Sabtu, 1 Jun 2013

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


PKR to defy Agong says Johari Abdul

Posted: 31 May 2013 06:37 PM PDT

(TMI) - PKR stressed today that the Black 505 rallies will go on to show the people's disapproval towards the Election Commission (EC), and are not meant as a sign of disrespect against the Yang di-Pertuan Agong.

The rallies will continue to protest against alleged electoral fraud during Election 2013, despite calls by the King, Tuanku Abdul Halim Mu'adzam Shah, who wants the people of this country to accept the results of the 13th general election (GE13) which they themselves have determined. 

"The reason why we gather is to state our dissatisfaction towards the EC's action, there is no intention to disrespect Your Highness," PKR's Datuk Johari Abdul told The Malaysian Insider through a phone call here.

"That is why every time we end our gatherings, we would sing "Negaraku" to show our obedience and loyalty towards Your Highness," said the rally's programme director, referring to the national anthem. 

Johari explained that the rallies will continue until the chairman, deputy chairman, and every member of the EC that were elected by the King himself resign. 

"As a leader, I "menjunjung kasih" (honour with love) Your Highness' advice. However, the citizens under Your Highness ask to inform Your Highness that there is clear fraud that was done by the EC," he said. 

Last night, Tuanku Abdul Halim said that any political change in the country must be done in a peaceful manner, through the ballot box guided by the principles of the supremacy of the Constitution and the rule of law. 

"If there are differences of opinion, use the channels to resolve them as outlined in the Federal Constitution and the country's laws," Tuanku Abdul Halim said in conjunction with the official birthday of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong today in his speech that was carried live by RTM last night. 

The King said: "The act of casting doubts on an institution that has been entrusted under the Federal Constitution to conduct the general elections in this country is very dangerous and might only cause a never-ending conflict. 

"Don't we ever weaken and destroy our constitutional monarchy system, parliamentary democracy and federal philosophy which all this while have formed the basic ingredients for Malaysia's success." 

Earlier this week, Johari had said that the rallies will continue next month and be held every week until all PKR's demands are met. 

This comes even as Barisan Nasional (BN) leaders and analysts criticised the rallies and called for Pakatan Rakyat (PR) to accept the results and move on towards nation building efforts instead.

 

'Nurul Izzah barred from entering Sabah based on the law'

Posted: 31 May 2013 06:29 PM PDT

(Bernama) - The Sabah Immigration Department decision preventing PKR vice-president Nurul Izzah Anwar from entering Sabah on Thursday was based on the law.

Tourism and Culture Minister Datuk Seri Mohamed Nazri Aziz said the Sabah Immigration Department had specific reasons to do so based on provisions of the law for the safety of Sabahans.

"Under our law, the Sabah Immigration Department belongs to Sabah. As such, it has the right to prevent or allow anybody to enter Sabah," he said when commenting on decision preventing Nurul Izzah from entering Sabah to attend 'Pesta Kaamatan.'

Mohamed Nazri believed the decision would not affect Sabah tourism as any individual who enters the state should produce identification card as stated in the agreement between the Federation of Malaya, Sabah and Sarawak.

Yesterday, Sabah Umno deputy chief Datuk Seri Salleh Said Keruak fully supported the state government decision to ask the Sabah Immigration Department director to prevent Nurul Izzah from entering the state.

Sabah Immigration Department director Noor Alam Khan Abdul Wahid Khan said the decision preventing Nurul Izzah from entering was done under Section 65 (1) of the Immigration Act 1959/1963 on the order of the Sabah government.

Noor Alam Khan did not say why.

Mohamed Nazri said the Sabah government has good reasons to prevent any individual form entering to ensure the interest and stability of the state.

"While we all celebrate Pesta Kaamatan, we want the people to rejoice enjoy a peaceful life. We don't want any trouble as election is over and must accept the result but the opposition don't and hold demontration all over the country," he added.

Asked about Nurul Izzah's threat to sue the Sabah government and the Chief Minister, Mohamed Nazri said it was stupid and was not surprised as the Lembah Pantai Member of Pariament is not a legal expert and a novice in politics.


Karpal Singh congratulates Michelle Yeoh

Posted: 31 May 2013 06:10 PM PDT

(NST) - DAP national chairman Karpal Singh congratulated actress and Malaysia Brand Ambassador Tan Sri Michelle Yeoh for being conferred the title 'Panglima Setia Mahkota' by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong Tuanku Abdul Halim Mu'adzam Shah today.

Karpal, who is Bukit Gelugor member of parliament, said it was befitting for Yeoh, Malaysia's own Bond girl, to received the title, which was one of the highest honours conferred by the King to mark his birthday.

"She is a Malaysian who has brought the name 'Malaysia' into the international scene," he said this morning at a press conference here.

Karpal likened Yeoh's conferment to the knighthood presented by Queen Elizabeth II to famed James Bond actor Sir Sean Connery in July 2000.

Yeoh played Chinese spy Wai Lim in the 1997 James Bond movie 'Tomorrow Never Dies' opposite Pierce Brosnan.


 

Former assemblywoman Jenice Lee to take DAP to court

Posted: 31 May 2013 06:05 PM PDT

(The Star) - Former Teratai assemblyman Jenice Lee will be bringing the matter of her sacking from DAP to court, claiming that it was illegal.

She said she will seek a declaration that her automatic expulsion after she contested as an independent candidate was invalid since she was not properly notified.

"I cannot attend any party functions or meetings at all. The proper procedure is to give me my expulsion letter.

"This is not fair to me," she said, maintaining that she is still a life member of the party.

The party issued a warning that anyone who contested as an independent candidate in the general election would be sacked immediately, although they would be given 14 days to appeal. She did not appeal.

During a press conference at what used to be her service centre on Saturday, she questioned the party leadership over "double standards" in how they treated members with integrity issues.

"If they are trying to use these integrity reasons to drop me, then they should use by their same standards and apply it to the new assemblyman Tiew Way Keng," she said, slamming her successor from DAP.

She said that Tiew, who was a MBPJ councillor, had chosen Segambut MP Lim Lip Eng's law firm to handle a matter back in 2010.

Lee claimed that Lim had increased his legal fees from RM15,000 to RM55,000, and that Tiew appointed Lim's firm Messrs Stella, Lim and Co to represent the local council.

However, on May 14 last year, MBPJ denied that Lim's firm was paid RM55,000 for the job, and said it was not Tiew who appointed the firm, but the mayor.

Meanwhile, DAP deputy chairman and the disciplinary committee chief Tan Kok Wai said he had "nothing more to say about her".

"I prefer not to reply anymore. I don't want to waste my time. As far as I am concerned, she is no longer a DAP member," he said when contacted.

 

French far right leader loses immunity, faces charges

Posted: 31 May 2013 05:54 PM PDT

(BBC) - French far right leader, Marine Le Pen, could face criminal charges for inciting racism, the BBC has learnt.

The French authorities opened a case against Mrs Le Pen in 2011 after she likened the sight of Muslims praying in the streets to the Nazi occupation of France.

As a European Parliament member (MEP), she enjoyed immunity from prosecution.

However, this protection was removed by a European parliamentary committee in a secret vote this week.

BBC chief political correspondent Gary O'Donoghue says he has been told that the vote to remove her immunity was "overwhelming".

It will need to be ratified by the full parliament, but that's expected to be a formality, our correspondent says.

When the parliament's legal affairs committee first tried to consider the case, Marine Le Pen, leader of France's far right National Front party, failed to turn up.

This week she sent a fellow French MEP in her place.

The move clears the way for the French authorities to pursue a case against the leader, who steered her party to a record 18% showing in the first round of last year's presidential election.

Mrs Le Pen made the remarks at a party rally in 2010 in the southern French town of Lyon.

She said that Muslims using the streets to pray because mosques were overflowing was an "occupation" of French territory.

Praying in the streets was banned in Paris in 2011 in response to growing far right protests.

By some estimates, as many as six million French people, or just under 10% of the population, are Muslims, with origins in France's former North African colonies.

Their integration has been a source of political debate in recent years, and earlier this year France became the first EU state to ban the wearing of the Islamic veil in public.

The BBC has so far been unable to reach her for comment.

 

S’pore licenses news sites

Posted: 31 May 2013 02:26 PM PDT

In a historic move, 10 top websites have to register if they want to continue to report on the republic's news and current affairs.

(The Star) - IT is happening! In a historic move, the Singapore government is moving into the Internet to regulate news reporting by requiring – for a start – the 10 biggest news-sites to be licensed.

From today, these websites must renew their registration every year if they want to continue to report on Singapore news and current affairs.

Some observers believe that the principal target is the rising number of Singaporeans who post comments attached to, rather than, the news reports themselves.

These public reactions and discussions are overwhelmingly anti-government.

Many Internet users have accused the government of trying to dampen free discussions.

A performance bond of S$50,000 (RM122,206), similar to that required for TV broadcasters, is required.

Offenders will be ordered to remove portions assessed to be "in breach of content standards" such as undermining racial or religious harmony, within 24 hours.

There was no mention of political boundaries, but given the tradition here, dissent is likely to be a top target.

A survey by The Straits Times had found 36.3% of people between the ages of 21 and 34 cited the Internet as their top source of domestic political news, compared with 35.3% who preferred newspapers.

Failure to do so could be severe.

The owner may be fined a whooping S$200,000 (RM488,824) or imprisoned up to three years or both.

Legislation will probably dilute the intensity of online discussions since all are commercial enterprises.

If it works, it may create history, not only here but possibly elsewhere too.

The Singapore experiment will undoubtedly be watched with interest by

Governments outside Singapore, particularly China, to see if they can also adopt a similar method of controlling web dissent.

A bigger issue will be if – and when – the measure to regulate is extended to cover blogs that are operated by small groups or individuals. A few are highly popular with Singaporean Internet users.

Presently, they are excluded said a spokesman nut he added: "If they take on the nature of news sites, we will take a closer look and evaluate them accordingly".

Some bloggers are already discussing possible options to take in case the authorities move against them. One was quoted by a news agency as saying: "You can try to shut us up. We will find a way around it."

The chosen 10 are obviously easier targets, vulnerable because they are large commercial enterprises.

But blogs, which exist like little cells, are another matter. Many are anonymously edited; some may operate from outside Singapore.

Some bloggers say if the crunch comes, they rely more on FaceBook and Twitter.

People who have their own pages – including Prime Minister Lee and several cabinet ministers – are already writing and posting without control.

Another possible means could be mass e-mails, in which a writer can send articles to a designated list of thousands of people simultaneous with a press of a button.

Of the chosen 10 websites, nine belong to the two giant media companies, Singapore Press Holdings (SPH) and Mediacorp.

Since both are staunchly pro-government, they are unlikely to be the principal targets since any reporting excesses can easily be rectified by a phone call without resorting to laws.

The tenth, Yahoo Inc Singapore, however, is a different kettle. In the past few years, this US-based web browser has gained rising popularity among Singaporeans for its objective news coverage.

It has reserved comment pending receipt of details of the new regulations.

The sweep may be extended to include foreign websites that regularly report on the city, like The Financial Times, CNN and BBC.

This means that they, too, like Yahoo Inc will have to obtain a license or stop reporting on Singapore.

According to AFP, Yahoo has a team of reporters whose coverage of Singapore's major news has become "a magnet for anti-government comments posted by readers in reaction to local news.

Actually, this is a similar problem for many operators, including the pro-government media. Quite often, it is not their reporting, which is pro-government, but the critical comments it attracts from angry readers.

It is understood that the new measures will attribute any "excessive" or "extremist" reader comments to the web operators.

Early this year, PM Lee had given a strong hint that such legislation was forthcoming when he warned that sensitive, extremist views were being raised over the web.

"We don't believe the community in the social space, especially online, moderates itself. It doesn't happen anywhere in the world."

"It's in the nature of the medium, the way the interactions work and that's the reason why we think it cannot be completely left by itself," he added.

Apparently, Deputy Prime Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam has a slightly different view.

Some bloggers were quite thoughtful, said Tharman, who is also Finance Minister, though more balance is needed.

"Well, it cannot be ignored and I think so far, on balance, the fact that you've got an active social media is a plus. It'll go through phases," his deputy PM told The Straits Times.

Politically for the ruling People's Action Party (PAP), moving to stamp out web dissent is a tempting proposition with the general election due in 2016.

The party has been losing popularity among its core supporters who had kept it in power for nearly half a century.

But for PM Lee Hsien Loong, there are political risks. He had obviously acted out of conviction that it is necessary.

A journalism student remarked: "Now people are saying half-jokingly that father started to control the print media, now son wants to do the same the with Internet news media."

 

'It was Anwar who pursued deal'

Posted: 31 May 2013 02:17 PM PDT

TRUE PICTURE: Pakatan leader wanted to ensure Najib accept GE13 results, says former Indonesian minister

(Bernama) - PKR leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim had pursued a deal to ensure that Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak ceded power if Pakatan were to have won in the 13th  General Election (GE13).

Hamid Awaludin, the former Indonesian minister of law and human rights who witnessed meetings between former Indonesian vice-president Jusuf Kalla and the two Malaysian leaders, said: "Nothing jeopardised the agreement in the run-up to the election or on election day but things changed after Najib was declared the winner."

He said Anwar had sought the agreement of the GE13 results because Anwar had "convinced himself that he would win the election" in light of opinion polls that were often in his favour and crowd turnout at Pakatan rallies.

Hamid, who was also Indonesia's ambassador to Russia and Belarus from 2008 to 2011, said Jusuf had accepted Anwar's request to mediate.

"He (Jusuf) did not take the initiative and approach Anwar."

Anwar, in media reports recently, denied that he reneged on a peace pact brokered by Jusuf and claimed that the former was the one who reached out to him to offer his assistance in ensuring an orderly outcome to the elections.

However, it was reported that Anwar acknowledged that he had made the agreement with Najib, with Jusuf as mediator, but claimed that Barisan Nasional had reneged on it by the way it ran its campaigns.

The GE13 saw the Najib-led BN return to power by winning 133 of the 222 parliamentary seats, resulting in Anwar and Pakatan staging rallies across the country since May 8 claiming electoral fraud.

Hamid also pointed out that Anwar knew that Najib did not sign the agreement, "but Najib gave his word that he would honour the agreement".

"He consented to the agreement," he said and added that Najib delivered on his promise and called for national reconciliation during his acceptance speech.

"Najib's deeds matched his words," Hamid said.

He said that even a day after Najib's victory: "I was optimistic that a deal is a deal and both sides would abide by it. But Anwar broke the deal.

"I feel that Anwar still does not accept the political reality."

The following is the full interview:

Question: Anwar Ibrahim claims it was Jusuf Kalla who approach- ed him whereas Jusuf said he was approached by Anwar. Which is true?

Answer: I was present during Jusuf Kalla's discussions with both Anwar and Najib. It was Jusuf who accepted Anwar's request to mediate. He did not take the initiative and approach Anwar. Jusuf does not have any political and economic interests in Malaysia. He is busy with his affairs in Indonesia. So why would he take the initiative and approach Anwar? It isn't logical.

Jusuf considers both Anwar and Najib as good friends. He wanted to help because they were competing fiercely with one another. That is how he saw this.

Question: Anwar claims there were several "preconditions" in the agreement e.g. free elections, fair media, etc. Can you outline any preconditions?

Answer: I am very sure that there were no preconditions discussed between Jusuf and Anwar. For me, a deal is a deal. And there was a deal that both parties -- Anwar and Najib -- agreed to. Some people always try and find a loophole after the event, or an excuse not to deliver on their promise. Some people are different in character to others.

Question: Anwar now claims Najib didn't sign the agreement and it was, therefore, not valid. Jusuf says Najib did give his verbal agreement and, therefore, the deal was agreed by both parties, and was valid. Is Anwar correct or is Jusuf?

Answer: Anwar knew that Najib did not sign the agreement. Najib had reasonable political reasons for not signing it and Anwar understood and accepted it.

But Najib gave his word that he would honour the agreement. He consented to the agreement. Basic morality teaches us that a man's word is more important than his signature. And deeds are more important than any declaration. Najib delivered on his promise. He called for national reconciliation during his election result acceptance speech. Najib's deeds matched his word.

Question: On election day, did you feel that the agreement was still in place? Had anything happened before election day to invalidate the agreement?

Answer: I am very sure that nothing jeopardised the agreement in the run-up to the election or on election day. The agreement still stood.

Things changed after Najib was declared the winner. Even the day after his victory, I was personally optimistic that a deal is a deal, and both sides would abide by it.

But Anwar broke the deal. Perhaps, he was unable to manage his followers, especially because DAP had won more seats than Anwar's own party.

Anwar found himself in a difficult position. But a leader must lead, not be led.

Question: Do you and Jusuf feel Anwar broke the deal? If so, how?

Answer: I feel that Anwar still does not accept political reality. Perhaps, he has things he will not say because he doesn't want to hurt people. I don't know.

Question: Do you feel Anwar is sincere in wanting national reconciliation in Malaysia?

Answer: I believed that Anwar had sincerity and I still hope he has.

Question: Why do you think Anwar is denying the agreement, refusing to accept defeat and organising protests across Malaysia?

Answer: From the beginning, Anwar had convinced himself that he would win the election. He had struggled for so long and he thought that this was the end of the struggle. He thought he would win the battle and defeat BN.

His belief was strengthened by opinion polls that were often in his favour. And at each rally that Anwar held during the campaign period had attracted massive crowds.

But in the end, the people's choice is the ultimate factor in a democracy.

Anwar believed he would win the election but he was afraid Najib would resist and not hand over power.

So Anwar wanted insurance against this scenario. That is why he came up with the idea of the deal.

 

Umno to file more than 50 election petitions

Posted: 31 May 2013 02:12 PM PDT

(FMT) - Umno will file more than 50 election petitions to challenge the 13th General Election results, its president, Datuk Seri Najib Razak said last night.

Najib, who is also Barisan Nasional chairman, said the matter was discussed at the party's supreme council meeting last night — the first after the May 5 polls that saw BN returned as the ruling government.

"Yes, we will file the petitions," the prime minister said yesterday at a press conference in Menara Dato Onn at the Putra World Trade Centre here.

Umno secretary-general Datuk Seri Tengku Adnan Tengku Mansor (picture) said Umno would contest the results of more than 50 parliamentary and state constituencies, but did not elaborate on the locations of the seats.

"Our lawyers are looking into the matter. We will file them by June 11 (a day before the deadline)."

Tengku Adnan also said Umno was also mulling to file petitions in 37 other constituencies.

"We haven't decided on these 37 yet. We may or may not file the petitions."

The loose Pakatan coalition was the first to announce that it would challenge the results of 31 constituencies.

PKR strategic director  Rafizi Ramli had said  Pakatan planned to file 31 petitions by the end of this week.

The party, he said, would file 20 petitions, Pas eight and DAP three.

Deputy solicitor-general II Datuk Tun Abdul Majid Tun Hamzah had been quoted as saying that the High Court must complete the hearing of a petition within six months after it had been filed, while appeals to the Federal Court must also be completed in the same period.

However, Election Commission deputy chairman Datuk Wan Ahmad Wan Omar told the New Straits Times yesterday that it had yet to be notified of any such filings by the court.

Once a petition is filed, the court would inform the EC.

Meanwhile, Najib said Umno would despatch teams throughout the country to explain the new format of the party elections to members. The teams would also seek feedback from party members.

The teams will be led by former Perak menteri besar Tan Sri Mohd Tajol Rosli Ghazali and assisted by the party's executive secretary, Datuk Ab Rauf Yusoh and other leaders. The teams need to complete the briefings before the start of the party's branch-level meetings, which have been set for July 15 to Aug 31.

"Details of the new format needs be scrutinised as it will involve almost 150,000 members. This will be a challenging and complex process."

Najib, who confirmed that Umno's polls would be held this year, said the new format would allow more members to be involved in electing the party's top leadership, in accordance with amendments to the party's constitution in 2009.

Some 150,000 Umno members will now be able to vote for top leadership posts, including the president, deputy president, vice-presidents and members of the supreme council.

Previously, only 2,500 delegates attending the general assembly would elect the top leadership in the triennial party polls.

Najib said the delegates would cast their vote simultaneously at a date to be announced after the nationwide briefings. The dates for the division-level elections would also be announced later.

He said Umno supreme council members had noted the party's improved performance at the recent general election, which saw it capturing 88 seats compared with 79 in 2008.

"According to our research, the total number of votes that went to Umno had increased by 30 per cent in this election. Umno has emerged as a strong party in the 13th General Election as evident from our improved performance.

"If we compare Umno's performance as a single party with the opposition, which is made up of three parties, we fared better as a single party."

Najib said the supreme council had also accepted a proposal from the Umno management committee, chaired by deputy president Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin, to beef up various technical aspects of Umno's management. He said these improvements would be in the management of the headquarters and the setting up of committees to handle research and social media.

On election offences by party members, Najib said the disciplinary board had received 99 complaints related to sabotage throughout the election. The cases would be handled by a special committee under the disciplinary board.

He said 192 party members were expelled after they had contested as independent candidates in parliamentary and state constituencies.

On a proposal to make BN a single multiracial party, and how it would affect Umno, Najib said: "Umno is well loved by its members, so, suggestions such as these must be studied carefully. We will leave it to the lab sessions and gauge its acceptance."


Wan Ahmad denies involvement in 2003 delineation, demands apology

Posted: 31 May 2013 01:39 PM PDT

Pathma Subramaniam, fz.com

Election Commission (EC) deputy chairman Datuk Wan Ahmad Wan Omar had demanded newly-elected Serdang parliamentarian Ong Kian Ming apologise for accusing him of having a hand in the electoral delineation exercise last conducted in 2003.

"I was not the deputy chairman then. I was the secretary to the then seven member panel comprising of the chairman and deputy chairman who have since retired," he told fz.com when contacted.

"I was only appointed in December 2004. The delineation exercise started in 2002 and ended in March 2003.

"This is a very irresponsible coming from the young MP, who has made assumption without double-checking his facts," he said in rebuking Ong, who is the DAP stategist.

Ong, in statement yesterday, said the EC did not perform their duties according to the law and was biased in redrawing the electoral boundaries during last exercise while Wan Ahmad was deputy. He alluded that with the Wan Ahmad's continued service in EC in the proposed upcoming delineation would be equally problematic.

Ong cited Kedah as an example, where voters were moved in and out of constituencies arbitrarily.

He stated that he has no confidence the delimitation will be done "transparently and fairly" as long as Wan Ahmad remains a part of the commission.

Ong insulted the EC

Wan Ahmad, however, refused to entertain claims of irregularities posed by Ong but countered by advising the latter to take his woes to the then chairman, Tan Sri Abdul Rashid Abdul Rahman, for clarification.

"I didn't have a say in the previous exercise. I don't want to comment on it. The decision to authorise delineation is taken after a series of stakeholders' consultation and public inquiry.

"Once that's done the redrawn boundaries are displayed for public scrutiny for two months before it is passed in Parliament and legislative assemblies.

"Ong insinuated that one person makes the decision. He insults the credibility of the seven member panel which was appointed by the Agong and a panel which made the decision collectively based on many discussions and groundwork," said Wan Ahmad.

"If he has a complaint he should go after the previous panel, not me.

"This is nonsense. I would like to extend an invite to him to my office and he can check the documents himself. He was probably in college when the exercise was conducted in 2003. This is very unprofessional of him," he said.

During the delimitation in 2003, the EC proposed 25 new parliamentary and 53 new legislative assembly constituencies, bringing the total number of federal and state seats to 222 and 604 respectively.

Despite the EC's assurance that the delineation was done in accordance to regulations stipulated by law, political parties and electoral reforms groups have consistently raised grievances on the irregularities to which the EC has remained unresponsive.

Opposition are driven by 'hatred'

Wan Ahmad asserted that he has been straightforward in dealing with the assaults by the federal opposition, Pakatan Rakyat.

"Every time they raise an issue, I have answered their queries with numbers and statistics. But they insist on gunning us down with perception.

"I think they (the opposition) have completely lost focus because of the hatred they nurture," he hit back.

Reiterating that the remark is disparaging to his reputation, Wan Ahmad asked Ong to be "fair" and "to start his political career on a clean slate".

 

Federal awards: Michelle Yeoh now a ‘Tan Sri’

Posted: 31 May 2013 01:21 PM PDT

(Bernama) -  International film actress Datuk Seri Michelle Yeoh, 49, is among personalities in the creative arts to receive federal medals and awards in conjunction with the birthday of Yang di-Pertuan Agong Tuanku Abdul Halim Mu'adzam Shah today.

Yeoh who has acted in several movies including Tomorrow Never Dies, Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, Memoirs of a Geisha and The Lady receives the Darjah Panglima Setia Mahkota (PSM), which carries the title "Tan Sri".

Renowned international shoe designer Datuk Jimmy Choo and New York-based fashion designer Zang Toi receive the Darjah Panglima Jasa Negara (PJN), which carries the title "Datuk".

Language expert Prof Dr Awang Sariyan, who is also the Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka director-general, also receives the PJN.

Meanwhile, the Chief Secretary to the Government Datuk Seri Dr Ali Hamsa heads the list of 1,574 recipients of federal medals and awards for 2013 in conjunction with the birthday of the King.

He will receive the Darjah Panglima Mangku Negara (PMN) which carries the title "Tan Sri". 

Also receiving the PMN is the founder and president of Limkokwing University of Creative Technology, Prof Emeritus Tan Sri Dr Lim Kok Wing. 

Other than Yeoh, 44 other individuals will be conferred the Darjah Panglima Setia Mahkota (PSM) which also carries the title "Tan Sri".

They include Federal Court judge Datuk Ahmad Maarop, Public Service Department director-general Datuk Mohamad Zabidi Zainal, Treasury secretary-general Datuk Seri Dr Mohd Irwan Serigar Abdullah, head of the Implementation Coordination Unit under the Prime Minister's Department Datuk Shukry Mohd Salleh, Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) chief commissioner Datuk Seri Abu Kassim Mohamed, chief private secretary to the Prime Minister, Prime Minister's Office, Datuk Seri Ab Aziz Kasim and the prime minister's special adviser Datuk Othman Abd Razak.

Universiti Teknologi Mara (UiTM) vice-chancellor Prof Datuk Dr Sahol Hamid Abu Bakar will also receive the PSM.

The other recipients of the PSM are Kedah Regency Council member Tunku Laksamana Kedah Datuk Seri DiRaja Tunku Abdul Hamid Thani ibni Almarhum Sultan Badlishah, Sarawak Islamic Welfare Association (Perkis) president Datuk Seri Abang Abu Bakar Datu Bandar Abang Haji Mustapha, Perkayuan Seng Liang (Pahang) Sdn Bhd chairman Datuk Seri Lim Sing @ Lam Kam Sang, Felda Global Ventures Holdings Berhad chief executive officer (CEO) Datuk Sabri Ahmad, DRB-Hicom Berhad group managing director Datuk Mohd Khamil Jamil.

Eversendai Corporation Berhad executive director and group managing director Datuk E Nathan, Impressive Communications Sdn Bhd CEO Datuk Wira Abd Halim Karim, Kumpulan SAPURA president and CEO Datuk Seri Shahril Shamsuddin, Real Estate and Housing Developers Association (REHDA) patron Datuk Chen Lok Loi, MMC Corporation Berhad chairman Datuk Wira Syed Abdul Jabbar Syed Hassan, Kim Company Sdn Bhd managing director Datuk Ong Gim Huat.

Sime Darby Group president and chief executive Datuk Mohd Bakke Salleh, Telekom Malaysia Berhad (TM) group managing director and CEO Datuk Seri Zamzamzairani Mohd Isa, CP Energy & Services Sdn Bhd chairman Datuk Tan Kean Soon, Mahsuri Ria Sdn Bhd chairman Datuk Seri Safri Awang Zaidell, Harbour-Link Group Berhad executive director Datuk Seri Celestine Ujang anak Jilan.

Former commissioner of Law Revision in the Attorney-General's Chambers Datuk Seri Dr Visuvanathan Sinnadurai, Petra Energy Group director Datuk Bustari Yusuf, IRDK Land Sendirian Berhad group managing director Datuk Seri Dr M Ramasamy, Frencken Group Limited chairman Datuk Low Hock Peng, Widetech (Malaysia) Berhad executive director Datuk Cheng Joo Teik and MKH Berhad group executive chairman Datuk Chen Kooi Chiew @ Cheng Ngi Chong.

Former Royal Malaysian Navy (RMN) chief, Admiral (Rtd) Datuk Mohd Ramly Abu Bakar and former Royal Malaysian Air Force (RMAF) chief, General (Rtd) Datuk Seri Suleiman Mahmud will also receive the PSM.

The others are former energy, green technology and water minister Datuk Seri Peter Chin Fah Kui, former information, communications and culture minister Datuk Seri Dr Rais Yatim, former home minister Datuk Seri Mohd Radzi Sheikh Ahmad, and former Public Accounts Committee chairman and former natural resources and environment minister Datuk Seri Azmi Khalid.

Also receiving the PSM are former federal territories minister Datuk Seri Zulhasnan Rafique (picture), president of the Federal Territory Council of Former Elected Representatives (Mubarak) Abdul Aziz Mohd Yassin, former Kedah menteri besar Datuk Seri Azizan Abdul Razak, Federal Territory MCA adviser Datuk Tan Kim Hor, 1MCA Medical Foundation trustee Datuk Lee Fook Long, SEG International Berhad group managing director Datuk Seri Hii Chii Kok @ Hii Chee Kok, Sarawak Progressive Democratic Party (SPDP) treasurer Datuk Seri Yit Ming Yik @ Yek Min Ek and religious adviser to the prime minister Datuk Seri Prof Dr Abdullah Md Zin.

Apart from that, 59 people are awarded the Darjah Panglima Jasa Negara (PJN), which carries the "Datuk" title, 24 individuals receive the Johan Mangku Negara (JMN), while there were 89 recipients of the Johan Setia Mahkota (JSM), and 434 individuals will receive the Ahli Mangku Negara (AMN).

The sole recipient of the Panglima Gagah Berani award is sergeant major (Rtd) Apot anak Saad, while the general manager of the New Istana Negara Project  Asri Arjan is conferred the Johan Setia Diraja.  

As for the other awards, 273 people are conferred the Kesatria Mangku Negara (KMN), nine the Kesatria Setia Diraja (KSD), 615 the Pingat Pangkuan Negara (PPN) and 16 the Bentara Setia Diraja (BST).


BN information chiefs play pivotal roles

Posted: 31 May 2013 11:25 AM PDT

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSBuodZ_nYTNCJJPvjUhJJFexLpFWNyLpw8KU3DuoaZWtnG0kKE 

(NST) - An endless stream of farcical allegations against the coalition of rigging the electoral system had stifled BN's proactive efforts to generate trust among the public, including those who are not even old enough to vote but young enough to rally. 

IMPROVE: They must revise and do more in their approach to be more effective

AS he carefully realigned his side-parted hairstyle before meeting journalists for interviews, Datuk Ahmad Maslan would often straighten his shirt's crisp collars with the tips of his fingers.

The Barisan Nasional (BN) information chief probably does not own a round-neck T-shirt or at least, does not want to be seen wearing one judging from a casual observation of him habitually caressing those starched flaps; he favours formal clothing.

It is not wrong to say that the 49 year old is always prepared to look good before the media. Perhaps, Ahmad was just doing his job as an information chief, whose capacity has often been perceived to include the role of a public relations officer.

Undoubtedly, information chiefs are leaders in the front line when it comes to providing a respectable image for their respective parties.

And now the aftermath of the recently-concluded general election has brought forth a herculean task for BN information heads as they journey into another term with a slightly reduced majority.

An endless stream of farcical allegations against the coalition of rigging the electoral system had stifled BN's proactive efforts to generate trust among the public, including those who are not even old enough to vote but young enough to rally.

But have the information chiefs been significantly effective in their tasks?

One of the points raised by Universiti Utara Malaysia's Dr Muhammad Fuad Othman was that some information chiefs have yet to master the tailoring of messages to suit their targeted demographic, which could make thin of the political endorsement sought.

Muhammad explained that in relaying information, one must take into consideration the audience's level of intellect, age, creed and to a certain extent the timing of the message being made public.

He stressed that the main task of any information chief was to disseminate information and knowledge to the masses.

"For example, the reality on the ground is that (some) from the middle-income group felt detached from the government following the disbursement of the 1Malaysia People's Aid financial assistance.

"This can, or has resulted in a vote swing. In hindering such perception, the information chiefs can play a larger role by creating awareness on the other benefits enjoyed by this middle-income group," said the political scientist.

This writer opines that fresh substance in their speeches can definitely boost the effectiveness of the propaganda -- sans the shady connotation of the term -- spread. Repetitive contents can be a chore for even a diehard supporter to listen to during a ceramah.

What the people want to know are issues relatable to their daily goings-on; national issues can be sensational but at the end of the day, one may wonder whether the potholes have been filled or the clogged drains cleared.

In the same context, information chiefs must be on the ground to better understand the people's sentiments as the cliched battle "to win the hearts and minds of the people" is very real, and covers each and every aspect of their demands.

Touching base with political issues in certain localities for instance could provide better inputfor information chiefs on the people's needs.

As of now it seems that immaculately ironed shirts and diplomatic dispositions just do not cut it anymore, if the messages were not effectively relayed to or inculcated among the masses.

Associate Professor Dr Mohd Adnan Hashim concurred that such an approach must be carried out as the task ahead was certainly daunting due to the political landscape.

"The information chiefs must make full engagement with the people (pro-opposition included), whether by meeting them (face to face) or in the social media. They must spend more time on the ground (for a long-term benefit)."

The specific approach to the younger generation especially, must be refined to make the party acceptable at all levels of the youth segment. In the long run, it is possible to create a sense of attachment, belonging and ultimately loyalty.

Adnan described the youth as a crucial reservoir in ensuring a continuity of support for any party. In listing out his suggestions, Adnan however noted at the same time, it was a job not to be solely assigned to the information chiefs.

The communications and media studies expert said other than having the rank and file to act as "party representatives" to help spread information, a credible and capable team must be set up to assist their respective information chiefs.

"A case in point is the fabricated information being circulated on the social media such as Facebook and Twitter. People nowadays are somehow inclined to believe in unverified facts.

"A team of 'gatekeepers' must be quick in their response the counter any allegations and come out with the right facts and figures or maybe, take a leaf from the strategy employed by their rivals (and beat them at their own game)," said Adnan who is also the Malacca Universiti Teknologi Mara rector.

This is one of the toughest terms yet for the BN, as the ruling coalition is also embarking on another five-year campaign since 2008 when it first experienced a bittersweet victory following the unprecedented losses of states.

With Pakatan Rakyat rousing its supporters for rallies to kick-start an early campaigning period for the 14th general election, the information chiefs should be one step further to offset the opposition's advance.

Their involvement to ensure the coalition's political survival and dominance will be pivotal in mitigating the opposition pact's onslaught.


 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


The myth of a two-party system in Malaysia

Posted: 31 May 2013 01:45 PM PDT

The absence of a two-party system in Malaysia would mean that the ruling party enjoys absolute power as a two-thirds majority is all it needs to amend the Constitution, with the exception of clauses pertaining Bumiputera Special Rights, the Monarchy and Islam as the Official Religion of the country. 

by Nicholas Chan & Koay Su Lyn, fz.com

A contention has arisen after the 2008 general election, be it academic in origin or generated by propaganda, that Malaysia will benefit greatly from a two-party system. 

It is a concept constantly thrown around but highly vague in its actual meaning, or at least in the public understanding of it. 
 
Hence, after all these years of political shakeup, did we achieve the two-party system? If yes, how far did it go? Are we enjoying the fruits of it or did it come at a cost, like the political gridlock that has been plaguing Washington?
 
In introducing the two-party system
 
By definition, the most commonly agreed feature of a democratic two-party system is that it is a political environment dominated by two major political parties, with either party winning in almost all the elections held.  
 
Although the system does not negate the existence of other splinter parties or independent candidates, it usually thrives in an "either-or" situation whereby the ruling party is just one or the other.  
 
The most notable example of a two-party system is the United States, as the Congress is populated by politicians from two major parties while the Presidency is always a tussle between a Republican and a Democrat candidate. 
 
A two-party system is not an engraved certainty as the United Kingdom, which had witnessed a two-party system between the Labour and the Conservative for decades (except for the case of a hung parliament in 1974), was struck by an embarrassing situation in its most recent 2010 elections, whereby neither party earned the simple majority to form the government, resulting in a Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition government.
 
Malaysia and its traditional single party monopoly
 
So, why is such a system much heralded in Malaysia?  The most obvious reason is that it offers an option to the people who do not agree with the governance of Barisan Nasional (BN), which reigned for 56 years and counting.  
 
Without a viable opposition to challenge the hegemony of the ruling party, BN has until recently enjoyed the monopoly of power without any serious checks and balances, to the point of being able to bulldoze through big detrimental changes to our Constitution, ala the 1988 Judiciary Crisis. 
 
The absence of a two-party system in Malaysia would mean that the ruling party enjoys absolute power as a two-thirds majority is all it needs to amend the Constitution, with the exception of clauses pertaining Bumiputera Special Rights, the Monarchy and Islam as the Official Religion of the country. 
 
The fact that Malaysian politicians tend to vote en-bloc as well as a diminutive and oppressed public sphere (back then) add to this convention of power without boundaries for the incumbent. 
 
Post 308: A monopoly broken and the birth of a two-party system
 
The status quo changed drastically after the March 2008 elections as Pakatan Rakyat (PR) has posed itself as a formidable foe to BN, winning close to 47% of the popular votes. No doubt PR has finally presented itself as a united and viable front in securing the confidence of the voters. 
 
It is noteworthy that this political tsunami also coincides with the social media boom, where the Internet became a congregational space for Malaysians to communicate, discuss and educate each other on national matters.  
 
Some would say that a two-party system in the country contributed to higher political awareness as well as greater participation in the political/decision-making process. 
 
But it is more of a synergistic process - as more people demand their voices to be heard, and BN does not represent those voices, they would gladly vow for the alternative. 
 
And if the alternative is capable of consolidating such voices or opinions, a two-party system is born. 
 
Today, politics in Malaysia is no longer business as usual. Public discourse and contention is rife and vocal; the media (or at least the alternative media) took Malaysian journalism to a new direction, and politicians are quick to compete for a place on the various platforms buoyed by public voices to gain political clout. 
 
With more states administered by the opposition, a comparison of governing standards is inevitable.  Everyone is kept on their toes. The existence of a resurgent opposition ensures that the government is not a mere 'talking shop' and promotes a sense of accountability and transparency, as in order to retain power, the government of the day will be pressured to be transparent in its governance. 
 
As long as better, more empathetic and accountable governance is what the rakyat wishes, a two-party system would ensure the continuity of such wishes.
 
How far did we enjoy the fruits of a two-party system?
 
There is a joke on how ironic our country is - when we had economic progress in the 80s, we lacked democratic freedom; now we have a greatly improved democratic freedom, but lack a robust economy.  
 
It is certain that economic progress and democratic expansion is not a zero sum game, but the saying amusingly highlights the kind of democratic freedom we have. 
 
Three Bersih rallies with a huge crowd have so far been organised, among the many smaller assemblies held by different political parties or NGOs. 
 
Public assembly or demonstration is the present norm of the day to the extent that the government has to acknowledge it by enacting the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012, removing the need for police permits for gatherings as laid down in Section 27 of the Police Act. 
 
While these are mere baby steps towards a full recognition of freedom to assemble, such steps are nevertheless seen as taking strides in multiple directions. 
 
The ISA was repealed and replaced by the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act (SOSMA), the need for an annual printing licence under the Printing Presses and Publications Act was scrapped, the ban of student participation in politics in the Universities and University Colleges Act 1971 was lifted among other legislative changes. 
 
While dissent against these legislative constraints existed long ago, it was not until the rise of a two-party system that such unimaginable reforms (why would the government do away with something that is beneficial to them?) were implemented. 
 
This paradigm shift to end the "government knows best" era happened only at the instance of BN sensing a tangible threat of losing power if they don't address the voices of the public. 
 
This also signals the role of a two-party system, as compared to one that has a government against multitudes of opposition, be it from the public or politicians, because it is vital for one party/coalition to pose itself as the second-in-line for the incumbent. The message is simple, if you can't do your job well; there is an alternative ready to take over.
 
A race exists whereby both parties not only seek to outperform each other, but also to outmatch each other in exposing the other's scandals and transgressions. 
 
Although this would lead to some gutter and vitriol politics, it keeps a proper check on the governments in power. Exposés like the National Feedlot Centre (NFC) scandal by Rafizi Ramli and the Talam Scandal in Selangor by the Malaysian Chinese Association (MCA) mark the fruits of a system where both parties attempt to catch each other red-handed, thus ensuring that the government runs its daily business in a clean, uncorrupted and dignified manner.  
 
The nation is also geared towards the frequent hosting of political and policy debates/forums aimed at keeping the public informed and engaged with government plans and dealings due to such competitive environment. 
 
This inadvertently promotes sufficient awareness and knowledge of the government's doings and thereby enabling them to keep a more efficient electoral check on the government. 
 
An extra bonus also exists where incumbents are no longer guaranteed a place in the government (be it state or federal) if they did not perform to the levels as expected by the voters. 
 
Although expectations vary over constituencies, this newborn uncertainty will foster competition between both parties to grab the best talents to field in the elections, thus effectively ending the 'warlord' culture, notoriously entrenched in the United Malays National Organisation (UMNO) as well as introducing new ideas, view and policies in the form of new blood/fresh faces to the parties. 
 
In the 13th General Election, one-third of the BN candidates were new faces. It would seem that the two-party system provides a mechanism for the renewal of candidates, which is good for ideas and the shedding of old bureaucracies. 

READ MORE HERE

 

The ‘five-year hitch’

Posted: 31 May 2013 12:18 PM PDT

https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Najib-GE-300x202.jpg 

If we want to restore our authority and make this nation great again, GE-14 is not the answer.

Mariam Mokhtar, FMT

Many couples go through a seven year itch; a "rough patch" in their marriage, caused by boredom, when some spouses desire the freedom of being single again.

In Malaysia, one can recognise the least productive and incapable BN politician by his "Five-Year Hitch"; the time frame needed to implement the tasks they promised to complete if they were to win GE-13.

Interestingly, these politicians have chosen an interval of five years, which is when the GE-14 would be called. The rakyat can see through the politicians' tricks and yet, the Election Commission (EC) has denied claims that the electoral system would mean BN would rule in perpetuity.

These politicians have not shown evidence that they are capable of carrying out their tasks, but they are already canvassing for re-election in five years time, in GE-14.

Despite the promises they made when campaigning for GE-13, they have already come up with excuses. They have learnt from their mentor, the leader of Umno-Baru, Najib Tun Razak, that words speak louder than actions and the best phrase is "You help me, I help you."

This year has yet to see the usual Malaysian election phenomenon, when turncoat politicians – "frogs" cross over to the 'other' side. They will probably make their moves soon.

Men who have lied to the rakyat, now have very senior roles in the Cabinet. Some of these men were not elected by the rakyat but secured a place in the Cabinet through deceit. Others who were once guilty of money politics, now draw a salary which is paid for by the taxpayer.

Both these sorts of men, have one thing in common; they are in charge of policies which will affect the rakyat.

The first to make his debut performance, barely two weeks after GE-13, was Hindraf's P Waythamoorthy, a deputy minister in the Prime minister's Department (PMD).

After his hunger strike, which he used to embarrass and weaken the opposition, Waythamoorthy announced that he would need five years to resolve the issue of stateless Indians. He made it clear that Hindraf had a mechanism to solve the problem and yet declined to give details. Does a plan even exist?

Is Waythamoorthy's time to be spent resolving only the issue of the stateless Indian? In the five years that Waythamoorthy claims he will need to resolve the problem of the 300,000 stateless Indian, a few hundred thousand people from Bangladesh, the Philippines, Pakistan, Myanmar or Indonesia will have become fully fledged Malaysian citizens, without any problems.

Does Waythamoorthy realise that many Orang Asli, Penan and other indigenous peoples of Sabah and Sarawak are also stateless? These people cannot afford the long and expensive journey to town to register the births of their children. These people are also denied education, health and other benefits.

Illegitimate children of Muslim parents are also disenfranchised and might as well be considered stateless. They cannot attend school, or have a passport or enjoy the benefits all children should be entitled to.

Read more at: https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/opinion/2013/06/01/the-five-year-hitch/ 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Baik pulih persefahaman kebangsaan

Posted: 31 May 2013 05:02 PM PDT

Dalam titah itu, Seri Paduka mahu agar prinsip-prinsip seperti demokrasi berparlimen yang sihat dan matang, Raja Berpelembagaan sebagai teras kestabilan nasional, menghormati falsafah Persekutuan, meraikan kepelbagaian, menjunjung keluhuran Perlembagaan dan memuliakan kedaulatan undang-undang dijadikan teras panduan kepada proses itu.

"Membaik pulih semula persefahaman kebangsaan harus menjadi agenda nasional yang menjadi keutamaan semua pihak. Sama ada Malaysia terus berjaya dan mencapai tahap pembangunan berikutnya sebagai sebuah negara maju berpendapatan tinggi atau menjadi sebuah negara gagal, semuanya bergantung kepada permuafakatan yang akan sama-sama kita capai.

"Oleh kerana itu, Beta mahu semua pihak mengekalkan dan memperkukuhkan lagi ikatan perpaduan yang sedia wujud," titah Seri Paduka pada Istiadat Menghadap dan Pengurniaan Darjah Kebesaran Persekutuan sempena Hari Keputeraan Yang di-Pertuan Agong di Istana Negara di sini hari ini.

Seri Paduka turut mengingatkan sesetengah pihak yang cuba membaja permusuhan dan persengketaan di kalangan rakyat demi kepentingan agenda sempit mereka, supaya segera menghentikan perbuatan yang tidak berperlembagaan itu.

Seri Paduka bertitah usaha pengukuhan perpaduan nasional tidak boleh dianggap sebagai tugas serta tanggungjawab pihak tertentu sahaja, sebaliknya ia menjadi agenda setiap warganegara.

"Beta berkehendakkan agar kerajaan pimpinan Mamanda Perdana Menteri Beta supaya memastikan setiap dasar pembangunan negara hendaklah berpandukan kepada prinsip meraikan kemajmukan.

"Realitinya, masa depan kita saling berkait dan memerlukan satu sama lain. Semua rakyat Beta, tanpa mengira kaum dan agama seharusnya mendapat pembelaan," titah baginda.

Tuanku Abdul Halim melahirkan rasa sukacita kerana proses pilihan raya umum lepas berjalan dengan tertib dan harmonis.

Baginda turut mengulangi agar semua pihak menerima keputusan yang telah dibuat rakyat iaitu melalui peti undi yang selaras dengan prinsip keluhuran dan kedaulatan undang-undang.

"Jika terdapat sebarang perbezaan atau ketidakpuasan hati, maka gunakanlah mekanisme mahkamah yang sedia ada, sepertimana diperuntukan Perlembagaan dan undang-undang negara.

"Beta tidak mahu mana-mana pihak mengambil sebarang tindakan yang lampau undang-undang, mahupun lampau Perlembagaan," titah Seri Paduka.

Seri Paduka juga berharap agar kerajaan dan rakyat Malaysia akan terus mendukung cita-cita untuk menjadi sebuah negara maju, beretika, bermoral tinggi dan rakyatnya dikenali sebagai bangsa yang berakhlak, bermaruah serta disegani.

 

Menteri Indonesia: Anwar mungkir janji

Posted: 31 May 2013 12:49 AM PDT

Hamid Awaludin, bekas menteri undang-undang dan hak asasi manusia Indonesia, berkata "oleh kerana tidak terdapat sebarang perkara yang boleh membatalkan perjanjian itu, yang dibuat menjelang PRU13 atau pada hari pengundian, maka perjanjian berkenaan terus terpakai".

Bagaimanapun, "keadaan berubah apabila Najib diisytihar sebagai pemenang" katanya sambil menjelaskan bahawa Anwar meminta perjanjian itu diadakan kerana beliau "yakin akan mencapai kemenangan pada pilihan raya itu berdasarkan hasil pungutan pendapat yang sering menyebelahinya dan jumlah hadirin pada majlis ceramah anjuran Pakatan Rakyat".

Hamid, yang pernah berkhidmat sebagai duta besar Indonesia ke Russia dan Belarus dari 2008 hingga 2011, memberitahu Bernama beliau turut hadir pada perbincangan yang diadakan antara bekas naib presiden Indonesia Jusuf Kalla dengan Anwar dan Najib.

Jusuf Kalla orang tengah

"Jusuf Kalla sekadar memenuhi permintaan Anwar supaya beliau menjadi orang tengah. Bukan beliau (Jusuf) yang mengambil daya usaha agar perjanjian itu diadakan atau pergi berjumpa Anwar," katanya.

Laporan media baru-baru ini menyebut Anwar menafikan beliau memungkiri perjanjian damai yang diatur Jusuf dan mendakwa bekas naib presiden Indonesia itu menemuinya untuk menawarkan bantuan bagi memastikan urusan selepas PRU13 berjalan secara teratur.

Bagaimanapun, satu laporan lain pula menyebut Anwar mengaku beliau ada membuat perjanjian dengan Najib, yang menyaksikan Jusuf sebagai orang tengahnya, tetapi mendakwa Barisan Nasional (BN) menjadikan perjanjian itu terbatal berikutan cara parti gabungan itu melancarkan kempennya.

PRU13 menyaksikan BN, yang diterajui Najib, kembali berkuasa apabila memenangi 133 daripada 222 kerusi parlimen. Oleh kerana tidak berpuas hati dengan keputusan itu, Anwar dan Pakatan Rakyat mengadakan perhimpunan di seluruh negara sejak 8 Mei dengan mendakwa berlaku penipuan pilihan raya.

Hamid berkata Anwar tahu Najib tidak menandatangani perjanjian itu, "tapi Najib memberi jaminan beliau akan mematuhi perjanjian itu."

"Beliau menerima perjanjian itu," kata Hamid dan menambah bahawa Najib mengotakan janjinya serta menyeru ke arah penyatuan nasional ketika berucap apabila BN diisytiharkan kembali berkuasa.

"Tindakan Najib ini menepati apa yang telah beliau ucapkan," katanya.

Malah, kata Hamid, sehari selepas kemenangan Najib, beliau tetap optimistik perjanjian itu akan terus terpakai dan kedua-dua pihak akan mematuhinya. Tetapi, Anwar memungkirinya," kata beliau.

"Saya rasa Anwar masih tidak dapat menerima hakikat politik," katanya.

Berikut adalah soal jawab dengan Hamid:

READ MORE HERE

 

Yang di-Pertuan Agong Mahu Rakyat Akur Keputusan PRU-13

Posted: 30 May 2013 01:00 AM PDT

Sambil merakamkan tahniah kepada anggota Parlimen dan Dewan Undangan Negeri yang dipilih, Seri Paduka berharap semua pihak di negara ini memelihara keutuhan sistem demokrasi berparlimen yang diamalkan sejak merdeka.

"Jika ada perbezaan pendapat, gunakanlah kaedah penyelesaian seperti mana yang telah digariskan oleh Perlembagaan Persekutuan dan undang-undang negara," titah baginda sempena ulang tahun keputeraan rasmi Yang di-Pertuan Agong esok yang disiarkan secara langsung menerusi RTM di Kuala Lumpur, malam Jumaat.

Baginda bertitah: "Tindakan menanam kesangsian kepada institusi yang telah diamanahkan Perlembagaan Persekutuan untuk mengelolakan pilihan raya di negara ini ialah perbuatan yang amat berbahaya dan hanya bakal menuai badai pertelingkahan yang tidak berkesudahan."

"Janganlah kita sekali-kali melemah dan merosakkan sistem Raja Berperlembagaan, Demokrasi Berparlimen dan Falsafah Persekutuan yang selama ini mendasari ramuan kejayaan Malaysia," titah Seri Paduka.

Tuanku Abdul Halim bertitah sebarang perubahan politik di negara ini perlulah dilakukan secara aman dan menerusi peti undi berpandukan prinsip Keluhuran Perlembagaan dan Kedaulatan Undang-undang.

"Apakah kita sanggup melihat Malaysia yang tercinta ini hancur dan lumpuh disebabkan oleh perbuatan kita sendiri. Merosakkan sebuah kejayaan amat mudah, namun untuk membinanya kembali amatlah sukar.

"Oleh itu, janganlah benarkan ia terjadi, wariskanlah Malaysia yang bersatu dan berjaya, kepada generasi Malaysia yang mendatang. Bak kata pepatah, sudah terhantuk baru terngadah, seribu penyesalan sudah tidak berguna," titah Seri Paduka.

Baginda mengingatkan anggota Parlimen dan Dewan Undangan Negeri yang dipilih supaya berkhidmat dengan jujur, ikhlas dan terbaik untuk rakyat tanpa mengira bangsa dan agama.

Tuanku Abdul Halim turut mengajak rakyat bersama-sama meneruskan usaha mencapai matlamat nasional untuk menjadikan Malaysia sebuah negara maju berpendapatan tinggi.

Baginda mengingatkan semua pihak bahawa keamanan dan kemakmuran yang dinikmati saat ini bukannya datang bergolek, sebaliknya hasil daripada pelaksanaan yang teliti dan rapi oleh para pemimpin terdahulu.

"Menjelang tanggal 31 Ogos ini genaplah 56 tahun kita mencapai kemerdekaan, manakala pada 16 Sept pula kita akan meraikan 50 tahun pembentukan Malaysia.

"Hakikatnya, walaupun secara relatifnya Malaysia merupakan sebuah negara yang masih muda, namun kita telah berjaya meletakkan kedudukan negara pada tempat yang membanggakan seperti yang ada pada hari ini.

"Namun, walau sempurna mana pun strategi yang telah dirangka oleh kerajaan, walau secekap mana pun pelaksanaannya, jika tidak wujud keamanan dalam negara, mana mungkin semua hasrat yang diimpikan mampu dizahirkan," titah Seri Paduka.

Tuanku Abdul Halim turut mengingatkan semua rakyat Malaysia tanpa mengira kaum dan anutan agama dipersatukan dengan lima prinsip Rukun Negara yang merupakan ideologi kebangsaan dan Perlembagaan Persekutuan yang merupakan undang-undang tertinggi negara.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Unity: Moving Forward

Posted: 31 May 2013 12:05 PM PDT

http://site.yayasan1malaysia.org/clients/yayasan1malaysia/images/photos/3416201225939PM_O.jpg 

When political polarisation conceals deeper ethnic-cum-religious polarisation, it is important to create opportunities for citizens with divergent ethnic perspectives to meet and share their innermost feelings in an atmosphere that allows for honest, sober reflection. 

Chandra Muzaffar

One of the most positive developments in the wake of the 13th General Election is the willingness of a number of Ministers in the Federal Cabinet to invite Opposition politicians to join them in policy formulation and planning at the ministerial level.

Hopefully, cooperation of this sort --- if it works out --- will reduce the antagonism and animosity between the Barisan Nasional and the Pakatan Rakyat which has poisoned the political atmosphere in the last five years or so. Adversarial politics upon which our political system is built often undermines the etiquette and respect that should govern relations between actors with different perspectives on society.

If the Federal Government and the Federal Opposition demonstrate that they can work together on certain matters, the Centre and the Opposition states should also aim to achieve a higher level of understanding especially on issues that have divided them in the recent past. Since there is always the possibility of a State and the Centre being ruled by different political parties, it is imperative that the rulers at both levels transcend partisan loyalties and focus upon the well-being of the people. Opposition leaders at the State level should perhaps initiate moves in that direction, since some Federal Ministers have already reached out to the Opposition.  

In the spirit of reaching out to each other, the BN and the PR should also give serious attention to a proposal that has re-emerged in the post-election scenario.

I had first mooted the idea of a Consultative Council on National Unity in 1987 when I was heading a local NGO. Later, when I joined the Opposition, then known as Barisan Alternatif (BA), I revived the proposal and developed it further. The BA accepted it and the concept of a Majlis Perundingan Perpaduan Nasional (MPPN) was presented to the public at a media conference on the 2nd of April 2001.   

I had suggested then --- and I remain convinced --- that the MPPN should be established through an Act of Parliament. It would be independent of the Executive and would be answerable to Parliament to which it would submit half-yearly reports to be debated by both the Dewan Rakyat and the Dewan Negara. These reports would also contain recommendations which if adopted by Parliament would be implemented by the Executive.

Since the proposed MPPN would be answerable to Parliament, its members would also be appointed by the same body. What is envisaged is a membership of about 40 to 50 persons comprising representatives of citizens' groups and individuals who have researched and written on ethnic relations in Malaysia. The membership should reflect the wide spectrum of ethnic concerns that characterise our society and should be as inclusive as possible. Political parties and serving politicians will not be part of the MPPN. This is to ensure that the consultative council will not be subjected to the pulls and pressures of partisan politics. It will also help to elevate issues pertaining to national unity above politics which in some ways has been a bane to the quest for national unity.

The MPPN would meet behind closed doors. There would be no media coverage of its deliberations. The media and the public would have access to its work through its half-yearly reports presented to Parliament. It is through Parliament that the MPPN would be accountable to the people.

It is crucial that a platform like MPPN be established expeditiously, given the situation we are in. When political polarisation conceals deeper ethnic-cum-religious polarisation, it is important to create opportunities for citizens with divergent ethnic perspectives to meet and share their innermost feelings in an atmosphere that allows for honest, sober reflection. If anything, the 13th General Election and its outcome has revealed that a substantial segment of the Malay and Chinese populace subscribes to notions of the character and identity of the Malaysian nation which are diametrically different. It is partly because many Malays felt in the week leading to the polls that the idea of the nation that they were comfortable with was being challenged by a view of Malaysia that ignored its historical foundation that they rallied around UMNO. The election also showed how 'equality' and 'justice' are increasingly seen through a communal prism that has little or no empathy for the other and how it understands its own situation.   The impact of young voters who mirror some of these communal tendencies and yet are different in their political orientation from the older generation is yet another development that merits serious thought. Add to this the role of the new media in fostering and reinforcing both communal and non-communal attitudes. Among these attitudes are those related to religion and its role in the public sphere which in the election generated responses from a segment of both the Muslim majority and the Christian minority.

What this shows is that there are issues of great magnitude that should be addressed outside the arena of electoral politics through sincere and continuous engagement and interaction with the diverse citizens' groups that constitute our multi-ethnic nation. Hence the case for MPPN.


Dr. Chandra Muzaffar is the Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Yayasan 1Malaysia.

 


 

Why not a "4 heads roll in 1" rally

Posted: 31 May 2013 11:52 AM PDT

http://globalvoicesonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/penang-rally-375x245.jpg 

Holding more rallies is a great way to empower the masses and encourage the growth of the people's movement in shaping a healthy democracy. As an overall strategy to win the hearts and minds of the other 48 percent who voted for the BN, it might not be a good idea.

Kuo Yong Kooi 

The opposition has wowed to continue with more Blackout 505 rallies that focus on making 'three key demands'. They are; the top heads of the Election Commission (EC) to resign from their posts; for fresh elections to be conducted in 30 parliamentary seats; and to postpone any amendment to the election law and the constituency re delineation exercise.

Holding more rallies is a great way to empower the masses and encourage the growth of the people's movement in shaping a healthy democracy. As an overall strategy to win the hearts and minds of the other 48 percent who voted for the BN, it might not be a good idea.

The pro-Umno media have been creating the perception that the opposition under the leadership of Anwar Ibrahim are sore losers, "crying over spilt milk" and not willing to move on for the good of the nation. The arguments they put forward, like the opposition have accepted the results of the three states that they have won, but disputed the others that they have lost; and the Blackout 505 rallies have to end soon for the nation to move on. 

These are reasonable points of argument in the eyes of those who voted for BN.

Art Harun pointed out another valid argument that the 'gerrymandering' was never an issue at all and Pakatan never challenged the legality of the delineation prior to the 2008 elections in his article 'Is BN a validly elected government?' 
 
Within the opposition ranks there are also dissenters for more rallies. The salient point that the opposition must consider is that will this 'more rallies strategy to highlight the fraudulent GE13 adding the latest three point demands' be able to win the hearts and minds of the other 48 percent who voted for BN?

If it doesn't, it will only serve to divide our nation further and intensifies the current stalemate. Bear in mind we might also lose more Pakatan supporters along the way as people might be 'rally fatigued' and bored with the same points of argument in all the Blackout 505 rallies. The reality is we can never replicate the initial Blackout 505 rally at the Kelana Jaya stadium on May 8. Any further rallies will only draw smaller crowds and dampen more spirits or hopes for change.

Hishamuddin Rais and Anything But Umno (ABU) head Haris Ibrahim have always pointed out that 'Pilihan Jalan Raya' is the only way to change the government. If we are prepared to take the path of more rallies, we might as well go all the way. 

Asking the EC to resign is not all the way. Asking the inspector-general of police (IGP), attorney-general (AG) and the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) head to resign to me is a more 'wholistic' approach to this problem.

We are not asking for the toppling of the current 'so-called' legitimately elected government. We are only asking for the installation of neutral/independent or non-partisan heads of these four crucial government departments so that they can facilitate and mitigate our current 'stalemate' situation.

The point that can gain universal approval is that if the police are charging the opposition figures under the Sedition Act, they also need to charge the head of Utusan Malaysia, Ibrahim Ali, Zul Noordin, Mahathir Mohamad and others that have made seditious statements, too, as Haris Ibrahim had said after he was released and charged.

Cutting four carrots instead of one
 
If we are to hold more rallies and make great strife to cut one carrot (the EC chiefs' resignation), we might as well cut the other three carrots along the way (which is the IGP, AG and head of the MACC's resignations). Changing the EC head might give us hope of a free and fair election in five years time, but what about remedies for now till before GE14?

We were told that the courts might take up to six months to settle all the petitions that the opposition had filed on the 13th general election. The second of the three-point demand for fresh elections to be conducted in 30 parliamentary seats is a waste of 'chi' like shouting slogans in a rally when the courts have not even started to look at the petitions filed. 

We cannot file petitions and at the same time ask for fresh elections on the 30 parliamentary seats. The settlement of the petitions filed in court precedes the demand for a fresh election.

Let's say hypothetically we managed to pressure the Najib Abdul Razak administration to change the heads of the EC through the rallies in the near future. That does not weed out the same 'shifty clown politicians' that have been running wild on the floors of our parliament for the last three or four decades. 

On the other hand if we managed to push for an independent AG, IGP and head of MACC after holding a series of rallies, we might have a total new breed of politicians on the floors of our parliament after GE14. Those 'shifty' politicians who are corrupt would have either ended up in jail or migrated overseas with our nation's loot long before the next general election commences.

Cutting four carrots with one knife will most likely not dampen the spirits of the future rally-goers. It might also attract more supporters from the other 48 percent who voted for BN. More than 51 percent of the electorate believed that Pakatan can be a more accountable and transparent administration. Over 48 percent believed otherwise. The majority would like a more transparent, accountable and independent government departments.

If the rally themes focus only on electioneering and post GE13 matters, the onus seems to be on the Pakatan side to stop the rallies so that our country can move on. Furthermore, it looks like Pakatan is only concerned with winning elections. That is a psychological negative. However if the rallies focus on changing the heads of EC, IGP, MACC and AG, the onus is on the Umno side to change this so that our country can move on. After all 51% of the rakyat wanted something positive changed here. 
 
We must note that not all who voted against BN like Pakatan. It is because they hate Umno for stifling our democracy through installing pro-Umno IGPs, AGs, and heads of the EC and MACC that landed our nation in this current state. Some voted for PSM, Star and many other independent candidates because they were thumbing their noses at the arrogance of the Pakatan leaders that had by-passed their years of hard and arduous grassroots work.

Further rallies that demand the new appointments of independent or non-partisan 'heads' of these crucial four government departments is a 'unifying' theme. Don't you agree?

Malaysians have tried beverages like '3-in-1' instant coffee mix and Kopi Jantan (coffee + tongkat Ali). Why not try out a new rally theme like '4-heads-rolling-in-1 rally'?

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


More than meets the eye

Posted: 31 May 2013 11:58 AM PDT

The state immigration department, based on tip off from the police special branch, denied entry to Nurul Izzah because she was slated to meet 2 individuals (trusted East Malaysian lieutenants of Anwar, one of them from DAP) to help facilitate the inflow of funds for the party in Sabah.

One of these two individuals had previously worked closely with sacked Alliance Bank CEO Bridget Lai.

(Bridget Lai is claimed to have played an important role in helping PKR convert millions of US dollars into Ringgit to be channelled for the 2008 General Elections but was subsequently removed over office renovation issues in 2010).
Now, these funds will play a crucial role in helping Pakatan Rakyat stage several rounds of rallies and conduct other activities similar to the Black 505 rallies in Semenanjung.

Why Anwar sent in Nurul? Because she has the image of a sweet, young and honest politician and no one will doubt her motives.
Two set of envelopes were carried by Nurul when she arrived at the KK International airport via Air Asia AK5118 at around 7.00pm on Thursday.

Based on information received by the special branch, the sealed envelopes contained, among others, payment & transaction details and a set of instructions assigned for this 2 trusted lieutenants.

She was supposed to meet these two lieutenants at a hotel in KK on Friday to pass them the envelopes.
In simple terms, Nurul's presence in Sabah was as to act as a 'facilitator' between Anwar and the party's operatives in Sabah for the staging of an uprising. 

After all, Anwar knows better that he can't sent in any other senior party officials such as Azmin, Sivarasa, Surendran or Tian Chua, because they would have been barred immediately.

Read more at: http://sabahgroundzero.blogspot.com/2013/05/more-than-meets-eyes.html 

 

Pakatan Rakyat Perlu Berubah

Posted: 31 May 2013 11:41 AM PDT

Disebabkan kongkongan suara di negara ini, pihak Pakatan Rakyat (PR) terpaksa mengadakan perhimpunan di serata negara bagi menyuarakan kekesalannya terhadap proses pilihan raya (PRU) yang lepas. Sambutan masyarakat terhadap perhimpunan-perhimpunan ini amat 'luar biasa', hingga ada yang melibatkan penyertaan ratusan ribu manusia.

Kerajaan Barisan Nasional (BN) pula menggerakkan media massa untuk memburuk-burukkan himpunan ini. Ia digelar 'Malaysia Spring' dan 'Anwar Spring' bagi menyamakannya dengan 'Arab Spring'. Perhimpunan rakyat ini dikatakan bertujuan untuk menggangu ketenteraman dan merosakkan harta benda. Hakikatnya, perhimpunan-perhimpunan ini menjadi bukti betapa teraturnya dan 'civil'-nya rakyat Malaysia. Tiada kerosakkan satu harta atau benda pun yang dilaporkan setakat ini. Malaysian Book of Records sepatutnya melakarkan perihal ini sebagai satu rekod nasional.

Pihak polis pula menjalankan operasi menangkap dan mendakwa aktivis-aktivis masyarakat. Polis sebenarnya sudah jemu dengan operasi-operasi sebegini. Bagi mereka, operasi-operasi ini membazir masa, sumber dan anggota; yang sepatutnya dikerah untuk menangkap penjenayah sebenar. Yang paling dikesali pihak polis adalah cemuhan masyarakat akibat tindakan mereka yang hanya 'menurut perintah'.

 

Ubahlah pendekatan

Kitaran PR berhimpun kerana tiada ruang bersuara, kerajaan BN memburukkan PR dan polis menzalimi rakyat – berulang terlalu banyak kali. Antara contoh yang boleh diambil iktibar adalah skandal Lynas. Pelbagai ikhtiar rakyat seperti berkali-kali berhimpun, berjalan kaki dari Kuantan ke Kuala Lumpur, petisyen demi petisyen, mogok lapar, dan aduan ke mahkamah telah dilakukan. Kerajaan buat tidak tahu sahaja. Sedar-sedar, kilang Lynas telah pun siap dan sudah beroperasi sekarang. Oleh itu, buat PR, janganlah bergantung harap dengan usaha berhimpun, petisyen dan aduan mahkamah. Besar kemungkinan, usaha-usaha tersebut akan diabaikan kerajaan. Keputusan PRU-13 akan kekal begitu sahaja.

Lainlah jika institusi Agong, penaung sebenar Suruhanjaya Pilihanraya (SPR), ingin menyiasat ketelusan proses PRU-13 (melalui Suruhanjaya DiRaja),  peluang untuk aduan PR didengari dengan adil nampak suram. Lebih-lebih lagi, apabila SPR dilihat 'berteduh' dibawah payung tuan 'de fecto'-nya, iaitu kerajaan BN.

PR hendaklah menerima hakikat bahawa negara ini adalah negara dunia ketiga yang diperintah oleh golongan yang mementingkan diri sendiri. Perjuangan menetang kezaliman memanglah mengujakan. Tetapi, berdasarkan pengalaman yang lalu, peluang untuk menukar keputusan kerajaan dengan cara ini, amatlah tipis.

Bagi penulis, pendekatan yang lebih bermanafaat adalah dengan melaksanakan dasar-dasar yang mampu menguatkan keyakinan rakyat kepada PR. Halu tuju PR dan momentum sokongan rakyat kepadanya sudah cukup memberansangkan. Dengan sedikit tambahan sokongan dari golongan atas pagar, moderat dan penyokong BN, ia pasti dapat membentuk kerajaan pusat di PRU akan datang. Kini, apa yang PR perlu adalah sedikit kesabaran dan ketabahan.

 

Biarkan Barisan Nasional

Mengapa PR sahaja yang perlu berubah? Jawapannya mudah. BN terbukti tidak mampu berubah. Lihat bagaimana ia sentiasa mendahulukan pemimpin-pemimpin korup daripada kepentingan rakyat. Taib Mahmud, Shahrizat Jalil, Raja Ropiah, Isa Samad dan rakan-rakan. Lihat bagaimana ia lebih mementingkan kepentingan 'perompak' kapitalis seperti tauke-tauke IPP (Independent Power Producers), konsensioner Lebuh Raya, syarikat air swasta, kontraktor pengangkutan awam (dan lain-lain) daripada kelansungan hidup rakyat. Lihatlah bagaimana tender-tender kerajaan dibaham ahli-ahli keluarga yang tidak berkebolehan. Banyak lagi, dan berkali-kali. Ia terlalu banyak dan berkali-kali hinggakan kebarangkalian skandal-skandal umpamanya berulang adalah satu kepastian. Bukan tidak ditegur. Bukan tidak dibongkar. Bukan tidak dibantah. Masalahnya adalah kepimpinan; tiada azam(will) atau kesediaan untuk berubah dan membela rakyat.

Read more at: http://secebiswaras.wordpress.com/2013/05/31/pakatan-rakyat-perlu-berubah/ 

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved