Khamis, 11 April 2013

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Indians suffered 56 years of internal colonisation!

Posted: 10 Apr 2013 02:01 PM PDT


It's the PR which needs Indian votes, not the BN. 

Joe Fernandez

The departure of the British administrators from Malaya in 1957, ostensibly giving independence to the country, meant nothing to the Indian Nation.

Indians soon found that they had exchanged one colonial master for another, from the British to the Malay-speaking communities drawn from the Bugis, Javanese, Minang, Acehnese, Arab Muslims and Indian Muslims, among others. This was the Malay Nation, a people without territory in Singapore, Malaya, south Thailand, Sri Lanka, Madagascar and South Africa.

From the scourge of external colonisation, Indians have been experiencing internal colonisation since 1957, a crime under international law. Incidentally, it was internal colonisation by Khartoum which eventually led to South Sudan breaking away from Sudan with the blessing of the UN Security Council.

On that score alone, internal colonisation, Umno/BN is the sworn eternal and mortal enemies of the Indian Nation in Malaysia. It's neither possible to forgive nor forget what Umno/BN has done to the Indians.

It's not possible for Indians to do business, purely on moral grounds, with this evil coalition which has squatted on Indians more than half a century.

 

Indians must seize the moral high ground and reject Umno/BN completely

The last General Election, the 12th, was a watershed for Indians when the makkal sakthi – people power in Tamil – wave generated by Hindraf Makkal Sakthi unleashed a political tsunami and installed Opposition Governments, formed by the Pakatan Rakyat (PR), in five states in Malaya and handed it Kuala Lumpur.

Alas, PR did little to roll back the policies institutionalized by 56 years of internal colonisation under Umno and its running dogs, the Barisan Nasional (BN). Neither is the Opposition making any attempts this time to woo the Indians despite 85 per cent of them voting against the BN in 2008. PR belabours under the delusion that Indians would automatically vote for them, having broken with BN the last time.

This 13th GE, Indians are in a league all by themselves, having not even one ethnic-majority seat in any legislature, despite nearly a million of them on the electoral rolls.

The community must seize the moral high ground and have nothing to do with the BN which, as the last GE proved, doesn't really need Indian votes to keep Putrajaya. Umno is more concerned about denying Indian votes to the Opposition and in return has offered the prospect of throwing some crumbs directly at the community instead of routing these through their political mandores in MIC and PPP. PR meanwhile has enthusiastically embraced the political mandore system being abandoned by Umno/BN.

PKR, the glue that holds Dap and Pas together in PR, was formed by the losing side after the proverbial falling out of thieves in Umno. Its aim is to replace Umno in the Federal Government.

 

New faces can be given the benefit of the doubt

Dap meanwhile has done a good job of wooing the urban and Chinese voters away from BN, on the verge of collapse on the eve of the GE.

Umno can no longer afford to give BN the seats where the Malays form the single biggest community but still less than 50 per cent. PR is set to sweep these seats from BN and Umno thinks it will have a better chance than its lapdog to retain the Malay voters.

Indians, having burnt their bridges with PR in the aftermath of 2008, have no reason to worry about the fate of the Opposition Alliance no matter what's in store for them. It's for the non-Indian urban and Chinese voters to save PR as their best vehicle to bring them to power in Putrajaya.

Indians must walk a lonely path in politics, even one that involves a spell in the cold or wilderness.

The community can give new faces, making their electoral debut in the 13th GE, the benefit of the doubt provided they endorse the Hindraf Blueprint. If both BN and PR candidates in a particular seat endorse the Blueprint, it's for the voters in that locality to decide among themselves which candidate appears more credible.

On balance, it would be difficult for Indians to endorse BN new faces given the ugly history of the coalition.

Alternatively, they can root for a 3rd candidate if there's one in the fray, provided the Blueprint is endorsed.

 

Not in Indian interest to see PR fail and crumble

If Hindraf fields candidates, probably under one common symbol and flag, Indians should naturally vote for this NGO as it offers them the best hope for the future. Indians decide in 67 parliamentary seats, and the related state seats, in Malaya. It's likely that Hindraf, win or lose, will garner more Indian votes than BN and PR combined and especially from among the underclass.

Hindraf and the new faces aside, Indians should vote against all incumbents. They can do this, not by abstaining or boycotting, but spoiling the ballots in protest against their marginalisation and disenfranchisement. Hopefully, there will be one million spoilt ballots to earn a place in world history and focus the attention of the international community and the UN on the plight of the Indian Nation in Malaysia.

Abstaining has been mentioned as a weapon so that the winners will know why they won i.e. the Indians didn't vote against them. The losers will know why they lost i.e. the Indians didn't vote for them.

If the last GE is any guide, the winners in this case would be the BN and PR the losers. It's the PR which needs Indian votes, not the BN.

Does the Indian community really want to see PR losing all its states? That would only strengthen Umno/BN, the sworn enemies of the Indian Nation, and make it all the more difficult to remove this scourge which has been plaguing the nation the last half century and more.

 

Ketuanan Melayu the great barrier to Indian advancement

Or should it take the position that the enemy (PR) of my enemy (Umno/BN) is my friend even if not so friendly.

Is it really in the Indian interest to see the return of BN stronger than ever or would it be more strategic to keep giving PR the chances that it obviously doesn't deserve but only until the ruling coalition has been driven out from Putrajaya? The only reason that Umno/BN is being respectful towards the Indians is because of the presence of PR. If PR is no longer around, Umno/BN will ignore the Indians once more like before 2008.

Some would say that there's method in madness if the Indians turn to the Opposition once again after having installed PR in Putrajaya. The odds are against the opposition peacefully assuming power in Malaysia as there are no free and fair elections in the country and it may be virtually impossible to overthrow BN through the ballot box.

Indians can have no part in Government unless and until the Sapu Bersih deviations and distortions of Article 153 in the Federal Constitution and the NEP are ended; the issue of statelessness dealt with; anti non-Malay minorities administrative laws be scrapped; Islam kept in its proper perspective as per Article 3 of the Federal Constitution which doesn't mention any official religion; the intrusion of Syariah and the Syariah Courts into civil law ended; forced and bogus conversions to Islam be outlawed; the bogus conversion of non-Muslims to Islam upon marring Muslims be outlawed; and Muslims be allowed to leave Islam without the sanction of the Syariah Court.

That's unlikely to happen as long as Umno continues its policy of ketuanan Melayu (Malay political domination and supremacy) -- a sick combination of Apartheid, Nazism, and Fascism, Communism, Political Islam and the caste system which allows no upward social mobility – driven by racism, prejudice and opportunism.

Now is not the time to play the devil's advocate. Hindraf Makkal Sakthi must announce its unconditional support for PR come the 13th GE although it has vowed No Free Votes.

It's more important for Indians at this stage to think about punishing, and even destroying Umno and BN, than to worry about what they can get out of a PR Government in Putrajaya.

 

Joe Fernandez is a graduate mature student of law and an educationist, among others, who loves to write especially Submissions for Clients wishing to Act in Person and tutor at local institutions. He feels compelled, as a semi-retired journalist, to put pen to paper -- or rather the fingers to the computer keyboard -- whenever something doesn't quite jell with his weltanschauung (worldview). He shuttles between points in the Golden Heart of Borneo formed by the Sabah west coast, Labuan, Brunei, northern Sarawak and the watershed region in Borneo where three nations meet. He's half-way through a semi-autobiographical travelogue, A World with a View.

 

The new front-line states in GE13

Posted: 10 Apr 2013 10:49 AM PDT


Johan Saravanamuttu, Today Online 

The 13th General Election of Malaysia to be held on May 5 promises to be the toughest ever to be fought between the ruling coalition, Barisan Nasional (BN) and the Opposition, the Pakatan Rakyat (PR).

What are the so-called new front-line states in the capture and defence of Putrajaya? I take "front-line states" to mean those that will be defended or won at the state level, and those that could deliver more parliamentary seats to the Opposition.

Kelantan, Kedah, Penang and Selangor are front-line states for the PR to defend, while Perak is an important front-line state for the BN to keep, since it was taken over after the 2008 General Election.

Added to mix now are Negeri Sembilan, Johor, Sarawak and Sabah, where the PR is targeting its state governments and, more importantly, the capture of parliamentary seats in new terrain.

The PR is banking on a continuation of the non-Malay swing of 2008 and a splitting of the Malay vote, which the 16 by-elections held since 2008 — in which each side scored an equal number of wins — appears to affirm.

 

NEGERI SEMBILAN

First, a brief word: In Penang and Kelantan, few back the BN's chances of a takeover, while in Selangor and Perak, the pundits are talking about 50-50 odds.

In Kedah, the Parti Islam Se-Malaysia (PAS) is said to be weak under Menteri Besar Azizan Abdul Razak, with the party dogged by internal squabbles, a poor public policy record, and unpopular actions, such as the stopping of stage shows and karaoke lounges, which has irked non-Muslims.

The prospect of Dr Mahathir Mohamad's son Mukhriz as a potential Menteri Besar has also created a small stir. The BN would need to capture five more seats to overtake the PR in the 36-seat State Assembly, in which the PR holds 20 seats.

The irony for the BN is that the converse could happen in Negeri Sembilan, a new front-line state, where the BN has only a slim majority in a 36-seat state assembly. The PR, with 15 seats, is four seats short of assuming power in the state. The key factor lies in the weakness of the non-Malay coalition partners within UMNO — the Malaysian Chinese Association (MCA), Malaysian Indian Congress and the virtually non-existent Gerakan in this state.

State Opposition leader Mr Anthony Loke of the Democratic Action Party (DAP) will lead the charge in contesting Chennah, a seat which has a mixed constituency of 54 per cent Chinese, 41 per cent Malays, and 3 per cent Indians. In 2008, the MCA candidate had won this constituency by fewer than 1,300 votes.

It is in such seats that the DAP generally holds an advantage, with the swing of Chinese voters to the opposition. (It is worth noting that Mr Loke is an MP for Rasah, a constituency with a similar ethnic make-up which he won in 2008 by more than 13,000 votes against his MCA opponent.)

 

SHIFT IN JOHOR

This leads us to Johor. How could this state, in which the PR took only one parliamentary and six state seats previously, be now seen as "front line"?

The PR's fate rests mainly upon Chinese votes and the "battle royale" building between the DAP and the MCA in Johor.

The MCA has floundered as a party wracked by factionalism ever since Dr Chua Soi Lek won the leadership struggle in 2009. This explains in no small measure the erosion of Chinese support in the BN's erstwhile bastion of Johor.

DAP party strategist Mr Liew Chin Tong (who will stand in Kluang) describes Johor's seats as having become "dominos". Somewhat optimistically, he thinks that some 20 seats could fall to the PR. This is premised on the expectation of 35 per cent Malay, 80 per cent Chinese and 50 per cent Indian support in the state, and the fact that most Johor seats are of the mixed variety.

Only in eight out of Johor's 26 parliamentary seats do Malays make up more than 60 per cent of voters. No seat has more than 60 per cent of Chinese voters.

Johor has also been targeted by the Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) and the PAS. PKR's Johor party chief Mr Chua Jui Meng was formerly Vice-President of the MCA and BN Minister for Health, but he is now a firm PKR man who will run in Segamat. The PAS will send Vice-President Salahuddin Ayub to contest the Pulai parliamentary seat and the Nusa Jaya state seat, with the distant hope that he could be made the Johor Menteri Besar.

Read more at: http://www.todayonline.com/commentary/new-front-line-states-ge13

 

How the tide has changed in Kluang

Posted: 10 Apr 2013 10:47 AM PDT

http://www.thesundaily.my/sites/default/files/imagecache/article/thesun/Catalogue/p3%20leekaw_c6_c658913_13411_732.jpg 

Lee Kaw 

A visible shift in public sentiment in this Johor constituency reflects how the battle is shaping up in what was considered a bastion of the BN.

N. Nadeswaran, The Sun Daily 

AFTER the DAP's announcement on March 30 that its elections strategist Liew Chin Tong would be the party's candidate for Kluang, a small group of party leaders including Lim Kit Siang walked nonchalantly into the Kluang Country Club. Members, who were having their beers after finishing their round of golf, gave a thunderous welcome and offered the visitors the hospitality usually reserved for VIPs.

Three days later, it was the turn of Johor Mentri Besar Tan Sri Ghani Othman to turn up at the club with trappings of pomp and protocol. But the response was subdued even though it is election time when you could get an unexpected windfall. Ghani announced a RM100,000 grant to the club from the state government.

These contrasting events reflect how the battle is shaping up in what was considered a bastion of the MCA and the Barisan Nasional (BN). The donation although welcomed, was met with cynicism – if he wants to give, why should we refuse?

One of the doyens of the club is Lee Kaw. He's 74 and was DAP's sole MP in Johor for just one term – elected in 1978, after which the BN through MCA has held on to the seat.

Last Saturday, he made his first political speech in a crowded shop house in Kluang after 26 years. But Lee Kaw still retains the fire in his belly despite staying away from politics since 1982.

Lee Kaw came out of "retirement" on a request to oblige an old comrade, Kit Siang, to assist the DAP in shoring up support for Liew to wrest the Kluang seat. And the thunderous reception and applause he got when he finally spoke at the launch of the party's operations centre was indicative of his influence on the people. It was not just from Chinese constituents. The response he received when he popped by for a coffee at the nearby Kopi Tiam showed his popularity.

"Those days, we campaigned for our voices to be heard in Parliament or the State Assembly. We talked about the cost of contracts, the issue of land and Chinese new villages. There were 86 such villages in Kluang which were in need of development," says Lee Kaw who was party treasurer when Kit Siang was the head honcho of the party.

Issues have since changed after all these years. Corruption, economic development and cost of living have taken centre stage. Locals say that Kluang has been left out of development. And of course, winning this seat is significant in Pakatan Rakyat's (PR) proposed march to Putrajaya.

"We have been 'colonised' for 26 years. While towns like Muar and Batu Pahat have enjoyed so much development, we can only say that our progress has been stagnant," says a local businessman.

Read more at: http://www.thesundaily.my/node/196886 

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Anwar needs to answer the entire Indian community

Posted: 10 Apr 2013 04:27 PM PDT

MEDIA STATEMENT

By Saravanan (Overseas Hindraf Member)

Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim was given the first chance by Hindraf Makkal Shakti to endorse their 5 years plan blue print. More than 18 meetings were held in between Pakatan Rakyat and Hindraf. Till today the silence of Pakatan doesn't make any sense about the blue print.

DSAI need to answer Indian voters why he rejected or neglected the 6 points Hindraf blue print demans. Anwar shouldn't play coward game any longer by using Indian Pakatan leaders and cyber troopers to protect his position. There is a need for Anwar to come forward and say what makes the whole discussion halted and why he stopped the blue print endorsement personally.

The scenario is going very ugly because DSAI continuously using journalist to attack a minority group which fighting for the downtrodden Indian's rights. Whereas Hindraf leaders are coming forward to answer all the necessary questions in the media. We Indians request DSAI to tear his cowardice mask and answer the whole blueprint scenario truth without any delay.

By Playing politics many Indians will boycott Pakatan Rakyat in the coming up 13th General election. The loser of the game will be Pakatan.

Indians been marginalized by UMNO for 56 years. If Pakatan is really into helping Indians they should safe their election situation from now. We Indians will not loose anything but Pakatan will loose Indian votes. Do not take Indians for a ride.

DSAI please answer us, you been propagating that Malaysia is not practising human rights to foreign medias. Now the 6 points demands of Hindraf is purely human rights matter why are you shying away?

You use to campaign anak melayu anak saya, anak Cina anak saya dan anak India anak saya. Where is the slogans of anak India anak kamu? If you think Indians are your children you will treat them equally but you are not eager to treat them in that manner.

In Last general election you promised Kampong Buah Pala folks that as soon as Pakatan win Penang the land will protected. But you behaved other way around as soon as Pakatan took over Penang, you played big time politics with Buah Pala Indians. You didn't safe them till last but you just blamed Barisan Nasional. Pakatan statement was we are not in charge of Putra jaya hard to undo the previous agreement. Now we are asking you a question if you take over Putra jaya will you undo the agreement now ? For the sake of your Indian children.

I personally challenge DSAI to abolish article 153 and other racist policies which been practised in Malaysia. Can you give equal rights to all Malaysian citizen besides 'mengankat martabat orang Melayu'?

If any Malaysian or coalition read the 6 points demands of Hindraf carefully will understand that it is a Human rights demands. Any Government can endorse it under the provision of human rights. Instead of approving and being straight forward DSAI and Pakatan playing dirty game by flip flopping downtrodden Malaysian Indians life.   Stop making Indians as 3rd class citizen of Malaysia.

My final request to DSAI stop using mandores and cyber troopers  to answer Hindraf´s questions. Please step forward boldly as a leader and explain us why you rejected the 6 point demands.

 

Why Rais Yatim shouldn’t drive the Information Department vans around the bend

Posted: 10 Apr 2013 02:17 PM PDT

http://i1.wp.com/aliran.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/rais-yatim.jpg?resize=640%2C386 

Dr Mustafa K Anuar, Honorary Secretary, Aliran  

Aliran roundly condemns Information, Communication and Culture Minister Rais Yatim's recent indefensible justification for the Barisan Nasional's blatant use of government machinery for its election campaigning in the run-up to the general election.

What was done had nothing to do with the functions of the caretaker government. The three Information Department vans were there to assist the BN coalition to prepare for the opening of the BN's election command centre for the Batu parliamentary constituency on Sunday. Government machinery was definitely used for party purposes.

It is crucial that all parties concerned must acknowledge and respect the demarcation line between party and government use to prevent abuse of power and to ensure a level playing field between the incumbent coalition and its contenders.
 
Surely, it doesn't take a legally trained person to realise that it is immoral for a caretaker government to take undue advantage of its incumbency in this callous manner.
 
The BN must emulate instead the fine and praiseworthy example shown by both the Selangor and Penang caretaker governments that recalled all official cars from their respective state executive councillors recently in keeping with ethical behaviour.
 
Similarly, it is politically indecent of the BN caretaker government to offer only a one-off 10-minute pre-recorded slot over Radio Televisyen Malaysia (RTM) to the opposition coalition during the election campaign period. To ensure a level playing field, the opposition coalition deserves and must be given equal access to the broadcasting station, funded by taxpayers, who, in turn, deserve to know better the policies of the competing parties.

It is therefore understandable that the Opposition coalition had no option but to reject the pathetic offer by the BN government, an action which Rais considered an attempt to 'mock' RTM. He fails to realise that without doubt he is mocking the democratic process.
 
To be sure, the caretaker government's misdemeanour in this matter is itself sufficient to mock the broadcasting station without the help of anyone outside the ruling coalition.
 

Monopolizing Indian Future?

Posted: 09 Apr 2013 02:15 PM PDT

http://freedomfilmfest.komas.org/images/uploads/2011/04/charlessantiago400px.jpg 

Hindraf is not the only organisation working towards the empowerment of ethnic Indians.

Charles Santiago 

Hindraf's illusion is dangerous and nonsensical. I am referring to its unyielding stand that the DAP Gelang Patah Declaration is plagiarised from Hindraf's manifesto.

It's commendable that Hindraf has come up with a manifesto to uplift the socio-economic status of ethnic Indians.

But other Indian based organisations such as the National Indian Rights Action Team (NIAT) have put forward a-68-page exhaustive Indian empowerment plan and policy reforms to uplift the Indian community.

Clearly, Hindraf is not the only organisation working towards the empowerment of ethnic Indians.

But the insistence by Hindraf's leaders that the DAP Declaration copies Hindraf's aspirations for the Indian community only goes to show their ignorance about the long-standing grievances faced by the minority community.

During the 1999 election, a group of NGOs under the umbrella of the Group of Concerned Citizens (GCC), first put forward a political document entitled 'Demands of Indian Malaysians: For a Better Future'. It was endorsed by political parties such as DAP, PAS, PRM, PAS and KeAdilan (now PKR).

Thus the aspirations of the Indian community are not a monopoly of any one group and there is enough room for all to contribute in the struggle.

I started working with the Indian community, and particularly the plantation workers, from the early 80s. The Indians were largely poor, did not have the necessary skills to survive in an urban environment and marginalised in terms of education, employment and business opportunities.

We fought alongside the Indians for the implementation of a minimum wage, the right to Tamil education and to have their inherent rights met.

We fought for better infrastructure in Tamil schools and higher intake in universities, among other issues.

Fast forward to 2013, nothing much has changed under Barisan rule.

Malaysian Indians are facing the same dilemma. The MIC, which was then the self-proclaimed custodian of the community, took it upon them to look into the welfare of the Indians.

The MIC's many schemes, including Maika shares, to uplift the community ended in disasters. Their only feat was successfully disengaging the Indians from the decision-making process of the government.

Hindraf leaders must bear in mind that many of the leaders in Pakatan Rakyat have been working with the Indian community long before Hindraf was even formed. We understand their issues and are not strangers to their aspirations.

Some of the points raised in the Gelang Patah Declaration were already raised in Pakatan Rakyat's manifesto. The Declaration itself is a work in progress.

My party, DAP, has put forth the Gelang Patah Declaration to PKR and PAS. We will reach a consensus as deliberations are currently underway.

The Pakatan state governments of Selangor and Penang have provided millions of ringgits in support of Tamil schools including computer labs.

Money has also been given to temples and other programs including interest free small business loans and programs for single mothers.

Pakatan Rakyat has walked the talk although more needs to be done. However delivery aspects of these programs can be more efficient.

But the structural problems facing the Indians can only be addressed in a comprehensive manner with the commitment of the federal government.

Given what Hindraf claims to represent, its natural ally would be Pakatan Rakyat. As such, it would be prudent on the part of Hindraf leaders to stop acting like children.

We are not at war with each other here.

 

 

Misleading Results

Posted: 09 Apr 2013 01:39 PM PDT

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQs_eVaxVdXcBho-C7f06CK8pcJm43azdkKMesaUFrDuD8YzYDS 

The Malaysia Airlines 4Q results are misleading to say the least. While the results look positive, on closer examination, it shows that the 4Q net profit of RM50 million was largely attributed to forex gains and lower impairment charges.

Edmund 

The impending rights issues are a massive disservice to Malaysians who have throughout the years been called upon to bear the burden of the bailing out MAS to the tune of billions. That's a whole load of schools, hospitals and better service delivery lost in opportunity costs.

This latest 'corporate restructuring' sees MAS requiring Khazanah Nasional to subscribe to the RM 3.1 billion rights issue. As the largest shareholder, Khazanah will be forking out a whopping amount of tax payers' money to take up the offer. That's our money, good money, being thrown after bad money again. This comes soon after Kumpulan Wang Persaraan, the nation's pension fund, took up RM 1 billion of sukuk issued by MAS. We should remember that the bonds were not guaranteed and carried a 6 percent coupon rate. At those yields, one wonders why there wasn't a long queue of foreign investors at the door.

We should not lose sight of the fact that both KHazanah and KWAP is the guardian of the Rakyat's wealth. Whatever happened to reducing Government's Role in Business (GRIB) that requires GLCs to divest stakes in companies once it hits a 'trigger' price. Khazanah's entry price to MAS shares was approximately RM 3. Does it hope that MAS will surpass that mark in the near term before it divests at a profit?

Interesting that the under the ETP, a key focus NKEA is reducing Government's Role In Business (GRIB). That's why we had Khazanah divesting IHH in monster IPO and selling its stake in Proton and Pharmaniaga. Looks like all this will be wasted on MAS.

As right thinking Malaysians, I think we have has enough of the shenanigans in MAS over the past 10 years at the tax payers' expense. Bottom-line is there is something not right with this rights issue.

 

Indians in Pakatan: Tradable or disposable?

Posted: 09 Apr 2013 12:56 PM PDT

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSY0ukeLf7x8P51nwAMD2a8jlc3F34wmbDVX_0VoHGPP0kRbCccDQ 

When the Chinese and Malay Pakatan elephants fight, it is the Indian grass that gets trampled.

P.M. Sivalingam 

Pakatan Rakyat leaders regard Indian candidates as tradable commodities at best and disposable merchandise at worst.

Anwar Ibrahim had been dropping names of candidates in a staggered fashion during nationwide road shows but had never mentioned a single Indian candidate. Until today that is, when he named N.Surendran as PKR candidate for Padang Serai in Kedah. 

Still in the balance are the candidatures of Kulasegaran, Xavier Jayakumar, Sivakumar, Sivarasa, Ramasamy, M. Manoharan, Charles Santiago and S. Manickavasagam. The Indian community is watching to see who will be traded and who will be disposed. 

Kulasegaran seems to be Pakatan's first fall-guy. Word had leaked out that he would be moved from his comfort zone in Ipoh Barat to Segamat. He was seen as a thorn in the side of the Ngeh cousins, and therefore disposable.

Kulasegaran had indicated that he would be willing to be sacrificial lamb for the sake of his party, the DAP. However, Anwar had other plans. He had to find a slot for PKR's Chua Jui Meng. And so he blocked Kula's move down south and named Chua as the Segamat candidate instead.

The political hopes of other Indians in Pakatan are also hanging on a thread.

It is common knowledge that the jostling for seats in the Pakatan coalition is continuing with great intensity. Since launching its manifesto on February 25, the Pakatan leadership had repeatedly said that parliamentary seat allocation had been finalised, with minor changes. But to date, the full list has not been announced.

That's because of last-minute jostling and intra-party rivalries.

The Star newspaper said in a report today, as follows:

In Terengganu, the announcement of PKR state chief Azan Ismail last Wednesday that the party would contest 11 state and three parliamentary seats was contradicted by PAS commissioner Abdul Wahid Endut...

 

In Penang, PAS central committee member Datuk Dr Mujahid Rawa said that a PAS candidate would contest the Sungai Acheh state seat. This was refuted by Penang PKR vice-chairman Datuk Abdul Malik Abdul Kassim...

 

In Perlis, PKR and PAS have locked horns over the Kangar seat, traditionally contested by PKR...

 

In Sabah, the Pakatan leadership is trying to hammer out a formula to share seats with its allies Angkatan Perubahan Sabah (APS) and Pakatan Perubahan Sabah (PPS)...

 

Problems can also be seen in Johor and Negeri Sembilan.

 

When the Chinese and Malay Pakatan elephants fight, it is the Indian grass that gets trampled.

 

A blatant lie about Nurul Izzah

Posted: 09 Apr 2013 12:41 PM PDT

 https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSsDYAFtXNp9a-xXlzvnScY45rUHEgEKZeMnA3ie9FSL0q7yJPS

Raja Nong Chik and his leaders only reacted after Nurul came into action.  If she did not make any inroads, I can guarantee you that we would have been suffering until today. 

Rebecca Jane Thomas, letter to FMT

I was reading the April 8 Malay Mail article, 'Lembah Pantai back to BN?' by Nadya Ngui and my blood rose. I was so furious with the following opening paragraph:

"The Barisan Nasional's (BN) chances of recapturing the Lembah Pantai parliamentary seat look promising as voters in the constituency say Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) representative Nurul Izzah Anwar was a "no show" after 2008."

I am here to say that this is a blatant lie. I have personally witnessed the dedication, the sensitiveness towards the people's concern, the humility and hard work of this MP in my area, Taman Bukit Angkasa especially Block 14 in Lembah Pantai.

When I approached the MIC and Umno leaders in 2010 to do something about the burst pipes in our block, I was told that since this place is now under MP Nurul Izzah, I should go to her and that they cannot do anything to help me.

I remember very clearly the MIC and Umno leaders mentioned that the government has no money to help replace the pipes which was causing a nightmare and a burden to its residents.  They just did not bother about our problems and wanted us to continue suffering.

But I kept on with my fight.  Even the PR Officer of Syabas at that point of time questioned our support for BN if they were to come in and help us.

So I took MIC's and Umno's advice and communicated with Nurul and she came to hear us out.  She said she will raise our issue in Parliament and this was confirmed by her former assistant. This former assistant is now serving Raja Nong Chik.
I found out the following touching characteristics in Nurul throughout 2010 and 2013:

  • Punctuality: Despite heavy rains, she never missed her appointment time with the residents.
  • Humility: She always respected the elderly with praying hands and with a bow.  She spoke very  politely and even when the odds were against her, she kept her calm spirit under control.  She will never let an elderly and sick person come to her.  She goes directly to their door step and if she has to climb the steps, which is what she exactly did in terms of giving away household provisions.
  • No campaigning: She never campaigned during her visits and asked any one of us to vote for her each time she met up with us
  • Quantity was not her concern: Even though there were a few of us, she took time of her busy schedule and came to meet up with us and hear our concerns.

When the Umno leaders saw that Nurul was making inroads, they sprung into action.  They decided to take matters into their hands including Raja Nong Chik. They felt threatened by her presence.

If I did not go to Nurul Izzah, all our pipe woes would not have been solved. I had to find my own sponsors to pay the 20% deposit for the funds under the TP1M scheme and Block 14 was the first block in Taman Bukit Angkasa which had its pipes upgraded in 2011.

Raja Nong Chik grabbed the golden opportunity to gain name and favour by providing funds for the remaining 18 blocks to upgrade their pipe systems. This was only announced last Saturday (April 7, 2013).  Why could he have not done this earlier?

Read more at: http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/opinion/2013/04/10/a-blatant-lie-about-nurul-izzah/ 

 

The real story behind Sodomy 2 – Part 2

Posted: 09 Apr 2013 12:28 AM PDT

This article is in response to the claims of Dato Omar Abu Bakar in a video that was shared by Anwar Ibrahim on Facebook.

Why Anwar was in the apartment?

Anwar at various times claimed that he was in the apartment to meet some economists. However, none of these claims was ever substantiated. Not even one of the economist were brought to court to verify their presence with Anwar in court.

The truth is the defence council did interview 2 of the economists but they declined to take stand to support Anwar. Why? Were they really present there? Ask Anwar. This was indeed baffling as their evidence would have given Anwar a chance to prove to the general public that it was INDEED A BN CONSPIRACY. Anwar claims he was set up but the question is what was he doing in the apartment? Typical Anwar. He puts the blame on one and all but fails to provide the sufficient and relevant evidence to come clean when he has the chance to do so.

Remember China Doll-Omega saga? If only he had shown his Omega watch or denied having one, he would not have the need to flash his tummy in every ceramah or press conferences to prove his innocence. Well, the truth is at that point of time, he did have a tummy which was carefully concealed by a bullet vest which made him look not having a tummy. How I know this? I should thank Anwar for the wonderful tea he served in his house on March 21 2011. What happened on this day? Google it up!

The landlord of the apartment

The landlord, his wife and 2 maids were brought as defence witness' for interview in KL High Court. Even he declined to be a witness. Imagine this. I have a friend. He gives me his house to have interviews, talks and even negotiations with people but hesitates to take the stand for you. I overheard a lot of disturbing things during this course of interview. For the record, the interview with the landlord was the longest and yet he did not take the stand.

What was spoken here and discussed here? I am privy to the information but I am declining to reveal much for now as I fear for my safety. Not wanting to sound dramatic but I do know the amount of harassing calls I am getting every single day.

All information that I know with regards to the issues that I have highlighted here will be out in my final part. Part 3. I promise to release it on nomination day. Part 3 will include the real story of why the house owner hesitated, alibi list, Anwar's flip-flop game with the defence counsels, and PM Najib's name was brought in to smear his credibility.

Cukuplah Anwar. Stop lying. Please.

Yuktes Vijay

 

MRT Communications

Posted: 08 Apr 2013 12:17 PM PDT

http://biz.thestar.com.my/archives/2012/6/27/business/p2-mrt.jpg 

Is MRT Corp afraid of what the public has to say? 

Tan from Damansara Damai  

MRT Corp has done a good job so far in trying to communicate and engage with the public on various issues affected city dwellers. However, I noticed recently that it has redesigned its website, and in the process, lost many of the user functionality that was previously there.

For instance, the map on the alignment was interactive and convenient to scroll and zoom in to see where the stations are on where it passes through. The current map is just flat and static and serves very little purpose. I have also noticed that that the poll feature has been removed. Is MRT Corp afraid of what the public has to say?

The pictures and video galleries too have been removed. I would have thought that would be the best way to show the nation what the progress is looking like and highlight engagements with various communities.

The twitter has also recently been used to promote contests and traffic diversions only. There does not seem to be a will to engage in conversations, which I find odd.

On a final note - what is the purpose of the MRT info centers? There is the rental of prime lots, staff and utility costs, but almost negligible people coming in. The location of the centers are ill conceived and I am sure no one would drive all the way to a Kota Damansara center, try to find parking, just to see posters and videos when a good, well designed website will do the trick. Does the final costs for the MRT take into account these spending?

Repeated Warnings Were Not Taken Seriously Says SEPA

Posted: 08 Apr 2013 12:10 PM PDT

http://starstorage.blob.core.windows.net/archives/2013/4/6/nation/bolders_380.jpg 

Sabah Environmental Protection Association (SEPA) 

Sabah Environmental Protection Association (SEPA), President Lanash Thanda expressed deep regret that the repeated warnings were not heeded by the quarry company and government agencies resulting in the incident on Saturday which saw boulders crashing down to the village under Kukusan Hill in Tawau.

"Since 2012, SEPA's past President, Wong Tack had repeatedly highlighted this issue and went down to the ground with SEPA member, Gary Yap to check the situation of this quarry that was allowed to be carried out after the Kukusan Forest was downgraded from being a Class I Forest Reserve to Class II," stated Lanash who was recently elected to the new committee for 2013.

SEPA had challenged the validity of the quarry, which damaged the environment of the Forest Reserve and endangered the community living at the foothill of the Reserve.

 

"We deeply regret seeing that once again the needs of development outweighed the wellbeing of not only the environment but also people living in the surrounding area," said Lanash at a Press Conference held at the SEPA office in Kota Kinabalu.

In September 2012, the company Hap Seng who runs the quarry issued a statement that claimed that the quarry was compliant with the terms of approvals from the Environmental Protection Department (EPD) and the Department of Environment (DOE).

 

"If the company did comply, this shows that the standard requirement for carrying out quarrying was flawed as it resulted in injury of people in the surrounding area and now the government has said it would relocate all the people living within the area," pointed out Lanash.

 

SEPA proposed that the quarry be closed for a thorough investigation which should look into two aspects aspect; firstly on the blasting that has been allowed within the Forest Reserve and secondly on the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) particularly on environmental and safety standards that were approved.

 

"We need to ask if the company had taken into consideration the proximity of the Kampung Tanjung Batu Tengah (Besi Buruk), was this issue identified in the mitigating measures, and if not why not?" asked the SEPA President.

There have been many incidents that show that development has priority over the environment and the safety of people. Like many other issues that SEPA have highlighted over the years certain developments are accidents waiting to happen.

 

"It was very fortunate that this incident did not result in deaths of the residents of the village but we must learn from our mistakes and we have to move forward by having more stringent measures and standards," concluded Lanash.

 

Sabah Environmental Protection Association (SEPA)

 

Election promises: Who copied whom?

Posted: 08 Apr 2013 12:02 PM PDT

http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/images/uploads/mugshots/anwar-ibrahim1-feb25.jpghttp://www.themalaysianinsider.com/images/sized/images/uploads/mugshots/najibrazak540px_5-324x216.jpg 

All of its overarching policy statements, ranging from eliminating discrimination to promoting culture to better education to job opportunities, have been the guiding principles of the ruling party these past 55 years. 

Wong Sai Kim 

Have you heard this story before?  At the launch of a new book, a visitor jumped up and down, screaming: "This is plagiarism. I have read every word in this book before." When he was asked 'Where?' he replied with a chuckle: "In the dictionary".

I was reminded of this joke when I read in the newspapers about Pakatan Rakyat's allegation that Barisan Nasional had 'plagiarised' its manifesto. PKR vice-president Nurul Izzah Anwar claimed that parts of the Barisan manifesto were 'lifted' from the Pakatan manifesto.

I have read the Barisan manifesto and I have re-read the Pakatan manifesto. I find instead that the reverse is true. Every policy in the Pakatan manifesto is a rehash of Alliance/Barisan policies which have been in existence since Malayan/Malaysian independence.

No, this is not an exaggeration. All of its overarching policy statements, ranging from eliminating discrimination to promoting culture to better education to job opportunities, have been the guiding principles of the ruling party these past 55 years. 

There is not a single policy guideline that is new in the Pakatan document. As a specific policy, Nurul singled out the 'reduction of car prices' as her example of BN piracy. Let's look at this claim closely.

The BN Government had introduced the National Automotive Policy way back in 2006 with the following as one of its aims: "To safeguard the interests of consumers in terms of value for money, safety and quality of products and services".

Inherent in this clause is the promise to not only review car prices but more importantly, to look into the whole question of making the total cost of transportation more affordable for all Malaysians.

If reducing the price of cars is to make them more affordable, one must remember that the national car project was launched almost 30 years ago, making car ownership affordable to a larger section of the Malaysian population than before.

Pakatan proposes to 'restructure the automotive policy'. The Automotive Policy is a dynamic instrument which has already been restructured over the last seven years. So, who is copying whom?

Another Pakatan proposal; to abolish tolls, is also not new. The BN government had in the past abolished tolls in selected areas and will continue to review toll collection on the expiry of toll concession periods. The Pakatan manifesto does not promise to abolish tolls immediately. Its stated policy is to 'gradually' abolish tolls. The word 'gradually' is not defined, and it could take 10, 15 or 20 years. It must also be remembered that collecting tolls is not anathema to Pakatan. In Penang, the State Government is proposing toll collection in its proposed undersea tunnel project. Again, who is copying from whom?

Yet another Pakatan proposal is to abolish monopolies. But isn't this the same purpose for which the Competition Act 2010 was introduced by the ruling government? So again, who is copying from whom?

Other copycat policies of Pakatan include the following: 

•  Building affordable houses for all.

•  Basic health access

•  Social safety network

•  One million new jobs

•  Minimum wage

These issues have always been the cornerstone of BN government's policy thrusts.

SO, ONCE AGAIN, WHO IS COPYING WHOM?

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Perbincangan sedang berlangsung untuk selesaikan tiga penjuru di Sg Acheh

Posted: 10 Apr 2013 03:52 PM PDT

Timbalan Presiden PAS Mohamad Sabu yang lebih dikenali sebagai Mat Sabu berkata, isu ini akan diselesaikan sebelum hari penamaan calon pada 20 April.

"Pemimpin kita akan berbincang dan menyelesaikan perkara ini nanti," katanya dalam sidang akhbar di ibupejabat DAP Pulau Pinang pagi ini.

Malam tadi, Pesuruhjaya PAS Pulau Pinang Datuk Salleh Man mengumumkan parti Islam itu akan meletakkan ketua pemuda PAS negeri Yusni Mat Piah di kerusi itu.

Sehari sebelum itu, pengerusi PKR Pulau Pinang Datuk Mansor Othman mengumumkan parti itu akan meletakkan penulis blog yang dikenali sebagai Chegubard atau Badrul Hisham Shahrin di Sungai Acheh.

PAS dan PKR, kedua-duanya dalam gabungan Pakatan Rakyat (PR), telah berada dalam perbincangan mengenai kerusi ini kerana PAS mahu bertanding di kerusi tersebut.

PAS secara tradisinya bertanding di DUN Sungai Acheh sebelum 2008 dan pada Pilihan Raya 2008, mereka meminjamkan kerusi tersebut kepada PKR.

Dalam Pilihan Raya 2008, Datuk Mahmud Zakaria dari Barisan Nasional (BN) menang dengan majoriti kecil 250 undi.

"Kami telah menyelesaikan lebih 100 kerusi dalam perbincangan untuk pilihan raya dan ini hanya satu kerusi, kita boleh selesaikan ini," kata Mat Sabu.

Sebelum itu Setiausaha Agung DAP Lim Guan Eng juga mengatakan perbincangan akan berlaku diantara pemimpin tertinggi PKR dan PAS.

"Adalah lebih baik kepimpinan tertinggi menyelesaikan ini," katanya.

Pengerusi PR Pulau Pinang itu mengatakan perbincangan mengenai kerusi Sungai Acheh adalah diantara dua parti itu dan yang terbaik adalah dengan membiarkan mereka menyelesaikannya.

 

Polis beri amaran kepada individu mahupun NGO agar tidak melampaui undang-undang

Posted: 10 Apr 2013 03:49 PM PDT

Penolong Ketua Urusetia Ketua Polis Negara (Perhubungan Awam) ACP Ramli Mohamed Yoosuf berkata tindakan golongan itu bukan sahaja boleh menjejaskan proses demokrasi malah turut menjadi kesalahan jenayah yang boleh didakwa mengikut peruntukan undang-undang sedia ada.

"Polis menerima maklumat ada terdapat unsur-unsur ugutan yang bertujuan menakut-nakutkan pengundi untuk keluar mengundi, seperti mereka ini akan melakukan sekatan jalan raya, memeriksa kad pengenlan dan mengugut pengundi agar tidak keluar mengundi.

"Polis memberi amaran, ia merupakan satu kesalahan jenayah kerana kuasa untuk memeriksa kad pengenalan mahupun sekatan jalan raya hanya boleh dilakukan polis dalam tempoh masa pilihan raya ini," katanya pada sidang media, di Ibu Pejabat Polis Bukit Aman, di sini, hari ini.

Beliau berkata tindakan golongan yang cuba menimbulkan kekacauan semasa musim pilihan raya ini sentiasa dipantau polis dari masa ke masa bagi memastikan tiada yang bertindak melebihi undang-undang.

Ramli berkata orang ramai yang mengetahui wujudnya aktiviti menakut-nakutkan pengundi di kawasan mereka perlu melaporkan kepada polis agar siasatan dapat dijalankan dan pihak yang tidak bertanggungjawab tersebut dapat diberkas.

"Kita (polis) tidak mahu pengundi terjejas dengan ancaman ini, jadi sekiranya mereka mengetahui ada pihak yang cuba melakukan ugutan, segera laporkan kepada polis," katanya.

Dalam pada itu, beliau berkata kekuatan anggota polis setakat ini mencukupi bagi memastikan proses demokrasi di negara ini berjalan aman dari sebarang ancaman pihak tertentu.

Sementara itu, beliau turut memberitahu sebanyak 333 aktiviti sempena pilihan raya umum ke-13 dijalankan semalam membabitkan 99 ceramah, 81 perhimpunan, 21 kempen, dan 132 lain-lain aktiviti.

Beliau berkata polis turut menerima 69 laporan polis membabitkan beberapa kesalahan pilihan raya di seluruh negara semalam.

 

PAS tetap bertanding DUN Sg Acheh

Posted: 10 Apr 2013 03:32 PM PDT

Pesuruhjaya PAS negeri Datuk Mohd Salleh Man berkata tindakan Pengerusi PKR negeri, Datuk Mansor Othman mengumumkan perkara itu dilihat seolah-olah membelakangi keputusan Pakatan di peringkat pusat yang diputuskan dua hari lepas.

"Saya bawa balik mandat yang telah diputuskan oleh PAS Pusat selepas perbincangan antara tiga parti komponen Pakatan, iaitu kerusi Sungai Acheh adalah milik PAS.

"Jadi keputusan PAS adalah muktamad bahawa kami akan bertanding di Sungai Acheh dan setakat ini tiada sebarang perbincangan dengan PKR negeri kerana keputusan telah dibuat (perbincangan peringkat pusat)," katanya kepada pemberita selepas majlis pengisytiharan nama-nama calon PAS Pulau Pinang di Pejabat PAS, Pongsu Seribu, di sini malam tadi.

PAS meletakkan Ketua Dewan Pemuda PAS negeri Yusni Md Piah untuk bertanding di kerusi DUN Sungai Acheh yang sebelum ini diwakili calon PKR Azhar Ahamad yang kalah menentang calon Barisan Nasional Datuk Mahmud Zakaria pada pilihan raya umum ke-12.

Mohd Salleh mengumumkan PAS akan bertanding di enam kerusi DUN dan dua kerusi Parlimen, dengan satu pertambahan kerusi DUN di Sungai Acheh pada pilihan raya umum ke-13 (PRU13).

Pada Selasa, Mansor dalam kenyataan mengumumkan calon PKR Badrul Hisham Shaharin yang lebih dikenali sebagai Cikgu Bard akan bertanding di DUN itu pada PRU13.

Sungai Acheh adalah satu daripada tiga kerusi DUN di bawah Parlimen Nibong Tebal yang dianggap sebagai kerusi tradisi PAS, namun beralih tangan kepada PKR dalam PRU 2008.

Mohd Salleh berkata beliau juga hairan bagaimana Mansor boleh mengumumkan nama calon PKR bagi DUN berkenaan sedangkan Ketua Umum PKR Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim hanya mengumumkan calon parti itu di peringkat Parlimen sahaja.

Beliau turut bertegas hanya PAS yang akan bertanding di DUN Sungai Acheh dan berharap PKR dan DAP dapat memberi sokongan kepada calon PAS yang akan bertanding.

Kepada soalan sama ada pertindihan kerusi yang timbul itu disebabkan kepincangan dalam kalangan Pakatan di Pulau Pinang, Mohd Salleh menafikannya dan menganggap itu perkara biasa dan bukan sesuatu yang mustahil.

"Tidak jadi satu benda yang pelik dan mustahil (pertindihan kerusi). Kita tunggu pada hari penamaan calon, siapa yang sebenarnya menjadi calon di situ (DUN Sungai Acheh), tetapi yang penting PAS akan tetap bertanding di Sungai Acheh bagi pihak Pakatan," katanya.

 

Pakar Feng Shui ramal BN menang

Posted: 10 Apr 2013 03:18 PM PDT

David Koh, 67, turut meramalkan BN akan meraih lebih banyak kerusi Dewan Undangan Negeri di Pulau Pinang berbanding semasa  pilihan raya umum lepas.

Bagaimanapun, BN dijangka menghadapi persaingan sengit di Negeri Sembilan dan Perlis, katanya ketika dihubungi Bernama.

Sebelum ini, Koh pernah memberitahu Bernama TV beliau meramalkan pengundian PRU13 akan jatuh pada 5 Mei depan dan nyata tekaan  beliau tepat apabila Pengerusi Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya (SPR) Tan Sri Abdul Aziz Mohd Yusof mengumumkan tarikh tersebut, semalam.

Biarpun ramai beranggapan ramalannya hanya sekadar 'tembak angin' namun Koh berkata ramalan itu berasas kerana ia menggunakan  pengiraan Feng Shui dikenali sebagai 'Shi' yang membawa maksud perang.

"Selepas pembubaran pada 3 April lepas, kita ada 60 hari untuk mengadakan pilihan raya, jadi menurut formula Shi, sepanjang tempoh  60 hari itu akan ada satu hari yang akan berperang dan hari tersebut jatuh pada 5 Mei," katanya.

Koh berkata BN telah banyak membuat perubahan drastik dengan beberapa kejayaan yang dilakukan Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib  Tun Razak dalam memenangi hati rakyat selepas negara mengalami tsunami politik pada 2008.

"Selama lima tahun ini kita dapat lihat pelbagai transformasi telah dilakukan oleh Perdana Menteri. Meramalkan siapa yang menang atau  kalah pada pilihan raya kali ini juga memerlukan ramalan yang berasas.

"Ia bukan bergantung kepada nasib tetapi berdasarkan usaha keras yang dilakukan oleh anggota politik itu sendiri untuk rakyat,"  katanya.

Beliau berkata semua pihak perlu terima keputusan siapa menang atau kalah pada hari mengundi nanti dan percaya rakyat Malaysia kini  lebih matang dan bijak dalam membuat keputusan.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Let us see the world through Rukunegara

Posted: 10 Apr 2013 01:54 PM PDT


Rukunegara is not just something we say with our lips, but it must also be with our actions. This needs commitment. It is not enough that it is printed at the back of our schoolbooks, and murals, we must carve Rukunegara onto our hearts. We need to melt ourselves into what Rukunegara truly stands for; so it becomes us.

We declare 'Belief in God'.

How do we translate Kepercayaan kepada Tuhan into our daily relationships in a multicultural society? How do we respect each other's way of life albeit our diverse practices?

We declare 'Loyalty to King and Country'.

Do we know what Kesetiaan kepada Raja dan Negara entails? Do we realize how this proclamation links us to our history and culture? Do we know our history and culture? Have we accepted them wholeheartedly? Have we embraced them? Do we respect them? How have we shown that?

We declare 'Supremacy of Constitution'.

What does it mean when we proclaim Keluhuran Perlembagaan? Does it not mean that we must always be guided by it? And respect it in totality? Does it not mean that we must take the Constitution as a whole? And not pick and choose clauses out of context to suit our arguments?
 

 

Kit Siang will lose in Gelang Patah unless ....

Posted: 10 Apr 2013 10:56 AM PDT

 

Situation Analysis

The results in 2008 should give UMNO a cause to worry. In N48 Skudai, DAP led by Dr Boo managed to overturn a 2,193 majority for BN obtained in 2004 into a  landslide 12,854 majority. This was a net shift of over 14,000 votes in 4 years that indicates the GE 12 tsunami did reach the shores of Johor. Dr Boo's giant killing feat in this regard should not be underestimated as well.

Elsewhere, in N49 Nusajaya, BN managed to hold the seat. BN's candidate YB Aziz Sapian managed to beat out PAS's Mohd. Shah Lamat with an over 7,000 majority. This however was still a far cry from the 14,000 majority BN obtained in 2004, to which people attribute it as being caused by Pak Lah.

Now here comes the interesting bit. If you add the number of votes obtained by PR component parties, namely DAP and PAS, it should add to 32,383. This would have allowed PR to gain a comfortable 5,000+ majority and take Gelang Patah away from BN.

However, it did not turn out that way. Instead MCA's Tan Ah Eng beat out Dr Zaleha Mustafa comfortably, obtaining 33,630 votes compared to the 24,779 votes obtained by Dr Zaleha's. 

This meant that on a net basis, over 7,000 voters who had voted for PR turned and voted for BN. If we add Malay voters who would have voted for BN in the state and PR in the Parliament in order to support a Malay candidate, this indicates that the actual number of Chinese votes lost by PR in Parliament could be as high as 8,500 to 10,000 votes.

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-LPr7E-LsMjk/UWFqz31JYgI/AAAAAAAAAf8/wcdpyTQgxVk/s280/kgpulai.JPG UMNO is very strong in this area and can easily deliver 80 - 85% of the Malay votes and up to 80% of the Indian votes if Ghani contests the seat.

Our assessment of this area is that UMNO support is around 80-85% of the Malays in this area. The net increase in Chinese voters for PR may be strong, but if a solid 80% turns out against Kit Siang, the situation may turn out to be more difficult than usual.

The key issue for DAP in this battle is to ensure that MCA's Jason Teoh is replaced by Ghani. From our observations, if Jason Teoh is repalced, then Jason's supporters will sabotage Ghani at the polls. If DAP can hold on to 80% of the votes secured in 2008, then he will still need 28% of the Malay vote assuming that only of the 30% of the Indian votes are cast in favour of the DAP.

As it stands 28% is touch and go for LKS. Our feel of Malay support for Kit Siang in Gelang Patah could be as low as 10% to 15%. Thus it is quite conceivable that Kit Siang would lose given the current circumstances.

The biggest difficulty for PR right now is its complete lack of a strategy in Johor. The big issue with the Malays in this state is Lim Kang Hoo.  But so far, PR has strangely avoided bringing up this issue.  Other issues surround the takeover of the land by PTP and this too has been avoided. 

This issue becomes critical given the choice of candidate. Right now, Dr Mahathir's factions are pushing for Ghani to vacate his state seat and contest in Gelang Patah against Kit Siang. 

Read more at: http://pirates-of-putrajaya.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/kit-siang-will-lose-in-gelang-patah.html?m=1 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved