Ahad, 26 Mei 2013

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Bitter election creates long-term headache Najib

Posted: 25 May 2013 02:42 PM PDT

Reuters' interviews with 15 polling agents give an indication of why many Malaysians have lost faith in an electoral system that clearly favours the governing coalition.

Reuters

Malaysia's divisive election has left a bitter taste for millions of people that risks creating a long-term problem of legitimacy for Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak's long-ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) coalition.

The outrage was clear at a busy intersection across from one of Kuala Lumpur's fanciest shopping malls, where a huge poster of Najib and his deputy had been defaced — a rare display of public disrespect in the Southeast Asian nation.

One of the scrawled comments poked fun at the unconvincing share of the votes won by Najib's ruling coalition in its May 5 election victory: "47 percent PM," it said.

"If you don't like it, you can leave," mocked another, alluding to a comment by Najib's new home minister that those unhappy with the result — and the electoral system that produced it — should pack up and emigrate.

The tense political atmosphere threatens to prolong policy uncertainty that investors hoped the polls would put to rest, as Najib braces for a possible leadership challenge and the opposition mounts a noisy campaign to contest the result.

By securing 60 percent of parliamentary seats with less than 50 percent of the popular vote, the BN's victory has served to expose starkly the unfairness of a gerrymandered electoral system that is also prone to cheating and bias.

That has galvanized the opposition, led by former deputy prime minister Anwar Ibrahim, into holding a series of big rallies as it refuses to accept the result and prepares legal action to challenge the outcome in nearly 30 close-run seats.

Disgruntled Malaysians have submitted over 220,000 signatures to the White House online petition page, exceeding the number required for a response from President Barack Obama.

In response, divisions have appeared in Umno, the main party in the ruling coalition — in power since independence from Britain in 1957.

Hardliners have urged a crackdown on dissent and blamed minority ethnic Chinese voters for deserting the ruling coalition. That has raised racial tensions in a country whose ethnic Malay majority dominates politics and enjoys special privileges to offset what its leaders see as its disadvantaged position compared to relatively wealthy ethnic Chinese.

Reformers have urged Najib to press ahead with social and economic reforms to blunt the opposition's appeal and address the concerns of discontented young and urban voters. That includes many ethnic Malays who voted for the opposition.

"Every day Najib sees angry Malaysians on the Internet. It is not an easy thing to swallow," said a senior government official who declined to be identified. "There are people in his cabinet asking for a crackdown and there are others asking for him to brandish his reformist side."

The hard liners appeared to gain ground last week when police used the colonial-era Sedition Act to detain three opposition politicians and activists and charged a student with inciting unrest.

The three arrested were later released after a court rejected the police remand order, but could still face charges.

Najib is under pressure from Umno conservatives such as Dr Mahathir Mohamad, who served as prime minister for 22 years, to show a tougher side ahead of a leadership election that could be held as early as August. At least until then, planned reforms such as steps to widen Malaysia's tax base and reduce heavy food and fuel subsidies are likely to stay on hold.

"Najib is not in a very strong position," Mahathir told reporters in Tokyo on Saturday, saying there was a risk that his majority could be weakened further if some ruling coalition politician defected to the opposition.

"When you are concerned about that, the focus on development, economy and all that will be affected. That is Najib's problem."

The opposition has yet to present clear evidence of widespread fraud, but Reuters interviews with 15 polling agents give an indication of why many Malaysians have lost faith in an electoral system that clearly favours the governing coalition.

A majority said that officials of the Election Commission (EC), which is part of the Prime Minister's Department, did not follow procedures or were ill-equipped to oversee the polls.

"Some, not all, officials were not trained enough or did not have the experience to determine what was a spoiled vote," said a counting agent in the Segamat parliamentary seat in southern Johor state, where the BN candidate won by a slim 1,200 majority with 950 votes deemed as spoiled.

"I cannot speculate on whether it was deliberate but there was quite a bit of incompetence," said the agent, who declined to be identified due to the sensitivity of the issue.

Anwar's three-party alliance says it has evidence that BN officials bought votes with cash and transported immigrants granted citizenship on shaky grounds to vote in areas with close races.

While its legal action, due to be filed with courts around the end of May, is unlikely to succeed, it will keep the electoral fraud issue in the spotlight for months ahead.

In Selangor state near Kuala Lumpur, a Reuters examination found at least 2,000 voters had identity cards deemed "dubious" by a commission of inquiry in Sabah. That commission is investigating longstanding allegations that the ruling coalition handed out citizenship for votes to immigrants.

The government denies the fraud claims, accusing the opposition of being sore losers and of trying to stir up an Arab Spring style revolt. The EC says it took a tough approach in eradicating possible fraud in the electoral rolls.

"The opposition did not lose because of election rigging, it lost because they did not get the vote," EC chairman Abdul Aziz Mohd Yusof told Reuters.

Deep concerns over the integrity of Malaysia's elections are nothing new. The government has been shaken by huge street rallies in recent years organized by the influential Bersih movement that has called for sweeping reforms, including a clean-up of the electoral roll and equal access to media.

After a violent police response to a 2011 rally, Najib burnished his reform credentials by rolling back some draconian security laws and introducing limited electoral reforms.

Bersih says those reforms did not go far enough, and is refusing to recognize the election results until it has verified hundreds of allegations of fraud in a "people's tribunal". It has previously highlighted instances of voters over 120 years of age and hundreds of voters living at a single address.

Likely far more influential than fraud are electoral boundaries that have been manipulated over the years to favour the BN. Pro-opposition constituencies in urban areas have up to nine times the number of voters than pro-government seats.

The opposition won just 89 seats in the 222-seat parliament, despite winning more than 51 percent of the vote.

"Najib won on malapportionment rather than his policies to eradicate corruption and reform theeconomy as voters felt he wasn't sincere," said Ooi Kee Beng, Singapore-based deputy director of the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

Najib, the 59-year-old son of a former prime minister, is unlikely to countenance deeper electoral reforms, a move that could be political suicide for the BN.

Reformists within Umno are urging him, however, to ignore calls for a security crackdown and push ahead with steps to tackle corruption and make the ruling coalition more appealing to urban and ethnic Chinese voters who have deserted it.

"Of course the debate on whether we are truly a majority government will go on. But we can gain respect from the people," said Saifuddin Abdullah, a prominent reformist who is a member Umno's Supreme Council.

 

MCA: Asset strippers and plumbers within?

Posted: 25 May 2013 02:07 PM PDT

The latest tension within the party hierarchy on the proposed Matang-Scope affair is a good reason for the re-introduction of the CBOT to the party.

Stanley Koh, FMT

There is a certain hypocrisy and controversy in the latest proposed Matang-Scope merger involving MCA's financial arm, Huaren Holdings Berhad.

The ongoing proposed merger between Scope Industries and Matang Holdings Bhd had minority shareholders crying foul and alleging bad faith over the proposed deal.

Scope Industries is an electrical and electronic manufacturer while Matang Holdings Berhad is a property investment company that was established some 36 years ago.

Huaren Holdings is the largest capital shareholder in Matang, having 10.72 per cent or 12.864 million shares. With 19,984 shareholders, most of them are in Johor (81.48%) followed by Selangor and Malacca.

Spokesman for the minority shareholders Wong Pang Nam, who has since left Matang as financial controller, had claimed that he was kept in the dark and disallowed to be engaged in the negotiation on the proposed merger.

Wong, in his formal written complaints to the relevant authorities, listed five major grievances, the main one over the market value figures on the assets held by Matang Holdings.

According to claims by the minority shareholders, the valuation on the assets (properties) of Matang indicated a shortfall or difference of RM48.45 million, assessed by their respective professional market consultants engaged separately by the disputed parties.

The disputed parties have also engaged their respective solicitors. In a statement through its solicitors, the Matang Board of Directors had denied they acted in bad faith or have failed to discharge their fiduciary duties to the shareholders of Matang.

The prevailing dispute is not only an embarrassment but has put the party leadership into the public's spotlight on the hypocrisy and double standard of its leadership in tackling its own backyard on investment matters when it had frivolously attacked the Pakatan-led Selangor government over the disputed valuation of landed assets of Talam Corporation.

On the political front, besides blaming the party president Dr Chua Soi Lek for the MCA's disastrous electoral showing, his critics are raising questions as to why an outgoing president and his key officials are pursuing investment opportunities for the party's financial arm when they should in fact leave it to the impending new MCA leadership expected to emerge in a few months' time.

This they argued would be consistent to the tough stand undertaken by Chua and his core group when they had similarly challenged and opposed the proposal for a Board of Trustees in 2008 on the ground that outgoing Ong Ka Ting presidential office should leave the matter to the newly elected incoming leadership.

Then, Ka Ting's detractors objected to the proposal for a Central Board of Trustees (CBOT) to manage the party's movable and immovable assets believed to worth some RM1.5 billion at that time.

CBOT's objectives were to ensure more transparency in investment decision-making and a collective accountability in managing the party assets. It would also have diluted the powers of the party president in relation to the management of party assets and custody of the party's funds.

It was not surprising that those who objected the CBOT proposal were backers of Chua.

Introduce CBOT now

Perhaps this is the time again for MCA to bring back the CBOT proposal.

The latest tiff within the party hierarchy on the proposed Matang-Scope affair is a good reason for the re-introduction of the CBOT to the party.

The proposal to set up a central board of trustees would be a positive move to rationalise or prevent the power abuses of the president's office in making investment decision-making.

It would also involve key signatories, including the party treasurer and the secretary general, in managing party assets and party funds.

That will definitely require a major review and overhaul in the party's constitution, specifically referring to the Article 146 and other related provisions pertaining to managing the party's assets.

"Many in the party seemed to have forgotten or perhaps have not learned any lessons over the party's decision to acquire Nanyang Siang Pau group of companies which split the party into two major factions," a party insider said.

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Sarawak DAP to `go rural' in 2016 state election

Posted: 25 May 2013 06:33 PM PDT

(The Sun Daily) - Inspired by its electoral successes in the 2011 state and this month's parliamentary elections, Sarawak DAP is now eyeing the rural seats, particularly the Dayak-majority areas.

"A rural drive committee, which I am asked to lead, will sit down this Tuesday to chart down and plan what we need to do," Sarawak DAP Dayak Consultative Committee chairman Dr John Brian Anthony said today.

He said the drive committee will identify the seats which the party may contest in the 2016 state election.

He said the "go rural" is in line with the party's objective to penetrate the rural areas, instead of just concentrating in the urban and Chinese-dominated constituencies for support.

Brian was assigned to lead the rural drive at the party's state committee meeting here yesterday.

In the 2011 state election, the party won 12 urban seats, while in the recent parliamentary election, it won five urban seats.

After the 2011 state election, the Sarawak DAP proposed to merge with the now defunct Sarawak National Party (SNAP) as a political vehicle to penetrate the rural areas. The proposal, however, was rejected by the SNAP's supreme council.

Meanwhile, Sarawak DAP chairman explained that the party is embarking on the rural drive to prepare for the next state election. He said it is time for the party to spread its influence in the rural areas, especially the Dayak majority seats.

Wong, who is also the State Assemblyman for Bukit Assek, said that the party needs to reach out to the rural areas where he believes that it will be accepted.

On the parliamentary election, Wong said Pakatan Rakyat (PR), comprising the DAP, PKR and PAS, could have won more seats had the election been fair.

"Money politics was rampant, especially in the rural areas," he alleged.

Wong also said that the Sarawak DAP will hold its annual convention on June 9 in Sibu to elect new office bearers.

 

'Anwar using Red Bean Army to incite hatred'

Posted: 25 May 2013 03:05 PM PDT

(NST) - A former PKR leader has claimed that Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim is utilising a band of cyber troopers, known as the Red Bean Army (RBA), in an elaborate effort to incite hatred against the government by spreading falsehoods over social media.

Ex-PKR Youth information bureau secretary Nordin Ahmad told the New Sunday Times Anwar was fully aware of the existence of the RBA, which he claimed had been operating for the past six years.

"Among others, this group is responsible for the vicious rumour circulating online that several polling centres had suffered blackouts during the vote-counting process on May 5, sparking claims of election irregularities."

He also claimed that Anwar had employed the services of the RBA, which is believed to be DAP-funded, after Pakatan was formed in March 2008.

Nordin said the group's subtle but effective propaganda had managed to influence many Malaysians into thinking that the elections were mired with fraud, thus enabling Anwar to stage a series of rallies called Blackout 505.

"When Pakatan appeared to be losing that day, social network sites like Facebook were bombarded with claims of blackouts and many Malaysians chose to believe the rumours. That's the extent of the RBA's influence."

Nordin, who was a strong supporter of Anwar in 1999, explained that the series of alleged blackouts had "conveniently" given Anwar a valid reason not to retire from politics despite promising to do so should the opposition pact fail to win the election.

"Now Anwar says he cannot retire until the Barisan Nasional government and the Election Commission admit that the election was fraudulent in nature. That is why he had been openly supporting the Bersih rallies in the past," he said.

Nordin said the recent Bersih rallies, which called for free and fair elections, had provided Anwar a platform to convince the public that the EC was untrustworthy.

"After the people became certain that the EC's credibility was compromised, all the RBA had to do was to post a picture purportedly showing EC staff counting votes in the dark to ignite the Blackout movement."

However, EC deputy chairman Datuk Wan Ahmad Wan Omar had said on Friday that the photograph was taken prior to the polls.

"They had staged the act even before the elections and spread it on the Internet as a ploy to show that a blackout had occurred.

"The EC staff shown in the photo were not even wearing EC uniforms," he had said.

Nordin pointed out several of the RBA's alleged postings, which included rumours of price hikes, had been proven to be mere hoaxes meant to deceive the public and stir up hatred against the government.

The RBA, which is believed to consist of 3,000 members, is said to be a dedicated network based in Komtar in Penang and Concorde Hotel here.

 

PM Najib: BN has to adapt to remain relevant

Posted: 25 May 2013 02:29 PM PDT

(The Star) - Change is imminent and Barisan Nasional has to adapt if it wants to continue to be relevant, said Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.

He said the political landscape would continue to undergo significant change due to several factors.

"Among the elements that will bring forth changes are urbanisation, better standards of living and access to information and communication technology.

"Nothing is constant. Whether it is quick or not, change will happen," said Najib at a thanksgiving event with members of Pekan Barisan's election machinery here Sunday.

He said that was why the party had to adapt its strategy and change with the times.

"We cannot assume what we used before will be a suitable recipe for the future. We must be open, be pragmatic not dogmatic, solve problems and not deny them. Only if we act this way, Barisan will continue to be relevant," said Najib.

Najib said with each elections, the ruling party would face even tougher challenges.

"The fact that we are in power now does not mean it is a passport to our victory forever," he said.

 

Election Commission promises utmost transparency in redelineation exercise

Posted: 25 May 2013 02:22 PM PDT

Many people are unaware of how the review is conducted and merely believe some political parties which accuse us of not doing our job in accordance with the law.

(The Star) - The Election Commission (EC) will begin a review of the country's electoral boundaries by the end of this year, and has assured the public of "utmost transparency" in the exercise.

EC deputy chairman Datuk Wan Ahmad Wan Omar said the commission would display the draft of its redelineation to the public for registered voters, state governments and local councils to present their views and objections before submitting the final report to the Dewan Rakyat for approval. (see graphic)

"This exercise will be conducted according to the utmost level of transparency before going to Parliament to be debated, so there is no question of us trying to conceal anything from the people," Wan Ahmad said when contacted.

He said that any proposed redelineation of electoral boundaries would require the approval of a simple majority in the 222-seat Dewan Rakyat. The creation of any new constituencies would require two-thirds support.

Asked whether new constituencies would be created, he said: "Logically, there should be more seats because there have been so many new voters since the 12th general election."

According to Article 113(2)(ii) of the Federal Constitution, the redelineation of the constituencies must be made within a period of not less than eight years and not more than 10 years from the completion of the previous review.

Wan Ahmad said the Federal Constitution provided a maximum of two years for the commission to complete the review.

The last redelineation exercise was completed in March 2003, and while the next review should have started in March 2011, the EC decided to postpone it because it was preparing for the 13th general election.

Responding to allegations that the EC would attempt to gerrymander the electoral boundaries to favour Barisan Nasional, Wan Ahmad said: "Many people are unaware of how the review is conducted and merely believe some political parties which accuse us of not doing our job in accordance with the law."

On why small urban constituencies have more voters than large rural seats, Wan Ahmad said it was to ensure that voters in urban, semi-urban and rural constituencies all had reasonable access to services by their elected representatives and local councils.

Citing an example, Wan Ahmad said the parliamentary constituency of Puchong had 107,010 voters but residents enjoy good access to services and the elected representative can travel throughout the constituency within a few hours by car.

The parliamentary constituency of Silam in Sabah, on the other hand, has only 51,662 voters but is remote and is as large as Negri Sembilan and Malacca combined, he added.

"To ensure equal voter weightage, we will have to widen the boundary of Silam even further and this would be unfair to the voters as it would make it even harder for them to get service of their elected representatives and local council who will have even more ground to cover," Wan Ahmad said.

On why Putrajaya, which only has 15,791 voters, was considered a single parliamentary constituency when its neighbouring constituencies had more voters, Wan Ahmad said: "This is because the constituency of Putrajaya was formed not by a redelineation exercise but by an Act of Parliament following the establishment of the administrative capital.

"It is therefore not possible to merge Putrajaya with any of its neighbouring parliamentary constituencies."

Meanwhile, Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim said Pakatan MPs would not support the boundary redelineation exercise although two-thirds majority is not required for the exercise (unless it involves creation of new constituencies).

He alleged that the EC had lost its credibility and was complicit in electoral frauds, and as such, Pakatan did not recognise its legitimacy.

 

Anwar: Yes, we instigate the people

Posted: 25 May 2013 02:13 PM PDT

The opposition leader says that Pakatan Rakyat instigates the people to defend their rights and stand up against 'robbers'.

RK Anand, FMT

Since the 2008 electoral battle, which left the mandibles of Barisan Nasional agape with horror, Malaysia continues to remain trapped in the jaws of election mode.

Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak exacerbated the situation when he kept dropping hints of a snap polls but instead chose to dissolve Parliament upon the completion of his five-year term.

Now after the 13th general election, which saw BN suffering an even bigger setback, the election mood still grips the nation, with the opposition claiming that fraud had prevented it from capturing federal power.

And last night, thousands of vehicles clogged the major arteries here, bringing traffic to a crawl, as more than 50,000 people packed Dataran PJ opposite Amcorp Mall for a pro-Pakatan Rakyat rally.

In the evening, less than 3,000 braved the blistering heat to listen to the various NGO leaders' spirited speeches while volunteers went around collecting donations since the organisers claimed that funds were needed to settle the PA system bill.

Down the road at the Civic Centre, PKR was holding its annual congress while the pathways leading to Dataran PJ were littered with stalls selling opposition merchandise, food and drinks.

But as the sun began to set, droves of people dressed in black came pouring into the field. Soon the blaring of vuvuzelas and rapturous cheers shattered the tranquility of the night.

The familiar sight of party flags as well as banners and placards denouncing the Election Commission, Najib and BN flooded the field.

Despite Home Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi's stern warnings with regard to the gathering, police presence was minimal, with the majority being traffic policemen.

'The government is afraid'

"The government is afraid… the slightest provocation by the police could set the nation on fire and that is why you don't see the FRU and water cannons.

"The people are angry [over the alleged election fraud]… So testing their patience would not be wise and BN knows this," said Kevin Thanaraj, a 28-year-old chemical engineer.

His friend, Darren Teoh, argued that the rallies were getting tiresome and wanted the opposition to take more drastic measures.

"Yes, the people are angry. But the opposition cannot expect us to keep attending rallies, sing songs and hear the same things over and over again for the next five years," said the 34-year-old businessman.

Asked what he would propose, Teoh, without the slightest hesitation, replied: "The time has come to take these protests out of the fields and stadiums… It is time to take them to the streets."

Overhearing the conversation, law student Hafiz Iskandar, 23, cited the famous phrase, "Bila tipu pilihanraya, kita turun jalanraya [When there is cheating in the polls, we must take to the streets]."

"I have attended four rallies so far, and I am tired of blowing the vuvuzela, my mouth hurts. This is not a fun-fair… It is a serious issue and serious action must be taken," he stressed.

READ MORE HERE

 

Pakatan seeks 500,000 volunteers for anti-EC action

Posted: 25 May 2013 11:18 AM PDT

http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/images/uploads/2013/may2013/m_rallya265.jpg 

(TMI) - Pakatan Rakyat (PR) wants to sign up some 500,000 volunteers to protest at the Election Commission (EC) offices until the members resign in favour of replacements who report directly to parliament.

The coalition also wants voters to lodge reports against the EC forusing indelible ink that can be washed off immediately after the May 5 general elections, despite claims that it was introduced to prevent possible double voting.

"The people will move to SPR until SPR is dibubarkan (disbanded). Can?" losing PKR candidate Badrul Hisham Shaharin asked thousands who crowded a rally here organised by 60 NGOs, referring to the EC by its initials in the Malay language.

Emceeing the rally to protest alleged electoral fraud at the Dataran Petaling Jaya in Jalan Timur, Badrul led the crowd in chants of "SPR letak jawatan" (EC resign), singling out EC chairman Tan Sri Abdul Aziz Mohd Yusof and deputy Datuk Wan Ahmad Wan Omar.

PR has blamed alleged electoral fraud for not becoming government although it won the popular vote in Election 2013. It won 89 federal seats against the ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) which took 133 seats in the 222-seat parliament.

The politician better known as CheguBard heads Solidariti Anak Muda Malaysia (SAMM), which is demanding that the EC should not be under the Prime Minister's Department but should report to parliament.

A man holds a sign at the rally. — Picture by Saw Siow Feng

Opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim was the last to address the rally but he also rejected the idea of working with the EC and supported calls that the current EC members resign immediately.

"We will never cooperate or work or engage with such a deceitful Election Commission," the PKR de facto chief said, adding that an "ultimatum" will be issued if they do not resign.

Anwar urged the public to lodge police reports if they had experienced the alleged premature washing-off of the indelible ink from their fingers on voting day.

He said they should do so from tomorrow onwards up until Monday and send copies of the reports to PR.

"This is to show the power and might of the people. We challenge you according to due process. We also respect the rule of law," said Anwar.

Read more at: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/pakatan-seeks-500000-volunteers-for-anti-ec-action/ 

Proposal for BN to be single party could be made in desperation

Posted: 25 May 2013 11:15 AM PDT

https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRWLhUxEj9jccX_L9im4-EmjLLlt2VOrsEzcgfB3eyq07_os9Df

(Bernama) - The suggestion could have been made in a 'desperate' situation with the Chinese community regarding Gerakan as no longer relevant and merely wanted to depend on BN. 
 
Umno vice-president Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi said the suggestion by Gerakan that Barisan Nasional (BN) turns into a single party must be studied very carefully before its implementation. 
 
He said this was because the suggestion could have been made in a 'desperate' situation with the Chinese community regarding Gerakan as no longer relevant and merely wanted to depend on BN. 
 
"I don't think the Umno leadership will agree to the formation of a single party as suggested by the Gerakan party leader," he told reporters here today.
 
He was commenting on the suggestion by Gerakan acting president Datuk Chang Ko Youn who wanted BN to merge into a single party to regain the people's support and to avoid racial problems. 
 
Ahmad Zahid, who is also Home Minister, said what was more important for Gerakan now was to strengthen the party and restructure its organisation.
 
On another matter, he said the ministry, via the police, will work together with the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) and the Malaysian Cyber Security to check immediately the channelling of contents which violate social media law.
 
He said the immediate action was to ensure that information channelled by individuals or cyber groups through the various social media such as the Facebook, Twitter and blogs were transparent and correct. 
 
"The complaints have been on the contents of the social websites and blogs including by the 'Red Bean Army' group which touched on matters contained in the Sedition Act concerning racial sensitivity as well as slanderous contents that exceeded legal principles," he said.
 
Various groups have reportedly urged the government to take stern action against undesired elements in cyber space such as the Red Bean Army which jeopardised harmony between the people of various races in the country.
 
These groups also called on the authorities to amend the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 to prevent slanders and sedition which the cyber troopers concerned were attempting to promote.
 
Ahmad Zahid said the policy on the social media mooted by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak was to provide freedom of expression including the formation of the 'cyber troopers' by political parties and certain groups.
 
However, he said these principles and policy must be respected on the basis of responsibility towards the country and the laws and must not be abused.
 
"This is what we try to avoid. We want the MCMC and the Malaysian Cyber Security to be able to take action, not because of the existence of the cyber troopers such as the 'Red Bean Army' but because of the contents in the social media managed by them," he said. 
 
He said 85% of new media in the country were managed by the opposition in the country without any obstacles imposed by the government.
 
What was puzzling was that the contents highlighted by the groups such as the Red Bean Army were believed to be done by the professional groups and technocrats who were highly educated, he said.
 
Meanwhile, in PUTRAJAYA, Communication and Multimedia Minister Datuk Seri Ahmad Shabery Cheek said the ministry will review all aspects of the law, control and education, pertaining to abuse of the social media.
 
He said the review would also cover the latest technologies which could be utilised to check the abuse.
 
"We will also take a closer look at existing laws to ensure they are adequate to tackle abuse of the social media," he told reporters here today.
 
He said this was because irresponsible parties would endeavour to find means to disseminate negative matters through the social media.
 
On the success of the MCMC in detecting the suspect who insulted the Sultan of Terengganu in his Facebook, he said the commission would continue to intensify efforts across the board.
 
Ahmad Shabery said the commission would always cooperate with the police and other related quarters on issues pertaining to evidence.
 
Earlier, the minister launched a Malaysia Customer Experience Carnival organised by the Customer Relationship Management and Contact Association of Malaysia, in conjunction with the 2013 Putrajaya Youth Festival.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Now, let the polls petitions speak

Posted: 25 May 2013 06:48 PM PDT

The gathering on Saturday has been described as the climax of a series of massive rallies that began at the Kelana Jaya Stadium on May 8, followed by similar events in almost all the states in the peninsula. All these events underscore the sentiments of voters that the reports of electoral irregularities must be thoroughly and impartially examined so that the people's will is accurately reflected in the election results. That point is already unmistakably clear.

fz.com

THE sea of people who turned up on Saturday night at Padang Timur, Petaling Jaya to protest against alleged fraud in the 13th general election have shown that public disquiet over several controversial aspects of the polls is not to be underestimated.
 
The sizeable turnout for the event, despite being the umpteenth public rally since the national vote was held on May 5, is also significant because it comes on the heels of a testy statement by new Home Minister Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi that there would be no more warnings before the authorities act against those who disrupt public order.
 
Furthermore, the rally-goers who flooded the protest venue despite the arrests of several political leaders, activists and peaceful protesters in the preceding days were more concerned to show that they want action on the reported irregularities than they were worried that the assembly was deemed illegal.
 
The gathering on Saturday has been described as the climax of a series of massive rallies that began at the Kelana Jaya Stadium on May 8, followed by similar events in almost all the states in the peninsula. All these events underscore the sentiments of voters that the reports of electoral irregularities must be thoroughly and impartially examined so that the people's will is accurately reflected in the election results. That point is already unmistakably clear.
 
So, enough is enough. The general election is over and the government has been formed. The country must move ahead. Last Wednesday, the Election Commission gazetted the official results of the election. Under Malaysia's laws, the result of an election can only be challenged by an election petition which must be filed within 21 days of the gazettement. So let the aggrieved parties prepare their evidence and file their petitions. Present the cases in the court and let the judiciary play their role in upholding the rule of law. After all, the ultimate avenue for redress in a democracy is the court of law.
 
The street protests and rallies must stop. The constant attempts to whip up the emotions of the people through grandstanding and rhetorical speeches will only tend to create an atmosphere charged with tension and confrontation.
 
Let's focus on building the country instead. There is a great task ahead for all of us to bring positive changes to our national institutions and strengthen governance. Pressing for greater transparency, checking corruption and preventing abuse of power is a responsibility of all Malaysians. These challenges will take systematic work and unwavering commitment to democratic ideals.
 
If the opposition and its allies continue to push the people towards extra-judicial measures that can paralyse the country, they will run the risk of developing "protest fatigue" and may come face-to-face with a public backlash.
 
Should that happen, they will only have themselves to blame for pushing their luck with the people that they claim to represent.
 
 

Chinese politics in Malaysia: What's next?

Posted: 25 May 2013 11:27 AM PDT

http://news.asiaone.com/a1media/news/05May13/20130524.223224_tian.jpg 

A new generation of young Chinese do not want to play it safe. To them, Malaysia is their homeland and they do not see why they should be treated as second-class citizens when it comes to politics. To them, what is wrong in Malaysia is best exemplified by the ethnic-based approach of the BN. 

James Chin, Straits Times 

From the time the Chinese landed in Malaya in large numbers in the 19th and 20th century, the political question has always been the same: What role will the Chinese play in local politics?

During the British colonial era, the answer was simple: no politics. All issues were channelled through a Chinese appointed by the British to act as a liaison person and known as "Kapitan China". All dealings with the Chinese community went through him.

This "no politics" rule was to last a century; many forget that when MCA, the Malayan (now Malaysian) Chinese Association, was established in 1949, its aim was Chinese welfare, not politics.

It was only when Britain granted self-rule in 1955 and when MCA became a member of the Alliance that it became political. Back then, the MCA could count on its Malay partner Umno to treat it as an equal.

The rules were simple: Umno represented the ruling elite Malays while MCA had the funds to keep the Alliance going. MIC, the Malayan (now Malaysian) Indian Congress, came on board to represent the Indians.

But it was clear that Umno-MCA ruled the country. The Malays wanted to control the government while the Chinese wanted the economy - a perfect match. MCA always kept the finance and trade ministries in the first decade of independence.

This cosy relationship expired in the 1969 racial riots. In 1974, the Alliance was reconstituted as Barisan Nasional (BN) and the relationship was fundamentally changed. Umno was now numero uno while MCA and the rest were merely part of the larger coalition.

MCA's status as co-driver ended when its Tun Tan Siew Sin lost the finance portfolio in 1974. Worse, two other Chinese-based parties, Gerakan and Sarawak United Peoples' Party, joined the top table in BN. MCA was no longer the sole voice in the coalition when it came to Chinese affairs.

The New Economic Policy (NEP) caused the Chinese community to ask: Should we support MCA or the opposition Democratic Action Party (DAP), formed in 1964, to show our frustration with NEP's ethnic discriminatory policies?

 

While the Chinese towkays decided that they had to support BN to "do business", ordinary Chinese wanted it both ways.

They essentially split their vote; a smaller portion voted for the MCA/Gerakan while the majority supported the DAP. Another way was to vote for MCA/Gerakan at the state level while giving the parliamentary vote to DAP. This "split vote" tactic lasted more than two decades - until the 2008 General Election.

In that GE, the Chinese, including the usual apathetic middle class, decided it was time for change and threw their support behind DAP. In this year's May 5 polls, the Chinese hardened their attitude and basically wiped out MCA/Gerakan in all 22 Chinese majority constituencies.

And for the first time in Malaysia's political history, Chinese majority constituencies in Sabah and Sarawak voted en bloc for the DAP.

What role will Chinese politics play now in Malaysia?

Having it "both ways" no longer works. A new generation of young Chinese do not want to play it safe. To them, Malaysia is their homeland and they do not see why they should be treated as second-class citizens when it comes to politics. To them, what is wrong in Malaysia is best exemplified by the ethnic-based approach of the BN.

Read more at: http://news.asiaone.com/News/AsiaOne%2BNews/Malaysia/Story/A1Story20130524-425005/2.html 

 

Political rebranding needs guts, ideas

Posted: 25 May 2013 11:14 AM PDT

MULTIRACIAL PARTY: The need to refresh the BN brand is seen to be more vital after the recent polls

Ahmad A. Talib, NST 

A PIECE of news from Phuket, Thailand, has started a fresh round of debate. It started when Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin responded to an idea that Barisan Nasional be developed into a single party.

By this, it means that all 13 component parties in BN should be merged into one national party. Of course, this is not automatic. The components in the national ruling coalition will need to think through this carefully, weighing the pros and cons.

Earlier, Datuk Chang Ko Yuon, the acting president of Gerakan, a BN component which did badly in the May 5 general election, had initiated the idea of a single party union. If adopted, Chang said, BN would become the single biggest multiracial party in the country.

The idea of merging the components is not without merit. Component party leaders had, at some point and privately, broached the idea among themselves. The idea is not totally new in that suggestions for a multiracial party had once been suggested by an Umno leader.

Its founder president, Datuk Onn Jaafar, had suggested that Umno open its doors to non-Malay members, an idea that was strongly objected at that time. This was in the late 1940s, soon after Umno was founded. His idea was seen by Umno members as to be too ahead of the time then.

While the idea didn't gain support, the three major political parties then -- Umno, the Malayan Chinese Association (MCA) and the Malayan Indian Congress (MIC) -- instead formed a coalition representing the three major ethnic groups. Hence, the Alliance.

Today, the need to refresh the brand is seen to be more vital after the recent polls. Even though BN was returned at the federal level, and wrested back Kedah from the opposition, many in the coalition want BN to be given a fresh, new look.

Not just in look and feel, but in substance as well. BN, which replaced the Alliance as more components were added, is a strong brand, having been at the helm of national administration since Merdeka. A rebranding exercise may appear to be the answer, but this has to be holistic, deep and meaningful.

The idea will not get automatic support. As Muhyiddin rightly said, many would agree and many would disagree.

"This is something big, but I think it's important because I don't know if we can sustain our position for a period of say, five years... looking back at the recent elections, support at certain levels was not encouraging despite BN winning and forming the government.

"Many in the BN leadership believe it may be time to review the coalition from the current coalition make-up," said Muhyiddin, the Umno deputy president.

Having a lab to study and debate various aspects of BN is an excellent idea. There really is no harm in having some frank debates on the matter. Various reforms have already been undertaken in the BN components. To continue to be relevant and appealing, more needs to be done though.

There are talents in BN. Fresh ideas can come from younger voices, and there are many. The coalition has tradition but that needs tampering to go with the times.

A rebranding exercise will not be complete without tearing the brand apart and building it up with renewed passion, boldness and clear vision.

Let's see what happens next.

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Redelineation exercise can erode Sabah rights further - BoPi MaFo

Posted: 25 May 2013 02:37 PM PDT

The UK-based Borneo Plight in Malaysia Foundation (BoPiMaFo) is in full support of Upko's stance that the proposed redelineation of electoral boundaries must strictly adhere to the spirit of the Malaysia Agreement.

The Upko Kota Belud Deputy Chief, Ewon Benedick, had stated argued that Sabah and Sarawak are not ready for the one-vote-one-value voting system as both states will see its representation in Parliament reduced to only 15% from the present 25% or 56 of the total 222 seats.
 
"We have 981,814 voters in Sabah and 1,083,972 voters in Sarawak. That makes 15 per cent of the total 13,268,007 voters in Malaysia. If we adopt the one-vote-one-value system, then the people of Sabah and Sarawak must be ready to accept its consequences," said Ewon.
 
BoPi MaFo's President, Daniel John Jambun warned in a statement here that the redelineation exercise can be implemented to further erode Sabah and Sarawak's position as equal partners in the Federation.
 
"Sabahans are very worried that after this exercise Sabah and Sarawak will lose more rights and voice in Parliament," Jambun said. "This is because the exercise can be another federal manipulation with gerrymandering after which Sabah and Sarawak will lose more leverage as Borneo states."
 
He said that consistent with the spirit of the 20 Points, both states should have 34% of the parliamentary seats, and it is for this reason that  Sabah and Sarawak must never surrender any seat -- parliament or state seat -- to any Malayan-based parties, but defend it by all means.
 
"Local opposition based party must unite and fight for their rights consistent with the Malaysia Agreement, the 20 Points, the IGC Report and the Oath Stone, both in letter and spirit. Allowing any seats to be contested by KL parties tantamount to surrendering the rights of the Bornean states.
 
"But as it is now, most of these seats have been robbed by KL-based parties -- Umno, MCA, and Gerakan from BN, and DAP and PKR from PR," he said. "The usual excuse is that the candidates of these parties are still from Sabah, but we can't deny the fact that the parliamentarians who have won on these parties' tickets are subservient to their Peninsular parties.
 
"We have to understand that the very purpose of the 34% seats that Sabah and Sarawak have is not only to represent the two states but to enable us to veto any negative laws that Kuala Lumpur may decide to impose on the Borneo states.
 
"Any seat transferred to a Peninsula-based party will be our serious loss because the parliamentarians will not be able to speak firmly for Sabah, simply because they have to toe the line with their Malayan political bosses.
 
"What we are worried about is that the federal government may be ignorant about Sabah rights as promised as special arrangements in the many documents such as the Malaysia Agreement the 20 Points, the Cobbold Commission Report and even the Oath Stone,"Jambun said. "This worry is strongly founded by the fact the during the recent campaign, the Prime Minister was making statements betraying his ignorance of Sabah history and Sabah rights.
 
"For example he, just like the PKR supremo Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, didn't know that Sabah's autonomy was a special arrangement promised before the formation of Malaysia. If the federal leaders are still this ignorant, or feigning ignorance, then we are bound to lose a lot more with this redelineation exercise.
 
"There is also the real danger that the Barisan Nasional will use this exercise to strengthen its grip on the two states, which it considers to be its fixed deposits. I commend Upko for its strong stance, but it should be consistently fighting for Sabah rights from now on. It should also ask itself up to what limit it will fight for Sabah rights. Will Upko be daring enough to leave BN if the coming redelinenation exercise will not adhere to the spirit of the Malaysia agreement?" Jambun asked.
 
 
Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Is GE-13 over yet?

Posted: 25 May 2013 02:52 PM PDT

I would claim to be among the earliest (if not the earliest) to explain why BN with 47% of the popular votes ended up with 133 or 60% of the 222 federal parliamentary seats. I wrote on that in my 06 May 2013 post The Morning After - Part 1 as follows:

It's also interesting to note than Pakatan has actually won the popular vote by amassing about 51% share of the total votes for GE-13 but been rewarded with only 40% share of federal seats, whilst BN with 47% of total votes garnered 60% of the 222 federal seats  Only once before in Malaysia's political history has a party with the majority of federal seats lost the popular vote, to wit, in 1969.

But this is a result of a combination of 'first past the post' contest combined with gross gerrymandering where in one federal constituency, only 15,000 registered voters can elect a MP to represent them in parliament while in another constituency, nearly 150,000 voters may only vote for also one MP to represent them. The voter in the former has ten times the say in parliament compared to his/her sardine-ized fellow Malaysian in the latter, who is perhaps a 'lesser' Malaysian.

The job of a truly independent impartial Election Commission, which of course doesn't describe the Malaysian EC, would have endeavoured to ensure the universal suffrage of 'one person, one vote' in a democracy, thus dividing the 222 federal constituencies into lots having an average of, say, 60,000 voters in each [some minor variations may be allowed but subject to justifications, etc].

Kapar would then be divided into Kapar East (or North) and Kapar West (or South) represented by 2 MPs while Putrajaya doesn't deserve to be be a federal seat by itself and would be subsumed under another Wilayah constituency or combined with Labuan as one.

But that's only a pipe dream as the ruling party will never allow such impartial professionalism to come about for the EC. Let me share a very closed secret with you - the EC is in fact UMNO's real fixed deposit, not just some pro-UMNO states.

Nonetheless, I would say, notwithstanding suspicions of UMNO's alleged 'creativity' with the alleged help of the EC, Najib has done well not to let the BN lose and, what more, also in regaining BN's control of Kedah and retaining rule in the Silver State, the latter very much to my surprise!

It's a truism of politics that political parties lose elections, not win them.

I believe poor Anwar Ibrahim must have thought he would end up as the PM of a post GE-13 situation when he made a secret peace deal with Najib which was brokered by former Indonesian VP Jusuf Kalla.

The broker had recently emerged to criticize Anwar for reneging on the peace deal by his continuation of post-election protest rallies.

Of course Anwar's fave journalist, Terence Netto, expectedly came up with an article in Malaysiakini on the circumstances an issues surrounding this so-called peace deal which concluded with a one-liner stating "It looks like Anwar has allowed one Bugis, Jusuf Kalla, to get him snookered by another, Najib Razak."

Let me just say I am not at all impressed by Netto's terrible Bugis remarks.

Anwar has no shortage of supporters in this apparent attempt to create a state of political instability, not when his supporters possess the mindset of Myrmidons. They drew heavily on the 51% vs 47% popular votes as indicative of Anwar's right to be PM without even understanding the Westminster first-past-the-post character. And what for - why let the inconvenience of facts interfere with jolly good protests!

They talked about the BN government being a 'minority' government without understanding that its 133 seats out of 222, namely 60% of the total number of parliamentary seats, is not a minority in any way.

Their Myrmidon mindset was apparent when in an (pre election) article about Hishamuddin Hussein escaping unscathed from a private chartered helicopter during is election campaigning, some readers of that news article berated him for misusing RMAF (TUDM) helicopter for his political purpose.

Attack, attack, attack - that's all they can think of. Just right up someone's alley, which to understand more will require you to read The fantasy of Anwar Ibrahim? wakakaka.

In my second post-election post The Morning After - Part 2 I stated very clearly my 5 reasons why Dr Mahathir will NOT oust Najib from being PM despite not winning 2/3 majority in GE-13. In support of this, my personal views, I also wrote on Najib's election achievements in a letter to Malaysiakini which was surprisingly but to my entire delight published as an article titled (wakakaka) Apa lagi UMNO mahu?

In one of RPK's articles I left a comment about my 6th reason which I missed out in The Morning After - Part 2, that currently UMNO has no one apart from Najib to lead UMNO.

Thus I am not surprised at all to hear Dr Mahathir echoing my views in Malaysiakini's Mahathir says Umno has no alternative to Najib.

But our dear Olde Man couldn't resist harping on the Chinese tsunami bullsh*t, stating that national unity will be an uphill task because, according to him, "We are still striving to bring the races together".

He striving to bring the races together? Wakakaka, what an obscenity of such a brazen claim by him, and then some.

He provided the nonsense that because of racial polarization, Najib couldn't obtain Chinese support, conveniently avoiding mention that the Chinese had voted for Malays in PKR and PAS, while Malays also voted for Pakatan. And I feel sorry for those Chinese who had voted for BN to be so insulted by Dr Mahathir.

Though Dr Mahathir was speaking at the Foreign Correspondents' Club in Japan, he was obviously addressing his propaganda to the Heartland faithful. Given that the Malay middle and upper social class and Malay young voters have swung towards Pakatan, his strategy for UMNO would have to be keeping up the rage against the evil bogeymen behind every Hibiscus plant in Malaysia, those bloody Chinese.

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Sabtu, 25 Mei 2013

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


We are what we are today because of what happened in the past (part 1)

Posted: 24 May 2013 05:19 PM PDT

This was a complication that the British did not need. More than 80% of the businesses, tin mines, estates, and so on, in Malaya belonged to the British and 30% of Britain's economy -- which had been practically bankrupted by the war -- depended on Malaya. Hence the last thing the British wanted was another India-Pakistan type of conflict in Malaya.

THE CORRIDORS OF POWER

Raja Petra Kamarudin

Since the 2008 general election, the favourite 'war cry' was: the Malays must wake up. They were referring to the Hindraf rally of November 2007, of course, and the Bersih (1.0) rally about two weeks before that -- which for the first time since the rise of the Reformasi movement in September 1998 a rally managed to attract a reasonable level of non-Malay support.

This was followed by the most impressive March 2008 general election result a few months later (for the opposition, that is), which saw Penang, Perak and Selangor fall to the opposition, and which would not have been possible purely on Malay votes alone and unless the non-Malays too voted opposition.

Actually, for a long time before 2007-2008, the Malays had been saying that the non-Malays must wake up. The Malays realised that kicking out Umno and Barisan Nasional would be impossible unless the non-Malays also joined the 'resistance movement'. However, in the past, the non-Malays have always given many reasons as to why they could not join the Malays to kick out the ruling party.

To understand Malaysian elections you need to analyse all the general elections since 1959 and the municipal elections four years before that in 1955 plus understand why and how Malaya was given independence or Merdeka in 1957.

Without sounding as if I am repeating myself here, when the Japanese surrendered in 1945 and Britain 'repossessed' Malaya, the British tried to 'restructure' the country. Part of this restructuring exercise was to create the Malayan Union whereby the feudal system would be eroded somewhat and the Monarchs whom the Malays call 'Raja-Raja Melayu' would lose some of their powers.

Now, the normal 'Malay-in-the-street' or Malay layman did not have any strong opinions on the matter. However, the Malay elite plus the Malays from the intellectual community could not agree to this move. They felt that to erode the feudal system plus to reduce the powers of the Monarchy meant that the Malays would lose their status as the Tuans (Lords) of the land. Thus was born the concept of Ketuanan Melayu or Malays as the Lords of the Land.

The Chinese and Indians were not too bothered about what was going on while the natives of East Malaysia were not involved since this was a Malayan issue and East Malaysia was not part of Malaya. The majority of the Chinese and Indians were not citizens anyway so it did not matter what the British wanted to do to Malaya since any system was not going to change the lot of the Chinese and Indians in any way.

The Malays did not have a political movement in which to resist the British. They did have many associations, societies and movements but these were very specific to the group that they represented. What they needed was a national movement so that the hundreds of associations, societies and movements could be combined into one national organisation.

And this was what triggered the birth of this national coalition called the United Malays National Organisation or Umno, a coalition of many groupings and sub-groupings. Hence Umno, in a way, was a coalition rather than a political party. In fact, Umno was not even called a political party, not with a name like United Malays National Organisation. Nevertheless, Umno was the new platform to unite the many smaller groupings so that the Malays could talk to the British as one voice.

If you were to look at the old black-and-white photographs of the Umno demonstrations of 1946 you can see that the people in the demonstration were not fishermen and farmers. From their dressing it is clear that these people were from the elite community. Back in 1946, only those from the elite community dressed like that.

In short, Umno was not a people's movement as such but an elitist movement of Malays who were related or linked to the palace plus Malays who had gone to school and had received an education. And, more importantly, Umno was not set up as the platform to fight for independence or Merdeka but to resist the Malayan Union. Independence or Merdeka was never the endgame or in the minds of the Malays back in 1946 when Umno was born.

Three months after that, the Malayan Indian Congress or MIC was formed followed by the Malayan Chinese Association or MCA three years later.

MIC was called the Malayan Indian Congress because it was strongly influenced by the Indian National Congress or INC of India (or Congress party for short) that was formed about 60 years earlier. MIC, however, did not get much Indian support especially when its second President, Budh Singh, who was a Communist, opposed the Malayan Union. The Malayan Indians were more interested in matters back home in India than about matters in Malaya.

And MCA, too, was more concerned about raising money to support the Kuomintang that was fighting the Communists in China than about Malayan politics. Hence both MIC and MCA did not really have any solidarity with Umno.

It was not until some MCA leaders from Melaka travelled to London to raise the issue of independence with the British that Umno began to have similar thoughts. The Umno leaders also made a trip to London to meet the British to talk about Merdeka but only after the Chinese had first raised the issue. So now it looked like two different groups wanted to talk about Merdeka, which would have complicated matters.

It must be noted that the British already had a very bad experience in India in 1947 when India was partitioned and which resulted in an estimated one million deaths. So are we going to also see Malaya partitioned into 'Malay Malaya' and 'Chinese Malaya'? What will happen to the Indians then? Will they all be sent back to India?

This was a complication that the British did not need. More than 80% of the businesses, tin mines, estates, and so on, in Malaya belonged to the British and 30% of Britain's economy -- which had been practically bankrupted by the war -- depended on Malaya. Hence the last thing the British wanted was another India-Pakistan type of conflict in Malaya.

TO BE CONTINUED

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved