Jumaat, 27 Mei 2011

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


WIKILEAKS: ‘Anwar lacked Dr M’s clout in tackling Islam’

Posted: 26 May 2011 02:31 PM PDT

 

A leaked 1997 diplomatic cable shows that the US had backed Dr Mahathir's version of moderate Islam but felt that Anwar was too soft to handle the religious conservatives.

Following the messy beauty contest incident, Mahathir had then announced that by early 1998, the government would unify syariah laws at the federal level, thus sharply curbing the autonomy of local religious authorities.

K Kabilan, Free Malaysia Today

 

The US embassy here had given its tacit approval to Dr Mahathir Mohamad's hardline approach against Muslim conservatives in Malaysia as it was in line with the "US interests and values", revealed a leaked US confidential cable from 1997.

However, the US diplomats were highly concerned if Mahathir's successor as prime minister could cope with the growing Muslim conservatism.

They were specifically worried if Anwar Ibrahim, who was Mahathir's deputy at that time, had the "political position or the desire to take on Muslim conservatism as vigorously as Mahathir has done".

"Moreover, Anwar, if he does become the next PM, will not have Mahathir's almost unquestioned authority. Thus, for political reasons he may be reluctant to take strong stands that upset the vocal religious constituency," they added.

And they concluded that in the long run, the "growing proportion of Malays in Malaysia's ethnic mix will probably lead inexorably to the further Islamisation of Malaysian society".

The details were revealed in a cable sent by the then US ambassador in Malaysia John R Malott to the US State Department in Washington on Dec 23, 1997.

The confidential cable was leaked by whistleblower site WikiLeaks exclusively to FMT today.

The year 1997 was a critical year for Malaysia as Mahathir was facing a major financial crisis. He was also facing problems with haze and the country's zealous religious officials, added the cable.

Mahathir takes charge

The cable said several incidents involving "zealous Islamic authorities" have angered Mahathir during this period. They include:

  • a proposal by a unit within the education ministry to introduce compulsory Islamic civilization studies for all students. This proposal was then broadened to become Asian civilization following protests and Mahathir's intervention.
  • the arrest of three Malay women by the Selangor religious authorities for taking part in a beauty contest.
  • an open warning by the Sarawak religious authorities against Muslim men from taking part in a bodybuilding competition.

Following the messy beauty contest incident, Mahathir had then announced that by early 1998, the government would unify syariah laws at the federal level, thus sharply curbing the autonomy of local religious authorities.

"Theoretically, the government's plan for standardisation of syariah law will require the agreement of the states' ruling sultans, but such constitutional niceties have rarely delayed the PM before.

"The 'unification' of syariah law early next year is already a fait accompli and conservative clerics know it, but don't like it," added the cable from the ambassador.

The cable further stated that Mahathir then in his keynote address at the Umno meeting in September 1997 had called on Malays to reject extremism and noted the results of sectarian violence in Bosnia and the Middle East.

The confidential cable added that Mahathir also criticised Muslims who put more stock in outward appearances (such as traditional clothes and beards for men and headscarves for women) than in leading a moral lie.

"Such a speech might sound sensible enough to Western ears, but by all accounts it was a disaster with the largely Malay audience, including Deputy PM Anwar, sporting traditional dress and goatees and most of the women, including Anwar's wife, wearing headscarves," it stated.

Malott said that Mahathir's "attack" on "extremist" Islam soon saw a fiery reaction from conservative Muslims, including the Selangor mufti who had apparently labelled the prime minister as an apostate.

"Reportedly, Friday sermons at many mosques have included both oblique and direct criticism of the government. The police confirmed publicly that anonymous 'poison pen' literature criticising the PM is circulating at mosques," added the US cable.

The Selangor mufti, who had denied ever calling Mahathir an apostate, was replaced by the state religious authorities on the grounds that the state needed a mufti whose views "were acceptable to all" and that a replacement was needed due to the mufti's advanced age.

This prompted the US embassy to point out that the age reasoning was curious as "the PM himself has repeatedly stated that he will not step down, though he is one year older than the mufti".

Anwar will lack authority

The US cable stated that Mahathir's moves to modernise Islam made even the moderates feel anxious over the tone and direction taken by the prime minister.

However, the top US diplomat felt that Mahathir "consistently advocates a moderate Islam squarely in line with US interests and values".

"The PM, for better or worse, is not afraid to take on anyone, including conservative Islamic groups that generally have negative views toward the US.

"Mahathir is also important as a voice of moderation within the international Islamic community," added the secret cable.

The cable then went on to describe how Anwar, labelled as Mahathir's "good conscience", "has not proven he has either the political standing or the desire to take on conservative Islam".

Malott, who was a firm Anwar loyalist following his sacking as the deputy prime minister in 1998, felt that Anwar who started off as a Muslim activist seemed loath to confront his former Muslim associates.

"Anwar's reaction to the beauty pageant incident, which happened while the PM was out of the country and Anwar was in charge, was much less vigorous."

Malott said that "Anwar, if he replaces Mahathir, will not have his predecessor's almost unquestioned authority".

"Thus, for political reasons he may be reluctant to take strong stands that upset the vocal religious constituency," Malott added in the cable.

READ MORE HERE

 

Less anger in Perak, but…

Posted: 25 May 2011 07:27 PM PDT

It's still not easy for BN to win in a free election.

A random survey in Ipoh indicates that most voters would again vote for Pakatan Rakyat, more because of dissatisfaction with BN policies than the desire to punish it for ousting the government they voted into power.

(Free Malaysia Today) - Although public anger over the 2009 power grab in Perak appears to have dissipated, Barisan Nasional still has some way to go before it can be confident of winning the state in a free election.

A random survey in Ipoh indicates that most voters would again vote for Pakatan Rakyat, more because of dissatisfaction with BN policies than the desire to punish it for ousting the government they voted into power.

Their main concern seems to be to choose the party that is more likely to be sensitive to their needs and concerns, and several participants in the survey said the short-lived Pakatan government showed some promise in this regard.

"The BN ruled for 50 years before 2008, and we had no means of measuring its performance," said Wong Hoe Hong, who operates a camera shop. "When Pakatan took over, at least we could see the difference.

"To me the important factor is that we need to have this benchmark to keep the BN in check."

The subject of the power grab seldom came up during the FMT interviews, seeming to confirm what a Pakatan survey found out last January—that voters had calmed down somewhat since early 2009.

According to the Pakatan findings, the opposition alliance would win 33 of the 59 seats in the state assembly if an election were held last January, fewer than the number it could have won if an election were called immediately after the power grab. A similar Pakatan survey in February and March 2009 found that it could have won 40 seats.

But 33 is still better than 31, the number of seats Pakatan won in the 2008 election.

BN sleeping on the job

Several participants in the FMT survey said they would vote Pakatan even though they were not sure it could do a better job than BN.

A 60-year-old man who sells bread for a living said one could not demand too much from Pakatan because its hands would often be tied for lack of funding and other forms of support from the federal government. He feels this was why Pakatan could not fulfil some of its promises during the short time it was in power.

He said national issues, rather than local ones, would help determine which party he would support.

"BN has been sleeping on the job," he said. "How serious is it about wanting to change? You see how it handles PSD scholarship matter? Fire the officers in charge if you are serious."

Joanna Selvi, a pharmacist in her 20s, echoed his sentiments. She said she would give Pakatan a chance because she was frustrated with what was happening on the national front.

"You don't only look at Perak. On the national front, the same issues are coming up over and over, like scholarships or Anwar's sex trial. It's the same old thing and it is very frustrating."

Jeslyn Amarasekera, 25, said even voters of parents' generation would want to give Pakatan a chance to prove itself.

"Most of the voters from the older generation have lived here all their lives. They have seen time and time again what the BN can—and especially cannot—offer, and they tend to romanticise what the other side can do. But what do they have to lose?"

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Police under probe over stolen cars

Posted: 26 May 2011 11:04 PM PDT

Bukit Aman is investigating several police officers for their alleged link with a syndicate specialising in re-selling stolen vehicles.

(Free Malaysia Today) - Bukit Aman police are investigating several of their own men over an alleged link with a syndicate selling stolen cars, sources said today.

The officers are being investigated for allegedly handing over stolen cars which have been recovered by police, to the syndicate instead of returning them to their rightful owners.

These stolen cars would then be re-conditioned and resold to unsuspecting second-hand car dealers or private owners.

It is also alleged that the syndicate has contacts in the Road Transport Department who would ensure the "re-conditioned" cars would not be blacklisted.

A source said that the syndicate's cover was blown open last year when investigators from an insurance company was preparing to reimburse a victim of a car theft. They had tracked down the stolen car which had been re-conditioned.

"The insurance agency then found out that there were many cases where these stolen cars are on the road or being sold, and lodged a police report," the source said.

Bukit Aman then swung to action and has been confiscating these "second-hand" cars since early this year.

The source also said that more light was shed on the syndicate when police conducted a highly publicised raid at a warehouse at Taman Wahyu, Kepong, in July last year. There they uncovered a "mini zoo" of illegally traded wildlife.

In the raid, police also recovered 42 stolen vehicles worth about RM1 million. Two men were arrested.

Police had said then that the syndicate members would disguise themselves as insurance agents specialising in stealing impounded cars.

Disciplinary unit

When contacted, Bukit Aman CID director Mohd Bakri Zinin said today he could only reveal more details on Monday after a briefing from his men.

Bakri said he had received several calls since the case was highlighted by DAP's Segambut MP Lim Lip Eng in a press conference earlier today.

Lim, who lodged a report at the Sentul police district headquarters, claimed that over 60 cars have been confiscated by Bukit Aman's disciplinary division. It is believed that the syndicate has been operating for at least two years.

Lim claimed that the fact that the disciplinary unit was looking into the case showed that police are investigating their own men.

"The only role of the (disciplinary) unit is to investigate police wrongdoings. Under normal circumstances, stolen car cases are under a different department," he told FMT.

Lim said he has been receiving more than 15 complaints from used-car dealers from Selayang, Serdang, and Kepong since December last year.

"The latest complaint – from Setiawan, Perak – prompted me to lodge the report today because we now have documents to prove that the police may be involved in foul play," he said.

He said that another owner was robbed of his Mercedes C200 Compressor on March 13, 2009, and had lodged a police report and made an insurance claim.

"An undated letter from an Inspector Saiful Irwan Abdul Hamid from the CID department in Ampang Jaya district police headquarters stated that the car was found and returned to the owner, but he never got back his car," said Lim.

READ MORE HERE

 

Perkasa demands 67pc Bumi quota for PSD scholarships

Posted: 26 May 2011 11:01 PM PDT

(The Malaysian Insider) - Perkasa demanded today that the government set a 67 per cent quota for Bumiputeras in Public Service Department (PSD) scholarships to reflect their ratio in the population.

"Seeing that the Barisan Nasional (BN) government, which is the ruling coalition, came into power because of majority support from the Malays and Sabah and Sarawak Bumiputeras, and also based on the federal constitution, this group must be prioritised in all allocations, including JPA scholarships," Perkasa chief Datuk Ibrahim Ali told reporters today, referring to the PSD using its Malay acronym.

"The quota now (for Bumiputeras) is 55 per cent," he said, after emerging from a discussion with PSD director-general Datuk Seri Abu Bakar Haji Abdullah here today.

The president of the Malay rights group pointed out that the Bumiputera share of PSD's 1,500 overseas scholarships had fallen from 90 per cent in 2007 to 55 per cent in 2008, and has stayed there since.

Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Datuk Seri Mohamed Nazri Aziz previously said the government had allocated 1,500 overseas scholarships to top students, but only 300 of the total were given based entirely on merit to students scoring straight 9A+.

The remaining 1,200 overseas grants, he said, were distributed according to those qualified within four categories — Sabah Bumiputeras (five per cent), Sarawak Bumiputeras (five per cent), social composition or the population's racial composition (60 per cent) and socially handicapped (10 per cent).

Nazri also said PSD had an allocation of 2,500 local scholarships and reiterated that in tandem with the prime minister's pledge last year, all SPM students who scored straight 8A+ and above were guaranteed a place in either local or foreign institutions. Today, Ibrahim accused MCA and MIC today of exploiting the PSD scholarship wrangling for political mileage.

"When they fight for their race, they want to score political points," said the Pasir Mas MP.

READ MORE HERE

 

Malaysia questions treatment of Aborigines

Posted: 26 May 2011 06:19 PM PDT

By Karlis Salna, AAP South-East Asia Correspondent, The Sydney Morning Herald

Malaysian Foreign Minister Anifah Aman has questioned Australia's treatment of Aborigines in response to criticism of his country's record on human rights and the controversial asylum seeker swap deal.


Speaking on the sidelines of a meeting of the Non-Aligned Movement in Bali, Mr Aman lashed out at suggestions the 800 asylum seekers covered by the deal could be caned, saying Malaysia was a civilised nation.

"Australians always have fears," he told AAP on Friday.

Advertisement: Story continues below
When asked if he could guarantee that asylum seekers would not be caned, he said: "We won't treat them like you have treated Aborigines."

The comments come in the wake of criticism of the asylum seeker transfer deal linked to Malaysia's record on human rights.

A series of Amnesty International reports have detailed how asylum seekers in Malaysia are subjected to abuse and extortion, and live in constant fear of deportation. Thousands are believed to be beaten and caned every year.

"I don't know (why) you think that we cane those people," Mr Aman said.

"We are a very civilised nation. If we are not civilised then you (Australia) are the ones to blame, because most of our politicians are Australian graduates.

 

 

READ MORE HERE.

Concerns over lack of interest in OKU rights

Posted: 26 May 2011 06:17 PM PDT

KUALA LUMPUR, May 27: The Human Rights Commission (Suhakam) has criticised the government for not helping disabled people (OKUs) causing many of them failing to achieve in life.

OKUs need opportunities, not merely sympathy

Its commissioner Dr Mahmood Zuhdi Abd Majid said the acceptance level towards OKUs was still low, and the group was treated as merely deserving sympathy.

The body said many OKUs were still facing difficulties in finding decent jobs due to being denied a chance by businesses and corporate sector, although they possess many abilities.

"These OKUs are not supposed to be treated this way, instead they should be given roles like normal people. Every human being on earth has a role to play," he told a press conference.

Mahmood admitted that it would be a mounting task to change perception towards OKUs, and needed radical efforts to give proper explanation to various quarters.

Earlier, during a round-table discussion on the topic, Malaysia Disabled Association Mah Hassan lamented the BN-led government's weaknesses to address OKU grouses.

"How can the OKU group improve their achievement when the government did not appoint any senator from OKU?" he asked.

Another Suhakam commissioner Khaw Lake Tee meanwhile said the issue regarding OKU rights in the country had always been brought up and debated.

As the smallest and most vulnerable group, he said, the OKU's rights must be defended and protected.

 

READ MORE HERE.

PKR denies being in financial quandary

Posted: 26 May 2011 03:49 PM PDT

 

The party's secretary-general stresses that the eviction issue concerns the building's landlord and not PKR's coffers.

(Free Malaysia Today) - PKR secretary-general Saifuddin Nasution denied allegations that the party is in a financial quandary as the opposition lynchpin faces eviction from its current headquarters.

The Machang MP maintained that the core problem with the eviction is the building's landlord as the party has been prompt in paying rent.

"We are not in any financial problem. It is the owner who has a problem with the bank as we have been paying rent without fail," he told FMT.

PKR is facing possible eviction from their headquarters located in upmarket Merchant Square Tropicana here after the building owner failed to service the bank loan.

According to news reports, a bank auction notice has been put up near the Merchant Square premises, and the auction price of the building is estimated to be between RM460,000 to RM1 million per unit. The auction is slated for June 9.

It is learnt that PKR is paying close to RM20,000 monthly to a company called Ainb-Tech Sdn Bhd to rent the premises. The PKR headquarters takes up eight floors.

Some party leaders like vice-president Nurul Izzah Anwar and former deputy president, Syed Hussin Syed Ali, have questioned the timing of the auction, hinting at a possible government conspiracy to harass PKR by whatever means.

BN conspiracy?

PKR is currently locked in a legal battle with the Registrar of Societies (ROS). PKR has been accused of breaching the party constitution when it sacked a member without valid reasons and is facing the prospect of de-registration. June 9 is the date of hearing for the case.

"PKR may have to relocate, the building we are renting will be auctioned. ROS sent a letter to shut down the party. Enforcement dates for both are on June 9. Coincidence?" said Syed Husin on his Twitter posting.

Saifuddin, however, refused to be drawn into the speculation and insisted that the eviction mess is limited to the problem between the bank and the landlord.

READ MORE HERE

 

3.9 million Malaysians yet to register as voters

Posted: 26 May 2011 03:34 PM PDT

(Bernama) - The 3.9 million Malaysians aged 21 and above have been advised to quickly register as voters so as not to affect their chances of voting in the coming general election.

Election Commission (EC) chairman Tan Sri Abdul Aziz Mohd Yusof said the advice was given as the process for voting eligibility would take two to three months.

"Malaysians like to do things at the last minute, whether it's paying utility bills, assessment rates or traffic summonses. So I urge that they register as voters immediately when they've reached the voting age," he said in an exclusive interview with Bernama.

Abdul Aziz said the process began with registration, displaying the electoral roll, the objection process, public investigation, appeal against the objection, gazetting the electoral roll, and combining the supplementary electoral roll with the electoral master roll.

He said that until February this year, 15,784,484 Malaysians aged 21 and above were eligible to register as voters and out of this number, 11,811,452 had done so.

"The remaining 3,973,032 or 25.2% have not registered as voters."

Abdul Aziz said the EC had completed the display of the supplementary electoral roll for the first quarter of 2011 from April 28 to May 4 at 1,005 locations nationwide.

"In that quarter, 360,246 people had applied to register as voters, comprising 301,171 new applications and 59,075 for change of polling centre address."

He said the number would increase when the supplementary electoral roll for the 1/2011 quarter was confirmed and combined with the electoral master roll.

 

‘Attack on Shi’ites a diversion tactic’

Posted: 26 May 2011 02:56 PM PDT

Islamic authorities and the Malay mainstream media have joined forces to attack the Shi'ite community, a leader said.

(Free Malaysia Today) - Raids conducted against the Shi'ite Islamic community are nothing more than a distraction from the bigger picture, a local organisation said.

Ar-Ridha director Mohd Kamilzuhairi Abdul Aziz said that the Selangor Islamic Department (JAIS) had more pressing concerns than harrassing Shi'ite believers.

"JAIS' actions are seen as an effort to shift public opinion from the increasing social problems that it is unable to overcome," he said in a press statement.

Kamilzuhairi claimed that there were over 250,000 babies born out of wedlock; a number that was on the rise.

"JAIS also has to curb the widespread use of alcohol," he said, adding that Malaysians were some of the heaviest drinkers in the world.

He said that JAIS should have had its hands full tackling social problems, but was wasting its time attacking the Shi'ite community.

He also warned that persecution by the state went against resolutions drafted by the Organisation of the Islamic Conference (OIC) which supported the Shi'ite school of thought.

On May 24, a group of JAIS officials and police officers gatecrashed a Gombak celebration organised by the Shi'ite community.

Although given official permission with assurances that it was not a religious Shi'ite event, the authorities were nevertheless relentless.

Four Shi'ite community leaders were also arrested.

READ MORE HERE

 

LRT lobbying tests Najib’s resolve to push public tenders

Posted: 26 May 2011 12:34 PM PDT

By The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, May 27 — The award of a contract to upgrade the light rail transit (LRT) line to European engineering powerhouse Balfour Beatty has sparked intense lobbying which is testing Datuk Seri Najib Razak's commitment to public tenders.

 

According to a report in today's Singapore Straits Times, the intense lobbying over the contract could also delay the PM's plans to upgrade the chaotic transport network and inject fresh vigour into Malaysia's economy.

It is also shaping up to be a test of Najib's resolve to make public tenders a hallmark of his administration, as opposed to the opaque system of the past, the Straits Times said.

Syarikat Prasarana Negara has just completed an international tender for upgrading the LRT.

But Prasarana's yet-to-be publicised decision to award the contract to the lowest bidder — a consortium led by European engineering powerhouse Balfour Beatty — is being hotly contested behind the scenes by the losing bidders, executives familiar with the situation told the Singapore Straits Times.

"The rivals include Bombardier, which installed the city's existing light rail system, and Britain's Colas. According to executives close to the tender exercise, the lowest bid was Balfour Beatty's at RM590 million. The highest was Bombardier's at RM850 million," the Straits Times reported.

How Najib handles the Prasarana award will signal whether he can break away from past practices and introduce a more level playing field in the award of contracts, analysts and private economists told the Straits Times.

If the government decides to review the contract, it could raise speculation that the intense lobbying prompted him to step in.

"There is a strong lobby with people close to the PM to change the decision," one industry executive closely involved in the tender exercise told the Straits Times.

This executive said the Balfour Beatty consortium could face problems integrating with the existing systems installed by Bombardier.

But parties close to Balfour Beatty said those concerns were misplaced. "These issues were considered by the Prasarana board before it came to the decision," said one engineering consultant familiar with the tender exercise.

Prasarana had been forced last week to cave in to pressure from Malay rights groups when it revised pre-qualification criteria for several construction packages for the Klang Valley Mass Rapid Transit (KVMRT).

The project owner said last week that contractors who wish to tender for elevated civil works, stations and depots work construction packages will be allowed to form joint ventures or consortiums among local companies.

Prasarana had on March 30 imposed additional criteria on contractors taking part in the project tender which disallowed them from forming joint ventures or consortiums.

But Perkasa was quick to accuse Prasarana of blocking Bumiputera contractors from participating by enforcing "strict" guidelines that would only benefited "rich non-Bumis", saying that MMC-Gamuda was "looting and monopolising" the project.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Truth buried in the printed pages

Posted: 26 May 2011 12:24 PM PDT

By Jeswan Kaur, Free Malaysia Today

Not so long ago "don't believe all that you read in the newspaper" was said in jest. Now, unfortunately there is a ring of truth to this statement.

Ask just about anyone what they think about the mainstream media and chances are you will get a look of disgust. The mainstream media is owned by political parties and their glossed-over news coverage has given rise to the alternative media.

The Barisan Nasional (BN) has a stake in all the country's premier' newspapers such as New Straits Times (NST), The Star, Utusan Malaysia, Tamil Nesan and Sin Chiew Jit Poh through its investment companies

The Utusan Melayu Group is owned by Umno and publishes three Malay language dailies.

The major English newspapers, The Star and New Straits Times, are also owned by the political parties. The Star is owned by the MCA while NST is owned by Umno. Besides The Star, MCA also controls four other dailies – Sin Chew Jit Poh, Nanyang Siang Pau, China Press and Guang Ming Daily.

Private interests aligned with the MIC control Tamil newspapers such as Makkal Osai and Tamil Nesan.

Under such tight leash, the mainstream media are left with no space to engage in a fair and free reporting. They end up parroting all that the government of the day says.

Take, for example, the incident in 1995 where an investigative team from The Sun newspaper investigated the circumstances leading to the deaths of 59 detainees, mostly Bangladeshis, in an illegal immigration detention camp. These detainees died of beri-beri, a symptom of malnutrition and typhoid, which is easily preventable.

The team's report stating that it was a case of criminal neglect on the part of the police who ran the camp was spiked hours before it went to print.

Bias reporting continues

More recently, the lopsided reporting by the mainstream media was evident during Sarawak's April 16 state election. The NST had nothing but only "nice" things to report about BN, including why the people should dismiss the opposition alliance of Pakatan Rakyat.

But what the NST did is nothing new. Be it the by-elections or general election, these mainstream newspapers do a good job of serving their political masters and betraying the trust of their readers.

The NST is not the only culprit. The government-owned Radio Televisyen Malaysia (RTM) channels have long forgotten the importance of reporting without fear or favour.

RTM1's Berita Wilayah aired at 5pm daily is a classic example of how reporting is manipulated by the "powers that be". The one-hour news has all things good to say about the BN government's "remarkable" job in serving the people when the truth really is otherwise.

Likewise, the television stations including those owned by Media Prima do not have the guts to report the truth. At best, they do a fantastic job of glossing over BN and condemning the opposition parties.

READ MORE HERE.

No Chinese Reps in Cabinet After GE13?

Posted: 26 May 2011 12:16 PM PDT

By Dajmarizal Zolkipli. Malaysian Digest  

In a country that is currently working hard to push for a racial unity, the cohesive pronouncements from BN 's two main honchos somehow emphasized BN's obsession with race politics.


Following the big Chinese vote swing in the Sarawak state election which has helped the DAP gain huge momentum leading to the 13th General Election (GE13), Barisan Nasional (BN) chairman Najib Razak warned Chinese voters that they are risking their right to have Chinese representatives in the government in the next term. Najib's message was  aggrandized by MCA president Chua Soi Lek who had announced that MCA will not accept any position in the government should the party underperform in the upcoming GE13.

It is obvious that the statements by Najib and Chua were meant to restore the confidence of Chinese voters towards BN. However, both proved to be counterproductive as by making such remarks, the two BN leaders have only made their Pakatan Rakyat rivals look better. The remarks only confirmed that BN is getting more and more jittery over the fact that a growing number of Chinese Malaysians are turning against BN as we could see in the recent Sarawak election and past by-elections hence something drastic needs to be done.

Chua's daring announcement was supposed to be a signal to Chinese voters that MCA will be rolling up their sleeves to ensure that Chinese reps have a place in the Cabinet. However, most see it more of a threat now that the Chinese are left with a predicament: vote for MCA or you'll be left with no voice in the Cabinet.

The same goes for Najib's statement. Now the Chinese are forced to be more obliged to vote for MCA or else there will no longer be Chinese ministers in the Cabinet. This also has given rise to the question of whether we need to have Chinese representatives in the government for their voice to be heard.

 BN must come to terms with the present reality and that the acclamation they had received for championing a particular race in the yesteryears is over. The rakyat now are partial to be called Malaysians rather than Malay, Chinese, Indian, Orang Asal etc.

The rakyat is also more aware on the importance of maintaining unity among races and BN has lost touch with this collective standpoint even with Najib's introduction of 1Malaysia. While the rakyat is crying out for unity, BN leaders have failed to make significant progress to strengthen the camaraderie among the diverse cultures of this country.


READ MORE HERE.

Najib explains why fuel prices remain unchanged

Posted: 26 May 2011 12:13 PM PDT

By Mergawai Zulfakar, The Star

"This means the Government will have to consider alternative measures when we decide not to increase the price of fuel," he added. (the 11.13am online version)

 

TOKYO: The plight of the rakyat was uppermost in the Government's mind when it decided not to increase the price of RON 95 petrol, diesel and liquefied petroleum gas.

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak said the decision was made despite the heavier financial burden on the Government.

"I hope the rakyat will appreciate the Government's decision because we are only thinking of their plight although from the macro economic point of view, maintaining such a huge subsidy does not constitute good governance.

"It may be a bit difficult for the people to understand this but for those who know elementary economics, they will understand," the Prime Minister told reporters here yesterday at the end of his trip to Japan where he delivered an address at the Nikkei International Conference and met Japanese captains of industry. 

Asked how long the Government would be able to sustain the subsidy, Najib said: "I don't know, nobody knows. It will depend on the price of oil on the world market."

He said the Government would do its best to look at creative ways of managing the increase in subsidy.

Najib said the Government had initially budgeted RM11bil for subsidies this year but with the increase in global oil prices, the amount in direct subsidies had ballooned to RM20bil.

"This means the Government will have to consider alternative measures when we decide not to increase the price of fuel," he added.

On claims that the Government's decision pointed towards a general election soon, Najib replied: "People can always connect these two. That is the normal game in Malaysia anyway.

"So it does not surprise me. What is important is that we are always concerned about the plight of the rakyat and that is always uppermost in our mind."

Najib also said that during his meeting with Japanese businessmen, he told them the Government would continue to maintain its investor-friendly policies.

He also announced that Japanese companies would invest RM3.8bil by the end of next year.

"These are confirmed investments although I cannot reveal the details yet.

"For long-term investments, Japanese companies will invest RM5.22bil between 2013 and 2015 in various projects," he said.


Merit v manpower needs

Posted: 26 May 2011 12:09 PM PDT

By Terence Fernandes, the Sun

DEPUTY Education Minister Datuk Wee Ka Siong has been on the receiving end of brickbats on "Twitterjaya". Unlike his minister, Wee is an active member of the social media network and has been fighting a losing battle trying to convince some of his 5,500-plus followers and others that all is above board in the awarding of Public Service Department scholarships to top SPM scorers.

Wee took pains to explain that full PSD scholarships would be given to straight A+ students – not merely straight A's. However, he also put himself out there by stating that 363 straight A+ scorers had failed to secure scholarships, taking the PSD to task for denying Malaysia's crème de la crème the opportunities they deserve.

The government promised last year that all students who scored eight 8A+ and more in the 2010 SPM will get a PSD scholarship. The problem is, it did not specify what courses they will be offered, hence there are bound to be disgruntled students who did not get their chosen field of study despite doing their part – studying hard and acing their exams.

Hence, there is this perception that every year, there are more than a few who slip through the cracks. One example is Selwyn Jong of Kuching who scored 9A+ but instead of a university placement, was given matriculation – a place he could have secured with 5As. Another example is P. Kugnethran from Selangor who scored 12A+. Instead of getting the medical course he so wanted, Kugnethran was offered a diploma in animal husbandry from Universiti Putra Malaysia while those with less than stellar results won choice courses at top varsities abroad.

Selwyn and Kugnethran approached the MCA and MIC respectively to intercede for them and get them the courses they feel they deserve. It is learnt that Selwyn's case is pending while Kugnethran has managed to secure a spot to do medicine.

While one lauds those who helped this youth to fulfil his dream, such episodes are repeated every year. The announcement of the SPM results is followed by dissatisfaction over the awarding of PSD scholarships. Accusations of biasness make its rounds at this time every year.

Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz explained the awarding of PSD scholarships this way: There are two primary categories – the overseas degree programme (PILN) for 1,500 selected students and the local degree programme (PIDN) for 2,500 students. From the 4,000 PILN and PIDN scholarships awarded, 2,183 spots (55%) were allocated for bumiputras and 1,817 (45%) for non-bumiputras.

He was reported as saying that only 8,857 from the 16,900 students who applied for PILN scholarships met the PSD requirements, with 7,277 (43.1%) of them being bumiputras and 9,623 (56.9%) non-bumiputras. Only 1,500 PILN scholarships were offered and 300 were given on merit. "Unsuccessful applicants have the PIDN option which offers 2,500 spots," he said. Should they fail both, students will still be eligible for the 8,000 scholarships at matriculation or diploma levels.

Question is, what exactly are the PSD scholarships criteria? They cover extra curricular activities and aptitude tests including an interview – where it is learnt non-bumiputra students often do not do as well.

While one agrees that limited seats would mean not everyone will get what they ask for, PSD director-general Datuk Seri Abu Bakar Abdullah's explanation that scholarships are offered based on "manpower needs" leaves much to the imagination. It also illustrates that each official – minister and public servant alike – has his or her own reasons and interpretation about what constitutes an eligible PSD applicant.

If manpower needs is the criteria, it does not explain why there are top scorers who do not get the best courses and underperformers who do. Granted, an all-rounder who scores 6A+ may be more eligible than a kaki bangku who scored full marks; but is it right to penalise a child who's only calling is the classroom and not the football field as well? And does 8A+ by a son of a tapper in a rural estate have more value than 12A+ by a son of a doctor in the big city? Is it therefore acceptable that there are limited spaces for PSD scholarships – to the tune of only 4,000 spots when there are double that number who qualify?

If we check the leakages in public procurement, could we not have enough to ensure all our top scorers have a shot at being the best that they can possibly be? Is it illogical to expect your government to ensure that everyone has a chance? After all, what message are we sending to our youth when we say: "Study hard and you'll get a place in university to study whatever you want"?

In Brunei, the cream of the crop are sponsored for overseas studies while the rest are given spots in local varsities. OK, so this may not be the best example, but one gets the drift.

Every year, we lose top students to Singapore which uses the carrot of the prestigous Asean Scholarships to attract the best brains of other countries. Due to the additional incentive of secured jobs and attachments in the public and private sectors, many Asean scholars continue to live in and contribute to Singapore's growth. The fact that there are 600,000 Malaysians (of course not all of them are Asean scholars) living in and contributing to the island republic's growth is an indication that we have not been doing enough to keep our best at home.

As the bar for excellence is raised and the government is spending time, effort and money to stop the brain drain, it is unfathomable how some policies contradict these efforts. It seems that some people are not talking to each other, leaving a confused state of affairs for our children.

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Is the Tunku’s dream dead?

Posted: 26 May 2011 03:47 PM PDT

 

As a nation, we are moving backwards in time. We are almost tribal in the way we defend our racial space.

The tudung has become a symbol of hypocrisy. If it is supposed to signify that the girl is chaste, then it is maddening to see tudung-clad girls in parks openly kissing and fondling their boyfriends. It makes a mockery of the tudung and what it is supposed to signify, if anything.

Mariam Mokhtar, Free Malaysia Today

How ridiculous that 54 years after Merdeka, we are still talking in terms of Malays, Chinese and Indians, and that we cannot and will not think and work as Malaysians.

In the article, "Big Unity Plan" (Sunday Times, May 28, 1961) the Federation Prime Minister, Tunku Abdul Rahman, warned of the communist threat: "We want citizens to think, feel, believe and work for the good of Malaya and look to Malaya as the sole object of their loyalty. This, I am sure, is the desire of all in the country except for a small minority."

Last week, I spoke with a 77-year-old Malay lady, who used to work in the Tunku's secretarial pool. The lifestyle that she described then, is a far cry from the one that we read about today.

She had photographs in which Malays dressed in sarong kebaya and had bee-hive hairdos, or long flowing locks. Young people went to dances with music played by live bands in town. Her friends and work colleagues were of different races.

Although her mother and her mother's peers, dressed conservatively, the selendang was the norm, even among the older generation. In some typical Malay families, men and women ate separately. This was probably in deference to the breadwinner, who was the man of the house.

Parents sent their children to the mission schools, to be taught by nuns. There were no issues with the morning assembly, when the Lord's prayer was said.

During catechism, the Malays had their agama classes, but every child went to "moral class" or "civics" as it was also commonly known.

Children who were sent to board in Convent schools, shared many experiences. During Sunday mass, the Muslims stayed behind and read while waiting for their friends to return from chapel.

One couldn't help notice the interaction and bonding between the girls, for in the schools, children of various races, including Europeans and non-Malayans, were thrown together.

So what went wrong in the intervening years?

Symbol of hypocrisy

Today, the Malay has replaced the sarong kebaya with the unflattering sack-like baju kurung. At work, women don the tudung, not because they want to but because of peer pressure and career advancement.

The tudung has become a symbol of hypocrisy. If it is supposed to signify that the girl is chaste, then it is maddening to see tudung-clad girls in parks openly kissing and fondling their boyfriends. It makes a mockery of the tudung and what it is supposed to signify, if anything.

However, no one I asked, would dare volunteer that their grandmothers and grand-aunts were not as religious, just because they lacked today's standard tudung.

Children, including toddlers, are told they cannot play with children of the opposite sex. Conservatively clad girls in baju kurung cannot easily run around in the playground or play on a climbing frame because they are told it is not ladylike, or the "baju" is a physical impediment.

When boys are not familiar with girls and vice-versa, apart from their own brothers or sisters, they find it awkward to relate to members of the opposite sex, when they are later thrown into a social, work or study environment.

Young hormones and a lack of exposure play havoc with teenagers' feelings and they mistake mutual attraction or curiosity, for love. The need to explore their feelings may lead to sex, which both are mentally and physically unprepared for.

Today, mission schools are in a terrible state of disrepair. It was as if these physical structures were being punished for churning out hundreds of thousands of educated children, some of whom became excellent scholars, administrators, scientists, academics and captains of industry.

Symbols of Christianity had by the 80s been eroded. Gone were the crosses from school badges. Chapels in convents were stripped of their religious artifacts, some of which had been around for several decades and were of historical and religious significance.

Even corporations were not spared. The much loved Christmas party for the staff children, all but disappeared.

Few treated these parties – with Santa Claus and his cotton-wool beard, or the decorated Christmas tree, which was really a Casuarina tree – with any religious significance.

Today, these Christmas parties are not politically correct, at least not in Malaysia. And if they are held, all religious symbols and hymns are banned if senior government officials are invited.

Fear of causing offence

Many Malay weddings are increasingly becoming "his" and "hers" affairs where the sexes are segregated as soon as they arrive.

The racial and religious scarifying of Malaysia has gone to such an extent that many non-Malays are afraid to invite their Malay friends to their homes for fear of causing offence.

Among the Malays, there is probably more fear of the moral police than of breaking God's bond, when people go out for drinks with friends or when they are having a relationship with people they are not married to.

As a nation, we are moving backwards in time. We are almost tribal in the way we defend our racial space.

The lady I know, who once worked in the PM's office half a century ago, has now altered her outlook of Malaysia. Today, she is convinced the Chinese and Indians are out to take control of Malaysia.

Had she been to Perkasa's or Umno's ceramahs, I asked. What about the efforts of the opposition, I ventured.

"No," she replied. "I watch TV and the television says that Umno is doing so much for the nation."

When asked to quantify "so much", she volunteered "like building roads for the kampungs".

"Now you tell me, what the opposition has done?" she challenged.

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Have our parents generation caused the rift between races in Malaysia?

Posted: 26 May 2011 09:37 PM PDT

I remember as a child being told by my parents that I am not to forget my heritage, my culture, where my ancestors are from. I was sent to classes to learn my native language and to learn classical singing. All this was expected of me, to ensure I did not forget my roots.

By Nitya Kamalanathan

 

I am currently a PhD student in the United Kingdom, my first time in England. When people ask me about Malaysia, I beam, telling them how wonderful our country is and our food! Oh that is my favourite topic of discussion.

We come from a country bursting with flavour, warmth, culture and diversity all of which have been the building blocks of the country. The three representing races of Malaysia each have rich traditions and cultures, which have blended together to produce a Malaysian culture of which I am proud to say I am a part.

I remember as a kid celebrating the lantern festival with my neighbours, buying little lanterns and watching them float away into the darkness of the night; I remember in school making ketupats during Hari Raya and hanging them around school and I remember for Deepavali having little girls dance bharata natyam in school, and sharing murukku and mixing with my friends.

As I grew older, I felt the rift between the respective groups. What caused this?

I remember as a child being told by my parents that I am not to forget my heritage, my culture, where my ancestors are from. I was sent to classes to learn my native language and to learn classical singing. All this was
expected of me, to ensure I did not forget my roots. In this rush to enforce remembrance of heritage, some parents, in my perception, have been distracted by the need to preserve their culture and have forgotten to show their children the importance of intermingling among the races. I am sure a variety of factors exist causing this rift and dissecting each factor would probably be like working on another PhD thesis.

While having a little chat with my friends over here in my research area, one particular friend (a foreigner who lived in Malaysia for several years) mentioned how evident it was that the races are struggling to preserve their own individual identity. This triggered a recollection of memories and encounters in the past which too made me wonder if being caught up in preserving one's unique culture and traditions, people have drifted from embracing the uniqueness of Malaysia and the rich diversity in cultures, traditions and ancestry.

I understand the pressing dilemma of culture dilution, and the striving to maintain each group's uniqueness and identity. However does mingling with others dilute mine? I have grown up with exposure to people of all walks of life and yet I enjoyed listening to my grandparents stories of their childhood and how things were then. I also enjoyed learning to sing classical songs and learnt to read and write my mother tongue, but that never caused me to want to surround myself only with people of 'my own kind'.

Personally, I have valued the time spent with my friends learning about their culture, traditions and experiencing the difference. Recently a string of my best friends got married; one was a fairytale Christian wedding, one was a dazzling Malay Nikah ceremony and the other a bright and colourful Indian wedding. Each of them was beautiful and special in their own way and wearing different outfits according to the different ceremonies was exciting. We are so gifted to have the opportunity in Malaysia to experience such a variety of traditions that bring two people together.

Embracing the diversity of the cultures, tradition and food has always been a delight to me. Everyone has some good and some not so good to offer. At the end of the day we are all human and we all have some good and some not so good to offer. Mingling with others and participating in their traditions has never threatened my own identity, as at the end of the day I am aware of who I am and who I want to be.

Once, I was also told by someone I look up to, that a culture can best be defined in relation to other cultures. It is the differences in cultures that make each culture perceptibly different, and therefore unique and individual. So, experiencing the differences between your own and other cultures leads you to recognise the good and bad points of your own.

This shouldn't, of course, mean that you are liable to reject or neglect your own cultural traditions. Globalisation has made us all 'citizens of the world', for better or worse. This gives us all more opportunities to see other cultures, to compare them with our own and to share in their traditions. At the same time we can appreciate our own culture and traditions more realistically, without having to abandon them.

So to all Malaysians like me, I say let's celebrate the gift of diversity presented to us.

That Effing Show 54: How to spot a racist?

Posted: 26 May 2011 09:35 PM PDT

Dear fellow Malay-sians,
 
If there is one credo that we Malaysians stand by, it's that we're all a little bit racist, sometimes.

Whether it's UMNO or PAS. Whether it's MCA or DAP. Whether it's some teacher in a rural school telling the Chinese to go back to China. But how do we distinguish between the real racists from those folk who are just having a laugh; from all those folk who have just been misinterpreted and misunderstood? How do we tell them apart?

But do not fret. Have no fear. You've come to the right place. Because we've done all the work for you. We tell you just how to spot a racist.


tes54_02.jpeg


We are not racist,
PopTeeVee

--
latest projek:  

1955 Baling Talks at 2011 Singapore Arts Festival  

BN Federal Government paid 73% higher than the market value of Syabas bonds to bail out its ...

Posted: 26 May 2011 04:44 PM PDT

Media Statement by Tony Pua, DAP National Publicity Secretary and Member of Parliament for Petaling Jaya Utara

On Wednesday 25 May, The Edge Financial Daily reported that Syarikat Pengurusan Aset Air Bhd (PAAB) will acquire the bonds issued by the Selangor state water concessionaires through its-wholly owned subsidiary Acqua SPV Bhd for the amount of RM6.5 billion. The paper further quoted a market source that "in terms of price, the buying back is at 94.49 against mark to market value of only 54.54 at the end of last month".

It is bad enough that the Federal Government has decided to bail out the Selangor water concessionaires, but for it to pay a whopping 73.2% higher than the market vallue of these bonds borders on being outrageous and an abuse of taxpayers' monies.

This rescue deal for the private concessionaires is reminiscent of the Malaysian Airlines System (MAS) bailout when the Federal Government paid RM8.00 per share, or 121% higher than the market price of RM3.62 per share to Naluri Bhd, owned by Tan Sri Tajuddin Ramli in December 2000. In fact, the Government has yet to see any returns on its "investment" for the stock price has slumped to RM1.59 (as at yesterday) or a 80.1% decline for its investment after 10 years. MAS continues to be troubled as it made RM242.3 million in losses for its first quarter this year in its financial results released this week with no end in sight to its problems.

It is inexplicable that the Government has decided to settle the outstanding bonds of these privatised water companies when it should be the shareholders of these companies themselves who should be responsible for their own debt. 

In fact, when these companies were profitable, they have declared handsome dividends for their shareholders. Among the concessionaires, Syarikat Pengeluaran Air Sungai Selangor Holdings (SPLASH), whose parent company is Gamuda Bhd, declared dividends of RM578.6 million in 2007 while Puncak Niaga Holdings Bhd had declared dividends amounting to RM214 million between 2006 and 2010.

The above certainly makes true the dictum of the BN Government privatising profits and socialising losses by taking over the debt burden of these companies.

The debt bailout is worsened by the fact that the Government has not been transparent with the whole exercise when the Minister of Energy, Water and Green Technology, Datuk Peter Chin announced that there has been no cabinet decision on the matter earlier this week.

To date, we still do not know how the Federal government plans to restructure the water industry in Selangor based on the Water Services Industry Act 2006 after taking over these debts and whether these private concessionaires would be required to repay the Government for the bailout, despite the denial of a "bailout" by the Minister.

The Minister must no longer pretend to be clueless about the entire exercise and disclose the full terms of the bailout exercise as this affects the basic right to water of all residents in Selangor, Kuala Lumpur and Putrajaya as well as billions of ringgit of tax-payer's monies. Unless of course, he is completely powerless in his own Ministry, with key decisions made without his knowledge, in which case, he should then just resign honourably to protect his personal reputation and integrity.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


‘PENGKHIANAT’ JADI PENGERUSI PERBADANAN LABUAN?

Posted: 26 May 2011 05:05 PM PDT

Hazreeq mengulas ura-ura Menteri Wilayah Persekutuan, Dato' Raja Nong Chik Bin Datuk Raja Zainal Abidin melantik Ahli Parlimen Labuan, Datuk Yusof Mahal sebagai Pengerusi Perbadanan Labuan yang baru menggantikan Ketua Setiausaha Kementerian Wilayah Persekutuan, Datuk Ahmad Phesal Talib.

Menurut Hazreeq, beliau melabelkan Yusof Mahal sebagai 'Pengkhianat' kerana secara sedar telah menggagalkan beberapa projek penting untuk rakyat, termasuk Pembinaan Pasar Baru Labuan yang diperolehi oleh syarikat peribadi Yusof, Labindo Engineering Sdn.Bhd dan disubkontrak kepada beliau melalui Nautika Innovasi Sdn.Bhd sebelum ditamatkan tanpa sebarang notis.

"Yusof Mahal seorang yang rendah akhlak, tidak jujur dan mempunyai pelbagai skandal, tidak wajar dilantik sebagai Pengerusi Perbadanan Labuan dan saya mempunyai hak beneficiary untuk menghalang perlantikan beliau dan menuntut kembali sejumlah lebih RM2 juta daripada beliau kerana dikhuatiri akan berlaku percanggahan kepentingan," ujar Hazreeq yang telah memperoleh penghakiman mahkamah berhubung tuntutannya dan kini menanti jumlah bayaran gantirugi diputuskan oleh hakim.

Menurut Hazreeq, berdasarkan amalan biasa, mahkamah boleh meluluskan award minima 10 peratus atau maksima 20 peratus daripada nilai kontrak; iaitu beliau berhak untuk memperolehi antara RM2 juta hingga RM4 juta bersandarkan nilai kontrak yang ditawarkan kepadanya sejumlah RM20.59 juta berbanding nilai tender RM24 juta.

Sebelum ini Hazreeq telah membuat beberapa laporan polis terhadap Yusof Mahal termasuk Labuan/004295/08; LABUAN/004831/08 dan LABUAN/004833/08 namun tidak ada satupun yang disiasat sedangkan Yusof melakukan kegiatan jenayah penipuan dan mencuri harta benda Nautika Innovasi Sdn.Bhd.

READ MORE HERE

 

KENAPA POLIS TUTUP KES YUSOF MAHAL?

Posted: 26 May 2011 05:03 PM PDT

Menurut Azizul, beliau membuat laporan polis pada 30 Julai 2008 di Balai Polis Semporna, namun sehingga kini beliau tidak dimaklumkan keputusan siasatan polis berhubung laporan yang beliau buat dan dipercayai polis telah menutup kes berkenaan.

Sehubungan itu, Azizul menggesa Tan Sri Ismail membuka semula laporan polis beliau, SED/RPT/3502/08 yang menyatakan bahawa;

"Pada Lebih kurang jam 4.00 petang, saya terbaca laporan laman web Malaysia-Today.net di sebuah kafe siber bertajuk 'Skandal Seks Ahli Parlimen Labuan'. Saya membuat laporan ini supaya polis dan Jabatan Hal Ehwal Agama Islam Labuan mengambil tindakan di bawa undang-undang jenayah terhadap Ahli Parlimen Labuan, Datuk Haji Yusof Mahal kerana bersekedudukan dengan Norazlina Asaplee sejak tujuh tahun lalu dan bersubahat melakukan pengguguran haram."

"Memandangkan kes ini adalah kes jenayah, maka demi menjaga maruah UMNO yang semakin tercalar ekoran tindakan pemimpin yang tidak Islamik dan khianat kepada bangsa sendiri, maka saya menggesa agar siasatan menyeluruh diadakan segera," kata Azizul yang percaya Skandal Seks berkenaan masih berlaku sehingga kini.

Berikut ialah Risalah yang diedarkan oleh Cawangan Tampi-Tampi Darat untuk ahlinya dan diserahkan sesalinan kepada Sabahkini.net untuk dipaparkan kepada umum bagi memberi pengajaran kepada semua pihak agar menghindarkan diri daripada sebarang skandal yang memalukan Negara.

READ MORE HERE

 

A New Alliance

Posted: 25 May 2011 05:52 PM PDT

This behaviour automatically triggers equally vicious reactions from the BN and there is so much mutual hatred even in Parliament that we wonder whether good laws are being made. How can there be? There is so little real debate. There is almost no engagement between the two sides.

Leaders in the BN and Pakatan seem interested only in annihilating each other. One side can "gain" only if the other side "loses", but the reality is that no one wins in this kind of system. It is unhealthy and it is certainly not democratic. This endless acrimony brings no benefit to the Rakyat. They are disappointed by all the broken promises, the absent leadership, and the blind pursuit of power that puts party politics above all else.

Many openly say the BN is no longer a working coalition. Some of the major component parties nolonger enjoy the support of their constituents and they cannot come to the table as equal partners as they once did. Only UMNO continues to wield its traditional influence—but without the strength of its partners to bring balance, UMNO too has changed. It has become autocratic and fixed in its ways. It is unaware, or afraid, of the need to change. It has become deaf to the needs of others.

Even now there is a movement within UMNO that wants more seats at the next General Election at the expense of the component parties. If this happens, the BN will cease to be a coalition even in name. It will no longer represent Malaysians. It will represent only its own interests and I fear for my country and my fellow citizens should that day ever come.

What about the Pakatan? Not only has it failed to provide a real and constructive Opposition to the Government, it has positioned Anwar as beyond question and reproach. He can do no wrong and his "coalition" follows him blindly out of politically expedience.

Anwar is a convenient figurehead, and he is the only person holding the Pakatan together. PAS and the DAP are still utterly divided on the issue of the Islamic state. They have merely postponed their differences—not resolved them—for the sake of achieving political power. In situations like this, basic questions of right and wrong get lost in the mud of ambition. Why should a coalition depend exclusively on the cult-status of one man alone?

How can we expect the Pakatan to provide responsible leadership if it simply ignores its own internal differences? Have we even seen any evidence that the Pakatan is a real coalition and not a marriage of convenience?

No, we haven't, and because they are locked in the endless death-struggle with the BN, we can'texpect anything more of them either.

So, what about the rest of us who are sick of this endless political feuding? There are many of us who adhere closely to the founding principles of our nation regardless of the political leadership of the day. We put national unity first, and we work tirelessly to ensure, as Tunku Abdul Rahman wanted, a place in the sun for everyone.

We yearn for real debate on policies that affect us because we know that this is the process through which we make good laws. We want to engage all sides because we recognise that good ideas exist everywhere, regardless of creed, colour or political affiliation. We never dismiss an argument simply because we don't like the person who says it—we evaluate proposals on their own merit for the benefit of all Malaysians, not just a particular party, ideology or interest.

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved