Isnin, 27 Jun 2011

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Malaysian arrests are a puzzle

Posted: 26 Jun 2011 08:49 PM PDT


Opposition party members arrested on allegations of seeking to overthrow the king 

The Penang deputy police chief, Abdul Rahim Jaafar said police seized 28 T-shirts, eight of which bore pictures of figures such as the long-dead Argentine revolutionary figure Che Guevara, from the 30 Parti Sosialis members. As a flock of critics pointed out, the Che T-shirts can be bought all over the night markets of Kuala Lumpur and Penang.

Asia Sentinel

The arrest Sunday by Malaysian security forces of a Socialist Party member of parliament and 30 others for allegedly intending to wage war against the country's Yang di-Pertuan Agong, or king, appears to be a throwback to 50 years ago when Communists still thronged the country's jungles.

The arrest has opposition party members scratching their heads in confusion and attempting to discern what actually happened at a police checkpoint in Penang, where police said the party members had been found with subversive materials instigating an overthrow of the government.
  
Opposition figures said the 30 were on a campaign swing in the north of the country to seek to generate support for a bigger rally on July 9 that has police – and the ruling Barisan Nasional – much more clearly worried. Sources within the United Malays National Organization, the country's biggest ethnic political party and the leader of the ruling Barisan Nasional, say that rally, by an organization called Bersih, or the Coalition for Clean and Fair Elections, an umbrella group encompassing 64 civil-society groups, has been hijacked by Pakatan Rakyat, the three-party opposition coalition made up principally of Parti Islam se-Malaysia, the Democratic Action Party and Parti Keadilan Rakyat, headed by opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim.

The Bersih rally's organizers say they are not connected to any political parties. Although the July 9 rally has been declared illegal by the police, the organizers, headed by Ambiga Sreenevasan, the former president of the Bar Council, say they plan to march through the streets of Kuala Lumpur to deliver a petition to the Agong, whom Parti Sosialis supposedly wants to overthrow.
  
Adding to police concerns, the Malay nationalist NGO Perkasa, led by firebrand Ibrahim Ali, and the youth division of UMNO say they will hold counter-rallies, increasing the possibility of violent confrontation. Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein has said that he wouldn't rule out using the country's strict Internal Security Act, which allows in effect for indefinite detention, on the organizers of the Bersih rally, but maintained that other laws will be used for now.

Indeed, the security establishment has considerable reason for concern even without the counter-rallies. A massive rally in Kuala Lumpur in November 2007 by led by Bersih brought 40,000 people to the streets in one of the biggest anti-government rallies Malaysia had seen to that point.  It was a harbinger of the March, 2008 vote that cost the Barisan Nasional its two-thirds lock on Parliament and the leadership of five states.
 
That rally turned central Kuala Lumpur into chaos as baton-wielding riot police used water cannon and tear gas to try and thwart an attempt by tens of thousands of marchers to deliver a petition to Malaysia's king, asking for royal intervention in delivering electoral reform.

As the current Bersih rally has become closer to reality, the government has grown more concerned, warning that any violence would be met with force.

"The Bersih marches have been hijacked by opposition parties ahead of pending national elections in a bid to cause unrest while clamoring for electoral reform despite the elections that yielded huge gains for the opposition," said a lawyer close to Umno. "Furthermore, elements of the outlawed communist Party of Malaya have reared their ugly head with the tacit backing from the DAP and the Bar Council, which is widely seen as engaging the ruling Umno Government to dilute its Malay privileges and national identity that places Islam as its official religion. How else to explain the arrests of 30 Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM) activists in Penang late Saturday, apparently under section 122 of the Penal Code which arraigns rebellion against the king?"

The Penang deputy police chief, Abdul Rahim Jaafar said police seized 28 T-shirts, eight of which bore pictures of figures such as the long-dead Argentine revolutionary figure Che Guevara, from the 30 Parti Sosialis members. As a flock of critics pointed out, the Che T-shirts can be bought all over the night markets of Kuala Lumpur and Penang.

Although the Communists were defeated in 1960, the insurgency dragged on in the northern jungles on the Thai border until 1989, almost unnoticed by the bulk of Malaysians, who had got about the business of turning their country into a capitalist, exporting powerhouse that made Communism basically irrelevant.  With the insurgency over for the past 22 years, the Communist Party remains outlawed and the party's elderly longtime leader, Chin Peng, remains outside the country despite a plea to be allowed to come back so that he could die with his family.

Opposition figures including the DAP's Lim Kit Siang ridiculed the arrests, saying on his blog that they were more an indication over the government's "fret and fever" over the planned July 9 march that "has driven elements of our security establishment nuts."

"The arrest and remand for seven days of 30 individuals (including two juveniles in their teens), apparently for having in their possession certain paraphernalia including T-shirts with images of former communist leaders, for waging war against the King is a reflection of such a clampdown," he told the news website Malaysian Insider.

"By analogy, if one were to be at home wearing a Che Guevara (the Marxist revolutionary) T-shirt listening to a song attacking the institution of royalty by either The Smiths or The Sex Pistols, one faces a very real likelihood of being investigated for waging war against the King. This surely cannot be."
 
 "The Communist Party is an outlawed political organisation. It is unlawful to display and promote communist elements," Abdul Rahim, the police official, told reporters.  Among other things, he said,  some of the Ts-shirts bore the emblem of  what looked like the Barisan Nasional logo being cut with a pair of scissors, and the words Anti-Capitalism and Udahlah tu.. Bersaralah (That's enough, retire).

Other items confiscated included copies of the Sosialis Party organ in various languages along with 600 pamphlets advertising the Bersih rally.  Some, Abdul Rahim said, contained "seditious content." Most of those arrested have been ordered held for seven days.  

 

US envoy did not believe Putrajaya’s jet engine explanation

Posted: 26 Jun 2011 02:32 PM PDT

 

By Shannon Teoh, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, June 27 — The United States ambassador here told his government early last year that embassy officials doubted the Najib administration's explanation of two F-5 jet engines theft in late 2007, according to a diplomatic cable released by whistleblower site Wikileaks.

The document signed by Ambassador James Keith said that the embassy shared in the "incredulity" expressed by "a chorus of commentary in online media" at Putrajaya's stand that "the thefts were carried out solely by two relatively low-level individuals and that higher-ups in the military and elsewhere were not involved."

"We share some of the incredulity expressed in the blogosphere about the Government's case and explanation of who was behind the engine thefts.

"In coordination with Washington, Post is continuing to push for a complete accounting of how the thefts occurred and the ultimate disposition of the engines, and to remind the GOM of the seriousness of the issue and need for remedial actions," said the cable which was published on the Malaysia Today news portal today.

It is understood "Post" referred to a lead US political official based in the embassy here.

Two individuals were charged over the missing jet engines — former air force Sergeant N. Tharmendran and company director K. Rajandran Prasad in January 6, 2010 in connection with the theft of the missing F5-E jet engines.

Tharmendran was accused of stealing the engines in December 2007 at the Subang RMAF air base while Rajandran was accused of disposing of the engines on April 30, 2008.

The theft was a major embarrassment for the government following reports that the country's first submarine — KD Tunku Abdul Rahman — could not dive in tropical waters.

The prime minister had vowed that there would be no cover-up in the high-profile case, which occurred during his tenure as defence minister while the current minister, Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, had claimed that it was an inside job.

The engines, purchased in 1972 at a cost of RM303,570, and not RM50 million as initially reported when the story broke, are now reportedly in Uruguay.

The cable also said that state-run media has been muted on the issue while the foreign ministry "has kept itself at arms' length from the scandal" with the embassy unable to secure meetings with senior Wisma Putra officials to discuss this issue.

It quoted the ministry's principal assistant secretary (Americas division) Mohamad Radzi Jamaluddin as saying that the defense ministry had the lead on the issue and was being "elusive in its handling of the case."

The cable, classified by political counsellor Brian D. McFeeters, also said that the Royal Malaysian Air Force (RMAF) only officially notified the US of the missing jet engines on January 6, 2010, the same day Tharmendran and Rajandran were charged in court. 

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Umno Youth applies for permit to hold patriotic gathering on July 9

Posted: 27 Jun 2011 01:24 AM PDT

(Bernama) - The Umno Youth movement today applied for a police permit to hold a patriotic assembly on July 9 to represent the voice of the public who opposed the illegal gathering organised by the group of trouble makers on the same day.

Federal Territory Umno Youth head Rizalman Mokhtar said the application was to show the opposition to the group who planned to hold the illegal assembly in the federal capital.

"Our (Umno Youth's) objective is to represent the silent majority who do not agree with the action of the organisers of the illegal assembly who try to disturb public order in the federal capital...so we hold this gathering which is in a more peaceful manner," he said.

He said this to reporters after applying for a permit for the gathering at the Dang Wangi District Police Headquarters at about 3.30pm today. Also present was the Umno Youth executive secretary Mohd Sumali Reduan.

"If the application is rejected, we will still proceed with the gathering because it also depends on the organisers of the illegal assembly. If the illegal assembly is held, then Umno Youth will also proceed with the assembly," he said.

 

Suaram website hacked

Posted: 26 Jun 2011 10:55 PM PDT

By Teoh El Sen, FMT

KUALA LUMPUR: Hackers have defaced the website of local human rights organisation Suaram today, in what is believed to be part of the "crackdown" against activists in recent days.

Suaram coordinator E Nalini said that the intrusion was detected at 6.45pm today and the NGO was still trying to get information technology experts to restore the website, which has been entirely replaced with a single page entitled "Indonesiancoder Team".

A logo with a twin AK-47s appeared beneath the flaming title while below were the words "Hacked by Dr. Cruzz". The website's icon is replaced by a daemon face and the greyed backdrop was also filled with animated falling snow.

What is believed to be Quranic prayers is also being played in the background.

Also written on the vandalised site were "Marhaban Ya Ramadhan that will come soon" and "Get the Codes and Feel the Soul".

"We don't know what happened but we suspect that it is linked to the 'crackdown' on activists that we're seeing on Parti Sosialis Malaysia and Bersih supporters," Nalini told FMT.

She said the website was so badly hacked that even archived information is inaccessible.

"We were once hacked in October 2008 around the time (blogger) Raja Petra (Kamarudin) was arrested," Nalini said, adding that it took several months before the website was restored then.

 

Bersih repudiates foreign Christian funding claim

Posted: 26 Jun 2011 10:45 PM PDT

By Debra Chong, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, June 27 — Bersih 2.0 chairman Datuk Ambiga Sreenevasan rubbished today Utusan Malaysia's claim that the electoral reform group's July 9 rally was funded by foreign Christian organisations, saying the money was donated by Malaysian citizens at home and abroad.

"The funds for the rally are entirely from public donations and the [sale of] Bersih t-shirts... I have never even heard of those [foreign] groups," she told The Malaysian Insider over the phone today after being questioned by the police over the controversial July 9 street demonstration that has triggered two other groups, Perkasa and Umno Youth, to call their own counter rallies.

She added that the Selangor state government has also pledged financial support for Bersih's July 9 rally.

Umno-owned Utusan Malaysia claimed in an editorial today that Bersih is being funded by some 11 foreign Christian organisations that have donated millions of ringgit to underwrite the group's rally. It named German think-tank Konrad Adenauer Foundation (KAF) and the Canadian Allied Foundation as among them.

KAF is associated with Germany's conservative Christian Democratic Union and  aims to further the "promotion of freedom and liberty, peace, and justice" through "furthering European unification, improving transatlantic relations and deepening development co-operation."

Little is known about the Canadian Allied Foundation named in the Utusan article.

Ambiga admitted to Bersih receiving some money from two US organisations — the National Democratic Institute (NDI) and Open Society Institute (OSI) — for other projects, which she stressed were unrelated to the July 9 march.

The NDI describes itself as a non-profit, non-partisan organisation "working to support and strengthen democratic institutions worldwide through citizen participation, openness and accountability in government".

According to corporate information on its website, the OSI was started by financier George Soros in 1984 to help countries make the transition from communism, and has grown to include not just the US but more than 70 countries in Europe, Asia, Africa, and Latin America.

Fellow Bersih steering committee member, Maria Chin Abdullah, explained that both NDI's and OSI's funding were specifically for to the electoral watchdog's delineation projects.

READ MORE HERE

 



Altantuya case: Judge yet to file judgment

Posted: 26 Jun 2011 07:16 PM PDT

(Free Malaysia Today) - The appeal of the two policemen convicted in the murder of Altantuya Sharriibuu is delayed by the High Court judge's need for more time to complete his judgment, the Dewan Rakyat was told today.

"Given that the judgment has not been filed, the appeal record is not complete," Minister in the Prime Minister Department Mohd Nazri Aziz said in a written reply to Karpal Singh (DAP-Batu Gelugor).

"Hence," he added, "the date for trial with the Court of Appeal cannot be determined as yet."

He said the large amounts of statement notes and evidences presented in the trial prevented the judge from filing his judgment more speedily.

Chief inspector Azilah Hadri and Corporal Sirul Azhar Umar were sentenced to hang when the High Court found them guilty of murdering the 28-year-old Mongolian mother of two in Mukim Bukit Raja near here 10pm on Oct 19, 2006 and 1am the following day.

They were tried with political analyst Abdul Razak Abdullah Baginda, who was charged with abetting in the murder but was acquitted and discharged without his defence being called on Oct 31, 2008.

Azilah and Sirul were convicted in April 9, 2009. They filed for appeal in the same month

Abdul Razak, known to be close to Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak, admitted in court that he had a romantic affair with Altantuya, who was allegedly shot before her body was blown up with C4 explosives.

French investigation

Opposition leaders have said Najib might also have had an affair with Altantuya and that there was a connection between her murder and the controversial multi-billion ringgit Scorpene submarine deal between the Malaysian government and French arms manufacturer DCNS.

French prosecutors are said to be in the final stages of preparing for a corruption trial which could see top Malaysian officials, including Najib, being asked to testify.

READ MORE HERE

 

Bersih says will march on without permit

Posted: 26 Jun 2011 06:59 PM PDT

(The Malaysian Insider) - Despite being hauled up for police questioning today, Bersih chief Datuk Ambiga Sreenevasan insists the July 9 march for electoral reforms will continue as planned.

The prominent lawyer said she will also not apply for a police permit to hold the street demonstration as the home minister and the police have made it clear one will not be issued.

She then slammed the authorities for hauling up civil society members campaigning for electoral reform instead of engaging them.

"Instead of threatening people, engage with us," she urged the authorities, repeating the movement's statement made last night.

Ambiga also repeatedly called the arrests of Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM) members in Penang during the weekend "ridiculous", denouncing attempts by various groups to link the minor political group backing Bersih to "communists".

"I don't know what it's about... They are caught in a time warp. Who talks about communists in this day and age?" she quizzed, claiming the arrests were baseless.

The British colonial authorities battled communist terrorists from 1948 to 1960 in a police action called the Emergency and Malaysia later enacted the Internal Security Act (ISA) to allow detention without trial. The Communist Party of Malaysia (CPM) later laid down their weapons in 1989.

"Whoever wants to support Bersih, it's up to them. It's open to all citizens," she stressed.

READ MORE HERE

 

PM, DPM, wives spent RM25.1m on trips since 2008

Posted: 26 Jun 2011 06:40 PM PDT

(The Malaysian Insider) - The Prime Minister's Department has revealed that Datuk Seri Najib Razak, Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin and their spouses spent RM25.1 million for their official trips abroad from 2008 to June this year.

In a written response to Chua Tian Chang (PKR-Batu) in Parliament last week, the department reported that of the total, Najib and his wife Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor had spent RM17,118,650.58 for their official functions abroad while Muhyiddin and his wife Puan Sri Norainee Abdul Rahman had spent RM8,020,328.07.

Chua had asked the prime minister to list the total cost of his and his deputy's official visits abroad according to date, location and purpose from 2008 to 2011. He had also asked for details on Rosmah's expenses in the same years.

Najib, who was deputy prime minister in 2008, only succeeded former Prime Minister Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi in April 2009.

Muhyiddin was international trade and industry minister in 2008 before he was appointed as Najib's deputy and education minister in 2009.

According to the department's response, made available to the media today, Najib and Rosmah had jointly spent some RM1.7 million in 2008, RM4.8 million in 2009, RM5.1 million last year and RM5.4 million until June this year.

Muhyiddin and Norainee, on the other hand, had jointly spent RM2.7 million in 2008, RM609,185 in 2009, RM1.38 million last year and RM3.27 million until June this year.

"The Prime Minister's Department does not prepare any special allocation for the expenses of the prime minister's wife. The department only finances the expenses of the Prime Minister's Office," the response said.

 

 

Mr and Mrs Najib’s travels cost RM17 mil

Posted: 26 Jun 2011 06:23 PM PDT

 

(Free Malaysia Today) - Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak and his wife Rosmah Mansor spent slightly more than RM17 million of taxpayers' money on travels from 2008 to June this year.

The figures were released by the Prime Minister's Department in Parliament today in reply to a question from PKR Batu MP Tian Chua.

Najib and Rosmah's travels in 2008 amounted to RM1.7 million, RM4.81 million the next year, RM5.41 million in 2010 and RM5.42 million up to June this year.

The opposition has in the past accused the ruling coalition of siphoning off public money to finance hefty private travels of the two, an allegation the government has denied.

Compared to her predecessors, Rosmah is seen as being more involved in government affairs, giving rise to the perception that she wields strong influence in her husband's administration.

Rosmah, however, has denied the allegation.

In its reply, the Prime Minister's Department said there were no specific allocations for the expenses of a prime minister's wife.

"The PM's Department only finances expenses involving the PM's office," it stated.

Meanwhile, the travel expenses of Deputy Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin and his wife was 100% lower than that of Najib and Rosmah's.

From 2008 to June this year, RM8 million was spent on their travels.

Some RM2.7 million was spent in 2008, RM609,185 the next year, RM1.38 million in 2010 and RM3.27 million up till June this year.

 

 

Police summon Ambiga, Samad Said

Posted: 26 Jun 2011 03:45 PM PDT

 

(Malaysiakini) - Bersih 2.0 chief S Ambiga and national laureate A Samad Said have been called to the Dang Wangi police station today to have their statements recorded.

It is understood that the duo will be asked to give their statements in relation to the official launch of the Bersih 2.0 rally two weeks ago.

Ambiga (in black jacket) and Samad are expected to turn up about 2.30pm, accompanied by senior members of the Bersih 2.0 steering committee.

It is understood that the police have also called in Perkasa president Ibrahim Ali, who was scheduled to give his statement at 12.30pm.

Ibrahim had said earlier that he would lead a protest group on July 9 to counter the Bersih 2.0 protesters who intend to march in support of electoral reforms.

Umno Youth chief Khairy Jamaluddin has also announced that the wing will organise its own march, dubbed the Patriot March, the same day.

READ HERE: MORE TO COME

NGOs rallying around Bersih banner

Posted: 26 Jun 2011 03:04 PM PDT

 

By Tashny Sukumaran, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR: NGOs nationwide are banding together in support of Bersih's upcoming march for clean and clear elections, set to take place on July 9.

The much-discussed march has been met with opposition from several sectors, including Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak who accused the organisers of attempting to "wrest back political momentum from the Barisan Nasional", saying that the Bersih supporters are to be blamed if the march leads to chaos.

Also strindently opposing the rally are pro-Malay rights group Perkasa, led by firebrand Ibrahim Ali, and Umno Youth headed by Rembau MP Khairy Jamaluddin.

The two groups have organised marches of their own to take place on the same day as Bersih's.

However, Bersih has repeatedly stressed that the "walk for democracy" is a form of "peaceful and principled activism", and that the July 9 gathering is merely to exercise the constitutional right of the people to have their voices heard in a democratic manner.

"Najib needs to protect human rights," Bersih steering committee said in a statement.

The Coalition for Clean and Fair Elections (Bersih) committee is made up of Ambiga Sreenevasan (chairman), Andrew Khoo, Arumugam K, Dr Farouk Musa, Haris Ibrahim, Liau Kok Fah, Maria Chin Abdullah, Richard Y W Yeoh, Dr Toh Kin Woon, Dr Wong Chin Huat, Yeo Yang Poh, Zaid Kamaruddin, Subramaniam Pillay and Arul Prakkash.

The election watchdog said it was "disappointed" that instead of "fulfilling his (Najib's) role as the protector of the constitutional rights and safety of peace-loving Malaysians, he has chosen to misrepresent our intentions".

True goal

Bersih also expressed disappointment at the accusation that the purpose of the march was to wrest back political momentum from BN, saying that Najib had failed to understand its stated

goals.

Bersih emphasised that its true goal was to make the electoral system truly free and fair so that all political parties in Malaysia could contest on a level playing field.

It called on Barisan Nasional parties to join the rally, and demonstrate the so-called "progressive" views that the prime minister has espoused.

"He (Najib) can conclusively do so simply by allowing the July 9 rally to proceed unhindered and by directing all government agencies to cooperate fully with all involved."

The statement also hit out at the police for arresting 30 Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM) activists under Section 122 of the Penal Code (for waging war against the king that carries a sentence of life imprisonment or imprisonment not exceeding 20 years). 

READ MORE HERE

 

Sabah natives urged to reconsider staying with BN

Posted: 26 Jun 2011 02:49 PM PDT

 

By Michael Kaung, FMT

KOTA KINABALU: A former senator has urged native leaders in Sabah to re-evaluate their position in the Barisan Nasional (BN) coalition as they lack power to make changes for the state.

Kalakau Untol, who is now with PKR, said Kadazandusun Murut (KDM) leaders in BN Sabah must remove their blinkers and see the coalition for what it is as it seemed not to be serving their
best interests.

Untol, the PKR Sabah election secretariat chairman, said that KDM leaders must know they have tried their best and have exhausted all avenues to voice their grouses to get a better deal for Sabah.

"But all their efforts have fallen on deaf ears… with Umno dominating the political manoeuvring, achievements are short of expectations," he said in a statement.

"I am therefore inviting the KDM leaders in Sabah BN to join the PKR," the former deputy labour minister said.

Untol said that ideally, since the inception of Malaysia in 1963, Sabah should now be a very progressive state, given its wealth of natural resources.

But Sabah has been shortchanged for so long that the state seemed to be 50 years behind other states in Peninsular Malaysia, he said.

"How can Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak proudly shout the 1Malaysia concept when the poverty rate is very high in Sabah?," he asked.

"I want to ask the KDM leaders how long more can they stomach the mistreatment of ethnic KDM? To quote Edwin Burke, 'for all injustice to happen, it takes a good man to do nothing,'" he said.

He said that KDM leaders should align themselves to those who treat them as equals, adding that "as a reminder to all, Sabah formed Malaysia as an equal partner in 1963 but has since been reduced
to just another state and hence have to share its wealth with other states.

"Why must we beg for what is rightfully ours? KDM had in the past been a major force in determining the state government of Sabah.

"This time, I ask for a bigger role from my fellow KDMs in BN to unite to help install Pakatan Rakyat as the next federal government so that Malaysia can be put on the right track and we, the KDM, are given due respect," he said.

Tide of change

He said that all KDM must sail with the tide of change as their Malay, Indian and Chinese brothers in Peninsular Malaysia have embraced change since the 12th general election.

Sabahans, especially the KDM, and its leaders must start the ball rolling to effect change in the state.

"We must not be at sixes and sevens anymore. God has given us the brain… all it takes is a little courage to ensure change as there is already growing disenchantment with the BN government," he said. 

READ MORE HERE

 

Rais: ‘Bersih in a plot to overthrow govt’

Posted: 26 Jun 2011 02:39 PM PDT

 

By Patrick Lee, FMT

KUALA LUMPUR: The Coalition for Free and Fair Elections (Bersih 2.0) is out to overthrow the government and cause social chaos, a minister said today.

Minister of Information, Communications and Culture Rais Yatim said that Bersih 2.0′s planned July 9 "Walk for Democracy" rally was nothing more than a plot to force power from the Barisan Nasional's hands.

"It looks like these parties that are working for July 9 have no other way. They think that this is a way to shake and disrupt the peace that we have and grab power," he told reporters in the Parliament lobby.

"This is a social coup which is happening at the moment."

Rais said that the Bersih 2.0 proponents were resorting to methods involving "illegal power grabs" and "mass psychology".

The minister then reminded "educated and right-thinking" Malaysians to oppose Bersih, which he claimed was "evil" and "illegal according to the law".

Rais was referring to Bersih supporters and Malaysian Socialist Party (PSM) activists who were arrested by the police yesterday.

Thirty people, including Sungai Siput D Jeyakumar were remanded by the police for supposedly spreading communism.

Police claimed that the group, who were arrested while traveling in a bus near Penang, were caught with Malayan Communist Party (MCP) materials.

'Bersih representing a minority'

Speaking in support of the arrests, Rais attacked PSM for supporting communism.

"Communism is not recognised in Malaysia, and this has been stamped in Malaysia's struggle and in the spirit of the (Federal) Constitution, and the practice of democracy."

"Those who want communism to come back have to be caught, and strict action has to be taken against them by the authorities," the minister said. 

READ MORE HERE

 

PSM: ‘Communist’ bogeyman theory an excuse to use ISA

Posted: 26 Jun 2011 02:27 PM PDT

By Shazwan Mustafa Kamal, The Malaysian Insider

 

(The Malaysian Insider) — Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM) has accused the government of falsely linking the party with attempting to revive communism, saying that it would be an excuse for the use of the Internal Security Act (ISA).

The police said yesterday they were probing attempts by Bersih activists for reviving communism, and are investigating 30 PSM members, including Sungai Siput MP Dr Michael Jayakumar, for "waging war against the Yang di-Pertuan Agong."

Deputy Penang police chief Datuk Abdul Rahim Jaafar said remand orders would be applied to detain the 30 activists under section 122 of the Penal Code.

"The desperate attempts by the police to bring back the 'communist' bogey from the Cold War is an attempt by Umno-BN to stay in power by frightening people and thus justifying the use of the ISA," PSM secretary-general S. Arutchelvan told reporters today.

Home Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein said yesterday that he could not rule out using the ISA on the July 9 Bersih rally, but maintained that other laws will be used for now.

Arutchelvan slammed the police for the arrests, saying that it was a prelude for mass arrests over the upcoming rally.

The activist explained that the 30 PSM members were originally arrested on Saturday in Penang on charges of taking part in an illegal assembly, sedition as well as printing seditious material under the Printing Press and Publications Act (PPPA).

"There was a commotion when those arrested said in their 112 statement that they would only speak in court. The police were angry and demanded those arrested give a second statement.

"After that they went to our truck and found some red T-shirts with pictures of Rashid Maidin... then the 30 were slapped with an additional charge, 122 of the Penal Code," said Arutchelvan.

"We've been accused of waging war against the King because of having these T-shirts," he added. 

READ MORE HERE

 



Utusan says foreign Christian funds behind Bersih

Posted: 26 Jun 2011 02:15 PM PDT

 

By Shazwan Mustafa Kamal, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, June 27 — Utusan Malaysia stepped up its attacks on Bersih today by claiming that the group is being funded by foreign Christian organisations that have donated millions of ringgit to underwrite the rally planned for July 9.

After it demonised Bersih chief Datuk Ambiga Sreenevasan yesterday as anti-Islam, the Umno-owned newspaper reported today that the group calling for electoral reforms was being funded by groups such as the Konrad Adenauer Foundation from Germany and the Canadian Allied Foundation.

The Konrad Adenauer Foundation is a German think-tank associated with the conservative Christian Democratic Union in Germany. It aims to further the "promotion of freedom and liberty, peace, and justice" through "furthering European unification, improving transatlantic relations and deepening development co-operation.

Little is known about the Canadian Allied Foundation named by the Utusan article.

In a separate editorial today, Utusan also said that information obtained from investigations into 31 Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM) activists arrested yesterday proved that the July 9 march for electoral reform "is not just infiltrated with subversive elements but also supported by foreign funds."

"If the organisers of Bersih sincerely want to demonstrate about elections, why do they need to ask for foreign help? Why the need for elements trying to revive communism?" the Malay daily wrote today.

Besides Bersih, other organisations like the Malaysian Strategic Research Centre (MSRC) have strong ties with the Konrad Adenauer Foundation.

The MSRC was formed by Abdul Razak Baginda, a close associate of Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak. Abdul Razak was acquitted in 2008 of abetting in the murder of his Mongolian mistress Altantuya Shariibuu.

Utusan Malaysia reported today that organisations from 11 countries had donated millions of ringgit to Bersih to be used for the cost of the July 9 demonstration.

PAS has promised to bring in hundreds of thousands of supporters from across the country as Pakatan Rakyat (PR) gears up for a second such rally in recent years.

The first Bersih rally in 2007 saw up to 50,000 people take to the streets of Kuala Lumpur before they were dispersed by police armed with tear gas and water cannons.

The demonstration has been partly credited for Pakatan Rakyat's record gains in Election 2008, where the opposition pact swept to power in five states and won 82 parliamentary seats. 

READ MORE HERE

 

DBP row risks cutting school textbook supply

Posted: 26 Jun 2011 11:56 AM PDT

By G. Manimaran and Syed Mu'az Syed Putra, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, June 27 — An on-going row between Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka (DBP) and printing company and distributor Dawama Sdn Bhd, which has escalated over the past week, could affect the supply of school textbooks for the 2012-2013 term.

The Malaysian Insider understands that the situation has reached a critical level whereby both parties are unable to meet face-to-face to resolve outstanding issues. DBP is an agency which is under the supervision of the Education Ministry.

A source told The Malaysian Insider that as a result, DBP faces a dilemma as it may not be able to supply school textbooks for the next school semester this August.

"The relationship between DBP and Dawama worsened last week when DBP editors were not allowed to enter Dawama's office to edit and conduct final checks (on the books) before the material is printed. This has a never happened before," said the source.

The source said the "cold war" started after DBP appointed another party to also print school textbooks, and that this could have "offended" Dawama.

Today is the deadline for DBP to submit the final manuscript for the school textbooks before the books are printed and distributed to schools nationwide.

Gerakan Darurat Bahasa (GDB) chairman Mohd Azmi Abdul Hamid said he was aware of DBP's current predicament.

"DBP seems to be in a dilemma, which started because of a one-sided printing and distributing agreement," he told The Malaysian Insider.

Mohd Azmi said the government had no choice but to intervene.

The Malaysian Insider understands that the Dawama management team will be meeting the Education Ministry on Wednesday to discuss the on-going row with DBP.

It is understood that the bad blood between DBP and Dawama reached a critical level after DBP director Datuk Termuzi Abdul Aziz recently gave Dawama a deadline to buck up and overcome a decline in sales of DBP books and magazines over the past couple of years. 

In September 2002, Dawama was given the contract to print and market all books and magazines by DBP. It expires in 2014.

Termuzi declined to comment on the matter.

READ MORE HERE

‘Keep to electoral process’

Posted: 26 Jun 2011 11:52 AM PDT

 

By Minderjeet Kaur, NST

BN does not manipulate polls, rally organisers told.

KUALA LUMPUR: The prime minister yesterday urged the organisers of the Bersih 2.0 rally to participate in the electoral process, citing Pas' long rule of Kelantan and Barisan Nasional's defeat in five states in 2008 as unmistakable proof of a free and fair process.

Datuk Seri Najib Razak said BN would rule in all the states if the Election Commission had manipulated votes on behalf of the coalition.

The BN chairman, who was speaking at the 58th People's Progressive Party general assembly, also delivered a decisive message to the rally organisers.

"If you have the guts, fight in the general election. If there is any chaos, you will face the consequences," he said.

And referring to those intending to take part in the rally, Najib said they, too, would have to face any consequences. The rally was reportedly being held to pass a memorandum to the Yang di-Pertuan Agong calling for free and fair elections.

"They say it is to stop the manipulation of votes.

"If we manipulate votes, then why are there five states under the opposition? How did Pas rule Kelantan for so many years?" Specifically referring to the loose grouping of DAP, Pas and Parti Keadilan Rakyat, which supposedly endeavoured to "correct the voting system in the country", Najib said: "They need to correct their own parties first before correcting the Election Commission. During their so-called reformasi meetings, they were known to throw chairs, coupled with incidences of boxing matches." He said BN would rule the country if the people still supported it.

"The power is with the people. We will fight till the end. And we will do it according to the law, which is to protect the interest of the people." He said the recent spate of by-elections and the Sarawak election showed the people's support returning to BN. "We have managed to reverse the trend. Our plans for the economy have worked" He said the recent victories in Merlimau, Tenang, Kerdau and other areas proved BN as a product and a brandwas still supported by the people.

Independent studies and research showed BN was on the right track as there was clarity of goals, vision and strateg ic plans to achieve developed nation status.

"We will always be with the rakyat.

And we will fulfil our promises."


Will wearing Che Guevara T-shirts lead to arrests too, Bar Council asks

Posted: 26 Jun 2011 11:31 AM PDT

 

By Melissa Chi, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, June 27 — Bar Council president Lim Chee Wee has mocked the police investigation of 30 Bersih activists for allegedly trying to revive communism, pointing out last night that their arrests could spell danger as well for anyone wearing a Che Guevara T-shirt and listening to the Sex Pistols.

"The arrest and remand for seven days of 30 individuals (including two juveniles in their teens), apparently for having in their possession certain paraphernalia including T-shirts with images of former communist leaders, for waging war against the King is a reflection of such a clampdown.

"By analogy, if one were to be at home wearing a Che Guevara (the Marxist revolutionary) T-shirt listening to a song attacking the institution of royalty by either The Smiths or The Sex Pistols, one faces a very real likelihood of being investigated for waging war against the King. This surely cannot be," Lim (picture) told The Malaysian Insider yesterday.

The police said yesterday they were probing attempts by Bersih activists for reviving communism, and are investigating 30 Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM) members, including Sungai Siput MP Dr Michael Jayakumar, for "waging war against the Yang di-Pertuan Agong."

Lim pointed out that Malaysia is a member of the UN Human Rights Council and now the chair of the Third Committee of the forthcoming 66th Session of the UN General Assembly where the agenda contains items such as social, humanitarian and human rights issues.

"The Malaysian Bar urges the authorities to act reasonably, responsibly and proportionately instead of a wantonly unjustified and wholly disproportionate clampdown on freedom of movement, expression and assembly."

Deputy Penang police chief Datuk Abdul Rahim Jaafar said remand orders would be applied to detain the 30 activists under section 122 of the Penal Code. 

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Dear Brother Anas

Posted: 26 Jun 2011 03:19 PM PDT

As unity is a subject which is really close to your heart, allow me to put my thought to that subject, especially in relation to what you had written in your said open letter.

Unity is a concept, an abstract, if not an intangible one at that. Being an abstract, it cannot be physically measured. It is a state of mind. It exists within parameters of perception. It is not like health or financial success, where someone could declare that our nation is full of healthy people, or that it is full of wealthy people.

By contrast, unity is like the concept of safety. One can declare that statistical data shows that crime rates have fallen by, say, 20%. But one cannot, armed with that statistical date, conclude that the country is safe.

In similar fashion, with respect, one cannot just create a slogan and a nice little symbol and paste the slogan and symbol on banners and shirts as well as bombard the media with them  and declare that unity has magically, if not miraculously, delivered itself to this country and her people. It does not work that way when it comes to unity.

When we speak of unity, or rather the concept of unity, we have to understand what the concept entails; what it really means and what it is all about. Please don't take me wrong. And when we want to achieve unity, we have to have a definite and tangible plan to make it a reality.

An intangible and abstract concept such as unity cannot be achieved or brought to reality with intangible and abstract moves, such as the creation of a slogan or symbol.

To me, unity, in so far as a nation – more particularly, Malaysia - is concerned, consists of two kinds. They are:

  • situational unity, and,

  • transcendental unity.

Situational unity is pockets of one-ness shown or practised by the people as individuals or as members of a group which they belong to. It arises out of cultural practice or individual beliefs. It might even arise out of certain circumstances and even out of purely selfish reasons and not precipitated by any altruism at all.

Examples of these situational unity are seen daily in our lives. People of various races and faiths sit together at a stall sipping their teh tarik while talking about how our Magistrate Courts turned into a sex video cinema, for example.

When the  Malaysian football team won the Suzuki Cup not so long ago, Malaysians of all races went berserk with a little burst of spontaneous patriotism and nationalism everywhere; at teh tarik stalls; at homes; in cyberspace over Twitter or Facebook etc. A long time ago, when Malaysia beat saudi Arabia at Stadium Merdeka, I spontaneously stood up together with 45ooo other Malaysians to sing Negara Ku, without being prompted by anybody or anything.

In my office, I, a Malay partner, am in unison with my partners of other races, for a purely self-altruism purpose, namely, to make a living.

Those are what I call situational unity.

Although at macro level, these pockets of situational unity may seem insignificant or even irrelevant, to me, they are reflective of a positive mind set. They show that there are certain situations or set of situations where people of various races and faiths are driven to disregard and put aside their cultural and genetic differences and spontaneously unite and become one.

That is proof that while unity, being an abstract concept, cannot be directly engineered, situations or circumstances conducive or leading to it may be created to foster unity.

Meanwhile, transcendental unity, in terms of a nation and nation building, would mean the people, regardless of their race, faith and cultural background or even genetic make-up, coming together and moving in unison towards the greater and common good of this nation while at the same time, putting aside self-altruism and interests.

I  call this concept of unity transcendental unity because it is an ideal and not real. A complete transcendental unity, I would dare say, can never be achieved because it is against human nature.

Human beings are by nature selfish. Francis Fukuyama, in his book, The Origins of Political Order, pointed out that human beings, for example, have the propensity for favouring their family and friends, something which Fukuyama calls "patrimonialism". If I may, I would stretch Fukuyama's patrimonialism even beyond family and friends. I think it is also human nature to prefer one's tribe, race or community.

Notwithstanding the fact that an absolute state of transcendental unity can never be achieved, a civilised society led by a government which is committed to achieving a common good for the nation must, at great cost and effort, work to achieve a state of transcendental unity or as close as possible to that state.

It is of course easy to disunite the people, especially when the people consist of various races and faiths and coming from diverse cultural background, than to even maintain a facade of unity.

Unity exists even as a facade. History would of course show that facades of unity were often created by dictators, authoritarians and totalitarians. These facades of unity would soon disintegrate as the dictators, authoritarians and totalitarians fell.

As soon as Saddam Hussein was defeated for example, the almost serene and tranquil racial, religious and cultural "melting pot" of Iraq became a boiling porridge of tribal and sectarians divisiveness. Just as the Berlin wall fell, glasnost and perestroika liberated the Russians from years of communism, the country broke into pieces and some former colonists, like Yugoslavia, descended into hellish war fuelled by centuries of racial and religious wounds. 

The danger  with creating a facade of unity, instead of working towards the establishment of a transcendental unity, is that we might be lulled into sleep with a dream-like belief that our people are united for the better good of this country while on the ground, racial bigotry and hatred are allowed to fester and infest the very fabric of our society, hidden behind this facade of unity which we created for whatever purpose which only we know. Deep underneath this veil or facade of unity, there is a virulent form of disease working insidiously. God helps us if or when this viral infection becomes too late to treat.

As I had stated earlier, there are innumerable pockets of situational unity displayed by us day in and day out in Malaysia. This proves that if left behind on their own and without interference by politicians and self-altruistic rebel- rousers, we, Malaysians, regardless of racial, religious or cultural background, are able to switch on our natural love for a peaceful co-existence. We are able to put aside our differences and become one if a situation conducive for such unity is present.

Towards achieving a state of transcendental unity, it is therefore the duty of a responsible government to create these  conduciveness. This conduciveness will not be present when there are newspapers like Utusan Malaysia being allowed, by the continued patronisation of the biggest political party in the ruling government, to spew racial hatred and bigotry almost on a daily basis.

This conduciveness will also not be in existence, regardless of how loud we shout 1Malaysia and 1this-and-that if at the same time ultra-right-winged organisation such as Perkasa be given a free hand – and mouth and leg – to threaten blood-shed and create racial fear by issuing warnings and mongering fear with impunity as if these people are above the law.

This conduciveness will not exist when a  rational discourse is not granted to minority groups who are trying to voice out minority's concerns, insecurity as well as well as fight for the recognition, at least, of their rights.

At this juncture Anas, your call for the acknowledgement by DAP that this land had always belonged to the Malays and that the Malays have been kind enough to let the non-Malays to be here and that DAP should be grateful for this kindness come into play.

Although various historical as well as anthropological studies could very well be used to at least dispute your assertion that this land had always belonged to the Malays, I do  not wish to go into such dispute in this post.

For the sake of argument, let's just assume for a while that you are correct, that this land, ie, this land which was otherwise known as Tanah Melayu, had belonged to the Malays.

With respect Anas, you had failed to recognise, or give any consideration at all, that such acknowledgement had been given by the non-Malays during the inception of this country as an independent state in 1957.

I say so based on the argument which has always been used by the likes of Dr Mahathir and his ilk. Not based on any arguments made up by myself, the so called Melayu Liberal who has given a bad twist to the word "liveral" and "Melayu".

Dr Mahathir and his band of nationalistic scholars argue that in 1957, there was a "social contract." This social contract, in effect, consists of the Malays being kind enough to "grant" citizenship to the Chinese and Indians. Because of that kindness, and to show gratitude towards the Malays, the Chinese and Indians agreed to grant "special rights" to the Malays. These "special rights" are enshrined in article 153 of our Federal Constitution.

I have written so many articles on this subject. I will not argue with Dr Mahathir anymore on this.

READ MORE HERE

 

National debts: more puzzling numbers tumblin'

Posted: 26 Jun 2011 10:18 AM PDT


I have no idea how TRE derived the number and baffled by the huge gap between this number and the finance ministry figures, on which the Prime Minister had cheerfully advised Malaysians that national debts have decreased.

Then some curious person sent me the breakdown of TRE numbers hoping I could clarify the situation. I am amused by this because I am certainly not part of the federal finance ministry administration but I can just take a cursory look at the data and hope to point out a thing or 2.

Picture 1 shows the finance ministry number as at 30 June 2010

Picture 2 shows the Thompson Reuters Eikon numbers, very much higher

Picture 3 shows some more detailed information

Luckily there is an excel file which makes analysing easierBase on a cursory review of the 2 sets of data, the discrepancies could be explained by

1) Finance Ministry only included bonds issued to Malaysia where as TRE included bonds issued to proxies such as Petronas, Khazanah, MISC etc

2) that still leaves a sizable difference between the TRE and finance ministry numbers - it could be different exchange rates applied and also classification differences between these 2. Statistic collection can be a dodgy business.

In any case, the Malaysian government should seek to clarify this with TRE urgently because its figure is giving a different impression from what the finance ministry is giving, hence confusing the business communities, foreign and local, as well as all tax payers.

Read more at: http://wangsamajuformalaysia.blogspot.com/2011/06/national-debts-more-puzzling-numbers.html

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Are activists more dangerous than criminals?

Posted: 26 Jun 2011 10:27 AM PDT

By P Ramakrishnan (President, Aliran)

The way the police hound and harass activists engaged in social issues gives the impression that they are more dangerous than the criminals who cause hell for peace-loving citizens.

The number of police engaged in this activity makes one wonder why the police are running after these activists instead of the criminals who are lurking among our midst committing all kinds of crimes, some even resulting in death.

More and more Malaysians are beginning to believe that the police are no longer what they used to be in the past when they were professional in their duty and were not seen as political tools of the ruling party.

The change in perception occurred during the Mahathir years as witnessed during the Refomasi days and while Anwar's first sodomy trial dragged on when the police were harsh and brutal in dealing with the crowd who stood up against a cruel regime.

We have seen how heavy-handed the police were during the Bersih 1.0 and Hindraf rallies in November 2007. They continue to behave in that same fashion right up to today.

Yesterday (25-6-11), 31 PSM members, including the Sungai Siput MP, Jeyakumar Devaraj, were detained at the Sungai Dua toll plaza at about 3.45pm. They were on their way to Penang after leafleting in Kedah when they were apprehended.

These activists were then taken to Kepala Batas Police Station in Seberang Perai Utara for questioning. Top-ranking Penang state police officers were seen at the police station.

According to Jeyakumar, they were expecting to be released on police bail, but all of them were then detained in lock-ups. The women were detained at the Kepala Batas police station, while the men were taken to the Butterworth police
station.

About the same time as the activists were detained at the Sungai Dua toll plaza in the north, PSM activists who had been leafleting in the south were detained in Tangkak and taken to the Ledang police station and subjected to the same harrowing experience. But they were released at 4.00am this morning, after 12 hours with the police.

One is tempted to ask, is this the reason why we have a police force - to deny the fundamental rights of citizens, making the constitutional provisions granting them these rights meaningless?

This is a sheer waste of time for everybody concerned in this episode. The police should not be tied down in a case where there was clearly no threat to the nation. The activists should not be wasting their precious time doing nothing when they have their work to carry out which has been unfairly disrupted.

Four lawyers who had turned up at the Kepala Batas Police Station last night were blocked from meeting the detainees. This is completely unwarranted; it is a basic right of detainees to have access to their lawyers. There is no justification for this refusal; it goes against natural justice.

The activists have now been remanded for seven days, the application granted at the Butterworth Magistrates Court. They are now being demonised in the media.

All these activists were engaged in legitimate, democratic activity which is guaranteed by the Federal Constitution. Leafleting is not criminal; educating the public on issues is not an offence. They are not engaged in violent or armed struggle.

The police have been going after activists similarly engaged in Johor and Shah Alam. And anyone wearing a T-shirt with the word Bersih (Clean) is hauled away. What have we come to? Why are the police targeting this group of people?

It is tied to BN's fear of the Bersih 2.0's Walk for Democracy Rally on 9 July.

This rally promises to draw unprecedented huge crowds. The sheer number of participants will debunk the BN's claim that Malay support has swung back to Umno. It would be such a humiliation for Umno, which is pretending to be brave and masquerading as the champion of the Malays.

July 9 will be the defining moment in Malaysian politics. Umno is not prepared to face this truth.

So the BN is using the police to stop the Bersh 2.0 rally on 9 July. It has to  be stopped at all costs for the survival of the BN.

We will know on 9 July whether Malaysians have been cowed by fear; whether they will choose to snivel and quiver or will cast aside their shackles once and for all.

Will 9 July be an epoch-making day? Only time will tell.

Seems everyone else has an ulterior motive except BN and PDRM

Posted: 26 Jun 2011 10:23 AM PDT

Are you saying that everyone else - including the 1 million people who are interested in marching for democracy in Kuala Lumpur and the thousands more overseas are all wrong except the band of BN leaders and their milking barons? 

By J. D. Lovrenciear

As the days keep tolling away for the momentous 'Moment of Truth' - July 9, 2011, the powers that be are already clawing and gnarling their grip in office. What nightmare awaits us tomorrow is anyone's guess.

The daily ration of all kinds of attacks on Bersih 2.0 is certainly the order of the day. The powers-that-be are already not only breathing down all sorts of threats on the rakyat, but the unfounded blatant arrests of some 30 citizens and the unfinished police order for the Bersih organizing team to report at Bukit Aman is again deliberately to put even more intimidating pressure on citizens.

The Home Minister is already barking up more threats and warnings of invoking the ISA on rally goers.

The Prime Minister of BN has also called for a fight. He prefers that the opposition have the "guts" to fight his army in the elections and not opt to 'demonstrate' in the streets.

Question is, is Najib the PM of BN or the nation? If he is the PM for the entire nation why is he calling for a fight with the opposition team? Is the General Election about fighting for power or appealing to the electorate in a democratic manner to vote one into power?

What is all these nonsense? Are we a democracy or a terrorist regime engaged in cavemen fights?

And anyway, Najib must be reminded like a school boy that he is not the PM of BN or UMNO. He is the PM of Malaysia and Malaysians are represented in Parliament by all political divides. The opposition is not a renegade group nor is it illegal; please Mr. PM.

And Bersih 2.0 is not a "demonstration". Is the PM so detached from reality that he still till this day does not know that Bersih 2.0 is the Malaysian citizens' Walk for democracy?

In any case, it now appears that everyone has an ulterior motive as far as Bersih is concerned except BN. Almost laughable is one painting a picture that His Royal Highness our revered Agung has been insulted. And another bewildering allegation is that the rakyat are trying to revive communism. What is next? That the Malaysian rakyat are all acting for the Martians? Please, can we have some sensibility to prevail?

If everyone else has an ulterior motive except BN, why are the BN led leaders plunging the panic button? Why run after even Bersih T-shirt sellers? Why call for fights with your opposition? Why run so sacred from Bersih that you want to desperately invoke the ISA? Why smear, slam and hammer away in your controlled media the respected and noted citizens?

Are you saying that everyone else - including the 1 million people who are interested in marching for democracy in Kuala Lumpur and the thousands more overseas are all wrong except the band of BN leaders and their milking barons? 

At the rate BN is getting worked up into wanting to do battle with its own citizens, it appears that the nation has no other business to worry about except Bersih 2.0.

Mr. PM, when will you come around and call for sensibility to prevail? As the PM of the country, if you allow chaos to prevail when you should be looking into ensuring that all measures are taken to tighten security and ensure a peaceful citizens' show of 'walk for democracy', then it is not the opposition or Bersih organizers or the citizens marching who should be held accountable.

On the contrary as PM of a nation you, and you singularly are answerable to citizens and King for your failure to act as a PM of the nation and for acting as a mere leader of a political party – UMNO.

Citizens, do you agree or disagree or is this too much to ask of a Prime Minister?


Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Ahad, 26 Jun 2011

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


When English is taught in Bahasa Malaysia

Posted: 25 Jun 2011 04:03 PM PDT

This is what you get when you teach English in Bahasa Malaysia. Read the piece below that was written by a blogger called toreksulong. I can only assume that toreksulong is a Malay and Umno member or supporter.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

No more erotic sexual in Malaysia hotel because it brought as a court case

Leader Pass urgent challenge Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to resign his post as Leader of the Opposition after the sex video that resembles genuine opposition leader was confirmed by a specialist.

President of the Malaysian Malay Network (MMD), Azwanddin Hamzah said the pass should be more firm in rejecting Anwar and choose the more moral and representatives do not take the silence.

He said Pas previously rejected the 'master' immoral leaders but the party has not taken similar action against him.

''Where PAS leaders called scholars and what their stance on the issue of Anwar's moral?

What is certain''Anwar will continue to deny the perpetrators in the sex video was that he and associate the spread of the video is a game of UMNO, "he told The Star here yesterday.

The facts recited in the magistrate's court here yesterday says the two experts from Dartmouth College, Handover, New Hampshire, United States, Professor Hany Farid and Professor Lorenzo Torresani confirmed that the video is displayed at the Hotel Carcosa Seri Negara in March is genuine.

Azwanddin in the said Anwar as a person associated as an actor in the video should be ashamed and take action to put all the positions he held.

He said people now know and have begun to notice that Anwar has always tried to avoid them and do lie to confuse people's minds.

Meanwhile, Anwar's former private secretary, Anuar Shaari said the Advisory Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) that have to do four things that pushed the former Chief Justice Youth Force (Akin), Senator Mohamad Ezam Mohd. Noor.

Four things, he said, do not swear curse men Anwar denies the sex video; test poligraf to prove they are not lying; sue Datuk Shazryl Eskay Eskay Abdullah and accused Shazryl as a liar.

Anwar''need not 'hide' behind the allegations to the contrary qazaf clear that this country actually practiced law and not takzir hudud, "he said.

***********************************

In case you doubt what I say and think that I fabricated this piece, you can view it at the link here:

http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/9498783-no-more-erotic-sexual-in-malaysia-hotel-because-it-brought-as-a-court-case

I suggest, however, you do not give him or her any further hits by visiting the site but do click that link above if you need reassuring that this piece is for real.

 

 

Saya sokong Dr Mahathir

Posted: 23 Jun 2011 09:41 PM PDT

Saya sokong Dr Mahathir, at least with regards to his statement that Muslims should project the correct perception of Islam to gain respect from the non-Muslims instead of shouting and screaming that non-Muslims must respect Islam while threatening to murder all those who do not show respect to Islam.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

Muslims Need To Project Actual Islamic Way Of Life To Gain Respect - Dr Mahathir

SHAH ALAM, June 24 (Bernama) -- Muslims should play an important role in projecting the actual Islamic way of life to the world so that the religion would be respected by the other communities.

Former prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad said by projecting the positive traits and fairness of the religion, "I am certain it will at least reduce opposition to the religion or fear among the non-Muslims against Muslims and Islam."

"To the extent that we are regarded as terrorists who kill without mercy . We are accused of many things. As a result, we are attacked and oppressed. This is the fate of Muslims currently," he said at the ground-breaking ceremony for the Malaysian Islamic Welfare Organisation Complex (Perkim) building for Selangor costing RM30 million, here today.

Dr Mahathir, who is also Perkim national president, said Muslims should always correct themselves so that they become successful people in the present world and hereafter.

For the Muslims in the country, who form the majority of the Malaysian population, they should implement and determine the system of administration according to the actual Islamic teachings which would bring justice and prosperity to everyone, he said.

Dr Mahathir said if the country's administration did not provide justice to everyone as required by Islam, and denied the rights of others and oppressed them, it would give a bad impression on Islam.

Dr Mahathir said Muslims in the country must be united and avoid factionalism or enmity between one another. The Selangor Perkim Complex would be built on a 0.56-hectare site and would comprise two blocks with a main hall, office space, shop lots, surau, library, seminar rooms, lecture halls, hostel and a kitchen.

***********************************

Now, now, now! Stop foaming at the mouth and start going berserk when I say that I agree with what Dr Mahathir said today. I certainly support what he said in that Muslims are Islam's greatest enemy (at least he implied it) and that Muslims must be good Muslims for the non-Muslims to respect them and Islam.

And note that one of the charges of my ISA detention in 2008 was because I had said exactly what Dr Mahathir is saying (although I can bet my sweet ninny that the government is NOT going to detain Dr Mahathir for what he is saying).

Dr Mahathir said: Muslims should always correct themselves so that they become successful people in the present world and hereafter.

Dr Mahathir also said: Muslims in the country, who form the majority of the Malaysian population, should implement and determine the system of administration according to the actual Islamic teachings, which would bring justice and prosperity to everyone.

Dr Mahathir further said: if the country's administration did not provide justice to everyone as required by Islam, and denied the rights of others and oppressed them, it would give a bad impression on Islam.

Okay, do you REALLY need me to explain what Dr Mahathir meant? I mean: have I not been talking about this same matter, over and over again, over the last 35 years since the mid-1970s? Are you not tired of hearing me harping on the same issue and sounding like a stuck record?

No, no need for me to add anything more to what Dr Mahathir has so eloquently espoused. Let me KISS (Keep It Simple Stupid). The majority of Malaysians are Muslims, as Dr Mahathir said. And the majority of government leaders and civil servants are Muslims as well. And most of the incidences of abuse of power and corruption are perpetuated by the Muslims in the government and civil service.

So, need I say more? Need I explain how Muslims should demonstrate good Islamic values so that the non-Muslims will respect them and Islam?

KISS: keep it simple stupid. 

Stop corruption. Stop abuse of power. Stop fraud and cheating. Stop robbing the rakyat of their right to a government of their choice through a free, fair and clean election. Stop racism and discrimination.

Stop! Stop! Stop! That's all it takes for the non-Muslims to respect Muslims and Islam. It is so simple it makes me laugh. You don't have to be a genius to figure it out.

And stop threatening and persecuting Malaysians who wish to march on 9th July 2001, which even the ex-Mufti of Perlis says is the correct Islamic thing to do.

Then, and only then, will the non-Muslims start respecting the Muslims and Islam.

Kapish?

 

Now what?

Posted: 23 Jun 2011 06:11 PM PDT

So what you and I -- the rational and intelligent bunch of Malaysians -- think is not important. We have already formed our opinions anyway and we know who to vote for in the next general election. Nothing is going to change our minds. It is what the simple-minded and God-fearing Malays in the Malay heartland think is what matters. And what are they going to think now that it has been 'proven in court beyond any shadow of doubt' that Anwar is the man in the video?

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

What Othman Wahab and Lim Kit Siang said in the two pieces published in The Malaysian Insider today makes sense (see below). They make sense because Othman and Kit Siang speak rationally and argue intelligently.

But this matter is not about making sense and arguing intelligently. It is about the perception game and psy-war. And in the perception game and psy-war nothing makes sense.

I, in fact, already anticipated what is going to happen today in my earlier piece: Ever heard of the phrase 'collateral damage'? And was I right or was I right?

Anyway, enough of 'I told you so'. What is done is done. Let us now explore what is going to be the upside and downside of this whole episode.

The government's reputation has been damaged by this episode -- in particular that of the Police and the Judiciary. But then, so what? What else is new? Their reputations had already been damaged big-time 13 years ago back in 1998 during the Sodomy 1 episode -- and then ten years later in 2008 when the Sodomy 2 episode erupted.

How can you damage any further what is already damaged beyond repair? So, have they lost anything? Can they lose anything that they don't have?

The 'Datuk T' trio pleaded guilty and 'paid the price' for their crime. It was a small price to pay though. (Shazryl Eskay Abdullah was fined RM3,000 or three months' jail, Shuib Lazim was fined RM1,500 or two months' jail, while Rahim Thamby Chik was fined RM1,000 or one month's jail.)

Now these three Datuks have suddenly become 'Malay heroes' (not criminals) for 'standing tall' and being 'brave' and 'righteous' enough to 'reveal the truth' and expose Anwar Ibrahim's 'transgression' in the true Islamic spirit of amar makruf, nahi munkar. (This is what the perception game and psy-war is all about, in case you did not realise this by now).

If I were in their place I would not have paid the fine but would have chosen the jail sentence instead. Then they would really be heroes. After all, it is only three months, two months and one month respectively. And for the three months and two months jail sentences there is a one-third remission on the sentence (but not for the one month jail, I think). It's a pity they are not brave enough to refuse to pay the fine and chose to go to jail instead.

Okay, what 'good' has come out of all this? As far as the pro-opposition supporters are concerned this just goes to prove that the Police and Judiciary are working for Umno -- as if they did not already know that and are not convinced enough yet?

For the pro-government supporters this proves that what Umno said about Anwar all along is true after all -- that he is an immoral person who talks about Islam until he foams at the mouth but is in reality a Munafiq and Fasiq, a type of person whom Islam considers worse than a Kafir (infidel).

But what is more important -- and this is what this perception game and psy-war is all about -- is that they now have something 'solid' and 'concrete' to tell the simple-minded and God-fearing kampong people. And this is what is more important to Umno, the simple-minded and God-fearing kampong people.

You see; there are two groups of people who are going to determine who gets to form the next federal government. The first group are the voters from East Malaysia (Sabah, Sarawak and Labuan control 57 of the 222 seats in Parliament). The second group are the voters from the Malay heartland.

And the second group is what Umno is concerned about. The East Malaysian seats are safe because the opposition in East Malaysia is in a mess (as the recent Sarawak state elections and the ongoing political developments in Sabah have proven). Anyway, Umno has only 11 of those 57 East Malaysian seats so it matters not to Umno -- they will leave it to the 'locals' to sort out Sabah and Sarawak.

What Umno really wants is the seats in the Malay heartland, which PAS and PKR captured back in March 2008. First, look at the following chart.

Can you see that in the 2008 General Election Umno saw 30 of its seats disappear? It managed only 79 seats or 35.6% (about one-third) of the total number of seats in Parliament.

This means Umno, on its own, can't form the federal government. It needs Barisan Nasional to be able to form the government. So Umno can't tell the non-Malays to got to hell -- like it did pre-March 2008.

Umno needs at least 112 seats to be able to be the Boss again -- or at least 112 seats together with MCA, MIC and Gerakan (which have 20 seats combined). Therefore Umno needs roughly another 35 seats or so. And these would be the 35 seats in the Malay heartland of Kedah, Perlis, Kelantan, Terengganu, Pahang, and Mainland Penang.

So what you and I -- the rational and intelligent bunch of Malaysians -- think is not important. We have already formed our opinions anyway and we know who to vote for in the next general election. Nothing is going to change our minds. It is what the simple-minded and God-fearing Malays in the Malay heartland think is what matters. And what are they going to think now that it has been 'proven in court beyond any shadow of doubt' that Anwar is the man in the video?

I don't know how gullible these simple-minded and God-fearing Malays in the kampongs are. Will this perception game and psy-war of Umno work? I don't know yet but in time we will know. It is a brilliant move nevertheless, whether it works or not. This is what perception games and psy-wars are all about.

As what Najib Tun Razak said last week: this is not about reality. This is about perception. The question now would be: has Umno managed to get the simple-minded and God-fearing Malays in the Malay heartland to perceive what Umno wants them to perceive?

You tell me!

*****************************************

Hail, the Datuk T trio — Othman Wahab

(The Malaysian Insider) - You mean the powers-that-be took months to play out this video tape sandiwara.

Maybe they were waiting for a suitable lawyer, err say, someone with aspirations for higher office and who is not so picky about the character of the clientele.

But that is lain cerita; this charade of a court case was already sketched in the minds of most Malaysians after the sordid tape was given unusual play by the mainstream media, the three stooges were feted like heroes by the Najib administration and the police spent an unusual amount of time investigating a simple case (the cops seemed more interested in the identity of the actor than the perpetrators of the sex video).

So many of my friends figured that the government would have a sham case, charge the three jokers, give them a slap on the wrist and then introduce the identity of the man as an aside. This came to pass today.

So does this qualify me and my friends as brilliant? Sad to say it just means that we are either as average as the thinkers in government or that we can think ahead of the rascals.

Does it matter if it is proven that Anwar Ibrahim is the actor? Yes it does because he has denied it. But I still say that this is not proven because the so-called "evidence" and "experts' info" were introduced by the government in court. It was not examined or challenged by anyone.

But this was meant to be this way, get the three to plead guilt, give them a token fine and then slip in some dirt on Anwar, dirt which can't be examined. The idea here is to persuade fence-sitters that Anwar is soiled goods and cannot be supported.

This is about the coming elections and the three stooges were just that, stooges in a play dictated by Umno leaders.

Anwar is a flawed individual, no question about that. But this is where we must not fall into the trap set by Messrs Najib and Muhyiddin. Anwar is not the opposition nor does he represent a better vision for Malaysia.

Nurul Izzah, Husam Musa, Tony Pua, Ambiga Sreenevasan, Khalid Samad, Haris Ibrahim, Fuziah Saleh, the former Perlis mufti, the people behind the Sarawak Report, you and me. Now we are the hope of the country.

The scoundrels have used all the institutions of the country to damage and destroy one man. They have no respect for the soul of this country, they destroy everything to stay in power and to continue to pillage.

Today's courtroom sham should be seen in this light. Don't forget Abdul Rahim Thamby Chik, Eskay, Shuib when you vote. Don't forget Ibrahim Ali when you vote. Don't forget the IGP or the A-G when you vote.

They only act for Umno.

***********************************************

Police, A-G major casualties in 'Datuk T' charge delay, says Lim

(The Malaysian Insider) - The independence and credibility of the police and the Attorney-General's chambers have been dented by the delay in charging the 'Datuk T' trio, Lim Kit Siang has said.

"The farce this morning in the magistrate's court where the "Datuk T" trio were charged for the Sri Carcosa sex tape screening has only served to further lower public confidence and esteem in the efficiency, independence and professionalism of the Attorney-General and the Police.

"The way the three criminals preened themselves as if they are national heroes for the crimes they have committed raised many questions — including why the AGC and police have to take more than three months to charge the trio in court," Lim said in a statement today.

The "Datuk T" trio pleaded guilty and were fined in a magistrate's court today over their involvement in the screening of a sex video allegedly featuring Pakatan Rakyat de facto leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

Former Malacca Chief Minister Tan Sri Abdul Rahim Thamby Chik was charged with abetting former Perkasa treasurer-general Datuk Shuib Lazim and businessman Datuk Shazryl Eskay Abdullah in "openly" screening the pornographic material featuring sex acts between a man and a woman at the prestigious Carcosa Seri Negara Hotel here on March 21.

Shazryl was fined RM3,000 or three months' jail, Shuib was fined RM1,500 or two months' jail while Abdul Rahim was fined RM1,000 or one month's jail.

Lim, who is DAP parliamentary leader added that both the police and the AGC have been exercising double standards in other cases, and listed them- inaction over Utusan Malaysia's Christian Malaysia claims and Perkasa president Datuk Ibrahim Ali's threatening bloodshed and another May 13 to counter the upcoming May 13 rally by election watchdog Bersih.

"Is it any wonder that never before in the nation's history has the ruling coalition suffered such massive and sustained erosion of public support and confidence to the extent that uppermost in the minds of Malaysians is the question whether the time for the end of UMNO and Barisan Nasional rule in Malaysia has really come?" Lim asked.

 

Your trivia for today: yellow

Posted: 22 Jun 2011 06:52 PM PDT

During the People Power Revolution of 1986, yellow was the dominant theme, the colour being associated with former Philippine President Corazon Aquino. It is now a symbol of both support for her as well as in commemoration of the popular revolt.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

The word yellow comes from the Old English geolu, or geolwe which is derived from the Proto-Germanic word gelwaz.

According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the oldest known use of this word in English is from The Epinal Glossary in the year 700.

In the English language, yellow has traditionally been associated with jaundice and cowardice.

The ancient Maya associated the colour yellow with the direction South. The Maya glyph for yellow (k'an) also means 'precious' or 'ripe'.

 

Yellow is traditionally associated with the Malay Rulers of Malaysia.

 

Yellow was also used to represent the Manchus in the new flag of China: Five Races Under One Union, and also under the flag of Manchukuo.

 

The legendary first emperor of China was known as the Yellow Emperor or Huang Di. Members of the imperial family of China at that time were the only ones allowed to display the colour yellow in buildings and garments.

 

The Yellow Turbans were a Daoist sect that staged an extensive rebellion during the Han Dynasty.

Yellow is associated with the word 'caution' and is the second light on traffic lights.

Yellow pan traps are used to capture insects, many of which are attracted to shades of yellow.

Yellow is also associated with aging, for both people and objects (e.g. yellowed paper).

 

Yellow was also the colour of the New Party in the Republic of China (Taiwan), which supports Chinese reunification.

In the United States, a yellow dog Democrat was a Southern voter who consistently voted for Democratic candidates in the late 19th and early 20th centuries because of lingering resentment against the Republicans dating back to the Civil War and Reconstruction period. Today the term refers to a hard-core Democrat, supposedly referring to a person who would vote for a 'yellow dog' before voting for a Republican.

 

In the United States yellow is also associated with the Libertarian Party, to contrast with the Green Party (green), Democratic Party (blue) and Republican Party (red).

 

In the United Kingdom, yellow is associated with the Liberal Democrats.

In the United Kingdom, The Monster Raving Loony Party (OMRLP) has made use of yellow, along with black, as its primary party colours.

 

During the People Power Revolution of 1986, yellow was the dominant theme, the colour being associated with former Philippine President Corazon Aquino. It is now a symbol of both support for her as well as in commemoration of the popular revolt.

In Europe, many liberal parties are symbolised by the colour yellow, including the Free Democratic Party (Germany), Liberal Forum (Austria), Estonian Reform Party, National Liberal Party (Romania) and Liberal and Centre Union (Lithuania). The pan-European Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe and European Liberal Democrat and Reform Party also use the colour yellow.

 

In football, the referee shows a yellow card to indicate that a player has been officially cautioned because he has committed a foul or has wasted time.

In American Football, a yellow flag is thrown onto the field by a referee to indicate a penalty.

Originally in Rugby League and then later, also in Rugby Union, the referee shows a yellow card to indicate that a player has been sent to the sin bin.

In auto racing, a yellow flag signals caution. Cars are not allowed to pass one another under a yellow flag.

 

In cycle racing, the yellow jersey - or maillot jaune - is awarded to the leader in a stage race. The tradition was begun in the Tour de France where the sponsoring L'Auto newspaper (later L'Équipe) was printed on distinctive yellow newsprint.

The term 'yellow' is used as a racial slur for both Asians (yellow peril) and, in the early 20th century, light-skinned African-Americans (high yellow).

Yellow (giallo), in Italy, refers to crime stories, both fictional and real. This association began in about 1930, when the first series of crime novels published in Italy had yellow covers.

The term 'yellow movie' can refer to films of pornographic nature in Chinese culture, and is analogous to the English 'blue movie'.

Lastly, yellow is associated with sensational journalistic practices, or yellow journalism, and resistance to militant trade unions. 'Yellow journalism' is a term that refers to sensationalist journalism that distorts, exaggerates, or exploits news to maximize profit.

 

Ex-Perlis Mufti agrees with my views on Islam

Posted: 21 Jun 2011 08:30 PM PDT

No, this is NOT my normal cheong hei article. I have nothing more to add to what the ex-Perlis Mufti said other than I have been saying the same thing myself for years. But then I am a 'western educated' person and not an 'Islamic scholar'. So my views on Islam are insignificant unless someone the level of a mufti says the same thing. Hah! It feels good to be able to say: I TOLD YOU SO!

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

Ex-Perlis mufti Asri backs Bersih's intentions

(Malaysiakini) - Former Perlis mufti Dr Mohd Asri Zainul Abidin said after hearing and evaluating the briefing given by the Coalition for Free and Fair Elections (Bersih), he found its intentions to be good.

Asri said he had been swarmed with questions over the Bersih campaign and for him to take a stand on the issue of demands for just elections.

He explained that any life dealings should be assessed in two ways: its purpose and method.

"If the purpose and the method used is good then it would be considered a good practice. If it is meant well, but the method deployed is wrong, it's like theft for the purpose of giving charity, it is deemed wrong. If the purpose is wrong or is a sin, then any move towards it would be considered likewise."

"Any individuals who participate in the activity must ensure its purpose is halal and noble and the method deployed is also halal," he said.

After hearing Bersih's briefing, Asri said he found its intentions are good, that is to claim the rights which should be accorded to the rakyat or people as promised in the constitution.

If the demands are successful, the former Perlis mufti said it would not only help alleviate the problems faced by political parties in seeking a just campaign but also improve the way we embark on politics without having a notion of where the party is from.

"I do not dispute Bersih's noble intentions. However, I am worried if a certain political party's agenda is realised and not the rakyat's aspirations in general. Whereas the demands are good to ensure justice in managing elections," he said.

As to holding a rally, Asri said in principle it is required unless it is accompanied by haram actions like destroying public property, fights and actions leading to bad behaviour.

Citing Prophet Muhammad's sayings, Asri said street demonstrations to protest transgression can be held.

"In today's context, peaceful demonstrations to prevent political misbehaviour could be held as it has been successful in many countries."

"However, demonstrations would be open to dangers and causing chaos and they should be used as a last resort if the demands for justice are not met," he added.

"Discussion, negotiation or writing in protest are preferred. I understand all this had been done and the Election Commission should adhere to these demands to prevent the people from going to the streets which would result in untoward eventualities," he said.

He warned that if the EC fails to adhere to the demands, it is the rakyat's right to demand them peacefully.

"A peaceful rally is an important pre-condition and if it turns violent then it becomes haram. Those who want to attend the Bersih rally must work towards ensuring that they do not destroy public property, injure someone or shout vulgarities at anyone but only shout their demands and slogans to show their dissatisfaction," he said.

"It is haram for the demonstrators or the police to provoke anyone, resulting in riots. The police should also realise that the demands are good for the country and not only for the betterment of the people but also the police."

"The demonstrators should realise the police are out to ensure peace and there should not be any provocation," he warned, adding that those who provoke would be considered to have sinned.

 

 

How politicians hijack revolutions

Posted: 21 Jun 2011 12:41 AM PDT

Never mind which revolution you are talking about, the stories are all the same. Politicians are not capable of starting revolutions. The people start revolutions and then politicians hijack the revolution. The politicians hijacked the people's revolution of 10th November 2007 and they will hijack the 9th July 2011 revolution as well if we are not careful.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

The French Revolution, the Russian Revolution and the Iranian Revolution are the more interesting revolutions to look at. Most of its leaders were in hiding or were not in the country and living in exile. They were not capable of organising anything in the country (especially back then when there were no mobile phones or internet like now).

Most of what happened was unplanned and took even the revolutionaries by surprise. Nevertheless, when the revolution did happen, this created a vacuum, which made it possible for the politicians to just walk in and take over.

Of course, once they took over, they rewrote the history books and painted a different picture of what really happened. Those who were in hiding or in exile overseas suddenly became the heroes of the revolution. And most times these 'hijackers' arrested and imprisoned or assassinated the real revolutionaries.

Let me quote some excerpts from Alan Bullocks's 1,000-page book: Hitler and Stalin, Parallel Lives.

Contrary to later legends, the Bolsheviks played only a marginal role in the development of the revolution before August 1917. On the eve of the February events, their membership was less than 25,000 and, although this was soon expanded, they continued to have much less support than either of their rivals, the Mensheviks and the Socialist Revolutionaries, the two parties that dominated the Soviets.

Neither Lenin and the Bolsheviks nor the other socialist parties 'made' the revolution; they did not create the grievances of the peasants about the land, the more recent anger of the workers against their exploitation, or the war-weariness of the army and the nation.

The outbreak of the revolution of February 1917, like that of 1905, took the Russian revolutionaries by surprise. Some weeks before that, Trotsky, despairing of developments in Europe, had moved to the United States, and in January, Lenin told a group of young socialists in Zurich: "We of the older generation may not live to see the decisive battles of the coming revolution".

February 1917 was no more a spontaneous revolt of the masses than October was to be. October was a coup d'etat, its predecessors in February the sudden collapse of the Tsarist regime, which had lasted for 300 years but proved incapable of coping with long-standing economic and social problems made intolerable by the strains of an unsuccessful war.

As the regime's authority crumbled it left a vacuum which was filled by mutinous soldiers demanding an end to the war, by factory workers demanding food and labour, and by peasants demanding land.

As in 1905, what released these pent-up forces was not a revolutionary conspiracy but the order given to the troops to fire on demonstrators in Petrograd which this time led to a mutiny among the soldiers.

The mutiny rapidly spread to the rest of the capital's garrison, and the government was unable to regain control.

The revolutionary parties were as divided as they were surprised -- divided about their attitude to the provisional governments; to the Soviets, which sprang up all over the country; to peace negotiations; to a unification of radical forces.

This confusion at the top, the lack of authority in face of anarchical conditions in the country and the continuation of the war, persisted until autumn.

Stalin's part in 1917 was neither as prominent as portrayed by official accounts later, nor as insignificant as Trotsky and his other enemies claimed.

There are three reasons why 1917 is a key to the understanding of Stalin's psychological development. The first is his failure to play the leading role he had dreamed of inflicted a deep and lasting trauma.

As soon as he was in a position to do so, from the end of 1929, he took extraordinary steps to heal it. Records were altered or withheld; memoirs suppressed or censored; editors, court painters and film-makers pressed into service to create a 'revised' version of events in the history of the Soviet Union.
 
The figure of Trotsky, who had unquestionably played a role second only to that of Lenin -- the leading role in the actual seizure of power -- was expunged and replaced by that of Stalin. Lenin remained the great leader who returned to Russia from abroad; Stalin was now elevated to the same level with him, as the leader who never left Russia, and greeted Lenin on his return.

In practice the seizure of power turned out to be relatively easy: the difficult part began only when the Bolsheviks had taken over the government, with a lost war on their hands, with a social upheaval still in progress, with an economy which had virtually collapsed and with the prospect of civil war.

Astonishingly, the revolution was over in less than forty-eight hours and with little bloodshed. Having set the policy, Lenin took little part in its execution. At the last moment he emerged from hiding and reached Trotsky's headquarters at the Smolny Institute in disguise just before midnight on the 24th.

At 2 a.m. on the 25th Trotsky pulled out his watch and said, "It's begun," to which Lenin replied: "From being on the run to supreme power, that's too much."

The Mensheviks and some of the Socialist Revolutionary delegates withdrew in protest at the Bolsheviks' seizure of power. They were assured by Trotsky as they left: "You have played your role. Go where you belong: to the garbage heap of history".

 

The Ninth of July

Posted: 20 Jun 2011 09:58 PM PDT

If they can pay RM1.8 million just for a 'free' Facebook website, surely the Government of Malaysia can pay that much for a Made-in-Malaysia movie. Let us imagine the dialogue between a local movie producer and the Minister of Arts and Culture when the local producer applies for a government grant to produce a Made-in-Malaysia movie. This is just imagination, mind you, and never happened nor could ever happen.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

Rice: Will you be showing how well Malaysia has developed under the Barisan Nasional government?

Producer: I did not plan on that but I suppose I could if you want me to. I could show scenes of Selangor and Penang.

 

Rice: No, Selangor and Penang cannot. Those are opposition states. You can only show scenes of the states that are under Barisan Nasional rule. You must also show the Petronas Twin Towers. We are very proud of our Twin Towers.

Producer: But isn't the Twin Towers in Kuala Lumpur, which is also under opposition control?

 

Rice: The opposition won only ten seats in Kuala Lumpur. We still won one seat, even though we cheated with the army votes. So Kuala Lumpur is not totally under opposition control, only 91% opposition.

Producer: Okay, if you say so. I can try to include the Twin Towers in the movie.

 

Rice: But make sure you show the Twin Towers in Kuala Lumpur and not in Melaka like that other movie that they made…can't remember what it was called now.

Producer: Oh, you mean that movie 'Entrapment' starring Sean Connery and Catherine Zeta-Jones.

 

Rice: Yes, that's the one. Our Prime Minister was very angry about that.

Producer: Najib?

 

Rice: No, Dr Mahathir.

Producer: Oh, you mean the Prime Minister back in 1999 when the movie was first released.

 

Rice: No, I mean the Prime Minister now. He is still the Prime Minister…de facto Prime Minister.

Producer: I thought Rosmah is the de facto Prime Minister.

 

Rice: Rosmah is de facto 2. Dr Mahathir is de facto 1.

Producer: We have two de facto Prime Ministers?

 

Rice: Why not? After all we have two Finance Ministers…Finance Minister 1 and Finance Minister 2.

Producer: I see, so what does that make Najib then?

 

Rice: A very confused man…but never mind…please explain the synopsis of your movie…very briefly though. Your detailed paper can follow later.

Producer: It is basically a conspiracy theory movie.

 

Rice: Ah, I just love conspiracy theories. All Malaysians love conspiracy theories. Dr Mahathir talks about the Western capitalist conspiracies. Anwar Ibrahim talks about the Sodomy 1 and Sodomy 2 conspiracies. Everyone talks about conspiracies, especially that Blogger-in-Exile, Raja Petra. He is the biggest spinner of conspiracy theories. That's why the people love to read Malaysia Today. They love fantasies involving conspiracy theories. Do you read Malaysia Today?

Producer: I'm afraid I don't.

 

Rice: Never mind, even if you do you will say you don't. Nobody admits that they read Malaysia Today. So what is this conspiracy theory about?

Producer: It is about the Opposition Leader being behind one politician named Abraham the Frog. The Opposition Leader sends Abraham to join the ruling party as a Trojan horse. Abraham then launches a Malaysian version of the Ku Klux Klan that we shall call Rogol or Perkosa or something like that…I have not decided yet.

 

Rice: Interesting. Frogs becoming horses.

Producer: Rogol or Perkosa is secretly a Brown Power Movement. They want all the non-brown people to be kicked out of the country and for power to be back in the hands of the brown people. It is like the Black Power Movement of the 1960s in America, except in this case the Black Power Movement and the Ku Klux Klan are one and the same.

 

Rice: Isn't that a bit confusing?

Producer: No, we shall call it 1Malaysia. Both the Brown Power Movement and the Malaysian Ku Klux Klan become one…1Malaysia.

 

Rice: Sounds reasonable.

Producer: Abraham then creates trouble and the people become very angry with the government. Actually the government is not behind Abraham. The real mastermind is the Opposition Leader whom Abraham works for.

 

Rice: But don't the people suspect anything?

Producer: No, because the previous Prime Minister is financing Abraham. So the people think that the government is behind Abraham. They don't suspect the Opposition Leader.

 

Rice: So the previous Prime Minister and the Opposition Leader are working together then?

Producer: No, that is just the thing. The previous Prime Minister and the Opposition Leader are enemies.

 

Rice: But you said they are working together.

Producer: They are not. Abraham is secretly working for the Opposition Leader but openly working for the previous Prime Minister. He is like a double agent.

 

Rice: I see. So Abraham is secretly sabotaging the government then?

Producer: Yes, that right.

 

Rice: Ah, so he wants to bring down the government to allow the Opposition Leader to take over.

Producer: Not exactly. This is where the conspiracy theory gets more interesting and Abraham's role as a double agent gets more complicating.

 

Rice: I see.

Producer: Actually, Abraham is pretending to work for both the Opposition Leader and the previous Prime Minister. He is really working for the Prime Minister.

 

Rice: I don't get it.

Producer: The previous Prime Minister is secretly trying to bring down the Prime Minister so that his son can take over. So if Abraham can be linked to the previous Prime Minister that will get his son into trouble and he can't take over as Prime Minister.

 

Rice: I see. So Abraham is suspected of secretly working for the Opposition Leader but is seen to be working for the previous Prime Minister whereas he is actually secretly working for the Prime Minister to sabotage the previous Prime Minister?

Producer: That's about it.

 

Rice: So who wins in the end?

Producer: Ah, that is the real twist, which no one is going to suspect. You see, the Prime Minister's wife is the real mastermind behind all this.

 

Rice: So now we have the Prime Minister's wife also involved in the conspiracy?

Producer: Yes, but the previous Prime Minister is aware of this so he too sabotages the Prime Minister's wife.

 

Rice: Ah, and how does he do this?

Producer: He asks all his cronies, the Chinese tycoons, to get close to the Prime Minister's wife and to give her very expensive presents. So they buy her millions of dollars worth of Hermes Birkin handbags and eventually she has all the colours and more bags than Victoria Beckhem.

 

Rice: Is that enough to sabotage her?

Producer: Yes, then the mainstream newspapers show pictures of all her handbags and she is eventually dubbed as Malaysia's Imelda Marcos and the people rise up in anger and march to the King's palace and Kuala Lumpur becomes just like Egypt, Libya, Jordan, Yemen, Sudan, Syria and so on.

 

Rice: So the government falls and who takes over then? The Opposition Leader or the previous Prime Minister?

Producer: None of the above. The person who takes over will be Abraham. The people become fed up with both the government and the opposition so they reject both. They want an independent Member of Parliament to take over and since Abraham is an independent Member of Parliament he becomes the new Prime Minister.

 

Rice: A very interesting twist indeed. And what are you going to call this movie?

Producer: 'The Ninth of July': the day the people took to the streets to make Abraham the Frog the new Prime Minister of Malaysia.

 

When the shoe is on the other foot

Posted: 20 Jun 2011 07:30 PM PDT

Ibrahim was later interrupted by a man claiming to be a member of the "rakyat" who accused him of "threatening" the Chinese with his statement. "I am talking to the reporter. You want to talk to me, you talk to me after this. Do not interrupt me. I can see you after this... bloody idiot," he said.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

Be fair to me, Ibrahim Ali tells media

(The Malaysian Insider) - Perkasa president Datuk Ibrahim Ali today appealed to the media to be fair to him and to stop spinning his statements out of context.

The Malay rights leader claimed his words were often misreported, particularly by media organisations like The Malaysian Insider and Malaysiakini.

"I hope all the newspapers report all the statements correctly and be fair. There are good statements from us. It does not appear so but if there are statements that are a little bit controversial, they spin off and people get the wrong message of what I said," he told reporters today.

The Pasir Mas MP caused an uproar earlier today when he was heard yelling at a group of reporters who approached him for a statement.

"I do not speak to The Malaysian Insider. Why should I? You only spin," he shouted while gesticulating.

READ MORE HERE: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/be-fair-to-me-ibrahim-ali-tells-media/

MAYBE IBRAHIM ALI WOULD NOT LIKE TO COMMENT ON THE FOLLOWING

NPQsZZZnXW0

SEE VIDEO ON YOUTUBE HERE: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NPQsZZZnXW0

 

4jA88gmFgMI

SEE VIDEO ON YOUTUBE HERE: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4jA88gmFgMI

 

adxPYoaIPAE

SEE VIDEO ON YOUTUBE HERE: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adxPYoaIPAE

 

Give me one reason why I should march on 9th July 2011 (UPDATED with Chinese Translation)

Posted: 19 Jun 2011 04:39 PM PDT

Actually I can give you more than one reason. But knowing that many Malaysia Today readers tend to focus on the 'wrong' part of the article rather than what they should be focusing on (just read the comments to see what I mean) maybe I should focus on just one reason. That is easier for most of the smaller brains.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

Now, look at the chart above and tell me what you see. Yes, that's right, Malaysian elections are won through gerrymandering.

Okay, in case you are not sure what you should be looking at, look at the figures under the column 'GOVERNMENT' and compare the % seats and % votes columns.

Can you see that in terms of votes the Alliance Party of 1959, 1964 and 1969 and Barisan Nasional since 1974 till 2008 never really did that well? The best was in fact during Abdullah Ahmad Badawi's rule in 2004 when Barisan Nasional garnered 63.9% of the votes and again in 1995 (65.2%) just before the 1997 financial crisis and the 1998 political crisis that followed.

Nevertheless, even this did not give them two-thirds of the votes (66.67%).

The rest of the time, Barisan Nasional (or the Alliance Party) won only 50% to 60% of the votes (except in 1969 when they won less than 50%).

However, as you can see, it is seats and not votes which has been giving them the government time and time again. And, as I said, this is because of gerrymandering.

The Parliament seats vary from a mere 5,000 voters to over 100,000 voters. Invariably, all those 'smaller' seats are Barisan Nasional seats, in particular Umno, while the 'bigger' seats are those which Barisan Nasional has no hope of winning and which will certainly fall to the opposition.

Okay, to make you understand the issue better, it works like this. The opposition can win 100,000 votes and it will be just one seat. Barisan Nasional, on the other hand, also wins 100,000 votes but it will be two or three seats.

Now, that is why the opposition wins 50% of the votes but only 40% of the seats while Barisan Nasional's 50% of the votes gives them 60% of the seats.

In short, dear readers, this means, based on the present system, the opposition will NEVER form the federal government because it will NEVER win more than 50% of the seats in Parliament (unless it can win more than 60% of the votes, which is quite impossible with that many phantom and postal votes floating around).

And this also means we need electoral reforms. We need a law passed that says the variance in Parliament seats should be plus-minus 20%. This means, if the benchmark for Parliament seats is, say, 50,000 voters, then the variance of 20% translates to 40,000-60,000 voters per seat (not 5,000-120,000 like now).

Only when this happens would the opposition have a fair shot at forming the next federal government. If not it will never happen (unless the opposition can garner more than 60% of the votes).

In some countries this is the law. Some countries make it law that the seats must be plus-minus 15%. In others it is plus-minus 20%. (In fact, in some countries the law says that not less than 30% of the candidates must be women). Only in Malaysia it is plus-minus 95% (gila babi sungguh).

So now you know why we need electoral reforms. And now you know why we need to march on 9th July 2011. And this is not about the opposition. It is not about Anwar Ibrahim either. It is about the rights of the people of one-man-one-vote.

If Malaysia had direct elections (like in the United States) to elect our Prime Minister, then Najib Tun Razak would never become the Prime Minister of Malaysia. Then, like in America, a non-white (in Malaysia's case a non-Bumiputera) could become the Prime Minister.

Alas, in Malaysia we have a system that ensures the Prime Minister will always be someone from Umno and the government will always be an Umno-led coalition.

The next question would be: why bother to vote then?

Good question. I would urge you to vote so that we can see a strong opposition in Parliament and the emergence of a two-party system in Malaysia. That in itself is reason enough to vote. However, if we can see electoral reforms, then that is another matter. Then we can vote to see a change in federal government.

And that is why we need BERSIH and also why we need to support Datuk Ambiga Sreenevasan. Electoral reforms will never happen unless the people make it happen.

And 'the people' are you and I. We can't depend on just the politicians.

Don't forget, at one point of time many now in the opposition were once in the government (and many now in the government were once in the opposition). And when they were in the government did they push for electoral reforms? Or did they take advantage of the unfair system to hold on to power and only now that they are in the opposition they make so much noise about electoral reforms?

Trust me, if the opposition takes over the federal government they too would not want to change the system. They will maintain the present system to ensure they remain in power. Why change the present system to one that allows an easy change of government? And many in the opposition who were once in the government exploited the present system and did not utter a word of protest until they found themselves in the opposition.

Then only they bising tak habis-habis.

 

Translated into Chinese at: http://ccliew.blogspot.com/2011/06/201179.html

 

Stop bitching

Posted: 18 Jun 2011 12:35 AM PDT

This is my response to the Penang mosque committee fiasco where the opposition was forced to do a 'U-turn' after adamantly stating that it would go ahead with the elections of the mosque committees. This is also my response to HINDRAF's announcement that it is boycotting the BERSIH rally to punish Pakatan Rakyat.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

Aziz Bari is grumbling because Umno has dragged the Monarchy into politics and is using the Palace against the opposition (read his article in Bahasa Malaysia below). My response to that is: so what? Isn't this what Umno normally does? Isn't this what Umno always does? So, what else is new? It's the same old story.

You mean the opposition did not suspect this would happen? You mean this is the first time this has happened and the opposition was caught off guard? How come the opposition was caught off guard? You mean Umno is cleverer than the opposition?

The opposition always seems to get caught off guard when it comes to issues concerning the Monarchy or the Palace. There must be some very stupid people in the opposition if they can get caught on the same issue again and again. There is saying: once bitten twice shy. Only fools get bitten 25 times and are still not shy.

Next time plan your strategy. Use preemptive strikes. Don't get into a situation half-cocked like you always do. And stop complaining about Umno this and Umno that, especially when it comes to the Monarchy or Palace.

And to those Chinese and Indian readers, stop falling into Umno's trap. Umno wants you to whack the Monarchy and Palace so that it can prove to the Malays that Pakatan Rakyat, in particular the non-Malays in Pakatan Rakyat, are anti-royalty. That will ensure Umno can win back Malay support. And you are doing exactly what Umno wants you to do.

Now, to the issue of HINDRAF. They want to boycott the BERSIH march because they are angry with Pakatan Rakyat. Why boycott BERSIH when it is Pakatan Rakyat you are angry with? I do not get that logic.

BERSIH is about the rakyat, not about Pakatan Rakyat. So, are you trying to punish the rakyat or punish Pakatan Rakyat?

The signal that HINDRAF is sending to the rakyat is that Pakatan Rakyat is behind BERSIH. Since Pakatan Rakyat and not the rakyat is behind BERSIH then this gives the government the justification to ban the BERSIH rally.

The government is saying that the opposition is the one really behind BERSIH. Now HINDRAF is confirming this. This means the government can legitimately clamp down on BERSIH and arrest or detain its leaders.

Maybe, after this, HINDRAF can proudly announce that it was they who made it possible for the government to take action against BERSIH and ban its planned march on 9th July 2011.

It would be good if the HINDRAF people can look at the two videos below. This is what I would call a quality Tamil leader. These are the kind of Tamil leaders that we want to see. Can you just visualise some of the HINDRAF leaders acting like this and demonstrating this type of class and quality?

**************************************
P'raya masjid: Nama Agong diheret, kata Aziz Bari

Meskipun mengakui Yang di-Pertuan Agong mempunyai kuasa dalam hal-hal berkaitan agama Islam di negeri-negeri yang tidak mempunyai Raja-raja Melayu, namun pakar perlembagaan Profesor Abdul Aziz Bari mempertikaikan cara nama Seri Paduka diheret setiap kali bagi membidas dasar-dasar kerajaan negeri Pulau Pinang.

NONE"Hanya selepas Pakatan Rakyat mengambil-alih Pulau Pinang, tiba-tiba peranan Agong menjadi tokoh yang signifikan.

"Nama Baginda digunakan bagi menghalang sebarang tindakan yang diambil oleh kerajaan negeri," kata pensyarah Universiti Islam Antarabangsa (UIAM) itu kepada Malaysiakini.

Abdul Aziz berkata prosedur atau peraturan yang betul mengikut perlembagaan adalah bagi pihak Istana Negara atau setiausaha sulit Yang di-Pertuan Agong bagi mengeluarkan kenyataan berhubung kedudukannya sebagai ketua agama dan bukannya oleh pihak-pihak yang lain.

"Pastinya bukan Menteri Di Jabatan Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Jamil Khir Baharom, yang merupakan sebahagian daripada kerajaan.

"Jadi beliau harus diam. Biarkan Baginda melaksanakan tanggungjawab yang diperuntukkan oleh perlembagaan - bebas daripada kerajaan sama ada peringkat persekutuan mahupun negeri," kata Abdul Aziz.

Beliau juga membidas dakwaan 'mengarut' oleh kumpulan pendesak Melayu, PERKASA yang berkata adalah salah bagi mengadakan pemilihan jawatankuasa kariah masjid diadakan.

"Pertama, tidak ada fatwa mengatakan pemilihan itu adalah haram mengikut Islam," katanya.Fatwa

Lagipun menurut profesor itu lagi, umat Islam, sama ada dari Umno, PAS dan PKR, semuanya pernah terbabit dalam pemilihan parti masing-masing.

azlan"Jika ini tidak mengikut Islam, majlis fatwa sepatutnya mengeluarkan hukum berhubung perkara itu," katanya.

Semalam, hasrat Majlis Agama Islam Pulau Pinang (MAIPP) bagi mengadakan pemilihan jawatankuasa kariah masjid bagi sesi 2012-2013 dengan kaedah pilihan raya terpaksa dibatalkan.

Keputusan itu dibuat di Istana Negara di Kuala Lumpur apabila Yang di-Pertua Negri Abdul Rahman Abbas dan Yang Dipertua MAIPP Ellias Zakaria menghadap Yang di-Pertuan Agong Tuanku Mizan Zainal Abidin.

Mesyuarat agung masjid-masjid di Pulau Pinang yang dijadualkan hari ini dan esok itu sepatutnya memilih jawatankuasa kariah di 151 daripada 200 masjid tetapi kini ditangguhkan sehingga notis lanjut.

Pemilihan ala pilihan raya yang dicadangkan itu bagi membolehkan anak kariah mengundi secara sulit untuk memilih pemimpin kariah yang sebelum ini dipilih oleh MAIPP.

Bantahan pelbagai pihak yang didalangi Umno begitu lantang kerana gusar pilihan raya kariah masjid akan menghakis sokongan kepada parti itu yang kini gagal menguasai kerajaan negeri Pulau Pinang setelah ditumbangkan pada pilihan raya umum 2008.

Umno mendakwa pemilihan secara demokrasi itu akan hanya membawa perpecahan di kalangan umat Islam selain mengheret masjid ke kancah politik kepartian.

THE FIRST TIME IN HISTORY A TAMIL LEADER HAS BEEN ELECTED INTO THE CANADIAN PARLIAMENT

K9yqU37MhT4
SEE VIDEO ON YOUTUBE HERE: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9yqU37MhT4

6TjlgBs_k0U
SEE VIDEO ON YOUTUBE HERE: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TjlgBs_k0U
 

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved