Sabtu, 28 Mei 2011

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Anwar shouldn’t unilaterally decide on Sabah, S’wak CM

Posted: 27 May 2011 04:53 PM PDT

 

He dosen't seem to realise that people in Sabah and Sarawak prefer their chief ministers to be elected by democratic means

The people in Sabah and Sarawak prefer the chief minister to be elected by democratic means and decided by the respective governors in accordance with the constitutional provisions. Any departure from this would be an exercise in illegality, and ultimately, futility.

Joe Fernandez, Free Malaysia Today

De facto Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) chief Anwar Ibrahim  attributes his poor showing at the April 16 Sarawak state elections  to, among others, the idea of a Dayak chief minister.

Anwar was  entertaining an online news portal's TV network earlier this week on his monumental failures in Sarawak, as in Sabah earlier. Like his equally naïve interviewers, he didn't seem to know whether he was coming or going on Sarawak.

Anwar's take was that the Malays in Sarawak were put off by the idea of a Dayak chief minister and refused to award even one seat to the party.

He claimed that the minority Malays, only 20 per cent of Sarawak, accused him of promoting the idea of a Dayak chief minister at their expense. Anwar, it appears, tried to unsuccessfully reason with them that the Dayaks were in a majority in Sarawak and therefore the chief minister should come from that community.

For those unfamiliar, Sarawak Chief Minister Abdul Taib Mahmud is a Melanau and therefore a Dayak.

The difference is that unlike the great majority of Dayaks who are Christian if not pagan, Taib is a Muslim.

However, he has a Christian paternal grandfather and as many Christian relatives as Muslim ones. He also avoided talking about Islam like the plague since he knew that the Dayaks were watching him like a hawk.

Taib even blasted the recent seizure of bibles in Malay print in Kuching as "stupid".

It was enough to secure the release of the bibles.

Interestingly, no Sarawak Malay has ever been chief minister of the state.

All four chief ministers so far have been Dayak, Taib and his predecessor and maternal uncle Abdul Rahman Yakub being Muslim, and the first two being Christians i.e.

Stephen Kalong Ningkan and Penghulu Tawi Sli, both Iban Dayaks from the Sarawak National Party (SNAP).

The Ibans, the biggest community in Sarawak, failed as chief ministers, because of opposition from the other Dayak communities i.e. Bidayuh, Orang Ulu and Melanau.

The Sarawak Malays are in no position to object to a chief minister on the grounds that he's Dayak or a non-Muslim.

To digress a little, the Sarawak Malays are in fact Bidayuh living on the coasts of the Kuching division and Ibans along the coast of the other division who converted to Islam.

The Brooke dynasty referred to them as Malays after the fashion of the colonial British who used it as an umbrella term to describe various ethnic groups in Peninsular Malaysia.

Also, it's unlikely that the Dayaks will ever support the idea of a Sarawak Malay being chief minister of the state. If one is thrust on them, he won't last in the tumultuous politics of Dayak country.

It's more likely that a Sarawak chief minister would continue to come from among the non-Iban Dayaks – the creed is not in question – and this would ensure political stability in the state. If a Sarawak Malay wants to be chief minister he should not deny his Dayak heritage.

PKR's emphasis on a Dayak CM, in any case, led to allegation among the Sarawak Malays that such a candidate would turn the state into a Christian one, according to Anwar.

The de facto PKR chief is like a "bull in a china shop" raising a preposterous non-issue. He naively treads, like all Peninsular Malaysians, where even devils and angels dare not.

Sarawak is Anwar's second monumental blunder in Malaysian Borneo after Sabah.

In Sabah, Anwar thundered that there was no way he would have Jeffrey Kitingan as the Sabah PKR chief". Jeffrey, who has many Musli relatives, was accused openly by Anwar of being a racist and harbouring a hidden Christian agenda, whatever that means.

Anwar was playing politics where he should not be doing so.

Jeffrey pushed for the idea that the Sabah PKR chief should be democratically elected by the division chiefs and not appointed by the party headquarters (read Anwar) in Kuala Lumpur.

Anwar would have none of it and wanted a Muslim to head Sabah PKR although the majority of the members were non-Muslim Dusun, including Kadazan (urban Dusun), and Murut.

Anwar's excuse is that the Muslims, no doubt the illegal immigrants with MyKads included, were now in a slight majority in Sabah.

Baru Bian seen as stooge for Anwar

He decided unilaterally that the Sabah chief minister should be Muslim.

He does not seem to realise that the local Muslims in Sabah were not a homogenous community and were further divided into Dusun Muslim – Ranau, Bisaya and Orang Sungei, among others – Bajau, Suluk, Brunei Malay, Irranun, Banjar, and Cocos-Keeling, among others.

In "compensation", Anwar decided also unilaterally that the chief minister of Sarawak would be Dayak and Christian.

He went on to appoint Baru Bian, an Orang Ulu Christian, as Sarawak PKR chief.

No one in Sarawak accepts Baru because he was not elected but thrust on the membership by the party headquarters (read Anwar).

That's one reason why PKR failed to interest the people of Sarawak on April 16.

Baru was seen as a proxy and stooge for Anwar and Peninsular Malaysians.

Jeffrey's stand in Sabah, meanwhile, was that if the division chiefs in Sabah elected a Muslim head, so be it.

Anwar did not want to risk elections and deal with the possibility of a non-Muslim head.

Eventually, Jeffrey left amidst accusations that he was the King of Frogs, a label he has explained, and interested only in party posts and positions and in being number one and chief minister.

Jeffrey's explanations that his politics was all about the people, the issues, principles, policies and priorities, and not posts and positions, were pooh-poohed by Anwar and drowned out by the propaganda barrage from party headquarters.

Sabah Deputy Chief Minister Joseph Pairin Kitingan thinks that Anwar made many promises to Jeffrey, all of which he had no intention of keeping, made use of him to build up the party in Sabah and eventually played him out.

If anyone is obsessed with the ethnicity and faith of the chief ministers of Sabah and Sarawak respectively, it's politicians from Peninsular Malaysia. They don't seem to realise that Peninsular Malaysia – Malay, Chinese, Indian – is no political model for Sabah and Sarawak.

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Where voters outnumber local population

Posted: 28 May 2011 04:40 AM PDT

(Bernama) - The Election Commission (EC) has been urged to monitor state and parliamentary constituencies where registered voters outnumber the local population, to prevent any irregularity.

Umno vice-president Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi said Umno had detected a questionable pattern of voter registration in certain areas that was likely to favour the opposition.

He claimed this was happening in places like Penang where those living on the island were purposely registered as voters on the mainland.

Speaking to reporters after opening the Kota Melaka Umno divisional meeting here today, he said: "It appears that the same strategy is being used in Perak, Selangor, Negeri Sembilan and Malacca."

"Only voters from the constituency involved should be allowed to vote there, not those who are turned into phantom voters," he stressed.

He said Umno was prepared to present evidence of the opposition's scheme to the EC for further action.

 

Enforcement officers offered bribes as high as RM1mil

Posted: 27 May 2011 11:02 PM PDT

(Bernama) - KUALA LUMPUR: A total of 442 people have been arrested since April last year until March this year for bribing enforcement officers, with the highest bribe offered at RM1mil.

Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Community Education division director, Datuk Samsiah Abu Bakar, said 422 of those arrested were men and 282 were locals.

"The arrest shows that the MACC is firm and we hope the public are also firm in rejecting bribes, no matter how small the amount involved," she added.

She said this during a forum," Towards Zero Corruption: Role of NGO in Fighting Corruption", here Saturday.

Meanwhile, MACC deputy chief commissioner, Datuk Sutinah Sutan, said associations and non-governmental organisations (NGO) should be active in helping MACC to fight corruption.

This, she said, was because the NGOs interacted a lot with the public and they could help explain on the dangers of corruption.

"The NGOs can be the eyes and ears or watchdog to report any malpractices, misappropriation, corruption and power abuse," she told reporters after the forum.

She said eradication of corruption was the responsibility of everybody and not that of the enforcement authorities or MACC alone. - Bernama

Handphones riskier than Lynas ore, says Pahang MB

Posted: 27 May 2011 10:58 PM PDT

By Shazwan Mustafa Kamal, The Malaysian Insider

GENTING HIGHLANDS, May 28 — Datuk Seri Adnan Yaakob today said concerns over Lynas Corp's Gebeng refinery were exaggerated, claiming the public have more to fear from cell phones than the rare earths to be processed there.

"There is nothing really...handphones have more radiation," the Pahang mentri besar said during an MCA retreat here today.

Adnan accused Pakatan Rakyat (PR) lawmakers, specifically PKR's, of "creating fears" about safety issues and blowing the matter out of proportion.

"PKR is smart, they are using the nuclear issue in Japan, radiation... of course people are scared," he said.

Adnan added that the federal government should have "nipped the problem in the bud" when the issue first arose, by countering PKR's attacks against the plant's construction.

"In Lynas, we made a mistake... to the point where MCA ever tried taking over the role of the opposition," said Adnan.

The Pahang MB, however, refused to add anything further during a press conference later.

"I don't want to prejudge anything... I advise that you do the same, don't write about Lynas, let the independent panel evaluate," he told reporters.

Health Minister Datuk Seri Dr Liow Tiong Lai, who was also present during the press conference, repeatedly stated that the safety of Malaysians was of paramount importance, and that the Najib administration would not "compromise the safety of its people."

Green groups here and in Australia have lobbied their respective governments to scupper the project ahead of Lynas Advanced Materials Plant LAMP's September start date, citing the company's opaque plans on waste storage and transport management between the Mount Weld mine in Western Australia and the Gebeng refinery.

The Malaysian Medical Association (MMA) has expressed "grave concern" that waste products could wreak harm on those living nearby.

The association, representing the country's 13,000 doctors, stressed that the possible health risks presented by radiation from "extremely toxic" thorium outweighed the economic benefits from the project.


READ MORE HERE.

Kuantan MP: Putrajaya selling out people for Lynas funds

Posted: 27 May 2011 10:56 PM PDT

By Yow Hong Chieh, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, May 28 — Putrajaya has committed "an act of treason on the rakyat" by asking Lynas Corp to set aside earnings from its Gebeng rare earth plant to fund research into waste disposal, Kuantan MP Fuziah Salleh said today.

She claimed the existence of the condition, imposed on the Australian mining giant by the Najib administration in exchange for a manufacturing licence, showed that the government had doubts about the controversial plant's safety.

"Why should we be doing research on waste management now? Should not Miti (Ministry of International Trade) have gathered all the facts prior to awarding them the strategic pioneer status?" Fuziah said in a statement.

The Malaysian Insider reported today that Lynas was asked to pay the government a "certain percentage" from its annual gross profit to undertake research and development on the management and disposal of radioactive waste or pay financial security.

Currently, rare earth waste products can only be buried, recycled or transmuted into non-radioactive material, although many small operations in China release toxic waste into the general water supply.

A government source said the requirement was mooted as a condition of Lynas's manufacturing licence by the Atomic Energy Licensing Board (AELB) during a meeting that also included representatives from the Malaysian Industrial Development Authority (Mida) and Miti.

While the source stressed that AELB — and not Mida or Miti — had asked for the security, he insisted that the payments should not construed as indemnity against potentially hazardous waste that may result from processing rare earths at the Lynas Advanced Materials Plant (LAMP) in Gebeng, Pahang.

Fuziah said today it was "immoral" for Lynas to pay what she described as a surety fund given its assurance that the plant will be safe, and claimed this was proof the company was ready to sacrifice fundamental principles just to obtain a local manufacturing licence.

She added that the government should make every doubt about LAMP a reason to nix the project as people's lives and safety was non-negotiable and too priceless to trade.


READ MORE HERE.

Mida and Miti successfully pulled Lynas to set up shop here after China — the world's biggest rare earths producer — closed its doors to foreign firms to maintain its 97 per cent chokehold on the global rare earths market.

PM: New air force base in Sendayan to replace Sg Besi base

Posted: 27 May 2011 02:48 PM PDT

By Sarban Singh, The Star

GEMAS: A new air force base will be built in Sendayan in Negri Sembilan, to replace the Sg Besi base in Kuala Lumpur.

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak said the details of the project would be announced soon.

He was speaking to reporters after launching the community rehabilitation centre here on Saturday.

It has long been speculated that the Sg Besi air base would be redeveloped into a commercial hub but the high cost of a relocation, estimated to cost several hundred millions of ringgit, if not more, has been a major sticking point.

On June 10, last year, Defence Minister Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi confirmed that the air base would be closed to make way for the "Greater KL" development project as laid out in the 10th Malaysia Plan.

Apart from Royal Malaysian Air Force and the police air wing, the air unit of the Fire and Rescue Deparment (Bomba) also operates from the airport, as well as the Royal Selangor Flying Club with its fleet of three Cessna aircraft and a Robinson R44 Raven helicopter.

The Aerospace Medical Institute and the RMAF museum are also located there.

The Sungai Besi Airport is the country's first international airport.

The 162-hectare airport, also known as Simpang, served as the main air link from 1952 to 1965, before Subang Airport was opened.

Sungai Besi Airport was originally used as an airstrip in the 1930s but was turned into an airport after World War 2.

Non-Muslims in Sabah in a limbo

Posted: 27 May 2011 02:46 PM PDT

By Michael Kaung, Free Malaysia Today

KOTA KINABALU: Many non-Muslims in Sabah are living in a limbo. In their birth certificates, there is no indication of their religion or citizenship status. In the space for citizen and religion columns it is stated "maklumat tidak  diperolehi" (information not available)."

A former researcher and analyst who only wanted to be known as Steve, says that there is a big need for improvement as data gathered by federal government departments is  hopelessly and perhaps willfull wrong.

The root of the problem, he says is that right from the beginning departments like the National Registration Department (NRD) failed to gather accurate information about citizens or others who do not fall into the  category of Muslims.

He said that when he recently scrutinised government forms he was surprised that the forms failed to provide for the large population of non-Muslims in Sabah who were simply bracketed "information not available" group.

He said this is abuse is  because of the inconsistency in the birth certificate application forms for Sabah and Peninsular Malaysia.

Relating his experience, he said: "On May 20, the place I was staying was burned down. As a consequence, I lost all my personal documents including the original copies of my birth certificate and MyKad.

"On the same day, I went to the Penampang Police Station to make a report and was told to collect the type-written report on May 23 which I did.

"From there I went straight to the Fire Department and obtained a confirmation letter from the officer in charge and then proceeded to the NRD, Penampang Branch to apply for a replacement of MyKad and birth certificate.

"There was no problem with my MyKad application as everything went smoothly and I obtained a temporary identity document.

I was asked to collect the MyKad in one month's time.

READ MORE HERE.

Declassify IPP agreements, DAP tells Putrajaya

Posted: 27 May 2011 02:42 PM PDT

By Shazwan Mustafa Kamal, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, May 28 — The government must declassify the independent power producer (IPP) agreements to justify its failure to restructure the contracts and to allow public scrutiny, the DAP has said.

 

"The government must declassify the independent power producer (IPP) agreements to justify their refusal and failure to restructure these wildly unfair contracts which allows them to make astronomical returns at the expense of the people," DAP national publicity secretary Tony Pua (picture) said in a statement today.

The opposition has stated that the Najib administration would only spur inflation by removing the diesel super subsidy before cutting "big opium" gas subsidies worth RM19 billion for IPPs and commercial power sectors.

But MCA president Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek countered that argument by saying that Putrajaya is unable to do so because it is tied up in agreements with various IPPs, and to restructure the agreements would put the government in a bad light.

Pua stressed that there was a need to make public the IPP purchasing power agreements (PPA), and used the highway toll concession agreements as an example. After the agreements were declassified in 2009, "close scrutiny" showed well-defined terms which allowed the government to buy back the concessions.

The declassification of the highway toll concessions, according to the DAP leader also proved that former Works Minister Datuk Seri S. Samy Vellu was "lying" when he charged that the government would have to fork out billions of ringgit in compensation should the concession contracts be terminated.

"It is only with the declassification of the PPAs from the Official Secrets Act (OSA) that Dr Chua can prove that he is not another Samy Vellu who tried to protect the interest of the crony concessionaires while hiding behind the OSA," said the Petaling Jaya Utara MP, who added that Pakatan Rakyat (PR) had no confidence with the government's political will in renegotiating the IPP contracts.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Lynas offered to fund waste management R&D in deal for licence

Posted: 27 May 2011 11:18 AM PDT

By Yow Hong Chieh, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, May 27 — Australian mining giant Lynas Corp will set aside part of its earnings from its controversial processing plant in Gebeng to help Putrajaya sponsor research into how toxic rare earth can be disposed off safely, government sources have said.

A source told The Malaysian Insider that Lynas was asked to pay the government a "certain percentage" from its annual gross profit to undertake research and development on the management and disposal of radioactive waste or pay financial security.

Currently, rare earth waste products can only be buried, recycled or transmuted into non-radioactive material, although many small operations in China release toxic waste into the general water supply.

It is understood that the requirement was mooted as a condition of Lynas' manufacturing licence by the Atomic Energy Licensing Board (AELB) during a meeting that also included representatives from the Malaysian Industrial Development Authority (Mida) and the Ministry of International Trade and Industry (MITI).

While the source stressed that AELB — and not Mida or MITI — had asked for the security, he insisted that the security should not construed as indemnity against potentially hazardous waste that may result from processing rare earths at the Lynas Advanced Materials Plant (LAMP) in Gebeng, Pahang.

"There's no such thing as an indemnity fund," the source said.

Lynas told The Malaysian Insider last week that it had deposited money with Putrajaya "to ensure safe management of any remaining residues as required by the AELB".

However, the company did not elaborate on the deposit or disclose the sum paid to AELB, charged by the Science, Technology and Innovation Ministry to approve and monitor radioactive industries.

But AELB director-general Raja Abdul Aziz Raja Adnan was quick to deny that his agency had made the deposit a requirement.

"It's got nothing to do with AELB. You got to check with Mida, check with MITI," he told The Malaysian Insider.

Mida and MITI successfully pulled Lynas to set up shop here after China — the world's biggest rare earths producer — closed its doors to foreign firms to maintain its 97 per cent chokehold on the global rare earths market.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Lynas’ plant environmental, radiological reports for public scrutiny till June 30

Posted: 27 May 2011 11:15 AM PDT

(The Malaysian Insider) - KUALA LUMPUR, May 28 — Two key assessment reports for the controversial Lynas rare earth refinery in Kuantan — environmental and radiological — are available for public viewing from May 30 to June 30 at various government offices, the International Trade and Industry Ministry said in a statement.

The ministry also told The Malaysian Insider that it ran public announcements in Malay, English, Mandarin and Tamil newspapers on May 25, 2011, inviting the public to submit their views to the international review panel that will sit from May 29 to June 3.

This was in response to Kuantan MP Fuziah Salleh's (picture) claims only selected papers ran the advertisements for the panel reviewing the RM700 million rare earth plant in Kuantan.

"On 25 May 2011, the ministry inserted the said public announcement in 8 major newspapers," it said in a statement sent to The Malaysian Insider.

MITI listed Berita Harian, Utusan Malaysia, The Star, New Straits Times, Sin Chew Daily, China Press, Malaysian Nanban and Makkal Osai as the newspapers.

As for the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and Radiological Impact Assessment (RIA) reports, the ministry said it will be available for public viewing at the Department of Environment library, the Natural Resources and Environment Ministry, the library of the Pahang Department of Environment, the Kuantan Municipal Council and the Pahang Land and District Office.

Both reports are also available at the Pahang police headquarters, the National Library of Malaysia, the police beat base at the Gebeng Industrial Estate, the Pahang State Library, Balai Penghulu Mukim and all Department of Environment and Atomic Energy Licensing Board state offices.

Putrajaya bowed to public pressure last month and put the plant being built by Lynas Corp on ice last month pending a month-long review by international experts.

READ MORE HERE.

Khairy: Pakatan immature for taking credit in petrol issue

Posted: 27 May 2011 11:12 AM PDT

(The Star) - HULU TERENGGANU: Umno Youth chief Khairy Jamaluddin has called the Pakatan Rakyat immature for taking the credit in the Government's decision not to raise the price of RON95 petrol.

The Opposition's claim that the decision came about due to their pressure on the Government was "immature politics" for political mileage, he said, adding that it was Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak's decision not to raise the petrol price.

"I could have taken credit, too, but it would be a foolish thing to do," he said after launching the Hulu Terengganu Umno Youth meeting here yesterday.

On allegations by PKR secretary-general Saifuddin Nasution that Khairy had backtracked on his support for the rationalisation of subsidy, the latter said he still believed in reducing subsidy but the timing must be right.

"Reducing it (subsidy) now would be wrong given the high prices of goods as well as a high inflation rate.

"There is nothing wrong in changing one's stand if it is for the benefit of the rakyat," he said.

Meanwhile, in Petaling Jaya, Wanita MCA deputy secretary-general Tan Cheng Liang has ticked off Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng for "sounding off an unnecessary alarm" when he claimed that the RON95 price would increase in July.

Lim's claims were quashed after the Government announced it would not be increasing the price of the fuel for the time being, she added.

"His false prophecy not only undermines his authority, but does not benefit the people in riding out the storm.

"We hope Lim, as a chief minister, and his party will be more specific in tending to the plight of the people rather than seeking popularity in riding out the high tide of inflation," Tan said.

58 residential areas face landslide risk

Posted: 27 May 2011 10:56 AM PDT

(Bernama) - KUALA LUMPUR: Based on a Public Works Department (PWD) ) study last year, an estimated 58 housing estates in Kuala Lumpur and Selangor situated in hilly areas face the risk of landslides, said PWD director-general  Datuk Mohd Noor Yaacob.

"All 58 housing estates are situated within four local council areas, namely Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL), Ampang Jaya Municipal Council (MPAJ), Kajang Municipal Council (MPKJ) and Selayang Municipal Council (MPS)," he told Bernama when contacted, here, today.

The highest number of areas at risk, 39, are listed under MPAJ, among them, Bukit Antarabangsa, Taman Melawati, Kampung Pasir, Taman Wangsa Ukay, Ukay Heights, Ukay Perdana, Kampung Tengah, Taman Keramat and Sering Ukay.

The others are Beverly Heights, Taman Hillview, Dataran Ukay, Taman Sri Ukay, Villa Sri Ukay, Bukit Utama and its peak, Taman Sri Watan, Taman Tun Abdul Razak, Taman Kesuma, Taman Cheras Utama, Kampung Cheras Baru, Taman Bukit Permai, Taman Muda, Taman Saga, Taman Teratai and Taman Mega Jaya.

Taman Mulia Jaya, Taman Permai Jaya, Lembah Jaya Selatan, Kampung Bukit Sungai Seputih and Taman Bukit Indah are also locations at risk.

There are such 11 locations under DBKL's area of jurisdiction, which are, Taman Melati, Desa Melawati, Wangsa Maju, Setapak, Taman Keramat Permai, Setiawangsa, Kampung Warisan in Jalan Jelatek, Kampung Setia Jaya, Keramat Wangsa and TAR College.

The areas under MPKJ are Taman Perkasa Indah, Taman Melur, Taman Tasek Permai, Ampang-Hulu Langat and the hilltop link road, with MPS having the least Cemerlang Heights, Gombak Setia and Karak Highway toll plaza.

According to Mohd Noor, dangerous hillsides fall into two categories, the first, hazardous but not life threatening as there are no housing areas around, and the second, life threatening due to houses in the vicinity.

Areas at the highest risk are within 100 metres from the hill slopes.

Mohd Noor urged people building homes in hilly areas to include systematic safety features and ensure proper drainage as hill slopes could be weakened by water retention.

RMAF to have training base

Posted: 27 May 2011 10:49 AM PDT

By Adrian David, NST

KUALA LUMPUR: The new air force base, to replace the one at Sungai Besi, will primarily served as a training establishment.

Royal Malaysian Air Force chief Gen Tan Sri Rodzali Daud said the new base would house the numerous training facilities in the organisation 'under one roof' as a management and leadership centre, especially for non-commissioned officers.

"At the moment, our various training institutions, like the Air Force Specialty School in Tanjung Bungah, Penang, are scattered all over the country but soon, it will be centralised in one base.

"It will allow us to restructure our operations and relocate the air divisions and command headquarters to forward operational bases just like how the navy and army has done."

As part of the 'Air Force-Next Generation' strategy, Rodzali said the force would emphasise on courses in aero-mechanics, avionics, aerospace support equipment and information communications technology for the future generation of technically skilled personnel.

"Under our 'Engaging the Talent' mission, we want to nurture people with calibre and quality with skills in handling sophisticated equipment like digital avionics, as a way of keeping up with global challenges."

He declined to identify the exact location of the new air base, which will not have a runway, but it is reportedly believed to be at Kota Warisan in Dengkil, near the Kuala Lumpur International Airport in Sepang.

"Having a runway will not be feasible as the Klang Valley already has a congested airspace," he told a press conference held in conjunction with RMAF's 53rd anniversary on Wednesday.

He said the bunkered air defence operations centre at the Sungai Besi base would be relocated, possibly to the air force commando base in Bukit Jugra in Banting, while the helicopter squadrons to Subang, home to the RMAF's VVIP jets and helicopters, Hercules C-130s, maritime patrol squadrons and a national disaster air relief centre.

The 160ha Sungai Besi air base will make way for the multi-billion ringgit upscale Bandar Malaysia, undertaken by 1Malaysia Development Bhd (IMDB) via the Armed Forces Superannuation Fund.

Meanwhile, he said the RMAF's development plan included buying the muti-role combat aircraft, radars, sensors and the airborne early warning and control system.

The shopping list also include the F-16 Fighting Falcon and F/A-18E/F Super Hornets of the United States, Dassault Aviation's Rafael from France and the Saab JAS 39 Gripen from Sweden.

"We are looking at acquiring between 12 and 18 ultra-modern fighter jets per squadron, to replace the aging MiG-29N Fulcrums by 2015. Ideally, we want to operate not more than two types of fighters for ease of logistics, maintenance and the like."

Rodzali added the RMAF would take delivery of 12 Eurocopter EC-725 from next year, six Airbus A400M medium-lift aeroplanes were due for delivery from 2015.

"In the meantime, at least 15 of our Nuri S-61 Sikorsky helicopters will be refurbished with upgraded avionics to complement the Eurocopters."



Najib: Stop the infighting

Posted: 27 May 2011 10:42 AM PDT

(The Star) - KUALA LUMPUR: Umno division leaders must give priority to the needs of the people instead of being caught up with infighting, said party president Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.

"The main objective of the party which we have nurtured all this while is to gain the trust of the people.

"In a parliamentary democracy, the absolute measurement is to win the elections and form the government. There would be no meaning in having so many members, divisions and branches unless we succeed and form the government," he told reporters after chairing the Umno supreme council meeting here yesterday.

To a question, Najib who is also Prime Minister, said he and his deputy Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin, as well as division chairmen, council members and the different wing chiefs regularly went down to the ground to look into people's needs.

"The supreme council members have been entrusted to monitor five divisions each," he said, adding that as of May 25, 90 Umno divisions, 134 Wanita, 135 Youth and 152 Puteri divisions had completed their annual general meetings.

On another matter, he said the council had decided to appoint former Perak Mentri Besar Tan Sri Tajol Rosli Mohd Ghazali as the chairman of the supreme council election committee for the 2011-2013 term.

He also announced that the three-year suspension imposed on Bandar Tun Razak Wanita Umno chief Salma Pin, Bukit Katil division Puteri vice-chief Zalinah Ismail and Bukit Katil division committee member Saadun Basirun, who is also the political secretary to the Malacca Chief Minister had been lifted.

The Umno disciplinary board suspended their membership from March 12, 2009 after they were found to be involved in money politics.

On the 13th general election, Najib said an election simulation exercise would be undertaken in the middle of the year.

"The preparations are continuous and efforts would be increased towards the general election," he said.

PM: Govt did not promise overseas scholarships to all top students

Posted: 27 May 2011 10:41 AM PDT

(The Star) - KUALA LUMPUR: While the Government promises scholarships for all top students, not everyone will be sent overseas, said Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.

He said the Government was committed to giving Public Service Department (PSD) scholarships to SPM students with results of 8A+ and better.

"We didn't promise that everyone will get overseas scholarships. This is what the public did not understand," he told reporters here yesterday.

Najib said students given scholarships for diploma and matriculation courses were still eligible for degree-level scholarships.

"We will guarantee to sponsor students with a degree scholarship. Some people misunderstand that the sponsorship will stop at the diploma level and not be extended further," he said, adding that the scholarship issue had been discussed with various groups, including MCA, MIC and Gerakan.

In a statement, PSD said students were chosen according to criteria approved by the Cabinet in 2009 and agreed to last year.

It said it had received 16,900 applications this year.

It said due to limited places and competition, candidates unsuccessful for overseas scholarships were offered courses in local varsities.

The department said 58.8% of overseas scholarships were granted to Bumiputra students while the rest were for non-Bumiputras.

Najib also said the Government would study the National Economic Council report on the electricity tariff review.

On reports that the increase had already been decided, he said: "We will see first. I cannot say anything."

Najib said the subsidy rationalisation study was not about reducing subsidies but about reducing its rate of increase.

"The subsidies are increasing from the current RM12bil to some RM20bil. This means we have to find an estimated RM8bil, which is not a small sum," he added.
Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Kazim The Crazy Cleric That Preaches Hate

Posted: 27 May 2011 11:07 PM PDT

By Mariam Mokhtar

If you are asked to watch the clip called "Ustaz Kazim Elias kutuk Cina India?" (Kazim the Cleric condemns the Chinese and Indians?) on YouTube, don't bother. 
 
It is a waste of 11 minutes and far from being inspirational or motivating, the clip was clearly an incitement to violence and every Malay/Muslim should be ashamed of Kazim. Come to think of it, the Malays who were listening to this mad mullah preach, should have walked out of the congregation.

 Prime minister Najib Abdul Razak goes around the nation trying to sell us his 1Malaysia slogan. So if the Chinese and Indians are prepared to accept this unity concept, why has Najib not been able to reach out to Malays like Kazim the cleric?
 
Kazim is not the only one who is deaf to Najib's slogan for there are others, like Ibrahim Ali and Najib's own deputy, Muhyididin Yassin, who are averse to Najib's 1Malaysia dream.
 
So why bother with 1Malaysia then? Why do Malays like Kazim escape censure but the non-Malays, who use less inflammatory speech get punished? Why the mixed messages from the government? Why the double-standards? It is obvious that Najib and his Cabinet do not take racism and extremism seriously.
 
Perhaps the only time Najib and his merry men will take racism seriously, will be when colourful characters like Namewee (Wee Meng Chee) make more videos about racism.
 
Mohammad Kazim Elias Al Hafiz, is the chairman of the Pusat Pendidiakan Al Barakah, a religious educational establishment which is located in Kampung Manjoi, Ipoh, in Perak.
 
It is baffling that Kazim has not been hauled up for sedition.

In the clip, he denigrates both the Chinese and Indians, and reproaches these two communities for taking advantage of the Malays, rebukes them for their constant disagreements with the ketuanan issue and for enslaving the Malays – because 'they (the Chinese and Indians) have never tasted what is like to be 'slaves''.
 
He also says that these two races are lucky to live in a land which is free of conflict.
 
But the puzzling thing is that Kazim was invited to preach on one of the naval ships.
 
He described how the bunk beds were cramped and how the sailors had to live onboard ship for three months when they are at sea.
 
Obviously this cleric has no idea what it is like to be in the service. Perhaps he imagines that every sailor would have the stateroom on a cruise liner and 70 virgins to nurse him every night.
 
He described the hardships a sailor or soldier in the jungle has to go through, as if the service personnel had been totally unprepared for those privations.
 
Kazim then makes unfair comparisons with the Chinese who are able to go drinking and to the disco, whilst the 'poor Malay' has to suffer in the jungles or on the high seas, in defence of his country; to provide the peace and tranquility enjoyed by the Chinese and Indians.
 
But his most damning statement was to say that the navy, army and police are composed solely of Malays, that they were prepared to sacrifice life and limb, whilst the non-Malays enjoyed the good life.
 
Following this description, he then asks: "Who is the master and the slave here?" and "How dare they tell us that they do not want 'Ketuanan Melayu'".
 
Is Kazim so ignorant that he does not realise that it is his government's policies that have turned the non-Malays from the services?
 
He asks if we find any Chinese or Indians in the services. He informs us that there are few Indians in the army but that many Indians are criminals.
 
He tells us that the Malays have been too tolerant, giving the non-Malays land and titles. The rest of his speech is littered with more racist comments.
 
Why did Kazim not mention the endemic corruption that is crippling the country?
 
Why did he fail to mention the rempit culture of the Malay youth? He may have condemned the Chinese for going to bars at night, but he did not breathe a word about Malay teenagers who hang out, until the early hours of the morning, in the mamak stalls.
 
Why did he not condemn the government ministers and 'elite Malays' who drink heavily at the casinos of London and Monaco?
 
Why did Kazim not talk about the deaths caused by the moral police, when raiding hotels and homes?
 
He forgot about the numbers of sexual assaults on Malay children by older Malay men. He failed to mention the high levels of incest and the illegitimate children borne by unmarried Malay women.
 
He did not talk about the wives who contracted HIV-AIDS from their husbands who practise unsafe sex with other women, including prostitutes.
 
And he failed to talk about irresponsible Malay men who marry several women simply because they had got bored with their latest 'young' wife, or consider that a wife is too old once she has hit twenty.
 
The high drug use by Malays is another scourge on the community that he failed to address.
 
What Kazim talked about, his incitement to violence, is criminal. But the worse crime is that our religious authorities and the police, have failed to censure him for his seditious and inflammatory remarks.

to5w7r_WxTk 

 

Managing inflation

Posted: 27 May 2011 02:50 PM PDT

By P Gunasegaran, The Star

The authorities should watch what they say about inflation because of the danger of self-fulfilling prophecies.

There is an interesting hypothesis in economics called the rational expectations theory - the idea of which is that players in an economy are likely to behave as if an expected event has already happened.

That has wide implications in a country like ours where everyone is talking about an increase in the price of products, especially subsidised ones such as sugar, cooking oil, rice, flour, petroleum products, electricity and so on.

The consequences can be quite serious because if prices of these goods are raised, then there is a knock-on effect on a whole lot of other consumer products from your teh tarik, roti canai and nasi lemak to transportation.

Add to these the spectre of further increases in interest rates which a section of economists and other analysts advocate and you have a potent mix of factors that spell just one thing – higher prices all round and the dreaded inflation.

Let's take an example. If sugar price is expected to increase then what will happen to sugar supplies. If you were a sugar supplier and you had a lot of sugar would you release all of your supply in the market if you expected prices to rise anytime soon?

Of course not. The suppliers who have their eyes on profit will hold out until the price increase happens and then the full supply will be released. Repeat the scene for a whole lot of scenarios, and the unpleasant big picture is hoarding and rising prices.

I am all for public debate almost all the time but when it comes to adjusting prices, the Government must keep its cards close – very close – to its chest and no one must be allowed to take a peek. Its much like a central bank keeping mum about what it wants to do about interest rates or the currency for instance – you know the card only when it is played and if you can help it, you don't want anyone to second guess it.

By all means the Government can and should indicate that it wants to roll subsidies back as a long term aim, but it must not disclose or give clear clues as to what it is likely to do in the very short term.

It can invite debate on the topic, listen to all the various views, make its own research on the issue but it should not hint at what it is going to do. That means top government officials must seal their lips fairly tightly beyond saying what their long-term policy is.

When they have acted, that is the time for them to explain what they have done.

That is why the Government has in the past never said anything about an oil price increase until it was made. Now it looks like top officials who should know better are too hasty when they hint that a decision on whether to increase petrol prices will be taken by a certain date.

That must be a clear no-no because it smacks of hinting at what card might be dealt before it's the Government's turn to actually deal it, causing unnecessary speculation and hand wringing well before the date.

The best way to announce a price increase, especially of subsidised products, is unexpectedly and immediately. That minimises inflationary expectations and allows the economy to make a quick, if painful, adjustment.

Taking an unexpected blow, falling down, and then recovering is far preferable to living in constant expectation of one, which basically means you make your every move as if the blow will land. That considerably hinders your mobility and your ability to act.

Managing editor of The Star, P Gunasegaram, is tired of all this talk about raising electricity tariffs. Either do it or hold your peace.

Rules of prudence: Serving in a new era

Posted: 27 May 2011 11:02 AM PDT

The people have given us a clear mandate to carry out our programmes. We must fulfil what we have promised to do in our manifesto. We must never break faith with the people, but always carry out our duties to them responsibly, address their worries and advance their interests.

By Lee Hsien Loong, Prime Minister of Singapore

Our Party has won 81 out of 87 seats in the just concluded General Election. The opposition contested 82 seats, of which the PAP won 76, with 60.1 per cent of the votes.

The people have given us a clear mandate to carry out our programmes. We must fulfil what we have promised to do in our manifesto. We must never break faith with the people, but always carry out our duties to them responsibly, address their worries and advance their interests.

The elections have shown that voters have concerns which need to be addressed. The Government will have to significantly improve our outreach to voters, our approach to formulating policies, and our policies themselves.

As MPs, you play key roles in all these areas. You have to listen hard to voter concerns, help them to tackle pressing needs, reflect their worries and aspirations to the Government and persuade them to support policies which are in their own long term benefit.

Singapore is in a new phase of its political development. The PAP Government has to operate and govern in a different way than before. But two things should not change. First, we must always hold fast to the spirit of service to the people, and work hard on their behalf. Second, we must never compromise the high standards of honesty and integrity, which have enabled the PAP to keep trust with the people all these decades.

The PAP's reputation for clean, incorruptible government is one of our most precious assets. As PAP MPs, your standing in society reflects this high standing of the Party as a whole. I cannot stress strongly enough that every MP must uphold the rigorous standards that we have set for ourselves, and do nothing to compromise them. Never give cause for accusations that you are misusing your position, especially your access to Ministers. This would discredit both you and the Party.

As MPs, you will come across many different sorts of people. Some will be altruistic, public spirited people who will help you without wanting anything in return, spending their time and money to get community projects going and to serve your residents.

But a few will cultivate you in order to obtain benefits for themselves or their companies, to gain respectability by association with you, or to get you to influence ministries and statutory boards to make decisions in their favour. Gift hampers on festive occasions, entertainment, and personal favours big and small are just a few of countless social lubricants which such people use to ingratiate themselves to MPs and make you obligated to them.

You must be able to distinguish between these two groups of people, and be shrewd in assessing the motives of those who seek to get close to you. At all times you must be seen to be beyond the influence of gifts or favours.

You should be scrupulously proper in your contacts with government departments or public officers. Do not lobby any ministry or statutory board on behalf of anyone who is not your constituent or grassroots activist. Do not raise matters with public officers on behalf of friends, clients, contractors, employers or financiers to advance their business interests. To be above board, conduct business with public officers in writing and avoid making telephone requests. If you have to speak, follow up in writing to put your requests on record.

MPs are often approached by friends, grassroots leaders or proprietors of shops and businessmen to officiate at the openings of their new shops or other business events. They usually offer a gesture, such as a donation to a charity or constituency welfare fund. Though you may find it awkward to refuse such requests, once you accept one, you will be hardpressed to draw a line. As a rule, you should decline invitations to such business events unless you have obtained prior approval from the Whip. The Whip will grant approval only if the business is one that will add much value to the economy.

SEPARATING BUSINESS AND POLITICS

You must separate your public political position from your private business or professional interests. MPs who are in business, who occupy senior management positions in companies, or who sit on company boards should be especially vigilant.

You must not exploit your public position as Government MPs, your close contacts with the Ministers, or your access to government departments and civil servants, for your personal business interest or the benefit of your employers. Your conduct must always be above board.

MPs who are employed by companies or industry associations may at times have to make public statements on behalf of their company or industry association. If you have to do so, make it clear that you are not speaking as an MP, but in your private, professional or business capacity.

When you raise questions in Parliament related to your own businesses, you should first declare your pecuniary interest in the issue. Do not use Parliamentary questions as a means to lobby the Government on behalf of your businesses.

You may, however, speak freely to Cabinet Ministers, who are your Parliamentary colleagues. Ministers will listen carefully to arguments on principles, especially when they relate to the general policy of their Ministries. But Ministers will not change individual acts of discretion, unless they have very good reasons which they can justify publicly.

Parliamentary Secretaries and Ministers of State who intervene in their Ministries to reverse or alter decisions should promptly report the matter to their Ministers to protect themselves against possible accusations of misconduct. The Government must always base decisions on the merits of the issues, and cannot yield to pressure from interested parties.

ON DIRECTORSHIPS

MPs are often invited to serve on the Boards of private and publicly listed companies. This is a sign that private sector values PAP MPs' integrity and service, and reflects the high standing of the Party and of PAP MPs in general. The Party permits MPs to serve as directors, provided you keep your private and public responsibilities rigorously separate.

The public will closely scrutinise your involvement in companies, because you are a PAP MP. You should conduct your business activities so as to bring credit to yourself and to the Party. Adverse publicity on your performance as a director, or lapses in the companies you are associated with, will tarnish your reputation as an MP and lower the public's regard for the Party.

You should not solicit for Directorships in any companies, lest you appear to be exploiting your political position to benefit yourself.

You should not accept directorships where the company just wants to dress up the board with a PAP MP or two, in order to look more respectable.

Some grassroots leaders are businessmen who own or manage companies. You should not sit on any boards of companies owned or chaired by grassroots leaders appointed by you, so as to avoid the perception that you are obligated to them or advancing their business interests.

If you are offered a Directorship, you have to decide for yourself whether to accept. The Party is not in a position to vet or approve such decisions.

Before accepting, consider the possible impact of the Directorship on your political life. Ensure that the company understands that you are doing so strictly in your private capacity, and will not use your public position to champion the interests of the company, or lobby the government on its behalf.

Make every effort to familiarise yourself with the business, track record and background of the key promoters of the company. Satisfy yourself that the company is reputable, and that you are able to make a meaningful contribution. Specifically, just like anyone else contemplating a Directorship, you should ask yourself:

a. How well do you know the company, its business strategy, financial status, shareholding structure and the underlying industry?

b. Do you know your fellow directors, the way the Board and its committees fulfil their responsibilities, the reporting structure between Board and Management and the relationship between shareholders and the company?

c. Do you have sufficient industry, financial or professional expertise to fulfil your expected role and responsibilities as a Director? Do you understand your obligations under the law and the Code of Corporate Governance? Will you be able to discharge your fiduciary duties properly and without fear or favour?

d. Will you face any conflicts of interest, and if so can you manage them?

If you are in any doubt, you should decline.

PARLIAMENT ATTENDANCE

Once you have decided to accept an offer of a Directorship, please inform the Whip. MPs are expected to attend all sittings of Parliament. If you have to be absent from any sitting, seek the prior permission of the Government Whip. Please inform the Whip if you have to leave the Parliament premises while a sitting is on.

If you travel abroad, or need to be absent from Parliament for any reason, you must apply to the Speaker for leave, with copies to the Leader of the House and the Government Whip. You should also inform the Whip where you can be reached while away from Singapore.

I will ask the Speaker to give all MPs, particularly new MPs, ample opportunity and latitude to speak in Parliament. Your first opportunity will be during the debate following the President's Address at the opening of Parliament. At the Budget Debate, all MPs should speak up. Script your speeches or put your key points in note form to organise your ideas, and help the media.

The public expects PAP MPs to express their views frankly, whether for or against Government policies. In debates, speak freely and with conviction. Press your points vigorously, and do not shy away from robust debate. However, please exercise judgement when putting your points across.

Bring out grapevine talk for the Government to rebut, but do not unwittingly lend credence to baseless gossip. By doing so, you help ministers to put across the facts, explain the reasons for policies and decisions, and hence maintain public confidence in the openness and integrity of our actions.

Your honest, informed views are an important political input which Ministers will consider in formulating and calibrating policies. Ministers will accept valid, constructive suggestions, but they have to correct inaccurate or mistaken impressions. Over time, the public will see that PAP backbenchers are as effective as Opposition MPs, if not better, at holding ministers to account, debating issues fully, and influencing policies for the better.

GIFTS, FINANCES AND DISCLOSURE


On certain occasions, like the National Day Parade and the Investiture Ceremony for National Day Awards, the whole Establishment - the Executive, the Legislature and the Judiciary - will be there. Those who cannot attend must have very good reasons. Those who have accepted the invitation must attend, otherwise they leave empty seats, which does no credit to them or to the Party.

At all public functions and constituency events, punctuality is of paramount importance.

You should not accept gifts which might place you under an obligation which conflicts with your public duties. If you receive any gifts other than from close personal friends or relatives, you must declare them to the Clerk of Parliament who will have the gifts valued. If you wish to keep the gifts, you must pay the Government for them at the valuation price.

Party Branches should not raise funds on their own without permission, for example by soliciting advertisements for a souvenir magazine or a carnival. If you intend to raise funds, please clear it beforehand with the Organising Secretary. When your branch embarks on a collective fund-raising activity, eg a Family Day or Walk-A-Jog, you must follow the rules strictly.

As MPs, you should manage your personal financial affairs prudently. Do not over-extend yourself, or become financially embarrassed. This would be not only a potential source of personal embarrassment, but also a weakness which may expose you to pressure or blackmail.

In particular, you should not make major financial commitments assuming that you will continue to receive your MP's allowance. While MPs typically serve several terms, you cannot assume that you will automatically be fielded in future General Elections, or that if fielded you will definitely be re-elected. There is no tenure or job security in politics.

For your own protection, every MP should disclose to me, in confidence, your business and professional interests, your present employment and monthly pay, all retainers and fees that you are receiving, and whether your job requires you to get in touch with officers of Government Ministries or statutory boards on behalf of employers or clients. Office holders need not do so because you will be subject to the reporting requirements of the Code of Conduct for ministers. This should be done by June 30, 2011.

We have held our position in successive elections because our integrity has never been in doubt, and because we are sensitive to the views and attitudes of the people we represent. MPs must always uphold the high standards of the Party and not have lifestyles or personal conduct which will embarrass themselves and the Party.

Any slackening of standards, or show of arrogance or indifference by any MP will erode confidence in him, and ultimately in the Party and Government. New MPs can pick up the dos and don'ts from older MPs, so that they conduct themselves always with modesty, decorum and dignity. You must win respect, not popularity, to stay the course.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Kalau ada 'fulus' apa pun boleh lulus

Posted: 27 May 2011 09:50 PM PDT

Kadangkala ada juga penyesalan kerana saya terlibat mengambil tahu tentang politik ini. Walaupun tidak bergiat secara fisikal lagi benak saya tetap berfikir tentang politik ini.. Saya tetap juga memberikan pandangan secara terbuka kerana saya tidak pernah berusaha untuk menaiki tangga kejayaan politik dan saya tidak pernah menyesal dengan keadaan itu.

Oleh itu saya tetap dengan pendirian untuk bercakap dan menulis ketika ada ruang untuk berbuat demikian kerana saya tidak dapat mengelak dari melihat dan mendengar apa yang berlaku di sekeliling saya. Saya bukan seorang 'social climber' dan apa yang saya perkatakan itu adalah pemikiran yang sejati tanpa dikotori oleh kepentingan peribadi. Justru saya tidak ada perasaan gentar dan takut untuk memberikan buah fikiran dan pandangan saya secara terbuka.

Mungkin apa yang saya perkatakan tidak keseluruhannya benar, tetapi terpulang kepada sesiapa yang terbaca untuk menilainya dan membuat komen yang berpatutan tanpa menggunakan bahasa yang kesat dan mengkritik saya secara peribadi. Saya mengalu-alukan jika pandangan serta komen yang di berikan itu hanya dalam 'parameter' isu dan tajuk yang saya perkatakan sahaja dan tidak menyimpang darinya.

Yang terbaik sekali komen itu biarlah menggunakan bahasa yang baik dan tidak menggunakan bahasa yang kotor kerana bahasa itu melambangkan bangsa. Menggunakan bahasa yang baik juga akan membawa maksud yang sama untuk menyatakan perbezaan dengan pandangan saya. Tetapi ianya memberikan perbezaan yang amat ketara untuk memberikan penilaian dan membezakan tahap budi dan keperibadian seseorang pengomen itu.

Saya tidak segan dan silu untuk menzahirkan perasaan kurang keyakinan terhadap 'jargon-jargon' besar yang diwar-warkan kerana masa yang begitu lama terlibat dan bergiat secara kecilan dalam politik memberikan persepsi yang segala-galanya adalah retorik politik kosong yang akhirnya akan kita sama-sama melihat kegagalannya.

Bermula dengan retorik slogan bersih, cekap dan amanah dahulu. Akhirnya bersihnya berkurangan , cekapnya tiada dan jauh sekali beramanah. Zaman slogan ini lah pelacuran terhadap semua institusi demokrasi berleluasa dan di zaman ini jugalah korupsi dan sifat tidak amanah itu mula hidup subur. Akhirnya zaman slogan ini berkumandang inilah segala budaya negatif dalam politik dan kerajaan menjadi masalah kepada negara dan kita sekarang sedang berperang mulut di atas isu-isu ini.

Sejak dari saat itu semuanya telah hilang dari kawalan seolah-olah kereta dipandu hilang kawalan sehinggakan terjunam ke dalam gaung yang dalam dan tidak tahu bila boleh keluar dari kejatuhan yang begitu dalam itu.

Apabila seorang lagi pemimpin datang dia minta pula semua orang bekerja bersama beliau dan jangan bekerja untuk beliau. Akhirnya kerja pun tak ada untuk kita bekerja dengannya sampailah beliau meletakan jawatan.

Datang pula seorang pemimpin yang lain dengan slogan 1Malaysia. Entah mana letaknya 1Malaysia itu kita pun tak tahu. Satu Malaysia tak faham sehinggakan Dr Mahathir sendiri mengaku tidak faham. Slogan hanya tinggal slogan. Masih lagi sekolah Cina naik macam cendawan tumbuh. Setahu saya jika benar untuk menjayakan 1Malaysia ianya mesti bermula dari sekolah dengan hanya mengadakan satu jenis sekolah sahaja seperti di Indonesia dan Thailand misalnya. Saya tidak menerima slogan ini kerana saya bersetuju dengan adanya sekolah yang berbagai di dalam negara ini.

Lain yang dislogankan lain pula yang dibuatnya. Ini semua membuatkan orang tertanya-tanya, mana dia 1Malaysia itu. Maka ini satu slogan yang lain. Kita akan menyanyikan slogan yang berlainan mengikut siapa yang memimpin. Tidak ada dasar yang kekal untuk rakyat melaksanakannya. Dulu tidak ada slogan-slogan canggih tetapi tidak pula ada banyak masalah yang membebankan rakyat. Seingat saya hanya satu slogan yang amat berjaya di dalam sejarah negara, iaitu slogan Muhibbah. Tetapi slogan itu telah dibiarkan begitu sahaja kerana tidak secucuk dengan pimpinan Dr Mahathir itu.

Lepas pimpinan Najib ini tidak tahu slogan apa pula yang akan dinyanyikan media letronik kerajaan. Akhirnya kita kenyang dengan slogan. Dalam pada itu sahajalah rakyat dikelirukan semata-mata kerana hendak meletakan jenama kepada kepimpinan yang memimpin waktu itu.

Slogan-slogan sekarang ini ibarat lagu pop yang hanya popular sementara sahaja. 1Malaysia kata orang 1Malaysia kata kita. Hasilnya entah di mana. Yang sesuai dengan kehendak negara masih lagi slogan Muhibbah sebenarnya. Slogan ini amat penting kerana rakyat tidak lagi hidup dalam muhibbah samada intra kaum mahu pun inter kaum.

Dalam perpecahan rakyat yang mendapat keuntungan dan labanya ialah pemimpin yang lemah yang disaluti dengan imej rasuah dan imej-imej yang tidak keruan. Ramai orang yang menyampah kerana saya tidak berhenti bercakap tentang rasuah. Mereka kata mereka sudah jemu dengan isu itu.

Kepada mereka yang memberikan pendapat itu, saya ada jawapannya. Perasaan jemu saudara itu merupakan perasaan yang 'mutual' dengan perasaan saya sendiri. Mereka jemu kerana saya tidak berhenti menulis tentang isu rasuah, saya pula jemu kerana ramai pemimpin yang tidak berhenti melakukan rasuah itu.

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Mana surat pemecatan saya? – Jayagopal

Posted: 27 May 2011 04:48 PM PDT

"Parti (PKR) tidak beri surat kepada saya. Mengapa tidak beri surat? Kerana mereka takut jika saya membawa surat itu kepada Pendaftar Pertubuhan (ROS).

"Saya terima surat yang ditandatangani bekas Setiausaha Agung PKR,  Datuk Salehuddin Hashim pada 2009 yang mengatakan saya bukan ahli PKR.

"Ini surat apa? Saya yang tubuh PKR Pokok Sena dan parti mengesahkan saya ahli parti. Mengapa dia kata saya bukan ahli parti.

"Saya dipecat kerana bertanding sebagai calon bebas dalam pilihan raya kecil (PRU) Dewan Undangan Negeri (Dun) Bukit Selambau pada April 2009?

"Tetapi tidak ada sekeping surat pemecatan dihantar kepada saya, Saya tahu, Dr Syed Husin Ali, timbalan presiden PKR waktu itu buat sidang akhbar memberitahu pemecatan saya tetapi surat tidak diberi kepada saya," katanya ketika dihubungi hari ini.

Tindakan lanjut

Rajagopal membawa perkara itu kepada ROS untuk tindakan lanjut.

Pada 9 Mei lalu, ROS menghantar surat kepada PKR menyatakan pendaftaran parti itu boleh dibatalkan kerana memecat Jayagopal tanpa disoal siasat dan dibicarakan oleh Lembaga Disiplin PKR. Surat itu ditandatangani oleh Pendaftar ROS, Datuk Abdul Rahman.

Bagaimanapun, dalam jawaban balas, Setiausaha Agung PKR Saifuddin Nasution Ismail berkata, Jayagopal dipecat melalui keputusan

Majlis Pimpinan Pusat (MPP) pada mesyuarat bertarikh 26 April 2009 kerana bertanding dalam PRK Dun Bukit Selambau sebagai calon bebas.

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved