Sabtu, 1 September 2012

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


PM: Pakatan being disrespectful of the Sultan is not surprising

Posted: 01 Sep 2012 01:53 AM PDT

(The Star) - It is hardly a surprise for the Pakatan Rakyat-led Selangor government to be disrespectful of the state Sultan, said Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.

"They would rather show more respect to the state's economic adviser, who has no locus standi, than the Sultan, the symbol of sovereignty in the country," he said.

Selangor's economic adviser is Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, who is also PKR leader.

Najib was responding to reports that Selangor Mentri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim had not issued an invitation to the Sultan to attend state-level Merdeka eve celebration in Shah Alam.

The Sultan's private secretary Datuk Mohamad Munir Bani had claimed that it was a norm to invite the Sultan to the event, adding that it had been a common practice of the previous Selangor government.

"It is also weird that they want to do things like change the flag," Najib said, referring to reports of individuals waving "alternative flags" to the Jalur Gemilang during the Janji Demokrasi gathering at Dataran Merdeka on Aug 30.

Firing more salvos at Pakatan, Najib said winds of change were also blowing in Selangor with more people responding positively to Barisan Nasional.

Speaking at the Selangor Barisan Hari Raya open house at the Rubber Research Institute here Saturday, he said this year's crowd, estimated at 100,000, was a lot more than last year's attendance.

"And it is definitely more than the state government's Merdeka eve celebration. This proves that the people of Selangor are ready to make that change so that the state's administration will return to Barisan," he said.

Najib said while the state government had not fulfilled its promises to the people, the Federal Government had gone above and beyond that was promised in its manifesto with various aid programmes for the people.

Meanwhile, in SHAH ALAM, Khalid defended the state-level National Day celebration against criticisms that the Sultan of Selangor was not invited.

He said the celebration was held according to all common practices and guidelines put into place by the previous state government.

"There was nothing surprising in the way the celebration was held. I did not see anything wrong in the way the function was planned and executed.

"Planning for the event was undertaken by a special task force under the purview of the Selangor state secretary (Datuk Mohd Khusrin Mohd) and it has been doing it this way before 2008," he said at the Shah Alam Gallery here.

Khalid said that although he would meet the Sultan every Wednesday to discuss various issues, they never talked about the celebration.

"There was no need to discuss the matter as the planning for the celebration was under the state secretary. Besides, there are many other important issues that need attention," he said.

On Saturday, members of the Selangor Perkasa, including its president Abu Bakar Yahya, lodged a report at the Shah Alam police headquarters on the matter.

 

PR has lost direction, says Noh Omar

Posted: 01 Sep 2012 01:43 AM PDT

Mohd Farhan Darwis, The Malaysian Insider

Agriculture and Agro-based Industry Minister Datuk Seri Noh Omar today took a swipe at Pakatan Rakyat (PR), saying the opposition bloc has started to lose its direction in wanting to replace the national flag, the Jalur Gemilang.

The Selangor Barisan Nasional (BN) deputy chairman also said it was impossible to do so as the flag is enshrined in the Federal Constitution.

"They have started to lose direction... until they even want to change the flag. I want to remind them that we cannot change matters enshrined in our Constitution such as the flag; whoever rules it is still our symbol. And the national anthem 'Negaraku', it is the song of whoever is in power. 

"They are not yet ruling (but) already want to do extraordinary things," Noh told reporters at the Selangor BN open house at the Rubber Research Institute of Malaysia (RRIM) in Sungai Buloh here.

The Tanjung Karang MP also expressed sorrow at the way PR celebrated National Day.

"I feel very sad at the attitude and the way they celebrate Merdeka Day, we should raise flags, but they make other flags," he said, in apparent reference to a group of individuals who were spotted waving flags sporting alternative designs to the Jalur Gemilang during the massive public countdown to the country's 55th National Day in Kuala Lumpur last Thursday.

"They are rude, not yet in power but they are already power crazy, their supporters and followers don't respect our rules."

The individuals were spotted carrying flags sporting the familiar crescent moon and 14-pointed star against a red-and-white striped background — similar to the national flags of neighbouring Singapore and Indonesia — which were alleged to be the alternative to the Jalur Gemilang.

Some of the street party-goers were also reported to have stepped on or tore posters bearing the images of Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak, his wife and the Election Commission chairman that night.

However, the organisers of the Janji Demokrasi rally — which took place at the same venue at Dataran Merdeka — has distanced themselves from the individuals who had allegedly demanded the national flag be replaced.

Noh also commented on Selangor PR ignoring the Sultan of Selangor in its National Day celebrations, saying that it shows that the federal opposition bloc did not uphold the Rukun Negara principle of "Loyalty to King and country".

"Before BN carried out today's programme, the organiser informed the Sultan of Selangor that the prime minister will come to celebrate with the people.

"Not like the opposition, their state-level Merdeka Day celebrations ignored the Sultan and turned this celebration into a political arena," Noh said, adding "we practise the Rukun Negara principle of loyalty to King and country."

Noh said: "In this life there are two things, morals and laws. Morally, they have to respect our culture, other people's functions, but they try to take advantage to carry out politicking activities including in the programme on Merdeka Day eve".

 

Seat distribution in Pakatan almost complete

Posted: 31 Aug 2012 08:46 PM PDT

(Bernama) - Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim said today allocation of seats to be contested by parties in the opposition coalition for the upcoming 13th general election was about completed.

He said they would negotiate based on consensus should there be additional suggestions.

"We will discuss if there are new suggestions. In Kelantan it is complete, while Penang is almost done," he told reporters after speaking at a programme here today.

On the implementation of Hudud law, Anwar said implementation at the national-level depended on amendments to the Federal Constitution.

In another development, DAP will submit a private members bill in pushing for an anti-hopping law when Parliament reconvenes on Sept 25.

Party chairman Karpal Singh said this was necessary as Article 10 (1)(c) of the Federal Constitution would have to be amended first to enable an anti-hopping law to be enacted.

"To bring in the anti-hopping law, you have to amend Article 10 (1)(c) which says there is right of association including the right to join or leave a party," he told a press conference in Penang today.

He said the Penang government was looking at enacting an anti-hopping law in November but it would be unconstitutional unless there was a change in the Federal Constitution.

To make the (anti-hopping) law constitutional, he said there must be either a change to Article 10 (1)(c) or bring up to the Federal Court to review its 1992 decision whereby it decided that an anti-hopping law enactment passed by the Kelantan state assembly was unconstitutional.

 

Karpal: DAP to push for anti-hopping law

Posted: 31 Aug 2012 07:57 PM PDT

(Bernama) - The DAP will submit a private members bill to push for an anti-hopping law when Parliament reconvenes on Sept 25, said its chairman Karpal Singh.

He said this was necessary as Article 10 (1)(c) of the federal constitution would have to be amended first to enable an anti-hopping law to be enacted.

"To bring in the anti-hopping law, you have to amend Article 10 (1)(c) which says there is right of association including the right to join or leave a party," he told a press conference here on Saturday.

He said the Penang government was looking at enacting an anti-hopping law in November but it would be unconstitutional unless there was a change in the federal constitution.

To make the (anti-hopping) law constitutional, he said, there must be either a change to Article 10 (1)(c) or it must be brought up to the Federal Court to review its 1992 decision where it decided that an anti-hopping law enactment passed by the Kelantan state assembly was unconstitutional.

 

Najib to offer oil royalty hike?

Posted: 31 Aug 2012 04:43 PM PDT

Fearing for his future, that of his party and ruling alliance, the PM has come to Sabah bearing gifts, according to Umno insiders. 

(FMT) - KOTA KINABALU: Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak, fearing for his future, that of his party and ruling alliance, has come to Sabah bearing gifts, according to Umno insiders.

One of them is an offer of an increase in the 5% oil royalty the state presently gets which the opposition Pakatan Rakyat has pledged to raise substantially if it takes over Putrajaya in the next general election.

According to the grapevine, Najib will announce the increased oil payments the state would receive for outflow of its resources.

However, while no figure was forthcoming, speculation is that the premier would offer "more than 10%" oil royalty to the must-win state for Barisan Nasional and Umno.

Sabah BN coalition partner United Pasokmomogun KadazanDusun Murut Organisation (Upko) said as much recently.

According to party president Bernard Dompok, under the Petronas agreement the royalty payment was set at 10% but was to be split between Sabah and Kuala Lumpur.

"I think the immediate doable figure, to my mind, is 10%. For a start, we can almost have another 5%. This is my thinking. Beyond that there will have to be some negotiation with the oil companies" he was quoted as saying last week.

However, those critical of the move warned that all the offer, counter-offer and wheeling and dealing being made is a sell-off of national assets for political expediency.

"If it is true (raising the oil royalty) then it is a shameless buyout … like a bribe that is not his to give but already belongs to the state," said a political analyst who added that the rumour of such an offer being made was known for some time.

"They know that people are fed up with this government. Fifty years is a long time and people are thinking its time… change the government, they are saying, and Najib and BN know this and are trying to buy more time with the country's resources.

"But it's up to the people… will they buy this? The BN federal government is giving to the BN state … from one pocket to the other pocket … apa macam (what do you think)?

"It will definitely come as a shock that federal is toying with Sabah… its wealth. Now coming begging for another chance. Now is the time for Sabahans … their leaders to twist the dagger," the person said.

The gift comes even as Sabahans debate the federal government's role in surrendering Sabah's oil-rich territories to Brunei as well as their small share in their own resources.

STAR chief Jeffrey Kitingan has urged state government leaders to study the oil agreement carefully as he believes many of them do not understand the underlying commitments of the deal and would be simply going to the negotiating table with the federal government without much thought of the future repercussions of renegotiating Sabah's oil resources.

READ MORE HERE

 

MCA opposes Islam; what about DAP?

Posted: 31 Aug 2012 04:10 PM PDT

(The Star) - MCA Youth has challenged the DAP to state its stand on the hudud issue instead of misleading the public by remaining silent.

As the PAS leadership is clearly not backing down on its plan to implement hudud if Pakatan Rakyat takes over Putrajaya in the coming general election, DAP leaders must state their stand, said its chief Datuk Dr Wee Ka Siong.

"We feel Pakatan Rakyat should be honest about what they are going to do and the implications of their actions to the community," he told a press conference after the wing's 23rd central committee meeting here yesterday.

Dr Wee was commenting on a recent interview published in a Chinese daily which quoted PAS deputy president Mohamad Sabu as saying that the party would propose constitutional amendments in Parliament to implement the Islamic law if it formed the Federal Govern­ment.

He later denied making the statement to Sin Chew Daily.

Following that, several PAS senior leaders had stated that hudud remained on the party's agenda.

They said that it was no longer a question of whether hudud should be implemented but how it was to be enforced.

PAS president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang said on Thursday that the party would not give up its struggle to uphold Islamic laws, adding that the Malacca sultanate centuries ago had imposed syariah laws on Muslims and customary laws on non-Muslims.

He also said the DAP had no authority to compel PAS to forgo its hudud agenda.

Dr Wee said PAS had never lied about its intention to implement hudud and questioned why the DAP had remained quiet.

"We don't want the Chinese community to be misled on this issue," he said.

On another matter, Dr Wee thanked the Cabinet and the Higher Education Ministry for offering some 600 STPM and Matriculation high-achiever scholarships for further studies in local private universities.

"The Government wants to retain these talents so they can contribute to the development of the country," he said.

He added that the youth wing would be holding its general assembly on Sept 20.

 

I’m not returning to Barisan, says Lajim

Posted: 31 Aug 2012 04:03 PM PDT

(The Star) - KOTA KINABALU: Beaufort MP Datuk Lajim Ukin has denied talk that he is returning to Barisan Nasional.

"I have not met any Barisan leaders either at the state or Federal level to talk about returning to Barisan," he told reporters here on Thursday.

Several bloggers have claimed that he was returning to Barisan because he was not given any "incentives" promised by the Opposition and that he failed to deliver more crossovers.

He believed such bloggers were trying to discredit him and make people lose faith in him.

He reiterated that his July 28 move to align himself with Pakatan Rakyat was done without any "incentives".

"Let me make it clear that I joined the Opposition not because of monetary gains. That is not how the Opposition works, they do not buy anyone," he added.

Lajim, who has formed non-governmental organisation Coalition for Change in Sabah, claimed that there would be more Barisan members leaving at the "right time".

 

Get real, pundit tells Young Power

Posted: 31 Aug 2012 03:51 PM PDT

It's unlikely for Pakatan to accept an Indian-based party, says analyst A Thiruvengadam.

B Nantha Kumar, FMT

A prominent analyst of Malaysian Indian politics has poured cold water on the idea of an Indian-based party within Pakatan Rakyat.

A Thiruvengadam, who writes a column for a Tamil daily, said today that the proposal was unrealistic in the light of Pakatan's stand against race-based politics.

He was commenting on a proposal by a group calling itself Young Power and claiming to represent Indian youths.

One member, G Krishnan, told FMT on Wednesday that the group was disappointed that neither Barisan Nasional nor any party in Pakatan was doing enough to address issues of concern to Indians.

Krishnan also said Young Power had raised the proposal with several Indian leaders in Pakatan by text message and had received positive responses.

"It's a mission impossible," said Thiruvengadam, noting that Pakatan leaders have often spoken against raced-based politics and that it is not easy to get registered as a political party in Malaysia, especially one that aligns itself with the parliamentary opposition.

Furthermore, he added, it was doubtful that any Indian currently holding a leadership position in any of the Pakatan parties would resign to join the new party.

Thiruvengadam is a former PKR member and former municipal councillor for Petaling Jaya.

His advice to Young Power was that it should instead support a two-party system for the country.

"Indians can benefit more via the two-party system since they are the third largest community in the country, which makes them an important deciding factor in the polls," he said.

However, Young Power's proposal has the support of P Jenapala, the pro-tem president of the Indian Justice Party.

Sambal belacan

Jenapala, a former PKR deputy secretary, said he saw nothing wrong in Pakatan accepting an Indian-based party since the bloc includes PAS, which he described as a "one hundred percent Malay-dominated party".

He rejected the Pakatan claim that it is a coalition for all races.

"PAS will say, 'Let's go towards a better Malaysia as long as Muslims are supreme.' DAP will say, 'Malaysia for Malaysians as long as the Chinese are supreme.' And PKR is a Pakatan version of Umno upholding Malay supremacy."

READ MORE HERE

 

Umno MP denies jumping ship rumour

Posted: 31 Aug 2012 03:42 PM PDT

Salleh Kalbi quashes the rumour, saying even if he is not nominated to defend his Silam seat in the next polls, he will remain loyal to Umno.

Thomas Pi, FMT

LAHAD DATU: Silam MP Salleh Kalbi has denied allegations that he is prepared to move to the opposition if he is not nominated as the Barisan Nasional candidate in the coming general election.

He also denied having met with any opposition leaders recently to discuss the matter.

He believed that such speculations by Silam Umno members was aimed at reducing his chances of being re-nominated as a candidate.

"I had told Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak and Sabah Chief Minister Musa Aman that I will not cross over to the opposition after such allegations surfaced recently.

"No matter what happens, I will remain with BN and Umno," he stressed.

As the guest of honour in a fund raising activity organised by San Long Dian temple here, Salleh made it a point to tell the media present that lies were being spread about him and those doing so had an agenda against him.

The speculation surfaced after Salleh failed to secure any post within the Silam Umno division recently.

With the crossover of two other BN leaders to the opposition last month, word spread that Salleh had secret discussions with PKR here.

It is understood that some PKR members here held an open survey of Salleh's popularity should he represent the opposition in the coming general election.

A close aid to Umno Silam division chairman Nasrun Mansur said the party had received such information and would leave it to the top leadership to decide on this matter.

 

Show some respect, DAP tells PKR

Posted: 31 Aug 2012 03:38 PM PDT

Pahang DAP takes its PKR counterpart to task over the latter's remarks with regard to DAP wanting extra seats. 

Athi Shankar, FMT

CAMERON HIGHLANDS: Pahang PKR's leadership should learn to respect DAP as a senior partner in Pakatan Rakyat.

State DAP vice-chairman J Apalasamy also reminded PKR state chairman Fauzi Abdul Rahman that it was his party that gave seats to PKR to contest in Pahang in the 2008 general election.

"He should not forget that when lashing out against DAP in the media. He should remember DAP is a much more senior party than PKR in Malaysian politics. He should learn to show some respect to senior partners in Pakatan, especially to DAP," he told FMT.

Apalasamy was irked by Fauzi's media outburst against DAP for requesting extra seats in Pahang – one parliament and two state from PKR for the next general election.

DAP was keen to contest the Damak and Teruntum state seats as well as the Bentong federal constituency. PKR contested those seats in 2008.

Fauzi had criticised DAP for lacking discipline in asking the seats.

He said that although it was not wrong for DAP to request for additional seats, it must be done through the proper channels and with mutual consent.

Apalasamy returned fire, reminding Fauzi that DAP proved to be more discipline as the party allowed unelected PKR supremo and Permatang Pauh MP Anwar Ibrahim to be the Opposition Leader despite having 29 MPs which was more than PKR's 26.

"Moreover PKR is prevalent with defections than DAP," he said.

In 2008, DAP contested two federal – Cameron Highlands and Raub – and seven state seats, winning only the Triang and Tras state constituencies.

PKR contested six federal and 13 state seats, winning only the Indera Mahkota and Kuantan parliamentary constituencies.

Apalasamy argued that DAP had better candidates to win those seats it was requesting.

Moreover, he reminded Fauzi that the results of the Sarawak election last year and a series of by-elections since 2008 have shown that DAP performed better than other Pakatan partners.

"So Fauzi should show some respect to us and be more disciplined," he added.

 

PKR blames Najib, Umno for bus attack

Posted: 31 Aug 2012 03:36 PM PDT

The bus which is being used for the party's "Jelajah Rakyat Merdeka" campaign was splashed with red paint and its windscreen cracked.

K Pragalath, FMT

PKR deputy president Azmin Ali has blamed Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak and Umno over an attack on the party's bus that is being used for the party's "Jelajah Rakyat Merdeka" campaign.

"The culture of gangsterism and threats has been the practice and main weapon of enemies, especially Umno to curb PKR and Pakatan Rakyat's march forward.

"Najib's silence clearly approves these actions. It is a culture brought by Najib," he said.

"Even former prime ministers Dr Mahathir Mohamad and Abdullah Ahmad Badawi never protected gangsters," he told a press conference at the PKR headquarters this morning.

The "Jelajah Rakyat Merdeka" campaign is a PKR initiative led by Opposition Leader and PKR advisor Anwar Ibrahim to garner support from the masses.

In the 4.30am incident that took place in Kota Bharu, Kelantan, the bus was splashed with red paint and its windscreen cracked.

The attackers threw bricks towards the front left corner of the bus, specifically aiming at the bus driver.

A police report on the attack was lodged at 5.15am.

The bus is currently on the way to Grik which marks Anwar's campaign in Perak.

 

New York priest says child often seducer in sex abuse cases

Posted: 30 Aug 2012 05:35 PM PDT

(Reuters) - A Roman Catholic priest in New York expressed sympathy this week for some clergy who sexually abuse children, saying that it was often the "youngster" who was the seducer, then later apologised for his remarks.

Comments by the Rev. Benedict Groeschel, 79, co-founder of the Franciscan Friars of the Renewal in Westchester County outside New York City, in which he expressed sympathy for convicted child rapist Jerry Sandusky, drew strong criticism from the Archdiocese of New York and the support group Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests.

"Suppose you have a man having a nervous breakdown, and a youngster comes after him. A lot of the cases, the youngster — 14, 16, 18 — is the seducer," Groeschel said when asked by an interviewer from the National Catholic Register, the nation's oldest Catholic newspaper, about his work with priests who abuse children.

Groeschel, who has published numerous books and hosted shows on the Eternal Word Television Network, suggested that children might seduce priests because they lacked a father figure, adding, "They won't be planning to get into heavy-duty sex, but almost romantic, embracing, kissing, perhaps sleeping, but not having intercourse or anything like that."

Yesterday evening, Groeschel apologised, claiming his mind and ways of expressing himself "are not as clear as they used to be".

"I apologise for my comments. I did not intend to blame the victim. A priest (or anyone else) who abuses a minor is always wrong and is always responsible," he said in a statement. " I deeply regret any harm I have caused to anyone."

The Catholic Church has been rocked in recent decades by accusations that it tried to cover up the sexual abuse of children by priests and has paid out billions in settlements to abuse victims, bankrupting several US dioceses.

Similar scandals have shaken the lucrative world of college sports, most notably the conviction of Sandusky, a former Penn State assistant football coach, for sexually abusing 10 boys over 15 years, most of them in the campus football showers.

Groeschel referred to Sandusky as "this poor guy". Pondering how Sandusky's attacks could have gone on for so long, Groeschel added, "Well, you know, until recent years, people did not register in their minds that it was a crime".

The interview was published on Monday but was removed from the National Catholic Register's website by yesterday. It was replaced with a note from Jeanette De Melo, the Register's editor in chief, apologising for what she called an "editorial mistake", saying the publication should have attempted to clarify or challenge his comments.

"Child sexual abuse is never excusable," she wrote.

The Archdiocese of New York said Groeschel's comments were "simply wrong" and could not go unchallenged, although it does not have direct authority over Groeschel, who retired from teaching in the archdiocese's seminary last year.

'Said something like grandpa would say'

Colleagues of Groeschel suggested yesterday that he was recovering from a fall and was mentally frail.

The Rev. Glenn Sudano, a spokesman for the Franciscan Friars, likened him to an elderly relative.

"He said something like grandpa would say and it's like 'Grandpa, why would you say that?'" Sudano told Reuters in a telephone interview.

"Obviously we don't agree with what he said. Obviously it's terribly disappointing that people are hurt or upset," Sudano said. "We feel very bad about it."

Sudano said he did not know if Groeschel would face any consequences for his remarks.

Barbara Blaine, president of Survivors Network for those Abused by Priests, called the remarks "callous".

"A teenager does not have the power to seduce anyone. The adult is in the position of power and authority," Blaine said. "He should be removed from speaking as a Catholic leader."

Archdiocese spokesman Joseph Zwilling said, "The harm that was done by these remarks was compounded by the assertion that the victim of abuse is responsible for the abuse, or somehow caused the abuse to occur.

"This is not only terribly wrong," he said in a statement, "it is also extremely painful for victims."

 

End hudud tiff, PAS told

Posted: 30 Aug 2012 03:06 PM PDT

Dzulkefly

DZULKEFLY: Hudud issue will only hamper party's performance in election

Spat with DAP will hamper election results, say party leaders 

Asrul Hadi Abdullah Sani, The Malay Mail

PAS leaders have called for the party to stop the hudud tiff with DAP and avoid creating unnecessary distractions, stressing the need to solely focus on the general election.


Political analysts, however, have disregarded the political quarrel between the two Pakatan Rakyat (PR) parties as a "gimmick" to strengthen their political base.

PAS central working committee member and Kuala Selangor MP Dzulkefly Ahmad said the hudud issue would not help but only hamper the party's performance in the elections.

"I want the hudud polemic to stop as we would like the electorate to clearly focus on the 'defining issues' of the general election and how both divides advocate solutions and what both have done in the course of the 12th parliamentary session," he said.

"Besides, it will allow PAS-PR to mount a campaign against the Umno-BN government.

Dzulkefly, the PAS Research Centre director, told The Malay Mail the party needs to be realistic in its struggle for hudud and stressed that any amendments should be done democratically.

He said the party has established its commitment in implementing the Islamic Penal Code.

He said the biggest obstacle for the penal code to get a federal mandate is the Syariah Courts (Criminal Jurisdiction) Act 1965 which reduces all punitive laws of Islam to RM3,000 fine, fives years detention and strokes of the rotan.

"PAS and other political parties and NGOs and academics must work together to get hudud explained and supported. They should also ensure it is implemented democratically," he said.

PAS Shah Alam MP Khalid Samad agreed that the party needs to get its act together, saying its leaders needed to be more understanding.

Khalid

KHALID: PAS needs to get act together, leaders should be more understanding

"Unfortunately some of the party youth leaders are not sensitive to understanding the current situation. The hudud issue is like a double-edged sword. Maybe in Terengganu, PAS can get more support from the Malays by championing hudud but the party might lose votes from non-Malays in other states like Selangor.

"The party must be wise in handling the issue. The public knows the party's Islamic agenda. Even though we don't talk about it, it doesn't mean that they don't know it," he said.

Universiti Utara Malaysia School of International Studies Dean Dr Mohd Azizuddin Mohd Sani, however, said the war of words between DAP and PAS was only a "political gimmick."

"I think this is a political gimmick before the election. They want to maintain their core support but they also do not want to scare away the Chinese voters because PAS was able to win several seats due to Chinese support.

"That is why they have their top leaders reassuring that hudud will not be implemented but their grassroots are saying the opposite," he said.

Independent political analyst Khoo Kay Peng also said the hudud debate was a "political necessity" for both parties.

"I don't think there will be an all out war but it is a political necessity. Their sole purpose is to defeat Barisan Nasional (BN) at the polls. Hudud will not become an issue for both parties and will be set aside when election takes place," he said.

 

Nasharuddin not among PAS candidates

Posted: 30 Aug 2012 02:52 PM PDT

(The Star) - Nasharuddin Mat Isa's chances of defending the Bachok parliamentary seat are as good as gone.

The controversial former PAS deputy president's name is not in the list of contenders for the seat, said Kelantan PAS deputy commissioner II Datuk Mohd Amar Nik Abdullah.

"I have received information that Nasharuddin's name is not in the list of those nominated for the seat," he said at a Hari Raya gathering here.

He added that it had also come to his attention that Nasharuddin's name had not been mentioned at the grassroots level in Bachok.

He added, however, that the PAS central committee would decide on Nasharuddin's fate.

The MP's fallout with PAS and spiritual adviser Datuk Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat started after the 2004 general election when then prime minister Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi led the Barisan Nasional to a landslide win.

Nasharuddin, at that time, was accused of trying to engineer a "unity government" with Umno. In the 2008 general election, he defeated Barisan's Datuk Awang Adek Husin to take the seat.

Matters got to head a year later when Nik Aziz, who is Kelantan mentri besar, demanded that Nasharuddin quit as Bachok MP and join Umno if he persisted on the unity government agenda.

Nasharuddin's political mettle was again tested when he was accused of being in the "good books" of Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak when they met in Medina.

A meeting by the Syura council on Sept 9 will either make or break the deadlock that is crucial to Nasharuddin's future in the party.

However, PAS Ulama chief Datuk Harun Taib said the syura council would unlikely give in to pressure from certain quarters to kick Nasharuddin out of the party.

"Whether Nasharuddin would still be fielded as a candidate in the next election is immaterial.

"The party needs his energy and ideas," he said.

Harun said the list of candidates had not been officially confirmed.

"Even if Nasharuddin is not fielded in the next general election, he is still a potential candidate for following elections," he said.

 

Hadi: DAP cannot stop us

Posted: 30 Aug 2012 02:46 PM PDT

(The Star) - PAS president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang has strongly upheld his party's hudud agenda in the face of opposition from a Pakatan Rakyat partner.

He said DAP had no authority to compel PAS to forgo its hudud agenda.

"DAP has no power to stop PAS from expressing its right just as PAS cannot stop DAP from objecting to hudud," he added in a statement yesterday.

Hadi said PAS had stood by its principles when DAP aired its views during open dialogues.

"PAS can collaborate on matters of common interest without imposing its views on others.

"We can give and take on some matters, but will not budge on others," Hadi said.

He said PAS would not give up its struggle to uphold Islamic laws, adding that the Malacca sultanate centuries ago had imposed syariah laws on Muslims and customary laws on non-Muslims.

Stressing that hudud would not be forced on non-Muslims, Hadi said it was clearly a "seasonal issue" that popped up in the run-up to elections.

DAP newcomer Datuk Aspan Alias, a former Umno leader, said DAP had not officially objected to hudud.

"DAP respects the aim of PAS to implement hudud," he added in his blog.

Aspan said hudud should not be a barrier to collaboration among Pakatan parties.

He added that DAP chairman Karpal Singh could object to hudud because he was not a Muslim.

Meanwhile, MCA Publicity Bureau deputy chairman Loh Seng Kok called on Pakatan leaders to issue a joint statement declaring their decision on hudud law once and for all and "stop confusing the Chinese community".

He noted that Hadi had stated that implementing hudud was the responsibility of all Muslims while DAP had told the Chinese community that the Islamic law issue was merely being stirred up by MCA.

Loh said DAP members should stop deceiving themselves and hiding behind the Pakatan common policy framework Buku Jingga on the issue of hudud.

 

Pahang PKR warns DAP about seat allocation

Posted: 30 Aug 2012 02:41 PM PDT

(The Star) - Pahang PKR fired the first salvo against its coalition partner, reminding the DAP to exercise discipline in the allocation of seats.

State PKR chairman Datuk Fauzi Abdul Rahman said although it was not wrong for the DAP to request for additional seats, it must be done through the proper channels and with "mutual consent".

Recently, the DAP hinted that the party hoped to contest in Damak, a seat alloted to the PKR, in the coming general election.

In retaliation, Fauzi said: "We would also want to contest in seats allocated to the DAP but out of respect for one another, we must adhere to the decision of the central leadership.

"The DAP can request for a swap in seats such as giving up its Tanah Rata seat in exchange for Damak.

"We are willing to swap but not give up any of our allocated seats."

Fauzi, a former deputy minister and ex-Kuantan MP, said Pakatan Rakyat was not an individual party or belonged to certain leaders such as (Datuk Seri) Anwar Ibrahim or (Penang Chief Minister) Lim Guan Eng.

He said as such, any important decisions, including the allocation of seats, must be agreed upon by all leaders of the coalition during its central meeting.

In the 2008 elections, PKR contested six parliamentary seats and 13 state seats while the DAP stood in two parliament and seven state seats.

Fauzi said PKR had already finalised potential candidates in all the seats allocated to the party.

On the lack of professionals joining the party as compared to their DAP counterparts, Fauzi brushed it aside, claiming the party had at least five lawyers and three engineers but not enough seats to contest.

On the senior Opposition man who was arrested for suspicion of committing incest, Fauzi said the suspect was not from the party.

"He is not a PKR leader and neither do we have any dealings with him.

"Although he had met me before to discuss seat allocations, nothing was concluded as his party was not part of Pakatan," he said.

 

Pakatan now aiming for more support from women

Posted: 30 Aug 2012 02:34 PM PDT

Hafidz Baharom and Joan Lau, The Malaysian Insider

Pakatan Rakyat (PR) is ramping up its efforts to win over women voters with the formation of an initiative called Agenda Wanita Malaysia (Malaysian Women's Agenda) this September 13.

This comes on the back of political observers and analysts saying that both the youth and women are the swing voters who will determine who takes Putrajaya, as the ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) and PR are locked in an almost even tussle for support.

As women make up half of the country's electorate, the fight for women voters is something the federal opposition is taking very seriously.

While reluctant to go into the details of the initiative ahead of the launch, Wanita PKR information chief Ramlah Bee Asiahoo said: "The agenda will focus on the enforcement of law, increasing quality of life, providing opportunity for women to involve themselves in the economy, revamping the educational policy, social harmony and the empowerment of young women."

Although this sounds very much like political rhetoric, the initiative seems to be more than just talk. 

Srikandi PKR chief Siti Aishah Shaik Ismail said they would also head to the ground and host forums as well as ceramahs. "Once Agenda Wanita Malaysia is launched, we will head to the ground starting with rural areas, and then suburban areas and finally target the young working professionals in the cities.

Wong said apart from welfare, Pakatan will concentrate more on policies.
"This is because those in the rural areas require more exposure than those in the suburban areas and cities," she said.

PR leaders are going to focus on bread-and-butter issues like safety and economy as it is believed that women vote principally on issues and established experience.

PKR president Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail recently began an initiative for mothers against crime, a growing issue especially among women in urban areas.

Another issue taking centre-stage the past week is the apparently lenient sentence for two men convicted of statutory rape, which both BN and PR have protested.

PAS Muslimat information chief Aiman Athirah Al-Jundi said the party's women's division would go door-to-door, a method that worked very well previously for Wanita Umno as well.

In recent years though, this personal touch has been replaced by mass gatherings where cash handouts are given to underprivileged families but now Agenda Wanita Malaysia is picking up where they dropped off.

"Giving aid is good, but it is very piecemeal and not enough. So apart from welfare, we must concentrate more on policies," said PKR central committee member Elizabeth Wong.

These policies have to be explained and this is where door-to-door visits can help to drill down the nuts and bolts of these proposed policies.

"We need to step into their houses, sit down and spend some time explaining what we have to offer," said Aiman.

In the race to win the next general election, it looks like the opposition is willing to do something a little retro — go down to the ground and meet potential voters face to face.

 

China editor's suicide sparks web debate

Posted: 30 Aug 2012 11:32 AM PDT

File photo: Newspaper stand in Beijing
 
People's Daily newspaper is the mouthpiece of the ruling Communist Party

(BBC) - "My pain is I dare to think, but I don't dare to speak out; if I dare to speak out, I don't dare to write it down, and if I dare to write it down, there is no place to publish. 

The suicide of a senior editor working for China's Communist Party newspaper has sparked strong reaction from Chinese cultural and media circles and on the internet.

Xu Huaiqian, 44, was editor-in-chief for the Dadi (Earth) supplement of the People's Daily.

According to its official microblog, he jumped to his death on 22 August.

The official People's Daily microblog said he had taken time off because of depression and had sought medical help.

Xu Huaiqian was born in 1968 and graduated from the prestigious Peking University in 1989.

After a year of work experience in a steel plant, he started working for People's Daily, where he stayed until his death.

'Can't leave system'

Zhu Tieszhi, deputy chief editor of Seeking Truth journal, said he could not believe that Mr Xu had chosen this route.

Many people praised his excellent writing, and quotes from his interviews and publications have become instant hits.

In an interview he gave before his death, Xu Huaiqian was quoted as saying: "My pain is I dare to think, but I don't dare to speak out; if I dare to speak out, I don't dare to write it down, and if I dare to write it down, there is no place to publish.

"I admire those freelance writers, but I can't leave the system because if I do that my family will suffer."

In an article entitled "Let Death Be the Witness", he also wrote: "Death is a heavy word, but in China, in many cases, without deaths society will not sit up and pay attention, and problems won't be resolved."

These quotes were widely circulated on the internet and resonated with netizens who expressed shock and anger as they asked why a talented journalist ended up taking his own life.

'Unpublished script'

A reader posted in Tencent Weibo (one of China's Twitter equivalents): "I am only starting my career as a journalist and I have encountered such difficulties in my work already, and I feel that I can't fight them."

A reader asked on Sina Weibo: "Did Xu Huaiqian die to serve as a witness? Was it personal depression or the depression of an era? What kind of country is this?"

Another netizen commented that Mr Xu experienced the 1989 student movement as a young man but he had to live in lies, which caused his illness.

Some netizens mentioned the fact Mr Xu's suicide happened just days after the Burmese government said it was lifting its censorship, and lamented the sad state of affairs for Chinese intellectuals and journalists.

An eulogy posted on QQ Weibo by Gao Shixian summed up like this:

"People are the editors of a country; People only have their lives to publish; Their life is their article, and their death is the payment; Your sad end to life is like an unpublished script."

 

Stop fanning rumours, DAP man tells PR

Posted: 29 Aug 2012 10:38 PM PDT

(The Sun) - Penang DAP chairman Chow Kon Yeow has urged Pakatan Rakyat leaders to nip rumours in the bud to prevent uneasiness fermenting among the grassroots.

Chow said instead of adding to such controversies, leaders instead should disseminate the right information to party members.

"If something does not happen (not true), kill it and not fuel it," the Tanjung MP told theSun.

Chow was commenting on the recent controversy involving Penang PKR chairman Datuk Mansor Othman after it was reported that he had described Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng as "arrogant and cocky" as well as seen a "tokong" (temple or deity).

The deputy chief minister I was alleged to make the remarks in a PKR meeting over seat negotiations with DAP. The remarks were contained in the minutes of the meeting which was leaked to a blog.

Mansor has denied describing Lim as arrogant but defended using the word "tokong" as it was made in reference to the esteem and respect of the people had towards the DAP secretary-general.

Chow said the issues raised during the PKR meeting would not have repercussions with the DAP as he was of the opinion that the matter were were just the concerns of a particular group in the party (PKR).

"The views of these groups in the party does not necessarily reflect the reality on the ground," he added.

 

'Exodus if PBRS has to give up MP seat'

Posted: 29 Aug 2012 07:39 PM PDT

(Daily Express) - Keningau: The public spat between Barisan Nasional components Parti Bersatu Rakyat Sabah (PBRS) and Umno in the Interior seats in the coming general election continued with PBRS Sook Youth Chief Kahirin Bador predicting that BN will lose thousands of members if PBRS loses one of its two seats here to Umno.

Nevertheless, he said PBRS Sook Youth remained loyal to the BN and fully supported the leadership of Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak and Chief Minister Datuk Seri Musa Aman.

The incumbent for the Pensiangan parliamentary seat is Tan Sri Joseph Kurup, President of PBRS. The court ruled in favour of the Deputy Natural Resources and Environment Minister when his rival claimed that he was prevented from filing his nomination papers on time. Kurup also faced an angry mob at the nomination centre that day in 2008.

According to Kahirin, PBRS has 26,630 members in Pensiangan with 13,850 in Sook and 9,780 in Nabawan.

"This is the up-to-date figure as of June 2012 and not as stated by Umno Pensiangan Youth assistant secretary Khairil Abdullah who was referring to an outdated report that was based on the 2008 figure," he said.

Kahirin advised Khairil to respect the power sharing concept of BN and respect whatever decision made by the leadership.

He said Khairil should have not tabled the motion to ask for one of the three seats in Pensiangan during the Umno Pensiangan Youth annual general meeting.

Kahirin praised Nabawan Upko Assemblyman Datuk Bobbey Suan and Upko members as always cooperating with PBRS leaders to resolve problems of the people in the constituency.

"This is a true example of the BN concept, which is in line with the unity and peaceful spirit, not bully small parties like what Umno Pensiangan Youth is doing," he said.

"I suggest Umno Pensiangan Youth stop discussing the seat distribution because it will only cause disunity among the BN parties," he said.

"Respect whatever decision by the BN leadership as well as the statement by Umno Pensiangan Chief, Datuk Abdul Ghani Yassin, who promised to cooperate with whoever is the BN candidate in Pensiangan," he said.

Meanwhile, Pensiangan Umno urged its members to unite and ensure BN wins and remains the government. Its chief, Ghani, said they should support all BN candidates irrespective of which party they represent.

Pensiangan Umno deputy chief Ahuar Rasam said the Division had yet to receive any information on whether Umno will be contesting the parliamentary seat.

Ahuar said anyone has the right to apply to contest in Pensiangan including Umno. Nevertheless, the decision rests with the BN leadership, he said.

On his son joining the PKR, he said anyone has the right to choose whatever political avenue. However, he did not discount the possibility of his son supporting the BN in the future.

Such scenario, he said, is not strange and cited PBS President Tan Sri Joseph Pairin Kitingan and his brother, Star Sabah Chairman, Datuk Dr Jeffrey Kitingan.

"My son's decision to join another party is his choice and has nothing to do with me," he said. Ahuar is an influential figure in Pensiangan.

He was instrumental in relocating villagers from five settlements on the

Kalimantan-Sabah border to Kg Salarom Taka near Sepulut Kalabakan.

The villagers were given a longhouse as dwelling and also 74 houses to continue their livelihood. According to him, there are 15,464 Umno members in Pensiangan that include Sook and Nabawan.

A former secretary of a BN component, James Jamil, 58, said PBRS President Tan Sri Joseph Kurup, as BN chairman for Pensiangan, should call for a meeting of all the component parties and discuss the issue.

"This is the best way to resolve the crisis," he said, adding that any BN component has the right to request to stand in Pensiangan or Sook and Nabawan.

However, he said it was better the matter not be debated in the media.

"The opposition will gleefully take the opportunity if the crisis between the two component parties cannot be resolved," he said.

According to him, during the formation of PBRS on March 15, 1994, he organised the party in Pensiangan, which at the time covered Tambunan, Bingkor and Pensiangan itself.

"At that time the BN component parties were facing a very tough situation and the PBRS branches at that time had to be re-organised until 2004 the time when I retired.

"However, I know more about Pensiangan especially its people," he said.

In 2004, the electoral boundary re-delineation exercise saw Pensiangan separated from Keningau to cover the state seats of Sook and Nabawan with the incumbent being Datuk Ellron Alfred Angin (PBRS) and Datuk Bobbey Ahfang Suan (Upko), respectively.

"I was made to understand that the BN government had in 1994 until today given the Pensiangan and Sook quota to PBRS until last year when Umno Pensiangan demanded Pensiangan to be represented by Umno," he said.

 

PKR disagrees with Lajim

Posted: 29 Aug 2012 07:35 PM PDT

(Daily Express) - Kota Kinabalu: Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) Sabah Chief Ahmad Thamrin Jaini said it is not true that all Muslim majority seats in Sabah are to be contested by Sabah Reform Alliance (PPS) as mentioned by its chief Datuk Lajim Ukin.

Thamrin who attended Lajim's Hari Raya open house on Aug. 28 in Beaufort said, in fact, Lajim admitted that all Muslim majority seats were still currently being discussed among the PKR, PAS and PPS.

Ahmad Thamrin said Lajim whose power base is mainly in Beaufort needs to continue to champion the cause of Pakatan Rakyat so that more Umno-BN members would join Pakatan Rakyat for the sake of justice for the people and the nation.

He believed everyone has a right to voice his or her own opinion including Lajim, but that all final decisions are to be collective in nature among the parties in Pakatan Rakyat.

"The strength of Pakatan Rakyat is that all decisions are decided by consensus and not by dominance like Umno-Barisan Nasional," he said.

Ahmad Thamrin was confident that the on-going closed door seat negotiations and allocation among Pakatan Rakyat parties namely PKR, DAP and PAS and also with the newly formed PPS as well as Sabah Reform Movement (APS) headed by Datuk Seri Wilfred Bumburing would be concluded soon in preparation for the 13th General Election.

On another note, he said the Pakatan Rakyat Malaysia Day National Celebration will be held from Sept 15-16 in both Sabah and Sarawak, respectively.

The theme for 2012 is "Sebangsa, Senegara, Sejiwa" (One Race, Once Country, One Soul), which would be jointly-organised by all three parties from Pakatan Rakyat together with PPS and APS.

Ahmad Thamrin welcomed PPS and APS into the Pakatan family.

"Much space will be given to them to grow and to mature in the Pakatan family for the sole objective of bringing about a new and just government both in the federal level and also in Sabah," he said.

 

Najib: Six Umno divisions can spearhead recapture of Kedah

Posted: 29 Aug 2012 03:09 PM PDT

(The Star) - Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak wants the six Umno divisions in southern Kedah to be the catalyst for Barisan Nasional's victory in the general election.

He said the divisions of Baling, Merbok, Sik, Sungai Petani, Padang Serai as well as Kulim-Bandar Baharu formed the backbone of the party in the state.

"I chose to visit southern Kedah because this region has been our fort all this while.

"As Baling had played an important role in our country's history, then let the voice of Baling be etched in the history of Umno and Barisan Nasional in our struggle to return Kedah back to Barisan," he said when opening the Umno delegates conference for the six divisions here on Thursday.

He said other areas such as Alor Setar and Jerlun were equally important, stressing that the divisions should work together and fight hard to win back Kedah.

He said party members should have resolved all internal problems that by now.

"Enough is enough. It has been over four years since the last general election and they should stop pointing fingers at each other.

"We, at the top leadership, have spoken about this issue countless times and now its time for the members to fulfill their pledges of loyalty to the party.

"Let us not merely look at what the (Barisan) government had promised to do for us, but rather what we can do for the government," he said.

The premier stressed that if all Umno members and fellow Barisan component party members voted for Barisan's candidates in Kedah, there was no reason why the party could not win in the state.

He said party members should understand the meaning of unity and loyalty as well as put the party's interests above all else, including personal interests.

"Umno is 66 years old while the nation will be celebrating 55 years of Independence.

"People say we should be matured as a party by now, with a lifetime of experiences.

"But, we need to further explore the knowledge of rational thinking to make wise and acceptable decisions.

"That is what maturity should mean, where leaders know the true meaning of unity and loyalty, not merely by the party's age," he said.

Najib advised Kedah Umno members to take the party's defeat in the last general election as a valuable lesson to do better this time.

He said with an oath of loyalty that was earlier taken by Umno leaders from all six divisions in southern Kedah, led by Baling Umno division chief Datuk Abdul Azeez Abdul Rahim earlier, he was confident southern Kedah would return to Barisan.

 

Rafizi’s ‘NOW’ centre to make whistleblowing Malaysian culture

Posted: 29 Aug 2012 12:54 PM PDT

Rafizi and NOW director Akmal Nasir (right) pose outside the centre's entrance during an interview with The Malaysian Insider. — Pictures by Saw Siow Feng
(The Malaysian Insider) - KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 30 ― PKR's "exposé man" Rafizi Ramli will launch his latest pet project today ― the National Oversight and Whistleblowers Centre or "NOW" ― a non-profit outfit to encourage whistleblowers come forward at a time when public confidence in government agencies has reached an all-time low.

Rafizi told The Malaysian Insider that NOW will be a "civil society alternative" to government authorities like the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) and the police, whose reputations have been marred by numerous reports of custodial deaths as well as assault and intimidation by armed officers.

"Malaysians have been spooked from coming forward, but whistleblowing should become a culture in Malaysia, and that is what we hope to create," he said in an exclusive interview.

Rafizi explained that the centre will prepare a step-by-step process for whistleblowing, which will include offering advice to informants on the legal risks they may face with their disclosures should they agree to proceed.

By providing a support structure for potential informants, the NOW centre aims to make whistleblowing a part of local culture.
Each facet of the disclosures must be thoroughly vetted, he said, from the credibility of the whistleblower to the validity of the documents provided, as well as a deeper probe into the case to uncover sufficient evidence before anything is revealed in public.

But the final step in the process ― publicly disclosing the scandal through the media ― is the stickiest of all, Rafizi admitted, as it would immediately open himself, the centre and the whistleblower to legal risks, if any law was broken in the process of investigation.

The country's sole whistleblower law ― the Whistleblower Protection Act 2010 (WPA) ― only offers protection to whistleblowers if they make a "disclosure of improper conduct" to an authorised enforcement agency.

As it does not accord protection to whistleblowers who go to the media, NOW's system will likely result in a mountain of lawsuits and prosecutions in court.

"That is why we need some funds raised for legal fees. Most probably, we will be sued left, right [and] centre," Rafizi said.

Rafizi is experiencing the lack of whistleblower protection firsthand.
The PKR chief strategist himself currently faces two court charges for his exposés on the RM250 million National Feedlot Centre (NFC) cattle farming scandal, after he disclosed confidential financial documents to the media.

"But we have to do it and take the risk. After all, the law is such that if you lodge a report with the MACC, for example, you have to submit all your evidence to them and you cannot speak to anyone else or go to anyone else.

"If the MACC actually functions well, we would not need NOW. But does it?" he questioned.

"So at this point, what we have are two choices: Either we live and work within the current framework of the WPA, which is used to suppress whistleblowing, or we prove to and convince the society that whistleblowing is actually good for the country.

"We can show them that there is a support system from the non-governmental organisations and the civil society movement to hopefully increase pressure on the government to amend the Act," he said.

Rafizi said another provision in the WPA renders the intention of the Act useless ― it stipulates that a whistleblower cannot break any other law when making his disclosure to the authorities.

"So if the documents disclosed are confidential, even if you are revealing them to the authorities, you have no protection," he said.

This is reflected in Rafizi's NFC court case, where he was charged for violating Section 97 of the Banking and Financial Institutions Act (Bafia) for exposing the confidential banking details of the National Feedlot Corporation (NFCorp), the firm that runs the NFC project.

But the politician is determined to push forward with NOW, saying the centre must serve as a civil society movement to help spread awareness of the importance of whistleblowing as a "Malaysian culture" and increase pressure on the government to move legislative reforms.

On this note, the politician said another primary objective of NOW was to be a legislative reform lobbyist and an "oversight" centre to make parliamentarians, governments and government-linked companies accountable for their actions.

Whistleblowing, he said, was only 50 per cent of the centre's main work.

"We need a centre like this now because if we rely on the government, we will continue to be stagnant. And the best way is to take the civil society route to it," he said.

He pointed out that it was through decades of pressure from civil society movements that the government finally agreed to repeal the controversial British-enacted Internal Security Act 1960, which allows for detention without trial.

"It has worked before. In this case, we want to change the way society views whistleblowing so that maybe five or six years down the road, there will be enough public pressure that no government can actually ignore it," he said.

Read more at: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/rafizis-now-centre-to-make-whistleblowing-malaysian-culture/

Government has fulfilled all promises through NEP

Posted: 29 Aug 2012 12:50 PM PDT

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/8/88/Bumi_discount_mod.jpg

(Bernama) - The New Economic Policy (NEP) has managed to free Malays from the clutches of poverty and allowed them to be counted among the prominent entrepreneurs, professionals and corporate figures of the country.

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia's (UKM) Professor Dr Kamaruddin M. Said pointed out that the NEP is a development and socio-economic restructuring programme, geared towards eradicating poverty among the Malays as well as the Bumiputera people of the Sabah and Sarawak.

"It was also established to restructure the social economy of all Malaysians, by bridging the gap in their incomes, careers and standard of living during the last 20 years," he explained.

He added that Article 153 of the Malaysian Constitution has ensured the success of the NEP during the Second Malaysia Plan of 1971 to 1975. In addition, Article 152, which declares Bahasa Melayu as the national language and Islam as the official religion, has also been implemented well.

EFFECTIVE EDUCATION POLICY

Under the aegis of the NEP, the government had set up additional public tertiary education institutions (IPTA) like Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) and Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) in addition to the already existent Universiti Malaya (UM) and the then Institut Teknologi Mara, which is now known as Universiti Teknologi Mara or UiTM.

Bumiputera students also profited from the scholarships and privileges granted by the government during the NEP, which were in accordance with Section (2) of Article 153 laid down in the Constitution, Prof Kamaruddin stated.

The policy also allowed the government to set up boarding schools for providing educational opportunities to Malay children, who had excellent academic results but were unable to afford a better education.

Matriculation colleges and technology institutes were also established by the government under this policy, he noted.

Interestingly, Prof Kamaruddin said he and his wife Prof Dr Solehah Ishak were also among those who have gained from the NEP.

"I belong to a poor rural family. My parents were poor. After primary school, I got placed in a boarding school called Sekolah Alam Shah at Jalan Cheras in Kuala Lumpur, which was for underprivileged Malay children wanting to obtain a secondary education. Everything was provided for and the scholarship I got was more than enough to supplement my expenses," he stated.

"I think that the majority of successful Malays grew up in boarding schools. Many have gone on to become academicians, scientists, professionals, entrepreneurs and corporate figures," he added.

FAST-PACED DEVELOPMENT

Prof Kamaruddin pointed out that Malaysia's development quickened during the prime ministerial term of Tun Abdul Razak from 1970 to 1976.

Tun Razak, who is known as the 'Father of Development' set up the Federal Land Development Authority (Felda) to develop the rural community, particularly that of the Malays.

NEP measures were continued to be implemented by the country's third prime minister Tun Hussein Onn under the Third Malaysia Plan of 1976 to 1980 and development peaked during the tenure of the fourth Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad.

During his 22 year-reign as prime minister, Dr Mahathir developed Putrajaya in 1995, Multimedia Super Corridor in 1996 and Petronas Twin Towers in 1998 among others.

He also left the legacy of Vision 2020 that was unveiled in 1991 and which, aims to make Malaysia a fully developed nation by the year 2020.

Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi took over as prime minister after Dr Mahathir stepped down in 2003.

He introduced the 'Islam Hadhari' approach that focuses on development and achievement in line with the global economic demands of the 21st century.

Badawi also made efforts to lift the quality of human capital, particularly among Malays.

RESTORING MALAYS' SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS

Prof Kamaruddin said the creation of the NEP also aimed at restoring the position of Malays in terms of socio-economic aspects.

Even though the NEP took a substantial amount of time to fructify, many Malays now enjoy a better socio-economic status because of this policy.

He stated that because of the successful implementation of governmental development initiatives, Malays and their children are now ready to face future challenges, including those at an international level.

The academician said this positive development has augured well for the concept of 1Malaysia and its spin-off programmes such as the Kedai Rakyat 1Malaysia, Klinik 1Malaysia, Perumahan 1Malaysia and Bantuan Rakyat 1Malaysia.

(1Malaysia People's Shop. 1Malaysia Clinic, 1Malaysia People's Housing and 1Malaysia People's Assistance).

"These programmes are continuing to fulfill the pledges made by the government," Prof Kamaruddin noted.

FOSTERING NATIONAL UNITY

Malaysia's sixth prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Abdul Razak introduced the 1Malaysia concept of 'People First, Performance Now' after assuming power.

This concept is geared towards fostering unity among Malaysians from various ethnic groups, religious beliefs and cultures.

"The concept prioritises the people of this country and gives the foremost importance to their performance and achievement," said Prof Kamaruddin.

He said the Economic Transformation Programme (ETP) and the New Economic Model (NEM) are among the government's latest efforts to inculcate unity among all Malaysians.

"Looking back at the past 55 years following the nation's independence, the government has truly fulfilled many of the pledges it made to the people," Prof Kamaruddin added.

Malaysia’s New Internet Law

Posted: 29 Aug 2012 12:48 PM PDT

http://thediplomat.com/asean-beat/files/2012/08/onternet-400x300.jpg

(The Diplomat) - Malaysians are right to protest the recent amendments that the government made to the Evidence Act of 1950. Although they deal specifically with the internet, the amendments could have wider implications on media freedom, democracy, and human rights.

Section 114A of the bill seeks "to provide for the presumption of fact in publication in order to facilitate the identification and proving of the identity of an anonymous person involved in publication through the internet." In other words, the section makes it easier for law enforcement authorities to trace the person who has uploaded or published material posted online.

According to the amended law, however, the originators of the content are those who own, administer, and/or edit websites, blogs, and online forums. Also included in the amendment are persons who offer webhosting services or internet access. And lastly, the owner of the computer or mobile device used to publish content online is also covered under section 114A. 

This means that a blogger or forum moderator who allows seditious comments on his or her site can be held liable under the law. An internet café manager is accountable if one of his or her customers sends illegal content online through the store's WiFi network. A mobile phone owner is the perpetrator if defamatory content is traced back to his or her electronic device. 

Critics of the amendment contend that under section 114A, a person is considered guilty until proven innocent. Their fear is not entirely baseless. Indeed, the Thai government has used a similar law to prosecute a blog moderator for an allegedly seditious comment which she approved to be posted on her website.  

The Malayisn government has rejected these criticisms with one cabinet member calling some of the objections "childish."

The Centre for Independent Journalism was quick to denounce the provisions of the bill which went into effect at the end of last month. It warned that "internet users may resort to self-censorship to avoid false accusations made under Section 114A. Bloggers, for example, may excessively censor comments made by their readers.  As a result, Section 114A inadvertently stifles public discussion about pertinent political or social issues and protects public authorities, such as the State, from public scrutiny."

Internet users signed a petition opposing the amendments and lectured the government about the importance of allowing online anonymity to protect the identities of human rights and democracy advocates. But the amendments, according to the petition, "reduce the opportunity to be anonymous online which is crucial in promoting a free and open Internet. Anonymity is also indispensable to protect whistleblowers from persecution by the authorities when they expose abuses of power."

When the petition was ignored by the government, netizens and media groups organized an online blackout on August 14, which succeeded in mobilizing thousands of internet users. The global attention which the action generated was likely what convinced the Prime Minister to agree to have the cabinet review the controversial amendments. Although this announcement was initially welcomed by opponents of the amendments, the Cabinet ultimately upheld the amended law.

The amendments are supposed to empower authorities to prosecute people publishing seditious, libelous, and harmful content on the internet. But it doesn't take a whole lot of imagination to envision how these same authorities could abuse the law to restrict media freedom, violate the privacy of individuals, and curtail the human rights of ordinary internet users.

Courts sending out mixed signals over statutory rape

Posted: 29 Aug 2012 11:57 AM PDT

http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Noor-Afizal-Azizan-and-Chuah-Guan-Jiu.jpg

(The Star) - NOW that their trials are over, former national youth squad bowler Noor Afizal Azizan can go on to fulfil the promise of his bright future and electrician Chuah Guan Jiu can focus on his fixed job and many years ahead.

Through it all, no one spoke of the 13-year-old girl Noor Afizal took to a hotel to spend the night with, or the 12-year-old schoolgirl who was "coaxed" to go to her 21-year-old electrician boyfriend's flat instead of to school because he said he was too sick to take her.

These were prepubescent girls who were deemed to have consented to sex with the older boys they were dating and Court of Appeal president Justice Raus Sharif wrote in his written judgment that Noor Afizal had not "tricked the girl into submitting to him".

In the electrician's case, Sessions judge Sitarun Nisa Abdul Aziz also thought the "sexual act was consensual", even though DPP Lim Cheah Yit recounted how the girl had repeatedly asked Chuah to take her to school. If she did give consent, there was certainly trickery and fraud involved.

The fact remains that the girls were 12 and 13, children barely out of primary school.

They are not old enough to be able to legally buy cigarettes, or even obtain medical treatment if they had contracted sexual transmitted diseases.

The law on statutory rape was meant to protect these very girls. Section 375(g) of the Penal Code states unequivocally that a man has committed statutory rape if he has sexual intercourse with a girl under 16 years of age, with or without her consent.

It is rooted in the presumption that girls below 16 have not attained the mental maturity to consent to sex, and this law was enacted to protect children from abuse. It places the onus on those around her to not have sexual intercourse with her, even if she gives consent, because she is not deemed mature enough to give consent.

In other words, the older guys should have known better.

Noor Afizal and Chuah were found guilty of raping the underaged girls, but were not jailed. They were bound over for five years and three years respectively on a RM25,000 good behaviour bond.

The public uproar has been over how these young men got away with a slap on the wrist, and how the emphasis has been on not blighting their future.

Our teenagers are growing up inundated with overt sexual messages from the media and the Internet, without the benefit of a full-fledged sex education curriculum, or avenues to get answers.

Clearly, our young people are having sex with each other but there is a line drawn by the law. And that is sex with girls below 16 – children – is off limits, even to their peers.

By letting Noor Afizal and Chuah off lightly, are the courts sending out mixed signals?

Are they saying these two girls – aged 12 and 13 – are capable of giving consent for sex, and are they saying future good behaviour is sufficient punishment for having sex with minors? What is the message that teenage boys and younger men are getting?

At the root of it all, this is about protecting our children – boys and girls.

A 12-year-old girl was lured by a man twice her age into his flat, and coaxed into having sex with him, and he got away with a promise to behave himself for the next three years.

Where does that leave her? What about her worth? What are we doing for these two girls?

How do we protect other naive young girls from being sweet-talked by an older teen into a sexual relationship if he knows he could be found guilty of statutory rape but walk away with a promise to behave?

If we do not uphold unequivocally our intolerance of sex with underaged girls, what does that say about us?

 

Jho Low's RM4.9 mil 'proposal' to Taiwanese singer makes waves (UPDATED with video)

Posted: 28 Aug 2012 09:16 PM PDT

NOT ENOUGH? Hsiao apparently thinks of Low as  a brotherNOT ENOUGH? Hsiao apparently thinks of Low as a brother(Malaysian Digest) - Jho Low, the young Malaysian millionaire who partied with the likes of Paris Hilton and Jamie Foxx, has been thrust into the spotlight again.

This time, the 30-year-old is the star of a video which features what is claimed to be an elaborate marriage proposal to Taiwanese singer Elva Hsiao.

The Penangite, whose full name is Low Taek Jho, is reported to have blown a cool RM4.9 million on the private function, which is set on a private beach at the super-exclusive hotel resort Atlantis, The Palm – the most opulent hotel on the island of Palm Jumeirah off Dubai.

Hong Kong tabloid Apple Daily recently reported that a video had surfaced on popular video-sharing site Vimeo, titled 'Atlantis Engagement, Dubai', with the caption 'Surprise Engagement Proposal Rumoured To Cost Over £1m.'

Tender moment...Tender moment...The 5:27-minute long video, which appears to be professionally-produced, opens with the couple arriving in a black Rolls Royce and making their way to the beach, where lit candles formed a giant heart-shape.

The couple then proceed to an elaborately-designed canopy while laser lights project the couple's silhouette. As the two enjoy their meal, they are serenaded by a violinist and harpist.

The couple are then surprised by parachutists who descend from above, only to present Hsiao, 33, with Chopard jewellery.

However, Apple Daily reported that even the extravagant demonstration wasn't enough to sway Hsiao, who allegedly only saw Low as a "brother".

The paper quoted her spokesman as saying that the event was just a romantic dinner, and no proposal took place.

Heart-shaped candle arrangements on the beach...Heart-shaped candle arrangements on the beach...It is also understood that Hsiao is currently dating hunky actor Kai Kho, the star of Taiwan hit movie You Are The Apple Of My Eye.

Low first came into public prominence in 2010, when pictures of him partying with socialite Paris Hilton made waves on the internet.

In a subsequent interview with The Star, Low, the son of Penang businessman Datuk Larry Low, disclosed that his wealth originated from his investment fund.

The Wynton Group, he said, was started from US25$ million from his family and nine other investors comprising schoolmates from the Middle East.

The group is now understood to be based in Abu Dhabi.

niiYU1KBuBw
Or watch at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=niiYU1KBuBw

 

Chinese businesses give Najib thumbs-down

Posted: 28 Aug 2012 06:24 PM PDT

A survey conducted by the Chinese trade chambers also showed most are not happy with the minimum wage policy. 

Syed Jaymal Zahiid, FMT

Chinese businesses have given Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak's economic policies the thumbs-down, according to a survey conducted by the Associated Chinese Chambers of Commerce and Industry (ACCIM).

The report revealed that many of the community's small and medium enterprises (SMEs) or industries believe they have not benefited from the prime minister's economic initiatives despite the raft of reforms introduced since Najib took office in April 2009.

"This has led to many respondents not believing that Malaysia is on its way to being successful in moving its economy out of the middle-income trap," said the survey.

Najib had made the promise to drive Malaysia into a high-income economy by 2020 as one of his policies under the grand Economic Transformation Programme (ETP).

The blueprint, which promises to strengthen and make the local market its primary drive, is seen as a key election push as Najib aims to score a stronger mandate at the upcoming national polls.

His administration has so far managed to weather the global economic turmoil with a strong back-to-back growth that surpassed expectations, giving him the boasting rights against heavy opposition criticism that he has done little to improve the ailing economy.

Negative performance

Heavy government spending under the ETP – to create a strong local market to help offset dipping exports – was said to be a major factor behind Malaysia's steady growth.

The ACCIM survey, however, said 73% of its respondents are discouraged by the country's economic outlook leading up to the 13th general election.

Much of the survey indicated negative performance, and slowing demands and employment among the Chinese businesses. Close to half of the 374 respondents polled blamed it on weak government policies.

"It should also be noted that despite efforts to transform the Malaysian economy, the effects and benefits appear to have not filtered down more significantly to the SMEs," said the survey.

More than half of the respondents said they are pessimistic with this year and 2013′s economic outlook although they are cautiously optimistic for 2014.

The ACCIM also urged the Najib administration to reconsider its minimum wage policy, with close to 60% of the respondents saying it would affect their businesses.

READ MORE HERE

 

PAS intensifies push for hudud

Posted: 28 Aug 2012 03:17 PM PDT

(The Star) - PAS is intensifying its push for the implementation of hudud law with more of its senior leaders coming out to say it is on their agenda.

They said that it is no longer a question of whether hudud should be implemented but how it is to be enforced.

Datuk Mohd Nik Amar Nik Abdullah Datuk Mohd Nik Amar Nik Abdullah

More than that, the leaders hope the non-Muslims would accept Islamic law in due course.

Kelantan PAS deputy commissioner Datuk Mohd Nik Amar Nik Abdullah said: "Although only applicable to Muslims, it will be ideal if non-Muslims one day accept hudud and Islam jurisprudence towards the creation of a just society."

Mohd Nik Amar, who is also a PAS central committee member, maintained that hudud would remain the clarion call of the party.

PAS national unity bureau chairman Datuk Dr Mujahid Yusof Rawa said there should not be any dispute over hudud.

"It is not whether hudud is right or wrong but how it can be implemented in a broader context to encompass Islamic principles of good governance," he said.

"Not all Muslims may agree with hudud but I believe the majority of Muslims in the country want to see it implemented after seeing the failure of secular laws in dealing with crime," he added.

Datuk Dr Mujahid Yusof Rawa Datuk Dr Mujahid Yusof Rawa

On the opposition of the DAP to hudud, Dr Mujahid, who is Penang PAS deputy commissioner, said no party in Pakatan Rakyat could force its views on another.

"As much as they cannot force us to abandon our ideals, we also cannot force them to accept ours," he said.

The assertions on hudud came a day after PAS deputy president Mohamad Sabu was quoted as saying that the party would propose constitutional amendments in Parliament to implement Islamic law if it forms the Federal Government.

He later denied making the statement to Sin Chew Daily.

In a related development, Terengganu PAS Youth chief Mohd Nor Hamzah said that hudud would be implemented in the state if the party captured it.

Perak PAS Dewan Ulama chief Noz Azli Musa, meanwhile, said that the party had always been fighting for hudud and would continue to strive for it.

 

Discord in SNAP over BN membership

Posted: 28 Aug 2012 03:11 PM PDT

According to SNAP secretary-general Frankie Nyumboi, the party has 'chosen to remain independent' but its president appears to have other ideas. 

Joseph Tawie, FMT

KUCHING: Sarawak National Party (SNAP) president Stanley Jugol and secretary-general Frankie Jurem Nyumboi appear to be on a collision course over the issue of SNAP returning to the fold of Barisan Nasional.

Jugol wants SNAP to return to BN, while Nyumboi is against it.

"If he insists I will resign because I disagree with the direction he is taking with the reasoning that SNAP officials may be appointed senators and to other government posts.

"I do not subscribe to that brand of politics for personal gains and grandeur.

"I believe in protecting the rights and autonomy of Sarawak under the 18-Point Agreement…," Nyumboi told FMT.

He added that rumours that the party's recent central executive committee (CEC) meeting was stormy is not true.

"The recent CEC meeting was not stormy except for my reminder that any change of policies must have the consent of the CEC members in accordance with the [party's] constitution, but he [Jugol] said that CEC had already agreed to return to BN.

"This puzzled me and other CEC members," he said.

Nyumboi said that Kebing Wan, SNAP deputy president and a couple of others, had expressed their disappointment at the unilateral decision of the president.

"As far as I know, Kebing Wan cannot support BN because of the Baram dam issues," he said, pointing out that Jugol had the support of the immediate past president Edwin Dundang.

'Naughty rumours'

The disagreement over the issue of returning to the BN fold is certain to undermine SNAP's preparations to contest in at least four seats in the coming general election.

It has named Mas Gading, Lubok Antu, Saratok and Baram as the seats it wants to contest.

Earlier in his statement, Nyumboi said that SNAP will remain as an opposition party and this position will continue until a new direction is decided by the CEC in accordance with the party's constitution.

"There will be no about-turn on SNAP's position as an opposition party

"Any rumours of SNAP being BN-friendly or rejoining BN are naughty rumours. Furthermore, the party abides by its constitution which does not allow unilateral decisions to be made on the party's policies.

"The party has chosen to remain independent because it wants to voice out issues affecting Sarawak.

"Among others there is the issue of non-fulfilment of the 18-Points Agreement, which has given rise to numerous policies and actions detrimental to Sarawak.

"As a result, progress in structural and human development was painfully slow," he said, adding that SNAP is in a better position to address all these issues, because it is homegrown and does not need to report or answer to anyone else.

Nyumboi said that SNAP is an old and a respectable political party that does not betray its members and supporters as well as its friends in the Borneo alliance with whom it shares a common Borneo agenda on the 18- and 20-Point Agreements.

"If there is 'Jangi Ditepati', why is the 18-Point Agreement unfulfilled for 49 years?" he asked, referring to this year's Merdeka Day theme.

"SNAP shall continue to provide Sarawakians with a channel to voice their dissatisfaction over their rights and autonomy," he said.

READ MORE HERE

 

‘Young Power’ wants Indian-based Pakatan party

Posted: 28 Aug 2012 03:03 PM PDT

Fed up with way things are, a group of young Indians are planning to form an Indian-based component party in the opposition coalition.

B. Nantha Kumar, FMT

A group of young Indians are planning to form an Indian-based component party in Pakatan Rakyat.

Talking to FMT, one of the members G Krishnan said they were fed-up with both Barisan Nasional and Pakatan leaders with regard to issues affecting the Indian community.

"We call our group 'Young Power' and our goal is to help the Indian community become on par with the other races. Look at our nation. It is a Malay-dominated Chinese-controled nation," he added.

He insisted that Young Power was not against the Malays and Chinese but focussed on upholding the rights of Indians.

"It is unfair to talk about multi-racialism when the Indians live in deplorable conditions compared with other races," he added.

Krishnan said that Young Power had been collecting feedback from community leaders regarding the possibility of forming a new party within the Pakatan framework.

"We sent SMS to about 30 Indian Pakatan and BN elected reps, NGO leaders, businessmen, celebrities on Aug 25," he added.

According to Krishnan, the response was positive with even DAP MPs welcoming the move.

He said that on Aug 26 and 28, Young Power sent text messages to grassroots leaders, who also mostly backed the suggestion.

Krishnan pointed out that there was only one Indian in Pakatan's 30-member council.

"Is Pakatan going to say that there are no capable Indians to be members in the council. How many state chairmen or bureaus are headed by Indians in PKR or DAP?" he asked.

"Do not ask why we [Young Power] did not raise the same issue with BN because we voted for Pakatan and not for BN in the last general-election," he said.

"The issue is not not about how many seats Pakatan is going to give to the Indians but how are they going to treat the community," he added.

Krishnan also said that Young Power had identified several business tycoons who were willing to fund their movement and more details would be made public soon.

 

‘Unseen hands involved in leak’

Posted: 28 Aug 2012 02:50 PM PDT

The leaking of minutes of a private meeting between the Penang deputy chief minister (I) and Chinese representatives was the work of ambitious politicians within the party, claim some PKR insiders.

Athi Shankar, FMT

GEORGE TOWN: The unseen hands of some master plotters are at work again within the Penang PKR. This time the fall guy is Deputy Chief Minister (I) Mansor Othman.

Those out to drive a wedge between DAP and PKR have succeeded to an extent. Minutes of a private meeting between Mansor and several Chinese representatives were published verbatim in a blog, namely Gelagat Anwar, in its June 16, 18 and 19 postings.

Some insiders say the leak was to trap Mansor and expel him from the state PKR. The sabotage and back-stabbing is nothing new within the state PKR.

Since the 2008 general election, there have been two other such cases. Internal politicking has resulted in Mohammad Fairus Khairudin been booted out as Penang deputy chief minister (I) and Penanti assemblyman in April 2009. Then Bayan Baru MP Mohd Zahrain Hashim was removed as state PKR chief in November 2009.

In the latest episode, the leak revealed that Mansor had described Chief Minister and DAP secretary-general Lim Guan Eng as "cocky and arrogant". He had also said that Lim was revered like "tokong" (deity) by Chinese voters in Penang.

Mansor's depiction of Lim as "cocky and arrogant" is not a surprise as there is no love lost between the two parties.

Local PKR leaders have always felt marginalised under the DAP-helmed Pakatan Rakyat state government.

Although Mansor denied saying "cocky and arrogant" in last Friday's press conference, the damage was already done.

It's learnt that Mansor's colleagues in the state executive council have persuaded him to "eat humble pie" by reading out a prepared text before an army of pressmen.

But if only Mansor had sought a second opinion from other PKR grassroots leaders, he could have avoided the embarrassing situation.

Some party loyalists suggested that Mansor should have instead instructed those who attended the meeting to clear the air at a press conference.

"It would have put the conspirators in an embarrassing situation instead," said insiders.

Conspiracy to oust Mansor

Mansor aside, the blog disclosed that PKR's state deputy chief and Batu Kawan division chief Law Choo Kiang, Bukit Bendera division deputy chief and island municipal (MPPP) councillor Felix Ooi Keat Hin, and Bayan Baru division appointed vice-chairman and MPPP councillor Tan Seng Keat attended the meeting

Others at the meeting were PKR's 2004 general election candidate for Bayan Baru parliamentary and Batu Uban state seats Raymond Ong Ting Cheow; Tanjung Youth chief Ng Chek Siang; Batu Uban branch chief Cheah Peng Guan and Mansor's assistant John Ooi.

They are representatives of an internal all-Chinese group called "Pasukan Keadilan".

Party grassroots are now pointing accusing fingers at "Pasukan Keadilan" for the leak.

READ MORE HERE

 

Musa remains our leader, says Umno man

Posted: 28 Aug 2012 02:45 PM PDT

Umno insiders are warning of serious repercussions should Najib Tun Razak refuse to reinvigorate the BN in Sabah, which is fast losing support.

Luke Rintod, FMT

KOTA KINABALU: Sabah Umno has brushed off claims of a shake-up in the party and that its strongman Musa Aman could well be on the way out ahead of the crucial general election.

Senior Sabah Umno leader, Masidi Manjun, quickly dismissed the news report in FMT as mere rumour, claiming even Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak was impressed by Musa's performance, both as Umno head and chief minister.

"Musa is doing an excellent job leading the party and the state government and the prime minister himself has complimented Musa's leadership," he said recently.

"Sabah Umno and Barisan Nasional (BN) are fully behind Musa to continue leading the state," he insisted when reporters asked him on the FMT article that the chief minister was marking time and could be replaced soon.

Local newspapers here yesterday carried Masidi's denial prominently but party insiders whom FMT contacted insisted that many in Sabah Umno do not subscribe to the party line that Musa is doing an excellent job.

Said one: "If Musa is doing an excellent job as Masidi claimed, how come leaders like Lajim Ukin and Wilfred Bumburing had left? Please explain too why the Kadazandusuns and Chinese and even more Muslims in Sabah are leaving BN?"

According to the report, an increasingly embattled Umno could well be forced to do a rescue reshuffle in its "fix-deposit" Sabah's party hierarchy and state leadership.

The rationale for the reshuffle getting the go-ahead from Najib is reportedly due to grumbling among the business community in the state as well as a series of high-profile defections from Umno as well as other BN parties.

According to well-placed sources, the shake-up would involve Musa taking leave and either Masidi or Hajiji Mohd Noor acting as Sabah chief minister until the general election.

Serious repercussions

However, talk of a shake-up in Sabah Umno is also being seen as a gambit by those close to another Sabah Umno strongman and Musa rival, Shafie Apdal, the current Semporna MP who is a trusted man of Najib, to eventually pave the way for him to helm the state.

This is plausible but Umno insiders are warning of serious repercussions should Najib refuse to reinvigorate the BN in the state which is reportedly steadily losing the support of almost all the communities in the state.

They claimed that party's interest must be put first and ahead of personal agenda and failure to do so would result in more defections as the election looms.

READ MORE HERE

 

Suaram funded by US, Finland, Canada

Posted: 28 Aug 2012 05:35 AM PDT

(Bernama) - Suara Rakyat Malaysia (Suaram) director Kua Kia Soong on Tuesday revealed that the non-governmental organisation has been receiving funds from foreign countries and individuals nationwide.

He said the human rights group was being funded by countries, namely the United States, Finland and Canada, as well as some Malaysian state governments and individual donations.

Kua, however, kept a close guard on the funding issue and the amount Suaram had so far received from funders and primary sponsors.

"Do I really need to tell you where our funds come from? Why does everyone want to know where our funds come from?" he asked at the unvealing of the Malaysia Human Rights Report 2011 here.

He also questioned a local Malay daily reporter whether he knew the daily's source of funding.

Kua urged any party dissatisfied with the NGO to lodge a police report.

In July, Suaram and its role as an independent NGO was questioned for being a recipient of annual allocations consistently from the US-based National Endowment for Democracy (NED) since 2006.

According to the AIDC portal, as stated in NED's annual report, Suaram had received a total amount of US$385,000 (RM1,218,328.65) for 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009.

Besides Suaram, other Malaysia-based NGOs being funded as listed by the NED include the International Republican Institute, National Democratic Institute for International Affairs, Southeast Asian Press Alliance, Centre for Independent Journalism, Open Dialogue Centre and Mkini Dot Com.

It had been widely reported that Suaram was not even registered as an NGO with the Registrar of Societies, instead it was registered as a company under the name of Suara Inisiatif Sdn Bhd with RM2 paid-up capital.

Since then, Suaram has remained tight-lipped over allegations concerning its NGO status, and its source of funding.

 

PAS will not push ahead hudud law without majority support in Parliament: Hu

Posted: 28 Aug 2012 05:27 AM PDT

(Sin Chew Daily) -- PAS Supporters Congress national chairman Hu Phang Chaw said PAS advocated the implementation of hudud law through democratic proceedings. In other words, if support from two thirds of MPs in the Parliament could not be secured in order to amend the Constitution to implement the hudud law, then it will be shelved.

He said that was the decision of the party's political bureau.

Hu pointed out that hudud law was a part of the Islamic penal code that could never be abolished, just like Buddhism's advocacy of vegetarianism and the Ten Commandments of Christianity, which must never be challenged. As such, he said PAS hoped to decide whether to implement the hudud law in the country through democratic proceedings.

He said during a media conference this afternoon that he was recently appointed a member of the party's central political bureau, becoming the first ever non-Muslim in the party's 61-year history to have the opportunity of taking part in the party's decision-making mechanism.

He believed the move showed that PAS was willing to accept the reality of Malaysia's plural society, and had thus adopted a more open and more plural political direction.

The membership of PAS' political bureau, which has just been established recently, comprises the party's president, deputy president, four vice presidents, secretary-general, Youth national chairman, Wanita chairman, national chairman of PAS Supporters Congress, election bureau chairman and central strategy research centre chairman.

Hu pointed out that other than the issue of hudud law, the political bureau also discussed Nasharudin Mat Isa's proposal that PAS withdraw from the opposition pact.

He also said the party would organise a seminar in Selangor early September to seek public opinion on the party's policies so that these policies could be implemented for the well-being of all Malaysians if it won the next general election.

He added that the chances of Pakatan taking the helm at Putrajaya was on the rise following changes in the political situation in East Malaysia and Johor.

He also urged the MCA to stop instilling Islamophobia among the people from the hudud law in a bid to solicit support from Chinese voters.

As a political party, he said MCA should instead highlight its own political ideologies and not persistently distort Islam just to win the election.

He said MCA was playing with fire trying to fan up emotions among the Chinese community by using the hudud law, adding that this would kill any chance of MCA candidates in Malay constituencies because no one would tolerate his religion being insulted and sabotaged by other people.

Besides, Hu also felt that the hudud law forum organised by MCA in the past was indeed a good beginning. He said MCA should organise more of such forums to allow the Chinese community and Muslims to look into this issue in a more macroscopic and rational approach.

He said if needed he would be willing to help make arrangements for PAS leaders to meet up with their MCA counterparts and to hear their views on various issues.

 

Report confirmed by Mat Sabu before going into print

Posted: 28 Aug 2012 05:24 AM PDT

(Sin Chew Daily) -- On the front page report on Tuesday, Sin Chew Daily reporter had on Monday repeatedly clarified with PAS deputy president Mohamad Sabu, who confirmed that his party indeed had the intention of implementing the hudud law through constitutional amendment in the Parliament if it won the next general election. However, he said the party had yet to discuss tabling of constitutional amendment in the Parliament.

Online media have been playing up the news Tuesday morning that Mat Sabu had denied the report. We have, nevertheless, tried without success to contact Mat Sabu to get his further clarification on this matter.

As a matter of fact, we called up Mat Sabu on Sunday and forwarded him the question, "Can you explain the remark made by PAS president Datuk Seri Hadi Awang after the party's political and election bureau meeting on August , that PAS will implement the hudud law through democratic proceedings?"

The above remark was made by Hadi Awang on the party's Harakah Daily website last Saturday (August 25).

Mat Sabu replied, "Democracy is about forming the government through the ballot box. The amendment of any policy needs to go through the Parliament, and the support of two thirds of all MPs is required for constitutional amendment."

As such, we based on the reply of Mat Sabu to come up with the headline news of the evening edition whereby Mat Sabu said PAS had decided to seek constitutional amendment in the Parliament to implement the hudud law if Pakatan Rakyat won the next general election.

However, having learned that Mat Sabu denied to an English daily the report appearing on Sin Chew Daily, we called him again Monday afternoon to seek further clarification.

Mat Sabu said, "What I was saying was any law that needed to be amended had to go through the Parliament. I did not mention hudud law."

He also said PAS had not discussed tabling constitutional amendment in the Parliament.

However, since we sought the explanation from Mat Sabu in relation to the remark made by party president Hadi Awang, so we asked him again whether his so-called "any law" would include the hudud law, and he said affirmatively, "Yes."

We sought further clarification from him, "Can we say PAS indeed has the intention (memang berhasrat) to amend the Constitution to implement any law, including the hudud law, but then the party has yet to discuss tabling this motion in the Parliament?" He also replied affirmatively, "Yes, you can."

As such, we changed the headline on the morning edition of Sin Chew Daily to: "Mat Sabu says PAS has intention to seek constitutional amendment in the Parliament in order to implement the hudud law if the party wins the next general election."

PAS vice president Salahuddin Ayub said when contacted Tuesday that the political bureau's meeting last Saturday had decided that all issues related to the hudud law could only be answered by the party president alone and as such, he was not in any position to answer the question.

We tried again today (Tuesday) to call Mat Sabu for clarification, including ringing up Shamsuri Ahmad, political secretary for PAS president Hadi Awang, but unfortunately we still could not get the line through.

 

Janji Demokrasi gathering is definitely on

Posted: 27 Aug 2012 06:08 PM PDT

The organisers have decided to ignore a police warning that the gathering would be considered illegal.

Teoh El Sen, FMT

The Janji Demokrasi gathering on the eve of Merdeka Day will go on despite a police declaration that it would be illegal.

Gabungan Janji, the group organising the event, reiterated today that the gathering was being planned as a celebration of Independence Day, "not a demonstration, not a protest, and not a rally".

"Gabungan Janji" translates as "Coalition of Promises" and "Janji Demokrasi" as "Promise of Democracy".

Yesterday, referring to a statement by Gabungan Janji representative Maria Chin Abdullah, Dang Wangi district police chief ACP Zainuddin Ahmad denied that he had been vague about allowing or disallowing the gathering to go on.

Several hours before that, there was a meeting between Dang Wangi police and Gabungan Janji and another group—the Preservation of Jalan Sultan Committee, which is planning a march in the city, also on the eve of Merdeka Day.

Chin told a press conference afterwards that the meeting went well, adding that Zainuddin did not specifically say police was against the Janji Demokrasi gathering at Dataran Merdeka.

She maintained that position today. She told FMT that police briefed the two groups about the Peaceful Assembly Act (PAA) and told them to maintain order during their events. Police "did not say yes or no" to the gatherings, she added.

In the FMT interview yesterday, Zainuddin said Chin had given reporters the wrong impression that police were agreeable to the Dataran Merdeka gathering. He said he had made clear during the meeting that Janji Demokrasi would be in violation of Section 9 (1) of the PAA, which requires any group planning a gathering to notify police 10 days before the event.

"Since that was not done, it is illegal under the law, and I did not allow it," he said. "But if they say they'll go ahead anyway, which I advised against, then I may have to take action based on public safety and order."

Chin confirmed today that Zainuddin did mention Section 9. "He did talk about it, but not at the beginning of the meeting. I would still say it was a friendly meeting and that there was no clear answer."

She called on the authorities to consider Janji Demokrasi as "part of the countdown" to the Merdeka Day anniversary.

"Every year there is a countdown at Dataran Merdeka," she said. "Are they saying every year people must have approvals? I mean, is Zainuddin saying that everyone who appears at Dataran Merdeka must have that approval?

"I'm going there just like any other citizen."

Self-imposed conditions

About the PAA, she said: "We disagree with it, but that doesn't mean we'd violate it on purpose.

"We've already put in so many conditions for ourselves. There is no elaborate programme except for Pak Samad (national laureate A Samad Said) reading a poem. That's about it. This is a very low-key event. Are the police saying we can't even wear yellow and celebrate Merdeka and be part of a national event?"

READ MORE HERE

 

Pakatan: Sabah defections not party-hopping

Posted: 27 Aug 2012 05:07 PM PDT

PKR's Tian Chua claims that Sabah MPs Lajim Ukin and Wilfred Bumburing 'resigned' from Barisan Nasional, so there was "no party-hopping."

Syed Jaymal Zahiid, FMT

Under fire for what has been described as a 'contradictory' stand on party-hopping, Pakatan Rakyat leader Tian Chua said today he saw no wrong in the recent 'defections' by two Sabah lawmakers.

The PKR vice-president said the opposition pact are also against party-hopping but the defections of Umno's Beaufort MP Lajim Ukin and Tuaran UPKO MP Wilfred Bumburing were merely resignations following disillusionment with the ruling coalition's "failed" leadership.

"They just don't believe in the Barisan Nasional leadership anymore so they resigned and said they would back Pakatan. That is not party hopping," Tian, who is also PKR's vice-president, told a press conference after the pact's secretariat meeting here.

The duo's resignation from BN, followed by rumours of more possible resignations by lawmakers from the key state of Sabah, prompted some leaders from both sides of the political divide to call for an "anti-hopping" law.

Pakatan component party DAP said it would try and introduce the law in Penang where they head the administration in a move seen as critical of Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim's ongoing move to court more defections.

Sabah provides 25 out of the 222 parliamentary seats which makes it a crucial state to infiltrate for Pakatan in the upcoming polls.

With the pact winning just a few seats less than BN in the landmark 2008 elections, Sabah, known as the ruling coalition's "fixed deposit", became the ruling coalition's saving grace next to Sarawak when it provided the majority it needed to maintain power.

'Hypocritical'

The party secretary-general and Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng said his party's silence on Lajim and Bumburing's exit from their respective parties was "self-explanatory" of the DAP's position on the matter.

But the move came under immediate fire with rivals accusing Lim of being hypocritical for his alliance with Anwar who was seen as the architect behind the Sabah defections.

READ MORE HERE

 

AG to explain Section 114a: Nazri

Posted: 27 Aug 2012 01:23 PM PDT

http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTmLkEtktfpEKP501HrbqlTAI0n9a84YS8raLY9VNQHMkuMbdxJJQ&t=1

(The Sun) - The Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) has been asked to explain to the public the government's clarification over the confusion surrounding the controversial Section 114a of the Evidence Act.

Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Datuk Seri Mohd Nazri Aziz told theSun however it is up to the AGC on how it intends to communicate to the people.

"They are (already) engaging stakeholders, such as the Bar Council.

"I have also arranged a meeting on Wednesday between (Umno Youth chief) Khairy Jamaluddin and the AGC as Khairy met me last week and requested for a meeting with the AGC," he said.

Last week, Khairy had in a tweet called for the section to be revoked.

This came after the Centre of Independent Journalism (CIJ) had organised Malaysia's first Internet Blackout Day on Aug 14.

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Abdul Razak tweeted on the same day that the cabinet had been told to look into the legislation.

However, a cabinet meeting chaired by Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin last week decided to maintain it.

Critics and lawmakers from both sides of the divide have been lobbying for the law to be repealed after it came into force last month, stressing that internet users are now automatically presumed guilty for any offensive content posted through their registered networks, hand-held devices, blogs and web portals.

It was reported that last Friday, the Bar Council had met the AG to discuss the amendments made to the Evidence Act.

Nazri said there has been much confusion as many do not understand the legal terms of the amendment, and the matter is taken out of context.

"People are free to talk but be more responsible, (don't cause) unsubstantiated fear," Nazri said. "I think most (people) who write (or talk) about this don't understand. It's not presumption of guilt.

"It is presumption of fact and the safeguard is the court. If in any situation the court is convinced, only then the burden of proof will shift to the accused and he (the accused) can challenge this later through a balance of probabilities.

"People who are legally trained will know that the threshold in rebutting on the balance of probability is very much lower than trying to prove beyond reasonable doubt.

"But if you come and say you don't trust the court, then there is nothing I can do because in any developed country, the court is the arbiter of all this... You need to trust the court … If you come up to me and say you don't trust the court, then you are being childish," he said.

Citing the case of Umno Youth where a seditious message was posted on a Facebook page created in Umno Youth's name, Nazri said since the wing has lodged a police report the presumption of probability has shifted.

Nazri reiterated that the amendment was meant to protect the country's security, adding that people must look at the spirit of amendment as a whole as 114a is to complement the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012, Penal Code (amendment) Act 2012 and Criminal Procedure Code (amendment) (No2) Act 2012.

He added that people should be more responsible and prudent, especially when lending their smartphones or gadgets to others.

Asked on the presumption that even the owner of a coffee shops or outlets that offered a free Wi-Fi facility could be presumed to have published an online publication originating from a computer using the Wi-Fi facility, Nazri said it does not automatically mean that the owner will be charged.

"The only thing that will happen is that we will get your cooperation to trace to the person (who allegedly posted matters deemed seditious), we are not going to charge you because someone else used your Wi-Fi facility," he said, rubbishing claims that the amendment curtails people's freedom.

Johor cop jailed, fined RM1.7m for money laundering

Posted: 27 Aug 2012 04:15 AM PDT

(Bernama) -  A police superintendent was today sentenced to two years jail for each of the four counts of money laundering by the Sessions Court here.

Azmi Osman, 55, was also fined RM1.75 million for the offences committed between 2002 and 2005.

Johor Baru Sessions Court Judge Salawati Djambari ordered the sentence on Azmi to run concurrently after finding him guilty under the Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorism Financing Act 2001.

Salawati later allowed Azmi to be freed on RM900,000 bail in two sureties and a stay of execution pending an appeal on the decision.

In November last year, Johor Baru High Court Judge Datuk Abdul Halim Aman had set aside the decision of the Sessions Court and directed the case to be transferred back to the Sessions Court in which Salawati had acquitted Azmi following the failure of the prosecution to prove a prima facie against the accused.

Azmi, who is currently suspended from duty, was alleged to have committed the four offences of money laundering totalling RM3.8 million between 2002 and 2005 when he was an officer of the Secret Societies, Gambling and Vice Division in Johor.

For the first and second charges, the accused was alleged to have received RM2.08 million and RM679,850 proceeds from money laundering through his Maybank current account in Mentakab, Pahang between February 6 and December 20, 2002 as well as January 15 and October 2 in 2003.

For the third and fourth charges, he was alleged to have received RM941,930 and RM250,000 for the same activity through another Maybank current account at the City Square Shopping Centre, Johor Baru on January 13, 2004 and April 5 in 2005, respectively.

Prosecution was conducted by Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission deputy public prosecutors Hazril Harun and Mohd Farez Abd Rahman while the accused was represented by Adam Yap and CN Sritharan.

 

‘Suspend all who attended meeting’

Posted: 26 Aug 2012 09:23 PM PDT

The recent leak of a closed-door meeting involving Penang DCM Mansor Othman was a 'clear act of sabotage', claims PKR. 

Athi Shankar, FMT

GEORGE TOWN: PKR's top brass must immediately suspend those who attended the now leaked closed-door unofficial meeting with state chairman Mansor Othman, pending a probe on their alleged internal misconduct.

State PKR information chief Johari Kassim insisted that the leadership should not hesitate to sack any of them if found guilty as charged in the internal investigation.

He said the leak was a clear act of sabotage on the party that the central leadership cannot ignore and step aside.

He said it was obvious that one or more among them could have leaked out the information to serve own selfish interests and the party disciplinary committee must act fast to punish them.

"Obviously the culprits who leaked the meeting details did not hold dear the party's best interests.

"All those who attended the meeting should be hauled up to the dock and suspended immediately pending investigation.

"If anyone is found guilty, sack instantly to teach others a lesson. It's the best way to deal with it or else it will happen again," warned Johari.

Lim 'cocky and arrogant'

Details of the closed-door meeting between Mansor and party local grassroots Chinese leaders, including elected representatives, were posted in a blog Gelagat Anwar in June.

The meeting was held in May in Mansor's DCM office in Komtar.

In the leaked details, Mansor had allegedly described Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng as "cocky and arrogant".

However, last Friday, Mansor denied describing Lim as "cocky and arrogant" but admitted saying that Lim was being revered like a "tokong" (deity) by Chinese voters in Penang.

In its postings in June 16, 18 and 19, the blog revealed that PKR's state deputy chief and Batu Kawan division chief Law Choo Kiang; Bukit Bendera division deputy chief Felix Ooi; Bayan Baru deputy chairman Tan Seng Keat; 2004 candidate for Bayan Baru parliament seat Raymond Ong; Tanjung Youth chief Ng Chek Siang; Batu Uban branch chief Cheah Peng Guan and Mansor's assistant John Ooi attended the meeting.

Party insiders and political observers view the controversy as part of a conspiracy by certain PKR local reps to kick out Mansor from state PKR altogether.

 

Police disallow Janji Democracy

Posted: 26 Aug 2012 09:20 PM PDT

It will violate Peaceful Assembly Act, says top Dan Wangi cop. 

Teoh El Sen, FMT

Police today declared as illegal the Bersih-linked Promise of Democracy (Janji Democracy) gathering to be held at Dataran Merdeka on the eve of Merdeka Day.

Dang Wangi district police chief ACP Zainuddin Ahmad has told the organisers to cancel it and warned the public against participating in it.

Speaking to FMT, Zainuddin said the statements made this afternoon by Maria Chin Abdullah, a representative of the Coalition of Promises (Gabungan Janji), were inaccurate.

Chin's statements came after the group had a dialogue with the police chief.

"I did not give them the green light actually, if that was the impression given [in her press conference]," he said. "In fact, the first words that came out of my mouth were that they had already violated the law."

He said that under Section 9(1) of the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012, the organisers should have submitted an official notification to the police of their gathering 10 days before the event.

"Since that was not done, it is illegal under the law, and I did not allow it. But if they said they would go ahead anyway, which I had advised against, then I may have to take action based on public safety and order," he said.

Asked if anyone would be charged with the violation, he replied: "We shall see. If they
go anyway, we will open up investigations."

The law provides for a maximum fine of RM10,000.

Asked if police would make arrests, Zainuddin said it was possible under the law.

"We will monitor it," he said. "We have the right to detain or take action against those who break the rules."

He added that under Section 83 and 84 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which deals with unlawful assemblies, the police were empowered to order the dispersal of such assemblies and use reasonable force if such orders were ignored.

He said that so far no police station in the Dang Wangi district had received any complaint against the gathering.

Asked if he accepted the group's argument that the gathering was simply to celebrate Merdeka, Zainuddin said the group was obviously promoting Bersih, which "has done all sorts of things".

Referring to plans by the Preservation of Jalan Sultan Committee (PJSC), Zainuddin said the group was celebrating their community and heritage and he did not see any problems arising from them having a gathering.

However, he said this group too would be breaching Section 9(1).

READ MORE HERE

 

Senator Syed Husin Ali sued over alleged defamation in book

Posted: 26 Aug 2012 09:14 PM PDT

(NST) - Kulim-Bandar Baru member of parliament Datuk Zulkifli Noordin has sued Senator Dr Syed Husin Ali over alleged defamation contained in the latter's Malay language book entitled 'Memoir Perjuangan Politik Syed Husin Ali'.

Zulkifli, who filed the suit through Messrs Kamarul Hisham and Hasnal Rezua on Friday, alleged in his statement of claim that the book implied that he had agreed to resign as Kulim Bandar Baru MP in order to allow Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to contest in a by-election.
 
He further alleged that the words in the book implied that he had asked Parti Keadilan Rakyat for RM60,000 to vacate the seat and that he had conspired with Umno to gain politically and financially by smearing PKR and Anwar.
 
Zulkifli added that the allegations were not true and had damaged his reputation.
 
He is claiming for general, exemplary and aggravated damages and an injunction to stop the defendant from re-producing the said words.
 
Zulkifli's lawyer Hasnal Rezua told reporters yesterday that this suit emanated from the defamation suit filed by Syed Husin against Zulkifli and two others earlier this year.
 
In that suit, Syed Husin alleged that Utusan Melayu (Malaysia) Bhd and its editor in chief Datuk Abdul Aziz Izhak had, with malicious intent, published words defamatory to him in an article dated Nov 20, 2011 headlined, "Zul Noordin nafi dakwaan Syed Husin" (Zul Noordin denies allegation by Syed Husin).
 
Syed Husin had also claimed that Zulkifli had posted the same article in his personal website although under a different heading, "Anjing-anjing Pencen" (Retired Dogs).
 
Yesterday, Hasnal and Syed Husin's lawyer N. Surendran, met High Court judge Vazeer Alam Mydin Meera in chambers for case management.
 
The suit by Syed Husin against Zulkifli, Utusan Malaysia and Abdul Aziz is fixed for trial on Thursday. 
 

DAP says has always been against defections

Posted: 26 Aug 2012 04:53 PM PDT

Clara Chooi, The Malaysian Insider

Lim Guan Eng today deflected criticisms of hypocrisy against the DAP's plan to enact anti-hopping laws in Penang, insisting that the party has always been against defections as a means to gain political power.

The DAP secretary-general acknowledged that in Pakatan Rakyat's (PR) September 16 takeover attempt in 2008, Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim had pre-empted Barisan Nasional's (BN) fall in Putrajaya through mass defections into PR, but said that even then, the DAP had been against the idea of using crossovers to wrest federal power.

"This was suggested by Anwar, when he mentioned the disillusionment of some MPs but DAP's position is clear.

"Anyone can jump parties but it is important that there should be a fresh mandate," Lim said today.

The September 16 affair led by Anwar has continued to haunt the federal opposition, and was raised again recently when Lim's DAP-led administration in Penang proposed an anti-hopping law to prevent such crossovers.

Lim repeated today that his government's proposal would not curb an individual's right to free association under Article 10 of the Federal Constitution as it does not forbid the individual from joining another party.

What is most important, he said, was to uphold the democratic right of voters by allowing the electorate to re-elect their representative if a parliamentarian or assemblyman decides to switch political camps.

The Bagan MP questioned BN's rejection of the DAP's anti-hopping law proposal, suggesting that this meant the ruling pact was still keen on trading elected representatives to help them gain political power when needed.

Lim again cited the case of Perak, which saw a shift in government in 2009 from PR to BN when two PKR and one DAP assemblymen left their respective parties to become BN-friendly independents.

"Why does BN refuse to have this anti-hopping law? Do they still want to trade in defections?" he asked.

The DAP's proposal in Penang has been met with harsh criticism from several BN leaders, with MCA president Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek sniping at the party for maintaining silence when PR welcomed defectors from BN into its fold.

The most recent case was the crossover of two senior Sabah BN MPs — Datuk Seri Wilfred Mojilip Bumburing and Datuk Seri Lajim Ukin — who left their posts in BN to form PR-friendly political movements in the east Malaysian state.

But Lim pointed out today that the DAP has not made any direct statements regarding the duo's twin defections, insisting again that the party was still opposed to crossovers that do not result in re-elections.

"We have not commented on their decisions. We have only said that there should be an anti-hopping law.

"By leaving BN, it just shows that they have lost confidence in the prime minister and the Sabah chief minister... but what we add is this — let us have an anti-hopping law," he said.

Asked if the DAP planned on raising the issue in the PR leadership council to push for similar laws to be enacted in all PR-led state governments, Lim said: "Let us start with Penang first. Let this be the first step."

He said the DAP's proposal in Penang will soon be formalised during the next state executive council meeting.

 

‘Free water policy unwise’

Posted: 26 Aug 2012 04:39 PM PDT

(Bernama) - The Selangor Government's policy of giving free water over the last four years is unwise and non-sustainable, says an academic.

Prof Dr Suhaimi Abdul Talib said the policy had resulted in shrinking revenue for the state that would have been useful for improving infrastructure facilities.

"Although free water looks good as a short-term gain, from the long-term view we are not educating the people to value water," he said in an interview.

Dr Suhaimi, who is assistant vice-chancellor for Development, Facilities Management and ICT of Universiti Teknologi Mara, warned that "we don't have the luxury of infinite supply of water. We have to realise that our sources of water are depleting simply on account of a sharp increase in demand."

He said the state would also come to a stage where it could no longer draw raw water from outside sources and new sources of water would have to come from how it could manage its own internal sources best.

Dr Suhaimi said he was against a free water policy because the question of affordability was not an issue.

"If we have to pay our water bill at RM40 per month, what is RM40? Your kids spend more than RM40 on their (handphone) prepaid (bills). So it's not a question of affordability. We should be paying for our water."

Dr Suhaimi said the people of Selangor must be made to change their perception on water by appreciating the true value of water and this could not be done as long as they get free water.

"The people of Selangor must use water wisely so that each resident can reduce consumption by 20%. This means the capacity at our reservoirs can increase accordingly by 20%. This is something that we have overlooked."

Dr Suhaimi explained that if a water tariff increase was inevitable, it had to be justified and with the agreement of the government.

He said water, being a basic necessity for everyone, should not be given free because it would mean that the precious commodity did not have a value.

 

Anwar urged to resolve dispute over allocation of seats

Posted: 26 Aug 2012 04:11 PM PDT

(The Star) - Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim should step in and resolve the alleged dispute between PKR and DAP over seat allocation in Penang for the coming general election, said Penang Malay Congress president Rahmad Isahak.

"It has become clear that segments in PKR do not like the overbearing style of Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng based on the transcript of a conversation among PKR leaders.

"This is not some NGO or Barisan Nasional making callous remarks. It came supposedly from within the Pakatan Rakyat ranks - allegedly from Penang PKR chairman Datuk Mansor Othman," he said.

Rahmad was referring to the news reports which quoted Mansor as describing Lim as "cocky, arrogant and tokong (deity)", in what was apparently a leaked citation from a conversation with other Chinese PKR leaders here.

He said the congress was not bothered by the name-calling or the alleged criticism of Lim, as it was part of politics.

"What's important is that Anwar must be aware that there is a declining interest within PKR over the need to field more Malay candidates."

The congress is said to be an impartial civil movement entity, but Rahmad stressed that it was formed to uphold the Malay political rights in Penang which he claimed had eroded.

 

DAP recruits political analyst

Posted: 26 Aug 2012 04:05 PM PDT

(The Star) - DAP has welcomed more new recruits to the party, including political analyst Dr Ong Kian Ming and oil and gas engineer Yeo Bee Yin.

Both University of Cambridge graduates, Ong and Yeo are one of the few high-profile young professionals that the party has been aggressively recruiting.

Ong in particular is famed for his political analysis published in Malaysiakini, apart from his day job as a lecturer at UCSI University.

In announcing their entry, party secretary-general Lim Guan Eng said Ong will be helping him in the party's election strategy while Yeo, will be assisting DAP in crafting social media strategies in their effort to woo young voters.

Meanwhile, in the press conference here Monday, Lim said the party will be pressing on with its effort to legislate anti-party hopping laws in Penang.

"We're not denying the basic human rights in their freedom of association. But we are talking about the democratic choice of the voters who have voted for the party," he said.

 

Guan Eng denies DAP at war with PAS

Posted: 26 Aug 2012 03:33 PM PDT

The DAP secretary-general was responding to the public spat between his party chairman Karpal Singh and PAS heavyweight Nasharuddin Mat Isa over hudud.

Syed Jaymal Zahiid, FMT

DAP secretary-general Lim Guan Eng today denied that his party is at war with its Islamic ally PAS over hudud.

"No, its business as usual," said the Penang chief minister when asked by reporters if the public spat between DAP chairman Karpal Singh and former PAS No 2 Nasharuddin Mat Isa had driven a deeper wedge between the two parties.

Karpal is mulling to sue Nasharuddin after he accused the DAP leader's staunch anti-hudud stand as being "anti-Islam".

The hatchet over PAS' plan to implement the controversial Islamic penal law was again unearthed after Nasharuddin criticised the party for what he described as a subservient posture and said he would continue to speak out on the subject.

Nasharuddin had first made the statement during a controversial meeting with Saudi Arabia's ulamas in the presence of Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak and repeated his criticism upon returning to Malaysia two weeks ago.

The meeting drew accusations of disloyalty from within PAS since Nasharuddin had suggested that he was prepared to break ranks in pursuit of implementing hudud.

Some claimed that the former PAS deputy president's statement was aimed at creating internal friction and was engineered by Umno.

The federal opposition bloc had been forced to contain the damage over the long-standing hudud debate several times following PAS' insistence that the law would remain as part of its core agenda.

The pact then agreed that hudud was no longer an issue after the Islamist party said it would respect the Common Policy Framework that excluded implementing the Islamic penal law.

Lim said Karpal's plan to sue Nasharuddin was done on his own accord and had nothing to do with the party.

"I think we should just leave what Karpal said to himself," he added.

 

Guan Eng continues to push for anti-hopping law

Posted: 26 Aug 2012 03:27 PM PDT

Penang chief minister Lim Guan Eng says the anti-hopping law proposal will be formalised to include views from other fellow Pakatan Rakyat state reps.

Syed Jaymal Zahiid, FMT

KUALA LUMPUR: Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng will go ahead with his "anti-hopping" law enactment plan, even though it will go against Anwar Ibrahim's pursuit of more defections in Sabah.

Lim said that he will bring his plan to the state's top-level meeting to formalise a proposal.

Lim had announced the proposal last week, a move that drew flak from the ruling coalition who described the move as hypocritical when the opposition leader, his ally, is openly courting lawmakers in the key state of Sabah ahead of national polls.

Two Barisan Nasional MPs, one of them a deputy minister, had recently resigned from the ruling coalition citing as reasons their disillusionment with Putrajaya's inability to deal with the state's longstanding illegal migrants issue.

While Umno's Beaufort parliamentarian Lajim Ukin is vague about his political leaning, Upko's Tuaran representative Wilfred Bumburing said he will be campaigning for the federal opposition bloc Pakatan Rakyat.

Anwar was believed to have engineered the defections. The PKR de facto leader also said that more "surprises" are expected in the near future.

Lim was questioned on his position on the defections but avoided criticising it openly, saying the DAP's silence on the two defections is "self-explanatory".

"Have we commented on that? I believe that is self-explanatory," the Bagan MP told a press conference at the party's headquarters here.

Legal blockade

Pakatan leaders had said that any proposals for new policies will have to observe its binding Common Policy Framework which adheres to only what is provided in the Federal Constitution. The anti-hopping law is not one of them.

Lim's decision will only be proposed in Penang where his party controls two-thirds of the state's legislative assembly. He said there are no plans to raise this with Pakatan's top leadership.

READ MORE HERE

 

Why re-negotiate oil deal in private?

Posted: 26 Aug 2012 03:13 PM PDT

Why is Chief Minister Taib Mahmud, who has been silent about the 5% oil royalty for the past 30 years, keen to look at the issue again?

Joseph Tawie, FMT

KUCHING: Sarawak opposition has questioned the need for secrecy in the re-negotiations of the existing oil agreement with the federal government.

"I am curious to know as to why Chief Minister [Taib Mahmud] should think royalty negotiations are better done in private. Why is that so?" asked Sarawak PKR chief Baru Bian.

Bian, who is a senior lawyer and Ba Kelalan assemblyman, said oil and gas issue was of public concern.

"The oil and gas in Sarawak is not the property of the chief minister – it belongs to all the people of Sarawak, hence we have a right to know what is being discussed.

"We want to know what the chief minister intends to do about it… we would like to remind him that he is a servant of the people and is accountable to them," Bian said.

He pointed out that Sarawak has been lagging behind the Peninsula in every aspect including roads and infrastructure, education, healthcare, jobs, transport, industry and development.

"One could say that Peninsular Malaysia and many individuals have prospered or benefited via Petronas at our expense.

"Sarawakians now say kini masa balas budi to quote a line from the infamous Barisan Nasional Merdeka theme song 2012.

"The former prime minister (Dr Mahathir Mohamad), in a Freudian slip, had referred to the current administration as the 'devil' and the opposition as the 'angel'. That in itself says it all.

"I trust that the rakyat are astute enough to judge for themselves whether to choose more of the same or to give themselves the hope of a better and brighter future with the Pakatan Rakyat," he said.

Why now Taib?

Bian also questioned the timing of Taib's decision to re-negotiate the 5% oil royalty, when he knew about the imbalance and unjust agreement these past 30 years.

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Three questions for Najib

Posted: 31 Aug 2012 03:54 PM PDT

The PM is known to avoid answering difficult questions.

Selena Tay, FMT

There are three questions pertaining to the 13th general election which Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak must answer immediately.

These three questions are:

1. Will the movie 'Tanda Putera' be shown in the cinemas while the election campaign is going on?

2. Will the voter rolls be cleaned up before the election is held?

3. If Pakatan Rakyat were to win the 13th GE, will PM Najib hand over power graciously in a smooth transition of power?

"If the PM fails to answer the above three questions immediately, then his credibility and sincerity as a leader who strives for the good of the nation is seriously in doubt," opined PAS strategist and Kuala Selangor MP, Dzulkefly Ahmad.

The PM is known to avoid answering difficult questions. No one knows the reason why.

The PM must give a reasonable and acceptable answer as to why 'Tanda Putera' is being screened during the election campaign period if it is to be screened during that particular period in question and he must state clearly the purpose of doing so.

Question No 2 in regards to the voter rolls has been asked many times. Still, the PM has turned a deaf ear to this said question. Is this question so very difficult to answer?

If the voter rolls have been cleaned up, then just say so. If not, then please state the reason why and when action will be taken to clean them up. There is no reason not to answer this question unless one has something to hide. Not answering the said question does indeed give rise to the suspicion that there is something highly irregular with the voter rolls.

"Winning the general election is one thing but by not answering the question pertaining to the voter rolls, then there will be a suspicion that the victory was achieved via dubious methods," remarked Dzulkefly.

Then what can the citizens do? Call for international observers to be on duty before and during the polls is one.

And if that is disallowed, then it is highly suspicious. We should also play an active role by volunteering to keep our eyes and ears open to monitor the electoral process by joining electoral watchdog groups.

A smile and a wave

The PM is only concerned with sprucing up his image as a leader. A smile here and a wave there is all that matters instead of really providing answers to tough questions especially in regards to the voter rolls.

Each time this issue is raised, BN leaders will inevitably reply that the voter rolls are clean by saying "If not, then how can the opposition win five states in the previous general election?"

The BN leaders always give that same reply. Well, if the voter rolls are clean, the margin of BN's victory would have been much narrower. BN can still win of course and this is due to the tricky delineation of electoral boundaries.

Therefore there are many questionable goings-on in the electoral process, not only in regards to phantom voters but also in regards to the constituency mapping.

As for Question No 3, it has been asked before earlier this year. Till today the PM has avoided answering this particular said question. Why? This is a very simple question. Just answer 'yes' or 'no'.

The PM's reluctance to answer the question pertaining to the smooth transition of power is most telling. Is this an ominous sign?

As we have just celebrated the 55th year of Independence, it is time to look forward to meeting the challenges facing the nation. With the advent of instant technology, no one can easily hide their misdeeds.

Thus we as citizens must demand that our leaders be forthright and honest. Double-talk and dodgy answers are unacceptable. No two-ways about it.

PM Najib owes the citizens, including the Pakatan lawmakers frank and straightforward answers. He must put aside partisan politics and be fair to all.

He has to strive to improve in all areas of administration as has often been proclaimed in the much-touted GTP (Government Transformation Programme) and the various NKRAs (National Key Result Areas).

READ MORE HERE

 

Merdeka: The end of the fairy-tale

Posted: 30 Aug 2012 02:16 PM PDT

Najib has made a lot of mistakes and has reneged on many promises. His Merdeka slogan, 'Janji DiTepati' is an affront to the rakyat.

Mariam Mokhtar, FMT

The nation is 55 years old today. To read some newspapers you'd think that it was Barisan Nasional, and not the people, which achieved independence from Britain.

To learn that the Merdeka Day celebrations at the Bukit Jalil Stadium is "by invitation only", is appalling. Who decreed that the rakyat had to be members of the "select" BN club to celebrate Merdeka? If Merdeka is exclusively BN, then the slogan "1Malaysia" is rendered meaningless.

As with many things in Umno, the taxpayers are made to pay for the prizes and the ceremony, but they are denied the opportunity to win any of the prizes or even attend the event.

If the Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak and his Information, Communications and Culture Minister, Rais Yatim, cannot even organise a Merdeka event that is inclusive of all Malaysians, then they are not fit to run the country after the 13th general election.

You'd be forgiven for thinking that it was not Merdeka we were celebrating but Hari BN. Rais' foray into composing the Merdeka song makes you wonder: which is he worse at – songwriting or being a Cabinet minister?

The biggest disappointment is Najib. He is weighted by personal and political baggage. Even if he listened and learnt (from his and others' mistakes), he cannot be rescued politically. He was not elected into office and is now vilified by the man who put him there, former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad.

Najib has made a lot of mistakes and has reneged on many promises. His Merdeka slogan, "Janji Di Tepati" is an affront to the rakyat. He is insecure and is desperate to win the affection of the rakyat. His reputation locally and abroad is tarnished.

Wasting taxpayers' money

At the beginning of the week, it was reported that The Guardian had sacked its journalist, Joshua Trevino, for conflict of interest and for bringing the media industry into disrepute.

Trevino had belonged to FBC Media, a public relations company, which had been paid by Najib to bathe Malaysia in a good light, to whitewash the misdeeds of its government, and to criticise Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim. Using taxpayers' money, Najib paid overseas PR companies such as Apco, FBC and CNBC millions of ringgit to promote him and his administration.

Why does Najib need to spruce up his image? Why waste taxpayers' money when he only needs to act responsibly at home? If he is not sure of his duties, they are to lead, to listen and to learn.

Najib holds on to the illusion of power, but the real power is in the hands of a man, who is sitting in The Mines Resort, just outside Kuala Lumpur.

Najib thought he could win the hearts of the overseas Malaysians with the promise of enfranchisement, but his promises have remained an illusion.

The Home Ministry, the police and Pemandu CEO Idris Jala, all gave us the illusion that crime was falling, but the truth is people are being raped, mugged, killed, abducted and robbed, on a daily basis.

The illusion that Najib presents to overseas leaders is that he is a champion of the "moderates", but Malaysians beg to differ. At home, race and religion are used to divide the nation. Thus, the illusion of racial and religious harmony is just that. An illusion.

Periodically, Malays are scared into thinking that Muslims are covertly being converted to Christianity, en masse. The controversial raid on the Damansara Utama Methodist Church (DUMC) sparked off the formation of Himpunan Sejuta Melayu to defend Islam.

Himpunan reported that it had the support of four million Muslims and 200 NGOs. Last October, a mere 5,000 people turned up for the rally, at the 100,000-capacity Shah Alam stadium. Another illusion was broken.

Last May, the government held a "Million Youths Rally 2012" in Putrajaya, an event which some alleged was the government's attempt to try and rival the success of the Bersih 3.0 rally.

The illusion of mass support by the youth was crushed with allegations of money and free food for those who attended. To make matters worse, several people were injured when a drag race car tore into the crowds.

The illusion that the government looks after its youth was shattered when the Youth and Sports Minister Ahmad Shabery Cheek asked that the event not be politicised. Both he and the organisers refused to be held responsible for the lack of safety at the event.

The 11th National Cooperative Day Expo 2012 held in mid-July at the National Stadium was another flop. Many seats were unoccupied. Old-age pensioners who had been bused in to fill the seats started to disperse as Najib started to speak. Bored schoolchildren blew their vuvuzelas and were reprimanded by Najib for drowning him out.

The illusion that the prime minister draws crowds wherever he goes is false. It is also alleged that several government servants were transferred because of the dismal attendance.

READ MORE HERE

 

A depressed Merdeka — Are you celebrating Merdeka?

Posted: 29 Aug 2012 02:50 PM PDT

Malaysians at this moment can't be bothered about politics. They're concerned about GE, but right at the top of their heads is how to make a living in Malaysia. If corporate professionals turn to multi-level marketing as a side-income, and journalists to tuition and freelance writing to make up for their pay, what about the average Malaysian? This year's Ramadan revealed the rising cost of food. A pitiful currypuff is now 50 sen, when it used to be RM1 for three currypuffs. And it seems that it is the same everywhere, from Bangsar to Keramat. Maggi Mee, a staple for Malaysians, has gone up, and a cup of very sweet Milo at a small mamak-like café at Giant Kota Damansara now cost RM4. Could this be why crime is rampant?

Dina Zaman, The Malaysian Insider

Seeing a headline shouting "Putrajaya offers cash rewards to N-Day event participation" does not encourage patriotism. It does not help that this year, just like the past few years, the atmosphere is muted. 

Very few Malaysians are in the mood to celebrate Malaysia's 55th year of Independence, and that is a truly sorry state for the country to be.

There are many factors related to this. A declining economy, rising costs of living, gutter politics, crime, and there is also a general air of hopelessness among Malaysians when asked if they were looking forward to August 31, 2012.

If one is to believe the noise on social media, and in forums, it would seem that Malaysians hate their country. There seems to be nothing positive about the country, and every effort the government puts, is met with ridicule.

What does the average Malaysian think about this year's Merdeka celebrations?

CS Tan of Terengganu finds that this year theme is a joke. "I 'created' a few phases to my Merdeka celebration. From primary to secondary school Merdeka was about how we managed to be independent, govern our country on our own terms, instead of being under British rule, and of course the colourful floats we saw on television. Tertiary – it's about holidays. Young working life – it's about holidays plus those outrageous uniforms from TNB and Telekom and other Malaysian companies we had to wear. Middle age phase – Merdeka is about able to think of myself after years of believing that the government can't do wrong. This year – it's about Merdeka from crime in Malaysia. Not optimistic huh?"

The 1Malaysia Merdeka logo provoked such outcry and ridicule, one can only feel sorry for the government. "I'm sure that our Government had the best of intentions when they commissioned the design …" a rather diplomatic professional who did not want to be named said.

Oso-San Anna disagrees. A Communications professional, she has worked in advertising agencies and in-house communications departments. She understands design and branding – she lives and breathes them. "Firstly, for something as important as Merdeka, the Government should leave it to the pros. I mean real pros (and not some crony's son) who has a solid understanding of the use of symbol and colour and collective expression of national pride."

"Secondly, branding is powerful when built and layered over time with consistency and commitment."

"Thirdly, where are the brand values? Both from the standpoint of the creator and the people it's meant for? Is there buy-in from the Rakyat? I feel all 3 are missing in the 1Malaysia logo that was designed. We are 55 years old as a Nation. Sure it's national pride but the meaning of real patriotism is already lost since it's seldom practiced in soul & spirit," she said.

Angelia Ong, who works in animation is saddened by recent celebrations. The idea of Merdeka has somehow lost its spirit, she says. "It used to be more alive and less about polishing the achievements of a particular political coalition. It used to come across as more inclusive and meaningful. The phrase "1Malaysia" has taken over so much, my youngest had one time thought our country was called 1Malaysia, rather than Malaysia. From a branding point of view, I guess they have succeeded in ensuring that it's everywhere and anywhere, to the point of oversaturation."

From a Malaysian's point of view (on what she thought of the logo), "it was just a major facepalm moment."

On Facebook, one lone friend is spotted asking on his status update, "Where can I get a Malaysian flag? I want to hang it from my balcony." Very few of his friends responded to the query.

No Money, No Merdeka Honey

Malaysians at this moment can't be bothered about politics. They're concerned about GE, but right at the top of their heads is how to make a living in Malaysia. If corporate professionals turn to multi-level marketing as a side-income, and journalists to tuition and freelance writing to make up for their pay, what about the average Malaysian?

This year's Ramadan revealed the rising cost of food. A pitiful currypuff is now 50 sen, when it used to be RM1 for three currypuffs. And it seems that it is the same everywhere, from Bangsar to Keramat. Maggi Mee, a staple for Malaysians, has gone up, and a cup of very sweet Milo at a small mamak-like café at Giant Kota Damansara now cost RM4. Could this be why crime is rampant?

Tania Leong, who runs a new age shop, is not confident of our economy. "Everyone I know who owns a business, has reported a decrease in revenue. Even my customers share a same complaint of their businesses, be it property, legal (clients unable to pay), travel agency, health spas, dvd shops, children's play facilities, restaurants etc. Sungai Wang Plaza in the city has always been golden hot property (probably one of the top 5 most expensive per sq.ft.), and even that is suffering."

"What I have observed is that this country is lacking qualified personnel in many areas of work from a sale assistant to corporate positions, a low standard of education system, many government workers are slow, inefficient and clueless, there is no minimum wage, corruption appears to be the norm in our judicial, police & government departments, religion has been made into law, sex education in schools are non-existent or minimal and so we have children bearing children. Crime rates seemed to have soared the last couple of years."

"If leaving the country was an option for me, I would leave in a heartbeat."

Hani B works in retail and has first-hand experiences with customer spending. Her customers range from the wealthy Middle Easterners to young college students, and understands their buying habits. "I used to be confident that our economy can weather most adversities, now I get totally scared when reading that our national debt amounted to 257 billion in 2011 … yikes!!

When I google about our economy, the results go on and on about how much it's growing bla bla bla but retail wise, I just don't see it and my salary certainly doesn't reflect it."

Like Tania, she notes that skilled workers are lacking. "I read that our country is among the top 20 nations to be labelled as losers of capital flight ... that is RM893 billion(!) siphoned out between 1970 and 2010, so why should we stay back and help with the improvement of wealth to the 1 per cent? Then again, what do I know, I'm just a shopgirl."

At the many open houses around the capital, the Malaysians asked, professed to forgetting that Merdeka was around the corner. This year is bad, they said, and their open houses reflect that.

Open houses are celebrated on a smaller scale now.

READ MORE HERE

 

Time for DAP to be a good partner

Posted: 29 Aug 2012 02:42 PM PDT

The Chinese-based party should not rock the Pakatan boat right now by harping on non-issues and should instead work towards winning the polls.

CT Ali, FMT

The 13th general election is there for Pakatan Rakyat to lose. And lose it they will if DAP does not get its act together. I never thought I would say that.

All this time I have watched DAP grow from strength to strength. Consolidating its considerable presence in Sabah and Sarawak while making inroads into the Peninsula in places where even Umno thinks Pakatan would not dare venture into or could hope to field a candidate against the Barisan Nasional and have a chance to win.

All this while, the DAP has made concerted efforts to take in Malays to boost its claims to be a party for all Malaysians. Its commitment on taking over the government in concert with PAS and PKR seems to be the order of the day.

And yet as the 13th general election nears, we see the real DAP is starting to unravel… to fray at its edges.

The memory of the controversial exit of its vice-chairman, Tunku Abdul Aziz Tunku Ibrahim, has returned to haunt the party because now, through Tunku Aziz, we are privy to what has been said of Anwar Ibrahim by DAP's first-tiered leadership.

And what they say of Anwar is not flattering to DAP and to Anwar himself. Now, is DAP making use of Tunku Aziz to rein in Anwar after his acquittal of Sodomy II?

Or is Tunku Aziz making use of DAP to continue his public spat with Anwar over his insistence that the April 28 Bersih rally should not have proceeded at Dataran Merdeka? You tell me. Either way, it bodes ill for the Pakatan coalition.

Hudud a non-issue

The DAP also insists on mischievously harping on hudud – a non-issue as both BN and Pakatan are on record as having said that they will not and cannot implement. So why talk about something that is not going to be implemented?

Another non-issue is party hopping. It is a non-issue because anybody with an ounce of grey matter in his or her brain is against this.

But anybody with an ounce of grey matter also knows, understands and accepts that no matter what anybody says, any politician worth his salt will have to accept that in a democracy, elections are won in a number of ways – and party hopping is one of them.

Tell us, Karpal Singh and Lim Kit Siang, was there not a time when this Anwar was once your sworn enemy? Wasn't he your favourite target and whipping boy in Parliament? And now you are comrades in arms.

And do you not have within DAP ranks former Umno politicians? What do you call that? A change of heart, a marriage of convenience? Or has the time come even for sworn enemies to look again at each other's convictions and see if there is room to work together towards a common goal?

So please DAP, while it is a decent thing to do to be against frogs that go hopping from one party to another, the adherence to such sentiment might be a bit harder to do.

We are at war with BN. Almost anything that could assist us to win that war must be considered. When victory is in hand, these "questionable tactics" can be looked again with clear heads. Until then shut up.

READ MORE HERE

 

Hudud: A PAS objective, not an agreed Pakatan agenda

Posted: 29 Aug 2012 11:35 AM PDT

http://i967.photobucket.com/albums/ae159/Malaysia-Today/mat_sabu2.jpg

Mat Sabu was telling the truth when he denied he said PAS would amendment the constitution to implement hudud. The word 'hudud' was planted into the conversation by the reporter, who was smart enough to put the questions in such a way that Mat Sabu could hardly answer in the negative.  

Kim Quek

Like any reader of The Sin Chew Daily, I was stunned by its front page headline on Aug 28, which reads: "PAS will implement Hudud when it rules". 

My split-second reaction was: "Gosh, this is serious!". Flashing instantly across the mind is the image of an Islamic state, mixed with the consternation that PAS might have suddenly changed course over the Islamic state issue and the devastating electoral repercussion that can be expected to ensue from the Chinese community following such a shocking turn of event.

Anxious to know more, I read through the entire two pages covering the event without pause, and was relieved that, as I expected, PAS has indeed held on to its policy of putting the pursuit of an Islamic state and implementation of Hudud as a long term objective – certainly not the current priority. I am happy that the alliance of PAS-PKR-DAP remains intact and on-course in its relentless march to Putrajaya.

Meanwhile Sin Chew's headline on Aug 28 has kicked up a mini-storm in the Internet.


MAT SABU DENIES, BUT SIN CHEW PERSISTS

PAS Deputy President Mat Sabu immediately denied that he said PAS would amend the federal constitution to implement Hudud should it come to power. 

"I did not say (we'll bring) hudud (to Parliament)," he told Malaysiakini.

He added that good governance and social justice must be practised in Malaysia before implementing the Islamic penal code.

However, Sin Chew on the other hand also defended its headline report by giving the following sequence of events through its website on Aug 28 (Tuesday):

Stage 1: On Sunday, Aug 26:

Sin Chew asked Mat Sabu to comment on PAS President Hadi Awang's statement on Saturday (Aug 25) that PAS would implement Hudud through the democratic process.

Mat Sabu answered: "Democracy is to govern through the ballot box, and change to any policy must be done through Parliament, and two-thirds support (in Parliament) is needed to amend the constitution."

Stage 2: On Monday, Aug 27:

Based on the above Mat Sabu answer, Sin Chew's evening edition said in its headline story: "Mat Sabu says PAS has decided to propose constitutional amendment to implement hudud should the Islamic party capture Putrajaya"

Upon learning from an English daily that Mat Sabu had denied saying so, Sin Chew called Mat Sabu to clarify further.

Mat Sabu reiterated that if any party wanted to amend "any Act", it would need to go through Parliament, and that he didn't mention hudud.

He also stated that the party had not discussed whether to table a motion to amend the constitution.

However, Sin Chew reporter pressed further and asked: "The 'any Act', does it include hudud?".  Mat Sabu answered: "Yes."

The reporter further asked: : "Can I say PAS 'memang berhasrat' (intend) to amend the constitution to implement any Act, including hudud, but at the moment has not discussed the matter of tabling a motion in Parliament?".  Mat Sabu answered: "Can."

Stage 3: (Tuesday, Aug 28)

Sin Chew splashed the headline "PAS will implement hudud when it rules", saying in its first line: "PAS Deputy President Mat Sabu says PAS intends to seek constitutional amendment in Parliament in order to implement hudud, when it rules in the central government". 


THE TRUTH

From the above sequence of events, we can see that Mat Sabu was telling the truth when he denied he said PAS would amendment the constitution to implement hudud. The word 'hudud' was planted into the conversation by the reporter, who was smart enough to put the questions in such a way that Mat Sabu could hardly answer in the negative. 

In fact, Mat Sabu was only making a general remark when he answered that a constitutional amendment needs to have two thirds support in parliament. He was certainly not specifically referring to hudud, so it is not fair to coin the words in such a way as to portray Mat Sabu as driving the point that PAS will seek parliamentary approval for implementing hudud upon taking over the federal government.

It is apparent that Mat Sabu didn't want to give a direct answer. The reasons are simple. 

In the first place, a parliamentary motion from PAS needs to go through the process of building consensus within Pakatan Rakyat, more so when it is a  constitutional amendment as momentous as the introduction of hudud and the conversion of the status quo into an Islamic state. There is no such consensus now or in the foreseeable future.

Secondly, social conditions are not ripe for implementation of hudud as exemplified by the lack of social justice and good governance in our country, as pointed out by Mat Sabu and other Islamic scholars.

Thirdly, it is suicidal for PAS to hammer home the hudud agenda at this sensitive election time when it says it is still in the process of building greater understanding among non-supporters of hudud,who in all likelihood, predominate the electorate.

So, with all these hurdles standing in the way, does it make sense for PAS to trumpet the message that upon reaching Putrajaya, it will implement hudud – as if this is currently its urgent priority?


HEADLINE MISLEADING

Perhaps what causes the furor most is not so much the details in Sin Chew's report as the grossly misleading and sensational title of "PAS WILL IMPLEMENT HUDUD WHEN IT RULES". It distinctly gives the impression that hudud is on the cards, the moment PAS steps into Putrajaya.

So, who among the non-Muslims wouldn't be alarmed and shocked by such a headline and the leading sentences of the story, when they have all along been assured that PAS will only move through consensus within Pakatan Rakyat and that the latter's prime political objective is to improve the people's welfare by replacing the corrupt and obsolete Barisan Nasional?

Considering that many readers do not read through all the relevant details or possess the analytical mind to sort out the wheat from the chaff, many must have already been misled and alienated by this sensational report.

(In all fairness to Sin Chew, despite the misleading headlines and the leading story on Aug 28, its entire coverage of the subject, particularly its exhaustive coverage spreading over five pages in the following day, Aug 29, do contain sufficient truthful information for the more discerning reader to form the correct conclusion).

Now that the damage has been done, it falls upon Pakatan Rakyat and democracy activists to dispel the misperception and spread the truth that hudud remains a PAS objective, but not an agreed Pakatan Rakyat agenda when it comes to power. And hence, a vote for PAS is not a vote for Hudud, but a vote for good governance.

Hudud law: Truth or illusion?

Posted: 28 Aug 2012 03:55 PM PDT

Our reporter called him again after the evening edition of Sin Chew Daily hit the street, and wanted to reconfirm with him the content of his speech. Mat Sabu offered to change the tone from "decided" to "had the intention" (berhasrat) which our reporter agreed. As a result, some minor changes appeared on the morning edition of the newspaper: "PAS has the intention of seeking constitutional amendment in the Parliament in order to implement the hudud law once the Pakatan takes the helm of the federal administration."

Tay Tian Yan, Sin Chew Daily

In an open society, everything is laid out under the sun for public scrutiny.

I personally have nothing against what PAS deputy president Mohamad Sabu has said. On the contrary, I used to have very high regards for his candidness, and his relatively open and pragmatic attitude towards things.

Such a perception has been reflected in many of my past commentaries on PAS.

This time, we have to really thank Mat Sabu for accepting an interview from Sin Chew Daily, during which our reporter requested him to expound the remarks made by party president Datuk Seri Hadi Awang on Harakah that the party had the intention of implementing the hudud law through democratic process.

Mat Sabu explained, "PAS has decided that it will seek constitutional amendment in the Parliament to implement the hudud law once the Pakatan takes the helm of the federal administration."

Our reporter called him again after the evening edition of Sin Chew Daily hit the street, and wanted to reconfirm with him the content of his speech. Mat Sabu offered to change the tone from "decided" to "had the intention" (berhasrat) which our reporter agreed.

As a result, some minor changes appeared on the morning edition of the newspaper: "PAS has the intention of seeking constitutional amendment in the Parliament in order to implement the hudud law once the Pakatan takes the helm of the federal administration."

In the meantime, we also interviewed PAS information chief Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man to get him to clarify on the party's stand on this issue. His response was consistent with that of Mat Sabu and the same was published on the day's edition of Sin Chew Daily.

We have later acquired the official statement of PAS president Hadi Awang on August 13, as well as his August 25 statement published on the party's mouthpiece Harakah on the implementation of the hudud law.

We later clarified with PAS secretary-general Mustafa Ali on the same issue.

Unfortunately, after the report went into print, Mat Sabu denied the following day what he had said, and claimed that Sin Chew Daily had distorted his speech.

We tried contact him with the hope of seeking further clarification from him but have so far not been able to get him.

It appears that politicians' customary ways of doing things have been repeated on Mat Sabu. Although this is nothing new in politics, I am still somewhat disappointed. I thought Mat Sabu was a responsible man who would loyally adhere to his principles.

To support our case that we have not misquoted or distorted anyone's speech, we published the statement Hadi Awang has made on today's Sin Chew Daily, along with an exclusive interview with Mustafa Ali for public scrutiny.

We have to make it very clear that our reports on the hudud law have not been tailored in such a way to baffle PAS or Pakatan but to deliver accurate and essential information to the reading public.

As a public medium, we are in no position to conceal any piece of important information from public knowledge, especially something that involves public interests, and incidents that may transform our society in one way or another.

It is imperative that PAS' stand on the implementation of hudud law be exposed under the sun so that members of the public could comprehend, evaluate and make their options.

The worst thing we could do is to selectively hide the truth, glorifying the most beautiful parts and covering up the rest of it.

The most despicable and deceitful way of doing things is to tell one side of the story to the Muslim community, and the other side to the non-Muslims.

PAS used to enjoy a respectable repute and should therefore treasure its own credibility. If the party insists that the hudud law is correct and appropriate, it should then publicly proclaim its political agendas in the same tone, be it to the Muslim or non-Muslim society, and go on to promote and lobby for them among the Chinese voters.

That said, the party must make its agendas unreservedly open to all Malaysians. This is the most fundamental way of doing things justly.

Meanwhile, PAS' allies in the opposition pact must never attempt to create a glamorous illusion among the Chinese community with their own interests and ballots as prime considerations. While political parties have every right to pursue their goals and objectives, they have to be accountable to the rakyat in so doing.

Whether the hudud law is eventually good or detrimental to our nation, once it is put into implementation, it will stay in effect for generations, even as electoral ballots and political parties do not last forever.

Malaysians are entitled to the whole truth to make sensible judgements and choices that will shape their common future.

 

The bankruptcy of the Islamic vs secular state debate

Posted: 28 Aug 2012 03:35 PM PDT

Those who ignore ― whether deliberately or otherwise ― the civilizational, historical, intellectual and spiritual dimensions of Islam risks projecting their own prejudices and fantasies onto their understanding of Islam wherever they employ the words "Islam" or "Islamic" in their utterances or writings, thus betraying their superficial grasp of the religion which they (falsely) claim to represent.

Imran Mustafa and Wan Mohd Aimran Wan Mohd Kamil, The Malaysian Insider

We read with interest the article by Dr Farouk Musa entitled "Arguing for a secular state" published on August 22 in The Malaysian Insider.

The idea of the Islamic state, as mentioned by Farouk, is indeed a modern creation. It did not appear, or even conceivable, prior to the total fall and destruction of the Caliphate, as Muslims have always understood polity and politics to be intimately linked to some form of authority which upholds systems that are congruent with principles in Islam.

This is of no surprise, as there had never been any point in Muslim history in which there was a total loss of sovereignty in almost all Muslim lands, and of which Muslims can do nought but watch as their precious way of life, their entire being, were unrecognizably altered to fit a system whose history and philosophy they did not share.

In fact, according to Shaykh Seraj Hendriks, a Mufti in South Africa, the adjective "Islamic" was never truly used for organisations or entities prior to the fall of the Caliphate, including "Islamic Renaissance", whatever that might mean. Indeed, the use of the adjective came first in Muslim majority countries, rather than non-Muslim countries, indicating the severity of the trauma that the Ummah suffered at that time.

A tangential but crucial point that needs to be made on the meaning and scope of the word 'Islamic' is that it should be not understood simply as a prefix, the addition of which automatically transforms the subject-matter into agreement with the requirements of the religion of Islam.

This is especially true if one reduces and restricts the meaning of the word 'Islam' and 'Islamic' to an external show of piety without a conscious and knowing submission, or to a private choice without an outward and social manifestation of religious belief, or to an intellectual form of religious understanding severed from its spiritual and intuitive wellsprings, instead of conceiving the word 'Islam' or 'Islamic' as standing for a religion founded upon Divine Revelation, transmitted by Holy Prophets and Messengers (upon them be peace!) and nurtured by learned scholars and men and women of spiritual discernment and of pure and upright character.

Those who ignore ― whether deliberately or otherwise ― the civilizational, historical, intellectual and spiritual dimensions of Islam risks projecting their own prejudices and fantasies onto their understanding of Islam wherever they employ the words "Islam" or "Islamic" in their utterances or writings, thus betraying their superficial grasp of the religion which they (falsely) claim to represent.

Indeed, inserting the word "Islam" or "Islamic" into the name of one's movement or organization does not necessarily mean that words and deeds of the movement or organization will be in harmony with the teachings and practices of Islam nor does it guarantee that everything it stood for faithfully represents the religious and intellectual traditions of Islam, especially if those in movement or organization of such kinds are themselves confused about the fundamental elements of the worldview of Islam and completely unmoored from the living tradition of Islam as constituted by its scholars and saints, in addition to men and women of spiritual discernment.

In evaluating the validity and soundness of the proposals made by such movements or organizations pertaining to the direction and future of the Ummah, one doth well to remember that even the devil can quote Scripture.

A sensitivity towards history

The study of history is only as useful as it contributes to a true and correct perspective of the present, upon which a proper and clear path to the future may be charted. This alone should be sufficient in justifying the need for a sensitive awareness of the historical context and a critical assessment of historicity whenever one wishes to discuss ideas and theories, peoples and nations.

The attitude that readily marginalizes the historical perspective and analysis on the assumption that everything that has happened are of no value to our predicaments today and which pretentiously declares the obligation to respect and care for our intellectual inheritance amounts to a form of 'medievalism' which is regressive and archaic, is predicated on a shallow concept of what being medieval represents and entails.

There is, in fact, nothing wrong with being 'medieval' ― some of the best buildings in the world are medieval buildings, as are some of the best poetry. One only needs to point to the great Gothic churches of Europe; to Chaucer and Rumi as obvious examples.

In fact, the Mu'tazilites, whom Farouk is fond of mentioning, were also 'medieval' rather than classical, being influenced primarily by Plotinus, a neo-Platonist, due to a misattribution in the title of the book, "The Philosophy of Aristotle".

The same is also true of Muslim thought and matters of fiqh (jurisprudence). One cannot, for example, take a text such as al-Mawardi's al-Ahkam as-Sultaniyyah out of context and assume universality ― this is in fact an inversion of fiqh, which literally translates to understanding.

One also cannot, by virtue of the same reasoning, throw away such works due to some misappropriation of some quarters in society. What is required, obviously, is a proper understanding of the historical context and a critical examination of the text. There can be errors in reasoning, and we shall deal with this in due course, but it is the principle still stands, nonetheless.

Therefore, when discussing the so-called "Islamic state" and the way it was understood by past Muslims, one needs to look at how medieval Muslim polities operated, and whether or not such contexts and elements that existed then still exist in the same form today. Then, a critical evaluation and interrogation of the current, accepted system need also be made in order to best fit the purposes of the din, which is ultimately, submission to the Almighty.

Now, traditional Muslim polities are known to be relatively decentralised. In fact, the appropriation of the hudud laws in traditional Muslim societies have been mainly local, even though the Qadis might be appointed by the government. The fact that Qadis are normally local means that they would normally understand the local context, and therefore are able to exercise discretion in the way the Law is exercised.

There is, after all, a distinction made within Islamic Law between hudud and ta'zir, and it was also related by Shaykh Hamza Yusuf that the dishing of punishment, whether hudud or ta'zir, very much depended upon the understanding of the local qadi of both the Law, which requires an understanding of the Principles of Jurisprudence (Usul al-Fiqh) as well as the local context.

Therefore, the objection that, "The formulation, adoption and implementation of legislation are always matters of human judgment and reasoning. Therefore their intended implementation is subject to human error and fallibility and can always be challenged and questioned", has always been understood within the Muslim intellectual tradition, and jurists traditionally have been acutely aware of their own fallibility as human beings; hence all treatises on fiqh always ends with the phrase "Allahu a'lam" or "God Knows Best". Indeed, to a certain extent, this is no different than today's justice system, whereby cases of miscarriages of injustice is not unknown to have occurred.

If it argued that the mere fact that somebody is a human being automatically renders his judgement and conclusion on matters of religion suspect in terms of its validity and truth, then is not the questioner himself open to similar charges of human fallibility?

After all, if the mere fact that a scholar is also a human being impairs him from giving valid and correct solutions to a particular religious problem, how can it be guaranteed that those who are challenging the scholar will be immune from the same failings, especially if the intellectual and spiritual qualities of the challenger is nowhere near compared to the scholar against whom he rails upon?

Therefore, in brazenly imputing the fallibility of the learned of the past due to the self-evident fact that there are merely human beings, the challenger leaves himself open to the same charge of fallibility by others, which then calls into question the validity of his challenge in the first place since he too is a mere human being.

Now, in the specific case of hudud, the intrinsic flexibility and robustness of the system which takes into account the diversities and weaknesses of human reasoning was radically altered with the permeation of Western ideas of nation states into the minds of the Muslims at the turn of the 20th century, which among other things, calls for a singular and uniform codified law within the political boundaries of the state.

The reduction of legal principles to strict and clear rules in a legal code disrupts and impairs the ability of the jurists to exert his or her own opinion to the fullest, disempowering them by shifting the judicial-legislative powers to a centralized state bureaucracy.

An example of this occurred when the Ottomans, as part of programmatic response to external Western threats, initiated a series of internal reform in the early 19th century, the most significant being an attempt to codify the Syariah, which involves compiling large amounts of authoritative Hanafi legal rulings and codifying it into a single body of work. As Noah Feldman explained in his book, "The Fall and Rise of the Islamic State":

"This Westernizing process, foreign to the Islamic legal tradition, sought to transform Syariah from a body of doctrines and principles to be discovered by the human efforts of the scholars into a set of rules that could be looked up in a book."

What transpired was that the jurist were, to a very large extent, forced to make their own rulings based on previous ones (simple precedents), thereby removing their traditional flexibility in applying principles of justice and significantly diminishing their role as the source of legal authority.

This, coupled with the breakdown of the Millet system ― which divided the population of the vast Ottoman Empire into several quasi-autonomous groupings according to their religious affiliations, with each groupings enjoying comparative legislative, judicial, fiscal and religious freedom, thus granting security, stability and self-confidence to the members of each grouping, securing the preservation of religious and cultural identity across successive generations within the same religious community ― due to the rise of nationalism, were among the factors which contributed to the failure of the multiracial, multiethnic, and multireligious Ottoman system.

As the 19th century progressed into the 20th century and the idea of nation states with their fixed borders and single codified law became the norm, the conception of what a "state" is and of "Islamic law" crystallised around these accepted models of "nation states" and now should be and, indeed are, critically evaluated so as to test its validity in light of the intellectual and religious traditions of Islam and more importantly, to determine the extent to which it can be made to serve the needs of Muslims living in the modern world.

READ MORE HERE

 

UMNO, PAS and the hudud debate

Posted: 27 Aug 2012 05:44 PM PDT

UMNO keeps attacking PAS through state-controlled media in the hope that it would turn PAS and DAP against each other. Many too are waiting for PAS to fall apart before elections. At the same time, UMNO has not shown courage to respond to MCA's repeated rejection of Hudud. It is more interested to keep deceiving Malay voters, ensuring they remain in the dark.

Tuan Guru Abdul Hadi Awang, Harakah

Hudud form one of several of Islamic penal codes, along with qisas and ta'zir. It is divine prerogative, as codified in the Qu'ran and mutawatir hadiths (whose chain of narrations is solid making them authoritative), detailing specific offences covered in Hudud, the punishments they entail and the grounds of punishment.

It is obligatory upon Muslims to firstly believe that Islam is the way of life. This obligation is not just upon PAS supporters but is required of all Muslims, whether they belong to NGOs or political parties, including UMNO. Although UMNO is party based on race which is only open to Bumiputera, Muslim and non-Muslim, its Muslim members are nevertheless bound by this conviction. They are obligated to believe in and act on Islam as the way of life according to the Quran and Sunnah.

Qur'anic verses revealed in Madinah as contained in such surahs as Al-Maidah and Al-Nur have touched upon the issue of crimes and punishments.

It starts with a strong call:

O you who believe, fulfil all contracts. (Al-Maidah: 1)

These contracts include the declaration of faith or shahadah, the most essential requirement in being a Muslim. It is the point at which one declares his belief in God and His Messenger.

[This is] a surah which We have sent down and made [that within it] obligatory and revealed therein verses of clear evidence that you might remember. (Al-Nur: 1)

It is a must that the implementation of Islamic law which incorporates hudud, qisas and ta'zir is carried out through a just system of judiciary. It is prohibited that they are implemented spontaneously by mere individuals or families or even by officials at district or state levels, without first having a proper structured system in place. This is especially so in Malaysia, where Islamic law is implemented by virtue of political power. This is not so different from the time of the Prophet (peace be upon him) when he was unable to implement Islamic law in the absence of political power during the early years of Makkah. Such a power was vested in him in Madinah, where Islamic law was supreme under the auspices of a sovereign state and a comprehensive legal system.

A multiracial and diverse society is not a hurdle for Islamic law; many verses in the Qur'an have been revealed specifically for the purpose of explaining the law to non-Muslims in Madinah who objected to Hudud. The Prophet did not wait until everyone in Madinah agreed or understood the law before implementing it, and ultimately, this understanding came together with implementation. The social effects of Islamic law have demonstrated to the suspecting non-Muslims in Madinah that it is just and effective in controlling crime and creating a sense of security in society.

We must not forget that even though Islamic punishments are harsh, the punishment thresholds are proportionately higher. The burden of proof that the accuser or the prosecutor has to bear is more stringent than that in most civil laws. A slightest shadow of a doubt would lead to acquittals from being subjected to Hudud punishment, and could lead to a clean acquittal or a sentence based on the principle of ta'zir (punishment meted out at the discretion of the judge). Ta'zir ensures that Hudud is not rendered ineffective due to its stringent application. In a way, it also ensures out of court settlements. That was why some criminals had indeed escaped Hudud during the times of the Righteous Caliphs, not because the authority deliberately dropped the Hudud, but because the ta'zir was opted instead.

PAS has ruled Kelantan through democracy and adherence to federalism, in  the same way it once ruled Terengganu. This is in contrast with UMNO which had undermined the principle of federalism, punishing the people of Kelantan over their choice of government. Faced with Federal pressure, PAS has consistently fulfilled its obligation to implement Islam as the way of life. These efforts culminated in the passing in Kelantan of the Shariah Criminal Code enactment at the state assembly. Kelantan has also implementing several Islamic laws at the municipal level, including the prohibition on gambling and the limitation of liquor to only non-Muslims. PAS has at the same time taken every care to respect the inviolable freedom of non-Muslims.

The process of compiling the Shariah enactment was done with the help of legal scholars and experts, and publicised to the public before being debated at the state assembly level. Political parties and NGOs were invited to debate the enactment. PAS members of parliament had several times sought to amend the constitution but stopped by the Standing Orders of the Dewan Rakyat and their motions were deliberately placed at the bottom of the agenda, making them unlikely for parliamentary approval.

PAS is determined to uphold its objectives through democratic channels and political alliances, as allowed by Islam as well as the party constitution. In the same spirit, PAS respects and acknowledges the differences of opinions among its allies in Pakatan Rakyat, and subscribes to a common policy platform to battle corruption, power abuse and oppression. In the past 50 years, Barisan Nasional at the federal government has shown little determination in bringing useful reforms where needed, instead, power play has become a central agenda.

UMNO is the largest component in BN, and it drew votes from the Malay Muslim community at every election. It controls governments at state and federal levels, is in charge of national institutes such as the Institute for Islamic Understanding Malaysia (IKIM),  the National Fatwa Council, the religious departments in most states and various institutes of higher learning. With all the resources and opportunities at its disposal, there is no doubt that UMNO bears a bigger responsibility to implement Islamic law. Clearly, this has only been used as UMNO's political tool against PAS to manipulate voter sentiments.

After more than half a century at the helm, UMNO should have been aware of its obligation to uphold Islamic principles, at the very least to nurture understanding of Islam among its allies in BN. If that obligation has been fulfilled by UMNO, PAS would be more than happy to support efforts to implement Islam, which include the fight against corruption and for justice in society. In such a situation, it will even be wrong for PAS to oppose UMNO, or any other BN components for that matter. Unfortunately, there is no sign that UMNO even wishes to go in that direction. In fact, it was the top UMNO leader who delivered the ultimatum to Kelantan to stop the implementation of Islamic law.

A Muslim's failure to fulfil the duty of implementing God's law amounts to a betrayal of God and His Messenger. The effects of such betrayals are clear for us to see; crime is on the rise, mainly due to the ineffectiveness of the current legal system to combat crime, and yet we continue to support the retention of such a flawed system.

UMNO keeps attacking PAS through state-controlled media in the hope that it would turn PAS and DAP against each other. Many too are waiting for PAS to fall apart before elections. At the same time, UMNO has not shown courage to respond to MCA's repeated rejection of Hudud. It is more interested to keep deceiving Malay voters, ensuring they remain in the dark.

The culture of subservience to UMNO must be ended. It is time that we rise to be better and more dignified. In that spirit, PAS will continue to welcome support and not be deterred by any obstacle, wherever it may come from, in order to uphold Islam. Because we believe that Islam is the way of life.

 

Hopping means betrayal

Posted: 27 Aug 2012 05:21 PM PDT

We are curious about the stand of Pakatan Rakyat leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, who is the leader behind the scene that caused the fall of the PBS state government in 1994 and planned the September 16 takeover attempt in 2008, over the proposed anti party-hopping Bill.

Lim Sue Goan, Sin Chew Daily

The Penang state government is planning to table an anti party-hopping Bill at the November sitting of the State Legislative Assembly. It has triggered the questions of whether preventing the people's elected representatives from changing parties is a violation of the freedom of association conferred by the Federal Constitution, and why Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng made such a proposal at this time?

It is not something new to have elected government being collapsed by party-hopping lawmakers. In the 1994 Sabah state election, Parti Bersatu Sabah (PBS) managed to stay in power after winning 25 of the total 48 state assembly seats. However, its members were induced and roped, and the state government fell two months later. It is a forever pain in the heart of its founding president Datuk Joseph Pairin Kitingan.

On January 25, 2009, Umno Bota state assembly member Datuk Nasarudin Hashim hopped to the PKR, causing the Pakatan Rakyat to have 32 seats in the Perak state assembly, five seats more than the BN's 27 seats. The BN and Umno rapidly launched a counterattack by pulling back Nasarudin to Umno, and roping in DAP Jelapang state assembly member Datuk Hee Yit Foong, PKR Behrang state assembly member Jamaluddin Mohd Radzi and Changkat Jering state assemblyman Mohd Osman Jailu. They quit the Pakatan Rakyat and supported the BN, allowing the BN to regain the Perak state regime.

Different people in different situations have different feelings for the proposed anti party-hopping Bill. Pairin believes that when a people's representative contests under the banner of a political party, he or she has "sealed" a social contract with the people. If he or she changes party after being elected, it means a betrayal to the commitment. However, other BN leaders do not agree with the anti party-hopping Bill and MCA president Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek even challenged the DAP to amend its party constitution to prohibit party-hopping lawmakers from joining the party.

We are curious about the stand of Pakatan Rakyat leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, who is the leader behind the scene that caused the fall of the PBS state government in 1994 and planned the September 16 takeover attempt in 2008, over the proposed anti party-hopping Bill.

If there is no law to prevent lawmakers from violating the commitments, the elected government might eventually fall, causing the election to lose its significance.

The Penang state government proposed the anti party-hopping Bill with the hope to gain public support and prompt the federal government to amend the Federal Constitution. The general view is, the BN and the Pakatan Rakyat are equal in strength and if the numbers of seats they gain in the next general election are close, the elected government would be unstable, if there is no law prohibiting lawmakers from changing parties. Can the BN be sure that betrayal will not happen within the ruling coalition?

Therefore, there must be an anti party-hopping law to clarify that the seat of a lawmaker who quits his or her party will be vacant, even if he or she does not join the rival party.

The people's right to vote should be prioritised over lawmaker's right of association. Moreover, the act of quitting and joining rival parties is related to the lawmaker's integrity and should not be simplified as democracy and freedom.

However, even if the anti party-hopping Bill is passed in the Penang state assembly, it would still be ruled invalid once it is brought to court.

In 1993, the PBS had foreseen a potential threat for the state government and thus, an anti party-hopping Bill was passed by in the Sabah state assembly. However, the Bill was challenged in court and eventually ruled invalid due to the violation of the Federal Constitution.

Similar to the restoration of local elections, lawmakers can still change parties as they like if the federal government refuses to cooperate. Such kind of democracy and freedom of association are not worth mentioning.

 

Hudud not just a religious issue

Posted: 27 Aug 2012 01:19 PM PDT

http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Hudud-1-300x202.jpg

Muslims must recognise that people of other religions have the right to their own beliefs. They must also recognise that a person's belief does not hinder him from associating and or cooperating with – what is now a commonly used term – "kafirs" if the purpose is beneficial to all.

Awang Abdillah

According to the Quran, there is no compulsion in the freedom of faith.

The hudud issue is one of those opportunistic topics that snakes its way into the mainstream every time conniving politicians hit a wall.

As a Muslim, let me share a simple truth enshrined in the Quran.

The Surah AlKafirun affirms that for a Muslim "his religion is his" and for a non-Muslim "his religion is his", which basically means "to you your religion and to me mine".

It is crystal clear that there is no compulsion in this freedom of faith. As such, persons with different beliefs can still work together

Beliefs are a set of values about the spiritual or physical things that a person has faith in such as truth, strength, guidance and benefits.

Hence everyone has his own beliefs, be it factual, real or mythical.

Muslims must recognise that people of other religions have the right to their own beliefs.

They must also recognise that a person's belief does not hinder him from associating and or cooperating with – what is now a commonly used term – "kafirs" if the purpose is beneficial to all.

Which brings me to the politics of the day.

Prophet lived with a Christian

If the DAP does not accept the hudud Islamic law, so be it. The question of prohibiting Muslims from supporting DAP does not arise at all.

As a political party, DAP has its own struggle – in the pursuit of its own principles and objectives.

And being a non-Muslim party, its beliefs will in many ways run contrary to that of a Muslim.

Nevertheless in the political cause, the party can still work together with Muslim parties for the benefit of the nation.

As far as cooperation – for justice, good governance and nation building – is concerned, there is no reason why different political parties cannot work together.

The Holy Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) lived with his uncle Abu Talib who was not a Muslim and assisted the latter in the trade business.

The first Hijrah of the Muslims was to Habsyah (now modern Ethiopia), which was a Christian country at that time, to seek protection from persecutions from the Meccans.

Let me enlighten you with this insight: on the issue of the implementation of hudud law, even many Umno stalwarts are not in favour of it.

What is happening now is that certain PAS hardliners are believed to be using the issue for their own political ends.

Read more at: http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/opinion/2012/08/28/hudud-not-just-a-religious-issue/

 

Do ghosts and spirits exist?

Posted: 26 Aug 2012 02:40 PM PDT

Is there any truth in the Chinese folklore that during the Zhong Yuan festival the gates of hell are opened allowing all wandering and suffering spirits to enter the earthy realm? 

Stanley Koh, FMT

Do ghosts or earth-bound spirits exist? If so, why do they exist? Is there any truth to the belief that after death, humans are reincarnated into the spirit world? Is their existence a part of the human spiritual evolutionary process in the cycle of life and death?

The curious mind can go on generating a list of perplexing questions on the mysterious and puzzling existence of invisible beings that continue to influence and shape religious-cultural practices since the dawn of human civilization.

Perhaps, the answers are within our human psyche and not externally out there.

Millions of people with diverse cultural and religious backgrounds across the globe have some sort of personal life and death experience which shapes their views and beliefs on the existence of invisible beings and the spirit world.

A student on spiritualism will swear that suicides and other victims of sudden death (that is, accidents and murders), including executed criminals, having been cut off in the full flush of physical life, are likely to be earth-bound in the hope of satisfying their deeply rooted desires or thirst for life.

Some scholars of occultism also claim that passionate sorrow and desires of friends on earth tend to draw departed spirits down to the earth-sphere again, thus, often causing acute suffering to the deceased as well as interfering with the normal course of their evolution.

Furthermore, the uninitiated ordinary folk are unable to distinguish the major difference between an astral body and an earth-bound reincarnated spirit (that is, ghost) during paranormal encounters.

Perhaps, there are clues to this perplexing question. This is provided by author and student of theosophical studies, Lieut Colonel Arthur E Powell, in his publication titled, "The Astral Body."

Some define the "astral body" as a duplicate of the physical body, though this may not necessarily be true as it is composed of "subtle" or ethereal substances which are much less grosser than physical matter.

An astral body leaves the physical body upon death of a person and often, encounters with an astral body apparition with swirling colours are mistaken for ghosts.

"Astral matter exists in seven grades or orders of fineness, corresponding to the seven grades of physical matter which is solid, liquid, gaseous, etheric, super etheric, sub-atomic and atomic.

"Being much finer, the astral body's matter interpenetrates physical matter. Every physical atom therefore floats in a sea of astral matter which surrounds it and fills every interstice in the physical matter.

"Thus a being living in the astral world might be occupying the same space as a human being living in the physical world. Each entirely unconscious of the other and in no way impeding the freedom of movement of the other," according to the theosophical interpretation.

'Many kinds of heavens and hells'

In short, the astral body of man is a vehicle and every living man possesses and is capable of using an astral body. Most humans are able to use their five physical faculties of sense, taste, touch, hearing and sight but lack the knowledge in developing their astral senses which can reap the special powers of clairvoyance and astral travelling.

Hence to the uninitiated they lack the ability to distinguish the difference when they see an "astral body" and often mistake it for a "ghost" which is completely another different entity, another form of spiritual reincarnation.

In actuality, an astral shell of a deceased person is not immortal unlike the life span of a "ghost".

An auric astral shell will eventually disintegrate and dissolve into its original elements just as the physical body decomposes into different earthy elements upon death – corresponding to the five elements, namely earth, fire, water, air and metal as stipulated in the Taoist text on metaphysics.

Are there more interpretations on "ghosts" in other religions? According to Buddhist scriptures and texts, there are different types of ghosts while in Taoist metaphysical studies, the principle of "ying" and "yang" gives a clearer picture of human life after death.

"Hence, the many kinds of heavens, hells and purgatorial existences believed by followers of innumerable religions, all fall naturally into place and become intelligible as we understand the nature of the astral body and of the astral worlds," wrote Powell in his famous publication depicting in detail the characteristics and nature of the human astral body.

In a nutshell, there is a growing realisation and awareness of Man's true spiritual nature and the complexities in the human evolutionary process after life on earth, with interludes in other and subtler worlds.

With the dawn of the 21st century, there is little doubt the human species is steadily evolving and becoming more and more aware of their spiritual knowledge and needs.

"Physical science, with its ions and electrons, is on the threshold of the astral world, while the researches of Einstein and others are rapidly making acceptable the conception of the fourth dimension, which so long has been familiar to… students particularly of the astral and spiritual worlds.

"In the realm of psychology, modern analytical methods are giving a promising future of being able to reveal this true nature of human spiritual journey… the lower fraction of man's psychic mechanism, confirming incidentally some of the statements and teachings put forward by ancient Eastern books and by Theosophists and occultists of today."

Modern sciences and the enormous vogue of spiritualism, physical science and the realm of psychology are beginning to unfold the true psyche of the human species being not just a physical body endowed with merely physical senses.

Modern clinical sciences are beginning to understand the existence of other "bodies" encasing the human physical forms – the etheric astral and casual bodies including all the other complex interplaying different levels of human consciousness.

'We are indeed spiritual beings'

We are indeed spiritual beings on a human path, drifting on the broad current of the evolutionary stream on an eternal life voyage. Is it not logical to accept the principal truth that our life and death cycles involved an unbroken consciousness during rebirth, alternating between the physical and invisible astral planes or even other "lower or higher" spirit-bound dimensional worlds?

It is therefore fascinating when prominent psychiatrist Dr Brian Weiss through his scientific clinical studies on his patients opened an unexpected door into the astonishing realm of past-life regression.

His professional findings proved that life after death is not mere superstition or a myth of ancient wisdom.

Whatever profound yet simple truth on human evolutionary existence unveiled by Brian is nothing new. But the fascinating fact is, the truth of his clinical findings has finally pointed scientifically to the evidence of reincarnation.

Reincarnation can take place in many invisible dimensions of existence as some religions have described and narrated in their scriptures.

The existence of "etheric beings", ghosts or aggrieved spirits cannot be proven by chemistry. Spirits of the ghostly types or spiritual beings do exist in different levels at varying higher to lower hierarchies in the cycle of rebirths. It is sheer ignorance or arrogance even to ponder that human beings are the only spiritual, visible and living creatures on Earth.

In his publication, "Messages from the Masters," Brian wrote, "Humans always think of themselves as the only beings. This is not true. There are many worlds and many dimensions… many, many more souls…."

Brian is convinced of life after death despite his initial scepticism of "unscientific" fields in parapsychology and he confessed he knew nothing about the concept of past lives or reincarnation, nor did he initially desire to during the early years of his profession.

His scepticism changed 20 years ago when one of his patients inexplicably began recalling what seemed to be her past-life memories. Since then Brian regressed more than 2,000 patients to perinatal, in-utero or past life memories.

Do these evidential documented cases shed any light about the cycle of life and death involving the passage of time – past, present and future? Do they provide a scientific logical explanation on the existence of other beings, namely, ghosts, spirits, souls, angels, demons, vampires, elves, bogeymen, unicorns, phoenixes, energies of karma, chi, holy-spirit and guardian angels, to mention some examples of supernatural beings amid our human existence?

Anything unknown is generally fascinating, even to the sceptics.

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved