Khamis, 26 Mei 2011

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


PKR facing eviction from HQ

Posted: 26 May 2011 01:40 AM PDT

Since the landlord has failed to service the bank loan, the opposition party finds itself in a lurch.

(Free Malaysia Today) - Facing possible eviction from their party headquarters in Merchant Square Tropicana here because the landlord failed to service the bank loan, PKR is now planning to buy the premises when the bank auctions it next month.

If that fails, the opposition party would seek to rent it from the new owners. But even if that did not work out, then PKR might have to find itself another office.

Party treasurer-general William Leong said this was the contingency plan.

"We are only a tenant, we plan to bid in the coming June 9 auction and buy the building. We have an idea in mind of how much we will like to bid.

"If that is not successful we can talk to the new buyers if they wish to continue with the tenancy. If the new owner is not agreeable then of course we will move," he told FMT.

The Selayang MP stressed that the problem was not with the party but with the landlord.

"It is the landlord, the banks are going after them. A lot of people have the wrong notion that we are the owners. We are just the tenant and not responsible for the loan. We have never failed to pay the monthly rental," he said.

It is learnt that PKR was paying close to RM20,000 monthly to a company called Ainb-Tech Sdn Bhd to rent the premises. The PKR headquarters takes up eight floors.

Leong said it was inevitable that the issue would be exploited by certain parties.

"This has nothing to do with the party and we are not in trouble but the nature of politics is such… look at the ROS (Registrar of Societies) wanting to de-register us.

"We have got (party vice-president) Tian Chua being fined and possibly losing his (Batu) parliament seat. Every chance they have, Barisan Nasional will exploit it," he added.

Asked who forked out the money for the rental, Leong said that PKR was dependent on friends and contributors.

"We are of course dependent on people to help us, but there is no such thing as one person coming out and bailing us out. We welcome anyone to assist us, either in funding the office or looking for another," he said.

Nurul questions the timing

Meanwhile, PKR vice-president Nurul Izzah Anwar said the party was cognisant of being up against various apparatuses of the state.

"We are operating in a hostile environment. The date of the ROS hearing and auction is the same (June 9) but I don't want to speculate on that. We are doing all we can to fulfill our obligations (to the people). Certainly our political enemies will exploit this issue," she said.

READ MORE HERE

 

MCA wants review of PSD scholarship quota

Posted: 26 May 2011 01:38 AM PDT

MCA president Dr Chua Soi Lek urges the government to take a second look at the race-based quota.

(Free Malaysia Today) - MCA president Dr Chua Soi Lek today urged the government to review the racial quotas for Public Service Department (PSD) scholarships for overseas courses.

However, he said that MCA supports quotas for the socially disadvantaged groups, students in Sabah and Sarawak and those based on merit.

"We support the quota for socially disadvantaged groups and students in Sabah and Sarawak. That's only fair because school facilities in Sabah and Sarawak are not of the same standards as those in Kuala Lumpur or even Ipoh.

But he suggested that the 60% racial quotas should be reviewed.

Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Nazri Aziz, who is in charge of the PSD scholarships, said that the government had allocated 1,500 overseas scholarships to top students.

Of this, only 300 or 20% of the total were given based entirely on merit to students who score straight 9A+.

The rest of the scholarships are divided under the categories of Sabah and Sarawak (10%), the socially disadvantaged (10%), and race-based (60%).

"We fully support the 60% quota but there is a need to review it," Chua said.

READ MORE HERE

 

Anwar is lying, says SNAP

Posted: 25 May 2011 07:14 PM PDT

There was no written agreement with PKR or Pakatan Rakyat on seat allocations 'few months' before the April 16 Sarawak elections, says Sarawak Nasional Party.

(Free Malaysia Today) - Sarawak Nasional Party (SNAP) has strongly rebutted PKR de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim's claims that it had signed an agreement with the party, to contest only in three seats a few months before the recent Sarawak election.

SNAP Youth chief Dayrell Enterie said Anwar's statement was "totally incorrect".

"This statement of his (Anwar) is totally incorrect as neither SNAP nor its president (who was erroneously named Stanley Jugol in the Malaysiakini article) had entered into any written agreement whatsoever on seat allocations with PKR.

"SNAP wishes to reiterate that it is not a push-over party for any West Malaysian entity nor is SNAP a Pakatan stooge," he said in a statement mailed to FMT.

Dayrell was responding to Anwar who had reportedly said that "there was an agreement in writing, where SNAP only agreed to contest three seats, and then they asked us if it is possible to have another three".

"It was signed a few months before the election by (SNAP president) Stanley (Jugol)," Anwar had said.

Anwar had also said that Sarawak PKR chief Baru Bian and his "Dayak boys had strong issues against SNAP".

"It was not just about being from a different party… (it was also about) whether or not this group of people (from SNAP) can be trusted," Anwar said.

Inherent right

Expressing SNAP's frustration, Dayrell said the party was fed up with the insinuations and allegations PKR has slapped it with.

"As a Sarawak-based Party, SNAP has an inherent right to decide its own direction. Being a local party, it has the legitimate obligation to care for Sarawakians.

"SNAP is fed up with the allegations by a Pakatan party that it is Umno-funded, and an agent for BN.

"We left because SNAP was not accorded any respect," he said, adding that in view of PKR's treatment of SNAP in the last state election, there is now a strong desire for SNAP to be unencumbered by any political collaboration.

This, however, did not mean that SNAP will not collaborate with anyone.

READ MORE HERE

 

PAS Needs More Warriors If It Wants To Replace Umno

Posted: 25 May 2011 06:49 PM PDT

(Bernama) -- PAS needs more "warriors" than religious leaders if it wants to unseat Umno in the 13th general election.

Political analyst Prof Dr A. Aziz Bari said that PAS led by its president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang needed to undertake more transformation in the party by bringing forth more "warriors".

"The party should not be looking for 'tok imam' but 'warriors' and 'fighters'. It should not be delusional but offer alternatives to the people. If PAS still wants to discuss on how many ulama to be placed at the top party leadership, what's the use?

"If it continues to be like this, it is in no position to replace Umno," he said at a forum on "Charting PAS' Future" organised by the Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs (IDEAS) at the Selangor and Kuala Lumpur Chinese Assembly Hall, here Wednesday.

The other speakers at the forum were PAS Member of Parliament for Shah Alam Khalid Samad, and party Central Committee members Dr Dzulkefly Ahmad and Datuk Kamaruddin Jaafar.

Aziz said although PAS claimed to have more than one million members, it should stop thinking that its top leaders must come from the ulama group, that it should be more open to accept change although there were leaders among them who were uncomfortable with change.

"Some want things to remain the same while others are edgy about new developments, and there are also those who feel uneasy when the party opens its doors to non-Malays," he said.

Khalid, however, said that it was not the main issue from the party constitution aspect, as the ulama leadership referred to the Syura Council and there was nothing in the constitution which said that the leadership must come from the ulama.

"Such thinking may be influenced by the media and those with vested interest in the party who say that the PAS president and deputy president must be from the ulama group."

Khalid's views were supported by Kamaruddin who said that there were no leaders in the party who viewed the top leadership as being divided into two groups - the pro-ulama and the pro-professionals, or better known as the Erdogan group.

PAS, which was established in 1951, will be holding its election next month to choose the top leaders for the 2011-2013 term.

So far, party president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang has retained his post unopposed.

 

‘Cops beat me, told me to die’

Posted: 25 May 2011 06:29 PM PDT

 

A 20-year-old student claims that he was assaulted and verbally berated after knocking into a policeman's motorcycle.

(Free Malaysia Today) - "The policemen kept beating me and called me 'keling'. They also shouted at me, saying I should just die so that they can close the case."

A 20-year-old student was allegedly beaten up and verbally berated when he knocked into a policeman's motorcycle at a roadblock in Rembau, Negri Sembilan, during the wee hours of the morning.

After the Monday incident, S Ganesan was also warned against lodging a complaint before he was put into an ambulance and sent to the Tuanku Jaafar Hospital.

However, Ganesan summed up the courage to lodge a report with the Chembong police station on the same day.

In the report, he stated: "I want the authorities to take action against the errant policemen. I don't understand why they treated me like an animal although I repeatedly apologised for the accident."

Ganesan said that he fell to the ground when his motorcyle collided with the policeman's bike, and an officer identified only as Hisham allegedly started raining blows on him.

"Soon, several other officers joined him to beat me up," he added.

Ganesan claimed that he was kicked in his stomach, arms and back. The policemen, who also used a helmet to assault him, then allegedly tore his shirt, threw him into a drain and stomped on him.

Apart from the beating, the student claimed that the policemen had also hurled racial insults, among others, calling him "keling" (a derogatory term used on Indians).

"They also said I should just die so that they can close the case," he alleged.

Despite several attempts, FMT failed to reach Negeri Sembilan CID chief ACP Hamdan Majid for comments.

READ MORE HERE

 

Villagers cry foul over fraudulent logging deal

Posted: 25 May 2011 04:04 PM PDT

By Joseph Tawie, Free Malaysia Today

KUCHING: Bidayuh landowners from four villages in the Lundu district – Kampung Stum Muda, Kampung Stungkor Baru, Kampung Stungkor Lama and Kampung . Bokiah – have claimed that a Miri-based timber company has cheated them through an 'undated, unsealed and improperly attested agreement'.

They claimed the agreement also had not been stamped with the term 'hasil'.

On May 3, the villagers lodged a report, at the Lundu police station, against Bagos Anak Gaok and Kampung Stim Muda village chief Labob Anak Sindeh for allegedly selling their forest in their native customary rights (NCR) land to the timber company, Malaystar Sdn Bhd.

Villagers Jemat Anak Tikek and Manis Anak Nundod of Kampung Stungkor Lama, lodged the report on behalf of the residents from the four villages.

They told the police that various species of timber in their NCR land near Gunong Undan have been felled.

"We found that an illegal agreement had been made between the timber company with Ketua kampong (village chief) Stum Muda, Laboh Anak Sindeh without the agreement of AJK (Development Action Committee) of the four villages.

"We made this report for information and action to be taken by the Lundu District Council, Forest Department, Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission, the police and other relevant authorities," Jemat said.

Jemat believed that illegal loggings are being carried out on 1,000 acres of their NCR land at Gunong Undan that belonged to the communities of the four villages.

"The majority of the people in these villages are opposed to the illegal loggings carried out by the loggers who were given consent to do so by a village chief of Kampung Stum Muda .

"He has not been given the mandate by the people," Jemat said.

False documents

Jemat alleged that the village chief could have based his authority on two points; i) an undated, unsealed and improperly attested agreement without stamp of the phrase 'hasil' and (ii) a written prior demand from the villagers which is attested by the agent of the loggers and not by any of the village elders.

"Upon perusal of these documents we found them to be false, void, and invalid by misrepresentation, and contravened laws governing NCR lands," Jemat said.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Government says to review subsidies if oil rises to US$110

Posted: 25 May 2011 04:03 PM PDT

(The Malaysian Insider) - KUALA LUMPUR, May 26 — Malaysia will review fuel prices if the price of oil is at US$110-120 per barrel, Deputy Finance Minister Donald Lim said today.

He did not specify the brand of crude but the government had said yesterday it would keep fuel prices unchanged for now, taking into consideration the people's interests.

Brent crude held steady around US$115 a barrel today due to a softer dollar and as an unexpected drop in US distillate stocks overshadowed gains in gasoline and crude inventories.

US crude for July delivery rose 38 cents to US$101.70 this morning, adding to a US$1.73 gain yesterday.

Investment research firm AmResearch recently estimated Putrajaya is now subsidising at least 90 sen per litre of RON95 versus the intended 30 sen per litre after global crude oil prices surged to US$99 per barrel from US$79 per barrel last year, matching the US$100 per barrel recorded in 2008.

Petrol subsidies will push the government's fiscal deficit over the projected 5.4 per cent of GDP towards six per cent if RON95 is kept at the current price of RM1.90 per litre for the rest of the year, AmResearch noted.

Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin has said the government expects the subsidy burden to double from RM10.32 billion to RM20.58 billion this year.

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak also said fuel subsidies were "like opium" to the Malaysian economy and would have to be gradually slashed as the initial bill of RM11 billion had soared to RM18 billion for the year due to escalating crude oil prices.

The government also announced today that the National Economic Council will decide tomorrow on any revision to the electricity tariff.

Energy, Green Technology and Water Minister Datuk Seri Peter Chin said the Cabinet had directed the council to deliberate the matter and make a decision on a new tariff.

"We know at this juncture, a lot of other things have also increased, including food prices and housing. So the government decided not to increase (fuel prices)," Lim told reporters today after a function here.


READ MORE HERE.

Bleeding bus companies honk for aid

Posted: 25 May 2011 03:55 PM PDT

Bus operators are pleading with the government for monetary aid. They warn that if no help comes forth, their services will grind to a halt.

(Free Malaysia Today) - Private bus operators are pleading with the government to disburse the RM4 billion stored under the Public Transportation Fund.

Pan-Malaysian Bus Operators Association (PMBOA) president Mohamad Ashfar Ali said the financial aid would give the companies a new lease of life.

"We have problems applying for loans because the banks look at our accounts and see our losses.

"We would like to ask the government, who collected this fund under (former premier) Abdullah Ahmad Badawi to disburse it to us," he told FMT after meeting with Land Public Transport Commission (SPAD) officials yesterday.

In March 2006, Abdullah said that the RM4.4 billion gleaned from oil subsidy reductions would be placed in a Public Transportation Fund.

At the time, the premier said that the fund would be used to improve public transport in all states. However, it was not clear if this fund had been used so far.

Solutions to their problems

Meanwhile, Ashfar said that PMBOA members also suggested other options to SPAD officials during their meeting.

These included a further reduction on their partial diesel subsidy from RM1.48 to RM1.00 per litre, and for the option to use buses that were older than 15 years.

Failing that, the operators also requested a cost-per-kilometre measure, where the government would subsidise buses according to the routes they took.

But as far as PMBOA was concerned, these solutions were still short-term remedies, and pleaded for the government to buy them out, lock, stock and barrel.

Even so, yesterday's meeting did not appear to be fruitful.

Although listening to their cries for help, SPAD chairman Syed Hamid Albar allegedly told the bus operators that the commission could only make recommendations.

The final decision, Ashfar said, rested in the hands of the Cabinet.

Companies in dire straits

Ashfar said that bus companies across Malaysia were in dire straits.

"We are shutting down slowly. It's not going to be like a television channel where we just turn off, but it's going to be like a domino effect," he added.

He said that bus services in many rural and small towns were slashing their schedules or shutting down altogether.

Negeri Sembilan Bus Operators Association president Hardev Singh Gill said the Seremban Town Service (STS) company, which had 25 buses running a few years ago only had four left now.

He added that operators servicing other towns in the state such as Port Dickson and Nilai had closed down completely.

READ MORE HERE

 

Malaysia's use of cane raised in refugee swap debate

Posted: 25 May 2011 03:46 PM PDT

By Jeremy Thompson, ABC News

The Federal Government is facing more criticism of its Malaysian asylum seeker swap deal, with Opposition, Greens and independent MPs questioning Malaysia's human rights record.

A press report today quotes Amnesty International saying 6,000 detainees in Malaysia each year suffer the rattan cane, which "shreds the victim's naked skin and turns tissue into pulp".

Opposition immigration spokesman Scott Morrison says Immigration Minister Chris Bowen cannot give a rock-solid undertaking that 800 asylum seekers Australia plans to send to Malaysia will not be caned.

"I would have thought this is a fairly fundamental, basic check-off in terms of the human rights issues that will need to be squared away if you were going to conclude this sort of deal," Mr Morrison said.

Liberal Senator Eric Abetz says the Government should restore the so-called Pacific Solution.

"If you have offended against the law of Nauru or Malaysia, where would you prefer to be? It's quite clear the Howard government's Nauruan solution, the Pacific solution, worked, and what's more, was more humane," Senator Abetz said.

"All the people we sent to Nauru, none of them were submitted to caning."

Greens MP Adam Bandt says sending asylum seekers to a country that has not agreed to abide by international law is not something his party can support.

And independent Senator Nick Xenophon says he cannot understand why the Government will not send asylum seekers to Nauru because it has not signed the UN Refugee Convention, but will send them to Malaysia which is not a signatory either.

He says Malaysia has a history in relation to human rights issues that is "less than exemplary".

"I think the Government needs to get assurances, because it's not going to be a good look that we send people who have sought asylum back to a country where they are subject to inhumane punishment," Senator Xenophon said.


READ MORE HERE.

Of crusaders, clowns and kooks

Posted: 25 May 2011 11:02 AM PDT

By M Veera Pandiyan, The Star

Rabble-rousers will only end up enjoying influence way beyond their merits if we take them too seriously or give too much attention to their grandstanding.

WHAT politicians say or do tend to invoke a whole range of emotions – from anger and disgust to fear and surprise, and in rare exceptions, even joy.

In Malaysia, there's one player whose antics have been perpetually confounding.

When it comes to Perkasa head Datuk Seri Ibrahim Ali, one is often left wondering whether to laugh or to cry.

The latest being his threat to wage a jihad (not a crusade, in this context) against Christians, if, in his own words, they continued to challenge Islam's position in the country.

The source of the grossly implausible story, published by a newspaper on page one recently, is now under police investigation.

The newspaper cited two blog sites which claimed that a meeting attended by Christian and DAP leaders to make Christianity the official religion had taken place in Penang.

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak has since met Christian and Muslim leaders on the issue while the Home Ministry has sent a letter of caution to the newspaper.

At the meeting with Najib, besides strongly denying involvement in any such conspiracy, Christian leaders – except one bishop, who turned up his nose at the event and described the delegation as lambs being led to slaughter – reiterated their upholding the spirit of the Federal Constitution and the status of Islam as the religion of the federation.

They also gave their commitment to work with the Government to sustain peace and harmony and seek amicable solutions to various outstanding inter-religious issues.

Despite this, the Pasir Mas MP has been going round the country accusing Christians of "challenging the sovereignty and dignity of Malays and Muslims" and challenging the authorities to take action.

It's tragic that this is happening when Najib is urging moderates of all religions to come together in his current trip abroad.

But it is no secret that just as in mosques and suraus, preachers in churches, too, have abused the pulpits to preach highly-political sermons.

We certainly don't need this, especially with the country already having too many demagogues enjoying influence way beyond their merits.

They have proven time and again that reason and common sense is no match for rabid rhetoric, especially when it comes to issues of race or religion.

Most of the seeds of intolerance and distrust were sown more than two decades ago but how many fanatical cyber-utopians of today will bother to go that far back to trace the planters?

Ironically, some of the disingenuous politicians are now portraying themselves as champions of unity and religious harmony when they have never sought to find common ground in the name of seeking solutions, even when they had the power to do so.

As for DAP and those who have been denouncing Ibrahim's actions as the worst kind of grandstanding, they are only fanning the flames.

The Home Minister has been accused of being soft on Ibrahim but he does have a point about not giving the Perkasa leader too much attention.

It's really up to right-thinking Malaysians to evaluate him.

It is up to us to see him as a crusader or as a clown.

Aren't his antics comparable to Benteng Demokrasi Rakyat (Bendera) – the group of Indonesians armed with "samurai swords and black magic" who planned to invade Malaysia two years ago as revenge for stealing their country's cultural heritage?

Ibrahim certainly does not represent the majority of Malays and Muslims in the country and neither does he have any real support to wage any kind of war.

But thanks to the increasing lack of civility in our political discourse, and with key players still focused on scoring points, this unnecessary anger is allowed to fester.

Life is too short for one to be taken in by serial rabble-rousers or to take them too seriously.

It could well be very, very short indeed – as in 153 days from this Saturday – according to a kooky group of Christians led by Family Radio Worldwide's founder Harold Camping, 88.

The preacher, an engineer by training, has predicted that the Bible-prophesied Rapture and Judgment Day will take place on May 21.

Unlike predictions based on the Mayan calendar, which ends next year, and the Hollywood apocalypse movie 2012, Camping, who has believers stretching from the United States to China, is convinced that the date is correct.

His followers, who claim to be God's true believers, are expecting to be lifted into heaven and be saved, along with some 200 million more of the faithful.

They say that those left behind will have to suffer ghastly torment until Oct 21 – Camping's date for end of the world.

But we shouldn't be too worried, I guess.

The preacher, who claims he has studied the Bible for 70 years, has got it all wrong before.

On Sept 6, 1994, the date he had promised for two years, believers gathered awaiting the Rapture by holding their Bibles open-faced towards heaven.

But, the world just moved on – with no shortage of kooks, crusaders and clowns continuing to sell their gullible believers all sorts of promises, theories and beliefs.

The Malaysian Solution - refugees caged and caned in world of pain

Posted: 25 May 2011 10:50 AM PDT

By Gemma Jones, The Daily Telegraph

ASYLUM seekers shipped overseas under the proposed "Malaysian Solution" face the prospect of caning if they step out of line in detention.

Living conditions at refugee camps in Malaysia have also been condemned as crowded and unhygienic, with some inmates reported to have died from disease spread by rats.

According to Amnesty International, Malaysia flogs up to 6000 detainees a year, using a rattan cane that causes visible injuries and scarring.

The law allows guards to punish children.

"Across Malaysia, government officials regularly tear into the flesh of prisoners with rattan canes travelling up to 160km/h. The cane shreds the victim's naked skin, turns the fatty tissue into pulp and leaves permanent scars that extend all the way to muscle fibres," an Amnesty report into caning says.

Graphic video of caning in Malaysia - warning, some readers may find this disturbing

 

UN Human Rights Commissioner Navi Pillay, who is visiting Australia, claimed yesterday the Gillard government risked breaching international laws with the proposed swap of 800 boat arrivals for 4000 refugees from Malaysia.

While Immigration Minister Chris Bowen insists the deal complies with the UN Refugee Convention, that document does not cover torture, cruel punishment or conditions in detention centres that are dealt with under other international covenants and UN guidelines.

 

READ MORE HERE.


 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Umno and its farcical morality

Posted: 25 May 2011 07:06 PM PDT

The public can perhaps accept the punishment meted to Anwar. Indeed, the public does not really care about Anwar anymore. But what does the government in, is the collateral punishment unjustifiably meted out to his family: his wife, his children, his grandchildren. Public disapproval of this unjustifiable tyranny visited upon the family is what will do in the government.

Mohd Ariff Sabri Abdul Aziz, The Malaysian Insider

I wrote a short article about Anwar Ibrahim volunteering going to jail. The term volunteer, I used in a wide sense, including Anwar conceding to whatever fate the Barisan Nasional government metes out to him.

That action, if he so chooses, is to serve a purpose. The purpose is to hasten the downfall of the present national government.

But Anwar is a recalcitrant and stubborn is his middle name.

That short article was actually meant for Umno people, to get them familiar with sophisticated thinking. The message is: Send Anwar to jail, we will hasten the downfall of the Umno government.

The weight of evidence this far indicates that Anwar's next stop will be the jail. He will spend maybe 10 years in it, by which time he will be in his 70s. He won't see his children grow into adulthood and perhaps will not see a number of his children getting married.

The public can perhaps accept the punishment meted to Anwar. Indeed, the public does not really care about Anwar anymore. But what does the government in, is the collateral punishment unjustifiably meted out to his family: his wife, his children, his grandchildren. Public disapproval of this unjustifiable tyranny visited upon the family is what will do in the government.

Anwar will succeed in portraying the government as a tyrant and heartless ogre.

Umno is not handling Anwar the right way. I have written some time ago, of the option of using outside experts from the FBI or Interpol. At that time, the idea was laughed off.

We could have subjected the forensic investigation under the terms of a royal commission of inquiry. That way, right from the beginning, Umno would have cut off any inferred linkage to the production of the video.

In effect, that action if taken would signal to everyone the three jokers were acting on their own driven by personal agenda. Umno shouldn't have gotten involved by default at all.

That would also stop the spin undertaken by the audio visual and print media linked to Umno. That would have also stopped the opposition from crashing in with their own spins.

At that time, what I wrote was received with much scepticism. There were accusations that such a proposal would suggest that our police experts at home are not as skilful as foreign experts. That wasn't the inference at all, but it would demolish any accusations about our local police being bought over by the government. The opposition parties would seize on this point.

Now it's too late. The media frenzy that accompanied the revelation of the trio turned what initially could have been an advantage into a general rejection of the veracity of the story. Now, even if we can prove that it was indeed Anwar who is the actor in the porn clips, general distrust and cynicism would destroy any balance of truth in the sex scandal.

We actually don't care whether Anwar is the sex culprit or not. The videos shown were probably old film clips. He is morally culpable. He answers to the people whose faith in him is somewhat shaken. He answers to his loving family.

The public cannot find the stomach to tolerate the injustice forced on Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail and her family. What the government has done as a result of its own sluggishness and mental blockage is to allow itself to be regarded as a tyrannical bully.

READ MORE HERE

 

Longing For A Free Mind (Part 12 of 14)

Posted: 25 May 2011 05:36 PM PDT

What would be worse than losing our special privileges?

By M. Bakri Musa

[Presented at the Fifth Annual Alif Ba Ta Conference at Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, organized by UMNO Club of New York-New Jersey, January 29, 2011.]

Q& A (Cont'd): Pakatan, UMNO, and Mahathir

Q4: Pakatan declared that it will take away Malay special privileges. Why should I vote for that coalition?

A4: Your greatest fear, and reason for not voting Pakatan, is the possible loss of your special privileges. Thanks to the agitations of leaders from the increasingly shrill Mahathir down to the ever-frothing Perkasa's Ibrahim Ali, affirmative action is now an existential issue for Malays.

It need not be. Let me suggest to you and others who share your view that the way to deal with a fear is to imagine the worse possible scenario and then be prepared for that.

What would be worse than losing our special privileges? Imagine the descendents of Chin Peng or someone of his persuasion gaining power either legitimately or through corrupt means. After all if UMNO can bribe voters to vote for it, why not Chin Peng's party? Make the scenario even scarier; imagine that this party is determined to make Malaysia a province of China as indicated in some moldy maps in the musty tombs of its emperors.

How do you prepare for that? Take to the streets and challenge those Chinese army tanks a la Tiananmen Square? If the Chinese government had little sympathy for its own kind, do you imagine it would be more sympathetic to Malays demonstrating?

Let me suggest another and more productive way for preparing for this worse case scenario. Equip yourself and your children with the best education and the most useful skills. Then whoever is in charge of the country would beg you to stay; they need you! Besides, if you do not like working for the new power, you can always find ready takers for your talent elsewhere.

Every year thousands of Chinese, Indians, Irish and Italians leave their country for far lesser fears and problems. So do not worry about losing your special privileges. There are worse things. Instead prepare yourself by being well educated and trained.

Tunku Abdul Rahman once said if Malaysia were to be invaded by China or any major power, then he would be the first to raise the white flag. His point was not that he was a coward, rather that he viewed human life as precious and that you should not waste it over such dubious things as "patriotism." Instead you should learn to accommodate to reality if you cannot change it.

Q5: Which party will win the next election? Barisan or Pakatan?

A5: If I could see the future, I would not waste it on predicting which party will win; I would instead pick some winning stocks! That flipping remark aside, I do hear you! Answering your question however, requires some downstream analysis.

Imagine if Barisan, specifically UMNO, were to win and win big. Will that trigger change? Far from it! It would merely reaffirm their arrogance that what they have been doing all along is being approved by Malaysians. So if you like where the country is today, with rampant corruption, endemic inefficiencies, and deepening polarization of the races, then you will certainly get more of those things with another UMNO victory.

For Pakatan, a major loss would trigger much soul searching. Perhaps that would make them focus on their commonalities (like getting rid of corruption and intrusive laws like the ISA) instead of on their differences.

Now imagine the alternative, with UMNO suffering major defeat. The party would implode. It would be left to only true believers and those not in it for material gains. They will rebuild UMNO to its humble origin in the decades of the 40s, 50s and 60s. The party emerging from the ashes would be better and cleaner.

If Pakatan were to win, yes there will the inevitable squabbles especially on whether the Deputy Prime Minister should be a Malay. Such squabbles over the fruits of victory are predictable.

My view on the specific question of a Malay Deputy Prime Minister was expressed earlier in response to a question on a Muslim versus non-Muslim leader. I go for competence. I believe Pakatan has its share of talents, and I am all for giving them a chance.


Q6: Do you agree with Tun Mahathir's relentless criticism of his chosen successor Abdullah Badawi to the extent of undermining his (Abdullah's) authority?

A6: If Mahathir had not been relentless – and merciless – in his criticisms of Abdullah, the old man (Abdullah) would still be in power today and busy running the country to the ground. Actually it would not be him as he would be dozing off, rather his assorted hangers on who would be ruining Malaysia.

I disagree with Mahathir on many substantive areas, but on Abdullah I not only agree with his actions but also grateful for what he did. Malaysians too owe Mahathir a deep debt of gratitude for he was very instrumental in getting rid of Abdullah.

I applaud Mahathir on two points. First, he had the courage to admit his error, in this case, choosing Abdullah as his (Mahathir's) successor. Not many of us would readily admit to our mistakes and do so publicly. Score one for Mahathir. Second, and more important, is that he went beyond that and actively corrected his mistake. That took more than just courage.

Mahathir's harsh criticisms of Abdullah also broke new grounds for Malay culture. Again here is an example of his successfully changing Malay culture, contrary to his assertion elsewhere. The Malay cultural taboo of criticizing our leaders is broken; we now do not hesitate doing it, as Najib is finding out much to his chagrin. That is good. Elsewhere I cheekily suggested that maybe Mahathir had a hidden motive in choosing Abdullah – to provide Malaysians practice in this exercise of criticizing our leaders. Abdullah was so inept that he practically invited contempt and criticisms.

Now that Abdullah is out it is easy to belittle or even dismiss Mahathir's effort. Remember when Mahathir was doing it, the mainstream media under Abdullah's cronies were ignoring Mahathir; likewise senior UMNO leaders and leading corporate figures and senior academics. They all quickly aligned with their new master, conveniently forgetting the man (Mahathir) who put them there. If not for the alternate media (specifically Malaysia-Today) and the Internet (Mahathir having his own very popular blog) Mahathir would have been silenced.

My praising Mahathir on this matter notwithstanding, I still have a nagging unanswered question. Why did he pick Abdullah in the first place? Surely he has known Abdullah for decades and thus should have a very good assessment of the man. How could a simpleton like Abdullah hoodwink a seasoned politician like Mahathir?

I live 10,000 miles away and have never met Abdullah, yet I can see through the man's hollowness. I am not trying to be wise after the event; I have publicly stated my doubts on Abdullah in front of a sophisticated international audience long before he assumed office. Why did Mahathir (and so many other seasoned observers in Malaysia) missed what was obvious to me?

Even after Abdullah had clearly demonstrated his ineptness there were still many toadying praises for the man. One respected scholar gushed Abdullah was a "social engineer par excellence!" This phenomenon cannot simply be attributed to our senior people eagerness to bodek (suck up), although that is a significant factor.

We have to look elsewhere for a fuller explanation. My theory is this. Abdullah was a simple, courteous and humble man, that is, until he tasted power and all its vanities. (Having seen his performance, Abdullah has every reason to be humble!) Having not met the man I was not the beneficiary of those fine qualities of his; thus my judgment of the man was not clouded. In Malay culture those traits are highly valued. One could hide one's other inadequacies, including incompetence and corruption; hence Abdullah's successfully concealing his! As can be seen, he successfully deceived many, even Mahathir.


Q7: Tun Mahathir recently admitted that his greatest failure was his inability to change Malays and the Malay mindset. How confident are you that the changes you advocate would topple our metaphorical coconut shell?

A7: I totally disagree with Mahathir's self assessment; it is totally self-serving with a barely disguised tone of pseudo humility. On the contrary, he has changed Malays, in profound and irreversible ways. It is just that he does not like the changes that he has wrought. He has turned Malays into corrupt, insular, rent-seeking and dole-dependent citizens. He does not like what he sees and consequently concluded that he has not succeeded in changing us. To him apparently we have always been that kind of people.

I disagree. There was a time when we were honest, open and tolerant. We may be poor in our villagers but at least what we earned was honest, the result of our effort and not our being parasites on the rest of society. He recently labeled UMNO as "the party of contracts, APs, and licenses." Since to UMNO folks UMNO is Malay and vice versa, he thinks that all Malays are like those UMNO folks.

I do not know whether the strategies I discussed here will work, but I do know the current policies championed by UMNO has led us to where we are to day. Even Mahathir does not like where we are today.

The only way forward is to ensure that Malays are liberated mentally, that is, we have a free mind. Once we have that and see where we have been led to, then we will become angry and demand actions be taken or else take it upon ourselves to change things.

We have to be competitive, only then can we find our rightful spot whether in Tanah Melayu or elsewhere. There are no short cuts.

So forget about 1Malaysia, 100-storey tower, multibillion-dollar GLCs and all those alphabet soup of acronyms that promise miraculous transformation. Improve our schools, have trained teachers, and get rid of corruption. There is nothing secret or magical to my prescription. The Irish, Japanese, South Koreans, and now the Chinese are doing it. That is the only workable recipe.


Q8: Has (UMNO Youth President) Khairy Jamaludin a future in his party and country?

A8: The future of UMNO Youth or Khairy Jamaluddin specifically is peripheral to my interest. Meaning, I could not care less about what happens to him or the organization he leads. The future of Malaysia and that of Malays specifically is far divorced from that of UMNO or Khairy.

Your question however prompts me to make a more general observation on Malay youths, specifically those few bright ones. Too many of them are like Khairy, poorly mentored and not so wisely counseled. Far too many think that graduating from a top university with an undergraduate degree was the height of intellectual achievement. Thus they eschew further education or the broadening of their experience.

As so few of our youths end up at those elite institutions, these fortunate few acquire a sense of special destiny. They feel destined to lead us. They are imbued with undisguised confidence in their innate ability and without having to gain further experience or training to helm a major corporation or organization.

If there are so few Malays graduating from elite universities today, there were even fewer a generation or two ago. So these bright young graduates lack proper role models or mentors to guide them. Thus unless they have a sterling core they are too readily susceptible to flattery. This is especially so for those who have connections to important people as Khairy is. You add to this our cultural penchant for effusive praises, and things can get very heady for a young man or woman.

There was a young Malay student who, like Khairy, graduated from a top university. Unlike Khairy he graduated from an American university and furthered his studies beyond the undergraduate level. He worked in America and was later posted to Malaysia. With his expatriate pay and Malaysia's relatively low cost of living, he was ready to live it up.

Fortunately for this young man, the head of the Malaysian branch of the American company was also a Malay. On his first day at work, the young man was taken aside by the local CEO for a friendly fatherly talk. Aware that the young man was being paid as an expatriate, the local head said, "Young man, many of our clients are GLCs and public agencies. They are paying your salary, and you will be dealing with civil servants who will be paid a fraction of your salary. It would not look good if you were to flout your fabulous income in front of them."

He then suggested to the young man to instead have his luxury condo and Porsche in New York but to live more modestly in Kuala Lumpur. That was the best advice that young man ever had. Unfortunately far too many fast-rising young Malays today have been deprived of similar valuable advice.

Bright young Malays are no different from other bright students. In America however, these students have plenty of role models and mentors to give them such guidance; not so with our boys.

Thus our Khairys believe that their undergraduate degree is their ultimate achievement and not the beginning, as with bright American kids. Indeed the measure of excellence with American universities is the percentage of their graduates who go on to graduate or professional schools. Those few who opt for work would choose companies or organizations where they would get the best experience, including best mentoring.

Our problem is compounded by our institutional rigidity. A year ago one of the students here was accepted to the graduate program at one of the top universities. Every year literally thousands of bright eager students from all over the globe apply to this and similar programs. Yet when our student was accepted, the folks at the ministry with their rigid bureaucratic mindset would hear nothing of it. She had to return home.

If I were to advise the Khairys of today (meaning, some of you), this is what I would offer. First, congratulations for having graduated from a top university. You should be justly proud of your achievement. Explore how you could leverage that to even greater heights. Sit for your GRE, GMAT or whatever and get yourself enrolled into a quality graduate or professional program. Then when you are suitably qualified, work with some reputable corporations or organizations where you will have capable leaders and executives to be your role models and mentors. Better yet, set up your own enterprise. If you are pursuing your doctoral work, stay back for some postdoctoral experience and have a few papers under your belt.

If you are related to a VVIP, all the more you should take my advice. If you were to bank on your connections to achieve your goals, your achievements will forever be tainted, as Khairy is belatedly finding out. Unfortunately there are many Khairys out there who look upon their connections as durian runtuh, and exploit that relationship.

That will definitely make you rise very quickly as long as your patron is in power. It would not however, be enduring. While you are on the rise they will shower you with superlatives. Khairy was once called "the best investment banker!" Really! Those things can go to the head of even the most humble. It helps to remember that when they shower you with such extravagant praises, that reflect more on them than on you.

As for Khairy, he is now a damaged brand; he cannot recover. My advice would be to get out of politics, possibly out of Malaysia too, and find your niche elsewhere. There are many ways to serve your country besides being in politics or even being in Malaysia.

Next: Q&A (Cont'd): Islamic State and Leaders

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Jangan masuk campur urusan JPA, Perkasa beri MCA dan MIC amaran

Posted: 24 May 2011 07:01 PM PDT

Justeru tegas Presiden Perkasa Datuk Ibrahim Ali (gambar), pihaknya mendesak Jabatan Perkhidmatan Awam (JPA) agar tidak tunduk kepada tekanan yang dibuat parti-parti politik termasuk dari Barisan Nasional (BN).

"Perkasa mendesak agar JPA tidak tunduk kepada tekanan mana-mana parti politik dalam soal urusan pemberian biasiswa.

"Ia urusan kerajaan dan MCA atau MIC jangan ganggu urusan JPA, Umno dan Pemuda Umno tidak ganggu JPA walaupun ramai Bumiputera tidak dapat biasiswa JPA dan pelajar Bumiputera yang tidak diberi biasiswa belajar di luar negara," katanya dalam satu kenyataan.

Kata Ahli Parlimen Masir Mas itu, sepatutnya semua pihak tidak memperbesarkan isu pembahagian biasiswa.

Beliau berkata pelajar-pelajar terbabit  boleh meneruskan pengajian masing-masing dalam negara memandangkan semua kursus ada ditawarkan di pusat-pusat pengajian tinggi.

"Sepatutnya semua pihak bersyukur, belajar di mana-mana tidak menjadi soal apatah lagi belajar dalam negara sendiri, di mana-mana sudah banyak IPTA dan semua kursus ada ditawarkan.

"Ia juga menyelamatkan aliran wang keluar negara malah kosnya lebih tinggi. Membiayai seorang pelajar keluar negara boleh menampung dua hingga tiga pelajar belajar dalam negara," katanya.

Kata Ibrahim, kuota pembahagian biasiswa yang dilaksanakan kerajaan sekarang menyebabkan Bumiputera terjejas.

READ MORE HERE

 

Blog Hina Islam, Perkasa tampil lapor polis

Posted: 24 May 2011 05:23 PM PDT

Entri blog itu dikesan pada Isnin lalu dengan menggunakan nama Makcik Hajjah Sitt Al-Wuzara atau http://makcikhajjahsittalwuzara99.wordpress.com.

Malah sebuah akaun laman sosial Facebook turut dikesan menggunakan profil 'Makcik Hajjah Sitt Al-Wuzara'.

Ketika dihubungi FMT, Ketua Wira Perkasa Irwan Fahmi berkata laporan akan dibuat di Ibu Pejabat Polis Dang Wangi (IPD), Kuala Lumpur jam 3.30 petang ini. Laporan polis itu dijangka telah dibuat apabila berita ini ditulis.

Menurut Irwan, beliau dan Presiden Perkasa Datuk Ibrahim Ali telah membaca entri blog terbabit dan menyifatkan ia satu tindakan yang tidak bermoral dengan menghina Islam yang merupakan agama rasmi negara ini.

Irwan berkata laporan itu untuk mendesak pihak polis dan Suruhanjaya Komunikasi dan Multimedia Malaysia (SKMM) untuk menyiasat lebih lanjut dan mengambil tindakan sewajarnya terhadap pemilik atau jurublog tersebut.

"Ia satu penghinaan yang sangat kurang ajar dan melampau batasan. Saya minta orang yang bertanggungjawab hormati agama Islam.Maka kami mahu desak pihak polis untuk membuat siasatan lanjut. Kalau boleh letak orang yang terbabit dalam ISA…..kerana tiada toleransi bila membabitkan hal agama.

"Kita perlu tegas kerana ia soal agama. Bagaimana jika perkara ini berlaku kepada agama lain?," soalnya.

Irwan berkata selain entri blog itu, Perkasa turut membuat laporan berhubung tindakan Timbalan Menteri Pelajaran Datuk Dr Wee Ka Siong yang memprotes ekoran dakwaan berlakunya salah urus dalam pengagihan biassiswa oleh pegawai Jabatan Perkhidmatan Awam (JPA).

READ MORE HERE

 

Pendedahan WikiLeaks serampang dua mata dedah Eskay, Anwar

Posted: 24 May 2011 04:53 PM PDT

Terdapat dua perkara pokok yang perlu diperjelaskan kepada umum berikutan pendedahan terbaru WikiLeaks seperti didedahkan kepada Asia Sentinel yang kemudiannya disiarkan oleh laman web kendalian Raja Petra Kamaruddin iaitu Malaysia Today. Pendedahan tersebut berdasarkan kabel sulit Kedutaan Amerika Syarikat (AS) di Malaysia yang dibocorkan.

Pendedahan terperinci itu merupakan maklumat mesyuarat pada 5 Februari 2006 yang dihantar kepada Jabatan Negara AS di Washington melalui kabel sulit oleh kaunselor politik Mark D Clark.

Pertama ialah peranan yang dijalankan oleh ahli perniagaan Datuk Shazryl Eskay Abdullah dalam konflik bersenjata di negara jiran Malaysia iaitu Thailand. Menurut pendedahan tersebut, Eskay mempunyai pengetahuan yang mendalam tentang pergerakan serta aktiviti puak pemisah Melayu Muslim di selatan Thailand dalam konfliks berdarah dengan kerajaan pusat Thailand yang telah mengorbankan ramai nyawa terutama di pihak puak pemisah akibat serangan tentera kerajaan Thailand termasuk menyerang masjid dan sekolah agama di selatan Thailand yang mempunyai penduduk majoriti Melayu Muslim.

Eskay dikatakan telah berkongsi maklumat dengan pegawai-pegawai berpangkat tinggi di Kedutaan AS Kuala Lumpur. Antara lain, Eskay dikatakan berkongsi maklumat perihal aktivis-aktivis puak pemisah Melayu Muslim Thailand yang menetap di Malaysia serta jaringan dan aktiviti mereka.

Kedua, malah mungkin lebih mencetuskan persoalan dan kontroversi ialah pendedahan bagaimana Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, sama ada ketika masih di pihak kerajaan Umno dan Barisan Nasional mahupun selepas disingkirkan oleh Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad daripada Umno dan kerajaan – acap kali dikatakan berhubungan dengan pegawai-pegawai kedutaan AS bagi memberi amaran secara kerap kepada kedutaan AS tentang Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Mohd Najib Abdul Razak.

Menurut pendedahan itu lagi, kabel sulit yang mengandungi lebih 900,000 perkataan itu merangkumi laporan selama 15 tahun bermula pada tahun 1993 hingga tahun 2008. Anwar, sejak awal lagi dikatakan menganggap Najib sebagai bahaya kepada dirinya dan secara kerap memberi amaran kepada kedutaan AS betapa Najib sering melakukan jenayah korupsi dalam pembelian peralatan pertahanan negara dan menjadi ancaman kepada amalan demokrasi di Malaysia.

Menjadi sedikit pelik apabila laman web yang dianggap berwibawa seperti Malaysiakini dan The Malaysian Insider – begitu pantas dan prihatin melaporkan pendedahan tentang Eskay tetapi bertindak menggelapkan pendedahan tentang Anwar walhal tindakan seseorang ketika memegang jawatan timbalan perdana menteri dan selepas itu, pemimpin utama pakatan pembangkang yang melapor kepada sebuah kedutaan asing tentang seseorang yang menjadi ahli parti politik serta ahli kerajaan yang sama – boleh menimbulkan persoalan yang amat besar.

Sekiranya perkara tersebut berlaku sewaktu Anwar menjadi sebahagian daripada kerajaan – tidakkah ini menunjukkan betapa Umno sebagai parti politik utama yang memerintah dalam kerajaan Malaysia tidak mempunyai cara atau mekanisme untuk menangani amalan korupsi ahli-ahlinya. Jika sebagai sebuah parti politik perkara ini gagal ditangani, bagaimanakah pula dari sudut sebuah kerajaan yang memerintah negara?

Pada waktu yang sama, apakah kuasa dan peranan seorang perdana menteri ketika itu, malah berlanjutan kepada semua agensi atau jabatan seperti polis, pencegah rasuah dan lain-lain.

Jika seorang timbalan perdana menteri bertindak sedemikian, apakah yang dapat menghalang orang lain sama ada menteri-menteri kabinet, ketua-ketua turus tentera, ketua-ketua kementerian dan lain-lain untuk melapor kepada mana-mana kedutaan asing di Kuala Lumpur?

Tidakkah tindakan sedemikian sebenarnya amat merbahaya kepada keselamatan negara?

Pendedahan tentang Eskay hanya melibatkan peranannya secara peribadi – yang jika diperhalusi tidak melibatkan maklumat sulit negaranya sendiri. Eskay memberi maklumat tentang puak pemisah Melayu Islam di Thailand kepada kedutaan AS di Kuala Lumpur. Barangkali yang dipersoal ialah moralnya sebagai orang Muslim, atau juga risiko yang perlu dihadapinya sendiri akibat peranannya itu.

Sebaliknya, jika pemain-pemain politik Malaysia, tidak kira di sebelah pihak parti yang memerintah atau di barisan pembangkang dibenarkan mengadu atau melaporkan perihal seteru politik mereka kepada mana-mana kedutaan asing di Kuala Lumpur, sama ada seteru politik itu berada di dalam parti sendiri atau tidak, tidakkah tindakan sebegini pada tahap paling daif lagi naïf malah amat berbahaya umpama suami isteri anak-beranak bergaduh lalu masing-masing mengadu-domba sekeliling kampong.. opps, serata dunia.

Dan soalan cepumas untuk PAS – sebagai parti politik yang mendakwa mendambakan Islam sebagai destinasi perjuangannya yang syumul – apakah pendirian PAS dalam soal seperti ini? Atau seperti isu-isu lain sebelumnya, terutama yang melibatkan seseorang yang menghuni rumah agam di Segambut Heights, PAS sentiasa berpegang kepada keputusan konsensus bersama-sama rakan politik mereka iaitu DAP dan PKR?

Zombi Kg Pisang ialah nama samaran seorang pembaca SiasahDaily. Beliau merupakan pemerhati politik tempatan, terutama melibatkan PAS dan hubungan dengan rakan pembangkang lain.

 

PAS bagai gajah tak berkepala

Posted: 24 May 2011 04:31 PM PDT

"Kalau dipimpin korporal saja, apa jadi pada general?" Aziz bertanya dalam forum dalam satu forum bertajuk 'Pemilihan PAS: Mampukah PAS membuat lonjakan?' di Dewan Perhimpunan Cina  Kuala Lumpur dan Selangor (KLSCAH).

Beliau berkata demikian semasa mengulas keengganan presiden Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang menjadi pemangkin pembaharuan dalam PAS.

"Walaupun PAS besar dengan keahlian lebih 1 juta orang ia bagaikan gajah tak berkepala," Dr Aziz berkata dalam forum anjuran Free Public Forum (FPF) dan Institut Hal Ehwal Demokrasi dan Ekonomi (IDEAS).

Beliau menambah kepimpinan parti lebih dilihat aktif secara bermusim sedangkan ketua parti boleh dilantik sebagai Perdana Menteri.

PAS terjebak

"PAS masih lagi terjebak. Perwakilan enggan berubah dan enggan memberi arahan buang padang meskipun Tan Sri Mohd Asri Muda pernah dikeluarkan."

Asri merupakan mantan presiden PAS sejak 1971 hingga Oktober 1982 yang dibuang oleh jawatankuasa disiplin PAS.

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Voter registration this weekend

Posted: 25 May 2011 05:35 PM PDT

DAP FT/Selangor is having a mega statewide (Selangor & FT) voter registration exercise this weekend, 28-29 May, at 12 locations. We're hoping to hit 10,000 new voters!

Venues include markets (for the semi-urban areas) and shopping centres for the urban areas, locations are:

1. KAJANG: Metro Point (near Old Town White Coffee); 11am-9pm

2. KEPONG: Waterfront, Desa Parkcity (near Coffee Bean); 10am-8pm

3. KLANG: Klang Parade (Renren Book Store); 10am-10pm

4. KUALA KUBU BHARU: KKB Market; 8:30am-10:30am

5. PANDAN: Pandan Perdana Morning Market (Sat) & Taman Muda Market (Sun); 8am-11am

6. PETALING JAYA: 1Utama (1st Floor, Oval); 10am-10pm & Digital Mall, Sect 14; 10am-9pm

7. PUCHONG:  IOI Mall (Guardian, Old Wing); 10am-10:30pm

8. SEKINCHAN: Restaurant Sheng Hui (Sekinchan Market); 8am-12pm

9. SERDANG: The Mines Shopping Mall ; 11am-9pm

10. SUBANG JAYA: Empire Shopping Gallery (P1 Travelator); 10am-10pm

AR RIDHA DESAK GUGUR PERTUDUHAN EMPAT ANGGOTA SYIAH

Posted: 25 May 2011 03:57 PM PDT

PRESS STATEMENT

Ar Ridha, sebuah badan bukan kerajaan (NGO), membantah tindakan Jabatan Agama Islam Selangor (Jais) menyerbu majlis jamuan makan dan kesenian yang di adakan di kawasan lapang, Taman Sri Gombak dekat Kuala Lumpur hari ini, 25 Mei 2011. Majlis tahunan itu diadakan sebagai memperingati hari ulangtahun kelahiran Fatimah Zahra, puteri Rasulullah saw.

Ketika serbuan itu berlaku, lebih 1,000 tetamu daripada pelbagai bangsa dan agama dalam konteks 1Malaysia sedang menjamu selera dan tindakan ini adalah sesuatu yang memeranjatkan dan tidak wajar. Ini kerana pihak penganjur telah mendapat kelulusan daripada Majlis Perbandaran Selayang, Polis Diraja Malaysia dan Kementerian Dalam Negeri (Rela) untuk menganjurkan majlis tersebut.

Dalam serbuan tersebut, empat anggota bermazhab Syiah telah ditahan dan dilepaskan dengan ikat jamin pada petang tadi. Mereka ialah Mohd Kamilzuhairi Abdul Aziz, Radin Ahmad Faizul, Syed Mohd Shafiq Syed Husin dan Mohd Asyraf Ahmad. Mereka dituduh menyebarkan ajaran mazhab Syiah walaupun majlis itu hanya sekadar majlis jamuan makan yang biasa diadakan setiap tahun.

Tindakan Jais ini dilihat sebagai satu tindakan yang biadap dan merupakan suatu penindasan kerana Jais bertindak tanpa waran dan tidak mengikut saluran undang-undang yang betul. Oleh yang demikian, kami mendesak Jais menggugurkan segala pertuduhan ke atas mereka kerana majlis itu dianjurkan dengan mendapat kelulusan daripada pihak berkuasa.

Tindakan Jais dalam membuat serbuan dan menahan empat anggota Syiah adalah bercanggah dengan Artikel 11, Perlembagaan Malaysia, yang menyebut agama Islam sebagai agama rasmi dan penganut-penganut agama lain bebas untuk mengamalkan ajaran agama mereka.

Mereka akan dihadapkan ke Mahkamah Rendah Syariah Gombak Timor, Kuang, Selangor pada 7 Jun depan. Sementara itu, Ar Ridha telah membuat laporan polis petang tadi berhubung dua artikel berunsur fitnah tulisan Hasliza Hassan di akhbar Berita Harian  pada 23 Mei 2011 bertajuk "Masyarakat mesti disebar luas bahaya Syiah" dan bertajuk "Tiada sebab terima Syiah di Malaysia" pada 24 Mei 2011.

Ar Ridha
Pengarah
Mohd Kamilzuhairi Abdul Aziz

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


A New Alliance

Posted: 25 May 2011 05:52 PM PDT

This behaviour automatically triggers equally vicious reactions from the BN and there is so much mutual hatred even in Parliament that we wonder whether good laws are being made. How can there be? There is so little real debate. There is almost no engagement between the two sides.

Leaders in the BN and Pakatan seem interested only in annihilating each other. One side can "gain" only if the other side "loses", but the reality is that no one wins in this kind of system. It is unhealthy and it is certainly not democratic. This endless acrimony brings no benefit to the Rakyat. They are disappointed by all the broken promises, the absent leadership, and the blind pursuit of power that puts party politics above all else.

Many openly say the BN is no longer a working coalition. Some of the major component parties nolonger enjoy the support of their constituents and they cannot come to the table as equal partners as they once did. Only UMNO continues to wield its traditional influence—but without the strength of its partners to bring balance, UMNO too has changed. It has become autocratic and fixed in its ways. It is unaware, or afraid, of the need to change. It has become deaf to the needs of others.

Even now there is a movement within UMNO that wants more seats at the next General Election at the expense of the component parties. If this happens, the BN will cease to be a coalition even in name. It will no longer represent Malaysians. It will represent only its own interests and I fear for my country and my fellow citizens should that day ever come.

What about the Pakatan? Not only has it failed to provide a real and constructive Opposition to the Government, it has positioned Anwar as beyond question and reproach. He can do no wrong and his "coalition" follows him blindly out of politically expedience.

Anwar is a convenient figurehead, and he is the only person holding the Pakatan together. PAS and the DAP are still utterly divided on the issue of the Islamic state. They have merely postponed their differences—not resolved them—for the sake of achieving political power. In situations like this, basic questions of right and wrong get lost in the mud of ambition. Why should a coalition depend exclusively on the cult-status of one man alone?

How can we expect the Pakatan to provide responsible leadership if it simply ignores its own internal differences? Have we even seen any evidence that the Pakatan is a real coalition and not a marriage of convenience?

No, we haven't, and because they are locked in the endless death-struggle with the BN, we can'texpect anything more of them either.

So, what about the rest of us who are sick of this endless political feuding? There are many of us who adhere closely to the founding principles of our nation regardless of the political leadership of the day. We put national unity first, and we work tirelessly to ensure, as Tunku Abdul Rahman wanted, a place in the sun for everyone.

We yearn for real debate on policies that affect us because we know that this is the process through which we make good laws. We want to engage all sides because we recognise that good ideas exist everywhere, regardless of creed, colour or political affiliation. We never dismiss an argument simply because we don't like the person who says it—we evaluate proposals on their own merit for the benefit of all Malaysians, not just a particular party, ideology or interest.

READ MORE HERE

 

Anwar Ibrahim – Victim of baseless allegations

Posted: 24 May 2011 09:21 AM PDT

A village of Cherok Tok Kun where hardly the political will connects gave rise to a star of new Malaysia on 10th August 1947 when the dawn of new era had began & when the shine of imperialism was started to fade then in a small unknown corner of the world someone was going to take birth whose ideology & growth will go to give Malaysia a new dimension to think beyond ethnic boundaries.

Anwar Ibrahim started his career when he was pursuing Malay studies as a President of Muslim student organization Persatuan Kebangsaan Pelajar Islam Malaysia (PKPIM) & of Persatuan Bahasa Melayu Universiti Malaya (PBMUM) simultaneously. In 1971 he was one of the prominent members & among the founders of Muslim Youth Movement of Malaysia or Angkatan Belia Islam Malaysia (ABIM) founded in 1971. During 1974 student protests against rural poverty & hunger he was booked under Malaysian Internal Security Act leading him to imprisonment of 20 months detaining him without any judicial trail.

Famous for his nationalist ideology his move to support the government of Malaysian President Mahathir Mohammad in 1981 shocked his liberal & unconditional supporters of his founded organization Angkatan Belia Islam Malaysia (ABIM). As he joined the politics the rise of his ranks & status gathered momentum. His first ministerial post was as the minister for Culture, Youth & Sports in 1983.

The time of Anwar's golden era has now just started in 1983 & he remained & gained his ranks of political world with a great pace when ultimately he reached & was sworned in as a Deputy Prime Minister in Mahathir bin Mohammad government from 1993 – 1998 which ended with the blow of ASEAN financial crisis of 1997 closing of his son-father relationship of political path in 1998 with UMNO. He was also appointed as an Acting Prime Minister during absence of Mahathir Mohammad who took holiday from his work for about two months.

Before climbing to the Prime Minister's desk Anwar Ibrahim headed many ministries in UMNO such as in 1984, Minister of Education 1986 which cleared the way for his prime ministerial position expected as per Malaysian politics which rife him to the surety of his Deputy Prime Ministerial choice.

Anwar came in limelight when he took charge of the two prominent ministries in 1986 Education Minister & 1991 Minister of Finance. During his tenure as a Minister of Education he introduced numerous pro Malay policies in the national school curriculum & the most controversial of them all was when he renamed the national language as Bahasa Melayu from Bahasa Malaysia this invited the huge public outcry from the non Malays who felt that this will detached the future generations from the national language & there will be nothing which does not belong to Malaysians but only to Malays.

This has created a much silent rift which has now widened with his moves. When he was Finance minister the allegations were drawn that he is being corrupt & is using public exchequer in a non transparent manner.

During the last years of his golden era when Malaysia & other ASEAN economies were facing brunt of financial crisis Anwar blamed Mahathir being a capitalist & was opened a clear front against his protectionist policies which have resulted in financial turmoil in Malaysia.

The trail & allegations which he faced & is going through are completely baseless as it is completely political which a result is of the confrontation between the two political magnets. With a rise in support & increasing popularity in the masses especially in the minorities Anwar's demise can be beneficial to one person & that is Mahathir himself who even have called him the potential prime minister for Israel.

The person who is nationalist by choice & is clear with transparency in his views cannot be corrupt & can't perform the act of sodomy with his fellow ministers. The trail under which he gone & spent 6 months under severe torture by the police authorities are completely not justified. The person who had been declared as Asian of the year just because of his policies & stand for his nation's worst days is charged with the allegations of being corrupt political figure; the person who took stand against the corrupt political practices of the national leaders of his Malay nation especially that off Mahathir whose intentions to save his own investments leads the national exchequer to the mere dummy.

The reason which nobody knows is that Anwar stopped Mahathir to protect his family's fortune & business interests by diversifying the public funds to their corporate. This has gone against the wishes of his senior colleague. It is said there is nothing bigger than the self politics which even does not spare the closest of the relations if they come in between of the personal satisfaction & greed of political growth.

This is what happened to the relations of Mahathir & Anwar which when tested on the values came under the political weight of scrutiny. The nationalistic values & patriotism of Anwar Ibrahim which thought was right & has guided him right on the path of truth & justice which his nation was expecting of him at the most difficult times of its economy didn't matched with the greedy expectations of the corrupt political circles of the Mahathir bin Mohammad's regime which even at the harsh times were just trying to save their own interests rather than those of nation.

The Anwar's policies favouring financial & banking system which allows them to protect their funds in terms of saving them from bankruptcy & not allowing any offerings for public bailouts for the corporate had resulted in the first between the two titans of the Malaysian Cabinet.

It is the policies of Anwar & the values of his nationalism which saved Malaysia from the worst of the financial turmoil otherwise if there would be someone else corrupt then scenario of Anwar's nation would have been completely different. This is he who have helped building Malaysia a more secular & friendly state rather being clutched in the grip of fundamentals of the radical Islam which has always threatened Malaysia's system from the start of its first years of independence.

When somebody wants fame & want to get famous mostly the people choose to target who is already under sight & this is what happened to Anwar Ibrahim who was prosecuted under the false charges of sodomy by his fellow minister which though somehow proven on the false identification & criticised reports of the DNA has ended Anwar's career altogether as Malaysian law has provisions of 15 years jail term under sodomy charges.

The trail which Anwar went through was full of loops in the judicial decision which made him the victim of the corrupt politicization of the judiciary in Malaysia. The decision to sentence Anwar & the maltreatment of him by the police officers in jail was the matter of the fact of political influence which still exist in advance Malaysian society which portrays itself as the most clear & a true Asian in real.

Defaming the image of the person whose ideology & focus is his nation, who have always stand for his nation in the most difficult times for which he even got awarded as the Asian of the Year. The person who sees life as respect & believes in being natural & clear in his approach was booked under the false allegations of the sodomy charges falsely put by the greedy sections of his fellows who Anwar has always trusted & coordinated on every level.

The person who visions a better & safer future for his nation was declared corrupt defaming his image which characterises him as the national hero who saved his nation from being driven in the down line of crisis. The person who talked about secularism & national unity was banned from the politics just because the loopy trails of false allegations were being conducted under the political channels favouring the hollow desires of greedy politicians.

The trail has not only tarnished the image of Malaysian judiciary but has also been criticised by most respected international organisations & communities. The open truth of Anwar Ibrahim's patriotic soul has not been felt by the citizens of his nations to whom he served the most. The mockery of the Malaysian judiciary has now been made in the public resulting in the complete shame for the nation like this which is secular & friendly.

Read more at: http://www.facebook.com/armedforthequill

Talking Malay on false premises

Posted: 24 May 2011 04:12 AM PDT

How can we force ourselves to suffer fools by allowing ourselves to consume the hate spewing writings of some bloggers whose Malay-ness are questionable? Why isn't the peddler of rancid curry speaking on behalf and for Kimma members? He looks more kitol-ish that the person he castigates as Kitol. Why isn't the gold nugget seller doing the same? We thank you but no thanks.

Jadi jadi lah kita orang Melayu kena tipu.

I find myself in strange territory listening to people like Reezal Merican, or Rahim Azeez speak for the Malays. I would have thought, Malays are better off if these people speak on behalf of KIMMA. I think Malays have got enough talented people to speak for ourselves.

Then we have those who pretend they speak for UMNO but are themselves not UMNO members. Can they have the same thinking dynamics of an UMNO member? And I am not even differentiating between good and bad thinking- just undifferentiated UMNO thinking. Why is this important? It's important because then, what we say can be leavened with realistic assessment. Then we can appreciate the UMNO spirit.

Without the UMNO spirit, what you write is mechanical.

The real UMNO man wouldn't speak of an imagined clash of Christians and Muslims or spun the story about Christians taking over this country. I think Malays are already suffering from an overdose of ghost stories and will NOT want to add to their consumption ,manufactured tales about DAP becoming PM or Christians taking over this country.

Does a Malay cease to be a Malay if he is not UMNO member? Being UMNO is not an absolute requirement to fight for a Malay cause. Even being Malay is not an absolute guarantee that Malay interests are taken care of. Both require the right Malay with the right values and the UMNO Malay with the right values.

Consider the record before us. From the day we got independence, most of our MBs are Malays. The top bosses in the Police and the army are Malays. The KSUs and TKSUs are almost invariably Malays. The top government officers are Malays. All the District officers are. All penghulus are Malays. All the Kings? All are Malays.

Now, one would be justified into assuming that given the fact that almost all the important orifice bearers are Malays and the governmental institutions we have are peopled by Malays, the lot of the Malays would be greatly improved or would have been vastly improved. Wouldn't it?

Well, in terms of control of the economy, Malay economic interest is just about 20%. That's 20% of the overall wealth being shared by 65% of the population. We would further imagine that Malays would own more land in this country. We would also imagine that Malays owned better housing. Their education would be of higher standard. With Malays in power, there would have been more rich Malays than rich non Malays. Yet in the top 20 richest in Malaysia, you would find probably one fellow. In the top 40, you start getting more Malays but you also get more non Malays.

So what conclusion can you deduce from these observations? The only valid and justifiable conclusion, is having Malays up there does not readily translate into Malay prominence in any of the fields we mentioned. It follows from here, that positioning Malays in strategic offices is not necessarily beneficial and advantageous to Malays.

READ MORE HERE

 

Wikileak: Did Eskay botch again?

Posted: 23 May 2011 04:23 PM PDT

There were two opportunistic moments to release the information but it didn't come out.

During the heat of the moment of the sex video allegedly of Anwar as the male leading role, Eskay posed five questions:

  • How many times Anwar went to Thailand in the last two years?
  • Who received him in Thailand?
  • Which hotel is his accomodation?
  • What did he do in the hotel?
  • Who made all the payment?
Naturally Anwar would not give credence by answering or even responsing.

Eskay had not answer the five questions but he is now faced with a Wikileak expose by Raja Petra on Malaysia Today here yesterday. Read also reports by Free Malaysia Today here. Blogger rbf here notice Malaysiakini, Anwars paid mouthpiece has yet to make a report of it.

When pushed, only then would Eskay respond?

There is supposed to be an expose in Utusan Malaysia today but where is it online? Did Eskay botch again?

Fumbled Big Time

In the last sex video case, he fumbled big time. Although the man is not the same, getting Tan Sri Rahim Tamby Chik involved destroyed the credibility of the expose.

Displaying the video to reporters and opposition leaders and sympathisers at Carcosa, of all the place, was unnecessary. It build up curiosity to the public but late in fulfilling it. By the time, the video was released, which was rather late, Eskay was playing games as though he was trying to emulate his spin maestro friend, Anwar Ibrahim, by releasing it bit by bit.

He fumbled in the handling and many mistakes were made that finally the impact was lost. Anwar had all the time in the world to response, cook up excuses, and played his religious card.

Do not be surprise if Eskay is charged for the offense of distributing pornography and Anwar goes scots free from this episode. He did not do anything wrong under the law. It is the woman that will be charged for prostitution.

Thank God, this blogger was not called back by the Dato Trio to view the video. Anwar's friends and supporters can be dangerously unreliable, unethical in their game and in some cases, naive gloryseekers.

Eskay is undoubtedly an associate of Anwar. Read this blog X-PKR here, believed to be that of a former associate of Anwar.

Cards in hand

The manner that made Eskay turned against Anwar has still not jive with many. Furthermore, comments this blogger received from those with business dealing with Eskay does not make him credible.

This blogger believed Eskay has many cards in hand. Assuming he has no credibility issue and is really a changed man, does he knows what and how to do with the information he has?

One possibility is the video below that revealed Anwar sourcing money from abroad via Bangkok.

READ MORE HERE

 

Top 7 Reasons NOT To Vote BN Come GE13

Posted: 23 May 2011 11:28 AM PDT

Reading the latest happenings about our country is a pain for many of us. Seeing the kind of filth BN politicians churning day in and day out makes you think that Malaysia is in a state of anarchy.

Would anyone disagree? Politically, economically and socially our nation is sinking lower and it seems we are reaching the point of no return.

We were considered to be a model country at one time but today we are on the way to become the "Next Sick Man of Asia" or the next Somalia.

Can we re-claim our country from these corrupt and good for nothing BN politicians? I say we have to. And we need to.

And we need to do it this coming GE13. Personally, I have 7 good reasons to kick BN out of Putrajaya come GE13:-

1)      When BN is voted out you vote out people like Ibrahim Ali, Dr M, Perkasa and the likes. When you vote these people out you too vote out extremism, racism and bigotry from our nation. This is something we need to do as the current regime under Najib has failed to reprimand these racist politicians. In fact, Najib and his crony has been giving tacit support and approval by giving some of the most ridiculous statements in our nations history. Let us remember that "Perkasa adalah Perkakas UMNO" (Perkasa is UMNO's tool).

Read more at: http://realitybytesdmd.blogspot.com/2011/05/top-7-reasons-not-to-vote-bn-come-ge13.html

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved