rakyat untuk menghadapi tindakan pihak Polis yang dianggap dari segi moralnya sebagai 'high handed' ini. Jika Bersih di haramkan maka rally itu akan mudah digagalkan oleh pihak Polis dan saya tidak mahu ramai rakan-rakan yang menjadi mangsa oleh tangkapan pihak berkuasa.

Itulah sebabnya di dalam posting saya yang lepas saya mencadangkan supaya jika seseorang itu masih mahu menyokong Bersih elok diberikan sokongan itu dirumah sahaja. Banyak cara boleh kita lakukan. Oleh kerana pihak kerajaan telah menjadikan isu ini sebagai isu politik, dan sengaja meletakan rally ini sebagai rally anti kerajaan, maka sekali gus ianya menjadikan perhimpunan ini sebagai perhimpunan yang menyemarakan perasaan penentangan terhadap kita dan ini benar-benar menyebabkan kita kehilangan sokongan yang bertambah ketara dari orang ramai.

Segala usaha untuk mengembalikan sokongan ramai terhadap UMNO kembali gagal kerana tindakan negatif kita sendiri. Saya menganggap tindakan ini sebagai tindakan yang tidak berhidayah dan satu lagi yang nyata kekurangan yang ada kepada kita ialah 'wisdom'm sebagai pihak yang memerintah manusia yang berbagai macam ragam.

Pihak pemimpin-pemimpin UMNO khususnya tidak berupaya menghadapi krisis yang kecil, jauh sekali untuk menghadap krisis yang besar. UMNO telah menggalakan Perkasa untuk melakukan rally untuk menentang rally Bersih yang dari awalnya telah berterus terang untuk melakukannya secara aman. Apa yang dilakukan ini seolah-olah sengaja untuk menjadikan rally pada 9hb Julai ini untuk mengambil kesempatan bagi mengambil tindakan undang-undang terhadap mereka yang mereka (UMNO) tidak sebulu dengan mereka.

Apa yang mengganggu pemikiran kita ialah apabila memikirkan apalah 'consequence' buruk yang pihak kita sendiri akan hadapi. Jika ianya menghasilkan perasaan tidak senang kepada orang ramai rakyat tidak akan memberikan sokongan kepada kita lagi. Dari segi psikoloji nya tidak ada rakyat yang akan memberikan dukongan kepada pemerintah yang tidak tahu mengawal perasaan ramai. Tetapi apabila rakyat tidak berkeyakinan kita selalunya akan melakukan bermacam-macam perkara yang lebih tidak di sukai ramai.

Itulah sebabnya saya berulang kali menyatakan yang untung di dalam isu ini ialah parti-parti pembangkang. Kita tidak sedar parti-parti pembangkang mendapat sokongan orang ramai kerana sikap dan kelakuan kita sendiri. Parti-parti pembangkang tidak lagi payah berusaha kuat untuk memenangi hati rakyat kerana kerja itu semua telah dilakukan oleh pihak kita sendiri. Kita yang memperkuatkan parti pembangkang sebenarnya.

Kita tidak mampu untuk membuatkan orang ramai sayang kepada kita, sebaliknya kita hanya membuatkan rakyat takut kepada kita. Kalau kita berterusan menakutkan rakyat, kita mesti mengakui yang ketakutan itu tidak akan kekal lama. Rakyat akan memberontak di dalam jiwa masing-masing dan itu akan diterjemahkan kepada penolakan di dalam peti undi nanti.

Tetapi oleh kerana pandangan seperti ini tidak mendapat pertimbangan maka jika terbukti kebenaran kepada pandangan ini nanti, ianya mungkin sudah terlambat untuk membetulkan keadaannya.

READ MORE HERE

 

M’sia’s electoral system: Govt of the people? (2)

Posted: 02 Jul 2011 04:07 PM PDT

IV. The apportionment and delimitation of constituencies – Gerrymandering as norm

The Federal Constitution places the responsibility of delimiting constituencies68 on the Election Commission.69 The delimitation of constituencies ought to be done according to clear guidelines by a neutral and independent Election Commission because electoral results can differ greatly according to how the lines are drawn. There are broadly two ways in which the power to delimit may be abused: firstly, mal-apportionment (where the size of the constituencies delimited are grossly disproportionate) and, secondly, gerrymandering (where a delimitation is made with a view to unfairly favouring a particular political party).70

Unfortunately, the Federal Constitution does not adequately spell out the guiding principles under which the Election Commission should carry out its duty in delimitation exercises.71 Vague and general guidelines give rise to inherent ambiguities that could work unfairly against contesting candidates. The vague usage of expressions such as "regard ought to be had", "inconveniences attendant on alterations of constituencies", and "maintenance of local ties" 72 without further elaboration leaves much to be desired in assuring consistent and fair delimitation practices.

It would hence not come as a surprise that the electoral process is susceptible to abuse through arbitrary and capricious definitions adopted by the Election Commission of the day. For instance, nothing in the guidelines obliges the Election Commission to strictly adhere to the equal-sized constituency doctrine in the delineation process. This gives rise to mal-apportionment where disproportionately-sized constituencies can be delineated to favour a particular political party.

The Malaysian electoral system fails to adhere to the one-vote-one-value principle in its elections. A rural weightage principle is constitutionally provided for in the Thirteenth Schedule of the Federal Constitution,73 thereby augmenting the value of rural electors' votes and, as a result, diluting the perceived advantage (in terms of accessibility, connectivity and communication) their urban counterparts carry over them.74

However, the Federal Constitution does not define "rural" and "urban" for the purposes of constituency delineation.75 Not once has the Election Commission attempted to define what "rural" and "urban" areas actually mean in the course of the delineation exercises.

The problem is made worse by the removal of the limitation on the maximum allowable difference in the number of electorates between the rural and the urban constituencies.76

Prior to 1957, the maximum allowable difference between the number of electorates in a rural and an urban district was 33 per cent.77 Following the Reid Commission's recommendations in 1957, the limitation was reduced to 15 per cent. This produced a closer adherence to an equal-sized constituency doctrine. However, this limitation was relaxed to 50 per cent in 1962 78 and eventually entirely removed in 1973, 79 resulting in Malay-based parties being given an electoral advantage.80

Some empirical analysis on electoral trends between 1960 and 1999 is sufficient to illustrate the Malay electoral advantage. The Malay population in Peninsular Malaysia was relatively stable, measuring to an average of around 55 per cent of the entire Peninsular Malaysian population.81 One would have expected that this would be proportionally mirrored in the corresponding percentage of Malay-majority constituencies. However, it was observed that notwithstanding the relatively constant percentage of the Malay population, the percentage of Malay-majority constituencies has seen a consistent increase over the years from the 1959 election to the 1999 election.82 This trend holds true at the Federal level as well.83

One possible explanation for such an electoral pattern is the increasingly liberal franchise rules flowing from the Federation's gradual move towards liberalisation of citizenship requirements over the decades.84 This invariably resulted in decreasing the enfranchisement advantage that the Malays had over other minority ethnic groups. The ruling coalition saw the need to counterbalance this effect by adjusting the scale to maintain its electoral advantage over other opposition parties representing the minority non-Malay electorate. This could only be brought about through carefully engineered constituency re-delineations in a way that would enhance the political control of Malay-based political parties.85

With respect to Sabah and Sarawak, political competition is heavily skewed in favour of the Muslim bumiputras (including the Malays) vis-à-vis non-Muslim bumiputras and other ethnic groups. This has been made possible through a grossly disproportionate advantage given to the former that devalues the latter's votes more drastically than the rural weightage imposed in Peninsular Malaysia.

In both states, no electorally advantaged community constituted the majority in their state constituencies.86 Malay-based political parties had the most to gain from this. Again, the success of Malay-based political parties in Sabah and Sarawak87 would not have been possible without biased re-delineation practices.

The rural weightage principle would have become the Umno-led coalition's absolute trump card were it not for the opposition PAS (Parti Islam SeMalaysia). PAS is a predominantly pro-Islam Malay political party which primarily aims to attract Malay-Muslim votes. As such, the rural weightage principle becomes a double-edged sword in PAS-contested constituencies.

Umno runs a considerable risk of losing out to PAS, as evidenced by PAS's historical success in diluting Umno dominance in the 1999 and 2008 elections. In the 1999 election, PAS secured a total of 98 out of 394 seats in both the Federal and State legislatures in Peninsular Malaysia, posing a real threat to the BN.88

In 2004, Umno's apparent stratagem against the PAS came in the form of mal-apportionment and gerrymandering in the 2003 constituency re-delineation.89 The opposition charged, inter alia, that the effect of the constituency review was to diversify the ethnic composition in PAS-held constituencies so as to reduce PAS's chances of securing victory in the 2004 election.90 True enough, it turned out that PAS suffered a huge setback, losing control over the state of Terengganu and securing only a marginal victory in Kelantan with a narrow majority of 24 out of 45 seats.91

With respect to one of the most contentious states,92 Kedah,93 it was shown that "[t[he 2002 delimitation process involved moving 'safe areas' in traditional Umno strongholds and non-Malays seats into constituencies that were vulnerable to the opposition and changing boundaries beyond the usual administrative areas in order to create constituencies that would strengthen the BN's electoral position." 94

Again, the 2002 re-delimitation exercise demonstrated how Umno became the beneficiary of a tactical dilution-through-diversification approach against PAS-held state constituencies in Kedah. Non-Malay wards deemed to be the BN's "safe state seats" were fused with PAS-held constituencies in the redrawing of boundaries.95 For instance, the cross-administrative district transplantation of the Gurun state seat to the parliamentary state seat of Yan (renamed Jerai) was cited as a particularly egregious case of gerrymandering, the intention of which was to defeat PAS which previously won the seat in Yan by a slim majority of 0.7 per cent of the votes cast.96 The political impact of importing the "safe votes" from Gurun to Yan essentially boosted the BN's electoral strength by an estimated 5,233 97 votes.98

A similar pattern was observed in the parliamentary seats of Pokok Sena, Kuala Kedah and Baling.99 The parliamentary seat of Alor Setar (which previously gave the BN an overwhelming victory of 14,384 votes) was employed as a buffer to absorb the state seat of Telok Kechai, neutralising the electoral disadvantage it provided the BN (in the parliamentary seat of Kuala Kedah) in the 1999 election. 100 The result of the 2004 election, as one might have expected, was a crushing defeat for PAS.101

A revival of the limitation on the variation in the numbers of electorates between rural and urban constituencies has to be the primary focus of reform. It is not logical to assume that rural areas invariably remain rural in light of the relentless pace of urbanisation in Malaysia. This is sufficient to justify imposing a limitation – with the prospect of increasing equalisation – on the variation in electorate size between rural and urban areas.

As mentioned earlier, constitutional amendments over the years have gradually eroded the Election Commission's status as an independent administrator of the electoral process. For instance, the dissatisfaction by the Alliance over the Election Commission's Report of 1960 to re-delineate constituencies and reduce the number of seats in the House of Representatives from 104 to 100 was reversed by a constitutional amendment passed in Parliament. 102

This showed how easily the Election Commission's actions in delimitation could be reversed by dissatisfied political parties in power. This 'thwarting mechanism' makes a convenient tool for the ruling party to fine-tune any changes brought by the Election Commission to its own political advantage. The Election Commission's powers to delimit constituencies were also seriously constrained with the addition of the Thirteenth Schedule to the Federal Constitution, which effectively confined the Election Commission to reviewing only the division of the Federation and states into constituencies and recommending necessary changes.103

Also, the Election Commission's recommendations are now required to be submitted to the Prime Minister who reserves the right to alter the recommendations even before they are submitted to the House of Representatives. 104 If the House of Representatives does not accept the recommendations, the Prime Minister may amend it "after such consultation with the Election Commission as he may consider necessary".105 The recommendations for delimitation need only be objected to by one-half of the members in the House of Representatives, and neither the Senate nor the Upper House (Dewan Negara) need to be consulted.106

Even though the public may under appropriate conditions submit its objection to any recommendations proposed, thereby obliging the Election Commission to conduct a local enquiry in respect of the relevant constituencies,107 the Election Commission may not conduct more than two such local enquiries. 108

Other later changes109 include a prescriptive approach undertaken by Parliament as a prerogative to apportion the seats amongst the states of Peninsular Malaysia,110 as well as the removal of the limitation in the variation in electorate numbers between the rural and urban constituencies.111 The exercise of the Election Commission's powers has since been relegated to the residual task of delineating constituencies within every state. The more important macro prerogative of apportioning seats in the House of Representatives is acquired by Parliament.

More recent changes112 have further relaxed the rules regarding periodic review of constituencies by allowing a special review of constituencies to be undertaken for any state, or part of a state, whenever the House of Representatives or any state assembly varies the number of its seats.113 Additionally, the upper limit for mandatory periodic review of constituencies has been removed, giving rise to the possibility that constituencies may turn static should the Election Commission decline to initiate a review. The consequence of these changes is to enable the ruling party to effect any change to the constituencies at practically any time.

This substantial whittling down of the constitutional role of the Election Commission and the considerable transfer of constitutional power to Parliament runs counter to the notion of an independent and effective Election Commission, capable of discharging the independent and neutral administration of elections. 114

READ MORE HERE

 

Najib, is your AG anti-Islam? Does your administration condone the vilification of Islam?

Posted: 02 Jul 2011 08:21 AM PDT

No elaboration on when and how she is supposed to have made the threat.

A vile and unsubstantiated allegation.

I've known Ambiga for over a decade now and have known her to always be most respectful of all faiths and beliefs, without exception.

I'm not alone. Many members of the Bar will bear testimony to this.

Perhaps Najib should desist in unsubstantiated attacks against Ambiga and explain why charges of sedition for a most vile and filthy attack on the faith of the Malays in this country by Syeditious Akbar ali were dropped by the Attorney General's chambers.

The charge sheet, in PDF, is linked below again for your ease of reference.

Charge Sheet against Seditious Akbar Ali

You will note that it is dated 6th May, 2008 and signed by DPP Mohamed Hanafiah bin Zakaria, the same day, according to Syeditious post dated 18th October, 2010, that he was charged in court.

It is fair to assume that someone in the AG's chambers had, before Syeditious was charged, scrutinized the investigation papers submitted by the police authorities and had formed the view that Syeditious comments were indeed seditious and warranted the preferring of charges.

Hence the charges in court on 6th May, 2008 upon the terms as appear in the charge sheet.

And I cannot imagine that anyone who has since read the full tenor of Syeditious comments, however much they disliked the sedition laws, would argue that he did not deserve to be charged for such an insensitive and hateful attack.

In my related post yesterday, I had shared how, after Syeditious had received advise of legal counsel, he had asked that no moves be made to raise techncal objections until he gave further instructions, and when those instructions finally came, it was that no such technical objections were to be taken as the case against him would be dropped.

As Syeditious had predicted, the charges were subsequently dropped.

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Ahad, 3 Julai 2011

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Putting it in perspective

Posted: 02 Jul 2011 06:51 PM PDT

I repeat: politicians can never be trusted. They never serve the Rakyat's interest. We, the Rakyat, have to take matters into our own hands. We need electoral reforms. So we need BERSIH to be able to bring about those electoral reforms. It is about seeing clean, fair and free elections.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

Stay away from illegal rally, says Sultan

(The Star) - The Sultan of Pahang has urged the people to not get involved, either directly or indirectly, in the July 9 illegal assembly.

Sultan Ahmad Shah said the assembly would only bring trouble and won't benefit the people.

'I appeal to the people not to get themselves involved in this. Whether it is bersih (clean) or dirty, as long as it is a demonstration, it is not clean,' he said after opening the new Mardi office in Muadzam Shah near here.

The Sultan added that such an assembly should not take place in Malaysia. 'I'm personally against this,' Bernama quoted him as saying. The country's 1.2 million civil servants have also been told to stay away from the rallies.

This is to safeguard the principle of 'neutrality and impartiality' of public sector employees, Public Service Department director-general Tan Sri Abu Bakar Abdullah said. He said in a June 30 directive that the General Orders clearly stated that civil servants were not allowed to put their personal interests before the Government's.

Mr Abu Bakar said civil servants were not allowed to participate in any illegal activity, even after office hours. 'In fact, they cannot leave their work stations to even watch such activities being held,' he said, adding that action could also be taken against any civil servant who used government facilities for such activities.

***************************************

Muhyiddin: Opposition wants to seize power through street protest

(The Star) - The Pakatan Rakyat does not respect the mandate of the majority and chooses to use street protest to wrest power from the government said Barisan Nasional deputy chairman Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin.

He said that it is crucial in any democracy for political parties to respect the mandate of the majority.

"The mandate of the majority must be accepted by the parties. This is a rule of democracy," he said officiating the Federal Territories Barisan Nasional Convention Sunday.

Instead of recognising this fact, he said the opposition has disregarded the will of the majority that had voted for Barisan.

"They (opposition) does not respect the mandate of the majority but chooses to use street democracy as a means to wrest power," he said.

He said the Barisan would oppose the opposition's dirty tactics of attempting to wrest power via street protest.

He said the opposition was using the Bersih rally as a front to cause chaos.

"We know they (opposition) are behind several non-governmental organisation to hide their dirty intentions.

"They claim the gathering is peaceful which is guaranteed by the Constitution," he said.

However, the deputy Prime Minister said opposition claims of the country not having a free and fair democratic system is unfounded.

The opposition, he said, denied the reality of their victory in the previous general election.

"If they claim that elections in our country is not fair and dirty, it is impossible for the opposition to win in so many seats and control several states," he said.

He said it was a farce for the opposition to talk about democracy when there are top leaders within Pakatan Rakyat who were appointed' to power.

***************************************

It is times like these that make me proud to be a member of the royal family. When I read what His Highness the Sultan of Pahang said it brought a tear to my eyes. Malaysia's ten Monarchs -- the seven Sultans, the Raja of Perlis, the Yam Tuan Besar of Negeri Sembilan and the Agong -- are Islam's Fidei Defensor.

For the uninitiated, 'Fidei Defensor' is Latin for 'Defender of the Faith' -- just as 'Petra' is Latin for 'rock' (now you know why I am stubborn and hard-headed like a rock).

It is good that sometimes the Rulers advice the Rakyat about what is the right thing to do and remind us to not do the wrong thing, especially if that particular action violates the laws or religious edicts. If it is not the Rulers who speak out then who else can speak out, especially when it concerns wrongdoings perpetuated by the Rulers themselves?

Is it not correct to say that one must be judged by one's peers? That is how the legal system works (although Malaysia has already ended the jury system and you are now no longer judged by your peers).

My peers are fellow-bloggers so let fellow-bloggers judge me. The Rulers, on the other hand, must be judged by fellow-Rulers. You and I can't pass judgement on the Rulers.

In the past, only God could judge Rulers as Rulers took instructions directly from God (thank God that system has since been abolished or else God will not have time for any other work with so many cases or Rulers' misconduct to manage).

So we need the Rulers to speak out when necessary. There are many wrongdoings being committed not just by the Rakyat but also by the Rulers.

Take gambling, as an example. Never mind whether you are Muslim or Christian, gambling is haram in all religions. But many Malaysians gamble and this cause a lot of social problems. It is an even bigger problem when the Rulers themselves gamble because they are not gambling with their own money, like the Rakyat. They are gambling with our money.

Some Rulers go to the US, UK, Australia, etc., and waste millions of Ringgit in a single day at the casinos. And the government has to foot the bill for these gambling loses.

Ask the two cousins -- Hishammuddin Hussein and Najib Razak. Both their fathers were once-upon-a-time Prime Ministers of Malaysia and they know how much problems their fathers faced in trying to keep the Rulers in line. They both know how much money the government had to fork out to pay off the gambling debts of the Rulers.

So it is good that His Highness the Sultan of Pahang has spoken out and has advised us not to do anything unlawful, illegal or sinful. We need those kinds of reminders. If not many Malaysians would misbehave. And this would cost the nation millions and billions in taxpayers' money. 

What the Deputy Prime Minister said is also very true. There are attempts to use the BERSIH march of 9th July 2011 to grab power through street demonstrations. But maybe the intelligence agencies have not correctly advised Muhyiddin on what is really happening.

He said that the opposition is using BERSIH to grab power. Actually that is not quite correct. The opposition is not using BERSIH. The Rakyat is using BERSIH.

The truth is, to us Rakyat, both the ruling party and the opposition are all the same. They are all politicians. And politicians are self-centred and serve only themselves, not the Rakyat.

Politicians can't be trusted. History has shown us that. Look at what the Bolsheviks did in Russia. They kicked out the Tsar but became worse than the Tsar. The Tsar's secret police murdered 6,000 dissident Russians. When the Bolsheviks took over they killed 200,000 Russians. That shows we can't trust the politicians.

The same happened when they ousted King Louis XVI of France. More people died at the hands of the Revolutionaries than at the hands of the King.

So, no, I as the Rakyat do not trust politicians. If we have not learned from history then we must be plain dumb. And that is why I criticise the opposition as much as I criticise the ruling party. And that is why I criticise Anwar Ibrahim as much as I criticise Najib Razak. Both are politicians and we should be careful with both. 2,000 years of recorded history has shown us that.

If you are Christian, which means you probably went to church today, you would believe that Jesus Christ was crucified. And who crucified Jesus or went before the government and demanded that he be crucified? Was it not politicians who were worried that Jesus was becoming too popular and was undermining the power of the politicians?

If you are of the Muslim faith you would believe in Prophet Muhammad. And who were the ones who persecuted the Prophet and his followers? Was it not the politicians, those heading the government of Mekah, who feared that they might lose power if they did not act against the Prophet?

Yes, all through history, politicians have betrayed us and have put to death those viewed as dangerous to them, prophets included. So, no, the politicians are not behind BERSIH. We do not trust them enough to allow them to be behind BERSIH. It is the Rakyat who are behind BERSIH. And both Barisan Nasional and Pakatan Rakyat better know this and had better remember this.

So Muhyiddin is wrong if he thinks that BERSIH is about making Anwar Ibrahim the next Prime Minister. I would never agree to that. I would oppose that even if every single Malaysian condemns me and alleges that I have been bought, have done a U-turn, am a turncoat, am a Trojan horse, or whatever.

I repeat: politicians can never be trusted. They never serve the Rakyat's interest. We the Rakyat have to take matters into our own hands. We need electoral reforms. So we need BERSIH to be able to bring about those electoral reforms. It is about seeing clean, fair and free elections.

Who eventually wins that election -- Barisan Nasional or Pakatan Rakyat -- is secondary. The important thing is that whosoever it is that may win must win fairly. And if the majority of the Rakyat chooses Barisan Nasional then Barisan Nasional it will be. And if instead they choose Pakatan Rakyat then so be it. But it must be on the basis of a clean, fair and free election.

Of course, if you were to ask me whom I would vote for I will make no secret about it. I will vote for Pakatan Rakyat. But this is not about whom I support or will vote for. It is about ensuring that the election process is clean, fair and free.

Oh, and one more thing, Muhyiddin said, "If they claim that elections in our country is not fair and dirty, it is impossible for the opposition to win in so many seats and control several states." Actually, if the elections had been clean, fair and free, the opposition would not have just won so many seats and five states, Barisan Nasional would have been kicked out totally.

So the Deputy Prime Minister's argument is terribly flawed. The fact that the opposition won so many seats and a few states is not the yardstick to declare that Malaysia's elections are clean, fair and free. That fact that Barisan Nasional is still in power is proof that the elections are not clean, fair and free.

 
Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved