Khamis, 16 Mei 2013

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Wan Azizah told to make way for Azmin

Posted: 16 May 2013 04:18 AM PDT

(Malaysian Digest) - A former aide to PKR women's wing chief Zuraida Kamaruddin, Mohd Fareez Kamal Intidzam, has urged Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail not to defend the party presidency and make way for deputy president Azmin Ali.

"The PKR machinery in Selangor headed by Azmin has managed to retain the state with a bigger majority in this general election. Following Azmin's strong showing, Dr Wan Azizah should not seek re-election in the coming party polls," he said in a statement yesterday.

Fareez also called on Dr Wan Azizah to openly admit her "failures" and to acknowledge Azmin's great leadership as the Selangor PKR chairman.

"Even though Azmin is only the deputy president, he managed to win both the parliamentary and state seats he contested in the recent polls. Also, he was able to lead the PKR machinery in Selangor to win a two-thirds majority in the state assembly," he said.

Fareez said on the other hand, Dr Wan Azizah proved to be a failure as PKR president after announcing that she would not contest in the general election.

"She is a liability to PKR and she should stop humiliating the party. It is shameful for any political organisation in the world if its president does not hold a parliamentary or state seat."

Fareez added that Dr Wan Azizah was no longer relevant in the current political scenario as she could not win the hearts and minds of the youth who supported PKR.

Fareez said instead, PKR needed a "complete leader" like Azmin to become the next president who could map out a new direction for the party.

"The perception that the party is led by a dynasty should be quashed once and for all. Failing which, PKR will be frowned upon by other countries as it will be regarded as a party that is nepotistic in nature."

He, therefore, urged every PKR member, including the party's top echelon, to give their full support to Azmin to become the new party president in the coming elections.

 

Chua thanks Najib for respecting MCA's wish

Posted: 15 May 2013 03:40 PM PDT

(NST) - MCA president Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek yesterday thanked Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak for respecting the party's wish not to be included in the new cabinet line-up following its dismal performance in the recent polls.

Dr Chua had conveyed the message in a Twitter posting after Najib announced the new cabinet.

"MCA did not submit any name for cabinet post. We thank the PM for respecting the MCA resolution passed in AGM (annual general meeting) for not accepting any government posts," tweeted Chua.

"The most challenging part is to reach out to all races for greater unity in order to counter the divisive politics of the PR (opposition coalition)," he added.

Dr Chua also congratulated the newly appointed ministers and deputy ministers, whom he believed would bring new input to the cabinet.

MCA won only seven out of the 37 parliamentary seats and 11 of the 90 state seats it contested nationwide in the 13th General Election.

Red Bean Army hard at work spreading rumors

Posted: 15 May 2013 03:23 PM PDT

(Malaysian Digest) - The 'Red Bean Army', a group of cybertroopers believed to be funded by DAP has been hard at work spreading rumors on the internet alleging the government has increased the prices of basic goods like petrol, cooking oil, cooking gas, sugar and flour in a bid to further fuel the public's anger towards the ruling government.

According to a few online blogs, the rumors were spread mainly on social networking sites, namely Facebook and Twitter and has made many internet users angry at Barisan Nasional (BN) making them believe the Opposition coalition (Pakatan Rakyat) would have been a better option in ruling the federal government.

Malay daily, Utusan Malaysia, today reported that blog owner tunfaisal revealed several blatant lies spread by the Opposition; the first one regarding the increase of sugar price.

However some shops supporting Pakatan may have taken to increasing prices on their own.

Two other lies according to him, which was also made by PAS deputy Secretary-General, Dr Syed Azman Syed Ahmad Nawawi is the claim that cooking gas is now up RM2 to RM30, and that the price of Gardenia breads has also gone up.

Syed Azman was found to have spread the rumor on cooking gas price increase via his Twitter account which was later retweeted by Opposition leader, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

"Gullible members of the public will believe all this and be manipulated in the process."

"That is why we should not support liars, because when they lie and we share, like and retweet their lies, we are merely helping them to spread the rumors and indirectly we too become responsible in duping the public," the blog owner said via http://tunfaisal.blogspot.com last Saturday.

This picture showing a price hike of the White Gardenia bread is untrue; according to Gardenia the tag on the left is from a different Gardenia product, sliced Sandwich Bun (Burger bun). Pic: Gardenia's Blog

Meanwhile, another blog, The Flying Kick, claims that several shops have taken to increasing prices after the recent 13th general election (GE13) in an attempt to sabotage the ruling government.

"Malaysia is now faced with a wave of rumors and untruths. It is believed that Anwar is behind this. DAP is helping him from behind by providing the means to do so," the blog mentioned.

Because of these rumors, Gardenia Bakeries (KL) Sdn Bhd has had to issue a statement refuting the price increase.

This act by the Opposition is seen as their means of strengthening their earlier claims that the government will begin increasing the prices of basic goods after GE13.

 

Haris: Street rally will go on

Posted: 15 May 2013 03:07 PM PDT

It does not hinge on Pakatan Rakyat's support, says ABU's Haris Ibrahim.

Alyaa Azhar, FMT

Anything But Umno (ABU) spokesperson Haris Ibrahim said that a street rally against the Barisan Nasional federal government will go on with or without Pakatan Rakyat's support.

When asked if he will call off the rally following Opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim's objection to it, he said: "This is not Pakatan Rakyat's initiative, rather, it is the rakyat's initiative."

"The rally is not hinged on Pakatan's support. The latest announcement by Anwar yesterday that Pakatan does not condone streets rallis has no bearing on our initiative," he said.

Haris, however, said that no date has been set for the street rally.

Social activist Hishamuddin Rais echoed Haris' view by saying that the decision to go on with the street rally will be taken by the rakyat and not Pakatan Rakyat.

Haris told a forum on Monday that pro-Pakatan NGOs would topple the BN federal government through massive street rallies in protest of irregularities during the 13th general election.

"We will take to the streets and take over Putrajaya. If we really want to overthrow them, there is no other way. Democracy does not work.

"The people cannot wait anymore. We don't want to wait another five years. We will take the streets," he said.

Police to take preventive steps

Pakatan, however, said that it does not condone overthrowing Barisan Nasional through mass street demonstrations.

"The proposal has never been submitted to us, it has never been discussed by Pakatan. Those are the views of some NGOs," said Anwar yesterday.

DAP chairman Karpal Singh said his party too, rejected the call for street protests to overthrow the BN government.

While he commended Haris for opposing violent demonstrations, Karpal warned that a street protest may cause unrest if it was not handled properly.

Police on the other hand, have warned against holding a street rally and said they will take preventive measures ahead of the event.

Outgoing Inspector-General of Police Ismail Omar said the statements by the organisers on the rallies were dangerous and provocative.

"Nobody should try to change the government through undemocratic means.

"It must be done only through democratic means. Let the people make their choice through the voting system," he said.

 

‘Racial polarisation no surprise’

Posted: 15 May 2013 02:31 PM PDT

It has been with us a long while and we should admit that it is a potent factor in Malaysian politics, says Chandra Muzzafar.

Lisa J. Ariffin, FMT

Political analysts are not surprised with the country's distinct racial polarisation following the results of the recent 13th general election (GE13).

Political scientist Chandra Muzzafar said that there has always been "a certain degree of polarisation" throughout history, however, in Malaysa, this was made more distinct in GE13.

"Ethnic consciousness has always been strong in society so it should not surprise us. People sometimes attribute to political parties based on ethnicity," he said.

"It has been with us a long while and we should admit that it is a potent factor in Malaysian politics," he added.

Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM) associate professor James Gomez said the re-emergence of racial polarisation "shows that Malaysia is unable to evolve politics into a more policy-centered approach".

"There was a positive indication in the run up to the election where different parties put out their manifestos which were very much policy-centered," he said.

"But soon it degenerated from a policy-centered approach and now after all the race-based talks, we have lost the plot. It has just gotten worse," he added.

Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (Unimas) associate professor Andrew Aeria agreed that racial polarisation "certainly exists within Malaysian society".

He accused ruling Barisan Nasion of making it worse by "not making much effort in closing the ethnic and religious divides".

"Fanning ethnic supremacist positions has only made ethnic/religious relations worse," he said. "In contrast, Pakatan Rakyat has achieved much more in closing this ethnic and religious divide."

Aeria further described Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak as a "lame-duck, wishy-washy PM" who "continues to pander and appease the racist fringes of Umno and BN".

"The racism that has emerged post-GE13 is reprehensible," he said.

Anwar has been giving false hopes

Chandra believed "false perceptions" that the Chinese were "marginalised" by Umno-BN played a key factor in determining the Chinese vote.

"These are all false perceptions that have become widespread. It was effectively built up, especially after the 2008 general election when DAP did well," he said.

Chandra pointed out that the Chinese dominated the upper strata of the Malaysian economy and those at the bottom were mostly of other races.

He added that in terms of politics, "Chinese participation is quite remarkable".

READ MORE HERE

 

Dayaks bitter over cabinet choices

Posted: 15 May 2013 02:25 PM PDT

The Sabah Kadazandusun Murut Welfare and Education Association however described "as historic" the appointment of three full ministers from the community. 

(FMT) - KUCHING: The much anticipated "stronger" representations by Sarawak's loyal Dayak community in the new federal cabinet turned out to be a major disappointment.

In fact local Dayak majority parties Parti Rakyat Sarawak (PRS) and Sarawak Democratic Party (SPDP) have questioned the rationale behind Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak's decision to handover a large chunk of cabinet positions to Chief Minister Taib Mahmud's Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu (PBB).

A SPDP insider in a text message even went so far as to ask if Najib had hoped to mask the fact that he had fewer peninsular-based Umno members on his cabinet compared to before.

"Look at the (cabinet) list, PBB/Sabah 'Malays' all over place," read the message.

Sarawak Barisan Nasional pact comprising PBB, PRS, SPDP and Chinese-majority Sarawak United Peoples Party (SUPP) delivered 25 of 31 parliamentary seats to Najib's push for a new term in office in the 13th general election.

Sabah BN comprising Umno, MCA, Gerakan, LDP, Upko, PBS and PBRS gave federal BN 22 seats.

But yesterday's announcement of cabinet positions showed he had little regard especially for his Dayak-majority party partners – PRS and SPDP, who fought hard battles and delivered 100%.

Collectively PRS and SPDP delivered to Najib 10 parliamentary seats. Of the 11 Sarawak ministers appointed, seven were from PBB.

Among them were four full ministers – Douglas Uggah Embas, Fadillah Yusof, Rohani Abdul Karim, Nancy Shukri, and three deputies, Dr James Dawos Mamit, Dr Wan Junaidi Tuanku Jaafar, and Alexander Nanta Linggi.

Said a deeply disappointed PRS president James Masing last night: "Something is wrong somewhere.

"Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu was given four ministers (57%), PRS one minister (33%), SUPP (100%), while SPDP has zero%.

"Where is the fairness?"

Salang declines, Entulu reluctant

Masing said Najib's cabinet had not rewarded winners and loyalists as could be seen in PRS's and SPDP's allocations.

"Politics normally is not kind to the losers, but (Najib must) reward those who win, " he added.

He said PRS's ministerial appointments did not commensurate with the party's contribution to BN's win.

PRS, which won all the six seats it contested, had expected to be rewarded with one full minister and two deputy ministers and so did SPDP which delivered all four parlaimentary constituencies.

But instead Najib promoted the PRS' former rural and regional development deputy minister Joseph Entulu to a minister in the Prime Minister's Department and retained Julau MP Joseph Salang Gandum as the deputy minister of tourism.

But Salang, who had served nine years as a deputy minister, has declined the cabinet post.

According to sources close to Salang, putting him in the tourism ministry would not help empower the rural Dayak community.

Previously Salang was the deputy minister of information and communications and culture, and during his tenure had worked hard to ensure better internet accessibility in rural Sarawak.

Entulu on his part is a "reluctant" minister.

According to Masing, he had to persuade Entulu to accept the position, adding that he had failed in his bid to get Salang to stay.

Said Masing: "The allocations doen't make sense. Sarawak United People's Party (SUPP) won one seat, yet it is given one full minister. I can't understand the promotion of Richard Riot. The party won one out of seven seats it contested.

"That is 100% accommodation to a party which performed badly in the recently concluded general election. Why?

"While Sarawak Progressive Democratic Party (SPDP) has 100% delivery yet it got zero appointment, " he said.

READ MORE HERE

 

Analysts: Umno-heavy Cabinet reflects Najib’s party polls focus, could affect reforms

Posted: 15 May 2013 02:02 PM PDT

"Well definitely he is seeking re-election this year and that will be reflected in his Umno Cabinet line-up. You can see him strategising for re-election but how is he to do that leaves a question mark because most of them are just old-timers," he said, adding that the names announced have been in government for a very long time, even if not at Putrajaya's highest decision-making level."

By Amin Iskandar, Debra Chong and Syed Jaymal Zahiid, TMI

Umno's domination of the 2013 Cabinet shows Datuk Seri Najib Razak's desire to shore up his personal support ahead of party polls but at the expense of the prime minister's national reform measures, several observers say.

While the pundits hold grave reservations over the large number of veterans in the 32-man Cabinet, they said Najib deserves a chance to prove he can deliver on his promised government and economic transformation agenda once he has secured his party presidency.

The Umno president had cast 17 of his party colleagues in ministerial positions when naming members of his Cabinet yesterday. Of the line-up, most were old government hands being switched around or promoted with the exception of new faces Umno Youth chief Khairy Jamaluddin and Sabah Barisan Nasional (BN) secretary Datuk Abdul Rahman Dahlan.

Universiti Putra Malaysia political scientist Prof Jayum A. Jawan was sceptical about the changes that Najib could make with what the don branded a "conservative" Cabinet.

"I don't see a real power-sharing here. The positions of power are all held by Umno like Finance, Home Affairs and Defence," he said.

"Well definitely he is seeking re-election this year and that will be reflected in his Umno Cabinet line-up. You can see him strategising for re-election but how is he to do that leaves a question mark because most of them are just old-timers," he said, adding that the names announced have been in government for a very long time, even if not at Putrajaya's highest decision-making level."

Like the other pundits, Jayum viewed Khairy's inclusion as a positive step towards getting youth support, but noted the move was unlikely to be sufficient to parry a possible challenge in the party polls.

"Some people in Umno are already saying that Najib would not see a smooth re-election and that there are some people that will likely challenge him," he said.

But such an Umno-studded cast was "clever", according to William Case, a professor in Asian and International Studies at the University of Hong Kong.

"My take is that while many critics are dismissing the Cabinet as made up most of old hacks, I see it as more mixed, possibly in clever ways, as it includes Najib's personal supporters, reformers, and nativists," he told The Malaysian Insider in an emailed response yesterday.

There has been speculation that Najib, 59, is likely to face a challenge to his presidency from within Umno in the party ballot due this year for failing to return BN's two-thirds supermajority in the May 5 general election despite improving the Malay party's number of federal seats to 88.

READ MORE HERE

 

BN urged to improve cyber strategy

Posted: 15 May 2013 01:25 PM PDT

An academic says the ruling coalition is still lagging in the perception war.

Athi Shankar, FMT

Barisan Nasional needs to beef up its cyber team to beat Pakatan Rakyat in the game of shaping public opinion, a political analyst has suggested.

Sivamurugan Pandian, an associate professor at Universiti Sains Malaysia, said social media proved to be the decisive battleground in the campaign for the 13th general election, adding that Pakatan had the upper hand.

"BN surely lagged behind in social media like portal mails, tweets, Facebook, blogs and YouTube," he said.

He cautioned BN against overdependence on the conventional mainstream media and warned that it would face big problems in the next election if it failed to improve on its social media networking and strategies.

"It's time for BN to learn to battle out in social media," he said.

He acknowledged that BN had improved in its cyber strategies since the 2008 election, but not well enough to beat Pakatan in the game.

"BN needs to be more on the offensive," he said.

To illustrate the skill of Pakatan cyber troopers, he cited their treatment of the controversy surrounding Perkasa vice-president Zulkifli Noordin, who was BN's defeated candidate for the Shah Alam parliamentary seat.

He said those troopers effectively played up an old video recording of Zulkifli insulting Indians and Hindus in a religious discourse.

He noted that the video was already online when Zulkifli was still a PKR member but the troopers had skilfully used it to create the impression that BN was in the habit on nurturing racism.

Consequently, he added, the Zulkifli factor was a major cause of BN's loss of Indian votes in Selangor and other urban areas.

READ MORE HERE

 

In the Malay Press: Anwar should step down, says Umno leaders

Posted: 15 May 2013 01:04 PM PDT

by Asrul Hadi Abdullah Sani, fz.com

In Sinar Harian today, Umno leaders called on Opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to fulfil his promise of leaving politics if he failed to win Putrajaya in the 13th general election.

Former Umno Masjid Tanah member of parliament, Datuk Abu Seman Yusop, told the Malay daily that Anwar was still dreaming of becoming the prime minister and was willing to do anything to realise that goal.
 
"He (Anwar) had previously said he will step down if he fails to win but until now he is still the leader of Pakatan Rakyat (PR).
 
"He should actually fulfil his promise but I see what he is doing today is more due to his personal interest than the rakyat's," he said.
 
Abu Seman said Anwar is purposely creating discord in the society because he cannot accept that he failed to win the federal government.
 
Abu Seman stressed Anwar must stop making allegations of election fraud and must instead provide concrete evidence supporting his claims.
 
Puteri Umno chief and Papar MP, Datuk Rosnah Rashid Shirlin, added Anwar must accept the voice of the majority.
 
She also accused PR of hypocrisy and questioned why the Federal Opposition was willing to accept the decision in states that they won.

The poll done by The Edge
 
"PR is seen practicing selective democracy when they refused to accept the decision on the federal government but are willing to accept the decision on seats they won and quickly form their state governments," she said.
 
Rosnah said PR leaders must take responsibility for anything that happens from the street demonstrations, adding that their actions will cause national disunity.
 
Utusan Malaysia also reported that Anwar's political career should have ended following GE13. 

Former PKR youth information bureau secretary, Nordin Ahmad, told Utusan said the national polls have shown that the public want Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak over Anwar.

 

Najib Cabinet Rewards Base as Chinese Sidelined: Southeast Asia

Posted: 15 May 2013 12:20 PM PDT

http://www.bloomberg.com/image/i9fIZadsmZ0o.jpg 

(Bloomberg) - "The Cabinet reflects a prime minister concerned about retaining the premiership and the presidency of UMNO," said Edmund Terence Gomez, a professor at the University of Malaya in Kuala Lumpur. "I don't see any move in the direction to talk about reconciliation and transformation and inclusivity in this cabinet." 

Prime Minister Najib Razak stocked his Cabinet with party stalwarts, after the ruling coalition's biggest ethnic Chinese partner said it wouldn't accept ministerial posts following its poor election showing.

Najib tapped leaders of his ruling United Malays Nasional Organisation for key positions before party polls later this year that will determine whether he stays on as prime minister. He also gave posts to the heads of Malaysia's biggest bank, a corruption watchdog and a Hindu rights group. Two of the new line-up are Chinese, compared with more than a dozen previously.

"The Cabinet reflects a prime minister concerned about retaining the premiership and the presidency of UMNO," said Edmund Terence Gomez, a professor at the University of Malaya in Kuala Lumpur. "I don't see any move in the direction to talk about reconciliation and transformation and inclusivity in this cabinet."

Najib's coalition retained power in the May 5 election even after losing a majority of the popular vote for the first time since 1969, which the prime minister attributed to a loss of support from Chinese voters. Besides an ethnic divide, his administration faces a weakening economy, with Malaysia's growth slowing to less than 5 percent for the first in seven quarters.

"The recovery in terms of exports is quite weak" and will be determined by a growth rebound in developed markets, Ho Woei Chen, a Singapore-based economist at United Overseas Bank Ltd., said yesterday, before the release of economic data. "But consumption, investments will remain strong in Malaysia."

GDP Misses

Gross domestic product rose 4.1 percent in the three months through March from a year earlier, after a revised 6.5 percent gain in the previous quarter, the central bank said yesterday. That's lower than all 22 estimates in a Bloomberg Newssurvey. The monetary authority kept its full-year growth forecast at as much as 6 percent.

The ringgit slipped 0.4 percent before the GDP data was released. It has risen about 3.8 percent in the past 12 months, the fourth-best performer among the 11 most actively traded Asian currencies tracked by Bloomberg. The benchmark FTSE Bursa Malaysia KLCI Index has gained more than 14 percent and closed 0.3 percent lower yesterday.

Najib's coalition won 133 seats, topping the 89 seats claimed by Anwar Ibrahim's three-party opposition, which captured 51 percent of the popular vote. Anwar has said he'll challenge about 30 seats, enough to swing the result, and has held rallies in different states after the election.

MCA Vote

Ethnic Chinese parties in the government won nine seats compared with 23 in the 2008 election. Chua Soi Lek, president of the Malaysian Chinese Association, said on on May 6 the party wouldn't take up its allotment of Cabinet posts.

Najib said he has reserved the transport minister's position for the party in case it changes its mind when it meets to select a new leader.

"We are a balanced cabinet and the transport ministry will be given to MCA once they have decided," Najib said in Putrajaya, the country's administrative capital.

Read more at: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-15/najib-cabinet-rewards-base-as-chinese-sidelined-southeast-asia.html 

Hindraf's Waythamoorthy joins Najib's cabinet line-up

Posted: 15 May 2013 12:12 PM PDT

https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Waythamoorthy1.jpg 

(Bernama) - Hindu Rights Action Force (Hindraf) chairman P. Waythamoorthy has been appointed to join the new Cabinet of Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak. 

The surprise appointment of the 47-year-old lawyer is expected to bring a new wave of hope to improve the livelihood of the Indian community, following a memorandum with the Barisan Nasional (BN).
 
On April 18, Hindraf and BN signed a memorandum of understanding (MoU) with six key points, aimed at bringing poor Indians into the mainstream of the country's development.
 
In return, the movement - which was influential in swinging Indian votes to the opposition in 2008 - said it would tell the Indian community to vote for BN in the 13th General Election.
 
The Kelantan-born Waythamoorthy left Malaysia three days after the historic Hindraf rally of Nov 25, 2007, which resulted in the detention of several activists under the Internal Security Act.
 
The arrests took place on Dec 13, the same year.
 
Meanwhile, Waythamoorthy when contacted by Bernama expressed surprise by the appointment, claiming that he was not aware of the appointment until a friend called him.
 
"I am now in India and I only came to know about the appointment through my friend who called me in Chennai, India. Once I return from India, I will call a press conference," he said, refusing to comment on his appointment.
 
He is expected to return on Saturday.

 
Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Najib looks set to stay

Posted: 15 May 2013 01:41 PM PDT

Why would Umno want to rid itself of a leader who won an unwinnable election for Barisan Nasional? 

Almost two million Chinese voted for Pakatan – largely for DAP really. They voted for DAP in the hope that Pakatan will form government, and that DAP will have effective control of that government. This is NOT what you or I think but this is what a vast majority of the Malays think. It is irrelevant whether it was Umno that put that thought in their mind or whether they worked it out for themselves.

CT Ali, FMT

If Pakatan Rakyat expects Najib Tun Razak to accept defeat at the polls graciously, why don't they graciously accept his victory at the very same polls?

The 13th general election is a done deal. A 44 seat margin win is emphatic! The loss or gain of a few marginal seats would not have made a difference to the final outcome of this 13th general election.

This is not an election where the popular vote of the people determine who should form government. When Pakatan submitted itself to the electoral process, it must do so in its entirety.

This means accepting that the party with a simple majority will form government – an anomaly that would have applied equally to Barisan Nasional or Pakatan Rakyat.

That it favoured Barisan Nasional is moot. This is a separate issue of rampant gerrymandering to be addressed later.

There are also concerns about voting irregularities and we know that Pakatan faced significant restrictions on access to the media but there is a process to resolve those vexing issues of voting irregularities and that process, however tainted, should start now while BN goes on with the business of government.

The allegations that the Election Commission conducted itself with dishonor by doing the bidding of its political master is an issue to be addressed at a more opportune time – not now!

In the final analysis there are enough people who believe that BN has done a satisfactory job and deserve another term in government.

Will Pakatan and Anwar Ibrahim be magnanimous in defeat and proceed with the next business at hand – that of assisting the authorities to investigate any irregularities in the 13th general election, and start its onerous duties as the Opposition to a weakened and bloodied BN government?

In the end there is no gain for BN as they lost eight seats to Pakatan, but give Najib credit for taking BN through a harrowing 13th general election.

Why would Umno want to rid itself of a leader who won an unwinnable election for Barisan Nasional? It was an election that was Pakatan's to lose. And lose it they did!

The race card

The elephant in the room that Pakatan refused to acknowledge was the race factor. This is not about whether you or I are mature enough to NOT make race a factor.

We have already established the fact that we do not want race and religion to be a factor in determining the manner in which each and every one of us will be treated by our government.

Meritocracy should rule the day. Unfortunately the reality is that a critical mass within the Malaysian population will make race and religion their criteria in deciding who should govern Malaysia.

Almost two million Chinese voted for Pakatan – largely for DAP really. They voted for DAP in the hope that Pakatan will form government, and that DAP will have effective control of that government.

This is NOT what you or I think but this is what a vast majority of the Malays think. It is irrelevant whether it was Umno that put that thought in their mind or whether they worked it out for themselves.

That is what the critical mass within the Malay community thought would happen if Pakatan won the election – and guess what they did to counter that possibility? They voted for Umno.

Yes Lim Kit Siang won the battle in Gelang Patah but Pakatan did not win the war against BN.

Kit Siang going into Gelang Patah was exactly what Umno needed to get the Malays on side – and they had the DAP to thank for it. DAP spooked the Malays into voting for Umno.

The big losers

The biggest loser of the 13th general election was MCA and PAS.

Najib had nothing to do with MCA being rejected by the Chinese. MCA leaders did it all by themselves without any help from anybody.

READ MORE HERE

 

Another May 13 in the offing?

Posted: 15 May 2013 01:36 PM PDT

For the sake of this country, the writer hopes his entire analysis is rubbish, and that he will be proven absolutely wrong and a pessimistic idiot.

Before moving on let me just clarify that this analysis is not meant to monger fear or accuse the government of anything. It is a hypothesis based on my historical analysis of post-election trends in Malaysia, and as with all hypotheses, is unproven and certainly not set in stone.

By Ong Kar Jin, FMT

May 13 has arrived and passed with no major incidents. For many Malaysians who sit uneasily with the date, there is a culpable sense of relief. However, is the threat of a nationwide disturbance over?

Is it possible still in this day and age for something on the scale of the May 13 riots to reoccur?

Before moving on let me just clarify that this analysis is not meant to monger fear or accuse the government of anything. It is a hypothesis based on my historical analysis of post-election trends in Malaysia, and as with all hypotheses, is unproven and certainly not set in stone.

This article seeks to analyse and answer two main questions:

How possible is it to have some sort of disturbance that will spark unrest?

What form might it take?

Through a careful examination of past incidences of civil unrest in Malaysia, three incidents in particular stand out for their scale, their impact on the political narrative of Malaysia, and their nature.

The three incidents I speak of are the May 13, 1969 riots, the 1987-1988 Operation Lalang and judicial crisis, and the 1998 sacking of Anwar Ibrahim and the subsequent Reformasi movement.

In considering the events leading up to, during and following the events, three key traits stand out.

Internal Umno struggle

Firstly and perhaps most importantly, all three incidences have taken place in the foreground of internal Umno struggles.

In Dr Kua Kia Soong's thesis of May 13, he posits that the riots were in fact a coup d'état initiated by the ascendant Malay capitalist class under Razak to replace the Malay aristocratic class lead by Tunku Abdul Rahman.

The validity of Kua's statement is subject to debate, but the swift and stunning reversal of fortunes that Tunku Abdul Rahman suffered cannot be discounted as coincidence. Even if the riots were not facilitated by the top leadership of the right wing of Umno, Razak certainly made full use of the opportunity to grab the reins of government.

Recently, Gerakan veteran Dr Goh Cheng Teik and ex-Umno strongman Mohd Tamrin Abdul Ghafar came out to clarify that May 13 was indeed an internal coup orchestrated by irate Umno members against Rahman.

The 1987-1988 Operation Lalang also had similar internal rumblings. In fact, the judicial crisis roots lay in the dismissal of Umno as an illegal organisation due to complaints from Tengku Razaleigh's Umno Team B.

The same goes for the mass arrests that followed the Reformasi movement. Again, it was an inside Umno fight between then deputy prime minister Anwar Ibrahim and Dr Mahathir Mohamad.

Time and time again, Umno leaders especially those from the right wing have shown that they are more than willing to externalize internal struggles to distract people from the real issues and to eliminate opposition.

Come this October, Umno internal elections will be held, and it will be a titanic clash between the reformers under Najib Tun Razak and the Mahathirists under Muhyiddin Yassin's tutelage.

The first shots have already been fired by Mahathir, calling Najib's performance a "disappointment" and openly stating before elections that given a slim victory Najib should give way to deputy Muhyiddin.

Need for consolidation of power

The second trait is a need for constitutional/ law changing. As we all know, the last time Umno was in government with a minority of the popular vote was in 1969. Post-1969, constitutional amendments made the EC beholden to Barisan Nasional and various laws such as the Sedition Act were strengthened.

Similarly, in 1988 the threat from the Semangat 46' coalition formed posed enough of a threat to the Umno hegemony of power that the Mahathir felt was necessary to cripple the judiciary and rob it of its independence.

These changes in law to consolidate Umno dominance have however often been met with significant opposition. It is because of the backlash that comes with these changes in the institutions and dilution of the rule of law that such exercises have needed to be preceded by mass arrests/ unrest preventing any coordinated response.

The Reformasi movement of 1998 was rife with similar arrests, but with a firm 76.56% of seats, BN could comfortably continue its gerrymandering, mal-apportionment exercises.

One must also bear in mind that due to 1998 being led by Anwaristas, it took on a different nature.

At the end of this year, there will be a re-delineation exercise that threatens to entrench BN firmly in power, no matter what the popular vote turns out to be in GE14. Civil society, opposition politicians and proactive citizens have already begun raising awareness of the exercise.

The rakyat, especially urban folk, are acutely aware of their rights and attendance at rallies such as the May 8 Kelana Jaya rally have shown that from here on escalation of civil action can be only grow.

It would require a major distraction on an unprecedented scale to divert attention away from the re-delineation exercise.

Incitement of racial sentiments

The third trait that has preceded such incidents is the exacerbation (or in some cases manufacturing) of racial sentiments.

This has largely been the domain of the government-controlled mainstream media. In 1969, the mainstream media reported Labour Party processions as shouting "Malai-si!" and provoking the Malays.

However, such accounts are doubted and are contradictory to the foreign press accounts that reported the procession as a show of "discipline" and "genuine restraint".

In 1988, Utusan Malaysia blew the issue of Chinese educationists out of proportion. What followed were the mass arrests of not just prominent members of Dong Zong but also of activists and opposition politicians.

In 1999, BN blew up fears of Islamisation, loss of non-Malay rights etc to secure a win despite losing the popular vote of Malays to the Barisan Alternatif.

Now the racist rhetoric has reached an all-time high. From Utusan Malaysia's "Apa Lagi Cina Mahu" (What More Do The Chinese Want?) , an ex-judge's warning of backlash against the Chinese, to PM Najib's "Chinese Tsunami", all Umno media seems to be blasting out racism at every avenue.

READ MORE HERE

 

Finally, KJ

Posted: 15 May 2013 12:09 PM PDT

http://fz.com/sites/default/files/styles/1_landscape_slider_photo/public/KhairyJamaluddin_ShahrinYahya_2.jpg 

Khairy has weathered the storm. Even his political foes and detractors acknowledge that he deserved a ministerial post, citing his loyalty to Umno when he was being sidelined and the number of times he responded in the name of the party in facing off the opposition and NGOs in debates and what not.

Mohsin Abdullah, fz.com 

I'M SORRY I can't resist but to begin this piece like this. Who is KJ? The answer depends on who you ask and where you ask the question.
 
In PAS, KJ is Datuk Kamaruddin Jaafar, MP for Tumpat. In PKR, its Khalid Jaafar, who lost in Hulu Selangor in the recent general election. But the KJ of the hour must surely be Khairy Jamaluddin, Umno Youth chief and MP for Rembau.
 
So finally Khairy has made it into the Malaysian cabinet. Expected of course, as many believed Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak simply can't ignore the young Umno leader anymore. 
 
As we know, he missed the boat or rather was overlooked when Najib named his cabinet upon taking over from Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi in 2009. This is despite Khairy winning the Rembau seat in 2008 and the Umno Youth top post. 
 
If that wasn't bad enough, his deputy in Umno Youth Datuk Razali Ibrahim and also the man he had beaten in the Youth polls Datuk Mukhriz Mahathir leapfrogged him – apparently earning the trust of the PM as deputy ministers in the Najib administration.
 
And we all know the tirade and onslaught launched by former PM Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad. And of course, the many allegations and controversies. 
 
To cut a long story, Khairy has weathered the storm. Even his political foes and detractors acknowledge that he deserved a ministerial post, citing his loyalty to Umno when he was being sidelined and the number of times he responded in the name of the party in facing off the opposition and NGOs in debates and what not.
 
So now he's a minister. Of course the hows and whys are a plenty. But all that is for another day. The story now is the cabinet that Khairy is in. 
 
Minutes after Najib named his cabinet – live on national TV – I asked several analysts, political observers and commentators for their views. All of them mentioned Khairy first. As if to suggest that's the only bight spark in an otherwise "not exciting" cabinet line-up. I'm being polite here in using "not exciting".
 
"The cabinet is a recycled cabinet although there are new faces. To me, the inclusion of KJ is the only thing worth talking about," said a long-time observer who had served the government years ago. 
 
He went on to say: "And seen from an Umno political perspective, the PM finally acknowledged the need to have the Ketua Pemuda in the cabinet. And now that Khairy has position (as a minister), his footing in Umno is entrenched and his political base strengthened," he added, casting an eye on the Umno party polls in November. 

In short, pretenders to the Umno Youth crowd (should Khairy want to defend it, chances are he will and won't go for higher posts, at least for now) would think twice before mounting a challenge.  

Read more at: http://fz.com/content/finally-kj 

What if only taxpayers were allowed to vote?

Posted: 15 May 2013 12:06 PM PDT

http://manilatimes.net/index/images/columnist/dolor.jpg 

We cannot ignore the obvious: vote buying is rampant in all our elections because there is no shortage of vote sellers. Anyone who sells his or her vote clearly does not understand or appreciate the democratic institutions that so many Filipinos have fought so hard to attain.

 

Manila Times 

 

This is one of those proposals that crops up every so often, but which never goes anywhere because too many sectors slam it as anti-poor, anti-democratic, and anti-populist.


It may be all of the above, but it is also a sensible proposition when you get right down to it.

Who, after all, has a bigger stake on the future of the country than the working men and women who fund the government's day-to-day operations with their taxes?

And what of the millions of poor Filipinos who cannot pay taxes? opponents to the proposal will ask.

This is precisely the point. All they have to do is to work their way up to taxpayer status, and voila! They can become active participants in all the electoral exercises. They don't even have to be among the top taxpayers either. Anyone who pays a minimum amount of taxes— say P1,000 a year in basic income tax—can qualify to become a voter.

We cannot ignore the obvious: vote buying is rampant in all our elections because there is no shortage of vote sellers. Anyone who sells his or her vote clearly does not understand or appreciate the democratic institutions that so many Filipinos have fought so hard to attain.

Call them the masa if you wish. They are the ones who keep dynasties in power because they refuse to fight for a better quality of elected leadership. They are the ones who elect con men to public office on the premise that they would do the same things if they were given the chance to become mayors, senators, governors, congressmen and yes, presidents.

Another impossible condition
Add to this requirement another one that will have human rights groups up in arms —only those who can read and write should have the right to vote.

This, too, is another sound proposal that deserves serious consideration once the emotional arguments are set aside.

This can be implemented not in the next elections, but somewhere down the road. Those who say that it is an anti-poor proposal should be reminded that poverty cannot be used as an excuse to get an elementary education. The government's conditional cash transfer (CCT) program sees to it that the poorest of the poor may not use their economic state as an excuse to deprive their kids of an education.

For one, education is free nationwide. And secondly, they receive cash from the government on the condition that their kids of school age be enrolled.

Read more at: http://manilatimes.net/index/index.php/opinion/columnist1/47396-what-if-only-taxpayers-were-allowed-to-vote 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Anwar sukar terima takdir Tuhan

Posted: 15 May 2013 03:37 PM PDT

Ketika orang lain menikmati saat-saat suka-duka sebagai pesara setelah bersara dari perkhidmatan awam ataupun pencen dari pekerjaan di sektor swasta, tidak ada siapa di antara kita yang menduga bahawa seorang lelaki yang berusia 55 tahun dari Kubang Pasu dilantik menjadi PM Malaysia ke-4.

Tidak banyak tanda yang membolehkan kita meramalkan bahawa tokoh dari Kubang Pasu itu bakal dilantik sebagai TPM sebelum disahkan ke jawatan PM sebaik Tun Hussein Onn bersara.

Namun takdir tercatat pada 1976 apabila Dr Mahathir dilantik menjadi TPM berikutan pelantikan Hussein menggantikan Tun Abdul Razak yang baru meninggal dunia.

Hussein tidak meninggal tetapi memilih melepaskan jawatan dan seperti sudah tersurat ditakdirkan pada 1981, Dr M secara rasmi dilantik menjadi PM ke-4.

Bila kita bercakap pasal takdir, maka kita harus akur kepada hakikat bahawa apa pun yang berlaku ke atas kerjaya politik seseorang ataupun sesebuah pertubuhan politik adalah sebenarnya takdir.

Pas sejak sebelum merdeka lagi sudah bercita-cita menguasai beberapa kerajaan negeri dan akhirnya kerajaan Pusat. Parti itu melakukan pelbagai rancangan bagi memastikan mereka muncul pemenang dalam setiap pilihan raya sejak selepas merdeka lagi, namun seperti kita ketahui takdir tidak menyebelahi mereka.

Paling mutakhir dan terkini serta yakin dengan slogan 'Ini Kalilah' Pas terus gagal walaupun terpaksa menumpang kekuatan DAP dan PKR. Sebagai parti paling senior dalam Pakatan Rakyat dan keanggotaan terbesar, Pas hanya mampu memperoleh 21 kerusi Parlimen berbanding DAP dan PKR yang masing-masing peroleh 38 dan 28 kerusi.

Begitulah takdir menimpa Pas. Di sebalik doa demi doa, solat Hajat demi solat Hajat daripada pemimpin berimej agama yang cukup tebal dan jarang menanggalkan jubah dan serban, Pas terus gagal menunjukkan  peningkatan nyata, baik ketika berlawan secara sendirian atau bergabung dengan orang lain.  

Walaupun sudah tersurat bagi Pas 'habuk pun tarak', namun pemimpin, ahli dan penyokong Pas nampaknya enggan menerima takdir walaupun mempercayai qadak dan qadar adalah satu daripada Rukun Iman.

Anwar Ibrahim adalah nama besar yang diramal menjadi pemimpin utama negara sejak mula berkecimpung dalam Umno lagi dan menimba populariti dengan memperagakan imej Islam. Anwar sedar jika ia masuk Pas pada awal 1980, bukan saja peluang nak jadi PM jauh lebih malap, nak dipilih sebagai ahli Parlimen pun belum tahu lagi.  

Nampaknya sementara Anwar boleh menerima takdir yang baik menjadi TPM, namun enggan pula menerima takdir malang dipecat dari jawatan kerajaan dan parti serta dipecat dari Umno pada 1998. Anwar mencetuskan kegelisahan awam dan menyebabkan kacau-bilau dengan kempen 'reformasinya'.

Tanpa disedarinya, orang mula sangsi tentang Anwar yang selama ini mempergunakan ayat Quran dan hadis bagi mengaburi mata rakyat, terutama orang Melayu apabila terang-terang cuba menentang perjalanan takdir. Dalam keghairahan memetik kata-kata Abul Ala Al-Maududi, Yusof Qardawi, Anwar terlupa kata-kata Kahlil Gibran, "Manusia tidak boleh mengubah takdir sebagaimana bintang di cakerawala tidak boleh mengubah orbitnya."

Kini, bak kata orang, secara retrospektif, rakyat mula menyangsikan keupayaan Anwar menjadi TPM waktu dalam Umno jika dibanding dengan Tun Ghafar Baba. Ghafar sebenarnya memang jauh lebih hebat. Ia setia pada parti dan tidak rosakkan parti berbanding Anwar. Dari aspek moral, semua tahu Pak Ghafar seorang insan yang mulia.

Begitulah mekanisme takdir yang bersifat halimunan. Jika ditentang sekalipun, ia tetap tidak mengubah apa-apa. Apakah peluang Anwar dalam PRU14 nanti? Ketika itu usianya sudah menjangkau 71 tahun. Kalau berdasarkan peristiwa yang memberikan justifikasi kepada kejayaan dan kegagalan masa lalu, nampaknya jalan untuk Anwar ke Putrajaya dihalang tembok-tembok tebal dan kabus gelap.

Hari ini kempen Black 505 yang dicetuskan oleh beliau sebagai bantahan kepada takdir Tuhan mungkin disokong oleh mereka yang imannya mengenai qadak dan qadar adalah cakap tak serupa bikin, tapi hakikat sebenarnya Black 505 adalah catatan pendahuluan kepada episod hitam terakhir bagi Anwar sebelum terus pudar dan lenyap serta terpadam sama sekali dalam sejarah politik Malaysia.

Mungkin ketika itu nanti Anwar akhirnya dapat menerima takdir betapa kerusi PM bukan ditentukan untuknya.

 

Kuasa Melayu takkan hilang sampai bila-bila

Posted: 15 May 2013 01:14 PM PDT

Ahli Parlimen DAP-Bukit Bendera Zairil Khir Johari berkata, perkara itu dilihat berdasarkan tiga perkara utama.

Pertama, dari segi demografik menunjukkan komposisi masyarakat Melayu adalah majoriti di Malaysia dan semakin berkembang, namun tidak bagi masyarakat Cina yang semakin mengecil.

Keduanya, menurut Zairil hak kaum Melayu dilindungi oleh undang-undang yang termaktub dalam Perlembagaan Persekutuan dan tidak boleh dicabar oleh mana-mana pihak.

"Selain itu ada kuasa Raja-Raja Melayu yang menjadi pelindung bagi memastikan hak keistimewaan Melayu terus terjamin," katanya.

Beliau berkata demikian dalam sidang media selepas menjadi panel forum Wacana Sinar Harian Siri 20: Pasca PRU 13: Ke Mana Haluan Politik Melayu di Kompleks Karangkraf di sini semalam.

Perlu optimis

Sementara itu, Ahli Majlis Tertinggi Umno Datuk Saifuddin Abdullah menolak dakwaan wujudnya fenomena 'tsunami' pengundi masyarakat Cina semasa Pilihan Raya Umum (PRU) ke-13 pada 5 Mei lalu seperti yang digambarkan Barisan Nasional (BN).

Sebaliknya, beliau menegaskan BN perlu optimis dan menerima perubahan tersebut, bukannya bersikap tuding jari serta cuba meniupkan api perkauman.

"BN perlu minta maaf atas kesilapan masa lalu dan (berjanji) tidak akan ulangi kesilapan.

"Kemudian baru boleh mulakan kehadapan dengan cara urus tadbir baru, dan perlakuan itu harus bentuknya baru," katanya.

Bekas Timbalan Menteri Pengajian Tinggi itu berkata, untuk kekal relevan Umno mesti terus melakukan transformasi bagi menjamin kelangsungan bangsa Melayu.

"Kalau tidak semasa PRU nanti Umno akan kalah lagi teruk," katanya.

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


GE13 : The "Tsunami" Aftermath - An Open Letter To The PM, To Pakatan Rakyat and To ...

Posted: 15 May 2013 12:29 PM PDT

It's been 2 weeks since the Malaysian GE13 and while it seems like the iron is starting to warm down, the dust looks far from being settled. 

I was one of those who flew home to vote for change - and came out seriously disappointed with the results. When I woke up to catch the red-eye back to Yangon and saw the news, my first thought was "Shit, it's still them." Then, millions of messages flew my way, some flew past me - asking us to stay strong and that a revolution takes years and as such, we've taken our first steps, yada-yada-yada. 

Well, that revolution thing may be true. In fact, I was even thinking perhaps a change might still take place, considering how much the rakyat had shown its powers on rallying for change. I was naïve enough to think that perhaps, this would be BN's wake-up call. Nobody can ever be that, that, that stupid not to wake up to the roar of the rakyat. Ever the idealist....... 

And what was one of the first thing the shit-head PM said? "Chinese Tsunami". That was stepping on my tail - the 2nd time. Then the UMNO running-dog paper called Utusan comes up with a headline that asks "What More Do The Chinese Want?" The Star echoed with "The Chinese Would Be Sidelined". That's stepping on my tail the 3rd time. And then the idiot PM comes out to defend Utusan. That's stepping on my tail the 4th time. 

With that, I left Malaysia angry, frustrated and no, I alone (as I cannot speak for others) do not accept the incumbent government as the party that I had voted for. I flew home all the way to vote for change, to vote for justice. But judging on the fiery racist remarks, it just tells me - BN will never, ever change. 

I've been tossing and turning for the last couple of weeks over my own feelings and thoughts on all the above. And so, I decided to write this 'open letter'. I clarify - I'm no political analysts and I'm not here to talk about smokescreens and conspiracy theories. These are but my own point of view. A lot of talk, and I know talk is free, talk is easy. Some may agree, some may not. It's a free world (if not country :P)

________________

Dear Mr. Najib ("Mr." is used intentionally as I have every intention to greet you as an equal), 

You asked what more do the Chinese want, well, can I ask what have you given me before? Can't answer me, eh? And then you ask why did the Chinese like me betray you and your goons, and went on to vote for the opposite team instead. Ok, since you asked me as a Chinese, I'll give you a Chinese answer. Although, I believe it is the wrong stereotype. 

Firstly, please look at it from a business point-of-view. I see Malaysia as a "BERHAD" company. The day I was born, I was given a birth certificate as required by law (and please don't think this certificate is your "favour" to me. It ISN'T). This certificate is my shareholding certificate to a company called Malaysia. So, one of the T&C of this share certificate is that I get to vote for the Director and his team that would be running the company. 

Now, if you only used your pea-brain for just a second - you would know that any businessman/woman worth their salt would obviously look at putting in place a team that would make profit for the company. I'm not sure a Director and his team who makes over-priced purchases on machines and submarines that wouldn't work is considered as someone with great business skills. I mean - *slap forehead ten times* right? Under your steerage, the company seems to have made considerable losses - a drop in the quality of living, escalating crime rates, increasing gap between the rich and the poor, serious drop in quality education, no further achievement in sports, no real development in the country, and you know what? I could go on and on. In summary - you and your team had failed to give me any ROIs (and that's called Return On Investment just in case you don't know) at all. And I personally think, your time is up. I mean, your nemesis Pakatan Rakyat had won the pitch with me simply because in the smaller companies (which I am also a share certificate holder of, by the way) where they had been given a chance to steer, had shown at least some form of ROIs. As such, I voted for them. I mean, you and your team had been given how many mandates thus far? And yet, nothing to show. I'm ready to invest on another team, you see. 

Whilst your racist war-cry is in real bad taste, as a "Chinese" businesswoman, I can understand where you are coming from. In fact, I think your team is pretty brilliant in defining your target market segment. The Chinese are a minority group in Malaysia. In actual fact, with or without us, makes no difference to your brand/product. Since your product and brand is made for mass usage, why waste time targeting the minorities, right? You obviously need to keep your 70+% of your major market segment happy. Thus, a strategy you thought would echo your market sentiments. 

But Mr. Najip, marketing case studies and history have shown that products or brands who do not keep up with market trends will find their market share graph going down. Case-in-point - Nokia. I'm using Nokia as an example because Nokia used to be one of the top mobile phone brands. But because they aren't exactly changing with times, they now have mobile phones that would be more suited for the masses (read SEC C and below), not the executives or upper-level white collars or the yuppies. Hell, even school kids would rather be caught dead than with a Nokia. My point is - your strategy is no longer cool. But then again, your Mamakootie Agent Mr. M pointed out that Pakatan Rakyat's target market is the urban, educated people. So, it can only mean that your target is the.. err... rural, uneducated. Well, my friend (no, I take that back. You're not my friend) - newsflash. People progress. One day, rural will become urban and uneducated will become educated. UNLESS, of course, your aim is to keep them where they are so that you can forever pull the wool over their eyes. Hang on a second, that is already what you're doing, aren't you??? *horrified discovery on my part*. Just to stay in power, you will hold back other people's progress? 

As a shareholder, my biggest concern is to not see the company going bankrupt. I mean, all those "Free Gifts" promotions you are running so rampantly is surely going to hurt the bottomline. Then all the investments I had been making (read TAXES and yes, I do pay them) will come to naught. I shudder to think of the day when the people of Malaysia is sent to Myanmar to work as maids or construction workers. In fact, right now, I'm thinking of how stupid can I be, investing in a company that is headed that way?? I mean, really now, do I even want to invest in a company that is the laughingstock of the region, if not the world? I have businesses in Cambodia. I've got my local team asking me about that damn indelible ink (because it seems that the ones used in Cambodia really lasts a long time). And then I've got them asking me also - "how come Malaysia is inviting Cambodia to observe your elections? We are third world country, you know." I don't know. They can ask the stupid pea-brain Prime Minister, I guess. That means YOU, Mr. Najip. 

In conclusion - from a time where I thought I should be fair and cross one vote for your team and cross one vote for the opposite team, I think right now, I've had enough of you and your team's nonsense. As a tax-paying shareholder, I'm fed-up with the racism, the INEQUALITY, the corruption (how can you steal my investment and put them into your own pocket??? - under corporate laws, that's called CBT!!), the crime rate, the everything under your regime. So NO - you do not get my vote, you didn't and you do not have my acceptance. 

_______________ 

Dear Pakatan Rakyat,

And so right, I voted for you. Not really because I truly, truly believe in you guys, but because I just wanted a change and no other team's pitching. So you lost. So what? Maybe it's a good thing. You now have a bigger team in the parliament and you have another five years to learn. Whilst I am myself bitterly disappointed with your loss and I do not accept Mr. Najip's mandate, I've gotten over it. And I think you should too. It's time to start working! 

Popular votes and all that jazz aside, you still lost. Yes, yes, I know - gerrymandering, fraud, phantoms and so on - what are you going to do about it? Cry like a little boy? If you're going to do that, just join the now-defunct MCA team and close shop. Time to grow up and be a man. I didn't vote for you guys to conduct one rally after another. Stop wasting resources and get to work. Your campaigning should start now and not 2 weeks before GE14. Don't you agree? 

Why did you fail to win over the hearts of the rural population? Are you making your presence felt enough with them? Or are you doing a UMNO-BN/MCA? "Because you didn't vote for me, I don't represent you"? I think you could take a page from Obama's speech here - "Even though you didn't vote for me, I hear your voices, and I'm going to work as hard as I can to be your president." A dear friend of mine posted on his FB status - "praying for rapid urbanization and internet penetration into the rural areas within the next 5 years." Damn right, Pakatan team. You heard that? 

I'm not even sure this could be possible, but if I am looking at this from a business / marketing point-of-view again, since the company called Selangor and Penang is making profits, perhaps, some of those profits could be re-invested into 'opening of new markets' - like Sabah / Sarawak? Again - that's just me, ya. You need to check with your other shareholders too. We don't want a case of 'misuse of funds'.  Whenever a new product or brand is launched into the market, a long-term education and awareness programme is required. Not just a 2-week campaign! And definitely not on-going long-term 'sales promotion' programmes. 

Read more at: http://midnitemessages.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/ge13-tsunami-aftermath-open-letter-to.html 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


GE13: How BN lost the battle of perception

Posted: 15 May 2013 01:30 PM PDT

For the 13th GE, the Opposition set out a strategy of portraying BN administration as a corrupt, evil, racist and inept government while seeking to position and elevate PR as Apostles of good governance, anti-racism, anti-corruption, democracy, equality and human rights. To support their campaign, PR came up with the catchy war cry of "UBAH" and the grammatically awkward and incorrect "Ini Kali lah".

FMT LETTER: From Calvin Sankaran, via e-mail

To an objective and intelligent observer of our divisive and highly charged political scenario, the result of our 13th General Election wouldn't have come as a surprise. The deep fault lines across ethnic lines, the anti-establishment mood prevalent among the educated urban populace and political leaning of social media-influenced youths were all there to see even to amateur watchers of the Malaysian sociopolitical landscape.

Even without the benefit of opinion surveys and statistical analysis, the mood of the electorate was quite easily discernable and election result predictable. The real surprise was to see the surprise expressed by the leaders and strategists of the ruling coalition of Barisan Nasional (BN) over the result.

So what had contributed to the worst ever result for BN? Was this due BN's internal problems and weaknesses or contributed by externally-driven factors? As with most problems in life and business, it is my belief this result was a combination of a complex mix of both internal and external factors. However, it is also true that the root causes can be categorisCalvin Sankaraned to a few key reasons and a long list of minor ones.

In analysing and searching for key root causes, we need to look at the demographics of groups that BN had received lowest level of support – the Chinese, urban middle/upper middle class and the youths. Based on my analysis the root causes for lower level of support from these demographics can be pinpointed to two key reasons. One – Pakatan's highly damaging political campaign and two, BN's lack of effective strategies and countermeasures to respond to and neutralise this Pakatan's hate propaganda.

German Chancellor Otto von Bismarck had famously defined politics as the art of the possible. While this was probably true 300 years ago, however in this Age of Information, politics is the War of Perception.

It doesn't matter how you have performed, the core principles and philosophy you believe in, your capability and capacity to deliver promises, personal and party credibility or even the rationality and deliverability of your manifesto. The only thing that matters is the perception about you that exists in the minds of the masses.

If you succeed in implanting a positive perception of you, from then onward you own the electorate's collective psyche. For they will only see and hear what they want to see and hear – irrespective of the persuasiveness of argument and the strengths of facts to the contrary. To these people, truth is defined as news reports and facts that confirms and reinforces the pre-existing perception that has been deeply ingrained into their consciousness. Anything that doesn't is automatically rejected as propaganda and lies.

For the 13th GE, the Opposition set out a strategy of portraying BN administration as a corrupt, evil, racist and inept government while seeking to position and elevate PR as Apostles of good governance, anti-racism, anti-corruption, democracy, equality and human rights. To support their campaign, PR came up with the catchy war cry of "UBAH" and the grammatically awkward and incorrect "Ini Kali lah".

That many Malaysians, including those from highly educated and upper middle class background, were completely taken in by PR's campaign and voted for the Opposition is an excellent illustration that politics is indeed the War of Perception.

So how did PR managed to infiltrate such completely false notions into the collective psyche of these voters? The strategy and tactics of Pakatan in waging this War of Perception are not difficult to analyse or understand for these have been deployed, tested, fine-tuned and proven in numerous political battlefields by political master strategists such as Hitler, Goebbels, Lenin, Stalin, Osama Bin Laden and Machiavelli.

To implant negative perception of BN in the minds of electorate, PR propagandists spread lies and half-lies and made outrageous, vicious charges to inflame emotions and propagate hatred. It was irrelevant these accusations and rumors were irrational or completely unsupported by reason or facts. What mattered was the constant and consistent barrage of attack using simple but repetitive lines of attack – BN as euphemism for corruption, racism and mismanagement.

This initially started in the PR-owned or friendly news portals where these accusations were machine gunned on daily and non stop basis. Knowing that most people only skim the headlines and do not bother to read the contents, these news portals skillfully presented news with highly misleading headlines while burying the truth deep into the stories.

The fundamental journalistic and ethical principle of presenting both sides of story was completely ignored. Even when presented with denials by BN, their statements were published late, given low prominence and/or placed in such way that it was easy for readers to miss it.

The latest and most sinister mode of attack is the use of social media – truly the Wild, Wild West frontier of the Internet – and the mobile network (SMS/MMS/WhatsApp). Some of the most vicious and dangerous accusations and rumours were spread via Social Media and SMS/MMS/WhatsApp.

Another interesting aspect of Pakatan's campaign is the extensive outsourcing of political hate campaign to (ostensibly independent) NGOs to accord a semblance of respectability and deniability in case things go wrong. Many of these NGOs are either closely allied or formed solely to further Pakatan's political objectives.

No sane person would consider NGOs such as Bersih, ABU, Bar Council, Merdeka Center, REFSA, NIAT, Pemantau, SMM, ANAK, Tindak Malaysia, CIJ, Himpunan Hijau, WAMI, Aliran, Penang Watch, NIAT, MoCS, KOMAS, SABM, MIBA, Suaram, etc., as even remotely independent or objective.

READ MORE HERE

 

Tindak Malaysia demands the EC Chairman, Deputy Chairman and Secretary resign to take ...

Posted: 15 May 2013 12:58 PM PDT

https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRowdysvy3roqsUeSLqiJVExhPUWNLW3j_NAplI90U74eYHEZ98ew

To mislead the people and squander millions of Ringgit (more than RM 6 million) of public funds to procure 'indelible' ink that cannot serve its function as indelible ink is, we believe, a criminal breach of trust.

PY Wong 

Election Commission's Ajaran Sesat is seen from the way it is prepared to mislead the rakyat about the use of indelible ink. Here is the response from PY Wong (for the Chinese press, 黄炳耀), founder of Tindak Malaysia:

It was reported by The Malaysian Insider (http://bit.ly/TMIIndelibleInk) that EC Chairman Abdul Aziz had announced in Dec 2011 that the EC would use silver nitrate indelible ink for the general elections. Indonesian Election Watchdog, ANFREL, stated that silver nitrate up to 4% concentration was safe and that Indonesia spent US 2.7 million to buy 1,149,890 bottles of indelible ink for 574,945 polling stations (2 bottles per station) in the Indonesian Presidential Election, 2009. http://bit.ly/1011c46

ANFREL Bangkok explained that the indelible ink needed 30 seconds to dry and can last up to 4 days. http://bit.ly/AnfrelBKKIndelibleInk Then India's EC on 29th Sept 2011 warned that ink used on voters will be easily removable if poor quality indelible ink is used. http://bit.ly/IndelibleInkIndianEC

Silver nitrate will stain the skin and the nail, making the stain indelible. While the stain on the skin commonly last up to 3 days, depending on the concentration of silver nitrate used, the stain on the nail will last until the nail grows out. We invite the public to examine their nails to see if there is any stain there. If not, you know that silver nitrate was not used as promised. Then what ink did the EC really use?

The function of the indelible ink is a check to prevent double voting. Because there are concerns that advanced voters vote more than once using their police/military authority cards and their personal Identity Cards, the indelible ink is to alert the Election Commission clerks and the polling agents of people voting twice.

In most countries, ink is applied after voting. We recommended this repeatedly to the EC. This is in contrast to the EC's insistence on marking before voting. This will create risk of dirtying the voting slips thereby delaying the voting process and creating confusion as to the validity of the ballot paper. Now that we have found that the ink was not indelible as promised, the EC has come up with all sorts of excuses:

  • It doesn't matter. The voter will not be able to vote twice in the same polling station.

But the worry was never about voting twice in the same polling station. No voter is that stupid. The worry is about a voter using another MyKad to vote elsewhere undetected because the ink on the finger has been removed.

Now here's an even more ridiculous excuse by the Deputy EC Chairman. http://bit.ly/TheStarIndelibleInk Their audacity is incredible!

  • "The people must understand that we were using indelible ink for the first time, and surely there would have been shortcomings. We appointed a well-known company to produce the ink for GE13.

  • "Some 250,000 bottles of indelible ink were booked two months before GE13,'' he said.

That is 10 bottles per station! Five times the quantity used by Indonesia. It is outrageous that after years reminding them to have an open procurement process to avoid problems, they got into the exact problems we feared – indelible ink that did not work and purchased at horrendous cost. This cannot be allowed to go on!

Tindak Malaysia demands that the Election Commission chairman and his team resign en bloc to allow a total revamp of the Election Commission.

To mislead the people and squander millions of Ringgit (more than RM 6 million) of public funds to procure 'indelible' ink that cannot serve its function as indelible ink is, we believe, a criminal breach of trust. A number of police reports have been lodged against the Election Commission, and Tindak Malaysia hereby urge the Royal Malaysia Police and the MACC to investigate Abdul Aziz Mohd Yusof (chairman), Wan Ahmad Wan Omar (deputy chairman) and Kamaruddin Baria (secretary)

Tindak Malaysia also urge the EC to explain why the ink could be removed so easily instead of pointing fingers on the public for proving that the ink is removable. For once, can the EC come clean? Did they use indelible ink or not?


Cadangan Memperkukuhkan Sokongan Cina

Posted: 15 May 2013 12:41 PM PDT

http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/images/uploads/2012/october2012/21/2110chua4.jpg 

Berilah nafas baru ke atas sokongan komuniti Cina dangan penubuhan parti baru, Parti Tionghua Baru. 
 
Fariq Islam
 
Kepada Y.B. PM yang dihormati,

Salam 1Malaysia. Selamat menubuhkan kabinet baru.

Apa yang nyata berlainan sekarang ialah ketandusan perwakilan Cina dalam kabinet baru. Ini bukannya satu gejala yang sihat. Keengganan MCA dan Gerakan mengambil bahagian dalam pentadbiran BN membawa risiko besar, bahawa BN kehilangan sokongan Cina yang kian tipis sekaligus.

MCA banyak silap percaturan. Dalam PRU 13, MCA bukan sekadar hilang sokongan Cina, malah Melayu juga tidak sanggup bersabar dengan kata-kata yang tergantung pada bibir Dr. Chua itu, ANTI-HUDUD. Dr. Chua ini bukan sahaja "menjual" hak-hak Cina, malah menyebabkan kemarahan Melayu, yang ramainya juga penyokong BN. Maafkan sajalah kalau saya sebut dia sebagai si maksiat, yang paling berdosa dalam sejarah kepemimpinan BN mahupun MCA. Kini pulak, dia hendak "menghukum" Cina kerana enggan memberi undi kepada MCA! Apakah ini semangat demokrasi? Sampai bilakah MCA akan insaf? Cina memang pandai berniaga, tetapi dalam soal politik, memang pada tahap kurang matang.

Pada hemat saya, kalau MCA begitu degil enggan mendengar nasihat PM, biarkanlah sahaja. Berilah nafas baru ke atas sokongan komuniti Cina dangan penubuhan parti baru, Parti Tionghua Baru. Masukkan ahli-ahli MCA yang menang dalam PRU 13 ke dalamnya. Tarik juga ahli-ahli Gerakan kaum Cina yang menang dalam PRU 13 ke dalamnya. Ambil kesempatan untuk mendorong ahli-ahli DAP dan PKR kaum Cina melompat parti. Peruntukkanlah semua kerusi DUN dan parlimen kepada Parti Tionghua Baru. Jangan BN dibebani dengan MCA yang "koyak"!

Yang ikhlas,
Fariq Islam

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved