Sabtu, 11 Mei 2013

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Anwar backs Azmin on Khalid’s MB job, says must have consensus

Posted: 11 May 2013 04:37 AM PDT

Syed Jaymal Zahiid, TMI

Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim appeared to have backed his confidant Azmin Ali in calling for a consultation process for the Selangor mentri besar post after the latter claimed Tan Sri Abdul Khalid Ibrahim's candidacy had bypassed the democratic process.

The PKR advisor also appeared to have suggested that the party were considering removing Abdul Khalid when he told Sinar Harian that the consultation should include discussions on other possible candidates for the job.

"I have no problem with Tan Sri Khalid. But the problem is... there is no problem but there should be consultation. Are there other names? New faces? Do we continue?" Sinar Harian quoted him as saying.

Anwar, however, added that they will solve the debacle within these few days.

The tussle over the mentri besar post has pushed PKR into a leadership crisis with its deputy president now openly accusing the party of "nepotism" when he alleged it had bypassed the consultation process in picking Abdul Khalid for the job.

Azmin also appeared to question Abdul Khalid's leadership at a press conference yesterday, and said he was seeking a meeting with PKR's national leaders for a consensus decision to be made on who gets to be the new Selangor MB.

The debacle has sparked talk that Azmin, who is also said to be vying for the position, would leave PKR following the party's supposed endorsement of Abdul Khalid's governance.

Azmin dismissed the speculation at yesterday's press conference where he was flanked by some of the party's Selangor line-up in what appeared to be a sign of protest against Abdul Khalid's likely reappointment as the state's chief executive.

Although the Bukit Antarabangsa assemblyman was evasive when bombarded by questions for his view on the candidacy for the post, the PKR deputy president made several insinuations that leaders from the party's Selangor chapter were against Abdul Khalid's reappointment.

READ MORE HERE

 

'I was offered post once'

Posted: 11 May 2013 12:30 AM PDT

SELANGOR MB'S JOB: Azmin blames Wan Azizah for arbitrarily sending list to sultan

SYED UMAR ARIFF AND ROZANNA LATIFF, NST

THE gloves are off in the tussle for the Selangor menteri besar's post with PKR deputy president Azmin Ali yesterday revealing that party supremo Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim had offered him the job after allegedly branding Tan Sri Abdul Khalid Ibrahim as an "inefficient" menteri besar.

At a packed press conference at the PKR headquarters, Azmin was stinging in his remarks when he alleged that Anwar's wife and PKR president, Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail, had acted arbitrarily by submitting a list of MB candidates to the Selangor sultan without consulting PKR members.

The former aide of Anwar, who co-founded PKR, disclosed that Anwar had wanted to boot Khalid out as menteri besar in 2008.

Azmin claimed that this was conveyed to him by Anwar after the Permatang Pauh by-election, which marked Anwar's return to Parliament five years ago.

"Anwar told me to prepare myself to replace Khalid. He said the party was extremely dissatisfied with the performance of the menteri besar.

"Civil servants and the business community had complained on the gross bureaucratic practices which did not reflect a reformist administration."

However, Azmin, who was later promoted as Selangor PKR chief to take over from Khalid at the time, said he firmly declined Anwar's offer as he did not want to jeopardise the party's unity.

Instead, Azmin claimed he, instead, pushed for Anwar to be appointed as the state economic adviser to mitigate complaints and problems which arose during Khalid's tenure.

"When we talk about a reformed government, there has to be reforms. You want to talk about reformasi, but you might as well keep the old government if it takes two years for business owners to get approval. I would expect a reformist government to do away and dismantle this bureaucratic system. We want something that is transparent and above board."

On Thursday, Azmin had said Selangor did not deserve a "lame duck" menteri besar since Pakatan had won the state with a sound majority.

However, Azmin yesterday deflected questions on his view of Khalid's performance, stressing instead on the importance of seeking consultation and consensus among the state party leaders on the appointment of the menteri besar.

He emphasised that he did not reject Khalid's nomination as menteri besar outright, saying that any decision made by consensus would be accepted and obeyed.

"This is why consultation is important... we want leaders who have the humility to listen to the people.

"If they can listen, they can change. But if they cover their ears, it is a different story."

Without being specific, Azmin hinted that Anwar had also recently broached the subject of his possible appointment as menteri besar and on Khalid's performance.

He said the opposition leader was willing to sit down for a discussion.

"But I told him that we have been discussing the same issue for many years. Be fair to me... if I am ambitious, then I would have taken the post after Permatang Pauh. I did not do that because I wanted to strengthen the party."

Azmin expressed his frustration after being informed that a letter containing a list of possible appointees had allegedly been submitted by Dr Wan Azizah to the Selangor sultan on Thursday.

He claimed he did not know the contents of the letter as it did not receive the approval and consent of the party's state leadership, suggesting instead that the move could promote "nepotism" within the party.

When asked if Dr Wan Azizah was acting unilaterally in sending the letter, Azmin replied: "In a way, yes."

To offset the alleged transgression, Azmin said he later put up another list of candidates which he said was done with a consensus between Selangor PKR state assemblymen and parliamentarians.

"Our list was submitted to Dr Wan Azizah on Thursday and it is up to her to take the next step."

Ironically, Azmin denied that PKR was having problems in retaining Khalid as menteri besar, despite the fact that Pas and DAP had already endorsed Khalid's appointment

Cracks seem to be emerging in Anwar's PKR

Posted: 11 May 2013 12:19 AM PDT

Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) deputy president Mohamed Azmin Ali on Friday questioned the letter sent by PKR president to the Sultan of Selangor on the candidate for the state's chief minister.

Melisa Goh, Channel News Asia

Cracks appear to be emerging in opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim's Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR).

On Friday, PKR deputy president Mohamed Azmin Ali openly challenged the top leadership's decision to reappoint former Menteri Besar of Selangor, Khalid Ibrahim, for another term.

At a packed news conference at the PKR headquarters in Petaling Jaya, Mr Azmin Ali questioned the letter sent by PKR president Wan Azizah to the Sultan of Selangor on Khalid Ibrahim's candidacy for Selangor Menteri Besar.

This was even though the choice was endorsed by PKR's two allies -- DAP and PAS - and that a formal letter of appointment had already been sent to the Sultan of Selangor.

Mr Azmin Ali, flanked by his supporters, made no secret that he is gunning to helm Selangor -- Malaysia's richest and most industrialised state.

He said: "Aspiring for political office is no crime, and indeed a good motivation for anyone entering politics, provided, and that is the most important proviso, that the reason for taking such office is to serve the people better, and more effectively, nothing more, nothing less."

The 48-year-old was once seen as the blue-eyed boy of PKR de-facto leader Anwar Ibrahim.

Mr Azmin Ali claims he and all 14 newly elected PKR state assemblymen were not consulted on the choice of Selangor Menteri Besar.

"I did not question the decision of PAS-DAP on the candidate for Menteri Besar but I am concerned about the letter sent to the palace without first consulting with other state assemblymen in PKR, which is one of the three components of Pakatan Rakyat," he said.

Mr Azmin Ali claimed that he has the support of the grassroots.

"It was unanimous support. I served him (Anwar Ibrahim) in the government for 13 years, and he was in jail for 8 years -- 21 years (in total). And he has been released for the last what, since 2004. I mean, I have been so loyal to him," he said.

Visibly disappointed by the leadership's decision, Mr Azmin Ali also warned against nepotism taking root in the party -- a direct reference to Mr Anwar and his family.

Political analysts keenly watching the development in PKR say a potentially damaging fallout is imminent if Mr Azmin Ali does not get his way.

For now, Mr Azmin Ali is staying on as the party number two, and many are not ruling out him making a direct bid for party presidency at the upcoming party polls.

Separately, Dr Farish Noor from the S Rajaratnam School of International Studies in Singapore told Channel NewsAsia that the timing of the PKR cracks is unfortunate.

"Obviously those who are watching the coalition and in particular, Anwar Ibrahim's party PKR, are worried that this is actually a sign of further schisms to come. There's a lot of speculation that some of the key leaders of the party may be abandoning Anwar Ibrahim very soon," said Dr Farish.

Dr Farish also shared his thoughts on Anwar's reaction to the May 5 poll results.

He said: "It has to be noted that in a sense the Pakatan Rakyat has gained. The number of seats that the opposition coalition has won has increased. They are also better represented in the state of Selangor where they have won more state assembly seats. So frankly, I'm not entirely certain as to why so many of the opposition supporters seem disappointed because it's actually been a net gain for them.

"We look at Kelantan and Penang, and we can see that the PAS-dominated state government in Kelantan and the DAP-dominated state government of Penang have gone about their business in beginning to govern the two states but in Selangor, there are these rifts still emerging and I think that it's highly problematic that all the divisions seem to be coming from one party, namely the PKR."

 

Selangor Sultan has absolute right to appoint Menteri Besar

Posted: 10 May 2013 05:32 PM PDT

Despite the storm brewing up among the leadership of the three parties, the political factor is not the determinant of who will be appointed as menteri besar because it is the absolute right of the Sultan of Selangor, Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah. 

(Bernama) - The polemic of who is going to be the Menteri Besar of Selangor appears to be hotly debated by Pakatan Rakyat component party leadership namely PKR, PAS and DAP as no final decision has been made to date.

Despite the storm brewing up among the leadership of the three parties, the political factor is not the determinant of who will be appointed as menteri besar because it is the absolute right of the Sultan of Selangor, Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah. 

As recorded in history, the late Sultan Salahuddin Abdul Aziz Shah was very firm on deciding who was the replacement for Tan Sri Muhammad Muhamad Taib who resigned as Selangor Menteri Besar on April 14, 1997 as the Sultan wanted a candidate that had been screened and reviewed to ensure the person was really clean. 

The late Sultan Salahuddin Abdul Aziz stressed that the candidate should be honest and sincere and the Sultan would reject a Menteri Besar who enriched himself. 

In a meeting between the Sultan and the then Prime Minister, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad on April 21, 1997, the Sultan said the suitable candidate had not been selected and on May 2, he chose Tan Sri Abu Hassan Omar as Selangor Menteri Besar. 

Universiti Malaysia Kelantan (UMK) professor and legal advisor, Prof Datuk A. Halim Sidek said the impending appointment of the Menteri Besar of Selangor by Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah is based on the 1959 Selangor State Constitution and two important articles. 

"Firstly, the Sultan has the right to appoint a member of the State Legislative Assembly who in his judgment enjoys the confidence of the majority of the assembly. Secondly, the person appointed must be a Malay and a Muslim," he said when contacted by Bernama. 

Prof A. Halim said this in reference to Article 51 (1) and based on Article 53 (2)(a); and Article 51 (2) subject to Article 53 (4) of the state constitution 1959. 

Also of interest is Article 51 (1A) which mentions the Sultan having the right to appoint a deputy Menteri Besar of Selangor. 

The outcome of the 13th general election (GE13) showed both PAS and DAP obtaining 15 seats in the assembly while PKR obtained 14 seats. 

"It is clear from the seat count, the three parties are equally eligible but with the power of the Sultan based on the articles above, DAP is not eligible as it does not have a Muslim Malay candidate in Selangor. 

"Whether the candidate is from PAS or PKR is not the question even though PKR has one seat less than PAS but they could come to an agreement to nominate one candidate. 

"But eventually, the power of consent for their candidate rests in the hands of the Sultan, which shows the Sultan has absolute power to choose the Menteri Besar of Selangor," said Prof A. Halim. 

Malay Consultative Council's Muslim Transformation Bureau chief, Datuk Dr Mohamed Ghazali Md Noor said the importance of the Selangor Menteri Besar being a Malay and a Muslim is to ensure the Sultan has a capable advisor on the issue of Malays and Islam. 

"The Sultan is an umbrella for the Malays and a pillar of Islam and therefore needs a Menteri Besar of Malay origin and a Muslim. If otherwise, how is one going to advise the Sultan?" he said. 

Dr Mohamed Ghazali said one more factor which should be considered is the historical factor that this country was built by the Malay Sultanate and the government formed by the Sultanate has survived till today as the government of Malaysia. 

The Malaysian Council of Former Elected Representatives (MUBARAK) president, Tan Sri Abdul Aziz Rahman said the power to select the Menteri Besar of Selangor is clearly with the Sultan and the three parties should not make it a political game among themselves. 

He said they needed to stop being arrogant by saying they can choose who is to be Selangor Menteri Besar when the right to choose is in the hands of Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah.

 

DAP mulls filing election petition amid GE13 fraud claims

Posted: 10 May 2013 02:29 PM PDT

Syed Jaymal Zahiid, TMI

The DAP is mulling whether to challenge the Election 2013 results in the court by filing an election petition amid widespread allegations of fraud in a polls that saw the ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) coalition winning on minority support.

Party secretary-general Lim Guan Eng (picture), however, said his party was still conducting legal research and in the process of compiling the necessary data for the case and is expected to make an announcement soon.

"I think we should let our lawyer look into it first... we will make the necessary announcement soon," he told a press conference after delivering his opening speech at a meeting with DAP lawmakers here.

Lim said its Puchong MP and lawyer Gobind Singh Deo will be spearheading the legal action.

READ MORE HERE

 

Anwar’s allegations are lies to confuse people – EC

Posted: 10 May 2013 01:53 PM PDT

(Bernama) - The Election Commission (EC) has deemed Parti Keadilan Rakyat advisor Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's allegation that it did not carry out any improvement in the 13th General Election (GE13) as a big, blatant lie aimed at confusing the people.

EC chairman Tan Sri Abdul Aziz Mohd Yusof said the commission had carried out various improvements for the just-concluded general election on Sunday, including providing the cleanest-ever electoral rolls.

He said the electoral rolls used in GE13 had been gazetted through a thorough cleaning process and online review of citizen record and latest voters' address in the data base of the National Registration Department.

"As the voter registration system uses the unique 12-digit of the identification card as registration identifier, therefore, it was impossible to obtain multiple registration in GE13 electoral rolls," he said in a statement here today.

He explained that through the registration system, non-citizens – whether they were from Bangladesh, Indonesia, China or India – could not register as additional voters.

Apart from that, Abdul Aziz said the electoral rolls used in GE13 had been verified, gazetted and finalised.

"It is impossible to enter additional voter name after a certain electoral roll has been gazetted for the election.

"As such, the allegation that 40,000 Bangladeshis were brought in to vote in GE13 was completely unfounded and slanderous after the electoral rolls were gazetted and finalised," he added.

In the general election, the EC also conducted early voting on April 30 which involved 235,826 police and armed forces staff and their spouses to replace the balloting process through the post for the group.

He said in line with the claims of opposition political parties and non-governmental organisations, the EC introduced the indelible ink in GE13 as an additional element to strengthen the balloting procedure to prevent any attempt by a party to vote twice.

Abdul Aziz said the primary basis of reviewing voter identity and the method to ensuring a voter did not vote more than once, was that the name list in the electoral rolls was used in each stream or voting place on polling day.

"If a person's name could not be found or has been deleted after voting, the voter could not vote more than once. This means multiple voters could not have happened in the balloting process of this country," he said.

Improvement was also seen from the aspect of campaign duration which saw the official campaign being fixed for 15 days from April 20, to last Sunday.

 

Social media beat me, says Nong Chik

Posted: 10 May 2013 01:44 PM PDT

(The Star) - Former Federal Territories and Urban Wellbeing Minister Datuk Raja Nong Chik Raja Zainal Abidin said he lost in the election due to allegations levelled against him and his family in cyberspace.

"It was not a Chinese tsunami' but character assassination in the social media that caused my defeat to Nurul Izzah Anwar in Lembah Pantai," Raja Nong Chik told a press conference here yesterday.

Looking rested and cheerful, Raja Nong Chik said he would never blame Chinese voters even though he lost heavily in a Chinese majority area.

"It was a culmination of a series of articles in online news portals and the Internet which disparaged me and my family that caused me to lose.

"They targeted my father, my daughter, and even accused me of bringing in phantom voters into Lembah Pantai," he said.

Nurul Izzah received 31,008 votes, beating Raja Nong Chik with a majority of 1870 votes.

Raja Nong Chik said Nurul Izzah had falsely accused him of bringing in phantom voters into the constituency.

"At the end of the day, all these personal attacks probably influenced the fence sitters to vote against me," he said. He will probably initiate legal action against Nurul Izzah.

Raja Nong Chik thanked the 29,000 people who voted for him.

 

Rival Pakatan factions fight it out in cyberspace

Posted: 10 May 2013 01:39 PM PDT

(The Star) - The battle lines between rival factions in PKR appear to have been drawn after deputy president Azmin Ali's dramatic press conference, with the fight already started in cyberspace.

As soon as Azmin sent puzzling tweets about the party's state of affairs and appeared to criticise Wednesday's mammoth rally to reject the general election results, vocal personalities took to Twitter to make their allegiance known.

Although most top leaders kept their silence on the ongoing internal fight, PKR legal affairs bureau chief Latheefa Koya (picture) did not stop slamming those lobbying for Khalid to continue as mentri besar.

"It's not surprising that most of those churning out anti-Azmin tweets are the same guys who supported Zaid (Ibrahim) during the PKR elections!" she tweeted, referring to the former PKR leader who eventually left the party.

"Secretly. the TSKI suck-ups' are basically hoping Azmin leaves - hence the taunting," she added referring to Khalid's initials.

PKR chief Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's aide Najwan Halimi, who is also the Angkatan Muda Keadilan deputy information chief, also rebuked Azmin's detractors, including state PAS deputy Youth chief Mohd Sany Hamzan.

Sany said that PAS was upset over statements by PKR leaders that the MB's post was permanently theirs even though PKR holds the least seats.

In response, Najwan tweeted that he was disappointed with Sany's "arrogant" and "selfish" attitude.

"To the Selangor PAS deputy Youth chief, don't butt in. Who betrayed the Pakatan Rakyat candidate in the Kota Damansara state seat?" he asked.

But those close to party president Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail, who endorsed Khalid, rallied against Azmin.

Newly-elected Kelana Jaya MP Wong Chen tweeted this Thursday night, after it was rumoured that Azmin would leave the party: "Rumours of defections are rife tonight. If it comes true tomorrow I have only two words to traitors: good riddance!"

"I am with the younger generation of Pakatan leaders who are here for the long haul," he tweeted again yesterday.

 

MAS denies flew phantom voters for polls

Posted: 10 May 2013 01:28 PM PDT

(Bernama) - Malaysia Airlines (MAS) ferried 6,553 passengers in 57 commercial chartered flights between May 2 and May 4, and from May 6 to May 8, as the carrier pooh-poohed claims it carried so-called phantom voters during 13th general election.

MAS group chief executive officer Ahmad Jauhari Yahya (picture) said all the passengers were Malaysian citizens who presented their identity cards upon check-in.

"Malaysia Airlines has and will always be an airline with integrity and as such, we would not tolerate further baseless allegations against us and will do whatever necessary to protect our position," he told a press conference at the Malaysia Airlines Academy here today.

He said MAS operated commercial chartered flights to bring voters home to their constituencies, so they could exercise their right to vote.

"These flights were from Kuala Lumpur to four destinations, namely Kota Kinabalu, Sandakan, Kuching, Sibu and return, and also voters from Sabah and Sarawak to Kuala Lumpur and return," he said.

Ahmad Jauhari said the carrier had played its role as a responsible corporate player by introducing special fares to Malaysian voters who needed to return home to vote.

"In fact, Malaysia Airlines waived all penalties for revised travel plans for all our passengers during the period of the general election. We were probably, the only airline to do so," he said.

He said the general election promotional campaign — from April 17 to April 28 — received overwhelming response.

"Within two weeks of the announcement of the campaign, 34,000 seats were already taken.

"However, it is unfortunate that several allegations were made against Malaysia Airlines, specifically that Malaysia Airlines carried so-called phantom voters on our aircraft between Peninsular Malaysia and Sabah and Sarawak during the recent general election," he said.

 

‘Anwar told me to prepare to take over from Khalid in 2008’

Posted: 10 May 2013 01:17 PM PDT

(The Star) - PKR deputy president Azmin Ali claimed that he was offered the Selangor mentri besar's post in 2008 during the Permatang Pauh by-election.

"Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim asked me to prepare to take over from Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim as the party was unhappy with his performance in helming Selangor.

"There were complaints by civil servants and the business community on bureaucracy and that the administration was not reformist in nature.

"I refused the offer as it could cause instability to the party.

"Instead, I proposed that Anwar be appointed as Selangor's economic adviser to ensure the smooth administration of the state," he said at a press conference yesterday.

Despite Khalid's high-profile corporate experience in Permodalan Nasional Berhad and Kumpulan Guthrie Berhad, it is public knowledge that Azmin has been unimpressed by his performance.

The rivalry culminated in a public spat in July 2009 when Azmin hit out at Khalid repeatedly over what he claimed was slow action in the Selangor Economic Action Council and called for a state exco reshuffle.

Both agreed to put their differences aside during the Hulu Selangor by-election in April 2010, despite rumours that Azmin was unhappy about being passed over for the campaign director's post, which eventually went to Khalid.

But things boiled over again in June 2010 when Azmin replaced Khalid as the state PKR chief, with the explanation that it was better for one man to be in charge of running the state and the other to run the party.

Then, Khalid's political secretary Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad known to be Azmin's loyalist resigned, paving the way for Faekah Husin, PKR president Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail's former aide, to replace him.

Faekah became Khalid's most vociferous defender, rising to the occasion each time her boss was criticised or ridiculed by anyone, including Azmin.

Up to October 2012, Faekah had several public rows with those loyal to Azmin on a range of issues.

 

Guan Eng: Selangor MB post should be decided by Pakatan and not just PKR

Posted: 10 May 2013 01:15 PM PDT

(The Star) - The candidate for the position of Selangor Menteri Besar (picture) is a matter for Pakatan Rakyat to decide and not just one party, says DAP secretary-general Lim Guan Eng.

He said as the people voted for the coalition, and not just PAS, PKR or DAP, it was important for all three parties to be involved in the process.

"It is a Pakatan matter," he said when commenting on Wanita PKR chief Zuraida Kamaruddin's call for DAP and PAS to stay out of the issue on the appointment of the Selangor Mentri Besar.

Zuraida had said that the post belonged to PKR and the party should be given space to decide the best person for the job with no interference from a third party.

Lim said Zuraida was looking at factional politics.

"We look at it from the position of Pakatan, not as Team A or Team B. We went into the elections as Pakatan PKR, PAS and DAP not as PKR Team A or Team B, and the people voted for Pakatan, not for PKR Team A or Team B.

"Let the people decide whether they prefer factional politics or DAP and PAS looking at it separately from the position of Pakatan," he told a press conference yesterday.

Lim reiterated his support for Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim to retain the mentri besar post, saying that he had led the Selangor team to a two-thirds majority in the May 5 polls.

"He should be given another opportunity to serve," he said.

Selangor PAS deputy commissioner Khalid Samad said the party maintained its stand that Khalid should serve a second term as mentri besar, echoing PAS secretary-general Datuk Mustafa Ali's statement made earlier this week.

 

Azmin Ali questions Wan Azizah

Posted: 10 May 2013 01:06 PM PDT

Azmin said his unhappiness stemmed from the failure of PKR leadership to engage Selangor assemblymen, MPs and division leaders in the selection process and not because he was eyeing the mentri besar's post.

(The Star) - PKR deputy president Azmin Ali has launched a thinly veiled attack against president Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail for failing to consult Selangor party leaders over who should be the mentri besar.

The Selangor PKR chief had fired the first salvo a day earlier by saying that the next mentri besar should not be a "lame duck" who allowed himself to be led by others.

The reference was seen as a dig at Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim.

At a packed press conference yesterday, Azmin said Dr Wan Azizah had sent a letter to the palace endorsing a particular candidate for the post without the knowledge of state PKR leaders.

"The process to select the mentri besar was not done through consultation and consensus.

"I expected the party leadership to call for a special meeting to get the opinion of MPs and assemblymen before making any recommendation on who should be the MB.

"As of now, my friends and I have no idea whose name was submitted to the palace because we were not consulted," he said.

However, he said whoever was chosen would be respected as long as the decision was reached through consensus and consultation.

Azmin said his unhappiness stemmed from the failure of PKR leadership to engage Selangor assemblymen, MPs and division leaders in the selection process and not because he was eyeing the mentri besar's post.

He also denied rumours that he would resign from his party position and that of Gombak MP and as Bukit Antarabangsa assemblyman, stressing that he had no intention to do so.

"I have no doubt these rumours were started by Umno and Barisan Nasional to cast me in the most negative light and to paint me as an unscrupulous person who would abandon his party for political position and material gains.

"To these people, let me say this: carry on dreaming because I have no intention of resigning.

"This has been my struggle for the past 15 years. I am confident with the PKR struggle and will not leave the party," he said to the applause of his supporters.

On Khalid's leadership style, Azmin said it was no different from his Barisan predecessors, adding that it was still too bureaucratic for a reformist party.

"I am not saying that he is corrupt but we need to be more than just that. In 2008, we were all caught by surprise (in winning Selangor).

"After five years, we need to ensure a new system is in place and a strong leader is appointed to work for the people who have given us a strong mandate," he said.

On Wednesday's mammoth rally held in Kelana Jaya to protest against the general election results, Azmin said he was not lambasting the party in his tweets but only urging it to move forward after the polls.

Azmin said disagreement was not the reason why he did not attend.

"I have been going to one rally after another for the past 15 years. But for future rallies, I will be there and support them," he said.

 

Malaysia's Opposition not after an 'Arab spring' - DAP leader

Posted: 10 May 2013 12:28 PM PDT

https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSJ3wdsDNBYZ9chMP8RdpCOkhWdzSQXIIOgVQnjYeN-WIZWS6rUqQ

Radio Australia has spoken to several BN - UMNO voices, who all say, "Present the evidence of fraud, take it to the courts." Why hasn't the Opposition done this? 

Malaysia's opposition is planning several political gatherings across the country this month, over last Sunday's disputed national elections.

The protests could be the most provocative challenge to the Malaysian government in years.

Mr Lim Kit Siang, a veteran senior member of the DAP, a component of the three-party Pakatan Rakyat, told Asia Pacific that the Opposition is studying allegations of fraud in between twenty to thirty constituencies.

Mr Lim, who caused a political upset last Sunday by winning a seat in Johor state against the incumbent chief minister, says media reports of a 'wave of protests' are erroneous.

Presenter: Sen Lam

Speaker: Lim Kit Siang, member of parliament for Gelang Patah, and senior member of the opposition Democratic Action Party

LIM: Well, we're having ceramahs (meetings) in order to explain to the people the electoral fraud, as well as the latest political situation in the country. I had one last night for instance, a DAP ceramah. Of course people are angry and frustrated that the election process has been so unfair, not having a level playing field, that has deprived the country of a government that they wanted - which is a replacement of the present government and prime minister.

LAM: Are you concerned that such ongoing protests might lead to national instability?

LIM: Well, we definitely do not want an 'Arab spring' in the sense of having national incidents and all that. We want to continue to have peaceful and orderly process, where there can be public meetings to explain to the people the latest political developments in the country, including the electoral fraud.

LAM: Isn't it time for all Malaysians now, to get together, after you've had these elections - to forward the progress of the country?

Read more and listen to the podcast at: www.radioaustralia.net.au/international/radio/program/asia-pacific/malaysias-opposition-not-after-an-arab-spring-dap-leader/1129248  

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Democracy perverted

Posted: 11 May 2013 12:23 AM PDT

Trickery is used to unseat an elected government by foul means

Malaysians, who trooped in the tens of thousands to listen to the diatribes of sore losers, will rue the day when this country would have lost the progress made economically, socially and politically. This last is obvious from the way PKR and DAP are attempting to commandeer a mature democracy by deception.

New Straits Times

LEADERSHIP by example has no place in PKR. If it did then Malaysia would be in deep trouble for, in the actions of its de facto head, are  manifest everything that parents would have taught their children not to do. Foremost would be the unending refrain in every home for every member of the household not to break the law. Yet, here is a man professing to be a leader, encouraging anyone who will listen to defy the authorities and rule of law. Of course, there are parties trained in law happily charging the police's interpretation of the Peaceful Assembly Act to be wrong and that there is nothing illegal about the protest rally held recently by both PKR and DAP at the Kelana Jaya Stadium. It is important here to note that Pas has already accepted the outcome of the recent general election.

Malaysians, who trooped in the tens of thousands to listen to the diatribes of sore losers, will rue the day when this country would have lost the progress made economically, socially and politically. This last is obvious from the way PKR and DAP are attempting to commandeer a mature democracy by deception. Accusing the Election Commission (EC) of all manner of electoral irregularities and the police force for facilitating them, PKR, however, does not appear anxious to take its accusations to the courts of law. Instead, the country is witnessing a situation where one of its own key officials is forming the party's own tribunal and calling upon the public to come forward with evidence of electoral fraud. Strange that the accusers are only just looking for evidence.

Something is surely amiss when allegations are made prior to the gathering of evidence. What is undeniable is that they are baseless in the first place. That it all began from well before the general election is further proof of PKR's intention to draw a veil of trickery, abusing social media towards accomplishing these ends. There, credulous parties are picking these fabrications up and spreading the purported video evidence of vote buying, phantom voters being bussed in and reports of blackouts at counting stations. If all these were unimpeachable proof why are they not being carted in as complaints to the EC? Instead, they are allowed to go viral on Facebook. Now why is that? Obviously, the aim is to trap the unthinking into the web of lies orchestrated by PKR's de facto head and his stooges. Is this not dishonesty belying a tyranny waiting to surface and, maybe, even worse?


Riding waves on the M’sian tsunami

Posted: 10 May 2013 12:51 PM PDT

BN and Pakatan need to go back to the drawing board, reassess their positions on important issues, and envisage new ways to improve their platforms.

Nile Bowie, FMT

The mood was jubilant at the Kelana Jaya mass rally held on the evening of May 8, as some 50,000 to 70,000 participants filled the stadium and crowded the highway. The national anthem was sung, slogans were changed, flags were waved, and people dispersed peacefully.

I cannot recall witnessing any police presence at the event or along the highway. Participants honked horns and carried around placards that read "Save Malaysia", "1Bangla", and my personal favorite, "Bangla Nasional (BN)".

For one thing, the multi-ethnic crowd was a testament to Najib's misstep with the "Chinese Tsunami" statement.

The thrust of his statement isn't incorrect; Chinese voters by and large abandoned BN and voted for the opposition.

Really, the outpouring of support for Pakatan reflects an "Urban & New-Media User Tsunami," which doesn't exactly role off the tongue, so better or for worse, let's call it a "Malaysian Tsunami".

The swathes of discontent (predominately) young and middle-aged participants at the rally are indicative of the massive trust deficit the BN is faced with.

While it's evident that many have lost faith in the government and the electoral authorities, the vast majority of opposition supporters are hostile to legitimate criticism of the Pakatan coalition and unwilling to scrupulously scrutinize hearsay and social-media rumours.

As questionable pictures float around social-media purporting to show "foreigners" standing in line to vote as definitive proof of BN being engaged in fraud, the DAP has condemned social network users for spreading rumours and allegations that a massive blackout took place in Bentong during the tallying of votes, at which time EC officials brought in "dubious ballot boxes" that favoured BN.

The opposition leader's claims of 40,000 foreign nationals being flown into Malaysia to vote for BN remain unsubstantiated.

Partially free and not fair

The thrust of the report issued by the IDEAS Institute detailing their assessments of the election results is more-or-less objective and balanced; it presents the legitimate grievances of the rally-goers and lays out the challenges facing the EC and BN.

Firstly, many voters are under the impression that the EC is a creation of the BN; the report corrects those assumptions.

The membership of the EC are appointed by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong (Federal Head of State) after consultation with the Conference of Malay Rulers, not the Prime Minister (Head of the Government).

The report noted how the EC made a "bold and laudable" move to accredit 17 organisations as domestic election observers; five in Peninsula Malaysia, nine in Sarawak, and three in Sabah, noting that "the EC did not interfere with the recruitment process of observers, and the organisations were given full autonomy to recruit, train and deploy their volunteers within the terms and conditions of their appointment."

The report highlights how the EC continues to face criticism from many quarters as a result of the widespread perception that the EC is not politically independent.

The authors of the report attribute this to the EC's failure to affectively appease public concerns (compounded by hundreds of cases of indelible ink washing off), as well as all EC officials being former civil servants.

The authors state "the EC is open to new ideas, but their weakness is that they can only work cordially with organisations that employ a non-confrontational approach."

The report confirms what is an obvious truth, that the Malaysian mainstream-media environment is heavily dominated by BN-friendly coverage. The report notes how the BN government offered Pakatan a 10-minute, pre-recorded slot on RTM to air their manifesto. Pakatan rejected this offer on the basis that 10 minutes was insufficient compared to the coverage enjoyed by BN.

More troublingly, the report notes the repeated usage of government facilities, especially government schools, for BN campaigns, along with cases of political speeches being delivered in army camps.

It is fair to say that these instances created an uneven field as it allowed BN to campaign using government facilities paid for by taxpayers. The report cites concerns that the electoral roll contained multiple cases of voters sharing the same name and address, voters sharing the same IC number, mismatch between gender indicated by IC and data on EC database, voters with incomplete house addresses.

The authors stated their belief that popular suspicions would have not arisen if the integrity of the electoral roll were guaranteed, though it does not link these alleged discrepancies to any abuses that would have allowed BN to unfairly win the election.

Perhaps the most compelling discrepancy was that constituency electorate sizes were not delineated proportionately. The EC, not the government, is empowered to delineate constituencies every 10 years, and the last delineation exercise was done in 2003.

The report notes how the difference in constituency electorate sizes was limited to a margin of 15% above or below the average constituency electorate at the time of independence. This rule was relaxed in the 1960s and was completely removed in 1973, allowing a political party to win the majority of seats through winning smaller constituencies, but without receiving the majority of popular votes, which is what happened in GE13.

This is by far the most glaring case of an institutional-slant in favour of BN.

The report states, "While the overall election process proceeded with no major incidences, we observed verbal and physical confrontations against several individuals who resembled foreigners. Despite the various technical issues, we found that the overall election process proceeded smoothly and the vast majority of the glitches were not major. Many of these issues were rectified by the EC officers on duty immediately. We also found most nomination and polling centres to be well organised. We also found the effectiveness of the indelible ink to be questionable, and the allegations of phantom voters to be plentiful. However, we were not able to verify if the alleged foreigners were indeed foreigners, or they were actually Malaysians who looked like foreigners."

It should be noted that the Merdeka Centre, called "the country's most respected polling organisation" by many international media outlets, criticised the IDEAS Institute report, saying it rejected some of the reports "accusations" because it believed they had gone beyond their scope of work.

The Merdeka Centre also accused the opposition of making a "host of unsubstantiated allegations about the elections". Though the IDEAS report lays heavy focus on the BN's control of mainstream media, it omits how Pakatan dominates social media and is able to reach millions through new-media applications, which would be entirely necessary to explain in such an assessment; it fails to do so.

It is also worth noting that Pakatan is not denied space on mainstream-media, it chose to refuse it because it was unhappy with the time allotments. Pakatan is also not prevented from using digital media and having print newspapers, not prevented from campaigning, and granted freedom of movement.

What is curious, is that the IDEAS Institute report hesitated to classify Pakatan's claims as "unsubstantiated allegations", even when it admitted it could not confirm their statements.

READ MORE HERE

 

Ku Li as PM?

Posted: 10 May 2013 12:13 PM PDT

http://malaysiasdilemma.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/may-13-kl1.jpg 

Someone had suggested a government of national unity. This could be a baby step to heal the current rift, or else we might be stuck for another decade in this current predicament. The worst possible scenario is that we might implode and send us back to 1969. These are possibly the remaining scenarios for us now, assuming PKR de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim fails to pull a 'Sept 16' rabbit out of the hat. Malaysia is now split into two political loyalty camps.

Kuo Yong Kooi 

Eighty-four percent turnout to vote in GE13 is as good as it gets. The way Umno created the delineation, it probably needs a 100 percent turnout of voters for the opposition to get a good shot at Putrajaya.  

Someone had suggested a government of national unity. This could be a baby step to heal the current rift, or else we might be stuck for another decade in this current predicament. The worst possible scenario is that we might implode and send us back to 1969. These are possibly the remaining scenarios for us now, assuming PKR de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim fails to pull a 'Sept 16' rabbit out of the hat. Malaysia is now split into two political loyalty camps.

Most of the time, politics in the Parliament is just a numbers crunching game. Can someone in the Parliament do some number crunching and ask all the newly-elected parliamentarians who would they prefer to be prime minister? Muhyiddin Yassin or Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah (Ku Li)?

Is there anyone on the Umno/BN side with any conscience at all? If there are enough numbers on the Umno/BN side waking up to this new post-GE13 reality, then right-wing conservative Umno leaders like Muhyiddin cannot possible take the helm.

The results of GE13 have clearly send a message to the Umno rank and file that the rakyat wanted something to change here. The political careers of Perkasa's Ibrahim Ali and Zulkifli Noordin have just been buried. Leaders like Muhyiddin, who firmly stated that "I am a Malay first and Malaysian second", will only divide us and push us closer to a nightmare scenario.

There are decent Umno leaders like Tengku Razaleigh who are acceptable to Pakatan Rakyat. Why not take this option? If there are enough numbers on the Umno/BN side who think this is the only way to salvage Umno/BN from oblivion, then when Parliament convenes, make a motion of no confidence on the current Prime Minister Najib Razak. 

Give the newly-elected Parliamentarians a chance to vote according to their conscience on who they have confidence on to become prime minister.

I believe Ku Li can heal the rift and this is a crucial baby step to end the current stalemate. It departs from the tradition that Umno president is automatically the PM, instead the representatives of the people voted in a new prime minister through a conscience vote. I think the rakyat will be happy with just that slight tectonic shift at the moment.

Most of us will have some faith that Ku Li will make real efforts to do some serious work in reforming the electoral system, judiciary and other government departments. Najib is history, he was given four years to perform and we've got nothing in return except lip service on transformation and 1Malaysia.

If this is not done as soon as possible, Mahathir Mohamad and his cohorts will have the last laugh.

This is a Democracy, You Understand?

Posted: 10 May 2013 11:49 AM PDT


Voting against BN is not voting against the Government. It is voting against the party that was in government up till the point Parliament was dissolved to allow for new elections.  

What is so wrong with voting for the Opposition? Why is an Opposition set up in the first place? Isn't it to provide competition to the ruling party? So if people are more persuaded by the case made by the Opposition, why shouldn't they vote for it?

Kee Thuan Chye

Prime Minister Najib Razak blamed the Chinese for not voting for his Barisan Nasional (BN) coalition at the 13th general election on May 5 and ex-prime minister Mahathir Mohamad slammed the Chinese and the Malays who voted for Pakatan Rakyat.
 
Others from BN and its main component party, Umno, jumped on the bandwagon and said the same thing, accusing the Chinese of being ungrateful.
 
They all made it sound as if it was a great sin to vote for the Opposition.
 
What is so wrong with voting for the Opposition? Why is an Opposition set up in the first place? Isn't it to provide competition to the ruling party? So if people are more persuaded by the case made by the Opposition, why shouldn't they vote for it?
 
Mahathir and the rest of them surely can't be ignorant of what a democracy is. For their enlightenment, let me point out that in a democracy, any number of parties can take part in a contest to decide which one should become the government. And the people who choose through voting are free to vote for any party.
 
So, since that is the case, it is neither a crime nor a moral wrong to vote for the Opposition. And that is why in a democracy, the ruling party can be voted out if more people feel it doesn't deserve to be the government any more.
 
This, in fact, was what happened at GE13. The popular vote for Pakatan was higher than that for BN. But since our electoral system is based on the first-past-the-post one, and due to gerrymandering the Opposition needs to win more votes to win seats, BN came out the undeserving winner.
 
Ali Rustam, the former chief minister of Melaka, who lost in the polling and thereafter appeared a sore loser, echoed his master, Najib, and blamed the Chinese too. "The results have shown that the Chinese do not appreciate the Government, they just want to change without considering the consequences and what we have done for them all this while."
 
Well, what is there to appreciate of a government that is corrupt and continually plays the race card? Even during the GE13 campaign period, its leaders, especially Mahathir, were saying things to demonise the DAP in order to frighten the Malays and persuade them against supporting the party and its Pakatan partners, PKR and PAS.
 
Furthermore, contrary to what Ali Rustam says, the Chinese did consider the consequences. They knew why they voted for the Opposition. They wanted Pakatan to form the next government so that a new Malaysia might emerge, purged of the malpractices of BN and its rotten system and culture.
 
And what is there to be grateful to the Government for? If it provides the things needed for society to thrive in, that is its job. That is what it was elected to do. So no Chinese, Malay, Indian, Kadazan, Iban needs to be grateful to the Government.
 
One more lesson for the BN leaders who are ignorant of what a democracy is – the Government is not the same thing as the party in government. They are two separate things, and therefore voting against BN is not voting against the Government. It is voting against the party that was in government up till the point Parliament was dissolved to allow for new elections. This is an important point that everyone – not only these ignorant leaders – should appreciate.
 
And even more important is this – BN is not the country. Anyone voting against BN is therefore not being disloyal to the country.
 
Anyway, Ali Rustam should learn from his BN colleague, former deputy minister Saifuddin Abdullah, who also lost in the elections.
 
Saifuddin said he did not blame anyone for his defeat. As for the Chinese vote, he said "it was not against the Malays and certainly not about being ungrateful". He added: "It was more like they wanted to teach the MCA a lesson. Some of (the voters) told me frankly – we like you, but we want to teach the MCA a lesson."
 
The Chinese wanted to teach the Chinese party a lesson – that summed it up correctly. They voted for the DAP, but they also voted for Malay candidates from PKR and PAS. Some Malays also voted for the DAP; otherwise, it wouldn't have won so many seats in Johor, Selangor, Penang, etc. Which debunks the spin that Najib concocted when he said BN's poorer performance this time was due to a "Chinese tsunami". Fortunately, he has since been pointed out to be grossly wrong by many people, including BN politicians, who say instead that it was a "Malaysian tsunami".
 
Ali Rustam is quoted in Utusan Malaysia, the Umno-owned newspaper that published the offensive article 'Apa Lagi Cina Mahu?' (What Else do the Chinese Want?), as saying the Chinese are racist. He might do better to reserve that tag for Mahathir.
 
Before polling day, Mahathir irresponsibly said that if the DAP's Lim Kit Siang were to win the Gelang Patah seat, there would be racial conflict. And after the results came out, he blamed the Chinese and said the Malays who voted for the Opposition were greedy.
 
Why greedy? Because, he said, they were willing to sell their own race.
 
Is politics about race? In multi-racial Malaysia, should it be about race? Isn't it perpetuating racial conflict to drum it into people they should vote for the ruling party because of their race? Why are leaders who should know better telling people to vote according to their race?
 
Why are leaders like Mahathir taking this racist approach?
 
Mahathir keeps rubbing it in that Malays who voted for the Opposition should not have done so. He seems to imply that they couldn't think for themselves. He and his ilk must think that such Malays are stupid. But he's very wrong. They are among the most intelligent people in Malaysia.
 
And the more he rubs it in, the more he will distance them from him – and his party.
 
Malaysians who voted for the Opposition, regardless of race, did so following their conscience. They should not be shaken by bullying talk, even if it comes from a prime minister and a former one. They ought to know what such politicians are capable of saying.
 
Najib now says he wants to be "a prime minister for all Malaysians" and yet he defended what Utusan Malaysia wrote in that offensive article, obviously aimed at causing racial tension. He talks of national reconciliation and yet he doesn't walk the talk. As I have written before, in my book No More Bullshit, Please, We're All Malaysians, Najib speaks with a forked tongue. I am repeating it here.
 
If he wants national reconciliation, he should clean up the system, dismantle Mahathirism, end cronyism, free the media, make the EC and Petronas answerable to Parliament, redelineate the electoral constituencies to ensure a fair fight for all parties in GE14 … and do many more things right.
 
Otherwise, what he says is nothing but bullshit.
 
 
* Kee Thuan Chye is the author of the bestselling book No More Bullshit, Please, We're All Malaysians, and the latest volume, Ask for No Bullshit, Get Some More!

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Let's Recolor May 13 by Healing Malaysia through...

Posted: 10 May 2013 12:05 PM PDT

Dear Malaysians,

We are calling you to join us in Healing Malaysia.

Since 2008, for 5 years our country has been split into extreme partisan blocs where we throw hurtful words at each other. This has wounded many hearts and the vibrancy of our peaceful society, thus we need to heal ourselves.

Let us focus our energy on putting back love, respect, and dignity in this country. To achieve this, we need your help. To heal our country, we need to work hand in hand, heart in heart.

We have to change from within. We have to admit our mistakes. Many of us have erred and we must admit it. We first must forgive ourselves and then we must also forgive others. This is the time to reflect and instead of looking at what others should do, look at what we can do without expecting others to change at all. We take the first step regardless.

Everyone starts with themselves.

What is Healing Malaysia?

The Healing campaign starts now with the groundwork until we reach Hari Merdeka. We must stop resending, sharing, reposting any hate mails, any racist remarks.

We must be strong and find the strength to ignore them. We may think we are helping by posting and sharing but in actual fact we become the very agent for those people who are spreading hate and hurtful words. By ignoring them, we have already won.

It takes some time for people to embrace the outcome of the 13th General Election, let us give ourselves room for this. This campaign period is approaching us and we need time to plan the impact we intend to achieve when the time arrives.

Read more at: http://letusaddvalue.blogspot.com/2013/05/lets-recolor-may-13-by-healing-malaysia.html 

Utusan Malaysia is Now Utusan Karut

Posted: 10 May 2013 12:01 PM PDT

Utusan Malaysia has done it again. Their justification of BN's terrible performance was racial and totally divisive which does not help the nation building process at all after GE13. By singling out a race of people who decided to choose Pakatan Rakyat(PR) instead of the incumbent UMNO/BN government they have portrayed the Chinese Malaysians as ungrateful and should be dealt with in the near future.

Why the sudden interest in Chinese only? Was it because they voted overwhelmingly for PR as though none of the other races did especially in the urban areas? Or is it because the BN caretaker government spent millions on them than the other races and hoping that the Chinese would reciprocate on polling day? Either way, it is NOT right for Utusan Malaysia or Najib to single out a particular group of Malaysians for his own failure. Yes, I say it again it is Najib's own failure!

So, what does Utusan Malaysia wants to do now? Are they planning and scheming something sinister in this country of ours? Yes Utusan, it's either you are with us or against us. You have forgotten that it was the overwhelming Malaysians that voted for PR hence PR popular votes was much higher than BN for the first time in Malaysian history.

And you Utusan can't seem to take it, right? After all UMNO is your political master for the last 50 plus years and YOU have been a political tool for them as well! Utusan, you have fail to grasped what Malaysian DEMANDS are! Here are a few list to start with:-

- We want a government that looks into the interest of Malaysians and not those of the Banglas, Indons, Myanmarese, Filipinos only. One day we might have a Benggali news papers in this country and you Utusan could be out of job. Yes, I hope you will face your demise as the mainstream paper of this country soon as you have not been able to bear good fruits but instead rotten ones only! That goes to the other MSMs as well who have been spewing lies after lies to please your masters so that you and your board of directors could pamper yourself and be fed well like the cows of Bashan!

- We also want a government that is truly free from the scourge of corruption and incompetence which hinders our country from reaching our highest potential. Is it too much to ask? If yes, then go and tell your political masters they are not fit for the top job of this country in the first place.

Read more at: http://realitybytesdmd.blogspot.com/2013/05/utusan-malaysia-is-now-utusan-karut.html 

Chinese Tsunami? Najib, Zee Kin & Tommy Thomas

Posted: 10 May 2013 11:55 AM PDT

My Prime Minister said the reason his coalition was returned on 05 May 2013 with much fewer seats than in the 2008 General Election (GE12) was a "Chinese Tsunami."  Dato' Sri Haji Mohammed Tun Razak used the label Chinese Tsunami as a sound-bite for "the Chinese have abandoned Barisan Nasional (BN)."

Najib said much more, but I will restrict my discussion to the Chinese Tsunami.

Najib's comments resulted in rage-inducing headlines in Malay newspapers owned by the PM's party, the United Malays National Organization (Umno).  Utusan asked "What more do Chinese People want?" Kosmo! said "Chinese Voters are 2-faced."

Najib did not denounce the views expressed by his newspapers.

The Malaysian Chinese Association (MCA), the second largest component party of BN, agrees ethnically Chinese Malaysians have abandoned the MCA.

The MCA has said it will refuse all offers of cabinet positions.  MCA leaders are resigning from government posts.  I suppose they are doing so because they recognize their shameful performance in GE13 will cause their Umno masters to treat them even more like the puppets and conniving thieves voters perceive them to be.

The MCA is closing down several service centres.  Some say the MCA is keeping its pre-election promise.  Others say the MCA wants to "punish" voters who didn't support them – seemingly forgetting that many did vote for MCA candidates.

Overall, the leaders of the MCA appear to believe there has indeed been a Chinese Tsunami, in so far as this term means large numbers of Chinese voters no longer wish the MCA to represent them.

There has been an outcry in the social media (all traditional media parrot Najib) and online news portals over the race-based analysis which underlies the conclusion that the root cause of Najib's failure to deliver more seats in GE13 compared to GE12 is the loss of the Chinese votebank.

I have seen two data-based responses to Najib's claim that there has been a Chinese Tsunami.  The first is contained in a Note posted by a Facebook user, Tai Zee Kin, who identifies himself as a Malaysian citizen trained in the law.

Zee Kin writes charmingly ("please do not read while driving," "face palm") and throws in technical terms and attenuated references to academic authors to show us he  really has done what he claims – he once wrote an undergraduate dissertation about democracy.

Zee Kin begins with what he calls an unreliable source – which he doesn't name.  He says the DAP contested in 91 % of constituencies with "high" ethnically Chinese voters.  I'm unclear what he means by "high," though he alludes to ranking by ratio of Chinese voters.  I suppose he's saying the DAP's GE13 strategy was to compete in areas with relatively high concentrations of Chinese voters.

Zee Kin says:

"DAP gained 10 seats for contesting in 91% (pls rebut if u have better source) highest ranked Chinese population ratio seats, and have a net GAIN of 10 seats, PKR and PAS combined running in the rest, and have net LOSE of 3 seats. I think that's what NAJIB meant by "Chinese Tsunami". he uses electoral system.  then again, i didn't agree with him." (sic)

Again, I'm unclear what "high" means.  I'll speculate that the DAP, like all other parties in Malaysia, recognizes the reality of race in post-colonial Malaysia ruled for 56 years by a coalition with the same race-based agenda as the colonists.  Therefore the DAP considered it best to use its limited funds to compete in constituencies with a relatively large numbers of Chinese – which also happens to be urban areas.  [The DAP (Democratic Action Party) is still shaking off the perception that it's primarily Chinese.]

After saying he doesn't agree with Najib, Zee Kin says if the term Tsunami is to be used, it's more useful to say it's an Urban Tsunami than to say it's a Chinese tsunami.

What I like about Zee Kin's approach is that he tries to see what straws Najib may be clutching at in order to make the Chinese Tsunami claim.  And Zee Kin shows it was one straw, grown from a probably unreliable seed (source).

That was the first "data-based response."  (My own post immediately after GE13 was about the Elections Commission; it was based on impressions, some of them statistical in nature, but without any actual GE13 numbers.)

The second response I've seen is by Tommy Thomas, a senior lawyer who has a reputation for acute analysis and who writes pithily.
 

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Spewing a Poisonous Brew on the Chinese ‘Lack of Multiracial Spirit’

Posted: 10 May 2013 01:59 PM PDT

As any student of history or other social science enrolled in a second or third year course at the undergraduate level learns, historians need to explain their findings or assertions with reference to the methodology they have used to collect data and other information from their research.  They should also explain how they have drawn inferences or general conclusions from their research work on the subject and synthesized their findings into their major conclusion.

Dr. Lim Teck Ghee

As part of its media onslaught on its Malay readership and aimed at provoking an extremist and emotional Malay response to the outcome of the recent elections, Utusan Malaysia has now found its academic champion. 

In comments which were front-paged by the newspaper, Prof. Khoo Kay Kim was quoted as saying that the Chinese do not understand the importance of unity as their racial sentiments still burn strongly since the community first came to Malaya (see The Malaysian Insider, http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/chinese-lack-multiracial-spirit-historian-tells-utusan/)

According to Prof. Khoo, Chinese do not have the multiracial spirit that national leaders have always tried to push for.

"Many among them do not think of Malaysia as their own country; instead they always feel like they are being colonized ….That's why their racial sentiments are still very strong."

During another time and coming from another person, few people would have paid little attention to these comments which were provided without any evidence or substantiation. 

But the comments were not from any ordinary person.  They came from an academic – a member of the Chinese community - who had reached the pinnacle of his profession in the country and who to the Malay readers of Utusan must be speaking the truth about the racism in the Chinese community and their lack of love for the country.    

The comments were made in the supercharged environment of the election aftermath. Given special prominence by Utusan, they are also likely to be widely disseminated in the Malay community. 

This is why the comments by Prof Khoo should not go un-refuted or unchallenged.  This is why he should not be permitted to get away with either a convenient waffling or discreet follow up silence. While he may have found support from the Utusan staff which is intent on proving its case that the country's Chinese community are unworthy citizens, Prof. Khoo needs to explain his views further to the rest of the country and made to answer for their veracity, falseness or untruthfulness.

Prof Khoo's Record of Research on Malaysia Chinese Thinking 

As any student of history or other social science enrolled in a second or third year course at the undergraduate level learns, historians need to explain their findings or assertions with reference to the methodology they have used to collect data and other information from their research.  They should also explain how they have drawn inferences or general conclusions from their research work on the subject and synthesized their findings into their major conclusion.

The following are some initial questions for Prof Khoo to respond to:

1.     What research have you recently conducted on Malaysian Chinese to make the assertion that "many among them do not think of Malaysia as their own country; instead they always feel like they are being colonized". Please provide details of papers published arising from your research which explains the methodology (sampling; use of qualitative or quantitative methods, etc) and the findings.

2.     What is your evidence that Malaysian Chinese do not understand the importance of unity and that their racial sentiments burn strongly? Are you citing findings from your own study or from other studies?  Please clarify and provide references.   

3.     How do you explain the term "multiracial spirit" and what research have you conducted to uncover that spirit whether in the Chinese, Malay or other communities that can be used as comparison.

Finally, a charitable view of Prof. Khoo's comments as printed by Utusan is that the paper may have edited his remarks or misquoted him.  If so, he needs to come out with an explanation and clarification of what he said or meant at the interview and to get Utusan to publish the correct version.  Otherwise, these foolish and ill-advised comments will only lead to the further demonization of all Chinese in the country.   

 

Hey BN and PR! Listen! Remember your Faults! and Change and Sacrifice! or start becoming irrelevant!

Posted: 10 May 2013 12:07 PM PDT

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgEX2wzbtNzDTSmo6FALoogpW2tfXpDn32MVE08f2XtiayygsZO7YY8gulkcbonYNbXDHei8i4ZsF5X71FioAqqbmz1CWBXPto40z9ckp6IkGZknTatdgUx55o78B7bnwhPWW4VutPEzRO9/s1600/KL27_251008_MALAYSIA.jpg 

When BN, UMNO, DAP, PAS and PKR start reflecting about what happened in GE13, do you think they will really want to sacrifice and give up things that could end racial politics/parties/management (starting with themselves)?  
 

This letter is more about the internal politics, practised values and management in PR. Not about which ethnicity or class voted for which party or not, and as far as I am concerned, that is their personal freedom and right!

When I told some top DAP leaders way back before GE12, that they should consider combining DAP and PKR into one party, or start the movement for it after GE12, they gave all sort of bullshit reasons and most of it were racial and chauvinistic beliefs. This is a test, go and ask them again now and you are likely to hear this still, behind the lies that come out of their mouth. The logo being known ain't an issue by the way, as you could always combine the Rocket and PKR's eye easily and even the colours too.

Before GE13, I asked why they were so obviously running candidates according to the majority race in those areas, especially in bigger towns and cities, and they showed their racial leanings and internal "racism and chauvinism" priorities and concerns again.

"Oh, if we run another ******* in *********, our leaders and members of that race would make noise." Another test... positive for racial/racist politics and management again. Zan and Arul, touch a little on this here and here.

After GE13, I told some PKR leaders that what is happening to DAP now is partly PKR's fault too, and they should start the movement to combine both the parties into one. At least there are much more ethnic Malays in PKR (and a bit more Indians too compared to DAP depending on the area), and this will counter the "perception" and make it harder for the UMNO machinery to attack them based on race; also giving the chance for the new party to have a true multiracial make-up and values, combining their strengths and attracting new members. Again I was given a lot of "racial and chauvinistic reasons and excuses" mainly. More evidence...

And I haven't even got into the internal politics, lack of multicultural ethics that tend to be very obvious in procedures and favouritism here and there, or even sometimes the chauvinism based cronyism practised inside these two parties. I don't need to! Any long term member with any real integrity and conscience would know, though they might not say it openly in public.

When BN, UMNO, DAP, PAS and PKR start reflecting about what happened in GE13, do you think they will really want to sacrifice and give up things that could end racial politics/parties/management (starting with themselves), benefit all Malaysians, the people, secularism, liberty, egalitarianism and of course the environment/nature/animals? hahaha... dream on!

Related: This specific RPK article, along with the his latest ones for more insight.http://www.malaysia-today.net/mtcolumns/56567-towards-the-14th-general-election

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved