Ahad, 25 September 2011

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


What has happened to our rule of law?

Posted: 24 Sep 2011 10:30 PM PDT

Surely someone must be answerable. Shouldn't the Inspector-General of Police who is the head of the police force be held accountable for this? Shouldn't the Minister of Home Affairs be taken to task for this break-down in the rule of law? Why didn't the judge who is responsible for granting the remand order demand proof before granting such an order?

By P Ramakrishnan (President, Aliran)

While we are somewhat relieved that the Barisan government had decided to drop the charges against the 30 PSM members, the issues surrounding their case have not been resolved.

We must not forget the larger issues involved in the case simply because the government had decided to get out of a messy situation for its own good.

The BN government created this untenable position which cannot be sustained by logic and facts. As a cover-up for its high-handedness, it is posturing itself as a generous institution that is capable of being considerate. The fact is it is trying to extricate itself from this unjustified and cruel action against these helpless people who only meant well.

It is unthinkable that people will be deluded by this gesture of the police. Malaysians are no more gullible or naïve to be easily fooled by such tokenism. The reprehensible conduct of the police cannot be condoned.

These 30 PSM members are innocent and not guilty of any offence by any stretch of the imagination under any Malaysian law. That was the reason why the police tried desperately to incriminate them by all sorts of ridiculous accusations:

  • They were accused of carrying weapons in their buses on 25 June 2011.
  • They were accused of possessing subversive material.
  • They were accused of waging war against the Agong.
  • They were accused of being a national threat.

The police invoked Section 122 of the Penal Code, Section 48 and Section 43 of the Societies Act, Section 29 (1) of the Internal Security Act and the Emergency Ordinance to build up a case that these are indeed dangerous criminals. The police threw everything available at them in an attempt to crush them and frighten other Malaysians in an attempt to prevent them from joining the Bersih 2.0 Walk for Democracy.

They were incarcerated unjustly under intolerable conditions. On 4 July – after nine days of imprisonment – 24 of them were charged in court while the rest of the six were charged in court on 3 August after having been held for 28 days in solitary confinement. The court imposed bail of RM8000 each, which meant they had to scramble desperately to raise RM240000 to seek their freedom – almost a quarter of a million ringgit! How could these poor people raise such a huge sum to post bail?

All this, however, failed to break the spirit of these 30 stalwarts; it failed to discourage outraged Malaysians from marching for democracy on 9 July 2011. If anything it only spurred Malaysians to discard their fear and stand up for their rights.

But the worrying thing about the whole episode involving these 30 Malaysians is the conduct of the police force. We are perturbed that the police can detain anyone under baseless charges with impunity. It looks that they can accuse anyone for whatever reason without a shred of evidence to back up their claim and detain them.

How could they accuse them of waging a war against the King, which is a serious criminal offence – Section 122 allows for 20 years or even life imprisonment – without an iota of incriminating evidence. This is clearly an abuse of their authority.

How could they accuse them of carrying weapons in their bus when no weapon was found in the bus?

How could they accuse them of possessing subversive material when this was not established?

How could they accuse them of being a national threat without proving the existence of such a threat?

Who cooked up these stories? Surely someone must be answerable. Who will be held accountable for this sordid affair? Shouldn't the Inspector-General of Police who is the head of the police force be held accountable for this? Shouldn't the Minister of Home Affairs be taken to task for this break-down in the rule of law?

Why didn't the judge who is responsible for granting the remand order demand proof before granting such an order? Aren't the fundamental rights and freedoms of a person his concern? Isn't he the person who ensures that justice must be upheld and every person under the law is entitled to the protection of the law? Why did he fail miserably in his duty to uphold the constitution?

The rule of law should not become a myth in our country. The police must not be a law unto themselves. The rule of law must prevail at all times.

To prevent similar incidences from occurring in future we need to go deep into this episode and ferret out those who were callous in accusing innocent Malaysians without just cause. We need a Royal Commission of Inquiry to examine how and why the detention of the 30 PSM members took place. We need to know what gives the police the authority to behave in the manner they have without being accountable for their action. We need to establish the fact that there is such a thing as Rule of Law in this country.

Invitation to the MCLM forums on Rakyat Reform Agenda (RARA)

Posted: 24 Sep 2011 04:53 PM PDT

The Malaysian Civil Liberties Movement (MCLM) have successfully launched its series of forums to be held nationwide on the 'Rakyat Reform Agenda' on 19th September 2011 in Kuala Lumpur at the Kuala Lumpur Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall (KLSCAH).

It is MCLM's fervent hope that in order for Malaysia to be the great inclusive nation envisioned by our founding fathers, we must return to basic principles.

How will we achieve this? The answer - Through the Rakyat Reform Agenda (RARA), which is a four-point plan to:

1. Honour the agreements made in 1963 between the Federation of Malaya and Sabah and Sarawak prior to the formation of the Federation of Malaysia

2. Restore the national institutions to the Rakyat – the judiciary, Election Commission, police force, Attorney-General, etc.

3. Restore the liberties guaranteed to the Rakyat under the Federal Constitution by repealing the ISA, OSA, PPPA, UUCA and Sedition Act

4. Adopt the Social Inclusion Agenda, designed to raise the living standards of all marginalised persons in Malaysia.

 

We are now proceeding to the next stage for venues in East Malaysia:

a) 27th September - Kota Kinabalu - Courtyard Hotel

b) 28th September - Tawau - Belmont Marco Polo, and

c) 29th September - Kuching - Hotel Grand Continental

(Note: All the MCLM RARA forums are scheduled for 7pm to 11pm)

 

We would appreciate if you can send your journalist/representative to cover the events.

MCLM Secretariat

 

For general information, please contact the MCLM Secretariat (KL) at Tel: 03-79827101/79712244 or Fax: 03-79829097 or Email: admin@mclm.org.uk

For details and registration on the RARA forums in East Malaysia, please contact tel: 012/8285442 (Sabah) 012/8893815 (Sarawak) or Email: eventsEM@mclm.org.uk


Religion vs Politics

Posted: 24 Sep 2011 04:47 PM PDT

By John Doe

Greetings. Firstly, I believe I owe some of you all an explanation for yesterday's "Top 10 Reasons why Hudud is good", it was an experiment done on MT readers as a means of a gauge on the MT populace. In line with the recently opened anonymity and the allowance of comments from unregistered commentators, I wondered what MT readers really felt in their hearts.

From a bird's eye view, it approximated what  was initially anticipated. I was however slightly disappointed that few had things of real substance to say, and of course, you had the occasional "Jar-Jar Binks" archetype who hopped around screaming for attention. What was worrying however, was the curiosity that why so few people openly condemned what  I stated. 

The list which I presented yesterday consisted of nothing more than the most often misquoted and abused texts of the Holy Quran. And surprisingly, they were not misquoted by non-Muslims, but by Muslims themselves. I even made a glaring mistake in naming the Sabbath as a Friday instead of a Saturday, and save one, no one else picked it up. I did deliberately pick on the Quran, as someone rightly pointed out, for this short "test" because of its relevance to Malaysia. Do feel free to watch footage on YouTube for the following.

I'll give you the brief run-down. Any NGO can confirm the following list.

Item 1 was the supposed justification of wife-beating. 

Item 2 was the supposed justification of amputations.

Item 3 was the supposed justification of multiple wives.

Item 4 was the supposed justification of marriage to under-aged girls

Item 5 was the supposed justification of Slavery from Prisoners of War.

Item 6 was the supposed justification of anti-semitism.

Item 7 was the supposed justification of marrying your daughter in-law.

Item 8 was the supposed justification of inequality of Gender

Item 9 was the supposed justification of inequality of the distribution of wealth

and item 10 is the most often used supposed justification of the annihilation of non-Muslims by Suicide Bombers.

 

None picked up on this. In fact, I was complaining to my friends, while watching some of the updates. I asked "Where are the fireworks? Where are the screams of my gross (and deliberate) misinterpretation?" I was actually pretty glad when someone actually challenged me to the justification of child-brides, and I was really hesitant to give my reply, pensive if I might give the game away. Be assured that my best intentions are for Malaysia. My only wish being that Malaysian would start to think for themselves. I received an email this morning asking if "I had sold my soul to the Devil" for writing such a piece. Rest assured that I have not. 

It makes me sad however, that Malaysians have been brought up to simply absorb, and absorb, and absorb whatever is taught to them, and regurgitate it during exams. There is never any desire to think out-of-the-box. Teachers tell you time and again to toe-the-line instead. This hinders personal thought, cripples creativity and retards growth. This method of learning merely makes one a foot soldier, suitable only for deployment as a faceless statistic. If you want to be a leader, then you need to stop being a foot soldier. On the flip-side however, UMNO loves to have such demure citizens. Ever looking up to them, ever willing to provide corruption money to them, and in a cruder way, ever-willing to "kiss and suck up" to anyone with a Title, be it earned or bought.

The whole point of the exercise yesterday was to show how easy it is to manipulate ANY Religion, by throwing in a few verses of scripture, and then use whatever "revelation" or "enlightenment" , thus allowing for pretty much ANY INTERPRETATION for WHATEVER intentions imaginable. Of course I am acutely aware of Catholic Priests and Imams who rape, Temple Priests who rob, and Monks who give themselves $5million loans. Point is they succeed not because their Religion is bad. These villains succeed because their "flock" is gullible. Please stop being gullible. I cannot say this enough times. Religions are so easy to manipulate given the correct opportunity, and "Holy-sounding words"  Please educate and equip yourself for your own good. I mean this in the most sincere way. Read, digest and learn your Holy Book often, and in a Language which you understand, so that you are not easily misled. In fact, I personally gain nothing if you succeed in this. My only reward being the slight satisfaction that I could help contribute towards a better Malaysia. A Malaysia which is free of tyranny. A truly free Malaysia.

It is now time the Rakyat took back this freedom. A freedom lost for exactly 500 years since 1511, when the Portuguese colonized Malaya. From a Merdeka which UMNO now claims never happened, and the Malaysia which helped them acquire the Colony States of Sabah and Sarawak. I look forward to this New Merdeka. 

True to my word, I, John Doe will never let Malaysians down.

 

The stream runs its course

Posted: 23 Sep 2011 11:50 PM PDT

By Kek Lok Si Temple Management

Two things are bad for the heart: (i) running up hill; and (ii) running down people, so said a philosopher.

To be relevant to the needs of the time and the million odd people who visit the Kek Lok Si Temple and its premises, the Temple had to develop and up-grade its facilities.

The land beside the stream that is called Ayer Itam River is being upgraded to accommodate the traffic congestion during public holidays and Chinese New Year. The queue would at times extend up to the State Mosque (at the junction of Jalan Masjid Negeri and Jalan Air Itam) especially after the completion of the new Penang Hill train. It is also necessary to build a new and bigger pond for the tortoises that were released by worshippers. That was a request by SPCA.

Every year more that a million worshippers and tourists visit the Kek Lok Si Temple. The number is increasing. The basic infrastructures such as the access roads and parking bays are stretched to its limits. The visitors were complaining of long periods of waiting. The residents in Ayer Itam area were complaining of access disturbances.

The management was responding to these genuine complaints. The management wants an efficient use of available land. The proposed upgrading of the facilities will include:

a) 1000 car parking bays and 20 coach parking bays
b) a landscaped garden, lily ponds, rock gardens, tea pavilion while maintaining the rich flora and fauna
c) a bigger and better tortoise pond and fish pond
d) public toilet and visitors resting area

The armchair critics must descend from the ivory towers and face realities. 120 years had lapsed since the Temple was first build. It cannot stagnate and choke itself. A certain amount of debris must be cleared for development to take place. It is not destruction.

The course of the stream was not interrupted. The removal of some vegetation and small boulders adjacent to the stream should not be viewed with a magnifying glass. The management of the Temple is very much alive to environmental needs. There is no destruction as claimed. If the Temple were to cater for all the gossipers, there will be no development.

The Temple was established more than a hundred years ago. It cannot remain in that period. The Temple will become irrelevant if it is not allowed to develop. It needs the facilities for the visitors and the traffic.

A few dissenting voices may surface once in a while but the truth should not be distorted to please the dissenting few.

THE STREAM WILL MAINTAIN ITS COURSE

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Najib and Rosmah Boarded Bus ... Luxury Bus

Posted: 24 Sep 2011 10:28 PM PDT


Najib has been trying to woo Malaysians that he is the MAN OF THE STREET but in actual fact he is just making a mockery of the situation by showing how POWER speaks for itself. This is the picture that was featured in mainstream medias:-

Najib Boards Bus To Attend Programmes In Perak
 

Who needs an Islamic state?

Posted: 24 Sep 2011 04:28 PM PDT

Well, PAS thinks we do.

And if PAS had its way, we'd be an 'Islamic State' today.

Whatever 'Islamic State' means.

Hope PAS knows because I haven't a clue although, looking around at the goings-on in some nation states that would have us believe they are 'Islamic States' sends a chill right down the spine!

And its fair to assume that at some point, PAS will want to share with the rest of us their grand plan for this 'Islamic State', going by what YB Dr Zulkifly Ahmad said at a talk bearing the same title as this post last Sunday in KL and as reported in the Star.

I quote Dr Zul :

'We are not pulling it (setting up of an Islamic state) back. It is still an issue that matters to us but we are allowing more time for the electorate to understand us better. The more important agenda now is reinstating democracy and good governance'

PAS is allowing more time for the electorate, you and I, to understand them better before they…

So they dropped 'Islamic State' from their 2008 election manifesto.

And they endorsed our People's Declaration.

And they are now part of Pakatan Rakyat.

So what?

Not for one moment in the run up to the last elections and thereafter have I deluded myself that PAS has abandoned its aspiration to establish an 'Islamic State'.

Dr Zul's statement as quoted above, as such, came as no surprise to me.

Another statement, though, left me wondering if the good doctor is himself deluded about how and why PAS did so well with the non-Muslim voters this time round. Will return to this shortly.

In truth, PAS's stance of not pushing their 'Islamic State' agenda to the fore at this time and the stance of many of us who, whilst wary of their 'Islamic State', gave PAS our vote, are both instances of pragmatic politics.

Calculated, pragmatic politics.

Just as DAP, PAS and PKR forging Pakatan Rakyat is pragmatic politics.

If PAS cannot expect those of us who aspire to retain the secular state established under the Federal Constitution  to give up just because we gave them our vote this time round, can anyone fairly expect PAS to abandon its 'Islamic State' agenda just because they are now part of the Pakatan?

Well, YB Karpal Singh does!

Malaysiakini reports that, responding to Dr Zul, Karpal said :

'It is incongruous for PAS to insist on having on its agenda (the) Islamic state and at the same time work with the other two parties in the Pakatan Rakyat…PAS should give an assurance that its leaders, including Kelantan Mentri Besar Nik Aziz Nik Mat and PAS president (Abdul) Hadi Awang will not publicly clamour in turning Malaysia into an Islamic state'

Why is it incongruous? 

READ MORE HERE

 

MACC’S Appeal against Dato’ Ramli Yusuff is sheer buffoonery

Posted: 23 Sep 2011 06:23 PM PDT

You may recall that Dato Abdul Razak is the top notch MACC lawyer who appeared on behalf of A-G Gani Patail, as the Public Prosecutor, who had lodged and lost several appeals against the acquittals granted by various Courts to Dato' Ramli.

This Dato' Musa (above) gained fame on Youtube as the MACC lawyer who tried to strangulate himself in order to demonstrate how Teoh Beng Hock could have died of self-strangulation when he was challenged by Thai Forensic expert, Dr Pornthip Rojanasunand, during the TBH Inquest. After that slapstick comedy in court, the MACC got wiser and engaged the much respected and extremely competent Dato Seri Shafie Abdullah to represent the MACC during the TBH RCI.

The MACC's appeal that Razak Musa appeared for on September 23 is against the acquittal granted by Sessions Judge M Gunalan on  March 2, 2010. However, on this occasion, Razak was a bit more respectful because Dato' Ramli was represented by Dato Seri Shafie Abdullah, his nemesis in the TBH saga.

The MACC's appeal that Razak Musa appeared for this morning is against the acquittal granted by Sessions Judge M Gunalan on 12 March 2010. However, on this occasion, Razak was a bit more respectful because Dato' Ramli was represented by Dato Seri Shafie Abdullah, his nemesis in the TBH saga.

The saying – "once a fool always a fool" is so apt on Razak Musa. In attempting to make a most passionate appeal on behalf of the PP, AG Gani Patail, Razak put on his most pathetic appearance when it became clear that the PP's appeal is a lot of hogwash.

The High Court Judge Dato Ghazali Cha noted that Sessions Judge M Gunalan had written a comprehensive and exhaustive judgment which showed that MACC DPP Kevin Morais had relied on a very questionable statement from a known criminal, self confessed briber, murderer, pimp and everything else that an underworld kingpin can be, called  Moo Sai Chin.

In doing so, Kevin successfully brought down Dato Ramli Yusuff (pictured above with his wife Dato' Anita Haron), at that time one of the top five most senior police officers, who could have been the IGP today.

To observers who have been following Dato Ramli's trial, it is all very clear that IGP Musa Hassan and A-G Gani Patail had used the MACC as a tool in the conspiracy against and persecution of Dato Ramli Yusuff. Yet, there are so many allegations of selective prosecution by the MACC at the behest of A-G Gani Patail.

READ MORE HERE

 

Dr M - PAS' Hudud is sheer propaganda

Posted: 23 Sep 2011 04:54 PM PDT

Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad told The Mole that PAS was actually in a dilemma following the party's decision to drop their quest to set up an Islamic state and implement Hudud.

"This is the problem with PAS, they are never very consistent. When they see that dropping (the struggle for an) Islamic state and Hudud makes them very unpopular now they want to come back and say that they want to implement (Islamic state and Hudud).

"But they know very well that they cannot implement simply because they are afraid they will not get the support of Karpal Singh and the DAP. … So what they are saying now is just propaganda to win back Muslim votes.

"PAS is in a dilemma. On one hand they want the non-Muslim support on the other hand they are afraid they would lose the Muslim support," the former Prime Minister and Umno president said when met at the National Mosque on Friday.

Nik Aziz who is also Kelantan Mentri Besar rekindled PAS' aspiration to implement the party's version of Hudud a few days ago and insisted that the party has never dropped its struggle for an Islamic state.

During PAS' 57th muktamar in early June, the party dropped their long-standing quest for an Islamic state and adopted the welfare state concept.

Party president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang made the 'Welfare State' announcement at the end of the muktamar, much to the chagrin of PAS' own members and supporters. 

But Nik Aziz revived the Hudud issue again when he recently accused Dr Mahathir of singlehandedly preventing PAS from implementing Hudud in Kelantan when the latter was Prime Minister.

Nik Aziz said the high number of HIV/AIDS cases in Kelantan could have been prevented had PAS been allowed to implement the Hudud laws.

READ MORE HERE

 

Will they never learn?

Posted: 22 Sep 2011 11:32 PM PDT

Whoever crafted this piece in Malaysianinsider is absolutely spot on.

I quote : "It is a no-brainer why Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad dredged up the issue of PAS's pursuit of hudud law in Kelantan".

In 2002 or 2003, I think, Dr M did the same.

Needled PAS to detail their proposed plan for an Islamic state in Terengganu, then under PAS rule.

Hadi bit the bait that Dr M tossed at them.

Came up with their blueprint for their Islamic state in Terengganu.

Kit Siang's reaction to PAS's posturing then says it all.

In the 2004 GE, PAS paid the price for falling for Dr M's ploy : Terengganu went back to BN

Is it not obvious enough that Dr M's latest salvo on the hudud issue is simply to try to get PAS to feel obliged to defend their 'Islamic state' ideal and get DAP to respond with a defence of the secular nation that we are?

Yesterday, FreeMalaysiaToday reported Tok Guru Nik Aziz as describing Mahathir as 'lucu' for his latest attempt to drive a wedge between DAP and PAS.

Today, Malaysiakini reports HERE and HERE  a war of words between DAP's Karpal and Nik Aziz, the latter saying that DAP can leave Pakatan for all he cares if they are not in agreement to PAS's agenda to establish an Islamic state!

What the @#$% is going on?

I am particularly baffled by the response to this whole hudud business by Anwar.

Yesterday, Malaysiakini reported Anwar as saying that he personally supported Kelantan's bid to implement hudud law.

"For now, in general, in principle, I believe this can be implemented. Looking at the specific areas and there are clear guarantees on the administration of justice. It does not in any way infringe on the rights of non-Muslims," Anwar is reported to have said.

There are clear guarantees on the administration of justice?

Does not infringe on the rights of non-Muslims?

Dato Seri, tell that to the widow of Seargeant Moorthy.

Tell that to the family and friends of the late Lawrence Selvananthan.

What baffles most, though, is this.

The Kelantan hudud law that Mahathir has raked up again and which Anwar now supports implementation, was passed by the Kelantan Legislative Assembly in 1993.

However, to be effectively implemented, it needed an act of Parliament to clothe the syariah courts in Kelantan with the power to implement the hudud precribed punishments.

That meant that UMNO and the BN government would have to support such a bill in Parliament.

This put UNMO then in a spot.

Anwar was then the deputy president of UMNO and the deputy prime minister.

To the best of my knowledge, the law passed in 1993 remains unchanged to this day.

If Anwar now says that it is now worthy of support and implementation, perhaps he can now share with us why it was not okay to be supported in 1993?

READ MORE HERE

 

What is meant by Hudud?

Posted: 22 Sep 2011 08:37 PM PDT

The origins and obligations of Sharia law

Sharia is the body of Islamic religious law based on the Qu'ran and the words and actions of the prophet Mohammed and his followers.

In the West, Sharia has become synonymous with the brutal punishments meted out in Islamic states, but the majority of laws are to do with everyday issues, ranging from personal hygiene to banking.

Hard line Muslim leaders claim that Sharia is eternal and can never be changed, while moderates argue that it is not a strict set of laws but should be open to interpretation.

Sunni and Shia Muslims follow different schools of thought in interpreting the Sharia laws, but all Muslims are required to live according to Sharia wherever they are.

Islamic countries such as Saudi Arabia and Iran have implemented Sharia as the legal system of the country, but in Britain it has no legal standing, despite the introduction of Sharia-compliant banking and food.

Examples of obligatory laws

• Earnings must be lawfully obtained

• Food must be halal

• Personal hygiene must be of a very high standard

• Couples must have a full bath in flowing water after intercourse

• The body must be covered modestly

• Prayers must be said five times a day

• Believers must fast during Ramadan

By Clare Dwyer Hogg and Jonathan Wynne-Jones, The Telegraph

*******************************************

Sharia is an Arabic word meaning "the right path". The Sharia comes from the Qu'ran, the sacred book of Islam, which Muslims consider the actual word of God. The Sharia also stems from the Prophet Muhammad's teachings and interpretations of those teachings by certain Muslim legal scholars.

Muslims believe that Allah (God) revealed his true will to Muhammad, who then passed on Allah's commands to humans in the Koran.

Since the Sharia originated from Allah, Muslims consider it sacred. Between the seventh century when Muhammad died and the 10th century, many Islamic legal scholars attempted to interpret the Sharia and to adapt it to the expanding Muslim Empire.

The classic Sharia of the 10th century represented an important part of Islam's golden age. From that time, the Sharia has continued to be reinterpreted and adapted to changing circumstances and new issues. In the modern era, the influences of Western colonialism generated efforts to codify it.

Following Muhammad's death in A.D. 632, companions of the Prophet ruled Arabia for about 30 years. These political-religious rulers, called Caliphs, continued to develop Islamic law with their own pronouncements and decisions. The first Caliphs also conquered territories outside Arabia including Iraq, Syria, Palestine, Persia, and Egypt.

As a result, elements of Jewish, Greek, Roman, Persian, and Christian church law also influenced the development of the Sharia.

Islamic law grew along with the expanding Muslim Empire. The Umayyad dynasty Caliphs, who took control of the empire in 661, extended Islam into India, Northwest Africa, and Spain. The Umayyads appointed Islamic judges, kadis, to decide cases involving Muslims. (Non-Muslims kept their own legal system.) Knowledgeable about the Qu'ran and the teachings of Muhammad, kadis decided cases in all areas of the law.

Following a period of revolts and civil war, the Umayyads were overthrown in 750 and replaced by the Abbasid dynasty. During the 500-year rule of the Abbasids, the Sharia reached its full development.

Under their absolute rule, the Abbasids transferred substantial areas of criminal law from the kadis to the government. The kadis continued to handle cases involving religious, family, property, and commercial law.

The Abbasids encouraged legal scholars to debate the Sharia vigorously. One group held that only the divinely inspired Koran and teachings of the Prophet Muhammad should make up the Sharia. A rival group, however, argued that the Sharia should also include the reasoned opinions of qualified legal scholars. Different legal systems began to develop in different provinces.

From this very brief history of the Islamic empire and the development of the Sharia, some scholars argue that the Sharia evolved over time and transformed to meet the needs to society during their respective times. In other words, the Sharia was not static but dynamic.

Other scholars argue that the Sharia was already present during the time of the Prophet and was already fully developed by the time the Prophet died. In other words, this was what was laid down by the Prophet and merely continued after the Prophet died (meaning, the Sharia did not evolve or transform over time). This argument is to support the theory that the Sharia came from God and was not 'invented' by man over hundreds of years following the death of the Prophet.

In an attempt to reconcile the rival groups, a brilliant legal scholar named Shafiee systematised and developed what were called the "roots of the law". Shafiee argued that in solving a legal question, the kadi or government judge should first consult the Qu'ran. If the answer were not clear there, the judge should refer to the authentic sayings and decisions of Muhammad. If the answer continued to elude the judge, he should then look to the consensus of Muslim legal scholars on the matter. Still failing to find a solution, the judge could form his own answer by analogy from "the precedent nearest in resemblance and most appropriate" to the case at hand.

This clearly shows that even the scholars themselves could not agree on whether the Sharia is God's law or man's creation based on interpretation of the Qu'ran and the teachings (examples) of the Prophet.
 

 

The answer to Bersih 2.0 is Project IC 2.0 – now I know why we marched (dwi bahasa)

Posted: 22 Sep 2011 01:25 PM PDT

Translation of key points in the report entitled "Pemuda Pas discovered more than 170,000 suspicious voters", published in Oriental Daily on 22nd September 2011

Terjemahan kenyataan-kenyataan utama dalam laporan akhbar bertajuk "Pemuda Pas menjumpa lebih daripda 170,000 orang pengundi yang mencurigakan" dalam akhbar Oriental Daily bertarikh 22 haribulan September 2011.
Pemuda Pas discovered more than 170,000 suspicious voters
"Pemuda Pas menjumpa lebih daripda 170,000 orang pengundi yang mencurigakan"


(Putrajaya 21 September) Pemuda Pas urge Jabatan Pendaftaran Negara to set up a Royal Commission of Inquiry to check on the inclusion of 170,818 persons with unknown country of origin as voters and citizens in 2nd quarter of 2011 alone.
(Putrajaya 21 September) Pemuda Pas menyeru Jabatan Pendaftaran Negara mengadakan Suruhanjaya Diraja untuk menyiasat kejadian seramai 170,818 orang yang negara asal mereka tidak diketahui tetapi boleh diberikan kewarganegaraan Malaysia serta didaftarkan sebagai pengundi hanya dalam suku tahun kedua 2011 sahaja.
Pemuda Pas pointed out that they discovered 170,818 voters with kod negara 71 in their IC number in SPR voters roll.
Pemuda Pas mendedahkan bahawa mereka mendapati seramai 170,818 orang pengundi dalam senarai SPR yang memegang kad pengenalan dengan kod negara 71
According to Ketua Pemuda Pas, Nasiruddin, 52% or 97,923 of these persons are allocated to Pakatan Rakyat administered states as the top 5 states with the most such voters are Selangor (29,758), Kuala Lumpur (17,548), Perak (16,680), Kelantan (15,345) and Penang (12,799).
Menurut Ketua Pemuda Pas, Nasiruddin, 52% atau 97,923 orang daripada jumlah tersebut telah diagihkan ke dalam negari-negeri yang ditadbirkan oleh kerajaan negeri Pakatan Rakyat di mana 5 negeri yang memiliki jenis pengundi in yang paling tinggi adalah Selangor (29,758), Kuala Lumpur (17,548), Perak (16,680), Kelantan (15,345) serta Penang (12799).
"The number of people with unknown country of origin allocated to Pakatan administered states is huge and enough to topple the state government."
"Bilangan orang yang negara asal mereka tidak dapat dikenalpastikan telah diagihkan ke negeri-negeri kawalan Pakatan Rakyat cukup untuk menjatuhkan kerajaan negeri."

TG Nik Aziz mahu Hudud, Negara Islam tak peduli DAP!

Posted: 22 Sep 2011 04:50 AM PDT

Tuan Guru Nik Aziz berkata beliau akan tetap dengan pendiriannya untuk menegakkan hukum hudud dan penubuhan negara Islam walaupun mendapat tentangan hebat daripada rakan sekutunya itu.

"Saya tetap dengan Islam kerana benda (perkara) ini wujud pada tahun 1950-an lagi dan bukannya benda baru. Berdialog beberapa kali berdialog dah," kata beliau.

"Nak jumpa beberapa kali jumpa dah. DAP dah (pernah) keluar sekali dah, pada masa (gabungan pembangkang dalam) Angkatan Perpaduan Ummah (APU), saya kata 'bye-bye' tak apa.

"Sekarang dia (DAP) masuk balik ... itu dia (DAP) punya pasallah (jika DAP mahu keluar)," kata beliau selepas Majlis Himpunan Kursus Kenegaraan 2011 di Pusat Tarbiyah Islamiah Kelantan (Putik) di sini hari ini.

Dipetik Bernama Online, Nik Aziz berkata demikian mengulas kenyataan Pengerusi DAP, Karpal Singh bahawa parti itu tetap menolak penubuhan negara Islam dan pelaksanaan hukum hudud kerana ia bertentangan sama sekali dengan Perlembagaan Persekutuan.

Awal hari ini Ketua Pembangkang Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim secara peribadi menyokong pelaksanaan hukum hudud, tetapi katanya ia belum dibincangkan oleh Pakatan Rakyat.

Semalam, Nik Aziz menolak pandangan bekas mufti Perlis, Dr Mohd Asri Zainul Abidin bahawa keadaan negara ketika ini tidak kondusif untuk melaksanakan hukum hudud itu.

READ MORE HERE

 

Anwar & Zaid Ibrahim's - chalk & cheese

Posted: 22 Sep 2011 04:39 AM PDT

Asia's Renaissance Man supporting hudud? Wakakaka!

Or, maybe I should ask whether the DAP is now squirming with such an ally and touted leader of Pakatan? No, am not asking Tian Chua or Eli Wong because those PR people are utterly hopeless without any spine or independent thoughts, much as I love Eli ;-)

To answer my own questions, alas, no, I won't because Anwar being Anwar is always tap-dancing around any tulips which would make him personally smell sweet – note his classic evasive weaving 4-face Brahma-nic snake oil salesman talk, with a back door open for escape, where he … stressed … that PR had not discussed the matter and this was only a "personal opinion".

What I do know is that dearest invincibly anti-DAP Helen Ang would be dancing too, but in rapt delight at DAP's undoubted discomfort at the 'out from the left field' declaration by its unreliable undermining unconscionable Asia's Renaissance ally wakakaka.

Sorry, Uncle Lim and Lim GE, can't help you guys – go see Karpal Singh who will surely have a word or two to say about Anwar's treacherous pulling of the rug right from under the DAP's feet.

Rather, I prefer to write about Zaid Ibrahim.

But as a refresher, some words first about Zaid that I had written in Pakatan must not avoid the unavoidable as follows:

READ MORE HERE

 

Who will lead in Putrajaya post the 13th GE, and who will give us the reforms we demand?

Posted: 21 Sep 2011 05:12 PM PDT

Looking at the huge mandate he got, it would seem that I was not the only one taken in by his promised reform agenda.

Maybe it was his seemingly squeeky clean image that persuaded so many of us that this man might just deliver on his promises of reforms.

Today, Pak Lah concedes that his reform agenda fell by the wayside due to resistance to the same from within his own party and his own government colleagues.

"Perhaps when I was in office I should have been more forceful about it considering the resistance I was facing," , Malaysiakini reports Pak Lah as saying.

Pak Lah was also quoted in an earlier Malaysiakini report as saying that Najib, too, might face the same resistance from within to his proposed repeal of the ISA.

My take, though, on why Pak Lah failed to deliver on his reform promises is that, post the 2004 GE, he was preoccupied with consolidating his position in the party in the hope that he could lead the charge into the next GE and return for a second term as PM.

Delivering all his pre-election promises would make him popular with the rakyat generally, but would earn him the ire and thee wrath of the UMNO warlords, most notably, Dr M himself.

It was common knowledge then that Pak Lah was facing a revolt from within the party, led by Dr M.

In the end, Pak Lah opted to renege on his pre-election promises to us so as to keep the peace with the UMNO warlords.

Today, Najib faces the same dilemma as his predecessor.

And like his predecessor, Najib does not have it in him to go against the UMNO warlords.

I will not hold my breath waiting for the repeal of the ISA to become a reality during his watch.

Firstly, it might simply not happen.

Secondly, it remains to be seen how draconian the proposed anti-terrorism laws that are intended to take the place of the ISA will be.

Finally, and, for me, most importantly, is that Najib, unlike Pak Lah, came into office weighed down with a litany of scandals.

READ MORE HERE

 

The MAS-AA deal once again-1

Posted: 21 Sep 2011 03:39 PM PDT

So let's go back to retrace our steps. Khazanah and Tony and CIMB takes us through the motion making magic before the public eye. They are allowing Tony and company take up 20% of MAS shares under the pretext that Tony and that accountant Meranun can do their magic for MAS. Stupid MAS's capitalization is at RM 5 billion while Air Asia stands at RM 11 billion. So how can MAS with a shotgun compete with Air Asia which has a rocket launcher? Air Asia is fully loaded firing live ammunition while MAS fires blanks.

Air Asia made more than RM 1 billion profit in 2010 while MAS incurred nightmarish losses despite Jala being there followed by Dato Tengku Azmil. Air Asia has more planes than MAS and MAS owns or leases boneshakers and call itself the airline with the golden service and touch. What a joke and this joke has been allowed to be uttered for too long by incompetent people at MAS and Khazanah.

Then with so many factors assisting Tony and Kamarudin, Mas does indeed make profit. Some bright people at Khazanah will advise the PM to suggest since Mr. TF is already the single largest shareholder of MAS wand he has made profit why not merge Air Asia with MAS?

How? Assist Tony to make Air Asia private and then allow him to inject the new entity into MAS. Give cheap loan to Tune Air to mop up the entire shares of Air Asia and then allow it to be injected into MAS. Tune Air the original owners of Air Asia will be freed from debt and the entire debt is now absorbed into the merged entity of a new MAS. The MAS owners will be Tony and company and Khazanah. Certainly and naturally, that will create synergies (read profits for some people) and hear this, gets protection from the Malaysian government. It's a long bullshitting exercise but one necessary to lead astray so many pesky bloggers. Some of them buyable but others are not

I am trying to find the one thing that is repulsive about the MAS-AA deal.  Why is this attempt by Khazanah in trying to mend MAS our national pride, appears to be a leaving a bitter after taste? What's so distasteful about it?

My one reservation about this deal is that it shows Khazanah as trustee to the nation's wealth and therefore enforcer about how our assets are being managed isn't trying hard or serious enough to keep it national and strategic. Diluting the nation's share in MAS can also diminish what potential advantages the country can leverage by having a national airline. Every country has one that it leverages on to give it comparative advantages.

The share swap with Tony Fernandes is effectively paying protection money. Give Tony shares in MAS in return of a pledge by Tony that he will not use Air Asia to compete with MAS. It's a payout to Tony in return for TF's promise not to work hard.

It's also the old game of carving out the monopoly board among business rivals. Better to cooperate rather than bludgeon each other. So will MAS make profit after this after it secures a promise from Tony to not disturb it? The people at MAS appear to blame some unprofitable costs center (such as Firefly) for its losses. And it believes that removing this will turn MAS profitable plus having Tony and whoever else on board will allow MAS to benefit from their skills.

It's more like better to keep friends close and enemies closer. I go to a friend's burial not to pay my respects but to make sure he's dead. So keep Tony on board to ensure he's not up to mischief which MAS people and by backward linkage, Khazanah people are incapable of dealing with.

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Analisis Pakatan Rakyat menuju PRU 13 di Sabah

Posted: 22 Sep 2011 04:34 AM PDT

Pendahuluan

Pada 16 September yang lalu, bersamaan dengan sambutan Hari Malaysia, Konvensyen Pakatan Rakyat Sabah telah berlangsung dengan jayanya di Convention and Event Center, Star City, Kota Kinabalu Sabah. Konvensyen ini dihadiri oleh semua penyokong dan ahli dari Pakatan Rakyat seluruh negeri.

Konvensyen yang bermula dari pukul 1.00 petang hingga 5.00 petang itu bertujuan untuk merasmikan Buku Jingga Pakatan Rakyat Negeri Sabah. Lim Kit Siang, Haji Mohamad Sabu dan Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah antara pimpinan Pakatan Rakyat yang turut hadir memberikan ucapan dan sekaligus merasmikan Buku Jingga Pakatan Rakyat.

Tawaran PR

Tawaran baru Pakatan Rakyat (PR) untuk rakyat Sabah meliputi 20 perkara. Antaranya adalah mengenai agama, menjunjung kedaulatan negeri Sabah, menangani pendatang asing tanpa izin (PATI), pemuliharaan tanah Sabah, Borneonisasi, pengambilalihan Blok L dan M, 20 perkara autonomi Sabah, royalti minyak dan gas, dasar kabotaj, pengawalan cukai hasil negeri Sabah, kajian fungsi FELDA dan FELCRA, Yayasan Orang Asal, pembasmian kemiskinan, perumahan rakyat, peranan Yayasan Sabah dan lain-lain.

Penerimaan rakyat Sabah terhadap PR pada masa ini adalah pada tahap yang amat baik. Di sesetengah kawasan, wakil PR sama ada terdiri daripada PAS, DAP atau PKR, dijadikan rujukan utama oleh masyarakat setempat untuk memberitahu masalah dan mendapatkan penyelesaian kepada masalah itu, hal ini menjadi simbolik kepada ketidakcekapan wakil rakyat BN yang ada untuk melaksanakan amanah dan tanggungjawab yang diberikan.

Menurut Ketua Penerangan Pas Sabah, Hisamudin Sulaiman yang juga merupakan Yang Dipertua Pas Kawasan Pensiangan, apabila beliau turun mendengar keluhan dan permasalahan masyarakat di kawasannya, di samping mendedahkan penipuan yang dilakukan oleh BN, pada ketika itulah masyarakat sedar bahawa selama ini mereka hanya ditipu dan tidak diambil berat langsung oleh wakil rakyat yang dipilih oleh mereka dalam PRU lalu.

Beliau juga mendakwa bahawa penduduk kampung memberikan kepada beliau beberapa pucuk surat yang mengandungi berbagai-bagai permintaan daripada penduduk kampung. Beliau menegaskan kepada penduduk kampung bahawa tugas wakil rakyat yang dipilih dalam pilihanraya bukan hanya untuk memberikan beras sekilo dua ataupun memberikan 'tandas segera', tetapi ia lebih dari itu, iaitu mendengar dan menyelesaikan permasalahan yang wujud.

PAS mengukuh di Sabah

Di kawasan Sandakan pula, penerimaan masyarakat terhadap PR juga pada tahap yang amat memberangsangkan. Masyarakat di sekitar Batu Sapi sangat teruja apabila mengetahui bahawa Tuan Guru Haji Hadi akan turun ke kawasan mereka, namun harapan mereka untuk bertemu dengan dengan beliau tidak kesampaian apabila beliau tidak dapat hadir atas sebab-sebab tertentu yang tidak dapat dielakkan.

Namun kedatangan beliau di tempat lain seperti di Tawau, amat meriah dan disambut dengan baik.

20 perkara yang ditawarkan oleh PR untuk rakyat Sabah dalam PRU ke 13 yang diurakan-urakan bakal berlangsung dalam masa terdekat ini, merupakan antara isu yang sangat genting dan menjadi satu tuntutan kepada PR untuk memberikan yang terbaik kepada rakyat Sabah jika PR berjaya menakluki 'fixed deposit' BN ini.

Antara isu yang cukup sinonim dengan rakyat negeri ini, adalah isu Tanah Hak Adat Bumiputera (NCR). Di semua kawasan, terutamanya kawasan pedalaman, seperti di kawasan Pensiangan, kawasan Batu Sapi, dan kawasan Beluran serta di Merotai, penduduk kampung meneroka dan mengusahakan tanah-tanah tersebut untuk dijadikan kawasan petempatan dan pertanian atau penternakan. Apabila tanah-tanah tersebut diusahakan, ia sepatutnya menjadi milik penduduk yang mengusahakannya.

Namun, hal yang sebaliknya pula terjadi apabila kerajaan sewenang-wenangnya merampas tanah NCR tersebut. Pampasan yang dijanjikan hanya menjadi 'pemanis mulut' sahaja tanpa ada tindakan susulan. Rakyat dibiarkan turun naik ke mahkamah dan akhirnya kes ditutup.

Pembelaan yang sewajarnya dibuat oleh wakil rakyat seperti yang diharapkan oleh penduduk kampung, tidak terjadi. Malahan wakil rakyat pula hilang entah ke mana. Hanya akan muncul apabila ada program nyanyian, kebudayaan dan acara tari menari yang sememangnya sinonim dengan jiwa wakil rakyat BN negeri ini.

Tahun ini, PAS Sabah amat tekun dan gigih untuk memastikan Sabah tidak lagi menjadi 'fixed deposite' BN pada PRU akan datang. Pada Mei tahun ini, Konvensyen PAS Sabah yang berlangsung di Sabah Hotel, Sandakan yang bermatlamatkan "merakyatkan PAS di Sabah" telah mengusulkan juga beberapa tindakan lain antaranya untuk menyebarkan isi kandungan Buku Jingga, menarik undi masyarakat bukan Islam, mengenalpasti permasalahan masyarakat setempat, kursus pilihanraya kawasan dan penekanan kualiti ahli.

Seminar pendidikan yang diadakan di Kundasang yang turut berlangsung beberapa bulan yang lalu turut menarik perhatian. Resolusi seminar ini antaranya menubuhkan Sekolah Rendah Islam (SRI), menubuhkan Pusat Pendidikan Islam, Pusat Tahfiz, Pondok Fi Zilalil Quran, Madrasah Al Ulumiyyah wa Tarbiah dan sebagainya.

Hal ini berikutan insitusi keagamaan yang seperti ini yang kurang di Sabah. Ia merupakan langkah yang sangat bijak untuk mendekatkan rakyat Sabah terhadap ilmu keagamaan yang bersistemkan madrasah, pondok dan SRI.

Pada 17 September yang lalu pula, Konvensyen Pas Negeri Sabah telah berlangsung di Yaho Hotel, Kota Kinabalu. Konvensyen pada kali ini turut dimeriahkan dengan kehadiran semua ahli PAS dari seluruh pelusuk negeri ini. Konvensyen yang berlangsung selama sehari ini turut mengupas mengenai Negara Berkebajikan: Tawaran Pas yang telah disampaikan oleh ahli parlimen Pasir Putih Kelantan, Ustaz Muhammad Husin.

Menariknya, konvensyen kali ini menggunakan buku MENEGAKKAN PERJUANGAN: Memenangi Pilihanraya Menerusi Persiapan Tarbiyyah yang ditulis oleh Ustaz Datuk Abu Bakar Chik yang turut digunakan ketika Ijtimak Tarbawi DPPP di Rusila Terengganu pada Oktober tahun lalu.

Sebanyak tiga kertas kerja telah dibentangkan iaitu 'Menegakkan Perjuangan' yang disampaikan oleh Ustaz Anuar Ali merangkap Timbalan Pesuruhjaya Pas 3, 'Pilihanraya adalah Jihad dan Wasilah Perjuangan' yang disampaikan oleh Ketua Dewan Ulama Pas Sabah, Ustaz Nuruddin Abdullah dan pembentangan ketiga mengenai 'Adakah PAS boleh menang dan memerintah Malaysia' yang disampaikan oleh Ketua Penerangan PAS Sabah, Saudara Hisamudin Sulaiman. Majlis ini diakhiri dengan bacaan doa wehdah oleh Ketua Pemuda PAS Sabah, Saudara Lahirul Latigu.

Jaringan PAS dan NGO

Konvensyen PAS kali ini juga disertai oleh beberapa wakil NGO yang turut serta bersama-sama memperjuangkan isu setempat, antaranya NGO ini bekerjasama dengan PAS Sabah untuk menangani isu alam sekitar yang melibatkan pembukaan lombong arang batu di Felda UMAS. Hasilnya, mereka berjaya menghentikan pembukaan lombong tersebut. Hal ini secara tidak langsung menampakkan bahawa PAS adalah sebuah parti yang universal, tidak hanya merangkumi hal ehwal keagamaan semata-mata.

Di Sabah, pilihanraya Parlimen Batu Sapi yang diadakan tahun lalu adalah cerminan kepada usaha PR di Sabah, khususnya di Sandakan. Walaupun ketika itu wakil dari PKR yang menjadi calon bertanding, namun usaha untuk memenangkan calon ini turut dibantu oleh jentera dari semua parti PR. Hasilnya, lebih 3000 pengundi yang mengundi calon PKR ini. Ia merupakan satu 'hint' awal betapa rakyat Sabah mahukan perubahan yang lebih baik dan wakil rakyat dipilih biarlah menjadi mata dan telinga kepada rakyat di parlimen nanti, bukan hanya melihat dan membiarkan rakyat terseksa.

Keberkesanan pendidikan rendah PAS

Penerimaan masyarakat terhadap PAS juga turut dilihat melalui peningkatan murid yang berdaftar di PASTI yang ada di seluruh negeri. Hal ini menunjukkan kepercayaan yang tinggi oleh masyarakat agar anak-anak mereka dapat dididik dengan baik dan berkonsepkan Islam.

Dakwah Islamiyyah turut dapat disebarkan secara 'bil hikmah' melalui PASTI. Rata-rata ibu bapa pelajar yang menghantar anak-anak ke sekolah PASTI, berpakaian tidak menepati syariat Islam dan disinilah peranan guru ditonjolkan. Beretika pakaian yang sopan dan menutup aurat merupakan tuntutan wajib untuk semua guru PASTI.

Pada masa ini juga, PASTI beroperasi di seluruh tempat yang mempunyai kepadatan penduduk yang tinggi dan tidak hanya tertumpu pada sesuatu kawasan sahaja. PASTI ada di bandar-bandar besar, di flat-flat mewah dan ada juga di kawasan perumahan elit. Hal ini menunjukkan bahawa PAS mampu untuk memberikan pendidikan bukan hanya kepada golongan sasaran tertentu sahaja tetapi merangkumi kepada semua golongan.

Rintangan seteru politik

Namun, kepastian yang nyata adalah pihak BN tidak akan pernah untuk berdiam diri membiarkan Sabah jatuh ke tangan PR. Ternyata pelbagai usaha difokuskan kepada negeri ini untuk memenangkan BN di Sabah pada pilihanraya akan datang.

Ketika syawal baru-baru ini pun, Ketua Menteri turun ke semua masjid yang ada untuk menyampaikan sumbangan dan membuat rumah terbuka menjamu rakyat yang dahagakan janji ketika PRU lalu. Pemberian beras dan barang-barang keperluan lain kepada golongan sasaran seperti ibu tunggal atau orang kurang upaya sudah menjadi kelaziman untuk wakil BN apabila turun bertemu masyarakat.

Malangnya wakil BN menganggap bahawa itu sudah cukup untuk memadamkan janji-janji yang dibuat ketika PRU lalu. Rakyat Sabah sudah bertahun hidup dalam keadaan yang sama, tidak ada perubahan yang drastik walaupun Sabah merupakan negeri yang kaya pada suatu ketika dahulu. Jalan raya misalnya, hanya dibaiki apabila tiba musim pilihanraya, jambatan di kampung hanya akan dibaiki apabila wakil rakyat BN akan melawat kampung tersebut dan jalan yang berlubang hanya akan ditampal apabila Ketua Menteri melawat kawasan tersebut.

Fenomena yang amat menyedihkan. Adakah rakyat yang tinggal di kawasan itu tidak berhak untuk mendapat kemudahan yang baik? Kenapa perlu tunggu 'orang besar' masuk ke kawasan tersebut baru semuanya akan dipulihkan? Saya menyarankan agar Ketua Menteri dan jemaah menterinya berulang alik dari Sandakan ke Kota Kinabalu, atau dari mana sahaja, dengan menaiki kereta melalui jalan raya yang ada. Biar mereka turut merasai betapa sistem perhubungan jalan raya yang ada di negeri ini berada pada tahap yang amat teruk.

Di kawasan Sandakan, misalnya di kawasan pedalaman Batu 12, sehingga saat ini penduduk masih belum mendapat bekalan air bersih walhal tempat tersebut mempunyai sekolah dan petempatan. Penduduk di kawasan itu juga perlu menunggu 11 tahun untuk mendapatkan sistem perhubungan jalan raya yang lebih baik.

Logik atau tidak rakyat perlu menunggu bertahun lamanya untuk mendapat kemudahan yang lebih baik? Sedangkan BN memerintah Sabah lebih lama daripada tempoh itu. Jika anda berkesempatan ke Sandakan, anda akan melihat sepanjang jalan dari Batu 14 hingga ke Batu 12, jalan raya sedang dalam proses pembesaran. Hal ini rentetan daripada jumlah kenderaan yang semakin bertambah. Satu langkah yang amat baik dan disambut baik oleh semua penduduk namun persoalan yang timbul, kenapa sekarang usaha itu dibuat?

Kenapa tidak selepas sahaja kemenangan BN di Sabah pada PRU lalu? Bergerak pula ke kawasan bas ekspres Sandakan, anda akan melihat satu kawasan yang amat daif. Kawasan bas ekspress ini hanya terdiri daripada beberapa pondok tiket bas dan tandas serta beberapa gerai jualan makanan. Dan lebih malang lagi, kawasan bas ekspres ini tidak berbumbung.

Namun, jika anda ke Tawau atau Kota Kinabalu, anda akan dapat merasakan bahawa stesen bas ekspres yang ada setaraf dengan stesen bas ekspres di bandar utama negeri-negeri di Semenanjung Malaysia. Cukup lengkap dan gah. Walhal, Ketua Menteri Sabah adalah anak jati Sandakan, namun mengapa Sandakan seakan-akan dianaktirikan, sedangkan Sandakan merupakan bandar terpenting selain Kota Kinabalu dan Tawau.

Stesen bas harian yang terletak di tengah-tengah bandar Sandakan turut mengalami nasib yang sama, dianaktirikan daripada pembangunan. Stesen bas ini tidak berbumbung, (kecuali stesen bas Labuk yang merupakan stesen bas swasta) dan ia sangat menyukarkan pengguna apabila hujan. Hal ini bertambah sukar apabila terdapat bas sesuatu kawasan yang adakalanya jauh dari tumpuan orang ramai.

Hal ini sudah wujud bertahun lamanya tanpa ada apa-apa tindakan daripada pihak kerajaan negeri. Perkara ini patut dipandang dengan serius kerana kebanyakan penduduk menggunakan bas sebagai pengangkutan utama. Jika hal ini tidak ditangani dengan baik, ia akan membebankan rakyat. Jika alasan sempit dan tidak ada ruang yang diberikan, ia adalah tidak relevan kerana kemudahan ini adalah lebih penting daripada pembinaan kompleks membeli belah (Harbour Mall) yang semakin pesat dibangunkan di pinggir bandar Sandakan. Jika kompleks ini ada tempatnya di bandar ini, kenapa pula tidak boleh diperuntukkan tempat untuk stesen bas harian?

Masalah setinggan

Isu setinggan juga amat sinonim dengan negeri ini sama ada di Sandakan, Kota Kinabalu dan Tawau. Di Sandakan, kawasan setinggan BDC yang dulunya terletak di Batu 2 dirobohkan tanpa pembelaan yang wajar diberikan kepada penduduk yang terlibat. Kawasan tersebut kononnya akan digunakan untuk mendirikan Hotel Sri Malaysia namun sehingga ke hari ini, lebih dari 5 tahun kawasan setinggan itu dirobohkan, belum pun ada tanda-tanda pembangunan dilakukan. Semuanya hanya untuk menghapuskan kawasan setinggan agar negeri ini dikatakan 'zero setinggan' walhal hakikatnya rakyat merempat dan terpaksa mencari tempat tinggal yang lebih mahal kosnya.

Adakah ini langkah yang betul-betul bijak mengurangkan kemiskinan di Sabah? Penduduk masa kini yang tinggal di kawasan setinggan bagaikan telur di hujung tanduk. Bila-bila masa sahaja tempat mereka akan dirobohkan. Ketika berkunjung ke Batu Sapi Ramadhan lalu, rumah penduduk di kawasan Kampung Lupak Meluas juga ingin dirobohkan dan tidak ada seorang pun wakil rakyat yang turun menjadi 'front liner' mempertahankan penduduk.

Apabila ditanya kepada pihak berkuasa yang bertanggungjawab merobohkan kawasan tersebut, mereka hanya menyatakan bahawa wakil rakyat mereka yang memberikan arahan. Sudah terang lagi bersuluh bahawa wakil rakyat yang dipilih oleh mereka hanya 'menyayangi' mereka apabila tiba musim pilihanraya sahaja.

Isu PATI

Kebanjiran PATI di Sabah juga tidak dapat ditangani dengan baik oleh kerajaan Negeri. Tawaran PR untuk PRU akan datang adalah menyempurnakan penubuhan Suruhanjaya DiRaja bagi mencari jalan menyelesaikan kemelut pendatang asing tanpa izin di negeri ini. Pendaftaran PATI sebagai penduduk tetap yang dijalankan oleh kerajaan bulan lalu amat membimbangkan.

Penduduk amat takut jika hak yang sepatutnya dimiliki dirampas dan diberikan kepada PATI. Pendaftaran yang dilakukan juga amat merobek hati penduduk, kerana ada antara penduduk tetap negeri ini yang terpaksa berurusan ke Putrajaya semata-mata untuk mendapatkan kad pengenalan penduduk tetap, tetapi kerajaan sewenang-wenangnya memberikan hak tersebut kepada PATI.

Rakyat menghabiskan ribuan ringgit dan perlu menanti bertahun-tahun untuk mendapatkan kad pengenalan, PATI pula mendapat kerakyatan hanya dalam masa beberapa jam. Bukan itu sahaja, kebanjiran PATI di Sabah turut menyebabkan kadar jenayah meningkat. Pecah rumah, mencuri, penyeludupan rokok dan sebagainya turut membimbangkan masyarakat tempatan.

Pelbagai isu yang boleh dicanang untuk menjatuhkan BN di Sabah, point utamanya adalah menyampaikan kepada masyarakat tentang maklumat dan kebenaran yang sepatutnya mereka ketahui.

Meraih kepercayaan penduduk tidak mudah, tapi apabila kita menyampaikan kebenaran insya Allah mereka akan dapat berfikir pilihan yang lebih baik. Jika tempat mereka tidak boleh diakses menggunakan internet, kita perlu turun menyampaikan. Keadaan di Sabah amat berbeza dengan kawasan lain.

Di Sabah ada tempat yang perlu untuk menaiki kereta pacuan empat roda, ada tempat yang hanya boleh menggunakan pengangkutan air, dan ada jalan yang tidak berturap, dan tanah merah. Namun semua ini bukan halangan untuk kita membantu menyampaikan kepada masyarakat. Saya amat yakin dan percaya bahawa rakyat di bawah bayu ini mahukan perubahan kerana semuanya sudah muak menderita di bawah pemerintahan BN yang tidak mempedulikan rakyat.

Penutup

Bahang pilihanraya semakin terasa samada akan diadakan pada tahun ini atau tidak. Pelbagai usaha harus dijalankan oleh semua jentera pilihanraya kawasan. Penculaan, mengenalpasti permasalahan setempat, mendekati golongan sasaran, menarik undi bukan Islam, memantapkan kualiti ahli dan memperbanyakkan program dan aktiviti bersifat luaran, tidak hanya tertumpu aktiviti dalaman sahaja. Jika usaha sudah dibuat sebesar Gunung Kinabalu dan sedalam Lautan China Selatan, namun jika kemenangan masih belum diberikan, bersabarlah kerana Allah SWT beserta dengan orang-orang yang sabar.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Sabtu, 24 September 2011

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


When ‘Hang Tuah’ became ‘Hang Jebat’

Posted: 23 Sep 2011 05:29 PM PDT

The Prime Minister's campaign continued. He silenced the Rulers over the issue of the 1987 ISA detentions; staged a hostile debate on the monarchy in the 1990 Umno general assembly after the loss of Kelantan to PAS; removed the Rulers' immunity to prosecution following the constitutional crisis of 1992-93; stripped away their flights, outriders, and special hospital wards; and in 1994, with little opposition, finally removed the need to obtain the Rulers' assent for State laws.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

The young should emulate Hang Tuah - Melaka CM

(Bernama) -- Youths should emulate the legendary Malay warrior Hang Tuah, who had a superior character and was loyal to king and country, Melaka Chief Minister Datuk Seri Mohd Ali Rustam said last night.

He said that Hang Tuah was indomitable in defending the Melaka Sultanate from external attacks.

"His leadership qualities were pronounced because his knowledge covered religion and the art of silat," Mohd Ali said when opening the Hang Tuah Festival at the Malay Melaka Sultanate Palace Museum at Bandar Hilir here last night.

Also present were Information, Communications and Culture Deputy Minister Datuk Maglin Dennis D'Cruz and Melaka State Assembly Speaker Datuk Othman Muhamad.

Mohd Ali said Hang Tuah used his mastery of several languages to help boost relations between Melaka and other states and territories.

************************************** 

Mahathir vs the Malay Rulers

By HUZIR SULAIMAN, The Star

In the concluding instalment of the three-part series, Ruling the Rulers, our columnist looks at the outcome of Dr Mahathir's 1983 standoff with the Sultans.

BY October 1983, Malaysians were becoming aware that a constitutional crisis was in full swing. The Constitution (Amendment) Bill 1983 had been passed by both houses of Parliament, but the King, under pressure from his fellow rulers, was refusing to give his Royal Assent to it.

The bill would remove the need for the King to assent to legislation, and would similarly do away with the need for Sultans to assent to State laws. It would also take away the King's power to declare an Emergency and give it to the Prime Minister.

The Rulers publicly rejected these amendments after a meeting in Selangor on Nov 20, 1983. When the public became aware that a storm was brewing, Dr Mahathir's administration initiated a propaganda war to put pressure on the Rulers.

There took place a "series of illegal public rallies held by Umno in Alor Star, Bagan Datoh, Seremban, Batu Pahat, Malacca, for the Prime Minister with reports of officially inflated crowd figures?." as Lim Kit Siang would later describe them in the Dewan Rakyat.

These rallies, staged in order to generate sympathy for the Government's cause, were illegal in the sense that police permits were neither sought nor granted.

Whether or not the crowd figures were inflated by the Umno-aligned media – it is true that they generally reported these events in positive terms – it is clear that the 1983 rallies were exciting evenings, with republican sentiments on everyone's minds, if not exactly on their lips. One of the most arresting images in Rais Yatim's Faces in the Corridor of Power is a photograph of two youths at one such rally. They are wearing T-shirts bearing Dr Mahathir's picture and the words "DAULAT RAKYAT".

Although the Prime Minister denied wanting to abolish the monarchy, at these rallies "the historical moment of unfolding Malay nationalism was relived as a continuing battle of Malay popular sovereignty against royal hegemony," as Khoo Boo Teik writes in Paradoxes of Mahathirism.

At a rally in Alor Star on Nov 26, Dr Mahathir declared that "It was the rakyat who had protested against the Malayan Union after the Second World War; it was the rakyat who wanted a democratic system that would enable them to choose their own leaders. It was always the people who had fought for their destiny."

At the largest rally, in Batu Pahat, Dr Mahathir told the crowds, in a thinly veiled dig at hereditary rulers, "We weren't born Ministers ? We're up here because we were chosen by all of you."

The propaganda war continued, with tales of royal extravagance and impropriety emerging. The Government leaked the fact that they were compiling dossiers on the Sultans. RTM announced they were preparing a year-long TV series on the Rulers and the Constitution.

Yet pro-royal rallies took place too – especially in Kelantan and Terengganu, where Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah was rumoured to be responsible for them – and they drew large crowds, although they went unreported by the media.

Upping the ante, the Umno Youth executive council called for the Government to gazette the Constitution (Amendment) Bill without waiting for the King's assent, effectively daring the Rulers to challenge it in court. Dr Mahathir did not immediately adopt this strategy, but held this "nuclear option" in reserve while behind-the-scenes negotiations continued with the Rulers.

Public opinion was divided over the issue. Rural Malays tended to support the Rulers; urban Malays, while not uncritical of Mahathir's strategies and motives, were more ready to accept egalitarian ideas.

As for the Chinese community, R.S. Milne and Diane K. Mauzy note in Malaysian Politics Under Mahathir that "One might have expected that, since the rulers and the Agung were symbols of 'Malayness' the Chinese would feel little loyalty to them. Paradoxically, they were quite pro-royalty, because they did not really trust Malay politicians. Indeed, they viewed the Agung and the rulers as protectors of their vital interests."

There seemed to be no way out of the impasse except by compromise – which is what happened. The Rulers agreed to the Constitutional (Amendment) Bill 1983 on the condition that many of its provisions were modified or repealed immediately with the introduction of the Constitution (Amendment) Bill 1984.

The new bill, passed in January 1984, meant that the King could now only delay a piece of non-money legislation for a month. It then had to be sent back to Parliament with his objections. If the King still opposed it in the form in which Parliament then passed it, he could only delay it for another month before it was gazetted as law.

The King could therefore only delay legislation for up to two months before it became the law of the land.

But this principle was no longer extended to the State level: Sultans still needed to assent to State bills before they became law, which was an important symbolic victory. Most importantly for those who feared Dr Mahathir's supposed plan to concentrate power in his own hands, the bill removed the proposed ability of the Prime Minister to declare an Emergency by himself, and restored it to the King.

Nonetheless, Dr Mahathir saw himself as having won, declaring at a victory rally in Malacca that the feudal system had ended. He had brought his theatrical, confrontational, unapologetically antagonistic style to a high-stakes arena and had, by some accounts at least, triumphed over the Malay Rulers.

He quickly moved to consolidate his gains. Stories had been circulating that the head of the army, Jen Tan Sri Mohd Zain Hashim, was opposed to Mahathir's approach and believed the armed force's loyalty lay with the Rulers. Mohd Zain took early retirement. This was followed by a reorganisation of the army and some 500 other early retirements and dismissals.

When the independent-minded Sultan of Johor took over as Yang di-Pertuan Agong in 1984, some feared (and some hoped) that royal activism would reassert itself.

As Roger Kershaw writes in Monarchy In South-East Asia: Faces of Tradition in Transition, "From the beginning, the Agong had made no secret of his contempt for Mahathir on the grounds of his mixed blood, calling him, to his face, 'Mamak' (a derogatory nickname for those of Indian Muslim ancestry). [?] But Dr Mahathir had proved more than a match for this difficult sovereign. Having got the measure of the King's essential vanity and exhibitionism, he prudently pandered to it, even to the extent of placing a more convenient Royal Malaysian Airforce helicopter at his permanent disposal?."

Through this and other measures, Dr Mahathir maintained good relations with the new King, enlisting him in his 1987 move against the judiciary, the effects of which are still felt today.

The Prime Minister's campaign continued. He silenced the Rulers over the issue of the 1987 ISA detentions; staged a hostile debate on the monarchy in the 1990 Umno general assembly after the loss of Kelantan to PAS; removed the Rulers' immunity to prosecution following the constitutional crisis of 1992-93; stripped away their flights, outriders, and special hospital wards; and in 1994, with little opposition, finally removed the need to obtain the Rulers' assent for State laws.

Looking back, we can see how the bars of the yellow silk cage began to go up in 1983, closing in year after year.

Should we find it surprising, then, that after 25 years the tigers within should want to break free? Can we not understand that the Rulers might want to regain what has been lost?

And here is the hardest question of all: without giving up our democratic ideals, in a cynical and disloyal age, can we find a way to let our Rulers rule?

Huzir Sulaiman writes for theatre, film, television, and newspapers.

 

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved