Selasa, 6 September 2011

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Puteri Umno lodges police report against Anwar

Posted: 05 Sep 2011 11:54 PM PDT

(BERNAMA) - The Puteri Umno movement today lodged a police report against Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, who is alleged to have made a false report on the sex video issue in March.

The police report was lodged by Puteri Umno vice-head Shahanim Mohd Yusof at the Kuala Muda District Police Headquarters, here.

She said Puteri Umno had requested the police to take action against Anwar, who is alleged to have abused the law by making a false report at the Dang Wangi District Police Headquarters in Kuala Lumpur on March 22.

"We take a serious view on the false report made at the Dang Wangi District Police Headquarters in March concerning the sex video. This is because Anwar had never sued Datuk Shazryl Eskay Abdullah for libel when he said the (sex) video was not true," she told reporters after lodging the report.

 

Malaysia activists outraged after 300 cats starved

Posted: 05 Sep 2011 11:52 PM PDT

(AP) - Malaysian pet owners and activists who found nearly 300 starving cats caged and soaked in excrement at pet care centers demanded sterner laws Tuesday against cruelty to animals.

The felines had been left with a company that was supposed to take care of them in Malaysia's central Selangor state while their owners returned to their hometowns for a week to celebrate the Muslim festival of Eid al-Fitr.

Many owners became worried when they were later unable to contact company representatives. Rescue volunteers broke into the company's two facilities Sunday and discovered the emaciated cats lying in their own feces and urine in cages stacked atop each other.

Activists estimated at least 12 cats were dead and dozens more were missing. Police have questioned the company owner and an employee, but no arrests have been made.

The case has energized activists to push for stronger prosecution against people who mistreat animals, said Christine Chin, who heads the Malaysian Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals.

"There is no deterrent in this country for animal cruelty, so the problem just spreads," Chin said.

More than 7,500 people have joined a Facebook group created Monday demanding government action against the company that abandoned the cats. The animals' owners were also considering suing it for breach of contract, Chin said.

Chin said her organization receives about 200 complaints of animal mistreatment each month, mostly involving dogs. However, it has recorded only about five prosecutions by authorities in the past decade.

Malaysian laws provide for a 200 ringgit ($66) fine and a jail term of up to six months for people convicted of cruelty to animals. However, only one offender is known to have been jailed - for a day - after he kept his dog chained so tightly that it suffered a bloodied neck wound, Chin said.

Government veterinarian resources are often focused on livestock and the prevention of disease outbreaks, with insufficient attention paid to animal cruelty, Chin added.

Abdul Aziz Jamaluddin, head of Malaysia's Veterinary Services Department, told reporters Monday there were already plans to introduce a new law next year to raise the animal cruelty fine to 100,000 ringgit ($34,000).

Chin said activists also want offenders to be forced to undergo psychiatric treatment and be banned from owning pets.

 

Jais charges Khalid Samad over unauthorised sermon

Posted: 05 Sep 2011 10:28 PM PDT

 

(The Malaysian Insider) - KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 6 — Selangor's religious authorities have clamped down on the state's PAS leadership, charging deputy commissioner Khalid Samad over giving a sermon without permission and revoking state chief Rani Othman's religious credentials.

According to Harakahdaily, Khalid was summoned to the Selangor Islamic Religious Department (Jais) today and notified of the charge in relation to a sermon he gave in Klang during the recent fasting month.

The PAS party organ also said that Rani, whose credentials expired during Ramadan, had his renewal application rejected.

"I received the credentials last year and applied to extend them but I received a letter from Jais informing me that my application has been rejected and my credentials revoked," the Meru assemblyman said of the license which allows a Muslim scholar to give sermons without prior permission.

Khalid was charge under Section 119 of the Selangor Islamic Religious Administration Enactment for giving a sermon in a surau at Taman Seri Sementa, Kapar in Klang on August 16 without prior permission.

The Shah Alam MP will face trial on November 24 in the Klang Syariah court.

He told Harakahdaily today that the sermon had touched on the role of Muslims in the religious affairs of the state.

 

READ MORE HERE.

The greater threat than communists according to Salahuddin

Posted: 05 Sep 2011 07:19 PM PDT

(Harakah Daily) - Sep 6: The act of distributing instant Malaysian citizenship to foreigners for political reasons is greater threat to the country than communists, said PAS vice president Salahuddin Ayub.

"Giving citizenship to foreigners and have them registered as voters is more dangerous than militant communists," Salahuddin told Harakahdaily, in response to  Mohamad Sabu's August 21 speech urging people to be wary of UMNO's twisting of the nation's history of independence.

The PAS deputy president has been the target of an intense media campaign by UMNO for stating that those who launched the famous attack in Bukit Kepong in 1950, killing scores of colonial-era policemen, were the true freedom fighters, and not as being depicted by official propaganda including by UMNO-leaning film makers.

The remark and the reactions which followed immediately resurrected a decades-old debate on the distortion of Malaysia's history of independence, with historians and politicians urging for a re-think of historical narrations as they could have been written to serve British colonialists who handed over power to a select group of leaders with whom they felt comfortable to deal.

 

 

READ MORE HERE.

Anwar reset button: SAPP

Posted: 05 Sep 2011 05:22 PM PDT

(Daily Express) - Sabah Progressive Party (SAPP) on Monday welcomes Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's statement that SAPP need not join the Pakatan Rakyat in toppling the Barisan Nasional (BN).

Its President, Datuk Seri Yong Teck Lee, said Anwar has also given assurance that Pakatan can negotiate with the SAPP in going against the BN one-to-one in the next election.

"As the de facto leader of PKR and Pakatan, Anwar has re-set the button on the relationship between SAPP and Pakatan to the same positive footing that SAPP had with Pakatan in 2008," he said in a statement.

On the policy framework, he said SAPP has been supportive of the national opposition agenda for change, clean elections, an independent judiciary and an efficient economy.

In fact, he said SAPP's two MPs, namely Datuk Eric Majimbun and Datuk Chua Soon Bui, have been consistent on this matter.

He said SAPP's eight-point declaration in June 2008 stated that the Government shall be of the people based on good governance and civil society and non-racial politics based on a progressive, just and harmonious society.

At the same time, Yong said the party also fights for Sabah autonomy, 20 per cent oil royalties, return of Labuan, review of unfair federal laws in Sabah, Borneonisation of the civil service, solution to the illegal immigrants issue and redressing the socio-economic imbalances affecting Sabah.

 

Ex-senator agrees with US cable on Sabah situation

Posted: 05 Sep 2011 03:56 PM PDT

A Sabah activist claims a 'reverse takeover' was happening in Peninsular Malaysia where names of non-citizens were begining to appear on electoral rolls.

(Free Malaysia Today) - Former senator Dr Chong Eng Leong has endorsed a US embassy cable that revealed the federal government's alleged involvement in the recruitment of illegal immigrants for political support in Sabah.

The practising surgeon who has been fighting a decade long battle to prevent the takeover of the state by illegal immigrants, alleged that government politicians had acted treasonously by ignoring immigration laws and would never allow an investigation into the matter.

Chong, who is currently a Sabah PKR leader, said the same reverse takeover was happening in the peninsula where the names of non-citizens were beginning to appear on electoral rolls.

"BN wants to regain political support in the peninsula through non-citizens' votes – by giving away our sovereign rights.

"That's why one of Bersih 2.0 demands is calling for the electoral rolls to be rid of phantom voters.

He reiterated that in the 90's, when peninsula-based Umno spread its wings to Sabah, an Umno Task Force was set up to look for foreigners who were then issued Malaysian ICs, registered as Umno members and as voters in Sabah electoral rolls.

"The director of this task force was Musa Aman and the deputy was Yayha Hussin, current Sabah Chief Minister and deputy CM.

"That is the reason why RCI on Sabah illegal immigrants and Project IC will never be set up as long as Umno and BN is still the federal government," he added.

"Recipients (of Malaysian citizenship papers) stated openly that they got ICs through Project Mahathir – stated under oath by Election Commission registering officer during the 1999 Likas election petition trial (to prove presence of non-citizen names on the electoral roll)," he said.

Unnatural population surge

Chong also disputed the Statistics Department's 2010 numbers that they were 2.354 million Malaysians in Sabah.

He contended that if Sabah's population growth rate since 1970 were the same as Sarawak's, then Sabah in 2010 should have 1.617 million Malaysians, instead of 2.354 million Malaysians.

READ MORE HERE

 

Razali backs call for A-G to act against Anwar

Posted: 05 Sep 2011 03:45 PM PDT

(NST) - Deputy Umno Youth chief Datuk Razali Ibrahim has come out in support of the call by a senior lawyer for the Attorney-General to initiate fresh summons against Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim for contempt of court.

He also said Anwar's passport should be compounded to stop him from going overseas and belittling the country with his comments.

On Sunday, senior lawyer Datuk Seri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah urged the A-G to take immediate action against Anwar for contempt of court, saying that Anwar had made various allegations from the dock during the hearing of his sodomy trial.

Razali, who is also deputy youth and sports minister, told a news conference here yesterday that he did not see Anwar defending himself at the trial.

He said Anwar did not take the witness stand and neither did he take his oath.

"He is taking advantage of the trial and turning it into a political stage. He said the court was a playhouse of Barisan Nasional, and many other things. It is a clear case of contempt of court."

Razali said if the A-G did not take action against Anwar, others could also belittle the court and get away with it, and the people would lose respect for the law.

"His final aim is to confuse people," added the Muar member of parliament.

Razali said a fresh summons would not delay the sodomy trial as these would be two different cases that could be heard separately.

However, Anwar's lead counsel Karpal Singh said the opposition leader had a "substantive right" to make a statement from the dock.

"Judge Mohamad Zabidin sat through listening attentively to what was said by Anwar in the course of putting forth his statement from the dock," Karpal said in a statement.

He said that only the judge could hold Anwar in contempt.

 

DAP claims Rasah postal voters using army spouses’ IC numbers

Posted: 05 Sep 2011 03:34 PM PDT

 

By Shannon Teoh, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 6 — DAP has claimed that at least 21 postal voters are registered in Rasah with identification (IC) numbers belonging to their spouses who are army officers.

Rasah MP Anthony Loke told reporters today that 19 wives and two husbands registered at the army camp in his constituency had IC numbers which corresponded to their spouses birthdates and also ended with digits denoting the wrong gender.

(The National Registration Department (NRD) issues IC numbers ending with odd numbers for males and even numbers for females.)

"We do not even know whether the spouses really exist," the DAP youth chief said.

Loke said that he suspected that the IC numbers belonged to the army officers, who are themselves registered at the camp under their own military ICs, allowing someone to double vote.

"These IC numbers do not belong to the spouse of the army personnel. So the spouse's own IC numbers can still be registered elsewhere and someone can vote twice. It doesn't matter who. The issue is an extra vote can be made," he added.

He said that the Election Commission (EC) ruling last year that spouses can be registered as postal voters meant that all constituencies could potentially see postal votes doubling.

"This is not confined to my constituency. We have evidence in Rasah but also know it happens in Rembau, (Umno Youth chief) Khairy Jamaluddin's constituency which we will scan through next," he added.

In the second quarter of this year alone, Loke said that 269 spouses have been added in his constituency where there were over 2,000 army postal voters for Election 2008.

Loke also found a Yuzina Nodin married to another female named Yuniza Nodin who both had the same birthdate.

"I'm not sure whether the Malaysian army has allowed same sex marriage," he joked.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Now PAS wants review of independence struggle

Posted: 05 Sep 2011 03:20 PM PDT

By Boo Su-Lyn, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 6 — PAS today urged Putrajaya to form a Cabinet committee to review the history of the nation's independence amid controversy surrounding the party's deputy president's remarks on Malaya's pre-independence freedom fighters.

PAS No. 2 Mohamad Sabu, widely known as Mat Sabu, told a Bukit Gelugor ceramah recently that those who attacked the Bukit Kepong police station — which killed 25 — during the pre-independence communist insurgency in 1950 were freedom fighters, including Muhammad Indera.

PAS secretary-general Datuk Mustafa Ali said today that Umno had lied in calling Muhammad, better known as Mat Indera, a communist, highlighting a book endorsed by the Johor state government titled "Pengukir Nama Johor".

"If he is sincere, (Prime Minister Datuk Seri) Najib (Razak) can set up a Cabinet committee to review the history of the country's independence," said PAS vice-president Salahuddin Ayub at a press conference today with Mohamad, Mustafa, party central committee member Dr Dzulkefly Ahmad and party information chief Datuk Tuan Ibrahim Tuan Man.

Mohamad has since been accused of being a communist sympathiser by Umno leaders and sniped at daily in Umno-owned newspaper Utusan Malaysia despite denying that he had used the word "communism" in his speech.

Umno Youth said recently it would gather former soldiers, policemen and kinsmen of victims of the Bukit Kepong tragedy in a nationwide roadshow — called the Pentas Patriot or Patriot Stage — to counter Mohamad's view of the fire-fight.

Umno Youth chief Khairy Jamaluddin has also accepted a challenge to debate Mohamad on the latter's remarks, although the PAS No. 2 said today that he would let the party's Youth wing debate instead.

Mohamad has previously pointed out that Mat Indera was already recognised a freedom fighter by Umno-controlled daily Berita Harian on August 13, 2010.

Mustafa said the nation's history needed to be reviewed as the official version only recognised Umno as Malaya's independence fighters.

"The fight for independence didn't start with Umno... the ones who fought the British were the Malay Nationalist Party (PKMM)," he said.

 

READ MORE HERE.

 

Grabbing graft by the horns

Posted: 05 Sep 2011 03:17 PM PDT

By Karim Raslan, The Star

Corruption is one of the biggest challenges facing Asia's rapidly maturing democracies. The regions' leaders must acknowledge that power cannot exist without responsibility.

ACROSS the region, the failure to fight graft has made ordinary people lose confidence in the political process, the police and the courts of law. Popular frustration and anger is clear for all to see.

Interestingly, India is witnessing the emergence of influential non-institutional players responding to the society-wide sense of revulsion. This comes at a time of galloping economic growth in India — some 7.7%.

However, despite the good news, the world's largest democracy has also been beset by a stream of high-level scandals — ranging from the improper sale of 2G telecom licences to mismanagement and graft in the preparations for the recent 2010 Commonwealth Games in Delhi.

 

Indeed, its rising prosperity has made these scandals all the more unacceptable to its middle classes.

Given the context, it's unsurprising therefore that a figure like Anna ("Big Brother" in Hindi) Hazare's anti-corruption campaign has found so much resonance in Indian public life.

A 74-year-old civil society activist, Hazare has made the fight against corruption his life's work. A military man turned Gandhian, he spent many years promoting his brand of socio-economic and spiritual development in his home village of Ralegan Siddhi, in the booming state of Maharashtra.

By the 1990s, however, Hazare had turned his attention to beyond his village.

He started targeting corruption in his home state and employing the tactics of his icon Gandhi by using selective hunger strikes against politicians and policies he disapproved of.

Matters came to a head this year when Hazare demanded that the Indian government adopt legislation his supporters had drafted for the appointment of an anti-corruption ombudsman. Hazare claimed the original Bill was ineffective and allowed for too much external political interference.

Hazare's independently-constituted Jan Lokpal (Sanskrit for "People's Protector") ombudsman commission is set to have the power to investigate all levels of the government (including the Prime Minister), directly impose punishments on offenders and provide protection for whistleblowers. It would even have the power to obtain wire taps on suspects.

When Premier Mamohan Singh rejected his demands, Hazare famously launched a "fast-unto-death", leading to his arrest in Delhi. This, in turn, led to a groundswell of support as well as nationwide demonstrations.

While the Congress-led Indian government initially held firm, the outcry eventually forced them to back down. Hazare was released and Manmohan promised to draft the Bill according to the former's specifications.

What's this got to do with Malaysia? First, it's a sign that desperate times call for desperate measures.

Hazare's tactics reveal his almost complete disdain for parliamentary politics.

Notwithstanding his hardline position, he's managed to capture the public imagination and much of this is due to his shrewd understanding and manipulation of popular grievances.

Frankly, I think Malaysia needs its own Anna Hazare. We need a charismatic, morally irreproachable figure to inject some sense into our public discourse.

Moreover, Hazare's Jan Lokpal certainly sounds more appealing than our MACC.

If that's the case, who could become Malaysia's Hazare? Is it even possible for any public figure to develop appeal across ethnic lines these days?

Would middle class Malaysians now flush with democratic consciousness be willing to imitate their Indian counterparts in dispensing with constitutional niceties to fight corruption? In short, how far would we be willing to go to clean up our system?

What would we do if we had to absolutely choose between democracy and good government? Does democracy sometimes need to be rolled back to save it from itself?

What happens when people want more freedom and democracy, but without the difficult process of strengthening the underlying institutions of state?

Second, the Hazare affair ought to be a warning sign to Malaysian politicians. Leaders are not indispensible — if you fail to deliver you will be replaced sooner or later.

India's elite failed to quell the rising tide of corruption. Indeed, they have been complicit in perpetuating it. This, in turn, permitted a figure like Hazare to step into the moral vacuum they vacated, imbuing him with the authority and political capital to dictate his terms.

Power cannot exist without responsibility. If Malaysia's rulers think that they really know better and that it would be an unmitigated disaster if the country were led by anyone but themselves, then they best start bucking up, especially in the issue of corruption.


 

Malaysia under Scrutiny as Illegal Ivory Seizures Spike in August

Posted: 05 Sep 2011 03:09 PM PDT

By International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development

Late August saw a surge in arrests related to the illicit trade of African ivory with the seizure of two major shipments destined for markets in Asia. Tanzanian officials on 24 August announced the discovery of more than 1,000 elephant tusks hidden in a shipment of dried fish bound for Malaysia. Five days later, Hong Kong authorities intercepted a further 794 tusks - weighing close to two tonnes - from Malaysia bound for Mainland China.

The timing of the seizures coincides with a major illegal wildlife trade training session presented by the International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW) and Interpol in Gaborone, Botswana. Officials from IFAW said the Tanzanian shipment underscores the fact that more training is needed to help save elephants - particularly those in the Congo Basin, which are most threatened.

"We need a global outcry to spur investment in creating the necessary wildlife law enforcement capacity to take on the international criminal syndicates who benefit from these massacres," said James Isiche, IFAW's East Africa director.

Countries across sub-Saharan Africa have been struggling with how to effectively deal with poachers, who target elephants and rhinos for their tusks which are used for ornaments and in medicines, particularly in China.

Illicit trade in African ivory has been on the increase since 2004, with many experts pointing to increased disposable income in China as a major factor in growing demand. According to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), China is now the single biggest consumer of illegal ivory.

But Malaysia - the common link in the late-August seizures - is increasingly under scrutiny for its role as a hub for illegal wildlife shipments northward. In the past decade, Hong Kong authorities have intercepted two other major shipments of African ivory from the Southeast Asian country also destined for Mainland China.

In December 2009, Hong Kong customs officials seized a container shipped from Malaysia containing 186 pieces of Nigerian ivory. The container was erroneously labelled "white wood." Similarly, in 2003, police seized 275 tusks en route from Malaysia, weighing nearly 2 tonnes. The Tusks had originally been shipped from Tanzania.

The Elephant Trade Information System (ETIS), an illegal ivory trade monitoring system operated by monitoring agency TRAFFIC on behalf of CITES, says Malaysia has progressively gained prominence as a transit country of choice for African ivory.

"This latest Hong Kong seizure further underscores Malaysia's role as an intermediary country in the illicit flow of African ivory to Asia," said Tom Milliken, TRAFFIC's Elephant & Rhino Programme Coordinator. "It's time for Malaysia to get tough on international ivory smugglers, who are tarnishing the country's reputation."

The shipment of Tanzanian elephant tusks concealed in sacks of dried sardines was also earmarked for export to Malaysia. Authorities in Zanzibar have arrested two suspects.

Bian: Sarawak govt wrongly advised on NCR

Posted: 05 Sep 2011 10:45 AM PDT

By Joseph Tawie, FMT

KUCHING: Is the Sarawak government being wrongly advised on the issue of native customary rights (NCR) over land?

The opposition here believes that the Attorney-General's Chambers is not knowledgeable enough about the reach of the NCR issues and is ill-advising the state government.

Said Sarawak PKR leader Baru Bian: "The advice given (to the state government) is that NCR land only covers temuda land, and it does not cover pulau galau (communal forest), pemakai menua (territorial domain), pendam (graves) and tembawai (old longhouse sites).

"But we have proved to them that they are wrong.

"The High Court, the Court of Appeal and the Federal Court have agreed with our interpretation and have ruled that the NCR land also covers pemakai menua, pulau galau, pendam and so on."

Asked why the state government has been ignoring the court decisions, Bian said the government was afraid that recognising the court rulings would mean that the entire state could come under NCR ownership.

"Accepting the ruling on pulau galau and pemakai menua means the whole of Sarawak belongs to the natives. That's why the state government is worried.

"A lot of areas deemed to be state land may not be state land after all; it could be NCR land.

"Those are not my words, but the words of a government officer," he said, citing remarks made by a government officer in the Nor Anak Nyawai case.

Indiscriminate approvals

According to the officer, if the government is to recognise pulau galau and pemakai menoa as part of NCR land, then it would have to survey all the NCR land.

Bian said the state government has been indiscriminately approving licences, leases and provisional leases covering pemakai menua, pulau galau and temuda land to oil palm and timber companies.

"Many native landowners have sued the government over its decision to take away their NCR land.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Nazri says no to zero Chinese representation in government

Posted: 05 Sep 2011 09:06 AM PDT

By Clara Chooi, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 6 — A senior Umno minister has declared that he would fight tooth and nail to ensure Chinese representation in a Barisan Nasional (BN) government even if the MCA or Gerakan fails to secure a single parliamentary seat in the coming polls.

Datuk Seri Mohamed Nazri Aziz told The Malaysian Insider that BN would not "punish" the Chinese voters by simply yanking their representatives from Cabinet posts if they refused to vote for the two Chinese-centric component parties.

While admitting that the matter would not be his to decide, the minister in the Prime Minister's Department gave his word that he would champion this cause to Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak should such a situation arise when the coalition retains the government.

"I want to tell the Chinese voters that BN is a multi-racial government and regardless of the outcome of the elections, we will always have a Chinese representative in Cabinet. I want to say this with certainty even though I am a nobody in Umno... not even a vice-president.

"But if it should come to that, I will do my very best to persuade the PM that we should not have a single communal government. The system allows us to appoint senators and we need to have representatives of the non-Malay community," he said.

Nazri recalled that such a promise was made by the country's longest-serving prime minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad during his tenure in government.

"I remember back when Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad was PM... he told Cabinet that even if we come to a stage where MCA or Gerakan loses in all parliamentary seats, we cannot form a Malay government.

"We cannot be a single communal government as it simple goes against the spirit and policy of BN. We cannot punish and penalise a section of the community just because they do not support BN," he said.

Nazri was recalling a pledge made by MCA president Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek several months ago when the former Cabinet minister said he would pull his party from the government if it performs worse than it did in Election 2008.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Petulant Khairy calls Mat Sabu a eunuch

Posted: 04 Sep 2011 07:07 PM PDT

Khairy sees red after PAS deputy president Mohamad Sabu suggested that the debate on Bukit Kepong should be between the two Youth chiefs.

(Free Malaysia Today) - Umno Youth chief Khairy Jamaluddin has not even verified if PAS deputy president Mohamad Sabu really made a social blunder over the Bukit Kepong incident but he has already started his character assassination.

A petulant Khairy, upset that Mohamad Sabu or Mat Sabu has refused to have a debate with him over who were the true independence heroes, has started maligning him in his micro blogging Twitter site.

Some of the names Khairy has called Mat Sabu in his Twitter site are "coward" and "eunuch".

"One thing is sure: today I know that PAS chose a coward as a deputy president who doesn't have dignity. He is afraid because he is wrong. He is defeated before the war.

"That is what they elected. A eunuch," wrote Khairy.

The debate was suggested following controversy relating to Mat Sabu's speech in Penang on Aug 28 during which the PAS strongman is alleged to have said that the communists who attacked Bukit Kepong police station are the true independence heroes.

Khairy explained that Mat Sabu wants him to debate with PAS Youth chief Nasruddin Hasan Tantawi instead.

"I have no issues with PAS Youth chief. Nice guy. But I debated with PAS Youth chief in Sinar Harian. Been there, done that," wrote Khairy in reference to a debate in July at Sinar Harian office on the issue of slander.

Khairy heaped praises on PAS vice-president Husam Musa for brushing aside protocols to debate with him on hudud in 2008 in Kota Baru.

"Even though Husam was vice-president and Kelantan senior exco, he agreed and we debated in the presence of more than 3,000 people. Husam wasn't concerned about protocols.

"At least Husam dared to keep party protocols aside for the sake of political openness. He is daring. We met on an intellectual platform."

READ MORE HERE

 

Court must ask Shafee to explain Sodomy II remarks, says Pakatan

Posted: 04 Sep 2011 05:08 PM PDT

By Shannon Teoh, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 5 — Pakatan Rakyat (PR) has called on the High Court hearing Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's sodomy trial to haul up lawyer Datuk Seri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah over allegations that he conspired with the Najib administration to destroy the opposition leader's image.

Opposition lawmakers told The Malaysian Insider that the court must find out if the prominent lawyer had met media chiefs along with staff from the Prime Minister's Office to subvert media coverage of the high-profile trial.

"This raises doubt over the proceedings of the case and the court should call on Shafee to explain to ensure the credibility of the trial," said PAS vice-president Datuk Mahfuz Omar (picture).

This was echoed by Perak DAP chief Datuk Ngeh Koo Ham, who said that as Shafee is frequently employed by and linked to backroom discussions with Barisan Nasional (BN) lynchpin Umno, he cannot be considered a neutral party.

"Justice must be seen to be served. This was also the lawyer who said openly to the media that it was 99.9 per cent sure that Anwar was the man in a sex video," the Beruas MP said, referring to allegations earlier this year that the PKR de facto leader was the man recorded having sex with an unknown woman.

With Anwar's ongoing sodomy trial winding to a close, the Permatang Pauh MP had given his statement from the dock, claiming that the accusation, which surfaced over three years ago, was a conspiracy by Datuk Seri Najib Razak to end his political career.

Muhammad Shafee has come under scrutiny online purportedly for interfering with the news coverage of the controversial court case by issuing instructions to mainstream media editors and reporters over their reporting of Anwar's statement.

The alleged conspiracy was given more flavour by a blogger calling himself Ahmat Gaza who claimed that a clandestine meeting on August 23 at the swanky Le Meridien Hotel in the city here included one of Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak's media advisers, Abdul Jalil Hamid.

But the lawyer scoffed at the allegations, stating that the meeting with various media such as Utusan Malaysia, TV3 and The Star was not a secret and he was there to talk about the law of contempt.

 

READ MORE HERE.

 

Singapore’s Lee denies calling Islam ‘venomous’

Posted: 04 Sep 2011 05:07 PM PDT

Former prime minister Lee Kuan Yew has stirred a hornets' nest with his remarks about the religion as reported in leaked US diplomatic cables.

(Free Malaysia Today) - Singapore's outspoken former leader Lee Kuan Yew today denied calling Islam a "venomous religion" after leaked US diplomatic cables set off a furore in the multiracial city-state.

One of hundreds of cables from the US embassy in Singapore released last week by the anti-secrecy website WikiLeaks had Lee as describing Islam as a "venomous religion" in a 2005 meeting with then senator Hillary Clinton.

"This is false," the 87-year-old Lee, Singapore's founding prime minister and elder statesman, said in a statement.

Lee said that he looked up a foreign ministry note of the meeting, and "nowhere does it record me describing Islam as 'venomous', nor did I say anything which could have given that impression".

"I did talk about extremist terrorists like the (Southeast Asian) Jemaah Islamiyah group, and the jihadist preachers who brainwashed them. They are implacable in wanting to put down all who do not agree with them," he said.

"So their Islam is a perverted version, which the overwhelming majority of Muslims in Singapore do not subscribe to."

During the meeting, another US lawmaker in Clinton's party had asked Lee about "how organised terrorists were internationally", according to the leaked cable signed off by then US ambassador to Singapore Frank Lavin.

It said Lee "responded that orthodox Islam was a powerful force capable of recruiting volunteers for terrorist groups".

"He noted Singapore's experience in 2001 and 2002 in dealing with Jemaah Islamiyah's terrorist plots in Singapore and characterised Islam as a 'venomous religion'."

Singapore has a predominantly Chinese population with minority races including Malays, who are mostly Muslim, making up 13.4 percent of its population of five million.

READ MORE HERE

 

Pak Lah’s fishing trip to the Caribbean

Posted: 04 Sep 2011 04:54 PM PDT

While in St Vincent for a 'working visit', Abdullah spent most of his time vacationing in the Grenadine islands where high-end resorts are located, says a leaked US cable.

(Free Malaysia Today) - Former prime minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi's four-day "working visit" to two Caribbean islands in 2006 was the subject of a confidential US cable which raised questions over the purpose and the potential achievements for the countries involved.

The cable by US diplomats based in the Caribbean to the State Department in Washington DC came about two weeks after Abdullah completed his visit to St Vincent and the Grenadines from April 29 to May 2 in 2006.

The cable noted that Abdullah's visit was more of a vacation rather than a working visit, in which the Malaysian premier had spend a day on a fishing trip with St Vincent Prime Minister Ralph Gonsalves.

"After meeting with PM Gonsalves, the Malaysian (Abdullah) vacationed for a few days on the Grenadine islands Mustique and Canuoan.

"He spent one of these days on a fishing trip accompanied by Gonsalves. PM Abdullah returned to St Vincent proper on May 2 and addressed Parliament before departing for Jamaica," added the cable.

The cable noted that Mustique was a private island containing over 75 private villas, many of which are owned by international celebrities.

Canuoan meanwhile was the location of the high-end Raffles Resort and an opulent villa complex and golf course developed by Donald Trump.

The cable was leaked by whistleblower site WikiLeaks and handed over to Raja Petra Kamarudin's Malaysia Today website which published it today.

Red carpet welcome

The US diplomats added in the cable that following Abdullah's departure from St Vincent, a joint statement by the two countries expressed further interest in "enhancing cooperation" in a number of areas.

The cable also noted that the lack of a concrete agenda or results from Abdullah's trip to St Vincent did little to clear up the circumstances surrounding Gonsalves' earlier trip to Southeast Asia.

"When first announced, the Malaysian leader's St Vincent trip appeared to suggest that PM Gonsalves had indeed accomplished something for his country by travelling to Southeast Asia earlier this year.

"Considering, however, that the 'working visit' was really a vacation, it does not appear that St Vincent will necessarily benefit from its PM's previous globetrotting," stated the cable.

"The lack of a concrete agenda or results from PM Abdullah's trip does little to clear up the circumstances surrounding Gonsalves's earlier trip to Southeast Asia, the purpose and financing of which remain unclear," stated the cable.

The US cable also stated that the government of St Vincent "literally rolled out the red carpet for the Malaysian PM, who was greeted by the entire Cabinet and other dignitaries at St Vincent's small airport when he arrived on April 29".

READ MORE HERE

 

Umno lawyer defends comments over Sodomy II

Posted: 04 Sep 2011 04:53 PM PDT

By Debra Chong, Malaysia Today

KUALA LUMPUR, Sept 5 — As Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's ongoing sodomy trial winds to a close, Malaysia's best-paid lawyer has denied conspiring with staff in the Prime Minister's Office to subvert the media and end the political career of the man once deemed the biggest threat to the ruling Barisan Nasional (BN).

Prominent lawyer Datuk Seri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah, frequently linked to the BN's powerful lynchpin Umno, has come under fire online after Anwar's unsworn statement of defence from the dock, purportedly for interfering with the news coverage of the controversial court case by issuing certain instructions to mainstream media editors and reporters.

The alleged conspiracy was given more flavour by a blogger calling himself Ahmat Gaza who claimed that a clandestine meeting at the swanky Le Meridien Hotel in the city here included one of Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak's media advisers, Abdul Jalil Hamid.

Muhammad Shafee broke his earlier vow of silence yesterday to denounce the allegations against him as an attempt to plunge the country's government institutions into chaos in order to enable a takeover of Putrajaya, but stopped short of attributing it to the opposition Pakatan Rakyat (PR) pact, headed by Anwar.

"His agenda is to create as much distrust as possible, against the institutions of government including the judiciary, to create chaos against the rule of law," Muhammad Shafee replied when asked the motive of the allegations against him, referring to the blogger Ahmat Gaza.

"This Gaza is an idiot who does not know the true nature of this meeting," the pro-Umno lawyer said yesterday when contacted by The Malaysian Insider.

He scoffed at the allegations of a conspiracy to do harm to Anwar, and put it down to the imagination of the unknown blogger Ahmat Gaza, whom he warned he would sue for defamation once the latter's real identity is revealed. The allegations have since gone viral and been replicated on other websites.

Muhammad Shafee admitted that he had met with several media workers at Le Meridien on August 23, saying it was "not a secret".

"It was organised by Utusan… someone called Fatiman, to explain to the media what is contemptuous law," he said, adding that there were between eight and 15 media representatives present that day from several mainstream news organisations and named the Umno-owned Malay-language daily, national private broadcaster TV3, English-language daily The Star, among them.

He said he doubted Ahmat Gaza was a whistleblower among those present at that meeting because it was not a secret meeting as claimed in the blog.

Asked if Abdul Jalil was also present at that meeting, Muhammad Shafee said: "If Jalil was there, I vaguely think he was there, I'm not surprised if Jalil was there because he was there as a media person."

He said he knew of Jalil but was not on close terms with the PM's aide, adding that he only was aware of the latter's current position after being informed as such by The Malaysian Insider.

A former senior journalist with international news agency Reuters, Abdul Jalil declined comment when contacted by The Malaysian Insider.

Muhammad Shafee said he had also been approached by TV3 for a similar explanation after both media companies were hauled up in the Shah Alam court for contemptuous coverage of the murder of cosmetics tycoon Datuk Sosilawati Lawiya last month.

 

READ MORE HERE.

 

Awang Adek taken to task over highway remark

Posted: 04 Sep 2011 04:19 PM PDT

 

(Harakah Daily) - Kelantan PAS has slammed deputy Finance minister Awang Adek over his remark that the state government could never solve traffic congestion issue, describing it a vile and shallow attempt to discredit the PAS-led government.

Kelantan PAS Youth chief Abdul Latiff Abdul Rahman reminded Awang that Federal government was responsible for highway infrastructure across Malaysia.

"Has Awang Adek just woken up from his slumber or deliberately trying to collide with Kelantan UMNO's state liaison chief (Mustapa Mohamad) in this issue?" he asked, referring to the International Trade and Industry minister who said Kelantan would not able to build highway on its own as it was the responsibility of the Federal government.

On August 24, the state government agreed to take over the long-delayed construction of the Kota Bharu-Kuala Krai highway, following the Federal government's failure to complete it as promised.

The state said it would cost some RM1.9 billion, lower than the RM2.3 billion quoted by the Federal government.

Kelantan state Exco in charge of Finance, Husam Musa, said the allocation had been withdrawn from the 10th Malaysia's Plan.

Husam said the highway was extremely important to the people.

 

READ MORE HERE.

S’gor offers Sarawak Pakatan help

Posted: 04 Sep 2011 04:02 PM PDT

 

By Joseph Tawie, FMT

KUCHING:  Selangor has pledged to channel its resources, including manpower, to help Sarawak in the coming general election as it is one of the important states that can ensure the Pakatan Rakyat 'march' to Putrajaya is successful.

Selangor Menteri Besar Khalid Ibrahim, who was here on a  visit together with de facto PKR leader Anwar Ibrahim, said people were begining to accept Pakatan.

"As the people are now beginning to understand our policies and our struggle, the Pakatan Rakyat will mount a very serious challenge against the Barisan Nasional government.

"It is possible for us to go to Putrajaya with strong support coming from Johor, Sarawak, Sabah and other states.

"Sarawak is important to us. This is why we have to send our manpower and resources to Sarawak," he told a press conference yesterday.

Khalid and Anwar were in Kuching for a meeting with state PKR leaders.

Khalid called on Sarawak PKR leaders, members and supporters to work hard and to go to the ground and mix with the people.

"You must explain our policies, our struggle and our pledge to the people.

"The more they understand our struggle, the brighter the chance for us to win over their hearts and minds," he said.

Not easy

He admitted, however, that it is not easy to organise things in the state especially if it has to do with Anwar.

"Many people are scared of political backlash or that they are being threatened if they show open support for us.

"Let me remind Sarawak leaders that if they continue to do this, we from Selangor can also do the same that is, banning them from entering the state or refusing them from using our facilities.

"But Selangor will not do it. They can use our halls and other facilities because these facilities are built using people's money.

"However, they must follow rules and regulations.

"Tell Sarawak leaders not to be arrogant and give the people the opportunity to choose between BN and Pakatan.

"I feel sad that Sarawak is so rich with natural resources, but the people have no chance to enjoy those benefits.

"That is why I dare to say that we will work together with the people to plan a better future for the people of the state," he said.

Later in the afternoon Khalid left for Miri to meet with party leaders and members, while Anwar met with members of the state leadership council.

Later Anwar left for a Bidayuh village in the Mambong constituency, which is one of the 15 seats that PKR has expressed its interest to contest.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Coup bid: ‘Five MPs were ready to defect’

Posted: 04 Sep 2011 03:55 PM PDT

By Joseph Tawie, FMT

KUCHING: A leader of a component party within the Sarawak Barisan Nasional (BN) today revealed that five MPs from Sarawak were prepared to defect to the opposition before or on Sept 16, 2008, in support of Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim's plan to take over the federal government.

The leader, who requested anonymity, told FMT: "I was directed by an Umno leader to contact 10 MPs from PBB, SUPP, PRS and SPDP to defect to the opposition.

"Five of the MPs agreed to jump ship on condition that an Umno leader would be appointed as the interim prime minister to replace (premier) Abdullah Ahmad Badawi."

The leader was responding to a WikiLeaks report which said that Anwar's plan to take over Putrajaya, with the support of BN legislators, was real.

"Five more were interested, but they wanted to wait and see before making any decision," the BN leader said, adding that there were several BN parliamentarians who had been unhappy with Abdullah.

"I had a number of meetings with the Umno leader, who told me that Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah would be appointed as the interim prime minister in the unity government for the next two or three years.

"Anwar would be appointed as deputy prime minister," he said.

According to him, the Umno leader claimed that apart from Sarawak MPs, the plan had also received the support of MPs from Sabah and other states.

'My job to explain our policies'

However, the plan failed to materialise as some Umno MPs who were considering defecting had leaked the plan to the then prime minister.

Two weeks or so before the Sept 16 deadline set by the opposition to form the new government, about 40 MPs, mostly from Sabah and Sarawak, were sent by the BN backbenchers club to Taiwan to "study" agriculture.

The move derailed Anwar's plan.

 

READ MORE HERE.

‘What if govt cannot repay EPF?’

Posted: 04 Sep 2011 03:38 PM PDT

 

By G Vinod, FMT

PETALING JAYA: With a RM290 billion debt hanging over its head and with continued overspending, the government is on a reckless path to self-destruction which could well eat into the people's Employee Provident Fund (EPF) contributions.

According to a research group although the country has been running on deficit since 1998, it has however not stopped the government from spending beyond its means.

The group pointed out that the government has overspent by RM290 billion in the past 13 years.

According to Research for Social Advancement (REFSA) executive director Teh Chi-Chang, the deficit could pave the way for more cuts in spending on other important areas such as education and healthcare.

"The last time we had a surplus or savings, where we spent less than our income was in 1998.

"By end of this year, our total over-spend would reach about RM290 billion.

"It means all Malaysians would be in debt by an average of RM10,000 each," said Teh raising concerns over the impending content of the 2012 national budget.

Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak, who is also Finance Minister, would be tabling Budget 2012 come Oct 7.

Many quarters are expecting Najib to announce several goodies in the upcoming budget to cater for snap polls, rumoured to be held sometime late this year or in early 2012.

Barisan Nasional is said to be facing its toughest ever battle in its political history going into the 13th general election.

In the 2008 polls, the ruling coalition lost five states – Perak, Penang, Kedah, Kelantan and Selangor – to opposition Pakatan Rakyat.

BN later wrested Perak in a reverse takeover. In the recent April Sarawak state elections which was seen as a litmus test of approval, BN lost an unprecedented 16 seats, a clear indication according to analysts of fast dwindling popularity.

Going into the 13th GE, BN is expected to blow hundreds of millions to secure its grip on Putrajaya and such excess spending will mean more borrowings.

EPF funds under threat

Explaining the economic scenario, Teh said people should understand that when the government runs on deficit, it means having to borrow money to pay for the excess spending.

"And the lenders are normally the EPF, banks and fund managers," said Teh.

He also said that as long as the government continues to borrow to pay for its dues, interest rates in the country would eventually soar.

Teh said with substantial amount of borrowing, there would come a time when lenders would be unwilling to lend anymore which would force government to cut its spending.

"Lenders may be forced to take 'hair-cuts; that is accepting lesser payment than what is owned by the government.

"Imagine if the government can't pay back its dues to EPF, the contributors will have lesser savings in their account," said Teh.

The NGO then offered a solution to the government.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Umno riding on the slippery Mat Sabu bandwagon

Posted: 05 Sep 2011 01:20 PM PDT

It's OK if Mat Sabu has done something wrong. But the awful truth is that he has done nothing wrong. Mat Sabu has only exposed the myth that Umno is the only one who fought and gained Malaya's independence from the clutches of the colonial power.

By Kim Quek

If you do not believe that Umno has already passed its expiry date as a potent political party, all you need to do is to watch how its entire leadership as well as its entire propaganda machineries have been fully engaged in the past week to indulge in an orgy of attacks against Mat Sabu – PAS' deputy president.

It's OK if Mat Sabu has done something wrong. But the awful truth is that he has done nothing wrong.

Mat Sabu has only exposed the myth that Umno is the only one who fought and gained Malaya's independence from the clutches of the colonial power.

His illustrative mention of Muhammad Indera (fondly known as Mat Indera) as an independence fighter was only in the context of lambasting Umno for ritualistically twisting the Bukit Kepong assault incident on every Merdeka Day for Umno's self-glorification – as if it is the only body accountable for the country's independence.

MAT SABU BASHING

Pouncing on Mat Sabu's positive mention of Mat Indera, Umno bays for Mat Sabu's blood. It accuses Mat Sabu – and by extension PAS – of praising communists and glorifying communism and wanting to turn the country into a republic.

While the entire might of Umno has been unleashed on a non-stop assault on Mat Sabu's alleged advocacy of communism, has any one of them paused to reflect that the word "communist" or "communism" was never mentioned by Mat Sabu in his entire speech? 

For the sake of truth, let us recapture the relevant part of Mat Sabu's speech, delivered in a ceremah at Tasek Gelugor, Penang, on Aug 21:

"When it's near Merdeka Day (television programmes) on Bukit Kepong will be aired. The police who died in Bukit Kepong are police who belonged to the British.

"Those who attacked Bukit Kepong were the ones fighting for independence. The one who attacked Bukit Kepong was Mat Indera (Muhammad Indera). He is a Malay, but this is not in the history books.

"Jins Shamsudin made a film (about this). Jins Shamsudin is from Umno. (His film on) Bukit Kepong criticised (the attackers) as the villains.

"The police are British police. Before independence, our country was ruled by the British. But in the film, the heroes were the British and the (insurgents) were terrorists."

 Mat Sabu also criticised in his speech how Umno had perverted the essence of Merdeka Day into self-glorification and ignored non-Umno elements that had also contributed to the country's independence.

HISTORICAL BACKGROUND

For a better understanding of the issues, let me put the Bukit Kepong incident in its proper historical perspective.

The time was 1950, two years after the declaration of Emergency (to deal with the armed insurgency by the Malayan Communist Party) and seven years before the country gained its independence. It was at the height of the guerilla war waged by the MCP to seek independence from the colonial master Britain.

One night, on 23rd Feb 1950, a band of guerilla fighters attacked a remote police station at Bukit Kepong, Johor, and killed 25 persons who were mainly policemen and their family.

The attack was led by Mat Indera, a Malay, and the policemen were also Malays, serving the British colonial government.

This incident was only one of numerous skirmishes within in a larger war staged between the independence fighters led by the MCP on the one side, and the British colonial government determined to protect its colonial rule on the other side.

NO FACTUAL BASIS

The question we want to put to Umno is: since this is a guerilla war for independence, in what way was Mat Sabu wrong when he said Mat Indera was fighting for independence?

And also, in what way Mat Sabu was wrong when he said the policemen who died belonged to the British? Weren't they serving the colonial government? Didn't they fight to protect the colonial power?

Since no "communist" or "communism" was ever mentioned, how did Umno come to the conclusion that Mat Sabu was praising communists or glorifying communism? Haven't Umno leaders and Umno propangandists been taking a big flight of fantasy to conjure up the PAS – Communist nexus?

Isn't it true that all Mat Sabu was saying was simply that Umno had used the wrong analogy to self-glorify on a false claim – that it alone has brought Merdeka?

What Mat Sabu has uttered has nothing to do with communism. Neither was such uttering intended to downplay the contribution of Malay leaders to the country's independence movement – as wrongly accused by Umno leaders.

With regards to the role of MCP in our independence struggles, we have to say this. While we might not like communists or agree to the communist ideology, there is no denying the fact that the MCP fought for Malaya's independence. In fact, it was the high toll caused by the MCP armed insurrection that had prompted Her Majesty's Government (Queen Elizabeth) to shorten the transition of power to its hand-picked successors to ensure continuity of its legacy. In that sense, the MCP struggle had hastened Merdeka.

And even under the canopy of the MCP, not everyone was a communist, as many had joined the guerilla warfare not to serve the ideology of communism, but to fight to get rid of colonial rule.

CONFLUENCE OF FORCES

As for Umno's claim as the sole power that has brought this country independence, this is a far cry from the truth. 

Apart from MCP, other nationalist forces had been at work right after World War II (even before Umno was formed) to struggle for an independent Malaya. These were grouped under two umbrella bodies, namely, PUTERA (Pusat Tenaga Rakyat) comprising Malay-based organisations, and AMCJA (All-Malayan Council of Joint Action), a coalition of multi-racial bodies and unions, which included the MCP. These two umbrella bodies quickly joined forces then to press the British colonial government to grant independence to the then Malaya, for which even a draft People's Constitution was proposed in 1947. But the British rejected this proposition.  

In the subsequent crackdown on this joint political movement, during which many leaders were arrested, some Malay nationalist leaders, including Mat Indera, joined forces with MCP to continue their independence struggles through armed insurgency. As mentioned earlier, it is this armed struggle, which began in 1948 when Emergency was declared, that had served as the constant prod that pushed the British into a speedy hand-over of power.  

Thus, it was the confluence of forces that had brought Merdeka in 1957. Admittedly, the Alliance – a coalition consisting of Umno, MCA and MIC – as the political group favoured by the British, had played a major role in the negotiation that led to independence. But for Umno to claim sole credit for this independence achievement, as it has done in the country's official version of history, to the exclusion of even its own coalition partners MCA and MIC, would be to do a great injustice to all non-Umno Malayans who have contributed. Other nationalist movements, including those led by prominent leaders like Burhanuddin al-Helmy and Ahmad Boestaman, as well as the MCP, had also made significant contribution towards the speedy realization of Merdeka.

From this perspective, Mat Sabu in raising the Bukit Kepong example has done the nation a great service in awakening the country from the great distortion of history perpetrated by Umno.

A DESPERATE UMNO

As for Umno's current campaign to vilify Mat Sabu, it is sheer vulgar propaganda aimed at critically damaging the electoral support for of PAS and through it, the entire opposition alliance of Pakatan Rakyat, as Umno's accusation is nothing but concoction of twisted accounts, unsupported by facts or logic. 

That Umno has to resort to such childish and untenable strategy to salvage its precarious political fortune clearly indicates that it has already lost its potency as a political force – it has neither the substance nor the confidence to compete on a legitimate political platform.

Malaysia in the Era of Globalization #81

Posted: 04 Sep 2011 09:26 PM PDT

http://img194.imageshack.us/img194/3554/bakrimusa.jpg

M. Bakri Musa

IFIs thrived in the first few centuries of Islam not because those early Islamic thinkers had found a magic way to dispense with the cost of funds and returns on investments, rather they used different terms (or more crudely said, put a different spin on the issue) to circumvent interests payments and earnings.

Chapter 9: Islam in Malay Life

Reform in Islam

Islamic Financial Intermediaries (Cont'd)

 

IFIs thrived in the first few centuries of Islam not because those early Islamic thinkers had found a magic way to dispense with the cost of funds and returns on investments, rather they used different terms (or more crudely said, put a different spin on the issue) to circumvent interests payments and earnings.

 

The modern version of Islamic banks was resurrected only in the last few decades. Despite its recent rebirth, its popularity has soared both in Islamic and non-Islamic countries. This recent history should serve as a ready caution. The system has not been tested. The system of auditing, accounting, and regulating has not been standardized. What I fear most is that should Islamic banks fail in an economic crisis, it would not only aggravate the situation but also set back people's trust in them. That in turn would severely shake Muslim's trust in their religion.

A senior official of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, which supervises the world's largest and most sophisticated banks, voiced his concern about this in his address to a meeting of Islamic bankers who were eager on introducing the concept to America. Through bitter experience America has wisely separated commercial banking from insurance and investment banking, and also banking from commerce.

A century ago American banks were deeply involved with commercial enterprises much along the lines currently advocated by proponents of Islamic banking. The 1930 depression was blamed in part because banks were deeply involved in speculative share trading activities of companies they owned. Further, such co-mingling of banking and other commercial activities could lead to an unhealthy concentration of economic power. Banks would then cease from becoming an impartial arbiter of credit worthiness.

Modern Western banking has been continuously refined over the past centuries. Banks today (at least in Western countries) are safer and offer better services. They have also contributed immensely to economic development. The challenge for IFIs is not simply to say that Western banks are un-Islamic but to offer comparable services to customers and thus serve the economic needs of society.

Instead of trying to parse non-existent differences between interest and other costs of funds, modern Islamic bankers and economists should more productively focus their intellectual resources to differentiating the various kinds of lending. Islam rightly prohibits "making money on money," which I interpret as gambling and speculating, but encourages trade, which is taking risks in productive investments.

There are certainly significant differences between my borrowing money to buy a Mercedes limousine to show off to my colleagues and neighbors, or to use it as a taxi. The economic multiplier effect of the purchase, for example in creating jobs at the factory as well as the car repair shops, is the same in both cases – the direct effects of consumer spending. From there the economically meaningful differences emerge.

With the first instance I am using borrowed funds for consumption; the second for production or investment. With the latter I, as a borrower, would actually earn money (passenger revenues) as a consequent of the loan. And if I share my taxi with another driver, that would create yet another job (making a total of two taxi drivers). No such additional incomes or job creations would result with the first type of borrowing. Additionally, my taxi would provide a much-needed transportation service to the community. My private limousine would only create more pollution and envy from my neighbors. But the most important difference is that with the first borrowing, only the lender (bank) makes money out of the borrower; with the second, both lender and borrower make money.

In either case money is being borrowed and interest (cost of funds) incurred. But with the second case the borrowing serves a useful societal purpose; it is in fact a form of trading. I trade my service or expertise as a taxi driver for the bank's capital. The first borrowing on the other hand, is purely for consumption. One can be easily persuaded that borrowing in the second instance should be encouraged as society as a whole would benefit from such activities. No such societal benefits would accrue from the first borrowing. Thus we could properly differentiate, as many recent scholars have suggested, between the costs of capital in the first type of lending as interest, riba; the costs in the second instance should be more accurately called profit on the trading of capital, which in this case is money instead of the usual assets such as goods and real estate.

Muslims must remind ourselves that current accepted interpretations of terms such as riba and gharar (risky sale, speculation) are just that: interpretations. Indeed there are some scholars who interpret riba to mean excessive interest. Just as excessive profit is bad (and often illegal as they are usually obtained through such means as market manipulation, monopoly, or plain hoarding) so too are excessive interest rates. Likewise there is a conceptual difference between interests on "productive" versus "consumptive" loans. The latter would more likely fit the description of riba while the former as profit on the trading of capital.

There is a comparable controversy on whether insurance, specifically life insurance, is halal or haram. Islam has its own version of managing risks, Takaful. (mutual aid). Again here it is the duty of its proponents to clearly differentiate their product, especially with respect to safety, security, and rate of returns from traditional insurance so consumers could be better informed and be able to "comparison shop" intelligently.

In such important matters we must go beyond simplistic and legalistic changes of specific words but instead concentrate on deciphering the meanings and intent of such terms.

Indeed Muslim shippers in Spain first started the very concept of takaful or insurance. They would collect levies on each shipper so they would have funds to support the unfortunate shipper who would meet untimely calamity along the way. Of course the concept has since developed a long way from there.

When one traces the development of insurance from a mutual aid society, the ulama can easily understand and readily agree to the concept. I once explained to an alim who vehemently opposed life insurance, the concept of risk sharing. I described a community where when someone dies, the rest of the community would contribute some money to take care of the deceased's family. He readily agreed to the benefits of such deeds and went on to quote eloquently some holy passages to buttress his agreement. Then I suggested that instead of collecting the money only when someone dies, we would collect it regularly and put that cash in a pool ready to be distributed at the time of need, that is, the death of a member. Again, he readily concurred.

Then I moved on and suggested that instead of giving the same amount of money for each family, we use our judgment and give more to those who die leaving behind young children as opposed to those whose children have grown up. Again, he readily agreed to the rationale that the expenses of a family with dependent children would certainly be greater and therefore they should get more. Then I made the leap forward by suggesting that instead of us or the village committee deciding how much money the deceased family would get, we let individual members decide how much to leave to their family when they die. Surely the individual is the best judge on the needs of his or her family. Those who want to leave more would of course have to contribute more; those who want to leave less would contribute less. Again he saw no problem with that. Then I surprised him by saying that is in essence the concept of life insurance. You decide how much your family would get when you die and you make your contributions (that is, pay your premiums) accordingly.

Today, life insurance is much more complex as other risk factors like age and family history are considered. And instead of a village committee we have a team of professional actuaries who assess and price risks as well as invest the premiums. But cut to its core, life insurance is essentially a commercialized mutual aid society. The money contributed (premiums), instead of being left underneath the village headman's mattress, is being invested and thus further contributes directly to the economy.

The ulama's prohibition on insurance, specifically life insurance, is simply based on their lack of understanding of the concept of risk sharing. They have this simplistic notion of life insurance as a bounty to invite some mischief on the part of the beneficiary in order to collect the cash. Well, such a scheme is a crime. One would be punished right here in this world for fraud and murder.

Life insurance, like other forms of insurances, is merely a form of mutual sharing of risks. Nothing prevents a community, co-operative, or a "mutual" company from offering such investments. Indeed such co-ops and mutual insurance companies are among the biggest issuers of insurances in America. The Mormon Church has a similar insurance-like scheme by levying charges (tithes) on its members to take care of the sick and disabled amongst them.

Next: Educating Ulamas on Modern Economics

 

Cry of the silent millions goes unheeded

Posted: 02 Sep 2011 11:12 PM PDT

When the Malayan flag was hoisted in 1957, 'every person there did not represent one race, they were Malayans," recalls Mrs FR Bhupalan, who was then a 30-year-old mother of two.

Having championed causes such as the anti-drug abuse movement, women's rights, education and social justice, Bhupalan was one of the earliest women involved in the fight for Malaysian (then Malaya) independence.

Aneesa Alphonsus, Free Malaysia Today

At the age of 84, Rasammah Bhupalan's eyes still light up at the mention of Aug 31, 1957.

Her eagerness when sharing what she witnessed that momentous day is infectious and at times poignant.

Known to many as Mrs FR Bhupalan, she was both a Malaysian freedom fighter and social activist.

Having championed causes such as the anti-drug abuse movement, women's rights, education and social justice, Bhupalan was one of the earliest women involved in the fight for Malaysian (then Malaya) independence.

At the age of 16, she joined the Rani of Jhansi Regiment, the women's wing of the Indian National Army, to fight the British.

As founder president of the Women Teacher's Union, she fought for equal pay for women teachers and tried to bring a disparate teachers' unions under the same roof.

With these achievements, which she described as, "modest", it is little wonder why she feels so strongly about the day Malaya was liberated and recalls the day with much clarity and enthusiasm.

"It was the most exhilarating and happy period of the time. But it also came with the realisation that therein was a challenge (for me) as a citizen of an independent country and nation.

"It made me think about how I must undertake certain responsibilities and have greater participation in the life of our country. I was 30 years old at the time."

On the eve of Merdeka, Bhupalan made her way from Ipoh to be in Kuala Lumpur with two of her children in tow – a girl of five and a boy of three.

Excitement and anticipation

Having been a student of history, Bhupalan felt it was important that when the Union Jack was brought down and our Malayan flag hoisted, she should be there in order for her to share with her children the value of liberty.

So together with her cousins, Mrs Bhupalan arrived at what is now is known as Dataran Merdeka, as early at 9pm on Aug 30.

She recalled that even at that time, a massive crowd had already gathered.

There is pride in her voice when she recalls that the ambience that night was breathtaking.

"People were chatting and there were happy shouts everywhere. I never saw anything like it. Then the Union Jack came down and it was the most poignant moment.

"The clock struck 12 midnight and Tunku Abdul Rahman raised our flag. I was emotional with happiness because I felt that the future held great promise.

"Here was a country previously under colonial rule but which was now free.

"The whole spirit of that night was triumphant. Every person there did not represent one race, they were Malayans," she says, her voice catching.

At this juncture, she pauses and shared a thought that had come to her mind while witnessing the historic moment.

"My paternal grandfather came to Malaya in 1860 as a contractor and there I was standing as witness to this independence in 1957, three years short of a century.

"This fact struck me at the time. For me, there was every hope that Malaya would achieve its independence with a unity in spite of our multi-racial, cultural, language, and socio-economic differences.

"Tunku brought forth great hope. There would be no turning back now and as a nation, we would be moving forward," she said.

When 'hope' was born

Bhupalan smiles when she recalls the Merdeka morning. She arrived at the newly constructed Merdeka Stadium very early and the first thing that caught her attention were flag poles upon which state flags flew.

"The guest list was impressive, but we squeezed ourselves in. Yes, we were insignificant among the illustrious guests, but being there when our independence was declared made me feel very special.

"It was a majestic and breathtaking sight to see our nine Sultans decked out in full regalia looking so strong and proud," she said.

When asked about her stand on the monarchy and liberty, Bhupalan said she believes in the status of the Sultans.

"I knew at the time that we were a constitutionally democratic country where we would have free elections.

"There was hope that the nation of Malaya would uphold the constitutional monarchy within a democratic party.

"That the government would assure that every man, woman and child would get their place in the sun. The whole concept of a democracy was there."

She said she knew then that everyone had rights that would be protected by the constitution, and the government which the citizens would elect would have the power and responsibility to rule this new country.

"Electing the government was one thing, but more essential was assuring that each person becomes major players in the various multi-faceted responsibilities.

"It was the duty of a citizen to contribute to the progress and development of this new, young nation, " she said, adding that it is not enough to be a recipient of rights without understanding that with this comes both accountability and responsibility.

True spirit lost

When asked her views on the current situation in Malaysia, Bhupalan was biting. She didn't mince her words.

"To be honest and forthright, I am greatly perturbed and disappointed that many aspects of life which we had dedicated ourselves to in the country have not received the same commitment and dedication from the vast numbers of persons.

"Many men and women have lost the true spirit of sacrifice, but there are also others who are pushing forward for change.

"In our country, we have… acquired a spirit of complacency. We have lost in part our spirit and determination to stand up without fear or favour.

"Many have just chosen to accept instead of boldly stating what should be a strong impetus for the country and our people as a whole.

"There is a streak of egotistical self-sufficiency, which has become a major part of our individual life.

"There are millions in Malaysia who have seen minimal change. The gap between the haves and the have-nots is still with us.

"The cry of the silent millions goes unheeded. From 1957 to 2011, could we the citizens have made a greater, positive contribution to the lives of the have-nots?

"I ask myself this everyday."

No unity now

Bhupalan also feels strongly that a predominant part of our early history is tragically lost.

She opines that rhetoric from politicians, leaders of corporate bodies, non-governmental organisations and from both men and women clearly shows that the much-needed action is ignored.

The need for a strong proponent for unity in the country is unfortunately not present.

READ MORE HERE

 

The NEP and the downfall of Malays

Posted: 01 Sep 2011 04:40 PM PDT

The NEP may have caused an increase in the wealth of the Malay urban middle class but on the whole, many Malays remain poor.

It was not just his work that was a sham. His private life was just the same. There was no personal responsibility and those Malays who entered into polygamous marriages with two or three families to support, invariably ended up with dysfunctional families. The kids would be feral, without a father figure and no role model in their lives.

Mariam Mokhtar, Free Malaysia Today

Dr Mahathir Mohamad came to the defence of the New Economic Policy (NEP) when economist Ramon Navaratnam and Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim condemned the NEP for discouraging foreign investment and for promoting corruption.

However, Mahathir failed to note that the NEP, like many of the government's other programs with catchy, meaningless acronyms are only publicity stunts which fail to address the underlying problems that face many Malaysians, principally the Malays.

He said: "There may be corruption involved in some cases but the charge is not warranted because in most cases, the benefits of NEP have been enjoyed by almost every Malay and bumiputera. In fact, indirectly and, in some cases, directly it has benefited the non-bumiputera as well."

The former prime minister's selective amnesia serves him well. The NEP's short-term benefits may have impressed his Cabinet colleagues but in the long term, the NEP has disadvantaged all other Malaysians.

The warped policies have destroyed racial harmony and in East Malaysia, the bumiputeas are more desperate than ever. There is increasing resentment against the Malays who many believe, have squandered the benefits they have been given.

The NEP may have caused an increase in the wealth of the Malay urban middle class but on the whole, many Malays remain poor.

Despite the housing privileges and discounts, how many Malays can afford to buy houses? How many possess the business acumen to sustain a business without going bust in the first year?

Undeniably, those who benefit the most are Umno cronies, whilst the majority of Malays remain marginalised, hoping that things will get better, only because Umno says so.

Thus, many live in hope and some shun jobs because one day, they hope to become rich without putting in any effort.

The business incentives may have given the Malays a kick-start in life but many did not use them wisely. They did not reinvest the money in the company but instead spent it on the teak desk, the gold watch and the Mercedes car.

It was not just his work that was a sham. His private life was just the same. There was no personal responsibility and those Malays who entered into polygamous marriages with two or three families to support, invariably ended up with dysfunctional families. The kids would be feral, without a father figure and no role model in their lives.

Many of the children do not have a family life to speak of and education is not an important factor in their lives. Many grow up lacking aspiration and become adults who are just as irresponsible.

There are some decent people amongst this lot, but they are trapped in the system, with no way out.

Moving forward together

Mahathir claimed that under the Federal Land Development Authority (Felda) scheme, the settlers were much better off with higher incomes and children who were better educated.

He failed to note that there were serious issues that have cropped up. Few of the children of the original Felda settlers want to make a living off the land like their grandparents or parents did.

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


REPRESENTATION IN GOVERNMENT IS ABOUT ACCOUNTABILITY

Posted: 05 Sep 2011 06:46 PM PDT

By Tan Sri Datuk Robert Phang Miow Sin  

1. I am amused by the statement made by Datuk Seri Mohamed Nazri Aziz, the so-called de facto Minister for Law, who declared that he would fight tooth and nail to ensure Chinese representation in a Barisan Nasional (BN) government even if the Chinese component  party, namely MCA fails to secure a single parliamentary seat in the coming polls. 

2. That seems to be a truly "Jantan" statement  in championing the Chinese cause. If that statement is supposed to elevate Nazri Aziz in the eyes of the Chinese community, then he is mistaken. That statement would in fact constitute an insult to the Chinese electorates.

3. Who is Nazri to make such offers if the Chinese voters have rejected this Chinese-centric component party? Who appointed Nazri to be the Chinese champion on this issue? Since it is a historical fact that the BN political parties are race-based parties, it is best that Nazri look into his own backyard. I am sure my Malay brothers and sisters would appreciate to have their welfare being continuously taken care of by a vocal Malay Minister like Nazri Aziz, and not only during elections time.      

4. There is more than meets the eye to Nazri's statement. I have said it before that the statement by MCA President Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek is nothing more than a cheap political gimmick. Soi Lek loses nothing by making that statement. He knew that his "pornographic" background makes him unsuitable to be a government Minister. Thus, Soi Lek is actually sacrificing the government posts of other MCA leaders who could pose a threat to his MCA Presidency. The Chinese community is not stupid to not see Soi Lek's objectives.

5. It was only recently that Nazri Aziz was seen interfering with GLCs by instructing them to appoint a favored legal firm in order to cause a withdrawal of the cases that these GLCS have against former MAS Chairman, Tan Sri Tajudin Ramli. The public uproar showed that Nazri had miscalculated the public intelligence and reaction.
 
6. But more than that, I am told that it showed Nazri's failure to comprehend basic principles of corporate law. I am also told that Nazri's directive offends the Rule of Law because a government Minister cannot suborn the board of directors of a GLC which is a public listed company in that manner. I believe that Nazri Aziz should know these things better as he is a lawyer, while I am not.

7. By the same reasoning, Nazri's statement on Chinese representation in the government offends basic logic on the purpose and objective of elections. A general elections is part of the democratic process to allow the electorates to select the leaders whom they would want to govern over them and the country. If the Chinese electorates have rejected the Chinese leaders from MCA, who is Nazri to force upon us to accept such leaders as our representatives in government?

8. It is more alarming to note the second part of Nazri's statement that "The system allows us to appoint senators and we need to have representatives of the non-Malay community." This confirms the public skepticism that appointments to the Senate have been abused as a backdoor entry into government. This is preposterous. More than that, this statement coming from a senior Minister who is a lawyer, displays sheer arrogance which will be deservedly punished in the coming GE 13.  
9. Let us be reminded that the being elected to form the government is part of the democratic process. It erodes the fundamentals of democracy when a government is formed not from elected representatives but by back door appointments from politicians who have failed. A government post is not a trophy for political gratification.

10. I hope that as a person trained in the law, Nazri would recant his statement as it demeans the democracy that we hope to nature as we mature as a nation. Merdeka! Merdeka! Merdeka!      
 

 "HUMBLENESS IS GOOD VIRTUE, ARROGANCE SHALL FALL, THE MEEK WILL RULE THE WORLD".
 

Tan Sri Datuk Robert Phang Miow Sin

Justice of Peace

‘Don’t Blame’, because he is not your son, Mr. Prime Minister

Posted: 05 Sep 2011 01:09 PM PDT

I am not saying that all parties involved in a particular incident should be jailed or penalized, but do we at least allow such matters to be debated openly or investigated with transparency?

By Ng Ooi Cheng

Journalist Noramfaizul Mohd Nor was one of the casualties in many 1Malaysia-tagged programmes. Last month and in June alone, nearly 200 primary students in different schools of Melaka and Johor experienced symptoms including stomachache and vomiting due to milk poisoning under the 1Malaysia School Milk programme, and they seemed to carry no weight in the UMNO-controlled newspapers. In 2010, more than 20 primary students fell into a river at night in Kuala Dipang, Perak at the 1Malaysia Camp, and three of them died.

Definitely, no one would have wanted the above incidents to take place.

However, had the organizers and parties involved taken enough consideration, precautions and measures to prevent the undesired incidents? (Read report below)

I was upset when I saw the headline 'Don't Blame' in a local newspaper yesterday (5 September), alluding to a comment by Prime Minister Najib about what had happened to Noramfaizul. My spontaneous reaction from my heart was, "Don't blame? Of course, because he is not your son."

It is this 'blameless' attitude that people are now facing hard times, mistakes are repeated, and many culprits escape. So, nobody is accountable for any faults, or all faults are denied as false.

In Japan, Naoto Kan relinquished his prime minister post, kneeled down and apologized when admitting his government's responsibility for the HIV-tainted blood incident when he was the health minister. In Korea and Taiwan, former presidents got jail terms for corruption. In China, businessmen were sentenced to death for tainted milk powder that killed several babies.

I am not saying that all parties involved in a particular incident should be jailed or penalized, but do we at least allow such matters to be debated openly or investigated with transparency?

For instance, in the case of Noramfaizul, did those organizing the mission understand the modus operandi of journalists when in a battlefield or war zone? Did they provide the journalists with adequate protection? I have learnt from news reports that the Malaysian journalists did not even wear bullet-proof jackets.

Did anyone have full understanding of what is happening in Somalia? It is basically a state of anarchy. People who follow the international news know that the Gulf of Aden offshore Somalia recorded piracy cases higher than any other region over the last few years, and they were mainly Somali pirates who were involved. Dozens of journalists were reported to have been killed in Somalia and foreign journalists have been fleeing the country. A local journalist was reported to have said that both insurgents as well as pro-government forces were targeting journalists as they did not want any record of their criminal acts.

Everything is too late now as damage cannot be undone. Heroic titles and compensation can be given, but the beloved father, husband and son to family members cannot be returned.

May he rest in peace and his family blessed.

 

 
 
 
 
Somalia: Will Anyone Be Left to Tell the Tale?
Posted by Katherine Carson on Jun 12, 2009
Anti-government fighter in Mogadishu - AP

It seems there may be a campaign underway to rid Mogadishu of its independent media. Recent reports highlight the increasing harassment and intimidation of journalists in Mogadishu.

While dozens of journalists have been killed since late 2006, there has been a visible increase in the targeting of journalists this year. Thus far in 2009 , five journalists have already been killed – most recently Mukhtar Mohamed Hirabe, director of Radio Shabelle. Dozens more have fled Mogadishu after receiving death threats. According to Hamdi Kadiye, an executive member of the National Union of Somali Journalists, "We [journalists] are in a very difficult and dangerous situation. We are being forced to choose between reporting on what is happening and our lives."

 

But why are journalists being targeted? According to Hamdi Kadiye, it is because the groups fighting, both the insurgents and pro-government forces, want to ensure there are no records of the crimes they are committing. Over the past month, fighting has overtaken Mogadishu, resulting in the displacement of 117,000 people since early May. According to UNICEF's acting representative for Somalia Hannan Suleiman, it "is the most concentrated displacement of civilians the city has seen in years." Even more worrying are U.N. reports of ongoing war crimes and crimes against humanity, including the use of boys – some as young as nine – as fighters on the front lines, and increasing reports of rape and sexual violence against women. These are the stories the fighters want silenced due to fears that media reports could be used as evidence against them in the future.

Silencing these reports would be a catastrophe for the Somali people. As fewer international journalists are able to travel to Somalia, it has fallen to the independent media within Mogadishu to continue reporting on the ongoing violence. Without their reporting, the world will know woefully little about the horrors facing the Somali people. Hamidi Kadiye put it best when he said, "If journalists left and the independent media ceased to exist, there would be no one to tell the story of those suffering."

 

 

 

 

Najib Should Admit Putera 1Malaysia Somalia Trip was Reckless

Posted: 04 Sep 2011 12:56 AM PDT

The media workers from Malaysia had no bullet proof vests, head gears and the 4-wheel they were traveling in was not marked "Media" to avoid sniper attacks.

Charles Santiago

Member of Parliament, Klang

We all understand that Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak is thinking about the reputation of his party, UMNO, even as the wife and family members of BernamaTV cameraman Noramfaizul Mohd Nor grieve over his death.

At a press conference this morning, Najib rebuked those who were trying to pin the blame for Noramfaizul's death on UMNO Youth and Putra 1Malaysia.

The premier must understand that no one is playing a blame game. But UMNO division chief Abdul Azeez Abdul Rahim, Putra 1Malaysia and Bernama must be held responsible for not providing Noramfaizul with adequate protection and training.

The media workers from Malaysia had no bullet proof vests, head gears and the 4-wheel they were traveling in was not marked "Media" to avoid sniper attacks.

Najib has gone on record to say that one could get killed even if he wears a bullet proof vest. He also dodged questions about whether journalists assigned to conflict zones must be given adequate training, saying such assignments come with its inherent risks.

But his most irresponsible remark is this – "Even foreign journalists get killed…If you don't want to become a journalist, stay at home".

I am shocked.

Journalists do not have to go to conflict zones to bring back news reports and footage. But some opt to do so to tell the truth and disseminate accurate information to the people. This is an honorable job.

As such, it is the duty of the media organizations to adequately train and protect their journalists.

Noramfaizul has been described by Najib as a national hero. Let's try telling that to his wife, two young children and parents.

The truth is that he died because of a reckless trip put together by Putra 1Malaysia and Abdul Azeez with the backing of the government and Bernama.

It was nothing but a cheap publicity stunt for UMNO and Putra 1Malaysia when the aid could have been disbursed through existing aid agencies like the Medecins San Frontieres (MSF).

The government has to stop repeating what it does best – sweeping pertinent issues under the carpet.

Najib must admit that a gross mistake has been made by Putra 1Malaysia and Bernama.

Following that the Ministry of Information must impose safety protocol requirements to media organizations in order to protect reporters going to hostile areas.

This is because no story is worth dying for.

I call upon the government to institute an investigation into the level of preparedness of  this poorly planned and reckless mission to Somalia.

 

WikiLeaks crowdsourcing tool / Alternative cablegate browser

Posted: 03 Sep 2011 11:26 PM PDT

By Addy

Following the full release of unredacted WikiLeaks cables on Sept 2, 2011, we have made available an updated crowdsourcing tool for journalists and general public also at:

The app allows you to easily browse, search and read all the released WikiLeaks cables in a sleek and simple interface.

All 251,287 cables will be uploaded to the site soon. Stay tuned.

I believe this will certainly interest quite a number of people as we have over 900 Malaysian cables.

Tee Keat's fall - the inside story

Posted: 02 Sep 2011 11:32 PM PDT

What further alienated him from Umno was the opinion poll on whether MCA should pull out from BN in his blog after he assumed the MCA Presidency. This was said to have really irked Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak's administration.

By Lee Kee

ACCORDING to MCA little birds, former MCA president Ong Tee Keat was known to have abhorred the arrogance of power perpetrated by Umno in Barisan Nasional (BN). He was labelled by Umno as anti-Malay through its mouth-pieces in the 2008 General Election.

He created another wave shortly after the political tsunami when he openly expressed his strong disagreement over Ketuanan Melayu in his capacity as a minister. That earned him several brickbats from his
coalition partners.

What further alienated him from Umno was the opinion poll on whether MCA should pull out from BN in his blog after he assumed the MCA Presidency. This was said to have really irked Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak's administration.

It was believed that Tee Keat's insistence on having "leaving BN" as an option had indeed precipitated the determination of Umno top brass to remove Ong in the long run. They grabbed the opportunity when the duly elected MCA leaders like Liow Tiong Lai, Wee Ka Siong (once aligned to Tee Keat) felt insecure when Tee Keat went on to spearhead the multi-billion-ringgit Port Klang Free Zone (PKFZ) financial scandal probe with gusto. Both were known to have strong links with Tiong King Sing (the key contractor implicated in the PKFZ probe who is known to have the confidence of the Umno top brass).

Tiong has so far been holding the chairmanship of BN Backbenchers' Club unscathed despite the strong adverse publicity implicating his involvement in the PKFZ scandal.

Whilst the then Wanita MCA chief Chew Mei Fun (known to have remained loyal to Ong Ka Ting and Ong Ka Chuan (Ka Ting's elder brother who was later dropped as a minister) had also placed their hope on the Umno top brass in view of Tee Keat's unpredictable move of contemplating to leave BN.

Both the Liow and Ka Chuan cliques realised the latent danger that Chua Soi Lek (the then Deputy President of MCA) might ascend to the presidency should Tee Keat be toppled. They craftily designed a conspiracy to eliminate both Tee Keat and Chua through Chua's disciplinary case.

According to MCA insiders, in all fairness, the case was instituted against Chua not by Tee Keat but by his
predecessor Ka Ting who left the case open-ended. That had warranted Tee Keat to act later under the heavy influence of Liow, Wee, and Chew in the Presidential Council.

The expulsion decision meted on Chua's disciplinary case (over the sex DVD scandal) triggered by the Presidential Council was indeed a masterstroke as the trio (Liow, Wee and Chew) managed to influence the decision of the Council while hiding behind the shield of Tee Keat. So, Tee Keat had to bear the full blame in the eyes of the Umno top brass who had earlier wanted Tee Keat to stop or to defer the disciplinary proceedings against Chua.

Tee Keat was known to be overly gung-ho by giving an uncompromising "No".

Both Najib and Umno vice president Hishammuddin Hussein, who were then engaging Tee Keat on the issue, were said to have hit the roof top over Tee Keat's recalcitrant stance. They dubbed him as unpredictable, uncompromising and unfriendly to Umno.

What actually served as the last straw breaking the camel's back was Tee Keat's resistance to Najib''s demand for the Port Klang Authority (PKA) to pay Kuala Dimensi (the controversial turnkey contractor in the PKFZ scandal) the hefty bond interest due. Tee Keat was quoted as arguing that the disputable bond interest payment had to b held in abbeyance in the public's interest, whilst Najib was wary of the bond market confidence.

When the various factions thirsty for Tee Keat's blood managed to oust him at the behest of Umno, Najib ultimately chose to oust him from his Cabinet on the rationale that the ministerial appointments are party-based. Since Chua made the recommendation to replace Tee Keat, Najib willingly obliged.

But the mockery was Najib's action came on the heels of the assessment of his six National Key Result Areas (NKRAs) where the opinion poll rating in favour of the Tee Keat-led Public Transport revamp ranked top.

That, the MCA insiders say, is the reward for performance or in terms of the next general election, a winnable candidate for BN?

The moral of a politician's story in the BN is: "Don't be a smart ass! Just suck Umno's ass to remain relevant for the crumbs."

UMNO own's media confirm Mat Sabu is correct

Posted: 02 Sep 2011 11:27 PM PDT

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhqYo1FDyG9f9SFu25d78UyJw4nk2BlDmLYm-tgDe_-Bv-5XOQP9hfu5DLh04dvXGsxUQ2KMnASnAC8OJ19Fy3DLZyN8SBD1B0RLyzlRR7VJAsA9LJP6eXHGYlZXN8WVsp2ZBVnA9ovkOQ/s1600/Berita+Harian+Online%25

I found an article in Berita Harian dated 13 Dec 2010 entitled, "Kopi Kecubung Tewaskan Mat Indera". "Kecubung' is amethyst, the purple semi-precious stone. It shows Mat Sabu is correct on Mat Indera as confirmed by UMNO own's media.

By Arazak

The article can be found at: http://www.bharian.com.my/articles/KopikecubungtewaskankekebalanMatIndera/Article/

Kopi kecubung tewaskan kekebalan Mat Indera

NAMA Jawa Ponorogo pernah terkenal dengan berita penangkapan anggota komunis, Ahmad Indera atau dikenali sebagai Mat Indera, berdarah pahlawan daripada keturunan Datuk Bentara Husin Lela Pahlawan Siak Seri Inderapura yang menjadi panglima kanan Sultan Sharif di Siak.

Meskipun Mat Indera dikaitkan sebagai pengganas oleh sesetengah orang kerana pembabitannya dalam komunis dan dilabelkan sebagai petualang oleh kerajaan Inggeris, ramai masyarakat Jawa Ponorogo menganggapnya pejuang dalam menuntut kemerdekaan, cuma memilih jalan yang salah.

Pemuda kelahiran Kampung Gombak, Peserai, Batu Pahat itu mempunyai peribadi tinggi dan dikatakan kuat beribadat serta tinggi pengetahuan agamanya. Justeru, dia disenangi penduduk di Sri Medan yang kerap membantunya membekalkan makanan ketika dia dalam parti komunis.
Namun, tekanan yang diberikan Inggeris terutama kepada rakan karibnya, Mat Tukyo supaya menangkap Mat Indera atau tindakan tegas dikenakan terhadap penduduk Sri Medan menyebabkan mereka tiada pilihan selain memastikannya ditangkap. Namun, bukan kerja mudah menangkapnya kerana kehebatan dan ketinggian ilmu Mat Indera.

Ugutan Inggeris terus menjadi tekanan kepada penduduk Sri Medan termasuk untuk memindahkan mereka dan mengambil tindakan tegas kepada mereka yang membantu membekalkan makanan kepada Mat Indera.

Penangkapan Mat Tukyo oleh Inggeris sebelum ditawarkan beberapa ganjaran selain hidup bebas di Sri Medan menjadi kemuncak tindakan nekad penduduk Jawa Ponorogo, namun perlu melalui kaedah terancang kerana semua mengetahui kesaktian Mat Indera.

Pada 14 Oktober 1952, lima lelaki Jawa Ponorogo yang diketuai Md Sham dan dibantu Ismail Mustakim (Misban), Beladang, Mat Tukyo dan Bajuri menggunakan tipu helah untuk memberkas Mat Indera.
Ia bermula dengan jemputan Mat Tukyo dan Misban untuk mengadakan perbincangan mengenai pelan bantuan orang kampung kepada Mat Indera. Dalam perbincangan itu, dia dijamu dengan tempe dan kopi yang dicampur kecubung. Akibat itu Mat Indera mabuk dan mengantuk.

Kesempatan itu digunakan untuk menanggalkan semua tangkal serta mengikat tangannya dengan lalang. Dikatakan, kerana itulah ilmu ghaib dan kehebatan Mat Indera tidak lagi dapat digunakan.

Bekas ketua kampung Parit Warijo, Malik Samuri menjadi saksi bagaimana Mat Indera dibawa dengan basikal sedang tangannya diikat daun lalang. Peristiwa itu sebenarnya menimbulkan pelbagai reaksi masyarakat Jawa Ponorogo. Ada yang gembira dan ada yang sebak.

Mohd Abidin Ismail iaitu anak salah seorang yang menangkap Mat Indera, Misban, berkata meskipun terbabit secara langsung dalam tipu helah itu, sepanjang hidup ayahnya tidak pernah menyatakan kebanggaan atas kejayaan itu, malah tidak sesekali melabelkan Mat Indera sebagai petualang.

"Cuma apa yang kerap diceritakannya ialah tindakan mereka ketika itu adalah disebabkan tekanan yang dihadapi akibat ugutan Inggeris. Mungkin ada melabelkannya sebagai petualang tetapi saya merasakan dia seorang pejuang tetapi memilih jalan yang salah.

"Tidak adil terus melabel Mat Indera sebagai pengkhianat kerana dia juga berjuang untuk menuntut kemerdekaan. Cuma kumpulan yang disertainya itu tidak sesuai, itupun disebabkan tiada kumpulan lain ketika itu. Kumpulan Melayu lain terlalu lambat bertindak" katanya.

 

UMNO's Somalia Medical Mission: Genuine or Publicity Stunt?

Posted: 02 Sep 2011 11:12 PM PDT

A brief look at the Army's hospitals' websites indicate that almost all their hospitals have hardly any patients, which will then beg the question. What do our army docs and medics do with so much free time on their hands? Shouldn't they have gone instead of the UMNO club?

By Blackhawk

By the time this article is published, the body of 39-year-old Noramfaizul Mohd Nor, Bernama's late cameraman, who had apparently followed UMNO Putra club's humanitarian mission to Somalis would have arrived in Malaysia. It is tragic, that apart from the hundreds of lives lost during the Raya period on Malaysian roads due to the balik kampong mayhem, Faizul should meet his death in war torn Mogadishu, Somalia.

Was this just an accident? Could it have been avoided? Did UMNO rush to Somalia to genuinely help Somalians? Or did UMNO throw caution to the wind and rush callously on the eve of Raya to Somalia just for a publicity stunt? If it was for a publicity stunt, then Faizul would have died in vain and this wouldn't have been the first time when our personnel, both medical and non-medical would have risked not only their lives but more importantly the people around them who may be completely oblivious to the dangers of this sort of missions.

 

In 2003, Mercy Malaysia similarly put medical personnel at risk. Its two doctors, Dr. Jamilah and Baba Deni were lucky to get away alive although both were shot in Baghdad. Not so lucky were their Syrian driver and the Iraqi medical personnel who were accompanying them. Both lost their lives in the shooting. Malaysians may mean well, but extending aid to war torn and disaster areas carries immense risks and requires specific training. It is not a boy scout outing. Apart from the safety aspect, questions have arose as to how these trips are being financed and who actually audits these ventures.

 

When the 2004 tsunami flattened Acheh, Malaysians were one of the first to reach Acheh. But they were hopelessly ill-equipped for the task ahead. In direct contrast, Singapore and Australia sent in their army and naval outfits to attend to the distribution of aid. Humanitarian aid carried out by trained forces tend to be more orderly, organized, triaged and focused to help. Malaysians out to help nuclear-disastered Sendai, Japan following this year's tsunami were not even allowed to leave Subang for Japan by Japanese authorities, as the Japanese politely refused knowing well they could not guarantee the safety of their own people let alone foreign volunteers untrained in handling nuclear fall-outs.

 

From the images shown on local TV, the UMNO Putra Team appeared to be untrained personnel doing their rounds on unfriendly and sometimes hostile terrain. How would giving adhoc cholera/typhoid vaccinations and holding impromptu outpatient clinics at refugee camps help civilians there in the long-term? And why would you want to do a job you are not trained to handle especially on terrain you are not familiar with and unfriendly at that too. Shouldn't it have been a job for our army boys. We are in peace time anyway and this would have been a good mission to keep them on their toes. There is no imminent danger of our submarines sinking as they apparently cannot dive, or our air force jets with no engines crashing and there are certainly no communists to look out for who may be waiting to create another Bukit Kepong situation.

 

A brief look at the Army's hospitals' websites indicate that almost all their hospitals have hardly any patients, which will then beg the question. What do our army docs and medics do with so much free time on their hands? Shouldn't they have gone instead of the UMNO club? Unless of course the help UMNO wanted to deliver was a sideshow, the main menu being publicity for UMNO or its leaders judging from the daily reporting in the MSM and TV images during prime time. Is this GE-13 election campaigning using the Somalians misery and our journalists' lives to brainwash our kampong folk?

 

UMNO must now be ready to answer some difficult questions. The Mission arrived in Somalia on 30th August at one of the world's most dangerous destinations and to a country that is home to pirates that can put to shame even the mightiest of navies in the Indian Ocean, including the US Navy. Apparently it was timed to provide Hari Raya aid and according to a statement issued by its chief, Datuk Abdul Azeez Abdul Rahim to even have Hari Raya prayers there! If the Health Ministry was involved and had sent some of their personnel, Liow Tiong Lai better have some answers ready! With our own Malaysians getting literally war conditions treatment in many of our government hospitals, it would be interesting to listen to Liow's excuses, in his own Tung Shin way.

 

Aid was supposed to be distributed to five areas, with Mogadishu being the first stop. Others included Badbadur, about 25km from Mogadishu, where about 250,000 people are taking refuge, Al Shabeb in Merka where 300,000 people are affected by the famine and in the Balet Veni camps which house 100,000 people. Both areas are located 100km from Mogadishu. Even the Operations chief Lt-Col Zahani Zainal Abdin had warned saying it would be risky to even fly into Mogadishu at night. In total there were a total of 55 volunteers and members of the media who formed part of the mission to cover a radius of almost 200 km in a country where there was no law except for a 9000 strong UN backed force - the only law in a country of 10 million.

Make no mistake, in this country even 12 year olds carry AK-47s. UMNO club members had no business being in this country and in their pursuit of cheap publicity endangering the lives of other civilians both Malaysians and Somalians. Any mission that carries with it civilians and journalists are a handicap to any military personnel exposing even the most well-trained military commando to being nothing more then a sitting duck. Al- Fatihah to Noramfaizul Mohd Nor's family. Let's hope Bernama and Utusan don't spin his untimely and unnecessary death into a "mati syahid" affair.

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Well, Screw Yew!

Posted: 05 Sep 2011 04:07 PM PDT

That was part of what Minister Mentor Lee Kuan Yew reportedly said to a bunch of students at Nanyang Technological University last night.

The "agreements" which he was referring to was the one which was allegedly signed in 1990 in respect of the status of the KTM's railway station in Tanjung Pagar and land between Bukit Timah and Tanjung Pagar. I have heard so many versions of that so-called point of agreements and the personality involved behind it. Suffice if I say that that so-called agreement is not beyond scrutiny when it comes to its enforceability.

After having said the above, The Minister Mentor continued to speak "positively" of "increasing connectivity" between Malaysia and Singapore through the construction of a third bridge. (I bet you Dr Mahathir is now hyperventilating with immense pleasure after reading that statement).

The above remark is typical of the bomb-in-floral-wrap diplomacy which Singapore is so well known for. That tiny southern cock is well known for cuckoo-ing nice little compliments and praises to its neighbours while at the same time lacing them with seemingly harmless little hypothesis of wars and mayhems.

To me, the above remark is but a reflection of Singapore's insecurity as a smallish state without any real and tangible strength in its resources, particularly in terms of citizenry and natural sustenance capabilities.

Singapore is almost always haunted by the fact that she even have to import water from Malaysia. She is of course also mindful, at all times, of the fact that 300000 of its workforce, come from Malaysia. Her economy by and large is also dependant on Malaysia's willingness to maintain a peaceful, cordial and neighbourly relationship with herself.

There is absolutely no reason for Lee Kuan Yew to spell out his nightmare to 1700 students in a forum, unless that nightmare has been haunting him and the rest of the Cabinet of Singapore for all of their collective life.

READ MORE HERE

 

The Winter of Chinese Discontent

Posted: 05 Sep 2011 09:22 AM PDT

Undoubtedly, the political consciousness of Chinese has changed very radically. The Chinese community today are now more politically active and dare take a stand on issues - a far cry from those who cowered in fear ten years ago! (As a Chinese, I am discussing it from a Chinese perspective without prejudice against other races. I thought I'd better make this clear from the start.)

Whereas in the past, there were few Chinese who were involved in activism, the years of being sidelined have propelled them out of the comfort zone to come out in full force such as during the Bersih rally, even though some deny that fact. The stigma of being called 'pendatang' has injected us with new courage and indignation. And yes, we are finally coming out of our individual tempurungs for a better Malaysia for all!

And why are Chinese Malaysians braver now? It is because they are fed up. Angry. Frustrated. Even after contributing to the vibrancy of the Malaysian economy by opening up all kinds of enterprises, even after trying to be positive contributors to the development of this country, even after trying their best to integrate and to assimilate to the best of their abilities, they still have to fight for rights before the government gets to be more hard core in marginalizing and sidelining us. All this is done while they have the cheek to grandly deny that they are NOT sidelining us and worse still, we cannot voice our concerns or question this.

After slogging away and contributing to taxes, we see how vernacular schools i.e. hua xiao (do not get enough funds, and deserving students do not get scholarships. Our bright students who do not meet certain 'requirements' have to be on F and M scholarships i.e. father's and mother's scholarship. Whereas in the past people kept quiet, now we see how even a young man Chan Xian Yao, 19, a student who failed to obtain a "Khazanah-Cambridge Scholarship" filed a suit against Khazanah Nasional Berhad and three others at the High Court through his father Chan Chow Wang's law firm. (Read more here.)

Despite whatever economic development achieved or the level of affluence enjoyed, or even the existence of middle class Chinese, does democracy and equality really exist? How far has the status quo crushed the patriotic hearts of the people by discriminatory policies, such as in education and housing?

While in the past many hid in political passivity, more and more are rising up to join organized movements to demand greater power, free speech, or other democratic rights against a repressive political system. In the last ten years, the winter of discontent has led to heavy debates which are more and more animated. Goodbye reticence, hello boldness!

Previously, it was normal for Chinese to give their support to MCA or Gerakan but the tide has changed because they will not suffer any more wishy-washy policies but are ready to moot political change via activism and the ballot box. The image of infallibility of MCA or Gerakan has been completely eroded in the last few years and regardless of how much they swivel in self- denial, they can forget about winning the support of the Chinese in the next election.  We know how these two political parties have fared in recent years, and more damningly, many have perceived them as being unwilling to take accountability for their mistakes. Even now, they are in political inertia and their popularity ratings are plummeting. Have they tried their best to protect and promote the welfare of Chinese?  How many will continue to support them and resign themselves to stagnation? I am sure that if candidates are good, Malaysian voters will vote for them based on the quality of their leadership and commitment and not along racial lines! And now, we have to contend with the implications of Nazri's statement here.

In the last six months, the quality of life in our country is worsening despite claims of economic growth. Our pockets are lighter and we have to work longer hours to make ends meet. With the removal of subsidies and increases in fuel cost, the cost of living has spiralled out of control. My son has just graduated and I cannot see how his current salary is sufficient to afford his insurance premiums and housing loan (if and when he saves up enough $$ to buy a place).

In reality, the income gap in our country has increased so alarmingly that we now have one of the highest Gini co-efficients in the world as seen HERE.  Whatever fruits of our labour or economic success have not been fairly distributed so the spoils are NOT being enjoyed by those who work hard! The winter of discontent on the ground is real but does it appear that the status quo are able and willing to address the situation? Does it seem that they are more intent to do cosmetic surgery to make things look good when in fact, they do not?

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Aziz Bari: ‘Secara teknikal tidak, pada hakikat British jajah kita’

Posted: 05 Sep 2011 04:38 PM PDT

"Pendeknya dari segi teknikal memang negeri-negeri Melayu bukan atau tidak pernah dijajah... hatta pentadbiran agama pun dipantau oleh British," kata beliau dalam reaksi kepada The Malaysian Insider hari ini.

"Secara teknikal memang betul bahawa kita tak pernah dijajah; negeri-negeri Melayu hanya negeri lindungan. Hanya Melaka, Pulau Pinang, Sabah dan Sarawak yang pernah dijajah," kata beliau.

Bagaimanapun menurut ahli akademik ini, negeri-negeri Melayu bukan negeri yang bebas dan berdaulat kerana mereka tidak bebas mengadakan hubungan luar.

"Raja-raja, contohnya, dipaksa menerima kejatuhan Empayar Uthmaniah yang dihancurkan oleh British dan sekutu-sekutunya pada 1924. Ini semua berlaku kerana Raja-raja di bawah tangan British meskipun mereka tidak dijajah.

"Selain itu meskipun di sisi undang-undang, yakni secara teknikalnya, mereka berdaulat kita semua tahu dasar dan undang-undang semuanya ditentukan oleh British," kata beliau sambil menambah, Prof Emeritus Tan Sri Dr Khoo Kay Kim tidak harus membesar-besarkan kedudukan teknikal itu sehingga menafikan hakikat yang berlaku ketika itu.

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved