Sabtu, 1 Oktober 2011

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


‘Nothing done to stop RM20b yearly losses’

Posted: 30 Sep 2011 06:00 PM PDT

Alternative budget will propose drastic measures to cut on the colossal monetary wastage, says the opposition leader.

(Free Malaysia Today) - Every year, the country suffers about RM20 billion in losses through monetary leakages via corruption, wastage and money laundering, Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim said.

"But what is the government's action to address it (the losses)? Absolutely nothing," he added.

Quoting international financial reports on the colossal losses, he said the Barisan Nasional government could have carried out various programmes and projects with the money to benefit the people.

"But the government is not doing anything about it. Is the government pro-active in combating corruption?

"Definitely not," Anwar, the PKR supremo, told a sizeable crowd during a forum on development themed "Interaksi Komuniti (Community Interaction) here here today.

Also present were Deputy Chief Minister I Mansor Othman, state executive councillor and Penang DAP chief Chow Kon Yeow, and Penang State Legislative Assembly speaker Abdul Halim Hussain, who is PKR state secretary chief and Balik Pulau division chief.

Others were Balik Pulau MP Yusmadi Yusoff , Senator Mustafa Kamal Mohd Yusoff and Pantai Jerejak assemblyman Sim Tze Tzin.

As a constructive opposition coalition, Anwar said Pakatan Rakyat would prepare its own alternative people-oriented budget early next week to address the issue and deal with budget deficit.

Pakatan is expected to table its budget to the press after Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak, who is also the Finance Minister, had tabled the national 2012 Budget at Parliament next Friday.

Anwar indicated that Pakatan's budget would propose drastic measures to cut down on the colossal monetary wastage currently suffered by the country and the escalating budget for the Prime Minister's Office (PMO).

READ MORE HERE

 

DAP lawmaker claims offered RM150,000 to run for BN in GE13

Posted: 30 Sep 2011 05:22 PM PDT

Gwee said though he was upset after being suspended he would not accept the BN offer.

(The Malaysian Insider) - A suspended Johor DAP assemblyman today revealed he had been offered RM150,000 and 50 acres of land to quit his party and stand as an independent candidate aligned to rival Barisan Nasional (BN) in the coming national polls.

First-term Bentayan state lawmaker Gwee Tong Hiang said he was approached last Tuesday by a Chinese man claiming to be a representative from the Prime Minister's Department who caught him while he was feeling down over his six-month suspension for alleged power abuse.

The allegation comes on the heels of Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak's latest charge to win back support from ethnic Chinese voters nationwide, following the dismal performance from the ruling coalition's Chinese parties, notably the MCA, which has been practically written off as irrelevant.

The allegation also recalls the controversial takeover of Perak, which was won in the 2008 general election by the PAS-DAP-PKR pact.

Jepalang MP and Perak state assembly Deputy Speaker Datuk Hee Yit Fong had quit the DAP to become a BN-friendly independent, tipping the balance in favour of the BN.

Najib, who is also BN chairman, carried out a whirlwind tour into enemy territory in DAP-controlled Penang last weekend, but support towards the BN government in Umno-controlled Johor appears to be eroding as well if Gwee's claim is to be believed.

Gwee told reporters the man, whom he named as Wee Pao Chin, had arranged for him to meet Najib in Putrajaya on Monday where the BN chairman would announce the news at a media conference.

He said the RM150,000 would be provided by Putrajaya and would be paid to him in one lump sum through the Wee clan association in order to avoid detection.

He also claimed that he was promised more than RM5,000 a month as extra funds and would be given an office and staff to take care of his constituents if he agreed to quit the DAP.

"Their terms were 'you must stand as independent candidate in the next election to fight DAP candidate'," Gwee, 44, disclosed at the DAP headquarters here today.

The Bentayan state seat is in the Bakri parliamentary constituency and was until 2008 an MCA stronghold. Gwee beat the MCA's Lee Chin Yong in the last general election with a comfortable 2,798-vote margin.

Asked why the BN wanted him as a candidate there for the next polls, Gwee said he was told: "Top management kau-tim [has been fixed]. MCA will not put a candidate in Bentayan constituency."

READ MORE HERE

 

Asri: PAS needs new political framework

Posted: 30 Sep 2011 05:16 PM PDT

Asri said Umno is not the standard for PAS to make comparisons.

(The Malaysian Insider) - PAS needs a new political framework where all of its leaders can be accepted by voters, Assoc Prof Dr Mohd Asri Zainul Abidin has said.

The former Perlis mufti said the Islamist party needed to think beyond governing a state if it was serious in taking over federal power.

He cautioned PAS leaders against getting involved in issues which can be resolved internally.

"PAS needs a new political framework, PAS needs a bigger framework... Malaysia's framework is not Kelantan.

"Umno is not the standard for PAS to make comparisons, PAS needs to be at a higher place," he said at a PAS forum here last night.

PAS celebrates its 60th anniversary today.

Asri stressed that the party needed to groom leaders which could be accepted by all layers of society if it wanted to remain relevant politically.

"PAS needs to create or groom a leader who is acceptable by not just by the party but also by those outside PAS; if we look there are 60 per cent of voters who are undecided on who to vote for.

"PAS needs a leader like Burhanuddin al-Helmy... great, everyone knows him, some even say he was worthy to become prime minister," he said.

READ MORE HERE

 

Next GE will be all-out ‘cyber war’, Liow warns MCA Youth

Posted: 30 Sep 2011 04:30 PM PDT

(The Malaysian Insider) - The battlefront for the next general election will be an all-out war in cyber space, Datuk Seri Liow Tiong Lai warned MCA Youth leaders today.

The MCA deputy president reminded the party's Youth wing that it needed to embark on a more aggressive online campaign, and that the party's dismissal of the influence of blogs and the Internet in the last general election had contributed to the MCA's loss of parliamentary and state seats.

"To stop opposition parties to continue deceiving the people, efforts for an all-out war must begin now. I call on all Youth members to prepare for cyber war.

"We understand that blogs were a mainpublicity media in the last general election while Facebook and Twitter are expected to become the primary media in the coming general election. MCA candidates cannot neglect the Internet war in the coming general election," he said at the MCA Youth annual general assembly.

READ MORE HERE

 

Iranian Pastor Sentenced to Death: Attorney Hopeful of Acquittal

Posted: 30 Sep 2011 04:19 PM PDT

(Business and law) - The attorney for an Iranian Christian pastor who is facing the death penalty for the crime of apostasy said he is optimistic his client will be acquitted and freed.

Youcef Naderkhani has refused to renounce his Christian faith in a case that has sparked global fury against Iran and appeals for clemency.

According to a report in BBC, Naderkhani's lawyer, Mohammad Ali Dadkhah, said there was a 95 percent chance he will be freed.

U.S. House Speaker John Boehner also has already spoken out against Iran.

"While Iran's government claims to promote tolerance, it continues to imprison many of its people because of their faith. This goes beyond the law to an issue of fundamental respect for human dignity. I urge Iran's leaders to abandon this dark path, spare [Nadarkhani's] life, and grant him a full and unconditional release," said Boehner.

Naderkhani, 32, reportedly was born Muslim and converted to Christianity at the age of 19. He became a pastor of a 400-person Church of Iran congregation in the northern city of Rasht.

He was arrested two years ago and sentenced to death in 2010 by a court of appeals. His crime was apostasy, or abandoning his Muslim faith.

Iran's Supreme Court said Naderkhani could be freed if he renounced his Christian religion.

The Right Reverend Michael Nazir-Ali, the former Anglican Bishop of Rochester, told BBC: "As a Christian I can't do that [refute my faith]. In a much lesser way I have faced these questions myself, and I would ask for myself for strength in this situation and courage, and that is what I would ask for him. But at the same time to ask that understanding and compassion and clemency be exercised by those who are in authority."

Nazir-Ali sad Iranians are likely concerned about the growth of Christianity in the country and may want to make an example of Naderhkani.

He added that the death penalty has not been imposed in Iran in such a case since 1990.

Before his last hearing Wednesday, Nadarkhani had been given three previous chances to repent, and all three times he has refused. After his final refusal Wednesday, no verdict has been announced, but many expect that he could be put to death as soon as Friday.

Even if the sentence were commuted, Nadarkhani could still face life in prison. And even if he were released, there would still be danger.

"In Iran about 18 years ago, they had released a pastor, but then came and assassinated him and his bishop later. We cannot stop the pressure," Pastor Firouz Sadegh-Khandjani, a Member of the Council of Elders for the Church of Iran, told the American Center for Law and Justice.

Between June 2010 and January 2011, more than 200 people in Iran were arrested for their religious beliefs, according to Elam Ministries, a United Kingdom-based church with ties to Iran.

In August, a pastor named Haghnejad was arrested for the third time, according to Christian Solidarity. Police also confiscated 6,500 bibles, which Iran's social issues committee deemed were being used to deceive youths.

 

Club knows nothing about Kelantan’s latest move

Posted: 30 Sep 2011 04:10 PM PDT

(The Star) - PAS Supporters Club chairman Hu Pang Chow has claimed that he was "in the dark" over the Kelantan government's plan to implement hudud in the state.

Hu said he had received hundreds of calls from club members asking about Kelantan's hudud plan.

"As it is, even before hudud is implemented (in Kelantan), there are no investments here. Just imagine when hudud is actually put into practice here.

"I would say it would be minus zero investment for Kelantan in the coming years until the general election. I received hundreds of calls from club members asking me about Kelantan's plan," said Hu yesterday.

"The only answer I can give is that as club chairman, I was not consulted or invited to discuss the matter. I am also in the dark over this sudden move by the state government."

Hu said the stalemate in Pakatan Rakyat's stand over the hudud issue also had far reaching consequences for non-Muslims in both the west and east coasts of peninsular Malay-sia.

He said the inconclusive meeting among Pakatan members would affect non-Muslim support not only in religious terms but also the investment climate.

Hu said although Kelantan had stressed that such laws would not affect non-Muslims, such a move, if implemented, would eventually impact them.

"I cannot say much on the investment climate because non-Muslims are a minority in the east coast.

"However, the Chinese would be alarmed by the move."

 

Hudud laws okay in Kelantan

Posted: 30 Sep 2011 04:02 PM PDT

However, FMT readers are confident that it would not be implemented nationwide when Pakatan Rakyat comes to power.

(Free Malaysia Today) - A majority of FMT readers are not seeing red over the implementation of hudud in Kelantan but, at the same time, do not expect hudud to be featured in a Pakatan Rakyat federal government.

In a FMT poll conducted for the past two weeks, some 81 percent or 1,968 out of 2,417 readers, voted that hudud would not be Pakatan's national policy compared with 300 readers who voted "yes".

Only seven percent or 149 voters were undecided on the issue.

The controversy over the implementation of hudud was sparked a fortnight ago when Kelantan Menteri Besar Nik Aziz Nik Mat, who is also PAS spiritual adviser, announced that he wants to implement hudud in Kelantan.

The DAP, a partner in the Pakatan Rakyat alliance, promptly opposed it on the grounds that it is unconstitutional.

Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim announced that hudud will not be implemented due to a lack of consensus after a meeting of Pakatan top brass to discuss the hot-button issue on Sept 29.

READ MORE HERE

 

Wall Street protesters march on police

Posted: 30 Sep 2011 01:57 PM PDT

(Reuters) - Protesters who have camped out near Wall Street for two weeks marched on Friday on police headquarters in Manhattan over what they viewed as a heavy-handed police response to a previous demonstration.

The Occupy Wall Street movement, whose members have vowed to stay through the winter, are protesting issues including the 2008 bank bailouts, foreclosures and high unemployment.

More than 1,000 people marched past City Hall and arrived at a plaza outside police headquarters in the late afternoon. Some held banners criticizing police, while others chanted: "We are the 99 percent" and "The banks got bailed out, we got sold out."

Workers from the financial district on their way home watched as the marchers passed, with some saying it was not obvious what outcome organizers of the Occupy Wall Street movement wanted.

Police observed the march and kept protesters on the sidewalk, but no clashes were reported. Police said no arrests were made before the protest dispersed peaceably by 8 p.m. after the march.

"No to the NYPD crackdown on Wall St. protesters," organizers had said on their website, promoting the march. Other online flyers for the march read: "No to Stop-and-Frisk in Black & Latino neighborhoods" and "No to Spying and Harassment of Muslim Communities."

The protest came less than a week after police arrested 80 people during a march to the bustling Union Square shopping district, the most arrests by New York police at a demonstration since hundreds were detained outside the Republican National Convention in 2004.

A police commander used pepper spray on four women at last weekend's march and a video of the incident went viral on the Internet, angering many protesters who vowed to continue their protests indefinitely.

Police have said pepper spray was a better alternative than night sticks to subdue those blocking traffic.

RIGHT TO PROTEST

Friday's crowd appeared to have been boosted by an announcement that the rock band Radiohead would perform at 4 p.m. Later, organizers said on their website, "Radiohead will not being playing. This was a hoax. Please accept our apologies."

"We heard about Radiohead coming here on Facebook," said Alegra Felter, a 34-year-old teacher from Brooklyn who was among the disappointed rock fans.

The protest encampment in Zuccotti Park in downtown Manhattan is festooned with placards and anti-Wall Street slogans. There is a makeshift kitchen and library, and celebrities from filmmaker Michael Moore to actress Susan Sarandon have stopped by to show solidarity.

Asked on his weekly radio show on Friday whether the protesters could stay indefinitely at the private park they call their base, Mayor Michael Bloomberg said, "We'll see."

Bloomberg added: "People have a right to protest. But we also have to make sure that people who don't want to protest can go down the street unmolested."

While the protest has been made up mostly of young people, it also has recently attracted the support of a loose coalition of labor and community organizations.

Marty Goodman, a unionized subway worker, said, "Last year we had 900 of our members laid off ... These are our issues too: Wall Street, the banks, layoffs, the struggle that these young people are spearheading is our struggle too."

Among those pledging solidarity were the United Federation of Teachers and the Transport Workers Union Local 100, which has 38,000 members. The unions could provide important organizational and financial support for the largely leaderless movement.

Similar but smaller protests have also sprouted in other cities in recent days, including Boston, Chicago and San Francisco.

Guan Eng wants Najib to apologise for Bumi quota flip-flop

Posted: 30 Sep 2011 01:47 PM PDT

By Yow Hong Chieh, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, Oct 1 — DAP secretary-general Lim Guan Eng wants the prime minister to apologise for another "flip-flop", this time over the scrapping of Bumiputera quotas.

Datuk Seri Najib Razak said yesterday he had not promised to abolish the 30 per cent quota eventually despite media reports to the contrary.

But Lim (picture)pointed out today it was hard to believe state news agency Bernama, which also carried the alleged misquote, would dare to misrepresent the prime minister.

"As it is hard to imagine a government news department like Bernama daring to misquote or misrepresent what the prime minister said, will the prime minister be compelled to apologise for saying the wrong thing?" Lim said in a statement.

Bernama, several online news portals and the Chinese media reported earlier this week that Najib had called for the eventual removal of Bumiputera quotas.

"We want to do away from (with) quotas but we must support them (Bumiputera entrepreneurs) in a way that would allow them to grow," Najib told the Khazanah Megatrends Forum 2011 here on Tuesday night.

The prime minister, however, denied yesterday he had meant for such quotas to be scrapped and that he was merely trying to urge Bumiputera entrepreneurs to be more self-sufficient.

"I did not say we want to abolish quotas, but I said we cannot be too reliant on them," he had said after chairing the Umno supreme council meeting here.

 

 

READ MORE HERE.


 


 

MCA ‘always’ relevant, say party leaders

Posted: 30 Sep 2011 01:36 PM PDT

(The Malaysian Insider) - MCA leaders today lambasted former party president Datuk Seri Ong Tee Keat for saying the party is becoming increasing irrelevant, claiming there is no basis for his remarks.

They denied that the Chinese community had written the party off, claiming that the MCA was on its way to regaining Chinese support.

Ong had told The Malaysian Insider in an interview that the MCA was on the path to irrelevance, and that the Barisan Nasional (BN) component has not heeded the push for reform that saw the party lose 25 of the 40 federal and 59 of the 90 state seats it contested in Election 2008.

He had said the reforms he tried to implement in the MCA "all went down the drain" after he was ousted.

"MCA is always relevant. Although we lost badly in 2008, we still have strong representation within the Chinese community.

"He (Ong) can say what he likes, but he must not eat his own words," said MCA deputy president Datuk Seri Liow Tiong Lai.

Liow said that when Ong was president, he had instructed MCA members to refrain from saying bad things about the party.

"No (we are not irrelevant), MCA has been working hard to ensure support of Chinese," said Liow.

 

 

READ MORE HERE.

 

 

MCA challenges Opposition leaders to justify show-cause order issued to school

Posted: 30 Sep 2011 08:50 AM PDT

(The Star) - MCA Youth has challenged Pakatan Rakyat leaders to justify a show-cause letter issued by the Pasir Puteh Land and District Office (PTJPP) in Kelantan to a Chinese school for celebrating the Mid-Autumn Festival.

MCA Youth chief Datuk Dr Wee Ka Siong said the movement was angry that a festival, which is part of the Chinese community's culture, could be interpreted as "entertainment".

"I want Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, Lim Kit Siang and Lim Guan Eng to answer if what they are doing is fair to the Chinese community.

"Since when is celebrating the lantern festival a crime under the entertainment enactment?

"Is this what they mean when they claim respect for different cultures?" he asked during a press conference after the MCA Youth central committee meeting at Wisma MCA yesterday.

Dr Wee, who is also Deputy Education Minister, showed a letter to the press from PTJPP, dated Sept 18, to SJK(C) Kai Chih in Pasir Puteh, Kelantan, informing the headmaster that it had held an entertainment event Sept 15 from 8pm to 11.30pm at the school's premises without obtaining a licence or approval.

"In relation to that, the organiser can be punished if found guilty of violating Section 6 (2) of the Entertainment and Places of Entertainment Enactment 1998, which carries a maximum fine of RM20,000 or a five-year jail term, or both," Dr Wee quoted while reading out the letter.

Dr Wee questioned whether PAS is sensitive to the beliefs and culture of the community.

"If they were celebrating the festival, it should not be an issue. We consider this a violation of the rights of non-Muslims, especially the Chinese," he said.

Meanwhile, Dr Wee defended the video clip Undilah and said he did not regard it as controversial despite Information, Communications and Culture Minister Datuk Seri Dr Rais Yatim saying it offended certain segments of society.

"We do not regard the message of the video as sparking a Reformasi and it does not contain any hidden message to bring down the Government," he said.

 

MCA heading for irrelevance, says Tee Keat

Posted: 30 Sep 2011 08:34 AM PDT

(The Malaysian Insider) - The MCA is on the path to irrelevance, its former president Datuk Seri Ong Tee Keat said this week ahead of the party's annual gathering this weekend.

He told The Malaysian Insider in an interview that the Barisan Nasional (BN) component has not heeded the push for reform that saw the party lose 25 of the 40 federal and 59 of the 90 state seats it contested in Election 2008.

"MCA is still stuck in the mindset of being gung-ho with statements instead of delivering good governance. It is parroting old polemic rather than delivering reforms asked for by voters.

"If MCA continues on this same old path and psyche, then it is certainly headed for irrelevance. Some have bluntly said we are already irrelevant," said Ong, who was deposed as MCA boss by Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek in a fractious power struggle 18 months ago.

The Pandan MP cited, as examples of "empty platitudes," his successor's threats to quit BN if Umno implemented hudud and to resign from the Cabinet and other government posts if the party does not improve in a general election expected soon.

"I don't see how his threats can lift the party from its doldrums," he said.

The party holds what is likely to be its final general assembly this weekend before federal polls are called.

But despite having three presidents in as many years, the MCA has seen Chinese support continue to shrink in by-elections.

Some analyses state that the Tenang polls held earlier this year saw just 18 per cent of Chinese voting for BN.

Datuk Seri Najib Razak has begun taking over the charge for Chinese votes, spending last weekend dishing out RM15 million to Chinese schools and exempting a Community Chest project headed by Chinese tycoons from tax to help it channel RM100 million a year into vernacular education.

"Najib as BN chief is spearheading initiatives to win Chinese votes, triggering the question of 'where is MCA?' from the public," Ong said.

He said the MCA could not shirk its responsibility as part of government despite Umno's seniority in the ruling coalition.

"How are they justifying their position as minister? Chinese want a level playing field. Ministers must get rid of cronies and monopolies," he said.

Ong cited his 26-month tenure as transport minister where he opened the probe on the RM12.5 billion Port Klang Free Zone scandal even though senior officers told him it was a closed case.

"I put aside considerations of whether or not it would implicate Tun Dr Ling Liong Sik or Tan Sri Chan Kong Choy," he said of the former MCA president and deputy who were Ong's predecessors as transport minister.

"I was more concerned about how the party had been linked to that debacle which was a key factor in the March 2008 tsunami," he added, referring to the BN's landmark loss of its customary two-thirds majority in Parliament and five state governments.

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Pairin can’t solve illegals problem with his committee

Posted: 30 Sep 2011 03:29 PM PDT

The job is an insult to Pairin knowing that he was a former Chief Minister of a ruling party (PBS) which was brought down ignominiously through power plays with the help of the votes of phantom voters. And those people involved in the issuance of ICs are a former Prime Minister, Tun Dr Mahathir, and the Chief Minister, Datuk Seri Musa Aman.

Daniel John Jambun

It has been said that we shouldn't have too many ambitions; we might achieve them! And Tan Sri Pairin's appointment as head of the Sabah Committee on illegal immigrants is certainly case in which he got more than what he asked for. He had given the government until 2012 to solve the illegals problem, and now, as if to over-satisfy him, the government has given him the whip and said, "Now, it's all yours."

 

Which is not exactly a course for celebration, because the job he is given is impossible to do! The task at hand is a huge one, like a monster which had grown for 40 years, and he is expected to kill it within a few months. But can he? He might be a deputy chief minister, but how much can the committee do to solve the illegals problem? We know that the state had several committees already since the last few decades formed under the State Security Committee which was headed by the Chief Minister. Pairin as a former head of the State Security Committee must know very well that it is a very ineffective committee.

 

He has to ask what is it that he can do that has not been done already? The scenario is most probably one in which the committee members will comprise political leaders and heads of various relevant departments, including representatives from the police. These people are already terribly bogged down by endless meetings in a dozen or two other committees of various types. So how much can they do initially other than to go into another round of paperwork, collecting statistics (which are unreliable), assess (again) the status quo, and records details of various aspects of the problem. This alone will require the setting up of a permanent working unit which will function as a secretariat, just to receive and process the data and compile reports. By the time the work begins it will be time for the general election, in which case the committee will be abandoned. The whole thing is definitely a sham, a farce that is being choreographed as a shadow play to pull wool over our eyes.

 

The job is an insult to Pairin knowing that he was a former Chief Minister of a ruling party (PBS) which was brought down ignominiously through power plays with the help of the votes of phantom voters. And those people involved in the issuance of ICs are a former Prime Minister, Tun Dr Mahathir, and the Chief Minister, Datuk Seri Musa Aman. There was a whole conspiracy to use the immigrants to kill off PBS to wipe off the majority position of the KDMs in Sabah. This is no fanciful thinking because this is now general knowledge, with many reports and visible proofs everywhere. And now, Pairin is humble and soft enough to come back to supposedly solve the problem as it is as easy as sweeping the floor. Umno leaders must be giggling, amused to no end, seeing Pairin bending over to do their bidding.

 

The other dilemma facing Pairin is that, since he is now appointed to the responsibility, the state BN (or rather Umno) leadership can now say, if you fail to solve the problem, you will have nobody else to blame except yourself. Umno gave him an impossible task because that way Umno leaders can later accuse him of failing in his responsibility, and Umno will be able to wash their hands off the responsibility. Very clever. And they know Pairin wouldn't be daring enough to say, I won't do it because it can't be done unless by a royal commission of inquiry. He is too obedient to Umno to put his foot down even in this situation when he is already guaranteed to fail! It's a classic Catch 22 situation for Pairin.

 

For how can he ever hope to solve the illegals problem without any power to arrest and deport? Will he be able to command the army and the police to act and make a sweeping arrest of the illegals throughout the state within a week? I seriously doubt this power and assignment will be in the list of terms of reference of his appointment. It has been quite about a week after the announcement of his appointment but we have not heard any news of the committee being formed, about who the committee members are and what are the objectives and rough modus operandi. If Pairin was more pro-active he would have made an announcement by now, at least to give us some sort of confidence.

 

What Pairin needs to do, as a leader with character, is to show his mettle and not bow down to bullying. He must not go into a political acting mode and pretend he will be able to rid the state of illegals. He must say, "Sorry fellows, this is not right. The best and fastest way to solve the problem is through an RCI, and not through anything else." It's high time he as the Huguan Siou stopped playing the nice guy when his people are drowning under the weight of illegals.

 

No deal with PAS

Posted: 30 Sep 2011 06:14 AM PDT

Unless PAS is prepared to abandon its raison d'etre of wanting to establish an Islamic federal administration in the country, I cannot foresee a truely feasible, viable and dynamic administration at Putrajaya if the Pakatan Rakyat manages to oust the Barisan Nasional from power. To say otherwise is to conceal the truth. 

Thomas Lee Seng Hock

That PAS is insistent on its Islamic state agenda should not surprise anyone, since the very fundamental reason it was set up way back in the 1950s was to work for the creation of a government administration based on the spiritual, doctrinal, theological, moral and ethical precepts of Islam.

What should really surprise us is the fact that the party has apparently soften its previously preceived uncompromising adherence to a firm policy without the readily perceived prudence for the feelings and sensitivities of the non-Muslim citizens of the multi-racial, multi-religious, and multi-cultural nation. This is obvious from the fact that it is seen as even prepared to readjust its foundational ideological stance of wanting a full-fledged Islamic governing state to adopt a seemingly watered-down welfare state administration. The new direction, albeit considered a pragmatic political conveniency by many people, was approved and adopted its national general assembly earlier in 2011.

But the so-called new political pragmatism of PAS is, for all intent and purpose, a mere illusion.

The current controversy over the party's declaration of wanting to implement Islamic rule in the states it controls, i.e. Kelantan and Kedah, with the accompanying proposed imposition of hudud judicious practices, is something inevitable and unavoidable, given the basic nature and character of the Islamic party. Sooner or later, the theoretical and practical considerations of this Islamic agenda must be objectively and honestly dealt with by the component parties of the multi-idelogical alternative coalition Pakatan Rakyat. As the Cantonese saying "Jee um pow tak chi for" ("paper cannot be used to wrap around fire"), so the PAS Islamic idealism and focus will eventually shatter the pretentious peaceful co-existence among the the three Pakatan Rakyat components of the DAP, PKR and PAS.

Being an Islamic party, PAS certainly has a duty to strive for an idealogical political state based on the basic foundation for the religious, political, economical, social, and cultural system that is practised in all Islamic countries which impose the Islamic rule and law.

An Islamic state is essentailly an ideological state, based on the concern for submission (the word being the meaning of Islam) and faithfulness to the seedbeds of the Islamic faith -- the Quran and Sunna. Muslims all over the world are clamouring to establish Islamic rule in their communities, to give Allah his rightful place as the Soverign Ruler in their lives and societies. In an Islamic state, the ultimate sovereignty and authority belong to Allah as the Lord of the whole Universe. For the Muslims, Islam is not just a religion per se, but a complete way of life covering every aspect of life, lifestyle, and thoughts.

Hence, it is understandable that those in PAS, in seeking to create and promote an Islamic state in Malaysia, are basically being true and honest to being part of the faithful and the submitted of the global Umma, the universal community of all Allah followers and worshippers. 

Syed Abul A'ala Mawdudi, a Pakistani Sunni journalist, theologian, and political philosopher, and a major 20th century Islamist thinker, summarizes the basic differences between Islamic and secular states as follows:

(1) An Islamic state is an ideological state, whose people are divided into Muslims, who believe in its ideology, and non-Muslims who do not believe.
 
(2) Responsibility for the policy and administration of an Islamic state rests primarily with Muslims. Non-Muslims cannot undertake or be entrusted with the responsibility of policy-making.

(3) In an Islamic state, there is a marked distinction between Muslims and non-Muslims, but the Islamic Shari`a law guarantees certain specifically stated rights to the non-Muslims, beyond which they are not permitted to meddle in the affairs of the state. However, if they embrace the Islamic faith, they are made equal participants in all matters concerning the state and the government.
 
Mawdudi's view represents that of the Hanifites, one of the four Islamic schools of jurisprudence. The other three schools are the Malikites, the Hanbilites (the strictest and most fundamentalist of all), and the Shafi`ites. All four schools agree doctrinally and dogmatically on the basic creeds of Islam but differ in their interpretations of Islamic law which is derived from four sources:

(a) The Qur'an

(b) The Hadith: The collections of Islamic traditions, including sayings and deeds of the Prophet Muhammad as heard and recorded by his contemporaries.

(c) The Al-Qiyas: The legal decision drawn by Muslim jurists based on precedent cases.

(d) The Ijma' (consensus): The interpretations of Islamic laws handed down by the consensus of reputed Muslim scholars.

Textual laws prescribed in the Qur'an are few. The door is left wide open for prominent scholars versed in the Qur'an, the Hadith, and other Islamic discipline to present their Fatwa (legal opinion and pronouncement).

In an Islamic state, the political head of the state must inevitably be a Muslim, because he is bound by the Shari`a to conduct and administer the state in accordance with the Qur'an and the Sunna. The function of his Cabinet is to assist him in implementing the Islamic principles and adhering to them. Anyone who does not embrace the Islamic faith and ideology cannot be the head of state or a member of the Cabinet. If Malaysia is an Islamic state, Lim Guan Eng would not be qualified to be the Chief Minister of Penang, and there will not be non-Muslims serving as Ministers and Deputy Ministers in the Federal Government. This is the case even in the civil service, whose heads and top officials must be Muslims.

But Mawdudi, apparently conscious and aware of the circumstance of the modern world, seems to be more tolerant toward the non-Muslims. Hence, he said: "In regard to a parliament or a legislature of the modern type which is considerably different from the advisory council in its traditional sense, this rule could be relaxed to allow non-Muslims to be members provided that it has been fully ensured in the constitution that no law which is repugnant to the Qur'an and the Sunna should be enacted, that the Qur'an and the Sunna should be the chief source of public law, and that the head of the state should necessarily be a Muslim."

According to Mawdudi, under these circumstances, the sphere of influence of non-Muslim minorities would be limited to matters relating to general problems of the country or to the interest of the minorities, and their participation should not damage the fundamental requirement of Islam.

Mawdudi's view does not receive the approval of most other schools of the Shari`a which hold that non-Muslims are not allowed to assume any position which might bestow on them any authority over any Muslim. A position of sovereignty demands the implementation of Islamic ideology. It is alleged that a non-Muslim (regardless of his ability, sincerity, and loyalty to his country) cannot and would not work faithfully to achieve the spiritual, ideological and political goals of Islam.

Apparently, the political arena and the official public sectors are not the only areas in which non-Muslims are not allowed to assume a position of authority. Even in the conduct of business and trade, there are such restrictions too.

Mawdudi, who is more liberal and lenient than most Muslim scholars, presents a revolutionary opinion when he said that in an Islamic state that "all non-Muslims will have the freedom of conscience, opinion, expression, and association as the one enjoyed by Muslims themselves, subject to the same limitations as are imposed by law on Muslims."
 
His views, however, are not accepted by most Islamic schools of law, especially in regard to the freedom of expression like criticism of Islam and the government.

So, how should we non-Muslims look at PAS, given the indisputably absolute Islamic agenda the party is committed to, whatever the conspicious political compromise it is currently seen as advocating?

First of all, I believe we need to exercise wise caution, discernment and practise discerption in our evaluation of PAS and what it stands for.

In our anger against what we perceive as more than half a century of extremely offensive and oppressive rule by the Barisan Nasional, and in our euphoria over the March 2008 political tsunami and enthusiasm to send the recalcitrant politicians of Umno, MCA, Gerakan, and MIC packing at the next general election, we may become irrational and irrepressible, even irresponsible, and opt to jump from the frying wok into the fire, throwing away the baby with the bath water.

Are we sure that PAS and what it stands for are what is good for the nation at this juncture? Can we be sure that PAS will not seek to impose its exclusive Islamic agenda to achieve its fundamental aim of making Malaysia an Islamic state, if ever the Pakatan Rakyat manages to take control of Putrajaya?

Why is PAS so adamant about the appropriation, propagation and implementation of the doctrinally framed hudud jurispudence in Kelantan now?

We need to be sensible and realistic to know that whatever political propagada PAS may convey to us now, to win our support and vote, the party would never give up its objective to make the country an Islamic state, or else it would not be PAS anymore.

The uneasy and unaligned alliance between PAS and the DAP within the Pakatan Rakyat alternative coalition is surely unapt, like trying to combine oil and water into one substance, PAS being an exclusive religious party, and the DAP a secular socialist-orientated set-up.

If we look objectively, analytically, critically, and honestly at the PAS Islamic agenda, we cannot help, but will come to understand and realise that the uncanny association of PAS and the DAP in the Pakatan Rakyat is simply an electoral expediency to win the Battle for Putrajaya. After that, what?

Unless PAS is prepared to abandon its raison d'etre of wanting to establish an Islamic federal administration in the country, I cannot foresee a truely feasible, viable and dynamic administration at Putrajaya if the Pakatan Rakyat manages to oust the Barisan Nasional from power. To say otherwise is to conceal the truth.

Hence, I appeal to leaders of the DAP, and perhaps the PKR, to reconsider the unequal yoke they have with PAS. The political marriage of covenience will inevitably end in a bitter divorce, and may be costly for the well-being of the nation.

Much is at stake in the Battle for Putrajaya, and we should not allow PAS to derail the march towards reforming, regenerating, and revitalising our beloved country to become a better place for all who call it home.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Pemuda MCA: Tolak jawatan jika prestasi PRU13 merosot

Posted: 30 Sep 2011 07:58 PM PDT

Pada mesyuarat yang berlangsung di Pusat Konvensyen HGH di sini hari ini, perwakilan Pemuda MCA mencapai tiga resolusi melibatkan hal ehwal parti, lima politik, tiga pendidikan, empat berkaitan ekonomi dan dua berhubung hal ehwal sosial.

Antara lain, sayap MCA itu menggesa parti melatih anggota muda bagi mempercepatkan proses pembaharuan dalam kepimpinan serta memberi peluang kepada lebih ramai pemimpin Pemuda MCA untuk mewakili BN dalam pilihan raya umum akan datang.

Selain itu, pergerakan itu mahu MCA mempertimbangkan semula cadangan meluluskan resolusi agar semua Pemuda MCA di setiap bahagian boleh memilih seorang perwakilan ke perhimpunan agung MCA bagi meningkatkan bilangan perwakilan serta suara golongan muda.

Resolusi itu juga menyokong penuh Gagasan 1Malaysia, Program Transformasi Kerajaan (GTP), dan Petunjuk Prestasi Utama (KPI) yang diketengahkan Perdana Menteri, Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak di samping menggesa Jabatan Perkhidmatan Awam meningkatkan bilangan penjawat awam berbangsa Cina di peringkat pegawai kanan di setiap jabatan bagi menonjolkan konsep 1Malaysia.

 

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Corporate Welfarism and the Munafikation of Malays

Posted: 29 Sep 2011 06:23 PM PDT

Any time I write critically of Mahathir, there's this buffoon who says I am paid by KJ. I wished I were so then I can drive around in Porsche Cayenne (as does Mukhriz) or a Maserati (as does Nazir Razak). Maybe I can also own a Bentley as do many UMNO ministers.

You are wrong fool; why not say I am on the current PM's payroll? I can name a few operatives in the PM's office who operate the slush funds to pay pro UMNO bloggers.  So come on say it- the current PM sucks because he arranges to pay me to hit at Dr Mahathir.

Did KJ pay Nazri Aziz for being a consistent pain-in the ass- to Mahathir with his vitriol thrown at Mahathir? How moronic and super stupid can you be- Mahathir's opinions can't be contested without accusing those who disagree with him being paid lackeys? Your grey matter must be polluted either with rancid curry or is lard layered.

The subject matter is too complicated for run of the mill pro UMNO bloggers to debate. So we will leave them to wallow in their stupidity.

The most piercing observation lies in his opinion that "In short, the hidden personal interests embedded in UMNO's corporate welfarism sold as defending Umno to defend our Malay race has instead brought about the MUNAFIQATION of our Malays".

Mahathir's economic prescriptions have exactly turned Malays into that- munafiks who continue to live a life of lies and deceit believing they can't overcome their deficiencies WITHOUT having to depend on a paternalistic government. That's how Mahathir's UMNO survived all these years making Malays live a life of self-disbeliefs. This is the perpetual munafiqation of the Malays and that's how UMNO stays in power forever.

UMNO can stay in power by (1) keeping Malays continuously stupid (2) allowing them to live a life of self-deceit and self-censoring and (3) accept the big lie that any questioning and challenges to the opaque economic agendas by UMNO are a direct assault and threat to the Malay race. Why don't we for once shake off that yoke of mental servitude and see whether without UMNO, Malays can survive or not.

The corporate welfarism of PETRONAS may not take the form of our national oil company descending into a morass of incompetence like what happened in MAS. But it can take the form of deliberately shielding what goes on in PETRONAS and making them as opaque and transparent as possible.  That is where Walla's comparison to what happened in Pertamina, an object lesson for us.

READ MORE HERE

 

Australia’s Kevin Rudd alerts Attorney General over Taib family activities

Posted: 29 Sep 2011 01:36 PM PDT

We would like to briefly update you on the latest developments on the Bruno Manser Fund's international Stop Timber Corrupting campaign:

- Australia's Foreign Minister and former Primer Minister, Kevin Rudd, has replied to a joint letter by the Bruno Manser Fund, Sarawak Report and PKR Sarawak Leader Baru Bian on suspected unlawful activities of the Taib family in Australia. Please find scans of the letter attached.

- Research by the Bruno Manser Fund has identified 25 Australian companies with links to the family of Malaysian potentate Abdul Taib Mahmud. Please find the exclusive list attached.

- Canadian Finance Minister James H. Flaherty has personally replied to a letter by the Bruno Manser Fund on suspected money-laundering by Sakto corporation, an Ottawa-based property developer which is being directed by Taib's daughter, Jamilah Taib, and her Canadian husband, Sean Patrick Murray.

BMF has not yet received an answer from American authorities contacted on these matters, including FBI director Robert Mueller. The FBI is renting its Seattle field office, located in the Abraham Lincoln Building in downtown Seattle, from Taib family-owned Wallysons Inc., a Washington state corporation.

With best wishes,

Your BMF campaignteam

 

Below is the article reported at the web site sarawak report

Kevin Rudd, Australia's former Premier and current Foreign Minister has issued a prompt and positive response to our request for an investigation into the Taib family's foreign assets in that country.

In a letter received yesterday, just one day after Sarawak Report publicised the request, Australia's Foreign Minister confirmed that the matter of Taib's wealth has been referred to the Australian Attorney General's Department for consideration.

This follows similar commitments to investigate by the Swiss and German governments.  Malaysia's own Anti-Corruption Commission has also confirmed that it has launched an official investigation into the Chief Minister's conduct.

Read more at: http://hornbillunleashed.wordpress.com/2011/09/30/23903/

Where We Are Right Now

Posted: 28 Sep 2011 06:01 PM PDT

Stupid law, stupid results part II

Posted: 28 Sep 2011 10:05 AM PDT

In the run up to an anticipated snap GE, the prime minister dangled previously unimagined sweet promises.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------


Najib: We value an independent judiciary
By V. Anbalagan and Sean Augustin
news@nst.com.my
2011/09/08

PUTRAJAYA: The prime minister said that his administration respects and understands the need for an independent judiciary.

"My administration is committed to an independent judiciary, which is an essential ingredient in nation-building," Datuk Seri Najib Razak said in his speech during his maiden visit to the Palace of Justice (POJ), here yesterday, which houses the Federal Court and Court of Appeal.

http://www.nst.com.my/nst/articles/Najib_ISArepealedtomakeMalaysiabestdemocracy/Article/

Najib: ISA repealed to make Malaysia best democracy
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Well, he got a very easy thing to do to prove how serious he is with regards to those lofty goals and put away the ghost of Perkasa torpedoing his previous flagship called NEM (not to mention a tragic waste of tax payers' money succumbing to subcontractor of some sorts to a political party)

Take a look at this section of Election Act, 1958.

Whoever drafted this piece of injustice is basically telling the judiciary to f@#k off if a concerned tax payer notice something amiss with the electoral roll.

This is a piece of legislation by the best democracy in the world, basically saying that basic democractic right of seeking justice from courts is denied.

This is a piece of legislation by the administration that respect the judiciary, basically saying that a set of bureacrates who are proven incompetent (by, from numeorus examples, registering lesbian army couple as postal voters)  is a force above the judiciary.

Holy goreng pisang, if a matter as serious as Perak power grab can be brought to several round of court hearing, then how come a set of electoral roll ladden well proven to be full of issues, is not subject to judicial review?

Isn't seeking redress from courts a foundation for democracy?

Isn't separation of power - independent legislation, execution and judiciary are basic tenets of democracy, let alone the best shiok-sendiri-promise-everything-darling-before-sex-find-a-way-out-later democracy?

Then how come the legislation is telling the judiciary not to look at the proven incompetent executive over matters of public interest?

Read more at: http://wangsamajuformalaysia.blogspot.com/2011/09/stupid-law-stupid-results-part-ii.html#more

Of wet dream, nightmare and Marty McFly

Posted: 27 Sep 2011 03:47 PM PDT

Whatever public posturing Pakatan Rakyat puts up in relation to hudud, everybody knows that in hudud resides an issue within Pakatan Rakyat which is potentially explosive and may ultimately be destructive. Everybody knows that. Pakatan Rakyat knows that. And Tun Dr Mahathir, unfortunately to Pakatan Rakyat, also knows that.

While the Barisan Nasional, particularly UMNO, was busy trying to out-manoeuvre Mat Sabu in history 101 and the Prime Minister eagerly venturing into a state of "coolness" and "sempoi-neity", Tun Dr Mahathir had other ideas. His was a meister stroke of all political strokes in Malaysia. That's because he knows what hurts the most as well as when and where to execute the hurting blow.

So, in an interview one day he threw a seemingly harmless challenge to PAS. PAS has always maintained that he (Tun DrM) was the reason why it could not implement hudud in Kelantan. Tun DrM then asked why hasn't PAS written to Prime Minister Najib to implement hudud as he (Tun DrM) is now no more the PM.

Those of you who of my generation will remember the character Marty McFly from the Back to the Future trilogy – to digress, I wonder when Hollywood is going to remake this film – apart from the totally cool and sempoi DeLorean DMC-12 in the movie. Marty boy was a smart kid. Very nice and mild-mannered boy. Quite cool and level headed too. That was until the antagonist started calling him "chicken". Upon being called "chicken", Marty McFly would lose all his good manners and level-headedness. He would turn reckless and completely berserk. He would even do really stupid things.

Tun DrM knew all the while that hudud is to PAS and Tuan Guru Nik Aziz what "chicken" was to Marty McFly. Mention the word "hudud" and Tuan Guru Nik Aziz would instantly go ape and all bananas. The whole PAS would grimace in orgasmic pleasure like a 13 year old after his first wet dream. That would in turn be a nightmare for Pakatan Rakyat. In Pakatan Rakyat, DAP's stand on hudud is clear. DAP is against hudud. As for PKR, well, it depends on what day the issue is raised and on which side of the bed Anwar Ibrahim wakes up that day.

TDM knows very well that hudud will cause Pakatan Rakyat to lose its "pakatan". His challenge was a calculated move to throw Pakatan Rakyat into shambles. That was exactly what had happened after his challenge.

TGNA firstly dismissed as laughable suggestions by TDM that Kelantan can now implement hudud now that TDM has retired. He then challenged the present Prime Minister to withdraw Putrajaya's objection to the implementation of hudud in Kelantan. If TGNA was politically savvy, he would have stopped there.

No, he did not.

TGNA then continued to meet with Prof Aziz Bari and Dr Dzulkefli Ahmad on 25th September 2011 to discuss the implementation of hudud in Kelantan and gave assurance that hudud will only affect Muslims and will not be imposed on non-Muslims. (the full report is here).

DAP, quite expectedly, responded. Karpal went into amok mode. Lim Guan Eng, meanwhile, said that the party's entire Central Executive Committee would resign from their position in the party if hudud was ever included in Pakatan Rakyat's Common Policy Framework or Buku Jingga.

The Star newspaper of course saw this as an opportunity. On 25th September it apparently reported what Guan Eng said above. However on 26th September, the Star apparently modified the news to report that Guan Eng had threatened the resignation of the DAP's leadership from Pakatan Rakyat.

The water gets even murkier when Anwar Ibrahim, quite recklessly (politically) said that he supports the Kelantan State Government's move to implement hudud (see here for the report). He later clarified his statement saying that all decisions affecting the people will have to be based on consensus within Pakatan Rakyat. He was quoted as saying:

"We hold firm to the conviction that any issue which affects the interest of the people must be discussed frankly in a civilized manner with the objective of seeking an amicable resolution."

That statement actually does not add or detract to what he had earlier said, namely, that he thinks hudud can be implemented in Kelantan. This was what he said earlier:

"For now, in general, in principle, I believe this can be implemented…It is a specific area that affects Muslims and does not impeach rights of non-Muslims. The proceeding makes sure that administration of justice is guaranteed."

By then a full storm was brewing within Pakatan Rakyat. PAS was again, showing its true colours.

READ MORE HERE

 

Stupid law, stupid results

Posted: 27 Sep 2011 11:03 AM PDT

Law is man-made regulations. People make mistakes and bad people makes bad decisions. When bad people make law, we ended up with bad laws.

For decades, inadequate delivery systems have diverted our law makers from their original legislation duty to that of local councilors, rendering the due process of drafting progressive, fair and reasonable law as a secondary, or even ignored, role.

World Class Parliament = World Class Law = Good Place to Live

Crap Parliament = Crap Law = Crappy Place to Live

Within the MP ranks, with characters such as "close one eye", "bocor" and "RM1 million FB page", how many right minded tax payers can safely say they have the utmost confidence in their ability then?

This is what I have in mind when I read some of the laws relating to conduct of general elections.

According to section 15 of AKTA PILIHAN RAYA 1958, PERATURAN-PERATURAN PILIHAN RAYA (PENDAFTARAN PEMILIH) 2002,

1.  Objections to any addition to the voters' roll must be made within 7 days from the date the supplementary electoral roll is open for inspection; (supposedly every quarter hence 4 times a year)

2.  A person can only object against up to 10 registered names only; and

3.  A fee of RM10 is to be charged for each name being submitted for protest.

Section 15 made me choked on my tau foo fah, I tell you.

 

1. 7 days only limitation

Every quarterly updates may contain hundreds and thousands of names. Is it reasonable to allow only a 7 day window period for public to review and investigate?

Revisiting the disgusting errors DAP recently discovered – lesbian marriage involving a female army personnel, dozens of army wives carrying IC which actually belong to their husbands etc. These are not innocent, straight forward errors but sophisticated mischief not visible to the naked eye or reasonable bystander.

http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/reform-vote-now-as-evidence-mounts-says-dap-leader/

"This shows there are systematic way ways of planting voters by irresponsible parties..."

New voters have to wait for months before they can check if they are being registered properly so why the glaring double standard here?  Income Revenue Board can investigate up to 7 years back, testing our memories to the limit and in case of fraud, there is no limit in the number of backlog years.

Yet, how come the mistake ridden SPR / EC is so damn well protected with this 7 days only ruling? Does the legislators ever thought of interested citizens do have other things to do in life? After multiple orgamistic screaming of Rakyat Diutamakan, this punter is extremely disappointed with the fake front, all form no substance.

How prominent and transparent are displays of these supplementary electoral rolls? We can see the newspaper publishing those lucky ones heading to National Service but where is the electoral roll being located for public inspection? SPR/EC has been doing a very poor job in this respect.


2. 10 objections per person

Limiting a person's right to object more than 10, is without logic, especially with an error prone SPR/EC.

If a policeman sees 3 men committing a crime should we legislate and limit him to say, he can only arrest 2 persons a day only? Would that make sense? Why limit pursue of correct records?

To this tax payer, it appears to be a form of non-financial bailout of a Barisan Nasional dependent/supporting party.

If there is a sysmatic abuse, e.g. the dozens of shemales in the army camp, then surely there would be more than 10. A talented and committed individual who uncovered this would be blocked by this stupid rule.

I wonder what was said in the parliament when they scanned through this section, or did the ruling coalition bulldozed this through?

 

3.     RM10 fee per protested person

It is also adding insult to injury to penalize concerned and justice-minded citizens for RM10 when SPR/EC (already well funded by tax payers) is suppose to investigate and correct their own gross, laughable and irresponsible or even errors.

Read more at: http://wangsamajuformalaysia.blogspot.com/2011/09/stupid-law-stupid-results.html

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved