Selasa, 12 Julai 2011

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


PM Najib's tyranny draws focus on bribes, murder

Posted: 12 Jul 2011 03:23 AM PDT

By Jarius Bondoc, The Philipine Star

Whom the gods wish to destroy they first make . . . Mad it was for Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak to prime the police into thinking days prior that last Saturday's opposition protest in Kuala Lumpur was illegal, and that seized firebomb stashes would have been used. Madder still, for him to have the 20,000 marchers tear-gassed and 1,667 arrested.

The rally was to call for electoral reforms, a domestic issue that attracted only the Malaysian press. But when riot squads aimed teargas canisters at opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim's head, actually hitting his aide's eye, and causing the fatal heart attack of one demonstrator, the event drew world attention. Now international groups are denouncing the mayhem as proof of Najib's disregard for human rights. Worse, there's sudden global interest in an imminent subpoena of Najib to a Paris trial on kickbacks in purchasing three French submarines in 2002, and the consequent murder of a Mongolian socialite in 2006.

Malaysia's parliament will have no choice but to take up the brutal dispersal. Najib's home minister's claim has been debunked that police performed their duties "with bravery, fairness and integrity." Narratives jibe that marchers were on their way to a downtown stadium from different parts of the capital when confronted with teargas and chemical-laced water cannons. Even if the storm does not affect next year's setting of national polls, the fallout predictably will hurt Najib.

Najib allegedly has concocted sexcapades to bring down arch foe Anwar. Not only has the scheme backfired, Najib is now himself under fire for immorality. Trial is to begin of French arms giant DCN-Armaris for bribery in the 2002 submarine sale to Malaysia through then-defense minister Najib. Commissions supposedly came in three tranches: first euro 30 million upon contract signing, then euro 114 million subcontracted to an unknown firm owned by Najib's security adviser Razak Baginda, and last euro 2.5 million. From reports, Najib, Baginda, and their purported shared Mongolian girlfriend Altantuya Sharibu motored around France after sealing the deal. Najib and now London-based Baginda will be summoned to Paris as soon as a judge is assigned to the case this month or next.

The bribery worsened into kidnapping-murder when Altantuya raucously tried to collect her euro 350,000-share from Baginda in 2006. Najib's jealous wife Rosmah forbade the men from paying her a single cent, provoking Altantuya to picket their manor. Two Najib bodyguards abducted the pregnant Altantuya, shot her dead in the woods, and burned the corpse with military explosives. Party mates nevertheless made Najib prime minister in 2009. The bodyguards confessed and were convicted last year; Baginda was acquitted. Prosecutors, defense lawyers, and the judge were forbidden from mentioning the sleazy submarine deal during the trial. Still, Najib got an international black eye.

France has no power to compel the attendance of Najib or Baginda. But it can demand the truth from DCN-Armaris. The Malaysia Chronicle recently quoted Kuala Lumpur politicians as saying that if Najib snubs the trial he would in effect tell the world that he's guilty as charged.

And the world will be watching, now that Najib has turned the spotlight on himself with last weekend's tyrannical squashing of dissent.

 

Mat Zain wants Altantuya accused retried

Posted: 11 Jul 2011 10:05 PM PDT

(The Malaysian Inisder) - Datuk Mat Zain Ibrahim urged today Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak to step in and relook the Attorney-General's (A-G) prosecution of two policemen now on death row for the murder of Mongolian model Altantuya Shaariibuu.

The retired cop accused the A-G of mishandling the case, which reflects a miscarriage of justice as the motive for murder was never found.

The former head of the KL Criminal Investigation Department (CID) has repeatedly accused A-G Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail of having deceived the federal government and former prime minister, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, in several high-profile cases ranging from the infamous 'black eye" incident involving Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to most recently, the trial of Tun Dr Ling Liong Sik in the multi-billion ringgit Port Klang Free Zone (PKFZ) project.

In an open letter today, Mat Zain suggested that Abdul Gani's handling of the prosecution in the Altantuya murder case had blocked the court from giving a fair trial to the two men accused of murdering the former mistress of PM Najib's once close friend, political analyst Abdul Razak Baginda.

"The possibility exists that there was miscarriage of justice, whether deliberate or otherwise, that caused the court to sentence to death Chief Inspector Azilah Hadri and Corporal Sirul Azhar [Umar]," Mat Zain said in the letter to the PM; a copy was also sent to the media.

The ex-cop drew parallels between the Altantuya murder case and that of former beauty queen Jean Perera Sinappa who was also discovered murdered in April 1979 near the Subang airport.

Mat Zain recounted that in the 32 year-old case, Sinappa's brother-in-law, Kartigesu, who was accused of her murder and sentenced to death was later freed after the Court of Appeal found that one of the witnesses, Jayatilake, had lied in his testimony.

In comparison, Abdul Gani had "buried" possibly crucial evidence in the Altantuya trial, namely private investigator P. Balasubramian's two contradictory statutory declarations (SD), that could help both Azilah and Sirul Azhar.

"I conclude that Gani Patail's action to bury the testimony in Balasubramaniam's two SDs made on 3 and 4 July 2008, from being presented for tghe judge's consideration in the then-ongoing Altantuya murder trial had denied the two accused, C/Insp.Azilah dan Koporal Sirul, justice," Mat Zain said.

He stressed that the A-G has the discretion to begin, manage or end a criminal proceeding, under Article 145(3) of the Federal Constitution.

"But the A-G does not have the right or power to abuse his authority or perform a criminal act such as creating false testimony, cheat, hide or bury testimony from being presented for the judge's consideration and other criminal acts," the retired cop said.

"If he does any of these, he too is bound by the laws under the Criminal Procedure Code, same as everyone else," he added, and reminded the PM of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong's message to the public on July 3 that "no one [is] above the law".

 

Ambiga clarifies meeting with Pak Lah

Posted: 11 Jul 2011 06:34 PM PDT

(The Malaysian Insider) - Bersih 2.0 chief Datuk Ambiga Sreenevasan clarified today she was advised to act according to the Yang di-Pertuan Agong's wishes over last Saturday's rally and declined to comment further on the private conversation she had with former Prime Minister Tun Abdullah Ahmad Badawi.

Ambiga also told a news conference today that the ex-PM had only urged her to heed the King's unprecedented advice when she and Abdullah met last week prior to the Bersih 2.0 rally.

"Yes, [Abdullah] Badawi did ask us to abide by the 'titah' of the King. That's all, I don't want to breach the confidentiality," she said, and declined to speak further on the subject.

Earlier today, Abdullah told reporters he had arranged a meeting with Ambiga (picture) to "remind" her to abide by the King's advice to find alternatives instead of having the rally on the streets of the city.

"I told her that she should abide by what was impressed upon (by the King), that we should not have the rally," said the nation's prime minister from October 2003 to March 2009.

In an unprecedented move a week before last Saturday's rally, Tuanku Mizan Zainal Abidin stepped in to defuse tension by advising the Najib administration and Bersih 2.0 to hold consultations over the issue of free and fair elections.

In the statement issued by Istana Negara on July 3, Tuanku Mizan Zainal Abidin said he was following closely the developments of the proposed assemblies by Bersih 2.0 and how the federal government and its agencies were handling the matter.

"The fact is, street demonstrations bring more bad than good although the original intention is good. Instead, we should focus on our main objective to develop this country, and not create problems that will cause the country to lag behind," the King said.

"I also urge the government to carry out everything that is entrusted to it by the people in a just and wise manner, and it is important that I as the Yang di-Pertuan Agong do not want to see this country with a plural society in a situation where there is animosity among them or a section of the people being enemies with the government, on whatever grounds," he added.

Tuanku Mizan also reminded the public, in his open statement, that moderation and compromise remain an important practice in the nation's administration.

After meeting with the King, Bersih 2.0 pledged to cancel the rally and have the event in a stadium, as previously suggested by Datuk Seri Najib Razak.

The prime minister, however, reneged on his offer, resulting in tens of thousands of Bersih supporters thronging the city capital last Saturday for a street demonstration which went ahead without police permission, resulting in nearly 1,700 arrests, scores injured and the death of a PKR leader's husband.

 

WikiLeaks’ Assange in court extradition appeal

Posted: 11 Jul 2011 06:13 PM PDT

(Reuters) - WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange will begin his appeal on Tuesday against his extradition from Britain to Sweden for questioning over allegations of sexual misconduct.

The 40-year-old Australian computer expert will take his legal battle to the High Court in London for a two-day hearing after losing an initial challenge to the extradition order in February.

Swedish prosecutors want to question Assange about allegations of sexual assault made by two women, both WikiLeaks volunteers, in Sweden last August. He denies the allegations.

He was arrested in December around the same time as his whistle-blowing website began publishing a cache of more than 250,000 secret U.S. diplomatic cables which hurt the U.S. government and caused a media sensation.

A judge originally dismissed arguments by Assange's defense team that he would not get a fair trial in Sweden and that it would ultimately violate his human rights.

Assange has said he believes the Swedish case is politically motivated.

The U.S. government is examining whether criminal charges can be brought against Assange over the leaks. Assange fears extradition to Sweden could be a stepping-stone to him being taken to the United States.

His lawyers have in the past argued he could be sent to the Guantanamo Bay detention center in Cuba or even face the death penalty.

Even if the High Court upholds the extradition request, Assange could take his battle to Britain's Supreme Court, the country's highest, though this can only be done on a point of law considered to be of general public interest.

The Supreme Court ruling marks the end of the process. Assange has hired a new legal team to represent him after his previous team, which included prominent British attorney Mark Stephens, was seen as too confrontational.

Replacing Stephens is prominent human rights lawyer Gareth Peirce.

She has represented accused militants in high-profile cases, including former prisoners held by the United States at Guantanamo, and the "Guildford Four," a group of Irish citizens whose conviction in an alleged IRA bomb plot was overturned after they spent years in prison.

An assistant for Peirce at her office Birnberg Peirce and Partners told Reuters the firm would not be making any comment prior to the appeal.

However, in an emailed statement the firm said "it would be highly unusual" for the High Court to pronounce a decision over the appeal on the same day. "It is normal for a written judgment to be given," it said.

After a brief spell in prison following his arrest by British authorities at Sweden's request, Assange was released on bail and has been living under strict court-imposed restrictions at a country mansion in eastern England.

Despite the bail conditions, which include wearing an electronic ankle tag, reporting to police daily and respecting a curfew, Assange celebrated his 40th birthday on Sunday.

British media reported that he threw a party at the estate and more than 100 guests, including celebrities and high-profile supporters, were invited.

 

Don’t roll out red carpet for Najib, Britain urged

Posted: 11 Jul 2011 06:03 PM PDT

Police action against citizens during Saturday's rally has jeopardized the country's reputation as a moderate democratic state, says international human rights community.

(Free Malaysia Today) - The consensus from international organisations is that the red carpet should not be rolled out for Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak when he begins his official visit to Britain today.

Najib begins his four-day official visit to the UK today, after which he is expected to be in Rome to meet with Pope Benedict XVI.

Najib has said that street protests are not the Malaysian way but the International Human Rights community are angry with him and the police force for denying Malaysians their basic rights during Saturday's Bersih rally.

Amnesty International (AI) had even gone a step further and called for heads of states to censor Najib .

"Prime Minister Najib's government rode roughshod over thousands of Malaysians exercising their right to peaceful protest," said Donna Guest, deputy Asia-Pacific director at Amnesty International in a statement.

"This violent repression by the Malaysian police flies in the face of international human rights standards and cannot be allowed to continue," she  added.

"The British government shouldn't reward this brutality by rolling out a red carpet for Malaysia's prime minister… (British Prime Minister) David Cameron should tell prime minister Najib that these human rights violations against peaceful reform protests are unacceptable," she said.

Amenesty International also called on the Vatican to press Najib to respect human rights when he visits the pope later this week.

AI also highlighted the many complaints of police hard-handedness during the rally. It said that the use of force by the police was "excessive, unnecessary and designed to instill fear".

The Malaysian government however has denied this and said that it has video footages of its own to show otherwise.

The international human right watchdog also asked the Malaysian authorities to investigate claims that police failed to provide immediate assistance to Baharuddin Ahmad, the husband of PKR Setia Wangsa chief, who passed away in the vicinity of KLCC due to heart complications during the rally.

Undermining progress

The United Nations (UN) had also took Najib and the police to task for the handling of Saturday's rally and events leading up to it.

Frank La Rue, UN special rapporteur on the right to freedom of opinion and expression, said that the Malaysian government "risks undermining democratic progress to the country" with the pre-emptive measures taken to derail the rally.

"Declaring Bersih illegal based on claims that it is trying to topple the government or it is a risk to national security and public order – in the absence of any credible evidence to substantiate such claims – is also an unnecessary restriction of civil and political rights," La Rue added.

READ MORE HERE

 

RM73 mil diamond ring for Rosmah?

Posted: 11 Jul 2011 05:35 PM PDT

A blog claims that the self-styled First Lady received a 'Natural Fancy Blue Gray Cushion Cut Diamond Ring' in April.

(Free Malaysia Today) - As Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak still reels from the Bersih 2.0 rally's political aftershocks, a glittering new allegation has surfaced about his wife, Rosmah Mansor.

The self-styled First Lady had allegedly come into possession of a diamond ring, worth a whopping US$24 million (RM73.48 million) sometime in April this year.

A pro-Pakatan Rakyat blog called "Milo Suam" claimed that the ring was sent to Rosmah by the New York-based fine jewellers, Jacob & Co.

The blog claimed that the ring, identified as a "Natural Fancy Blue Gray Cushion Cut Diamond Ring" passed through the Kuala Lumpur International Airport customs and was cleared by a customs operations manager known as A Krishnan.

Screenshots of the alleged customs computer displays also revealed that the ring did not have import duties imposed on it.

The same display also indicated the value of the ring to be US$24.4 million.

The story of the ring had also spread to many other pro-Pakatan blogs.

According to a Forbes website, the ring is a "VVS2 clarity diamond mounted on a platinum ring surrounded by 414 diamonds in a micro-pave setting (3.48 cts.)."

Meanwhile, "Milo Suam" questioned Najib's rationale in allegedly purchasing such an expensive item for his wife.

READ MORE HERE

 

"Malaysia Has Too Many Phobias"

Posted: 11 Jul 2011 05:33 PM PDT

By Denny Armandhanu, Vivanews

It is the people that are mostly concerned with the elections. So, why is he standing in their way? If he wants to get me off the game, why should he deceive the people?

A clash broke between the police and protesters on Saturday, July 9, in Malaysia following mass street protest demanding electoral changes. The Bersih 2.0 rally went uncontrolled after riot police fired tear gas and water cannon and arrested more than 1,600 people to end the protest. 

Malaysian opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim told VIVAnews on Monday, July 10, has accused the Election Commission (EC) of electoral malpractices in conducting the recently concluded state election in Sarawak. 

It is not possible to file reports on the fraudulent practices to the special 
court for elections. The opposition party has instead spent more money for paying fines for making lawsuits. 

The government controls the media. However, Anwar believes that people will always manage to gain information from alternative media and sources. 

VIVAnews interviewed Anwar Ibrahim to get a wider picture of what is really going on in Malaysia. Here are the excerpts:

What did the Saturday mass protest actually want from the government?

We are demanding that malpractices will no longer be committed in the future. In fact, the previous elections had provided no access to the media. We has conveyed the issue for years. The UMNO has always been benefited by the elections.

In what ways were the malpractices done?

They were various ways. For example, there is a house of four people. However,  it was found out that the house held 82 voters. They voted for UMNO. Moreover, the opposition was during the campaigning period subject to massive criticisms. 

Yet, the opposition was not even given one minute to answer to the discontents on TV.

It is also clear that we the opposition cannot monitor hundreds of the available ballot boxes. The Election Commission also banned local and international electoral monitoring agencies from doing their job. We have also brought the malpractice cases to to the special court. But the court sides with UMNO, resulting in unfair decisions.  

Should we file more reports to the court, we won't win the cases and we will get huge fines. 

Is is true that thousands of multiracial people joined the mass protest?

Yes, it was. And I think it's good for us. The situation will not allow the
government to come up with racial issues. We have many interests involving the Christians, the Hindus, and Moslems, and Malay politicians. But I believe that the Malay ones are still on the top. 

Nonetheless, how can the Moslems and Malays be proud of themselves if there are still fraud and corruption? The idea has been a slogan indeed.

Given the protesters of multiple backgrounds, does this affirm that most people  are not satisfied with the electoral results?

They may control the media, they may curb the opposition and wipe out the Bersih  movement, and they may produce terrible images of me. But, the people can still think positive. They are looking at alternative media. That makes us proud. 

Imagine, 50 thousand people are blocked by the police. All entrance roads to Kuala Lumpur are closed. I myself can afford to get out of venue. We were faced by shielded police officers at the Hilton Hotel's frontyard. Out of a sudden, gunfires broke, aiming at the protesters and, especially, me.

I was their target. My bodyguard had his face torn off.

I was walking ahead together with party leaders as well as Bersih 2.0 
coordinator. [The police] targeted me and the leaders although we're not the bad  guys. We're marching with the protesters and were shot without firm reasons. It's obvious that no leaders were permitted to gather with protesters. They did not want peace protest. 

Police chief claimed no victims were down during the mass protest. The media reported that only 6,000 protesters were on the streets. The fact is that 50 thousand people joined the rally. The people, who also gained information from alternative media, laughed at the news. The Malaysian government is in denial inasmuch as Egypt was during the Hosni Mubarak administration.  

Prime Minister Najib Razak said the protest was illegal. How did you see it?

How come it was illegal? They said so because we're against UMNO. They accused us of becoming agents of Christianity. They claimed Bersih 2.0 was powered by foreign parties. How can it be illegal if the Malaysian King himself invited us to have some talks?

The decision to hold protest at the Stadium Merdeka (Independence Stadium) was made after we met the King. His excellency wants us to avoid the streets. The protesters refused to accept the idea. However, since it's his excellency's wish, we must abide by king's advice. Pak Najib nodded to the suggestion earlier. But he in the end was against it. 

He is not into debates. Up until today, Najib is reluctant to meet with either the opposition or Bersih 2.0. How would he be applauded as a prime minister of a democratic country if he refuses to set up meetings with the representatives of both the opposition and Bersih 2.0?

Najib is making public relations campaigns by hiring an Israel- and US-based PR companies, APCO, by paying 70 million ringgit. This is to show the public that he is a moderate official and solid policy maker on the economy. In fact, he has done injustice to the people.

I'm a moslem. But I'm not pleased upon seeing his building images as a moderate moslem. A moderate moslem does no harm to others and does not discriminate against other religious supporters. A moderate moslem avoids corruption.

Prime Minister Najib said you're behind the mass protest. He also believes that you're gaining supports for the next elections.

It is the people that are mostly concerned with the elections. So, why is he standing in their way? If he wants to get me off the game, why should he deceive the people?

The last protest demands for free and clean elections. Anwar, Ahmad, Saleh, whatsoever, may be elected. But it's the people's business. We're not demanding Anwar to become the Prime Minister. It is clean elections that we want the most.

The Malaysian government has too many phobias. Whatever problems they deal with, they will blame me. Name everything you have in mind: may it be economic, oil price rise, everything.

They would blame me if tourism is stagnant. They would blame me if Malaysia is in dispute with Indonesia.

They would say that I'm a Jew, that I'm a Christian, that I'm an Al-Qaeda, an extremist, even a homosexual.

Will you continue to protest?

We have committed from the start that the rally would end in two and a half hours. We would like to see how the government reacted against it. In fact, the government played it the hard way. We were beaten and shot. The government-controlled media did not mention anything about our demands of having free and clean elections. They instead wrote that we set out the clash.

A protester dies during the rally. Is it confirmed?

It's been verified. I've asked a permission from his doctor to visit his grave for five minutes to show my respect. We met a lawyer and carried out an autopsy. We will bring the case to the court.

I myself am injured in the head and foot from tear gas canisters fired by the police.

I would like to express my gratitude to my Indonesian counterparts for the support and sympathy. Habibie, Gus Solah and the media asked about me. I'm affected by their concerns. Would you please send them my regards? Thank you.

Indonesian NGO: Anti-Bersih acts against Islam

Posted: 11 Jul 2011 05:28 PM PDT

A youth organisation calls on Indonesians to condemn Putrajaya's use of "violent and forceful" means to quell dissent.

(Free Malaysia Today) - An Indonesian youth organisation today added its voice to the international outcry against the repression of last Saturday's Bersih rally.

In a strongly worded statement emailed to news organisations in Malaysia, Generasi Muda Pembangunan Indonesia (GMPI) accused the Najib administration of failing to uphold Islamic values and democratic principles.

It said Putrajaya "should always" distance itself from "authoritarian politics" and the "use of violent and forceful means" to quell dissent.

GMPI also called on all Indonesians to use both organisational and informal channels to condemn the action against Bersih demonstrators.

It said the arrest of activists and the use of chemical sprays and tear gas against demonstrators constituted a "repressive offensive tactic" by a government that felt that its power was "under threat" by citizens trying to express their desire for free and fair elections.

READ MORE HERE

 

Anwar deserves an Oscar, says Muhyiddin

Posted: 11 Jul 2011 04:20 PM PDT

(NST) - BETONG: Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin said yesterday that Parti Keadilan Rakyat de facto leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim should get an Oscar award.

He said the opposition leader had made the injury he received in Saturday's illegal street demonstration worse than it seemed.

He said Anwa r 's injuries could have been self-inflicted to give him an excuse to discredit the government and the police.

"Anwar should be given an Oscar for making what is not true look like the truth. We expected him to twist the facts to suit his goals," Muhyiddin said after attending the national-level Gawai Dayak open house at Rumah Wilson Begat Anak Bakir, in Penom, Ulu Paku, here.

Anwar was said to have suffered a bruise on his head and a cut leg as a result of police firing tear gas at protesters near where he was.

He said the chaos that broke out caused him to fall.

"I saw him on YouTube looking frail in a hospital bed. An hour later, I was told he was up and about, at the home of the protester who had died, paying his last respects and looking fine and healthy." Muhyiddin said he had expected Anwar and the opposition to capitalise on the incident as "this was not the first time (it had happened)".

"There were no extreme police actions in the area, nor was he attacked by the police or targeted by the police." He said police were investigating the circumstances that led to Anwar getting injured.

"Did he fall because of police action? Was it selfinflicted or did he walk into a glass wall?" He said policewould make a statement on Anwar's injury and the death of protester Baharudin Ahmad.

Muhyiddin said Anwar, the opposition and rally organisers Bersih had distorted the facts on what had happened during the rally. "We expected it. We knew from the beginning that it would happen." He praised the police for showing "great restraint" in their handling of the rally.

He said the death of the demonstrator was not because of police brutality, as claimed by the opposition.

He said the opposition distorted the death to gain sympathy by portraying the government and the police as brutal.

Muhyiddin said street demonstrations were not part of Malaysian culture and would never be as the majority of people were against them.

"It is not something we do. So what happened shows that they (the protesters) do not have respect for the law." He accused Bersih of showing disrespect by lying to the king when they had promised that theywould not take to the streets.


Were cops trying to trap Ambiga’s group?

Posted: 11 Jul 2011 03:33 PM PDT

By Zehfry Dahalan, FMT

In at least one of their encounters with Bersih supporters last Saturday, police appeared to have used tear gas to trap and punish instead of to disperse a group of demonstrators.

This happened to be the group led by Bersih leader S Ambiga and opposition leaders Anwar Ibrahim, Abdul Hadi Awang, Tian Chua and Nurul Izzah Anwar.

FMT reporter Zefry Dahalan filed the following first person account.

"I was with some journalists following the group that had Bersih chief Ambiga and the top Pakatan Rakyat leaders in the front line. They marched from KL Hilton into the KL Sentral station and went down the narrow staircase that leads to the tunnel that links with Jalan Tun Sambanthan.

When they had almost reached the end of the tunnel, police from the Federal Reserve Unit (FRU) suddenly released tear gas directly into the group. A canister hit Anwar's bodyguard (photo, below), injuring his left cheek.

There was pandemonium. It was at this point that Ambiga, Abdul Hadi and Tian Chua were arrested.

The entire group ran back into the tunnel. And then the FRU fired again. The fumes filled the closed area.

Everyone seemed to be out of breath as they ran, more for air than to escape the FRU. But back at the entry point of the tunnel, a dozen or so policemen were waiting with batons raised.

My vision became blurry, my throat itched and I struggled for breath. Fortunately, I had the presence of mind to flash my media card for the benefit of the waiting policemen. They let me go on my way, and I soon regained my strength with fresh air.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Bersih clampdown has shamed Malaysia, says PAS

Posted: 11 Jul 2011 03:22 PM PDT

 

By Shannon Teoh, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, July 12 — PAS lamented the crackdown on Saturday's Bersih rally, saying today that media reports have disgraced Malaysia especially in the eyes of Southeast Asian neighbours.

PAS deputy president Mohamad Sabu said the world has seen how the events of Saturday in the federal capital contrasted with how Malaysians were allowed to gather peacefully overseas on the same day "without a single arrest."

"In Southeast Asia, only Malaysia and Myanmar are at this level," he said, referring to the nation that was under military rule for nearly half a century until an election last year, which was widely described as fraudulent," he told a press conference here.

Mohamad, who is popularly known as Mat Sabu, was among the nearly 1,700 arrested in the crackdown. All were later released the same day.

The Jakarta Post and Straits Times, leading English dailies in Indonesia and Singapore respectively, criticised this morning the clampdown on the tens of thousands who poured into the city last weekend, resulting in the massive arrests, scores injured and the death of the husband of a PKR division leader.

The Wall Street Journal also slammed the Najib administration for creating an atmosphere of "fear and repression" and predicted that the "silent majority" would soon speak out against Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak.

"The international media understands our demands for clean elections.

Even Singapore was restrictive like Malaysia but they have reformed and now their candidates get media access," Mohamad said, referring to the island republic which saw the ruling People's Action Party slip from 65 to 60 per cent of the popular vote.

Ahead of diplomatic meetings with British Prime Minister David Cameron and Pope Benedict XVI, Najib had taken the unusual step of sending Umno secretary-general Datuk Seri Tengku Adnan Mansor to Jakarta to insist that the Bersih rally was just a ruse by Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, who is popular as a Muslim leader in Indonesia.

Bersih had claimed a turnout of 50,000 for the street demonstration which went ahead without police permission.

The electoral reforms movement decided to take to the streets despite previously accepting Najib's offer to move the street rally to a stadium after the government refused to allow the gathering to take place in Stadium Merdeka.

This came after the Yang di-Pertuan Agong called on the government a week ago to execute its duties fairly and for it to meet Bersih and discuss the issue of free and fair elections.

Tuanku Mizan Zainal Abidin had intervened after a police dragnet that had seen over 100 arrests, the raiding of the Bersih secretariat and confiscation of Bersih-related materials in the space of a week.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Bersih 3.0 if no electoral reforms before GE, says PAS

Posted: 11 Jul 2011 03:15 PM PDT

By Shannon Teoh, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, July 12 — PAS has called on the Najib administration to bow to Bersih's eight-point reforms to the electoral system or face a repeat of the rally that plunged the capital into chaos on Saturday.

Party deputy president Mohamad Sabu said today it would hold another rally before the next general election if the Election Commission (EC) failed to implement the reforms demanded by the coalition of 62 NGOs.

"The EC should act. If there is no action by the next election, we will suggest that Bersih holds another demonstration," he said at a press conference.

Despite Bersih claiming that 50,000 had poured into the city last weekend, Mohamad (picture) threatened a larger rally, stating that "PAS president Datuk Seri Hadi Awang has already said this is only the beginning."

He also said the Islamist party would ask Bersih to declare Saturdays "Bersih Day" where members of the public should wear yellow to show their support for free and fair elections.

Asked if he was calling for the public to disobey the law, Mohamad said "the yellow shirts are only illegal to Umno but no court has declared them unlawful."

He added that the EC could already implement part of the demands set out by the electoral reform movement such as cleaning up the electoral roll, reforming postal votes, using indelible ink and providing free access to the media for all parties.

Bersih had claimed a turnout of 50,000 for the street demonstration which went ahead without police permission, resulting in nearly 1,700 arrests, leaving dozens injured and the spouse of a PKR leader dead.

The electoral reform movement decided to take to the streets despite previously accepting Najib's offer to move the street rally to a stadium after the government refused to allow the gathering to take place in Stadium Merdeka.

This came after the Yang di-Pertuan Agong called on the government a week ago to execute its duties fairly and for it to meet Bersih and discuss the issue of free and fair elections.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Crackdown 2.0 in Malaysia

Posted: 11 Jul 2011 10:23 AM PDT

The Wall Street Journal

Based on the evidence of this weekend's rally in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysians aspire for a more competitive political system than what they have. Also based on this weekend's evidence, Prime Minister Najib Razak isn't prepared to give it to them.

An estimated 20,000 or more people peacefully gathered in Kuala Lumpur Saturday to call for free and fair elections. Their complaints included vote-rigging and gerrymandering of constituencies to the ruling party's benefit. Bersih 2.0, as the rally was called, was the biggest event of its kind in four years. The original Bersih (the word means "clean" in Malay) called for electoral reforms in 2007.

As with the original rally, this one was met not by understanding from the government but by police deploying tear gas and water cannons. More than 1,600 attendees were detained and released late Sunday. One demonstrator died from a heart attack.

Malaysian activists from Coalition for Clean and Fair Elections (Bersih) run away as riot police fire water cannon at them during a rally.

The crackdown was little surprise given the government's actions before the rally. Over the past two weeks, the ruling United Malays National Organization (UMNO) tried its best to intimidate the organizers. More than 200 activists and opposition members were detained, some on charges of "waging war" against Malaysia's constitutional monarch. The police arrested those wearing T-shirts affiliated with Bersih. The army publicly conducted crowd-control exercises.

The situation was on the boil until the king intervened, asking both sides to settle differences. Mr. Najib offered a stadium to host the rally but then backed off. Last Thursday, he appeared with a group of martial artists who vowed to "wage war" against Bersih, saying: "If there are evil enemies who want to attack the country from within, you, my brothers, will rise to fight them." His scare tactics backfired as thousands of protesters, further angered, arrived from across the country.

Saturday's rally has united and energized the political opposition. So the government is now downplaying the entire event and even blaming Bersih for creating chaos. The police claim only 6,000 protesters showed up. Home Minister Hishamuddin Hussein complimented police efforts to keep control despite "being challenged and provoked." He said the protesters sought "to be arrested in order to portray the government as cruel."

If the government is going to respond like this—intimidation followed by denial—a Bersih 3.0 could eventually materialize, though organizers have ruled it out anytime soon. Underlying this weekend's events is growing public impatience with UMNO as Malaysians find rising inflation, coupled with slow reforms, eating into their standard of living. Saturday's turnout is a sign that Malaysians also understand the link between true democracy and good government.

On Sunday, Mr. Najib called on the "silent majority" of Malaysians, who he claims opposed Bersih, to speak up. If he continues to create an environment of fear and repression, he may find this silent majority speaking up soon, but against him

Lying Najib, recalcitrant Umno

Posted: 11 Jul 2011 10:09 AM PDT

By Luke Rintod, FMT

KOTA KINABALU: A 70-year-old political activist from Panampang who is known to both the opposition and the ruling regime has expressed shock at the way Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak has handled Bersih 2.0′s call for electoral reforms.

Having closely monitored Najib's reaction to Bersih 2.0 from the onset of its chairman S Ambiga's announcement on June 8, activist Fredoline Edwin Lojingki is both amused and angered by his irrational comments

"I listened and am amused at the comments by various Umno leaders including Najib's on the peaceful Bersih rally.

"Especially on the point where they accused Bersih organisers of causing shop and business operators to lose business last Saturday.

"Those accusations are unfair…" he said in a statement today.

Lojingki said that Bersih did not instigate an "unruly" gathering or "disturb businesses in Kuala Lumpur or caused shops to close".

"Najib and Umno people must ask themselves who were the ones who closed the roads and divert traffic and deprived Malaysians and tourists of transport on that day?

"Wasn't it the police, under the instruction of Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein?

"Why was the King's advice not taken seriously?

"Why block the roads if you are to allow the rally in a stadium as you promised Ambiga and the world?

"Of course, you (Najib) broke your promise and showed your inner self to be manipulative and exploitative.

"This is a very dirty tactic indeed and all in a desperate act to thwart the Bersih rally.

"By doing so, Najib, you have incurred the wrath of the people, including an old man like me. You have failed and you must ponder on it," said Lojingki.

Untrustworthy Najib

The infuriated veteran also slammed Umno calling it "recalcitrant".

"Recalcitrant Umno must do some deep soul-searching on what caused tens of thousands of Malaysians to join in the Bersih 2.0 rally.

"There must be a very good reasons for it.

"You know it, Najib – your Umno and its political culture are the main causes why Bersih was well-attended and participated even though there were no free food provided and no rock stars around as is usually done in your rally.

"And who was trying to disturb a peaceful rally? Wasn't it Umno-linked Perkasa and Patriot?

 

READ MORE HERE.

Bersih rally a public awakening

Posted: 11 Jul 2011 09:54 AM PDT

By Debra Chong, The Malaysian Insider

BANGI, July 11 — The most significant thing to come out of the Bersih 2.0 rally was not the state's reaction to it, but the public's realisation that they held the power to transform the way the government of the day administrates the country.

Social scientist Datuk Shamsul Amri Baharuddin told reporters today the Bersih 2.0 rally on Saturday had stirred the middleclass into action by building on the momentum from the previous Bersih street rally on November 16, 2007.

He noted that the civil society movement was itself born from the Reformasi campaign triggered in 1998 when Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim was sacked from government.

"For them, it's [previously been] 'I can vote who I want. Now, can I say what I want?'" he highlighted, and explained that many already realised that their votes matter in the electoral sense, to transform the government.

"The question is: Is there a public space I can do this?" he quizzed, rhetorically.

"Yes and no. They can do it, not on the road but other spaces, yes," he said, answering his own question.

The academic noted that while the ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) coalition has faltered in the eyes of the public, it did not quite fail when it mobilised public institutions, notably the police force, to clamp down on civil society.

"I would not say that," he said.

In his view, the ruling coalition now has an advantage in that they knew the ground sentiment with a certainty.

"The only thing is how they use it to evaluate their next step," he said.

"Bersih has done them a favour and allowed them to know what they want without them asking for it.

"We are going to see more, this is not the last. It's not about the opposition. People are getting braver but also reasonable and rational," said Shamsul Amri.

"If I were in power, the first thing I would do, I'd organise them, hold townhall meetings, give them drink and food," he said.

He noted that Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak's walkabout the day after the public rally for electoral reform had many implications, notably to show that Malaysians were by and large a rational group not spurred to act impulsively and join street demonstrations.

He pointed to the PM's speech on silat practitioners rising up to defend Islam when questioned.

"Don't get caught up in the script. He was addressing Anwar and the opposition [party]. The world can pick up on it," when asked if Najib's provocative statement could hurt the BN's image further.

Tengku Adnan explains Bersih crackdown to Jakarta

Posted: 11 Jul 2011 09:46 AM PDT

(The Malaysian Insider) - KUALA LUMPUR, July 12 — The Najib administration took the unusual step of sending Umno secretary-general Datuk Seri Tengku Adnan Mansor to Jakarta to explain Saturday's Bersih rally and allay fears of unrest as Indonesia's oldest English paper criticised the crackdown.

The Jakarta Post newspaper said Malaysians should be "rich and free" while Tengku Adnan said the Bersih rally calling for free and fair elections was just an opposition ruse by Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, who is popular as a Muslim leader in Indonesia.

"Two million tourists visit annually and Indonesian students also come to Malaysia. The riot made me come quickly to Indonesia to explain the issue," the Vivanews website quoted the former tourism minister as saying at a press conference in central Jakarta.

He told them that the government feared that tourist numbers would fall if the situation was not explained fully, saying that Indonesia played a big role in the Malaysian economy. The Southeast Asian nation of 17,000 islands is a Group of 20 country and is developing quickly as an investment destination, especially from Malaysian oil palm plantation companies.

Some two million Indonesians officially work in Malaysia while officials estimate an equal number work illegally. Putrajaya yesterday suspended a registration scheme for illegal immigrants and workers pending a full evaluation of a faulty biometric system.

Sticking to his party line, Tengku Adnan (picture) blamed Pakatan Rakyat (PR) for the rally and denied there was electoral fraud as claimed by Bersih 2.0, the coalition of 62 groups that had organised the rally.

He noted that most of the Indonesian media supported Anwar, who was deputy prime minister and finance minister under Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad until his sacking in 1998, pointing out his Jakarta visit was to straighten out any misconception about the rally which was declared illegal by the government.

"Indonesia is an important country for Malaysia, first in tourism, two in terms of investment. We also hope that Indonesian investors invest more in Malaysia," he said, telling a press conference at the Financial Club that Kuala Lumpur was back to normal.

"Traders are furious with the demonstrators. Tourists are also angry, because the monorail and LRT were closed. If we did not block, the traders would have clashed with the demonstrators," he said, referring to police blocks in the capital city.

The Jakarta Post editorial, headline "Malaysia: Rich but not free", said Malaysian leaders were labouring under the "old paradigm that says you can have development or democracy, but not both".

"We have news for them: You can be rich and free at the same time. Malaysians deserve both and they deserve it now — not some time in the future," the newspaper said, adding the security lockdown showed Putrajaya was not ready to let go of controls despite Malaysians pressing for more freedom and justice.

"The police clearly overreacted. They did not need to invoke the Internal Security Act to arrest some of the protest's leaders before Saturday. They certainly did not need to detain more than 1,600 on the day of the demonstration.

"Aspirations for freedom and democracy are universal. Governments everywhere will, sooner or later, have to make accommodations. You cannot suppress the people and deprive them of their freedom forever. You must give them their due — or else they will get it by force," the paper said, saying the Arab Spring was a case in point.

It pointed out that given its current economic strength, Malaysia was in an enviable position to allow greater freedom and democracy.

"It can afford to take some risks without necessarily undermining development. A few powerful people may stand to lose their economic privileges, but they should have been phased out by now.

"The Bersih 2.0 rally is the clearest sign that Malaysians want freedom and justice, as well as wealth," the paper concluded.

 

Read Editorial in Jakarta Post at: http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2011/07/11/editorial-malaysia-rich-not-free.html

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Does Malaysia’s ruling party under under Prime Minister Najib Razak have a death wish?

Posted: 11 Jul 2011 07:23 PM PDT

By Dr. Bibhu Prasad Routray, Al Arabiya News

What amazes analysts of Malaysian politics is the sheer detestation the government demonstrates towards the opposition. In this politically polarized island nation of 28 million people, Prime Minister Najib Razak has made no attempt whatsoever to reach out to the opposition to evolve a consensus politics and erect an electoral system that provides fair ground for competition to both the ruling party and the opposition.

Presiding over the longest continuing ruling party of the world, it is natural for Prime Minister Najib Razak to develop some false sense of invincibility and resultant arrogance. However, political events since 2008 have demonstrated that the grip of United Malays National Organization (UMNO) on the country's politics might be waning.

The 9 July rally by Bersih, a conglomeration of about 63 political parties and NGOs, was indeed significant for several reasons. Centered on the issue of corruption free politics and a range of measures to ensure free and fair elections, it was Bersih's second rally since 2008.

The rally made a lot people exposed to the genuine electoral reform demands of the opposition and evoked passions of direct participants as well as non-participants to be a part of the vision the opposition has for the country. It also left a lot many people unhappy with the way the government imposed confrontational shutdown measures to ensure that the rally was not a success.

Observers of Malaysian politics indicate that electoral reform as per Bersih's demands will invariably lead to the ruling party's defeat. This provides ample reason to UMNO to be skeptical of Bersih. In the last election in 2008, UMNO received only one-third of the country's votes. It, however, managed to bring together other political parties under a coalition that claimed power. This is becoming increasingly clear to many of the country's voters, who are now aided by the social media as well as foreign media channels.

This is precisely why the government wants to control the functioning of the foreign media in the country. Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein on 11 July threatened to take legal action against "irresponsible foreign media," which he says sensationalized the coverage of the 9 July Bersih rally. Unlike the largely state controlled media in the country, footages provided by the foreign media showed the police beating rally participants, firing tear gas canisters and even directing water canons on a retreating crowd. It made quite clear to the people that the government was afraid of the opposition's demands and wanted to sabotage it at any cost.

The reaction of the government to the 9 July rally is indeed indicative of its threatened mindset. Prime Minister Najib Razak referred to a "lust to become prime minister" in opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim, forgetting that aspiration to become prime minister by an opposition leader is not such a horrifying thing.

Prime Minister Razak's popularity increased to 72 per cent according to an independent survey, results of which were published in June 2010. Notwithstanding the results of this one-year-old survey, experts indicate that racial politics has since undermined UMNO's acceptability among the country's voters.

The opposition parties have been buoyed by the results of the 9 July rally and now want to continue with similar program in the provinces.

Malaysia's Economic Transformation Program (ETP), an ambitious project to convert the country into a fully developed nation by 2020 remains critically linked to foreign investment. The ETP requires annual foreign investment in the range of $11 billion to fund a quarter of the proposed projects. However, average annual investment since 1997 has only been $3.1 billion.

A March 2011 report by Bank of America Merrill Lynch ranked Malaysia the second least popular market after Colombia among global emerging market fund managers. Malaysia, thus, is in no position to project a picture of chaos and disruption to the investors from outside.

But UMNO under Najib Razak appears to have a death wish. It appears to have no hesitation to sacrifice its own goal of bringing economic development for the sake of staying on in power. For how long it manages to do so, is a mere question of time.

(Dr. Bibhu Prasad Routray is an independent analyst based in Singapore and has previously been Deputy Director, India's National Security Council Secretariat (NSCS).

 

A case of two opposing sides

Posted: 11 Jul 2011 03:51 PM PDT

 

By Karim Raslan, The Star

We've reached a point where it doesn't matter who brings the change – BN or PR, conservative or liberal, socialist or right-wing. Malaysians will get behind whoever is the most sincere in taking us out of this mess.

LAST weekend's thwarted march wasn't an ordinary incident – it reveals two radically different world views.

While the march was nominally non-political, the chasm between the two forces – the Government and the demonstrators – clearly mirrors the increasingly acrimonious split between Barisan Nasional (BN) and Pakatan Rakyat (PR).

Of course, a deeply divided political terrain is always troubling, however, it is at least proof of a dynamic and thriving public discourse.

Ironically, the opposition, despite being excluded from the mainstream media, is clearly setting the terms of this debate.

It also shows that Malaysia remains a democracy – albeit a flawed one.

Indeed, I'd argue that the intensity of the discourse over the past few weeks highlights quite how much we Malaysians care about the state of our nation.

We can see and feel that the state is becoming more polarised – and in such a situation, we are being forced to choose sides.

Sitting on the fence is no longer a viable option – especially when the fence is been shaken so hard by the two opposing sides. However, there are some positives. Most notably the fact that the divide is not racial despite what some politicians are alleging.

In fact there are Malays, Indians, Chinese, Iban, Kadazan, Muslims, Christians, Buddhists and Hindu on both sides of the debate. Indeed, the struggle has gone way beyond racial and religious lines.

Instead we are tussling over political philosophies and principles.

While the differences are certainly stark, their mere existence indicates a certain maturing of our political system presenting us with the alluring prospect of a two-party system.

I must stress that the racial diversity on both sides represents a steadying force – anchoring us together as a nation.

And yes, you could say, it underlines the fact that we are debating a truly Malaysian set of issues.

So what are these substantive political differences? Well, for a start, they transcend mere personality.

On one hand, we have a strident Umno-led Government demanding the continuation of the status quo.

In this respect, Umno is very definitely a conservative (small "c") force – defending and promoting the interests of the influence-bearing classes.

It's arguable that Umno's small businessmen/contractors have adopted the mindset and behaviour of the many minor aristocrats and noblemen that once surrounded Malaysia's many istana (or palaces) jockeying for favours and/or contracts.

The current Umno vision is retrogressive – it looks back to the party's heyday under Tun Abdul Razak and Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad.

It is not a dynamic, expansive vision – witness the primordial and unavoidable cry for Malay unity interspersed with Malay rights.

As with those enamoured and indeed obsessed by the past there is a paranoia and fear of change. Understandably then, any concession or reform is seen of as an affront to Umno's domination, dignity and integrity.

On the other, you have what is essentially a socialist front in Pakatan Rakyat.

They claim to represent the interest of the rakyat – the ordinary people, taking a moral high-ground on issues such as corruption, mismanagement and civil liberties.

They know the language of the people – focusing on day-to-day issues from rising food prices to the quality of education.

Obviously my formulation ignores the inconsistencies, but there's no denying the socio-economic and "class" basis to this struggle.

At the same time the respective leaders play up these associations because politics – let's face it – is also theatre and understatement doesn't play to the gallery.

Returning to Pakatan, I must point out that the coalition's very new-ness means they are much more flexible, less rigid and accepting.

Indeed, Hadi Awang's courageous stance on Negara Kebajikan is an indication of the extent to which Pakatan is exploring new paradigms.

Of course, PAS carry a certain baggage themselves. For example, will the gentle and considerate PAS of today be replaced by a morally sanctimonious force once in power?

At a time when technology is changing so rapidly, (iPad succeeded by iPad2, just when you've begun to understand it), we've got to accept political systems have to change as well.

But will the face-off between the two opposing forces benefit us – the rakyat?

Well, I for one am confident that there will be change and that we as a nation desperately need that change.

Indeed, we've reached a point where it doesn't actually matter who brings the change – BN or PR, conservative or liberal, socialist or right-wing.

Malaysians will rally behind whoever is the most sincere in taking us out of this mess, just as Ronnie Reagan and later Obama inspired their respective voters.

Ironically, after all this talk of substantive politics we're back where we started with character and personality.

So, we have to batten down, wait, watch and judge because at the end of the day we, the people are sovereign and through the ballot box, we can kick out those who've let us down.

So carry on ladies and gentlemen of the political world, we're watching and evaluating your performance.

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


A Most Disconcerting Scenario

Posted: 11 Jul 2011 09:28 PM PDT

According to this report HERE, : MCA president Dr Chua Soi Lek came out in defence of the police firing tear gas into the compound of Tung Shin Hospital by saying pictures can be deceiving and it is difficult to determine what exactly transpired at the hospital on Saturday. 

"A picture may not convey the total story, depending on the angle the picture is shot," he said.

In Malaysiakini, he said, "If they want to make you look bad, they can," said the party chief.

How ironical! He should know because he lost his position as Minister of Health and MCA VP 3.5 years ago because of a video scandal.

According to Wikipedia HERE:

On January 1, 2008, Chua admitted that he was the person featured in a sensational sex DVD that was widely being circulated in Johor. The two DVDs were distributed anonymously in Muar and other towns in Johor show Dr Chua having sex with a young woman, described by him as a "personal friend." The DVDs are believed to be wireless hidden camera recordings in a hotel suite. 
He claimed no involvement in the filming or production of the DVD in question.[4] On January 2, 2008, he formally announced his resignation from all posts including Member of Parliament for Labis, vice presidency of MCA, and Minister of Health at a press conference.

 

Yet, when the sex videos surfaced, a certain MP was accused of being the man in the video recording. Looks like some people will accept or reject the authenticity of a video recording based on their personal slants in the issue.

What is MORE disconcerting would be CONTRASTING reports on same issue by the same MSM.

According to THIS REPORT Hospital staff witnessed teargas attack, despite police denials (last updated on 11 July 2011 - 12:36pm):

 

READ MORE HERE.


Government in “time warp”

Posted: 11 Jul 2011 04:08 PM PDT

This is why there is considerable merit in the advice by the University Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM) social anthropologist Professor Datuk Shamsul Amri Baharuddin that the Najib administration should discard its "Cold War" mindset and to modernize its concepts to address internal security and national issues.

Shamsul reminded the ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) coalition that the "enemy" was no longer armed communists battling a jungle war but a civilian movement consisting of politically awakened middle class that is wired to the global community and moved by fully legitimate issues based on the Malaysian Constitution such as free and fair elections; human rights of freedom of assembly and association; integrity, good, clean and incorruptible governance!

If Najib and Hishammuddin had acted on Shamsul's advice, the country would have been spared the farce, idiocy and agony of a "Cold War" response to the Bersih 2.0 call for free and fair elections – with the police and the national security apparatus fully mobilized nationally against the citizenry to fight ghosts and imaginary non-existing enemies of "revived communism", "war against the Agong", "Christian Malaysia", "foreign-power interference" and "another May 13"

It is truly sad and pathetic that despite the gross mishandling of the 709 Bersih 2 rally which has plunged the Najib administration into a new nadir point of public trust and confidence, the Prime Minister and his Cabinet do not seem to be ready at any time to get out of the "time warp" and reconnect with Berseh 1Malaysia generation who came of age last Saturday on July 9 despite massive police threats, mass arrests, tear gas and water cannons, and these negative signs are aplenty.

Former Prime Minister, Tun Abdullah today admitted that Najib administration's image could be affected by the Bersih rally, but said he was confident the government would be able to repair it in no time.

Abdullah is no authority on governments regaining lost public confidence and I do not think Najib would be asking for any advice for general election strategy from Abdullah, who slumped from biggest electoral mandate to worst election debacle for the ruling coalition in a matter one term of five years, putting paid to his premiership as well.

If the Najib administration is seeking to come out of the "time warp" to re-connect with the Bersih 1Malaysia generation, it would not have exhibited very advanced stages of denial syndrome after July 9 – with the Home Minister and Inspector-General of Police competing as to who could win the competition to hide their head in the sand!

What is worse, the craziness of the double phobia of xanthophobia (fear of yellow) and Bersih-phobia are still in full swing – with first arrest in Sabah for wearing yellow Bersih T-shirt yesterday.

There is in fact no sign of awareness or remorse whatsoever that the Barisan Nasional had grossly miscalculated and mishandled the 709 Bersih 2.0 rally, creating the worst crisis of confidence for the Najib premiership in 27 months!

How else could one explain the obstinate refusal to admit responsibility for the instances of police excesses, violence and brutality during the Bersih 2.0 rally, as in causing the death of Baharuddin Ahmad, the criminal police landrover ramming of PAS Deputy President Mat Sabu on motor-bike or the wanton and reckless firing of tear gas and water cannons into Tung Shin Hospital and directly at Bersih and Pakatan Rakyat leaders at KL Sentral tunnel?

If the Barisan Nasional Government does not get out of the "time warp" it has locked itself into and reconnect with the new Bersih 1Malaysia generation operating in a vibrant social media, then the days of both the Najib premiership and Barisan Nasional ruling coalition are numbered.

They will be left behind by the Bersih 1Malaysia generation as utterly irrelevant belonging to the outdated "Cold War" past that is not prepared to keep abreast of changing times.

READ MORE HERE.

Kota Kinabalu City Hall Blunders Big Time

Posted: 11 Jul 2011 01:52 PM PDT

 
Head of the Licensing Unit of DBKK, Sairullizam Bin Sukor, was in his element displaying arrogance, normally displayed by a person with instructions from "Higher Up's".

If the present UMNO/BN Government were "Bersih" in their administration,"Berani" in fighting for the people and "Benar" in their promises and not only during election time,then UMNO/BN should not be fearing those sacred words.
Fear has reaped into the nervous system of UMNO/BN-hence anything with words such as Bersih is now taboo to them.Perhaps DBKK should mirror themselves if they are Bersih at all.In the fiasco that lasted for almost 2 hours,the Fire Department were also called in to assist to demolish the signage board placed on the 2nd floor of the Party's office.Onlookers were seen running,in an apparent move to see if their shop lots were on fire,with the presence of the Fire Engine.In the end it was a hoax,only to know that DBKK had wasted taxpayers money by summoning the Fire Department to assist them in an illegal mission.

DBKK had apparently issued a notice to SAPP at 2.30pm(11th.July.2011),demanding them to remove the signage board with immediate effect(DBKK No/BPL:1100-23/0/1 Kit.30(23) for violating-UUK 3(1) & 13(1)(2)(3) Undang-Undang Kecil (IKLAN) 1983,which was sign by the Director General,Datuk Yeo Boon Hai and copied to the Mayor,Datuk Abidin Madingkir,City Police Chief ACP Sofi and DBKK's Enforcement Director.
Meanwhile SAPP's lawyers had faxed a letter to the Director General of DBKK threatening to take legal action against them if they continue to harass SAPP of their Constitutional rights.The letter also mentioned violation of the principles of natural justice.

Shortly later at about 3.15pm,City Police Chief ACP Mohd Sofi arrived with his personals. SAPP President,Datuk Yong Teck Lee was seen discussing with the Police Chief and Sairullizam Sukor,on the existing laws available and whither DBKK had the legal right to continue their illegal demolition exercise. Where is the natural justice that's found in our Constitution,isn't the law clear enough that we must be given 14 days notice?The City Police Chief who acted more as a mediator,looked rather mind boggled that DBKK was unaware of the existing  laws.Doesn't DBKK have a Legal Department with "Qualified Lawyers",or are they also ignorant of the law themselves?

Kota Kinabalu residents must now take serious view of the incompetency of DBKK,we may have been hoodwinked or perhaps even "conned"by them in the past,because of our ignorance.The Business Community should also now re-examine their payments made for licenses,fees and compounds in the past,and not be intimidated by them again.
Read more at: http://advocateviews.blogspot.com/2011/07/kota-kinabalu-city-hall-blunders-big.html

An inconvenient truth for Pakatan Rakyat!

Posted: 11 Jul 2011 12:48 PM PDT

 
Pakatan Rakyat has a fight on its hand.The 13th general election nears and as each day passes the fortunes of Pakatan Rakyat ebbs and flows like the tide that washes up on to our shores. At times in spurts it erratically seizes upon a momentary lapse in Barisan Nasional concentration and then claims a victory of sorts for the day. Then inevitably the tide turns as its more powerful and wealthy adversary once again steam rolls itself over any force that dares to even contemplate standings in its way towards another term in office.We are all interested on lookers to this oft repeated spectacles of Malaysian politicians fighting for political survival where winning is the only way to go. 

Against Barisan Nasional the only ally Pakatan Rakyat has is the people - for it has no large armies and no deep pockets from which it can scoop up endless richess to fund its way to victory. Against Barisan Nasional the people, in the main, will demand for Pakatan Rakyat to have leaders who are without blemish in their public and private lives. Leaders who would stand up to any inquisition demanded of it by the people from whom the are seeking a mandate to govern....almost an impossible task given the Malaysia we live in. So why is Pakatan Rakyat not addressing the issue of DSAI credibility?

The inconvenient truth is that Pakatan Rakyat first tier leadership would prefer the issue of DSAI credibility to be addressed AFTER the 13th general election. But as Shakespeare puts it: 

"Truth is truth 
To the end of reckoning"

And what is the truth about DSAI?

That he is a politician par excellence can be borne out in the manner that he has survived Mahathir's political execution of him at the height of his political nadir when he was DPM. Not only has he survived that but he has come back as leader of the opposition to torment the party that once held him to be the heir presumptive to its Presidency. He has done so at great personal sacrifice - physically and mentally - he has emerged strong and resolute to win the 13th general election as leader of Pakatan Rakyat - heir presumptive to BN's after the 13th general election. These are stuff of which dreams are made of...but dreams have a habit of disapperings when the dreamer is awakened! 

DSAI is an enigma- different things to different people...but what he is to different people is immaterial. What matters is what he is to Pakatan Rakyat. He is leader of Pakatan Rakyat by default. There is simply nobody around that can hold Pakatan Rakyat together and give it that sense of purpose as it goes into the 13th general election. Truly an unenviable position for DSAI to be in but for Pakatan Rakyat somewhat a precarious situation given that Barisan Nasional is also in the same frame of mind - but for different reasons. To BN if they take DSAI out, Pakatan Rakyat will self destruct.      

And so we have the situation today. BN attacks DSAI on all fronts and Pakatan Rakyat desperately fighting a  rear guard action to keep DSAI head above water to live and fight another day. But with each salvo thrown at DSAI's by BN the ability of DSAI to be effective as a leader in Pakatan Rakyat diminishes. Apart from the practical issues of having to front up in court to defend himself there are the niggling and cumbersome issues that keeps flying in formation around DSAI like flies around a road kill- Zaid, the PKR's party elections, PKR defections and of course the recent Carcosa Tapes etc etc. 

To date despite spirited defence from Azizah and declarations of continued support from Pakatan Rakyat's UMNO is still bent on pursuing this line of attack on DSAI. And we can expect more of the same as UMNO steps up its attempts to wreck havoc and mayhem if not on DSAI then on Pakatan Rakyat's leadership for not being able to resolve the issue of DSAI credibility once and for all.
 

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Isu saham: Anak saudara Sultan Selangor mohon bonda dipenjara

Posted: 11 Jul 2011 07:22 PM PDT

Kebenaran itu diberikan pada 23 Jun lepas dan permohonan itu sepatutnya didengar pada Selasa di hadapan Hakim Amelia Tee Hong Geok Abdullah.

Dipetik Bernama Online, peguam Datuk Rajan Navaratnam yang mewakili Putera Azamuddin Shah memberitahu pemberita bahawa hakim menetapkan 26 Julai ini untuk perbicaraan kes itu disebabkan peguam yang mewakili, Tengku Putri Arafiah ibni Almarhum Sultan Salahuddin Abdul Aziz (gambar) yang merupakan adinda Sultan Selangor, tidak hadir ke mahkamah.

Pada 8 Jun lepas, Putera Azamuddin Shah memohon perintah komital itu kerana bondanya itu gagal menandatangani dan mematuhi perjanjian jual beli saham syarikat Sunshine Fleet Sdn Bhd berjumlah RM2 juta.

Mengikut notis usul, Putera Azamuddin Shah berkata mahkamah telah membenarkan permohonannya untuk perintah pelaksanaan spesifik pada 19 April lalu dan bondanya dikehendaki menandatangani dan mematuhi perjanjian jual beli saham itu dalam tempoh lima hari selepas itu.

Bagaimanapun, beliau mendakwa bondanya sehingga kini dengan sengaja tidak berbuat demikian dan ia jelas mengingkari perintah mahkamah.

Afidavit sokongan Putera Azamuddin Shah menyatakan bahawa bondanya telah bersetuju untuk membeli kesemua 100,000 unit saham miliknya dalam syarikat Sunshine Fleet Sdn Bhd.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved