Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News
Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News |
| The sins of the fathers visit the sons Posted: 19 Oct 2013 08:40 PM PDT So what was the just-concluded Umno party election all about? Was it about bringing change to Umno? Certainly not! It is about who is going to take over as Prime Minister once the son of Tun Razak is forced out of office. Is it going to be the son of Tun Hussein Onn or the son of Tun Dr Mahathir? And he who wins the Umno Vice-Presidency can then prepare himself to take on the Deputy Presidency and from thereon the Presidency of Umno, which also means the Prime Ministership of Malaysia. THE CORRIDORS OF POWER Raja Petra Kamarudin
The pro-Umno Bloggers are on the attack. They are not happy with the just-concluded Umno party election. They were hoping that Mukhriz Mahathir instead of Hishammuddin Hussein would win one of the three Vice-Presidencies. A. Kadir Jasin is also on the attack (read below). He has repeated what Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad has to say about Najib Tun Razak -- which is not at all flattering. But then Kadir Jasin has always been Tun Dr Mahathir's 'mouthpiece'. So this is probably not at all surprising. The issue here is that the son of Tun Hussein Onn won with just a nine-vote lead against the son of Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad. And they blame the son of Tun Abdul Razak Hussein for this narrow defeat. This sounds like a proxy war between two dead one-time Malaysian Prime Ministers versus one still alive one-time Prime Minister. Tengku Abdul Rahman did not like Tun Dr Mahathir. In fact, that is putting it mildly. Tengku Rahman actually hated Tun Dr Mahathir and he once said that Umno would perish at the hands of Tun Dr Mahathir. And that hatred is mutual. Tun Dr Mahathir played a prominent role in Tengku Rahman's ouster that saw Tun Razak take over as Prime Minister in 1970. Tun Razak then appointed Tun Dr. Ismail Abdul Rahman as his Deputy and when Tun Dr Ismail died in 1973 Tun Hussein took over. When Tun Razak died in 1976, Tun Hussein took over as Prime Minister and he reluctantly appointed Tun Dr Mahathir as his Deputy -- because of pressure from the party -- when he would rather have appointed Tun Muhammad Ghazali Shafie as the Deputy instead. And once Tun Dr Mahathir became the Deputy he made his move to oust Tun Hussein and took over as Prime Minister in 1981. Since the 1950s Umno has seen power struggles for the top two positions. First Onn Ja'afar was ousted. Then Tengku Rahman was ousted. Then Tun Razak died before he could be ousted, as did Tun Dr Ismail. Then Tun Ghazali was ousted. Then Hussein Onn was ousted. Then Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah and Tun Musa Hitam were ousted. Then Tun Abdul Ghafar Baba was ousted. Then Anwar Ibrahim was ousted. Then Tun Dr Mahathir was ousted. Finally, Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi was ousted. The only way you could avoid being ousted was to die in office like Tun Razak and Tun Dr Ismail. So what was the just-concluded Umno party election all about? Was it about bringing change to Umno? Certainly not! It is about who is going to take over as Prime Minister once the son of Tun Razak is forced out of office. Is it going to be the son of Tun Hussein Onn or the son of Tun Dr Mahathir? And he who wins the Umno Vice-Presidency can then prepare himself to take on the Deputy Presidency and from thereon the Presidency of Umno, which also means the Prime Ministership of Malaysia. So the son of Tun Dr Mahathir did not make the Vice-Presidency. The son of Tun Hussein did. Hence the son of Tun Hussein and not the son of Tun Dr Mahathir would have a better shot at the number two slot -- and thereafter the number one slot. It is about the son of which ex-Prime Minister will take over once the son of another ex-Prime Minister is successfully ousted from power. This is what the just-concluded Umno party election was all about. And that man who aspires to take over must be seen as more Malay and more Islamic than his opponents. And has Umno's history not shown that liberals eventually get ousted in favour of hardliners? Umno can't change, say some liberals. Of course Umno can't change. If Umno does change then the top leaders would get ousted. But will Umno soon become extinct if it does not change? I fear not. I fear that PAS may become extinct instead -- unless it changes course and becomes more Islamic than Umno. The animal called Umno is about Malay and Muslim supremacy. And unless Najib sees this he would soon join the long list of top Umno leaders who eventually get kicked out. What happened yesterday was that the Malays have sent the top party leadership a message that Umno is about Malay political power and that there must be no compromise on this matter. And the only way that PAS is going to remain relevant is to become more radical than Umno. That is what yesterday's Umno party election means. Welcome to the realm of Malay politics. Hidup Umno! Hidup Melayu! Hidup Islam! **************************************************** Umno can't change, will soon become extinct, says former NST chief editor Jennifer Gomez, The Malaysian Insider Umno is unable to bring change and just like the dodo bird, will soon become extinct, writes the former group chief editor of Umno-controlled New Straits Times. The analogy of the now-extinct bird species from Mauritius was made by Datuk A. Kadir Jasin in his latest blog posting. He writes that whether there were 2,000 or 140,000 delegates who took part in the just-concluded Umno polls, it is obvious that the party could not make the leap forward as it could not elect a fresh line-up of future leaders. For Kadir, the only consolation in the Umno vice-presidential race is that those who were accused of being involved in money politics previously have been rejected. According to Kadir, while the status quo for the VP line-up was a good sign for Umno president Datuk Seri Najib Razak, the same could not be said for the party. This is because it could not vote in a new generation of leaders except for a few who made it to the supreme council. Re-elected vice-president Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi's big win also puts him as the third in line to succession in Umno, after Najib and his deputy Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin. As such, Kadir does not want to discount the possibility that Ahmad Zahid, who is the Home Minister, could turn from being a trusted ally to challenger for the top post. He notes that Ahmad Zahid's stern stance on crime and national security differs from Najib's liberal image. Ahmad Zahid's approach has steered clear from Najib's liberalism, something which Malays and Umno members shun, Kadir adds. Kadir, a loyalist of former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, then takes a swipe at Najib for abolishing preventive laws such as the Internal Security Act and Emergency Ordinance, which he says resulted in a spike in crime. He says there is the possibility of a new alliance between Ahmad Zahid and re-elected Youth chief Khairy Jamaluddin to further the former's political ambitions. Khairy, explains Kadir, can ensure Ahmad Zahid receives more support being the Youth chief, adding that votes from the Youth wing would come in handy in the future. The alliance would also be relevant given the duo's very different backgrounds and approaches. Ahmad Zahid could be the champion of the Malays and a local hero, while Khairy could be the savvy spokesman in the international arena. Kadir says the fact that so many ministers and deputy ministers have been elected to the supreme council line-up means that they would not be able to speak out on behalf of the Malays. He adds that only a handful in the line-up do not have high posts. And if these individuals could be sweet-talked, it would mean a total absence of independent voices for the Malays in the supreme council. Kadir warns that there will now be only those who act as "yes men and women" to the party president. He laments the lack of young blood in the party line-up, and points to the negative perception of the new generation towards Umno. This, he writes, clearly distinguishes Umno from PKR, PAS and DAP which have many young leaders as well as a second echelon who are well-grounded in research and debate.
|
| Change by any other name is still change Posted: 19 Oct 2013 06:41 PM PDT So, back to my opening question: going by the just-concluded Umno party election, have we seen any change in Umno? Many of you will say 'no'. I, however, will say 'yes'. Umno has changed. It now realises what it needs. It understands that what it wants does not matter. What it wants will not keep Umno in power. And what Umno needs is to stay in power. And, to stay in power, it needs to give the Malays/Muslims want they want. THE CORRIDORS OF POWER Raja Petra Kamarudin
Two old friends bump into each other on the street after not having met for some time. "Hey, Mike, how are you? Haven't heard from you for some time." "Yeah, I've been away over the last few months. Been in rehab." "Yeah, I heard about that. And how is your drinking problem?" "Oh, much better. I'm doing great. I don't drink any more." "That's certainly great to hear. Well done." "I don't drink any less either." I suppose that can either be taken as an improvement or a setback, depending on how you look at things and whether you perceive half a glass of water as half-full or half-empty. And how would you perceive the just-concluded Umno party elections? A step forwards or a step backwards (or many steps as the case may be)? That would probably depend on whether you think that not drinking any more is good when one does not drink any less either. Or maybe you think there is really no change for the better although things may not be getting any worse as well. Again, how would you perceive the just-concluded Umno party elections? Has Umno moved forwards? Has Umno moved backwards? Or has there actually been no change? To the alcoholic, not drinking any more is good even though he or she does not drink any less either. To the teetotaller, though, that would probably be seen as a setback. After months of rehab all you could achieve is to arrest the slide but not reverse it? That, to some, would be a disaster. The Islamists look at Malaysia today and compare it to Malaysia of, say, 60 years ago, and would say that much has improved since the 1950s. Nowadays, most Muslim women dress 'decently' and wear a tudung compared to short skirts and bareback dresses as in the past. This, to the Islamists, is a great leap forward. Liberals frown and sigh and say that Malaysia has gone backwards since the days or Saloma and P. Ramlee. What has become of Malaysia when Malay women today dress like Arabs in the desert whereas once they were so modern and sexy? And where has all the joget and ronggeng gone to, which was very much part of Malay culture back in the days before Merdeka? People will change when there is a need for change. The question would be whether the change is for the better or for the worse. Better or worse would be how you perceive things and is not constant. The only constant thing, as they say, is change. But then if it changes how could it be constant? That is what we could probably call an oxymoron. Umno would change if there were a need for change. Everything and everyone changes dependent on need. The only thing is: what would be this need? And this is where we enter the realm of the debate between wants and needs. There are wants and there are needs -- and most times people are confused between the two. You need a car because you cannot get to work without one, especially when Malaysia's public transportation system sucks. But you do not need a BMW or a Mercedes Benz. That is not a need. That is what you want. Hence the difference between wants and needs, which most people cannot seem to differentiate. The question of needs and wants would also come into play when we talk about the change, or lack of change, as the case may be, in Umno. Going by the just-concluded Umno party elections, has Umno changed? And if it has, has it changed for the better or for the worse? Different people will have a different answer to this. I would rather ask another question. Does Umno want to change? Or, more importantly, does Umno need to change? Umno may want to change, or at least some people in Umno may want to see Umno change -- for example, people such as Party President Najib Tun Razak and Youth Leader Khairy Jamaluddin. But can Umno change if many people see no need for change in Umno? So, what then does Umno need before we talk about what Umno wants? In the past, Umno depended on their partners in Barisan Nasional. That was in the days when Barisan Nasional could win general elections with landslide victories and with more than two-thirds of the seats in Parliament (plus the same in the state elections as well). Today, that is no longer possible. The days of landslide victories and two-thirds majorities are gone. And, worse still, the days of the balance between Malay seats and non-Malay seats are also gone. Today, a Barisan Nasional victory just means an Umno victory with not much contribution from the non-Umno partners in the coalition -- except for those in Sabah and Sarawak. In the past, whatever Umno does and says must take into consideration the backlash or affect on MCA, MIC, Gerakan, PPP, and so on. Hence Umno must try to be seen as more centrist than rightist. The survival of the non-Umno parties in Barisan Nasional depended on this. That, however, is no longer important. In the past, the more 'unIslamic' Umno is seen the more support PAS will get -- but then the non-Umno parties in Barisan Nasional will benefit. Hence, while Umno will lose some Malay/Muslim support to PAS, this loss can be covered or compensated by the gain in support that the non-Umno parties would get. But now the non-Umno parties in Barisan Nasional can no longer hold their ground no matter what Umno does and says. And by being more liberal, and therefore be seen as less Islamic or less Malay-centric, would just send the Malays over to PAS. So now what Umno needs to do is to win back the Malay support from PAS. Umno can no longer win back the non-Malay support. And for that to happen Umno must be seen as more Islamic and more Malay than PAS (and PKR, of course). So what Umno wants (or what some people in Umno want) is no longer important. It is what Umno needs that matter. Needs come first and wants come later only when you can satisfy your needs. So what Umno needs is to appear still relevant to the Malays as well as to the Muslims. What Umno wants is probably to appear more middle-of-the-road or more centrist. But it cannot appear too 'compromising' if that appearance would only mean the Malays will swing over to PAS. If Umno thought that a 'softer' approach would help MCA, MIC, Gerakan, PPP and so on, then Umno would take this 'softer' approach. That, of course, is what Umno (or some people in Umno) would want to do if the situation permitted that. But Umno can no longer worry about what it wants or what some people in Umno want. It needs to worry about what it needs. And what it needs is to stay in power. And the only way it can stay in power would be with the Malay/Muslim support. Hence Umno must be seen as more Malay and more Muslim than its competitors such as PAS and PKR. In the recent general election, Umno came head-to-head with DAP in only one constituency -- Gelang Patah. Even then it was a choice that Umno rather than DAP made. In all the other seats that Umno won, it was against an opposing Malay candidate. Hence Umno's survival depends on Malay votes, not Chinese votes. And Barisan Nasional's survival, too, depends on the Malay votes that Umno gets, not the Chinese votes for MCA, MIC, Gerakan, PPP, etc. Hence it is what the Malays/Muslims WANT that will become Umno's NEED. And if you can understand the difference between wants and needs you will understand this. So, back to my opening question: going by the just-concluded Umno party election, have we seen any change in Umno? Many of you will say 'no'. I, however, will say 'yes'. Umno has changed. It now realises what it needs. It understands that what it wants does not matter. What it wants will not keep Umno in power. And what Umno needs is to stay in power. And, to stay in power, it needs to give the Malays/Muslims want they want. Sounds complicated, does it not? It is actually not that complicated. Umno needs to change. It needs to know on which side its bread is buttered. And Umno will change to ensure that the Malays see it as the champion of the Malays and Islam. That may be good for Umno. It may even be good for the Malays/Muslims. But that does not mean it is also good for the country. But then since when do politicians do what is good for the country? Even opposition politicians will not do that. It must always be what is good for the party and the future of the party plus the survival of the party.
|
| You are subscribed to email updates from Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |
