Sabtu, 23 Julai 2011

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Bar Council: Suicide finding is ‘a leap in logic’

Posted: 22 Jul 2011 08:39 PM PDT

The Malaysian Bar says the RCI's finding that Teoh Beng Hock had committed suicide was "unsupported by the facts and evidence".

Lim said in view of the above, and as there were no evidence whatsoever produced at the RCI hearing of Teoh's whereabouts or movements after 6:15am, and that the MACC staff would have begun arriving by 8:00 am, "to surmise that Teoh had committed suicide between 7:15am and 11:15am requires a leap in logic and an assumption of facts not in evidence".

Teoh EL San Free Malaysia Today

The Bar Council has rejected the suicide finding of the Royal Commission of Inquiry on Teoh Beng Hock's death, saying that the conclusion was "unsupported by the facts and evidence".

Bar Council president Lim Chee Wee also urged the government as well as the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission to apologise to Teoh's family and the citizens of Malaysia, over his death; and compensate Teoh's family over their loss.

"It is very clear to the Malaysian Bar that full responsibility for Teoh Beng Hock's death lies squarely and solely on the MACC, and that immediate action must be taken to hold the culpable officers accountable for their behaviour," said Lim.

He said the Bar welcomed the statement by Minister in Prime Minister's Department Mohd Nazri Abdul Aziz that "appropriate action would be taken against the officers through the process of law without delay".

Lim said the authorities should investigate the relevant officers for possible offences under sections 304 and 304A of the Penal Code, namely for culpable homicide not amounting to murder and for causing the death of TBH by negligence, respectively.

However, Lim said that Nazri had erred when he quoted forensic psychiatrist Professor Paul Mullen
to support the fact that Teoh had a "weak character".

"Contrary to the statement made by Nazri, Mullen did not testify that Teoh had a 'weak character' that led him to take his own life. He did not conclude that Teoh had committed suicide," said Lim.

Rather, Lim said, Mullen's testimony stated:"in [his] opinion, what we learned of Teoh Beng Hock's personality and behaviour do not suggest any increased risk of suicide".

"He (Mullen) further opined that the context of the events that had taken place was not one 'which, in [his] experience, leads to suicide in custody', as he had not been made aware of anything 'to explain panic and distress sufficient to drive [Teoh Beng Hock] to conclude his honor had been irreparably tarnished'," said Lim.

Lim said this was in stark contrast to what Nazri had stated during the release of the report as Mullen's testimony in fact did not provide the basis for a finding of suicide.

Leap in logic

The Bar Council noted the RCI findings were the following:

  • That the time of death had been between 7:15 am and 11:15 am on July, 16, 2009;
  • That Teoh Beng Hock had not been released at 3:30 am and been left alone sitting on a sofa after his statement had been recorded;
  • That Teoh Beng Hock had been subjected to a fourth interrogation session after 3:30 am by Hishamuddin Hashim and his officers, which was aggressive and relentless. In addition, the RCI rejected the evidence of MACC officer Raymond Nion that he had seen Teoh Beng Hock lying down unattended on a sofa at approximately 6am;
  • That the fourth interrogation session was probably between 3am and 7am; and
  • That the window from which Teoh Beng Hock is said to have fallen out was located conspicuously.

Lim said in view of the above, and as there were no evidence whatsoever produced at the RCI hearing of Teoh's whereabouts or movements after 6:15am, and that the MACC staff would have begun arriving by 8:00 am, "to surmise that Teoh had committed suicide between 7:15am and 11:15am requires a leap in logic and an assumption of facts not in evidence".

Lim also noted that the the other joint expert psychiatric report tendered during the RCI by Dr Badiah Yahya and Dr Nor Hayati Ali (who were engaged by MACC and present during most of the court proceedings and had interviewed Teoh Beng Hock's family members, housemate and work colleagues) also said there was lack of information on whether Teoh had suffered any strenuous mental strain from an interrogation.

READ MORE HERE

 

French probe to zoom into Altantuya-subs deal link

Posted: 22 Jul 2011 06:29 PM PDT

(Yahoo News/Malaysiakini) - Investigations by French authorities into the controversial RM7.3 billion Scorpene submarine deal , which allegedly involves kickbacks to top Malaysian officials, may shed light on the mystery surrounding the death of Mongolian national Altantuya Shaariibuu.

Paris-based lawyer William Bourdon, who was in Penang on Thrursday, said the probe would probably reveal relevant details related to Altantuya's involvement in the purchase of the two French submarines by Malaysia.

Police investigations have already revealed that Altantuya and Abdul Razak Baginda, a close confidante of Prime Minister Najib Razak, had been beneficiaries of travel expenses paid by an obscure French company in Malta.

Bourdon, who was detained by immigration officers at the KL International Airport upon arriving from Penang about 10.30am yesterday, said he had kept abreast of Altantuya's case since her death in 2006, and had noted that her murder trial had been overly dramatised.

Speaking to Malaysiakini in exclusive interview just hours before he was detained by immigration authorities, who boarded his plane at KLIA this morning, Bourdon said: "The manner in which the trial was conducted provoked many questions; a lot of obscurity remains regarding her murder."

The trial ended in 2008 with two of the bodyguards of Najib, who was then deputy prime minister and defence minister, being convicted of her murder.

The duo are currently appealing their death sentence. Abdul Razak, who had been charged with abetting the duo, was acquitted without being called to make his defence.

Observers had remarked that despite the high-profile trial, two pertinent questions surrounding Altantuya's murder were yet to be answered: why was she killed and who ordered her killing?

Najib, who as defence minister was in charge of the mega-Scorpene submarine deal, has denied any involvement in the murder.

On the Suaram case which the lawyer filed in Paris last year, Bourdon said he was confident he would be able to access the related documents and files very soon.

These expose is expected to bring to book high-profile Malaysian officials who are said to have received kickbacks amounting to millions of ringgit from the submarine deal.

Bourdon said the case was still under the investigation phase, where the police still interrogating witnesses.

On behalf of human rights group Suaram, Bourdon has applied to the public prosecutor to allow the Kuala Lumpur-based NGO to be admitted as a civil plaintiff in court.

If accepted, he said, an investigative judge will be appointed to handle the case.

"The investigative judge is the only real independent institution to deal with sensitive cases such as corruption," he said.

No real democracy if judges not independent

On whether the independence of the judiciary could be guaranteed, Bourdon said this would be assured through the appointment of the investigative judge by an independent body.

"The judges in such cases answer to no political hierarchy, so there is at least a legal guarantee that ensures their independence," he added.

"There can be no real democracy if judges are not independent."

However, Bourdon does not discount the fact that in sensitive cases like corruption, there could be a possibility of the public prosecutor being approached to keep the truth from coming out.

"Especially if the truth is dangerous (to the people who approach the prosecutors)," he said.

"Which is why we need an independent media to balance between state power and these institutions," he said, adding quickly that he was aware of the current state of the media in Malaysia.

Although Bourdon - who was accompanied by his lawyer wife, Lia Foriester, in his trip to Malaysia - is confident that the case is making headway in France, he is still careful not to be presumptuous on whether Suaram would eventually be accepted as a civil plaintiff.

This is due to the circumstances in any case involving corruption, which can be very challenging anywhere in the world, he said.

The public prosecutor could well deny Suaram the right to appear as civil plaintiff and if this happened, Bourdon said, he would definitely file an appeal.

Even if Suaram failed to make it to court, there would be the opportunity for its lawyers to access the relevant documents and files in the case.

"In my opinion, if Suaram is not accepted as a civil plaintiff, it would seem like a breach of international legal standards and law," Bourdon added.

A Plan B in place

In any case, he said, he has a Plan B, about which he would not speak now. "All I can say is that we will move forward."

Bourdon himself has been involved in battles to make government leaders accountable for their corrupt ways and in issues of human rights abuse over the past 30 years.

He set up Sherpa, a non-profit organisation, with other lawyers in Paris in 2005 to work on international justice cases.

He has conducted about 50 monitoring missions in several countries.

During the course of his work in various countries, the authorities have threatened him with deportation - but never went through with it.

They did, however, monitor his movements and he felt he was 'in permanent control by the secret police', for example, in Tunisia and Turkey, from 1995-2005.

In all these years, his team has not only registered defeat but there have also been several victories.

For example, in a forced labour case between France and Thailand, his intervention helped secure a better life and working conditions for his clients.

Bourdon said he has realised that these days citizens, from Malaysia to Tunisia, were no longer tolerant of corruption.

"In the last 20 years, there has been a sense of resignation where corrupt practices are in a way 'acceptable' but not any more," he said.

"What has become important is democracy and rule of law, and corruption involving government leaders can break the confidence of public votes," he added.

 

Malaysia’s Political Awakening: A Call for US Leadership

Posted: 21 Jul 2011 08:08 AM PDT

On elections, the US Department of State Country Reports on Human Rights Practices declares that Malaysian opposition parties are unable to compete on equal terms with the governing UMNO-dominated coalition because of restrictions on campaigning and freedom of assembly and association.

by John R. Malott, Asia Pacific Bulletin

A Malaysian recently wrote to me, "Most Americans don't know or even care where Malaysia is." Even among the so-called foreign policy elite, little attention is paid to Malaysia. There are few American academics who specialize in domestic Malaysian politics, and except for hosting visits by senior Malaysian leaders, think tanks and universities hold few Malaysia-themed programs. US newspaper and magazine reports are few, with most articles focusing on tourism and the delights of Malaysian cuisine. As a result, there is a tendency among Americans to hold an idealized (and outdated) image of Malaysia as a successful multi-racial and multi-religious paradise, an Asian economic dynamo, and a stable and moderate Muslim democracy. As a result of this deficit of informed analysis of Malaysia, there has been a failure to notice the internal political and economic changes unfolding within Malaysia over the past few years. The reality today, as one Australian expert puts it, is that the situation is the "most fluid and dangerous" in Malaysia's history.

The Events of July 9 – A Date for the History Books

Because of this attention shortfall, the events of July 9, 2011 came as a surprise. On that day, tens of thousands of Malaysians—who have been ranked on Hofstede's Power Distance Index as the most submissive to authority of any people in the world—chose to defy their government and join a "Walk for Democracy." They heeded the call of Bersih 2.0, a coalition of 62 non-governmental organizations that calls for free and fair elections. In the days before the rally, the Malaysian government cracked down. It rounded up 200 leaders associated with the movement, claiming that they were "waging war against the King" and planning to overthrow the government. It declared both the Bersih coalition and the planned rally illegal, and in a truly bizarre action, it declared the color yellow—Bersih's signature color—illegal. Malaysian citizens were arrested for possessing Bersih literature or wearing yellow T-shirts. The police established roadblocks around the city and banned 91 Bersih and opposition leaders from entering the capital city of Kuala Lumpur. By the morning of July 9, the city was in total lockdown.

Then something remarkable happened. As Ambiga Sreenevasan, the distinguished attorney who leads Bersih put it, the Malaysian people showed that they no longer would be intimidated by their government. They chose to march, knowing that they would be met by tear gas, chemical-laced water cannon, and police batons. Even after Bersih's leadership was arrested, Malaysians of all ages, races and religions continued their "Walk for Democracy" through the streets of Kuala Lumpur. They locked arms, they sang their national anthem and "We Shall Overcome," they blew bubbles and carried flowers. They were peaceful. The only muscle seen that day was the heavy hand of the police. Human Rights Watch later called the use of force excessive, the 1,670 arrests unwarranted, and the police attacks on marchers unprovoked.

This repression by Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak and his government drew international condemnation, and it also put a lie to Najib's two-year effort to portray himself as a modern, liberal-minded leader. More importantly, and of greater concern to Najib and his United Malays National Organization (UMNO) party—the main party that has ruled Malaysia continuously since independence in 1957—is that it awakened a new generation of Malaysians. It is too soon to know whether the movement for electoral reform and the establishment of true democracy in Malaysia will be sustained. If it is, then July 9 will be remembered as a turning point in Malaysia's history.

Just How Free and Democratic is Malaysia?

Why should a government be so afraid of a call for fair elections? Like his predecessors, Najib claims that demonstrations will lead to chaos, even though the right of assembly is guaranteed by the nation's constitution and is commonplace in any true democracy. As for free and fair elections, Najib says that Malaysia already has them; if not, then opposition parties would not have achieved the gains they made in the 2008 elections, when they received 47% of the popular vote and took control of five states. Opposition parties counter that if elections truly were fair and free, they would form the government and not the UMNO-led coalition.

Political rhetoric aside, Malaysia's electoral system has been analyzed by academics in Australia, Malaysia, the United States, and elsewhere. In addition, the state of Malaysia's political freedom has been assessed by many international groups. The Economist Intelligence Unit, for example, labels Malaysia a "flawed democracy" in its Democracy Index. Freedom House says that Malaysia is only "partly free." Reporters Without Borders places Malaysia 141st out of the 178 countries in its Press Freedom Index. On elections, the US Department of State Country Reports on Human Rights Practices declares that Malaysian opposition parties are unable to compete on equal terms with the governing UMNO-dominated coalition because of restrictions on campaigning and freedom of assembly and association. "News of the opposition," the report says, is "tightly restricted and reported in a biased fashion." Academics point to the Election Commission's gerrymandering, which creates highly imbalanced districts that favor the ruling party, where the number of voters per electoral district can range from 7,000 to over 100,000. Over the years there have been numerous credible reports of the use of phantom voters, stuffed ballot boxes, vote-buying, and abuse of government resources to attract votes. In Sarawak's state elections this past April, Prime Minister Najib was caught on video, blatantly telling a village gathering that his government would give them US$1.5 million for a local project, but only if they elected his candidate.

What Should Be Done?

Malaysia's government may assert otherwise, but the evidence is overwhelmingly on Bersih's side. Malaysia is not a full democracy, and its elections are neither free nor fair. Malaysian citizens have awakened to that fact. Now the world's democracies need to stand on the right side of Malaysia's future. The United States has a multitude of interests in Malaysia, one of which is to help strengthen democracy and the rule of law. Human rights groups have condemned what they call the US Government's "lukewarm" response to the events of July 9. This is a moment when the United States, which named Bersih's leader Ambiga Sreenevasan an International Woman of Courage in 2009, can show the same courage and make a difference in the life of a nation.

John R. Malott was the US Ambassador to Malaysia, 1995-1998, and continues to follow developments in that country closely.

The Asia Pacific Bulletin (APB) series is published by the East-West Center, which promotes better relations and understanding among the people and nations of the United States, Asia, and the Pacific through cooperative study, research, and dialogue. Established by the US Congress in 1960, the Center serves as a resource for information and analysis on critical issues of common concern, bringing people together to exchange views, build expertise, and develop policy options.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Authoritative Verdict

Posted: 23 Jul 2011 12:19 AM PDT

 

(NST) - Let no one impugn its rigour, credibility and integrity when the proceedings were held in the open, the 124-page report made public, and no punches pulled in stripping bare the abuses of power.

IT was a foregone conclusion that the verdict of suicide reached by the Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI) would be unacceptable to the family of Teoh Beng Hock. After all, they have insisted that the 30-year-old had no reason to jump to his death. Certainly, as the cold-eyed forensic psychiatric evaluations revealed, Teoh was by no means suicidal. Nonetheless, no dispassionate observer can rule out with absolute certainty the fact that the torment, frustration and despair that he experienced under the "aggressive, relentless, oppressive and unscrupulous" questioning from the officers of the Selangor Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) could have become so overwhelming that he broke -- with heartbreaking results for his family and a lot of ill-tempered politicking for the nation.

Of course, homicides can be staged to look like suicides. But then again, suicides could also be made to resemble murders. True, as the family pointed out, there seems no reason for him to kill himself as he was going to get married the next day to the mother of his unborn child. But it's also just as true, as the RCI concluded, that the MACC had no reason to liquidate a potentially valuable witness.

One may not be happy with the verdict and disagree with the findings. Certainly, they can challenge the decision through judicial reviews and appeals. But like it or not, the considered judicial opinion of this panel of distinguished judges and reputable forensic experts was delivered after a thorough, meticulous and conscientious examination of the two postmortems, the assessments of forensic pathologists and forensic psychiatrists, the testimonies of witnesses, and the statements in the written submissions. It has also been able to come up with a definitive answer that the Shah Alam magistrate's court failed to provide with its open verdict in January. Let no one impugn its rigour, credibility and integrity when the proceedings were held in the open, the 124-page report made public, and no punches pulled in stripping bare the abuses of power.

Rather, now that the RCI has closed the case as a suicide, the focus should be on the recommendations to seal the gaps in procedures and end the "blue wall of silence" in order to prevent ill-treatment of witnesses and suspects. As the report has singled out three MACC officers, the case has also become a question of their criminal responsibility for Teoh's death. This should be a matter for the police to investigate and the courts to decide rather than a matter of internal discipline to be dealt with behind closed doors.

Public sees Najib as guilty in Scorpene deal, says Pakatan

Posted: 23 Jul 2011 12:12 AM PDT

By Clara Chooi, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, July 23 — Pakatan Rakyat (PR) leaders today warned Datuk Seri Najib Razak that the move to deport French lawyer William Bourdon last night has only confirmed his guilt in the eyes of the public.

They told the prime minister that chasing Bourdon out of Malaysia would not absolve him of blame but, instead, would resurrect the ghost of Mongolian model Altantuya Shaaribuu.

Altantuya, who was killed in 2006 and blown up with C4 explosives, has been linked to the government's controversial RM7 billion Scorpene submarines purchase from French defence company DCNS which is now under probe in France. The purchase was made while Najib headed the Defence Ministry.

Bourdon, who is handling the case in France, was held by immigration officers yesterday morning upon landing at the KLIA in Sepang from Penang where he had briefed an audience on the progress of the probe.

"This strange move would only fuel public suspicion that something is terribly amiss in the Scorpene case... which, of course, is linked to Altantuya's case.

"Instead of coming clean, he (Najib) is trying to cover up the matter. Everyone knows that Bourdon will be in the country to explain the progress of the case, that he is trying to prise open the layers of secrets surrounding the Scorpene deal, which is related to the murder case," said DAP adviser Lim Kit Siang.

Lim pointed out that Malaysians were already aware of the RM540 million in commission for the submarine deal paid to Perimeker Sdn Bhd, a company run by Abdul Razak Baginda, and are now demanding answers if the sum was paid as "corruption money".

Abdul Razak, who was tried for abetting in Altantuya's murder but was later acquitted, was said to be Najib's close aide when the deal was made in 2002.

"Najib has committed himself to fighting corruption so this RM540 million must be subject to a public audit. Was it justifiable? How was it spent? All these details must be scrutinised via an independent public inquiry so that Malaysians will know whether it was a genuine above-board deal," said Lim.


He castigated the prime minister for failing to address the matter and said that the government should not wait to be exposed in a foreign country but should initiate its own proceedings.

"The French prosecution is trying to decide if there is a case to go to trial but why wait? Najib has the responsibility to answer to Malaysians. Establish a commission and give the full details of the procurement," said Lim.

PKR vice-president Nurul Izzah Anwar agreed with Lim that Bourdon's deportation last night would return soon to haunt the Najib administration.

She however warned that any information revealed in the French courts would eventually reach Malaysia and could not be swept under the carpet.

"They (Najib administration) prefer to sweet dirt under the carpet... deport possible whistleblowers and gag such exposes through their control over the mainstream media. The fact that information is globally obtainable stops them dead in their tracks," she told The Malaysian Insider via SMS today.

 

READ MORE HERE.

 



AirAsia Moves Corporate HQ from KL to Jakarta

Posted: 22 Jul 2011 11:51 PM PDT

 

By Asia Sentinel

With all the troubles he has had over the last two months, the confirmation Friday that AirAsia, arguably Malaysia's most vibrant private company, is moving its headquarters out of the country to Indonesia is one more blow.

Tony Fernandes, AirAsia's group chief executive, confirmed the decision in Tokyo Thursday, saying the move is an effort to upgrade his company's image as a regional Southeast Asian airline rather than just a Malaysian carrier.

"I don't know whether Najib has been told or not," said a business associate of Fernandes in Kuala Lumpur. "But why should Tony care? There are solid business reasons for moving to Jakarta."

Najib has been on a whirlwind trip to foreign capitals to try and mend the country's image in the wake of a violent police crackdown on peaceful marchers seeking to present a petition to the country's king on July 9, asking for election reform. In a throwback to the 1980s, Malaysian censors blacked out details of a report about the march carried in The Economist.

That was followed on July 23 with the results of a royal commission of inquiry that concluded that a young aide to an opposition politician had been hounded so badly during a marathon interrogation over office spending that he threw himself out of a window and killed himself.

Then on Friday, immigration officials took William Bourdon, the leader of a team seeking to ferret out the details of a massive scandal involving defense procurement, off a plane in Kuala Lumpur, held him for several hours and ordered him deported via a flight back to Paris.

Fernandes characterized the move of the headquarters as a simple business decision to take advantage of Indonesia's vastly larger economy and population, which is nearly 10 times that of Malaysia's, although Malaysian annual per-capita gross domestic product of US$14,700 by purchasing power parity is much higher currently than Indonesia's at US$4,200. The size of the country, however, meant that the Indonesian economy was estimated by the CIA Factbook for 2010 at SS$1.03 trillion against Malaysia's US$414.4 billion.

AirAsia's decision to move the headquarters is a serious negative propaganda blow for Najib's 1Malaysia Plan, an intensive effort to lure foreign direct investment to Malaysia. In September 2010, the Malaysian government announced ambitious plans to mobilize hundreds of billions of dollars in private investment in an effort to move the country out of the so-called middle income trap, and double per capita income to push Malaysia into the ranks of developed nations by 2020.

AirAsia may well be the only Malaysian company besides the state-owned energy giant Petronas to have made an international impact – and Petronas does it by advertising intensively during Formula 1 races and by sponsoring a car – which Fernandes does as well. Launched in 2002 as a regional no-frills carrier with just two planes, AirAsia now flies 93 planes all over Asia. In addition, a long-haul service, AirAsia X, flies to Europe, Japan and Korea. The company earlier ordered 300 Airbus A320neos.to expand its routes across Asia and beyond.

It isn't just the publicity damage. In the past 10 years, according to report by the news agency Reuters, private companies invested just RM535 billion (US$172.4 billion), according to official data. Malaysia's private investment rate of about 10 percent of GDP is among the lowest in Asia and a third of what it was before the 1998 Asian financial crisis. The government, according to Reuters, contributes around half the investment in Malaysia.

In addition, Malaysia has long been plagued by capital flight, which has been generally regarded as an indication of lack of faith in the country on the part of its businessmen, although in Malaysia's case the bulk may well be from stolen timber leaving the country from Sarawak and Sabah. Nonetheless, the US-based financial watchdog Global Financial Integrity estimated in a 2010 report that as much as RM888 billion (US$298.3 billion at current exchange rates) had left the country between 2000 and 2008. Illicit financial flows generally involve the transfer of money earned through illegal activities such as corruption, transactions involving contraband goods, criminal activities and efforts to shelter wealth from tax authorities.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Najib: Don’t dispute RCI report on Teoh

Posted: 22 Jul 2011 11:48 PM PDT

(Bernama) - KANGAR: Najib Tun Razak said today there should not be any more dispute over the report of the Commission of Inquiry into the death of Teoh Beng Hock, saying the findings were based on truth.

 

The prime minister said the commission was formed in the name of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and was an independent, just and credible body and that their findings would be the truth.

"Don't question the findings because this will defeat the purpose of having the commission," he told a news conference here.

He added that if the people continued to dispute the findings, what then was the alternative to establish the political aide's cause of death?

He was asked to comment on the reaction to the commission's report unveiled on Thursday, with some disputing the findings that Teoh's death was suicide.

The commission was headed by Federal Court judge James Foong Cheng Yuen and comprised Federal Court judge Abdul Kadir Sulaiman, former Appeal Court judge TS Nathan, Penang Hospital's forensic pathology consultant Dr Bhupinder Singh, Dean of Cyberjaya Medical Science College University and consultant forensic psychiatrist Prof Dr Mohamed Hatta Shaharom and Legal Affairs Division Director-General at the Prime Minister's Department Saripuddin Kasim.

It was tasked with investigating the death of Teoh — political aide to Selangor executive councillor Ean Yong Hian Wah — whose body was found on July 16, 2009, on the fifth floor of Plaza Masalam in Shah Alam, Selangor.

On the three officers of the Malaysian Anti Corruption Commission whose "relentless, aggressive and oppressive" interrogation techniques were blamed for driving Teoh to suicide, Najib said any action taken against them should be based on existing laws and regulations.

- Bernama

Najib’s hypocrisy

Posted: 22 Jul 2011 11:40 PM PDT

 

By Ronald Benjamin

The statement by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak that Christians have to respect Islam before they are respected is disappointing because one would have expected the prime minister to speak in an inclusive tone since he articulated the importance of a global coalition of moderates in his overseas trip.

A leader who sincerely believes in moderation would have said that it is time for Muslims and Christians to work together to promote peace, justice and prosperity in the country.

It is this type of statement that would have been most welcome instead of demanding respect on an imaginary assumption that Christians have no respect for Islam.

How does he come to this type of conclusion? What is the evidence to show that Christians have no respect for Islam?

The prime minister, from time to time, has shown that he is incapable of courage and honesty in dealing with religious matters as that would make him look weak among extremist elements in his party.

This has made him a weak leader who is not capable of confronting extremism in his own party besides having a poor understanding of human rights. It reveals elements of poor governance.

The question is why he has chosen a right-wing tone in conceptualising the relationship between Muslims and Christians, after establishing diplomatic relations with Vatican?

Is it to show to right-wing groups that he is a firm Muslim leader in dealing with Christians, and diplomatic relations with Vatican have no bearing on current issues such as the usage of the word Allah in the Bible? Would this type of tone start the ball rolling for upcoming propaganda for the general election in ensuring the Muslim-majority vote?

The characteristics of credible leadership are its ability to dialogue and proactively solve problems and take a principled and inclusive position on issues of great importance that has major implications on the future of the country in terms of the common good, and not take the country towards destruction by playing to the tune of influential extremist voices.

A resolution on the usage of the word Allah in the Bible is a test of Najib's governance on whether common good would triumph over exclusivity.

The so-called slogan of a coalition of moderates should start in one's own backyard.

Ambiga dedicates UK doctorate to Baharuddin, PSM 6

Posted: 22 Jul 2011 11:37 PM PDT

By Clara Chooi, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, July 23 — Datuk Ambiga Sreenevasan has dedicated her honorary law doctorate to the late Baharuddin Ahmad and the six Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM) leaders now held under the Emergency Ordinance.

The Bersih 2.0 chairman also dedicated the award, conferred by her alma mater, the University of Exeter in the United Kingdom, to the "brave people of Malaysia" whom she said had overcome "fear of intimidation and harassment" when they dared to march with her on July 9.

"The real heroes of that day are our friend and supporter Allahyarham Baharuddin Ahmad who paid the ultimate price in fighting a noble cause, the six members of the Socialist Party of Malaysia who, as we speak, sit in solitary confinement under preventive detention laws and finally the brave people of Malaysia who overcame their fear of intimidation and harassment to uphold their fundamental rights.

"With all my heart, I dedicate this honour you have bestowed upon me to them," she said in her university acceptance speech received here today.

She touched briefly on the events of July 9 but did not lash out at the Najib administration, choosing instead to honour Bersih 2.0 supporters and advise graduating law students to use their knowledge to fight injustices.

"You have already heard of the events of July 9 in Malaysia. Whilst it brought out the worst in some, it brought out the best in others and this is where our hope lies," she said.

The former Bar Council president has been the target of much criticism of late, with many anti-Bersih 2.0 parties calling for her head over the chaos that took place on July 9.

Even Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak has been generously doling out accusations against Ambiga and her Bersih 2.0 movement, claiming the rally was an attempt to oust him from government.

Ambiga, however, highlighted in her speech that not all of Najib's men were happy with how the administration had clamped down on the rally.

"There were some in government who opposed the methods used to shut us down," she said. "Even doctors left their comfort zones to speak up against injustices. And of course there were the lawyers and the independent media who stood on the side of truth and justice."

Ambiga also spoke on the "rule of law", saying that Malaysia's democracy was still being held back by repressive laws, turning it into a country that practises "rule by law".

She cited the example of preventive detention laws that "lock people away without affording them the basic right to a trial", likely referring to the Emergency Ordinance and the Internal Security Act (ISA).

Ambiga told graduating students that in their quest to uphold the rule of law and pursuit of profit, they should also be reminded of their role to fight injustices.

 

READ MORE HERE.

 



Bar Council says MACC responsible for Teoh’s death

Posted: 22 Jul 2011 11:31 PM PDT

By Clara Chooi, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, July 23 — The Bar Council said today the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) is fully responsible for the death of DAP political aide Teoh Beng Hock and urged the graftbusting agency and the government to issue public apologies.

Council president Lim Chee Wee said the council did not agreed with the suicide conclusion made in the royal commission of inquiry (RCI) report released on Thursday as it was not supported by facts and the evidence.

"It is very clear to the Malaysian Bar that full responsibility for Teoh Beng Hock's death lies squarely and solely on the MACC," he said in a statement today.

As such, Lim (picture) said the officers named in the report should be punished immediately for committing offences under sections 304 and 304A of the Penal Code, namely for culpable homicide not amounting to murder and for causing Teoh's death by negligence.

"The Malaysian Bar also calls on the government of Malaysia and MACC to consider offering an unqualified written apology to Teoh Beng Hock's family and to the citizens of Malaysia for his death and making reasonable recompense to Teoh Beng Hock's family in respect of his death," he said.

Lim also rejected the notion that Teoh's "weak character" had led him to suicide, as described by Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Datuk Seri Mohamed Nazri Aziz when he announced the release of the RCI report.

He pointed out that forensic psychiatrist Professor Paul Mullen had not testified that Teoh had a "weak character" and had not concluded that Teoh had committed suicide.

On the other findings in the RCI report, Lim said the council had concurred with the royal panel that Teoh had been subjected to "aggressive, relentless, oppressive and unscrupulous interrogation" and that most of the MACC officers involved in the case were not credible as they "had the inevitable habit of lying".

Lim said the council also agreed that the massive operation launched by the Selangor MACC at the time had been based on a mere belief without proper ground work or verification.

The then-Selangor MACC deputy director Hishammuddin Hashim, he said, had been accurately described in the RCI report as "arrogant, given to falsehoods, untruthful and uncompromising" and "just too stubborn to retreat from his mistake in mounting such a massive operation".

"Hishammuddin should be held responsible for the actions taken by him and his officers that led to Teoh Beng Hock's death," Lim agreed.

The RCI report, which was released two days ago, ruled that Teoh committed suicide as a result of pressure from aggressive and prolonged questioning by MACC officers.

The officers had wanted to pressure Teoh into becoming a witness in their case against his boss, Seri Kembangan assemblyman Ean Yong Hian Wah, for alleged abuse of public funds.

 

READ MORE HERE.

MACC suspends three named in Teoh RCI report

Posted: 22 Jul 2011 11:27 PM PDT

 

By Clara Chooi, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, July 23 – The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) has suspended three graftbusters who were said to have pressured DAP aide Teoh Beng Hock into committing suicide in 2009.

MACC said the trio's suspension is pending the outcome of an internal probe on the findings of the just-released Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI) report into Teoh's death.

"Pending the outcome of this report, all three officers will be suspended or barred from any investigation operation," the statement said.

The commission said the special investigation team to conduct the probe will be led by MACC deputy chief commissioner (management and professionalism) Datuk Zakaria Jaffar.

It did not state, however, the names of the trio but it is believed that they are former Selangor MACC deputy director Hishammuddin Hashim and enforcement officers Arman Alies and Mohd Ashraf Mohd Yunus, all of whom were named by the RCI.

Upon completion, it said, a report will be sent to the agency's complaints committee comprising four independent individuals – former Court of Appeal Judge Datuk Mohd Noor Abdullah as chairman and three members, namely former Prime Minister's Department deputy secretary-general Datuk Muhammad Mohd Noor, former Public Complaints Bureau director Datuk Wan Abdul Wahab Abdullah and lawyer V. Ravindran.

Apart from the internal probe, the anti-graft body also pledged to give its full co-operation to the police to carry out its own investigation on the three officers named in the RCI report.

"We will not protect any individual that breaks the law. MACC would like to stress that we will not tolerate any officer found to be guilty of any crime or wrongdoing," it said.

The RCI report into Teoh's death, released two days ago, ruled that the DAP aide had committed suicide as a result of pressure from aggressive and prolonged questioning by MACC officers.

The officers had purportedly wanted to pressure Teoh into becoming a witness in their case against his boss, Seri Kembangan assemblyman Ean Yong Hian Wah, for alleged abuse of public funds.

The RCI had also found fault with the MACC's techniques, saying that the graft officers on Teoh's case were not only brutal during interrogation but also had poor interview skills and viewed witnesses and suspects as "the enemy".

It noted that the Selangor MACC's operation to obtain evidence to support its corruption case had led to the death of Teoh, whom it described in the report as "a young man in the prime of life who had everything to look forward to" and whose family had been "robbed" of a son, brother, husband and father.

MACC said today it "accepts and views seriously" the royal panel's findings, adding that it has already moved to implement some of its recommendations and suggestions.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Sarbani’s family wants Commission of Inquiry into his death

Posted: 22 Jul 2011 08:35 PM PDT

(The Star) - The family of late customs officer Ahmad Sarbani Mohamed are now calling for a Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI) to investigate the circumstances leading to his death at the MACC building.

Maziah Manap, 50 said her hopes to get justice over the death of her husband, Ahmad Sarbani, were wearing thin, alleging that police were not taking her statements seriously.

"My family's hopes are getting dimmer especially since the findings of the Teoh Beng Hock RCI were made public," she told reporters after lodging a police report at the Kelana Jaya police station on Saturday.

Maziah asked for a fresh investigations to be carried out over a remark made by an Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) officer about those responsible for her husband's death.

"Until now the police did not record my statement regarding the officers remark, it wasn't me, it was my people', which he made to me when I told him I was dissatisfied over my husband's death," she said.

"I am very confident that my husband did not commit suicide but there is foul play," she said adding that she hoped an RCI would be formed to investigate her husbands death.

Ahmad Sarbani, the Selangor Customs assistant director, was found dead on April 6 after he was believed to have fallen from the pantry on the third floor of the MACC Kuala Lumpur office on Jalan Cochrane here and landed on a badminton court on the first floor.

The most recent outcome from the inquest was a forensic investigator's conclusion that Ahmad Sarbani did not jump to his death nor was he pushed from the KL anti-graft office.

Raja Petra alleged in his blog on the Malaysia Today website that Ahmad Sarbani accidentally fell to his death after being forced onto the ledge by a senior MACC investigator.

He further claimed that the MACC investigator convened a "conference" with his colleagues to "brainstorm and concoct the most plausible story" to protect their careers.

Up till today, Raja Petra has written a nine-part series on Malaysia Today alleging that Ahmad Sarbani's death was caused by the anti-graft body's officers.

When contacted, City CID chief Senior Asst Comm Datuk Ku Chin Wah declined to comment as a public inquiry was already being carried out on the case.

 

Teoh’s suicide: MACC suspends three officers

Posted: 22 Jul 2011 07:58 PM PDT

The three were named by the Royal Commission of Inquiry as driving Teoh Beng Hock to commit suicide.

(Free Malaysia Today) - The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission today suspended three officers identified by the Royal Commission of Inquiry as being indirectly responsible for Teoh Beng Hock's death.

The suspension is pending an outcome an internal probe into their actions.

"Pending the outcome of the internal investigation, all three relevant officers have been suspended or exluded from any investigative operations," said a MACC statement today.

The three suspended officers are Negeri Sembilan MACC director (then Selangor MACC deputy director) Hishamuddin Hashim and two enforcement officers Mohd Anuar Ismail (then the investigating officer) and Mohd Ashraf Mohd Yunus. They were alleged to have driven Teoh to his death.

MACC said that it will not protect any of its officers that had broken the law.

"We want to stress that we will not tolerate or protect any of our officers who are found to be guilty of any criminal offence or breaching any code of conduct," said MACC.

The decision followed Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Mohd Nazri Abdul Aziz's request to the police to investigate the three officers.

"We would also give our full cooperation to the police so that investigations would be independent and transparent."

A special investigative team — led by deputy chief commissioner (management and professionalism) Zakaria Jaffar — will look into the claims made against the three officers, and the results would be submitted in a report.

The results would then be tabled to the MACC Complaints Committee that consists of four independent individuals, and is chaired by former Appeals Court judge Mohd Noor Abdullah, added MACC in its statement.

MACC added that it viewed with seriousness the recommendations of the RCI which had released its report on July 21.

READ MORE HERE

 

Is a Minister’s aide’s university degree for real?

Posted: 22 Jul 2011 05:36 PM PDT

By K Pragalath, FMT

PETALING JAYA: The university degree of a private secretary of a minister could be a fake degree. This allegation comes from a little known NGO, People's Rights and Welfare Coalition (POWER).

 

POWER claims that Human Resources Minister, Dr S Subramaniam's private secretary also known as S Subramaniam holds a fake degree as the Kensington University was deregistered in 2003 by the Hawaiian authorities .

"The minister has recruited a private secretary who holds a fake degree from a university not recognised by JPA," said POWER chairman, S Gobikrishnan today.

Subramaniam who is also Puchong division MIC Youth leader holds a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering from Kensington University.

Gobikrishnan said: "We have evidence to show that the university was deregistered on Oct 2003 by the state of Hawaii.
"It is also not recognised in Malaysia. And Subramaniam received his degree last year."

 

READ MORE HERE.

Putrajaya agrees to fund voter verification system

Posted: 22 Jul 2011 05:29 PM PDT

 

(The Malaysian Insider) - KANGAR, July 23 — Putrajaya has agreed to pay for a voter authentication system that will quell talk of phantom voters, a key demand of outlawed electoral reforms group Bersih 2.0

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak said today the system was one of the initiatives undertaken by the Election Commission (EC) to ensure transparency in the country's elections.

"The implementation of the biometric system will be able to counter allegations about the existence of phantom voters," he said at a meet-the-people programme at Dewan 2020, here today, according to Bernama Online.

Bersih 2.0 had sought to send a memorandum to the Yang di-Pertuan Agong over its eight demands for free and fair elections, after the EC said it was too busy to meet the movement, a coalition of 62 groups.

However, the EC later agreed to meet Bersih over its demands, but on the condition they stopped the July 9 rally. The commission also said most of the demands involved amendments that needed parliamentary approval.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Mind analysis courses

Posted: 22 Jul 2011 02:42 PM PDT

By Farrah Naz Karim, NST

MACC takes steps to train officers on investigation procedure.

PUTRAJAYA: Malaysian Anti- Corruption Commission investigation officers will undergo courses on psychoanalysis to better assess the state of mind of witnesses during interviews.

They will also relook the duration a witness or a suspect is held for investigations.

These are among some of the immediate measures being put in place after the report by the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the death of Teoh Beng Hock was made public yesterday.

The report stated that Teoh was driven to suicide and it also highlighted several shortcomings in MACC's handling of witnesses.

Commenting on the findings of the RCI, a senior MACC investigating officer admitted there were flaws in their standard operating procedure but stressed they could not make outright changes that could jeopardise their role as an anti-graft body.

"Some of our officers do not know enough experience to gauge the state of mind of witnesses, as shown in Teoh's case.

"That is why we are now determined to include courses on psychoanalysis in the training module." He said said some officers did not realise witnesses get stressed out after prolonged hours of interviewing.

"They feel that the witness is holding back information and in their zest to get that information out, they forget that the witness is not as resilient as they are.

"This is where the problem arises," he said.

"Then there is the risk that if a witness is released without providing the necessary information, he may jeopardise investigations by making contact with the suspect later.


"This would give the suspect the edge as he could dispose of the evidence or alter his story.

"Do we let the witness go and stop asking him pertinent and crucial questions simply because he is tired? "At the end of the day, it is also the responsibility of the MACC to protect the interests of the public." He explained under the MACC SOP for interviewing witnesses, they first contact the witness through the phone and give them the time and venue of the meeting.

However, the source said 80 per cent of witnesses who were contacted were not cooperative.

"In such cases, the commission will issue them a notice, compelling them to turn up," he said.

The source insisted that MACC investigating officers would not rough up witnesses.

"Our IOs have been trained to withstand long hours of investigation, but as human beings, if they are seen to be agitated and losing patience with a witness, another officer will take ove r. " Through its SOP, the officers are also trained to use their discretion when dealing with witnesses and would not deny them breaks.

In cases where witnesses needed to be examined by a doctor, MACC would bring them for treatment.


‘Bourdon deported because he knew too much’

Posted: 22 Jul 2011 02:32 PM PDT

By G Vinod, FMT

PETALING JAYA: Was French human rights lawyer William Bourdon deported because he knew too much?. That's what PKR vice president Nurul Izzah Anwar thinks.

She claims that Bourdon may have had access to crucial documents that may link Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak to the controversial Scorpene submarine purchases.

"But the French court will provide public access to the investigation papers when the case goes on trial in September," claimed Nurul at the Ops Scorpene fund raising dinner in Petaling Jaya yesterday.

The dinner, attended by nearly 500 guests, was hosted by Nurul's aide, Fahmi Fadzil.

Yesterday, Bourdon, who was tasked to investigate corruption involving the submarine purchases, was detained at KLIA at 11.40am by the immigration officials when his flight arrived from Penang.

Subsequently, Bourdon was served a deportation order for violating the terms of his social visit pass and left the country at about 11pm.

Bourdon was supposed to be one of the speakers at the fund raising event yesterday.

Nurul, who is also Lembah Pantai MP, thanked  Bourdon for his courage in taking up the case on behalf of Suaram to investigate the mystery involving the submarine deal.

"He is a well known personality worldwide yet he was kicked out of the country dishonorably," she said.

Fellow PKR vice president, Tian Chua reminded the guests at the dinner on how the Scorpene deal was also linked to the gruesome murder of Mongolian translator, Altantuya Shaaribu.

Chua said that recently Kelana Jaya MP Low Gwo Burne went to Mongolia and subsequently met the Altantuya's father, Dr Setev Shaaribu.

In his visit, Chua said, Low was told by Shaaribu that his daughter's ashes still remain in a Malaysian court as the case, in theory, is still unsolved.

"We may feel sympathy for his family but also remember that our tax money was used to finance the Scorpene deal," he said.

In 2006, Altantuya's remains were found in a secluded area in Puncak Alam, Shah Alam. Police investigation found that she was shot twice before her body was blown up using C-4 explosives.

She was said to be working as a translator for Perimekar Sdn Bhd, a company linked to Najib's aide  Abdul Razak Baginda,  which was the company that sealed the deal on the two Scorpene submarines for Malaysia.

The multi-billion ringgit deal, which was inked in 2002 during Najib's tenure as defense minister, was reported to have involved kickbacks worth RM500 million.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Family demands RCI, new probe into Sarbaini’s death

Posted: 22 Jul 2011 02:15 PM PDT

By Melissa Chi, The Malaysian Insider

PETALING JAYA, July 23 — Dissatisfied with the ongoing inquest into the death Ahmad Sarbaini Mohamed, the Customs officer's family today again demanded for a royal commission of inquiry (RCI) into his untimely demise during a graft investigation.

The family previously asked for an RCI to be convened immediately, but later relented to the inquest after Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Datuk VK Liew said that it was the first choice, and that there was a "procedure" which needed to be followed.

Today, Sarbaini's widow Maziah Manap also asked for a fresh investigation over a remark made by Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) officer Abdul Ghani Ali about those responsible for her husband's death on April 6.

"Until now the police did not record my statement regarding Encik Ghani's remark, 'it wasn't me, it was my people', [made] to me when I expressed dissatisfaction of my husband's death," she said in the report lodged at the Kelana Jaya police station hear her house.

Abdul Ghani is a MACC investigating officer and the 18th witness to be called in the ongoing inquest into Ahmad Sarbaini's death.

He had defended his statement and told the coroner's court that he meant Ahmad Sarbaini had went to see his officers, not him personally, on the day of his death.

Ahmad Sarbaini, the Selangor Customs assistant director, was found dead on April 6 after he was believed to have fallen from the pantry on the third floor of the MACC Kuala Lumpur office on Jalan Cochrane here and landed on a badminton court on the first floor.

The most recent outcome from the inquest was a forensic investigator's conclusion that Ahmad Sarbaini did not jump to his death nor was he pushed from the KL anti-graft office.

MORE TO COME

As polls loom, Pakatan moves to repair battered image

Posted: 22 Jul 2011 01:22 PM PDT

By Shazwan Mustafa Kamal, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, July 23 — The Pakatan Rakyat (PR) leadership has agreed to stop publicly airing disagreements or infighting among its three component parties by setting up a "special mechanism" to settle inter-party disputes ahead of the upcoming national polls.

PR leaders came to a consensus during this week's party leadership retreat that a specific mechanism was needed to project a unified image for the coalition in order to deflect and prevent repeats of the cases of public inter-party feuds throughout the year.

"We have come up with mechanisms of streamlining... to make it more of Pakatan as a coalition rather than three separate parties, especially through our statements.

"We're thinking about weekly statements for Pakatan, instead of all of us coming out with separate statements... this will force us to sit down and discuss, react and get things moving," DAP's Zairil Khir Johari told The Malaysian Insider.

Zairil, who is political secretary to DAP secretary-general Lim Guan Eng, denied that PR's decision was in response to the recent uproar caused the Kedah government's entertainment ban.

He said the move was not a response to any incident "in particular" but more on how to "project Pakatan Rakyat as a cohesive coalition and force, a proper alternative to Barisan Nasional (BN)."

"In case of an emergency where a problem occurs where disagreements arise [among] PAS, PKR and DAP, no party should come up with contradicting statements. There will be one number for party leaders to call, a hotline if you want to call it that... where the top Pakatan leadership is immediately informed of the problem, and it will be discussed on the spot.

"And after that, a joint statement by all three parties will be issued... all this can avoid unnecessary misunderstanding between the PR parties, through proper channels of communication and discussion," added Zairil.

PKR strategic director Rafizi Ramli told The Malaysian Insider that a "common approach" was needed in order for PR to be seen and recognised as a "common alliance."

"A difference of opinion between parties is alright. The question is, how do we manage those differences so that our political opponents do not use it as an opportunity to attack us? How do we accommodate differing views so that it does not invite danger? That is a why a case-by-case mechanism is needed.

"We are slowly working towards integration of all Pakatan parties. We are not BN, where decisions are made by one party only," said Rafizi, adding that a large chunk of yesterday's retreat meeting was focused on "enhancing" PR's image as a alternative federal coalition for Putrajaya.

READ MORE HERE.

‘Charge MACC officers with criminal offence’

Posted: 22 Jul 2011 12:30 PM PDT

 

By Teoh El Sen, FMT

PETALING JAYA: Attorney-General Abdul Gani Patail should consider criminal charges instead of merely taking disciplinary action against drove Selangor political aide Teoh Beng Hock to suicide.

Lawyer representing the Teoh-family, Gobind Singh Deo, said that Abdul Gani should consider using Section 330 of the Penal Code which is the offence of "voluntarily causing hurt to extort confession…". He argued that he believes that "hurt" should encompass mental injury as well.

Abdul Gani was quoted in the local daily New Straits Times on Friday that action against three MACC officers "for their aggressive, inappropriate and (therefore) in violation of the regulations", as indicted in the Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI) report, is to be read with the understanding of the word "regulations".

"If it refers to the standard operating procedure of the MACC, it then becomes a matter of discipline… Hence, the officers are to be dealt with by the disciplinary body of the Public Service Department," he was quoted as saying. He also said:"Conducting interrogations with the intent to derive information but in the process, driving someone to commit suicide is different from doing so with the intent to make him commit suicide."

"Although this does not mean we accept the RCI findings in any way, the report definitely allows for a criminal prosecution. The AG should look it the whole thing holistically, and he should very least consider this, or else explain why not," Gobind told FMT.

The DAP leader argued that Section 330 was designed to protect those people who are being abused in the course of interrogations and it was normal that torture would not only be physical but also mental.

"The illustration given in the section of the law refers to the word torture. Hurt must include injury to the mind and mental distress. Isn't that what RCI said happened to Teoh ?"

"I believe that the AG would have a case," said Gobind.

Test case

Although there has not been a precedent, this can be a test case, he said. "If you look in a dictionary, what does the word "hurt" mean? For the word injury, its already been accepted that it includes the mind," he said.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Zahid Cries Foul Over Smear Campaign On Submarine Purchase

Posted: 22 Jul 2011 11:29 AM PDT

(Bernama) - SEMPORNA -- Defence Minister Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi has warned certain quarters against running a smear campaign over alleged irregularities in the purchase of two submarines in 2002.

Commenting on a claim made by French lawyer William Bourdon that he would uncover more information on the purchase, Ahmad Zahid said the ministry was willing to be investigated in upholding the truth.

"The acquisition of submarines was transparent as I had mentioned in the Parliament. Please remember, any mistakes on their part, they will not get away scot-free," he told reporters after launching the Armed Forces' "Jiwa Murni" (community) programme in conjunction with "Ops Pasir" at Danawan island here yesterday.

Bourdon, a human rights lawyer, who is on a four-day visit to the country until Sunday, gave a speech at a Suaram's fundraiser dubbed "Ops Scorpene" in Bayan Baru, Penang on Thursday night purportedly to fund an awareness campaign to pursue the case in French courts.

Suaram filed a case against French naval defence giant DCNS in 2009 over alleged irregularities in the Scorpene deal worth RM7.3 billion between Malaysia and France and it is being investigated by French authorities.

Ahmad described the campaign as a malicious attack on the government and Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak, who was the defence minister at the time when the purchase was made.

In another development, Ahmad Zahid said the ministry would beef up naval capabilities in Sabah waters and an allocation would be sought from the 10th Malaysia Plan in October.

Meanwhile, Ahmad Zahid said the Defence Ministry Media Awards Night would be held on Nov 18 in recognition of the media's contribution in defence coverage

He said there would be 10 categories of awards, including best newspaper reporting, best magazine reporting and best new media journalism (blog) with a grand prize of RM5,000.

Further information on the awards can be obtained from the ministry's Communication Unit media relation officer Lt Kdr Rahimah Taib at 019-3851136 or 03-20715041.

 

Scorpene lawyer deported, RM16b in defence deals quizzed

Posted: 22 Jul 2011 11:11 AM PDT

By Shannon Teoh, The Malaysian Insider

PETALING JAYA, July 23 — Pakatan Rakyat (PR) seized on the sudden deportation of William Bourdon last night to renew scrutiny into billion-ringgit defence contracts said to be as scandalous as the RM7 billion Scorpene submarine deal that the lawyer was pursuing in France.

PR lawmakers told an audience of 500 here last night that the French lawyer's deportation showed the Najib administration wanted to keep facts about defence deals hidden.

"We know French police have obtained quite crucial documents, linking (Datuk Seri) Najib Razak, our beloved prime minister himself. That is why irrational actions were taken today," said PKR vice president Nurul Izzah Anwar.
The Lembah Pantai MP added, "the fact that the Malaysian government has kicked Bourdon out most dishonourably today has helped our cause even more." The French lawyer was held in the aircraft by three immigration officers when he landed in Sepang from Penang yesterday morning,

She said that Bourdon's deportation and Barisan Nasional's (BN) clampdown on the July 9 Bersih rally for free and fair elections raised questions of Najib's "pronouncements of transformation."

DAP publicity chief Tony Pua spent 20 minutes recounting three other defence deals made over the past three years totalling RM16 billion for vehicles that cost Malaysia far more than other countries.

The Petaling Jaya Utara MP told his constituents that this included the RM2.3 billion for 12 Eurocopter EC725 helicopters, RM6 billion for six offshore patrol vessels (OPV) and RM7.8 billion for 257 armoured personnel carriers.

He said that questions over these deals in the media or in Parliament's Public Accounts Committee were met with the repeated refrain of "itu rahsia (that is secret). The armed forces and defence ministry officials insisted they could not expose military secrets to the rest of the world."

According to Pua, Brazil had purchased the Eurocopters at just RM82 million per unit as opposed to RM190 million paid by Malaysia, while New Zealand paid just RM240 million per OPV versus the RM1 billion each paid by Malaysia.

He also pointed out that the 257 armoured vehicles are to be supplied by local conglomerate DRB-Hicom, who in turn had bought the vehicles from a Turkish firm for just RM1.9 billion, only a quarter of the price that Malaysian taxpayers would fork out eventually.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Rule of law, rule by law

Posted: 22 Jul 2011 11:43 PM PDT

By Ambiga Sreenevasan

I urge you to use this arsenal of knowledge and your passion for justice to fight for those who are downtrodden.

You have already heard of the events of July 9th in Malaysia. Whilst it brought out the worst in some, it brought out the best in others and this is where our hope lies.

JULY 23 — Good Morning! Chancellor, vice chancellor and graduating students.

It is so good to be back!

I am deeply moved by the conferment of this honour upon me. That it comes from my alma mater is especially significant for me. That it comes at this time is almost providential, for it allows me and all lawyers to reflect on our roles in the societies we live in.

For this honour and this moment of reflection, I extend my grateful thanks to the Council and Senate of the University of Exeter.

Tired of injustice and oppression, people the world over are crying out for truth, goodness, justice and universal love and understanding.

The events in Malaysia over the past six weeks culminating in the rally for free and fair elections on the 9th of July, has taught me so much more than I could have ever learned in the last 30 years as a practising lawyer.

My team and I faced first-hand the full force of the unleashed power of the state, and I realised then the importance of the independence of the Institutions of government, particularly the judiciary, to check such abuses of power.

I also realised how real and present the absence of the Rule of Law can be.

In countries where the Rule of Law reigns strong and true one probably does not even talk about it. But in countries that veer towards Rule by Law, talking about getting back to the basics is crucial.

In many countries, Rule by Law is reflected in the existence of repressive laws that violate the fundamental rights of its citizens. One example of this is preventive detention laws that lock people away without affording them the basic right to a trial. There are many examples of such oppressive laws worldwide and they are not confined to underdeveloped or developing countries.

As lawyers, we are in a unique position. Our years of legal study and practice teach us to see and appreciate the fundamental role that the Rule of Law plays in guaranteeing that the state governs its citizens in a just and democratic manner.

Who better to remind those in power of their responsibilities to their citizens than lawyers trained in understanding the difference between "Rule of Law" and "Rule by Law"?

Our role as lawyers must therefore extend far beyond traditional legal practice.

Here, I make no reference to rules, guidelines, documents, or declarations. My only reference point is our conscience. Can we as lawyers, ever sit back and watch the erosion of fundamental liberties of the people around us and do nothing? Clearly, silence in these circumstances, is not an option.

When I graduated from this university about 30 years ago, things were of course very different. Today the Internet and social media has empowered people with a continual flow of unfiltered and up-to-date information. No longer can the manipulation and control of information be effectively used by those in power to suppress either thought or action.

You are in a world where you know instantly of injustices taking place in any part of it. In this global village drawn together by so many factors, we are one. We can reach out to each other using these new means of communication and we owe it to each other to stand together for what is right.

You may say, "But I studied law to be a solicitor or barrister and to earn money for a decent standard of living". There is nothing wrong with that, I assure you. I run a commercial litigation practice in a partnership of four where we also do public interest litigation. The two can co-exist quite comfortably.

The point I make is this.

You are graduating from one of the best universities in the country if not on the planet! You are special. And you are now a proud member of an army of people that is equipped with all that is necessary to both practise law and to fight injustice.

I urge you to use this arsenal of knowledge and your passion for justice to fight for those who are downtrodden.

You have already heard of the events of July 9th in Malaysia. Whilst it brought out the worst in some, it brought out the best in others and this is where our hope lies.

There were some in government who opposed the methods used to shut us down. Even doctors left their comfort zones to speak up against injustices. And of course there were the lawyers and the independent media who stood on the side of truth and justice.

However, the real heroes of that day are our friend and supporter Allahyarham Baharuddin Ahmad who paid the ultimate price in fighting a noble cause, the six members of the Socialist Party of Malaysia who, as we speak, sit in solitary confinement under preventive detention laws and finally the brave people of Malaysia who overcame their fear of intimidation and harassment to uphold their fundamental rights.

With all my heart I dedicate this honour you have bestowed upon me to them.

* This was the acceptance speech delivered by Datuk Dr Ambiga Sreenevasan upon her conferment with the Honorary Doctorate Of Laws, University of Exeter.

Raja Aziz Addruse

Posted: 22 Jul 2011 06:40 PM PDT


He was without a doubt a tenacious and learned lawyer, and a great believer in the sanctity of the Rule of Law. He was my first boss and I was with him for the first four years of my working life. He was also instrumental in me becoming involved with the activities of the Bar Council.

Datuk Zaid Ibrahim

This towering Malay lawyer passed away last week, at 75. I was fortunate enough to have been in town and was able to pay him one last visit at his home. With his death, the country and the profession has lost a symbol of justice.

He was without a doubt a tenacious and learned lawyer, and a great believer in the sanctity of the Rule of Law. He was my first boss and I was with him for the first four years of my working life. He was also instrumental in me becoming involved with the activities of the Bar Council. I did not achieve the success that he earned for himself, but he taught me a few things that I cherish to this day. A lawyer, he told us, must not be afraid to do what is right by the law – the reason why we refer to the profession as an honourable one is because we have the capacity to fight for justice. The day we no longer care enough about justice is the day we cease to be a member of an honourable profession.

The country needs more people like Raja Aziz to stem the tide of authoritarian rule. There are many young lawyers joining the profession and I hope the gifted ones will continue the struggle to uphold just laws and protect the rights of individuals. Today, fortunately, we still have the courageous Maliq Imtiaz, Haris Ibrahim and Azhar Azizan Harun, who are relentless in their pursuit of justice in cases that other lawyers are too afraid to touch, and judges are too afraid to decide on. I am refering to cases involving the issue of religious freedom. Although enshrined in the Constitution, this right has become meaningless as it's politically not acceptable.

Every other day we hear of heartwrenching stories about such cases, all of which could be avoided if our leaders, adminstrators, and judges had a small dose of compassion in their hearts. Look at what happened recently to Ashraf Hafiz Abdul Aziz, who underwent a sex-change operation in 2008. All she wanted was for the Registration Department to change her gender from male to female, but she was refused because the religious authorities will not condone such action. The judge Datuk Yazid Mustafa said he could not do much, and Women, Family and Community Development Minister Dato' Sri Shahrizat Abdul Jalil has also said she cannot do much beyond offer welfare assistance. The truth is they all can, but they won't.

The details in our IC have only one purpose: to help identify the person carrying the card. That means the details are necessarily all personal in nature. If the cardholder says he lives in Tropicana, does the Registeration Department accept that as true or does it have a verification exercise before accepting that statement as correct? When it come to gender, Ashraf knows best the condition her body is in. Why refer to the religious authorities? What does the Religious Department know about genetics, human anatomy, or biology? Ashraf knows herself best.

But in our heartless country, it is the officials who know best, the judges who know best, the politicians who know best. They tell you what religion you belong to, what gender you are, what colour you can wear. They do not care about yourself, your beliefs, your rights or your dignity. Some people tell me that they are like that because they are all God-fearing. I don't think so. A God-fearing people would not condone injustice, corruption and abuse of power. More accurately, they are playing God. We have to continue to fight for these fundamental rights if we want to protect the little freedom we still enjoy. This is how we can best remember Raja Aziz and all the other great lawyers who have gone before us.
 

Happy birthday Mr PM

Posted: 22 Jul 2011 04:36 PM PDT

Najib turns 58 today and as far as the rakyat are concerned, they can only pray that he is bestowed with wisdom in leading a nation as diverse and challenging as Malaysia.

The 'green light' from Najib was all that the police needed. It spared no effort in firing tear gas and water cannons at the supporters. The tear gas was even fired inside the compound of the Tung Shin Hospital in Jalan Pudu, a fact which the Health Minister Liow Tiong Lai initially refuted.

Jeswan Kaur, Free Malaysia Today

Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak has a knack for ditching the rakyat when they need him the most.

In just two years, the premier has succeeded in proving that his 1Malaysia and 'people first' mantra are nothing but lip service and rhetorics.

Typically, 'what goes around comes around', the tide has turned against Najib. Najib's latest antic of leaving the people to face the wrath of the police on July 9 was enough for many  to decide he is not the leader they want as the nation's premier.

The Facebook page demanding Najib's resignation had as of this morning recorded 207, 935 "likes". The page, titled '100,000 People Request Najib Tun Razak's Resignation' was created immediately after the July 9 Bersih 2.0 rally.

It was reported that the page registered 300 "likes" per minute following the July 9 rally and hit the 100,000 mark within three days of creation.

The July 9, 2011 rally was the initiative of election watchdog Bersih 2.0,  the aim being to free the electoral system from corruption and manipulation. Despite the coalition's willingness to work with the police, Najib at the last minute turned back on his word and left it to the police to deal with the 'Walk for Democracy' supporters.

The 'green light' from Najib was all that the police needed. It spared no effort in firing tear gas and water cannons at the supporters. The tear gas was even fired inside the compound of the Tung Shin Hospital in Jalan Pudu, a fact which the Health Minister Liow Tiong Lai initially refuted.

The July 9 incident which bears proof of the police brutality has also gone on to earn Najib the ire of foreign nations. His official visit to the United Kingdom was not as pleasant as he had expected.

The UK premier David Cameron reportedly had queried Najib on the Bersih rally. And w hen Najib and wife Rosmah Mansor had an audience with Queen Elizabeth II at Buckingham Palace, the queen too sent home a message to Najib, knowingly or otherwise. Her yellow attire was enough to give Najib a 'jaundice' attack.

Najib's popularity is now at an all-time low and with the latest development concerning the death verdict of Selangor political aide Teoh Beng Hock, it is very difficult  for Najib to regain the trust of the people.

RCI finding no surprise

On July 21, Minister in the Prime Minister's Department, Nazri Mohd Aziz revealed the findings of the Royal Commission of Inquiry which says Teoh was not murdered but had committed suicide as he was unable to bear the aggressive interrogation by three Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC)  officers.

Teoh, 30, had fallen to his death at the then Selangor MACC office in Shah Alam on July 16, 2009, after an overnight interrogation.

Does this disturbing  verdict free the MACC of any wrongdoing?  Whatever it is, the conclusion leaves no room to doubt that the country's justice system continues to be manipulated by the 'powers that be'.

The public outcry that this latest development is set to result in is something Najb cannot pretend to ignore. When he refused to select even one of the seven names suggested by Teoh's family to sit on the RCI, that itself was ground for doubting that justice would ever come Teoh's family's way.
Incidentally, one of the names submitted by Teoh's family was that of lawyer Ambiga Sreenevasan, who heads Bersih 2.0 and was one of the key face behind the 'Walk for Democracy' rally.

Najib's lack of respect for the judiciary is going to cost him his plush chair in his cosy Putrajaya office. The Bersih 2.0 rally and now the doubtful verdict on Teoh Beng Hock's death will become the noose that with time will end up suffocating the prime minister.

To most people, they have not forgotten the arrogance Najib has displayed since assuming premiership in 2009.

Najib has not made an effort to assist the Penan women and girls who are continuously raped by timber loggers attain justice.

It is also Najib who has shown no courage to rebuke the Umno-owned Malay daily Utusan Malaysia for fanning racial discord through its seditious editorials and articles.

Likewise, Najib is the least bothered with Perkasa, the extremist Malay group which keeps threatening and humiliating the non-Malays.

Najib, shape up or ship out

Why does Najib so easily ditch the people in times of need? Is Perkasa his tool to achieve his very own agendas?

The premier displayed no interest in solving the issue surrounding the novel 'Interlok' which is used by Fifth Formers. The novel is said to degrade the Indian community.

Najib has shown no interest in tackling issues affecting the Christian community and this alone was enough to earn him the ridicule of many during his trip to Vatican City where he met Pope Benedict XVI.

READ MORE HERE

 

Ku Li’s Amanah a key to national revival?

Posted: 22 Jul 2011 04:11 PM PDT

We know that because of half a century of abuses, manipulation and instituionalising of corrupt practices into becoming a culture, the very attempt at repairing these damages through such reforms will be a gargantuan task, but we must make the first few steps towards repairing the damages and putting the nation on a path of revival. 

DANIEL JOHN JAMBUN

I feel it is very exciting that our highly respected veteran leader Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah, popularly known as Ku Li, has already launched his new outfit Angkatan Amanah Merdeka (Amanah)  towards nurturing unity as espoused by the country's founding fathers.

 

In the midst of our sharp racial divisions at the moment, Amanah said in a statement recently that the group wants "to reaffirm, inculcate and re-ignite the sense of togetherness and true family spirit that prevailed among all Malaysians during the time of our common struggle for national independence". It also said it wants to rekindle the legacy, promise and ideals of Bapa Malaysia and the founding fathers so that all Malaysians may live together as members of a truly just, fair, progressive, united and happy nation community. Its other objectives are:

 

(1) To earnestly acknowledge, affirm and respect the sovereignty of the constituent states of the Malaysian Federation, consistent with the principles of federalism, democratic principles and in the true spirit of the Federal Constitution;

 

(2) To ensure that our national institutions respect and uphold the rule of law, democratic principles, rights and universal values;

 

(3) To support a government and administration that is transparent and accountable, truly competent, efficient, free of corruption and cronyism, clean and honest, fair and trustworthy, and that will be fully able to serve its functions and meet its responsibilities, freely and fairly; an administration that will always be mindful of the rights and interests of the people in whose name and cause it is appointed to serve;

 

(4) To promote the socio-economic well-being of the people, so that all Malaysians may enjoy truly advanced, progressive, fair and equitable lives – individually upholding filial piety and other noble values and collectively joined together in sincere family kinship as members of our national community and as stakeholders in our common national destiny;

 

(5) To support an economic policy that will help achieve and sustain a high standard of living for the people, based on the principle of justice, fairness and balance, consistent with the constitution and under a stable monetary condition.

 

In two several papers presented locally and abroad (Shattered hopes and broken dreams and Disenfranchisement of bona-fide Sabahans) I had touched on the sweet promises made by no less than the Father of Malaysia, Tunku Abdul Rahman, who assured us that no colonialisation of any sort will be imposed on Sabah. At the outset of the formation of this federation, we had dreams of a new age of progress in which we Sabahans and Sarawakians will be enjoying a kind of development that will propel us strongly into the 20th and the 21st centuries, under a government which would be just, with no prejudice against any Malaysian regardless of skin colour and belief. Sabah and Sarawak would be part of a federation, not a nation, hence retaining their respective nationalities on equal status with Malaya. We were assured of many rights in perpetuity. But they were not to be. Successive governments and leaders were sweet-talked into surrendering those rights until we are just tools and stooges to federal powers. Through political manipulations and stratagems in the politics of federalism we fell into the traps and ended being what we are today – just one of the 13 states in Malaysia, and the poorest of the lot at that!

In the second paper mentioned above I had listed our disenfranchisements due to so many   losses and victimisations:

(1) Loss of right as a national entity,

(2) Loss of rights guaranteed in the 20 Points,

(3) We have been victims of demographic re-engineering,

(4) We have been victims of Kuala Lumpur's divide-and-rule manipulation,

(5) We have lost the true democratic system,

(6) We have been victims of gerrymandering and the manipulation of the electoral rolls,

(7) We have been re-colonised,

(8) Our security has been substantially compromised,

(9) We are losing our land rights,

(10) We are the poorest state!

(11) We are victims of Malay supremacy,

(12) Loss of harmonious and peaceful co-existence. I then followed up with a list of demands of things that are should have been rightly ours.

What Ku Li's Amanah can do are many, but what comes immediately to mind is the re-institution of real justice (in all matters including the fair redistribution of wealth and opportunities), liberty, transparency, true democracy, meritocracy, and freedom of the press. But amanah itself had made an excellent summary of all that need to be done by stating them in its comprehensive list of objectives. If we were to analyse everything mentioned in those objectives it would take a whole thick book. I have high hopes when reading objective No. 3, which aims for "a government and administration that is transparent and accountable, truly competent, efficient, free of corruption and cronyism, clean and honest, fair and trustworthy, and that will be fully able to serve its functions and meet its responsibilities, freely and fairly". We know that because of half a century of abuses, manipulation and instituionalising of corrupt practices into becoming a culture, the very attempt at repairing these damages through such reforms will be a gargantuan task, but we must make the first few steps towards repairing the damages and putting the nation on a path of revival.

The biggest damage has been in the area of race relations. We are now living in an era of interracial and interreligious suspicions and paranoia. We are so far into interracial distrust that we are actually nearing the point when another interracial riot may take place and bring the whole nation down to its knees – no thanks to many bigots and hate mongers like Ibrahim Ali of Perkasa. The second biggest damage, I believe, is in the area of economic confidence of the people as a result of rampant and unbridled corruption. With these two combined, the effect on the economy has been devastating, resulting in increased poverty and the frightening brain drain. And all these are dragging us deeper and deeper into the abyss. Without any drastic change, even with the so-called transformasi of the Prime Minister, the nation will continue to sink deeper and deeper into trouble.

We need more NGOs like Amanah, UBF, MCLM, CigMa, Bersih and others with similar aims to operate against the BN-sponsored tranformasi and 1Malaysia movements which have the single agenda of keeping BN in power and perpetuating the abuses. With enough pressure, the BN will be brought to heel. The only acceptable change is to beat BN and change the government. And with a giant like Ku Li making the move even while he is still in Umno, the BN is suffering a double injury. One injury is the stab in the back of BN by Ku Li, and the other is the great damage on the BN when Ku Li reveal all the dirty inside stories.  

It is very exciting to read of his speech at the launching of Amanah last Friday during which he said, "I believe at the end of the road that we are taking in these early steps, we will be called upon to make several important decisions for the future of our nation – choices that we must take regardless of the problems, challenges and obstacle that we face. This morning could be another normal social event or it could be the beginning of a journey towards something that has never taken place before, that may change the current of our country's future." Agreed, totally. And truth will prevail. Ku Li will be a major force, with a strong potential to become the leader of the Third Force, and to become the key to the great change we have been dreaming of. Can we dare to foresee him becoming our next PM? After all, politics is the art of the possible, isn't it?

 

MoCS march: A test of faith and fortitude

Posted: 22 Jul 2011 11:24 AM PDT

 

By Mariam Mokhtar, FMT

An insecure government which feels threatened by calls for democratic reform and proper governance will, for political gain, find a religious or racial issue to attempt to combat any of the rakyat's demands.

In March, Francis Siah, the leader for the Movement for Change, Sarawak (MoCS), lodged a police report against Sarawak Chief Minister Taib Mahmud for corruption, money laundering and abuse of power.

Siah confirmed that his report contained allegations and accusations which had been made by Sarawak Report, the Bruno Manser Fund and various news portals and blogs. He also urged the police to conduct a thorough investigation into Taib's alleged crimes.

"It must be noted that most of the corruption and money laundering and blatant abuse of power have documentary evidence."

The MoCS rally on Aug 13 is a public protest against Taib's mis-rule and Siah is adamant that he has acted within the confines of the law.

"I want to assure the police that MoCS will not take part in any illegal gathering or rallies in Kuching or any other place.

"There is no need to monitor MoCS as we do things in accordance with the law."

Just like Bersih 2.0, the MoCS is a non-political movement born from the rakyat's desire to rid their nation of a dictator.

The rally by MoCS shares the same aims as the Bersih 2.0 "Walk for Democracy" in that Sarawakians also desire free, fair and clean elections and a demand to return to a government that listens to and works for the good of its people.

By Merdeka Day 2011, Sarawak will have celebrated 49 years of being part of Malaysia. For many Sarawakians, especially those from the interior, life has not progressed much in almost five decades.

The indigenous peoples may think they are liberated from colonial domination, only to find that they are shackled by the yoke of rule under Taib.

Sarawak has an abundance of natural resources and its people should be enjoying a reasonable standard of living from the riches of oil, minerals, timber and land. In reality, the wealth has not been shared equally. Taib and his cronies have helped themselves to Sarawak's riches and shared very little with its people.

Taib's target practice

Sarawak's corrupt leaders are not made accountable for their actions and instead of developing the nation, have developed a taste for the high life by robbing the poor.

Rather than helping the people by creating jobs, these politicians create opportunities for themselves in the form of contracts and land-grabs.

Instead of recognising the native customary right (NCR) lands of the indigenous peoples, those in positions of power have recognised opportunities only for themselves and in the process denied the Sarawakians their way of life and their ancestral rights. They have also destroyed the environment.

While the old reminisce about a land that was once abundant with wild life and riches that could be shared by all, a majority of the young only know of poverty, a low standard of living, a poor health system, a sub-standard education, poor infrastructure and broken or scattered families whose members are forced to seek work for a paltry wage either in the coastal towns or elsewhere.

Sarawak is blessed in that the different races are more integrated and tolerant of each other than in peninsular Malaysia.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved