Ahad, 17 Mac 2013

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Unreasonable to stop Lynas if proven safe: PKR MP

Posted: 16 Mar 2013 09:52 PM PDT

Azan said if Lynas rare earth plant passed all the requirements needed to operate, it is unreasonable to stop it (Graphic by Dayang Norazhar/ The Mole)

Azreen Hani, The Mole

A Parti Keadilan Rakyat legislator, whose constituency is where the Lynas rare earth plant is located, has questioned the rationale of closing down the plant if it is proven to have met all safety and security requirements.

PKR's MP for Indera Mahkota Azan Ismail said it is unreasonable for anyone to stop the operation of Lynas rare earth plant if it has met all the requirements needed.

Azan said it is also premature for anyone to decide on the fate of Lynas without deliberating on the matter thoroughly.

"I may not be an expert on environmental or safety aspect of the plant like YB Fuziah (PKR's MP for Kuantan Fuziah Salleh) but I believe if Pakatan Rakyat wins in the general election, it will set up a panel to deliberate on the matter," Azan said.

"Of course all aspects will be looked into. I myself will bring up on the commercial aspect of this plant. I would want to see whether it will bring more benefit to the people or not," he added.

"I think if Lynas has passed the panel's vetting and that of relevant authorities, I think it is unreasonable for us not to allow it to operate."

The Gebeng Industrial Area near Kuantan where the Lynas Corporation Ltd's rare earth plant is located in the Indera Mahkota parliamentary constituency.

Speaking to The Mole on Friday, Azan expressed his support on remarks made by opposition leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim in an Australian newspaper, saying it is the most logical explanation anyone could give at the time being.

"I have checked and read on Datuk Seri (Anwar)'s statement and I agree with him. I believe it is only logical to allow the plant to operate unless it is proven otherwise," he said.

READ MORE HERE

 

‘Video recording of explicit act not Umno’s work’

Posted: 16 Mar 2013 09:48 PM PDT

Umno Information Chief Ahmad Maslan urges the people to watch the video and make their own judgement.

(Bernama) - Umno has denied the party is involved with a video grab showing explicit act resembling a political figure with a male partner.

Information chief Ahmad Maslan said the opposition will certainly blame Umno but the party had never arranged such perverse act in a hotel room.

"The opposition thinks everything is the work of Umno including the intrusion of Lahad Datu. We don't have the time to put cameras in hotel rooms," he told reporters after opening a briefing for information speakers here today.

He said this when commenting on a video grab showing two men involved in explicit act, including hugs and kisses, on the blog rajagoyang360.blogspot.com.

The Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister's Department said the people could  judge who was the political figure shown in the video recording.

"Don't dismiss without watching the video. Watch it and then make your own judgement," he added.

Meanwhile, Ahmad called on the Umno and Barisan Nasional machinery to have confidence that the party could win two-thirds majority in 13th general election.

The confidence was based on the success of programmes and policies implemented by the government under the leadership of Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak.

He said the opposition did not have any strength and had failed to fufill promises made to the people other than having leaders who were involved with various scandals.

Yesterday, Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim lashed out at Umno's "political gimmick" in producing a video clip involving a man resembling him.

"I have already said that I deny it. This is a disgusting political gimmick executed by Umno," he said, adding that he has asked his lawyers to handle the possibility of taking legal action against the bloggers who uploaded the series of 14 black-and-white photos.

 

Man United 15 points clear after City fall at Everton

Posted: 16 Mar 2013 06:05 PM PDT

(Reuters) - Manchester City's fingertip hold on their Premier League title was further loosened when a 2-0 loss at Everton followed by runaway leaders Manchester United's 1-0 win over Reading left them praying for a football miracle.

Leon Osman's swerving 32nd-minute shot put Everton in front at a raucous Goodison Park and, although the home side were reduced to 10 men when Steven Pienaar was red-carded for a rash tackle after 61 minutes, City could not reply.

Substitute Nikica Jelavic sealed victory deep in stoppage time after being set up by a rampaging Marouane Fellaini.

United needed no second invitation to open a 15-point lead in the title race although only Wayne Rooney's deflected early shot separated them and second-bottom Reading at Old Trafford.

Alex Ferguson's side never required top gear as they rolled on towards a 20th English title with their 24th victory in 29 league games this season, although the Scot refused to accept that the race was won.

"We have got Sunderland away in our next game, which is always a tough place to go, and then we face Manchester City at home," he told ESPN.

"You don't get points and medals for being complacent," added Ferguson whose side have 74 points ahead of City on 59.

Battling Arsenal

Everton briefly rose above Arsenal into fifth spot with 48 points in the battle for a top-four position but the Gunners responded with a 2-0 victory at Swansea City.

That took Arsene Wenger's side to 50 points within two of fourth-placed Chelsea, who host West Ham United on Sunday, and four behind local rivals Tottenham Hotspur, who are third ahead of their home game with Fulham also on Sunday.

Boosted by a surprise, if ultimately fruitless, Champions League win in their last 16, second leg tie at Bayern Munich on Wednesday, Arsenal struck late through Nacho Monreal and Gervinho.

"It was a difficult game away to Bayern in midweek. The spirit we showed today was fantastic. We're up for the battle," Wenger told Sky Sports.

Liverpool lost 3-1 at Southampton to virtually extinguish their top-four hopes and hand Saints a major boost in their bid to steer clear of trouble at the bottom of the table.

In a thrilling relegation scrap, Aston Villa clawed their way to a vital 3-2 victory over bottom club Queens Park Rangers.

Christian Benteke scored the winner after 81 minutes to leave QPR seven points adrift of the safety zone.

QPR, seeking a third consecutive league win, led 1-0 thaansk to Jermaine Jenas and then equalised through Andros Townsend having gone 2-1 behind before Benteke grabbed his 13th league goal of the season.

Everton, one week after being booed and heckled by their fans in an embarrassing 3-0 FA Cup sixth round defeat at home to struggling Wigan Athletic, produced a gutsy performance to remain in contention for a top-four finish.

Special strike

"Last week was disappointing but we showed when we are at the races we are a match for any team," said Osman, who is in England's squad for this month's World Cup qualifiers against San Marino and Montenegro.

His strike was a special one, the midfielder having received the ball from Seamus Coleman 25 metres out before lashing a shot past helpless England keeper Joe Hart.

City missed the drive of the absent Yaya Toure in midfield as Everton dominated, although they showed more desire after the break and were pressing hard for an equaliser when Pienaar raked his studs down the shin of Javi Garcia.

The inevitable red card merely galvanised Everton, with second-choice keeper Jan Mucha exemplifying their commitment with a double save from Carlos Tevez and James Milner.

City were denied a blatant late penalty when Tevez's shot was blocked by the arm of Fellaini, with the referee ruling it had been outside the box and awarding only a free kick.

Jelavic's effort rounded off a dark day for the champions whose manager Roberto Mancini declined to give his post-match television interview, instead sending out assistant David Platt.

"He's angry and he's taking stock," Platt said. "He wants to calm down rather than say anything that will get him in trouble.

"We got outworked by Everton but there is no doubt in my mind about the handball. It was three yards inside the area and though perhaps the performance didn't deserve it, we could have got a bit more out of it if that decision had gone for us."

United were uninspired against struggling Reading, who sacked manager Brian McDermott this week and put academy manager Eamonn Dolan in caretaker charge.

It needed some dazzling play from Rio Ferdinand, recalled by England this week after a long absence from international duty, to help break the deadlock, the veteran defender's elegant run setting up Rooney to score via a deflection in the 21st minute.

Southampton beat Liverpool thanks to goals from Morgan Schneiderlin, Rickie Lambert and Jay Rodriguez with Philippe Coutinho pulling one back for the seventh-placed visitors.

In the day's other match, Stoke City and West Bromwich Albion played out a tepid 0-0 draw.

 

Sulu invasion: Probe papers almost done

Posted: 16 Mar 2013 02:27 PM PDT

Police found several important documents believed to belong to Sulu terrorists during an inspection at Kampung Simunul. 

(FMT) - SEMPORNA: The investigation papers on the 27 people suspected to be terrorists and collaborators in the ambush incident in Kampung Simunul on Feb 2 are in the final stages of completion.

All the suspects, aged between 18 and 73, were detained since the incident at the water settlement broke out which resulted in the death of six police personnel and six enemies were shot dead.

"We are finalising the investigation papers on them," Semporna District Police Chief, DSP Mohd Firdaus Francis Abdullah told reporters here.

The media previously reported that 69 suspected terrorists and collaborators were detained in Semporna on suspicion of being involved in the attack at Kampung Simunul.

Mohd Firdaus also said police had found several important documents believed to belong to the terrorists during an inspection at Kampung Simunul, on Friday.

"In the documents, we found several important information that may help us in tracking the remnants of the terrorists who are still in the Semporna district," he said.

Bernama also reported that in LAHAD DATU, security forces had picked up an unarmed Sulu terrorist in the Ops Daulat offensive zone at the Felda Sahabat plantation at 6.30am yesterday. Less than 50 terrorists are believd to be still there.

Sabah Police Commissioner Hamza Taib said the detained terrorist, who had no identification papers on him, was taken to the police station for questioning.

He said the terrorist was held under the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012, but he did not reveal the exact location where he was picked up.

So far 104 individuals had been arrested under the act while 232 people were being held under different laws, he told the news conference, which was also attended by Army First Division commander Maj Gen Ahmad Zaki Mokhtar, here.

Hamza said 61 terrorists had been killed since March 1 when the terrorists killed two policemen.  Six more policemen and two soldiers have also been killed in clashes with the terrorists.

READ MORE HERE

 

GE13: Do not let DAP mislead you, says Soi Lek

Posted: 16 Mar 2013 12:32 PM PDT

http://starstorage.blob.core.windows.net/archives/2013/3/17/nation/GE13-malaysia-general-election-chua-soi-lek-n8.jpg 

(The Star) - DAP's plan to focus more on Johor will only help PAS strengthen its presence in the state, says MCA president Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek.

Reminding the Chinese not to be misled by DAP's propaganda, he said a stronger PAS' presence would be detrimental to the Chinese community as the party's focus was only on Islamic matters.

He said the best results that the DAP could score in Johor at the next general election was only 15 state seats out of a total of 56.

"It is DAP's right to contest in Johor, but we hope that the Chinese community will not be misled by the Opposition because Johor is not going to be the second Penang," he said after a luncheon with Chinese non-governmental organisations here yesterday.

"They (the DAP) are only paving the way for PAS to win more seats here."

Dr Chua said PAS could not win in certain seats because of the lack of Chinese support for the party.

"As long as PAS has extra state seats, it will bring problems to the state because PAS does not care about state developments.

"Look at Kedah and Kelantan. The Chinese stand must be firm.

"The DAP is not coming here (to Johor) to be the king," he said, referring to the problems faced by the Chinese community under PAS-led governments in Kedah and Kelantan.

On a number of DAP strongmen who were speculated to contest in Johor, Dr Chua said the Chinese should think thoroughly about their choice.

"One vote for the DAP is equal to a vote for PAS," he warned.

"They are only individual heroes. Even if they gain extra seats here, can they change the fate of the Chinese community?"

Dr Chua said DAP stalwart Lim Kit Siang would move from one place to another after defeating his opponents, serve for one to two terms there before he was gone again.

"What is he trying to prove? It only proves that he is only an individual hero," said Dr Chua.

"This does not help the Chinese to improve their political influence," he said, adding that in politics, a team needed a common direction. 

Nur Misuari: 'We had to fight for it'

Posted: 16 Mar 2013 12:10 PM PDT

http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Nur-Misuari-300x206.jpg 

(Al Jazeera)At stake could be the peace deal between the government of the Philippines and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front's (MILF) leader Ibrahim Murad. 

A new crisis in Southern Philippines is underway - it is a conflict with Malaysia over a province called Sabah.

Armed Filipino men are challenging the Malaysian government's power over the province, claiming that this land belongs to the Sultan of Sulu who lives in the Philippines. 

"We have achieved something tremendous in our quest for peace in our homeland as well as of course enhancing the freedom of our people. We had to fight for it and in fact we have lost hundreds of thousands of lives just to be able to reach this point. The problem is that our homeland is so rich, not only in terms of history but [also] in terms of its resources, that's why so many people want to occupy this land. And they applied what they call the classical policy of divide and rule so that our people could not unite and fight as one nation to roll back all of these foreign aggressors."

- Nur Misuari, chairman of the Moro National Liberation Fron

But the implications here could be severe for the region.

At stake could be the peace deal between the government of the Philippines and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front's (MILF) leader Ibrahim Murad. The deal was designed to bring peace to Mindanao and allow the fighters there to build a semi-autonomous Islamic state, to be called Bangsamoro.

The party that brokered the deal was Malaysia. Its Muslim-dominated government used its influence with the Islamic fighters in Mindanao to bring the parties together. But now, there are allegations that members of the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF), the original Islamic insurgency group, feels sidetracked and has allowed some of its men to fight the Malaysian government presence in Sabah. 
 
Which brings us back to where the conflict in Mindanao started -  it is in places like this that the resistance against what they call Philippine colonialism was nursed.
 
The fighters would hide in the Muslim ghettos with sympathisers and in turn bring soldiers into the alleyways hungry for revenge. Every family speaks of those years with an overriding sense of loss.
 
The man who started it all back in the 1970s was Nur Misuari. With international backing he negotiated a separate deal with the government in the 1990s, but he never managed to reach the success MILF reached after splitting with his group.

Today, when we caught up with him in his home in Mindanao, we found a man who is clearly not happy with the current state of affairs. Talk to Al Jazeera speaks to Nur Misuari, the former leader of the MNLF about the crisis in Sabah and peace in the Southern Philippines.

Watch the video at: http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/talktojazeera/2013/03/201331421944766446.html 

 

Filipinos fleeing Sabah endure ‘violent crackdown’ by Malaysian forces

Posted: 16 Mar 2013 12:01 PM PDT

http://1-ps.googleusercontent.com/h/globalnation.inquirer.net/files/2013/03/300x225xsabah-soldiers-300x225.jpg.pagespeed.ic.LqUS1SXJV9.jpg 

(Philippine Inquirer) - "I acknowledge that there have been some immigrants who were apprehended during Ops Daulat. However, the ancestry of those apprehended was purely incidental," Abdul Gani said.

Filipinos, who had fled Sabah in the aftermath of the armed intrusion there by the Sulu "royal army," had learned to endure the pains of being violently beaten by Malaysian security forces during crackdowns on suspected Sabah-based supporters of the sultanate's men just to stay alive, survivors had claimed.

 

As this developed, the Malaysian Attorney General announced that an investigation has started on the claims of witnesses and supposed survivors of the police's excesses in Sabah under Ops Daulat (sovereignty).

 

"I did not run when they ordered me to run because I know they will shoot me. What I did was to bear the pain when they hit me," 38-year old Ibrahim Alih, a Sama native from Zamboanga City, told the INQUIRER here, where he was being processed by government agencies before sending him home.

 

Alih, who was rounded up for failing to present immigration documents during Monday last week's sweep on his neighborhood in Sandakan, said he did not care even if blood was already coming out of his wounds because he knew it was safer for him to just submit to the beating.

 

When he noticed that the Malaysian forces appeared to be hell bent on beating him to death, Alih said he shouted: "I'm not a Tausug, I'm a Sama Badjao."

 

Upon hearing this, the Malaysian forces allegedly stopped from hurting him but they still frisked him and took the RM700 he earned from being a carpenter in Sabah for the past four months.

 

He was then allowed to board ML Fatima Editha – along with hundreds of other Filipinos trying to find a space on the crammed boat – for this province.

 

Alih said he wished he had not been illegally working in Sabah because a valid document might have saved him from harm.

 

"I don't even have a passport," he lamented.

 

Twenty-year old Sherilyn Viado, who worked in a construction company in Sabah, said she too had to assert her ethnicity when Malaysian policemen prepared to gang up on her.

 

"I told them that I'm not a Tausug but a Badjao," she said, adding that Malaysian security forces were singling out people from Sulu or Sabahans known as Suluk (people who originated from Sulu).

 

"If you're a Tausug, you will surely land in jail even if you had valid papers," Viado, a native of Zamboanga del Sur, said.

 

Viado said Malaysian forces were so angry at Tausugs and Suluks that they do not put distinction between males and females anymore.

 

"We saw on TV how they beat Tausugs, including women," she claimed.

 

Viado said Tausugs or Suluks who had disappeared from her neighborhood had not resurfaced since their arrest "and the lack of information on their fate had sowed unimaginable degree of fear on us."

 

Annang Im, 50, who tended a small sidewalk store in Sandakan, said she did not experience being abused but she saw how male Filipinos caught up during the sweeps had been made to physically suffer by Malaysian policemen.

 

Im, a Tausug-Visaya, also confirmed Viado's claim that Malaysian security forces hated Tausugs and Suluks so much that they did not care even if suspects were killed during the sweeps.

 

"It is because of what the Kirams did in Lahad Datu," she said.

 

Sabah police commissioner Hamza Taib had confirmed that the campaign against Sabah-based "collaborators" was continuing but maintained that policemen never violated the rights of the suspects.

 

"The reports of abuses were so dramatic but where did they took place? I am not aware of any incident in the entire Sabah area where people had been beaten or killed on mere suspicions of being terrorists or supporters of terrorists.

 

He also confirmed that 10 more people – who were either Filipino or have Filipino descent – had been arrested during separate raids on Thursday over suspicions of collaboration with the "Sulu terrorists."

 

Malaysian Attorney General Abdul Gani Patail said the fresh arrests had brought the number of detained suspects to 216 as of late Friday.

 

Hamza said two of the suspects— both in their 40s—were arrested by police authorities in Bukit Aman in Semporna around 8 p.m. Thursday, while the eight others were collared as they tried to enter the operation area in Lahad Datu on a speedboat past midnight, also on the same day.

 

Hamza said the two suspects with Filipino ancestry were taken in for questioning during a sweep of Bukit Aman, following information they were "collaborators or might have even been involved in the March 2 ambush in Kampung Simunul."

 

Hamza said later that evening, policemen in Lahad Datu arrested eight more men—all Filipino—who had no identification or immigration documents, as they tried to dock in Kampung Sungai Bilis.

 

He said a check on the speedboat uncovered a stash of peso bills, "totaling P369,000 and 300 jerrycans (water containers)."

 

"No weapons were found but we wondered what they were doing there with huge amount of money and lots of jerrycans," Hamza said.

 

He said the men, some as young as 17, were now being investigated under Malaysia's Security Offenses and Special Measures Act (Sosma) and immigration laws.

 

Hamza said the sweep against suspected supporters of the Sulu "terrorists" was continuing.

 

Reacting to an earlier statement by former Sabah Chief Minister Harris Salleh that he was alarmed by reports of police abuses under Ops Daulat (sovereignty), Hamza said he was not aware of any excesses committed by the Malaysian police since the crackdown started.

 

"We arrested them humanely and sent them to jail for investigation," he said.

 

But even then, Patail announced in a statement that an investigation into the reported abuses has started and those complaining of such excesses will be assisted by the Malaysian Bar and the Sabah Law Association.

 

"If the investigation showed there had indeed been abuses, the persons involved will be charged accordingly," Abdul Gani said in a statement sent to Bernama, the state media group.

 

In his written statement read by an anchor of another Sabah station known for its scathing anti-Najib commentaries on Wednesday, Harris said he had written Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein and asked him to order the police to stop their unlawful actions against the Suluk population in Semporna and Lahad Datu.

 

Harris said Suluk leaders had sought his help to make the appeal because they could no longer tolerate the abuses.

 

"These Suluk leaders reported that (the) police are taking away Identity Cards, Red Identity Cards and the IMM13 documents (of the Suluk people) and destroy them," he said.

 

Harris, giving credence to the claims of the Suluk leaders he did not identify, said the abuses were "unbecoming of a Malaysian police force."

 

"This behavior is against (any law)…, be it religious or the laws and policies of the Malaysian government," Harris quoted what he told Hishamuddin.

 

He also reminded Hishamuddin that the "police have no power to destroy any Federal Government document" unless they had been ordered to do so by the National Registration Department.

 

He warned that the abuses could eventually "create hostility between Sabah and the Suluk people," whom he described as the "original inhabitants of Sabah."


Read more at: 
http://globalnation.inquirer.net/69359/filipinos-fleeing-sabah-endure-violent-crackdown-by-malaysian-forces

 

Dr Mahathir: No directive to issue IC to unqualified migrants

Posted: 16 Mar 2013 11:59 AM PDT

http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTCr-Ih7taDA3R1aF7dHnlsQkxY1Gk44xaHfr4Ss0EkRD_44v1w 

(Bernama) - The government had never issued any directive to any quarters to issue identity cards (IC) or citizenship to unqualified immigrants in Sabah, said Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad.

As such, he said, Sabahans could not blame the government during his administration over cases of fraud committed by certain parties for self-interest.

"I am aware the issue (IC project) is getting the attention of the people. I have been told, there were those who were not qualified, having just arrived, who received IC.

"This is not our directive, not the government's directive...this is fraud on the part of the officers in the area because of other interests," he told reporters on Saturday.

The former prime minister was asked to comment on the opposition campaign trend which was aggressively playing up the IC Project issue to garner the people's support, in view of the coming general election.

He clarified that many people who were not from this country were made citizens because they had stayed in the country for a long time and had mastered the national language.

"Many of us are from other countries, for example from China, Arab (countries) and India. All of them have stayed here for a long time and are loyal to this country.

"We give them citizenship if they meet the necessary conditions," he said.

In another development, Dr Mahathir, when asked if the government was capable of increasing the oil royalty to Sabah which currently stood at five per cent, said the government's practice was to share riches with all citizens of the country.

Prior to this, the opposition pact, in its 13th General Election manifesto, promised 20 per cent oil royalty to the people of Sabah.

"If they (opposition) want to give (higher)...then, give 100 per cent to Sabah," said Dr Mahathir, who was prime minister for 22 years since 1981 before stepping down in 2003.

On the setting up of the special security area, Eastern Sabah Security Command in Sabah, following the intrusion by foreign terrorists in Lahad Datu, Dr Mahathir said the move was apt and timely, seeing the significant security threat in the national waters.

 

Wong Tack should have declared his political intentions, says PKR MP Fuziah

Posted: 16 Mar 2013 11:36 AM PDT

(The Star) - Himpunan Hijau chairman Wong Tack should have declared his political intentions from day one, said PKR MP Fuziah Salleh.

The Kuantan MP said Wong, who would be contesting in Bentong under DAP, should not have dragged in the whole environmental non-governmental organisation against the rare earth plant Lynas in Gebeng as his platform to be a politician.

"A person can wear many hats and if the environmental issue is something he feels strongly about, he can be a candidate who advocates it. But he must stand alone.

"If not, it will risk the NGO being viewed as a political entity and that will create a conflict," she was quoted as saying by The Mole.

Fuziah has also similarly campaigned against the plant.

Wong recently came under pressure from various groups asking him to quit the movement following DAP's announcement that he would be contesting the Bentong parliamentary seat.

He had since expressed his willingness to give up the movement, adding, however, that he was neither elected nor appointed to his post because it was not officially registered as an NGO.

 

GE13: PKR-DAP tussle for Bentong heats up

Posted: 16 Mar 2013 09:24 AM PDT

(The Star) - The tussle for the Bentong parliamentary seat between PKR and DAP has heated up with both sides standing firm on their right to put their candidate in the parliamentary seat.

The furore started after DAP announced Himpunan Hijau leader Wong Tack (picture) as its candidate for the seat in the general election.

The decision stunned PKR, which had wanted the seat as it had put a candidate there at the last polls in 2008.

In that election, Health Minister Datuk Seri Liow Tiong Lai won the seat for the Barisan Nasional when he defeated PKR candidate G. Ponnusamy by a majority of more than 12,500 votes.

Following the announcement of Wong's candidacy last week, Ponnusamy lashed out at his party leaders for allowing DAP to take the seat away from PKR.

However, PKR leaders had reportedly stated that they were willing to give up Bentong in exchange for two state seats previously contested by DAP, including the Ketari state seat in the constituency.

The other is Tanah Rata, which comes under Cameraon Highlands.

Both seats were won by the Barisan Nasional on marginal majorities in the last elections.

"On our side, we stand by our decision.

"If they (DAP) want the Bentong seat, it means we will take the two state seats," Pahang PKR chief Fauzi Abdul Rahman reportedly told news portal Antarapos.

The portal quoted him as further saying that his party would not hand over Bentong if DAP did not agree to the swap.

DAP reportedly responded by threatening it would take on PKR and Barisan in three-cornered fights in the contentious seats if its ally did not back off from its claims.

When contacted by The Star, Fauzi refused to comment.

It is understood that PKR and DAP were currently also in disagreement over the Teruntum state seat, which PKR contested and lost in 2008.

When contacted, Pahang DAP chairman Leong Ngah Ngah said: "The discussion has left the state level. It is now up to the central Pakatan Rakyat leadership to decide."

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


What can Saiful’s father offer PKR? Nothing!

Posted: 16 Mar 2013 02:30 PM PDT

What is the rationale in PI Bala, Deepak and Saiful's father being put to the fore by PKR, by Anwar, as a battering ram against Najib and Umno?

CT Ali, FMT

Mercenary, turncoat, scum, spin doctor, fiction writer, Umno mole! Even as I am being called these names, Saiful Bukhari Azlan's father Azlan Mohd Lazim joins PKR a day after insisting that his son was being used by several unscrupulous people, including a special officer to the PM, to fabricate lies against the de facto leader of PKR, Anwar Ibrahim.

Now which part of S.T.U.P.I.D does PKR not understand?

First PKR has Johari Abdul facilitating the press conference where Saiful's father announced that his son was being manipulated by the other side.

The very next day, the same Johari Abdul is there again when Saiful's father announced that he is joining PKR.

Now who is this Johari Abdul? He is the PKR member of parliament for Sungai Petani with a Master Degree in Strategic Studies.

Simple rule of thumb for PKR in any future expose: if you want the Malaysian public to believe that Saiful's father did all that he did on his own volition, then do not have Johari or any PKR operatives near him when he makes the announcement.

Better still, make sure no PKR operatives are even in the same room, same building, same locality. Why? Because when you do that, then right thinking Malaysians may believe that Saiful's father is doing it all on his own convictions.

Then if he does want to join PKR, please lah, give a decent interval between that announcement and having a photo opportunity for Johari Abdul so that the Malaysian public may be persuaded that he joining the PKR has got nothing to do with him calling his son a liar who is being manipulated by unscrupulous men connected to Najib.

But this Johari does not seem to have the ability to understand these simple niceties, and he has a Masters in Strategic Studies?

Some of you cannot see beyond the tip of your nose, what more the ability to follow the chain of events of why and how things happen in this sandiwara and odious drama that passes for politics in our country.

Ignorance I can understand, but stupidity I cannot tolerate.

For me Najib Tun Razak, Umno and all that are remotely within its sphere of toxicity are a lost cause.

So I would prefer to work on what is not yet a lost cause in as far as I am concerned.

Pakatan Rakyat, PKR and Anwar Ibrahim are not a lost cause yet! They potentially can be the future we aspire to.

They can potentially be the government we need in Putrajaya. They are our hope for change, but only if they are deserving of our trust and worthy of being leaders capable of good governance.

We are not imbeciles

You ask me if I have something against Anwar? Yes I do!

He had the opportunity of being PM once – he was just a step away from it happening. All it would have taken for him to be Prime Minister then would not even be 10 % of the effort he has put in the last nine years to get where he is today.

Now again he has been give this opportunity to be the PM designate if Pakatan Rakyat wins government in this 13th general election  – and is he once again going to shot himself in the foot?

Of course I am angry! How many politicians have a shot at the PM seat even once? Only Anwar had – and is he going to screw it up again?

And why am I angry?

Simply this – I have been blogging for the past three years and all this time I have worked on my blog for Anything But Umno (ABU). By default Anwar will lead Pakatan into the 13th general election to make ABU a reality because no one else, at this pointof time, can do it better.

I am but one of the many thousands of people who have done work for ABU, for Pakatan Rakyat and for Anwar to be the change we want through what I write.

However small my contribution has been, it has been work I have done because we have no other choice but Pakatan if we want a new beginning.

And then we see the late P Balasubramaniam, Deepak Jaikishan and this Father of Saiful being put to the fore by PKR, by Anwar to be used by PKR and Anwar as a battering ram against Najib and Umno.

READ MORE HERE

 

Getting ready for GE13

Posted: 16 Mar 2013 09:22 AM PDT

The long wait for the general election to be called is almost over as all the signs point to the Prime Minister making the big move this week.

Joceline Tan, The Star

EVERYONE thinks it is going to be any day now. They are, of course, talking about when Parliament will be dissolved for the general election.

Last Wednesday, there was a mild speculation frenzy after the Prime Minister's black Proton Perdana Executive was spotted going through the Palace gates early in the morning. A Malay daily tweeted about it and soon the chatter was Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak had sought the King's consent for the dissolution of Parliament.

Najib did indeed have an audience with the King as he does every Wednesday before chairing the weekly Cabinet meeting, and many people had a good laugh at themselves after that.

Speculation about the dissolution date has gone from "Is it going to be next month?" to "Is it tomorrow?" or even "Heard that PM is meeting the (Yang di-Pertuan) Agong this afternoon."

The window is getting smaller and every little move by Najib is scrutinised and analysed for hints. But even those with access to him are flummoxed.

"We keep watching PM's body language but no hints at all from him. When we ask him, all he says is, be ready," said Umno executive secretary Datuk Rauf Yusoh.

A few days ago, PKR deputy president Azmin Ali tweeted that Parliament would be dissolved on March 18. But the opposition parties have been predicting the general election since 2010 and we are still waiting.

The Prime Minister is as ready as can be, according to several top editors who met him at his office on Monday. It was a sort of tea-chat where they exchanged views over a variety of issues.

And, of course, there was the burning question of the day: When? Nobody really expected him to say when but what came across during the exchange was how visibly confident Najib was.

"He was upbeat, he looked at ease. I think he is ready. He has an impressive report card in terms of the Government's economic transformation policies. He has responded to the new political landscape in terms of social and political reforms. He's got his finger on the national pulse, he has reached out to everyone and he's tuned in to issues of the day," said one of the editors.

Najib told them he is "cautiously optimistic" about Barisan Nasional's chances in the elections. It is a phrase he has used whether in private or in public.

During a televised town hall-style session titled "Conversation with the PM" a few days ago, he had said: "I say cautiously optimistic because we cannot take anything for granted. But I am very encouraged by the people's response especially when I go round. At the same time, we have done our assessments, numbers and we believe the rakyat is behind us and the rakyat feel that their future is more secure with Barisan Nasional."

He has put his heart and soul into his work and those close to him said he has every reason to be confident and that he has his sights set on regaining Barisan's two-third majority in Parliament.

But like all seasoned politicians, he knows that this is the time when politicians are about to approach the people to ask for their precious votes and support. Humility is important and it is not the time to talk big or be presumptuous.

Najib has often been described as a wartime prime minister given the challenging post-2008 political landscape. But the terror intrusions in Lahad Datu has lent an uncanny meaning to the sobriquet and he has been able to draw on his experience as Defence Minister in handling the crisis.

He has been visibly saddened by the deaths on the battle front and his focus over the last few weeks has been as much on the situation in Sabah as it has been on the polls. The crisis is under control but far from over.

It has also taken on a life of its own in terms of national impact. There has been a surging tide of nationalist and patriotic sentiments especially among the Malays. Many have been moved by the nightly reporting from the battle front and the televised replay of the Jalur Gemilang-draped coffins emerging from the belly of army aircraft as solemn military music played in the background.

Malaysians have been galvanised by what is happening in Lahad Datu and what it means to the country's national security. They are angry there are people out there who have attempted to ridicule the gravity of the situation.

For instance, Wong Chin Huat, a leading figure in the Bersih group and now working for a Penang government think-tank, had in the early weeks of the crisis tweeted that the Sulu intruders were here for Chinese New Year, they would be getting ang pows, they decided to stay for Chap Goh Meh, they enjoyed it so much they extended their stay. He probably meant it as a joke but it was not funny when people, especially our police personnel, began dying.

PKR vice-president Tian Chua is facing sedition charges after dozens of police reports were lodged over his alleged remarks that the Sabah intrusion was a political conspiracy.

Very few are keen to talk openly about how Lahad Datu will impact on the political prospect of either Barisan or Pakatan Rakyat. It would be in bad taste given that the armed forces are out there, putting their lives on the line for the nation. But the political mood in Sabah is very different today compared to a month ago and talk about "Ubah" or change has quietened somewhat.

Pakatan leaders have been going on about how they are going to take Putrajaya. They have been reluctant to say how many seats they can possibly win to form the government but are making a concerted bid to win more seats in Johor, Sarawak and Sabah.

They have been very strategic in focusing on these states where there are a sizable number of Chinese-majority seats because they have won all the Chinese seats that they could possibly win in other states on the west coast.

But they have been tactically silent about the fact that Kedah and Selangor are looking wobbly. They may also lose seats in several other states that were won thanks to the political tsunami.

For example, at least five parliamentary seats are expected to fall to Umno in Kelantan. In Penang, Umno is sure of taking back two parliamentary seats from PKR while in Perak, at least four Pakatan parliamentary seats are in danger.

This means that the gains Pakatan makes in their frontline states may be negated by losses elsewhere. State seats usually carry parliamentary seats and if Kedah and Selangor fall, Barisan will be looking at a two-thirds majority.

The general consensus is that Barisan will still be in Putrajaya after the general election. It will win with a comfortable margin but will fall short of a two-thirds majority. Besides, very few democracies in the world enjoy two-thirds majority governments.

"Only the size of the majority remains uncertain," said Asli CEO Tan Sri Michael Yeoh.

Yeoh put it in a nutshell when he said that there are basically three possible outcomes for the elections:

> The status quo remains for Barisan at around 140 parliamentary seats.

> A reduced majority for Barisan.

> Barisan regains two-thirds majority.

Najib, said Yeoh, will campaign from a position of strength that is premised on his personality, the hard work he has put in and his track record of policies and programmes.

One of the reasons why Pakatan's recently launched manifesto has not had the traction of the earlier Buku Jingga is because of Najib's Janji Ditepati reputation, which has been in sharp contrast to Pakatan's excuse that "manifesto bukan janjian" (a manifesto is not a promise).

He has shown that it can walk the talk and deliver on its word.

"However, the urban voters are still largely with the Opposition. The urban Chinese support for DAP is strong and as high as 85% of urban Chinese may vote for it," said Yeoh.

Umno, he said, will be the big Barisan winner and DAP will be the big Pakatan winner. Malaysian politics is likely to get even more racially polarised.

It has been a long wait for the mother of all battles. During a pre-election briefing for the editorial staff a few weeks ago, this paper's group chief editor Datuk Seri Wong Chun Wai asked how many in the auditorium were covering the general election for the first time.

On seeing the number of hands, he said with a laugh: "Never mind, don't worry. The last five years have been one long election campaign."

He is so right. It has also been five years of endless politicking over almost everything and anything. And just as you thought that it could not get any more complicated, you have Saiful Bukhari Azlan and his father Azlan Mohd Lazim contradicting each other on Saiful's sex allegations against Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

But nothing could have been more stunning than how the Lynas campaign has unfolded. Lynas leader Wong Tack is now a DAP election candidate and he has veered from wanting to burn down the plant to okaying Lynas if it "goes through the front door".

On the other hand, Anwar said Lynas may be allowed to operate but his PKR Wanita chief Fuziah Salleh went the opposite direction with a firm "No".

The saying that fact is stranger than fiction has been all too true when it comes to politics since 2008.

Publisher Datuk A. Kadir Jasin's gripe about some of the greenhorn politicians swept in by the political tsunami is that they have been like "ayam jantan baru belajar berkokok" (cockerels learning how to crow).

"They not only crow at the wrong time, they are also out of tune and are a nuisance to the whole kampung," said Kadir.

The result has been some questionable Yang Berhormats who have a talent for saying the wrong things at the wrong time about issues which they are less than qualified to talk about.

Malaysians have had ample time to assess what the two coalitions are about. And that is why candidates are going to be a big factor in the elections.

Najib will meet the King again on Wednesday prior to the Cabinet meeting. But this time, according to insiders, this might just be the day when he seeks His Majesty's consent to dissolve Parliament. If that happens, he will then return to inform his Cabinet before making a public announcement.

The long wait is almost over.

 

Political chameleons

Posted: 16 Mar 2013 09:20 AM PDT

Politicians and wannabe politicians have hijacked the green movement to pursue their political goals at the expense of genuine environmental concerns.

Wong Chun Wai, The Star

HIMPUNAN Hijau activist Wong Tack has found himself facing a barrage of criticism after deciding to contest under the DAP banner in the coming general election.

His fellow members in the anti-Lynas movement feel let down because they see his decision as politically opportunistic.

They want him to step down from the movement but he says it is unwarranted because Himpunan Hijau isn't registered anyway. He is even saying that his position as chairman is not an official position.

But what Wong has not said is that all this while, he has been freely making press statements in that capacity.

Dr Kua Kia Soong, adviser for human rights group Suaram, has expressed similar sentiments about Wong, saying the latter must step down.

Dr Kua was a Chinese educationist who quit the United Chinese School Committees' Association of Malaysia (Dong Zong) in 1990 to contest under the DAP in the 1990 general election. He won the Petaling Jaya Utara parliamentary seat but he did not last long in the DAP as his idealism and uncompromising principles did not fit in the opposition party.

The respectable human rights activist, who was detained under the Internal Security Act in 1987, left the DAP bitterly and ended up pouring out his frustrations in a book, Inside the DAP: 1990-1995.

Dr Kua has returned to NGO activities.

As he rightly wrote recently, "Politicians like to spout the platitude that 'politics is the art of the possible', but movements must bear pressure on them to make their demands possible.

"Now, before Wong has even started his career as a politician, he is already faced with his first dilemma."

Pakatan Rakyat chief (Datuk Seri) Anwar Ibrahim, Dr Kua wrote, "has demonstrated the 'art of the possible' by declaring that if Pakatan comes into power, Lynas will be given a chance to prove the plant's safety".

Wong, when asked to respond to what Anwar had said, was quick to support the Opposition Leader's statement. That was a far cry from his earlier pledge to burn down the Lynas plant himself if Pakatan comes to power.

That's precisely the trouble with NGO leaders, especially some activists in Penang, who decide to take a partisan political stand. They begin to make compromises and, worse, they begin to lose their neutrality as they openly side with Pakatan.

At least one former NGO leader has taken up a Senator's post while others have been co-opted into various state government posts. Others cannot remember which hat they were wearing when they made statements.

The only beacon that stands out in Penang, home of NGOs, is the Consumers Association of Penang, which has consistently spoken out about issues affecting the country and state.

Unlike many NGOs which are actually one-man shows, CAP is professionally run and is focused on education and research. It does not need to flirt with politicians and has kept its credibility fully intact.

Wong obviously owes the thousands of people who took part in the anti-Lynas protest walk an explanation. Was he using them to increase his profile so he could secure himself a candidacy?

His commitment to the environment itself has now been questioned as he has maintained a stoic silence on the blatant raping of forests in Kedah and Kelantan, two states run by PAS, a partner in the Pakatan.

Again, I quote Dr Kua in reference to NGO leaders who have wavered after becoming involved in politics: "Is it because they are so caught up with the political hoopla they have also stepped down a notch from their previous uncompromising stand?

"It's time they found their own voice now that their erstwhile chairperson has gone on to pursue his political career."

There have been high hopes that environment issues would play a major role in this coming election but it would appear that much of it has been tainted with political motives. Politicians and wannabe politicians have hijacked the green movement to pursue their political goals at the expense of genuine environmental concerns.

Take, for example, the Bukit Koman gold mine issue. Purported environmental activists have claimed that the mine's use of cyanide caused medical problems among the residents nearby. Until now, however, not a shred of evidence has been produced to support their claims.

Last year, DAP Kepong MP Dr Tan Seng Giaw, a skin specialist, said "there is still no evidence to show the occurrence of skin problems among Bukit Koman residents in Raub is linked to cyanide used in gold mine activities".

"It is difficult to attribute the skin problems to a certain substance as it is a very slow process. I think we should approach this issue in a rational manner," he said.

Yet, the same allegations have been recycled, with the hope that if a lie is told a thousand times, it will become fact.

Interestingly, the gold mine employs over 300 local residents, and Barisan Nasional is claiming that most of the protesters are actually from outside Raub.

It is also interesting to note that a gold mine operator in PAS-run Kelantan uses cyanide and actually explained its operations on its official website. But there's not even a whisper of protest against it from pro-Pakatan environmentalists, who seem to choose their targets.

Two other gold mines in Pahang are said to also use cyanide but again they are not in the political spotlight. Bukit Koman, however, is in the Raub parliamentary constituency, which the opposition feels it has a chance of wresting from the Barisan.

Environmental awareness is crucial and important. Malaysians must demand that protection of our environment be included as part of the national agenda.

This newspaper has exposed wanton logging, illegal or otherwise, in Pahang, Kedah, Kelantan and Perak. We have highlighted the problems of the natives in Sarawak and incurred the wrath of politicians and developers over our reports on the excessive hill development in Penang. Then there is the never-ending issue of illegal sand mining in Selangor.

Our reporters have been threatened by both sides of the political divide but that's the price we have to pay if we are to pursue the issue passionately.

The Buku Jingga, for example, is totally silent on the customary land rights of the orang asli, public transport system and even a sustainable energy policy. Environmental groups and voters must insist on these when the Barisan unveils its manifesto.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Azman, isteri sumbang RM1 bilion untuk Yayasan Azman Hashim

Posted: 16 Mar 2013 09:16 AM PDT

Yayasan itu, yang ditubuh pada 5 Januari 1991, akan mengagih dana berkenaan kepada pelbagai program kebajikan dan pembangunan pendidikan di negara ini. Yang Dipertuan Besar Negeri Sembilan Tuanku Muhriz Tuanku Munawir dan Tunku Ampuan Besar Negeri Sembilan Tuanku Aishah Rohani Tengku Besar Mahmud berkenan melancarkan secara rasmi Yayasan Azman Hashim di sini malam tadi.

Yayasan itu pernah menyumbang RM42 juta untuk pembangunan pendidikan di beberapa institusi pengajian tinggi awam di negara ini, termasuk pembinaan sebuah kompleks pendidikan di Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia (UIAM) bernilai RM7 juta. Selain itu, sumbangan berkenaan diguna untuk membina sebuah bangunan baharu bernilai RM25 juta bagi menampung keperluan Fakulti Perniagaan dan Perakaunan di Universiti Malaya dan RM10 juta bagi membina sebuah bangunan untuk kegiatan sukan di Universiti Sains Malaysia.

 

Fitnah PM: Sivarasa didesak beri penjelasan

Posted: 16 Mar 2013 08:56 AM PDT

Berikut adalah kenyataan beliau:

Kita mahu tahu sama ada perancangan pakatan pembangkang untuk memfitnah Perdana Menteri akan tergendala ekoran kematian PI Bala.

Kita juga meminta penjelasan Sivarasa apakah rancangan beliau seterusnya. Apakah Sivarasa akan memperalatkan kaum keluarga PI Bala pula untuk meneruskan perancangan fitnah pakatan pembangkang terhadap Perdana Menteri.

Saya yakin kemungkinan besar, itu yang akan cuba dilakukan kerana memperalatkan keluarga orang adalah salah satu kemahiran pembangkang bagi meneruskan agenda politik peribadi mereka.

lKita juga inginkan penjelasan sama ada betulkah beliau berada di Manila pada 7 Februari 2013. Kita minta Sivarasa membuat penafian di semua akhbar utama tempatan jika fakta ini tidak betul.

Saya cabar Sivarasa untuk menjawab persoalan ini sebab semua rakyat Malaysia yang cintakan negara mahu tahu cerita sebenar.


Himpunan ‘Anwar dalang Lahad Datu’ depan Masjid Negara

Posted: 14 Mar 2013 06:09 PM PDT

Siri jelajah 'Anwar Dalang Lahad Datu' anjuran badan bukan kerajaan (NGO) berhaluan kanan itu bermatlamat meyakinkan orang awam supaya menolak Pakatan Rakyat dalam pilihan raya umum (PRU) 13 kerana menjadi punca pencerobohan 'Sultan Sulu' di Lahad Datu.

Antara NGO terbabit Pertubuhan Peribumi Perkasa (Perkasa), Jalur Tiga (Jati), Tolak Individu Bernama Anwar Ibrahim (Tibai) serta Jaringan Melayu Malaysia (JMM).

Selain Anwar, beberapa pemimpin Pakatan termasuk Naib Presiden PKR Tian Chua juga dibidas kerana kenyataannya mengaitkan Umno dengan insiden tembakan antara anggota keselamatan dengan kumpulan penceroboh.

"Kita takkan biarkan Tian Chua berkuasa…lepas PRU kita humban dia dalam longkang," laung Mursyidul Am Tibai Zahid Mat Arip dihadapan kira-kira 100 orang selepas menunaikan solat Jumaat.

Menjadikan lori sebagai pentas bergerak untuk ceramah, nyanyian lagu 'Negaraku' serta bendera Jalur Gemilang turut diagihkan kepada umum.

Presiden Perkasa Datuk Ibrahim Ali ketika berucap mendesak supaya segera diwujudkan Suruhanjaya Siasatan Diraja (RCI) mengenai isu Lahad Datu.

Katanya, semua pihak termasuk anggota keselamatan dan pembangkang perlu dipanggil membantu siasatan.

`Wujudkan kertas putih'

"Kita mesti desak wujudkan kertas putih untk hilang keraguan siapa dalang di sebalik insiden Lahad Datu.

"Kalau tak berbagai tuduhan akan terus berlaku dan takkan selesaikan masalah," katanya.

READ MORE HERE

 

Mengapa sumpah jawatan PM Najib secara rahsia?

Posted: 12 Mar 2013 08:50 PM PDT

Selain itu kekeliruan berhubung nama Najib dan status kerajaan turut dipersoal bekas Ketua Bahagian Siasatan Jenayah Perdagangan Bukit Aman, Datuk Mat Zain Ibrahim.

Bekas Ketua Bahagian Siasatan Jenayah Perdagangan Bukit Aman, Datuk Mat Zain Ibrahim meggesa Ketua Setiausaha Negara, Datuk Seri Dr Ali Hamsa menjelaskan tiga perkara yang menyebabkan beliau menyoal sama ada Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak bersungguh-sungguh untuk mempertahankan kedaulatan negara.

Dalam sepucuk surat terbuka kepada Ali, Mat Zain menjelaskan tiga perkara tersebut iaitu kesahihan sumpah jawatan Najib sebagai Perdana Menteri yang dibuat secara rahsia, nama Najib yang berlainan dan status kerajaan yang memerintah selepas 8 Mac 2013.

"Najib telah mengangkat sumpah jawatan,taat setia dan sumpah simpan rahsia menggunakan bentuk sumpah yang lain daripada yang ditetapkan dalam Jadual Ke-6 Perlembagaan.

"Di sinilah timbul persoalan sama ada Najib layak menjalankan fungsi-fungsi jawatan Perdana Menteri memandangkan sumpah beliau tidak mengikut perlembagaan.

"Jika dalam lain-lain perkara, Najib bertegas untuk mengikut perlembagaan, mengapakah pula dalam perkara penting, iaitu mengangkat sumpah jawatan dan sumpah simpan rahsia beliau enggan mengikut bentuk sumpah yang telah ditetapkan semenjak wujudnya perlembagaan itu?

"Jika semua Menteri dan Timbalan Menteri boleh lakukan,mengapa tidak beliau?.

"Secara peribadi saya menyatakan bahawa sumpah jawatan dan sumpah simpan rahsia yang diikrarkan oleh Najib pada April 2009 tidak memenuhi ketetapan perlembagaan. Oleh demikian beliau tidak layak atau berkuasa menjalankan apa-apa fungsi jawatan Perdana Menteri atau melaksanakan kuasa yang diperuntukkan oleh perlembagaan dan undang-undang lain kepada seorang Perdana Menteri," kata Mat Zain dalam surat tersebut.

Read more at: http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2013/03/13/mengapa-sumpah-jawatan-pm-najib-secara-rahsia/ 

Azmin bidas WikiLeaks, gesa jangan salahkan Anwar

Posted: 12 Mar 2013 06:13 PM PDT

"Sudah berbelas-belas tahun semua masalah diletakkan ke atas Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

"Maka kita minta rakyat bangkit untuk menyatakan pendirian mereka memberi amaran yang keras kepada pimpinan politik kerajaan pusat, jangan bermain politik tetapi menumpukan kepada usaha menangani isu keselamatan rakyat," katanya pada sidang media di Ibu Pejabat PKR, di sini, hari ini.

Menurut Azmin, tindakan itu hanyalah bertujuan untuk mengalihn perhatian daripada isu sebenar yang dalam kes Lahad Datu ini, jelas gagal ditangani oleh kerajaan.

"Untuk menutup kelemahan diri, pihak berkenaan cuba menyalahkan pimpinan Pakatan.

"Walau bagaimanapun, ini bukan perkara baru," kata Azmin.

Azmin berkata, beliau turut berhadapan tindakan sama apabila dipanggil petang ini untuk memberi keterangan kepada Suruhanjaya Komunikasi dan Multimedia Malaysia (SKMM) yang kononnya dikaitkan dalam isu Sabah.

Azmin turut menyangkal keras laporan WikiLeaks kononnya Anwar punya hubungan dengan Nur Misuari.

"Semua pimpinan bertemu dengan Nur Misuari, jangan  mereka cuba menafikan. Tetapi cubaan hendak mengaitkan dengan insiden yang berlaku itu sebagai sesuatu yang melampau," tegas Azmin.

Utusan Malaysia hari ini melaporkan, laman web WikiLeaks pada 2007 pernah mendedahkan Misuari yang merupakan pemimpin Barisan Pembebasan Kebangsaan Moro (MNLF), ketika menjadi tahanan di rumahnya pernah mempunyai hasrat untuk
menakluk Sabah dari Malaysia.

Kabel itu turut mendedahkan pemimpin Kanan Angkatan Tentera Filipina (AFP), Mejar Jeneral Ben Dolorfino sebagai berkata, Malaysia bimbang terhadap niat Misuari yang masih mempunyai beratus pengikut di negeri itu.

Malah katanya, Malaysia juga bimbang tentang hubungan Anwar yang disifatkan sebagai 'rakan lama' Nur Misuari.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


The Mysterious Case of the Sulu Sultan

Posted: 16 Mar 2013 01:03 PM PDT

Malaysia has been in the midst of an ongoing security crisis since early February, when a group of 235 rag-tag militiamen from the neighboring southern Philippines slipped into the eastern state of Sabah and began occupying several villages. While engaging police in several firefights, the insurgents beheaded and mutilated several captured Malaysian security personnel, prompting Malaysian forces to deploy fighter jets in an unprecedented air assault over the area in an operation to flush out the intruders. The gunmen call themselves the "Royal Army of the Sulu Sultanate", representing the heirs of a long-defunct kingdom which once controlled the territory up until the late nineteenth century. The so-called Sultan of Sulu, Jamalul Kiram III, who is believed to be directing the militant incursion from Manila, insists that Sabah is rightfully part of his kingdom and has vowed not budge on his claims even if his personnel are killed in the standoff.

Malaysians, who are preparing to vote in a pivotal general election just around the corner, have been fixated on events in Sabah as they unfold. The Philippines are soon expecting congressional elections as well, and given the timing, local analysts are wondering how exactly did this elderly self-proclaimed Sultan obtained the resources needed to establish his own private army. Both the Malaysian and Philippine governments have launched official investigations into allegations that figures within Malaysia's political opposition had a hand in aiding the Sulu gunmen. Reuters cited an anonymous Filipino military officer who claimed that Sulu rebels were "invited to Sabah by a Malaysian opposition politician".

The blame has been laid on Malaysia's de-facto opposition leader, Anwar Ibrahim, who Malaysian reports say has links to Filipino insurgent networks that have long eyed the resource-rich state of Sabah in northern eastern Borneo. Local journalist Adrian Lai recently unearthed classified diplomatic cables from the US embassy in Manila brought to light by WikiLeaks, which document ties between Nur Misauri, former chairmen of the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF), and Malaysia's main opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim. The MNLF is a political movement that pitted itself against predominately Christian Manila by seeking political autonomy for Muslim majority provinces in the islands in the southern Philippines. In 2001, Manila accused Misauri of terrorism when he led an MNLF unit that attacked an outpost of the Philippine army, prompting him to seek refuge in Sabah on the assumption that authorities in Muslim-majority Malaysia would empathize with him and block his extradition. Misauri was detained by Malaysian security forces in Sabah and sent back to the Philippines where he was jailed until 2008.

WikiLeaks cables claim that Misauri detested the Malaysian government for turning him over to Philippine authorities and that he was "a strong advocate for the recovery of Sabah". The cables claim that Misauri boasted that his militias could invade Sabah in the span of two hours. WikiLeaks has also confirmed that Misauri maintained close connections to Anwar Ibrahim, and that the two had met on several occasions. A separate report issued by AFP cited US diplomatic cables that implicate a Saudi Arabian ambassador to the Philippines of funding Muslim groups seeking autonomy in the southern islands. Misauri recently criticized Philippine President Benigno Aquino for siding with Malaysia in his firm stance against the Sulu militants, warning the Aquino government of chaos if Sulu Sultan Jamalul Kiram III is apprehended.

Anwar Ibrahim, who has vehemently denied all accusations, has long been considered a darling of the West. Mr. Ibrahim is a slippery character of sorts; he was once Malaysia's deputy prime minister prior to being sacked for getting too close to the IMF, among other things. Anwar also has friends in high places, from billionaire financier George Soros to senior neo-cons from the Bush administration. In recent times, Ibrahim has appealed to Carl Gershman, president of the US-Government funded foundation, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), requesting that he send a US observer team to Malaysia to monitor the upcoming elections. Ibrahim enraged many when he stated he would support policy to protect the security of Israel, and while his political party has long received training and backing from the International Republican Institute (IRI) chaired by Republican Senator John McCain, there is little doubt that Anwar – a creature of Washington's taxpayer funded "Democracy Promotion" overseas – would be the trusted ally that the White House is looking for as it refocuses its military muscle and political influence to the Asia-Pacific region.

Philippine President Benigno Aquino has recently conceded that events in Sabah showed signs of a conspiracy. A recent statement issued by Malaysian political-scientist Dr. Chandra Muzaffar alludes to reports of Malaysian opposition figures promising land, titles and other sinecures to the Sulu Sultanate if they emerged victorious in the upcoming elections. Muzaffar argues that a security crisis in Sabah, regarded as a political stronghold for the Barisan Nasional (BN) government, could weaken the ruling parties hold over the state, leading to a hung parliament or a narrow victory for the BN, prompting in his words, "massive street agitation which could pave the way for a regime change, which is the goal of not only the Opposition but also its foreign backers." When Chandra talks of "foreign backers", he is referring to the US political establishment.

Read more at: http://nilebowie.blogspot.com/2013/03/the-mysterious-case-of-sulu-sultan.html

 

Coffin with Tian Chua’s Photo Found at PKR Headquarters

Posted: 16 Mar 2013 11:55 AM PDT

The capper on the series of incidents occurred in the predawn hours of Saturday morning, when a coffin-like box was placed outside the entrance to the state PKR headquarters in Bukit Piatu.

The 'coffin' covered in black cloth was made from polystyrene. A framed photo of Tian Chua was placed on top, along with a garland of flowers. Completing the macabre image, red specks to resemble blood were sprinkled about the display.

Those placing the 'coffin' are assumed to be very dissatisfied with Chua's alleged speculation that implied Umno somehow had something to gain from the Lahad Datu intrusion.

The alleged comments, reported by PKR organ Keadilan Daily while the government was in the midst of trying to settle the touchy situation with a minimum loss of life through negotiations, didn't win him many fans.

However, the 'coffin' takes dissatisfaction to a new level – one that is illegal. The police have opened an investigation paper on the case under Section 506 of the Penal Code for criminal intimidation, as the 'coffin' could be interpreted as a threat to the PKR vice president's life.

This act is not merely illegal, it is simply wrong, and unbecoming in a mature democracy.

The highly-visible PKR officer and MP is starting to feel the wrath of those he allegedly insulted with his seditious words. On Friday, police were called when Chua received a hostile reception at a rally in Kedah. Around 40 people gathered prior to his arrival, carrying banners and shouting when the PKR vice president arrived to explain his alleged, controversial comments.

Read more at: http://www.thechoice.my/featured-articles/64283-coffin-with-tian-chuas-photo-found-at-pkr-headquarters

 

PI Bala - PII Americk Singh Sidhu

Posted: 16 Mar 2013 08:40 AM PDT

Breaking a promise for justice, how noble indeed.

Do I trust Messr Americk? You be the judge.

Malaysikini , "The truth about Bala's first statutory declaration", Americk Sidhu 15 March 2013,
"Valen had met Bala two years earlier, when Valen was engaged to represent Razak Baginda (before Razak was arrested). Bala and Razak were actually in Valen's office at 7.30am the day Razak was arrested.

As Bala related the unfolding of events to me, I recorded everything in long hand, pausing every so often to 'cross-examine' Bala on certain points to ensure his memory was indeed vivid and that there was no embellishment of anything he was narrating to me.

Bala cross-checked each detail by reference to the archives he had stored in his lap top, which was always kept open before him throughout the entire interviews"
From the annals of history, after much cross-examining to ensure PI Bala's memory was vivid and after Bala had cross checked each detail, the PI Bala Americk prepared Statutory Declaration Item 51 courtesy of anwaribrahimblog,
51. On the day Abdul Razak Baginda was arrested, I was with him at his lawyers office at 6.30 a.m.
So what? Those of you on the other side will say. Okay.

Here's more "truth about Bala's first",
"As the restaurant we were in was closing, we decided to adjourn to the Backyard pub down the road to continue our conversation. This is when fellow lawyer R Sivarasa turned up and joined us. The discussion continued.

Sivarasa felt Bala's story ought to be documented in a statutory declaration as the Altantuya murder trial was still ongoing at that stage"
Well, here is a more vivid recollection of Americk Singh Sidhu at the time, the day PI Bala made the U-turn, to be precise.

From the anal of time in non other than Anwar Ibrahim's blogpost, "Thank you for joining the live webcast of the press conference. KeADILan Vice President Sivarasa Rasiah (MP for Subang) and lawyer for P. Balasubramaniam, Americk Sidhu's statements are below,"
— PRESS STATEMENT FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE BY AMERICK SINGH SIDHU — 4 July 2008, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia - "I first met Mr. Bala in the presence of a few other persons in a restaurant about two months ago where he asked me to assist with preparing a formal document incorporating some evidence that had not been presented in the ongoing Altantuya trial."

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Idiot Guide to Malaysian Politics

Posted: 16 Mar 2013 12:26 PM PDT

http://starstorage.blob.core.windows.net/archives/2008/9/20/central/m_pg02anas.jpg 

Anas Zubedy 

1.    Cronyism is only wrong when it is practiced by the other side.

2.    Corruption is only wrong when it is practiced by the other side. But if he or she join us, 'halal' everything is again.

3.    If it was d BN Government who proposed an underground tunnel in Penang, PR will go against it – and, vice versa.

4.    Factories are dangerous when the other side builds it – and vice versa.

5.    When the other side talks about race, they are racist. When we talk about race, it's because we care.

6.    Big projects are wasteful ONLY IF it is a project mooted by the other side. When we moot it, it's smart economics.

7.    A Satan is a Satan as long as he is on the other side. Join us, immediately Satan becomes an Angel.

8.    If you are not with us, you are against us - even if you are right.

9.    My party and I speak on behalf of God. If you don't follow us, you will go to hell.

10. All my leaders are smart; all your leaders are idiots.

11. When my children move up the political ladder, they are smart. When your children do the same, its nepotism.

12. My research shows we got more support and will win in the next general elections. Your research that says otherwise sure wrongly done one.

13. My forensic expert is better than your forensic expert.

14. When our 2 leaders debate, my leader will always be better. No matter how stupid he or she sounded.

15. My ulamak is better than your ulamak even if my ulamak did not quote the Quran.

16. Our idiots are smarter than your experts.

17. When I disagree it is democracy, when you disagree you are rude, stupid, bought over, influenced, etc etc.

18. Green is blue when you say it. Blue is green when I say it.

19. When I give hand-outs it is because I care. When the other side does it, they are buying votes

20. Only jokes about the other side are funny.

Note : Siapa makan cili dia terasa pedasnya.

 

 

Hindraf Q & A

Posted: 16 Mar 2013 12:18 PM PDT

http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Ganesan-N-HRP-Hindraf-advisor-1.jpg 

How can Hindraf be an Indian right-wing pressure group demanding for special 'rights' for Indians while maintaining a Malaysian identity, support meritocracy and oppose the NEP-led affirmative actions? Isn't that hypocritical?  
 
N. Ganesan 
Soalan 1: Menang 2-3 hari di jalanan cuma mengundang solusi melepas batuk di tangga sahaja. Saudara mahu orang Melayu [misalnya saya seorang individu Melayu yang tak ada jawatan dalam parti politik mana sekali pun] melihat Hindraf ini sebagai apa?

Ganesan: Thank you for this interesting question.

I can understand that from the common Malay point of view, Hindraf's significance may be only the images of the fight they led on Nov 25th against Umno. Once the media lights moved on so did the memories of the common Malay person. However in the case of the Indians Nov 25th 2007 is viewed as a major historic day because of the huge psychological significance of unity and of defiance .

Only the victims in any battle will understand loss. The Indian poor lost everything, their dignity included, over the many years of living lives so close to slavery, after being brought here by the whites. When Merdeka was won, the "Indian near slaves" only saw a change in their masters and a worsening of their living conditions as the big plantations began to break up. The new Masters and new government development priorities saw their conditions deteriorate. They were pushed out of the estates in large numbers. In a recent estimate, about 800,000 Indian plantation workers were forcibly pushed out of their rural communities into the urban areas – poorly equipped for life in a completely alien environment.

Most Malays do not make the difference between the urban educated Indians who form about 25% of the Indians in the country with the poor Indians whom we speak of and whom Hindraf represents. Often you hear statistics about the number of Indian Doctors and Lawyers and of Tony Fernandez and Anandakrishnan. This confuses the problems of the Indian poor and totally wipes out the significance and antecedents of their poverty. The result of this has been a steady deterioration of the problems of the Indian poor. This is one of the major reasons for the significant increase in crime amongst the Indian youth.

The Malay people need to view Hindraf as a Human Rights organization that came about because of the poverty of the Indians from the estates. They do not threaten the well being of any other community. Of course our enemies will present us as the ones demanding an end to Malay special privileges. But when the Malays themselves are now demanding an end to Malay special privileges among the rich and powerful Malays, Hindraf is just the forerunner of brining these more democratic and just values into the country. In an environment of justice, fairness, dignity and equality, everyone will prosper. Hindraf is a patriotic organization that seeks to contribute to building a nation on a solid foundation of social justice.

Question 2: How can Hindraf be an Indian right-wing pressure group demanding for special 'rights' for Indians while maintaining a Malaysian identity, support meritocracy and oppose the NEP-led affirmative actions? Isn't that hypocritical?  

Ganesan: Thank you for the question.

"How can Hindraf be an Indian right-wing pressure group"… We are an Indian rights group. We seek the re-institution of the rights guaranteed under international norms as well as guaranteed in the Malaysian Federal Constitution. That is different than saying we are a right wing group. Right wing usually denotes terror elements of moneyed and vested interests in society. This we clearly are not. We represent the poor and  defenceless elements in our society. We have no sympathy for the moneyed groups whatsoever – whether Indians or otherwise.

Let me state here for your knowledge the stated objectives of Hindraf:

1) To bring the Indian poor and marginalized into the mainstream of National Development

2) To eliminate state-sponsored racist and religious supremacist policies.

We do not seek any special rights, just the rights that have been guaranteed us and the practice of equal rights for all citizen in the country. We do not seek special privileges or rights. This is clearly a misunderstanding.

Our driving thoughts are these that compel us to both seek targeted solutions for the Indian poor (which makes us look like we are asking for special rights) and to do it without any sense of conflict in multiracial Malaysia:

1) Many of the problems of the Indian poor are unique – the alarming increase in the involvement in underworld activities of Indian youth is one, large numbers of stateless Indians is another, non-commensurate representation in low skill jobs, breakdown of the social system, destruction of places of worship — whatever the reasons given and highest suicide rate among the ethnic groups.

The collapse of the primary education system for the Indian children is another glaring and unique problem confronting the Indian poor. These problems cannot be cured by general policies or by what we call trickle down approaches, they need a targeted approach. They need specific attention, allocation of funds and resources and appropriate approaches. These are specific problems that require specific solutions. Unless applied in this way the problems will not go away.

All of this is consistent with the national objective of building a strong and resilient Malaysia.

2) RM1,115 billion have been spent in the last 10 Malaysian Development Plans.  There has not been any significant allocation for the development of the Indian poor over the 48 years of the 10 plans. So, we are saying it is time for some funds to be allocated on a targeted basis for the upliftment of the Indian poor. If there are other similar communities, with similar problems, then they need to be addressed in similar ways. We are not asking for exclusive treatment (though our enemies will want to make it look like were doing just that). We are asking for comprehensive and permanent solutions to these problems.

We do not believe we are being hypocritical in any way in any of our approaches. We are a young organization, we are a small, resource lean organization, we do social and poltical work in the area where we started and where there is a great need. Nobody else is taking up the case for the Indian poor – they say they care, but the truth of the matter is that all they are interested in is the votes of these poor people. We do what we do, not by taking away from others, but by restoring justice and fairness where it is rightfully due.

However we let you decide if any of that is hypocritical.

Soalan 3: Berapa ramaikah di kalangan [pemimpin] tertinggi Hindraf yang beragama Kristian? Adakah India Muslim boleh menjadi ahli Hindraf? Mengapakah tidak menyertai party politik yang sedia, yang juga menjaga kepentingan kaum masing-masing?

Ganesan: At the Central Leadership there are no Christian members. This not by design. This is how it has worked itself out. Right from the very beginning when Hindraf was formed, the main objective was to prevent the demolition of Hindu Temples. Indian Christians were not affected by what was then happening and so we have it today that there are no Christian members at the Central Leadership level. We however do have several who are Christians at the next levels of leadership.

We do not define membership by religion. If you subscribe to the objectives of Hindraf you are eligible to be a member. The objectives of Hindraf are:

1) To bring the Indian poor and marginalized into the mainstream of National Development

2) To eliminate state sponsored-racist and religious supremacist policies.

If you subscribe to these objectives you can be a member.

None of the existing political parties truly represent the interests and rights of the Indian poor. All they seem to be interested in is their votes. They manipulate the poor Indians, get their votes and then forget about improving their livelihoods. MIC represents the rich Indians. The other Indian parties on Barisan Nasional side only serve Barisan to get them the Indian votes. They do not serve the interest of the Indian poor. On the Pakatan side there is no effective Indian poor representation – yes there are Indian representatives, but they are representatives who happen to be Indian but who do not serve the interest of the Indian poor.

In summary it would be right to say that there is no political party that serves the interest of the Indian poor in the country.

Soalan 4: Apa masalah besar jika Hindraf mengambil pendekatan lembut dan moderate? Kenapa perlu sentiasa bersifat konfrontasi dan menuntut sesuatu dengan pendekatan bombastik?

Ganesan: This question requires an understanding of how things really work in the world of politics.

We operate in a democratic system where a simple majority is all that is required for you to get the power of decision and control on all Government policy matters.

In this environment, you can see how the minority communities can be disadvantaged. If the minority community is disadvantaged in numbers but is economically strong, then it can buy a share of the power of decision. There are many ways by which this works. To give a simple example — providing a large financial contribution to a candidate who is standing in the elections and make him win as a result. Even though he/she may not belong to the minority community but he/she is now obliged to promote the interest of that community. This is common knowledge.

Now imagine what happens if you are a very small minority and you are not economically strong. Your destiny is entirely at the hands of those who hold a simple majority and you have no choice on this anymore. This is exactly the case with the Indian poor. You ask, you request, you do this behind closed doors, you do this in various ways, moderate methods, you do this in the Cabinet, you do this in the party meetings, but no one really hears. You cannot do anything. Years pass. The end result is a community in distress.

Couple this on the other hand with the policies designed by the community with a simple majority – all policies get slanted to their advantage, all benefits from the Government flows towards them. Opportunities to the minority communities are blocked, are denied, or are removed. You get a very unbalanced situation.

Then one day when the unbalance gets to be so great you suddenly get an explosion of anger against the unfairness and the injustice in the system. That is what you see in recent years. What you have not seen over the previous years past is all the patience and all the behind-the-door discussion and all the moderate and soft approaches that have been used to little benefit. When all that has not produced even small results, the outcome unfortunately is this – the problem spills over on to the streets.

As far as making extreme demands, I must say that extreme or not also depends on one's point of view. Take this example — when you have half the young Indian children go to schools that are in dilapidated conditions, in cowsheds and in transportation containers, and this is causing a collapse of the foundational education of half the future of the Indian community and there seems to be no sense of urgency to correct this matter on the part of the Government, what do you expect – more patience from us too, less demand than an immediate attention to the problem and adequate allocation of funds to correct the situation so not too many more generations of these children are affected. The net result, over the years, as you can see is the serious criminalization of Indian youth.

Please understand that whatever you see as expressions from Hindraf, we are just reacting according to the seriousness of the situation. Of course the Government will not want you to see that they are doing this to the Indian children. They make us into extremists and our demands to be extreme.

Question 5: How does Hindraf intend to be a functional social activist group or political party when they seem to have alienated both coalitions?

Ganesan: Very good question. Thank you.

Hindraf is not a political party nor does it intend to become one. However we will participate in the political process of the country as a people's movement.

As a people's movement we will articulate the needs, interests and rights of people.

In articulating for the people, when we see duplicity and deceit on the part of politicians, we will speak up. You must understand one basic truth about politicians – they are only interested in your votes. They are not necessarily interested in doing what is best for you. As a people's movement we are not interested in the votes, we are interested in getting for the people what is best for them. There clearly will be times when we do speak up impartially.

Now, think about this, does that make us more or less functional as a social activist group?

Not to alienate one or the other coalition is not our priority, to make sure that the politicians come up with policies in the interest of the people and then they follow through with implementation is our priority. That makes us play our roles more effectively.

Question 6: Having being ignored first by BN and then rejected by PR, what is Hindraf's next move and what is its political advice or recommendation to its followers and the underclass that it struggles for?

Ganesan: I will be brief on this question.

We will remain ambivalent on this question till it becomes clear who among the two coalitions will support the 5-year Blueprint plans. The political parties are interested in the votes of our followers. We do not see ourselves recommending to our followers to give it to one or the other without there being a quid pro quo as far as their response to our 5-year Blueprint is concerned. It is still too early (now with the Lahad Datu incident) to say that they have rejected our Blueprint. When the jostling gets heavier, we will then be able to more clearly know.

If the response seems too simplistic, take it that I do not want to be read too early on this question.

One thing is for certain – our focus and priority is the "5-year Blueprint to bring the Indian poor into the national mainstream of development".

N. Ganesan is the Hindraf national advisor.

To read the questions at source, see 'Soalan-soalan anda (pembaca blog ini) bagi Hindraf '.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved