Selasa, 18 Disember 2012

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


SAPP-Pakatan: It just ain’t working out

Posted: 17 Dec 2012 02:41 PM PST

SAPP president Yong Teck Lee is adamant that the party must stick to its principle that a Sabah-based party must take the majority of the state assembly seats.

Calvin Kabaron, FMT

KOTA KINABALU: Mistrust and uncertainty within Sabah's opposition politics could well indeed translate into a free-for-all fight at the coming general election.

Yesterday Sabah Progressive Party (SAPP) supreme council met in Likas near here and snippets leaked out indicated that things may not be going too well with its alliance with PKR-led Pakatan Rakyat.

Insider information noted that party president Yong Teck Lee implied that if things don't work out as it should, then SAPP could well be on a collision course with its newly-found allies PKR and DAP in many seats.

The former Barisan Nasional (BN) chief minister told his comrades that SAPP must stick to its "principle" that a local-based party must take the majority of the state assembly seats, something that PKR's Anwar Ibrahim had signaled to SAPP at one time that Pakatan would be willing to concede or consider.

But, to many observers here, that was typical of Anwar's trademark style which was to entice Yong and SAPP to come aboard the Pakatan ship first.

One SAPP leader told FMT that at yesterday's meeting Yong appeared adamant to go for majority state seats (60 in Sabah) purely on what he termed as "on the principle of Sabah autonomy".

"That means he may even defy PKR's seat 'arrangement' with SAPP if the former repudiate," he said.

PKR, emboldened by its recent coup of two BN's defector parliamentarians in Wilfred Bumburing and Lajim Ukin, is unlikely to concede much to Yong and Chinese-based SAPP.

"Yong anticipates that where PKR would not contest (in Sabah), DAP would do so to take on SAPP just to frustrate SAPP and that Anwar could not do anything about it," the SAPP leader stressed.

Trouble in STAR

Meanwhile, over the weekend, another pivotal Sabah opposition leader, Jeffrey Kitingan, told the local press that he was scheduled to meet Yong today.

He however cautioned supporters not to expect too much from the meeting.

The State Reform Party (STAR) he leads in Sabah, while still open to work a minimum seat arrangement with SAPP, is actually poised to leave SAPP out after Yong made his own deals with Anwar on Sabah's seats.

As of yesterday, an insider in STAR claimed that majority of its leaders, more than half are young Turks and many are green horns in politics, wanted their leader to be decisive instead of dragging until last minute to decide on seats and candidates.

Many within STAR complained that Jeffrey's dragging his feet on candidacy and playing "openness" with other players had denied the party a more rigorous campaigning at the grassroots level.

"It would be different if you know you are the candidate already, we can go straight away from house-to-house campaign already.

"But with uncertainty, many potential candidates just shy away from too much promotion which is bad for the party which is already lacking in funds," said one potential candidate who requested anonymity.

He alleged some very good potential candidates from STAR have yet to resign from their employment jobs, fearing they would not be fielded in the end.

READ MORE HERE

 

‘Frightened Musa wants to save his skin’

Posted: 17 Dec 2012 02:09 PM PST

Prominent lawyer Rosli Dahlan, who has dealt with Musa Hassan first hand, has an answer as to why the ex-IGP is reappearing in the media spotlight, flanked by PKR members. 

Anisah Shukry, FMT

Musa Hassan's sudden criticism of the government and the police is an attempt to reinvent his image and cosy up to Pakatan Rakyat out of fear that should the Barisan Nasional government fall, his head will be the first to roll, according to lawyer Rosli Dahlan.

The prominent lawyer, who previously represented Musa's rival, ex CCID chief Ramli Yusuff, is currently pursuing a legal suit against Utusan Malaysia and 16 others in a case related to the former inspector-general of police's purported links with underworld figures.

As such, Rosli has first hand experience with Musa and has nothing but scorn for the ex top-cop as well as his recent revelations of alleged ministerial interference and criminal elements in the police.

"Musa is a manipulator, opportunist and a liar. He is a principal lecturer at UiTM in media warfare, so we should not be surprised that he is using the media to reinvent his image," he told FMT.

"Clearly, Musa knows he will be in trouble if Pakatan forms the next government," added Rosli.

Former Kuala Lumpur CID chief Mat Zain previously accused Musa of fabricating evidence in Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim's 1998 black eye Incident.

Rosli said Musa was also the investigating officer in Anwar's first sodomy charge and the incumbent IGP when the second sodomy charge was "orchestrated".

"So it is no surprise that he now becomes a turncoat, against the government that gave him his mercurial rise to be IGP and enjoyed two extensions by contract in order to save his own skin," he added.

Musa appeared at a press conference late last month with several NGO leaders linked to the opposition, fuelling speculation that he would be joining Pakatan Rakyat soon.

The press briefing was organised by a new NGO called the Malaysian Crime Watch Task, or MyWatch, and was the setting for which Musa dropped the bombshell that ministers allegedly meddled in police investigations.

Anwar later said that PKR was open to Musa joining them if he wished to do so, although Musa had firmly stated that he would remain neutral.

'Leopard does not change its spots'

Commenting on this, Rosli said: "PKR must not forget the history of this man; a leopard does not change its spots."

"To me, for PKR to be a credible opposition, it shouldn't use characters who are known to have manipulated the system and fabricated evidence," he added.

Rosli recounted that the ex-IGP's own aide, ASP Noor Azizul Rahim Taharim, had called Musa a "pengkhianat" (traitor) in a 2009 statutory declaration (SD).

The document accused Musa of a slew of wrongdoings during his tenure and exposed how Musa had allegedly manipulated the police succession hierarchy with his associate, an underworld figure known as BK Tan, as well as silencing critics with transfers and trumped up charges.

"Never before in the history of this country has an active serving IGP faced such an accusation from his own ADC (aide de camp)," said Rosli.

"As for being a liar, it is not what I say, but the various people who have dealt with Musa including the damning judgment by Sessions Judge Supang Lian of the Kota Kinabalu court," he added.

Rosli was referring to the 2007 case levelled by Musa against Ramli. Musa had accused Ramli of abusing his power in using a police Cessna plane for his personal benefit. However, the judge found that Ramli was in full uniform and was escorted by four other uniformed police personnel while conducting a border surveillance patrol.

"If the prosecution was serious about finding out the truth, they should have called the two police pilots as the first and second witnesses. Instead, the pilots were called close to the end of the trial. DPP Kevin Morais also amended the charge several times. That is how insidious these people are," added Rosli.

Ramli was eventually acquitted without his defence being called.

When Musa became the final witness for the prosecution in order to rebut the other police witnesses who had given evidence supporting Ramli, the judge delivered the following stinging judgment against Musa:

"[Musa's] evidence is unreliable and is to be disregarded and whatever he says in court lends to his discredit. I am in total agreement with the case for the defence that this lack of support of the evidence of [Musa] on this point lends to his discredit… I found however that the evidence of [Musa] on this to be unreliable and to be disregarded."

According to Rosli that was a polite way of calling an active serving IGP a liar.

READ MORE HERE

 

Rise of DAP’s young Turks

Posted: 15 Dec 2012 04:18 PM PST

The Lim family is still on top but the DAP election saw the young Turks pushing the old guards down the rungs and even out of the 20-seat central executive committee (CEC).

Anwar had also skipped the PAS muktamar last month and the whispers of tensions over the issue of seat allocations between the three parties are getting louder. PKR vice-president Datuk Mansor Othman urged reporters not to read too much into it even though this is Anwar's homestate and his party will need the DAP's clout to win their seats in the general election.

Joceline Tan, The Star

THE emcee had said the CEC election result would be announced at about 6.30pm. An hour later, everyone was still waiting.

The soft music that had been playing in the background was switched up and Jelutong MP Jeff Ooi's melodic voice came on.

Ooi was staging a one-man concert from the Ubah truck parked outside the sports complex where the DAP congress was taking place.

The man is wasting his time in politics. He should have become a pop singer he would have made more money and become even more famous than he already is.

Everyone burst out laughing when Ooi stopped singing to ask whether the election results were in.

The top DAP leaders had already come in from the tea break and were hanging about near the front of the stage, chatting and waiting.

At about 8pm, Karpal Singh and his two sons arrived and soon after, the results came.

It was a wonder that Karpal managed to look so calm. He must have had some inkling of the outcome.

The outspoken lawyer had made a fantastic comeback to the No 3 spot from his previous 9th spot.

It was a clear signal that delegates want him to continue speaking out on issues like hudud and the encroachment of PAS policies on non-Muslim lifestyles.

Lim Kit Siang, despite his lack of a party post, remains the most well regarded person in the party followed by Guan Eng.

The father-and-son pair will have to factor in what Karpal says, including his view on the one-man, one-seat policy in the general election.

The outcome was described by some as a transition team.

The young Turks are on the rise, with Chong Chieng Jen and Anthony Loke surging into the top five.

The old guards like Tan Kok Wai, Fong Kui Lun and Ngeh Koo Ham slipped down the rungs as younger faces like Vincent Wu, Gobind Singh Deo and Tony Pua moved up.

The three-way fight in Selangor saw Datuk Teng Chang Khim emerging victorious, moving from No 14 to the prestigious top 10.

Rival Teresa Kok slipped from No 6 to No 18 while another rival Ronnie Liu lost.

The power structure in Selangor has changed dramatically.

"They are the new generation, you can ask for their vote but you cannot tell them how to vote," said a Perak leader pointing to the delegates.

The delegates put Kit Siang right on top to show their appreciation while endorsing Guan Eng's quest to defend Penang.

Another independent voice Dr Boo Cheng Hau moved up two slots from No 19 to No 17.

The inclusion of Teng and Dr Boo in the CEC means that the party wants people who dare to question the leadership.

The DAP transition is in place and the next echelon of leaders are up there.

The leaders know the veterans have felt left out of the party's post-2008 success and these old-timers were brought on stage to receive mementos in the shape of the Penang ferry.

The party is telling them they are still appreciated.

It was a good move because these old soldiers will have to work the ground like never before in the general election.

Size matters in politics and the opening event was jam-packed with delegates and observers, all of them in an upbeat mood.

But the massive show of numbers could not hide the glaring absence of the man whom DAP is promoting as their next prime minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim. Neither Anwar nor his wife and PKR president Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail was present.

Pakatan Rakyat's other prime minister candidate Datuk Seri Hadi Awang was also missing. PAS vice-president Datuk Mahfuz Omar and secretary-general Datuk Mustafa Ali came instead.

PAS deputy president Mohamed Sabu popped in after lunch and received a big hug from Guan Eng. PKR was represented by Wanita chief Zuraidah Kamaruddin.

Anwar had also skipped the PAS muktamar last month and the whispers of tensions over the issue of seat allocations between the three parties are getting louder.

PKR vice-president Datuk Mansor Othman urged reporters not to read too much into it even though this is Anwar's homestate and his party will need the DAP's clout to win their seats in the general election.

The other glaring aspect was DAP's attempt to ignore the elephant in the room; the party is clearly afraid to take a strong stand on the recent incidents of moral policing on non-Muslims in Kelantan.

The furthest that Guan Eng went was to ask PAS to withdraw the summonses that had been issued against the hair salons.

Guan Eng's speech ran on for almost 120 minutes mainly because he spoke in English, Bahasa Malaysia and Chinese.

Earlier this month, he had poked fun at the tears and emotion that flowed during the Umno general assembly.

But now it was he who was all choked up as he vowed to stand up against Umno and to fight for equality of the races.

His cheeks were wet and he could be seen wiping his nose.

Some of the delegates looked on a little shocked but fortunately the mood lightened up after the speech when the party's highly entertaining video titled "Ubah Rocket Style", which showed DAP leaders doing the Gangnam Style, was unveiled.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Bar Council: Give us more evidence

Posted: 18 Dec 2012 04:23 AM PST

Bar Council president Lim Chee Wee has urged anyone with more facts and proof to come forward in regard to the 'Tan Sri lawyer' and son who have been accused of helping draft the SD2. 

Teoh El Sen, FMT

The Bar Council has expressed its concern over new developments that revealed that a senior lawyer and his son were allegedly behind the drafting of the second statutory declaration (SD2) by private investigator P Balasubramaniam.

(The SD2 reversed the first statutory declaration which implicated Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak in the murder of the Mongolioan national Altantuya Shaariibuu.)

However, the Bar Council stopped short of declaring that it will immediately launch an investigation, saying that more facts and evidence are needed before the disciplinary board can act.

"The Bar Council views these circumstances seriously and invites those who have the facts and evidence to come forward openly and officially and, if there is compelling evidence of any professional misconduct, to lodge such evidence together with a complaint immediately with the disciplinary board," its president Lim Chee Wee said.

The disciplinary board is an independent body statutorily established and tasked with the responsibility of investigating professional conduct and disciplining of advocates and solicitors.

Lim said that while investigation, if there is any, will be rightfully conducted by the disciplinary board, the Bar Council "[will] work together" with the board.

"As it stands now, the facts are not clear. We look at what Deepak Jaikishan and Balasubramaniam have said: have they ever alleged that the lawyer represented the private investigator? We have to go through this with a forensic eye," he said

Lim said that while the Bar is closely monitoring the situation, he lamented that until today, the identities of the said lawyer (s) have not been established, as a video recording of an interview with Deepak bleeped out the names.

Unnecessary speculation

"We have also received yesterday a letter from [lawyer-activist] Haris Ibrahim requesting the Bar Council to launch an investigation to identify the lawyer (s) concerned, when it appears to us that Haris may know the identity of these lawyers."

"This has caused unnecessary speculation and confusion," he added.

Lim also said that the most important person in a complaint against a legal practitioner should be the victim himself, but the apparent "victim" has yet to come forward.

"Who is the victim here? Has the victim Balasubramaniam raised concerns about anything at this point? We need more facts, either from the victim or somebody else."

"People must come forward with the facts. I'm not going on a fishing expedition… knocking on people's office or doors for facts. This is not a case of clients money disappearing.

"This information is revealed by someone whose own background is cause for concern," said Lim, referring to Deepak.

Asked if the Bar Council is reluctant to act, he said: "We cannot say we are not doing anything. Those with more facts, come forward. We will do what is necessary. Even at this time, we will look into this further if necessary," he said.

Lim said the disciplinary board's job is to determine if there is cause for investigation, but this process will not be disclosed to the public and statements will only come from the Bar Council on the matter.

READ MORE HERE

 

A-G’s Chambers freezes AES summons cases for now

Posted: 17 Dec 2012 10:20 PM PST

http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/images/uploads/2012/december2012/18/aes1812.jpg 

(The Malaysian Insider) - The Attorney-General's Chambers (A-GC) has ordered a halt to all court proceedings related to summonses issued under the Automated Enforcement System (AES) to study legal issues that have been raised, it said today.

 

The A-GC statement came today after an outcry over the AES which has issued nearly 300,000 summonses since it began last September 23.

"In view of the concerns made by certain quarters on the law and other technicalities, the AGC has decided to look into this matter and directed that all proceedings are to be withheld until the concerns have been addressed.

"A decision will be made within the next few days on the above-mentioned issues," the AGC said in a statement today.

The statement, however, added that the AES summonses issued by the Road Transport Department were still valid.

"In respect of the four AES summons cases that have been discharged not amounting to an acquittal, the AGC will re-study them and will be re-registered if they warrant any prosecution," it added.

The Malaysian Insider had reported this morning that Putrajaya was considering holding off the implementation of the system as it appeared to duplicate police speed traps along the highways.

Read more at: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/a-gs-chambers-freezes-aes-summons-cases-for-now/ 

More than one in three Malaysians to get cash handouts on January 15

Posted: 17 Dec 2012 10:17 PM PST

http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/images/uploads/logomix2/br1m.jpg 

(The Malaysian Insider) - About 12 million Malaysians, or more than one in three citizens, will receive cash handouts from the government on January 15, in a major boost for barisan Nasional (BN) ahead of elections expected soon after that.

Sin Chew Daily reported today that the estimated 12 million people will receive the cash through the Bantuan Rakyat 1 Malaysia (BR1M) and student aid schemes.

BR1M recipients will get handouts of RM500, while RM100 will be given to students from Standard One to Form Five.

Handouts worth RM250 will also be given out to those 21-year-old-and-above who are single and who earn less than RM2000 a month.

Read more at: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/more-than-one-in-three-malaysians-to-get-cash-handouts-on-january-15/ 

Kapar MP’s aide murdered

Posted: 17 Dec 2012 04:00 PM PST

Police say C Nachimuthu, 53, was involved in a quarrel with the man who killed him but a motive has yet to be established

Teoh El Sen and K Pragalath, FMT

An aide to Kapar MP S Manikavasagam was bludgeoned to death today about a kilometre from his home.

C Nachimuthu, 53, was riding his motorcycle this morning when the suspect hit him on the head with a gardening tool.

Bleeding from his wounds, he died on the spot. The suspect was arrested soon after. Nachimuthu had been Manikavasagam's personal assistant and driver for the past two years.

He lived in Puncak Alam, Shah Alam and was also the Sri Kayangan Resident Association's chairman. He is married with four children.

According to Manikavasagam (photo), there were previous reports lodged by Nachimuthu against the suspect.

"Nachimuthu had lodged about four police reports but they did not take any action. I want the suspect charged under section 302 of the Penal Code for murder," said the PKR leader.

Motive yet to extablished

Nachimuthu's body is currently at the Klang general hospital, said Manikavasagam. A post mortem is expected to be done today.

Meanwhile, a police source close to the investigations told FMT that the suspect was a 43-year-old gardener and was arrested in the area within half an hour.

He said that initial investigations revealed that the two men were involved in a quarrel earlier this morning.

"Insults and vulgarities were apparently hurled. But we're still trying to ascertain the cause of the fight," said the source, who did not rule out a possible political motive.

Police said the suspect has confessed to the crime.

 

Ariffin’s remarks inaccurate, says PSC

Posted: 17 Dec 2012 03:11 PM PST

(The Star) - The Public Service Commission (PSC) has chided newly appointed DAP vice-chairman Dr Ariffin S.M. Omar for allegedly saying that corruption could be wiped out from the public service if it was not monopolised by one race.

News portal AntaraPos.com quoted Dr Ariffin as proposing a massive reshuffle in the police and civil service if Pakatan Rakyat took control of Putrajaya in the coming general election.

He was reported to have said at the recent party congress that corruption could be eradicated more effectively if the two sectors were not dominated by the Malays.

PSC chairman Tan Sri Mahmood Adam brushed off Dr Ariffin's re-marks as "inaccurate".

"Don't just look at the surface, this is a war of perception we have to fight," Mahmood said at the PSC office here yesterday.

He said the commission had embarked on a campaign to encourage more non-Malays to join the civil service and the police force.

"For about seven months, we have worked with various non-governmental organisations, as well as Chinese and Indian associations, and we have seen changes.

"There has been an increase in the number of non-Malays (interested in the civil sector) this year, probably more than five times (the previous trend)," Mahmood said, adding that he would unveil the figures next week.

He said the Malays made up the dominant group in the civil service because out of 1.2 million job applications received each year, 80% were from them.

 

Zainuddin article on Habibie improper and unethical, says Indonesian president

Posted: 17 Dec 2012 02:24 PM PST

(Bernama) - Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono said the article written by former Malaysian Information Minister Tan Sri Zainuddin Maidin on Indonesia's third President BJ Habibie was improper and unethical.

The article, he said, could jeopardise the good ties between Indonesia and Malaysia. 

"We have worked it out, the foreign minister will take diplomatic notes both here and in Kuala Lumpur," Yudhoyono (picture) was quoted by Antara news agency as published by English daily the Jakarta Post today. 

Yudhoyono, who is leaving today for Malaysia to attend the annual consultation, the highest forum in Malaysia-Indonesia in bilateral ties, said Indonesia would raise the issues of mutual respect and tolerance during the meeting so that similar incidents would not recur to obstruct friendship between both countries. 

Zainuddin's article is considered by many in Indonesia as offensive towards Habibie. 

Meanwhile, presidential spokesman Teuku Faizasyah said the president would also raise priority issues including protection for Indonesians working in Malaysia, the boundary, trade and investment at the meeting. 

Yudhoyono will have a private, face-to-face meeting with Najib before leading the Indonesian delegation at the ninth annual consultation. 

Universiti Utara Malaysia is scheduled to confer the president with an honorary Doctor of Philosophy in Leadership of Peace.

 

No tussle in Sungai Siput, says PSM

Posted: 17 Dec 2012 02:06 PM PST

But the clenched fist logo stays, says secretary general Arutchelvan 

K Pragalath, FMT

Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM) has denied that it is tussling with PKR over the Sungai Siput parliament seat.

Responding to a news report that a three-corner fight was in the making in the constituency, PSM secretary general S Arutchelvan released a press statement today saying there was no friction between said his party and PKR.

The report, which FMT published yesterday, quoted a PKR insider as saying his party might field its own candidate for the seat because PSM was insisting on using its own logo in the campaign for the coming election.

"On the ground, there is no real tussle," Arutchelvan said. "People want to see change and PSM is committed to that agenda."

He added that PSM would support Pakatan Rakyat candidates in all seats except the four that it is contesting—Sungai Siput and the state constituencies of Jelapang in Perak and Kota Damansara and Semenyih in Selangor.

"We hope that PR will not force three-corner fights for these seats," he said, adding that negotiations to avoid this were ongoing.

The current MP for Sungai Siput is PSM's Dr D Michael Jeyakumar. He contested as a PKR candidate in 2008 and beat then MIC president S Samy Vellu.

The PKR insider said yesterday that PSM's logo, which features a clenched left fist, would put off Malay voters.

Arutchelvan rejected claims that voters would reject PSM because of its left-leaning ideology and defended the party's use of its logo in campaigning.

He said PSM had been promoting the logo since its inception in 1998 even though it was registered only in 2008.

"The fist is now a hit among the young people," he added.

"PSM will agree to use a common Pakatan logo if there is one. If there is none, it should be only fair for PSM to use its own logo."

 

Bumburing and Jeffrey in face-off

Posted: 17 Dec 2012 12:44 PM PST

http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Wilfred-Bumburing-dan-Jeffrey-Kitingan.jpg 

(Free Malaysia Today) - STAR is being accused of splitting the Kadazan, Dusun, Murul (KDM) communities' votes in Sabah and handing BN a measure of confidence that it can prolong its hold.

Two Kadazandusun opposition leaders here are going toe-to-toe over who has the more credible solution to what they claim is the great rip-off of Sabah and its people.

Maverick Sabah politician Jeffrey Kitingan has taken a hard line on 'Malayan' parties and has accused opposition leaders of being turncoats no better than the all-dominating Barisan Nasional ruling coalition they are castigating for rejecting his Borneo agenda that focuses exclusively on the rights of Sabah and Sarawak.

On the other side is Wilfred Bumburing, a MP who has turned independent and is leading Angkatan Perubahan Sabah (APS), a opposition-friendly grouping that sees Jeffrey's brand of Borneo-centric politics as out of touch with reality.

APS has not taken Jeffrey's State Reform Party (STAR) all-or-nothing, Sabah for Sabahans and accusations of pandering to 'Malayan' parties lightly in its battle to unite voters in the state under one opposition grouping.

Using Jeffrey's own words against him, the APS publicity machine went to work to show how Sabah has always been ruled by the doctrine of divide and rule used by the Barisan Nasional and that the STAR leader's Borneo agenda was like minded.

Making the case against Jeffrey, who on Sunday walloped rival Sabah opposition leaders as traitors, was APS information chief Lesaya Lopog Sorudim.

Sorudim told FMT today that Kitingan was only making matters worse by not making common cause with the Malayan-based opposition to oust the Umno-led BN coalition.

He said that by going its own route, STAR is disregarding the fact that it is also splitting the crucial votes of the Kadazan, Dusun, Murut (KDM) communities of Sabah and handing the BN a measure of confidence that it can prolong its hold on power through the coming general election.

He said that contrary to what the STAR leader was saying, Bumburing's movement was established with the aim of restoring the dignity, sovereignty and independence of Sabah as a state within the Federation of Malaysia.

"So when Bumburing held that the natives, especially the KDM community should reject STAR's strategy he was basing his opinion on facts," Sorudim said.

Pakatan manifesto not Malaya Agenda

Last week STAR deputy chairman Daniel John Jambun had lashed out at Bumburing for saying that the natives of Sabah should not pin their hopes on his party, calling it "patently mischievous, misconceived and misleading".

Jambun added that "it should be condemned in no uncertain terms by all right-thinking Sabahans, deplored and exposed as the mother of all lies by a political has-been who shamelessly continues to be a stooge of the local proxies of the peninsular masters."

Sorudim pointed out that there was nothing 'mischievous, misconceived or misleading' when Bumburing made the statement which he said was reflective of the sentiment of the majority of the natives.

"Who would pin their hopes on an organisation that is bent on splitting the Sabah into five regions and moving the state capital from Kota Kinabalu to Keningau should they come to power," Sorudim said of a controversial statement made by Jeffrey which the later claimed was taken out of context. 

Read more at: http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2012/12/18/bumburing-and-jeffrey-in-face-off/ 

Indonesia-Malaysia Border Spat Lingers

Posted: 17 Dec 2012 12:42 PM PST

http://www.kalimantantours.com/Borneomapkalimantan.jpg 

(Jakarta Globe) - If the Malaysian claim prevailed, that would result in Indonesia losing 4,800 hectares of land. 

Balikpapan, East Kalimantan. A senior military officer in East Kalimantan revealed on Sunday that the Indonesian and Malaysian governments were still haggling over the exact location of their shared border along five points between Nunukan district and Sabah state. 

Brig. Gen. Wiyarto, chief of staff at the Mulawarman Military Command, which oversees military operations across East and South Kalimantan, said that the points of contention included the location of the border across the Sinapad and Sumantipal rivers, as well as across Sebatik Island. 

Wiyarto said the issue with the Sinapad was that a small section of the river, which flows from west to east, dipped south. Malaysian authorities, he said, deemed the entire river to fall within their territory, whereas Indonesian authorities argued that the southern section crossed over into Indonesian territory. 

He added that if the Malaysian claim prevailed, that would result in Indonesia losing 4,800 hectares of land. 

"This issue still hasn't been resolved, but we have strong grounds for our claims based on GPS data," he said. 

The standoff over the Sumantipal River is similar in nature, with Wiyarto saying that Malaysia wanted to declare the entire river as falling within its territory. He said that this would result in the commonly agreed-on border being pushed south, farther into Indonesian territory. 

On Sebatik island, where the border is simply marked by a series of concrete blocks and there are no border posts set up by either country, the border issue has been around for almost a century. 

Wiyarto said that the currently recognized border, drawn up in 1913 by the Netherlands and Britain — the respective colonial powers in Indonesia and Malaysia at the time — was no longer applicable because of the spread of communities from both countries throughout the island. 

"We're in constant communication with the Malaysian authorities on resolving all these border questions," he said. "Our hope is that we can find a mutually agreeable solution to end all the bickering. In the meantime, we will continue to guard the border region for illegal logging, fishing and drug and human trafficking."

Explain Umno leaders’ claims, DCM Yee told

Posted: 17 Dec 2012 12:40 PM PST

http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Dr-Yee-Moh-Chai-300x202.jpg 

(Free Malaysia Today) - Allegations of a group enticing voters in Sepanggar to switch their voting address to Kota Kinabalu have been linked to Sabah DCM Dr Yee Moh Chai.

The Sabah Progressive Party (SAPP) wants Sabah Deputy

Chief Minister Dr Yee Moh Chai to explain allegations by two Umno politicians that Sepanggar residents are being enticed to register as voters in the Kota Kinabalu parliamentary constituency where he is the elected representative at state level.

The opposition party said it was strange that Yee who is also State Resource Development and Information Technology Minister, had remained silent about something that was said to be happening in his own constituency.

"The latest allegations of a voter relocation scheme are serious ones. They were made by senior Umno leaders who have publicly called for the police to investigate the matter.

"As deputy chief minister of Sabah and a state cabinet minister, it is only appropriate that Dr Yee come forward to clear himself," said Wong Yit Ming, the party's point man in the city.

He was commenting on renewed allegations that the political operatives who appeared to be linked to Yee were offering RM500 cash to Malay voters in Sepangar parliamentary constituency to change their voting address to neighbouring Kota Kinabalu parliamentary constituency.

Sepanggar Umno chief Jumat Idris and Karambunai state assembly representative Jainab Ahmad, who is Yee's deputy in the ministry, claimed that many Malay voters in Telipok Ria, Kampung Warisan, Likas and Inanam had reported that a group of Chinese were going round making the offers of RM500 as well as such goodies like bags of rice, water tanks and even laptops, to entice the voters to change their address.

Jumat said he was told that the group has an operation base in Likas Square and an NGO office. It is understood that Likas Square is managed and owned by businessmen linked to both Chief Minister Musa Aman and Yee.

The property is also the location of the state government's secretive online media office that runs the Insight Sabah website, dedicated mainly to parsing the government especially Musa.

The fresh allegations of impropriety matched a SAPP youth wing report in early October that a voter registration drive was being conducted at Likas Square and would-be voters who had gathered there claimed that they were being given cash to register as voters in Kota Kinabalu.

Read more at: http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2012/12/18/explain-umno-leaders-claims-dcm-yee-told/ 

China leads in illicit outflows, M’sia 2nd

Posted: 17 Dec 2012 11:47 AM PST

http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/money-300x202.jpg 

(Reuters) - Malaysia, an export-dominated economy with a wealthy elite, lost US$64.38 billion in 2010 and US$285 billion cumulatively between 2001 and 2010, the report said. Illicit financial flows have grown by 13.3 per cent a year since 2001, robbing countries of wealth and benefiting a handful of corrupt leaders.

WASHINGTON- Crime, corruption and tax evasion have cost the developing world nearly US$ 6 trillion over the past decade, and illicit funds keep growing, led by China, a financial watchdog group said in a new report.

China accounted for almost half of the US$858.8 billion in dirty money that flowed into tax havens and Western banks in 2010, more than eight times the amounts for runner-ups Malaysia and Mexico. Total illicit outflows increased by 11 percent from the prior year, Global Financial Integrity, a Washington-based group that campaigns for financial accountability, said in its latest report released on Monday.    

"Astronomical sums of dirty money continue to flow out of the developing world and into offshore tax havens and developed country banks," said Raymond Baker, director of GFI.     

"Developing countries are hemorrhaging more and more money at a time when rich and poor nations alike are struggling to spur economic growth. This report should be a wake-up call to world leaders that more must be done to address these harmful outflows," he said.    

All the countries in the top 10, which this year saw India, Nigeria, the Philippines and Nigeria join the ranks, face significant problems with corruption, and in most there are vast gaps between rich and poor citizens as well as internal security problems.     

Leaders of the Group of 20 major economies increasingly are focusing on ways to crack down on money laundering, bank secrecy and tax loopholes to prevent funds stolen from public coffers or earned through criminal activity from depleting the budgets of developing countries.     

The sums are so huge that for every dollar in foreign direct aid, 10 leaves developing countries.  

China lost US$420.4 billion in 2010 and over the decade lost a total of US$ 2.74 trillion. And its losses are steadily rising. In an October report, GFI said another US$602 billion in illicit flows left China in 2011 for a total of US$3.79 trillion between 2000-11.   

However, the numbers in the latest report are not directly comparable with earlier data because GFI has updated its methodology, making the estimates somewhat more conservative. It measures illicit flows by calculating the difference between fund inflows from loans and net foreign direct investment, and the outflows from a country to pay for trade, cash transfers and other earnings.     

Aware of the destabilizing impact of corrupt money, Chinese leaders are embarking on a crackdown. Outgoing President Hu Jintao recently warned corruption threatens to destroy the communist party and the state. In Russia, President Vladimir Putin last week also put the issue high on his agenda as citizen protests over corruption mount.  

"Our report continues to demonstrate that the Chinese economy is a ticking time bomb," said Dev Kar, GFI's lead economist, who compiled the report. "The social, political and economic order in that country is not sustainable in the long run given such massive illicit outflows."    

Mexico lost US$51.17 billion in illicit flows in 2010 for a total of US$ 476 billion over the last decade, which does not  even count the billions of dollars in bulk cash that probably left under organized crime and drug dealing.

Malaysia, an export-dominated economy with a wealthy elite, lost US$64.38 billion in 2010 and US$285 billion cumulatively between 2001 and 2010, the report said. Illicit financial flows have grown by 13.3 per cent a year since 2001, robbing countries of wealth and benefiting a handful of corrupt leaders.

Kar said the worsening picture over the past decade coincides with the globalization of finance and loosening of capital controls, changes that make it easier to transfer funds to Western banks and to tax havens.   

"Until governance improves and measures to shrink the underground economy take hold, we will not see a sustained decline in illicit flows," Kar said.     

GFI called on world leaders to accelerate efforts to curtail the flow of dirty money by clamping down on secret bank accounts and ownership of shell companies; reforming customs and trade protocols so that export/import payments cannot be used to hide illegal fund transfers; requiring multinational companies to report their profits by country to prevent tax avoidance; and strongly enforcing anti money-laundering laws.

DAP on damage control

Posted: 17 Dec 2012 11:38 AM PST

http://www.nst.com.my/polopoly_fs/1.187892.1355761760!/image/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/landscape_454/image.jpg 

(NST) - UPSET: Thrashing suffered by Malay candidates leaves Guan Eng red-faced

GEORGE TOWN: RATTLED by criticisms of not living up to its self-proclaimed multiracial image, DAP went on the offensive yesterday with its secretary-general, Lim Guan Eng, denying his party was anti-Malay.

He said DAP could not be labelled as such just because no Malay candidate had been elected to its central executive committee (CEC).

Guan Eng spent almost an hour refuting such criticisms following the disastrous showing by Malay candidates at the party polls over the weekend.

It was reported that all eight Malay candidates who contested lost and the party later appointed two of them, Senator Dr Ariffin S.M. Omar and Zairil Khir Johari, to the CEC.

Guan Eng said the DAP could not be faulted for the outcome of the polls as the party could not control who the delegates choose.

"We accept the results, but in terms of projecting DAP's multiracial image, an ideal situation would be to allow a few Malay candidates to be elected," he said.

His father, party stalwart Lim Kit Siang, was also present but seemed more composed than his son, who was visibly upset throughout the press conference at the party headquarters here.

The media was also not spared by Guan Eng, with national news agency Bernama bearing the brunt of his ire, mainly on its report that Johor DAP vice-chairman Ahmad Ton had not been given appreciation for his services to the party.

On DAP loyalist Zulkefli Mohd Noor's comment that the losses suffered by the Malay candidates indicated that the party was not living up to its Malaysian Malaysia struggle, Guan Eng said he would let the former explain that statement himself.

Zulkefli was one of the candidates who lost in the party polls.

Kit Siang insisted that the DAP was a party for all Malaysians.

"Of course, we admit we have our weaknesses and setbacks.

"And for not a single Malay leader being elected, it is a setback. That was my immediate reaction, yesterday (Sunday), and it reflects my views and the views of the entire DAP leadership," he said.

In Kuala Lumpur, Pas deputy president Mohamad Sabu said the party would not interfere with DAP's internal matters.

He said Kit Siang had talked about making the party multiracial and Pas would respect "their decisions".

Mohamad said the decision to appoint Malay representatives in the CEC had shown DAP's ability to perform as a multiracial party.

Parti Keadilan Rakyat vice-president N. Surendran expressed confidence that DAP Malay leaders would continue to support the party and its leadership despite not being elected into the CEC.

"While some were disappointed with the results, they were still committed to the party's struggle," he said.

 

Kelantan PAS turning on its non-Muslim supporters

Posted: 17 Dec 2012 11:36 AM PST

http://starstorage.blob.core.windows.net/archives/2012/12/18/nation/kelantan-PAS-supporters-congress-hairsalon-n8.jpg 

(The Star) - Kelantan PAS is turning on its non-Muslim supporters, accusing them of undermining the party's Islamic stand with their criticisms of the recent action against non-Muslims.

But the National Pas Supporters Congress insisted that it was only looking out for the rights of non-Muslims, especially over the "khalwat" controversy.

PAS assistant secretary-general and state executive councillor Datuk Takiyuddin Hassan accused congress chairman Hu Pang Chaw of having "bad intentions" for bringing to the media cases of action taken against non-Muslims for alleged indecent behaviour.

Hu had also criticised the issuing of summonses to non-Muslim salon workers cutting the hair of non-Muslim customers of the opposite sex.

During a visit to his Bunut Payong constituency here, Takiyuddin disputed Hu on the "khalwat" issue.

"He told the press that the municipal council had no power to issue summonses because the officer was not an enforcement officer but an administrative assistant.

"It is clear that he made the statement without checking his facts. The council officer has an authority card. If he (Hu) does not believe me, just sue the council.

"I would like it if he sues the council for having officers unauthorised to enforce the law. I am willing to defend the council myself," said Takiyuddin, a lawyer.

Takiyuddin, who is the state Local Government, Culture and Tourism Committee chairman, had said the congress should play its role as part of the party.

It was earlier reported that the council had issued summonses to two non-Muslim men for allegedly embracing each other in a car parked near the Sultan Ismail Petra Airport at midnight on Oct 31.

The two said they were watching planes land.

The other summons was issued to a 17-year-old teenager for giving a piggy-back ride to his 15-year-old girlfriend at Taman Tunku Anis at about 5.30pm on Oct 20.

Hu said that anything said and done by the congress was in the interest of non-Muslims.

"I stand by my statement that non-Muslims have the right to voice their grouses when their livelihood or social rights are affected. I will not back out from airing such grouses under principles enshrined in the democratic process," he said.

"I want to remind the state government that the party president (Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang) during the recent PAS Muktamar assured non-Muslims that Islamic laws would not affect them," he said.

Hu said he was preparing a memorandum to be presented to the Kelantan Mentri Besar Datuk Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat soon to clarify the situation.

 

Supporters Congress is PAS’ third bid to reach out to non-Muslims

Posted: 17 Dec 2012 11:34 AM PST

http://mole.my/sites/default/files/images/mole-hu-pang-chow-johor-kedah-perak-pas.jpg 

(The Star) - The PAS Supporters Congress is the party's third attempt in as many decades to establish a mechanism to woo non-Muslims.

Prior to the establishment of the Congress, PAS in the 1980s established a Chinese Consultative Council, followed by an Inter-Racial Department in the late 1990s.

Both attempts failed to stir the interest of many non-Muslims, leading PAS decided to set up a supporters club instead.

Party president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang announced on the eve of the 2004 general election the establishment of the PAS Supporters Club.

With the slogan "PAS for all", the club started by conducting dialogue sessions with non-Muslims and focused on reaching out to the Chinese, Indian and Siamese communities.

In the 2008 general election, PAS fielded its first non-Muslim candidate drawn from the club, R. Kumutha.

Contesting the Tiram State Assembly seat in Johor Baru, Kumutha lost to Barisan Nasional's Maulizan Bujang.

In 2010, the club expanded into a Congress through an amendment to the party constitution and was renamed the PAS Supporters Congress.

The move was supposed to be given the Congress equal standing to the party's three other wings, namely its Youth, Muslimat (Women's) and Ulama movements.

However, although the Congress was empowered to send delegates to represent it at the PAS annual meeting or muktamar, its members are not allowed to vote in party elections, unlike those belonging to the other three wings.

The party has since said that it would consider fielding more non-Muslim candidates in the next general election.

 

Putrajaya mulls freezing AES to avoid duplicating police speed traps

Posted: 17 Dec 2012 11:30 AM PST

http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/images/uploads/2012/december2012/18/speedcamera-dec18.jpg 

(The Malaysian Insider)Putrajaya is considering holding back the implementation of the controversial Automated Enforcement System (AES) to avoid duplicating the police summons system that can double the hardship to motorists, sources say.

The privatised RM700 million project began in September with a pilot phase of 14 cameras but the Road Transport Department (RTD) has pledged to roll out a total of 831 cameras by end-2013 to catch speeding motorists and prevent more road deaths.

The police, who enforce the speeding laws, have said they will continue enforcement and put up mobile speed traps near the AES cameras, raising the prospect of dual fines for errant motorists.

 

"The government is considering putting on hold the implementation of the AES due to the duplication of the summons system. That will cause hardship," a source told The Malaysian Insider.

He also noted that several lawmakers from the ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) have also asked the government to stop the implementation until all views are considered.

Another source said the government wants to ensure the AES will help ensure that motorists follow speed limits throughout their journey rather than just in the areas where the cameras are situated.

"This system is to enforce speed limits and ensure road safety," he added.

Some 10,000 motorists have paid up their summonses under the AES since it was implemented last September 23. The RTD said it has also issued nearly 300,000 summonses since then.

Read more at: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/putrajaya-mulls-freezing-aes-to-avoid-duplicating-police-speed-traps/ 

Outcome of general election will have impact on economy, says expert

Posted: 17 Dec 2012 11:18 AM PST

http://sin.stb.s-msn.com/i/7C/8A6A352868C9213C618062CE6AFB78.jpg 

(The Star) - The outcome of the general election will determine the focus on reform and the intention of the government to pare down debt, and this will have an important impact on the Malaysian economy, said Nomura International (HK) Ltd chief Asia equity strategist Michael Kurtz.

He said in that sense, the outcome of the general election would be crucial to the local equity market.

"Malaysia is one of those markets where the shape of the government with the reform orientation and the fiscal intentions matter a lot to the economic performance.

"So I think as a general answer, yes, the outcome is going to matter a lot for specific stocks or sector emphasis in the second half, but we are not going to go out on a limb to forecast the outcome of the general election," Kurtz said.

He said a substantial amount of the country's economic growth in 2012 had been either a direct consequence of or a lateral effect of government investment or policy.

Kurtz was relatively cautious on local equities for the first-half of the year based on the "worth" of the market, due to investor concerns about the outcome of the election.

"This will keep the market on a backfoot," he said.

Furthermore, an improving global environment would have a positive impact on Malaysia's growth, with a pick-up in global demand especially for soft commodities to play into the country's strengths.

"We do think that weakness in the Malaysian equity space presents an opportunity to accumulate stocks in anticipation of a better outlook, post-election in the second half," Kurtz said.

Specifically, he said the group favoured stocks that were perceived as defensive, in order to provide a downside insurance ahead of the election, like telecommunication stocks.

"In the medium term beyond the election, we like a bit more cyclical stocks in the plantation, oil and gas and finance sector," Kurtz said.

Recently, several other big names in the financial industry also highlighted the impact arising from the general election.

JP Morgan Securities (M) Sdn Bhd executive director of equity research Mak Hoy Kit said the equities market and economic outlook next year would be positive if Barisan Nasional continued to remain in power.

Eastspring Investments Bhd chief investment officer (Equities) Yvonne Tan Hong Yean cautioned that foreign funds might opt to stay out of Malaysia if there was a change in the government after the general election.

Malaysian Psephology: Lembah Pantai

Posted: 17 Dec 2012 11:16 AM PST

http://img.thesundaily.my/sites/default/files/imagecache/photo_gallery//thesun/Catalogue/p7_Nurul_c566900_121217_376.jpghttp://img.thesundaily.my/sites/default/files/imagecache/photo_gallery//thesun/Catalogue/p7_shahriza_c566917_121217_415.jpghttp://img.thesundaily.my/sites/default/files/imagecache/photo_gallery//thesun/Catalogue/P7_nongchik_c566927_121217_451.jpg 

(The Sun Daily)The Lembah Pantai electorate has apparently increased to around 71,000 voters, compared with 56,650 in 2008. This would translate to a 25% increase in registered voters in the four years since 2008, in sharp contrast to the 9% growth over the previous 13 years.

BETWEEN 1995 and 2008, the number of registered voters in Lembah Pantai had grown by about 9% from 52,108 to 56,650.

Ethnic breakdown: In March 2008, Malays constituted 53.2%, Chinese 25.7%, Indians 20.1% and the rest around 1%.

The percentage of voting had grown consistently over the 13 years (from 65% to 73%). Ballot papers issued increased by 21% to 41,289 in 2008 from 33,984 in 1995, indicating that an increasing number of the Lembah Pantai electorate were casting their votes. 

Support for Datuk Seri Shahrizat Abdul Jalil, from Barisan Nasional, had declined by 20% between 1995 and 2008. Considering the growth of registered voters, the actual decline was around 23%.

In 1999, Keadilan fought a close battle with BN, losing the seat by only 1,454 votes. This provided early indications that splits and differential perspectives were arising in the main ethnic group. Malay urban voters were becoming more discerning and considering a wider range of issues beyond basic ethnic priorities.

In 2008, PKR wrested the seat with 52.62% of the votes versus 45.61% polled by BN. While the gap in votes polled is only 7%, this seat witnessed a major swing. From losing the seat by 10,542 votes in 2004, PKR worked the ground and connected adequately with at least an additional one-third of the electorate, besides retaining most of its own support base. In the final touchdown, the swing factor was over 15%.

Despite the swing factor and breakthrough victory in 2008, incumbent Nurul Izzah Anwar said she is working even harder in 2012-13 to cover a substantial gap, allegedly caused by gerrymandering.

The Lembah Pantai electorate has apparently increased to around 71,000 voters, compared with 56,650 in 2008.

This would translate to a 25% increase in registered voters in the four years since 2008, in sharp contrast to the 9% growth over the previous 13 years.

Nurul Izzah told theSun this was a major concern, along with lack of specific details regarding the identity of the new voters on the electoral roll. She was trying to work with the Election Commission on these issues.

She described the constituency as a "microcosm of Malaysia". She has a trusted core team of 50 people plus a wider base of division heads and volunteers. Besides groundwork, the team is also analysing the historical voter turnout trends within the constituency to address any new challenge.

Nurul Izzah will most likely face BN's Datuk Raja Nong Chik Raja Zainal Abidin in Lembah Pantai in GE13.

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Voters’ dilemma : Party man or party?

Posted: 17 Dec 2012 12:08 PM PST

http://www.kualalumpurpost.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/karpal-singh.jpghttp://kualalumpurpost.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/najib_razak.jpeg 

Both men, though on opposite sides of the bench are dousing internal fires. 

Terence Fernandez, The Malay Mail

IN the span of one week recently I had the opportunity of meeting two very different politicians — each from a different camp with their own idea of what the country needs and how it can go forward.

One forgets that DAP chairman Karpal Singh is in a wheelchair, a result of an accident that put him in it seven years ago.

He was his usual firebrand self, not suffering fools and steadfast by his principles — even if it makes him unpopular in his own party or coalition (evidence of which was in his views on the hudud issue in The Malay Mail on Dec 7 and Dec 14).

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak, meanwhile was calm, collected and careful, yet candid in his opinions on what ails his party and not sugar coating the enormous task he has ahead of him — to consolidate a divided Umno and a bruised BN and win the next election. He knows failure to at least replicate the results of 2008 — however bad they may seem — could well mean the end of his own political career.

Karpal, 72, is conscious of the fact that time is catching up and he has nothing to lose by saying his piece. "Principles must be consistent.

You can't sacrifice principles for expediency!" he said as we met for a two hour chat in his office off Jalan Pudu late one Wednesday night.

Najib, 59-years-old and apart from shouldering a broken BN, also has his father's legacy to live up to. If Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, at 83, still has a say in how the SS Malaysia steered, then Najib is just getting started as far as leading the country is concerned.

"You think I'll let my father down?" he asks as he speaks to us late one Sunday night at his official residence in Putrajaya.

Both men, though on opposite sides of the bench are dousing internal fires. Najib is focused on getting his mandate, but to do that he needs to bring the liberals and the conservatives together. Like a trapeeze artist he walks a fine line between them as appeasing one side, could also mean falling out of favour with the other.

He also recognises that Umno and to an extent the BN's association with corruption and condoning graft has to be dealt with head on.

Again, he is caught between the good guys who want to reform the party and purge it of the lobbyists and selfinterests groups; and those who want it to be business as usual. These are the folks who joined the party to secure contracts and obtain "surat sokong".

Dr Mahathir recognised this greed and took the Works Ministry portfolio away from Umno and entrusted it to the MIC. His reasons were simple — anyone who holds that lucrative portfolio could evolve into a warlord of his own, dishing out Class F contracts to division heads whose votes ultimately decide the party leadership.

Both Karpal and Najib face factions out to oust them — Najib for the reasons stated above; Karpal because he is too candid for the DAP and Pakatan Rakyat's own good.

He believes in drawing a line in the sand and not hoodwinking the electorate that all is rosy.

He even in agreement that if his coalition cannot get its act together, it should not focus on capturing the federal government, as doing so would be harmful to the nation.

But Karpal has been doing this for over four decades and he knows that his immense popularity with the electorate also means he is untouchable.

Anyone in DAP who tries to go after Karpal will face the wrath of the electorate.

The muted response from the delegates and DAP leadership each time he spews rhetoric is evident of this.

Which explains why his fears that they will be factions out to get him at the convention, was unfounded.

He came back as chairman, albeit with fewer votes. The tame congress illustrating the general attitude of DAP members — to not wash dirty linen in public and look at the bigger picture — crossing the bridge over the internal divide when the time is more opportune andconvenient.

Likewise too, the popularity of Najib — who commands over a million Twitter followers — is indicative that this time around the electorate is going for the individual, not the party — as opposed to the trend four years ago.

But as I posed this question to the prime minister (which was later amended for refinement) "Najib is a good man but he is surrounded by clowns", also illustrates the fact that individual popularity can only go so far if those who Najib relies on to prop him up are no good or up to no good.

Just as how Karpal feels compelled to comfort non-Muslims each time PAS leaders talk enthusiastically about hudud or some overzealous enforcement officer in Kota Baru imposes Islamic values on non-Muslims; Najib too has had more than his fair share of damage control — especially getting everyone on his 1Malaysia bandwagon.

The mixed responses from those closest to him does send the message that he could be alone in this — a perception he was quick to correct. "I'm not alone. 3.2 million Umno members are with me".

As rosy a picture as that appears to be, one knows that the prickly issue of inclusiveness is the thorn in the conservatives and those who clamour for business as usual.

And this will be the premier's biggest challenge, although he has in his arsenal, DAP's own difficulty in shedding its image as a Chinese and Indian party, due to the reluctance of members to vote for Malay leaders.

Hence both will be capitalising on the weaknesses from within — just as how the perceived "unholy alliance" between the strange bedfellows of DAP and PAS will be sending mixed signals to the electorate.

Make no mistake, both Najib and Karpal have the best of intentions — but as far as voters are concerned, it is impossible to distinguish the man from the party because the party may not represent the values and principles of the person representing them. And this could be our dilemma as electorates on election day. 

Must DAP be truly multiracial?

Posted: 17 Dec 2012 11:40 AM PST

http://fz.com/sites/default/files/styles/mainbanner_645x435/public/FZ-181212-DAP_1.jpg 

And as why the Malay hopefuls lost, the party insider had this to say: "Either the majority Chinese in DAP have yet to warm up to the idea of having more Malays in the party or the Malays are lacking the credibility themselves as viable candidates." 

Mohsin Abdullah, fz.com

SOMETIME ago, there was this joke among us reporters about Gerakan. We called Gerakan a "multiracial Chinese" party.  The reason? Because the party professed to be multiracial but was (in fact, still is) dominated by Chinese, although there are a smattering of Indians in its midst. As for Malay members, well, it was negligible.

Hence the joke. Well maybe it wasn't a joke. Maybe we were being sarcastic. But we were "teasing" actually.

Anyway, it looks like that "honour" albeit dubious, of being a "multiracial Chinese" party now belongs to the DAP. So it seems. And all because of the unsuccessful attempt by eight Malay members to get voted into the party's CEC at the just concluded DAP Congress.

BN and other detractors of DAP were double quick to make this cannon fodder. And the irony is Gerakan was one of the earliest to pounce on it with its president Tan Sri Dr Koh Tsu Koon saying the non-election of any Malay in the DAP central executive committee  "is against the Malaysian spirit".

DAP has always suffered being labelled (by Umno) as a "Chinese chauvinist", "anti Malay, anti Islam" party. And considering the perennial Umno attacks ever since the party's inception in 1965, it's a "miracle" there are Malays who are actually DAP members.

The "latest" as we all know, are Alias Aspan and Datuk Mohd Ariff Sabri Aziz, both big names from Umno. Their coming in DAP has been described as a coup of sorts, especially Mohd Ariff who was former Umno assembly member for Pulau Manis and Information chief for the Pekan Umno division until 2004. Incidentally, Pekan Umno division chief is none other than Datuk Seri Najib Razak.

Relatively "big" is Hata Wahari, former National Union of Journalists (NUJ) president who took on the might of his employer - the Umno owned Utusan Melayu group -- and lost his job in the process. Then there's Zairil Khir johari, son of the former federal minister in the Tunku Abdul Rahman administration.

In the past there were big names as well, such as union leaders Ahmad Nor and Zainal Rampak. The late Ahmad Nor was a well known civil servant serving Cuepacs. Upon joining the DAP (it was big news then for a Malay civil servant to join a Chinese party) he was fielded as candidate and won the Bayan Baru state seat in the 1990 and 1995 general elections.

Back to the present. A  DAP insider admits: "If race is the only consideration, DAP is still Chinese in nature – based on votes by the delegates (at the recent party congress)."

And as why the Malay hopefuls lost, the party insider had this to say: "Either the majority Chinese in DAP have yet to warm up to the idea of having more Malays in the party or the Malays are lacking the credibility themselves as viable candidates."

Mohd Ariff, who is also a popular blogger under the pseudonym Sakmongkol AK47 posted the following in his blog: "The unsuccessful bid for places in DAP's CEC is more a case for being relative unknowns.

"Malay DAP leaders if they wish to get into the CEC must catch the attention and imagination of DAP delegates. Which means the Malays in the DAP must earn their keep and keep their peace."

Read more at: http://fz.com/content/must-dap-be-truly-multiracial 

Biggest questions without a doubt

Posted: 17 Dec 2012 01:20 AM PST

http://img27.imageshack.us/img27/6005/joceline.jpg 

DAP leaders drum home the '100-day countdown' to the general election but on the sidelines, the debate is about the biggest winner and biggest loser in the party polls.

Joceline Tan, The Star 

NOT many DAP leaders wanted to answer the question of who is the biggest winner or loser in the DAP election.

Outwardly, it might appear like Karpal Singh is the biggest winner.

The DAP veteran won big but the biggest winner was no other than Lim Kit Siang. He came out No 1 and, more importantly, he can cement DAP for his son Guan Eng before finally calling it a day.

Guan Eng, despite his position as Penang Chief Minister, still does not have the sort of control over the party that his father has. The next three years will see Kit Siang helping his son entrench his position and deepen his hold.

However, the opinion about the biggest loser title was more diverse.

Some think the biggest loser is "warlord" Dr P. Ramasamy. Among those who lost, he has the biggest job title, being Deputy Chief Minister. To rub salt into injury, his rival "godfather" Karpal shot up to third spot.

The bad blood between them has not dried up. Yesterday, as Karpal was being wheeled to his waiting car after the congress ended, Dr Ramasamy who was waiting for his car turned the other way.

Dr Ramasamy was, however, appointed as a CEC member but he may have lost his locus standi to continue contesting in two seats in the general election.

But others think that the Malays in DAP are the big losers.

The delegates had resisted voting in any of the Malay nominees although the top leadership had hinted that they favoured Senator Dr Arrifin Omar. It was a big blow to the party's quest to portray itself as a multi-racial party.

The party had made unprecedented efforts to recruit well-known Malay names in the last few years, including several ex-Umno members. But it has not moved much closer to a multi-racial image.

The party election ushered in an all-Chinese line-up apart from three Indians – Karpal, his son Gobind Singh Deo and Ipoh Barat MP M. Kulasegaran.

Yesterday, at the maiden meeting of the new CEC, Dr Arrifin and Zairil Khir Johari were among the 10 appointed members in the CEC.

It was a necessary move but it will only reinforce the perception of the token role of Malays in DAP, that they are there to plaster up what is largely a Chinese-dominated party.

There is some degree of resentment that Dr Arrifin parachuted from nowhere into a cushy senator post. Many in the party also feel that Zairil has been given more than he deserves.

Apart from being the political secretary to Guan Eng, Zairil is also CEO of Penang Institute, a post that comes with a fat salary. Zairil is quite a pleasant man but he is naturally shy, which sometimes comes across as being aloof, and that cost him votes.

Another segment in the party thinks the biggest loser is Ronnie Liu who did not make it into the CEC.

"Look at my face, do I look sad?" he said when met yesterday.

Many said that Liu was clearly on the way out in Selangor. His "replacement" is the burly-looking Vincent Wu, a party grassroots leader who is now favoured by the Lims.

Wu came in at No 6, way ahead of other big names, including his state chairman Teresa Kok, who almost did not make it at 18.

Some say that there is one big winner in Selangor, namely, Datuk Teng Chang Khim.

The famously independent voice and Guan Eng do not see eye to eye but the latter appears to have acknowledged Teng's clout and he was put in charge of the party's Pakatan Rakyat bureau.

"We have not been very happy about our dealings with Pakatan parties. Chang Khim is seen as someone who can bang the table. He is definitely not a sotong (spineless)," said a party leader.

Teng was reportedly not keen to accept the post but has since described the post as a mission and not just a job.

Party leaders have pressed home that the "100-day countdown" to the general election has begun.

The party showcased many young faces during the debate, who are also likely to be named as candidates in the general election.

They spoke fluent Bahasa Malaysia, they had ideals but they also sounded wet around the gills. Many read from prepared text and sounded like lecturers rather than politicians.

Their speeches did not quite resonate with the audience, many of whom are the traditional stable of DAP supporters – weather-beaten working-class folk who are more used to the old cut-and-thrust style of the senior leaders.

Many thought DAP would use this congress to also speak to the larger audience outside the party. It was primarily an internal affair to put in line the team to lead in the general election.

It failed to address the question of how it is going to make Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim the next premier over PAS' insistence that Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang is a better choice.

The party's reluctance to address the encroachment of PAS' Islamic agenda begged the question of who is going to call the shots on this sort of issues if Pakatan comes to power.

The DAP house is in order but its relations with its partners seem to be in the grey area as the party starts its 100-day countdown.

 

 

This’s what DAP members want

Posted: 16 Dec 2012 02:39 PM PST

http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/DAP-CEC-2012-300x224.jpg 

Give the DAP members credit for insisting that they stay what they have been, will be and shall always be – a Chinese political party comfortable in its own skin.

CT Ali, Free Malaysia Today

If what happened in the recently-concluded DAP election is projected onto the national stage, the Malays are gone!

Malays who are appointed to the central executive committee (CEC) will be lame duck members – they will be Malays who will forever be dependent on others for their position in DAP.

There really is not much to tell about the DAP election, is there? Factionalism, nepotism and race. Race, nepotism and factionalism. Is there anything new in Malaysian politics? Even Umno can beg to differ on a few matters that it has been accused of.

In nepotism, DAP has no equal.

But surely there cannot be anything new, not until we the people change ourselves. Change our perceptions of what politics should be, change our mindset and change the very DNA that resides in the inner-most sanctum of our being.

That's the DNA that tells us what to think, what to do and how to react when we think that we are being threatened and when we fear that our very being is in danger of extinction.

And it is not only the Malays that have this DNA. All of you out there have it, too. That is why those in DAP voted the way they did.

No need for excuses, no need for explanations, no need for name-calling and recriminations. We all know we would do the same in similar circumstances.

When will change happen? Education helps. A concerted effort by all of us to consciously better ourselves helps. Our ability to empathise with those who are different from us helps.

Speaking for myself, what education I have had and having lived among people who try to do the right thing in celebrating diversity helps me to tolerate and at times even appreciate people who are different from me.

But Malaysia is doubly cursed. As if it is not enough that we are burdened with having to understand each other's weaknesses and strengths, we are cursed with having a parochial government concerned only with its political survival.

Our concern should be what political advantage (what other advantage is there?) this Umno-led parochial Barisan Nasional government will make of this weekend DAP party election results?

Already BN cyber troopers have been working through the night, through the weekend, through much pain and sufferings (softened by dollops of cash!) in preparation for their vitriolic attack against DAP and Pakatan Rakyat when opportunism presents itself.

Why not seize it? And what opportunism this DAP party election has presented to them! They are going to town on this, not any old town, but to KL itself.

Race politics is alive

What I write here is merely a reflection of the goings-on around me. I read what others write, hear what others say and seek out what others think.

I put it down on paper and you read and let it permeate into the inner recesses of your mind, then spit out what you yourself deduce from all these inputs around you. And I kid you not, we will all come to the same conclusion.

Race politics is alive and well in DAP as it is alive anywhere else in any political entity in Malaysia. What differentiates one from the other is just a matter of degree, not substance.

Read more at: http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/opinion/2012/12/17/thiss-what-dap-members-want/ 

Chinese priority: First-class education

Posted: 16 Dec 2012 02:28 PM PST

http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/empty-classroom.jpg 

If we read our Federal Constitution, vernacular education should have by now been replaced completely by a national school education system. 

Mohd Ariff Sabri Aziz, Free Malaysia Today

The Chinese are not intent on having schools in Chinese as a means of preserving their culture. They just want the best education environment.

If we read our Federal Constitution, vernacular education should have by now been replaced completely by a national school education system.

Having allowed the continuity of vernacular schools, the government cannot undo it now. No way can we expect Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak to have the gumption and the courage to enforce the constitutional provision that there should only be one type of school – national schools.

Let's look at that current situation with the Chinese.

The Chinese are really not intent on having schools in Chinese as a means of preserving their culture and all things Chinese.

They are, I suspect, really after a good education setting which offers excellent and superior facilities and resources.

If they are pursuing the purity of their culture, then how do we explain the fact that the biggest enrolment in international schools and in the various private schools such as KDU, Sri Inai and others are Chinese?

I don't see Chinese cultural-enhancement or strengthening curriculum in these centres of superior education.

These offer what the Chinese are really looking out for – the best facilities and resources that money can buy that produce the best results.

Indeed the Chinese pay to get into colleges such as Taylors and Sunway because these colleges offer them pathways to better and first-class education.

Are they after the triumphalism of Chinese culture and if so, why then attend international and private colleges?

Chinese want top class education

The fact is the Chinese are after high-quality education because their own culture is best preserved in their home environments and other cultural-enhancement activities.

What if our national schools have first-class facilities and resources and produce top results?

Believe me, Chinese parents would gladly send their children there, forgetting the supposedly overriding need to preserve their culture.

If national schools have only one agenda – to produce the best results using the best facilities and resources and not imposing one group's hegemony on others – I think the Chinese will enrol their children at national schools.

If Education Minister Muhyiddin Yassin does not already know this, maybe I should replace him.

The government should turn all national schools into first-class teaching-and-learning facilities; then you will see the Chinese abandon their national-type schools.

My reasoning is simple. Take Sekolah Kebangsaan Subang. It has a very large Chinese enrolment. Competition to get into this school is super tough.

Why? Because this school, it seems, has the best teachers, excellent facilities and resources and offer what the Chinese see as first-class educational environment.

What is important to Chinese parents is that this school provides the best results and the best students year after year.

It's good education which the Chinese are really after. The Chinese appear to not mind that the medium of instruction in SK Subang is in Malay.

The Chinese can tolerate this as they see the resources and facilities and the preparation for a better educational future in SK Subang as the best. They want schools that produce the best results year after year.

Read more at: http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/opinion/2012/12/17/chinese-priority-first-class-education/ 

Why now, Musa?

Posted: 16 Dec 2012 02:23 PM PST

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhzLQSz-NgK_zonvxV5kAi8OM-qRjplxfJ9ayCZGvhXyyBt6M-o3dx441LInvS4HdG7k0ikIyhw31kb1Ina6nd1-au-t5YAGkMb3sv9aNkys3Duu1M1wJDCUi1PaMnHlw0pw2JMeB0Ffgc/s1600/musa.jpg 

You cannot create doubts in the minds of the people by making such sweeping statements without substantiation. No amount of denials by the minister or his cohorts is going to clear the reservations of the rakyat unless and until you are willing to be specific. 

R. Nadeswaran, The Sun 

WHEN Tan Sri Ismail Omar was appointed inspector-general of police two years ago, many had expected him to shape up an already beleaguered police force. From rising crime rates to public order, he had his work cut out for him. Besides, the internal bickering between his predecessor, Tan Sri Musa Hassan and the former commercial crimes chief, Datuk Ramli Yusoff, turned into what appeared to be a bare-fisted brawl. With Tan Sri Robert Phang in the fray, a battle royale has ensued.

After months of anxiety, worry and concern, Ramli was acquitted of charges accusing him of misuse of power.

While the civil suit which was filed by Ramli has yet to start, everyone thought the dust had settled and Ismail would be able to focus on reducing crime rates and other issues of public interest.

But last week, Musa came to the fore with his claims of "interference from politicians" and a host of other claims, allegations and assertions, this time accusing Phang of having had a hand in the transfer of a senior police officer.

Why now? If indeed there was interference, shouldn't Musa have thrown the Police Act in the face of the people behind the interference and ask them to mind their own business? Was he not the key witness in the trial of a former deputy prime minister who was charged with "interfering with police business"?

Why now? Did Musa consciously stop investigating crimes just because the call came from Putrajaya?

Why now? There were no reasons or provocateurs behind Musa's sudden outburst and hence why out of the blue, call for a press conference?

Why now? Having yet to answer the charges made by Ramli in his various court affidavits, does Musa now want us to believe his hands were tied in the past?

Why now? Musa retired two years ago and if he was unhappy with the events during his tenure, shouldn't he have voiced out his views at the handing-over ceremony to his successor?

Why now? Musa had all the opportunity to offer advice to his successor, Ismail who had been his deputy. Is he trying to undermine the IGP by describing Ismail as a "yes man"?

Why now? Who was the Tan Sri who came to you with a stack of summonses? Shouldn't he have been shown the door and told that the law takes it course?

Such claims have yet again forced the public to form their own views and opinions on the impartiality of the police force. People are wondering if the police pander to the wishes of politicians or if they go by the book in the application and enforcement of the law.

Going by Musa's assertions, people who have committed murder, robbery and other heinous crimes are walking on our streets on the basis of phone calls from politicians?

These claims may have some truth in them, but making statements without substantiation would be akin to self-appointed do-gooders and instantly-created NGOs demanding all kinds of explanations from the opposition.

Musa did not provide one instance where the minister or a politician had interfered in police investigations. Except for saying that a titled politician turned up in his office to sort out summonses, nothing more specific was revealed.

If indeed the police acceded to directives and instruction from higher up, are we to assume that the police closed the file on the Balkis fiasco where funds totalling almost RM10 million were transferred illegally, which borders on breach of trust?

Are we to say that the police also closed the files on the overseas money transfers that were carried out illegally through money changers although there were prima facie cases against them?

No, Musa. You cannot create doubts in the minds of the people by making such sweeping statements without substantiation. No amount of denials by the minister or his cohorts is going to clear the reservations of the rakyat unless and until you are willing to be specific – incidences, names, dates and times – when such interference took place.

R. Nadeswaran maintains that the police should be impartial and that any charges made must be backed up with evidence. Comments: citizen-nades@thesundaily.com

 

How Our Democracy is Damaged

Posted: 16 Dec 2012 02:15 PM PST

http://gbgerakbudaya.com/bookshop/images/books/9789675832642.jpg 

The individual analyses of the 16 by-elections in the book, contributed by about a dozen observers ranging from journalists to researchers to political scientists, reveal how inept the EC has been, especially in not attending to electoral roll irregularities and preventing abuse of public institutions and corrupt practices. 
 
Kee Thuan Chye
 
We often hear of electoral fraud and unfair election practices but what do they really mean? What forms does electoral fraud usually take? What constitute unfair practices and how have they surfaced?
 
Beyond that, what are the measures that need to be taken to ensure that Malaysian elections are free and fair so that this vital aspect of our democracy is truly well-served and our vote for the candidate or party we support is not made a mockery of?
 
A new book called Democracy at Stake?: Examining 16 By-elections in Malaysia, 2008-2011, published by Strategic Information and Research Development Centre, answers our questions and collates our concerns into a handy and comprehensive compact.
 
Edited by Wong Chin Huat and Soon Li Tsin, it analyses the 16 by-elections that have been held since the 12th general election according to such relevant categories as how free, fair and clean they were; the freedom and quality of the campaigning; the political parties' access to media; corrupt practices that were perpetrated; how impartial or otherwise the public institutions were; the amount of campaign money spent; the electoral roll; and the polling process.
 
Wong, who is in my opinion one of the sharpest political analysts we have, sets the standard for the conduct of elections in his introductory article.
 
Well-researched and replete with references from many documented sources, it explains why electoral fraud is wrong ("Even if one person is disenfranchised … even if one vote is rigged, democracy is damaged because political equality is compromised to favour the ones who play foul") and explains what we as citizens should expect of a free and fair election.
 
The most fundamental of expectations are that we "must be able to register as voters with minimal cost and trouble" and be able to vote "without much difficulty", and our votes "must be counted with integrity". By that token, we must also expect that the electoral roll "includes all citizens who are eligible to vote" and "nobody else".
 
Wong, however, declares that the electoral rolls in Malaysia "fail on both accounts". This is partly because as of March 2012, three million eligible citizens are still not registered voters. But what we may find more disturbing is his revelation that the electoral rolls "include many names who [sic] should not be there in the first place, such as illegally enfranchised foreigners, deceased voters, multiply-registered voters, voluntarily and involuntarily transferred voters who are non-residents in the constituency".
 
It is amusing to note that entries like Kampung Baru and a Police Station at Kampung Kerinchi are registered voters on the electoral rolls.
 
Wong proposes synchronising the electorate database maintained by the Election Commission (EC) with the citizenry database of the National Registration Department (NRD) to minimise errors and allow for corrections to be made continually.
 
Although he does not say so explicitly, it would also facilitate automatic voter registration, one of the eight demands of Bersih, the Coalition for Clean and Fair Elections of which Wong is a steering committee member. The synchronisation of databases would alert the EC to instances of citizens turning 21 and attaining eligibility for voting.
 
Another disturbing point Wong raises concerns the legal impediments to transparency in the procedure for correction of errors. Section 9A of the Election Act 1958 prevents the electoral rolls from being challenged in court, and Regulation 25 of the Elections (Registration of Voters) Regulations gives "unchecked power" to the EC to "correct any errors free from any public scrutiny".
 
This point is particularly pertinent in regard to the Malaysian EC because the public has lost much confidence in the commission's ability and inclination to be independent and neutral in the conduct of its duty. One important measure that the public needs to take, therefore, is to lobby for the EC to be truly independent and neutral.
 
If this were achieved, we can be better assured that other conditions necessary for free and fair elections will be facilitated.
 
These would include what Wong describes as allowing citizens to make "informed decisions after deliberation" from the "availability of information from all perspectives".
 
As such, there should be campaign freedom – a reasonable period for campaigning once an election is called; free airtime for all contesting parties on State-owned broadcast media like RTM and unbiased coverage in Bernama as well as private-owned media, like Utusan Malaysia, The Star, Sin Chew, Media Prima's TV stations, etc; and no restrictions like those imposed in three by-elections at which the Home Ministry banned campaigners from "mentioning (a) Altantuya Shaariibuu, the Mongolian model cum interpreter whose murder was linked to Prime Minister (PM) Najib Razak and his wife Rosmah Mansor, and (b) the role of the Perak Palace in the state's constitutional crisis".
 
The impartiality of public institutions should also be upheld. This includes no abuse of government machinery by the ruling party, such as using official cars and helicopters for party campaigning or, worse, announcing development projects like in the Hulu Selangor "buy-election" when BN offered about RM136 million in projects, payments and compensations while the Pakatan Rakyat Selangor State Government offered about RM27.6 million's worth.
 
And of course there should also be no pork barrelling at the hustings, the most famous example being the "I help you, you help me" offer of RM5 million for flood mitigation that Najib made to the Rejang Park voters in the Sibu by-election in return for their support of the BN candidate.  
 
Nor should there be outright vote-buying, as in the alleged giving out of RM100 cash to each Chinese voter at a polling station during the Merlimau by-election.
 
It is the duty of the EC to report such transgressions but, unfortunately, it has not been fulfilling that duty.
 
By and large, the individual analyses of the 16 by-elections in the book, contributed by about a dozen observers ranging from journalists to researchers to political scientists, reveal how inept the EC has been, especially in not attending to electoral roll irregularities and preventing abuse of public institutions and corrupt practices.
 
In the Permatang Pauh by-election, for example, a voter was turned away from the polling station because on the electoral roll, he was said to be dead.
 
Furthermore, 949 voters were discovered to have disappeared from the constituency's electoral roll. As the media reported the issue and the EC's deputy chairman could not explain the disappearance, Deputy Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin called on the EC to investigate it. However, "no finding was revealed to the public".
 
In Bukit Selambau, election watchdog Malaysians for Free and Fair Elections (MAFREL) backed the Opposition's claim that more than 60% of the voters in a housing estate were phantom voters, but the EC merely dismissed it.
 
In fact, the picture that emerges from the 16 analyses is that many of the complaints and allegations made during the by-elections were not resolved afterwards.
 
On the whole, as the editors sum up in the final chapter, "the integrity of the electoral rolls in Malaysia is highly questionable". Citing extensively from research done by political scientist Ong Kian Ming, they elaborate on unexplained deletions of names; unaccounted-for additions; high number of voters registered under the same address; unusually high increase of military/police voters (most markedly in Lembah Pantai, currently a Pakatan Rakyat seat held by Nurul Izzah Anwar, which has seen a 1,024% growth of such voters); and other manifestations.
 
EC Chairman Abdul Aziz Mohd Yusof has declared that Malaysia has "the cleanest electoral rolls in the world", with problematic registrations amounting to only 42,051 names, but according to Ong's research findings, the number is closer to 3 million.
 
Whomever you choose to believe, the outlook is far from rosy. The editors believe the irregularities are caused by deliberate fraud rather than administrative or clerical errors. They consider the state we're in an "Orwellian absurdity".
 
On our part, we the public should be pressing for accountability from the EC and other related authorities. Although Democracy at Stake? does not suggest how we could go about doing this, it focuses attention on a serious issue of our political life.
 
It's up to us now to protect our democratic right. Taking to the streets through the Bersih rallies has been done and resulted in some headway, but this is unlikely the way to achieve the ultimate goal.
 
We need to think of other ways to shake the powers that be to get the real democracy we deserve.
 
 
* Kee Thuan Chye is the author of the bestselling book No More Bullshit, Please, We're All Malaysians, available in bookstores together with its Malay translation, Jangan Kelentong Lagi, Kita Semua Orang Malaysia.

 

The Challenge of Muslim Youth

Posted: 15 Dec 2012 10:32 AM PST

http://ahmadalikarim.files.wordpress.com/2009/04/najib-tun-razak_3.jpg?w=510 

In an age of self-determination, they crave freedom of opportunity. They aspire to world-class education. And they demand open and accountable government. Our challenge is to deliver those freedoms without sacrificing our traditions. But this is only possible if we show leadership and commit to reform. 

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak, The New York Times

Profound change is underway in the Middle East and North Africa. It is too early to be definitive about causes, but I believe there is a common thread: young people in Islamic societies face an opportunity deficit.

The Arab awakening was driven by youth, organized by technology, and fired by a hunger for political change. In seeking more open societies and more responsive governments, young Arabs demonstrated a yearning for democracy. But they also expressed a deep sense of loss — not just of personal or political freedom, but of opportunity.

This unrest was the result of a basic misallocation of resources. Not natural resources, or capital, but people. The underrepresentation of youth in the economy created conditions in which tensions could grow — tensions that were fanned by a lack of political reform. Politically and economically disenfranchised, young people found an outlet in protest.

These pressures are not unique to Arab countries; they are felt throughout the world. Many young Muslims see no opportunities for themselves and do not feel they have control over their lives or a stake in their nation's future. Such pessimism leads to disengagement. We risk losing a generation of young Muslims to apathy and extremism.

As a leader of a majority-Muslim nation, I believe Islamic countries must better understand what young people aspire to. This means comprehending two great changes affecting their lives.

The first is demographic: The Muslim world is experiencing a "youth bulge." In 2010, people under 30 comprised about 60 percent of the population in Muslim-majority countries. A younger population means a bigger labor force. Higher investment and capital is needed to utilize this spare capacity. A big demographic change can warp fiscal policy for decades, as "baby boomer" countries are discovering. In social terms, the short-term impact can be even greater. A youth bulge introduces latent energy into a nation's economy and society. Left untapped, it can become a destabilizing force.

In 2010, youth unemployment in the Middle East was 25 percent; in North Africa, 24 percent. Such levels are toxic. When young people lack opportunity, they grow restless. Dependency robs them of their dignity; without an economic stake in society, they can lose their sense of belonging. That can spill over into hostility to the state. From 1970 to 2000, eight out of 10 countries experiencing new civil conflict had populations in which 60 percent were under 30.

The second great change is technological. Twenty-one years ago, there were no Web sites; today, there are more than half a billion. In the space of one lifetime, the Internet has opened up opportunities that were previously inconceivable.

The age of information has its own generation, the digital natives — those who have only ever known a connected world. They expect information to be free, democracy to be responsive, communication to be global. They want an active role in the digital economy.

Empowered by technology, young people can articulate their frustrations to a global audience. This has a profound implication: the emergence of a new, international political consciousness.

These two forces — demography and technology — shape young people's aspirations. In an age of self-determination, they crave freedom of opportunity. They aspire to world-class education. And they demand open and accountable government. Our challenge is to deliver those freedoms without sacrificing our traditions. But this is only possible if we show leadership and commit to reform.

Access to education is improving, but many young people still find that their qualifications do not match the opportunities available, so we must focus on vocational and technical training. We should also continue to open our economies: 23 percent of the world's people are Muslim, but the 57 members of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation conduct just 8.3 percent of global trade. Structural reforms must be pursued so that our private sectors become more dynamic. We must reform public services and confront institutions that stifle opportunity, remaining ever vigilant against corruption.

We must also respond to technological change. Our starting point must be recognition of the fundamental principle of the Internet — its autonomy. It should stay that way. This does not mean unregulated behavior, but independence. We should equip our youth with the skills to think critically about sources, to understand that just because information is free does not mean it is accurate. But the online space should remain one in which the free exchange of views is encouraged, in the best traditions of discourse.

As a Muslim nation, Malaysia faces many of these challenges. I believe we should see our youth not as a liability, but as an asset. They are an untapped resource that can lay the foundations for great success. Economic and political reform can give young people what they aspire to: a future defined by opportunity, not dependency. It is time to realize the hidden wealth of Muslim nations.

Najib Razak is prime minister of Malaysia.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved