Sabtu, 22 September 2012

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Senseless rage over anti-Islam film

Posted: 21 Sep 2012 03:30 PM PDT

Islamic Renaissance Front, The Malaysian Insider

The Islamic Renaissance Front views the recent murders and uproar over the film "Innocence of Muslims" with much sadness and bafflement.

All available facts suggest that "Innocence of Muslims" is not even a film. What is currently known about it was available in the widely circulated YouTube clip which ran for a total of some 13-odd minutes. What is worse, most critics are in agreement on the film's utterly poor quality — cheap sets, mediocre actors, bad voice-overs and incomprehensible narrative — all of which explains why no one had even heard of the so-called film until Muslims decided to make a fuss about it. 

Indeed, the added tragedy is not so much that the film is Islamophobic, which it clearly is, but that the unnecessary attention given to it by angry Muslims, eventually gave the film far more publicity than it deserves. 

Why?

The question is why. What is behind the apparent trend of Muslim hypersensitivity? For the protests is just one occurrence out of countless others before, whereby masses of Muslims occupy public space to pressure some form of censure, punishment or banning of some product for insulting Islam. Rather than to reflect, negotiate or dialogue the tenor has often been to confront and suppress. 

The most well-known case to date was the furore over Salman Rushdie's "The Satanic Verses". More recently there were the Danish cartoons. Even the rather well produced "The Message", directed by Moustafa Akkad in 1976 with Anthony Quinn as the main actor, which did not portray the Prophet at all was deemed by many Muslims to be offensive. A Muslim group staged a siege against the Washington DC chapter of B'nai B'rith, threatening to blow up the building and its inhabitants under the false belief that Quinn portrayed the Prophet.

We now witnessed the needless deaths of dozens of innocent civilians as a result of violent protests that only reinforced the distorted image of Islam as a religion of violence and intolerance. It portrays the vicious face of a religion that was supposed to be a religion of peace and compassion.

The West? 

When one observes the discourse closely, one will find that what underlies the narrative is a sense of defeat and insecurity upon being overwhelmed by what is often broadly termed as "the West". This sentiment is an obvious continuation of an earlier resentment against Western colonialism, which almost all Muslim-majority countries today experienced in one form or another. Daily life in the age of globalisation too has seen an increase of presence by Western products as well as political and cultural values. Geopolitically, the presence of Western military forces in Muslim countries is all too apparent and overwhelming. 

All this has somehow been viewed by Muslims as a sign that Islam is left behind, in one way or another, as a civilisation. That in turn further reinforces the anxiety of powerlessness before fearful imaginations of a monolithic behemoth called "the West". From there, everything Islamic is juxtaposed against it, giving rise to a mood of scepticism against anything and everything that comes from the so-called "West". 

Towards openness and dialogue

But the situation is not that simple. While there has been much decline in science and learning in the Muslim world, which is undeniably tied to a history of colonial exploitation, Muslims must learn to take responsibility for the course of their own progress. Thus, rather than to recoil in defensiveness against everything Western or offensive, there must be instead, an attitude of critical reflection and openness to ideas. 

Progress requires freedom, for no genuine learning can proceed when power is imposed from without on what can be said and heard. To embrace this is not to embrace or justify Islamophobic or racist sentiments. It is rather to affirm that racist or Islamophobic sentiments are best dealt with through dialogue, learning and empathy rather than brute force or coercion. 

Hate must be combated. Oppression must end. But Muslims will only fail themselves if they proceed in a stupor of insecurity and anger. 

Islam is a religion of patience and compassion 

There is nothing in Islam that says hate must be combated with more hate. Recall, when the Prophet Muhammad was just beginning his mission, a woman placed faeces at his door in hatred of Islam. Muhammad endured the humiliation peacefully, neither choosing to retaliate in anger or violence, to exemplify that ethos of calm and compassion that defined the eventual success of Islam in Mecca.  

Conservative Muslims tend to regard such instances as inevitable given that Muslims did not get in power until Medina, but they forget the historical fact that it was Muhammad's exemplary character as a clear-headed leader in Mecca that compelled the Medinans to turn to him as an arbiter and leader for their fragmented city in the first place.

Calm and compassion needed in Malaysia too

Yesterday, thousands gathered outside Masjid Jamek Kampung Baru and the US Embassy to protest the "Innocence of Muslims". Interestingly this saw members of the Islamist party (PAS) and the main ruling Malay party (Umno) marching for a similar cause for once, even prompting the Umno Youth chief to invite PAS to join the ruling coalition. 

It is too early to say if this will lead to anything but it does reveal again an age-old fact about Malay politics, namely in how the vagueness of "Malay and Muslim unity" is used as a pretext to overlook other more concerned issues, such as socio-economic justice and multiracial solidarity. Emotions and passions reign ahead of clear-headed rationale and human values. 

The Islamic Renaissance Front once again calls for all Muslims to focus on the central agenda of Islam and that is the end of oppression and the establishment of a just society whereby all citizens irrespective of race and creed are treated equally. Enough lives, time and effort have been wasted over this film. It is time to move on and wake up. 

* This Islamic Renaissance Front statement carries the names of Dr Ahmad Farouk Musa, Ahmad Fuad Rahmad, Fadiah Nadwa Fikri, Rizqi Mukhriz and Ehsan Shahwahid.

 

What are they defending?

Posted: 21 Sep 2012 12:22 PM PDT

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vo9JiGp0pGk&feature=share

I watched the above video with a very heavy heart, for I pity these pathetic human beings for doing what they are doing. Although I dislike the provocative video that seemingly belittled Islam, I find that I had to agree with Mr. Ngeh that time is wasted on this.

ViewAct

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLKk00OYKhU

I have a group of Christian friends that shared this video once, and when inquired, they said that it's just a joke. True Christian know who Jesus is and will never be offended by untrue illustrations of Him. Only those who are not so faithful would scream and shout, for they fear the "holy" image of their "God" or "religious leader" gets scattered. Well, They were people of history and will never have the chance to do the things depicted in the videos. What is there to shout about?

As a follower of a "holy" religion, I am amazed how these people in the first video could shout vulgarities and at the same time claim that they are defending a "holy" religion. Do they mean that to defend their "dignity", they can resort to all sorts of "wrongdoings"? Instead of leading by example, they resort to threatening and venting of hate? What are they defending then? "Holiness" or "gangsterism"?  I'm sure true followers of Islam don't do that.

Screaming at the top of their lungs, they claim that DAP is meddling into the matters of Islam. Is "advising them not to waste time in unnecessary lingering into a mindless video" an act of stepping into the matters of Islam? Is the video so seriously important that a comment of such would cause such important "change" or "influence" into the matters of Islam? If so, I would have no choice but to be amazed by the director's ability to create such impact over a mindless, non-depth research.

Another question to these groups. What had DAP enforced over Islam that they have been "tolerating" all this while? Has DAP changed Islam? Made any policies that sidelined Islam? Re-written the Laws of Islam? Or have them stopped or disrupted any religious activities of Muslims?

However, I am very glad that there are only a handfull of participants in that mindless "demonstration". For it showed that the majority of Muslims are not in the same state as these people are. Well, for a defender of Islam like what Perkasa is claiming they are, they should be condemning such vulgarities among their people instead. You can and should correct a non-muslim for making mindless statements as they do not know and it is your responsibility to tell them. But what you should really be concerned with are Muslims who go against the teachings of Islam. For one who know the religion so well as to claim to protect it, such acts are surely unbecoming. Imagine if these people are picked to be religious leaders and teachers one day (since they are so protective of the holy religion). What would they teach to the next generation?

Well, enough about this. I hope everyone can put this behind. Instead of screaming and shouting vulgarities over it, wouldn't it be more productive to teach the right teachings to clear the doubts of people over it? Wouldn't this make people respect Islam and Muslims more? By resorting to violence, what image would that give? Good and respectable? Or fearful and lowly?

Now what face of Islam are they showing? Or should I say... Is this any way Islamic at all?

Questioning four times within two weeks, police abuse of procedure for harassment?

Posted: 21 Sep 2012 12:08 PM PDT

http://www.loyarburok.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/480066_464752656887024_74263689_n.jpg

Instead of sending medical personnel to help the patients, or the ketua kampung to console, the police was sent to interrogate.

Pahang Raub Ban Cyanide in Gold Mining Action Committee (BCAC)

BCAC chairman Mr Wong Kin Hoong was summoned for questioning by the police on 11am on 18th September, which was his third time within 14 days following the Himpunan Hijau Raub 902. This time, he was summoned together with another BCAC leader Mr Alec Hue and one of the members, Mr Rajoo.

The police mainly questioned on the press conference held on 20th June at KL & Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall (KLSCAH). According to police, five people lodged police reports regarding the press conference and BCAC were summoned to assist the investigation. The two-hour-long interrogation centered on the health survey report which was released on 20th June's press conference. The police refused to disclose the details of the 5 people who made the police report, and BCAC also failed to acquire a copy of the police report mentioned.

May this year, BCAC conducted a questionnaire health survey in the residential areas adjacent to the gold mine in Bukit Koman, Raub, a total of 383 villagers responded. After one month of careful analysis and data verification, a press conference was held on 20th June 2012 at KLSCAH to release the report, which revealed that 50% of respondents faced a variety of skin problems, including itchy skin and rashes, and caught a national attention. Unexpectedly, the Raub police turned up at the door of one of the patients Mr Woon Soon Fatt who appeared in the press conference on 26th July, claiming that the police received a report and was there to investigate! The interrogation went on for one hour. Instead of sending medical personnel to help the patients, or the ketua kampung to console, the police was sent to interrogate; made people wonder what kind of world are we living in?  

This is the second time the police claimed that they received a report regarding the KLSCAH's press conference. If the police is supposedly carrying out their duty impartially, then does that mean that each time the villagers made a report complaining of the Gold Mine's unidentified gas emissions causing illness and discomfort the police would investigate the management of the gold mine? However, from past experience, instead of recording statements from the gold mine, the police interrogated the villagers who made the police reports! We are wondering why there are difference sets of Standard Operating Procedures?

After summoning Mr Wong Kin Hoong, Mr Alec Hue and Mr Rajoo for statements, the police called the BCAC Vice-Chair Ms Sherly Hue for questioning. Subsequently Ms Sherly Hue turned up at the Dang Wangi police station on 7pm on 19th September accompanied by Ms Malar who is an attorney, and was also interrogated by the police for two hours. Reason for investigation given by Police is the same and related to the press conference at KLSCAH on 20th June. However, this time the interrogation centered on the background of BCAC, the anti cyanide movement, the gold mining company. For example: "Why you are against RAGM?" "Is it your ultimate goal to close down RAGM?", "Any doctor can prove that the villagers' sufferings were caused by the cyanide?"

Police summoning BCAC to question four times within two weeks is a form of mental torture in disguise. And for the elderly people of more than sixty years old, it is both physically and mentally stressful. BCAC condemns this sort of inhumane and unprofessional conduct. The members of BCAC are just ordinary concerned citizens who are trying to protect their homes, to care for the environment, and to exercise their human rights; they are not criminals! It is the duty and responsibility of the Government to ensure that the people live and work in a safe and healthy environment. Not only did the government fail to fulfill that, now the police is abusing a seemingly legitimate procedure to harass innocent people!

Hisham, Rais, must apologise to M’sians for national shame

Posted: 20 Sep 2012 12:29 PM PDT

http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/images/uploads/2012/september2012/20/doctored_photo.jpg

Datuk Chua Jui Meng

BERNAMA's admission that its pictures were doctored has shamed Malaysia globally in the most unethical manner.

It is the Barisan Nasional (BN) government's national news agency and therefore the ministers linked to media affairs, namely Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein and Information, Communications and Culture Minister Rais Yatim, must apologise to Malaysians for the national shame.

They must start thinking out of the box and not resort to looking for scapegoats to cover up what was committed intentionally.

I guess that would be too much for the ministers and the BN to stomach.

After 55 years of Merdeka (Independence), Malaysians cannot continue to rely on a government that is unable to think out of the box to do the right thing.

BN resorts to cover-ups and sweeping everything under the carpet whenever blunders and scandals erupt.

Admitting that its photographs of prime minister Najib Abdul Razak in Pekan, Pahang (an east coast state of the peninsula), were doctored to reflect huge crowds is not enough.

Finding a scapegoat to take the rap is also deplorable as it will further shame Malaysia.

Very few Malaysians, save for loyal BN supporters who are always giving blind support, believe that the doctoring of pictures was the act of an individual out to sabotage the national news agency.

The delayed admission by Bernama that its pictures were doctored raises doubts of sincerity.

The admission came only after a series of pictures were posted on the internet that clearly showed the visuals were fakes.

Bernama's editor-in-chief Yong Soo Heong was quick to deny the pictures were fake and that the news agency had no time to engage in such unethical work.

When more of such pictures were posted in the internet, Bernama buckled under mounting pressure and admitted guilt.

Suddenly, Yong says "Bernama has conducted an initial investigation into allegations that one of its recent photographs was manipulated and found the flawed picture was discovered at the source from where it was sent".

Do you expect Malaysians to believe Yong who was quick to dismiss the allegations when the picture was clearly doctored and then admitted guilt when pressure for the truth continued to mount.

I doubt the doctoring was done by the photographer who would not be so stupid to put his job on the line because such doctoring can be easily detected. But he could have been pressured by his superiors to do so.

Whatever, this is going to be another case of going after the ikan bilis (anchovy or small fish) instead of the big fish.

I retract and apologise to any Muslim who is offended by my tweet

Posted: 19 Sep 2012 03:47 PM PDT

Ngeh Koo Ham 

I retract and apologise to any Muslim who is offended by my tweet as it was never intended to be so.

It was 1.43 am 17th September 2012, after seeing world news on CNN, BBC and Al Ajazeera showing violent protests in various parts of the world where lives were lost, many injured properties gutted and unrest ensued in response to the video produced by Sam Bacile, and after reading the news in Malaysiakini.com that YB Khairy Jamaluddin has planned to hold massive protest coming Friday (21st Sept 2012) with regard to the same matter that I tweeted the following words

'Khairy wants muslim protest against Same Bacile. For Islam or for his political gains? Are muslims wasting to much time and energy on this?'

In the context of the violent protests round the world and the many demonstrations to be held that I posed the question 'Are muslims wasting too much time and energy on this?' I was wondering if too much time and energy have been spent in response to the 13.5 minutes video produced by a mad man in the name of Sam Bacile. I wanted our society to think deeper with regard to the way we response to any provocation or issue that confronts us. I have been taught and have always emphasized to the young never to react but always to respond.

I want to make it very clear my following stands:-

1.     I strongly condemn the video and its producer for belittling the faith/religion of another person and reiterate support for the stand that has been taken by DAP on this issue which is contained in the media statement issued by my party's Secretary General on 16/9/2012.

2.     I totally support the rights of a person to hold peaceful demonstrations. In my 23 years of active political involvement, I have organized scores of demonstration in Perak. I was arrested by the police in Bersih 2.0 and was there at Bersih 3.0.

The abovesaid tweet has now been twisted by UMNO/BN to say I belittle Islam. This is a total lie. However, having explain the context in which my question was posed, any Muslim who is still offended by the question I posed, I apologise as that was never intended.

I feel comforted that a leading Muslim cleric Sheik Yusuf al-Qaradawi, head of international union of Muslim Scholars, Encik Fathul Bari Mat Jahaya, the Executive Committee Chairman of Malaysia Young Ulama Assembly and Encik Musa Awang, the President of the Syarie lawyers of Malaysia have also come forward to call for restraint in the response to this video issue.

 

Registration of Overseas Voter

Posted: 19 Sep 2012 12:58 PM PDT

http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/images/uploads/mugshots/abdulazizyusoff.jpg

I had contacted the Malaysian Embassy in Singapore and had been informed by Ms Shima from the consular, that only civil servants, full time students and their spouse are allowed to vote abroad. This is a gross conflict from your statements as publish by The Star.

Eugene Hooi

Dear Tan Sri Dato' Seri Abdul Aziz,

A very good afternoon sir, I refer to your comment published in The Star (dated 19 July)  as well as comments by your deputy Datuk Wira Haji Wan Ahmad published in The Star (dated 10 July). Both articles stated comments from your deputy as well as youself, that Malaysians residing overseas upon registering as voters can apply to vote as postal voters.

I had contacted the Malaysian Embassy in Singapore and had been informed by Ms Shima from the consular, that only civil servants, full time students and their spouse are allowed to vote abroad. This is a gross conflict from your statements as publish by The Star (quote: "As Parliament had decided to allow them voting rights, he said the EC had discussed the matter with Wisma Putra and the Immigration Department to ensure only those who had returned home at least once in five years be eligible to vote. Wan Ahmad said upon registration, they must request for postal voting in order to vote in the general election.")

I hope to have a firm and clear answer from your good-self how Malaysians overseas are able to exercise our right to vote. I trust to have your good governance and impartiality to ensure Malaysian constitutional rights are not ignored.

Looking forward to your response soonest.

Thanking you in advance for your quick reply.

Yours sincerely,
Eugene Hooi


Reference:
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2012/7/19/nation/20120719125518&sec=nation
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2012/7/10/nation/20120710090706&sec=nation

Mayra Nazarbayev released

Posted: 19 Sep 2012 12:52 PM PDT

http://img684.imageshack.us/img684/7645/maira2june18.jpg

According to several credible sources, her surprising and miraculous release was due to the direct and personal involvement by the Malaysian Prime Minister: during his Hadj to Mecca over this summer, which he made in the company Ms. Nazarbayeva's son and his future son-in-law Daniyar.

Daniyar Muratov

Early in September, Mayra Nazarbayev, the notorious Kazakhstani fugitive, ex-wife of the Kazakhstan's President's brother, and a would-be mother-in-law to Malaysian Prime Minister's daughter, was released from prison in Dubai, flew to New York and had a court date there on September 4.
 
According to several credible sources, her surprising and miraculous release was due to the direct and personal involvement by the Malaysian Prime Minister: during his Hadj to Mecca over this summer, which he made in the company Ms. Nazarbayeva's son and his future son-in-law Daniyar, Mr. Najib had extensive meetings with officials from the United Arab Emirates and Kazakhstan to convince them to let the detainee go. Within days after the Prime Minister's hadj, Ms. Nazarbayeva was, indeed, released, and allowed to proceed to her place of residence, New York.
 
Following her salvation due to the influence of her powerful future relative, Ms. Nazarbayeva has been hard at work reinventing herself as an opposition figure: she has reportedly attempted to contact several leading Kazakhstani opposition leaders in exile and, in the affidavit she has filed with the New York court, has characterized Kazakhstan's political system as lawless and attacked the Kazakhstani President and his brother, her former husband – this after being a member of the President's clan for many years. Herself a wanted fugitive for financial and outright criminal shenanigans, Ms. Nazarbayeva is now decrying Kazakhtan's "lack of an independent judiciary and due process" and its "widespread corruption."   
 
It looks like a substantial portion of the Prime Minister's time and energy is devoted to a family matter involving a fugitive from law – at the expense of all Malaysians.
 

Two popular request ignored in the Education Blueprint 2013 - 2025

Posted: 18 Sep 2012 09:34 AM PDT

Toh Boo Huat
 
The just released Education Blueprint was touted to be very comprehensive as it took into account the views and desires of Malaysians who were given opportunities to provide input during dialogues held in major towns across the country.
 
However, if the responses and loud cheers from large section of the crowd during the dialogues are any indication of popular support and demands by the people, then two such requests are missing in the blueprint i.e. calls for Science and Mathematics be taught in English and, for a non-politician Education Minister.
 
In my humble opinion, the blueprint ought to address the desire of many ordinary folks who would like their children to learn Science and Mathematics in its lingua franca i.e. English while fully supporting maintaining MBMMBI policy for those who want it. Interestingly, the rich who can afford to attend International schools and those Mara sponsored students are enjoying this privilege that is gradually being denied to those attending national schools.
 
It is an accepted fact that the English language proficiency among our students and workforce is low. The government has rightly, in this blueprint, seeked to tackle this issue by improving the teaching methods, getting better qualified teachers and allocating more teaching hours to it.
 
These is a good starting base to work from but let us be also frank and accept that learning any language in isolation is tough. Learning English will be very much easier and can be picked up faster when used frequently and applied appropriately. Realistically, studying both Science and Mathematics in English will provide our pupils, especially those from rural areas with a great platform to do so, much like a twin turbo-charger needed to help elevate our standard of English.
 
I am also of the opinion that the plan to introduce English Literature is premature and contradict the reasons why PPSMI was left out. The authorities have constantly highlighted that some of our pupils struggled with PPSMI and that we do not have enough capable English teachers for PPSMI, what more English Literature which is a much more difficult subject by itself. In fact, days before the launch, the DPM said "We have done studies repeatedly and we have found that there is a lack of English teachers" and that "when students did not understand, the teachers reverted to using Bahasa Malaysia to teach the subjects". (NST 9-Sep-2012 - Improving quality in all areas of education)
 
Walk before attempting to run. Our immediate and urgent target is students and a mass workforce with a higher proficiency in English, not flooding the country with Shakespeareans! We should only consider introducing English Literature in future when the standard of English amongst our pupils is elevated, thus reducing any likelihood of failing, leading to abandoning yet another overly ambitious policy.
 
The other loud call was for a professional and highly experienced academician to be the Education Minister and this popular request received among the loudest applause during those dialogues. It is obvious that the rakyat do not want any more politicians in that post. Many (including our former DPM, Tun Musa Hitam) are alarmed and have enough of seeing our education standard deteriorate continuously over the years with no end in sight, not to mention numerous "politically inclined" policy decisions made.
 
The people have spoken and the message was indeed conveyed up. An attendee of two Round Table discussions on education revealed in his blog that "there was an almost unanimous agreement that English should be made the medium of instruction for at least Mathematics and Science".
 
How then and why were these two well-supported requests left out of the blueprint? Whoever made this decision to do so have betrayed the people!
 
As parents and primary stakeholders, we demand that the final blueprint include these two issues to truly reflect and honor the desires of the people.

Did These Women Sleep Around, Dr?

Posted: 18 Sep 2012 09:26 AM PDT

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhS1PVFORzNcWHIX676R_ecUe9fboVH0oHVW6Zx1LwhV9JOPbvroRLGSRz4Yz523w9jnGHvR22bmA2Zb-29utiRhZWidzQz6oHXa5oTR74D9iScvHVxbaJrwGVeXi87DdG4H7uEyNIkAdQ/s400/bayi2.jpg"

It is believed that the child was still alive when thrown but died due to injuries in the head due to the fall

Presumably, their mothers cannot light a candle to our Malaysian women of virtue

Ice Cream Seller

Lets get straight to the point.

Are you suggesting that the mothers of the following Americans slept around?

1) B Obama

2) George Bush - senior & junior

3) Hilary Clinton

4) Neil Armstrong

6) Muhammad Ali

7) Bill Gates

8) Henry Kissinger

9) Billy Graham

10) Steve Jobs

Presumably, their mothers cannot light a candle to our Malaysian women of virtue - such as mothers that throw their newborns out of the balcony, mothers that flush their newborns down a toilet, mothers that stuff the newborns in bags and leave them in drains and road kerbs.

 

Dear Archbishop Murphy Pakiam

Posted: 18 Sep 2012 09:18 AM PDT

http://www.heraldmalaysia.com/newsimages//18617Archbishop%20Murphy%20Pakiam.jpg

Your directive does not augur well for our catholic religion in this country, if I do go for the service and receive communion despite being forbidden to do so by you does that mean I have committed a mortal sin and can lose my soul? Because ultimately why I still remain a catholic is because I believe I can go to heaven if I die.

Pakirisamy

Your Grace,

I am a devout catholic and truly believe in the teachings of the catholic church, especially in her teaching about Jesus' real presence in the Eucharist, I am "privileged" to visit Jesus preserved in the Blessed Sacrament almost everyday in the mornings before I go to work.  It however baffles me why I am the only one there every morning in a RM10 million church built for 5,000 people. Its a massive church built on two layers, with a beautiful tabernacle made of gold with the sacred host preserved inside. It does not seem to make sense that you have spent so much money to built such a church but it is only filled up with the faithful only during Sunday Mass and listening to the priest who excitedly speaks about the evils of our present administration in this country.

What was more surprising was your instruction to us catholics that we are "forbidden" from receiving "holy communnion" from services held by different denominations during the Malaysia Day celebrations at Taman Melawati stadium:-
 
"Message from Archbishop of Kuala Lumpur, Most Rev Murphy Pakiam
National/Malaysia Day Prayer & Thanksgiving Celebration at Stadium Melawati, Shah Alam on Sunday, 16th September @ 3.00pm

While it is a noble act for Catholics to join fellow baptised Christians to pray for the nation, we are aware that we do not share the same beliefs, especially in the Eucharist. The Catholic belief in the Real Presence in the Eucharist is different.
As such, Catholics who do join other Christians in any form of prayer gatherings or worship cannot join in the Christian Churches' "communion" as we are not in a "common-union".
Just as non-Catholics are not allowed to receive communion in the Catholic Church, so also, we are forbidden to join in their "communion".


Your directive does not augur well for our catholic religion in this country, if I do go for the service and receive communion despite being forbidden to do so by you does that mean I have committed a mortal sin and can lose my soul? Because ultimately why I still remain a catholic is because I believe I can go to heaven if I die.

How do we know that all the people receiving Holy Communion in our Catholic mass on Sunday are really catholics and not christians? I don't think in all fairness Jesus himself would have said this "Only catholics can receive Holy Communion because I am really present there only for catholics", all others are forbidden from coming forward for Holy Communion. Neither would Jesus have said "don't ever think of receiving Holy Communnion in other christian denominations because I forbid you to do so?

Maybe you could come out with guidelines as to how to spot non-catholics who come forward to receive Holy Communnion just like the Education Ministry's guidelines on how to spot LGBE and single them out to be prosecuted.

In this Sunday's reading St James aptly puts it :-

James 2: 14 - 18
14 What does it profit, my brethren, if a man says he has faith but has not works? Can his faith save him?
15 If a brother or sister is ill-clad and in lack of daily food,
16 and one of you says to them, "Go in peace, be warmed and filled,"without giving them the things needed for the body, what does it
profit?
17 So faith by itself, if it has no works, is dead.
18 But some one will say, "You have faith and I have works." Show me your faith apart from your works, and I by my works will show you my faith.

Your Grace, if your faith is just faith it's a dead faith if your directives are purely to preserve the sanctity of the the Real presence in the Eucharist. I dont think I or anyone else would go to hell if he went for the christian service at Taman Melawati Stadium and received the communnion offered there.

The FMM sisters had gone to great lengths to collect massive donations from the public, got govt grants, and built a catholic hospital for the poor and underpriviledged and called it the Assunta Catholic Hospital, (today the catholic has been removed). Even you and Peter Mooney had attended a fund raising dinner to raise funds for the hospital. Today, sad to say the hospital charges RM8,000+ for a simple appendix surgery, which you can get done in the govt hospital for less than RM450/- and the Jabatan Kebajikan pays for you if you can't afford to pay
What does it profit, my brethren, if a man says he has faith but has not works? Can his faith save him?
Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Guan Eng: DAP Kedah wajar dapat tambahan kerusi

Posted: 21 Sep 2012 03:15 PM PDT

Setiausaha Agung DAP, Lim Guan Eng berkata, DAP Pusat bersetuju dengan hasrat DAP Kedah yang mahu meletakkan calon di dua kerusi parlimen (Alor Setar dan Padang Serai) dan enam Dewan Undangan Negeri (Dun) membabitkan Kota Darul Aman, Bakar Bata, Derga, Bakar Arang, Gurun dan Lunas. 

"DAP tetap mahu tambahan kerusi untuk bertanding pada PRU13, ketika PRU12 kita hanya letak calon di Kota Darul Aman dan Derga. Jumlah ini amat kecil dan ia tidak boleh diterima untuk PRU13," katanya ketika berucap merasmikan Konvensyen Tahunan DAP Kedah, di Dewan Perhimpunan Cina Kedah, semalam. 

Bagaimana pun, Guan Eng berkata, jika agihan kerusi membabitkan DAP-PKR tidak mampu diselesaikan di peringkat negeri, perkara itu wajar diputuskan oleh Pusat untuk mengelak tercetus ketidakpuasan hati kedua-dua pihak. 

"Jika tidak boleh bincang lagi di peringkat negeri, ia tak perlu bincang. Biar Pusat buat keputusan muktamad dan kedua-dua pihak terima keputusan. Jangan bergaduh sesama sendiri, ia membuang masa, kita hanya mahu lawan BN sahaja, bukan dalam PR," katanya. 

Menurutnya, DAP Kedah diminta menyerahkan perkara itu kepada DAP Pusat untuk dibincangkan dalam Sekretariat Pakatan Rakyat (PR) sekali lagi, jika menemui jalan buntu. 

"Biar Pusat tentukan jika masih tidak dapat diselesaikan. Saya harap hasrat DAP Kedah diberi pertimbangan sewajarnya oleh rakan-rakan dalam pakatan untuk bergerak sebagai satu pasukan, dalam usaha mengekalkan kuasa di negeri ini," katanya. 

Guan Eng juga mengarahkan kedua-dua parti tidak lagi membuat kenyataan terbuka atau berbalas kenyataan dalam akhbar berhubung isu terbabit. 

"Kita tumpu pada gerak kerja parti sudahlah, biar Pusat putuskan. DAP juga mahu menyumbang lebih pada PR," katanya.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Putting My Foot Down

Posted: 21 Sep 2012 04:08 PM PDT

On Merdeka Eve, a group of people were photographed stepping on pictures of Prime Minister Najib Razak. The result was the arrests of three young people under the threat of sedition and a continuing 'manhunt' for the rest of the group. Suddenly stepping on the Prime Minister's photo – something no one even knew was supposed to be illegal – was threatened with criminal prosecution.

Such persecution by the Barisan Nasional government has prompted one of the suspects, a 19-year-old girl, to apologize for her actions. I don't know what satisfaction the BN government got from bullying a young girl into apologizing, but in at least one respect it seems to have succeeded: suddenly people are apologizing where no apology should be necessary.

The Opposition response to this has been disappointingly hesitant. So far most statements by Opposition leaders seem to urge the government to 'forgive' those involved.

It's a pity that so few are prepared to say what needs to be said: that those young people were just expressing their displeasure at the Prime Minister in a way that harmed no one, that threatened no one, and that the government has neither right nor cause to forgive them anything.

It's a pity that our government needs reminding that in a democracy politicians derive their authority from the people, and that when faced with public expressions of displeasure, a true leader should square his shoulders and put up with it. Because in politics, criticism and even insult come with the territory, and someone who cannot stomach it or who can only respond to negative feedback with threats and coercion is unfit to lead.

It's difficult for me not to see this persecution as just the latest in a series of attacks by the BN government on our liberty. I've grown up seeing how these attacks have infected the country with a pernicious self-censorship and reduced the mainstream media to its pitiful state, and I am unwilling to concede another inch.

I don't want Malaysia to become a country where the Prime Minister is so sacred that even stepping on his image is illegal. And since without a corresponding gesture my words will be empty, here's a photo to go with them:

READ MORE HERE

 

Read what the Umno Blogs are saying

Posted: 21 Sep 2012 03:47 PM PDT

Apabila UMNO dan PAS bersama-sama tunjuk perasaan membantah video You Tube dan karikutur akhbar Perancis yang menghina Nabi Muhammad S.A.W., ada babi-babi yang berkemungkinan adalah babi DAP yang resah dan gelisah.

Mereka gelisah melihat Melayu bersatu hati dan sepakat yang memungkinkan lebih banyak persepakatan sesama Melayu akan berlaku sebagaimana Cina dalam DAP dan luar DAP begitu bersepakat dan senada dalam memainkan isu berhubung kepentingan mereka.

READ MORE HERE

 

Sabah: Still a ‘fixed deposit’?

Posted: 20 Sep 2012 07:33 PM PDT

The upcoming 13th General Election is sure to be a hotly contested election. It will be a litmus test for Prime Minister Najib Razak who is banking on his "transformational agenda" to return the BN to power.

Indeed, to restore the BN to a two-thirds majority. For PR, the election is seen as Anwar Ibrahim's last chance to take over Putrajaya after the alleged September 16 coup failed. Even though many of the seats contested come from Peninsular Malaysia, the real battle will be in Sabah and Sarawak.

In the 2008 General Election, the 54 seats from East Malaysia ensured BN a simple majority win. Without the 54 seats, BN would have lost power to the opposition, in the event of party crossovers. Consequently Sabah and Sarawak are considered as BN's "fixed deposits".

This article is an attempt to look into the prospects and challenges of the 13th General Election in Sabah especially in light of the withdrawal of two Sabah leaders from BN – Wilfred Bumburing of UPKO (United Pasok Momogun Kadazandusun Association) and Lajim Ukin of Sabah UMNO (United Malays National Organisation).

With the persistent attacks on Sabah Chief Minister, Musa Aman for his alleged involvement in an international money laundering scandal and the Wilfred-Lajim factor, BN is expected to face a tough challenge from the opposition to retain Sabah. The article argues that if the opposition is able to form a strong alliance and avoid contesting against each other, it could affect Sabah's fixed deposit status. Similarly, failure on BN's part to address the perennial Sabah issues such as the illegal immigrant problems and state autonomy will affect its chances of returning to power.

Categorising the seats contested

For analytical purposes, all the 60 state and 25 parliamentary seats contested in Sabah will be divided into three categories: "safe" BN seats (where BN has more than an 80 percent chance of winning), "marginal" or "50-50" seats (where electoral support can go either to BN or the opposition) and "opposition" seats (where the opposition has more than an 80 percent chance of winning). This prospect is based on the following two factors: 1) Changes in the number of registered voters according to age and ethnicity and 2) Less multi-cornered but more one-to-one contests in the "marginal" areas. The opposition here refers to PR comprising PKR (Parti Keadilan Rakyat), DAP (Democratic Action Party), and PAS (Parti Islam Se-Malaysia). The other local-based opposition parties are STAR (State Reform Party) Sabah and SAPP (Sabah People's Progressive Party).

The safe BN seats

There are 42 safe BN state seats and most are Muslim-majority. At the parliamentary level, there are nine safe BN seats with a large number of Muslim Bumiputera voters and they all belong to UMNO. (See Table 1 & 2) With the absence of alternative Muslim-based parties, the majority of the Muslim electorate will remain in UMNO. Among the weapons used by UMNO to maintain Muslim support are the persistent championing of Islam as a religion that unites the Muslims and the practice of on-the-spot development funds allocation.

The Muslim-majority areas will be BN's key seats that will help maintain the party's grip on power. PKR appears to fail to take the Muslim support from UMNO. One of the reasons is the lack of credible and popular Muslim leaders in the party. The present Sabah PKR chief, Ahmad Thamrin is not popular among the Muslim electorate while another well-known Muslim leader, Ansari Abdullah, does not have strong Muslim support beyond his base in Tuaran.

There is also the assumption that UMNO is falling apart due to the factions formed by supporters of Musa Aman and Federal Minister, Shafie Afdal. However, the so-called factions do not affect UMNO that much. So far, Musa has been able to keep the Muslim support in UMNO intact. Musa has also successfully defused the Bajau challenge led by Salleh Said, a former Chief Minister and currently Sabah UMNO deputy chief.

Despite the attacks on Musa for his alleged involvement in a financial scandal, Najib seems to be mindful not to pursue the case with intensive investigations. Najib knows that Musa has the clout to decide the fate of BN in Sabah. Asking Musa to resign before the election would put Sabah BN at great risk. The question is, if Musa resigned, who will be the most likely candidate to replace him? Many people believe that Najib has an eye on Shafie, his loyal ally from Semporna, Sabah. But others have mentioned Salleh Said, Musa's number two in Sabah UMNO. Salleh is considered more liberal, in tune with the times and therefore, potentially, acceptable to Najib. Another possible candidate is Hajiji Noor, a senior UMNO member in the Sabah Cabinet.

The marginal or 50-50 seats

There are 10 marginal or 50-50 seats at the state level. Of the 10 seats, three are currently held by Gerakan (Parti Gerakan Rakyat Malaysia), two each by LDP (Liberal Democratic Party), PBS (Parti Bersatu Sabah), and SAPP respectively, and one by UPKO. The three seats currently held by Gerakan previously belonged to LDP (1) and SAPP (2) previously. After an internal party conflict, Peter Pang, Au Kam Wah and Raymond Tan left their parties and joined the Gerakan. The three seats are considered as marginal as they were won under LDP and SAPP tickets. There is a high possibility that the voters might change their support to the opposition as a mark of protest over the decision of their leaders to join the peninsular-based Gerakan. The two state seats currently held by LDP, Tg. Kapor and Merotai, were won by Teo Chee Kang and Pang Yuk Ming after the opposition failed to agree on a one-to-one contest in 2008. The opposition's chances of winning the two seats from BN are high in the upcoming election if it can avoid multi-cornered fights.

The other two marginal seats are in Tandek and Kadamaian. The PBS won the two seats in 2008 by marginal majorities. Grassroots sentiments in the two areas seem to indicate that the voters are unhappy with BN over its failure to address a number of local issues such as Native Customary Rights (NCR) land and poverty. The BN's handling of the Tambatuon dam in Kadamaian has also been strongly criticised. Many people are also calling for the incumbent BN representatives to step down and to allow "winnable" candidates to take over. There are several lobby groups in Kadamaian that call for the incumbent Herbert Timbun Lagadan to make way for a younger candidate.

Likas and Luyang are regarded as marginal seats simply because both were won under SAPP when the party was still with BN. With SAPP now outside the ruling party, the opposition has raised its stakes in the two areas. The SAPP's victory in the two areas in 2008 with marginal majorities shows that the opposition is highly popular there. In fact, had the DAP and PKR agreed to co-operate, SAPP would have lost in the 2008 election. The voters' mood in the upcoming election will depend on SAPP's next course of action.

So far, SAPP has not made any decision as to whether it would re-join BN or remain with the opposition. SAPP appears to have a "game" of its own. SAPP's neither "here-nor-there" stance has not been well received by other local-based opposition parties even though its leaders could be seen attending political rallies organised by other opposition parties. SAPP's future will depend on how well it can lobby to contest in Chinese and mixed areas. But again this will be difficult as DAP has strongly indicated its desire to contest in Chinese-majority areas. Unless SAPP and STAR Sabah are willing to compromise, they will have to contest against each other in mixed areas.

There are 13 marginal seats at the parliamentary level. Four of the seats are currently held by UPKO and UMNO, three by PBS, and two by SAPP. Most of the marginal parliamentary seats are non-Muslim Bumiputera-majority. The prospect of all 12 seats remaining with BN is dependent upon the reaction of the voters to the RCI (Royal Commission of Inquiry) to investigate the presence of illegal immigrants in Sabah and leadership issues.

Three of the main parties representing the Kadazandusuns are PBS, UPKO and PBRS (Parti Bersatu Rakyat Sabah). Joseph Pairin Kitingan, the president of PBS, is now regarded by the Kadazandusuns as an ineffective leader who is not as aggressive as before in fighting for state rights and autonomy. Pairin has defended PBS' "accommodative" and "census-building" approach but the Kadazandusuns see it as a sign of weak leadership.

Bernard Dompok, the president of UPKO is also in a dilemma after the withdrawal of his deputy, Wilfred Bumburing from BN. It is believed that more UPKO members will leave the party, if not sooner, then later. Dompok, who was previously praised for speaking against the banning of the word "Allah" in Catholic churches, is now slowly losing influence in Penampang. Joseph Kurup who leads another Kadazandusun-based party, PBRS, could lose his seat in Pensiangan if he fails to address local sentiments there. He won the seat uncontested in 2008 after the candidacy of the opposition candidate was rejected on "technical grounds".

The performance of the Kadazandusun-based BN parties will be seriously affected given the negative perception of the Kadazandusun electorate towards Kadazandusun leaders. The Kadazandusun voters have the habit of "kicking" their leaders out of office. This was evident in 1995 when many of the Kadazandusun leaders (for instance, Bernard Dompok and Jeffrey Kitingan) who left PBS in 1994 were voted out. In fact, BN lost in all the non-Muslim Bumiputera seats in 1995.

READ MORE HERE

 

SUARAM, and USAid expulsion from Russia

Posted: 20 Sep 2012 02:16 PM PDT

SUARAM's initial reaction to the various demands for investigations was to garner sympathy and support. They claimed they are being harrassed, authorities are reacting to the mob and finally they try a counter offense to express willingness to be scrutinised but insist a probe on Scorpene purchase.

What Malaysian should be concerned is the fact that SUARAM took money from organisation like George Soros's Open Society in which this is the man that was out to wreck our economy in 1997/98 through his currency speculation.

There is money that emanate from National Endowment on Democrasy (NED), a once CIA covert operation that is out in the open today. NED also operate through their two wings; International Republican Initiatives (IRI) and National Democratic Initiatives (NDI) in Malaysia.

SUARAM is not really fighting for human rights issue but for western agenda and it is obvious it is to bring down the Government covertly and not true honest democrasy.

If they had been truthful to the human rights cause, they wouldn't be championing Myanmar's Aung Sang Su Kyi and kept silence on the plight of the Rohingya. [This will be for our next posting.]

Ever heard SUARAM make any statement to condemn Israel for the Palestinians cause or fight for the economic discrimination by private sector against Melayu and Pribumi? Don't claim to say you probably heard them but not so sure when because they never did.

From working with the "enemy', they should consider themselves lucky to be investigated by CCM, MACC, Central Bank, etc. The natural penalty for traitors and act of treason is hanging!

 
US Government sponsored NGOs or aid organisations are not sincere organisation and always comes with ulterior motives to subjugate the receiver to follow their whim and fancy. Remember our experiance with IMF in during the 1997/98 financial crisis1?

And don't the SUARAM people read, Confession of an Economic Hitman?

Perhaps, they believe it is okay to work with the enemy of the state as long as they get their way of seizing power. That is undemocratic and they will only be another dictator to promote onlt their own agenda.

The international news have been giving favourable report on Putin lately. They claim he is having confidence problem with the people.

Two days back, the Russian expelled USAID out of Russia. The response would likely say that it is Putin trying to preserve himself by blaming others.

Is it so or there is basis to do so?

Not many months ago, one Middle East country expelled NDI operatives. Remember Rocky's posting here.

Read the news below:

READ MORE HERE

 

Revolusi Mental Orang Melayu

Posted: 20 Sep 2012 01:58 PM PDT

Lim Guang Eng, KM Pulau Pinang. Dalam mengurus negeri tersebut, dia tak mampu mengenepikan kehendak orang Melayu disana. Dia tahu reality politik Malaysia. Pengajaran nya ialah sesiapa pun yang memerintah, kalau dia peka dan akur kepada kehendak majority, akan selamat.

Orang Melayu mesti bersatu. Tapi bukanlah bersatu dibawah UMNO. Bersatulah dalam fikiran bahawa melalui bertindak seirama dan senada, merekalah yang ada kuasa dan daulat untuk menentukan bagaimana negara ini ditadbir. Kita mungkin ada kerajaan PR yang memerintah- tapi selagi orang Melayu bertindak secara kolektif, kerajaan PR pun tidak boleh lakukan selain daripada apa yang dikehendaki oleh bangsa Melayu. Itulah faktanya.

Bersatulah orang Melayu tapi tidaklah ia bermaksud bersatu dibawah UMNO. Kita mesti ingat pengorbadanan orang2 dahulu, tapi janganlah kita ingat yang berkorban dahulu2 hanya orang UMNO.

Masaalah UMNO sekarang ialah ia gagal memncerminkan kehendak majority dalam pemimpin nya, dalam kepimpinan merka, dalam dasar dan wawasan mereka dan dalam mutu penyokong dan ahli mereka. Adakah majority Melalu biadab dan kebiadaman mereka diwakili oleh pembaling batu dan cat kearah kenderaan Anwar Ibrahim. yang tonggeng bontot didepan rumah Ambiga- adakah mereka mewakili kebiadaban orang Melayu?

Hidup dan mati kita bukan disebabkan UMNO. Kalau orang Melayu yang beragama Islam berfikiran bahawa semua nya kerana dan untuk UMNO, itu sudah kufur. Jadi, banish the thoughts that only UMNO can serve orang Melayu. Kita biarkan orang UMNO jadi lembu, majority kita orang Melayu bukan sahaja tidak mahu jadi lembu tapi juga tidak rela dilembukan!

Kalau kita berkehendakkan sangat supaya orang Melayu jadi ketua, kita pilih orang Melayu. Antara calun MCA dan calun Melayu bukan UMNO bertanding, pilih orang Melayu. Kalau Melayu DAP lawan cina MCA, pilih Melayu DAP. Kalau Melayu PAS lawan Melayu UMNO, pilih yang terbaik diatara mereka. Jangan pilih Melayu UMNO walaupun kita tahu dia penyangak dan gangster dan kaki sapu duit. Salah fikiran begitu. Kalau orang Melayu nak selamat- maka perkiraan yang paling selamat, kalau Melayu lawan Cina , pilih Melayu. Kalau Melayu lawan Melayu pilih yang lebih baik.

Orang Melayu tidak ikat janji dengan UMNO. Jadi relakslah. Kita tak ikrar, sesungguhnya solat ku, ibadahku, hidupku dan mati ku kerana UMNO pemerintah alam kan? Tak kiamat dan tidak kafir kita kalau singkirkan UMNO.

Najib kata kalau UMNO kalah, masa depan orang Melayu akan muram. Ek betul dia dan UMNO. Macamlah dia dan UMNO sahaja yang boleh menjaga kebajikan orang Melayu.

Sebuah kerajaan yang majoritinya Melayu pun boleh buat lebih baik dari UMNO. Penjagaan dan perlindungan kebajikan dan kepentingan orang Melayu tidak bersyaratkan UMNO sahaja yang boleh lakukan. UMNO dah perintah sejak tahun 1955 dan semenjak merdeka iaitu selama 55 tahun. UMNO dapat masa tersebut dan masih gagal nak lakukan yang sepatutnya dilakukan. Itu sudah bukti kuat, UMNO tidak mampu lakukan apa yang mereka janji. Sudah tiba masa nya, kita tendang UMNO keluar dan gantikan dengan kerajaan PR dimana majority pemimpin nya tetap juga Melayu.

Apa yang kita lihat pada UMNO? Kita lihat bahawa setiap pemimpin UMNO melihat kedudukan dan jawatan yang mereka dapat sebagai punca mencari rezeki dan kekayaan. UMNO penuh dengan pemimpin yan rasuah. Tak masuk akal seorang naib preisden UMNO boleh beri isteri muda RM 200 ribu dan RM 1 juta seminggu!. Tak masuk akal pemimpin UMNI dengan gaji menterinya boleh memiliki lebih dari 12 buak kereta mewah. Kita tak boleh terima Noh Omar bekalkan benih padi melalui syarikat proxy nya. Semua menteri UMNO korap dan rasuah. Mukhriz dan Mutapa Mohamad dikatakan telah mengagihkan 100 juta saham FGV antara mereka berdua. Orang Melayu peneroka Felda yang berjumlah 112, 000 orang hanya dapat 800 unit saham seorang.

READ MORE HERE

 

APA?? Rosmah Mansor pakai jam tangan bernilai RM350,000?

Posted: 20 Sep 2012 01:51 PM PDT

Rosmah Mansor dikatakan memiliki sekurang-kurangnya  11 beg tangan mewah jenama Birkin dianggarkan  Rosmah membelanjakan minima RM638,000 hingga maksima RM5,192,000 untuk membeli beg tangan berkenaan.

Bagi beg edisi terhad miliknya pula harga sebuah beg tangan dikatakan mencecah RM28,000 (US$ 9,000) hingga RM472,000 (US$150,000) bagi setiap satu.. sila baca di ( SINI )

Cincin berlian yang dikenali sebagai 'Natural Fancy Blue Gray Cushion Cut" miliknya itu berharga lebihkurang RM24 Juta.. sila baca di ( SINI )

Kali ini kita akan melihat lagi koleksi barangan mewah milik  Rosmah Mansor iaitu jam tangan pula..

Terkini koleksi yang jam tangan yang dipakai Rosmah dalam satu majlis yang dihadirinya di Vietnam berjaya dirakam lensa kamera…



Ianya dikatakan  dikatakan bernilai antara £70,000 - £100,000. Dan harga tersebut tidak termasuk duti import lagi...

Atau dalam nilai RM lebih kurang RM350,000 hingga RM500,000 sahaja..

Dengan mengambil kira gaji minimum baru bagi Semenanjung Malaysia iaitu sebanyak RM900 manakala di Sabah dan Sarawak diletakkan pada paras RM800.. rakyat Malaysia perlu mengambil masa selama seperti perkiraan di bawah untuk memilikinya..

RM900 x 12 (bulan) = RM10800 x 46 tahun 4 bulan = RM500,400

Ini bermakna mereka memerlukan sekurang-kurangnya 46 tahun lama untuk memiliki jam tangan mewah berjenama Franck Muller ini..
 
Read more at: http://darisungaiderhaka.blogspot.com/2012/09/apa-rosmah-mansor-pakai-jam-tangan.html
 
 

Defending Ngeh's Tweet on provocative film

Posted: 20 Sep 2012 01:50 PM PDT

I agree with Ngeh that Muslims have been/are wasting to much time and energy on an issue (deliberately) provoked by one single person. Instead, they should look at the 'agenda' behind the provocation.

Apparently, 55-year old Sam Bacile's real name is Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, where he could well be an American Coptic Christian though he confessed to be Jewish and an Israeli. But Israeli officers asserted they have no record of any Israeli by that name (which name, Bacile or Nakoula?).

But far more interestingly, the person behind the scene involving Sam Bacile (or Nakoula Basseley Nakoula) and his film insulting Islam has been a pastor from the Dove World Outreach Center, a bloke by the name of Terry Jones.

Jones is notorious for provoking the Muslim world two years ago by his boast to burn 200 copies of the Quran. However, US State and Defence authorities successfully persuaded him against that as his action could imperil American troops in Afghanistan and the Middle East.

Nonetheless, one year later (in 2011) he did burn one copy of the Quran.

On the recent Bacile's provocative film, he ignored pleas from US authorities (again) not to upload the film on his church website. US media columnists have also appealed to church authorities to stop him to avoid violence in the Middle East but he gave everyone two fingers. Some US church leaders stated what he has done has been a travesty and detestable.

As for the suspected 'agenda' behind the film, my agreement with Ngeh also pertains to my observations and belief that there would usually be a Zionist element behind such provocations against Muslims in general and Arabs (Palestinians) in particular. There is a very strong nexus between Ultra Zionists (both American and Israeli Zionists) and the US Christian Right, hence Jones' deliberate provocations could be related to right-wing Zionists' aim to demonize the easily provoked Arab-Muslims and/or to win back lost European sympathies and support for them - sympathies and support lost as a result of their arrogant political intransigence and feral brutalities against the Palestinians.

Recently, President Obama has made an unprecedented decision (for a US President) in refusing to see Benjamin Netanyahu. Many Israeli leaders realized that Netanyahu has crossed the line in his usual 'dictates' to Obama, and took to criticizing him (Netanyahu) for his faux pas, hoping to steer him back on the proper polite path to winning back the US presidential support for an already isolated Israel.

Israeli PMs, particularly an ultra like Netanyahu, believe they alone in the world have the politically teflonised backings from the US Christian Right and American Zionists to lecture, berate and scold US President on the correct political policies for the Middle-East. Usually they have been correct but Netanyahu's increasingly arrogant and strident talk-down to the US President have gotten out of hand, to an extent the US President, the leader of the most powerful nation in the world, would have suffered irreparable humiliation if he continues (like his predecessors) to quietly accept the Israeli dressing down. Perhaps the Arabs must be brought into the picture once again to help divert attention from this.

If we recall some years back, when the Danish rightwing Jyllen-Posten published the Prophet Mohamad cartoons, it set the European world topsy turvy by the predictably violent reaction from Muslims and Arabs.

When European authorities and media were asked on the appropriateness of Jyllen-Posten publishing such offensive caricatures of a personality beloved by Muslims, the usual hypocritical mob would chant out blindly their mantra of 'freedom of speech and expression', while pretending not to remember how they persecuted Prince Harry for wearing a mere swastika armband to a fancy dress ball, or a Holocaust denier like David Irving for writing a book that says Jews killed by the Nazis did not number 6 millions and were considerably less.

Condemned for something associated with a fancy dress ball? For crying out loud!

But the Zionist-galvanized ruckus evoked from an innocuous incident by an unsuspecting youth was so great that it not only forced the young royalty into apologising but panicked his father, the future King of England into issuing abject apologies and explanations of how silly his son had been, with British ministers wading in, all stumbling forward to prostrate themselves before the Gods of their guilt.

His father even ordered little Harry to visit the Nazi concentration camp in Auschwitz to learn and atone.

I have seen 'Dracula', 'Stalin', 'Tojo' and even a 'George Bush' at fancy dress balls, all winning at least a laugh or two. Shouldn't those wearers of the costumes be made to apologize to respectively Romania, Russia, Japan and the USA too?

Lord Janner, a senior figure in Britain's Jewish community, said "What Harry did was both stupid and evil. The time has come for him to make a public apology."

Evil?

Hey! Freedom of expression? What happened to that supposedly cherished Western institution then?

Oh BTW, David Irving was jailed for a number of years by an Australian Court for challenging the sacrosanct figure of 6 million Jews killed in the Holocaust.

READ MORE HERE

 

On the Freedom to Offend an Imaginary God

Posted: 19 Sep 2012 02:39 PM PDT

Our panic and moral confusion were at first sublimated in attacks upon the hapless Governor Romney. I am no fan of Romney's, and I would find the prospect of his presidency risible if it were not so depressing, but he did accurately detect the first bleats of fear in the Obama administration's reaction to this crisis. Romney got the timing of events wrong—confusing, as many did, a statement made by the U.S. Embassy in Cairo for an official government response to the murder of Americans in Libya. But the truth is that the White House struck the same note of apology, disavowing the offending speech while claiming to protect free speech in principle. It may seem a small detail, given the heat of the moment—but so is a quivering lip.

Our government followed the path of appeasement further by attempting to silence the irrepressible crackpot Pastor Terry Jones, who had left off burning copies of the Qur'an just long enough to promote the film. The administration also requested that Google remove "Innocence of Muslims" from its servers. These maneuvers attest to one of two psychological and diplomatic realities: Either our government is unwilling to address the problem at hand, or the problem is so vast and terrifying that we have decided to placate the barbarians at the gate.

The contagion of moral cowardice followed its usual course, wherein liberal journalists and pundits began to reconsider our most basic freedoms in light of the sadomasochistic fury known as "religious sensitivity" among Muslims. Contributors to The New York Times and NPR spoke of the need to find a balance between free speech and freedom of religion—as though the latter could possibly be infringed by a YouTube video. As predictable as Muslim bullying has become, the moral confusion of secular liberals appears to be part of the same clockwork.

Consider what is actually happening: Some percentage of the world's Muslims—Five percent? Fifteen? Fifty? It's not yet clear—is demanding that all non-Muslims conform to the strictures of Islamic law. And where they do not immediately resort to violence in their protests, they threaten it. Carrying a sign that reads "Behead Those Who Insult the Prophet" may still count as an example of peaceful protest, but it is also an assurance that infidel blood would be shed if the imbecile holding the placard only had more power. This grotesque promise is, of course, fulfilled in nearly every Muslim society. To make a film like "Innocence of Muslims" anywhere in the Middle East would be as sure a method of suicide as the laws of physics allow.

What exactly was in the film? Who made it? What were their motives? Was Muhammad really depicted? Was that a Qur'an burning, or some other book? Questions of this kind are obscene. Here is where the line must be drawn and defended without apology: We are free to burn the Qur'an or any other book, and to criticize Muhammad or any other human being. Let no one forget it.

At moments like this, we inevitably hear—from people who don't know what it's like to believe in paradise—that religion is just a way of channeling popular unrest. The true source of the problem can be found in the history of western aggression in the region. It is our policies, rather than our freedoms, that they hate. I believe that the future of liberalism—and much else—depends on our overcoming this ruinous self-deception.  Religion only works as a pretext for political violence because many millions of people actually believe what they say they believe: that imaginary crimes like blasphemy and apostasy are killing offenses.

READ MORE HERE

 

Sam Harris on the Innocence of Muslims affair

Posted: 19 Sep 2012 02:35 PM PDT

There is much in the post to agree with. For a start, I agree that Innocence of Muslims, or the trailer for it, or selection from it, or whatever the hell that was, is (pretty much) unwatchable. I did actually force myself to watch the damn thing (you can find it easily if you really must), but it is atrocious in every possible respect – bigoted, scurrilous, disjointed, and suffering from the most abyssmal production values since Plan 9 from Outer Space (I know I'm not the first to make the comparison, so apologies to whoever was).

Harris dismisses as "obscene" such questions as, "What exactly was in the film? Who made it? What were their motives? Was Muhammad really depicted? Was that a Qur'an burning, or some other book?" I think that's going too far. It does appear that the film was deliberately created to express hatred for Muslims and to provoke a violent backlash. In the circumstances, we can ask these questions about it, especially when we add in further issues such as (apparently credible) claims of actors being conned into thinking they were involved in a very different project. There is much to discuss about the film itself and the circumstances of its production, even if, at the end of the day we agree with Harris that:

Here is where the line must be drawn and defended without apology: We are free to burn the Qur'an or any other book, and to criticize Muhammad or any other human being. Let no one forget it.

Yes, that's right. We do get to express our repudiation of belief systems, including Islam, without being constrained by the power of the state, or so I want to argue (and have done in the past). We can go on to criticise prophets or anyone else. Harris is pretty much correct when he says:

The freedom to think out loud on certain topics, without fear of being hounded into hiding or killed, has already been lost. And the only forces on earth that can recover it are strong, secular governments that will face down charges of blasphemy with scorn. No apologies necessary. Muslims must learn that if they make belligerent and fanatical claims upon the tolerance of free societies, they will meet the limits of that tolerance.

Yes, pretty much right. Only "pretty much" because there's an element of exaggeration to quibble about, the way it's been worded. The problem is not so much that we can't "think aloud" on certain topics as that we cannot publish those thoughts widely, once we've sorted them out, should we take certain strong stances. But even when the point is expressed in a less rhetorical way, it's true that an important freedom has been lost, not through the actions of the state but through the willingness of some Muslims to resort to murder in response to what they see as insults to Islam or their prophet.

How should the state and its officials respond – and how should we request that they do so? They may be tempted to suppress some kinds of anti-religious speech and to demonise the speakers as racists and criminals … and in some cases they may even be correct that they are dealing with racists or something very similar. Even leaving aside basic concerns about freedom of speech, however, this response can be counterproductive. If an impression is created that political power is being used to silence opposition to Islam, this will merely add to the resentments against Islam that are already present in Western societies, and which have now been fueled by the violent, in some cases murderous, responses to Innocence of Muslims. More generally, when religious leaders and organisations try to prevent certain speech from being heard or certain images from being seen, this adds to the layers of distrust and resentment. The effect is exacerbated if governments get in on the act, actually assisting to suppress speech and images.

READ MORE HERE

 

Najib’s theatre of dreams

Posted: 19 Sep 2012 01:20 PM PDT

As speeches go, the prime minister struck all the right chords last week at the National Press Club awards night. It would have been a cracker of a speech — had it come from someone else or made in another setting. A cracker of a speech to eager-beaver young cadet reporters, a valedictory speech to journalism graduates, or even as a half-time dressing-room pep talk.

Sadly it was not a championship coach speaking, but a prime minister being undercut even as he spoke by those ostensibly on his watch. It could have been worse: it might have been made by that oaf, his deputy, or that motor-trade Johnny waiting stage right.

Sadly, too, it was aimed mainly at online irregulars whose loyalty is projected at a price, and to a working press who toil quite comfortably in newsrooms owned and operated by various limbs of the corporatist-state that the prime minister attempts vainly to steer.

Reichstag Perdana, a Potemkim theatre of dreams

But the ship of state is a ponderous rotting hulk, not a nimble kayak.

And so, as speeches go, it just…went.

I don't know if anyone listening to his speech that night felt a sudden onset of vertigo, such are the giddy heights of the prime minister's annual recital of the free-press creed.

Reading the NST's abridged version the next morning, though, brought to mind my old Sixth Form English Lit master explaining what Coleridge meant by a willing "suspension of disbelief" — that state of mind required when reading poetry or fiction, of Xanadu or the second-hand thoughts of Reichstag Putrajaya.

As with Najib's grand declarations of intent in 2009, over-reaching ambition was quite apparent in a speech that was excellent in parts, as the curate once said; therein the problem: those are the very parts that others don't reach and won't.

Perdana West

Too often the prime minister's speeches have had the ring of being pitched both for the files of the National Archives and well as for the ears of Wall Street, Fleet Street, Whitehall, the Executive Building, the Champs Elysees, the Kohlesseum and other such fine hostelries for the transient and the sometimes sentient.

Real-life audiences at press nights are not composed of those driven by ambition to plant a footprint in the alley of stars; rather more mundanely, they comprise those enveloped in the machinations of petty flunkies and petty flacks whose eyes are firmly set on the next project, the next contract, and the next election. The nomenclitura, as Dato Sak AK47 calls them.

Noble thoughts and noble aims litter the prime minister's press awards speeches: they are meant to inspire but ring hollow when delivered to a shallow audience that lives by instructions to sell the sizzle.

It is the advertising copywriter, not the journalist, whose trade requires him to sell the sizzle, not the steak — and the journalist will hear no sizzle in a blancmange.

Read more at: http://uppercaise.wordpress.com/2012/09/20/najibs-theatre-of-dreams/

Killing innocents is never the answer

Posted: 18 Sep 2012 01:42 PM PDT

The strike was approved in response to the "guilt" of some Iraqis who had supposedly threatened the life of George Bush the elder. It did not seem to matter that the trial for said crimes was not even over yet when the missile was launched.

My point is that it does not take much for American government-sponsored violence to be unleashed on a country.

In this light, the death of Christopher Stevens, the American Ambassador to Libya, along with several of his colleagues could have severe repercussions on innocent people.

The Obama administration seems to be practising restraint for the moment, but one can question if a more hawkish government would act in the same way. As it is, Mitt Romney is making Bush-like sounds of war.

The catalyst for all this is that utterly obscene and reprehensible video insulting the Prophet Muhammad.

As of this moment, it appears that it was made by a petty crook with a shady past, and it was supported by odious right-wing groups.

These loathsome creatures can be said to be simply hatemongers, but it can also be said that whether on purpose or not, they are agents provocateurs for the hawks of America who are just itching for an excuse to wreak even more destruction on West Asia.

And nothing would serve their wicked intentions more than scenes of death and violence inflicted on American lives and property, shown with salivating eagerness by so-called news channels like Fox.

It does not matter that ordinary Libyans were the first to react in trying to save Stevens, it does not matter that the Islamic Orthodoxy, most notably the Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia, has condemned the killings.

The act of a shrill few would be used to colour the Islamic world as violent and sub-human.

In this light, it is of even more importance that Islamic countries that want to, rightly, protest against the film also be equally strong in their stand against the inflicting of violence. It is important because to do otherwise would be playing right into the hands of those who would wish harm unto them.

Let me be clear, this disgusting work of hatred naturally raises feelings of anger. Ordinary people as well as governments have every right to express that anger, but that expression must stop at the point of violence.

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved