Sabtu, 24 September 2011

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Dr M chews out MCA over quit threat

Posted: 24 Sep 2011 07:21 AM PDT

(The Malaysian Insider) - Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad chided MCA today for lacking the Barisan Nasional (BN) spirit, after the party threatened to quit the coalition if Umno pushes for the implementation of hudud law.

The country's longest-serving prime minister said the Chinese party was handing political foes DAP with ammunition ahead of an expected general election, saying that an MCA exit would fracture BN to the benefit of the opposition.

"We did not say we would or not (implement hudud). We didn't say anything," the former prime minister was quoted saying in a Bernama Online report today.

"There was no call for them to make the statement."

Dr Chua made the threat yesterday following Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin's statement that said Umno was also in support of the hudud law. Gerakan later expressed similar intent.

Muhyiddin later said Dr Chua had made his warning without fully comprehending Umno's stand on hudud.

The Umno deputy president explained that his party has always been clear that it supports hudud in principle, but could not enact the Islamic laws as Malaysia was not ready for them yet.

READ MORE HERE

 

 

No room for ‘personal views’, Anwar told

Posted: 23 Sep 2011 06:11 PM PDT

Karpal Singh tells the opposition leader that the latter's personal views will be construed as the party's official stand.

(Free Malaysia Today) - DAP national chairman Karpal Singh took a swipe at Pakatan Rakyat supremo Anwar Ibrahim over the latter's "personal view" on the implementation of Islamic law in the PAS-run state of Kelantan.

According to the veteran politician, leaders who held high positions did not have the luxury of expressing personal stands.

"There is no such thing as a personal view when one is in a top political position. When you are a top leader, your views would be construed and perceived as the official party stand," he said.

On Thursday, Anwar, the de facto leader of PKR, which forms the backbone of Pakatan, said he believes that in princple, Islamic law could be implemented in Kelantan.

"Looking at specific areas, there is clear guarantee of an administration of justice and it does not in any way infringe on the rights of non-Muslims," said the opposition leader.

Anwar then added that it was his personal opinion.

In an immediate reaction, DAP stalwart Lim Kit Siang stressed that his party's stand regarding PAS' theocratic aims had been consistent.

"It is not suitable for Malaysia and it is not part of Pakatan's common policies," he noted.

Lim also said that any such change required the agreement of all three Pakatan component parties – PAS, DAP and PKR.

'Out of the blue'

Meanwhile, Karpal admitted that Pakatan was now embroiled in a controversy due to an unwarranted political statement from PAS spiritual adviser Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat regarding the Islamic state agenda.

He hoped that Nik Aziz's statement did not reflect the stand of the PAS leadership and called on its president Abdul Hadi Awang to clarify the matter.

READ MORE HERE

 

Karpal wants emergency top-level meet

Posted: 23 Sep 2011 04:29 PM PDT

The DAP leaders wants the Pakatan top leadership to hold an emergency meeting as soon as possible on PAS' Islamic state agenda.

(Free Malaysia Today) - DAP has called on Pakatan Rakyat to hold an emergency top leadership meeting to once and for all trash out the controversial PAS' Islamic state agenda.

Declaring that DAP would always oppose the establishment of an Islamic state, its national chairman Karpal Singh called on the Pakatan secretariat to immediately arrange for the meeting.

He said any delay to address the contentious matter would severely erode public confidence, especially among non-Muslims, on Pakatan.

He acknowledged that the controversial issue was of fundamental importance to Pakatan's chances of capturing the federal government.

"Public perception and confidence on Pakatan would be badly affected. Pakatan must quickly address and resolve such an important fundamental issue of governance. An emergency meeting must be held immediately to publicly clarify Pakatan's stand on the issue.

"The controversy must end once and for all," he told reporters during his Bukit Gelugor parliamentary constituency visit here today.

The Islamic state issue cropped out this week when Kelantan Menteri Besar and PAS adviser Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat declared the PAS state government's intention to implement hudud laws in the east-coast state.

He also said that PAS had not abandoned its goal to set up an Islamic state.

Karpal, a lawyer by profession, said the Islamic state could never be implemented in any part of Malaysia because the Federal Constitution did not allow it.

He said state constitutions and laws could never contravene provisions under the Federal Constitution, which advocated a secular state.

He insisted that those who drafted the Federal Constitution in 1957 ensured that the country remained secular to safeguard the interests and rights of a multiracial society.

He recalled that a five-man Supreme Court bench led bythen Lord President Mohamed Salleh Abas, declared that the country was a secular state in a landmark decision on a case in 1988.

He said former prime ministers Tunku Abdul Rahman and Hussein Onn also declared the country as secular.

Even though another former premier Dr Mahathir Mohamad claimed that Malaysia was an Islamic state, Karpal stressed that it was more of a "political than legal statement."

'No such thing as personal view'

As if adding spice to the controversy, PKR supremo and Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim expressed support for Nik Aziz. But the Permatang Pauh parliamentarian was quick to clarify that it was his personal stand.

However, Karpal felt otherwise. "There is no such thing as a personal view when one is in a top political position," he said.

"When you are a top leader, your views would be construed and perceived as the official party stand," he added.

READ MORE HERE

 

Chua should know Umno's stand on hudud: Muhyiddin

Posted: 23 Sep 2011 04:01 PM PDT

(Bernama) -- Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin said MCA president Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek and party leaders should have known Umno's stand on hudud law and should not be make it an issue.

The Deputy Prime Minister said Umno's stand remained the same and it should not have been raised by Barisan Nasional (BN) component parties as it was different than PAS.

"The issue mentioned by Chua does not arise. Don't create suspicion in the minds of the Chinese community and others including the Muslim community about the matter.

"The stand we take is not new but that was taken by our past leadership," he said when commenting Chua's tweet today that MCA would leave BN if Umno implements hudud law.

Muhyiddin said this to reporters after Friday prayers during his working visit to Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) campus here today.

Asked whether Chua's action was seen as a threat, he said the matter should not arise as the stand taken by Umno leaders was clear.

"I don't know whether Chua forgot about our (Umno) stand. It is not the same with PAS as we have our view. I believe Chua did not understand the real situation."

He said Umno had never rejected hudud law as it is part of Islamic law but is unsuitable for implementation now.

"Scholars can explain why we can't implement hudud law and this stand is not taken by Malaysia but also many other countries," he added.

Asked about the statement by PAS spiritual leader Datuk Nik Aziz Nik Mat that he was not concerned if DAP left the opposition for disagreeing with formation of an Islamic state and implementation of hudud in Kelantan, he said, "that's his problem."

He said since time immemorial, PAS and DAP did not agree on many things even although they are in the opposition coalition.

"It is not a real partnership. They may be sleeping on the same pillow but they have different dreams. They are heading for an imminent split.

"With election just around the corner, the issues are getting clearer. The people can judge between our firm stand and their (opposition) different views.

 

MCMC Censorship of ‘Undilah’ Video Absurd, Against the Spirit of Democracy

Posted: 23 Sep 2011 03:47 PM PDT

By Masjaliza Hamzah via Malaysian Digest

Centre for Independent Journalism (CIJ) is shocked to learn that the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) has issued a directive to broadcasters not to air a video promoting voting for the upcoming general election. MCMC's 'ban' of the Undilah project's public service announcement urging the rakyat to vote is absurd and against the spirit of democracy.

Media reports on 23 Sept 2011, quoting unnamed sources, said the MCMC letter to broadcast giants Media Prima and Astro cited two reasons behind the 'ban': BN MP Tengku Razaleigh's admission that Malaysia was facing problems and the appearance of Opposition politicians.

Apart from Pakatan Rakyat's Nurul Izzah Anwar, Tony Pua, Khalid Samad and Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad, the hip promo also featured two deputy ministers, celebrities such as Daphne Iking, and famous Malaysians Tony Fernandes and Lee Chong Wei rapping to a tune led by Namewee and Afdlin Shauki.

The 'ban' came just days after Prime Minister Najib Razak, in his Malaysia Day message, announced a set of reforms affecting civil liberties, and promised Malaysia was on the path towards being the world's best parliamentary democracy.

This latest case of censorship highlights the powers given to the MCMC to police broadcast and online content under the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 (CMA), which governs the multimedia and communications industry.

Given the politically-motivated nature of this directive from MCMC, CIJ wishes to highlight a few ironies in the composition and function of this "independent" commission which is under the direction of the Information, Communications and Culture Minister:

- under Section 71 and 72 of the CMA, reports of investigations are given to the Minister who may direct the Commission to publish what it deems to be of national interest;

READ MORE HERE.


Pakatan asks if all TV content needs censorship board nod

Posted: 23 Sep 2011 03:38 PM PDT

By Clara Chooi, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 24 — Opposition lawmakers today heaped suspicion on the reason that "Undilah" was pulled off the air and questioned if it is common practice for all such clips to be first vetted by the Film Censorship Board (FCB).

Expressing doubt over the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission's (MCMC) explanation that "Undilah" has yet to receive the board's approval, Petaling Jaya Utara MP Tony Pua (picture) asked if all content aired on television was subjected to such strict controls.

"I am sure there's plenty of content that does not need approval from the board first... like news programmes, live telecast, talk shows... not everything requires such approval, so where is the line drawn?" he said when contacted.

The DAP national publicity secretary, who is also featured in the 4.38-minute clip urging Malaysians to vote, agreed with MCA Youth chief Datuk Dr Wee Ka Siong's statement defending the clip this morning, saying it was merely an "innocent music video".

He said the MCMC, an independent regulatory body that reports to the Information, Communication and Culture Ministry, should instead focus on protecting consumers of telecommunications and multimedia companies such as the recent plan to charge service tax to prepaid mobile users.

"They should not be harping on petty, irrelevant things like simple music videos urging Malaysians to vote," he said.

PKR vice-president Nurul Izzah Anwar went a step further and demanded the commission rescind the ban and instead help to promote the video to Malaysians.

"I urge MCMC to reverse its order and promote the video as a step to strengthen democratic practices in our beloved country," she said in a statement.

The Lembah Pantai MP, who is also seen in the video, pointed out that the ban had come at a time when Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak had pledged to increase civil liberties by announcing reforms meant to provide more freedom to Malaysians.

"This PSA (public service announcement), in which I and numerous other Malaysian public figures participated, is a non-partisan rallying call for all Malaysians to stand up, register as voters, and let our voices be heard through the democratic process of voting in elections.

 

READ MORE HERE.

MCMC: ‘Undilah’ block nothing to do with contents

Posted: 23 Sep 2011 03:30 PM PDT

By Clara Chooi, The Malaysian Insider

CYBERJAYA, Sept 24 — The Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) claimed today that its decision to temporarily pull the "Undilah" video off the air was a routine measure that had nothing to do with the contents of the clip.

In a statement to national news agency Bernama today, the regulatory body said it was "normal practice" to stop the broadcast of such public service announcements (PSA) as it was yet to earn approval from the Film Censorship Board.

The commission said its decision was in accordance with "routine monitoring and enforcement activities" allowed under the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998.

"In relation to that, it has become common practice for the MCMC to order the retraction of contents yet to receive approval from the Film Censorship Board.

"In the case of the PSA produced by musician Pete Teo, as a result of a routine compliance monitoring exercise made by MCMC, it was found that approval had yet to be obtained from the board for the said PSA.

"As such, the PSA should not have been aired on television till approval is obtained," MCMC said in the statement.

Without the approval, the commission said Teo's 4.38-minute music video clip promoting the right to vote could not be aired on TV.

Pursuant to the 1998 Act, it added, all broadcasters must pull the video off the air immediately.

"This directive is about the compliance of broadcasters rather than the contents of the PSA," the commission said.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Top Catholic bishop tells non-Muslims to support hudud in Kelantan

Posted: 23 Sep 2011 02:13 PM PDT

(Harakah Daily) - A top Catholic bishop has thrown his support for the implementation of the Islamic criminal laws stipulating deterrent punishment on serious crimes, or hudud, in Kelantan, provided non-Muslims were given "a cast-iron guarantee that it will not be implemented on us".

In comments on the issue sparked by former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad's challenge to Kelantan Menteri Besar Tuan Guru Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat, Dr Paul Tan Chee Ing, president of the Catholic Bishops' Conference of Malaysia, said it was wise for non-Muslims not to oppose such laws among Muslims "if they so desire".

"I say it's time to allow Muslims in Kelantan, if they so desire, to implement shariah only for them and with that the hudud enactments provided non-Muslims are exempt from its implementation," online news portal Malaysiakini quoted Dr Paul, also the titular head of Catholics in the Melaka-Johor diocese, as saying.

His comments come in the wake of a statement by Mahathir that Nik Aziz should implement hudud in Kelantan now that the former was no longer the prime minister who had once sent a letter warning the PAS-led state against any attempt to introduce the Islamic laws.

In response, Nik Aziz said a prime ministerial decree would not expire with Mahathir's resignation, and called on the current PM Najib Razak to revoke the Federal government's earlier stance on the issue.

'Extraordinary man'

Giving his views, Dr Paul said the issue had to do with the debate between two different Islamic schools of theology, the 'rationalists' or Mu'tazilites, and the 'traditionalists', or Ash'arites.

"I don't know if that extraordinary man, the Kelantan menteri besar (Nik Aziz Nik Mat), is a Mutazilite or an Asharite. Sometimes he sounds like a Mu'tazilite, sometimes like an Ash'arite," said Dr Paul, who added that such an ambiguity was "a good thing".

"It shows he is not dogmatic. I say let him and all who hold with him have their way so long as non-Muslims have iron-clad guarantees of their exemption. I am in favour of Kelantan Muslims having hudud implemented for them only," the portal quoted him.

Prior to this, Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim (left) said he was personally in favour of hudud laws being introduced in Kelantan as it would ensure justice.

Earlier, the issue, regarded as highly contentious and which in the past created rifts between DAP and PAS, has instead laid bare cracks between MCA and UMNO.

MCA president Chua Soi Lek said the Chinese-based party would leave the Barisan Nasional coalition if UMNO supported hudud laws. This was in response to UMNO deputy president Muhyiddin Yasin's cautioned comments on Kelantan's long-fought battle with the Federal government over hudud, saying he was obligated as a Muslim to support hudud but differed on the timing of its implementation.

 

Zaid told: Apologise, quit or get sacked

Posted: 23 Sep 2011 08:06 AM PDT

He should return to Umno, says Kita executive Zahrein Zakariah.

(Free Malaysia Today) - Kita president Zaid Ibrahim's recent controversial and solitary decisions have earned him three options from a party leader – apologise, resign or prepare to be ousted.

Zahrein Zakariah, a member of Kita's central executive committee, today issued a second call for Zaid's resignation, saying the party no longer needed him. He suggested that he return to Umno.

"I will continue calling for his resignation," Zahrein told FMT. "Nothing changes. I will rally the others to bring him down. And then we will introduce a new decision-making system which will be bottom-up."

Asked if Kita could function without Zaid, he replied, "Yes it can. I repeat, Kita is not Zaid and Zaid is not Kita."

Zaid began courting dissent when he sacked three party leaders. It sparked accusations of tyranny and persistent flouting of party protocol.

He exacerbated the uproar when he apologised to Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak for doubting his political will to make reforms. His most recent controversial move was to announce a Kita Democracy Roadshow to garner support for Najib's reform pledges.

Zahrein said Zaid did not consult anyone in the party leadership on the roadshow, adding that members were angry, viewing the move as another one of his "apple polishing antics".

Scandal list

He expressed incredulity at Zaid's support of a prime minister and government that had "clearly lost the people's confidence" and had "killed democracy".

"Maybe Zaid Ibrahim believes in Najib, but Kita does not," Zahrein said. "Barisan Nasional is failing big time and Kita wants nothing to do with it."

He rattled off a list of "scandals" that he said had erupted since Najib came into power, including the Perak coup, the church burnings, the Teoh Beng Hock case and the accusations of corruption in the purchase of Scorpene submarines.

"Zaid can talk for himself," he said. "He can polish all the apples he wants, but Kita will not follow.

"There is no Kita roadshow for Najib. Zaid can call it the Royal Malaysian Circus for all we care.

"Zaid is a one-man show and he is leading Kita in the wrong direction. Kita is a social justice movement aimed at setting things straight in Malaysia and it makes no sense for us to support Najib."

Zahrein disagreed with party leaders who had said that Kita's image remained intact despite Zaid.

READ MORE HERE

 

Outside force working to destroy Kita

Posted: 23 Sep 2011 08:04 AM PDT

Kita central executive committee member KS Kottapan says that there is a puppet-master orchestrating the attacks against Zaid Ibrahim.

(Free Malaysia Today) - Certain money-minded leaders are the cause of the rift in Kita, central executive committee member KS Kottapan claimed today.

He said that these leaders, who have been openly criticising party president Zaid Ibrahim in the past two weeks, wanted to drive the party in the wrong direction.

He added that some of these critics have been sacked by the party. He also alleged that these sacked leader were being manipulated by some outside force to destabilise Kita.

"I received a telephone call on Sept 13 midnight from a party leader, inviting me for a meeting. He said he was organising the meeting without Zaid's knowledge, and aimed at toppling Zaid as the party chief," he told FMT today.

However, the meeting did not take place as the said leader was sacked from the party the next day.

"I strongly believe someone from behind the screen is the puppet master. He is orchestrating the attacks on Zaid and Kita," Kottapan said.

He added that the party has started investigating its internal problems involving the so-called "unhappy" leaders.

"We will get rid of all these viruses which are affecting Kita," he said.

Kita has been rocked by internal turmoil following the sacking of its central executive committee member Muhammad Firdaus Christopher on Sept 14. Firdaus was also in charge of the party's administration.

Along with Firdous, party secretary-general Abdul Latif Abdul Tambi and former treasurer Rashid Azad Khan were also given the boot for insulting Zaid and working against the party's interest.

In retaliation, the trio charged that Zaid held a tight grip over the party, often acting as a dictator. They also said that there was no transparency in the nine-month-old party.

In recent days, several state Kita leaders have joined hands with the trio in attacking Zaid. Some have even called for Zaid to step down and hand over the party to younger leaders.

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Nik Aziz's wily hudud agenda

Posted: 23 Sep 2011 04:41 PM PDT

Karpal might be thinking that he was dealing with more oddities: in response to Anwar, Karpal was "somewhat taken aback" with the stand of his client in the sodomy trial but avowed that Anwar's stance was "personal and it does not reflect the stand of the PKR". Karpal is correct on his prognosis of Anwar, who is in it for his self-preservation simply because his trial on charges of sodomising a young male aide would have been a non-starter if hudud laws were applied.

New Straits Times Editorial

PAS, or at least its feisty spiritual leader Datuk Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat, wants to desperately reinstitute its Islamic state and hudud agenda barely three months after it shelved its most cherished dream to make way for a tenuous but politically expedient welfare/benevolent state.

You have to ask why Nik Aziz, who is also the Kelantan menteri besar, would risk resuming a feud with the DAP. Wasn't it Pas which rebranded itself when it surprisingly forged the "welfare/benevolent" state policy while electing that non-ulama political jester Mohamad Sabu as the party's new deputy president.

It could not be a coincidence. The shelving of the Islamic state goal was embraced by Pas' Pakatan partners, the DAP and PKR.

Even the feistier former PM Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad wryly remarked that DAP's Karpal Singh emerged the true winner after rebuffing the Pas ideal for years.

That was that but suddenly, the nation was riveted by the controversy that Mat Sabu outrageously ignited: he re-classified the Communist terrorists who massacred the 25 Malay police officers and their families in Bukit Kepong decades ago as "freedom fighters" on the basis that the dead were "British" officers.

Even Karpal and his senior DAP colleague Tunku Abdul Aziz, for their entire critical stance against the BN government, could not so stomach Mat Sabu's historical revisionism that they categorically made their feelings known in the mainstream media.

A month of intense debates later came Nik Aziz's startling pronouncement: initially Pas was to discuss with PKR and DAP on the idea of forming an Islamic state, but this was quickly upgraded into total dismissal of anything the DAP might have to object.

Karpal steadfastly rejected Pas' Islamic state pursuit as unconstitutional and impossible to implement. Kedah Pas wasn't enthusiastic while religious maverick, Dr Asri Zainul Abidin, articulated that hudud laws were unsuitable because the time was not conducive.

Sensing an opportunity, PKR de facto leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim backed Nik Aziz's declaration while asserting that in principle, Islamic law could be implemented without infringing non-Muslim rights.

Karpal might be thinking that he was dealing with more oddities: in response to Anwar, Karpal was "somewhat taken aback" with the stand of his client in the sodomy trial but avowed that Anwar's stance was "personal and it does not reflect the stand of the PKR".

Karpal is correct on his prognosis of Anwar, who is in it for his self-preservation simply because his trial on charges of sodomising a young male aide would have been a non-starter if hudud laws were applied.

The strict demand that FOUR morally-upright witnesses be produced as opposed to the alleged victim's testimony supported by DNA evidence was Anwar's natural defence. In the meantime, it didn't take long before Pas' (or Nik Aziz's) true form re-emerged. That hardcore essence of pursuing the Islamic state and execution of hudud laws is in their DNA. It is like instructing a scorpion not to sting.

It is obvious that Nik Aziz loathed the "welfare/benevolent" concept to begin with when the party chartered that vision to appease its political partners on the thought that it could swing voters should a snap general election they cavort be called.

But force of habit compelled the wily old guard to revert his position, thus triggering the old feud with Karpal and his secular soul mates.

But what does this lead to? The return to the old political bread and butter issues are understandable but eventually problematic because it still clashes with the Federal Constitution besides the bad blood with the DAP.

Pas is fond of accusing Dr Mahathir as the influential individual who barred the formation of an Islamic state in Kelantan but that's convenient scapegoating and cannot be a long-term plan.

The government, from the time of the founding fathers right to Dr Mahathir's era and now to the Najib administration has found it fit to retain Malaysia's moderateness while installing sensible Islamisation policies, a framework secularists have accommodated all these years.

Here are possible scenarios for Nik Aziz's abrupt reversal:

- Could it be that Mat Sabu's blighted history lesson was to distract detractors from his personal peccadillos; and,

- Because of Mat Sabu's indiscretion, Nik Aziz's born-again declaration was to avert a simmering electoral fall-out.

In Nik Aziz's supposition: better to reconvene the feud with the DAP on the Islamic state quandary rather than get kicked in the rear by voters, especially former soldiers who valiantly fought the terrorists, on Mat Sabu's poorly-judged departure from conventional wisdom that was a closure for the nation a long time ago.


Using hudud card to rally support

Posted: 23 Sep 2011 08:30 AM PDT

Realising that Barisan Nasional is making strides with Malay support, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim is now openly embracing hudud law in support of PAS' ambition. His move may cost him the votes of non-Malays and moderate Muslims.

COMMENT By BARADAN KUPPUSAMY, The Star

AGAINST great risk of losing the support from non-Malay voters, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has come out to endorse hudud law in Kelantan, backing PAS spiritual leader Datuk Nik Aziz Nik Mat's plan to implement the law and set up an Islamic state in the state.

The Opposition Leader's backing, although he said was in his personal capacity, is hugely different from his earlier commitment to religious pluralism and a multi-ethnic, secular society governed by secular, man-made laws.

The sudden change in attitude is a recognition on the part of PKR and PAS that they are rapidly losing Malay support with their concession to and dalliance with non-Malays, especially the Chinese voters.

This recognition had slowly dawned on them but was accelerated by the "Mat Sabu" incident in which PAS deputy president Mohamed Sabu has come under persistent fire for saying that the 26 policemen and their families who died defending the Bukit Kepong police station in 1950 against a band of communists led by Mat Indera, were not the real heroes.

The real heroes are Mat Indera and his communist band, Mat Sabu had claimed.

The incident has riled up many Malays and over 1,000 police reports were made.

Mat Sabu might have been charged for criminal defamation, but the case has strongly moved the Malay emotion and has become a rallying point against PAS.

No senior PAS leader has come to the defence of Mat Sabu who was left to manage the crisis on his own.

Umno has used the Mat Sabu case as a national rallying point whipping up strong reaction against him and PAS, accusing them as unpatriotic and showing little respect for the nation's founding fathers, Tunku Abdul Rahman and Datuk Onn Jaafar.

Constant reminders in the mainstream media that PAS had abandoned Islam and that it better drop the word "Islam" from its name has begun to rattle the party as well.

It is true that the party had abandoned its Islamic state policy for a welfare state at its last muktamar in July.

It also went on to elect Mat Sabu, a non-ulama who doesn't wear a turban and Arabic clothes, to its second highest elected office.

DAP especially was overjoyed with the way things had turned out at the PAS muktamar. But now that Anwar has sided with Nik Aziz on hudud, it has been left holding a time bomb in its lap.

DAP chairman Karpal Singh has always pointed out that hudud law was unconstitutional and the Federal Constitution would have to be amended to implement it.

That's why although the hudud law was passed in Kelantan and later in Terengganu, they were never implemented without the Federal Government's active support.

Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin said on Thursday that the Federal Government would not implement hudud law as Malaysian society was not ready for it and investors would get worried.

It appears that Anwar, after years of preaching pluralism and Islamic moderation has come out in support of hudud law in Kelantan saying it was clear and would administer justice for their intended purposes.

It is a blow to all Anwarites. Both PAS and PKR are now seeking to win over the Malays with this sudden and fundamental change in policy towards hudud.

After four years, they now realise that only DAP would stand to benefit from their dalliance with the non-Malays.

But it is too late in the day to reverse track and try to appease the fundamentalist Malays with the promise of an Islamic state.

By coming out in support of hudud they are also alienating many Ma­­lays who oppose the law and had supported PKR's multi-racialism.

That section of support for PKR is also now in danger with Anwar's readiness to embrace hudud law in Kelantan.

The nation was founded on one set of secular laws and only one.

To introduce another set, no matter if it does not involve non-Muslims, is a radical move without precedent and will significantly impact on every facet of our life.

DAP, which has championed secular law, must come out in the open now and state whether it too supports hudud on the grounds that it does not involved non-Muslims.

What about the moderate Muslims who oppose hudud but support DAP?

The issue is fundamental and sits at the core of the relationship among Pakatan Rakyat parties.

Can they run and carry a theological party like PAS whose only ambition is to create an Islamic state?

Nik Aziz has made himself very clear on the matter. He is all for hudud law in Kelantan and when Pakatan Rakyat captures the country, for all of Malaysia.

That has been the pillar of PAS' struggle since the party's inception in 1951.

Politicians are ruled by political expediency and Anwar is no different. Realising that he is losing crucial Malay support, Anwar is forced to come out to endorse hudud law and support Nik Aziz's plan in Kelantan, leaving DAP out in the cold.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Top 10 Reasons why Hudud is good

Posted: 23 Sep 2011 12:59 PM PDT

By John Doe

So much talk about the Hudud. Why question Allah? Any good Muslim would know, and should know what the Quran says. Here is my top ten list. And who says that the Hudud does not affect non-Muslims? Tell those who say that to shut up and cower in shame for their ignorance !!

You want progress? Then follow the words of Allah to the "T". Otherwise, leave Islam. There is NO VERSE in the Quran which prescribes stoning in Islam for Apostasy. Again, have ANYONE show you a single verse in the Quran which prescribes "Death by Stoning" from the Quran. GIVE ME ONE VERSE !!!

In no particular order, I'll list the top 10 reasons why Hudud should be implemented in Malaysia. The following 10 are from the Quran. I will leave out COMPLETELY any reference to the Hadiths for now, for there will be far too many arguments about which Hadith is true, untrue, real, false, fake and so on. 
 
Call the following list, The Quranic Ten Commandments if you wish.

1. The Obedient Wive's Club is almost correct. They forgot to tell you that in Surah 4:34 and I quote:
"Men are the maintainers of women because Allah has made some of them to excel others and because they spend out of their property; the good women are therefore obedient, guarding the unseen as Allah has guarded; and (as to) those on whose part you fear desertion, admonish them, and leave them alone in the sleeping-places and beat them; then if they obey you, do not seek a way against them; surely Allah is High, Great."

In other words, wives must comply with every single demand by their husbands. Be it a blow-job on demand, or any other requests made whether it is "better than a prostitute or not". Similarly, if a husband demands that a wife have plastic surgery to look more like Megan Fox, she also cannot refuse, or else, she should be punished by beating, and perhaps repeated beatings if necessary. This is obedience. Failure to do so is disobedience, and deserves a beating. For this is precisely written by Allah, and must be followed.

2. Who dares to say that Allah is a sexist? Allah is NOT prejudiced against gender at all !! Read Surah 5:38, and I quote:

"As for the thief, both male and female, cut off their hands. It is the reward of their own deeds, an exemplary punishment from Allah. Allah is Mighty, Wise."

If Allah was a sexist, he would have only said cut the hands off a particular gender. Allah did not. Therefore, Allah is NOT a sexist. If you persist to go against the will of Allah, then apply Surah 5:33, and I quote:
 
"The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter;"

Now you cannot say that you do not know. It is however unclear if the person who wages war against Allah has the option to choose between leaving the country vs execution or crucifixion, but regardless, Allah is great.

3. This has to do with orphans. And perhaps more to do with widows, as written in Surah 4:3 and I quote:
 
"If ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly with the orphans, Marry women of your choice, Two or three or four; but if ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one, or (a captive) that your right hands possess, that will be more suitable, to prevent you from doing injustice."

I am strongly suggesting that this verse has everything to do with the fact that the second wife either MUST be an orphan or a widow. (The waiting period for a widow is 3 months.) If it is indeed so, then why not? Personally, it means 3 less mother-in-laws to deal with. And that is not necessarily a bad thing.

4. Islam allows you to marry underaged girls. Be they your first, second, third or fourth wife. Only the uneducated have not read Surah 65:4, and I quote:

"Such of your women as have passed the age of monthly courses, for them the prescribed period, if ye have any doubts, is three months, and for those who have no courses (it is the same): for those who carry (life within their wombs), their period is until they deliver their burdens: and for those who fear Allah, He will make their path easy."

The Arabic version is here:
واللائي يئسن من المحيض من نسائكم ان ارتبتم فعدتهن ثلاثة اشهر واللائي لم يحضن واولات الاحمال اجلهن ان يضعن حملهن ومن يتق الله يجعل له من امره يسرا

and the phonetic way to pronounce it is as follows:
 
"Waalla-ee ya-isna mina almaheedi min nisa-ikum ini irtabtum faAAiddatuhunna thalathatu ashhurin waalla-ee lam yahidna waolatu al-ahmali ajaluhunna an yadaAAna hamlahunna waman yattaqi Allaha yajAAal lahu min amrihi yusran"

"Wallaee Lam yahidhna" which means "those who have not menstruated yet" This group of females are pre-pubescent girls who have not yet menstruated. Anyone who opposes this is violation of Allah's will, and is subject to number 2 stated above.

5. Should a declaration of war occur, like how Anwar Ibrahim declared War in Nov of 2009, then he can take any of the women or children as his future wives. It comes from Surah 33:50, and I quote:

"O Prophet! We have made lawful to thee thy wives to whom thou hast paid their dowers; and those whom thy right hand possesses out of the prisoners of war whom Allah has assigned to thee; and daughters of thy paternal uncles and aunts, and daughters of thy maternal uncles and aunts, who migrated (from Makka) with thee; and any believing woman who dedicates her soul to the Prophet if the Prophet wishes to wed her;- this only for thee, and not for the Believers (at large); We know what We have appointed for them as to their wives and the captives whom their right hands possess;- in order that there should be no difficulty for thee. And Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful."

Ibrahim Ali has declared Jihad recently. He is not living up to his promise. He should be punished severely. SImilarly, why hasn't Hishamuddin nor Najib bathed any Keris in Chinese blood yet? Are they really that incompetent? They too should be punished severely !!

6. Those who do not observe the mandatory rest day called the Sabbath shall experience reverse-evolution, and become themselves monkeys, or as KJ puts it, Beruk. It is in Surah 33:4, and I quote:

"And you know well the story of those among you who broke Sabbath. We said to them: "Be apes—despised and hated by all. Thus We made their end a warning to the people of their time and succeeding generation, and an admonition for God-fearing people."

The Sabbath by the way, is NOT on Sunday, but actually on a Friday. (Get your facts straight. And the correct way to pronounce it is similar to pronouncing the word Sabah (one of two Colony-States in East Malaysia)

7. The Quran previously did not allow for the adoption of children, as prescribed in Surah 33:4, and I quote:

"God did not make your adopted son as your own sons. To declare them so is your empty claim. God's word is righteous and constitutes true guidance."

however, three verses later, it allows adoption, as plainly states in Surah 33:37, and I quote:

"After a term of married life with her husband, We permitted you to marry her so that it may hence be legitimate and morally blameless for a believer to marry the wife of his adopted son provided that wife has already been divorced. That is God's commandment which must be fulfilled."

and not only does it allow for adoption, one can now marry his adopted son's ex-wife. I do not make these things up. It is decreed by Allah, and cannot be thus, challenged.

8. Malaysian Courts are unIslamic. They do not follow what is clearly stated in the Quran. Just to prove it, I will make a longer quote this time. Read every bit of Surah 2:82, and I quote:

"O you who believe! when you deal with each other in contracting a debt for a fixed time, then write it down; and let a scribe write it down between you with fairness; and the scribe should not refuse to write as Allah has taught him, so he should write; and let him who owes the debt dictate, and he should be careful of (his duty to) Allah, his Lord, and not diminish anything from it; but if he who owes the debt is unsound in understanding, or weak, or (if) he is not able to dictate himself, let his guardian dictate with fairness; and call in to witness from among your men two witnesses; but if there are not two men, then one man and two women from among those whom you choose to be witnesses, so that if one of the two errs, the second of the two may remind the other; and the witnesses should not refuse when they are summoned; and be not averse to writing it (whether it is) small or large, with the time of its falling due; this is more equitable in the sight of Allah and assures greater accuracy in testimony, and the nearest (way) that you may not entertain doubts (afterwards), except when it is ready merchandise which you give and take among yourselves from hand to hand, then there is no blame on you in not writing it down; and have witnesses when you barter with one another, and let no harm be done to the scribe or to the witness; and if you do (it) then surely it will be a transgression in you, and be careful of (your duty) to Allah, Allah teaches you, and Allah knows all things."

You must have the equivalent of 2 women for every male witness in the event of disparity. Similarly, the Quran speaks nothing of CCTV recordings, and as such, it cannot be allowed in court. However, since Allah is great, you can show the CCTV recordings to the appropriate number of men, which is a minimum of 4, or 8 female witnesses; and then, they in turn, can be eye witnesses to the alleged Crime, and thus testify in Court. CCTV's is Allah's great way of allowing humans to travel back in time.

9. Make no bones about it, female children should not complain about how inheritance is divided. If you do complain, you have obviously not read Surah 9:29, and I quote:

"Allah enjoins you concerning your children: The male shall have the equal of the portion of two females; then if they are more than two females, they shall have two-thirds of what the deceased has left, and if there is one, she shall have the half; and as for his parents, each of them shall have the sixth of what he has left if he has a child, but if he has no child and (only) his two parents inherit him, then his mother shall have the third; but if he has brothers, then his mother shall have the sixth after (the payment of) a bequest he may have bequeathed or a debt; your parents and your children, you know not which of them is the nearer to you in usefulness; this is an ordinance from Allah: Surely Allah is Knowing, Wise."
 
Lawyers, do take note fo this when writing wills in future.

10. Those lazy or incompetent Muslims have obviously not read Surah 9:29, and I quote:

"Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Messenger have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth, out of those who have been given the Book, until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection."

nor have you read Surah 9:5, and I quote:
 
"When the sacred months are over slay the idolaters wherever you find them. Arrest them, besiege them, and lie in ambush everywhere for them. If they repent and take to prayer and render the alms levy, allow them to go their way. God is forgiving and merciful."

And just so that people cannot say that I am taking things out of context, I shall reproduce Surah 9:1-8, so that all may be enlightened.

9:1 A declaration of immunity from God and His apostle to the idolaters with whom you have made agreements:

9:2 For four months you shall go unmolested in the land. But know that you shall not escape God's judgement, and that God will humble the unbelievers.

9:3 A proclamation to the people from God and His apostle on the day of the greater pilgrimage:

God and His apostle are under no obligation to the idolaters. If you repent, it shall be well with you; but if you give no heed, know that you shall not be immune from God's judgement. 

Proclaim a woeful punishment to the unbelievers, 

9:4 except to those idolaters who have honoured their treaties with you in every detail and aided none against you. With these keep faith, until their treaties have run their term. God loves the righteous.

9:5 When the sacred months are over slay the idolaters wherever you find them. Arrest them, besiege them, and lie in ambush everywhere for them. If they repent and take to prayer and render the alms levy, allow them to go their way. God is forgiving and merciful.

9:6 If an idolater seeks asylum with you, give him protection so that he may hear the Word of God, and then convey him to safety. For the idolaters are ignorant men.

9:7 God and His apostle repose no trust in idolaters, save those with whom you have made treaties at the Sacred Mosque. So long as they keep faith with you, keep faith with them. God loves the righteous.

9:8 How can you trust them? If they prevail against you they will respect neither agreements nor ties of kindred. They flatter you with their tongues, but their hearts reject you. Most of them are evil doers.

This needs to be preached in every Mosque, and every Muslim household shall take note. If you are unhappy with it, then perhaps you can consider leaving Islam, and I quote Surah al-Baqarah, 2:256, Allah explicitly states: "Let there be no compulsion in religion."

Additionally, in Surah Yunus, 10:99, and I quote:

"Had your Lord willed, everyone on earth would have believed. Do you then force people to become believers?"

The above verse also contradicts the Rukunegara, because "the unbelievers" also includes Atheists and Agnostics. 
Hence, "Kepercayaan kepada Tuhan" is flawed, and is justified by Surah Yunus 10:99.

Coming back to the Apostacy issue, let me remind everyone here that it is NEVER prescribed in the Quran where Apostates are to be stoned. Anyone who practises stoning-to-death is NOT FOLLOWING THE QURAN. And I will end with the last verse of  Surah An-Nisa', 4:137, and I quote:

"those who believe, then disbelieve, then believe again, then disbelieve, and then increase in their disbelief - Allah will never forgive them nor guide them to the path."

Read again... "believe, disbelieve, believe, disbelieve, and increase in their disbelief" refers to the wishy-washy. And that only says that Allah will NOT forgive them nor guide them to the path. It says NOTHING about fines, re-education classes nor stoning them to death !! JAKIM, JAIS do take note. It says that "Allah will NOT guide them to the path". In other words, Allah will LEAVE THEM ALONE !!!

So, in conclusion, Hudud vs non-Hudud has nothing to do with who wins the next elections. If you want to be a Muslim, then one must abide by the Hudud, and the Syariah. If not, then leave Islam. One cannot be wishy-washy about this. After all, there is no such thing as a semi-virgin.

If you have not read the Quran, then perhaps it is time to read it. If Allah did not intend for humans to read and understand it, then he would have written it in an Extra-Terrestrial Language. He did not. It was meant for humans to read it.

I rest my case.

PostScript:

The MACC is in direct violation of Surah 2:82, and I quote:
 
"let no harm be done to the scribe or to the witness; and if you do (it) then surely it will be a transgression in you, and be careful of (your duty) to Allah, Allah teaches you, and Allah knows all things."
 
So far, 2 witnesses have died under your care. Syariah Courts, do take note of this.
 
 
 

Voting registration

Posted: 23 Sep 2011 12:16 PM PDT

Below is the mail I received from SPR and below that are all the mails that we have been sending back and forth to each other. Just to refresh, my name is Shaman Narayanasamy, IC no.: (edited by admin), a Malaysian student in Helsinki, Finland. I have been wanting to REGISTER AS A VOTER for the past month or so. Please note once again, that I am NOT registering to be a postal voter yet. I want to register to be able to vote. I am NOT in the electoral roll and I am very aware of the fact. I have all the necessary documents to be able to register.
 
Based on the reply I got from SPR, I am eligible and fit the criteria to register as a voter. Just like their website, they insist that I will be able to register at the "Pesuruhjaya Tinggi". However, this has not been the case. From the mails below, we see all the announcements in media and confirmation from SPR themselves but I still failed at registering myself as a voter despite the claim of the facilities to do so overseas.

Note that I am CC-ing this mail to various people from SPR, Pengarah SPR Selangor (since I am from Selangor), Setiausaha Pejabat Pengerusi SPR and Setiausaha Naib Pengerusi SPR. I do not know if I am mailing the right people, but I would like some action to be taken instead of forwarding and regurgitating information/rules/announcements/news which I can find and read for myself in various websites. I was disappointed to receive such a reply from "sistem aduan SPR" who basically re-stated what is written in their website that I can read myself but not really getting into my case personally.

I am not trying to cause problems for anyone, but I just want to obtain my right to be a voter. I am ashamed that I did not register as a voter back in Malaysia and I apologize for that. I really hope that this issue is taken seriously and not just ignored. I hope that I would finally be able to register as a voter.

Best regards,
Shaman 


----- Forwarded Message -----
From: Sistem Aduan SPR <aduan@sistemaduan.spr.gov.my>
To: shaman
Cc: yusniati@spr.gov.my
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2011 4:36 AM
Subject: Jawapan Aduan/Maklumbalas AD-850113106057-2011-09-19-131421

Tuan, Terima kasih atas minat tuan dalam urusan pilihan raya khususnya terhadap bidang pendaftaran pemilih. Untuk makluman tuan,semakan telah dibuat ke atas rekod nombor kad pengenalan tuan,dan hasilnya didapati bahawa nama tuan masih belum tersenarai dalam daftar pemilih SPR.Untuk melayakkan tuan untuk menjadi seorang pemilih tuan mestilah; a)seorang warganegara Malaysia b)berumur 21 tahun atau lebih c)bermastautin / tinggal dalam mana-mana bahagian pilihan raya yang hendak didaftarkan. d)tidak hilang kelayakan sebagai pemilih Bagi warganegara Malaysia di luar Negara, permohonan untuk mendaftar sebagai pemilih boleh dibuat dengan HADIR SENDIRI dan membawa kad pengenalan milik sendiri dan mengisi borang pendafatran maklumat alamat di luar Negara di mana-mana pejabat Pesuruhjaya Tinggi atau Keduataan Malaysia atau pejabat Konsulat Malaysia di luar negara seperti yang berikut: a)http://www.kln.gov.my/bm/?page=mission Sekiranya tuan adalah seorang pelajar sepenuh masa yang sedang belajar di luar Negara atau pasangan kepada pelajar tersebut atau seorang penjawat awam yang sedang bertugas di luar Negara atau pasangan kepada penjawat awam tersebut,maka tuan adalah layak untuk mendaftar sebagai pemilih tidak hadir dengan syarat mengemukakan dalam Borang Pendaftaran dan dikepilkan bersama borang tersebut. Sekiranya tuan mempunyai sebarang pertanyaan lanjut berhubung perkara ini, tuan bolehlah menghubungi PEJABAT PILIHAN RAYA NEGERI SELANGOR,LOT 03-11,TINGKAT 3,KOMPLEKS PKNS,40690 SHAH ALAM,SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN di talian 03-5519 4273,5511 1806. Sekian semoga maklumat ini dapat membantu. Selamat Mendaftar dan Selamat Mengundi.


----- Forwarded Message -----
From: shaman
To: "receptionist@malaysianembassy.fi" <receptionist@malaysianembassy.fi>
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 3:07 PM
Subject: Re: Voting registration

Hi Jerlene,

Regarding the matter below. The "Form A" is available for online on the SPR website. Can I register through the embassy now since this service is available?

Best,
Shaman


From: "receptionist@malaysianembassy.fi" <receptionist@malaysianembassy.fi>
To: shaman
Cc: "ts@malaysianembassy.fi" <ts@malaysianembassy.fi>
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 12:03 PM
Subject: RE: Voting registration

Dear Shaman,

Thank you for your email. As spoken yesterday, the Election Commission is in the process of changing the law for allowing Malaysians residing abroad to vote. An extract of the news as follows:

"All Malaysian registered voters residing overseas WILL SOON be able to vote via post.

According to Election Commission chairperson Abdul Aziz Yusof, this will "hopefully happen in the next general election".

Speaking to reporters in Kuala Lumpur today, he said that the EC is CURRENTLY IN THE PROCESS OF AMENDING THE ELECTION RULES to allow this.

The change in election rules will expand the postal vote from only civil servants and full-time students and their spouses."


Some news article about the election. You must register as a voter if you have not registered in Malaysia.
http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2011/8/25/nation/20110825124644&sec=nation

http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?sec=nation&file=/2011/8/26/nation/9370989


We will keep you informed on this election matter once we received any information from Malaysia.

Yours sincerely,
Jerlene Wallenius

Embassy of Malaysia
Aleksanterinkatu 17
00100 Helsinki
Tel: 010 320 2030
Fax: 010 320 2041
______________________________
__________
From: shaman
Sent: 30 August 2011 11:51
To: receptionist@malaysianembassy.fi
Subject: Voting registration

Dear sir/maam,

My name is Shaman Narayanasamy and I came to register as a voter yesterday at the embassy as I did not register as a voter back in Malaysia. However, I did not manage to do so because the embassy was not prepared to handle such a case. Below is a video of the announcement which clearly shows the EC chairman saying that you can register as a voter in the embassy:

http://malaysiakini.tv/video/22240/postal-votes-to-be-extended-to-all-msians-overseas.html

Please look into the issue and keep me updated regarding this issue as soon as possible.

Best regards,
Shaman
Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


MACC’S Appeal against Dato’ Ramli Yusuff is sheer buffoonery

Posted: 23 Sep 2011 06:23 PM PDT

You may recall that Dato Abdul Razak is the top notch MACC lawyer who appeared on behalf of A-G Gani Patail, as the Public Prosecutor, who had lodged and lost several appeals against the acquittals granted by various Courts to Dato' Ramli.

This Dato' Musa (above) gained fame on Youtube as the MACC lawyer who tried to strangulate himself in order to demonstrate how Teoh Beng Hock could have died of self-strangulation when he was challenged by Thai Forensic expert, Dr Pornthip Rojanasunand, during the TBH Inquest. After that slapstick comedy in court, the MACC got wiser and engaged the much respected and extremely competent Dato Seri Shafie Abdullah to represent the MACC during the TBH RCI.

The MACC's appeal that Razak Musa appeared for on September 23 is against the acquittal granted by Sessions Judge M Gunalan on  March 2, 2010. However, on this occasion, Razak was a bit more respectful because Dato' Ramli was represented by Dato Seri Shafie Abdullah, his nemesis in the TBH saga.

The MACC's appeal that Razak Musa appeared for this morning is against the acquittal granted by Sessions Judge M Gunalan on 12 March 2010. However, on this occasion, Razak was a bit more respectful because Dato' Ramli was represented by Dato Seri Shafie Abdullah, his nemesis in the TBH saga.

The saying – "once a fool always a fool" is so apt on Razak Musa. In attempting to make a most passionate appeal on behalf of the PP, AG Gani Patail, Razak put on his most pathetic appearance when it became clear that the PP's appeal is a lot of hogwash.

The High Court Judge Dato Ghazali Cha noted that Sessions Judge M Gunalan had written a comprehensive and exhaustive judgment which showed that MACC DPP Kevin Morais had relied on a very questionable statement from a known criminal, self confessed briber, murderer, pimp and everything else that an underworld kingpin can be, called  Moo Sai Chin.

In doing so, Kevin successfully brought down Dato Ramli Yusuff (pictured above with his wife Dato' Anita Haron), at that time one of the top five most senior police officers, who could have been the IGP today.

To observers who have been following Dato Ramli's trial, it is all very clear that IGP Musa Hassan and A-G Gani Patail had used the MACC as a tool in the conspiracy against and persecution of Dato Ramli Yusuff. Yet, there are so many allegations of selective prosecution by the MACC at the behest of A-G Gani Patail.

READ MORE HERE

 

Dr M - PAS' Hudud is sheer propaganda

Posted: 23 Sep 2011 04:54 PM PDT

Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad told The Mole that PAS was actually in a dilemma following the party's decision to drop their quest to set up an Islamic state and implement Hudud.

"This is the problem with PAS, they are never very consistent. When they see that dropping (the struggle for an) Islamic state and Hudud makes them very unpopular now they want to come back and say that they want to implement (Islamic state and Hudud).

"But they know very well that they cannot implement simply because they are afraid they will not get the support of Karpal Singh and the DAP. … So what they are saying now is just propaganda to win back Muslim votes.

"PAS is in a dilemma. On one hand they want the non-Muslim support on the other hand they are afraid they would lose the Muslim support," the former Prime Minister and Umno president said when met at the National Mosque on Friday.

Nik Aziz who is also Kelantan Mentri Besar rekindled PAS' aspiration to implement the party's version of Hudud a few days ago and insisted that the party has never dropped its struggle for an Islamic state.

During PAS' 57th muktamar in early June, the party dropped their long-standing quest for an Islamic state and adopted the welfare state concept.

Party president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang made the 'Welfare State' announcement at the end of the muktamar, much to the chagrin of PAS' own members and supporters. 

But Nik Aziz revived the Hudud issue again when he recently accused Dr Mahathir of singlehandedly preventing PAS from implementing Hudud in Kelantan when the latter was Prime Minister.

Nik Aziz said the high number of HIV/AIDS cases in Kelantan could have been prevented had PAS been allowed to implement the Hudud laws.

READ MORE HERE

 

Will they never learn?

Posted: 22 Sep 2011 11:32 PM PDT

Whoever crafted this piece in Malaysianinsider is absolutely spot on.

I quote : "It is a no-brainer why Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad dredged up the issue of PAS's pursuit of hudud law in Kelantan".

In 2002 or 2003, I think, Dr M did the same.

Needled PAS to detail their proposed plan for an Islamic state in Terengganu, then under PAS rule.

Hadi bit the bait that Dr M tossed at them.

Came up with their blueprint for their Islamic state in Terengganu.

Kit Siang's reaction to PAS's posturing then says it all.

In the 2004 GE, PAS paid the price for falling for Dr M's ploy : Terengganu went back to BN

Is it not obvious enough that Dr M's latest salvo on the hudud issue is simply to try to get PAS to feel obliged to defend their 'Islamic state' ideal and get DAP to respond with a defence of the secular nation that we are?

Yesterday, FreeMalaysiaToday reported Tok Guru Nik Aziz as describing Mahathir as 'lucu' for his latest attempt to drive a wedge between DAP and PAS.

Today, Malaysiakini reports HERE and HERE  a war of words between DAP's Karpal and Nik Aziz, the latter saying that DAP can leave Pakatan for all he cares if they are not in agreement to PAS's agenda to establish an Islamic state!

What the @#$% is going on?

I am particularly baffled by the response to this whole hudud business by Anwar.

Yesterday, Malaysiakini reported Anwar as saying that he personally supported Kelantan's bid to implement hudud law.

"For now, in general, in principle, I believe this can be implemented. Looking at the specific areas and there are clear guarantees on the administration of justice. It does not in any way infringe on the rights of non-Muslims," Anwar is reported to have said.

There are clear guarantees on the administration of justice?

Does not infringe on the rights of non-Muslims?

Dato Seri, tell that to the widow of Seargeant Moorthy.

Tell that to the family and friends of the late Lawrence Selvananthan.

What baffles most, though, is this.

The Kelantan hudud law that Mahathir has raked up again and which Anwar now supports implementation, was passed by the Kelantan Legislative Assembly in 1993.

However, to be effectively implemented, it needed an act of Parliament to clothe the syariah courts in Kelantan with the power to implement the hudud precribed punishments.

That meant that UMNO and the BN government would have to support such a bill in Parliament.

This put UNMO then in a spot.

Anwar was then the deputy president of UMNO and the deputy prime minister.

To the best of my knowledge, the law passed in 1993 remains unchanged to this day.

If Anwar now says that it is now worthy of support and implementation, perhaps he can now share with us why it was not okay to be supported in 1993?

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Analisis Pakatan Rakyat menuju PRU 13 di Sabah

Posted: 22 Sep 2011 04:34 AM PDT

Pendahuluan

Pada 16 September yang lalu, bersamaan dengan sambutan Hari Malaysia, Konvensyen Pakatan Rakyat Sabah telah berlangsung dengan jayanya di Convention and Event Center, Star City, Kota Kinabalu Sabah. Konvensyen ini dihadiri oleh semua penyokong dan ahli dari Pakatan Rakyat seluruh negeri.

Konvensyen yang bermula dari pukul 1.00 petang hingga 5.00 petang itu bertujuan untuk merasmikan Buku Jingga Pakatan Rakyat Negeri Sabah. Lim Kit Siang, Haji Mohamad Sabu dan Datuk Seri Dr Wan Azizah antara pimpinan Pakatan Rakyat yang turut hadir memberikan ucapan dan sekaligus merasmikan Buku Jingga Pakatan Rakyat.

Tawaran PR

Tawaran baru Pakatan Rakyat (PR) untuk rakyat Sabah meliputi 20 perkara. Antaranya adalah mengenai agama, menjunjung kedaulatan negeri Sabah, menangani pendatang asing tanpa izin (PATI), pemuliharaan tanah Sabah, Borneonisasi, pengambilalihan Blok L dan M, 20 perkara autonomi Sabah, royalti minyak dan gas, dasar kabotaj, pengawalan cukai hasil negeri Sabah, kajian fungsi FELDA dan FELCRA, Yayasan Orang Asal, pembasmian kemiskinan, perumahan rakyat, peranan Yayasan Sabah dan lain-lain.

Penerimaan rakyat Sabah terhadap PR pada masa ini adalah pada tahap yang amat baik. Di sesetengah kawasan, wakil PR sama ada terdiri daripada PAS, DAP atau PKR, dijadikan rujukan utama oleh masyarakat setempat untuk memberitahu masalah dan mendapatkan penyelesaian kepada masalah itu, hal ini menjadi simbolik kepada ketidakcekapan wakil rakyat BN yang ada untuk melaksanakan amanah dan tanggungjawab yang diberikan.

Menurut Ketua Penerangan Pas Sabah, Hisamudin Sulaiman yang juga merupakan Yang Dipertua Pas Kawasan Pensiangan, apabila beliau turun mendengar keluhan dan permasalahan masyarakat di kawasannya, di samping mendedahkan penipuan yang dilakukan oleh BN, pada ketika itulah masyarakat sedar bahawa selama ini mereka hanya ditipu dan tidak diambil berat langsung oleh wakil rakyat yang dipilih oleh mereka dalam PRU lalu.

Beliau juga mendakwa bahawa penduduk kampung memberikan kepada beliau beberapa pucuk surat yang mengandungi berbagai-bagai permintaan daripada penduduk kampung. Beliau menegaskan kepada penduduk kampung bahawa tugas wakil rakyat yang dipilih dalam pilihanraya bukan hanya untuk memberikan beras sekilo dua ataupun memberikan 'tandas segera', tetapi ia lebih dari itu, iaitu mendengar dan menyelesaikan permasalahan yang wujud.

PAS mengukuh di Sabah

Di kawasan Sandakan pula, penerimaan masyarakat terhadap PR juga pada tahap yang amat memberangsangkan. Masyarakat di sekitar Batu Sapi sangat teruja apabila mengetahui bahawa Tuan Guru Haji Hadi akan turun ke kawasan mereka, namun harapan mereka untuk bertemu dengan dengan beliau tidak kesampaian apabila beliau tidak dapat hadir atas sebab-sebab tertentu yang tidak dapat dielakkan.

Namun kedatangan beliau di tempat lain seperti di Tawau, amat meriah dan disambut dengan baik.

20 perkara yang ditawarkan oleh PR untuk rakyat Sabah dalam PRU ke 13 yang diurakan-urakan bakal berlangsung dalam masa terdekat ini, merupakan antara isu yang sangat genting dan menjadi satu tuntutan kepada PR untuk memberikan yang terbaik kepada rakyat Sabah jika PR berjaya menakluki 'fixed deposit' BN ini.

Antara isu yang cukup sinonim dengan rakyat negeri ini, adalah isu Tanah Hak Adat Bumiputera (NCR). Di semua kawasan, terutamanya kawasan pedalaman, seperti di kawasan Pensiangan, kawasan Batu Sapi, dan kawasan Beluran serta di Merotai, penduduk kampung meneroka dan mengusahakan tanah-tanah tersebut untuk dijadikan kawasan petempatan dan pertanian atau penternakan. Apabila tanah-tanah tersebut diusahakan, ia sepatutnya menjadi milik penduduk yang mengusahakannya.

Namun, hal yang sebaliknya pula terjadi apabila kerajaan sewenang-wenangnya merampas tanah NCR tersebut. Pampasan yang dijanjikan hanya menjadi 'pemanis mulut' sahaja tanpa ada tindakan susulan. Rakyat dibiarkan turun naik ke mahkamah dan akhirnya kes ditutup.

Pembelaan yang sewajarnya dibuat oleh wakil rakyat seperti yang diharapkan oleh penduduk kampung, tidak terjadi. Malahan wakil rakyat pula hilang entah ke mana. Hanya akan muncul apabila ada program nyanyian, kebudayaan dan acara tari menari yang sememangnya sinonim dengan jiwa wakil rakyat BN negeri ini.

Tahun ini, PAS Sabah amat tekun dan gigih untuk memastikan Sabah tidak lagi menjadi 'fixed deposite' BN pada PRU akan datang. Pada Mei tahun ini, Konvensyen PAS Sabah yang berlangsung di Sabah Hotel, Sandakan yang bermatlamatkan "merakyatkan PAS di Sabah" telah mengusulkan juga beberapa tindakan lain antaranya untuk menyebarkan isi kandungan Buku Jingga, menarik undi masyarakat bukan Islam, mengenalpasti permasalahan masyarakat setempat, kursus pilihanraya kawasan dan penekanan kualiti ahli.

Seminar pendidikan yang diadakan di Kundasang yang turut berlangsung beberapa bulan yang lalu turut menarik perhatian. Resolusi seminar ini antaranya menubuhkan Sekolah Rendah Islam (SRI), menubuhkan Pusat Pendidikan Islam, Pusat Tahfiz, Pondok Fi Zilalil Quran, Madrasah Al Ulumiyyah wa Tarbiah dan sebagainya.

Hal ini berikutan insitusi keagamaan yang seperti ini yang kurang di Sabah. Ia merupakan langkah yang sangat bijak untuk mendekatkan rakyat Sabah terhadap ilmu keagamaan yang bersistemkan madrasah, pondok dan SRI.

Pada 17 September yang lalu pula, Konvensyen Pas Negeri Sabah telah berlangsung di Yaho Hotel, Kota Kinabalu. Konvensyen pada kali ini turut dimeriahkan dengan kehadiran semua ahli PAS dari seluruh pelusuk negeri ini. Konvensyen yang berlangsung selama sehari ini turut mengupas mengenai Negara Berkebajikan: Tawaran Pas yang telah disampaikan oleh ahli parlimen Pasir Putih Kelantan, Ustaz Muhammad Husin.

Menariknya, konvensyen kali ini menggunakan buku MENEGAKKAN PERJUANGAN: Memenangi Pilihanraya Menerusi Persiapan Tarbiyyah yang ditulis oleh Ustaz Datuk Abu Bakar Chik yang turut digunakan ketika Ijtimak Tarbawi DPPP di Rusila Terengganu pada Oktober tahun lalu.

Sebanyak tiga kertas kerja telah dibentangkan iaitu 'Menegakkan Perjuangan' yang disampaikan oleh Ustaz Anuar Ali merangkap Timbalan Pesuruhjaya Pas 3, 'Pilihanraya adalah Jihad dan Wasilah Perjuangan' yang disampaikan oleh Ketua Dewan Ulama Pas Sabah, Ustaz Nuruddin Abdullah dan pembentangan ketiga mengenai 'Adakah PAS boleh menang dan memerintah Malaysia' yang disampaikan oleh Ketua Penerangan PAS Sabah, Saudara Hisamudin Sulaiman. Majlis ini diakhiri dengan bacaan doa wehdah oleh Ketua Pemuda PAS Sabah, Saudara Lahirul Latigu.

Jaringan PAS dan NGO

Konvensyen PAS kali ini juga disertai oleh beberapa wakil NGO yang turut serta bersama-sama memperjuangkan isu setempat, antaranya NGO ini bekerjasama dengan PAS Sabah untuk menangani isu alam sekitar yang melibatkan pembukaan lombong arang batu di Felda UMAS. Hasilnya, mereka berjaya menghentikan pembukaan lombong tersebut. Hal ini secara tidak langsung menampakkan bahawa PAS adalah sebuah parti yang universal, tidak hanya merangkumi hal ehwal keagamaan semata-mata.

Di Sabah, pilihanraya Parlimen Batu Sapi yang diadakan tahun lalu adalah cerminan kepada usaha PR di Sabah, khususnya di Sandakan. Walaupun ketika itu wakil dari PKR yang menjadi calon bertanding, namun usaha untuk memenangkan calon ini turut dibantu oleh jentera dari semua parti PR. Hasilnya, lebih 3000 pengundi yang mengundi calon PKR ini. Ia merupakan satu 'hint' awal betapa rakyat Sabah mahukan perubahan yang lebih baik dan wakil rakyat dipilih biarlah menjadi mata dan telinga kepada rakyat di parlimen nanti, bukan hanya melihat dan membiarkan rakyat terseksa.

Keberkesanan pendidikan rendah PAS

Penerimaan masyarakat terhadap PAS juga turut dilihat melalui peningkatan murid yang berdaftar di PASTI yang ada di seluruh negeri. Hal ini menunjukkan kepercayaan yang tinggi oleh masyarakat agar anak-anak mereka dapat dididik dengan baik dan berkonsepkan Islam.

Dakwah Islamiyyah turut dapat disebarkan secara 'bil hikmah' melalui PASTI. Rata-rata ibu bapa pelajar yang menghantar anak-anak ke sekolah PASTI, berpakaian tidak menepati syariat Islam dan disinilah peranan guru ditonjolkan. Beretika pakaian yang sopan dan menutup aurat merupakan tuntutan wajib untuk semua guru PASTI.

Pada masa ini juga, PASTI beroperasi di seluruh tempat yang mempunyai kepadatan penduduk yang tinggi dan tidak hanya tertumpu pada sesuatu kawasan sahaja. PASTI ada di bandar-bandar besar, di flat-flat mewah dan ada juga di kawasan perumahan elit. Hal ini menunjukkan bahawa PAS mampu untuk memberikan pendidikan bukan hanya kepada golongan sasaran tertentu sahaja tetapi merangkumi kepada semua golongan.

Rintangan seteru politik

Namun, kepastian yang nyata adalah pihak BN tidak akan pernah untuk berdiam diri membiarkan Sabah jatuh ke tangan PR. Ternyata pelbagai usaha difokuskan kepada negeri ini untuk memenangkan BN di Sabah pada pilihanraya akan datang.

Ketika syawal baru-baru ini pun, Ketua Menteri turun ke semua masjid yang ada untuk menyampaikan sumbangan dan membuat rumah terbuka menjamu rakyat yang dahagakan janji ketika PRU lalu. Pemberian beras dan barang-barang keperluan lain kepada golongan sasaran seperti ibu tunggal atau orang kurang upaya sudah menjadi kelaziman untuk wakil BN apabila turun bertemu masyarakat.

Malangnya wakil BN menganggap bahawa itu sudah cukup untuk memadamkan janji-janji yang dibuat ketika PRU lalu. Rakyat Sabah sudah bertahun hidup dalam keadaan yang sama, tidak ada perubahan yang drastik walaupun Sabah merupakan negeri yang kaya pada suatu ketika dahulu. Jalan raya misalnya, hanya dibaiki apabila tiba musim pilihanraya, jambatan di kampung hanya akan dibaiki apabila wakil rakyat BN akan melawat kampung tersebut dan jalan yang berlubang hanya akan ditampal apabila Ketua Menteri melawat kawasan tersebut.

Fenomena yang amat menyedihkan. Adakah rakyat yang tinggal di kawasan itu tidak berhak untuk mendapat kemudahan yang baik? Kenapa perlu tunggu 'orang besar' masuk ke kawasan tersebut baru semuanya akan dipulihkan? Saya menyarankan agar Ketua Menteri dan jemaah menterinya berulang alik dari Sandakan ke Kota Kinabalu, atau dari mana sahaja, dengan menaiki kereta melalui jalan raya yang ada. Biar mereka turut merasai betapa sistem perhubungan jalan raya yang ada di negeri ini berada pada tahap yang amat teruk.

Di kawasan Sandakan, misalnya di kawasan pedalaman Batu 12, sehingga saat ini penduduk masih belum mendapat bekalan air bersih walhal tempat tersebut mempunyai sekolah dan petempatan. Penduduk di kawasan itu juga perlu menunggu 11 tahun untuk mendapatkan sistem perhubungan jalan raya yang lebih baik.

Logik atau tidak rakyat perlu menunggu bertahun lamanya untuk mendapat kemudahan yang lebih baik? Sedangkan BN memerintah Sabah lebih lama daripada tempoh itu. Jika anda berkesempatan ke Sandakan, anda akan melihat sepanjang jalan dari Batu 14 hingga ke Batu 12, jalan raya sedang dalam proses pembesaran. Hal ini rentetan daripada jumlah kenderaan yang semakin bertambah. Satu langkah yang amat baik dan disambut baik oleh semua penduduk namun persoalan yang timbul, kenapa sekarang usaha itu dibuat?

Kenapa tidak selepas sahaja kemenangan BN di Sabah pada PRU lalu? Bergerak pula ke kawasan bas ekspres Sandakan, anda akan melihat satu kawasan yang amat daif. Kawasan bas ekspress ini hanya terdiri daripada beberapa pondok tiket bas dan tandas serta beberapa gerai jualan makanan. Dan lebih malang lagi, kawasan bas ekspres ini tidak berbumbung.

Namun, jika anda ke Tawau atau Kota Kinabalu, anda akan dapat merasakan bahawa stesen bas ekspres yang ada setaraf dengan stesen bas ekspres di bandar utama negeri-negeri di Semenanjung Malaysia. Cukup lengkap dan gah. Walhal, Ketua Menteri Sabah adalah anak jati Sandakan, namun mengapa Sandakan seakan-akan dianaktirikan, sedangkan Sandakan merupakan bandar terpenting selain Kota Kinabalu dan Tawau.

Stesen bas harian yang terletak di tengah-tengah bandar Sandakan turut mengalami nasib yang sama, dianaktirikan daripada pembangunan. Stesen bas ini tidak berbumbung, (kecuali stesen bas Labuk yang merupakan stesen bas swasta) dan ia sangat menyukarkan pengguna apabila hujan. Hal ini bertambah sukar apabila terdapat bas sesuatu kawasan yang adakalanya jauh dari tumpuan orang ramai.

Hal ini sudah wujud bertahun lamanya tanpa ada apa-apa tindakan daripada pihak kerajaan negeri. Perkara ini patut dipandang dengan serius kerana kebanyakan penduduk menggunakan bas sebagai pengangkutan utama. Jika hal ini tidak ditangani dengan baik, ia akan membebankan rakyat. Jika alasan sempit dan tidak ada ruang yang diberikan, ia adalah tidak relevan kerana kemudahan ini adalah lebih penting daripada pembinaan kompleks membeli belah (Harbour Mall) yang semakin pesat dibangunkan di pinggir bandar Sandakan. Jika kompleks ini ada tempatnya di bandar ini, kenapa pula tidak boleh diperuntukkan tempat untuk stesen bas harian?

Masalah setinggan

Isu setinggan juga amat sinonim dengan negeri ini sama ada di Sandakan, Kota Kinabalu dan Tawau. Di Sandakan, kawasan setinggan BDC yang dulunya terletak di Batu 2 dirobohkan tanpa pembelaan yang wajar diberikan kepada penduduk yang terlibat. Kawasan tersebut kononnya akan digunakan untuk mendirikan Hotel Sri Malaysia namun sehingga ke hari ini, lebih dari 5 tahun kawasan setinggan itu dirobohkan, belum pun ada tanda-tanda pembangunan dilakukan. Semuanya hanya untuk menghapuskan kawasan setinggan agar negeri ini dikatakan 'zero setinggan' walhal hakikatnya rakyat merempat dan terpaksa mencari tempat tinggal yang lebih mahal kosnya.

Adakah ini langkah yang betul-betul bijak mengurangkan kemiskinan di Sabah? Penduduk masa kini yang tinggal di kawasan setinggan bagaikan telur di hujung tanduk. Bila-bila masa sahaja tempat mereka akan dirobohkan. Ketika berkunjung ke Batu Sapi Ramadhan lalu, rumah penduduk di kawasan Kampung Lupak Meluas juga ingin dirobohkan dan tidak ada seorang pun wakil rakyat yang turun menjadi 'front liner' mempertahankan penduduk.

Apabila ditanya kepada pihak berkuasa yang bertanggungjawab merobohkan kawasan tersebut, mereka hanya menyatakan bahawa wakil rakyat mereka yang memberikan arahan. Sudah terang lagi bersuluh bahawa wakil rakyat yang dipilih oleh mereka hanya 'menyayangi' mereka apabila tiba musim pilihanraya sahaja.

Isu PATI

Kebanjiran PATI di Sabah juga tidak dapat ditangani dengan baik oleh kerajaan Negeri. Tawaran PR untuk PRU akan datang adalah menyempurnakan penubuhan Suruhanjaya DiRaja bagi mencari jalan menyelesaikan kemelut pendatang asing tanpa izin di negeri ini. Pendaftaran PATI sebagai penduduk tetap yang dijalankan oleh kerajaan bulan lalu amat membimbangkan.

Penduduk amat takut jika hak yang sepatutnya dimiliki dirampas dan diberikan kepada PATI. Pendaftaran yang dilakukan juga amat merobek hati penduduk, kerana ada antara penduduk tetap negeri ini yang terpaksa berurusan ke Putrajaya semata-mata untuk mendapatkan kad pengenalan penduduk tetap, tetapi kerajaan sewenang-wenangnya memberikan hak tersebut kepada PATI.

Rakyat menghabiskan ribuan ringgit dan perlu menanti bertahun-tahun untuk mendapatkan kad pengenalan, PATI pula mendapat kerakyatan hanya dalam masa beberapa jam. Bukan itu sahaja, kebanjiran PATI di Sabah turut menyebabkan kadar jenayah meningkat. Pecah rumah, mencuri, penyeludupan rokok dan sebagainya turut membimbangkan masyarakat tempatan.

Pelbagai isu yang boleh dicanang untuk menjatuhkan BN di Sabah, point utamanya adalah menyampaikan kepada masyarakat tentang maklumat dan kebenaran yang sepatutnya mereka ketahui.

Meraih kepercayaan penduduk tidak mudah, tapi apabila kita menyampaikan kebenaran insya Allah mereka akan dapat berfikir pilihan yang lebih baik. Jika tempat mereka tidak boleh diakses menggunakan internet, kita perlu turun menyampaikan. Keadaan di Sabah amat berbeza dengan kawasan lain.

Di Sabah ada tempat yang perlu untuk menaiki kereta pacuan empat roda, ada tempat yang hanya boleh menggunakan pengangkutan air, dan ada jalan yang tidak berturap, dan tanah merah. Namun semua ini bukan halangan untuk kita membantu menyampaikan kepada masyarakat. Saya amat yakin dan percaya bahawa rakyat di bawah bayu ini mahukan perubahan kerana semuanya sudah muak menderita di bawah pemerintahan BN yang tidak mempedulikan rakyat.

Penutup

Bahang pilihanraya semakin terasa samada akan diadakan pada tahun ini atau tidak. Pelbagai usaha harus dijalankan oleh semua jentera pilihanraya kawasan. Penculaan, mengenalpasti permasalahan setempat, mendekati golongan sasaran, menarik undi bukan Islam, memantapkan kualiti ahli dan memperbanyakkan program dan aktiviti bersifat luaran, tidak hanya tertumpu aktiviti dalaman sahaja. Jika usaha sudah dibuat sebesar Gunung Kinabalu dan sedalam Lautan China Selatan, namun jika kemenangan masih belum diberikan, bersabarlah kerana Allah SWT beserta dengan orang-orang yang sabar.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved