Jumaat, 20 September 2013

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Time to cut the Umno cake differently?

Posted: 19 Sep 2013 10:26 PM PDT

The candidacy of just two Sabahans - federal minister Shafie Apdal and Kota Belud MP Abdul Rahman Dahlan - is telling of the frailty in Sabah Umno. 

Jude Wang, FMT

Things have not been going brilliantly for Sabah Chief Minister Musa Aman. For one he's been forced to concede that he will not be contesting for the vice-president's post in the Umno elections next month.

That zinger came on Sept 15, on the eve of Malaysia Day, when Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak was here to launch the 50th anniversary celebration and Musa was questioned on his plans following hints that he would contest for a top post or defend his Supreme Council seat in the party.

His statement just days before party nominations closed that he had deliberated much before deciding not to go for both posts was viewed as suspicious.

Adding to the incredulity was his explanation that much still needed to be done to further develop and improve Sabah which begged the question what he had been doing over the last 10 years he 'ruled' the state.

Earlier this year there was talk that he would step down as chief minister of the state next year. Speaker Salleh Said Keruak is said to be the leading contender to take over in a pre-election deal worked out with Kuala Lumpur.

The about turn raises speculation about what was offered in return for opting out of the VP race. A full term as chief minister perhaps?

In which case Salleh, who was cheering him on as a potential veep candidates, is now left dangling.

To maintain a firm hold on the party and by extension Sabah, a strategy can be seen emerging through the number of Umno leaders said to be aligned to the 62-year-old Musa as they position themselves to contest or re-contest their divisional posts.

In the past few months minor-league Umno leaders here have been sending out a flurry of signals at divisional level and this may well tell more about Sabah's future.

The first thing revealed is that the Umno leadership in the state is not as unassailable and steady as many believe and it is only a matter of time that their hold loosens.

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Wee Ka Siong: Papers have no intention of turning bumi agenda into racial issue

Posted: 19 Sep 2013 10:48 PM PDT

(The Star) - It is unfair to blame the Chinese newspapers of turning the Bumiputra Economic Empowerment Agenda into a racial issue when they are only reflecting the views of the Chinese community, says Datuk Dr Wee Ka Siong.

The MCA Youth Chief said the Chinese media had always been the mouthpiece of the Chinese community by accurately reporting and analysing their sentiments and aspirations.

"They have a responsibility to report the truth in order to keep their readers up to date of current affairs, and they have no intentions of stirring up racial issue," he said in a statement.

Dr Wee was responding to a statement made by Federal Territories Minister Datuk Seri Tengku Adnan Tengku Mansor who has reportedly lashed out against the Chinese newspapers for allegedly turning the agenda into a racial issue.

He said when the Government's Bumiputra Economic Empowerment Agenda came to light, it naturally caused the non-Malay community to fear that they were being marginalised.

"Thus, the Chinese media as the mouthpiece of the Chinese community had reflected their views objectively and truthfully. So it is not fair to say that the Chinese media are inciting racial hatred when they were only performing their responsibility.

"He (Tengku Adnan) obviously does not understand the role played by them," said Dr Wee.

Dr Wee, however, agreed that there were indeed certain vernacular media which publish inflammatory and racist reports.

"These types of the media are the real culprits behind racial hatred. Living in a multiracial country like Malaysia, we should practise mutual respect to allow everyone to develop and progress, and this is the role played by the Chinese media in relaying the voice of the Chinese community," he said.

Separately, MCA Young Professionals Bureau chief Datuk Chua Tee Yong said affirmative action by the Government should include all other agendas such as education and welfare of the people.

On the economic empowerment agenda, Chua said it should be needs-based rather than just focusing on the bumiputras.

A recent analysis on household incomes showed that 34% of homes took in less than RM3,000 a month, he said, adding that this significant percentage consisted of all Malaysians regardless of race and religion.

"Therefore, I strongly urge the Government to reconsider its stand and adopt a more inclusive approach," he said.

 

Don’t upset Malays with Chin Peng issue, Perkasa warns MCA

Posted: 19 Sep 2013 10:37 PM PDT

Hasbullah Awang Chik, TMI

Perkasa has warned the MCA not to upset the Malays by insisting that Putrajaya allow Chin Peng's ashes to be brought back here.

The Malay rights group pointed out that many Malays and Chinese died at the hands of the communists, led by Chin Peng, during the insurgency.

Perkasa secretary-general Syed Hassan Syed Ali questioned why the MCA was so adamant about the Chin Peng issue.

"Don't upset the Malays. Respect the feelings of others," urged Syed Hassan.

Perkasa chairman Datuk Ibrahim Ali also got into the debate and suggested that the communist leader's ashes should just be "tossed into the air", adding that the people should just forget about Chin Peng.

"We are better off discussing the problems faced by the living. He is dead. His ashes should be tossed into the air," he said.

MCA had called on the government to allow Chin Peng's remains to be brought back into the country, putting the Chinese party on a collision course with Putrajaya which is against the move.

MCA publicity bureau chairman Datuk Heng Seai Kie had said there was no law in the country which forbids anyone from either having their last rites or being buried in Malaysia.

She also pointed out the remains of terrorists Dr Azahari Husin and Nordin Mohamad Top were allowed to be buried in Malaysia, questioning if Putrajaya was taking a racial stand when it came to Chin Peng.

 

Bersih will back tribunal ‘witnesses’

Posted: 19 Sep 2013 10:21 PM PDT

Bersih co-chairperson assures the people that the NGO would fully back the "witnesses" if they were to be sued for defamation.

Alfian ZM Tahir, FMT

Bersih co-chairperson S Ambiga has firmly stated that legal aid will be provided to any "witnesses" who "testified" during the People's Tribunal should they receive any defamation suit.

The prominent lawyer also highlighted that Bersih would back the "witnesses" on what was said during the tribunal.

"We will provide legal aid. I believe we have said this even before the tribunal started. If anyone receives a defamation suit, Bersih will assist those in need," Ambiga told FMT.

Ambiga then continued by saying that the best move was to tell the truth and she was hoping that the tribunal would create greater awareness among the public whom she believed had more proof of what transpired during the general election.

"I'm aware about the possibility of defamation suit. But it is all about telling the truth and that is the best defence.

"The tribunal is a good avenue for ordinary citizens to air their dissatisfaction and allegations," she said, referring to P Rajamah who bravely spoke up about her son's death in yesterday's proceeding.

FMT earlier reported that those "testifying" before Bersih's People's Tribunal could spark a legal backlash of defamation and other civil suits, and possibly charged with sedition as according to legal experts.

Civil Liberties lawyer Syahredzan Johan and legal expert Dr Azmi Sharom concurred that unlike the Royal Commission Inquiry (RCI) and Suhakam inquiry, the Bersih's tribunal was without any legal standing, and the "witnesses" were without immunity.

 

‘What harm can Chin Peng’s ashes do?’

Posted: 19 Sep 2013 10:17 PM PDT

An MCA leader supports the return of Chin Peng's ashes, contrary to party president Dr Chua Soi Lek's position.

Lisa J. Ariffin, FMT

Despite his death a week ago, former Communist Party Malaya (CPM) leader Chin Peng continues to stir controversy – this time in MCA.

MCA Publicity Bureau chairman Heng Seai Kie today said the ashes of Chin Peng should be allowed to be brought home, contrary to party president Dr Chua Soi Lek's statement on Tuesday that Chin was a "personality who undermined national security for decades".

Chua had not directly dismissed Chin Peng's return, but acknowledged the call by former special branch deputy director Yuen Yuet Leng and had said: "I don't have (any reasons). He (Yuen) may has his information which is not made available to me."

"Whether Chin Peng is a hero or not is not an issue here. In fact, you do not need to be a hero to be allowed a burial in Malaysia," Heng said in a press statement.

"The BN government does not need anymore bad publicity of being seen as making decisions based on racial lines," she added.

Heng justified her statement with the "decent burial" of suspected terrorists Dr Azahari Husin and Nordin Mohamad Top – two individuals wanted by the Indonesian governments for several deadly bombings – in Jasin and Pontian, respectively.

"Born and bred in Malaya, everyone, including Chin Peng has the right to be interred in Malaysia. On humanitarian grounds, we should honour this nonagenarian's last wishes," she said.

"On the other hand, there are no laws in this country which forbids anyone who intends to have last rites and his resting place here," she added.

"After all, what harm can his ashes do to the country?" she asked.

Heng further said the government should honour the clauses agreed upon in the Haadyai Peace Accord "so as to uphold the integrity and credibility of our government".

"Since other Communist Party of Malaya leaders like Syed Hamid Ali and Shamsiah Faekah were allowed to return to reside in Malaysia, why not the same be applied to Chin Peng?" she questioned.

READ MORE HERE

 

Anwar next PKR president?

Posted: 19 Sep 2013 05:31 PM PDT

Party source reveals that a check-mate situation is brewing steadily in favour of Azmin Ali and Nurul Izzah to oust Khalid Ibrahim from presidential contest.

B Nantha Kumar, FMT

PKR may witness a major change as its de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim makes his way into the president's seat next year, revealed a party source.

The party insider hinted that incumbent president Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail will make path for her husband for the top post to avert a possible fracture in PKR.

"At the moment there are three top personalities vying for the president's post, as Wan Azizah plans to retire from politics," said the PKR man who wishes to remain anonymous.

Wan Azizah has been the party president since its inception.

According to the sourse, the three are party deputy president Azmin Ali, vice president Nurul Izzah and Selangor Menteri Besar Abdul Khalid Ibrahim.

Speaking to FMT, he further claimed that the trio are planning to wrest the seat in the party presidential election scheduled to be held next year.

"All three have respective strengths in the party level. While Azmin is well known as Anwar's loyalist, Nurul Izzah who is also the Lembah Pantai MP, is backed by the younger generation in PKR," he said.

Khalid, being the Menteri Besar of Selangor and has the most number of members in the party wants to take a shot too at the presidential seat.

Nevertheless it is highly speculated that there will be no contest for the said position if Anwar opts for it; basically to avoid internal bickering and conflict.

The party insider also highlighted that Anwar has picked Azmin as his deputy, while Nurul agrees to remain as vice president.

"Basically, the game plan is very simple. It is a plot to checkmate Khalid who apparently does not have a cordial relationship with the party leadership," he said.

"There is rumour lurking that Khalid has isolated himself from the top PKR leaders and is running the state merely with the blessings of the DAP and PAS."

READ MORE HERE

 

UM wants tie up with NUS on research to improve world ranking

Posted: 19 Sep 2013 01:34 PM PDT

http://mk-cdn.mkini.net/489/b4fb7d446ef5e61ab4472cf17247a6c8.jpg

(TMI) - Universiti Malaya (UM) wants to work more closely with Singapore's National University of Singapore (NUS) in scientific research in its bid to raise its profile among the world's top academic journals, the Singapore Straits Times reported.

This plan was presented to the island republic's president Tony Tan Keng Yam, who visited UM yesterday on his three-day state visit to Malaysia.

On September 10, the QS World University rankings list revealed that UM ranked at number 167 while NUS stood at a strong 24th position in the world.

QS had said Malaysian universities did not produce enough cited research although they have quality academics and produce employable graduates.

UM's efforts in the intended collaboration with NUS will be propelled by the Malaysian government-funded High Impact Research (HIR) scheme aimed at boosting UM's chances to be among the world's top 100 universities in two years.

As it stands, about 10% of the 192 projects under HIR involve NUS, the Genome Institute of Singapore and Tan Tock Seng Hospital, in areas like cancer and HIV/Aids.

The plan is to double this to 20%, said HIR consultant Emeritus Professor Lam Sai Kit, during the visit by Dr Tan, who is also the chancellor of NUS.

Just the day before, Dr Tan had spoken about how the bond between NUS and UM was an example of how the two countries can build on its historical ties.

This resulted in UM vice-chancellor Ghauth Jasmon suggesting for a dual PhD programme with NUS and UM students spending time at both institutions.

READ MORE HERE 

Malaysia's last push for affirmative action

Posted: 19 Sep 2013 12:56 PM PDT

http://watan-online.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/khairy_bn2.jpg

(Radio Australia) - Malaysia's Minister of Youth and Sport says the latest round of race-based affirmative action will be the "last big push" for ethnic Malays and indigenous people to catch up to their Chinese counterparts.

.. and soon they will have to compete on their own.

Despite rolling back some of this assistance in the past, Prime Minister Najib Razak announced this month that "stronger" policies are needed to help "Bumiputra"... a term for ethnic Malays or indigenous Malaysians.

Ethnic Chinese-Malaysians have traditionally done much better in business... but the Government's efforts to give Bumiputras a helping hand has sent many Chinese-Malaysians looking for a fair go overseas... and some say the brain drain holds Malaysia's economy back.

Presenter: Liam Cochrane

Speaker: Khairy Jamaluddin, Malaysia's Minister of Youth and Sport

JAMALUDDIN: Well I think it's important to recognise that the Malay and Bumiputra community in Malaysia are still far behind in terms of economic achievement, whether it's in terms of corporate equity ownership, in terms of ownership of property, whether it's the numbers of professionals and senior executives. So I think the program of affirmative action as far as economic empowerment is still very relevant, because the Bumiputra community is the majority community in Malaysia and we want to ensure that there is not just growth, but also equity and social justice as far as economic development is concerned. And when the Prime Minister announced a new program to uplift and empower the Bumiputra economic agenda, it's not to take away anything from any other communities, but rather it's targeted assistance for Bumiputras especially those at the lower income level and those at the medium income level, those who are involved in business, those who are entrepreneurs, to ensure that there is a sustained effort, which is market friendly, which encourages meritocracy within the Bumiputra community and which sends the message that this has to be done transparently and that one day you have to compete and that day is coming very soon, but this is the large big push to ensure that we get it right this time.

COCHRANE: You say one day you'll have to compete, this is the last push. Can you give a time frame for when these race-based policies will no longer be necessary?

JAMALUDDIN: Well, the time frame will be very much dependent on the success and efficacy of this program that we've put in place.

Read more at: http://www.radioaustralia.net.au/international/radio/program/asia-pacific/malaysias-last-push-for-affirmative-action/1193546 

No Secret Project Behind Granting Citizenship To Foreigners In Sabah - Najib

Posted: 19 Sep 2013 10:48 AM PDT

(Bernama) -  (Bernama) -- Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak said there was no secret project by the government in granting the citizenship status to foreigners in the country.

In fact, he pointed out, the citizenship was granted according to the country's legal process and the Federal Constitution, and other countries too offered the citizenship status according to their respective terms.

"Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad (a former prime minister) had replied clearly in the RCI (Royal Commission of Inquiry) that there was no secret project that we (the government) had undertaken.

"Whatever it is, those who became the country's citizens did so according to the legal process of the country based on the Federal Constitution. But if one were to say that there was a secret project, that is not true," he told reporters after opening the Middle Temple Conference 2013, here Thursday.

Najib said this when responding to the question concerning the statement by Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim at the Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI) on the problem of illegal immigrants in Sabah at the Kota Kinabalu High Court, here, that the government under his (Najib's) leadership knew about the granting of the citizenship status.

On the death of the Communist Party of Malaya leader Chin Peng, Najib denied that the government had not given Chin Peng an opportunity to return to the country before he died.

Najib said he had looked at the Hadyai Treaty 1989 where the government had given Chin Peng an opportunity to apply for Malaysian citizenship within one year but he declined to do so.

"Chin Peng did not take any action to become a citizen. As such, his rights had expired," the Prime Minister said.

To a question whether the government could act based on "humanitarian grounds" to bring Chin Peng's body into the country, Najib said the country had different opinion on that.

"But (we) must not forget of the communist's victims, they are very emotional of what happened. How many people had died, and so many had been wounded, so many lost their livelihood, there will be much emotion if we bring back the body," he said.

To another question that the government had ignored Chin Peng s contribution in fighting the British during the colonial era, Najib said: "No, you have to weigh that against the fact that he was responsible for killing thousands of the military, police and civilians. That has to be seen in that context."

Asked whether Malaysians could pay their last respects to Chin Peng in Bangkok, Najib said it was the individual's right to do so.

"(However) we don't pay respect to those who are responsible for the death of thousands of people. If you see that in a context of how the American treated Osama bin Laden, you could see that Chin Peng died a natural death.

"Osama bin Laden was singled out, and he was killed and his body was thrown into the sea. That's what the American stated in the case of Osama bin Laden," said Najib.

 

Mukhriz going for veep post

Posted: 19 Sep 2013 10:25 AM PDT

(The Star) - Kedah Mentri Besar Datuk Paduka Mukhriz Mahathir will contest for the Umno vice-president's post, making it the most closely watched race in the party polls.

Described as a "game changer", Mukhriz, 48, will join a tight, six-cornered fight with incumbents Home Minister Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, Defence Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Tun Hussein and Rural and Regional Development Minister Datuk Seri Mohd Shafie Apdal.

In a press conference yesterday, Mukhriz said his decision, which was made following unanimous support from state Umno leaders, was to bring new hope to Umno members and supporters who wanted to see changes in the party.

"I may look 34 but I am almost 50. So, I think it will not be accurate to say that I'm too young or should wait another term.

"What I'm offering is a sense of hope for members that Umno is truly changing and that it's making itself relevant to the young," he told reporters after announcing his candidacy and a list of Kedah candidates contesting for various posts in the polls here yesterday.

PKR, said Mukhriz, was already making changes by allowing young leaders to be actively involved in deciding the party's direction.

Mukhriz said these leaders, trained since their youth, would be the ones whom Umno would face in the next general election.

However, he admitted that he did not know how he would fare under the party's new electoral system.

The other candidates in the race for vice-president's posts are former Malacca Chief Minister Datuk Seri Mohd Ali Rustam and Felda chairman Tan Sri Isa Samad.

 

Latest race-based wealth aid not going to work too, declares prominent economist

Posted: 19 Sep 2013 10:00 AM PDT

Ranjit Singh, TMI

The new race-based cash aid and uplift plans aimed at Bumiputeras are off-tack – just like the old policies – and Malays would be better off if the Prime Minister targeted aid at the poor instead, said Professor Emeritus Datuk Dr Mohamed Ariff (pic) yesterday.

He pointed out that Malays form 80% of households which earn less than RM2,000 per month.

So, for example, the idea to increase the Bumiputera share of unit trusts under the Amanah Saham Bumiputera programme would not help the poor Malays as they could not even afford to buy into the unit trust, he said in an interview with The Malaysian Insider.

Referring to the previous long-term, race-based effort, he added, "The New Economic Policy had noble aspirations but the wealth generated through it did not filter to the Malays who were underprivileged. The wealth was retained within a small group."

That is what is going to happen again, he argued, echoing the same point made by former minister Zaid Ibrahim yesterday to The Malaysian Insider.

Zaid said, "They have to make people understand that a fairer, transparent policy should be promoted for the interest of all. We don't need this so-called protection. If the majority of the Malays are still poor, then something is wrong with the policy."

Last Saturday, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak launched the Bumiputera Economic Empowerment Council, which has a five-pronged thrust to strengthen Bumiputeras in the fields of capital, corporate sector equity ownership, non-financial assets, entrepreneurship and commerce, and service delivery and ecosystem.

The new effort includes a slew of economic programmes as well as cash aid, which Putrajaya said was aimed at helping Bumiputeras.

Analysts saw this as Najib's attempt to shore up support ahead of the Umno party polls next month, while respected law expert Dr Azmi Sharom said it was a violation of the Federal Constitution which promises equality.

READ MORE HERE

 

DAP polls: Zulkifili returns to “test” party’s outlook

Posted: 19 Sep 2013 09:40 AM PDT

(Bernama) - Former national DAP vice-chairman Zulkifli Mohd Noor will be contesting in the re-election of the party's Central Executive Committee (CEC), scheduled on Sept 29.

He said apart from wanting to see the transparency of delegates to reflect the party's multi-racial outlook and its Malaysian Malaysia ideology in the election, he was also contesting for the continuity of the party's policy.

"I am contesting in respect of the Registrar of Societies' decision and the law of the country," he told reporters here yesterday.

He said as proof of his commitment to contest in the re-election, several campaigns would be held to meet party members and delegates throughout the country, beginning now until Sept 27.

"In my 26 years in the party, I have never campaigned for any election…but this time, I will campaign to test the transparency of the party in its struggle for the ideology it has been claiming," he said.

Apart from that, Zulkifli said from his meetings with members and delegates in Sungai Petani, Kedah, Taiping and Kuala Kangsar in Perak recently, many DAP members wanted party secretary-general Lim Guan Eng to relinquish his post and not to seek re election.

"For them, Lim has failed to carry out his responsibilities in heading the election process in December last year, which led to the interference by ROS and as a result DAP was almost deregistered.

"I did not rule out the possibility that the incident was mainly due to Lim's agenda in strengthening his own position and that of his father," he said.

He also described the party's leadership as only seeing the participation of Malays in the party as 50sen members who do not bring any benefit to the party.

He said his allegations were based on the party election held at the end of last year which clearly showed the position of Malays in DAP. 

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


What Tun wants, Tun gets?

Posted: 19 Sep 2013 01:44 PM PDT

http://www.worldpress.org/images/103003mahathir.jpg
 
There are a thousand and one possibilities involving Zahid, Khairy or who's who in the party for that matter, from now until Umno goes to the polls. Or should that be "endless possibilities"?
 
Mohsin Abdullah, Fz.com
 
LET'S take a step further following Datuk Mukhriz Mahathir's announcement that he will be contesting the Umno vice-presidency. And that "step" is to say he's going to win. And at who's expense? More of that in a while.
 
Question at hand: Do you agree Mukhriz will be voted in as one of the Umno vice-presidents? Political pundits seem to say "yes". Considering the big influence his father still wields among Umno leaders and members alike.  
 
With a father who happens to be Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad in the picture, Tun Daim Zainuddin, another powerful and still influential figure in Umno can be counted on to lend support. Not forgetting the many pro-Mahathir bloggers, influential among Umno in their own ways. 
 
And some Umno watchers believe deputy president Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin and his supporters will throw their lot behind Mukhriz as well. With such a support base, how can Mukhriz not win?
 
When I first wrote some weeks ago on a big push for Mukhriz to contest the vice-president's post, there were several posers which he needed to look into before taking the plunge. (See Mukhriz Mahathir: Will he? Won't he?) 
 
Surely he has taken everything into account and is confident of his chances of making it. And of course there's Dad who he can and surely must have consulted.
 
As for Dad, well his recent "no holds barred" interview with Umno paper Utusan Malaysia and his recent blog post said it all. That he wants his son to be elected VP. Well not directly. Still political commentators read Mahathir's comments as that.
 
Comments like "Umno is dying of old age and needs renewal, new blood, new leaders". That Umno will be shunned by the younger generation if they see leaders who are supposed to take over from "old" leaders are themselves "old".
 
And the man who was Umno president for 22 years also said the party must rid itself of corrupt leaders who "do not bat an eyelid to even sell out their own bangsa".
 
Mahathir did not name names of course. But two candidates eyeing the Umno vice-presidency this time – Tan Sri Isa Samad and Datuk Seri Ali Rustam – both had been found guilty previously by the party of "money politics" in Umno elections.
 
Mahathir ended his blog posting by calling on all in Umno to "return to the Umno struggle, cast aside personal interest and choose the young and reject the old". 
 
That, to many an Umno watcher, is crystal clear as to what Mahathir is driving at.  
 
But in the same blog Mahathir said he was aware of "certain quarters" accusing  him of having a particular agenda – that he wanted to continue his legacy thorough his son.
 
Wrote Mahathir: "Perhaps by coincidence this can happen. But if because of this accusation I do not act for the good of Umno, then this will mean I am only concerned of my image and not my responsibility to the party. And if I want to help my son, I should have done that when I was prime minister."
 
But to an Umno insider who was involved in the party GE13 machinery, it's well and good that new blood is "infused" into Umno . "But not necessarily Mukhriz. KJ is new blood. Accept the fact KJ won on merit," said the insider.
 
KJ is of course youth chief Khairy Jamaluddin and the victory the Umno insider was referring to was the contest for the Umno youth chief's post in 2009. 
 
Mukhriz came in third – behind Khairy and former Selangor MB Datuk Seri Khir Toyo. But then, that win was achieved when Khairy's father-in-law, Datuk Seri (now Tun) Abdullah Ahmad Badawi was PM, although anti-Abdullah sentiment in Umno then (fanned by none other Mahathir himself) was high following BN's dismal performance in the 2008 election. But that's another story.
 
Mahathir's support aside, Mukhriz has got the endorsement and full backing of Kedah Umno to contest the VP's post. To that, the party insider had this to say: "Do not use artificial support from Kedah divisional heads as reason (to contest)."
 
"Artificial support?" I asked. The insider's response was quick. "You ask division heads (should I contest?). Do you think they dare to say Datuk Menteri Besar, don't contest?" Mukhriz, as we know, is Kedah menteri besar.
 
Still the insider "reluctantly" admitted that Muhkriz stands a good chance of winning. Already at least one blogger aligned to Mahathir is talking about a "succession plan" with some political commentators "predicting" Mukhriz could very well be deputy president by 2014.
 
"It's ok to contest but do not link it to a succession plan. This will weaken (Datuk Seri) Najib (Razak)," said the Umno insider – obviously the "succession plan" had riled him in the first place.
 
Now to the poser mentioned earlier. At whose expense will it be should Mukhriz grab one of the VP slots? 


Read more: http://www.fz.com/content/mohsin-abdullah-what-tun-wants-tun-gets#ixzz2fPAwAy65

History distorted

Posted: 19 Sep 2013 09:54 AM PDT

Our history teachers used to tell us, we must never judge historical events and individuals with our existing standards. Such events and individuals were by-products under a specific historical environment, and any evaluation of these events and people must be made under the condition such historical backgrounds are conscientiously taken into consideration.

Lim Mun Fah, Sin Chew

Over the past two days I have been thinking very hard over one question: How should I present my commentaries on historical events and historical personalities?

No doubt the Communist Party of Malaya (CPM) has become history now. So has its secretary-general Chin Peng. But even with the demise of the CPM, controversies over its historical status and its former leader remain rife.

I understand this issue is not only controversial, but can be extremely sensitive.

While we call ourselves a democratic country, the moment any issue pertaining to communism, race and religion is mentioned, we will find ourselves surrounded by an intangible wall, a truly impenetrable restricted zone. And because of that, it is hard for historical records and consensus to achieve full objectivity, justice and rationality.

Historians tell us the most fundamental prerequisites for writing a history book or researching history is to be objective, fair and just. However, people holding very different political views may have very different interpretations of justice and objectivity.

Our history teachers used to tell us, we must never judge historical events and individuals with our existing standards. Such events and individuals were by-products under a specific historical environment, and any evaluation of these events and people must be made under the condition such historical backgrounds are conscientiously taken into consideration.

Since there is complexity with historical events and people, it is therefore essential that our data must be comprehensive and non-selective lest we deviate from the criteria of objectivity and fairness.

What our teachers told us are merely principles; in reality, which among the countless illustrations of historical events and individuals actually meet such benchmarks?

Take the CPM case for instance, the official stance is very straightforward, that CPM started the chaos and war and killed many security personnel and civilians.

But some others see CPM as fighting for the country's independence and sovereignty, firstly against the Japanese imperial army, then assisting in flushing out the colonial government to complete the country's nation-building process.

Such polarized views do carry some elements of truth on either side, but also parts which have been severely distorted. But because of their differing stands, they have made two sets of very contradictory conclusions on CPM's positive impact on the country's historical developments, or impediment and destruction it has wrought on our social progress.

In a similar manner, historical records on Chin Peng have been authored differentially based on the commentators' political stand and perception. Those thinking positively of him will exalt him as a national hero while those denying him call him a despicable traitor.

Such a phenomenon has been attributed to the monopoly by the people commissioned to author history books, as they only pen down the history along their thinking line, making simple but dogmatic conclusions on historical events and personalities.

Because of that, historical events have become so ambiguous and facts are either buried beneath the ruins of history or intentionally distorted. In a similar manner, historical personalities have also been completely overhauled; either sanctified as saints or demonised as unforgivable villains. Such lopsided historical accounts are omnipresent among our history textbooks and other history books available in the market.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


MEB vs DEB (Bhg 1)

Posted: 19 Sep 2013 01:39 PM PDT

 
Mahu tidak mahu kita mesti akui yang keadaan politik negara dan pentadbiran pelaksana Dasar Negara sudah sampai ke tahap yang amat membimbangkan. Keadaan sekarang ini  begitu dirasakan. Ratusan, malahan ribuan manusia memberikan sebab kenapa keadaan menjadi sebegini buruk.

Sudah bertahun-tahun UMNO di berikan peluang untuk memperbaiki diri tetapi keadaan semakin buruk hari demi hari. Boleh lah kita mengambil pendirian yang 'conclusive' yang UMNO itu tidak akan dapat diperbaiki lagi. Apa juga tindakan membaik-pulih UMNO yang dilakukan oleh pucuk pimpinan dan barisan Pimpinan Tertinggi UMNO itu semuanya sentiasa tidak kena. Hasil dari tindakan dan pengumuman perancangan kerajaan itu adalah 'predictable'.

Pada hari ini kita wajar berterus terang dan jujur dalam memberikan pandangan. Pimpinan UMNO sekarang sudah tidak mempunyai apa-apa kebolehan lagi selain dari menjahanamkan 'fabric' politik tanah air dan amat membebankan rakyat. UMNO betul-betul sebuah parti yang menghadapi penyakit tua. Kos untuk mengubatinya terlalu tinggi. Itu pun belum tentu sembuh lagi.

Rakyat sudah kenyang dengan pengumuman berbagai-bagai perancangan dan belum pun satu dari banyak-banyak perancangannya telah nampak kejayaannya. Yang terakhir ialah perancangan tentang Pembangunan Bumiputra dan Melayu dan apa yang di umumkan itu semuanya merupakan ulangan dari apa yang telah di umumkan semasa pelancaran Dasar Ekonomi Baru (DEB) dahulu.

Perancangan yang di umumkan tidak terancang dengan baik. Kali ini pengumuman itu tidak lari dari sebab hendak menghadapi pemilihan dalam UMNO untuk memperagakan yang beliau adalah pemimpin Melayu yang efektif. Seperti perancangan yang puluhan jumlahnya yang telah Najib umumkan selama ini, peranangan MEB (Memperkasakan Ekonomi Bumiputra) beberapa hari lalu adalah 'predictable'. Bagi siapa yang menilai betul-betul dan jika di asaskan kepada pengalaman beberapa tahun Najib menjadi PM ini, MEB akan gagal juga.

MEB laungan Najib itu tidak lain tidak bukan, ialah dasar yang sama seperti DEB dahulu. DEB dahulu diwujudkan dengan persetujuan semua kaum dan ianya di rancang begitu rapi dengan bermatlamatkan satu matlamat sahaja, iaitu perpaduan kaum. Apa-apa perancangan sesuatu dasar penting negara ia mesti di rundingkan dahulu dengan semua pihak. Untuk merundingkan itu ia memerlukan pimpinan atau barisan pimpinan yang sebenar-benarnya di hormati oleh pimpinan rakyat semua kaum yang mendiami negara ini sebagai rakyat negara.

Ini amat perlu kerana sesuatu dasar itu mesti difahami dan diketahui sebagai dasar yang boleh membawa perpaduan kaum di negara ini. Masalahnya sekarang ini pimpinan negara tidak mendapat penghormatan rakyat secara keseluruhannya dan masalah untuk membawa kemeja perundingan untuk penggubalan dasar itu tidak dapat dilakukan dengan baik. Kerajaan boleh mengumumkan apa-apa dasar tanpa merujuk kepada semua rakyat tetapi inilah jadinya seperti yang kita alami sekarang.

Pimpinan kerajaan perlu memberi kefahaman kepada semua kaum melalui pimpinannya betapa pentingnya pengimbangan dan pembahagian kekayaan negara untuk menjamin kesejahteraan negara dalam jangka panjang. Katakan dan fahamkan semua pihak bahawa kita terpaksa melalui proses-proses yang drastik dan jelas untuk mencapai matlamat Perpaduan Nasional itu.

Katakan dan fahamkan yang ekonomi merupakan faktor terpenting dalam usaha pencapaian matlamat itu, maka dasar-dasar yang 'affirmative' perlu dilaksanakan bagi mencapai matlamat tersebut. Jika majoriti rakyat itu berada dalam keadaan kemurungan, kedudukan ekonomi matlamat pencapaian Perpaduan Nasional itu akan tidak tercapai sampai bila-bila.

Itulah yang dilakukan oleh pimpinan terdahulu khususnya Tunku Abdul Rahman dan Tun Razak. Setiap bangsa dalam negara ini dibawa berunding maka hasilnya setiap bangsa telah memberikan dukungan kepada DEB semasa itu. Bangsa-bangsa bukan Bumiputra telah bersama-sama berusaha menjayakan matlamat itu dengan menerima DEB sebagai proses pencapaian Perpaduan Nasional itu.

Semua kaum telah merasakan betapa pedihnya keadaan semasa berlakunya peristiwa 13 Mei 1969 telah di ketahui umum ketidak seimbangan kedudukan dan tahap ekonomi setengah kaum itu merupakan salah satu faktor terjadinya peristiwa itu. Kemiskinan merupakan faktor yang sangat mudah bagi kegelisahan rakyat untuk wujud dan akhirnya membawa sebuah negara itu terjebak dengan peperangan saudara dan perselisihan diantara mereka (rakyat).

Itu sebabnya DEB itu wujud diatas matlamat yang begitu luhur kerana ia telah difikirkan dengan mendalam bukan sahaja oleh pemimpin Melayu tetapi juga oleh pemimpin semua kaum. Ia berlaku sebegitu kerana semua kaum sedar yang keseimbangan kedudukan dan tahap ekonomi itu sangat penting untuk diselesaikan.

AES : RM700 Million Compensation For Chicken Sh*t Advisor?

Posted: 19 Sep 2013 12:36 PM PDT

Here is more news about the troubled AES. Unfortunately (for him) Hishamuddin Hussein now has to handle this AES matter. To be fair to Hisham, he has only recently been appointed the acting Minister of Transport. Here is the news :

  • summonses under the (AES) will carry fine RM150 said Hishammuddin 
  • increase to maximum RM300 if the offender delays settling 
  • Two concessionaires – Beta Tegap S/B & ATES S/B – awarded contract 
  • Taking over would be AES Solution SB, under MOF Inc. 
  • "..taking over assets, liabilities & system...we will have to pay compensation" 
  • due diligence would be conducted by a third party
  • independent auditor to evaluate worth of companies 
  • Under my watch, nobody is going to profit from this (take-over)
  • two companies spending RM300mil & RM400mil each 
  • including 831 cameras nationwide
  • began operations on Sept 23 last year with 14 cameras 
  • nationwide installation expected to be completed this year
Hisham says  "Under my watch, nobody is going to profit from this (take-over)".

Well I think this may be a little too late bro.  

First of all you know that too many people know that the two companies (Beta Tegap SB and ATES SB) are linked to the close "Advisor".  Its t hat chicken sh*t fellow again. 

Secondly these people are not stupid. Their profit has already been built into that RM700 million figure mentioned above (RM300mil &RM400mil each). Dari awal lagi depa dah kira untung dah. They were not born yesterday.

Read more at: http://syedsoutsidethebox.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/aes-rm700-million-compensation-for.html 

The Third Rail of Malaysian Politics: True Leadership

Posted: 19 Sep 2013 11:39 AM PDT

For many years now, MANY in Malaysia have had an uneasy feeling that democracy, as generally understood, sits uneasily among the people of this country. Malaysia has large and sometimes articulate political parties and it has had leaders totally committed to the concept of democracy, which is also true. There was Tunku Abdul Rahman Putra, Tun Dr Ismail, Tun Hussein Onn, John Aloysius Thivy, Tun Tan Cheng Lock, Stephen Kalong Ningkan, Tun Fuad Donald Stephens, Tun Dr Lim Chong Eu, Peter Mojuntin, Tun Mustapha, O K K Sedomon, Ahmad Boestaman,  and others who believed in the concept of democracy as the only one that would keep Malaysia together and take it forward.

Like true democrats they believed that dissent was an essential part of democracy, and that the country would only be enriched by debate and discussion, even by agitation if that became necessary. Their belief was complemented by their direct contact with the people; the trust that people had in them made it possible for them to persuade them to accept, enthusiastically, the beliefs and ideas they gave them.

But when such leaders and people are not there any more, what happens to the parties and institutions they have built and nurtured? One facile answer is that political argument gets stronger and power shifts from one group to another when elections are held. In other words, the people decide who will have the responsibility to manage the state, removing those whom they consider incapable and bringing in those they think can do the job. This is very convenient and comforting. It is also totally fictitious.

It is true that political argument does get stronger, more so because of the increasingly watchful media both print and electronic, of which most political groups have become wary, even fearful, and not without reason. The fiction lies in the belief that the "people" remove those who do not perform and bring in those who they think can perform.

First, the concept of "people" is simplistic; the vast numbers of individuals in the state are an infinitely complex entity consisting of a vast number of groups and sub-groups. This enormous mass of individuals does not come together and decide anything; that is not what happens, not at all. What happens is that a strategy aimed at finding acceptance with groups of individuals, in some cases possibly fortuitously, works or works better than the strategy of another group.

In the 2008 general elections, the strategy of what was called the Third Front did not work; most individuals did not trust it. In a muddle of strategies, five states fell to the opposition Pakatan Rakyat but not because it had planned to do so. It had, of course, tried to win the Federal Government, but its plans were wide off the mark. When it won 5 states and 82 parliamentary seats it must have been as surprised as anyone else.

On the other hand, Sabah Chief Minister Musa Aman had a strategy that he had worked on for years since 2003 – to give people the kind of development and security they had been yearning for – and his many victories till 2013 May 5th was no surprise, except perhaps to his opponents, and their surprise was more at the magnitude of his success than at the victory itself. It made their strategies and plans look comic in comparison. Musa Aman is an exception, and a phenomenon confined to Sabah.

At the national level, and in most other States, the structure of democracy is being subjected to forces that may well change it completely over time. To understand that one has, perhaps, to take a step back and look at what the process is about today.  It is not about representing the "people's" will. It is about control and power.

Our so-called democracy is defined not by the existence of dissent and opposition activity but by the nature of the power wielded. It is monarchical and meant to secure the interests, political and economic, of the ruling group, whichever it is. And this is done by ensuring that power remains with an elite group – preferably the family, but also those who are close to it and share the same backgrounds.

One can see it today in what many refer to as the First Family in the Umno Baru; Dr Mahathir Mohamad is clearly grooming his son, Mukhriz, to be the next Prime Minister. But they are not by any means the only family. Look at the number of sons and daughters and son-in-law now who are inducted into the corridors of power:  Najib Tun Razak, Hishammuddin Tun Hussein Onn, Khairy Jamaluddin, even Mukhriz Mahathir in Kedah who is what he is because he is Dr Mahathir's son, and a whole host of others whom media naively call the Young Turks. The original Young Turks were not just young; they had come to prominence because of their abilities, not because of who their father or mother or father-in-law was. A number of sons and daughters whom the media naively call Young Turks have been inducted into the corridors of power.

Inevitably, the elements of power are being chivied towards specific families, which will then determine who will stand for elections for their parties, and thus consolidate their own position, securing it for their generation and the generations to follow. Increasingly, their contact with the people has become more and more distant; the people get to be called the "rakyat" who have to be maneuvered by race, religion, money and promises. But this is not a phenomenon confined to the Umno party; it is as much in evidence in the opposition Pakatan Rakyat parties such as the DAP, PKR and PAS. Look at Lim Guan Eng, Nurul Izzah, Karpal's sons, Ustaz Din Tok Guru the son-in-law of PAS President Ustaz Abdul Hadi Awang, so many more.

Read more at: http://selvarajasomiah.wordpress.com/2013/09/19/the-third-rail-of-malaysian-politics-true-leadership/ 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Anwar Ibrahim dan Reformasi: Dari kaca mata seorang rakyat biasa

Posted: 19 Sep 2013 10:12 AM PDT

"Tiada sesiapa pun yang benar-benar mengenali sebuah negara itu sehinggalah dia pernah berada di dalam penjaranya. Sesebuah negara itu tidak wajar diadili dengan cara layanan kepada warga atasannya, tetapi layanannya kepada warga bawahannya." (Nelson Mandela)

Ketika remaja, saya sering menyelak helaian koleksi keratan akhbar lama milik abah. Salah satunya yang sering diingati ialah helaian akhbar tahun 1982 mengenai seorang personaliti bernama Anwar Ibrahim yang diumumkan bakal menyertai Umno.

Majoriti kalangan sahabat terdekat dan pengikut Anwar ketika itu, melihat beliau sebagai harapan mereka; susuk pemimpin masa hadapan yang mampu memberikan cabaran besar kepada kerajaan. Maka, tindakan beliau menyertai Umno tidak diterima umum; termasuklah Emak, yang merupakan seorang ahli JIM.

Tahun 1996, sewaktu Anwar membentangkan bajet di Parlimen — suatu acara tahunan ditunggu-tunggu, kerana sinonimnya dengan Anwar memperkenalkan perkataan baru — kelihatan terdapat tanda-tanda di wajahnya. Emak berseloroh, " Baru nak matang lah tu..." Mungkin, perasaan tidak puas hati masih kekal sehingga saat itu.

Tidak lama kemudian berlakulah krisis kewangan yang menggoncang ekonomi Asia Tenggara, tatkala Anwar berada di puncak kerjayanya di dalam kerajaan sehingga memangku jawatan Perdana Menteri. Dalam era yang sama, akhbar melaporkan usaha beliau menentang kronisme dan rasuah. Emak dan Abah menyatakan firasat mereka bahawa Anwar akan 'kena' tidak lama lagi. Saya tidak dapat menangkap maksud mereka sehinggalah peristiwa 2 September 1998.

Detik demi detik peristiwa itu saya saksikan di kaca televisyen dari kampus di selatan tanah air. Saat itu tidak dapat dilupakan; terduduk keliru cuba menenangkan fikiran dan memahami kekacauan yang sedang berlaku. Sejak itu, laporan berita dan perkembangan kes tuduhan Anwar menjadi urusan harian. Kata-kata masyhurnya: "Ini adalah konspirasi dan fitnah jahat untuk membunuh karier politik saya" bergema di dalam minda setiap hari.

Kemuncaknya ialah pada hari bersejarah, Ahad, 20 September 1998, di mana demonstrasi terbesar dalam sejarah Malaysia berlaku di Dataran Mereka, di bawah lembayung Reformasi. Rakyat yang berkumpul di Masjid Negara untuk mendengar ucapan Reformasi oleh Anwar, berarak ke Dataran Merdeka untuk ucapan seterusnya, beralih ke Jalan Raja Laut dan akhirnya menamatkan perarakan di persimpangan jalan menuju Parlimen. Di situ juga gas pemedih mata telah dilepaskan.

Ketika itu, saya menyaksikan sendiri tenaga dan keyakinan rakyat dalam perhimpunan itu yang boleh disamakan dengan negara jiran kita. Hanya lima bulan sebelum itu, rakyat Indonesia menjatuhkan Presiden Soeharto. Malaysia tidak pernah menyaksikan manifestasi ketegasan yang sebegini. Tetapi perkara penting yang perlu diakui ialah ia bukan kerana Anwar. Reformasi ialah satu gerakan massa menentang kezaliman. Jika ia mampu dan boleh bertindak kejam kepada nombor dua paling berkuasa, bagaimanakah pula nasib rakyat biasa?

Ramai personaliti lain juga turut ditangkap di bawah undang-undang zalim ISA selepas itu. Melihatkan ketidakadilan yang berleluasa, Allahyarham Fadzil Noor kemudiannya mengetuai GERAK yang terdiri daripada pakatan parti politik dan NGO. Antara aktiviti awal GERAK ialah mengadakan protes besar-besaran untuk membebaskan Anwar. Gerakan Reformasi yang asalnya tertubuh khas untuk membebaskan Anwar, kemudiannya memperolehi momentum dan berevolusi menjadi satu gerakan kerakyatan menentang ketidakadilan.

Reformasi terus bergerak menjadi sesuatu yang lebih besar, daripada pelbagai sudut. Salah satu perubahan yang berlaku ialah, penyatuan kesemua parti-parti pembangkang, NGO dan gerakan-gerakan Islam sebagai suatu penyatuan yang jitu dan tidak dapat diketepikan. Sebuah perpaduan, yang impaknya tidak pernah disaksikan sebelum ini. Kendatipun wujud perbezaan-perbezaan yang ketara, parti-parti pembangkang menyedari wujudnya nilai-nilai bersama yang dijunjung bersama yakni keadilan dan kebebasan. Perjuangan ini dipegang sepenuh keringat dan diperjuangkan sepenuh jiwa.

Kesedaran ini berkuasa menyatukan dan mengubah senario politik dan wajah Malaysia secara umum. Lantaran itu, pejuang-pejuang rakyat daripada PRM, ABIM, JIM dan mereka yang meninggalkan Umno membentuk ADIL, sebuah NGO yang kemudiannya menjadi Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) yang kita kenali sekarang.

Lantaran itu, kita disedarkan betapa luas, dalam dan melampaunya struktur kuasa dan pengaruh kerajaan dalam dalam mengawal kuasa polis negara, media massa dan keseluruhan sistem kehakiman negara.

Malam himpunan bersejarah itu, sepasukan komando bertopeng menyerbu kediaman peribadi Anwar dan secara kasarnya menahan beliau. Sembilan hari kemudian, beliau pertama kali muncul dengan mata lebam ditumbuk. Detik gelap sebuah negara bangsa, Malaysia menyaksikan terbunuhnya demokrasi.

Apa yang berlaku selepas itu bukan lagi rahsia, secara kolektif masyarakat mengetahui dan mengikuti butir perbicaraan dengan minat mendalam. Anwar diletakkan dalam perbicaraan yang penuh kontroversi — baik daripada segi intepretasi undang-undang mahupun keadilan moral — disabitkan bersalah, dan dijatuhkan hukuman penjara 9 tahun.

Bagaimana seorang yang pernah menjadi orang nombor dua di Malaysia, dipenjarakan dalam sebuah perbicaraan yang penuh kontroversi, dibelasah dengan ganas, diraduk emosi dan mentalnya tanpa peri kemanusiaan? Anwar Ibrahim menjadi "prisoner of conscience" Malaysia yang paling kontroversi.

Reformasi

Reformasi menghembuskan nafas baru ke dalam golongan muda Malaysia era 1990-an, ketika semangat belia dan aktivisma telah dilemahkan oleh falsafah kehidupan golongan muda yang berpandukan kekayaan material dan hedonism. Idealisme golongan muda sebelum reformasi bertentangan dengan golongan muda era 70-an, dengan idealisme perjuangan pro-miskin pro-rakyat mereka, yang digerakkan oleh budaya intelektual, selari dengan semangat merdeka, dan sesuai dengan nilai-nilai sebuah negara bangsa yang baru meraih kemerdekaan. Reformasi menjadi sebuah gerakan awam yang digerakkan oleh rakyat daripada pelbagai latar belakang kehidupan, aspirasi rakyat yang lahir dengan tiba-tiba, jujur dan mendesak. Reformasi masih kekal begitu; milik semua orang, sama ada yang berkecimpung dalam politik atau tidak, sama ada muda atau tua.

Lima belas tahun kemudian, rakyat Malaysia kini boleh dianggap telah mengalami suatu proses kematangan politik yang luar biasa dengan menyaksikan peristiwa Anwar dan Reformasi. Kita mewarisi sebuah negara, Malaysia yang sarat dengan kepelbagaian realiti untuk dihadapi; sistem pilihanraya yang tidak adil, masyarakat plural yang begitu sensitif dengan identiti perkauman sempit, kerajaan yang mempunyai kawalan melampau dalam aspek ekonomi, kehakiman dan sosial sebuah negara, tahap kehidupan yang tidak seimbang secara demografiknya, di antara banyak hal lain. Bukan mudah untuk mengubah status quo, mahupun sistem yang tertanam dan telah diamalkan selama 50 tahun. Sukar, tetapi bukan mustahil.

Sang pencetus reformasi

Gerakan Reformasi sebenarnya dilahirkan melalui pergelutan ramai personaliti politik, bukan sahaja Anwar. Tanpa mereka Reformasi tidak mungkin menjadi kenyataan. Namun, terlalu ramai yang perlu diiktiraf sehingga penulis tidak mampu menyenaraikannya tanpa meletakkan keadilan dalam risiko. Walaupun mungkin ramai yang akan mencapai kesimpulan mudah itu, artikel ini bukan tentang Anwar Ibrahim. Artikel ini tentang sang pencetus Reformasi.

Sebagai seorang pemimpin pelajar yang tersohor ketika zaman kuliahnya di UM, Anwar kemudiannya bersama-sama menubuhkan salah satu organisasi masyarakat sivil terawal di penghujung 1970-an di Malaysia, dikenali sebagai Angkatan Belia Islam Malaysia (ABIM). Kecenderungannya untuk mengangkat kepentingan orang miskin dan terabai, serta kelantangan beliau mengkritik kerajaan menyebabkan beliau dipenjara 20 bulan di bawah ISA selepas peristiwa Baling 1974.

Pasca Revolusi Islam Iran 1979, Malaysia turut merasakan bahang daripada kebangkitan gerakan-gerakan Islam di peringkat global. Kita menyaksikan buat kali pertamanya kebangkitan sebuah organisasi masyarakat sivil berasaskan Islam. Situasi itu menjadi bonus kepada PAS, yang ketika itu sedang menyambut kepulangan gelombang besar golongan profesional muda berpendidikan luar negara yang menyuntik dinamisme baru dalam parti terbabit. Profil parti di kalangan pengamal undang-undang, para doktor, jurutera dan ahli ekonomi yang menerima pendidikan di barat meningkat, lantas menjadi salah satu pencabar utama kepada hegemoni politik Umno.

Anwar Ibrahim dilihat sebagai penyelesaian terbaik dan bakal waris kepada Tun Dr Mahathir dan Umno ketika itu; seorang lelaki yang dilihat dan dikenali kerana prinsip Islam yang dipegangnya, digabungkan pula dengan kesarjanaan dan kepetahan beliau dalam disiplin pemikiran dan falsafah oksidental. Anwar bakal menjadi figura politik yang cukup berpengaruh, mendaki tangga politik sehingga memegang antara jawatan paling penting dalam negara; sebagai menteri kewangan dan seterusnya timbalan perdana menteri. Dikenali dengan sifat tidak pernah beralah terhadap tekanan korupsi dan sifat tiada tolak ansur kepada kronism, beliau mempunyai kerjaya politik yang tidak mudah untuk ditumbangkan. Pada bulan September yang malang itu, musibah besar menghentam jatuh ke atasnya dalam sebuah saga politik dan ekonomi yang selamanya merobek sejarah politik Malaysia.

Namun bukanlah semuanya punah dan sia-sia. Seperti yang pernah diungkapkan oleh seorang pemimpin waktu itu, untuk membersihkan air kumbahan, hampir mustahil jika kita berenang di dalamnya; pembersihan hanya boleh dilakukan dari luar. Anwar barangkali perlu belajar hal itu. Sebuah proses pembelajaran yang tentu sekali cukup pahit untuk beliau.

Membentuk blok menuju ke zaman baru Reformasi

November 1999, Malaysia menyaksikan penyatuan kuasa pembangkang menuju ke Pilihanraya Umum Ke-10 yang dikenali sebagai Barisan Alternatif. Untuk pertama kali dalam sejarah, barisan pembangkang memperolehi undi majoriti Melayu setinggi 54 peratus. Rekod itu tidak pernah dicabar sehingga hari ini. Barisan Nasional diselamatkan oleh undi orang Cina dan India, yang mungkin ketika itu tidak bersedia secara politik dan ekonomi untuk mencabar status quo secara serius.

Menjelang 2004, Barisan Nasional (BN) mengubah kembali senario dengan sebuah kemenangan besar. Proses persempadanan semula kawasan pilihanraya yang dipersoalkan telah membolehkan BN memenangi 24 daripada 25 kerusi baru, serta lebih daripada 90 peratus kerusi parlimen. Persaraan Tun Mahathir, yang mulai diterima secara besar-besaran waktu itu, juga menarik sokongan baru kepada Umno dan Barisan Nasional. Ketika itu saya merasakan harapan menjadi gelap gelita dan seolah-olah perubahan telah menjadi mustahil.

Era sebelum Pilihanraya Umum 2008 menyaksikan perubahan mendadak. Pengenalan kepada dasar berdasarkan-keperluan (needs-based) juga menarik perhatian baru, terutamanya di kalangan bukan-bumiputera. Dasar itu bukan sekadar usaha untuk meraih undi, malah kewujudannya memang kena pada waktunya,  memandangkan ketidakadilan menyeluruh yang timbul daripada polisi-polisi pilih kasih, ketirisan dan penyalahgunaan sumber yang berdekad lamanya di bawah pemerintahan Barisan Nasional. Anwar juga sudah bebas, dan mula berusaha  gigih menyatukan pelbagai parti demi membentuk satu pakatan pembangkang yang menggerunkan, dan suara mereka perlu diberikan perhatian oleh kerajaan.

Menuju Pilihanraya 2008, gelombang perubahan dirasakan lebih awal. Malah, saya mengambil cuti tanpa gaji demi untuk pulang ke tanah air ketika tempoh berkempen dan mengundi, daripada tugasan di luar negara. Pakatan pembangkang memenangi lima buah negeri dan membentuk Pakatan Rakyat yang mengandungi PKR, PAS dan DAP. Seruan untuk perubahan mula menunjukkan taringnya, raungan rakyat bergema daripada pelbagai latar belakang. Tsunami politik telah berlaku.

Kejayaan menjatuhkan kedudukan selesa majoriti dua-pertiga parlimen yang dipegang oleh parti pemerintah sedia ada bukanlah suatu kejayaan mudah. Peristiwa ini memaksa kerajaan melancarkan pelbagai usaha "transformasi" sebagai sebahagian usaha untuk mengekalkan pemerintahan. Justeru, kita memasuki satu tahap kemajuan yang bakal menyaksikan pelbagai perubahan dengan "kemungkinan tanpa sempadan". Ya, memang kita sedang membina lebih banyak lebuhraya dan landasan keretapi. Tetapi yang masih kurang sebenarnya ialah transformasi politik, dan transformasi nilai-nilai asas yang lebih halus, serta falsafah kita sebagai sebuah masyarakat Malaysia.

Masa yang sama juga memberikan barisan pembangkang masa untuk menyusun kembali dan mengatasi perbezaan antara mereka. Bekerjasama secara produktif membentuk satu pakatan dengan pelan pembangunnya yang menyeluruh unik, manifestonya yang menjaga kebajikan rakyat dan cadangan bajetnya yang tersendiri. Buat pertama kalinya, rakyat Malaysia punya alternatif untuk membandingkan secara kritis dokumen-dokumen pembangunan dan belanjawan yang dibentangkan oleh kerajaan.

Binaan-binaan ke arah Reformasi era baru

Pasca Pilihanraya Umum ke 13 dalam langkah-langkah kita menuju ke masa hadapan bersama-sama, kita bertanya sekali lagi, ke manakah arah tuju kita selepas ini? Secara semulajadinya, kita terdorong juga kepada bertanyakan, sama ada Anwar perlu membuka jalan kepada barisan pelapis mengagumkan terdiri daripada personaliti yang muda dan lebih segar dalam PKR dan Pakatan Rakyat, yang nyata sudah pun mempunyai kelompok penyokong tegar mereka sendiri. Adakah jalan ke hadapan kini ialah sebuah era baru pasca-Anwar Ibrahim, yang bergerak ke arah penginstitusian dan pemerkasaan sistem politik di peringkat akar umbi

Struktur yang lebih baik akan membenarkan pembangunan semulajadi kelompok bakat dan kepimpinan, namun adakah struktur yang utuh sahaja sudah mencukupi?

Sejarah membuktikan bahawa pemimpin yang hebat akan menjadi sumber utama perpaduan yang dapat membawa kepada gelombang perubahan yang mampu menggegarkan institusi atau sistem sedia ada. Hanya kepimpinan yang disegani dan kukuhlah yang mungkin mampu mengubah undi orang Melayu seperti yang berlaku pada tahun 1999, menafikan majoriti dua-pertiga parlimen untuk kerajaan pada tahun 2008, dan merubah mandat 52 peratus kepada PR pada 2013.

Anwar Ibrahim juga pada hari ini ialah seorang personaliti yang berbeza. Daripada seorang pemimpin mahasiswa muda popular, kepada pemimpin Islamik berkarisma yang disanjung tinggi, seterusnya mendaki tangga politik sehingga jawatan Timbalan Perdana Menteri Malaysia, beliau turut pernah dipenjarakan, dipukul dan dihina. Luka Anwar tidak mungkin hanya terhad kepada tubuh fizikal. Kebijaksanaan dan kematangan beliau hari ini tidak mungkin hadir tanpa darah, peluh dan air mata.

Dua pilihanraya umum telah pun berlaku selepas pembebasannya dan Anwar masih memegang janjinya. Beliau melangkah ke tepi untuk memberi kepada perkembangan politik PKR. Tetapi hanya ada satu cara untuk menuntut semula Reformasi sehingga menjadi realiti; iaitu dengan beliau menaiki tangga jawatan presiden parti PKR itu sendiri, untuk membawakan perubahan yang beliau sendiri telah nyalakan dan marakkan untuk negara ini lima belas tahun lepas. Masanya telah tiba untuk beliau sekali lagi berdiri berani berhadapan dengan cabaran, memastikan dipilih secara demokratik dan bangkit semula dengan gah sebagai Presiden Parti Keadilan Rakyat. Penyatuan dan pembaharuan ini adalah harapan Rakyat Malaysia, untuk beliau melaksanakan visinya untuk Malaysia, terutama buat khalayak muda dan pelapisnya.

Anwar Ibrahim ialah pencetus Reformasi. Kini, beliau perlu menghembuskan nafas baru kepada Reformasi kita. Reformasi milik Rakyat.

* Anas Alam Faizli ialah seorang profesional industri minyak dan gas, sedang menyambung pengajian peringkat kedoktoran, pengasas bersama BLINDSPOT, BANTAH TPPA dan tweet di @aafaizli

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved