Rabu, 8 Jun 2011

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Minister ignorant of link to brother

Posted: 08 Jun 2011 01:51 AM PDT

Richard Baker and Nick McKenzie, The Age

MALAYSIA's Home Affairs Minister says he had no idea a company associated with his brother was hired as an agent by troubled Reserve Bank of Australia firm Securency.

Hishammuddin Hussein- who is negotiating the asylum seeker swap deal with the Gillard government - also told Malaysia's Sun Daily newspaper this week that he did not think an Australian company would engage a company linked to politically-connected figures in the hope of furthering its business interests in Malaysia.

The comments came after The Age revealed Securency had hired a Kuala Lumpur firm called Liberal Technology as its Malaysian agent in 2009. Companies Commission of Malaysia records show the minister's brother, Haris Onn Hussein, to be Liberal Technology's largest individual shareholder.

The brothers are cousins of Malaysia's Prime Minister Najib Razak. Their late father Hussein Onn was Malaysia's prime minister between 1976 and 1981.

Securency is being investigated by the Australian Federal Police and Britain's Serious Fraud Office for allegedly bribing public officials in Vietnam, Malaysia, Nigeria and Indonesia in return for winning polymer banknote supply contracts.

The Age is not suggesting Liberal Technology, Hishammuddin Hussein, Haris Onn Hussein or Mr Razak have been involved with any of Securency's alleged corruption.

Liberal Technology released a statement on Tuesday denying Haris Onn Hussein was still a shareholder, claiming he sold his shares to other owners in September 2006. The company said Haris Onn Hussein had played no part in any dealings with Securency.

However, Liberal Technology's official corporate records obtained yesterday from the Companies Commission of Malaysia list Haris Onn Hussein as the holder of 180,000 shares.

The Age asked the company yesterday why its records still showed Haris Onn Hussein as a shareholder. It did not respond.

 

PKR HQ: ‘Real’ landlord stops auction

Posted: 08 Jun 2011 01:43 AM PDT

Beneficial owner had obtained court order to prevent the sale of the building, according to a source.

(Free Malaysia Today) -  In the latest twist to the PKR headquarters saga, the building located in Tropicana here will not go under the hammer today.

FMT learnt that on June 6, the building's "real" landlord and beneficial owner Butiran Nyata Sdn Bhd obtained an ex-parte injunction against Ainb Tech Malaysia Sdn Bhd and Affin Bank from carrying out the auction until the inter-parte hearing is disposed of on June 27.

Previously, party leaders named Ainb-Tech as the building's landlord, who they said failed to service the bank loan.

"PKR leaders, including treasurer William Leong, secretary-general Saifuddin Nasution Ismail and vice-president Tian Chua, got their facts wrong," said a source.

"The lease agreement is between Butiran Nyata and PKR. The bank is taking action against Ainb-Tech and not Butiran Nyata," he added.

Ainb Tech was the original owner of the building and sold it to Butiran Nyata in 2008.

The latest information confirmed an earlier FMT report where a party insider claimed that PKR leaders named a different landlord from the one on the lease agreement.

"They don't seem to have a clue about the lease details of the premises they are occupying. I don't think they know who they are renting the building from and even how much money they have to pay for rental," he had said.

The party's five-storey headquarters in Merchant Square was scheduled to be auctioned off at the auctioneer's office in Brickfields tomorrow afternoon.

PKR entered into a five-year lease with the landlord beginning July 2008 for RM20,000 per month. However, the party only paid rental until November 2008 resulting in arrears of RM600,000.

READ MORE HERE

 

Khairy defends Najib over ‘wedding’ trip

Posted: 07 Jun 2011 06:33 PM PDT

 

The premier was accused of using state funds to go to Kazakhstan in relation to his daughter's wedding. But the Umno Youth chief calls this a cheap shot.

(Free Malaysia Today) - Umno Youth chief Khairy Jamaluddin today defended Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak's official trip to Kazakhstan, which had come under fire from opposition leaders.

It was alleged that the prime minister was misusing public funds to go there in relation to his daughter's wedding.

Attacking PAS's Dzulkefly Ahmad, who first raised the allegation, Khairy said the Kuala Selangor MP had made a "cheap shot" and was concocting "despicable lies" and "desperate spins".

"I thought Dzulkefly was a decent guy. Didn't think he was capable of despicable lies and desperate spins," Khairy said on Twitter.

The Umno Youth chief, who is in Kazakhstan with Najib, suggested that it was impossible that the trip was planned just for personal reasons as the Seventh World Islamic Forum (WIEF) was a major international event.

"How long do you think it takes to organise a major international forum like WIEF? You think this was done for that?" asked Khairy, stressing that the event was already planned one year in advance.

He also poked fun at Dzulkefly for not being invited to the forum eventhough he was a "great mind".

Explain in Parliament

Meanwhile, Sarawak DAP leader Wong Ho Leng said that the matter should be discussed in Parliament and Najib should come up with answers.

"The truth must be told in Parliament. Government ministers, whenever they go overseas, must be accountable for their sepndings.

"We just want the PM to be answerable. We just want the PM to clarify whether he went there as part of the programme or to see his future son-in-law and family," he told FMT.

"What was his programme like? Was public funds used?" he asked.

Yesterday, Dzulkefly had questioned the use of public funds to pay for Najib's and his official entourage to Kazakhstan.

The PAS MP said it was morally wrong though not procedurally problematic.

READ MORE HERE

 

Rosmah’s prompt act shames ‘e-kasih’

Posted: 07 Jun 2011 02:38 PM PDT

By Queville To, FMT

KOTA KINABALU: The shocking exposure by Rosmah Mansor, the wife of Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak, that severe poverty continues to escape detection in Sabah is a wake-up call for the government.

Sabah DAP chief Jimmy Wong said the government's poverty eradication scheme known as 'e-kasih' has been sensationally confirmed as ineffective following Rosmah's direct intervention to help a family living in abject poverty.

Rosnia @ Annie Marambal, a poverty stricken widow from Kota Marudu had appealed repeatedly for aid under the 'e-kasih programme' but was ignored.

The plight of the 36-year-old widow and her three children, living in a one-room, zinc shack at Kampung Kandaway was widely reported in the media and had caught Rosmah's eye.

Wong questioned the effectiveness of the "e-kasih program" under the Ministry of Women, Family and Community Development which failed to respond to Rosnia's plight.

Wong, who is also Sri Tanjung State assemblyman, questioned the methods used to help the poor and the selection criteria for the poverty eradication programme.

He asked how the government had allowed Rosnia's case to slip thorugh the cracks.

"Rosnia and her  family are more than eligible for government assistance under the e-kasih programme for the poor and needy".

"How poor must one be before assistance is approved by the ministry?" asked Wong.

Dubious programme

He wants the government to be transparent about the programme which he slammed as dubious.

"I have been informed that many eligible applicants are not getting assistance because they cannot afford to pay some so-called commissions.

"The minister concerned may not be aware of this and I urge her to check if there is any truth to this matter.

"It appears that the e-kasih programme should be more suitably be called "pilih-kasih" programme," he said.

He said the party was disturbed to learn about yet another sad case of Sabahans living in abject poverty.

 

READ MORE HERE.

‘Taib buying time to cool off competitors’

Posted: 07 Jun 2011 02:34 PM PDT

KUCHING: The opposition in Sarawak is hoping that the appointment of Adenan Satem as minster of special functions will help change the state government's perception of issues relating to native customary rights (NCR) land.

By Joseph Tawie, FMT

Sarawak PKR information chief See Chee How said that currently the biggest problem is while the courts have recognised NCR land to include 'temuda' (farming land), 'pendam' (graveyards), 'tembawai' (previous longhouse sites), 'pulau galau' (communal forests), and 'pemakai menua' (territorial domain), the state hasn't.

"At the moment we are winning a string of cases related to NCR land, and it is clear from court decisions that it recognises NCR land.

"The government should give full recognition to NCR land according to the natives' perception that has been accepted by the court so that the number of cases being litigated can be reduced," he said.

He added that Adenan, a former Land Development Minister, who has vast experience on land matters, should be able to help by looking at the number cases that have been litigated in the court at this time.

"He can advise the state cabinet especially the chief minister on these cases and find ways  to reduce these cases. It will save the courts and everybody else's time. That is important and I'm hopeful that Adenan will look into the matter," he said.

See, who is the Batu Lintang state assemblyman, said that land matters will be one of the main issues to be discussed at the state assembly.

"It is not just for Baru Bian (state assemblyman for Ba'Kelalan), myself and Ali Biju (state assemblyman for Krian), but I believe that DAP members especially Richard Wong (state assemblyman for Bukit Assek) have expressed interest in land matters.

"Pakatan Rakyat is taking land matters very seriously," he said.

'Taib not prepared to leave'

 

READ MORE HERE.

Amnesty plan: Why now Hisham?

Posted: 07 Jun 2011 02:32 PM PDT

"There's always a tendency that many thousand more illegal immigrants will make use of the amnesty exercise to come into Sabah openly without fear," he said.

By Queville To, FMT

KOTA KINABALU: The Federal government is treading on shaky ground with its plan to grant amnesty and legalise the two million illegal immigrants in the country, a Sabah politician has cautioned.

Kota Kinabalu MP Hiew King Cheu expressed both shock and confusion over the statement by Home Minister Hishammuddin Tun Hussein on Monday, that the government would embark on a comprehensive programme to legalise illegal immigrants in the country, including those in Sabah.

The programme is expected to start next month.

Hishammuddin said the programme is not aimed at making the illegal immigrants Malaysian citizens but to allow them to live and work legally in Malaysia.

He added that the move would also stop flourishing drugs trade and human trafficking as well as money laundering and terrorist activities in Malaysia.

Hiew also questioned the timing of the amnesty programme by the Barisan Nasional (BN) government and asked what guarantees would be provided to ensure that those granted permits to stay would not be manipulated during elections.

"Are they going to put in more illegal foreigners to make them Sabahans and the 'New Bumiputras' just for the sake of using them to vote for them?" he asked.

He said the government needs to come up with a better plan to deal with the problem, citing that such a problem does not exist in neighbouring Sarawak and Brunei.

"May be this is done purposely to allow them to come into Sabah under a specific order?"

Ending exploitation

He warned that such a move might "open the flood gates" causing the influx of more illegal immigrants into the country and to Sabah in particular.


READ MORE HERE.

 

PAS – from cave to condo

Posted: 07 Jun 2011 02:30 PM PDT

By R K Anand, FMT

"The people of Malaysia should ask themselves one question, 'Is this the promised land or are we still searcing for the promised land after 54 years of independence?'" he added.

 PETALING JAYA: PAS' proposal to set up a welfare state won accolades from a business group, which said that the move was in tandem with the people's expectations.

From a political perspective, Malaysian Indian Business Association (Miba) president P Sivakumar said PAS had "come out of the cave and moved into a condominium".

"Thousands of Malaysians have left the country because of a system that discriminates and differentiates the races. They feel insulted because of the unequal treatment. And the call to end the discrimination and to treat all citizens the same falls on deaf ears," he told FMT.

PAS' welfare state, Sivakumar noted, was different and promised to be a colour-blind system of governance.

"It is based on the principles of equal opportunities, equitable distribution of wealth and public responsibility for those unable to avail themselves of the minimal provisions for a good life.

"The welfare state has surely caught the attention of Barisan Nasional politicians. This can be seen from their critical statements," he said.

Sivakumar said Malaysian politics must change from mere "fanfare attractions" in order to convince the people to support a particular party.

"The real issues must be addressed in an open manner based on political, social and economic justice," he stressed.

Now with PAS no longer pushing for an Islamic state and reaffirming its pledge to Pakatan Rakyat, Sivakumar said: "The mother of all battles is looming come the next general election."

 

 

READ MORE HERE.

Malaysia amnesty for millions of migrant workers

Posted: 07 Jun 2011 02:16 PM PDT

MALAYSIA will grant amnesty to as many as 2 million illegal migrants in the country, allowing them to work and live freely under a scheme to be rolled out next month.

By Tom Allard, The Age

Malaysia's new resolve to ''do the right thing'' by illegal immigrants also underpins its negotiations with Australia on the refugee swap deal and partly explains why the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees is supportive of the concept.

''It's a big step in the right direction,'' said Aegile Fernandez, director of Tenaganita, a group that assists undocumented arrivals in Malaysia, including refugees. ''We have been asking for this for at least 12 months.''

Malaysia's Home Minister, Hishammuddin Hussein, revealed some details of the new program on Monday, saying the scheme could be a model for other countries.

The deal is expected to be formally approved by cabinet later this week, at the same time the refugee swap deal with Australia gets the go-ahead.

The complete details have yet to be revealed, but The Age understands that illegal immigrants will be able to register with the authorities to stay and work legally for a year, which can be extended annually for five years in total.

Lingam, Former CJs Should Be Allowed To Challenge RCI Findings

Posted: 07 Jun 2011 02:11 PM PDT

(Bernama) - PUTRAJAYA -- Lawyer V.K. Lingam and former chief justices Eusoff Chin and Ahmad Fairuz Sheikh Abdul Halim who were implicated in the controversial Lingam tape affair, should be allowed to challenge the Royal Commission of Inquiry's (RCI) findings of their misbehaviour in a judicial review proceeding, according to Court of Appeal judge Zaharah Ibrahim.

In her 12-page written judgment which was made available to the media on Tuesday, she said the three should be permitted to argue on the issue of whether their rights to liberty as enshrined under Article 5 of the Federal Constitution had been adversely affected by the RCI's findings.  

On Aug 24 last year, a three-man panel of the Court of Appeal, in a majority decision, allowed their (Lingam, Eusoff and Ahmad Fairuz's) appeals to set aside a High Court's refusal to grant them leave to initiate a judicial review proceeding to challenge the RCI's findings.

Justices Zaharah and Tengku Datuk Baharudin Shah Tengku Mahmud ruled in favour of them while Justice Mohd Hishamudin Mohd Yunus dissented. They did not give their written grounds then.

Justice Zaharah said the High Court erred because it had placed a higher threshold on the three than they were required to cross, in showing to the court that their application for leave for a judicial review, was not vexatious and that they had an arguable case.
   
She also said whether or not the determinations made by the RCI constituted "decisions", thet were certainly arguable and that Lingam, Eusoff and Ahmad Fairuz should be permitted to take up the issue.

Zaharah said the appellants had claimed that as a result of the RCI findings, they would be exposed to criminal prosecution and that even if no criminal proceedings were brought against them, the findings had caused a permanent stain and stigma on their character.

A five-man panel of the RCI was set up in 2008 to look into the authenticity of a video clip allegedly showing Lingam in a telephone conversation with Ahmad Fairuz over the appointment of judges.

The RCI report made available to the public on May 20 2008, recommended that appropriate action be taken against six individuals namely Lingam, Eusoff, Fairuz, tycoon Vincent Tan, former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad, businessman and former minister in the prime minister's department Tengku Adnan Tengku Mansor for misconduct. 

It also found that there was prima facie evidence to investigate the six men for offences under the Sedition Act, Official Secrets Act, the Penal Code and the Legal Profession Act.

The RCI also concluded that the video clip was authentic, and that Lingam was the person in conversation with Ahmad Fairuz over the appointment of judges.

The matter is currently awaiting hearing of the RCI's appeal at the Federal Court which was expected to decide on a novel legal question on whether the findings of the RCI was reviewable. 

Except for Dr Mahathir, the other five had filed for leave for a judicial review in an attempt to quash the inquiry's findings. However, Tan and Tengku Adnan withdrew their appeal at the court of appeal stage early last year. 

In his written judgment dated May 4 this year, Justice Hishamudin held that the High Court was correct to rule that RCI's findings were not amenable to judicial review as its findings did not fall within the realm of the meaning of "decisions".

(Bernama)

Selangor Rejects Application For Development On TOL Land At Sg Buloh Green Lane

Posted: 07 Jun 2011 02:09 PM PDT

(Bernama) - SHAH ALAM -- The Selangor state government on Tuesday rejected all applications for development on the 8-hectares of TOL land known as Green Lane in Sungai Buloh, that belonged to the state government, including from Yayasan Selangor.

Selangor Menteri Besar Abdul Khalid Ibrahim said the land used by nursery operators is the site of safety reserve land which 'houses' high pressure water pipes where no development should have been carried out.

He said the current (nursery) sites are safety reserves where buried under are two high pressure water pipes which are 2.2m and 2.05m in size respectively.

The pipes from Jalan Batu 3, Sungai Buloh to Jalan Subang caters water supply needs to more than one million people and any uncalled for activities may cause damage to the pipes and disrupt water supply, he said.

"As a responsible Menteri Besar, I cannot just close an eye to dangers posed to the pipes due to development in the area," he said in a statement after meeting the relevant parties involved.

During the meeting, Sunny Low, president of the Landscape and Agriculture Nursery Operators of Subang Association, State Secretary Mohammed Khusrin Munawi, Datuk Bandar Petaling Jaya Roslan Sakiman, Petaling district officer Zulkifli Yaakob and Gombak district officer Ahmad Zaharin Mohd Saad were present. 
 
However, Abdul Khalid said he would try to find an amicable solution to the predicament of the 60 operators along the Green Lane to ensure their business would not be affected.

"We will ask Yayasan Selangor to conduct a feasibility study to determine whether activities along the Green Lane were safe. If the place is not safe the state government will offer them another site for their business," he said.

He also invited the nursery operators to conduct a similar study and submit a report within a month. 

PM: Openness, honesty, transparency vital for faith in Govt

Posted: 07 Jun 2011 02:04 PM PDT

By Audrey Edwards, The Star

ASTANA (Kazakhstan): Openness, honesty and transparency are vital if the people are to have faith that their government is working for them and not for itself.

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak said these guiding principles would also show that leaders and politicians were striving to lift the whole economy and not just to "line their own pockets".

Good governance, he added was not the only answer to the many and complex challenges faced.

"As political leaders and as statesmen, it is up to us to show the resolve, dedication, commitment and political will required to do what is right, to right what is wrong and to prevent corruption and secrecy from becoming a norm in our societies.

"We should be prepared to walk the talk and practise what we preach. And government should have no fear of criticism from the people that they serve," he said in his keynote address Wednesday at the opening of the seventh World Islamic Economic Forum here.

He added that it was vital for governments to develop new approaches and economic models appropriate for each country's respective internal dynamics if they wanted to endure and flourish besides meet the interests and expectations of their people, especially the young.

He said the responsibility of applying such principles was not just for governments but also that of the private sector, non-governmental organisations and the people.

Najib said good governance should come "naturally" to Muslim nations as it had been their nature for more than 1,500 years.

He cited the example of the fourth Caliph Ali bin ABi Talib, fourth son-in-law of Prophet Mohammed, who told Egyptian governor Maalik as-Ashtar that "his administration would only succeed if he governs with concern for justice, equality, probity and the prosperity of all", including women.

Consequently, Najib said Muslim nations had long known that such attitudes were not the preserve of Western liberal democracies.

However, he added that good governance was "easier said than done" in a world that has been characterised by factors such as political influence, unequal competition and opportunities, strong family ties, unlimited greed, inadequate rules and regulations, and poor enforcement.

"Even the fear of God at times can do little to ensure adherence to the principles of integrity," he added.

Najib added that he believed the Malaysian Government was doing its part by embarking on a series of readjustment and transformation initiatives to emphasise the positive influence of good governance on its competitiveness.

Among the efforts, he said, were the Whistleblower Protection Act, National Integrity Plan, the introduction of key performance indicators and establishing the Malaysian Institute of Integrity.

He said to keep a healthy check and balance, the Government also welcomed comments and views from its own institutions, religious organisations, minority groups, the media and businesses.

He added that the vision of transforming Malaysia into a high-income country in a just way that benefitted everyone was being done through strategies such as the Government Transformation Programme, New Economic Model and the Economic Transformation Programme.

Pua dares Mukhriz to distribute IPP contracts to MPs

Posted: 07 Jun 2011 01:52 PM PDT

By Clara Chooi, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, June 8 — DAP MP Tony Pua today demanded Datuk Mukhriz Mahathir to back his claim that all MPs are allowed access to the confidential independent power producer (IPP) agreements by distributing copies in Parliament next week.

The Petaling Jaya MP expressed doubt however that the Umno deputy minister would dare to do so, and described the latter's statement yesterday as "utter bunkum".

"Despite being a first term parliamentarian, I can say with certainty that the above statement by Mukhriz is complete and utter bunkum.

"MPs are not privy to documents protected under the Official Secrets Act (OSA) and have no immunity over the possession (even if it is for 5 minutes)," Pua said in a statement today.

He was commenting on Mukhriz's statement to reporters yesterday that details of the contentious IPP agreements can be requested by MPs to safeguard public interest since lawmakers represent voters.

"In Parliament, if an MP can ask for anything. You know we are all very transparent about it. If it is within the boundaries of the law then so be it but it is still up to what is said in the agreement," the deputy minister of international trade and industry had said.

But Pua insisted today that for any MP to gain access to such documents, the Cabinet would first have to initiate a declassification process.

A person found in possession of such secret documents, he added, would be liable to punishment — a mandatory one year jail term or up to seven years imprisonment.

Pua reminded Mukhriz of how tolled highway concession contracts and the Port Klang Free Zone (PKFZ) contracts had only been made accessible to MPs after a lengthy declassification exercise by the Cabinet and Attorney-General.

He added that Mukhriz's statement also contradicted Energy, Water and Green Technology Minister Datuk Peter Chin Fah Kui's announcement last week that the government had no power to release the documents.

"He said that this is because they are agreements signed between 'private entities'.  Who is telling the truth, and who is lying?," Pua asked.

Despite this, the DAP national publicity chief said he hoped he could be proven wrong and told Mukhriz to distribute the IPP agreements when Parliament opens on Monday.

"Give each MP a copy of the IPP agreement, attached with an undertaking from the Attorney-General that MPs are not punishable under the OSA for having possession of these documents.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Reveal police probe before calling inquest, says Sarbaini’s family

Posted: 07 Jun 2011 01:49 PM PDT

 

By Syed Mu'az Syed Putra, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, June 8 — The controversy surrounding Ahmad Sarbaini Mohamed's death could prove to be even more embarrassing than the death of a DAP aide almost two years ago, with his family questioning the police's motives for an inquest.

The senior Customs officer's family oppose an inquest and demand police reveal their investigation findings. They believe there is a cover-up, a claim which has been equally pursued relentlessly by fugitive blogger Raja Petra Kamarudin.

Raja Petra, in several blog postings on his Malaysia Today website, has claimed that Ahmad Sarbaini's assets and financial status was checked and cleared by the police.

He's accused the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) of trying to tarnish Ahmad Sarbaini's name following his death.

"The family is now confused and do not know what to do...the family is less agreeable for an inquest because it seems like an attempt to delay the case. The family insists that the police reveal the results of the investigation before taking any further action," said a source close to the family of the deceased.

The source told The Malaysian Insider that Ahmad Sarbaini's family also did not want the same fate as Teoh Beng Hock's inquest, with years passing and the case still being investigated via the Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI).

"What will happen if there is an inquest? Will there be other witnesses or proof? Reveal this immediately, do not keep quiet like you are hiding something," the source added.

Sarbaini, 56, was found dead on the badminton court of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) building on Jalan Cochrane on April 6 at about 10.20am, barely two hours after walking in.

His death, which occurred while the Teoh Beng Hock RCI was still ongoing, came as a huge blow to the anti-graft body's already battered credibility.

Teoh, a DAP aide, fell to his death at the then-Selangor MACC office on July 16, 2009. An 18-month inquest returned an open verdict, ruling out both suicide and homicide in Teoh's death.

READ MORE HERE

 

WIKILEAKS: Envoys said court’s Perak decision sanction of undemocratic takeover

Posted: 07 Jun 2011 01:48 PM PDT

 

By Shannon Teoh, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, June 8 — The United States embassy here concluded that "a well financed political coalition" could persuade lawmakers to cross over and shift power through undemocratic means, following a Federal Court decision confirming Datuk Seri Zambry Abd Kadir as Perak Mentri Besar, a leaked diplomatic cable to Washington said.

The document released by whistleblower website Wikileaks and published by the Malaysia Today news portal today said the US embassy here also concluded that the court had allowed the Perak Sultan to legitimise changes without voter input.

"Before this Federal Court decision, the assembly would have instead been dissolved for fresh elections, but now the sultan can legitimise the takeover without voter input," said the cable classified by the embassy's political affairs counsellor Brian D. McFeeters.

It also said that the February 9, 2010 decision in favour of Barisan Nasional (BN) "raised renewed questions about the independence of the Malaysian judiciary, already in question in connection with the (Datuk Seri) Anwar Ibrahim (sodomy) trial and other cases."

Three assemblymen had left PR and backed BN as independents, allowing Zambry (picture) to be sworn in by the Perak Sultan as mentri besar on February 6, 2009.

The ousted Datuk Seri Nizar Jamaluddin then challenged the validity of Zambry's appointment in court, claiming the state constitution did not allow the Sultan to order him to resign as MB and that BN's majority had not been tested in the assembly.

The cable also said that Nizar told a political officer in February 2010 that the ruling would result in "the Prime Minister or the Chief Minister holding office at the pleasure of the King or the Sultan," setting a "dangerous precedent."

Nizar's lead lawyer Chan Kok Keong had also said that he was certain the apex court would make a "political decision" and rule in favour of Zambry, thereby "rewriting its own decisions and the constitution."

But Zambry's political secretary and assembly speaker Datuk R. Ganesan both told the embassy official that the court "will make the right decision" by ruling in favour of BN.

READ MORE HERE

 

Malaysia Considers Amnesty for Illegal Immigrants

Posted: 07 Jun 2011 10:30 AM PDT

By Liz Gooch, New York Times

KUALA LUMPUR — Malaysia is considering what could become its largest-ever program to legalize illegal immigrants.

There are estimated to be as many as two million illegal immigrants in this Southeast Asian country, which relies heavily on foreign labor.

The plan, which is expected to be discussed at a cabinet committee meeting Wednesday, is designed to help the government keep track of foreign workers in the country, which could improve national security, reduce human trafficking and increase tax revenues.

Economists say the effort to grant amnesty to illegal workers would also help make Malaysia more attractive to investors because it would increase the legal labor pool. Employers have long complained about labor shortages in Malaysia, a country of 28 million with an unemployment rate of 3 percent in March. Many Malaysian industries, including the plantation and construction sectors, depend heavily on workers from Indonesia, India and Myanmar. Malaysia has about two million legal foreign workers.

The home minister, Hishammuddin Hussein, has said that the government is in the process of screening several private agencies to help the government register illegal workers.

"We are starting with the biometric system, as we can use thumbprints to register illegal immigrants," The Star, a Malaysian newspaper, quoted him Tuesday as saying.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Of competence, scholarship and your new neighbor with a funny accent

Posted: 07 Jun 2011 11:53 AM PDT

When we vote for candidates to form a government, we really should be looking at their capability in leading the nation, degree of diligence in discharging their official duties, prudence with tax payers' money, ability to form and implement sensible policies to bring the nation forward.

And it really does not have much to do with some dubious asshole of a dubious person or some dodgy black and white Thai pornography or colour-blindness of issue-focused individuals.

Which bring me to the 2 current issues: JPA scholarship and "purification" of illegal foreign workers.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2011/6/6/nation/8844841&sec=nation
Monday June 6, 2011

Comprehensive exercise soon to legalise and send illegal immigrants home

SEREMBAN: A large-scale legalisation and amnesty exercise is expected to be held next month to reduce the number of illegal immigrants in Malaysia, estimated at about two million.

The programme, which will take three weeks, will be codenamed "6P" pendaftaran (registration), pemutihan (legalisation), pengampunan (amnesty), pemantauan (supervision), penguatkuasaan (enforcement) and pengusiran (deportation).

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 immediate striking point is that capable and bona-fide Malaysians are denied what they are qualified for and entitled to, since their tax paying family members would have paid into the scholarship fund; contrast with those foreigners who broke our country's laws, and yet get rewarded with amnesty for illegal entry and exemption from persecution, provided it is paid for.

What kind of encouragement are we sending out to the potential illegal immigrants as well as those who smuggled and employed them?

Would the Pendatang-focused right wingers, who screamed for scholarships to be denied to rightful Malaysians, would also scream against such privileges awarded to bona fide Pendatangs diluting the percentages of their pool?

If they can come up with gems like this:

-----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.malaysia-today.net/mtcolumns/newscommentaries/40881-stop-scholarships-to-students-from-vernacular-schools

Free Malaysia Today) - Malay rights group, Perkasa has suggested that the government limit its Public Service Department (PSD) scholarships 'strictly' to non-Malay students who have completed their education 'exclusively in national school's.

In making this call Perkasa secretary general, Syed Hassan Syed Ali said it would be unfair to award scholarships to students whose parents have no faith in the national education system.
----------------------------------------------------------

Bodoh, they pay taxes too and probably more than you ever do.

Go on, what are you going to say about that?

Read more at: http://wangsamajuformalaysia.blogspot.com/2011/06/of-competence-scholarship-and-your-new.html

"People First" policy? Then come help us now!

Posted: 06 Jun 2011 01:31 PM PDT

Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin had went to the ground on Jun 5 in an effort to meet the Federal Territories constituents while promising to resolve issues.

"If he is sincere about helping the citizens, why don't he come to Bukit Jalil and help us to protect our land?" a resident asked.

The Bukit Jalil residents were currently involved in a land tussle with DBKL, whereby the latter had labeled the residents as squatters although the residents were former estate workers at the Bukit Jalil rubber plantation.

"Four generations have lived here, and now DBKL wants to evict us by claiming that we are squatters. Our ancestors were here even before Merdeka, how can they twist the truth and claim that we are squatters?"

The spat between the residents and DBKL had been brought to the judicial courts, where the former had applied for an interim injunction to stop DBKL from evicting them.

Unfortunately for the residents, the Kuala Lumpur High Court recently ruled in favour of DBKL, giving the latter a free hand to evict the residents, in spite of damning evidence that proves otherwise.

To make matters worse, DBKL had on two occassions (May 25 and Jun 6), sent over a large team of 40 to 50 personnel comprising of its own officers, police and sometimes, gangsters to harass the residents despite the court order approving the extension of the interim injunction.

Residents expressed shock that DBKL and also the police, who were supposed to uphold the law, had shown contempt of the court by trespassing while the injunction was still in effect.

"How can they say that they were following orders of the (Federal Territories) Minister? Does this mean that ministers do not have to uphold the law?" another resident, K. Balakrishnan said.

To-date, more than 100 police reports had been lodged against DBKL for various transgressions like trespassing, sexual harassment, threats and physical violence, amongst others.

READ MORE HERE.

 

The bigger subsidy addicts

Posted: 06 Jun 2011 09:48 AM PDT

Many years ago, our country suffered the worse outage in our nation's history. We were without electricity for many days. Manufacturers lost a lot of money. Industrialists were screaming their heads off and their voices reached Sri Perdana, the abode of the 4th PM then.

He came up with the solution. We have this problem because TNB has a monopoly. Monopoly is not good. Dependency on one supplier isn't strategic. It can be outright dangerous not to mention can cause untold economic damages if the system breaks down.

Let's deregulate the electricity industry he proclaims. So Ananda, YTL, Genting and others came rushing in. we can supply electricity sir. But we need to have iron clad agreements so that our investments are well covered. We must have a guaranteed purchase from TNB at secure prices.

But sir in order to generate our current, we need cheap fuels. Otherwise we bungkus or consumers will have to pay more. Never mind says sir, I control PETRONAS. I will ask them to sell you natural gas at subsidized rates. And so government pays subsidies up to RM 19 billion a year.

As many people now know, the electricity we consumed passes through 4 stages. Generation, transmission, distribution and retailing.

But boss, we will only generate electricity. We won't go into transmission, distribution and retailing. These are costly. Tarak untung. Kadang kadang untung.

In other words, TNB which has to invest in all 4 stages can offer us cheaper tariffs, but the IPPs awarded license which offer only generation of electricity cannot. How can this be? Apa nama? Macam mana?

Deregulation created an opposite effect in Malaysia. We ended up having to pay higher electricity tariffs because TENAGA was forced to buy electricity from IPPs who charged more for the electricity than if Tenaga produced it itself!

We come now to the stupid remark by the minister who says the government is powerless to reveal details of the PPA. Wasn't it the government that 'negotiated' the deals with the IPPs? So why can't we have access to the details?

Who were the first entrants to the IPP business? Genting Sanyen, YTL Power, Malakoff, SEV, Prai Power,Powertek, GB3, Tanjung Bin Power and Kapar Energy are among the two dozen or so IPPs in Malaysia. All of the above are owned by the Genting Lims, Francis Yeoh, Syed Mokhtar and Ananda Krishnan. These were the usual suspects consisting of the connected businessmen who get most of the big deals.

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Hickory, dickory, dock

Posted: 07 Jun 2011 11:45 AM PDT

It appears very clear that while the slogging citizens are borrowing to keep living, our leaders are borrowing to spend, spend, and keep spending. 

By J. D. Lovrenciear

Has the time come for the nation of 28 million people to rhyme "Hickory, dickory, dock"?

It appears very clear that while the slogging citizens are borrowing to keep living, our leaders are borrowing to spend, spend, and keep spending.

Analysts and observers are cautioning that the country, if not on the verge, it is already bankrupting. And the borrowings are done solely by the decision makers within the corridors of power while citizens are gasping to keep up with the promise after promise of foreign investments that will overflow the larder.

But the country is in the red. Our spending has far outgrown our investments. And all the borrowing is for all kinds of mega this and mega that. And even the way the BN government spends at the State Elections would make Hollywood billionaires blush.

Meanwhile, anyone who cries out in alarm will be branded as anti-government. He or she will be accused of even wanting to grab the Prime Minister's post. Or that political party will be run over with accusations of misleading the voters.

Fundamental questions and concerns are brushed off as being simplistic. The rakyat is drummed through the main stream media that the government is far better off than its neighboring countries. And that development comes with a price. A price that the rakyat eventually will have to pay for the borrowed investments.

The rakyat – the wage earner and simple businessman meanwhile cuts corners. When there are no more corners to cut, they short-change. So it is no surprise that the usual glass of the teh tarik is thinner, the indispensable roti canai – the working class fodder, is larger in size but thinner in dimension, the fried kueyteow has less prawns and taugeh or stumps of the sawi and the nasi lemak bungkus does not have ikan bilis but its paste mashed with cilli api.

Have the ministers and BN decision makers walked the streets patronised cherry tree stalls to figure this out? No. They are talking from the velvety cushions of penthouses and five-star studded meals. "Tighten your belts" they admonish the complaining rakyat.

The rate at which the government has been borrowing as revealed by none other than Bank Negara is causing spasmodic palpitation for the rakyat. At this rate, and if BN loses the GE-13, the in-coming political champs will be left with insurmountable problems that will make it almost impossible to perform.

What do we do? What can we do? Will we be allowed to do? Or is the rakyat totally disqualified to do anything to stop the raiding of the larder. Somebody please pray tell!

What use is it to have three or four multi-billionaires who offer jobs for a few thousand when the entire nation of people are living a nightmarish day to day experience in making the Ringgit stretch?

If all the spending from borrowings these past 25 years has today pinned the rakyat on a stretcher, what hope is there when the leaders holler, "we are developing this nation for the future."?

Indeed then hickory, dickory, dock the clock has begun to tick-tock for a disastrous end. No? Then tell us.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Selasa, 7 Jun 2011

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Ahmad Sarbani’s death: the lies and deceptions by the MACC (part 3)

Posted: 07 Jun 2011 01:00 AM PDT

The mention of the AG's name did not intimidate Wan Zainal who insisted to ASP Zuhairi that "saya takkan fitnahkan orang yang dah meninggal" (he would not defame a dead man) just for convenience. ASP Zuhairi also discovered that the background of Wan Zainal is not consistent with someone who would give bribes.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

Ahmad Sarbani – maligned in his death

We continue the story behind the mysterious death of Customs Deputy Director Ahmad Sarbani Mohamed. Ahmad Sarbani was the second person to 'commit suicide' while under the custody and while being interrogated by the MACC, the first being Teoh Beng Hock.

Although the government is trying to suggest that Beng Hock committed suicide, most Malaysians believe that this is not true and that Beng Hock was either murdered or was accidentally killed by the MACC officers who were forcibly trying to extract a confession from him.

Ahmad Sarbani's death appears to meet this pattern and because of this Malaysians are even more convinced that he did not commit suicide. In fact, Ahmad Sarbani's death reinforces the belief even more that Beng Hock did not also commit suicide.

Whatever the findings of the Royal Commission of Inquiry may be with regards to these two deaths, Malaysians have already decided that the two deaths are not suicides and that the government is trying to cover up this evil deed by fabricating reports and evidences.

However you look at it, these two incidences are going to have a negative impact on the government come the next general election.

Royal Malaysian Police (PDRM) Investigating Officer (I.O.) ASP Zuhairi Mohamed did a thorough check on the late Customs Department Deputy Director Ahmad Sarbani Mohamed's assets and found that there was no unusual or extraordinary wealth.

He had only three modest cars -- a Perodua Kancil, a second-hand Honda CRV and a Proton Persona -- and a Modenas Kriss bike, which he rode to the MACC office on that unfortunate morning of 6th April, the day of his death.

He owned an apartment in Bukit Tinggi, Klang (RM65,872), an apartment in Puncak Alam (RM68,988), a Semi-D cluster house in Saujana Impian in Sungai Buloh (RM230,000) and RM35,000 in savings in Amanah Saham Bumiputra.

All these were duly accounted for.

The only significant asset, which was the Semi-D house, was bought via a government loan drawn from his wife's savings with the Employees Provident Fund (EPF), which she had withdrawn when she turned 50.

ASP Zuhairi then interviewed Wan Zainal Abidin and found out something more perplexing.

MACC Senior Investigating Officer (S.I.O.) Abdul Ghani had said that Ahmad Sarbani had implicated Wan Zainal and that he was the last person whom Ahmad Sarbani and Abdul Ghani had called just before his death.

This meant that Ahmad Sarbani was already in MACC's custody when he died. And this shows that Dato' Mustafar Ali had lied in his press statement.

In all, Wan Zainal gave three statements to ASP Zuhairi because AG Gani Patail was not satisfied when this man had steadfastly denied being involved in any bribery each and every time.

The reason for these three statements is because AG Gani Patail and Abu Kassim wanted the police to 'wrap up' this 'suicide' case by pointing to Wan Zainal as the cause of the fear and the resulting death of Ahmad Sarbani. They were bent of coming out with a verdict of 'suicide' so they needed the 'cause' but failed.

The mention of the AG's name did not intimidate Wan Zainal who insisted to ASP Zuhairi that "saya takkan fitnahkan orang yang dah meninggal" (I will not defame a dead man) just for convenience. ASP Zuhairi also discovered that the background of Wan Zainal is not consistent with someone who would give bribes.

Wan Zainal is a God-fearing man and the Imam Jenazah of his surau. His salary and allowances are very modest. He voluntarily gave his last three years bank statements to DSP Shafie, which showed there was hardly any money for him to survive monthly, what more to bribe Ahmad Sarbani or any other Customs officer for that matter to the tune of billions of ringgit.

Wan Zainal also told ASP Zuhairi that on the eve of 4th April, he had met Ahmad Sarbani who apologised to him because he was forced by S.I.O. Abdul Ghani to implicate Wan Zainal. Since Wan Zainal worked for one of the largest forwarding companies in the country as well as globally it would be believable that this company would pay the biggest bribes to clear goods.

Upon realising that he had been tricked to implicate his innocent friends, Ahmad Sarbani told Wan Zainal that he would put things right.

On the morning of 6th April at about 9.50 am, S.I.O. Abdul Ghani had asked Ahmad Sarbani to summon Wan Zainal to the MACC office. By the time Wan Zainal arrived at around noon, Ahmad Sarbani had been killed.

At 2.00pm, S.I.O. Abdul Ghani met Wan Zainal and asked him to assist in giving a story to the police that would support the MACC's spin that Ahmad Sarbani committed suicide because he was under pressure. Wan Zainal was also asked to coordinate the timing of certain calls and events to corroborate the MACC's diary.

To absolve himself, S.I.O. Abdul Ghani also told a close friend that on the morning of 6th April, another MACC I.O. by the name of Shaikh had tried to upstage his leadership of the investigation by reporting to Mohd Fauzi that Ahmad Sarbani would not agree to be 'cooperative'. This caused Mohd Fauzi to go ballistic who directed Shaikh and another officer, Kamal, to apply pressure on Ahmad Sarbani.

S.I.O. Abdul Ghani felt slighted that Shaikh was trying to gain prominence over him in this 'big case'.

Abdul Ghani also confided that he saw Ahmad Sarbani with Shaikh and Kamal who were applying 'pressure techniques' and was making Ahmad Sarbani sign the acknowledgement form for the seizure of his telephone when Ahmad Sarbani was killed.

To pacify the Malaysian public, I.O. Shaikh and I.O. Kamal have been suspended indefinitely and this created a lot of enmity within the Selangor MACC, especially because S.I.O. Abdul Ghani was being protected by Yusof Akope and Mohd Fauzi.

Part 4 will follow tomorrow where we will reveal a massive cover-up and lying exercise aimed at hiding the fact that Ahmad Sarbani did not commit suicide but was murdered.

Ahmad Sarbani's death: the lies and deceptions by the MACC (part 1)  

Ahmad Sarbani's death: the lies and deceptions by the MACC (part 2) 

 

Something that never happened and never can happen

Posted: 06 Jun 2011 08:55 PM PDT

This article is an imaginary situation. This incident never happened and never can happen in a country like Malaysia. Nevertheless, let us break away from the reality of our miserable lives and allow our imagination to run wild just for once and fantasize just like in a Hollywood movie.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

Your Honour, Article 5(3) of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia says: Where a person is arrested he shall be informed as soon as may be of the grounds of his arrest and shall be allowed to consult and be defended by a legal practitioner of his choice.

My client may be regarded as a Muslim, Your Honour, and I stress the word 'regarded', as we shall come to that again later, and I am a self-professed atheist, but as Your Honour can clearly see, the Constitution stipulates that my client is allowed to be defended by a legal practitioner of his choice.

Your Honour can't forbid me from representing my client on the basis of my religion, or in this case my rejection of religion. To do so would be a violation of the Constitution and therefore a breach of my client's fundamental liberties and civil rights.

This court cannot impose any other laws and rules on my client, religious or otherwise, as Article 4(1) of the Constitution says: This Constitution is the supreme law of the Federation and any law passed after Merdeka Day which is inconsistent with this Constitution shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be void.

This means, Your Honour, the Constitution reigns supreme and overrides all other laws, especially if those laws were passed after 31st August 1957 and are opposed to and inconsistent with the Constitution.

In this case, Your Honour, this court cannot forbid me from acting for my client based on my religion or non-religion as the Constitution says that my client can be defended by a legal practitioner of his choice and there is no stipulation in the Constitution as to the religion of that practitioner.

Your Honour, Article 5(1) of the Constitution says: No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty save in accordance with law.

This means, Your Honour, the proper laws must be applied and these laws must be consistent with and in compliance to the Constitution and any laws passed after 31st August 1957 that are in violation of the Constitution are void.

In other words, Your Honour, this court cannot move the goalposts, so to speak.

Your Honour, Article 6(1) of the Constitution says: No person shall be held in slavery.

Your Honour, we shall be calling expert witnesses who will testify that religion is a form of slavery and therefore to impose religion on my client is to subject my client to slavery.

Our expert witnesses are renowned psychologists with no less than 40 years experience and who have lectured and written numerous books on the matter. They have also conducted intensive studies to determine that since time immemorial the ruling elite has been using religion to control and imprison the minds of the populace and subject them to mental slavery, which is more effective and dangerous than physical slavery.

Your Honour, Article 8(1) of the Constitution says: All persons are equal before the law and entitled to the equal protection of the law.

Now, my client is being denied this right, Your Honour. He is being brought before this court because he is regarded as a Muslim and has openly professed that he is an atheist who does not believe in the existence of God. However, if he were not regarded as a Muslim he would not have been subjected to this trial.

This means, Your Honour, my client is being prosecuted because of his faith, or in this case his rejection of faith, which also means he is not being treated equal before the law or being given equal protection of the law.

Would someone who is not regarded as a Muslim be subjected to what my client is being subjected to? Would a non-Muslim who rejects his faith be here today? The answer, Your Honour, is no! So this is a violation of Article 8(1) of the Constitution.

If Your Honour were to look at Article 8(2) of the Constitution, it says: Except as expressly authorized by this Constitution, there shall be no discrimination against citizens on the ground only of religion, race, descent or place of birth in any law relating to the acquisition, holding or disposition of property or the establishing or carrying on of any trade, business, profession, vocation or employment.

Your Honour, my client is being discriminated against because of his religion, or rejection of it, and this, again, is a violation of the Constitution.

Your Honour, Article 11(1) of the Constitution says: Every person has the right to profess and practice his religion and, subject to Clause (4), to propagate it.

This means, Your Honour, this court cannot take away the right of my client to believe in whatever he wants to believe in or not believe in whatever he chooses to not believe.

This court may argue that Article 11(4) of the Constitution overrides Article 11(1). Article 11(4) says: State law and in respect of the Federal Territories of Kuala Lumpur and Labuan, federal law may control or restrict the propagation of any religious doctrine or belief among persons professing the religion of Islam.

This Article merely talks about propagation, not belief. My client is not propagating anything, especially to persons professing the religion of Islam.

Now, Your Honour, let us go to the laws of Islam, in this case the Quran, the only true guidance for those who profess the religion of Islam.

Chapter 2, verse 256 of the Quran says: Let there be no compulsion in religion.

Your Honour, the Quranic passage, la ikraha fi d-dini, or there is no compulsion in religion, is generally understood to mean that no one should use compulsion against another in matters of faith.

As it is understood here, Your Honour, this statement represents a principle of religious tolerance.

Historically, the People of the Book, that is, the members of the older religions, particularly the Jews and the Christians, were in principle never compelled to accept Islam. They were obliged, while residing in any territory under Islamic domination, only to recognise the supremacy of Muslims and, at the same time, as an external indication of this recognition, to pay a separate tax.

In all other matters they could maintain their inherited beliefs and perform their practices as usual. They were even allowed to establish their own internal administration.

The situation, however, was different for members of the pre-Islamic pagan Arab society. After Islam became established and had extended its power over the whole of Arabia, the pagan Arabs were forcefully compelled to accept Islam. To state it more accurately, they had to choose either to accept Islam or face death in battle against the Muslims.

This regulation was later sanctioned in Islamic law that came long after the death of the Prophet Muhammad.

However, Your Honour, all this stands in open contradiction to the meaning of the Quranic statement: la ikraha fi d-dini. The non-Muslims at that time were clearly compelled to accept Islam unless they preferred to die.

In view of these circumstances we must return to the real meaning of la ikraha fi d-dini. And this, Your Honour, becomes clearer in chapter 10, verse 100 of the Quran, which says: And if thy Lord willed, all who are in the earth would believe together. Wouldst thou compel men until they are believers?

In other words, Your Honour, the Quran says that God could have made all people of the same faith had He wanted to but He purposely did not. And the Quran questions us: Wouldst thou compel men until they are believers?

That means the Quran is asking us whether we are trying to do what God Himself does not do.

Your Honour, in the contemporary world of Islam, the acknowledgement of religious tolerance is well established. And it is made clearer in the Quranic statement: la ikraha fi d-dini.

Your Honour, we must always keep in mind that in many ways the circumstances governing early Islam differed from those of today and that the presuppositions for a general and complete religious tolerance were not given at that time.

And that brings us to my client's case, Your Honour. Is this court empowered to try my client and impose upon him not only what the Constitution forbids but what the Quran also clearly does not propagate or allow?

Is this court playing God and doing the job of God when the Quran clearly states that God could have made everyone of the same faith if He had wanted to but intentionally did not?

This, Your Honour, will be what the Defence will be raising if this court persists in continuing with this trial and refuses to withdraw the charge of apostasy against my client.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Of competence, scholarship and your new neighbor with a funny accent

Posted: 07 Jun 2011 11:53 AM PDT

Why studying overseas is so much sought after by our best and brightest? Do we see top scoring Australians, Britons, Yankies, Singaporeans crying their eyeballs out because they can't get a scholarship to study in 1Malaysia?

By Lee Wee Tak

When we vote for candidates to form a government, we really should be looking at their capability in leading the nation, degree of diligence in discharging their official duties, prudence with tax payers' money, ability to form and implement sensible policies to bring the nation forward.

And it really does not have much to do with some dubious asshole of a dubious person or some dodgy black and white Thai pornography or colour-blindness of issue-focused individuals.

Which bring me to the 2 current issues: JPA scholarship and "purification" of illegal foreign workers.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2011/6/6/nation/8844841&sec=nation
Monday June 6, 2011

Comprehensive exercise soon to legalise and send illegal immigrants home

SEREMBAN: A large-scale legalisation and amnesty exercise is expected to be held next month to reduce the number of illegal immigrants in Malaysia, estimated at about two million.

The programme, which will take three weeks, will be codenamed "6P" pendaftaran (registration), pemutihan (legalisation), pengampunan (amnesty), pemantauan (supervision), penguatkuasaan (enforcement) and pengusiran (deportation).

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 immediate striking point is that capable and bona-fide Malaysians are denied what they are qualified for and entitled to, since their tax paying family members would have paid into the scholarship fund; contrast with those foreigners who broke our country's laws, and yet get rewarded with amnesty for illegal entry and exemption from persecution, provided it is paid for.

What kind of encouragement are we sending out to the potential illegal immigrants as well as those who smuggled and employed them?

Would the Pendatang-focused right wingers, who screamed for scholarships to be denied to rightful Malaysians, would also scream against such privileges awarded to bona fide Pendatangs diluting the percentages of their pool?

If they can come up with gems like this:

-----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.malaysia-today.net/mtcolumns/newscommentaries/40881-stop-scholarships-to-students-from-vernacular-schools

Free Malaysia Today) - Malay rights group, Perkasa has suggested that the government limit its Public Service Department (PSD) scholarships 'strictly' to non-Malay students who have completed their education 'exclusively in national school's.

In making this call Perkasa secretary general, Syed Hassan Syed Ali said it would be unfair to award scholarships to students whose parents have no faith in the national education system.
----------------------------------------------------------

Bodoh, they pay taxes too and probably more than you ever do.

Go on, what are you going to say about that?

Read more at: http://wangsamajuformalaysia.blogspot.com/2011/06/of-competence-scholarship-and-your-new.html

Hickory, dickory, dock

Posted: 07 Jun 2011 11:45 AM PDT

It appears very clear that while the slogging citizens are borrowing to keep living, our leaders are borrowing to spend, spend, and keep spending. 

By J. D. Lovrenciear

Has the time come for the nation of 28 million people to rhyme "Hickory, dickory, dock"?

It appears very clear that while the slogging citizens are borrowing to keep living, our leaders are borrowing to spend, spend, and keep spending.

Analysts and observers are cautioning that the country, if not on the verge, it is already bankrupting. And the borrowings are done solely by the decision makers within the corridors of power while citizens are gasping to keep up with the promise after promise of foreign investments that will overflow the larder.

But the country is in the red. Our spending has far outgrown our investments. And all the borrowing is for all kinds of mega this and mega that. And even the way the BN government spends at the State Elections would make Hollywood billionaires blush.

Meanwhile, anyone who cries out in alarm will be branded as anti-government. He or she will be accused of even wanting to grab the Prime Minister's post. Or that political party will be run over with accusations of misleading the voters.

Fundamental questions and concerns are brushed off as being simplistic. The rakyat is drummed through the main stream media that the government is far better off than its neighboring countries. And that development comes with a price. A price that the rakyat eventually will have to pay for the borrowed investments.

The rakyat – the wage earner and simple businessman meanwhile cuts corners. When there are no more corners to cut, they short-change. So it is no surprise that the usual glass of the teh tarik is thinner, the indispensable roti canai – the working class fodder, is larger in size but thinner in dimension, the fried kueyteow has less prawns and taugeh or stumps of the sawi and the nasi lemak bungkus does not have ikan bilis but its paste mashed with cilli api.

Have the ministers and BN decision makers walked the streets patronised cherry tree stalls to figure this out? No. They are talking from the velvety cushions of penthouses and five-star studded meals. "Tighten your belts" they admonish the complaining rakyat.

The rate at which the government has been borrowing as revealed by none other than Bank Negara is causing spasmodic palpitation for the rakyat. At this rate, and if BN loses the GE-13, the in-coming political champs will be left with insurmountable problems that will make it almost impossible to perform.

What do we do? What can we do? Will we be allowed to do? Or is the rakyat totally disqualified to do anything to stop the raiding of the larder. Somebody please pray tell!

What use is it to have three or four multi-billionaires who offer jobs for a few thousand when the entire nation of people are living a nightmarish day to day experience in making the Ringgit stretch?

If all the spending from borrowings these past 25 years has today pinned the rakyat on a stretcher, what hope is there when the leaders holler, "we are developing this nation for the future."?

Indeed then hickory, dickory, dock the clock has begun to tick-tock for a disastrous end. No? Then tell us.

 

Malaysia Considers Amnesty for Illegal Immigrants

Posted: 07 Jun 2011 10:30 AM PDT

By Liz Gooch, New York Times

KUALA LUMPUR — Malaysia is considering what could become its largest-ever program to legalize illegal immigrants.

There are estimated to be as many as two million illegal immigrants in this Southeast Asian country, which relies heavily on foreign labor.

The plan, which is expected to be discussed at a cabinet committee meeting Wednesday, is designed to help the government keep track of foreign workers in the country, which could improve national security, reduce human trafficking and increase tax revenues.

Economists say the effort to grant amnesty to illegal workers would also help make Malaysia more attractive to investors because it would increase the legal labor pool. Employers have long complained about labor shortages in Malaysia, a country of 28 million with an unemployment rate of 3 percent in March. Many Malaysian industries, including the plantation and construction sectors, depend heavily on workers from Indonesia, India and Myanmar. Malaysia has about two million legal foreign workers.

The home minister, Hishammuddin Hussein, has said that the government is in the process of screening several private agencies to help the government register illegal workers.

"We are starting with the biometric system, as we can use thumbprints to register illegal immigrants," The Star, a Malaysian newspaper, quoted him Tuesday as saying.

 

READ MORE HERE.

WIKILEAKS: Perak episode sets a dangerous precedent

Posted: 07 Jun 2011 01:00 AM PDT

A well-financed political coalition could persuade members of Parliament to support the other side, shifting power through undemocratic means, as many allege occurred in Perak. Before this Federal Court decision, the assembly would have instead been dissolved for fresh elections, but now the sultan can legitimize the takeover without voter input.

THE CORRIDORS OF POWER

Raja Petra Kamarudin

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 KUALA LUMPUR 000092

 

SIPDIS

 

FOR EAP/MTS AND INR

 

E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/19/2019

TAGS: PGOV, PREL, KJUS, MY

SUBJECT: COURT DECISION ON STATE POWER PLAY ENDS LEGAL BATTLE, BUT SETS WORRISOME PRECEDENT

 

REF: A. 09 KL 342 -- PANDEMONIUM IN PERAK STATE ASSEMBLY

     B. 09 KL 78 -- NAJIB LEADS TAKEOVER IN PERAK

     C. KL 20 -- WHAT IS GOING ON IN MALAYSIA?

 

Classified By: Political Counselor Brian D. McFeeters for reasons 1.4 b and d.

 

Summary and Comment

1. (SBU) Malaysia's Federal Court, the highest level in Malaysia's judicial system, announced on February 9 that the Sultan of Perak had the legal authority to appoint a new Chief Minister in his state, as he did in February 2009, after concluding that the ruling National Front (BN) coalition commanded the majority of seats in the Perak state assembly. 

The case effectively ends the Perak constitutional crisis, which has been simmering since three opposition politicians declared themselves independents friendly toward BN, tipping the balance of seats in the state assembly toward BN (refs A and B). 

The Sultan came under unprecedented scrutiny because replacing a Chief Minister is not specifically mentioned in the state constitution.  The opposition coalition People's Alliance (PR) announced that they would no longer contest the issue as they had vigorously done for the past year, and instead work alongside the BN for the benefit of the people of Perak, if certain conditions were met. 

A recent independent poll confirmed that most Perakians believe that the only way to fairly resolve this crisis would be to hold snap elections in the state, which the BN has announced they will not do prematurely.

2. (C) Comment:  This Federal Court decision in the BN's favor raises renewed questions about the independence of the Malaysian judiciary, already in question in connection with the Anwar Ibrahim trial and other cases (ref C). 

While the GOM argues that the decision is based on a sound interpretation of the Perak constitution, opposition figures disagree and argue the decision legitimizes political maneuvering to change the results of democratic elections, setting a dangerous precedent by implying that the King could remove the Prime Minister, without a no-confidence motion in Parliament. 

A well-financed political coalition could persuade members of Parliament to support the other side, shifting power through undemocratic means, as many allege occurred in Perak.  Before this Federal Court decision, the assembly would have instead been dissolved for fresh elections, but now the sultan can legitimize the takeover without voter input.  End Summary and Comment.

The February 9 Decision

3. (U) The Federal Court ruled on February 9 in a unanimous 5-0 vote that the Sultan of Perak, Azlan Shah, had the authority to appoint a new Chief Minister if he believed that a different political coalition commanded the allegiance of a majority of seats in the state assembly. 

In announcing its decision, the Federal Court confirmed that the Sultan was correct in his February 6, 2009 decision to verify that veteran politician Zambry Abdul Kadir, a member of UMNO (the United Malays National Organization -- the dominant political party in the BN) had the support of a majority of the members of the state assembly, replacing Mohd Nizar Jamaluddin. 

The switch in support came after three members of the People's Alliance simultaneously declared themselves to be independents friendly to the BN in early February 2009, a maneuver that is widely believed to have been driven by the BN.  Zambry's attorney Cecil Abraham went to great lengths to stress that "this decision is binding on the state government and the federal government."

Predictions and Reactions

4. (C) Poloff and Pol Specialist visited Perak from February 1-3 (to be reported septel) and discussed the (then upcoming) February 9 Federal Court decision with politicians and attorneys familiar with the case.  Nizar's lead lawyer Chan Kok Keong told Poloff ahead of the February 9 decision that he was certain the judges would rule in favor of Zambry. 

He opined that it would not be a "constitutional decision" but rather "a political decision."  Chan pointed out that when he and his legal team were making their submission at the Federal Court, all five judges "were extremely hostile" to them. Chan added that by ruling in Zambry's favor, the Federal Court "will be rewriting its own decisions and the constitution." 

Former Chief Minister Nizar told Poloff that a ruling in favor of Zambry would result in "the Prime Minister or the Chief Minister holding office at the pleasure of the King or the Sultan."  Nizar added that this would set a "dangerous precedent."  DAP Vice President and Member of Parliament from Perak Kulasegaran also told Poloff ahead of the decision that the courts would favor Zambry because "the political stakes are too high for Prime Minister Najib."

Poloff also spoke with Zambry's political secretary Abdul Rahman and the assembly speaker S. Ganeson; both expressed confidence that the court "will make the right decision" by ruling in favor of Zambry.

5. (U) After the February 9 decision, BN Chief Minister Zambry was quoted in the media on saying he was thankful for the court's decision, adding that "hopefully all parties can accept this decision and this political crisis in Perak can finally be put to rest." 

Prime Minister Najib appealed for everyone to respect the court's decision, commenting "We have to accept the decision of the country's highest court.  The issue and saga of who is the right Chief Minister of Perak has been decided, and I hope they (the opposition People's Alliance) accept this decision."   

National opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim slammed the decision, claiming UMNO "does not have the courage to face the people" in elections. Democratic Action Party leader Lim Kit Siang called the verdict "legalization of BN's coup d'etat."  Former de facto law minister Zaid Ibrahim called the decision "warped legal reasoning" done for "political expediency."

Nizar: Will Work with UMNO in Perak, but with Conditions

6. (SBU) Former Chief Minister Nizar convened a special meeting of state PR leaders on the day of the Federal Court's ruling, announcing that the opposition would give its full cooperation to the BN government in Perak.  He said, "for the good of Perakians, we have decided to become a strong opposition in the state assembly and lend our services to the Barisan National government in implementing policies that are good for the people." 

Nizar, however, caveated that the opposition would only give its full cooperation if Zambry's government agreed to four conditions. 

First, they must allow opposition parties to use public premises for the purpose of hosting functions; second, they must give memberships to opposition assemblymen to special committees; third, they must provide all opposition assemblymen with allocations of RM 150,000-RM 200,000 (approximately $40,000 to $55,000 USD) per year; and fourth, the BN must base its administration "on the principles of honesty, integrity, transparency, justice, and welfare."  Chief Minister Zambry responded on February 10 by stating "we have never discriminated against them on the allocations, so no need for conditions.  We must help the public.  That's the yardstick." 

(Note: The BN traditionally only grants "development funds" to constituencies held by BN representatives.  Just prior to the takeover last year, former Minister in the PM's department Ahmad Zahid Hamidi -- who is now the Minister of Defense -- announced that each BN assemblyman would receive RM 300,000, while the other constituencies would receive nothing.  End Note.)

Poll: Decide Through an Election, not a Court Decision

7. (U) The independent Merdeka Center announced results of a poll taken of Perak voters on February 5, in conjunction with the one year anniversary of the BN's takeover of the state.

Among the key findings of the poll: 74% of the respondents feel that fresh state elections are the best way to resolve the political crisis in Perak; 65% of respondents believe the Perak political crisis remains a relevant issue after one year; and 60% place a higher priority on having a democratically elected government than on improving the economy.

Looking Ahead

8. (SBU) Although it appears that both sides want to move ahead, there are still two pending legal cases that could, theoretically, result in a shift in power.  The first case involves a lawsuit by former state assembly Speaker Sivakumar, who was not initially removed from his position until after the first state assembly session under Zambry was conducted.  As speaker, Sivakumar held the power to suspend people for contempt; during the first meeting in April 2009, he suspended Zambry and six others for assuming their new positions before the initial court decision (Nizar v. Zambry) was complete. 

Although it is unlikely the courts will find in favor of Sivakumar, if they do it is possible that his authority to suspend Zambry and six others will stand, thereby giving Nizar the majority of seats again.  The second case concerns the alleged resignations of the three state assemblymen who defected from the PR.  Just prior to the defections, Nizar claimed that the three had resigned from the state assembly, and held undated letters of resignation from each as proof. 

The Election Commission, however, did not accept these letters as legitimate and refused to call for elections to replace the three.  The PR filed a lawsuit for the letters to be recognized as legitimate, currently under judicial review at the Federal Court.  All legal decisions on this lawsuit thus far have rejected the PR's assertions.

KEITH

 

Ahmad Sarbani’s death: the lies and deceptions by the MACC (part 3)

Posted: 07 Jun 2011 01:00 AM PDT

The mention of the AG's name did not intimidate Wan Zainal who insisted to ASP Zuhairi that "saya takkan fitnahkan orang yang dah meninggal" (he would not defame a dead man) just for convenience. ASP Zuhairi also discovered that the background of Wan Zainal is not consistent with someone who would give bribes.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

Ahmad Sarbani – maligned in his death

We continue the story behind the mysterious death of Customs Deputy Director Ahmad Sarbani Mohamed. Ahmad Sarbani was the second person to 'commit suicide' while under the custody and while being interrogated by the MACC, the first being Teoh Beng Hock.

Although the government is trying to suggest that Beng Hock committed suicide, most Malaysians believe that this is not true and that Beng Hock was either murdered or was accidentally killed by the MACC officers who were forcibly trying to extract a confession from him.

Ahmad Sarbani's death appears to meet this pattern and because of this Malaysians are even more convinced that he did not commit suicide. In fact, Ahmad Sarbani's death reinforces the belief even more that Beng Hock did not also commit suicide.

Whatever the findings of the Royal Commission of Inquiry may be with regards to these two deaths, Malaysians have already decided that the two deaths are not suicides and that the government is trying to cover up this evil deed by fabricating reports and evidences.

However you look at it, these two incidences are going to have a negative impact on the government come the next general election.

Royal Malaysian Police (PDRM) Investigating Officer (I.O.) ASP Zuhairi Mohamed did a thorough check on the late Customs Department Deputy Director Ahmad Sarbani Mohamed's assets and found that there was no unusual or extraordinary wealth.

He had only three modest cars -- a Perodua Kancil, a second-hand Honda CRV and a Proton Persona -- and a Modenas Kriss bike, which he rode to the MACC office on that unfortunate morning of 6th April, the day of his death.

He owned an apartment in Bukit Tinggi, Klang (RM65,872), an apartment in Puncak Alam (RM68,988), a Semi-D cluster house in Saujana Impian in Sungai Buloh (RM230,000) and RM35,000 in savings in Amanah Saham Bumiputra.

All these were duly accounted for.

The only significant asset, which was the Semi-D house, was bought via a government loan drawn from his wife's savings with the Employees Provident Fund (EPF), which she had withdrawn when she turned 50.

ASP Zuhairi then interviewed Wan Zainal Abidin and found out something more perplexing.

MACC Senior Investigating Officer (S.I.O.) Abdul Ghani had said that Ahmad Sarbani had implicated Wan Zainal and that he was the last person whom Ahmad Sarbani and Abdul Ghani had called just before his death.

This meant that Ahmad Sarbani was already in MACC's custody when he died. And this shows that Dato' Mustafar Ali had lied in his press statement.

In all, Wan Zainal gave three statements to ASP Zuhairi because AG Gani Patail was not satisfied when this man had steadfastly denied being involved in any bribery each and every time.

The reason for these three statements is because AG Gani Patail and Abu Kassim wanted the police to 'wrap up' this 'suicide' case by pointing to Wan Zainal as the cause of the fear and the resulting death of Ahmad Sarbani. They were bent of coming out with a verdict of 'suicide' so they needed the 'cause' but failed.

The mention of the AG's name did not intimidate Wan Zainal who insisted to ASP Zuhairi that "saya takkan fitnahkan orang yang dah meninggal" (I will not defame a dead man) just for convenience. ASP Zuhairi also discovered that the background of Wan Zainal is not consistent with someone who would give bribes.

Wan Zainal is a God-fearing man and the Imam Jenazah of his surau. His salary and allowances are very modest. He voluntarily gave his last three years bank statements to DSP Shafie, which showed there was hardly any money for him to survive monthly, what more to bribe Ahmad Sarbani or any other Customs officer for that matter to the tune of billions of ringgit.

Wan Zainal also told ASP Zuhairi that on the eve of 4th April, he had met Ahmad Sarbani who apologised to him because he was forced by S.I.O. Abdul Ghani to implicate Wan Zainal. Since Wan Zainal worked for one of the largest forwarding companies in the country as well as globally it would be believable that this company would pay the biggest bribes to clear goods.

Upon realising that he had been tricked to implicate his innocent friends, Ahmad Sarbani told Wan Zainal that he would put things right.

On the morning of 6th April at about 9.50 am, S.I.O. Abdul Ghani had asked Ahmad Sarbani to summon Wan Zainal to the MACC office. By the time Wan Zainal arrived at around noon, Ahmad Sarbani had been killed.

At 2.00pm, S.I.O. Abdul Ghani met Wan Zainal and asked him to assist in giving a story to the police that would support the MACC's spin that Ahmad Sarbani committed suicide because he was under pressure. Wan Zainal was also asked to coordinate the timing of certain calls and events to corroborate the MACC's diary.

To absolve himself, S.I.O. Abdul Ghani also told a close friend that on the morning of 6th April, another MACC I.O. by the name of Shaikh had tried to upstage his leadership of the investigation by reporting to Mohd Fauzi that Ahmad Sarbani would not agree to be 'cooperative'. This caused Mohd Fauzi to go ballistic who directed Shaikh and another officer, Kamal, to apply pressure on Ahmad Sarbani.

S.I.O. Abdul Ghani felt slighted that Shaikh was trying to gain prominence over him in this 'big case'.

Abdul Ghani also confided that he saw Ahmad Sarbani with Shaikh and Kamal who were applying 'pressure techniques' and was making Ahmad Sarbani sign the acknowledgement form for the seizure of his telephone when Ahmad Sarbani was killed.

To pacify the Malaysian public, I.O. Shaikh and I.O. Kamal have been suspended indefinitely and this created a lot of enmity within the Selangor MACC, especially because S.I.O. Abdul Ghani was being protected by Yusof Akope and Mohd Fauzi.

Part 4 will follow tomorrow where we will reveal a massive cover-up and lying exercise aimed at hiding the fact that Ahmad Sarbani did not commit suicide but was murdered.

Ahmad Sarbani's death: the lies and deceptions by the MACC (part 1)  

Ahmad Sarbani's death: the lies and deceptions by the MACC (part 2) 

 

Najib to decide which SPM top scorers will get 1MDB grants

Posted: 07 Jun 2011 12:54 AM PDT

(The Star) - Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak will decide on the successful SPM top scorers who will be given 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB) grants upon his return from Kazakhstan.

"I will decide on this matter when I return," he told Malaysian reporters yesterday during his official visit to Kazakhstan.

In Kuala Lumpur, Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz said 1MDB is offering 500 scholarships to 8A+ scorers in the SPM examination this year to study in public and private academic institutions in the country.

About 300 of the scholarships will be given to bumiputras.

"Priority will be given to 8A+ achievers who failed to get a Public Service Department (PSD) scholarship," Bernama reported him as saying after chairing a 1MDB scholarship meeting of Barisan Nasional representatives at Parliament House yesterday.

Nazri said conditions would be relaxed for bumiputra applicants from Sabah and Sarawak, with consideration given to 6A+ and 5A+ scorers.

The income of their parents and the location of their schooling areas would also count towards their qualification.

"For those in Sabah and Sarawak, we have agreed to relax academic conditions. Bumiputras in the peninsula have to comply with pre-conditions on academic achievements and parents' income," he added.

Nazri said scholarship holders at public academic institutions would receive RM7,500 a year for critical and non-critical courses.

Those at private academic institutions would receive RM15,000 a year for critical courses, and RM7,500 a year for non-critical courses, he added.

Nazri also said the Government was taking action against 145 PSD scholarship holders who had failed to return to Malaysia to serve from 2000 until May 31 this year.

"Action has been taken against 195 others," he said.

Most of the scholarship holders who defaulted were medical and engineering students pursuing courses in the United Kingdom, Ireland and the United States.

Of the 145 defaulting scholars now, 97 are in medicine and 26 in engineering, he said.

Nazri added that 160 cases had been settled, with the scholarship holders returning home or making loan repayments.

He also said the Government would have to review the PSD financing policy to take into consideration problems they have faced.

Meanwhile, MCA Youth chief Datuk Dr Wee Ka Siong said that 1MDB scholarship offer would provide an avenue to the SPM leavers to pursue their higher education despite failing to land PSD scholarships.

"We welcome the effort by 1MDB to assist the students," he said yesterday.

Dr Wee said the MCA had submitted a list of SPM scorers based on the criteria agreed to by all parties to Nazri in Putrajaya yesterday.

 

Something that never happened and never can happen

Posted: 06 Jun 2011 08:55 PM PDT

This article is an imaginary situation. This incident never happened and never can happen in a country like Malaysia. Nevertheless, let us break away from the reality of our miserable lives and allow our imagination to run wild just for once and fantasize just like in a Hollywood movie.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

Your Honour, Article 5(3) of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia says: Where a person is arrested he shall be informed as soon as may be of the grounds of his arrest and shall be allowed to consult and be defended by a legal practitioner of his choice.

My client may be regarded as a Muslim, Your Honour, and I stress the word 'regarded', as we shall come to that again later, and I am a self-professed atheist, but as Your Honour can clearly see, the Constitution stipulates that my client is allowed to be defended by a legal practitioner of his choice.

Your Honour can't forbid me from representing my client on the basis of my religion, or in this case my rejection of religion. To do so would be a violation of the Constitution and therefore a breach of my client's fundamental liberties and civil rights.

This court cannot impose any other laws and rules on my client, religious or otherwise, as Article 4(1) of the Constitution says: This Constitution is the supreme law of the Federation and any law passed after Merdeka Day which is inconsistent with this Constitution shall, to the extent of the inconsistency, be void.

This means, Your Honour, the Constitution reigns supreme and overrides all other laws, especially if those laws were passed after 31st August 1957 and are opposed to and inconsistent with the Constitution.

In this case, Your Honour, this court cannot forbid me from acting for my client based on my religion or non-religion as the Constitution says that my client can be defended by a legal practitioner of his choice and there is no stipulation in the Constitution as to the religion of that practitioner.

Your Honour, Article 5(1) of the Constitution says: No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty save in accordance with law.

This means, Your Honour, the proper laws must be applied and these laws must be consistent with and in compliance to the Constitution and any laws passed after 31st August 1957 that are in violation of the Constitution are void.

In other words, Your Honour, this court cannot move the goalposts, so to speak.

Your Honour, Article 6(1) of the Constitution says: No person shall be held in slavery.

Your Honour, we shall be calling expert witnesses who will testify that religion is a form of slavery and therefore to impose religion on my client is to subject my client to slavery.

Our expert witnesses are renowned psychologists with no less than 40 years experience and who have lectured and written numerous books on the matter. They have also conducted intensive studies to determine that since time immemorial the ruling elite has been using religion to control and imprison the minds of the populace and subject them to mental slavery, which is more effective and dangerous than physical slavery.

Your Honour, Article 8(1) of the Constitution says: All persons are equal before the law and entitled to the equal protection of the law.

Now, my client is being denied this right, Your Honour. He is being brought before this court because he is regarded as a Muslim and has openly professed that he is an atheist who does not believe in the existence of God. However, if he were not regarded as a Muslim he would not have been subjected to this trial.

This means, Your Honour, my client is being prosecuted because of his faith, or in this case his rejection of faith, which also means he is not being treated equal before the law or being given equal protection of the law.

Would someone who is not regarded as a Muslim be subjected to what my client is being subjected to? Would a non-Muslim who rejects his faith be here today? The answer, Your Honour, is no! So this is a violation of Article 8(1) of the Constitution.

If Your Honour were to look at Article 8(2) of the Constitution, it says: Except as expressly authorized by this Constitution, there shall be no discrimination against citizens on the ground only of religion, race, descent or place of birth in any law relating to the acquisition, holding or disposition of property or the establishing or carrying on of any trade, business, profession, vocation or employment.

Your Honour, my client is being discriminated against because of his religion, or rejection of it, and this, again, is a violation of the Constitution.

Your Honour, Article 11(1) of the Constitution says: Every person has the right to profess and practice his religion and, subject to Clause (4), to propagate it.

This means, Your Honour, this court cannot take away the right of my client to believe in whatever he wants to believe in or not believe in whatever he chooses to not believe.

This court may argue that Article 11(4) of the Constitution overrides Article 11(1). Article 11(4) says: State law and in respect of the Federal Territories of Kuala Lumpur and Labuan, federal law may control or restrict the propagation of any religious doctrine or belief among persons professing the religion of Islam.

This Article merely talks about propagation, not belief. My client is not propagating anything, especially to persons professing the religion of Islam.

Now, Your Honour, let us go to the laws of Islam, in this case the Quran, the only true guidance for those who profess the religion of Islam.

Chapter 2, verse 256 of the Quran says: Let there be no compulsion in religion.

Your Honour, the Quranic passage, la ikraha fi d-dini, or there is no compulsion in religion, is generally understood to mean that no one should use compulsion against another in matters of faith.

As it is understood here, Your Honour, this statement represents a principle of religious tolerance.

Historically, the People of the Book, that is, the members of the older religions, particularly the Jews and the Christians, were in principle never compelled to accept Islam. They were obliged, while residing in any territory under Islamic domination, only to recognise the supremacy of Muslims and, at the same time, as an external indication of this recognition, to pay a separate tax.

In all other matters they could maintain their inherited beliefs and perform their practices as usual. They were even allowed to establish their own internal administration.

The situation, however, was different for members of the pre-Islamic pagan Arab society. After Islam became established and had extended its power over the whole of Arabia, the pagan Arabs were forcefully compelled to accept Islam. To state it more accurately, they had to choose either to accept Islam or face death in battle against the Muslims.

This regulation was later sanctioned in Islamic law that came long after the death of the Prophet Muhammad.

However, Your Honour, all this stands in open contradiction to the meaning of the Quranic statement: la ikraha fi d-dini. The non-Muslims at that time were clearly compelled to accept Islam unless they preferred to die.

In view of these circumstances we must return to the real meaning of la ikraha fi d-dini. And this, Your Honour, becomes clearer in chapter 10, verse 100 of the Quran, which says: And if thy Lord willed, all who are in the earth would believe together. Wouldst thou compel men until they are believers?

In other words, Your Honour, the Quran says that God could have made all people of the same faith had He wanted to but He purposely did not. And the Quran questions us: Wouldst thou compel men until they are believers?

That means the Quran is asking us whether we are trying to do what God Himself does not do.

Your Honour, in the contemporary world of Islam, the acknowledgement of religious tolerance is well established. And it is made clearer in the Quranic statement: la ikraha fi d-dini.

Your Honour, we must always keep in mind that in many ways the circumstances governing early Islam differed from those of today and that the presuppositions for a general and complete religious tolerance were not given at that time.

And that brings us to my client's case, Your Honour. Is this court empowered to try my client and impose upon him not only what the Constitution forbids but what the Quran also clearly does not propagate or allow?

Is this court playing God and doing the job of God when the Quran clearly states that God could have made everyone of the same faith if He had wanted to but intentionally did not?

This, Your Honour, will be what the Defence will be raising if this court persists in continuing with this trial and refuses to withdraw the charge of apostasy against my client.

 

Dr M: Karpal the biggest winner in PAS polls

Posted: 06 Jun 2011 06:53 PM PDT

 

(The Malaysian Insider) - Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad said today that the DAP's Karpal Singh is the actual winner in last weekend's PAS elections because he claimed the party had abandoned its Islamic principles.

Dr Mahathir added that PAS's new push for a welfare state was proof that the Islamist party had abandoned its fight for an Islamic state.

The former prime minister accused PAS of forsaking its struggle to implement Islamic and hudud laws just to appease its Pakatan Rakyat (PR) coalition partner DAP.

"The person who won big did not attend the muktamar and is not even a PAS member. That person is Karpal Singh... his fight against PAS's plans to build an Islamic state which would have enforced hudud law has been achieved," he wrote in a blog posting today.

"PAS no longer has to cross over Karpal's dead body, nor does Karpal have to die... He is not even dead and PAS has made its struggle for an Islamic state a matter of secondary importance, now that PAS will be fighting for a welfare state instead," said Dr Mahathir, in reference to Karpal's famous line "Over my dead body". The DAP chairman has been firmly opposed towards PAS's Islamic state concept, and has maintained that it went against the Federal Constitution and that Malaysia is a secular state, with Islam as the official religion.

PAS president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang recently declared the party will not work with Umno in a unity government as the ruling party was ruled by self-interest, saying that PAS would work towards a welfare state that is fair to all if it took power. His policy speech signalled a change in direction that gave an advantage to professionals seeking places in the party's central working committee.

During the weekend's PAS polls, the party's conservatives in the ulama faction, who prefer to link up with Umno, were edged out in the contest for top leadership posts by a group of progressive leaders led by the new deputy president Mohamad Sabu.

The vice-presidential line-up of Salahuddin Ayub, Datuk Husam Musa and Datuk Mahfuz Omar was also from the professionals or Erdogan camp, who favour co-operation with PR allies rather than seek unity with Umno.

READ MORE HERE

 

The Cabinet should override Police and AG to establish a RCI into Sarbani Mohamed’s death

Posted: 06 Jun 2011 06:42 PM PDT

 

Lim Kit Siang

The Cabinet tomorrow should override Police and Attorney-General to establish a Royal Commission of Inquiry into senior Customs officer Ahmad Sarbani Mohamed's death as in the case of Teoh Beng Hock to restore public confidence not only in national institutions but also Prime Minister and Cabinet.

I have no qualms in admitting that I have reservations about the Teoh Beng Hock Royal Commission of Inquiry, particularly over the conduct and strategy adopted by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) and its counsel Shafie who could make the outrageous suggestion of Teoh Beng Hock's committing "honour suicide", but Malaysians are currently deprived of a more satisfactory option to get to the bottom of Sarbani's death.

I hope to be proven wrong over my reservations over the Teoh Beng Hock Royal Commission of Inquiry. However, the Cabinet's immediate task is to act boldly and justly into the death of Sarbani.

Let Najib and his Cabinet Ministers not disappoint Malaysians once again tomorrow.

In the past few days, Malaysians have been regaled by Wikileaks highlighting the utter lack of confidence of top government planners and officers in the "political will" of the Prime Minister to "transform" the nation as in implementing the New Economic Model to ensure Malaysia's quantum leap to escape the middle-income trap to become a high-income developed country. 

Nobody is really surprised by the Wikileaks.

Tomorrow Najib and his Cabinet will be facing another test – whether they dare to act boldly and justly to override the Attorney-General and the Police establishing a RCI into Sarbani's death or they are just "sitting ducks" waiting for a change of government in Putrajaya in the next general elections.

 

Taking a leaf from Sarawak’s politics

Posted: 06 Jun 2011 06:27 PM PDT

 

Musa may call for a state election if only to consolidate his grip on Sabah – and keep Najib's Umno commandos out of the state.

What Najib couldn't do in Sarawak with Taib, he wants it done in Sabah. His boys have already packed enough meat on the arrest of Sabah businessman Micheal Chia at the Chek Lap Kok Airport in Hong Kong, among others, to kill off Musa. Chia, who is said to be Musa's proxy, was detained with S$16 million in cash and the Hong Kong authorities are still investigating the money-laundering case.

Free Malaysia Today

Sabah Chief Minister Musa Aman has learnt a thing or two from his peer Taib Mahmud in Sarawak.

The most important lesson is that you should call the shots in your own state.

To be able to do that you should, like Taib, not overrate the role of "big brothers" from Putrajaya.

Some would say Taib can talk because his Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu (PBB) is not Umno and that Umno has no "real" influence in Sarawak.

But in Sabah, Musa is Umno chief. And Sabah Umno, they stress, is under Kuala Lumpur's thumb.

Still, what is to stop Musa from stepping out of the shadows and consolidating his political position, his state administration and his wealth when under threat?

If Taib is Sarawak, then Musa is Sabah. If Taib is a billionaire, so too is Musa.

If Taib is protective of his turf and influence, so is Musa.

Already rumours abound that Umno president Najib Tun Razak is planting his men in Sabah because he wants Musa out.

Open war

What Najib couldn't do in Sarawak with Taib, he wants it done in Sabah.

His boys have already packed enough meat on the arrest of Sabah businessman Micheal Chia at the Chek Lap Kok Airport in Hong Kong, among others, to kill off Musa.

Chia, who is said to be Musa's proxy, was detained with S$16 million in cash and the Hong Kong authorities are still investigating the money-laundering case.

But for Najib to pull the plug, Musa must first fall.

Politically, Najib has seconded his Umno "commandos" to Sabah to stir the cauldron of dissatisfaction.

Their warlord is Mohd Shafie Apdal.

To stoke up the fire, Umno Youth chief Khairy Jamaluddin recently declared that Sabah Umno is facing a "cold war" within.

The timely expression of "concern" gave vent to public accusations that Musa and his men were blocking development "brought in" by Shafie under his federal rural and regional development ministry.

Musa has denied Shafie's allegations, saying Sabah needs allocations from the federal government and that Shafie was lying.

But opposition Sabah Progressive Party (SAPP) president Yong Teck Lee and those in the business circles in Sabah have in the past also accused Musa's state government of stalling Shafie-linked projects.

According to the rumour mill, Musa had allegedly demanded that all federal funds be channelled through his state government.

But Shafie has refused to do so.

Although Shafie is seen not to have "major" support in Sabah Umno, he derives his clout from being Najib's man.

Curbing Shafie's influence

Musa does want this "clout". He does not want Shafie to get any credit from funding projects and by default, gaining influence in Sabah Umno.

Shafie's camp in Sabah include the likes of Pandikar Amin Haji Mulia, Amir Kahar Mustapha, Salleh Said Keruak and "semi-independent" Bung Moktar Radin, who sees himself as Najib's boy.

All are members of Usbo (United Sabah Bajau Organisation), which is also seeking to play a more political role in the state. The organisation secretly harbours a desire to get back the chief minister's seat once held by the Suluk community. Shafie is a Suluk descended.

But Musa has subtlely worked his influence on Shafie's camp.

He made both Pandikar and Salleh state speakers and brought them into his camp.

Then he removed Sabah Umno Youth chief Azman Ruslan, a Shafie's man.

Khairy said that Azman was removed from his post to prevent the Sabah Umno "cold war" from escalating.

It's no more a covert operation in Sabah, it is open war.

There are no more rumours of unhappiness and seething anger among members, but only "directives" from Musa that Shafie should not be invited to any of the Umno branch and division meetings.

Wealthy Musa, like Taib, will consolidate with or without Najib.

While Musa might not be liked in Sabah, he has the money to do as he pleases and most say he can handle this "cold war" problem if Kuala Lumur does not muscle in.

READ MORE HERE

 

Umno-MCA seat tussle begins ahead of polls

Posted: 06 Jun 2011 06:02 PM PDT

(The Malaysian Insider) - A battle over seats allocation has erupted between Barisan Nasional's Umno and MCA ahead of the next general election, suggesting the Chinese party may be edged out from its traditional seats.

In a statement today, MCA treasurer-general Datuk Seri Tan Chai Ho said he was upset Wangsa Maju Umno leaders had openly staked their claim over the division's parliamentary seat, which MCA usually contests and lost for the first time in Election 2008.

He scolded Umno for making its intentions public and urged all Barisan Nasional (BN) component parties to keep such matters internal.

"I would like to point out that all issues related to BN in the coming general elections must be decided on by the BN supreme council and processed in the spirit of BN whereby the views of all party members are looked into so as to find the perfect balance.

"Therefore, the unnecessary attention paid to this issue by the media is not healthy and should be ignored," said Tan.

He also agreed that the coming polls will likely see BN and MCA "pushed against the wall" and reiterated his hope that all seat negotiations or grouses be aired within internal channels.

"Simply speaking out to the media without proper thinking can do serious damage to BN's work preparation and morale in the elections thus leading to unnecessary disputes and discords as well as creating drifters who seek to take advantage of BN only," he warned.

Wangsa Maju is viewed as a hot seat for MCA, whose candidate Yew Teong Look lost to former PKR MP Wee Choo Keong by a narrow margin of only 150 votes during Elections 2008.

READ MORE HERE

 

Umno sedih pemimpin PAS tak mahu perpaduan Melayu, kata Mukhriz

Posted: 06 Jun 2011 05:54 PM PDT

 

(The Malaysian Insider) - Datuk Muhkriz Mahathir melahirkan rasa tidak gembira partinya dengan pendirian kepimpinan baru PAS yang tidak berminat dengan idea perpaduan Melayu, sambil menekankan parti itu berdegil "untuk memecahbelahkan orang Melayu demi kepentingan sendiri."

Bagaimanapun timbalan pengerusi Umno Kedah itu melahirkan keyakinan Barisan Nasional (BN) boleh mengatasi PAS meskipun mereka ada barisan kepimpinan baru khususnya di Kedah.

"Kami gembira kerana kami merasakan ada peluang lebih baik dengan barisan baru ini.

"Keduanya, kami tidak gembira kerana jika mereka tidak mahu perpaduan dan ia tidak akan berlaku... ini kerana mereka degil dalam memecahbelahkan Melayu bagi kepentingan mereka sendiri, dan sedih untuk melihat perkara ini berlaku," katanya.

"Dari sudut perpaduan, saya merasakan mereka telah mengetepikan idea (perpaduan)," kata Mukhriz (gambar) yang juga Timbalan Menteri Perdagangan Dalam Negeri dan Industri.

Kelmarin, meskipun PAS terus menolak kerjasama dengan Umno, Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin mengulangi bahawa pintu komponen BN itu masih terbuka kepada parti Islam tersebut untuk membentuk kerajaan perpaduan.

Timbalan presiden Umno itu berkata, idea berkenaan adalah demi Islam, bukan kerana kepentingan politik.

Dalam ucapan dasarnya Jumaat lalu, Presiden PAS Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang mengulangi pendirian partinya akan terus bersama Pakatan Rakyat untuk menghadapi pilihan raya umum ke-13 meskipun dihujani siri pelawaan dan jemputan daripada kepimpinan Umno sepanjang tiga tahun lalu.

READ MORE HERE

 

Use your head, Perkasa man told

Posted: 06 Jun 2011 04:58 PM PDT

 

Gerakan's Baljit Singh says Syed Hassan must decide whether his organisation is for or against the Federal Constitution.

(Free Malaysia Today) - A Perkasa leader's recent statement in the scholarship row has provoked questions about his ability to make reasoned arguments.

A Gerakan leader said Syed Hassan Syed Ali, the far right Malay group's secretary general, was not using his head when he suggested that the government deny scholarships to non-Malays who do not complete their education in national schools.

Baljit Singh, who heads Penang Gerakan's Legal and Human Rights Bureau, said Perkasa must decide whether it was for or against the Federal Constitution, which accepts vernacular schools as part of the national education system.

Perkasa has often claimed that its fight for Malay rights is a fight to defend the constitution.

"If Perkasa is so patriotic in protecting the Federal Constitution, it should also protect vernacular education," Baljit said.

A spokesman for the Malaysian Indian Forum, M Arivananthan, said Syed Hassan lacked knowledge about vernacular education and why some parents chose it for their children.

He said some Indians and Chinese preferred mother-tongue education for academic as well cultural reasons.

"Non-Malays were just asking for what they were entitled to and not questioning anybody's rights or privileges" when they called for fairness in scholarship distribution, Arivananthan said in a media statement.

READ MORE HERE

 

Sex and the nation gets blessings

Posted: 06 Jun 2011 03:44 PM PDT

In Malaysia it is sex that gets the blessings with the Perak Mufti being the latest to give his approval. It appears that with each passing day it is just sex, sex and more sex please! 

By J. D. Lovrenciear

The world is racing to address its socio-political and economic-environmental challenges. With drastic climatic changes, nations across the globe are busy with ideas and efforts to keep the fields blooming so that its population does not suffer unduly.

Nations from East to West and South to North are exploring all frontiers given the dawning global awareness of true democracy and the exponential quest for civil liberties.

Today the global war on corruption has been declared and citizens around the world are leading the battle lines from India to China, Mid-East to the West, from the South Pole to the North.

But in Malaysia it is sex that gets the blessings with the Perak Mufti being the latest to give his approval. It appears that with each passing day it is just sex, sex and more sex please!

As if the infamous Sodomy I and its sequel Sodomy II are not enough to choke the nation, we had to also put up with the well protected scandalous publicity of a sex-video that even boomeranged into the main stream media and today lands on car windscreens and in private mail-boxes too.

And now we have the crowning 'Obedient Wives Club' launched with fanfare. This all about being "good in bed" membership of 1,000 Malaysians really steals the prize.

Indeed morality is bankrupted in Malaysia but who cares. Can you imagine a nation that Constitutionally places a top priority for religion, today allows sex and sin to take center-stage on its national agenda. Is marriage not sanctified enough to keep the Yin-and-Yang obligations intact that we have to launch a club that teaches "wives to be whores" and to keep husbands from straying?

What kind of nation are we becoming with each passing day? Where are our morals anchored? What is our sense of morality? What are we teaching the young? Where is public decency and etiquette?

Is this Asian culture?  Where are all the principled leaders – why are they so silent about this sex club? And mind you the people for and behind this 'sex club' are going global to recruit more members. And does this not then make it a national concern?

Have we lost all shame? Do we have to be insulted by so-called leaders?

Honourable Mr. Prime Minister what is your take on this? Or are you saying that this is a small problem. Or are you maintaining that this is the route to Wawasan 2020?

And likewise, Dear First Lady of Malaysia, what is your take on this? This question too begs an answer from you for have you not taken that singular responsibility to raise the future generation with sound morals? Why are you keeping silent?

The above questions are posed to the Honorable Prime Minister and his spouse - Malaysia's First lady because the Obedient Wives Club hinges on national morals, national integrity and deeply concerns what we are teaching the young.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved