Ahad, 14 April 2013

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


PSM asked to run under Pakatan ticket

Posted: 13 Apr 2013 09:39 PM PDT

Pauline Wong and Tan Yi Liang, The Sun Daily

Parti Sosialis Malaysia's (PSM) candidates who want mutual cooperation with Pakatan Rakyat (PR) in the 13th general election (GE13) may run in seats also sought by PR parties - provided they agree to contest under the symbol of the relevant PR party.

PKR supreme council member R. Sivarasa explained that the PR coalition is not rejecting PSM's request to contest in those seats.

"We are offering the seats to their candidates but on condition that they contest under a PR ticket," he said at a press conference today. Also present was PKR secretary-general Datuk Saifuddin Nasution.

"We hope they compromise accordingly as we are thinking of winnability," he added.

He was responding to questions on reported seat tussles between PSM and PKR in Kota Damansara (which PSM won in the March 2008 GE) and Semenyih (which PSM lost).

In the 2008 election, PSM had not had its registration as political party approved by the Home Ministry and therefore contested on the PKR ticket. The registration was given in June 2008.

The PKR leaders yesterday were however mum on whether PSM will be accepted as a component of the PR coalition, saying the presidential council has yet to make a decision.

Meanwhile, at a separate press conference, PSM secretary-general S. Arutchelvan said PSM feels its candidates are the most credible for their respective constituencies.

"We are not parachute candidates as we have done work in these areas. We will support Pakatan Rakyat in all seats they are fighting for, except for the ones we are contesting," he said.

He stressed that PSM had strict conditions as to who the party could field as an election candidate, as only those who have worked for the party for five years in a constituency can stand as a candidate.

PSM is fielding four candidates – Dr. Michael Jeyakumar for the Sungai Siput parliamentary seat, PSM deputy chairman M. Sarasvathy for the Jelapang state seat, Arutchelvan for the Semenyih state seat, and PSM president Dr. Mohd Nasir Hashim for the Kota Damansara state seat.

On potential three-corner fights, Arutchelvan said PSM has proposed that a non-governmental organisation committee decides who should run for the seat.

"There must be a process when parties cannot agree who should run for a seat," he said.

He stressed PSM will not sabotage efforts by PR in its bid to seize Putrajaya.

Asked about the Selangor PKR's intention to field its candidates in Kota Damansara and Semenyih, Arutchelvan pointed out that Mohd Nasir was the incumbent in Kota Damansara having won during the 2008 general elections.

He said PSM was confident of winning as it had been working hard on the ground in its other campaign areas, Semenyih, Sungai Siput and Jelapang.

"In Sungai Siput, Dr. Michael Jeyakumar has been actively resolving local issues such as flooding and land disputes and in Jelapang, Sarasvathy has been resolving land disputes, such as the one in Kampung Jelapang Tambahan," he added.

Meanwhile, Saifuddin said seat allocations in PR have to follow two 'rules'.

A seat sought by the incumbent party cannot be contested by another party. And if the seat was lost marginally in the previous election, priority is given to the party which lost to re-contest there.

On the tussle for the Sungai Aceh state seat in Penang, which has seen announcements by PAS and PKR for their own candidates there, he said the coalition's leaders will need to resolve the issue based on these rules.

 

Sabah PAS announces names of 11 candidates

Posted: 13 Apr 2013 06:15 PM PDT

(Bernama) -- PAS appears to be reluctant to wait for the Pakatan alliance led by Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to announce the opposition's line up for Sabah in the 13th general election (GE13).

The party announced today that it would be contesting two parliamentary and nine state seats.

PAS president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang said the party's state deputy commissioner Hamzah Abdullah and Kalabakan PAS Youth chief Usman Madeaming would stand in the Batu Sapi and Kalabakan parliamentary constituencies respectively.

He disclosed this after a closed door meeting with the party's potential candidates for Sabah at its liaison office here.

In the last election, PAS did not field any parliamentary candidate and only two state candidates, in Sukau and Merotai, where it was defeated.

Abdul Hadi said line up for state seats comprised seven men, Awang Laiman Ikin@ Abang (Tempasuk), Hamid Ismail (Tanjung Aru), Ahdah Sulaiman (Sukau), Kasman Karate (Kunak), Hasai Tudai (Bugaya), Ahmad Dullah (Merotai), Daud Jalaluddin (Sebatik) and two women, Dausieh Queck (Pitas) and Fatmawati Mohd Yusuf (Tanjung Batu).

Anwar in a press conference in Kota Kinabalu yesterday had said the opposition line up would be decided by the Pakatan Rakyat state leadership.

The state Pakatan Rakyat comprises PKR, DAP, PAS and two non-governmental organisations, Angkatan Perubahan Sabah (APS) led by Datuk Wilfred Bumburing and Pakatan Perubahan Sabah (PPS) led by Datuk Seri Lajim Ukin.

Meanwhile, Lajim in a press conference here today, said PPS would be given at least four parliamentary seats and 14 state seats.

"Our candidates will be contesting on the PKR ticket. However, two of them, in Bugaya and Sukau, will use the PAS symbol," he said, hinting that he might be standing in the Beaufort parliamentary and Klias state constituencies.

Lajim said Anwar would reveal Pakatan's full line up for Sabah at the latest by Tuesday.

 

PKR shocked, PAS unveils Sarawak candidates

Posted: 13 Apr 2013 06:08 PM PDT

(The Kuala Lumpur Post) - PAS president Abdul Hadi Awang today named the party's candidates in seven constituencies in Sarawak, but three of the constituencies are also being claimed by Pakatan Rakyat partners DAP and PKR.

The names of the candidates are Abang Ahmad Kerdee Abang Masagus, a lawyer (for Kota Samarahan); Robby @ Muhamad Zaid Tandang, PAS Youth leader (Sibuti); Mohamad Jolhi, a homeopathy practitioner and PAS director of election, Sarawak (Batang Sadong); Ajji Ajiji, a businessman (Igan); Ambrose Labang Jamba, editor of Buletin Kenyalang (Julau); Jurina Mut, businesswoman (Tanjung Manis); and Nani Sahari, a businesswoman (Mukah).

Meanwhile, PKR also claimed Julau and Kota Samarahan, while DAP has named Hai Merawin @ Bonaventure for Mukah.

Hadi said that the list of the candidates has been finalised and had been agreed to by DAP and PKR.

The decision was made in the past few days.

Hadi said that the decision of the party to contest in Julau was to show that the party did not find its candidates in Muslim constituencies, but also in non-Muslim constituencies.

Julau has about 90 percent Iban voters, the majority of whom are Christians.

"We want to show that we have Iban and non-Muslims as our candidates," he said.

PKR 'shocked'

But PAS' decision to contest in Kota Samarahan and Julau is set to clash with PKR Sarawak which has firmly established its roots in the two constituencies.

Last month, over 3,000 people in Kota Samarahan attended a PKR ceramah where party de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim spoke at length.

When informed of the PAS decision, PKR chairperson Baru Bian expressed shock and said that he has not been informed of the decision.

"I will find out from Kuala Lumpur, and I am shocked that I have not been informed of the decision," he said.

He said he had directed Andy Wong, PKR's potential candidate for Julau to be on standby, pointing out that he might have to contest as an independent.

In Sibu, Wong Ho Leng, Sarawak DAP chairperson refused to comment on the decision of PAS to contest in Mukah.

He had earlier named Hai Merawin to be DAP's candidate there.

PKR and DAP still negotiating

Pakatan Rakyat has not finalised a number of Sarawak seats such as Mas Gading, Mambong, Sri Aman, Miri, and Stampin as both PKR and DAP want to stake their claim.

So far PKR has announced the names of its candidates for 11 seats that it will contest, and they are Baru Bian (Limbang), Roland Engan (Baram), Joshua Jabeng (Selangau), Thomas Laja (Kanowit), Abun Sui Anyit (Hulu Rajang), Ali Biju (Saratok), Cecilia Siti Una (Betong), Nicholas Bawin (Lubok Antu), Zulrusdi Hol (Santubong), Ahmad Nazib Johari (Petra Jaya) and Abang Zulkifli Abang Engkeh (Batang Lupar).

Meanwhile DAP has announced Bob Baru (Lawas), John Anthony Brian (Bintulu), Lim Sui Kien (Miri), Oscar Ling (Sibu),  Hai Merawin (Mukah), Ramli Malaka (Kapit) and Alice Lau (Lanang),  Edward Luak (Serian), and Andrew Wong (Sarikei).

DAP has yet to announce the candidates for Stampin and Bandar Kuching, but Sarawak DAP secretary Chong Chieng Jen and Julian Tan are expected to contest the respective seats.

As for the overlapping claims in Mas Gading, Mambong and Sri Aman, Anwar Ibrahim during his recent visit to Kuching that it is expected to be resolved very soon.

 

Hadi Awang insists man in sex video is not Mustafa Ali

Posted: 13 Apr 2013 06:04 PM PDT

(Bernama) - PAS president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang insisted that Mustafa Ali was not involved in the sex video recording spread in the internet.

He said he did not believe the PAS secretary-general was capable of doing the video act because for the past few years, Mustafa Ali performed his prayers while sitting down.

"Those who made the recording were not aware that for the past few years Mustafa Ali performed his prayers while sitting on a chair because his knees were aching…even going down the stairs was painful (for him)…go an find someone strong and not like what was shown in the recording," he said.

He disclosed this to reporters when asked to comment on the sex video issue concerning a man who is said to look like the PAS secretary-general, here today.

Meanwhile, reporters who attended the coverage on the announcement of PAS candidates for the 13th general election (GE13) were required to register their presence and had to undergo another check before being allowed to enter the PAS office in Kota Samarahan.

 

Dr M: Chinese votes in BN’s bag as long as business chances exist

Posted: 13 Apr 2013 05:13 PM PDT

"The NEP has in fact, benefitted the Chinese more than the Malays," he added, referring to the controversial national affirmative action policy introduced in 1971 by second prime minister Tun Abdul Razak Hussein, that aimed to close the economic gap between the Malays who were largely small-time farmers and Chinese who were into businesses. 

Debra Chong, TMI

Economic stability and chances for business growth are valued by Chinese Malaysians and they will support the ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) at the polls so long these are not at risk, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad said in an interview published today. 

Ahead of the 13th general elections, surveys and analyses by pundits have flagged the Chinese — who make up about 30 per cent of multiracial Malaysia's 13.3 million electorate — as pro-oposition supporters, contrary to the former prime minister's view.  

"I think the Chinese would still value their opportunities in business. If you take an environment where they can succeed in business, they would be supportive of BN, which they did even when the BN introduced the New Economic Policy," Dr Mahathir was quoted saying in the New Sunday Times. 

"The NEP has in fact, benefitted the Chinese more than the Malays," he added, referring to the controversial national affirmative action policy introduced in 1971 by second prime minister Tun Abdul Razak Hussein, that aimed to close the economic gap between the Malays who were largely small-time farmers and Chinese who were into businesses. 

Officially, NEP was ended in 1990 but its fundamental idea remains in effect through other governmental policies. Critics have argued that the NEP has only helped the few with close ties to the ruling elite. 

Dr Mahathir also acknowledged that without the NEP, Southeast Asia's third-largest economy would likely develop at a much faster rate than at present due to the dynamism of the Chinese community. 

"(But) it would be an unhealthy growth," he said. 

He pointed that the lopsided distribution of wealth between the races would be sharpened if the government had not taken action, and that the social imbalance would stir unrest. 

"The Chinese would be rich and the Malays would be poor. And that would lead to instability," he said. 

The 87-year-old who ran Malaysia for 22 years until his resignation from office in October 2003 said he still believed his socio-economic policies have been "fair". 

"I keep on telling people that in this country no one should feel extremely happy because if they feel happy, if one race feels happy, it means you are doing the wrong thing. You are helping that race too much. 

"The thing is you have to deny everyone something that they think they are entitled to. So they will all be unhappy, which means we are treating everyone equally," he said. 

The former Umno president who is now Perkasa advisor defended his patronage of the right-wing Malay organisation whom many Chinese appear to view dimly as being racist. 

"We cannot reject them as being non-Umno. We have to work with them. Otherwise, Umno will be a tiny organisation quite unable to get either Chinese or Malay support," he said. 

He added that he was unsure what role the group will play after May 5, but insisted that Perkasa backed not just Umno, the Malay component in the 13-party BN coalition but the other racial components as well. 

Dr Mahathir has been engaging in a tit-for-tat verbal battle against his political foe in the DAP, Lim Kit Siang since the opposition leader announced he was gunning for Gelang Patah, a Chinese-majority federal seat in Umno's JOhor home turf. 

Lim, who has repeatedly sparred with Dr Mahathir in Parliament, has also been backing the Umno veteran's ex-deputy, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, with whom he is now politically-friendly to be Malaysia's next leader. 

In his interview today, Dr Mahathir described his former right-hand man as a very smart man, very charismatic, and with the ability to get along with many people of diverse backgrounds. 

"He is a fantastic man, a fantastic man!" he said, but the compliment was backhanded. 

"In a way, he is a chameleon. His colours turn to suit the environment he is in."

READ MORE HERE

 

GE13: DAP and PKR yet to settle seat distribution in Johor

Posted: 13 Apr 2013 04:29 PM PDT

(The Star) - JOHOR BARU: The battle for seats between state DAP and PKR seems to be still firing on with both sides keeping mum on their list of confirmed candidates for GE13.

"The seats will be announced when it is announced," said DAP adviser Lim Kit Siang during a press conference at the Gelang Patah DAP headquarters on Sunday.

When asked if the delay reflected disagreement on seat allocations with PKR, Lim stuck with the same reply.

"Just give us some privacy.

"It will be announced when it is announced," he said.

On Saturday, PAS introduced their full list of state candidates and confirmed that the party would be contesting for 30 out of 50 state seats and eight out of the 26 parliamentary seats.

 

Jelapang state seat to witness three-corner fight

Posted: 13 Apr 2013 04:11 PM PDT

(NST) - SUNGAI SIPUT: The Jelapang state seat is expected to witness a three cornered fight as the PSM may be forced to field its candidate in the DAP-stronghold seat in the upcoming general election.

Former Sg Siput MP Dr D. Jeyakumar said as at now the DAP has failed to respond to PSM proposal for the issue to be solved by an independent committee consisting members of several NGOs.

"We have sent a letter explaining our proposal to the DAP two weeks ago. As at now, we have not received any response from the DAP leadership," he told reporters at his service centre here today.

Dr Jeyakumar said the DAP has also refused to meet the PSM to discuss the matter with the former insisted that there is nothing to discuss.

He added PSM will use the party's logo for its candidates in the 13th general election.


PPP eyes 4 state and 2 parliament seats

Posted: 13 Apr 2013 03:51 PM PDT

Among the names mentioned as a potential PPP candidate is PPP vice chief Maglin Dennis D'Cruz, presently a senator and a deputy minister in Najib's last cabinet.

Humayun Kabir, FMT

The People's Progressive Party (PPP) is likely to contest in two parliamentary and four state seats that were lost by Barisan Nasional component parties in the 2008 political tsunami.

According to a BN source, the party has earmarked the four state seats of Pasir Bedamar in Perak, Manek Urai (Kelantan), Kota Laksamana (Malacca) and Kota Alam Shah (Selangor), and also the Federal Territory parliamentary seat of Batu.

PPP is also said to be eyeing either the parliamentary seats of Kepong or Kapar, or another parliamentary seat in Perak.

The source said PPP was awaiting Barisan Nasional chairman Najib Tun Razak's approval before making any official move.

"They have said that Najib will tell them some time this week. They are confident of doing well in these seats," said the source.

In 2008, Gerakan failed to unseat DAP's Dr Tan Seng Giaw in Keong while MIC's Kapar seat was lost to PKR S Manikavasagam.

PPP meanwhile lost both the Taiping parliamentary seat and the Pasir Bedamar state seat that it had contested in 2008.

Last year PPP president M Kayveas told FMT that the party wanted to contest in BN areas that were lost to the opposition in the last general election.

While the party had claimed that it had been assured of two parliamentary seats and two state seats, it had however proposed to Najib for the additional two state seats.

READ MORE HERE

 

Jeffrey’s party calls BN’s Tataba Wave a sham

Posted: 13 Apr 2013 03:45 PM PDT

Gelombang Tataba - launched by BN's Kadsazandusun parties - has not empowered the natives in Sabah but only put Umno leaders like Mahathir and Ibrahim above the law.

Luke Rintod, FMT

KOTA KINABALU: Opposition State Reform Party (STAR) has accused Sabah Barisan Nasional coalition parties PBS, UPKO and PBRS of colluding with Umno and harming Sabahans' rights.

The native parties' unity drive which it is promoting as the "Tataba Wave" is merely rallying support for embattled Umno and Barisan Nasional (BN) and helping Umno's "ketuanan Melayu" or Malay supremacy in Sabah, a top leader said yesterday.

STAR Sabah deputy chairman, Daniel John Jambun, said Sabahans realise that the "Gelombang Tataba" was nothing but an idea hatched by Umno to empower Dr Mahathir Mohamad to help perpetuate "ketuanan Melayu dan Umno" idea to lord it over Sabahans.

The outspoken party leader who along with its chairman Jeffrey Kitingan is campaigning on a platform of autonomy for Sabah, said the trio of BN parties representing Sabah native interests had launched a programme that was simply an extension of BN's Blue Wave or "Gelombang Biru".

Two opposition leaders from the Kadazandusun community have already used the Tataba Wave as an excuse for joining the BN.

The Tataba Wave was started by the leaders of the three Kadsazandusun parties last month to galvanise waning support for the Umno-led BN government in Sabah and the country.

"By empowering Umno and BN, the non-Muslims would continue to be suppressed as the Tataba Wave would only embolden (former prime minister) Mahathir (Mohamad) and Ibrahim Ali of Perkasa," Jambun said.

"By calling the Kadazandusuns to support BN and Umno, the leaders of PBS, UPKO and PBRS are empowering Ibrahim to repeat his call for the burning of our Bible or Alkitab," he said in a statement.

Jambun who is also president of UK-based Borneo's Plight in Malaysia Foundation (BoPiMaFo) said Ibrahim should be charged for treason, and Mahathir too for the IC Project.

"But look, PBS, UPKO and PBRS are calling the people to support Mahathir and Ibrahim instead.

"Obviously the Gelombang Tataba has not empowered the natives in Sabah but has only put Umno leaders like Mahathir and Ibrahim above the law. Sabahans must see this ploy, hatched by Umno but carried by the three parties to hoodwink the people," he alleged.

READ MORE HERE

 

Hindraf to Anwar: Call off your mandores

Posted: 13 Apr 2013 03:38 PM PDT

The organisation wants the PKR leader to stop his party leaders with their cheap attacks on Hindraf and Waythamoorthy.

Athi Shankar, FMT

Pakatan Rakyat de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim should act like a gentleman if he was serious and sincere on working with Hindraf Makkal Sakti and endorse its blueprint, said the movement's Kedah chapter coordinator P Muniandy.

Pakatan has contacted Hindraf recently to recommence talks on the movement five-year blueprint meant to uplift the marginalised Indian community.

Muniandy said Anwar must choose between wanting to work with Hindraf for betterment of ethnic Indians under a win-win coalition pact or engage in cheap tactic by deploying mandores to criticise the human rights movement.

He said Hindraf's talks with Barisan Nasional national chairman Najib Tun Razak for his endorsement on the blueprint had nothing to do with Anwar or his mandores.

He said Hindraf was not interested in Pakatan – BN political feud because it was not helping the marginalised Indian cause anyway.

He said Hindraf's focus was to uplift the marginalised segment of working class Indians, who have been isolated and sidelined from mainstream development for over 200 years.

He said Hindraf never stopped talking with Pakatan and already had 21 meetings with the coalition.

"Only mandores are making noises as though they know everything.

"Have you seen any Pakatan top leaders making any statement against Hindraf?

"These mandores should stop from going berserk to condemn Hindraf.

"Anwar should gentlemanly stop them," he told FMT here today, when commenting on cyber attacks by PKR's S Jayathas.

Jayathas, who was formerly a paid staff in P Uthayakumar's Human Rights Party (HRP) office, has claimed Hindraf supremo P Waythamoorthy had struck a deal with Umno.

Labelling Waythamoorthy as a "traitor", Jayathas claimed the Hindraf supremo had hid the movement's registration from public knowledge.

Jayathas pleasing political master

Muniandy said Jayathas' remarks showed that he wanted to please his political master to grab a seat to contest in the forthcoming general election.

He recalled that Jayathas was a political hopeful who hopped from PKR to Hindraf then to HRP and now back to PKR within five years.

"Jayathas should shut his mouth up since he had left Hindraf to pursue his selfish interests," said Muniandy.

READ MORE HERE

 

DAP tells PAS to back off in Merotai

Posted: 13 Apr 2013 03:35 PM PDT

Merotai is considered a 'hot seat' as both Barisan Nasional and Pakatan Rakyat component parties are eyeing the seat. 

Azman Habu, FMT

TAWAU: The squabbles for seats in Pakatan Rakyat, the national opposition coalition, is now threatening to turn cannibalistic in Sabah with DAP warily eyeing PAS intentions in the east coast of the state.

With little to gain and everything to lose, the Pakatan parties are facing off over who gets to place their candidate in the Muslim majority Merotai constituency land held by the BN's Liberal Democratic Party (LDP).

PAS hit a 'sour' note when its president Abdul Hadi Awang included the constituency in its corner while Sabah DAP claims the seat is still under negotiations between the coalition partners.

Hadi announced at a function held at PAS Kalabakan office at Taman Semarak that the Islamic party would put up contestants in two parliamentary seats and nine state seats in Sabah.

The parliamentary seats are  Batu Sapi and Kalabakan, while the state seats are Pitas, Tempasuk, Tanjung Aru, Sukau, Kunak, Bugaya, Tanjung Batu, Sebatik and Merotai.

Merotai is considered a 'hot seat' as both Barisan Nasional and Pakatan Rakyat component parties are eyeing the seat considered a toss-up with the voters divided and moods likely to swing at the
11th hour.

Sabah DAP chairman Jimmy Wong, who was present when the PAS candidates were announced, said he was caught by surprise that Merotai was mentioned.

"The seat negotiations among Pakatan Rakyat has yet to be finalised and the Merotai state seat has already been conceded to DAP if LDP is defending the seat on behalf of BN," he said.

READ MORE HERE

 

Low IQ & Conservative Beliefs Linked to Prejudice

Posted: 13 Apr 2013 02:37 PM PDT

http://i.livescience.com/images/i/000/023/930/original/race-face-off-120126.jpg?1327592119 

Livescience

 

There's no gentle way to put it: People who give in to racism and prejudice may simply be dumb, according to a new study that is bound to stir public controversy.

The research finds that children with low intelligence are more likely to hold prejudiced attitudes as adults. These findings point to a vicious cycle, according to lead researcher Gordon Hodson, a psychologist at Brock University in Ontario. Low-intelligence adults tend to gravitate toward socially conservative ideologies, the study found. Those ideologies, in turn, stress hierarchy and resistance to change, attitudes that can contribute to prejudice, Hodson wrote in an email to LiveScience.

"Prejudice is extremely complex and multifaceted, making it critical that any factors contributing to bias are uncovered and understood," he said.

Controversy ahead

The findings combine three hot-button topics.

"They've pulled off the trifecta of controversial topics," said Brian Nosek, a social and cognitive psychologist at the University of Virginia who was not involved in the study. "When one selects intelligence, political ideology and racism and looks at any of the relationships between those three variables, it's bound to upset somebody."

Polling data and social and political science research do show that prejudice is more common in those who hold right-wing ideals that those of other political persuasions, Nosek told LiveScience. [7 Thoughts That Are Bad For You]

"The unique contribution here is trying to make some progress on the most challenging aspect of this," Nosek said, referring to the new study. "It's not that a relationship like that exists, but why it exists."

Brains and bias

Earlier studies have found links between low levels of education and higher levels of prejudice, Hodson said, so studying intelligence seemed a logical next step. The researchers turned to two studies of citizens in the United Kingdom, one that has followed babies since their births in March 1958, and another that did the same for babies born in April 1970. The children in the studies had their intelligence assessed at age 10 or 11; as adults ages 30 or 33, their levels of social conservatismand racism were measured. [Life's Extremes: Democrat vs. Republican]

In the first study, verbal and nonverbal intelligence was measured using tests that asked people to find similarities and differences between words, shapes and symbols. The second study measured cognitive abilities in four ways, including number recall, shape-drawing tasks, defining words and identifying patterns and similarities among words. Average IQ is set at 100.

Social conservatives were defined as people who agreed with a laundry list of statements such as "Family life suffers if mum is working full-time," and "Schools should teach children to obey authority." Attitudes toward other races were captured by measuring agreement with statements such as "I wouldn't mind working with people from other races." (These questions measured overt prejudiced attitudes, but most people, no matter how egalitarian, do hold unconscious racial biases; Hodson's work can't speak to this "underground" racism.)

As suspected, low intelligence in childhood corresponded with racism in adulthood. But the factor that explained the relationship between these two variables was political: When researchers included social conservatism in the analysis, those ideologies accounted for much of the link between brains and bias.

People with lower cognitive abilities also had less contact with people of other races.

"This finding is consistent with recent research demonstrating that intergroup contact is mentally challenging and cognitively draining, and consistent with findings that contact reduces prejudice," said Hodson, who along with his colleagues published these results online Jan. 5 in the journal Psychological Science.

Read more at: http://www.livescience.com/18132-intelligence-social-conservatism-racism.html

 

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Unfair media access: PR should boycott polls

Posted: 13 Apr 2013 03:28 PM PDT

Pakatan Rakyat has an important case to make to Malaysia and the world by standing firm and refusing to go to the elections without equal media access. 

Although the media in Malaysia does not primarily decide the outcome of elections, its role in influencing the decision-making process of the electorate is crucial and needs to take place on a level playing field.

Lim Teck Ghee, FMT

Even before the dust has set on the fixing of the polling date, the Barisan Nasional had already begun the hijacking of the elections.

With the apparent connivance of the Election Commission (EC) – the pit bull ensuring BN's electoral victory for the past 12 general elections – they have imposed a 10-minute slot for Pakatan Rakyat parties to explain their polls manifesto over the official media.

According to Rais Yatim, the Information, Communications and Culture caretaker minister, the short time offered to Pakatan will be more than enough to showcase their pledges.

Although an attempt has been made by the EC at damage control over the government's ludicrous but at the same time deadly serious intent – it has explained that the opposition had misunderstood the offer which was intended to be serial and not one-time – the objective of the government is clear.

This is to use its monopoly of the official (and much of the unofficial print) media to ensure a BN election victory by seeing to it that the public – especially rural and Malay voters – will hear only the good side and promises of the BN and to downplay, ignore or demonize the Pakatan side.

Quite rightly, the Pakatan has snubbed the offer in response, calling it a "joke" and a mockery of press freedom.

In fact, media manipulation has been one of the cornerstones of the BN's remarkable record of cheating and trickery in the elections over the past 50 years. So it is not surprising that the BN and its partner in electoral crime, the EC, will want the racket to continue.

And it will continue until the strongest possible stand is made against it.

Although the media in Malaysia does not primarily decide the outcome of elections, its role in influencing the decision-making process of the electorate is crucial and needs to take place on a level playing field.

Free and fair access to media should be what our electorate deserves, not media coverage which is saturated by BN propaganda and political advertisement overkill.

What is puzzling for now is the timidity of the opposition response. Although leaders from the opposition pact have maintained that they want equal media access in the mainstream media and television stations controlled by the government (RTM)) or by companies that are closely linked to the BN (the New Straits Times, The Star, Utusan Malaysia, etc), they appear to have forgotten or decided not to draw a line in the sand on this No.1 game changer.

Surely the opposition must be aware that any decision to limit them to anything less than equal time over official media for the elections will make a mockery of the democratic process.

Boycott the elections

Not only that, this blocking of media access will also hurt – if not – kill the Pakatan's chances of winning power in Putrajaya.

Although Pakatan parties have rightly rejected the offer, they need to go further and to insist on equal time as a precondition for participation in the elections or else they will boycott it.

Such a stand is not as extreme as it may appear.

READ MORE HERE

 

Lu Kacau Gua, Gua Kacau Lu – Hindraf under Star symbol and flag in Malaya!

Posted: 13 Apr 2013 02:47 PM PDT

https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTSaKA0Y9bDsddKny8hNogcy7vljw2CVpm91OWCBmdryA1VN23Shttps://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjDuv_pTJUzKUC3QtWtkiQLNnxzvdQVUXVTsWSuGOnzn4d2Qn_g1JY3soNOOHKJIzfAzqu9xgs6r7Iwq8jp2I0KbCS7-mBTQq-YawAsWj_AcEhXFJZpeP2EN6Zl4BAJ27eSlNENR5EFzp8/s1600/jeffrey+kitingan+star+sabah.jpg

Joe Fernandez

It's confirmed! Hindraf Makkal Sakthi will be fielding candidates in Malaya under the Borneo-based State Reform Party's (Star) symbol and flag in the forthcoming 13th General Election on May 5. Star is a national party.

Star chairman Jeffrey Kitingan, in a text message a little while ago said: "Let Hindraf be a big surprise."

Hindraf chairman P. Waythamoorthy in a text message confirmed: "We are still finalizing the list."

Star Secretary Guandee Kohoi confirmed in a text message: "We agreed to it. Letter of authorization to use symbol with me. We only need full name as per IC."

This is the culmination of a process which began quite some time ago to get the ten percent who are Christians in Malaysia on board with Hindraf as 3rd Force allies. At present, the Christians in Malaya don't have any political vehicle. Star has answered that need.

There are many Sabahans and Sarawakians in Malaya.


Hindraf Star alliance in Malaya mooted quite some time ago

When Waytha was still in involuntary political asylum in London, I casually suggested to him and Jeffrey that Hindraf field candidates under the Star symbol and flag in Malaya to help forge 3rd Force unity in Parliament. That was well before Waytha re-filed the Hindraf class action suit in London in early July last year.

Incidentally, I am not a member of Hindraf or Star. Neither am I a self-appointed Advisor to anyone. I am more for embedded reporting, albeit with a difference.

It's not about scooping anyone.

There's a difference between merely following the news and watching history on the one hand and giving a Hearing to All.

First, a little more digression.

The fact that the Registrar of Societies (ROS) approved Hindraf last month after earlier lifting the ban on the unregistered organisation is beside the point. The ROS himself said that Hindraf could apply for registration after the ban was ended. Hindraf still remains an NGO. It's not a political party. Obviously, the Barisan Nasional (BN) hopes that Hindraf would be a BN-friendly NGO. Hence, no doubt the approval. However, Hindraf's support for anyone would not be free.

The registration of Hindraf was filed at the same time as the appeal for the ban on it to be lifted. Nothing was done discreetly, according to a text message a while ago from Waytha. Supporters of former Legal Advisor and co-Founder P. Uthayakumar in PKR – the man himself is not involved -- were also at the same time trying to hijack ownership of the NGO.

Away from that little digression, I felt that no useful purpose would be served by Waytha continuing to stay in London once the suit had been re-filed.

 

No mystery in Waythamoorthy's return to Malaysia

He was worried that his return would be seen as a sellout to the BN, the same worry plaguing Royal Fugitive Blogger Raja Petra Kamaruddin who had met up with Waytha to exchange notes. The latter had put me in Skype contact with Petra.

Initially, Waytha did not know what to say about the Star proposal. I suggested subsequently that he head a Star chapter in Malaya, an idea which came from Jeffrey. Waytha appeared to agree somewhat and I even mentioned this in a story on his return from political exile. No one followed up the story as the media on both sides of the political divide, especially the Opposition, is anti-3rd Force.

Waytha himself, before the Star idea came up, toyed with the idea of standing on a Dap ticket, or even a Pas ticket. He was also for meeting Nurul Izzah and her mother Wan Azizah in Singapore to discuss patching up between Hindraf and PKR.

However, doing business with PKR was difficult since relations between Anwar and Hindraf were strained to the breaking point after the former tried to discredit the NGO as a racist organisation and kept claiming that it had nothing to do with the makkal sakthi – people power in Tamil -- wave which unleashed the political tsunami of Sat 8 Mar, 2008. Anwar had shamelessly jumped on the Hindraf bandwagon but now he was like the lembu punya susu, sapi dapat nama. The people did not vote for PR in 2008. They voted against BN.

Waytha decided to return via Singapore without his Malaysian passport. He had a UN Travel Document issued to him, as a political exile, by the British Government. He could travel to any country in the world except Malaysia and should he infringe the condition, his political asylum status would be immediately revoked.

 

People of Borneo should get a proper hearing in Parliament

The Malaysian High Commission in Singapore quickly re-issued a Malaysian passport to Waytha as otherwise he would have to be deported, as is the norm in Government agreements with carrier airlines, and this would have been politically and diplomatically embarrassing to both Singapore and Malaysia especially if Waytha refused to leave the city state and made repeated attempts to enter his country. The British Government and the UN would then enter the picture. Waytha's idea was to cross over from Singapore to Johore on foot. He was prepared to be arrested and charged with terrorism, sedition and treason as the Government had earlier indicated.

Jeffrey was initially hesitant about Hindraf fielding candidates under the Star symbol and flag in Malaya.

He feared that Star crossing the South China Sea to Malaya may perhaps contradict his own battle cry that Malayan parties should keep out of Borneo. Hence, we have Agenda Borneo v Agenda parti parti Malaya in Borneo, a Star version of a one-to-one fight in Sabah.

(Kepayan Star Chief Phillip Among, a young Turk, is the Architect of the Agenda Borneo v Agenda parti parti Malaya in Borneo theme. He sold me the idea one day over tea at McDonald's in Kota Kinabalu. I wrote about it, to gather public feedback, even before Jeffrey entered the picture and quickly endorsed it. Star is a young Turk party.)

I pointed out to Jeffrey that under the 1963 Malaysia Agreement, and related constitutional documents on Malaysia, Malaya was supposed to have one seat less two-thirds in the Malaysian Parliament at the very maximum. Given the present 222 seats in Parliament, that means no more than 147 seats. Malaya has 165 seats in Parliament. This is a theft of 18 seats which should be with Borneo, a heinous crime against the people, the result of the Registrar of Societies, the Election Commission and the Attorney General looking the other way to diminish the voice of the people in Parliament.

By the same token, there's no reason why Borneo cannot have the same one seat less two-thirds in the Malaysian Parliament at the very maximum. In order to achieve this, a Borneo-based national party or coalition would have to field candidates under its symbol and flag in Malaya. It's not tit-for-tat! It should not be tit for tat!

 

Nur Misuari can't help Anwar against Star/Usno in Sabah east coast

It's not possible for Borneo to achieve the same maximum in Parliament given its paltry 57 seats including Labuan. Even if Malaya had not stolen the 18 seats, Borneo would have only 75 seats in Parliament, far short of the 147 seats.

Jeffrey was finally sold on the idea of Hindraf using the Star symbol and flag in Malaya.

Also, the mood in his party was, Lu Kacau Gua, Gua Kacau Lu – a variation of Caretaker Unelected Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak's infamous Lu Tolong Gua, Gua Tolong Lu declaration in Sibu during a parliamentary by-election -- given the stubborn refusal of Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim to make way for local parties in Sabah.

Anwar is being politically suicidal in Sabah. Although he may not have been a party to placing illegal immigrants on the electoral rolls, he certainly knew about it, did nothing to stop the treasonous activities, and now wants to benefit from it, as he did when he headed Sabah Umno.

He wants to ensure that Muslim, whether local or illegal, political domination of Sabah continues so that he can "inherit" the system in tact through cross-overs en bloc. This is why he's having problems with his own Sabah PKR leaders who are up in arms against his nefarious plans in their country.

Anwar is pledged towards continued disunity among the Orang Asal, including the Muslim, in Sabah and Sarawak.

If possible, he wants to see the political destruction of the mainly Christian Orang Asal in Sabah and Sarawak in pursuit of ketuanan Melayu (Malay political domination and supremacy).

His attempts to get Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) leader Nur Misuari to throw a spanner in the Star-United Sabah National Organisation (Usno) alliance has not worked. Usno, now protem after deregistration, was founded by legendary Suluk Chief Mustapha Harun, a previous Governor and then Chief Minister of Sabah. Nur Misuari pledged he could do more than what Anwar wants according to Sabah PKR sources now with Star, and either known or unknown to him (Anwar), was behind the Lahad Datu intrusion. His latest ploy has been to try and wreck the possibility of a truce between Star and Sapp.

 

Anwar should make way for the sake of greater Opposition Unity

If Hindraf and Star maintain their position that the former fields candidates under the latter's symbol and flag in Malaya, it will be a whole new ball game.

Some will say that it will be BN that would benefit.

The jury is still out on the issue.

We need to watch where Hindraf will be fielding candidates and then work out the possible trends that could emerge.

It will be prudent if both BN and PR can give way to Star/Hindraf in Malaya instead of continuing to promote their political mandores.

Both should accept the proposed Ministry of Orang Asal and Minority Affairs (Moama) if the Hindraf Blueprint proper sticks in their throats. The Ministry can implement the Hindraf Blueprint.

Ideally, Indians should put off the inevitable destruction of Umno/BN, and help maintain the status quo in Malaya for now except for removing MIC from the scene and making place for Hindraf/Star. Indians have more than an axe to grind with Umno/BN for the 56 years of internal colonisation they suffered under the ruling coalition's bangsa, agama, negara (race, religion, country) policy of ketuanan Melayu (Malay political dominance and supremacy), a sick combination of Apartheid, Nazism, Fascism, and Communism, Political Islam, terrorism, militancy, "ethnic cleansing", and the caste system to prevent upward social mobility among the 45 per cent non-Malay minorities.

It would not be in the interest of Indians to see the destruction of PR. The PR is needed to destroy Umno/BN, if not now, later. In any case, the writing is on the wall for Umno/BN after 56 years. Its days are numbered. BN, outside Umno, is likely to be history this time in Malaya.

If there's going to greater opposition unity, come the 13th GE, Anwar has to step aside and let Lim Kit Siang, Karpal Singh, Lim Guan Eng, Chua Jui Meng, Hadi Awang, Nik Aziz and Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah have a greater say.

Anwar has become a divisive figure, partly the result of Azmin Ali & Co, on both sides of the South China Sea. He cannot continue to take Azmin's side against his own wife, the party president, and his daughter Nurul Izzah. It's the party president who should run the party, not the de facto whatever by using the fig leaf of being the Opposition Leader in Parliament.

 

Agenda Borneo v Agenda Malaya on the backburner in Sarawak

If the Opposition in Malaya and Sabah fails to measure up to public expectations, come the 13th GE, blame it on Anwar for not being able to rise to the occasion. His political impotence would be complete.

In Sarawak, the people have put the Agenda Borneo v Agenda Malaya on the backburner for the moment, given the destruction of local political parties by the Taib regime.

They are banking on PR to help bring about a change of government in their country.

However, PR component parties in Sarawak would have to incorporate locally and be autonomous and independent of Malaya, or they risk Jeffery entering the picture again in that nation to haunt them all over again.

 

Joe Fernandez is a graduate mature student of law and an educationist, among others, who loves to write especially Submissions for Clients wishing to Act in Person. He also tutors at local institutions. He feels compelled, as a semi-retired journalist, to put pen to paper -- or rather the fingers to the computer keyboard -- whenever something doesn't quite jell with his weltanschauung (worldview) or to give a Hearing to All. He shuttles between points in the Golden Heart of Borneo formed by the Sabah west coast, Labuan, Brunei, northern Sarawak and the watershed region in Borneo where three nations meet. He's half-way through a semi-autobiographical travelogue, A World with a View.

 

The EC Must Address These Doubts

Posted: 13 Apr 2013 02:34 PM PDT

http://cdn.malaysiandigest.com/images/zahar/Indelible_ink282.jpg

Another curious decision made by the EC is that the indelible ink would be applied on each voter before they cast their vote. Tindak Malaysia has tried this out in a practice run and found that it's a bad idea because it could result in the ballot paper getting smudged, which could lead to the vote being considered spoilt.  
 
Kee Thuan Chye
 
While announcing the date for the 13th general election, the Election Commission (EC) also said that it would make the event "the best" ever held. In pledging this, its chairman, Abdul Aziz Mohd Yusof, reiterated what he had said on Feb 5.
 
But somehow the pledge rings hollow. Many Malaysians have lost too much confidence in the EC to believe that it will be, in Abdul Aziz's words, "transparent" and that it "will not help any party to win". Its actions and pronouncements have too often indicated the contrary.
 
Besides that, NGOs that have engaged with the EC know how frustrating the experience can be. The latter is notorious for not replying to pressing questions concerning the electoral process or improper conduct at elections. Its dismissal of Bersih's demands for electoral reform compelled the Coalition for Free and Fair Elections to take its cause to the streets in July 2011.
 
The EC is also noted for its apparently cavalier attitude towards calls for cleaning the electoral roll. Instead of getting down to the task of doing it, it has been giving excuses – even though a Merdeka Centre survey in April 2012 revealed that 92% of Malaysians in Peninsular Malaysia want the roll cleaned.
 
The biggest joke, made in April 2012, was Abdul Aziz's declaration that the Malaysian electoral roll was "the cleanest in the world". He said there were only 42,000 dubious voters out of the 12.6 million registered, which works out to a mere 0.3%.
 
But political scientist Ong Kian Ming had a radically different figure to present. Ong said an analysis conducted under one of his projects showed that the number of dubious voters was 3.3 million.
 
Apart from dubious voters, missing names and other anomalies have reportedly been found in the constituencies of Klang MP Charles Santiago and Lembah Pantai MP Nurul Izzah Anwar, both from Pakatan Rakyat.
 
But when they both requested the EC to look into the matter, it did not respond accordingly. Both were forced to go to the High Court. However, Section 9A of the Elections Act denies the courts jurisdiction in regard to the electoral roll, so their cases were thrown out.
 
More distressing for Izzah is the sudden spike in the number of postal voters there. By the end of 2011, it had gone up by an unusual 1,400% from 2008. And since postal votes are known to favour the ruling Barisan Nasional coalition, their increased presence could be a bane to the PKR vice-president.
 
As for the total number of voters in Lembah Pantai, there has been, according to Izzah, a phenomenal increase of 15,000. While some are newly registered voters, many more appear to have been transferred there, for reasons known only to the EC.
 
With the general election coming up on May 5, what happens now to the discrepancies in the electoral roll? Do Malaysians go to the polls with doubt in their minds about whether the process might be compromised and phantom voting might influence the outcome unfairly?
 

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Use of Sosma an Overreaction to a Non Situation

Posted: 13 Apr 2013 03:17 PM PDT

Think tank Political Studies for Change (KPRU) welcomes the assurance given by the police that Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 (SOSMA) will not be abused during the the run up to the 13th General Election. The assurance is a proactive measure to quell any distrust by the public towards the police on the possibility of SOSMA being arbitrarily used. However, as well as providing assurance that SOSMA will not be abused, the police is highly recommended to take immediate and appropriate actions against perpetrators of political violence seen during and post election season.

This comes considering that SOSMA is intended to be used against matters that are a threat to parliamentary democracy. Considering that the definition to what constitutes to threat against parliamentary democracy is neither clear nor succinct, it opens the possibility of abuse. Malaysians are reminded of the arrests made in relation to the Lahad Datu intrusion which individuals were arrested under SOSMA for suspicions of having connections with the intrusion. What assurance does the police have for Malaysians and the opposition or its supporters will not be arrested under SOSMA on grounds of "suspicions for being a threat to parliamentary democracy" during this GE13?

A fair and just police is a police that protects the public at all cost. However, that role of the police in Malaysia is a perverted role. Instead of protecting the public, the police have issued a threat to all Malaysians that they will use the newly minted and widely controversial law of Sosma on Malaysians during the 13th General Election (GE 13) "to ensure the general election is not affected by incidents or security threats and be accused of being terrorist"?

The irony of this situation by the police comes when it warns individuals and non governmental bodies to not overstep the law but the police itself are overstepping the toes of Malaysians by indirectly accusing Malaysians of having intentions to disrupt the peace of this country.

The recent selective screening of the controversial movie Tanda Putera also raises the question on its weightage as influence during the GE13. Malaysians familiar with the tragedy of 13th May are also familiar of the conspiracies surrounding the cause of the tragedy. How will the police ensure that the selective screening of Tanda Putera will not fall into one of the conspiracy theories behind any unwarranted incidents during and post GE13?

There is a problem with wearing the badge with too much pride when the police asserts that SOSMA will not be abused during GE 13 when past records indicate the police have no experience or the know how to handle situations when faced with large crowds. On the other hand, the problem with threatening to enforce SOSMA during GE13 is that it gives a considerable amount of power and justification for the police to exercise their brute enforcement on Malaysians if, to say things went awry.

Read more at: http://kpru2010.wordpress.com/2013/04/14/use-of-sosma-an-overreaction-to-a-non-situation/ 

 

Pak Samad tells voters to oust BN

Posted: 11 Apr 2013 10:48 PM PDT

This is the first time the national literary icon, popularly known as Pak Samad, has openly urged Malaysians to back the federal opposition coalition to "overhaul" the government and "amend the broken machinery" like health care and education, which Pakatan Rakyat (PR) has promised to deliver.

"This is our chance… the time has come for us to overhaul the government to that power would fall in the right hands.

"This is our opportunity to amend the broken machinery like health care, education and democracy of which have been promised by the opposition," he said at an event organised by polls reform group Bersih 2.0 in Selayang.

Bersih 2.0, a coalition of over 80 non-governmental organisations, has in the past been forced to defend itself against criticisms calling it a partisan group, largely due to the immense support it had received from PR leaders for its street protests.

The former national laureate Samad said now is a critical time for voters to ask themselves why the same coalition has ruled Malaysia for more than five decades and why is it those in power are only Malays. "I am also a Malay but I often asked why is it that the powers above me are only Malays?

"Tunku Abdul Rahman was a Malay, (Tun) Abdul Razak was a Malay, (Tun) Hussein Onn was a Malay, (Tun Dr) Mahathir (Mohamad) is not a pure Malay but can be considered a Malay… (Datuk Seri) Najib (Razak) is also a Malay," he said.

Despite a solid Malay leadership for 56 years, Samad pointed to the racist tactic used by the ruling coalition to keep the country's ethnic majority on its side.

"So why are we repeatedly reminded that the Malay rights will be threatened?"

The private screenings of controversial 'Tanda Putera' film, purportedly depicting the May 1969 racial riots, only to Malays in the run-up to the elections was a testimony to the racism perpetrated by the BN government, he added.

"It is to sow fear in the heart of the Malays," he said.

Bersih 2.0 is now leading the campaign to reform Malaysia's polling system, which the coalition of rights groups claimed is rife with irregularities.

It is also launching a nationwide tour to educate voters on election laws aimed at making them 'citizen observers' and to reduce fraud including curbing vote-buying under its 'Jom Pantau (Let's Monitor)' campaign.

Samad pointed to widespread vote-buying when the Najib administration gave out cash handouts to key constituents under the People's 1 Malaysia Aid (BR1M) programme, which he said signalled BN's fear that its rule would come to an end soon.

"You must ask why is it that the government had suddenly want to give out money? This government is desperate, that is why they even promised more BR1M," he said.

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


On GE13

Posted: 13 Apr 2013 03:00 PM PDT

 https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS4SLS2eLBwEmRsq8Tp19y4Hq6WYvmQvbapXdxCSU8GqpFjqOsw

Most of BN's electoral promises can be found in their previous manifestoes for general elections since at least the 1980s. The BN solution to all of our problems is as follows: firstly, deny that there is a problem and crisis of confidence as to where we are heading as a nation; secondly, simply spend money that is not there to buy the peoples' support and loyalty; and thirdly, maintain the status quo under an elaborate charade of reform. 

Gerard Lourdesamy 

The 13th general election is upon us in three weeks time. The 5th of May 2013 like the 31st of August 1957 is a defining moment in our nation's history. After 56 years of near total domination of our political life first by the Alliance and then the Barisan Nasional (BN), the people of this great land have a historic opportunity to vote for change rather than piece-meal transformation and guarded reforms.

The nation's institutions and economy are in tatters. The Constitutional checks and balances guaranteed and envisioned by our founding fathers lie in ruin thanks to innumerable amendments to our charter of liberty and freedom, by successive BN governments. These amendments were calculated to entrench power in the hands of an all-powerful and yet unaccountable Executive with a subservient and unrepresentative police force and state security apparatus to instil fear and carry out retribution against persons or organisations perceived to be a threat to the vested interests of the ruling elite. In the process the regulatory role of Parliament was relegated to a rubber stamp; the rulers rendered powerless; the courts were emasculated and the media subjugated and controlled to the point of insignificance. Credible journalism in this country predicated on fairness, impartiality and integrity is long dead.

Against this backdrop of institutional decline, we have seen our economy get less and less competitive amidst an environment of over-regulation and ineffective enforcement, endemic corruption, inefficiency and weaknesses; leakages arising from a lack of transparency and accountability; and a bloated civil service that is incapable of improving itself thanks to inbred inertia, the absence of integrity and the inability to remain impartial and impervious to political pressure and influence. Corruption is accepted as a reality and a guarantee of upward social mobility and entry to elite circles resplendent with an extravagant and impressive lifestyle that is the envy of many ordinary Malaysians.

Rather than tackle fundamental and institutional problems with our economy largely caused by the distortion of the New Economic Policy (NEP) and its successor policies; the lack of innovation and research; a moribund and unproductive workforce which lacks proper tertiary education and skills training; and the inability to compete with the emerging economies, that has caused us to be left behind in terms of direct foreign investment and is leading us into stagnation and a middle income wage trap despite the overly optimistic target of fully developed status by 2020, the BN has chosen to tinker with economic planning and policy simply to protect the interests of various competing groups within UMNO who have simply high-jacked the Malay agenda in order to enrich themselves, their families and cronies.

Very often the fear of being unable to achieve the questionable equity targets set by the NEP and the perception that economic power is still in the hands of the Chinese and foreigners, is used as an excuse to perpetuate a culture of mediocrity and malaise but with incessant demands for closed or negotiated tenders for mega projects valued at billons of ringgit at the expense of transparency and ability to perform and deliver. Mismanagement and wastage is swept under the carpet while corruption and abuse of power often goes unreported and unpunished.

It is this culture of patronage and political largesse that has caused us to lose tens of billions of ringgits in failed economic ventures and other projects including speculative trading in currency and commodities, that has not benefitted the people by any measure. Successive bail-outs of well connected personalities and cheap credit and loans to companies that are abject failures have not helped empower the Malays either economically or socially. The beneficiaries are simply extensions of the ruling elite in UMNO or the BN through ubiquitous front companies both on and off shore. The ordinary Malays and Bumiputera in the kampongs, fishing villages and rural areas have not benefitted from these so-called attempts to create a Malay super-rich entrepreneurial class with the ability to compete nationally and globally who would invariable help the poorer Malays and Bumiputera with business and employment opportunities.

While eradication of poverty is much touted by the BN, we still have a very long way to go thanks to the increasing income disparity between and within various ethnic groups in the country where a disproportionate number of Malays and East Malaysian natives followed by Indians and some Chinese live on meagre incomes and appalling living conditions.

Access to minimum standards of housing, proper sanitation and basic utilities is still lacking in many parts of the country and is shockingly bad in Sabah and Sarawak where the incidence of poverty is at its highest despite these two states being rich in natural resources like oil, gas and timber.

Our education system is in disarray where most of our local graduates thanks to an over regulated and controlled education system that discourages critical and analytical thinking, compounded by the total absence of academic freedom and integrity among a great many of our professors and lecturers who are appointed not on merit, ability, experience or academic excellence but rather on political affiliation, sympathy and unquestioning loyalty to the ruling party that is often confused with the government, are unable to perform and compete in the private sector and have to be assumed into the civil service to reduce unemployment and avoid a political backlash, where they invariably perform below par and cause innumerable problems within the service.

The poor command of the English language and the declining standards of learning in that language thanks to misguided nationalistic education policies in the 70s and 80s have caused our students and graduates to compare poorly to their counterparts even from non-traditional English speaking countries like Indonesia and Thailand.

These poor language skills are evident when communication with foreigners and foreign governments is impeded because of a lack of knowledge and confidence to speak, write and use good and proper English. Our diplomatic service is a clear example where apart from its unrepresentative character, our diplomats seem to keep to themselves and do the country a great disservice by failing to interact with their host governments, business community, think tanks and media to promote our national interests simply because they are not confident to speak in English or any other foreign language. Instead their role is limited to hosting receptions and celebrations for visiting dignitaries and their spouses and on national festive occasions.

Healthcare and health related services have become mired in a lack of qualified specialists in government hospitals, poor facilities, lack of beds, rising costs of care and medicines and the limited access to such facilities in rural areas. Instead of attempting to provide free universal healthcare or at least a system that will protect the lower income group from high medical costs while providing them with adequate access, the BN is more interested in privatisation and other absurd policies aimed at rationalisation but at the same time benefitting cronies of the government.

As a country rich in natural resources and talent despite the increasing brain-drain thanks to the BN's deadwood policies since the 1970s, most Malaysians are still told to wait for an economic, social and political transformation that will propel us to greater heights and eventually developed country status in 2020, provided the BN remains in power, since it seems that only the BN has the monopoly over development, the ability to deliver on promises and guarantee peace, security and stability.

But this message of the BN that resonates throughout its unimpressive manifesto for the 13th general election is nothing new or transformative. It is nothing but a continuation of the slew of promises and handouts promised in the last four successive budgets under Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak and also in the 10th Malaysia Plan approved by Parliament.

In fact most of BN's electoral promises can be found in their previous manifestoes for general elections since at least the 1980s. The BN solution to all of our problems is as follows: firstly, deny that there is a problem and crisis of confidence as to where we are heading as a nation; secondly, simply spend money that is not there to buy the peoples' support and loyalty; and thirdly, maintain the status quo under an elaborate charade of reform or transformation with a glitzy media campaign and creating numerous government linked bodies, agencies and companies to perpetuate the myth of change and reform.

While no one can begrudge Prime Minister Najib Razak's efforts to tinker at a micro level with our fundamental economic, social and political demands and problems, he regrettably has failed to deliver on anything of substance at a macro level simply because he is beholden to vested interests and he is afraid of confronting the old guard in UMNO headed by the despotic former Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad.

Mahathir has proven time and again to be a master politician and tactician, far better than even Najib Razak or Anwar Ibrahim put together. He appeals to the base instincts of the Malays who fear a loss of political power if UMNO/BN loses the elections; the heightened demands of the Chinese and Indian minorities; and the overdependence on the natives of Sabah and Sarawak who are neither Malay nor Muslim. Mahathir's only concern at present is his legacy and his multi-billion dollar worth children who undoubtedly benefitted from his 22 years in office. The nation comes a poor second and the people probably third in his scheme of things. He wants to perpetuate the myth of UMNO as the only saviour and defender of the Malays while pretending to fight for the Malay economic cause.

The reality is of course different. His duplicity is clear for all to see. While he berates the Chinese and Indians, he has and continues to favour his cronies from these communities. He plays the race and religion card like a puppet master with Malay nationalist NGOs like Perkasa and others backing him unreservedly and doing his bidding which directly and indirectly benefits UMNO and the BN to the detriment of race relations and Najib's attempts to be more inclusive and embrace all ethnic groups under his 1 Malaysia campaign. And yet others like the Deputy Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin are happy to undermine the Prime Minister at every turn with the blessing of Mahathir to perpetuate the narrow nationalistic, communalistic and at times racist ideology of Malay supremacy and dominance which has succeeded in alienating the non-Malays and also the East Malaysian natives to a large degree.

UMNO is incapable of reform as long as Mahathir and the old guard continue to pursue their own agenda within the party. UMNO's domineering nature has weakened the BN and while the BN may have cohesion and discipline, the coalition members lack the freedom to disagree with and digress from the UMNO led agenda for nation building. Under the disguise of consensus and consociationalism, the BN component parties have become servile to UMNO even to the point of sacrificing the interests of the ethnic groups they represent in order to simply preserve their status, standing and benefits from being in government with UMNO.

There is at present a wide disconnect between the people and their leaders. BN has and will continue to practice a top down type of limited democracy where the people are the servants of their political masters and are expected to remain always loyal and grateful to the ruling elite for their leadership and benevolence. In fact the BN in the last three decades has established itself in the model of a neo-fascist regime where the cult of leaders is actively encouraged in a climate of fear and oppression with a subservient media whose only role is to perpetuate a culture of undying loyalty and gratitude to the ruling party.

The excesses and extravagance of the ruling elite has no limits. And this extends to their children and cronies as well. Despite claiming to be an Islamic country, UMNO pays scant regard to the key tenets of Islam which is moderation, piety, justice and fairness to Muslims and non-Muslims alike. Corruption and abuses of power are justified in the national interest and even religious scholars are roped in justify policies of the government that are not beneficial to the people as a whole and probably offensive to core Islamic values.

While I do not wish to trumpet the promises made by the Pakatan Rakyat (PR) in their manifesto which like the BN is populist and short of facts, figures and reality, it at least offers a genuine promise of change and reform. While the PR may not be perfect and at times appears disunited and disjointed, which may be due to its component parties' unique and competing ideologies and diverse interests, coupled with lack of experience in governance until 2008, they are at least making an attempt to restore sanity and normalcy to our national way of life by advocating greater democracy and freedom, respect for the rule of law and human rights, eliminating corruption, abuses, wastage and leakages in our economy and most importantly restoring social justice by way of a needs based approached as opposed to a race based one, which has failed the BN since the inception of the NEP.

While PR has to put up with constant criticism and bad press; divisions and infighting; listless leadership at times; and even poor handling of national issues amidst competing demands from ethic groups and core constituents, it has succeeded in creating a greater awareness among the people of our rights in a seemingly democratic society and our quest for economic and social justice, fairness and equitable treatment. People have become more responsive to national issues and have started to question, criticise and condemn. While at times there is a great deal of untruths and slander being bandied about by both sides of the political divide, people are less concerned about the sexual proclivities of our leaders but more about the direction and future of our country.

Not all in Malaysia is bad just as not all in Malaysia is good. The voters have to be discerning and wise in making their choice. The results must be respected by both sides provided the elections themselves are free and fair by minimum international standards. While we cannot depend entirely on so-called independent institutions like the Election Commission (EC), the police and the media to guarantee a free and fair poll, we must ourselves keep watch and guard over the electoral process to ensure that it is free from abuse and corruption. The voters must come out in high numbers and give a decisive victory to whichever coalition they feel is the right choice to govern and lead this country into our future.

The time has come to move away from old and decaying things and move towards something new, full of promise and dynamism that is guaranteed to provide us with an exciting and challenging five years ahead.

 

 

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved