Selasa, 13 November 2012

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Stop manipulating religious text: PUM

Posted: 12 Nov 2012 11:48 PM PST

(Bernama) - The Ulama Association of Malaysia (PUM) has urged Sisters In Islam (SIS) and secularist groups to stop manipulating religious texts to suit their secular perspective, including the issue of religious freedom.

PUM secretary-general Dr Mohd Roslan Mohd Noor described their action as defamation of religions and part of the manifestation of 'religionfobia'.

"It has been considered a crime at national and international level. PUM supports action in terms of legislation, education, media and the like to ensure that the religion is not denied its right in the name of human rights," he said in a statement tonight.

A pro-opposition news portal report recently quoted SIS as saying that religious freedom must include the freedom to change religion.

"How can Muslims demand this notion of religious freedom for those wishing to convert to Islam and at the same time argue the denial of this freedom to leave Islam for those who no longer believe," SIS said in the statement.

A pro-opposition news portal, in a report on Nov 3, quoted Nurul Izzah Anwar as saying that people should not be compelled to adopt a particular religion, and that this should also apply to the Malays.

"When you ask me, there is no compulsion in religion ... how can anyone say sorry, this (religious freedom) only applies to non-Malays, it has to apply equally," she was quoted as saying when speaking at a forum on "Islamic State: Which version; Who's responsibility?" in Subang Jaya.

 

PPP submits names for four parliament, 12 state seats

Posted: 12 Nov 2012 10:11 PM PST

(Bernama) - The People's Progressive Party (PPP) has submitted the names of candidates for four parliamentary and 12 state seats in the upcoming general election.

PPP senior vice-president Datuk Maglin Dennis D'Cruz said the candidates comprised mostly of new faces, except for PPP president Datuk M. Kayveas, and this reflected the transformation made by the party.

He said it would be up to Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak to decide on the candidates.

"We have submitted our list. We believe our candidates are highly qualified and have the credibility to ensure victory for BN (Barisan Nasional) in the general election," he told reporters after attending the Deepavali open house organised by the Federal Territories PPP here.

Asked whether his name was included, Maglin said he would not be contesting to make way for new faces.

He said if the party's candidates were not selected, it would not stop PPP from working closely with BN for their mutual benefit.

In the 2008 general election, PPP was allocated only two seats, namely Taiping parliamentary seat and Pasir Bedamar state seat.

In Taiping, Kayveas lost to DAP's Nga Kor Ming by 11,298-vote majority, while in Pasir Bedamar, PPP's Lee Heng lost to DAP's Seah Leong Peng by 7,914-vote majority.

 

Promise to cancel Batu Caves project is political bribery, says Pakatan

Posted: 12 Nov 2012 02:58 PM PST

Clara Chooi, The Malaysian Insider

Selangor Pakatan Rakyat (PR) lawmakers said today it was "political bribery" for Datuk Seri Najib Razak's to promise cancelling the controversial Batu Caves condominium project if Barisan Nasional (BN) recaptures Selangor, and accused the prime minister of abusing an emotive issue to woo Indian support.

"It is bribery... very unbecoming of the Prime Minister, I think," Selangor state executive councillor Xavier Jayakumar told The Malaysian Insider.

At the MIC's national Deepavali open house at Batu Caves this morning, Najib promised to cancel the controversial luxury condominium being built near the venue but provided that the Barisan Nasional (BN) coalition wins back Selangor from PR.

Jayakumar pointed out that despite holding state power, the Selangor PR government had not seen it fit to turn the issue into a political one, and chose instead to resolve it via consultation and discussion with the relevant parties.

He said it was unfair issue such ultimatums on voters, particularly since the issue was clearly a sensitive one to the Indian community.

"We in the Selangor government do not say ― if the Indians vote for us, we will definitely cancel the project.

"What we have done is, we have issued a stop work order and our task force is now workin on looking at different angles to solve this. In the end, we will ensure that it is resolved amicably," Jayakumar said.

DAP's Puchong MP Gobind Singh Deo agreed with his party colleague and accused Najib of threatening the Selangor Indian community with his promise.

He said Najib's words were similar to his "you help me, I help you" promise to Sibu voters during the 2010 by-election, which had earned the prime minister widespread criticism.

"Najib should make an effort to resolve the issue, not issue a conditional promise," he told The Malaysian Insider.

Selangor has ordered a temporary halt to the construction of the 29-storey condominium near Batu Caves pending the findings of an independent state-level task force to be set up soon, Mentri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim said on Octber 30.

He, however, offered the state's assurance that the matter would be resolved as soon as possible, admitting that the stop-work order would cost the developers financial losses.

The 29-storey Dolomite Park Avenue condominium project has turned into a political crisis as Batu Caves is the religious focal point of Hindu Indians, who form the majority of the 1.7 million Indians and are a key voting group in many urban seats in Selangor.

About 300 Hindu and non-governmental activists joined a "Save Batu Caves" rally in the Batu Caves temple complex to protest against the condominium construction on October 26, saying it was an environmental risk that would jeopardise the temple grounds but did not furnish proof to substantiate their allegations.

The project was given the nod by state authorities in 2007, but MIC and Barisan Nasional (BN) have in recent weeks pressured the current Pakatan Rakyat (PR) administration into calling a halt to the project amid a battle for Indian votes.

READ MORE HERE

 

Najib promises Indians no Batu Caves condo if BN regains Selangor

Posted: 12 Nov 2012 02:49 PM PST

Ida Lim, The Malaysian Insider

Datuk Seri Najib Razak promised today to cancel a controversial luxury condominium being built near Batu Caves that was approved by a Barisan Nasional (BN) administration in 2007, if the BN coalition wins back Selangor from Pakatan Rakyat (PR), stepping up the game in the battle for votes ahead of the coming general elections.

"I want to give an assurance that if BN is successful in taking over Selangor...the 29-storey project will be cancelled," Najib, who is also the BN chairman, told the crowd at the MIC's Deepavali open house here.

Noting that the Batu Caves temple complex is "very close to the hearts of Indians who are Hindus", Najib said that the complex must be defended from any threats to its position.

Selangor has ordered a temporary halt to the construction of the 29-storey condominium near Batu Caves pending the findings of an independent state-level task force to be set up soon, Mentri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim said on Octber 30.

Khalid, however, offered the state's assurance that the matter would be resolved as soon as possible, admitting that the stop-work order would cost the developers financial losses.

The 29-storey Dolomite Park Avenue condominium project has turned into a political crisis as Batu Caves is the religious focal point of Hindu Indians, who form the majority of the 1.7 million Indians and are a key voting group in many urban seats in Selangor.

About 300 Hindu and non-governmental activists joined a "Save Batu Caves" rally in the Batu Caves temple complex to protest against the condominium construction on October 26, saying it was an environmental risk that would jeopardise the temple grounds but did not furnish proof to substantiate their allegations.

The project was given the nod by state authorities in 2007, but MIC and Barisan Nasional (BN) have in recent weeks pressured the current Pakatan Rakyat (PR) administration into calling a halt to the project amid a battle for Indian votes.

Najib today said the BN government would apply to make Batu Caves a UNESCO World Heritage site, as a second step in defending the complex.

"We decided that through the Culture, Information and Communications Department, that this Batu Caves can be considered as a World Heritage site by UNESCO," Najib said today.

But he said that an application could only be made after Malaysia's term as a member of the World Heritage Commission ends in 2015, saying that this was to avoid a possible "conflict of interest".

Najib also announced that Deepavali will now also be a public holiday in the Labuan, the federal territory off the coast of Sabah.

READ MORE HERE

 

Salang: BN will still rule after GE

Posted: 12 Nov 2012 11:56 AM PST

Joseph Sallang Gandum

(TMI) -- The Barisan Nasional (BN) will still rule the country after the upcoming 13th General Election (GE), said Deputy Information, Communications and Culture Minister Datuk Joseph Salang.

 

He said for this and many other very good reasons, rural folks in the state should not waste their votes in supporting the opposition.

"In Sarawak we even have an opposition party, the Sarawak Workers' Party (SWP), which claims that it is actually pro-BN.

"This goes to show that it admires the BN and has great confidence in its leaders ability to administer the nation and serve the people," he said at a Natural Disaster Awareness Programme held at longhouse Rh.Kelukot in Nanga Telesa, Sungai Mujok in the interior here last evening.

The BN, he said, despite its shortcomings, had as a matter of fact, accomplished much more in terms of bringing unprecendented progress, stability and prosperity to the nation which also benefitted the people.

"It has still a lot more that it is going to implement to improve on these accomplishments. 

"The people, especially those in rural areas must remain with it in order to allow these to continue so that they can benefit even more,"he said. 

Meanwhile, Salang expressed the hope that all candidates, especially from the opposition parties, would not resort to personal attacks to win the people's support during the campaigning period (for the GE).

He said this was because the people themselves could tell whether the accusations and allegations made were true or otherwise and this could backfire on those responsible.

On the programme jointly organised by the Julau District Office, the Julau Police and the Bintangor Fire and Rescue Department, he said it was a step in the right direction as there had been recent cases of longhouse fires and next month, the Julau and Pakan Districts were expected to face the seasonal flood. — Bernama

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Nurul Izzah’s statement “There is no compulsion in religion, whether for Muslims or ...

Posted: 12 Nov 2012 06:34 PM PST

As Malik Imtiaz rightly opined, ''Malaysia is not an Islamic state, Malaysia is a secular state and the constitution is the supreme law of the land", in Malaysia the Federal Constitution prevails. Article 11 prevails. Article 160 merely defines who a "Malay" is.

Nicole Tan Lee Koon

I read with much excitement the current debacle over Nurul Izzah's (MP for Lembah Pantai) statement that there should be no compulsion in religion and that it applies to Muslims as well.  

Nurul Izzah is right in saying that all Malaysians, including Malays, have the right of freedom of religion, that is freedom to choose their own religion. This is a basic fundamental right as enshrined in Article 11 of the Federal Constitution.

The legal perspective. Article 11 of the Federal Constitution provides that every person has the right to profess and practice his own religion. Every person has the right to propagate his religion, but the law may control or restrict the propagation of any religious doctrine or belief among Muslims.

Article 160 defines a Malay as inter alia a person who professes to be a Muslim, habitually speaks the Malay language, and adheres to Malay customs.

Article 11 contains a proviso only against proselytising to Muslims but not a proviso against professing another religion.  Therefore, under the constitution, a Muslim has the freedom of religion. If a person who habitually speaks Malay and practices Malay customs but does not profess to be a Muslim is by definition not a "Malay" under the constitution.

I agree with Malik Imtiaz when he said that Nurul's statement is consistent with the Federal Constitution (http://www.freemalaysiakini2.com/?p=54761). As Malik Imtiaz rightly opined, ''Malaysia is not an Islamic state, Malaysia is a secular state and the constitution is the supreme law of the land", in Malaysia the Federal Constitution prevails. Article 11 prevails. Article 160 merely defines who a "Malay" is.

Since I am not a Muslim scholar, I shall be reiterating what other people wrote on the scriptural perspective. Surah Al-Baqara 2:256 : "Let there be no compulsion in religion. Truth has been made clear from error. Whoever rejects false worship and believes in Allah has grasped the most trustworthy handhold that never breaks. And Allah hears and knows all things."

Surah Al-Imran 3: 85 : "And whoever desires other than Islam as religion, never will it be accepted from him, and he, in the Hereafter, will be among the losers. How shall God guide a people who disbelieved after their belief and had witnessed that the Messenger is true and clear signs had come to them?"

I totally agree with Haris Ibrahim's scathing article against Nasharudin Mat Isa (http://harismibrahim.wordpress.com/2012/11/11/do-you-have-licence-from-god-to-lord-over-us-nash/) that even God allowed the freedom of religion under Surah Al-Imran 3: 85-90 albeit those who chose to leave Islam shall be condemned to Hell.

Anisah Sukry's article is like a compendium on freedom of religion with legal, scholarly and scriptural references : http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/opinion/2012/11/12/apostasy-compulsion-in-religion-and-nuruls-point/. She deftly argued that what Nurul Izzah said is nothing new and has basis both in the Quran and in the viewpoints of certain Islamic scholars. My favourite is the one by the former chief judge of Pakistan, SA Rahman who wrote "There is absolutely no mention in the Quran of mundane punishment for defection from the faith by a believer, except in the shape of deprivation of the spiritual benefits of Islam or of the civil status and advantages that accrue to an individual as a member of the well-knit fraternity of Muslims.

"He should, however, be free to profess and propagate the faith of his choice, so long as he keeps within the bounds of law and morality, and to enjoy all other rights as a peaceful citizen of the State, in common with his Muslim co-citizens."

SA Rahman  also added that apostasy is an offence in the realm of the rights of God, rather than the rights of mankind, thus there would be no pressing necessity to punish a peaceful change of faith.

Dr Chen Man Hin (DAP's Life Adviser) said that the threat of apostasy  was used frequently in the Middle Ages. Then, Christianity was a very strict religion. Wrongdoings were frequently said to be heresy and apostasy.  One outstanding example was Joan of Arc. Her enemies used the church to discredit her despite her many exploits of heroism for France.  She was burned at the stake for heresy. Sadly, some people in Malaysia are possessed with minds mired in the Dark Ages. Any Malay or Muslim who dares to think differently is quickly accused of apostasy. He or she is ostracised and denied the rights of a citizen.  Nowadays, apostasy and heresy is not a crime in present day Europe.  Likewise,  the mindset of the our people must change. Nurul Izzah wants young Malaysians to be free and open minded so that they will be the scientists who can create a new society. She wants to encourage the people to be adventurous and enterprising so that Malaysia can play a dynamic role in the new century which is destined to be an Asian Century.

Nurul Izzah is a courageous and conscientious leader. Malaysia needs such leaders in order to progress lest we stay in the Middle Ages' mentality. All the three Abrahamic faiths allowed for free will, lest we all become like robots. The choice is ours and we bear the consequences of our choices.  Nurul Izzah has opened up a fundamental truth that religious freedom is for all, including Islam religion.  Many Malaysian Muslims will sample a new freedom. I urge all you closet and/or "closed door" supporters to come out in full force to support Nurul Izzah as well !

Even Pak Lah said "Allow Muslims to convert if they choose to" (http://malaysiansmustknowthetruth.blogspot.com/2012/11/pak-lah-said-in-2007-allow-muslims-to.html) in 2007.

I would like to end with Wen Jiabao's quote "I am neither nervous nor afraid because I speak from the heart." Nurul Izzah, we support  you all the way !!

Nicole Tan Lee Koon

Secretary, Seremban branch, DAP NS

Tweet handle : @loyarbaik

Facebook : http://www.facebook.com/nicoletanleekoon

Facebook Page : http://www.facebook.com/nicoleleekoontan

 

Behind every politician are the Chinese

Posted: 12 Nov 2012 02:11 PM PST

And the same applies to every single politician in Malaysia's brief history, campaigns need to be financed, monies paid, agreements made….and which community puts their money where their mouth is, the Chinese…..again and again and again, the hypocrisy astounds!

Apaipache

Dear RPK
 
You are consistently getting this right again and again. Syabas!

Yes, the Chinese and Indians have always been racist towards the Malays, whether in business, education, etc – the malingering stereotypes from the old colonial days keep on going. In Sarawak, the Chinese community effectively bankrolled every single political campaign – really just pork barrel politics – from the 50s onwards. How did Kalong Ningkan became the first Sea Dayak Chief Minister of pre independence Sarawak? He was bankrolled by the Chinese.

And the same applies to every single politician in Malaysia's brief history, campaigns need to be financed, monies paid, agreements made….and which community puts their money where their mouth is, the Chinese…..again and again and again, the hypocrisy astounds!

Take Sarawak for example, do you think the Chinese Pan Malayan/Malaysian DAP will forcefully speak up against resettlement (forced displacement) of native people when their companies, triads, and agents are plundering Dayak land? No. And where would all these Malaysian Chinese corporations squirrel their money, surely not in Chinese PAP controlled Singapore. And who is the PAP and the DAP?

No Chinese will criticise Chinese Companies, Chinese Parties, Chinese Schools, Chinese Banks, Chinese provision stores, Chinese corruption, Chinese bribery, Chinese centres, Chinese temples, Chinese Guerilla Warfare, Chinese assassination, Chinese trade, Singapore, etc......

Take Tony Pua for instance. He came out, guns blazing, slamming the BN Government KR1M Stores opening in Sabah and Sarawak? Why?

Every single provision store, every single clinic, law practice, supermarket, garage, is owned by the majority Chinese in Sarawak. A KRIM store will take their income away! So who defends the poor Chinese shopkeeper? Tony will, and he'll point out its government money and therefore a misuse.  No shit Sherlock. Would that be a fair assertion?

And who subsidizes the Chinese in Sarawak. The Dayak off course. The Dayak will buy their mee, their clothes, their cars, their houses, their mobile phones, fridge freezers, tinned food, school textbooks, uniforms, sundry goods even food!  in exchange for land they once held!

In 1980s Sarawak, Taib found out that the Chinese were buying all titled Native land and before he put a stop to it, the Sarawak Chinese had accumulated some 250,000 hectares of titled land. Sound familiar? Does that sound familiar?! It happened in Malaya too.

FELDA is not a sacred cow and will no longer be in the future, or even now as we speak. Who is to say that FELDA will not pass to Chinese mutual exclusive ownership, if the road to privatisation is being paved already?

Dayak territory once gained only in fierce conflict was lost for Char Siew pork a few generations later. The Malay dilemma is predictability.

All above is fact. Can there be room for dispute?


The Election Commission should take action to prosecute irresponsible parties who are trying to ...

Posted: 12 Nov 2012 01:53 PM PST

The DAP in Negeri Sembilan took the initiative to lodge a police report in February 2012 to ask the Election Commission to investigate and charge the 2 Assistant Registrars whose status as ARs were revoked by the EC because they were found to have tried to register already deceased voters. But 9 months later, no action has been taken 

Dr. Ong Kian Ming, DAP Election Strategist 

While the Election Commission should be given some credit for taking certain steps to clean up the electoral roll, it has failed to take any concrete action against persons who have been trying to and are still trying to manipulate the electoral roll.

In a productive meeting between myself, as Project Director and DAP Election Strategist, with the Election Commission on Monday, 5th of November 2012, the Election Commission highlighted a few steps which they have taken and are taking in order to clean up the electoral roll.

One such initiative is to locate the 12 digit IC number of all police and army voters to check that these postal voters were also not registered using their 12 digit IC number. Although this verification process is long overdue, it should be welcomed as a necessary step in cleaning up the electoral roll. The decision of the EC to require all new army and police postal voter applicants, starting from 2012, to include their 12 digit IC number in their application forms, is also a positive step towards ensuring that these voters are not registered twice in the electoral roll, once using their army / policy identity card number and once using their 12 digit civilian identity card number.

MERAP has identified many past cases of such double registrations as well as cases whereby an army / postal voter has given their 12 digit civilian IC to their spouses to be registered as postal voters as well as army / postal voters who list themselves as their own spouse in order to be registered as postal voters using their 12 digit civilian IC numbers. Having the 12 digit civilian IC verification, hopefully, will prevent such cases from happening again in the future. I was also informed that the Election Commission has taken action to locate the 12 digit civilian IC numbers of all existing army / police voters. As of 15th October 2012, there remains 411 police and 613 army postal voters whose 12 digit civilian IC numbers have not been located.

However, what is disappointing is that the Election Commission refuses to take any independent action against those who have tried to manipulate the electoral roll other than removing certain Assistant Registrars. For example, the EC found 60 voters who had tried to register as army / police postal voters AND as regular voters in Quarter 2 2012. This is a clear violation of Section 3 (1) (a) of the Election Offences Act 1954 which states that a person who 'knowingly makes any false statement on or in connection with any application to be placed on any register of electors' is guilty of committing an election offence which carries a maximum jail sentence of 2 years or a maximum fine of RM5000 or both. These voters in question clearly knows that it is an offense to register twice, once as a postal voter and another time as a regular voter since every voter has to declare that they have not registered as a voter in another constituency in Borang A Pendaftaran Pemilih.

The presence of irresponsible parties and individuals who may have tried to manipulate the electoral roll was also detected in the Quarter 4 2011 electoral roll given to the members of the Parliamentary Select Committee (PSC) on Electoral Reform. The analysis comparing the Date of Birth as well as the Date of Application for all voters found that 282,086 voters were registered before they turned 21. Indeed, there were voters whose Date of Application were before their Date of Birth!

What is more worrying is the fact that the Election Commission knows of these attempts to manipulate the electoral roll. The Election Commission admitted that they have revoked the status a number of Assistant Registrars who tried to manipulate the electoral roll by, for example, registering voters who have already died. But this is not sufficient. It must take legal action against such parties / individuals in order to send a strong signal that the Election Commission is serious about maintaining the integrity of the electoral roll and to dissuade irresponsible parties and individuals from trying to manipulate the electoral roll.

For example, the DAP in Negeri Sembilan took the initiative to lodge a police report in February 2012 to ask the Election Commission to investigate and charge the 2 Assistant Registrars whose status as ARs were revoked by the EC because they were found to have tried to register already deceased voters. But 9 months later, no action has been taken, either by the Election Commission, the police or the Attorney General's Chambers.

As long as such irresponsible actions conducted by irresponsible parties and individuals continue to go unpunished, attempts to manipulate the electoral roll will continue. If the Election Commission is indeed serious about preserving the integrity and accuracy of the electoral roll, it must not only revoke the status of irresponsible Assistant Registrars and delete the records of dubious registrations, it must also take concrete legal action to see those responsible for these manipulation attempts charged and punished under Section 3 of the Election Offences Act 1954.

When asked, the Election Commission admitted that to date, no one has been charged under this Section of the Election Offences Act for attempting to manipulate the electoral roll.


 

Rafizi Ramli’s lawyers abuse Attorney General and Bank Negara Malaysia

Posted: 12 Nov 2012 01:40 PM PST

Fabiani Azmi 

A few weeks ago the law firm of Shafee & Co issued a few media statements, one of which was to welcome the Attorney General's remarks, "The investigation did not reveal criminal breaches as far as the Agriculture and Agro-based Industry Ministry (MOA) is concerned" and the other to plead with the Attorney General and Bank Negara Malaysia to stand firmly rooted in the ground on the Banking and Financial Institutions Act (BAFIA) charges levied against Rafizi Ramli.

These statements were issued to provide audiences a clearer picture of how Rafizi's lies, misrepresentations and distortions in the NFC issue had abused BAFIA. The defendant's lawyers then emerged to speak up against Shafee & Co saying the BAFIA request was "self-serving and preposterous." In their zeal, they went on to say a lot more. In the process, N Surendran and Latheefa Koya abused the Attorney General and Bank Negara Malaysia with their remarks. Blogger journo Fabiani Azmi examines the arguments.

In the last 12 months, the opposition led by PKR Strategy Director Rafizi Ramli had been spewing statements on the project National Feedlot Centre (NFC), the company National Feedlot Corporation Sdn Bhd (NFCorp), and Wanita UMNO chief Datuk Seri Shahrizat Abdul Jalil and her family.

Rafizi had taken advantage of the social media platform to create a political ruckus to sway public opinion in his favour. Rafizi had broken laws, lied, misrepresented and distorted to rope in the support for his political agenda and that of his master.

To correct misperceptions by the general public, law firm Shafee & Co decided to offer its opinion on the Internet news portals as well.

The learned Datuk Seri Dr Shafee Abdullah said, "Under the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010, a bona fide and a genuine whistleblower should report anything he thinks bordering on criminality or other wrongs first to the appropriate authorities, to allow for them to take action. By doing so this way, we have a situation where there is a bona fide whistleblower and the integrity of BAFIA would be protected.

"However, if a whistleblower is allowed to just announce in public protected materials under BAFIA without first resorting to the proper agencies, we would be courting chaos in our financial system."

Datuk Seri Dr Shafee added, "BAFIA is a statutory protection provided by Bank Negara Malaysia to customers of all banks. If BAFIA is allowed to be breached under the pretext of whistle blowing, the very stratum of banking collapses."

However, lawyers N Surendran and Latheefa Koya who both represent Rafizi, told Datuk Seri Dr Shafee that it was because of the PKR strategy director's exposes that the firm's client NFCorp had found itself hauled to court.

They said in a Malaysian Insider report, "The charges should be withdrawn as Rafizi had acted on public interest when he exposed the NFCorp's financial documents in public, even though his actions had violated the country's banking confidentiality laws."

Another news portal MalaysiaKini quoted Rafizi's lawyers saying, "Abdul Gani should exercise his discretion by not charging Rafizi's 'brave and honourable act' which benefited the public.

However, Shafee & Co argued that the 21 bank accounts exposed by Rafizi were nothing extraordinary to show any wrongdoing or were of any public benefit. Rafizi had done a dishonorable act violating BAFIA which did not benefit anyone but had brought great concern and worry to a highly regarded banking and financial system. Rafizi had lied, misrepresented and distorted the bank documents to allude that loans were taken for eight KL Eco City office lots.

In Rafizi's effort to melodramatise his accusations, the bank documents that he had illegally obtained breached the provisions of BAFIA under Section 97(1). Rafizi obtained the bank documents without the permission of the account holders, the bank nor the permission of Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM), the governing regulatory body.

BNM Governor Tan Sri Dr Zeti Akhtar Aziz told Bernama at the height of the breach, "The confidentiality of customer information is clearly protected by the Banking and Financial Institution Act 1989."  She pointed out that it was an offence under the Act for any officer of the bank to disclose any information relating to the account of its customer, and banks have in place control and effective processes to ensure compliance with this secrecy provision.

Zeti added that it was only when there is a suspected offence under federal law or if there is a court order or where a customer has given consent, that relevant law enforcement agencies are authorised under the law to obtain information. This information must be obtained through BNM, and if the central bank says there is no foundation for it, the information will not be given.

"Shafee & Co needs to understand that the BAFIA was never intended to be used to conceal or prevent the exposure of criminal acts," said Rafizi's lawyers

But were there any wrong doings in those bank documents that Rafizi distributed to the media? It would appear that BNM and the Attorney General absolutely do not think so. That's why they did a dawn raid on Rafizi on 1 August, and had him arrested and charged.

We are told no loans were ever taken by NFCorp or its directors for the KL Eco City properties which Rafizi announced at a news conference to suggest there was such a case. In fact, the personal bank loan documents given by Rafizi to the media went as far back as 2005, years before NFCorp was established and 2008, years before KL Eco City properties were even launched for sale in 2011.

On that premise, Rafizi had not only breached BAFIA, he even breached the Evidence Act where banking information not connected to NFCorp had been presented to allude to wrongdoing. He lied, misrepresented and distorted his evidence.

The debate heats up as audiences await if Rafizi would go to trial. Arguments abound aplenty.  Who does the average bloke believe from the debate running wild and wanton on the Internet landscape?

As founder of MARAH Dave Avran once expressed in Free Malaysia Today, "Clearly, there is manipulation of social media channels to form public opinion. Whilst Malaysians are quick in assuming that there are always hidden hands in every picture, we are also quick to judge on issues.

"Have we had all the complete facts of the case to mull over and evaluate before commenting?"

Looking at the comments section of some of the Internet news portals would have us think not. Almost every outpouring comment for Rafizi is not based on researched facts but riled and emotional sentiments. The facts have yet to be presented in court. The AG would be well armed and Malaysians would know the truth at a trial.

On a public relations note, Rafizi's lawyers have dug a deeper hole for Rafizi in this debate when Surendran and Latheefa went on to say, "The A-G and the central bank had instead 'disgraced themselves' for using BAFIA on Rafizi, adding that the young politician was likely only charged as his exposes on the NFC had embarassed and 'politically damaged' UMNO and BN."

"Do they seriously suggest that the UMNO or BN government would have taken any action against NFC in the absence of the public pressure created by Rafizi's revelations of the banking transactions?" they asked.

A bit out-of-line against the BNM, the AG and the ruling parties, would you not say? Rafizi's lawyers would need to look at the bank documents and check if there was any wrongdoing unearthed from Rafizi's revelations of the banking transactions.

"Obviously Rafizi's lawyers have misplaced their decorum. These are not the kind of statements to express insults against the BNM and AG on the Internet platform. It's tantamount to waging open war in the media.

Malaysia's well-respected banking and financial systems should not be compromised whatsoever for political dramas and sensationalism. This is not only our view but that of the chief executives of many banks as well as the chairman of the Association of Banks in Malaysia who came out in media news reports to emphasise that client confidentiality or secrecy must be upheld at all cost, said Datuk Seri Dr Shafee.

Rafizi has been charged under Section 97(1) of the BAFIA, for allegedly disclosing customer account profiles detailing the balance summaries of NFCorp, the National Meat and Livestock Corporation Sdn Bhd, Agroscience and Industries Sdn Bhd and NFCorp chairman Datuk Seri Dr Mohamad Salleh Ismail.

BAFIA's Section 103(1)(a) would also cause Rafizi to be fined a maximum of RM3 million and jailed up to three years if found guilty. This would seriously stumble Rafizi's chances of standing as a candidate in the 13th general election that must be held by April next year.

 

About the Writer

Fabiani Azmi is an avid reader of Malaysia Today, intelligent mainstream newspapers and Internet news portals. When not reading, he also enjoys the company of sapiosexuals. It's a highly stimulating discovery for him.

Follow Fabiani Azmi at @FabAz88.

 

Oh My Malaysia Truly

Posted: 12 Nov 2012 01:33 PM PST

http://teresakok.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/deepavali.jpg 

The PM and DPM wished all Indians a very Happy Deepavali. Get your facts correct please. 

Malaysian not Asian okay! 

Oh you Chinese why do you only enrich yourselves when you can enrich your neighbours as well so that all can live happily and peacefully!

Oh you Malays why do you always want the best of both worlds? Why can't you be more gracious and give some to the other Malaysians!

Oh you Indians! Why do you slay one another and commit atrocities to your fellow Malaysians? There is so much for the taking if only Indians study and work hard like your God fearing forefathers who came to this land from India.

Oh you Mamaks! (meant to be friendly not offensive) Why do you always play fiddle to the governments that are corrupt and their cronies. And why do your restaurants put up tables and chairs on the street until people can't park or use the streets at night!

Oh you Satherjees! Why do you keep quiet and silent on so many matters that has engulfed the nation? Only Karpal and son seem to be lions of Khalistan! Where are the other Aslans that we so much need in dire times to uphold freedom and justice!

Oh you Sarawakians! Why do still let your beloved state be plundered and your tribesmen be brutalized by a mere handful of crooks? All the more when these crooks are married to white and foreign men and women! Wake up and deliver Sarawak from evil less you too be destroyed with it!

Oh You Sabahans! Why do you let illegal immigrants flood your land! Behold all you born in the land below the wind, make haste to flood them soon lest you be washed away in their flood!

Last but not least Oh you Johor Bahru! Why have you literally become the anus of Malaysia! Not a day goes by that I cannot stop cursing all the people responsible for making my beloved scenic seafront home town that it was the quagmire that it is today! Woe to all of you especially all those corrupt and incompetent federal and state officials!

P/S: Was watching the news on TV3 at 8PM on eve of Deepavali. A bit of advice to PM, DPM; kick your speech writers butts. The PM and DPM wished all Indians a very Happy Deepavali. Get your facts correct please. Only Indians of Hindu faith celebrate Deepavali and not all Indians! There are Indians who are Catholics, Christians, Jains, etc etc who do not celebrate Deepavali as it is a religious festival unlike the Chinese Lunar New Year. Saddens me that even after more than a century of Indians being in Malaya/Malaysia our leaders still can't get this simple and basic racial, religious and cultural facts right!

And woe to all you Malaysians who read this and do nothing about making Malaysia better! But blessed be them who rise up to the occasions when they are needed! God Bless!


Yours Truly,
Malaysian not Asian okay!

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Umno sedang 'tunda najis hanyut'

Posted: 12 Nov 2012 12:26 PM PST

Kenyataan beliau ini mengulas serangan terhadap Nurul Izzah selepas kenyataan berhubung kebebasan beragama yang dinyatakan beliau.

"Sesungguhnya, kenyataan spontan dan bersahaja YB Nurul Izzah pada majlis berkaitan adalah secara umum dan memang boleh mengundang pelbagai persepsi dan tafsiran.  

"Namun, kekeliruan yang timbul telahpun diperjelaskan sendiri oleh beliau kemudiannya dengan tegas dan jelas," beritahu Dr Muhamad Nor.

Beliau memetik ayat al-Quran surah Al-hujurat: 6 untuk menjelaskan isu ini.

"Wahai orang-orang yang beriman! jika datang kepada kamu seorang fasik membawa sesuatu berita, maka selidikilah (untuk menentukan) kebenarannya, supaya kamu tidak menimpakan sesuatu kaum dengan perkara yang tidak diingini - Dengan sebab kejahilan kamu (mengenainya) - sehingga menjadikan kamu menyesali apa Yang kamu telah lakukan."

"Ayat di atas mengajar kita agar berhati-hati dalam menerima berita dari orang-orang fasik," katanya.

Ayat ini, katanya, menceritakan kisah seorang Muslim Al Walid bin Uqbah bin Abi Mu'id yang diutuskan oleh Nabi Muhammad saw melakukan suatu tugasan ke Kampung Bani Mustaliq.  

Al Walid menyangkakan mereka sudah murtad lalu segera pulang ke Madinah melaporkan kepada Baginda Nabi apa yang ditanggapinya.

Hasilnya, baginda mengarahkan Khalid al Walid bersama anggota tenteranya bertindak terhadap kampung tersebut. Namun, selepas melakukan risikan, Khalid Al Walid mendapati bahawa mereka tidaklah murtad sebagaimana didakwa.

Ini dilaporkan kepada Rasulullah. Diketika inilah ayat ini diturunkan sebagai teguran dan panduan buat orang beriman dalam menerima khabar berita dari orang fasik, katanya.

Menurutnya, media-media utama tertentu milik pemerintah UMNO dan Barisan Nasional  telahpun kerap didapati bersalah oleh mahkamah kerana melaporkan berita yang tidak tepat, berunsur  fitnah dan sengaja diputar belitkan.  

Pemimpin-pemimpin organisasi berita ini, katanya, sendiri mengesahkan bahawa harus diputarbelit sesuatu berita demi mendokong aspirasi parti yang menjadi pemiliknya.

Bagi beliau, media milik mereka dengan sengaja membentuk persepsi yang tidak betul mengenai apa yang dinyatakan oleh YB Nurul Izzah.  
Kemudiannya, dengan sengaja pula komen-komen berdasarkan persepsi yang salah ini disebar dan dijajakan, ujarnya.

"Amatlah jelas, UMNO sedang begitu tertekan dan desperado.  UMNO gagal menghakis  tanggapan buruk rakyat terhadap dirinya dalam pelbagai jenayah dan pengkhianatan terhadap rakyat dan Negara – penyelewengan SPR, NFC, Lynas, BERSIH, Kugan, Teo Beng Hock dan sebagainya," katanya.

Menurutnya, isu terbaru yang paling menekan adalah skandal RM40 juta yang melibatkan beberapa menteri kanan UMNO. Ia begitu hangat diperkatakan ketika ini.

Read more

‘Maafkan Nurul, dia masih budak-budak’

Posted: 11 Nov 2012 07:48 PM PST

Umur Nurul yang masih muda boleh menyebabkan beliau boleh membuat kesilapan jika bercakap mengenai agama Islam, kata Ketua Dewan Ulama PAS, Datuk Harun Taib.

"Saya mengingatkan orang poltik yang tidak tahu agama Islam supaya tidak bercakap mengenai agama Islam.

"Kalau orang yang tahu agama boleh lah mereka bercakap hal agama," kata Harun.

Harun menegaskan beliau tidak mengambil serius bimbang dengan kenyataan Nurul, sebaliknya lebih risau orang yang pandai agama tetapi banyak membuat salah dalam agama.

Dan tokoh PAS itu meminta orang ramai memaafkan Naib Presiden PKR dan ahli Parlimen Lembah Pantai itu.

"Nurul masih budak-budak lagi, dan dia juga tidak ada pendidikan tinggi dalam agama," katanya.

Harun  turut bertanya, mengapa isu Nurul heboh diperkatakan tetapi tidak kepada Perdana Menteri Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak walaupun pemimpin nombor satu juga banyak bercakap salah mengenai agama Islam.

Harun berkata demikian ketika diminta mengulas kenyataan Nurul dalam satu program di dalam sebuah gereja Sabtu lalu.

Dalam program tersebut Nurul dilaporkan sebagai berkata, jika kebebasan beragama boleh digunakan kepada orang bukan Islam ia juga seharusnya melibatkan orang Islam juga.

Kenyataan tersebut menimbulkan kontroversi sehingga beberapa pihak membuat laporan polis terhadap pemimpin muda PKR itu.

Nurul bagaimanapun, menafikan beliau membuat kenyataan tersebut dan mendakwa ia diputarbelit oleh media.

 

Mat Zain: Najib guna nama berbeza dalam afidavit

Posted: 11 Nov 2012 02:59 PM PST

Beliau berkata, afidavit yang berbeza memungkinkan Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya (SPR) menolak pencalonan beliau dalam pilihan raya umum ke 13.

Mat Zain merujuk kepada afidavit yang diikrarkan Najib pada 21 dan 23 September 2011 dan juga oleh isterinya, Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor pada 21 September 2011, ketika memohon mahkamah mengenepikan sapina untuk memberi keterangan dalam kes sodomi II.

Katanya, semasa mengangkat sumpah jawatan sebagai Perdana Menteri ke 6 di hadapan Seri Paduka Baginda Yang Di-Pertuan Agong pada 3 April 2009 dengan melafazkan "Wallahi,Wabillahi,Watallahi, Najib secara jelas dan lantang menyebut nama beliau sebagai Muhammad Najib bin Tun Haji Abdul Razak .

Bagaimanapun, katanya, pada 21 dan 23 September 2011, sewaktu mengikrarkan nama beliau di hadapan seorang Pesuruhjaya Sumpah, Najib telah mengistiharkan nama penuh beliau dalam afidavit-afidavit berkenaan sebagai Najib bin Tun Abdul Razak sahaja.

Manakala Rosmah dalam affidavit berasingan bertarikh 21 September 2011 yang diikrarkan di hadapan Pesuruhjaya Sumpah yang sama,memberikan nama suami beliau, sebagai Najib bin Tun Abdul Razak.

"Fakta yang jelas di sini ialah nama Muhammad telah digugurkan daripada menjadi sebahagian daripada nama Najib secara bersumpah oleh kedua-dua PM  dan isteri beliau, seperti yang terdapat dalam afidavit masing-masing.

"Memberikan nama penuh dan betul apabila mengikrarkan sesuatu afidavit adalah keperluan undang-undang.," kata beliau dalam suratnya kepada Ketua Polis Negara, Tan Sri Ismail Omar dan salinannya kepada Najib.

Mat Zain merujuk kes bekas pembaca berita RTM, Sharma Kumari Shukla yang pernah dijatuhkan hukuman penjara enam tahun kerana kesalahan membuat dua afidavit berasingan yang berkisar di antara Sharma Kumari dan Sharma Kumari Shukla.

Beliau meminta Ismail membuat semakan mengenai perkara "Afidavit YAB PM:Membongkar kelemahan diri sendiri" yang disalinkan juga kepada Menteri Dalam Negeri.

Turut dilampirkan dalam surat tersebut ialah salinan afidavit Najib.

Beri pertimbangan ikut undang-undang

"Selain itu saya sarankan Tan Sri melihat rencana saya yang disiarkan sepenuhnya oleh Malaysiakini pada 10 Disember 2011 atas tajuk "Najib's name game may cost him GE nomination".

"Susulan itu satu lagi rencana yang disiarkan oleh beberapa blog khasnya blog Lim Kit Siang pada 20 Disember 2011 bertajuk , "Election Commission gets rid of candidate objection period :A pre-emptive move to save PM Najib?." kata Mat Zain lagi.

Beliau juga menegaskan jika terdapat bantahan daripada mana-mana pihak, sama ada bakal calon atau individu persaorangan terhadap pencalonan Najib, untuk bertanding bagi kerusi mana pun dalam PRU 13 dengan mengemukakan perbezaan nama penuh Perdana Menteri  yang beliau ikrarkan dalam afidavit-afidavit dengan nama yang beliau lafazkan ketika mengangkat sumpah Perdana Menteri Ke-6, SPR  terpaksa memberi pertimbangan mengikut undang-undang bersangkutan dengan kecelaruan nama Najib itu.

Setakat yang diketahuinya, SPR tidak mempunyai hak atau kuasa untuk membatalkan sesuatu afidavit yang telah dikemukakan dan diterima oleh Mahkamah Tinggi atau kuasa untuk memutuskan sama ada afidavit berkenaan palsu atau tidak.

"Dalam keadaan yang ada sekarang,  SPR terpaksa menolak pencalonan Najib untuk bertanding dalam PRU akan datang, sama ada PM menggunakan nama Mohd.Najib atau pun nama Najib.

"Tanggungjawab untuk menyelesaikan kecelaruan ini dengan pihak Istana Negara,Kerajaan dan Mahkamah serta menjelaskan isu kecelaruan ini kepada seluruh rakyat, terletak di atas bahu Najib sendiri dan isteri beliau.

"Pembikinan afidavit-afidavit berkenaan yang mencetuskan kekeliruan ini adalah urusan persendirian dan kerelaan mereka suami isteri," kata Mat Zain.

Bekas pegawai kanan polis itu berkata, Najib sepatutnya bersyukur dan berterima kasih, kerana isu pertandingan merebut kerusi Parlimen Pekan ditimbulkan sekarang.

Sekiranya isu ini tambah beliau dibangkitkan selepas Parlimen di-bubarkan atau pada hari penamaan calon, maka Najib mungkin tidak ada masa untuk membuat pembetulan kepada afidavit beliau.

READ MORE HERE

 

‘Pembawa obor’ PKR enggan bertanding pilihan raya

Posted: 11 Nov 2012 08:18 AM PST

 

Bekas ahli parlimen Permatang Pauh selama dua penggal itu tidak boleh bertanding di kerusi parlimen selama lima tahun di bawah undang-undang selepas meletakkan jawatan bagi memberi laluan kepada suaminya, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim kembali ke parlimen. 

Akan tetapi beliau masih lagi layak untuk bertanding di kerusi dewan undangan negeri (Dun) sama ada di Pulau Pinang, tempat beliau mendaftar sebagai pengundi atau Selangor dimana beliau menetap sekarang.

"Saya mahu bebas berkempen di semua tempat," Dr Wan Azizah memberitahu The Malaysian Insider dalam sebuah temubual eksklusif baru-baru ini.

"Jika saya bertanding, saya akan terhad kepada kawasan saya," tambah beliau, jika dipilih, beliau mahu komited sebaik mungkin untuk memenuhi harapan pengundi, yang memerlukan beliau untuk terus berhubung dengan penduduk di satu kawasan berbanding dengan asas lebih besar di peringkat kebangsaan.

Dr Wan Azizah telah menggepalai parti berbilang kaum tersebut semenjak penubuhannya pada tahun 1999 selepas pemecatan suaminya daripada jawatan timbalan perdana menteri dan pernah berperanan sebagai ketua pembangkang.

Beliau bertanding bagi pihak suaminya di kubu kuat keluarga di Permatang Pauh, Pulau Pinang dalam pilihan raya 1999 dan berjaya mempertahankannya dalam kedua-dua pilihan raya berikutnya sebelum memilih untuk meletakkan jawatan.

PKR Selangor telah menawarkan empat "kerusi Dun selamat" kepada beliau — Kota Anggerik, Seri Muda, Seri Setia dan Sementa.

Sejak berhenti sebagai ketua pembangkang Parlimen - jawatan disandang selama lima bulan — Dr Wan Azizah mengambil tempat duduk belakang dalam politik, menjadi pemimpin parti politik yang hanya muncul di khalayak ramai apabila diperlukan.

Beliau mengeluarkan kenyataan sebagai presiden parti biasanya semasa musim perayaan atau di persidangan parti dan mengenai isu-isu yang membangkitkan kemarahan orang ramai, seperti kenaikan kadar jenayah di seluruh negara.

Tidak seperti rakan-rakan politik lelaki lain, Dr wan Azizah tidak ragu-ragu menjadi pemain dibelakang tabir dalam politik.

Malahan beliau gembira dengan peranan tersebut.

"Saya telah sentiasa dilihat diri saya sebagai membantu dari belakang tabir. Saya masih pembawa obor dalam erti kata itu.

"Saya fikir saya masih dikenali sebagai Keadilan," kata nenek yang akan berusia 60 tahun bulan hadapan.

Tetapi beliau mengakui bahawa pilihan untuk bertanding atau tidak, tidak lagi di tangannya jika parti beliau dan pakatan pembangkang PR membuat kemajuan sebenar dalam usaha untuk merampas kawalan Putrajaya dari gabungan Barisan Nasional (BN).

"Saya pernah bertanding dalam pilihan raya sebelum ini. Ia bukanlah sesuatu yang boleh diambil mudah," katanya.

Pilihan raya umum ke 13 — yang perlu diadakan pada April depan selepas mandat BN tamat — akan menjadi pilihan raya terhebat untuk merampas kuasa di peringkat federal, kata Dr Wan Azizah.

Dalam pemerhatian beliau, pengundi sudah lebih arif dalam tempoh empat tahun lepas dan pembangkang tidak lagi boleh bergantung kepada rasa tidak puas hati pengundi terhadap BN untuk mendapatkan sokongan ke arah PR.

"Sekarang, kita mahu mengetahui dengan lebih lanjut tentang siapa yang akan mewakili kami.

"Rakyat Malaysia sudah bersedia untuk berubah dan kita perlu tawarkan itu," katanya.

Gejala Melayu murtad sangat mengkhuatirkan

Posted: 10 Nov 2012 07:20 PM PST

(Harakah) - Sepatutnya kedudukan Islam di kalangan orang Melayu, walaupun mempunyai takrif yang tersendiri di dalam Perlembagaan Persekutuan namun ia tidak boleh memberi jaminan bahawa orang Melayu secara hakikatnya boleh kekal keislamannya.

"Kita boleh menegaskan bahawa orang Islam tidak boleh murtad mengikut hukum Islam tanpa dikenakan hukuman mengikut syariat Islam akan tetapi untuk selesa dengan hanya takrifan Perlembagaan mengenai definisi orang Melayu adalah berugama Islam adalah dangkal," kata Setiausaha Agung Mapim, Mohd Azmi Abdul Hamid (gambar) dalam satu kenyataan.

Kenyataan penuh seperti di bawah.

Majlis Perundingan Pertubuhan Islam Malaysia (Mapim) kesal dengan tabiat meraih 'kesempatan politik' (political mileage) dalam budaya politik di Malaysia. Dalam hampir semua tutur kata, ahli politik mengambil kesempatan untuk menyerang musuh politik walaupun maklumat yang sahih belum lagi diperolehi.

Cukup hanya melalui laporan akhbar, sudah memadai seluruh jentera media diguna untuk melancarkan kempen memburukkan imej seseorang yang menjadi musuh politik. Tidak cukup dengan itu agensi keselamatan juga diperalat untuk memberi tekanan kepada pihak yang dituduh.

Pemimpin politik pula bergegas mahu memberi komen tanpa menunggu maklumat sepenuhnya dan tanpa bersedia mendapat penjelasan dari yang dituduh. Malang sekali pemimpin politik yang mahu mencuri peluang menghentam lawan juga menunjukkan tahap pemikiran rendah dan murah bila memberi komentar sangat dangkal dan sarat dengan prejudis politik yang memualkan.

Inilah yang kami perhatikan di kalangan kumpulan yang terlalu obses dengan  politik sehingga seluruh jentera,  tenaga dan fikiran tertumpu kepada kepentingan politik dan bukan kepentingan umat dalam ertikata yang sebenar.

Politik di Malaysia nampaknya bukan lagi suatu aspek kehidupan yang bertujuan mengatur urustadbir dan membangun negara akan tetapi sudah menjadi suatu pertarungan, permainan dan percaturan yang sangat hodoh apabila aktor politik menyerang lawan dengan apa sahaja cara hatta menyebar maklumat palsu dan fitnah.

Media pencatur dan pencacar politik kian menonjolkan peranan menyebar fitnah tidak kira sama ada maklumat yang disebar itu betul atau di sebaliknya. Matlamatnya hanya satu. Rosakkan imej lawan atau paling tidak imej seorang musuh politik sekurangnya dapat dicalarkan. Itu sudah dianggap memadai untuk menjatuhnya. Walaupun ia termasuk menyebar fitnah.

Kini sentimen yang cepat dimanipulasi ialah sentimen agama kerana ia dianggap paling sensitif kepada orang-orang Melayu Islam. Pada hal matlamat yang tersirat bukan mahu membela Islam akan tetapi hanya untuk meraih peluang menghentam musuh politik.

Semua sudah sangat maklum betapa kerosakan agama sudah menjadi parah bukan sekarang akan tetapi sudah sedemikian lama. Soal orang Islam rosak aqidah pernah berkali-kali diungkap dalam pelbagai ceramah dan kuliah oleh para ulama. Namun pihak berkuasa tidak mempedulikan perkembangan yang berlaku sehingga kini keadaan menjadi sangat parah.

Sekarang apa yang sepatutnya menjadi tumpuan ialah bagaimana dengan ujudnya berbagai agensi agama yang punya kuasa yang diperundangkan, kedudukan Islam dan perlaksanaan hukumnya dapat dilaksanakan dengan berkesan. Sementara itu juga harus diberi perhatian  bagaimana program pendidikan dan dakwah perlu  diperkukuhkan.

Sebab itu bila pernyataan diungkap mengenai status Islam di kalangan orang Melayu, seharusnya yang perlu diberi tumpuan ialah bagaimana orang Melayu dapat mengatasi gejala terhakis keIslaman  mereka. Di samping itu juga ditumpukan apa yang perlu digerakkan untuk menyelamatkan pegangan Islam di kalangan orang Melayu.

Semua pihak harus mengelak diri dari menjadikan ia sebagai polimik politik dan saling menuduh, jauh sekali dijadi modal politik  dengan meletakkan kepentingan politik kelompok lebih utama dari kepentingan Islam itu sendiri.

Sepatutnya kedudukan Islam di kalangan orang Melayu, walaupun mempunyai takrif yang tersendiri di dalam Perlembagaan Persekutuan namun ia tidak boleh memberi jaminan bahawa orang Melayu secara hakikatnya boleh kekal keislamannya.

Kita boleh menegaskan bahawa orang Islam tidak boleh murtad mengikut hukum Islam tanpa dikenakan hukuman mengikut syariat Islam akan tetapi untuk selesa dengan hanya takrifan Perlembagaan mengenai definisi orang Melayu adalah berugama Islam adalah dangkal.

Tidak dapat dinafikan betapa gejala orang Melayu sudah longgar pegangannya kepada Islam kini sangat mengkhuatirkan. Secara umum gejala murtad bukan suatu perkara yang dapat dinafikan sama ada diisytiharkan secara rasmi atau tidak.

Oleh itu polemik mengenainya tidak seharusnya hanya tertumpu kepada persoalan undang-undang semata-mata tetapi juga kepada usaha yang berkesan untuk mendidik orang Melayu khasnya dan masyarakat Islam amnya mengenai bagaimana mengujudkan kehidupan Islamiyyah dalam semua aspek.

Kami dapati kini isu kebebasan beragama tersasar jauh dari apa yang sepatutnya dibincangkan. Sementara kita menegaskan bahawa orang Melayu tidak boleh bebas murtad dan boleh pilih agama lain, kini isunya terheret dalam arena pertarungan politik  bukan untuk menyelesaikan bagaimana hendak memulihkan orang Melayu yang telah mengisytiharkan diri keluar dari agama Islam.

Kami sangat kesal isu ini berlarutan dibincangkantidak bertujuan untuk menangani isu melaksanakan apa yang sepatutnya untuk memulihkan pegangan Islam di kalangan orang Melayu tetapi menyerang lawan politik di luar batas kebenaran.

Padahal yang jelas menghina hukum hudud pula dilepaskan hanya kerana beliau berada dalam kem politik yang sama. Lebih malang lagi kami mendapati ada pula ahli agama menjadi jurucakap bagi pihak beliau untuk mengesahkan bahawa pernyataan beliau tidak salah akan tetapi disalahertikan.

Kami menuntut agar semua pihak menghentikan perdebatan yang merugikan Islam dan umat Islam sendiri. Pihak agensi agama Islam yang berwewenang hendaklah memperbetulkan persepsi orang bukan Islam terhadap Islam dan bekerja keras untuk mengangkat martabat Islam secara murni  bukan hanya dengan mewujudkan program yang bersifat kosmetik.

 

Pemimpin-pemimpin politik jangan kiasu

Posted: 10 Nov 2012 03:03 PM PST

Tempoh empat tahun dalam dunia politik nampaknya begitu lama dan sesuatu yang cukup memeritkan.

Apa tidaknya, tidak pernah satu hari sejak berakhirnya Pilihan Raya Umum ke-12, tidak kedengaran perbalahan politik antara dua pihak yang bertelagah.

Rakyat pula mengaru-garu kepala dan tertanya-tanya – apa sudah jadi dengan wakil rakyat yang dipilih mereka? Mengapa wakil-wakil rakyat yang dipilih ini boleh berkelakuan sedemikian? Apakah mereka sudah lupa bahawa kuasa dan jawatan yang disandangnya ketika ini hanya bersifat sementara?

Suara rakyat yang meminta wakil rakyat melihat ke hadapan tenggelam timbul dan bagaikan tidak diendahkan.

Paling mendukacitakan, perbalahan dan perang lidah antara pihak pemerintah dan pembangkang belum menunjukkan tanda-tanda akan reda.

Sebaliknya, keadaan bertambah buruk. Di satu pihak, pelbagai isu dibangkitkan dengan harapan seteru mereka akan memberi maklum balas. Di satu pihak lagi pula, mereka hanya mampu bertahan dan menangkis tohmahan demi tohmahan.

Kedua-dua pihak seolah-olah tidak bersedia menerima kehadiran sesama mereka. Matlamat utama ialah kemenangan di satu pihak manakala kekalahan di pihak lawan.

Apa yang diamalkan itu adalah sesuatu yang lumrah dalam dunia politik. Isu kelangsungan adalah segala-galanya dalam dunia politik. Siapa lebih kuat, dialah yang berkuasa!

Namun demikian, perlukah mereka sampai ke tahap sedemikian?

Lihat sahajalah kepada tindak-tanduk Presiden Barack Obama dan pemimpin parti Republikan, Mitt Romney yang berentap dalam pilihan raya presiden baru-baru ini.

Mereka berdua cukup berlapang dada. Biarpun Romney tewas pada pilihan raya itu, beliau sempat mengajak kedua-dua pihak, Parti Demokrat dan Republikan untuk tidak berbalah sesama sendiri. Menurut Romney, Amerika kini berada di persimpangan dan sebarang perbalahan hanya akan merugikan kuasa besar dunia itu.

Malah, beliau turut mengajak semua pihak untuk bekerjasama bagi menunaikan mandat yang telah diberikan oleh pengundi. Obama dalam ucapan kemenangannya pula berjanji akan bekerjasama dengan Romney untuk memacu Amerika ke hadapan.

Kata-kata oleh Romney dan Obama itu cukup signifikan dan cukup bermakna. Mereka mempamerkan kematangan berpolitik tinggi yang wajar diteladani oleh semua pemimpin politik dunia.

Keghairahan untuk merebut jawatan paling berkuasa di dunia tidak sekalipun melekakan mereka untuk berperang antara satu sama lain. Romney dan Obama mengerti bahawa agenda yang lebih penting ialah negara. Sentimen partisan yang menebal diketepikan buat seketika.

Ketika kita ghairah bercakap mengenai pemimpin Amerika, bagaimana pula dengan pemimpin-pemimpin politik di Malaysia? Bersediakah mereka untuk berubah dan menjadi teladan kepada pihak lain? Mahukah mereka terus menjadi bahan gurauan? Apa manfaatnya untuk terus bertelagah? Cukuplah…

Tiada gunanya jika pemimpin-pemimpin politik kita sering bercakap mengenai budaya politik baru namun tidak disusuli dengan tindakan konkrit. Elak menjadi pemimpin yang cakap tak serupa bikin dan kiasu.

Budaya politik baru menuntut kesungguhan seseorang pemimpin untuk berubah, berubah ke arah kebaikan dan menjadi seorang yang lebih baik daripada sebelumnya.

Kepada pemimpin politik dari parti pemerintah dan pembangkang, ayuh ketepikan perbalahan dan bekerjasama demi kebaikan negara yang kita cintai ini.

 

‘Pemimpin Islam perlu sepakat dalam soal menjaga agama’

Posted: 10 Nov 2012 02:59 PM PST

Katanya tindakan sesetengah pemimpin politik yang mengetepikan kepentingan agama demi kedudukan politik dan menyebabkan kecelaruan berpanjangan dalam masyarakat amat dikesalkan.

"Amat dikesalkan kerana pemimpin PAS seperti Nik Aziz dan Haji Hadi tidak mahu memperbetulkan  kenyataan yang dibuat Nurul Izzah dalam soalan kebebasan beragama selain turut menyokong dan mengatakan perkara tersebut tidak penting," katanya pada satu perjumpaan dengan media, di sini hari ini.

Katanya sebagai Mursyidul Am PAS Datuk Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat jelas mengetepikan kepentingan Islam apabila menyokong Nurul Izzah sekalipun menyedari Naib Presiden Parti Keadilan Rakyat itu melakukan kesalahan besar.

"Nik Aziz jika tahu perkara itu salah sepatutnya jangan keluar apa-apa pandangan dan lebih baik  menjadi syaitan yang bisu daripada syaitan yang berkata-kata," katanya.

Beliau turut meminta Nurul Izzah memperbetulkan kenyataannya dan meminta maaf dengan mengakui tidak arif tentang bidang agama.

Pada 3 Nov lepas, portal berita Malaysiakini melaporkan Nurul Izzah yang juga Anggota Parlimen Lembah Pantai berkata rakyat tidak seharusnya dipaksa menganut agama tertentu dan perkara itu juga patut terpakai kepada orang Melayu.

"Apabila anda bertanya saya, tiada paksaan dalam beragama...bagaimana seseorang itu boleh berkata, maaflah, ini (kebebasan beragama) hanya terpakai kepada orang bukan Melayu, ia sepatutnya diguna pakai secara sama rata," katanya.

Beliau berkata demikian pada forum bertajuk "Negara Islam: Versi Mana; Tanggungjawab Siapa?" di Subang Jaya pada 3 Nov.

 

70% rakyat Selangor sokong Umno-PAS bergabung

Posted: 10 Nov 2012 12:28 AM PST

Bekas Setiausaha PAS Selangor Norman Toha, kajian yang dijalankan sebuah agensi perunding menunjukkan majoriti penduduk Selangor yang berbilang kaum mahu dua parti itu mengenepikan perbezaan politik dan bergabung tenaga.

"Kalau mengikut kaji selidik yang dibuat sekitar Mac 2012, 70 peratus penduduk mengharapkan satu kerjasama yang baik antara PAS dan Umno untuk mempertahankan Melayu-Islam," katanya dalam sidang media selepas mengadakan wacana 'Mengembalikan PAS ke Landasan Asal' pagi tadi di Hotel Vistana di sini hari ini.

Wacana tersebut menurut Norman dianjurkan atas inisiatif individu ahli PAS yang mahu suara rungutan mereka diberikan perhatian.

Katanya, peserta wacana itu terdiri daripada pemimpin dan penyokong akar umbi yang mahu memberikan pandangan serta luahan tentang kecelaruan hala tuju parti yang semakin tersasar daripada perjuangan asal.

Resolusi wacana

Wacana tersebut juga berjaya mencapai 11 resolusi yang mengandungi desakan supaya parti dan pemimpin PAS kembali kepada landasan Islam yang sebenar.

"Mungkin kita akan ajukan resolusi ini kepada pemimpin tertinggi dalam masa tersekat.

"Harapan kami supaya mereka (pemimpin PAS) agak terbuka menerima pandangan peringkat akar umbi yang sebenarnya sudah lama disuarakan," katanya.

Sebelas resolusi tersebut adalah:

READ MORE HERE

 

Pahang mahu ihsan atau royalti 20 peratus?

Posted: 09 Nov 2012 02:37 PM PST

Perdana Menteri sudah membayangkan wang ihsan yang bakal Pahang peroleh dalam masa yang tidak lama. Logiknya Pahang boleh jadi Kuwait baru di Malaysia selepas Terengganu.

Pakatan Rakyat menggesa supaya Pahang jangan ditindas kerajaan BN seperti Terengganu dan Kelantan - sekadar memberinya wang ihsan. Ia patut diberi royalti seperti yang diperuntukkan oleh akta Petronas.

Apa pun, nikmat Pahang itu tidak akan diterima sebelum PRU13 yang paling lewat bulan Mac 2013.

Lantaklah apa yang BN akan bagi baik wang ihsan atau royalti lima peratus. Sekalipun ia setuju Pahang diberi loyalti tetapi masih satu penindasan dibandingkan janji  Pakatan Rakyat untuk memberi royalti 20 peratus kepada semua negeri yang berminyak.

Pakatan tidak perlu bising supaya Pahang diberi royalti. Pakatan boleh bagi tahu kepada rakyat Pahang betapa mereka tidak perlu menuntut wang ihsan itu dijadikan royalti. Pakatan akan bagi tanpa dituntut royalti 20 peratus sama dengan Indonesia setuju beri kepada Aceh seperti peruntukan perjanjian damai Aceh dan Indonesia.

Sebaik saja keputusan PRU13 nanti memihak kepada Pakatan, maka Pahang tidak sekadar dapat  duit kesian seperti yang BN buat ke atas Terengganu dan Kelantan.

Secara automatik Pahang akan dapat royalti 20 peratus. Kelantan akan dapat royaltinya dan Terengganu pula akan dipulangkan semula royaltinya. Sementera Sabah dan Sarawak royaltinya akan dinaikkan dari lima peratus kepada 20 peratus.

Saya nasihatkan, tidak perlu lagi bising menuntut royalti. Bagitahu  saja rakyat Kelantan supaya jangan bimbang royalti akan dapat atau tidak semasa pemerintahan BN sekarang? Sebaik saja Putrajaya tumbang, Kelantan akan dapat royalti, bukan sekadar lima peratus tetapi 20 peratus.

Tugas pengundi sekarang terutama di Kelantan, Pahang, Terengganu, Sabah dan Sarawak ialah pada hari pilihan raya umum nanti mengundi Pakatan Rakyat, tidak kira  calon itu dari PAS, PKR, DAP atau sekutunya yang lain dari Sabah  dan Sarawak.

Mengundi BN bererti menindas Pahang, Kelantan, Terengganu, Sabah dan Sarawak. Tetapi mengundi Pakatan Rakyat adalah untuk memberi hak dan keadilan kepada negeri itu.

Sebelum Perdana Menteri Najib mengumumkan Pahang ada minyak dan akan didapat wang ihsan, semua terasa sukar juga untuk meraih  sokongan dari Pahang kerana ia adalah negeri Perdana  Menteri. Tetapi apabila Najib mengumumkan ia ada minyak, maka Pakatan Pahang berasa lapang, kerana pengumuman itu adalah satu bantuan besar kepada Pakatan menghadapi  PRU itu.

Tanpa Najib memberitahu dia membantu Pakatan, apa yang diumumkannya itu adalah membantu Pakatan dan memudahkan lagi Putrajaya dirampas.

Memberi royalti 20 peratus bukan satu janji melampau yang tidak masuk akal. Ia sudah jadi hak semasa bagi negeri pengeluar minyak.  Kalau Indonesia boleh bersetuju memberi Aceh royalti minyak 20 peratus, maka mengapa Malaysia yang pentadbiran dan ekonominya lebih baik tidak boleh beri.

Kalau Malaysia tidak sedia memberi royalti 20 peratus, nanti dibimbangi rakyat  di lima negeri mengira lebih baik negeri itu menjadi provensi Indonesia daripada  menjadi negeri di  Malaysia. Jangan sampai ada rakyat yang berkata begitu.

Apakah Pakatan berpolitik dengan royalti yang menarik itu? Tidak dinafikan ada politiknya, tetapi  yang jelas ialah negeri patut  dan berhak mendapat apa yang Petronas boleh bagi.

Jadilah pengundi yang cerdik dan merdeka, memillih yang baik. Jangan jadi pengundi hamba, terima saja apa yang tuan beri.

 

Nik Aziz pertahan Nurul Izzah

Posted: 09 Nov 2012 11:23 AM PST


Abdul Aziz berkata, kenyataan Nurul Izzah menjadi perkara serius dan dibincangkan oleh pelbagai pihak memandangkan beliau merupakan anggota parti pembangkang yang sememangnya sentiasa tidak sehaluan dengan pihak lawan.

Oleh itu, menurutnya setiap perkara mahupun kenyataan yang dibuat oleh pembangkang diputar belit untuk menjadikannya buruk.

"Bagi saya dalam isu ini, Izzah tidak bernasib baik kerana dia pembangkang, apabila buat benda sikit walaupun perkataannya boleh menjadi celaru juga tetapi ia menjadi 'gege gegok' (diperbesarkan)," katanya ketika menyampaikan Kuliah Mingguan di sini, semalam.

Dalam pada itu, ketika ditemui pemberita selepas Kuliah Mingguan, Nik Aziz yang juga Menteri Besar menyalahkan laporan media dan katanya, tidak semestinya apa dikeluarkan media serupa dengan kenyataan Ahli Parlimen Lembah Pantai itu.

"Izzah lain surat khabar lain...yang Izzah bercakap mestikah serupa yang akhbar siarkan? Sebab itu kali pertama saya tengok benda ini disiarkan akhbar saya rasa bukan dia," katanya kepada media semalam.

Nik Aziz berkata, berdasarkan keterangan daripada Pengerusi Lajnah Perpaduan Nasional Pas Pusat, Datuk Dr Mujahid Yusof Rawa yang hadir bersama-sama Nurul Izzah dalam forum Islamic State: Which version? Whose responsibility? di Subang Jaya Sabtu lalu, ia tidak sama dengan kenyataan Nurul Izzah.

"Saya pembangkang dan saya juga dituduh sebagai bapa kafir, sedangkan saya ini pejuang Islam," katanya.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Pesakit kanser wajar berehat atau direhatkan

Posted: 12 Nov 2012 12:40 PM PST

Seperti pengidap kanser, ia akan selalu berusaha untuk mengubati penyakit yang merbahaya itu, tetapi akhirnya tubuh akan mati juga. Pesakit dan pengidap kanser akan melakukan apa sahaja untuk berubat samada menggunakan ubat tradisi atau ubat-ubat moden di hospital-hospital. Selalunya pesakit kanser akan berbuat apa sahaja untuk meneruskan kehidupan. Jika ada yang memberikan nasihat untuk pergi ke tempat-tempat di mana-mana sahaja untuk berubat pesakit atau penjaganya akan pergi untuk memberikan harapan untuk terus hidup.

Tetapi akhirnya pesakit-pesakit kanser yang sudah pulih itu hanya mengalami pemulihan sementara sahaja dan akhirnya mereka akan mengakhiri kalamnya kerana penyakit itu juga. Tetapi saya tidak menafikan yang ada yang selamat sehingga satu jangka yang lama (dengan izin Allah), tetapi lambat launnya pesakit itu akan meninggal kerana penyakit itu.

Begitu jugalah UMNO. UMNO telah mengidap penyakit ini agak lama, tetapi oleh kerana UMNO ini parti kaya-raya dan dipimpin oleh semua pemimpin-pemimpin yang 'kaya baru' maka hayatnya telah dapat di sambung kerana yang kaya selalunya akan dapat berubat dan pergi terbang ke seluruh pelusuk dunia untuk berubat. Penyakit kanser UMNO ini sebenar nya sudah lama kerana ramai yang berpendapat ia mula merebak sejak pemerintahan Dr Mahathir. Tetapi UMNO mampu berubat kerana kekayaan pemimpin-pemimpinnya maka UMNO dapatlah untuk terus hidup sampai ke pilihanraya 2008 dahulu walaupun tanda-tanda kematian sudah jelas nampak apabila hilang majoriti 2/3 di Dewan Legislatif Parlimen.

Tetapi seperti yang saya katakan tadi, yang akan membunuh UMNO itu ialah penyakit kanser yang di hidapi selama ini juga. Sebagai pesakit kanser seseorang itu terpaksa berbelanja besar untuk membeli ubat dan membeli 'supplement' yang mahal-mahal untuk menyekat kemaraan penyakit kanser itu.

Maka kita sedang melihat bagaimana UMNO terpaksa berbelanja besar untuk merawat penyakit yang di hidapinya itu. Najib terpaksa ke hulu ke hilir serta mundar mandir ke darat dan ke baruh untuk memanjangkan usia parti yang sedang menghadapi penyakit yang serius itu. Sekali Najib melawat jutaan wang ringgit dibelanjakan dan semuanya ini adalah wang rakyat. Seperti yang saya katakan peruntukan besar terpaksa di adakan untuk membeli segala 'supplement' yang di katakan baik untuk mengekang penyakit ini dari merebak.
 

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved