Isnin, 28 Oktober 2013

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Retak menanti belah

Posted: 27 Oct 2013 07:58 PM PDT

More problems are looming over the horizon for DAP and it is believed that bigger problems are yet to come for the party that may eventually see Lim Guan Eng ousted from power for the poor handling of this matter. In fact, a very strong anti-Guan Eng group appears to be emerging that may eventually split the party into two.

THE CORRIDORS OF POWER

Raja Petra Kamarudin

DAP sets up two reconciliation committees to fix internal differences

(The Star, 27 Oct 2013) - DAP has set up two reconciliation committees to resolve and reconcile internal party differences. In a statement on Sunday, DAP secretary-general Lim Guan Eng said the first task would be to look into recent disputes in Kedah, Malacca and Johor. Lim said that the party's central executive had decided in a meeting on Oct 23 to establish the committees to foster party unity and resolve internal differences.

The first committee, chaired by national publicity chief Tony Pua, would handle Penang, Kedah, Perlis, Kelantan, Terengganu, Perak and Pahang. The other committee, which is chaired by national organising secretary Anthony Loke will handle Johor, Malacca, Negeri Sembilan, Selangor, Federal Territory and Sabah.

"The Chairman of the respective committees must convene meetings immediately and the conclusions be reported back to both the CEC and me," said Lim in relation to Kedah, Malacca and Johor.

The party has been plagued by infighting in recent times. Malacca DAP chief Goh Leong San, quit as the state opposition leader recently after coming under criticism from state DAP leaders for praising the chief minister while Johor DAP chairman Dr Boo Cheng Hau has been told to step down by his fellow state leaders for outspoken attacks against the party leadership.

The Kedah state committee was suspended and taken over by the CEC while in Sabah, Luyang assemblyman Hiew King Cheu turned independent after his support for Datuk Wilfred Bumburing as state opposition leader was rejected by other DAP assemblymen.

*****************************************************

Actually, DAP's problems are more than just internal problems. It is more serious than that and, as the Malays would say, it is retak menanti belah, or a crack waiting to split the party into two.

See the four complaint letters (below) sent to the ROS by DAP's Chinese members and branch leaders. It seems these are just four of about ten similar letters.

The real issue here is the validity of DAP's December 2012 party elections (which DAP agreed was in question since the party agreed to hold a re-election). Last month (September 2013), DAP held a re-election. The ROS, however, has not yet informed DAP whether this re-election is valid because of the same discrepancies in last month's re-election as in the December 2012 election.

The nine points, based on the complaints the ROS received, that will make last month's re-election invalid are:

1. Inadequate notice period (which should have been 10 weeks, as what Karpal Singh himself admitted).

2. The 851 delegates who were absent or not invited to the re-election when they were eligible to attend and vote at the meeting.

3. The 985 instead of 865 branches that were involved in the re-election.

4. The delegates' list 15th December 2012 was not used, as they should have.

5. The proper notice of the meeting was not issued.

6. The election was not transparent.

7. Suspected elements of fraud.

8. Suspicious election results.

9. Manipulation of votes.

There is a strong possibility that last month's re-election will also be deemed invalid and yet another re-election, or re-re-election, will have to be held. And this time the ROS may have to take over and manage the affairs of the party, in particular matters concerning the re-re-election.

If this were to happen then it would be bad publicity for DAP, which will be seen as incapable of even managing its own affairs and party election in a fair, transparent and democratic manner. DAP will lose the moral high ground and its right to talk about fairness and democracy when it cannot practice what it preaches.

More problems are looming over the horizon for DAP and it is believed that bigger problems are yet to come for the party that may eventually see Lim Guan Eng ousted from power for the poor handling of this matter. In fact, a very strong anti-Guan Eng group appears to be emerging that may eventually split the party into two.

With PKR's and now DAP's party elections being questioned, the legitimacy of Pakatan Rakyat to question the recent general election in May has just taken a beating.

********************************************

RE:  NOTICE PERIOD OF 4 WEEKS FOR THE DAP CONGRESS ON 29-9-2013 and NOTICE WAS NOT ISSUED BY THE DAP "PUBLIC OFFICER" AS PROVIDED UNDER SECTION 9 (C) OF THE SOCIETIES ACT

May I refer to the above matter.

I am a member of the DAP (Membership No: 0123614) and the Assistant Secretary of the DAP Taman Seri Branch in Selangor.

The Chairman of DAP, YB Karpal Singh had declared in a press statement that the DAP Congress will be held sometime in October 2013 in compliance with the provision of the DAP Constitution, which provides for 10 weeks notice to be given to all its delegates to attend its Congress.

Lim Guan Eng was not the properly elected Secretary General. He was appointed by the invalid Central Executive Committee (CEC) after the unlawful election of the CEC on 15-12-2012. 

It was in the record of the RoS that several DAP's delegates for the Congress dated 15-12-2012 and members have lodged official complaints to the RoS about the manipulations of votes or election frauds. The RoS had found that there were irregularities or elections frauds during CEC elections on 15-12-2012 and had directed the DAP to hold a fresh election for its CEC.

In view of the said directives of the RoS, it was clear that at the material time Lim Guan Eng was not the secretary General of the DAP and his father, Lim Kit Siang, was not the adviser of the DAP. In simple term, there was no office bearers in the CEC until a proper Congress is held in strict compliance with the DAP's Constitution and Societies Act.

Hence, the only proper and lawful office bearer of the DAP was the "Public Officer" as provided under Section 9 (C) Societies Act. Section 9 (C) provides that "a society may sue or be sued in the name of such one of its members as shall be declared to the Registrar and registered by him as the public officer of the society for that purpose, …".

In the premises, the only lawful person who can act for the DAP after 15-12-2012 was the "Public Officer" as approved by the RoS because RoS has directed a fresh election for CEC members.

Therefore, there was only one conclusion that Lim Guan Eng was not the legally elected secretary general of the DAP and he could not act and/or sign document as the secretary general of the DAP. Lim Guan Eng has the same right as any other DAP members, no more no less.

Unfortunately, Lim Guan Eng and his father, Lim Kit Siang, have treated the DAP as the asset of their family and do as they please.

In view of the above, the recent Congress that was held on 29-9-2013 was unlawful as it was not called by the Public Officer as provided for under the Societies Act and secondly, it was unconstitutional due to the fact that the notice period was only 4 weeks whereas the DAP Constitution provides for 10 weeks. This was a serious violation of the DAP's Constitution. 

As a DAP member, I would like the DAP to be properly managed in accordance with the Societies Act and the provision of the DAP's Constitution, which provides for the notice to call for the Congress is 10 weeks.

It was clear that at the material time Lim Guan Eng had abused his power by unlawfully appointed himself as the secretary general of the DAP, making announcements using the title of the DAP secretary general when the RoS had already found that the CEC elected on 15-12-2012 was invalid.

From the above events, it was clear that Lim Guan Eng has no respect for the Societies Act, RoS and/or the DAP's Constitution by giving only 4 weeks notice for the Congress dated 29-9-2013. The said notice was not signed by the "Public officer" of the DAP as provided for under Section 9 (C) of the Societies Act.

I hope that the RoS will investigate into the outright violation of section 9c of the said Act and the DAP's constitution by Lim Guan Eng and his cronies. It is about time that Lim Guan Eng should be stopped from treating the DAP as his family's asset.

Thank you.

Yours faithfully,

Wong Yu Liuh

********************************************

Re: The DAP Congress held on 29-9-2013

I am the DAP's Taman Gembira Branch Secretary and my DAP membership number is 0086604.

I am extremely upset with the way in which Lim Guan Eng has abused his power in the DAP. He runs the DAP as though it is his own company. He ignores everybody else in the Party including Karpal Singh, who is our Chairman but in reality just a puppet.

Firstly, Lim Guan Eng treats the Constitution of the DAP like scrap papers and he waves the Constitution when it favors him and threw it aside when he wants to do things his way. The Constitution clearly stated that the delegates must be given 10 weeks notice to attend the Congress but they were given only 4 weeks. The notice for the Congress held on 29-9-2013 was unconstitutional.

Secondly, when the ROS found that the DAP CEC elections on 15-12-2012 was fraudulent and directed the DAP to hold fresh elections of its CEC. This means that there was no office bearers in the DAP from 15-12-2012 until a proper fresh elections are held and until such time no one has the power to make any decision on behalf of the DAP. However, Lim Guan Eng continued to act as Secretary-General and made all kind of decisions not in the best interests of the DAP but himself.

In December 2012 the only eligible delegates, who were entitled to attend and vote at the DAP Congress, were from 865 branches. In the recent DAP Congress held on 29-9-2013, there was a total of 985 eligible branches. There was a sudden increase of 120 branches comprising of additional 450 phantom delegates. As at 15-12-2012 (the DAP Congress which was manipulated to let Zaril Khir Johari to win to resemble Malay representation) these 120 branches were of "B" Certificate status and the 450 delegates were of observer status with no voting right. 

Before the DAP Congress held on 29-9-2013 the invalid CEC under the behest of Lim Guan Eng quietly upgraded these 120 branches to "A" Certificate status in order to give the 450 delegates full delegates status with voting rights. It is an open secret that these 120 branches were aligned to Lim Guan Eng and his cronies.    

From the legal standpoint, it was clear that the invalid CEC could not meet and/or make any decision including the upgrading of the 120 branches from "B" Certificate status to "A" Certificate.

I have reason to believe that Lim Guan Eng desperately needed these 450 phantom delegates to shore up his standing in the DAP. It is general knowledge in the DAP that without these 450 phantom delegates votes Lim Guan Eng position in the CEC elections would have been worst than his current 5th position because he would have garnered only 851 votes (1,301 – 450 votes).

Lim Guan Eng is not fit to lead DAP with his deceit and election frauds.

I hope that ROS will conduct a thorough investigations into the abused of power by Lim Guan Eng and give justice to the DAP members in general.

Yours sincerely,

Teh Teong Guan

********************************************

RE:  COMPPLAINT ABOUT DAP'S CEC ELECTIONS HELD ON 29-9-2013

I refer to the above matter.

I am a Life Member of DAP and my membership number is 0026873. I belong to the DAP Taman Seri Sungei Pelek Branch.

Many DAP members were happy that Registrar of Societies (ROS) had found that the DAP's CEC elections on 15-12-2012 were tainted with serious manipulations by Lim Guan Eng and his blind cronies and also directed the DAP to hold fresh elections in accordance with the DAP's Constitution.

It was an open secret amongst the DAP membersship that there were massive election frauds in the DAP's CEC elections on 15-12-2012 and other CEC elections. Complaints from the memberships were ignored by Lim Guan Eng and/or his father Lim Kit Siang. After the last 13th GE, Lim Guan Eng really thought that he has been confirmed a "TOKONG" and can do no wrong.

Many members and I thought that Lim Guan Eng would have learnt from his past mistakes and that he will not repeat them after the ROS had discovered the existence of the election frauds. Unfortunately, for the sake of trying to make himself look good and popular in the eyes of the public, Lim Guan Eng held himself out to be the DAP's Secretary-General even after the ROS had declared the CEC elected on 15-12-2012 was invalid and that fresh elections had to be held.

After the findings of the ROS, Lim Guan Eng was not the lawfully elected Secretary-General of the DAP. Under the Societies Act and the Constitution of the DAP he could not act and/or made any announcements in the capacity of Secretary-General from 15-12-2011 until he was elected by the delegates in a lawfully held Congress. The same principles applied to all the other office bearers of the DAP.

If the ROS were to examine the records in the DAP and the DAP's Constitution, it will discover that the DAP Congress held on 29-9-2013 were rushed through by Lim Guan Eng and his cronies in total disregards of the DAP's Constitution so as to ensure that other candidates that were not aligned to him had insufficient time to campaign. 

Despite Lim Guan Eng being just an ordinary member like us, he just assumed the power of the Secretary-General to chart the course of the elections with the predominant objective of gaining unfair advantage over other candidates and to also ensure that his cronies were elected within the first 20.

As usual, Lim Guan Eng always thought that he is above the DAP's Constitution and the Societies Act, he and he chose to violate the DAP's constitution by given a mere 4 weeks notice for the Congress held on 29-9-2013 so as to deprive other candidates the mandatory 10 weeks for campaign period. This was a serious violation of the DAP's Constitution which has no doubt rendered the whole election process of the CEC on 29-9-2013 unconstitutional. 

Further, 851 delegates were absent from the Congress. I have heard from some of the 851 delegates that they have not received the 4 weeks notice that has been issued by Lim Guan Eng and/or his cronies. 

It was so clear that the CEC elections on 29-9-2013 was filled with election frauds as the last CEC elections held on 15-12-2012.

Many members were also upset with the arrogance of Karpal Singh who chose to threaten to take actions against the ROS when there were glaring violations of the DAP's Constitution and Societies Act by Lim Guan Eng. Under the circumstances, the ROS cannot be seen to succumb to such threats of those who had acted unlawfully and against his Party's Constitution. The ROS is duty bound to protect the DAP membership as a whole and ensure everyone in the Party, including Lim Guan Eng and Karpal Singh, strictly followed its Constituion.

I know that any complaint lodged with the Party will be swept under the carpet. As an ordinary member of the Party, there is only one avenue left for us that is to call upon the ROS to investigate into the above two serious violations of the DAP's Constitution by Lim Guan Eng for not following the mandatory 10 weeks notice period and failure to send out the notice for the Congress to all the remaining 851 delegates, who are eligible to attend and vote at the Congress.

Thank you.

Yours faithfully, 

Goh Swee Huat

********************************************

COMPLAINTS  REGARDING FRADULENT CEC ELECTIONS IN THE DAP CPONGRESS ON 29-9-2013

I am the Chairman of the DAP Kota Tanah Branch. My DAP membership number is 0129487.

There were gross election frauds in the last CEC Elections held on 29-9-2013. The magnitude of the election frauds were much worst than the one held on 15-12-2013 where ROS had already discovered election frauds.

Aside from the Societies Act, the Constitution of any political parties is supreme. Therefore, YB Lim Guan Eng and/or YB Karpal Singh have no lawful authority to go against any part of the Constitution of the DAP. The moment any person including YB Lim Guan Eng and/or YB Karpal Singh for that matter went against any part of the Constitution, the acts will be rendered unconstitutional. It will follow that whatever decisions made by the Congress will also be INVALID from the very outset.

Despite being warned that the notice period of the DAP Congress had to be 10 weeks, Lim Guan Eng proceeded to steam roll it with 4 weeks notice. This was a clear unconstitutional act perpetrated by none other than Lim Guan Eng and encouraged by his Lim Kit Siang who is his father. The father and son regime cannot be allowed to treat the DAP as their family property.

It was also condoned by Karpal Singh who have made a public statement in August 2013 that the DAP Congress will be held in October 2013 in conformity with the 10 weeks notice period. Subsequently, YB Lim Guan Eng totally ignored YB Karpal Singh's statement and proceeded with the 4 weeks notice dperiod. Of course, YB Karpal Singh as the Chairman of the DAP couldn't do anything as he is just a "Anak Patong" in the DAP without holding any post in a branch leader throughout his political career.

There was no transparency in the CEC Elections on 29-9-2013. The DAP membership had been short changed by this tyrant YB Lim Guan Eng, who has been protected by his father. The silent majority had been made to put up with the Lim Family's dictatorship for far too long and the election process has been designed to keep them in power at the expense of the membership. 

The last Congress was clearly manipulated by YB Lim Guan Eng with the help of his cronies to stay in control of the DAP. The discrepancies in the number of delegates and branches for the Congress on 15-12-2012 and 29-9-2013 were in the records of the DAP as well as ROS. 

It must be noted that the CEC Elections on 29-9-2013 must be based on the numbers of delegates and branches that were used on CEC Elections on 15-12-2012. This was another election fraud perpetrated by YB Lim Guan Eng to prop up his false image and to put ensure his cronies to stay in power to protect him. 

We want justice for the ordinary members of the DAP. YB Lim Guan Eng cannot be allowed to act unconstitutionally and against the existing law governing political parties. We cannot allow one person like YB Lim Guan Eng to ruin the DAP, which was built up by the membership throughout the years. YB Lim Guan Eng and his father have been making used of the DAP to achieve their personal political agenda at the expense of the community.

If the ROS does not take any actions to put right the unconstitutional acts of YB Lim Guan Eng, then the membership may be compelled to seek redress from the Court of Law to compel ROS to act. More importantly, ROS must act immediately in the light of the clear unconstitutional acts of YB Lim Guan Eng to protect the interests of the members of the DAP in upholding the DAP's Constitution, which has been approved by the ROS.

I hope that ROS will treat my complaint seriously.

Thank you.

Yours sincerely,

Tan Kim Seng

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Accept syariah law, says PAS’ Nasrudin

Posted: 27 Oct 2013 08:36 PM PDT

In defending his call for syariah law, Nasrudin says that non-Muslims can opt to be tried under the laws of their own faith

K Pragalath, FMT

PAS Youth chief Nasrudin Hassan Tantawi questioned the logic behind accepting laws from foreign countries that were against Islamic principles and human rights when we should indeed implement syariah compliant laws.

"How can one accept a British law that allows detention without trial but have reservations on Islamic law, syariah," said the first term Temerloh MP in reference to the now defunct Internal Security Act that provided detention on the basis of suspicion.

Currently the Special Offences (Special Measures) Act and Prevention of Crime Act also provides for detention without trial.

"I don't see why one should resist Islamic laws since Islam is the official religion and our banking and halal food industry are syariah compliant," he added.

He said this in defending his recent proposal for laws here to be syariah compliant; further adding that the syariah law with hudud punishments is limited to crimes which are related to robberies, murder, rape, adultery and alcohol consumption.

"It is more focused on preventing crime; so we should work to reduce situations that would spur people to commit crime," said Nasrudin.

Last Monday, Nasrudin had called for laws to be syariah compliant while debating on the amendments to the Penal Code (Amendments) Bill 2013 in Parliament.

He had called for Islamic laws to be given a chance as it will not only deter crime but also enrich an individual's soul since it encompasses the concept of sin and reward.

When asked how syariah law can be implemented since there is a significant number of non-Muslims in Malaysia, he said that non-Muslims should be given an option.

"The current laws fail because it lacks spirituality. For non-Muslims, they should be given an option whether they want to abide by civil law or the laws that are governed by their respective faith," stressed Nasrudin.

He also said that syariah law and hudud penalty is not foreign to Malaysia.

READ MORE HERE

 

DAP: We’ll ignore complaints by rogue members

Posted: 27 Oct 2013 08:31 PM PDT

DAP's leadership to ignore complaints made by members over "unlawful" CEC polls.

Lisa J. Ariffin, FMT

The DAP leadership will ignore complaints made by several members who are dissatisfied with party secretary-general Lim Guan Eng and the recent central executive committee (CEC) polls, said national organising secretary Anthony Loke Siew Fook.

Through letters sent to the Registrar of Societies (ROS) this morning, some DAP members said Lim was not the secretary-general due to the invalid Dec 15, 2012 CEC polls and thus did not have the power to call for the re-election.

"We have complied with the ROS and are not afraid because we have followed its directive.

"These are just a few troublemakers who want to disturb the party and keep the issue alive. As far as we are concerned, it is no longer an issue," the Seremban MP told FMT.

Loke said the directive from the ROS stipulated that the new congress must consist of previous CEC leaders.

He explained that Lim was the former secretary-general, therefore "there is no issue with this".

Loke said it was up to DAP's disciplinary committee (DC) to take disciplinary action against the rogue members.

Earlier today, Taman Seri branch assistant secretary Wong Yu Liuh said there were no office bearers in the CEC until a proper re-election was held.

Wong said as such, Lim was not the legal secretary-general and could not sign any documents.

He said Lim had no respect for the Societies Act, ROS and the DAP Constitution by giving only four weeks notice.

READ MORE HERE

 

Signs of trouble in Selangor?

Posted: 27 Oct 2013 05:15 PM PDT

Cindi Loo, The Ant Daily

Pakatan Rakyat has been in power in Selangor for five years and yet nothing seems to have changed. It is as if the Barisan Nasional was still ruling the state.

So when PKR de facto leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim apparently criticised the state government for the slow pace of development, he was registering his unhappiness over the leadership of Menteri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim.

The one sore point with Anwar and other critics is that Khalid is not planning to use the state's excess funds of more than RM3 billion for development purposes.

However, Anwar was also quite diplomatic in his approach, saying that the fact that Selangor has excess funds showed the state government had practised good governance and was not riddled with power abuse and corruption.

"Excess funds is okay, but there are still poor people in the state; there are still youths who can't afford to get into university, and there are people who need housing aid," he reportedly said.

But shortly after Anwar's veiled criticism, the Selangor Backbenchers' Club jumped into the ring when it submitted a memorandum to Khalid on Oct 7, claiming that the state planned to slash development expenditure by RM100 million.

The memorandum was signed by representatives of all three Pakatan parties – Kampung Tunku assemblyman Lau Weng San (DAP), Meru assemblyman Abdul Rani Osman (PAS) and Bukit Antarabangsa assemblyman Azmin Ali (PKR).

The trio urged Khalid to increase allocations for state development in the 2014 state budget.

"The failure of state government agencies to meet their budget performance targets should be scrutinised. However, the state government should not use it as an excuse to reduce development expenditure as it will burden the rakyat," the memorandum stated.

Political observers have interpreted this sudden move by the Backbenchers' Club as signs that something is wrong with the administration of the state.

Sources said Anwar's criticism of the state's lethargic performance came when Khalid showed no signs of developing Selangor further or turning it into another stellar state like Penang.

"Pakatan has been governing for a full five years and yet there are people who did not know there was a change in state administration, because everything looks and feels the same," the source told theantdaily.

"In the rural areas, they think that Mohamad Khir Toyo is still the menteri besar, and not Khalid," he said.

READ MORE HERE

 

Disgruntled members: DAP re-election ‘unlawful’

Posted: 27 Oct 2013 04:55 PM PDT

Disgruntled members say that the recent CEC election was unlawful as it was called by Lim Guan Eng who was not the secretary-general. 

Alyaa Azhar, FMT

Several disgruntled DAP members have expressed their dissatisfaction against party secretary-general Lim Guan Eng and the recent central executive committee (CEC) polls, calling it 'unlawful'.

Through letters sent to the Registrar of Societies (ROS), some DAP members stressed that as Lim was not the properly selected secretary-general due to the invalid December 15 2012 CEC polls, he did not have the power to call for the DAP re-election.

One of the members, DAP Taman Seri branch assistant secretary Wong Yu Liuh said there was no office bearer in the CEC until a proper re-election is held.

"The only proper and lawful office bearer of the DAP was the public officer as provided under Section 9 (C) of the Societies Act.

"The lawful person who can act for the DAP after December 15 was the public officer as approved by the ROS," he said.

Wong added that as such, Lim was not the legally elected secretary-general and could not sign any documents.

"Lim has the same right as any other DAP member, no more no less. (Thus), the recent polls that was held on September 29 was unlawful as it was not called by the public officer," he said.

Wong also argued against the notice period of four weeks given for the DAP re-election.

"It was unconstitutional due to the fact that the notice period was only four weeks whereas the DAP Constitution provides for 10 weeks. This was a serious violation of the DAP Constitution," he said.

DAP chairman Karpal Singh had declared that the party CEC polls would be held sometime in October in compliance with the provision of the DAP constitution, which provides for 10 weeks notice to be given to all its delegates to attend its Congress.

READ MORE HERE

 

‘Khalid yet to address real concerns’

Posted: 27 Oct 2013 04:47 PM PDT

Selangor state assembly deputy speaker Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad notes that the Menteri Besar has yet to tackle major issues in the state.

Anisah Shukry, FMT

Selangor state assembly deputy speaker Nik Nazmi Nik Nazmi has joined the volley of criticism against Menteri Besar Abdul Khalid Ibrahim saying that the state government has yet to address 'real concerns' in Selangor.

"We should not just be focused on reserves – building our reserves when there are still major issues faced by the public such as urban poverty, facilities for housing, affordable housing, basic services.

"People will start to [question] if we keep announcing higher and higher reserves, but these basic things are not addressed," Nik Nazmi, who is also Seri Setia state assemblyman, told FMT in a recent interview.

Abdul Khalid has come under criticisms not only from the Barisan Nasional but also from his own party over his 'stingy' ways. The Menteri Besar often boosts to have managed to increase state coffers but this had become a point in contention.

Among those who had criticised the Menteri Besar include Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim.

Selangor party chiefs Dr Abdul Rani Othman of PAS, Mohamed Azmin Ali of PKR and DAP's Lau Weng Sang also had submitted a joint memorandum on Oct 17 urging the state government to loosen its purse strings, while Pandan MP Rafizi Ramli has demanded an explanation over why the constituency's allocation had been slashed.

Adding fuel to fire, Nik Nazmi, who is also former PKR communications director, noted that the Selangor government had yet to tackle problems faced by the younger generation, who migrate to the country's richest state in droves to study and earn a living.

He acknowledged that affordable housing had become a real bone of contention for young working adults in Selangor, and that the state "could do more" about the issue.

"I think this is one of the biggest challenges for the young generation – my generation. A lot of my friends find that we are being driven further and further away from the city in order to stay and work in Selangor," the 31-year-old said.

"The development of younger generation also needs to be looked at, in terms of sports, youth development," he added.

READ MORE HERE

 

Deaths at NS camps due to undetectable diseases, claims ministry

Posted: 27 Oct 2013 01:34 PM PDT

http://www.themalaymailonline.com/uploads/articlesnational_service_2_2509_600_400_100.jpg 

(MM) - "Since the programme started in 2004, actually there were only 20 deaths, and not 22. 

All 20 deaths at National Service (NS) camps, except for one, were caused by "undetectable" health problems such as leukemia, the Defence Ministry revealed today.

In a reply to Sungai Petani MP Datuk Johari Abdul in Parliament, Deputy Minister Datuk Abdul Rahim Bakri said the deaths were "undetectable" as they were due to health problems prior to the trainees' participation at the camps.

"Since the programme started in 2004, actually there were only 20 deaths, and not 22. 

"There were various reasons for the deaths but the majority was caused by the trainees' health problems like leukemia, heart problems, breathing difficulties, which were not detectable, while one death at the Muadzam Shah camp was caused by a serious misunderstanding, resulting in one person being charged in court," he said.

On September 22, 2013, an 18-year-old trainee was bludgeoned to death at the Muadzam Shah, Pahang camp for allegedly cutting queue during breakfast earlier in the day.

However, there has been reports such as death caused by leptospirosis, or commonly known as the "rat fever" in March 2012, at a camp in Perak, a death due to viral infection in June 2005, in Negri Sembilan, another death in Sabah in May during the same year after allegedly being injured during training.

There was also a report on a trainee who died when he was swimming in Sarawak in April 2004.

"There is one rape case on February 24, 2004 when the programme had just started and the case has been tried in court and brought up to the Court of Appeal, the trainer has been punished 12 years jail with three strokes of the cane.

"As for arguments or fights, there are 442 cases misunderstandings in 10 years from 2004 to 2013 and 242 reported to police to be recorded and get counseling from the police while the rest were settled amicably.

"The government is always concerned about these cases and will take the appropriate action based on the law especially cases involving negligence and officers who did not follow the SOP," he said.

Read more at: http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/deaths-at-ns-camps-due-to-undetectable-diseases-claims-ministry 

Malaysia's English language crisis

Posted: 27 Oct 2013 01:30 PM PDT

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/new/2013/10/28/national/images/30218090-01_big.JPG 

(Straits Times) - Govt anxious to counter slump in test results by local students 

IN PERAK on the northern Peninsular Malaysia, an English teacher uses textbooks meant for seven-year-olds to teach her Form One class of students, mostly aged 13.
"When I first taught them, they could not even tell the difference between 'when' and 'what'," the teacher, who wants to be known only as Yee, told The Straits Times recently.

"I had to put my planned lessons aside and start with the basics."

It is the type of story many English teachers in Malaysia share, but are reluctant to speak openly about because they worry about being sanctioned by the education ministry. 

And so, when the ministry recently announced that from 2016 onwards, students in Form Five - the equivalent of a GCE O-level class in Singapore - must pass English before they can obtain their school-leaving certificates, it set tongues wagging.

After all, last year, almost a quarter of 470,000 Form Five students failed English, and only 16 per cent of them scored highly in the language.

"Without the school-leaving certificates, the students cannot further their studies or get jobs," said Lok Yim Pheng, secretary-general of the National Union of the Teaching Profession. "Is their future being killed?"

Part of the problem, educators say, is that there are not enough qualified English teachers. Recently, the education ministry revealed that 70 per cent of the country's 70,000 English teachers failed a competency test to teach the language.

The ministry is now working overtime to re-train thousands of English teachers around the country to try and meet the 2016 deadline.

"It is an ambitious goal, but we cannot tolerate students not being able to communicate in English any more," Dr Habibah Abdul Rahim, head of a new agency within the ministry, told The Straits Times in a recent interview.

"Something needs to be done."

In Malaysia, English is a |compulsory subject from Primary One to Form Five. Despite that, many school-leavers, especially in rural areas, cannot converse or write fluently in English.

It was not always this way.

During the British colonial era, schools used English as the medium of instruction. This continued after independence in 1957 and many English teachers either came from the United Kingdom or were trained there.

"In the 1960s, one of the books read and discussed in English classes by sixteen-year-olds was George Orwell's "Animal Farm", recalled Andrew Yip, 60, a shopkeeper in Ipoh, Perak.

In 1970, the Malaysian government began requiring all state-funded schools to use Malay to teach, to build nationalism; though English remained a compulsory subject. 

Many English teachers were phased out.

Over the years, students' academic performances declined.

In the 2009 Programme for International Student Assessment, an international benchmark on students' performance in reading, science and mathematics, Malaysian students were in the bottom third among 74 countries.
 
By contrast, 15-year-old students in Singapore, Hong Kong and South Korea appeared to have the equivalent of another three or more years of schooling compared to Malaysian students. 

According to Jobstreet.com Malaysia, a recruitment agency, poor English is among the top complaints that employers have about fresh graduates.

To compensate, middle-class parents are increasingly sending their children for tuition, or to private schools, as they lose confidence in the quality of education in national schools.

Teachers who spoke to The Straits Times on condition of anonymity said it was impossible to meet the ministry's English "must-pass" target in two years.

Habibah said they aim to prove sceptics wrong.

Her agency is named Padu, or the Performance and Delivery Unit. Starting in November last year, some 14,000 teachers have been enrolled on crash courses in English. After school hours, they take lessons online and attend classes taught by teachers from the British Council and English university lecturers.

Upon finishing 480 hours of studies, they are reassessed. Those who fail are redeployed to teach other subjects.

The ministry is also promoting experienced teachers to be coaches. Already, almost 300 such coaches have been sent to district education offices in mostly rural Kedah and Sabah provinces.

But some feel it is not enough.

Former premier Mahathir Mohamad has called for a return to teaching science and mathematics in English, a policy introduced by him in 2003 and scrapped by Prime Minister Najib Razak in 2009.

Such flip-flops, said Dr Kua Kia Soong, an educator, have hurt students. "They have affected students' concentration in grasping the language," he said.

A teacher in Sabah, who asked to be identified only as Nurul, is among those preparing the first batch of students aiming to achieve the compulsory English pass. She said they are doing what they can. For example, she advises the weakest students to find and copy sentences that have similar words to the question.

"At least they get some marks and do not hand in a blank exam paper," she said.

Zahid: Herald’s ‘Allah’ ban extends to East Malaysia too

Posted: 27 Oct 2013 01:23 PM PDT

http://www.themalaymailonline.com/uploads/articlesZahid_Hamidi_280913_600_399_100.jpg 

(MM) - The Catholic Church weekly, the Herald, cannot refer to God as "Allah" even in Sabah and Sarawak, Home Minister Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi said today, despite the prime minister's assurance that East Malaysians were free to use the Arabic word.

Zahid said this was based on the recent Court of Appeal ruling that the Home Ministry's decision to ban the use of the word "Allah" in the Herald was justified, but he stressed that the Al-Kitab, the Bahasa Malaysia translation of the Christian bible, is allowed to describe God as "Allah" as it is not technically a "publication".

"It can be used in the Al-Kitab, but not in the Herald," Zahid told reporters at his office here today, after meeting a Cambodian government minister.

"The Al-Kitab is not a publication; it's a bible," he added.

The Home Ministry seized copies of the Herald at the Kota Kinabalu airport last week for inspection, but cleared the newsletter for distribution yesterday after finding that the word "Allah" was not used in the weekly.

When asked if the ban of the word "Allah" was restricted to the Herald, Zahid said: "Refer to the court verdict".

"I don't want to go beyond what has been decided by the Court of Appeal," he added.

According to Herald editor Father Lawrence Andrew, around 2,000 copies of the weekly publication were seized at the Kota Kinabalu International Airport on Thursday, apparently on order of the Home Ministry.

The Council of Churches Malaysia (CCM), an umbrella body of Protestant churches, decried the confiscation as a violation of the Catholic Church's right to distribute the newsletter to its own members.

Read more at: http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/zahid-heralds-allah-ban-extends-to-east-malaysia-too 

On Herald seizure, Ambiga asks if ‘left hand knows what the right hand is doing’

Posted: 27 Oct 2013 01:21 PM PDT

http://www.themalaymailonline.com/uploads/articlesambiga_1909_600_400_100.jpg 

(MM) - The Home Ministry's unexplained seizure of the Catholic weekly The Herald conflicts directly with the federal government's directive on the "Allah" ban and places the Najib administration "in an embarrassing position", Datuk Ambiga Sreenavesan has said.

The vocal former bar council president and human rights activist charged that the incident either signalled a disconnect between the top and bottom leadership, or was yet another example of "broken promises" by Putrajaya in protecting minority rights.

"The seizure conflicts directly with what the PM said only a few days ago. Either the left hand does not know what the right hand is doing or this is yet another example of broken promises.

"Who gave the orders for the seizure that has put the PM in a very embarrassing situation?" Ambiga, who is also the co-chairman of popular poll reform group Bersih 2.0, told The Malay Mail Online.

According to Herald editor Fr Lawrence Andrew, around 2,000 copies of the weekly publication were seized at the Kota Kinabalu International Airport (KKIA) on Thursday, apparently on order of the Home Ministry.

"The consignment arrived at 2.54pm on Thursday, and it was checked by KDN officials as the usual practice," he told The Malay Mail Online, referring to the Home Ministry's Malay acronym.

"The forwarding company were however told not to release the consignment. The company checked again on Friday at 10am, and were told that the consignment has been withheld. No reason was given," Lawrence added.

But in a sudden about-turn yesterday, Home Ministry officials ordered a release of the publications and allowed the consignment to reach its Catholic readers in the east Malaysian state.

The flip-flop, although lauded by the Catholic church, only left more question marks in its wake and uncertainty over the possibility of more such bans in the future.

Calling the ban "bizarre", Andrew told The Malay Mail Online that the ministry must explain the episode.

He pointed out that apart from the church, many lawmakers are also keen on finding out why the ministry had ordered the ban in the first place.

"It is a very funny situation. The copies were already in the hands of the forwarding agents, but they were told not to distribute the Herald.

"They could only release it on the instructions of the authority," he said.

Read more at: http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/on-herald-seizure-ambiga-asks-if-left-hand-knows-what-the-right-hand-is-doi 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Azmin nafi, mahu jumpa Khalid lagi esok

Posted: 27 Oct 2013 04:44 PM PDT

Beliau turut menafikan kewujudan desakan terbabit dalam memorandum yang ditandatangani pemimpin PAS Selangor Dr Rani Othman dan Pengerusi DAP Selangor Lau Weng San kepada Abdul Khalid minggu lalu.

"Memang tidak ada kemelut dan tidak ada usaha menukar Menteri Besar. (Dakwaan) ini bukan benda baru bagi saya," katanya ketika ditemui di lobi Parlimen hari ini.

Menjawab mengenai memorandum itu, Azmin berkata sudah tiba masanya Abdul Khalid mendengar keluhan dan pandangan Ahli Dewan Undangan Negeri (Adun) lain demi pembangunan Selangor.

Antara isu kritikal yang dibangkitkan termasuklah tender lesen kutipan sampah, pendidikan, rumah mampu milik, dan masalah banjir yang dibincang secara rundingan meja bulat selama empat jam.

"Peranan ADUN mungkin ada keluhan mereka tak didengari, jadi saya minta pandangan itu didengarlah.

"Ini penggal kedua pentadbiran Pakatan Rakyat di Selangor sudah tentu tanggungjawab kerajaan laksanakan program pembangunan untuk rakyat.

"Kalau penggal pertama kita ambil jalan singkat salahkan kerajaan terdahulu (BN) dan bebankan pentadbiran Umno yang tak telus, saya berpandangan penggal kedua ini kita tak boleh nak salahkan Umno lagi.

"Penggal ini adalah penggal kerja yang harus kita laksanakan," tegasnya.

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Why 'God' loved Isaac more than Ishmael

Posted: 27 Oct 2013 08:51 PM PDT

Hagar soon became pregnant and not long after that Sarah, too, became pregnant. So now both of them were pregnant. Hagar's son was named Ishmael while Sarah's son was named Isaac. But Ishmael was elder to Isaac since he was born first.

Sarah soon became jealous and told Abraham to get rid of Hagar and Hagar's son, Ishmael. So Abraham dumped both of them in the desert and left them there. God, who called Himself, El Shaddai, then appeared and told Sarah that she will become the mother of all nations.

Now, there are two things to note here. First of all, God acknowledged Isaac (the younger brother) and not Ishmael (the elder brother) as the true successor and heir to Abraham.

and

Oh, by the way, Jews practice circumcision, an Egyptian practice at that time -- and Hagar was Egyptian while Sarah was not. Does this mean the Jews follow Hagar and not Sarah? 

Let me comment on the last part first, that of circumcision.

Gulp, I don't like the look of what appears to be a pair of pliers (on right)
what's that tool on the left?

RPK is correct that circumcision was then an Egyptian practice. The Egyptians were probably the first people to conduct circumcision, but then only among the royals and nobility.

Please note that when we refer to the biblical Egyptians we're NOT talking about today's Egyptian who are and have been mainly Arabs, and of course mainly Muslims since Prophet Mohammad (pbuh) introduced Islam to the Middle-Eastern world.

The biblical Egyptians were a different race, no, not even the people of Ptolemy's and Cleopatra's who came later and were mainly Macedonians and Greeks, remnants of Alexander's army. The original Egyptians were in a race of a much earlier era, and have since long gone; no one other than perhaps historians of ancient Egypt or Egyptologists know where they are now - perhaps in Padang and Negeri Sembilan wakakaka.

In a post earlier this year titled B-D,the new G-D of 'Truth' I had written about the same thing.

Strangely, for the Hebrews, a people who despised the Egyptians for their pagan beliefs, yet they adopted many Egyptian practices, including that of circumcision – see my post B-D, the new G-D of'Truth'. Of course the Hebrews would claim that Abraham circumcised himself to show his covenant with YVWH.

OK then, we might as well begin our discussion with Abraham who the Bible told us came from Ur of the Chaldees, as in Genesis 11:27-31, which say:

27 Now these are the generations of Terah: Terah begat Abram, Nahor, and Haran; and Haran begat Lot.
28 And Haran died before his father Terah in the land of his nativity, in Ur of the Chaldees.

29 And Abram and Nahor took them wives: the name of Abram's wife was Sarai; and the name of Nahor's wife, Milcah, the daughter of Haran, the father of Milcah, and the father of Iscah.

30 But Sarai was barren; she had no child.

31 And Terah took Abram his son, and Lot the son of Haran his son's son, and Sarai his daughter in law, his son Abram's wife; and they went forth with them from Ur of the Chaldees, to go into the land of Canaan; and they came unto Haran, and dwelt there.

Abraham was born around 2000 BC according to those who also believed that Adam and Eve and their Fall happened around 4000 BC). But archaeologists said that Chaldeans (of the Chaldees) didn't even exist until around the sixth to fifth century BC, nearly 1500 years after Abraham's time.

Thus the claim that Abram (before he became Abraham) came from Ur of the Chaldees was likely a latter day invention (or writeup) at a time (around 530 BC) coincidentally when the Judeans were incarcerated as slaves in Babylon and first wrote down the oral tradition of Abraham's story while compiling the written Hebrew Bible Tanakh).


Now, just note Genesis 17:17 which says Abraham became hilarious when God told him he would have a son:

Then Abraham fell upon his face, and laughed, and said in his heart, Shall a child be born unto him that is an hundred years old? And shall Sarah, that is ninety years old, bear?

This tells us that the age gap between Abraham and Sarah was 10 years.

OK, flashing back to earlier, specifically 25 years earlier, to Genesis 12:4, we have (before he changed his name to Abraham):

So Abram departed, as the Lord had spoken unto him: and Lot went with him: and Abram was seventy and five years old when he departed out of Haran.

Abraham was already 75 years old when he was instructed by God to leave Haran after his father died. Therefore Sarah was sixty-five years old. It also tells us that there was a gap of at least 25 years between entering Egypt and having their son Isaac.

In Genesis 12:14-15 we have:

And it came to pass, that, when Abrams was come into Egypt, the Egyptians beheld the woman that she was very fair.

The princes also of Pharaoh also saw her, and commended her before Pharaoh: and the woman was taken into Pharaoh's house.

When entering Egypt, Abraham wanted Sarah to pretend she was his sister. The biblical reason was that he was afraid of being killed if it was known she was his wife, for he anticipated Sarah would attract lustful attention. And he was right. Pharaoh was told of her beauty, took her into his Palace and rewarded her 'brother' generously.

Here, some questions begged to be asked.


(1) What did Egyptians see in a 65 year old Hebrew woman that made them acclaim she was fair, and recommend the beauty to the Pharaoh, and why would a Pharaoh, who could have any woman in the land, want an old crone as his lover?

(2) Did the Pharaoh have his naughty ways with Sarah after taking her into the Palace?

(3) What was a pastoralist (shepherd) like Abraham doing in a cosmopolitan city like Ur (remembering Ur existed only 1500 years later)? One would expect him to live in a tent in a rural area, but we are told he came from Ur of the Chaldees.

(4) Then, what would be the likelihood of a foreign commoner, a mere pastoralist, even allowing for his beautiful 65-year old wife, coming into contact with the royal house of Egypt, namely the princes and the Pharaoh? (Genesis 12:15) Can a great empire like Egypt be so small that a mere foreigner, on entering its border, would come into contact with or to the knowledge of its princes?

(5) Why is there a leitmotiv surrounding Abraham and Sarah of the man and wife pretending to be brother and sister, a King taking (or attempting to take her) the wife, God intervening to return the wife to the husband, and the husband profiting greatly from the separation? The leitmotiv may be discerned in:

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Membongkar Salah Faham dan Salah Persepsi Perjuangan Menentang TPPA

Posted: 27 Oct 2013 01:04 PM PDT

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-CVKrXPy-i4A/TsHdZXcLHGE/AAAAAAAAADw/F7Ur7-eYdoU/s250-c-k/ProfilePhotos 

Lantas, saya dengan rendah diri di sini cuba untuk membongkar beberapa mitos mengenai TPPA, dan mengapa penentangan terhadapnya mengatasi dan melebihi daripada memenuhi kepentingan pihak tertentu sahaja. 

Anas Alam Faizli

Sudah beberapa bulan berlalu selepas Perjanjian Perkongsian Rentas Pasifik (TPPA) meraih perhatian awam dan rundingan rahsia sejak 2010 terbongkar kepada orang awam. Sejak itu, dialog, bengkel, kempen kesedaran, berita media dan perbincangan di antara pelbagai pertubuhan gerakan awam sudah dijalankan.

Bantah TPPA, suara terbesar setakat ini dalam usaha penentangan TPPA secara berterusan, telah berjaya membuka jalan untuk meningkatkan kesedaran awam dan menarik pelbagai pihak, pakar-pakar industri, dan kerajaan untuk membincangkan keburukan yang mungkin diakibatkan oleh TPPA kepada rakyat Malaysia secara menyeluruh.

Sungguhpun begitu, terdapat juga penentang-penentang TPPA yang lain; terdiri daripada personaliti-personaliti politik, kumpulan-kumpulan berkepentingan tertentu, serta kumpulan pro-perlindungan yang mewakili pihak-pihak tertentu.

Walaupun begitu, isu TPPA sebenarnya lebih besar daripada itu. Kesannya nyata dan akan memberi kesan kepada semua rakyat Malaysia tanpa mengira kepercayaan politik, kaum dan kepentingan peribadi.

Penting ditegaskan di sini bahawa Bantah tidaklah menentang perdagangan bebas secara prinsipnya, tetapi yang ditentang ialah TPPA; yakni terhadap pemberian laluan percuma kepada rakan dagangan untuk sewenang-wenangnya mempunyai hak menentukan urusan mengawal selia perdagangan dalam negara kita dan akhirnya, kedaulatan dan hak kita. TPPA bukanlah suatu perjanjian perdagangan yang adil mahupun perdagangan bebas sama sekali, memandangkan hanya 6 daripada 29 bab rundingan melibatkan perdagangan, manakala bab-bab selebihnya berpotensi mengancam kedaulatan Malaysia dan pembangunan ekonomi negara.

Lantas, saya dengan rendah diri di sini cuba untuk membongkar beberapa mitos mengenai TPPA, dan mengapa penentangan terhadapnya mengatasi dan melebihi daripada memenuhi kepentingan pihak tertentu sahaja.

1)  Menentang TPPA ialah pro-perlindungan

Penyokong TPPA selalu berpegang kepada janji pasaran terbuka yang didakwa menjadi salah satu faedah utama TPPA. Syarikat tempatan boleh menembusi pasaran Amerika dan 12 buah negara lain dan faedah perdagangan bebas dan liberalisasi pasaran kelihatan memihak kepada mereka. Ada yang menggunakan analogi bahawa TPPA adalah seperti 6 atau 8 lorong lebuhraya yang akan membuka laluan besar kepada syarikat tempatan kita sebaik sahaja Malaysia meratifikasikan TPPA. Dibandingkan dengan laluan sempit dan buruk yang sedang digunakan, penentangan terhadap TPPA akan dilabelkan sebagai perlindungan yang akan melepaskan potensi besar yang menanti peniaga-peniaga ini. Adakah ini benar?

Perlindungan sememangnya dipandang jelek oleh banyak pihak. Jika kita membaca buku teks ekonomi dan perdagangan antarabangsa, kita tidak mungkin tidak terserempak dengan kritikan terhadap perlindungan yang mempunyai peranan besar dalam The Great Depression. Walaupun kita bersetuju secara prinsipnya bahawa perlindungan itu boleh dipersalahkan (walaupun hakikatnya, Amerika yang memulakannya), ia bukanlah boleh dilhat dengan mudahnya sebagai "laluan sehala". Menentang TPPA mungkin menyebabkan anda berada dalam kem yang menyebelahi polisi perlindungan (sekiranya ia benar wujud), tetapi adakah TPPA menjamin yang Amerika sendiri tidak akan turut menggunakan kaedah perlindungan untuk selamanya demi melindungi syarikat-syarikatnya sendiri?

Kita tidak boleh menjadi terlalu naif beranggapan yang Amerika akan menghapuskan undang-undang perlindungan perdagangannya terutamanya undang-undang anti-limpahan dan kuasa timbal balasnya yang kejam. Tatkala perunding-perunding MITI berhujah dengan sangat optimis tentang penerokaan pasaran baru di rantau Asia-Pasifik, pengeluar udang kita telahpun dikenakan tindakan 60% cukai anti-limpahan dan timbal balas oleh Suruhanjaya Perdagangan Bebas Amerika (FTC). Bukankah ini jugasatu bentuk perlindungan?

Sekali lagi, kita tidak boleh terpedaya dengan dakwaan bahawa kewajiban untuk mengurangkan tarif merupakan sebahagian daripada tanggungjawab untuk mengimarahkan kemasukan pasaran asing ke dalam pasaran domestik. Kadar tarif Amerika dalam banyak produk sudahpun dikira rendah sejak sekian lama. Apa yang menghalang produk eksport kita memasuki pasaran Amerika bukanlah kerana produk kita mahaltetapi kerana sekatan bukan-tarif yang menyebabkan peningkatan kos untuk para pengeluar kita seperti kos untuk mematuhi peraturan teknikal, standard dan ujian pematuhan yang ditetapkan oleh pihak kastam Amerika. Amerika mempunyai standard yang lebih tinggi daripada kita; ada kemungkinan standard mereka ini jugalah yang akan dikenakan ke atas kita apabila TPPA dilaksanakan.

2)  Menentang TPPA itu menentang persaingan sihat

Penyokong TPPA telah melaung-laungkan kemungkinan yang TPPA akan memperhebat persaingan pasaran di Malaysia. Walaupun peraturan-peraturan yang menggalakkan proses persaingan penting untuk negara, tiada hubungan jelas yang telah berjaya dibuktikan untuk mengesahkan bahawa persaingan yang sihat akan berlaku dengan TPPA. Malaysia sudahpun mempunyai Akta Persaingan 2010 yang mengawal selia ekosistem persaingan di Malaysia dan undang-undang tersebut tidak mendiskriminasikan antara syarikat luar dan tempatan. Walaupun kita melihat keperluan untuk meningkatkan tahap persaingan dalam pasaran, jawapannya wujud dalam keberkesanan peruntukan undang-undang yang sudah sedia ada ini dan penguatkuasaanya oleh pihak berkuasa berkaitan di Malaysia, bukannya cadangan wajib yang datang daripada luar Malaysia. Banyak perjanjian perdagangan bebas (FTA) tidak menyediakan peraturan substantif dan prosedur yang perlu digabungkan ke dalam peraturan persaingan tempatan.

3)  Menentang TPPA ialah agenda Melayu

Penyokong TPPA berhujah dengan analisis kritikal tentang kesan yang mungkin datang daripada TPPA ke atas aktiviti perolehan kerajaan; TPPA dikatakan satu langkah untuk menghentikan sikap pilih kasih dan hanya memenuhi kepentingan orang Melayu kerajaan dalam pembelian barangan dan servis serta penganugerahan kontrak. Bertentangan dengan pandangan ini, hujah daripada pihak yang menentang perjanjian ini menegaskan bahawa  penentangan terhadapnya adalah lebih daripada niat sebenar untuk terus menerus melindungi kepentingan orang Melayu Bumiputera. Sudah dimaklumi umum bahawa dengan TPPA, misalnya terdapat risiko bahawa prosedur standard mengimport harta intelek ke dalam negara ini akan menjadi lebih ketat. Peningkatan kepada harga ubat-ubatan, misalnya, tidak mungkin hanya dirasai oleh orang Melayu.

Polisi tiada-diskriminasi yang kononnya ingin dicapai menerusi TPPA bukannya menjanjikan penghapusan diskriminasi di peringkat domestic di dalam negara itu sendiri. Sasaran TPPA bila berbicara tentang amalan diskriminasi ialah menghapuskan diskriminasi antara pengeluar tempatan dan asing ataupun antara pengeluar di negara berlainan, dan bukannya sesame pengeluar domestik.

Terdapat dasar Bumiputera yang dipertikaikan terutama yang tidak mebawa kepada pemerkasaan ekonomi Bumiputera. Kita tidak menentang usaha menambah baik dasar yang sedia ada. Terdapat dasar-dasar yang terdedah kepada `political capture' dan `special interest capture'. Penambahbaikan perlu mengambil kira tindakan yang mengurangkan political capture dan special interest capture tersebut. Namun untuk kita mengubah dasar yang sedia hanya kerana kita tunduk kepada desakan luar adalah satu menjadi satu yang amat malang. Apa yang dibimbangi ialah yang dikejar tidak kesampaian dan yang dikendong keciciran.

4)  TPPA akan membantu menentang gejala korupsi daripada luar.

Persoalan sama ada korupsi berleluasa di negara ini ialah satu soalan yang akan mempunyai jawapan berlainan bergantung kepada siapa soalan itu ditujukan. Tetapi, jika diambil kira tahap ketidakpuasan hati rakyat ke atas perbelanjaan kerajaan dan pendedahan skandal-skandal rasuah yang menggoyangkan parti pemerintah, tidak menjadi satu keanehanlah apabila perjuangan menentang korupsi digunakan sebagai hujah untuk menyokong TPPA. Tetapi adakah perjuangan menentang korupsi satu kemustahilan sehingga pertolongan luar diperlukan untuk memastikan niat suci ini menjadi kenyataan? Dan jika jawapan kepada soalan ini berpihak kepada bantuan pengaruh luar seperti TPPA sebagai cara berkesan menentang gejala rasuah, apakah kawal selia untuk hubungan perdagangan antara negeri mempunyai kaitan dengan usaha menghapuskan ketirisan yang merupakan hasil daripada amalan korupsi di negara ini?

Malah, sebenarnya terdapat aspek kawal selia perdagangan antarabangsa pula yang cenderung kepada korupsi, seperti juga cabang-cabang penguasaan awam dan agensi awam yang lain. Walaubagaimanapun, tugas untuk menentang korupsi perlu diletakkan dibawah kawal seliaan pihak penguasa tempatan. FTA, termasuklah TPPA sepatutnya hanya memggalakkan liberalisasi perdagangan dan menghapuskan halangan-halangan kepada perdagangan bebas. Jika kaedahnya adalah untuk meluaskan skop FTA sehingga menggugat autoriti kerajaan domestic dalam pengawal seliaan setempat, maka menjadi satu kebaikanlah untuk undang-undang anti-korupsi Amerika yang berstandard tinggi dieksport ke dalam negara kita. Tetapi adakah hal ini yang terjadi dalam TPPA yang  sedang berada di dalam rundingan sekarang? Ya, kita cukup berharap supaya TPPA mempunyai satu bab yang menjelaskan polisi-polisi anti-korupsi ahli-ahlinya. Jika tiada, perlukah Amerika pula yang bimbang terhadap amalan korupsi yang wujud dalam sektor kerajaan dan perniagaan di Malaysia?

BANTAH TPPA

Bantah TPPA dilahirkan oleh pelbagai individu dan NGO yang menyedari bahaya dan ancaman yang ditawarkan oleh TPPA. Terlahir atas hasil cadangan BLINDSPOT, MTEM dan jawatankuasa Anti FTA pada Jun 2013, Bantah merupakan gabungan terbesar Anti-TPPA di negara ini kini, dan mendapat sokong penuh 60 buah badan bukan kerajaan dan 9 buah gabungan persatuan contohnya MAC, MCTC, MTUC, MPM, setiap satunya mewakili sekurangnya 50 badan bukan kerajaan.

Bantah juga dianggotai oleh gerakan belia seperti SAMM, SMM dan juga PKPIM, gerakan Islam seperti IKRAM, MAPIM dan ABIM dan beberapa dewan perniagaan Melayu dan Cina.

Bantah ialah gabungan bebas politik yang tidak mempunyai kepentingan politik, kepentingan perniagaan dan tidak mewakili kepentingan kaum atau kumpulan tertentu. Bantah menolak TPPA. Malah, Bantah telah menghantar 75 tuntutan (perkara yang memudaratkan negara) kepada Perdana Menteri, menyatakan yang jika kerajaan masih berkeras untuk menandatangani TPPA, kerajaan didesak untuk memastikan tuntutan ini dipatuhi segera dan tanpa kompromi.

Bantah dianggotai oleh ahli akademik, pakar-pakar perdagangan, pakar undang-undang, pakar kesihatan, aktivis alam sekitar, pakar pempatentan, sarjana dan profesional daripada pelbagai sektor industri dan segmen masyarakat. Semua cadangan dan pandangan Bantah dirujuk kepada pakar-pakar ini yang juga membentuk jawatankuasa Bantah.

Bantah telah bertemu dan akan terus menemui semua pihak daripada segenap lapisan masyarakat;nelayan, petani, peladang, ahli-ahli profesional, semua parti politik, agensi-agensi kerajaan, kementerian-kementerian, para menteri, termasuklah menteri MITI sendiri, malah Perdana Menteri, DS Najib Tun Razak sekalipun untuk tujuan diskusi dan pencerahan.

Perdana Menteri sendiri telah mengeluarkan kenyataan semasa Dialog Kemuncak APEC di Bali baru-baru ini menyatakan komitmen beliau untuk memastikan bahawa kerajaan akan menimbangkan perjanjian ini berasaskan kepada sokongan rakyat - samaada mereka bersetuju atau tidak dengan perjanjian ini. Bantah mengalu-alukan komitmen ini dan menggesa rakyat untuk meluahkan pandangan mereka. Sertai Bantah!

*Anas Alam Faizli ialah profesional dalam industri minyak dan gas. Beliau sedang menyambung pengajian peringkat kedoktoran, pengasas bersama BLINDSPOT dan BANTAH TPPA, tweet di @aafaizli

WIEF Serves and Benefits Non-Muslim Countries

Posted: 27 Oct 2013 12:55 PM PDT

http://www.utusan.com.my/pix/2010/0103/Utusan_Malaysia/Hiburan/hi_02.1.jpg 

World Islamic Economic Forum (WIEF) serves and benefits the non-Muslim countries more than the Muslim ones with many Arab and Muslim countries still in dire straits since it first came into existence as they are now almost destroyed by infighting and external provocation.

Mansor Puteh

 

It is quite obvious that the organizers of the so-called World Islamic Economic Forum (WIEF) does not care or know who they are actually serving or benefiting the most - the Muslim countries or the non-Muslim ones.

 

The truth remains that since it first came into existence, there are many Arab countries that have suffered, are being destroyed, and with their economy in shambles.

 

This happened through infighting and mostly by external provocation, by unseen but known and obvious enemies of Islam, the countries that had never ever used their veto power to protect Arab and Muslim interests in the United Nations. 

 

Yet, the organizers of the WIEF with their officers and the so-called leaders of the Arab and Muslim countries give comments and speeches as though they do not realize that the Muslim World that they like to talk about truly does not exist.

 

And that cooperation between and amongst Muslim countries and those of the non-Muslim ones favor the latter.

 

WIEF has indeed benefited the non-Muslim countries more than the Muslim ones.

 

If it is that interesting and truly beneficial, then it can be seen in the way Muslims interact with each other through commerce, which is what the Prophet Muhammad, pbuh, had also been engaged in, for which had become the tool of Islamic propagation, which had also caused Melaka to become the most important center for the spread of Islam in Southeast Asia.

 

Unfortunately, trading as encouraged by WIEF, has not managed to do this.

 

The organizers of WIEF and the so-called Arab and Muslim leaders are not fully aware why they are happy to be invited to attend this forum, when it is not servicing the real cause of Islam in any way.

 

It can be said to be effective if it can also help cause the expansion of trading amongst Muslim countries and between the non-Muslim ones, which can in the end cause the economic hold of the Muslim countries by the west to be further reduced, with the American dollar and European euros and other currencies of the non-Muslim countries depreciating in value and worth.

 

But this has not happened. It can never happen because the organizers of the WIEF, do not really know why they are organizing this sort of forum.


To them it is no more than to counter the World Economic Forum (WEF) that is held in Davos, Switzerland every winter there.

 

It was a good start. But WIEF does not know how to enhance their prestige and reputation other than to be the counter-WEF.

 

Whereas the WEF can rest on the earlier achievements of the countries in the west which have been fully developed, in all fields. WIEF has not managed to even think why they are able to achieve what they have managed to do, so that the WIEF too can encourage other Muslims to go into the line of businesses that those countries in the west especially America had done to uplift their economic performance so that they can influence not only the economic development of the Muslim countries, but also to promote Unity amongst the Muslims in the world.

 

WIEF has a very narrow-minded view of the Muslim World and also the world as a whole.

 

They are happy to get as many prominent Muslim and non-Muslim leaders to attend their annual conference.

And these so-called Muslim leaders are normally eager to attend it, because of the prestige attached, where they can read the prepared texts which do not espouse anything unusual or new, other than to repeat what has been said by their counterparts and also themselves before. 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved