Selasa, 5 Julai 2011

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Najib express gratitude to Tuanku Mizan

Posted: 04 Jul 2011 10:53 PM PDT

 

(Bernama) - Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak today conveyed his heartfelt thanks to the Yang di-Pertuan Agong Tuanku Mizan Zainal Abidin over His Majesty's concern that illegal street demonstrations should not be carried out in the country because they could threaten peace and harmony.

"I wish to express thanks to Yang di-Pertuan Agong Tuanku Mizan for his great concern to ensure that there will not be any incidents which can jeopardise the peace and security of our country.
   
"Upon his great and deep sense of responsibility and concern, the Yang di-Pertuan Agong had ordered all quarters against holding illegal street demonstrations that have been planned for July 9.
   
 "I wish to thank all parties who have heeded the advice of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and hence, no street demonstrations will be held on July 9," he said.
   
He told this to reporters after chairing a meeting of the governing council of Malaysia Innovation Agency here today.
   
The Coalition for Free and Fair Elections (Bersih) which had intended to organise the illegal street demonstrations on July 9 has now changed its plans and will instead hold a gathering in a stadium.
   
The U-turn came about after its chairman Datuk Ambiga Sreenevasan had an audience with the Yang di-Pertuan Agong at Istana Negara today.

 

Govt plans to engage with hackers

Posted: 04 Jul 2011 08:26 PM PDT

(Bernama) - The Government plans to engage with cyber hackers to understand them better and put their skill to good use, Deputy Science, Technology and Innovation Minister Datuk Fadillah Yusof said Tuesday.

It planned attending their annual conferences of cyber hackers who, he said, "should not be looked at only negatively".

"CyberSecurity, the National Security Council, police and Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission must be with them so that we can get to know a bigger networking circle among the hackers," he told reporters here.

The Government would be better able to distinguish between good and bad hackers and also "learn... how to defend ourselves," he added after opening a seminar on legal and technical aspects of cyber crime.

The three-day seminar is organised by the Attorney-General's Chambers in collaboration with CyberSecurity Malaysia.

Meanwhile, CyberSecurity Chief Executive Officer Lt Col Datuk Husin Jazri said there were lessons learnt from the recent cyber hacking incident.

He said there was need to engage with young people who possess hacking talent.

"Sometimes these young people are not happy with certain issues or action and resort to hacking. We need to engage with them so that we can turn them around to channel their dissatisfaction and grievances in a positive way," he said.

 

PM: Govt to meet Bersih over stadium for rally

Posted: 04 Jul 2011 08:11 PM PDT

(The Star) - The Government is prepared to meet with Bersih 2.0 to discuss the movement's plan to organise the July 9 rally in a stadium.

Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak said which stadium would depend on the request from the organisers.

"We will respond to that accordingly.

"What is important is for them to come to the stadium peacefully and orderly, and leave in the same manner," he told newsmen after chairing Agensi Inovasi Malaysia's first governance council meeting here Tuesday.

Earlier Tuesday, Bersih 2.0 chief Datuk Ambiga Sreenevasan emerged after an audience with the King and said the planned street march had been called off.

Instead, the rally would be held in a stadium, she added.

 

Perkasa to decide on rally tomorrow

Posted: 04 Jul 2011 07:38 PM PDT

Perkasa approves of Bersih's decision but will only decide whether to proceed with its own rally tomorrow.

"We feel that the King shouldn't have indulged Bersih," Syed Hassan said. "Ambiga asked to see the King like he was her uncle or something. But the fact is that our King is willing to meet with them for the sake of his people's safety. And we deeply respect him for that."

(Free Malaysia Today) - Malay rightwing group Perkasa has welcomed the Bersih's decision to hold the July 9 rally in a stadium, but said it will only decide whether or not to call off its own rally at a meeting tomorrow.

Bersih chairman S Ambiga, steering committee member Zaid Kamaruddin and national laureate A Samad Said were granted an audience by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong Tuanku Mizan Abidin at 2pm today after which a decision was made to hold the rally in a stadium.

"We welcome Bersih's decision," Perkasa secretary-general, Syed Hassan Syed Ali, told FMT.

"It's good for the people, country, economy and tourism. We will decide whether or not to proceed with our rally after our executive committee meeting tomorrow."

Perkasa had consistently stressed that its presence on the ground on July 9 would be purely to preserve the nation's security. Perkasa also said that it would cancel its rally if the Bersih rally was called off.

"But we also want the police to monitor the rally very closely even though it is being held in an enclosed area," Syed Hassan added. "We don't trust these people… we don't trust them."

He also admitted that Perkasa was disappointed that Bersih was granted an audience with the King.

Perkasa chief, Ibrahim Ali, yesterday railed at Bersih leaders for being "insolent" and "holding the King to ransom" by demanding an audience with him.

Ibrahim pointed out that similar requests by Perkasa had been turned down and asked that the King ignore Bersih's request as well.

READ MORE HERE

 

Malay NGOs want Ambiga’s citizenship revoked

Posted: 04 Jul 2011 05:15 PM PDT

Two Malay groups in Penang want Ambiga's citizenship revoked for allegedly challenging the King's authority.

(Free Malaysia Today) - Bersih 2.0 leader S Ambiga's citizenship is being questioned again. This time two Malay groups want her citizenship revoked for allegedly challenging the King's authority.

Perkasa north-east branch head Mohd Rizuad Mohd Azudin and Pesatuan Suara Anak-Anak Malaysia (PSAM) head Mohamed Ghani Abdul Jiman both claimed that Ambiga had defied the King's command to stop all rallies in the country.

On Sunday the King said any rally would bring more harm than good to the country, but the duo claimed Ambiga was stubborn not to call off the planned Bersih Rally 2.0 this Saturday.

Both accused Ambiga of being 'arrogant' to seek a Royal audience at Istana Negara before deciding whether or not to call of any rally.

They claimed Ambiga clearly defied the order and challenged the King when she said that she would only halt the rally if the King personally commanded Bersih to do so.

"Ambiga arrogance is appalling…her citizenship should be revoked immediately. She should leave Malaysia to live in another country if she feels that can better serve her interests," said both Rizuad and Ghani at a joint press conference.

Malaysian opposition-backed activists said yesterday that they would scrap the rally on Saturday if the country's constitutional monarch personally urged them to do so.

Today, Ambiga agreed to move the Bersih rally to indoor after meeting the King at Istana Negara.

Perkasa and Umno youth wing have also expressed willingness to cancel their own rallies meant to counter the Bersih rally.

Police reports lodged

Yang diPertuan Agong Mizan Zainal Abidin warned in a rare political statement late on Sunday that street demonstrations "bring more bad than good". He said demands for democracy should not destroy the country and urged the government and Bersih to resolve the matter through dialogue.

READ MORE HERE

 

Ex-Bukit Merah owner takes RM1b Lynas stake

Posted: 04 Jul 2011 03:24 PM PDT

By Shannon Teoh,  The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, July 5 — Japan's Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, part of the same group of companies which owned the Asian Rare Earth (ARE) plant in Bukit Merah, Perak, has taken a RM1 billion stake in Australian miner Lynas Corp, the Dow Jones newswire reported today.

The 9.99 per cent stake taken by Japan's largest financial group comes despite uncertainty over Lynas's rare earth refinery in Kuantan to start by year-end following a government review asking 11 recommendations to be met prior to licensing despite the plant being tagged safe.

Mitsubishi Chemicals, also part of the Mitsubishi Group, was forced to shut the ARE plant in Ipoh, Perak in 1992 following public protests over radiation pollution.

Nearly 20 years on, the company is still undertaking a RM300 million cleanup as radiation is still being linked to diseases such as leukaemia, which has killed seven in the neighbourhood in the past five years.

The move underlines Japan's economic dependence on the material crucial for high technology products such as smartphones, hybrid cars and wind turbines after a diplomatic spat with China last year.

China controls more than 90 per cent of the current market but Lynas says the plant being constructed in the Gebeng industrial zone will meet one-sixth of global demand once fully operational.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Grow up and work with Bersih, Najib

Posted: 04 Jul 2011 03:19 PM PDT

http://www.mcil.org/mcil/mcil/declaration/peoplefirst.jpg

By Jeswan Kaur, FMT

An innocent intention to undertake a walk for democracy has got Barisan Nasional, the police, the National Fatwa Council, the Election Commission, the bogeyman of Umno and even a silat grandmaster going hysterical, to the extent of willing to cause hurt to organisers and participants of the Bersih 2.0 rally.

July 9 has become a date synonymous with anarchy and hidden agenda, as far as Umno president and Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak is trying so very hard to imply.

Looks like the impact made by the inaugural Bersih rally on Nov 10, 2007, still haunts Umno. It was said to have attracted between 30,000 to 50,000 people and played a major role in helping the opposition parties win big in the 2008 general election.

The 2007 rally was intercepted by the police using tear gas and chemical-laced water cannons.

Four years later, Bersih 2.0 is going on another rally, on July 9. The aim, as far as its chief S Ambiga is concerned is to clean up the electoral system, to ensure elections are conducted in a just manner.

Still, Bersih 2.0 failed to realise that the heartburn the 2007 rally caused Umno never went away. This explains the hysteria behind Najib's actions this time around to leave nothing to chance, to ensure July 9 favours his leadership as the premier.

All means are being deployed by the Najib administration to ensure the July 9 rally never sees the light of the day. Participants of Saturday's "Walk for Democracy" are being harassed and hounded with threats of imprisonment, including using the Internal Security Act draconian law against the organisers.

The truth however is that the walk, organised by election watchdog Bersih 2.0 is a cry for clean and fair elections, which to BN and Umno is asking for the impossible, hence all attempts by Umno to thwart the spirits of all those behind the rally.

What however is unforgiving is the way the police treated the 30 Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM) activists detained in Kepala Batas, Penang, while campaigning for their "Udahlah" Bersaralah" (Enough already – Retire Now) roadshow campaign.

PSM secretary-general S Arutchelvan said the 30 were not campaigning for the Bersih 2.0 July 9 rally.

Arutchelvan said the police was mistreating the Hindu detainees, giving them beef to eat, knowing fully well eating beef goes against their religious belief .

'People first' – truth or fallacy

Now, with all the rantings about national unity and harmony by Najib, what does he, the Penang police chief Ayub Yaakob, Inspector-General of Police Ismail Omar and Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein have to say about the police brutality being carried out towards the PSM activists detained in what is seen as Najib's way of sending a message to Bersih 2.0 chief, lawyer Ambiga Sreenevasan.

The detainees were denied visitation rights, visits by their lawyers, proper medical care and treatment and also basic items like toothpaste and soap.

 

READ MORE HERE.

 

Call for class action against Police Act

Posted: 04 Jul 2011 03:13 PM PDT

http://www.oocities.org/capitolhill/congress/5544/police.jpg

By Humayun Kabir, FMT

IPOH:  A human rights lawyer has called for a class-action suit to challenge the constitutional validity of Section 27 of the Police Act, which sets conditions for the granting of permits for public rallies."Section 27 of the Police Act has to be challenged in court as it contradicts Articles 4(1)(a) and (b) of the Constitution," said Leong Cheok Keng, who gained prominence two years ago as counsel for former Perak menteri besar Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin in his suit against Barisan Nasional's takeover of the state government.

Article 4(1)(a) of the Federal Constitution provides for freedom of speech and expression and Article 4(1)(b) gives citizens the right to peaceful assembly.

Under Section 27 of the Police Act, a group intending to hold a public rally must apply for a permit 90 days before the event and the district police chief give his decision within three days.

If the application is rejected, an appeal to the chief police officer (CPO) of the state must be filed within 48 hours. The CPO's decision is final. It cannot be challenged in court.

Leong contends that Section 27 is unconstitutional.


READ MORE HERE.

Postal voting still relevant, says EC

Posted: 04 Jul 2011 03:10 PM PDT

(Bernama) - KUALA LUMPUR: The Election Commission (EC) has defended the postal voting system which allows security forces personnel and their spouses as well as Malaysians working or studying abroad, to exercise their right as voters.

If this system was done away with, it would affect security and public order because members of security forces would have to abandon their bases to cast their votes on polling day, the EC said in a booklet explaining the various issues raised over the country's election system.

The EC said it was constantly looking for the best way to strengthen the postal voting system, including implementing advance voting.

"Voters will be gathered in one place two or three days before the polling day.

"This system is not applicable, however, for Malaysians who are residing abroad and members of security forces who are on duties in their forward bases because of difficulties in gathering them," it said.

On the registration of spouses of military or police personnel as postal voters, the EC said the matter was provided for under the Elections (Postal Voting) Regulations 2003.

The EC said applications to become postal electors were scrutinised in a stringent manner.

Meanwhile, the EC said it had no plan to implement automatic registration of voters for Malaysians who had reached the voting age of 21.

Doing so would inconvenience the electors as most of them do not live in the address stated in their identification documents, which were used to register them as electors, the EC said in the booklet.

It added that people often moved places without informing the National Registration Department about the change of address.

If they were registered automatically based on the address in their identification documents, and if they had moved to other places, it would be difficult for them to return to vote in their registered polling centres, it said.

- Bernama

EC: Redelineation done according to federal constitution principles

Posted: 04 Jul 2011 03:08 PM PDT

(Bernama) - KUALA LUMPUR: Five previous redelineation of electoral constituencies and boundaries carried out by the Election Commission (EC) was done in accordance with Article 113 (2) of the Federal Constitution.

The EC said the redelineation of electoral boundaries had never breached the principles of the Federal Constitution.

Looking at the electoral boundaries, not a single redelineation exercise had breached the state or parliamentary constituencies, said

EC in a book published to clarify issues related to elections.

The EC said it would always try to accommodate the electoral boundaries for state or parliament constituencies within a district except for some exceptional cases.

"There are some cases in which the redelineation of a Parliament seat may involve two districts, just like Kulim/Bandar Baru, Tanjung karang/Kuala Selangor and a few others in Sabah and Sarawak," said the EC.

Even the redelineation of a seat involving two districts, does not breach the principles of the Federal Constitution.

"The only problem that we can foresee for the elected representative is related to administration and the fact that he may have to attend more meetings.

"However, so far, elected representatives have not faced any major problem since they understand their responsibilities when being elected," said the EC.

As for the cleaning up of the electoral list, the EC claimed that the process could not be carried out without valid information from the National Registration Department.

The next of kin of a deceased member must provide details of the person's death to the department so that the department can issue a dead person's certificate for the EC to update its data.

As for the campaigning period of between seven to nine days, the EC said the period was sufficient for all political parties because a longer campaigning period would incur additional cost.

The EC would, however, continue to carry out studies to upgrade and accommodate such requests in accordance with the law. - Bernama

International community piles pressure on PM

Posted: 04 Jul 2011 02:51 PM PDT

By Stephanie Sta Maria, FMT

PETALING JAYA: The international human rights community today expressed its strongest condemnation yet of the crackdown on Bersih 2.0 with an open letter to prime minister, Najib Tun Razak.

The three-page letter was signed by Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, World Organisation Against Torture, International Federation for Human Rights and Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development.

Copies were also sent to Deputy Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin, Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein, Information, Communications and Culture Minister Rais Yatim, Minister in the Prime Minister's Office Nazri Aziz and Inspector General of Police Ismail Omar.

While the NGOs decried the spate of arrests and the banning of the rally, their most vocal opposition was against the use of the Emergency Ordinance (EO) on the six Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM) members.

They stated that Malaysia's use of draconian preventive detention laws was incompatible with its seat on the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC).

The NGOs also reminded Najib of his pledge in 2009 to "uphold civil liberties" and "regard for fundamental rights of the people of Malaysia".

"We call on you to turn these pledges into concrete action by asking law enforcement officers to immediately cease use of all preventive detention laws, and by starting a time-bound process to repeal those laws," the letter read.

"The Malaysian penal code and criminal justice system are fully capable of addressing situations of internal security, and should be allowed to do so without resorting to preventive detention."

Alarm bells

The NGOs pointed out that government was violating the right to freedom of association by designating Bersih as an "illegal organisation" under Section 5 of the Societies Act of 1966.

"Your government has failed to provide any credible evidence to substantiate the Registrar of Societies' claims that Bersih is trying to topple the government, or is a risk to public order, safety, economy and sovereignity," they added.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Let Bersih march, say academics

Posted: 04 Jul 2011 02:49 PM PDT

By Tashny Sukumaran, FMT

KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysian academics say the Bersih crisis can be solved if the government drops all charges, release those detained and permit Bersih to march peacefully on Saturday.

The group of academics, who include political analysts Azmi Sharom, Terence Gomez and Lim Teck Ghee, said that the march was "undeniably noble", and expressed disapproval that the government was resorting to "harsh measures and use of draconian laws" to stop the rally from happening.

"They are a legitimate expression of the freedom and rights of the citizens of a country. A government that uses laws, institutions and resources of the state to suppress or repress such activities undermines its own credibility and claim to practising democracy," the academicians said in a statement today.

Some of the other signatories are well-respected local academics like Mustafa K Anuar, Andrew Aeria, Christopher Chong, Sharmani Gabriel, Francis Loh, Ooi Kee Beng, Janet Pillai, Johan Saravanamuttu, Tan Sooi Beng, Yeoh Seng Guan and Diana Wong.

The statement calls the relevant authorities not only to release all those who have been detained, but also for both the government and the opposition to commit to a code of peaceful conduct during the marches.

"Public assemblies and marches in support of causes that have attracted widespread public concern are a common feature of all democratic systems," said the academics.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Pakatan’s emergency Bersih meet tomorrow

Posted: 04 Jul 2011 02:47 PM PDT

By Shannon Teoh, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, July 5 — The Pakatan Rakyat (PR) leadership council will hold an emergency meeting tomorrow after the Yang di-Pertuan Agong's call for Bersih 2.0 organisers to meet with the Najib administration.

DAP parliamentary leader Lim Kit Siang said in a statement that the meeting will discuss the advice of Tuanku Mizan Zainal Abidin even as Bersih chief Datuk Ambiga Sreenevasan said yesterday that she will cancel the July 9 rally if asked by the King.

"I am most impressed by the advice of the King, particularly when he (urged) 'the government to carry out everything that is entrusted to it by the people in a just and wise manner... do not want to see... animosity among them or a section of the people being enemies with the government," the Ipoh Timur MP said.

Lim insisted that the electoral reform movement was planning a peaceful rally and allegations by the police and government of reviving communism and subversion by foreign powers were simply "imaginary enemies."

"A 'just and wise' government would never have allowed the situation to degenerate and descend into a national hysteria," he added.

Immediately after Tuanku Mizan's statement on Sunday, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak offered yesterday to allow the now outlawed Bersih to gather in a stadium.

In turn, Ambiga said she would seek an audience with the King and call off the rally if asked to do so.

The atmosphere ahead of Saturday's planned march has heightened after the government embarked on a nationwide clampdown on Bersih 2.0, hoping to block the now-outlawed coalition's plans for its July 9 rally.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Georgia's National Police Corruption Project

Posted: 04 Jul 2011 02:12 PM PDT

(NPR.org) Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili has targeted corruption in his first year of office. To that end, he revamped the police force — by firing all of the traffic police in his country, cutting 30,000 police from the payroll. Robert Siegel talks with Saakashvili, who is in New York for a world summit of the United Nations.
Listen at: http://www.npr.org/tablet/#story/?storyId=4849472

MELISSA BLOCK, host:

This is ALL THINGS CONSIDERED from NPR News. I'm Melissa Block.

ROBERT SIEGEL, host:

And I'm Robert Siegel.

Among the world leaders converging on New York this week for a United Nations summit is Mikhail Saakashvili. He is the president of the Republic of Georgia, the former Soviet republic. Mr. Saakashvili is an American-educated lawyer who led Georgia's Rose Revolution last year. He came to our New York bureau to talk about one area of reform that his government has undertaken, reforming the police.

President MIKHAIL SAAKASHVILI (Republic of Georgia): Basically, we had one of the most corrupt police forces. And the way it functioned was very simple. Government told the policemen, `You are supposed to be out there, keep order. You need to have some kind of cars, but we are not going to buy for you any cars. We are not going to put in any gasoline in that car, so you have to get money for it yourselves. You need to wear some kind of uniforms. We don't care where you get them from. And you also should sustain yourself, I mean, of course, because we are not even going to pay you because the payment was pretty symbolic. And not only do you have to take bribes from the people but you also have to share part of your corrupt income with your superiors--I mean, with the government that appointed you.'

SIEGEL: The cop was a thug with a franchise from the government (unintelligible) yeah.

Pres. SAAKASHVILI: Absolutely, absolutely, that was what it was. And so what we did--I mean, for the first few months we tried to temper it. You know, we urged them to be honest, you know, increased their pay. It didn't help. So, in the end, basically, 80 to 90 percent of all policemen were fired.

SIEGEL: And how many individuals are we talking about ...(unintelligible)?

Pres. SAAKASHVILI: We are talking about 25 to 30,000 people.

SIEGEL: All of them fired?

Pres. SAAKASHVILI: Yeah,

SIEGEL: Yeah.

Pres. SAAKASHVILI: And it was pretty miserable. Now people thought that we would have disaster because it was in the beginning of holiday season; therefore, that we will have a real chaos with traffic disasters. Nothing like of this sort has happened because what it proved was that this police was not only producing order, it was producing disorder.

So then we had new guys recruited. And it took us two to three months to find good guys and to give them initial training at an academy which is sponsored by the US. But what we also did, we gave them new, nice uniforms that look very much unlike the old Soviet ones. We gave them new, nice German cars, American radios, the US kind of looking badges and painting which we gave them. So...

SIEGEL: Appearances are important here, you're saying?

Pres. SAAKASHVILI: Yeah, it is.

SIEGEL: Yeah.

Pres. SAAKASHVILI: But besides, we gave them 20 times, in some cases, higher salaries, which they started to...

SIEGEL: Twenty times higher salaries?

Pres. SAAKASHVILI: Well, we are talking very roughly--I mean, we--they used to get like 30 to $40 and we got them minimum salary now--minimum money is 3 to $400, but we are talking about men...

SIEGEL: Per week? Per week?

Pres. SAAKASHVILI: These are monthly, but for Eastern Europe these are pretty high salaries. And...

SIEGEL: Now what do you do with the 30,000 cops you fired? Are they barred forever from becoming police officers? Are they barred from public employment? What happens to them?

Pres. SAAKASHVILI: No. First of all, most of them did have savings because they were corrupt and they had money. You know, in the beginning we had trouble recruiting people because many people would not take jobs that had such a bad reputation. Now there is a long line of applicants.

SIEGEL: Is the crime rate in Tbilisi lower today than it was three years ago, say?

Pres. SAAKASHVILI: You know what? If you look at figures it's much, much higher, but I'll tell you why. Because police in the old system would not register crimes. Nobody--many people wouldn't even bother going to the police because it was extra headache. Now people for even the small family conflict, a lot of the spouse will go and call the police or somebody--I mean, I had neighbors that, say, lose their key and they will call the police and say, I mean, `We lost our keys. Would you please help us to open the door?' And all these cases get registered.

But I think that the overall picture of crime has decreased. The old police used to beat up people. They basically used what amounted to torture to extort the evidence. And the new police force was educated and is controlled in a way where nothing like this--there is zero tolerance towards torture. Zero tolerance. Everybody thought that there was no way to keep crimes checked unless you occasionally beat them up or managed them with beating them up or blackmail them into something. No, our examples show that you can reverse the crime trend even by being civilized.

SIEGEL: Well, President Saakashvili, it's very good to talk with you once again.

Pres. SAAKASHVILI: Thank you, enjoyed it.

SIEGEL: Mikhail Saakashvili is the president of Georgia. He's in New York attending the session of the General Assembly of the United Nations.

 

Parties move to defuse tension over rallies

Posted: 04 Jul 2011 10:21 AM PDT

By Azril Annuar, Pauline Wong and Hemananthani Sivanandam, The Sun

In a positive response to the Yang di-Pertuan Agong's call for compromise and moderation to avoid trouble arising from protest marches planned for Saturday, the government and the organisers of the rallies today moved to defuse the tension which had built up in past weeks.

 

The prime minister said a venue would be offered to the rally organisers if they wanted to present a memorandum to the King. And the leader of Bersih 2.0 said the organisers would seek an audience with His Majesty and abide by the King's advice.

Umno Youth, which planned to hold a rally to counter Bersih, announced that it had called off its plans.

Warning that street demonstrations may bring more bad than good, although the original intention is good, the King had on Sunday counselled the government and the organisers of the three protest marches, the Coalition for Clean and Fair Elections (Bersih), Umno Youth and Malay rights group Perkasa, to resolve the issue through consultation rather than acting on their emotions.

Making the first move to defuse the situation, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Abdul Razak said the government was willing to allow the Bersih rally, provided it is not a street demonstration.

"If they want to present a memorandum, request it nicely from the authorities. We are willing to give them a stadium for them to gather," he said, at the Prime Minister's Department monthly assembly in Putrajaya this morning.

"The government will not stop them from having a demonstration in a stadium from morning till night. They can shout all they want but don't hold a street demonstration as it has the risk of endangering the nation," said Najib, adding that a street demonstration meant they had different intentions.

Najib's compromise offer was vastly softer than the no-compromise positions taken by the Home Ministry and the police earlier.

Last week, the police announced they were no longer willing to negotiate or compromise with Bersih 2.0 organisers, and began a crackdown which has so far seen over 150 people detained for questioning.

On Saturday, Home Minister Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein had declared that Bersih 2.0 is illegal and justified the crackdown.

Najib said there was no guarantee the proposed demonstration will be peaceful, as irresponsible parties might take advantage of the rally.

"There may be those who like to incite riots and cause disturbances that will take advantage of the situation and join the rally, leading to undesirable incidents. We must think of this, the worse that can happen, before it's too late.

"We must avoid making emotional decisions, taking emotional actions.There are other avenues available," he said, adding that the Election Commission (EC) is willing to review any legislation regarding the electoral process and to improve it where possible.

"We are willing to make improvements. The EC had said it is willing to implement a biometric system to dispel the perception that there are phantom voters, he added.

Bersih 2.0 chairman Datuk Ambiga Sreenevasan told a press conference that following an emergency meeting of the coalition's steering committee, the coalition had sought an audience with the King towards resolving issues surrounding the Bersih 2.0 rally.

"The coalition will abide by the advice of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, even if it means calling off the rally. As a matter of respect (to the King), we want to communicate with His Majesty our decision first before making an announcement," said Ambiga, urging the media not to speculate as to what the outcome of the meeting will be.

"We want to resolve this in the best interest of all concerned," she said.

Umno Youth today announced it had cancelled its plans to have a rally to coincide with the Bersih rally on Saturday.

Its deputy chief Datuk Razali Ibrahim said the decision was made to abide by the King's advice.

"We take the Yang di-Pertuan Agong's advice seriously. Thus, I have urged Patriot not to continue with the rally to heed Tuanku's advice that all parties should adhere to the rule of law to defend the country's Constitution," he said.

Umno Youth had last month launched "Himpunan Patriot" (Patriots Rally), to support the current electoral system.

Perkasa secretary-general Syed Hussin Syed Ali hinted that Perkasa may be willing to call off its counter-rally, but will announce its final decision tomorrow.

"If Bersih continues with the rally, so will we. This is our decision for now," he said in a text message.

 

Khairy offers to work with Bersih if rally called off

Posted: 04 Jul 2011 10:16 AM PDT

By Shannon Teoh, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, July 5 — Umno Youth will call off its counter-rally and instead back some Bersih 2.0 demands if the latter cancels its July 9 march, says Umno Youth chief Khairy Jamaluddin.

Khairy told The Malaysian Insider yesterday the youth wing will offer the olive branch as it has always acknowledged that the present system required improvements that could be worked out with the Election Commission.

"We believe that a united bipartisan front on points that we agree on will be more effective if Bersih really wants change," the Umno Youth chief said.

In an unexpected turn of events yesterday, Bersih pledged to abide by Yang di-Pertuan Agong Tuanku Mizan Zainal Abidin's advice to negotiate with the government instead of forcing a confrontation.

Former Bar Council president Datuk Ambiga Sreenevasan who leads the coalition — which was declared illegal last week by the government — of 62 NGOs said she will seek an audience with the King before Saturday and call off the rally if told to do so.

"I've always said that we support the present system but that acknowledge improvements are needed," Khairy added.

The Rembau MP, who is still overseas on a volunteer mission to Gaza, Palestine, said that Umno Youth would support a cleaning of dead individuals on the electoral roll, overseas voting, free access to all media and television slots for all parties contesting elections.

"These can all be on the table for negotiation," he said.

Both Perkasa and Umno Youth had declared earlier yesterday they'd reciprocate a Bersih stand down.

Tuanku Mizan Zainal Abidin's statement Sunday led to Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak making an offer yesterday to provide Bersih with a stadium for their rally if they opted out of a capital march.

 

READ MORE HERE.

PSM 23 charged under Societies Act and ISA

Posted: 04 Jul 2011 02:23 AM PDT

They are accused of being in possession of Bersih pamphlets and subversive documents.

(Free Malaysia Today) - Twenty-three members of Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM) were charged in the magistrate's court today with possession of 600 photocopies of Bersih pamphlets and subversive documents.

The accused ranged in age from 17 to 64. They were granted bail of RM4,000 for each of the two charges. Thirteen posted bail today and the others are expected to do so tomorrow. But police released all of them.

Pertaining to the Bersih pamphlets, they were charged under Section 48(1) of the Societies Act or alternatively Section 43 of the act. Section 48(1) carries a jail sentence not exceeding five years or a fine not above RM15,000 or both.  Section 43 carries a jail term not above three years or a maximum fine of RM3,000 or both.

The charge for possession of subversive documents came under the Section 29(1) of the Internal Security Act. It carries a jail sentence of not more than five years or a fine not more than RM10,000 or both.

The prosecution said they committed both offences at Sungai Dua toll plaza of the North-South Expressway at 3.30pm on June 25.

Thirteen of the accused are women and two are boys.

The women are Cheang Sew Yin, 60, Soh Sock Hwa, 29, Chan Mooi, 55, K Kamala Devi, 57, K Deeeba, 22, K Thanusia, 21, G Packialetchumy, 40, R Saroza, 64,  R Nalayani, 64, M Santhana Devi, 30, P Indra, 54, P Jody, 52 and M Kavitha, 35.

The boys are J Raveen Veerasenan and S Thivya Kumar, both 17 years old.

The other eight suspects are A Shanmugam, 57, M Ravindran, 20, M Arokiam, 62, G Velaitham, 54, M Sivoosamy, 52, S Ramasamy, 35, Gana Santhanam, 45, and S Selvam, 42.

Another man, S. Murugan, the driver of the bus in which the activists were travelling when they were arrested, was released without any charges.

Another teenager, S Ragu, 16, who was released on police bail on June 26, failed to turn up to face charges today. The prosecution asked the court for another date for his case.

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Bersih’s ‘hidden agenda’ a success

Posted: 04 Jul 2011 04:00 PM PDT

All it took was a press conference to announce the date and venue. BN leaders fell for the bait.

But if Bersih has a hidden agenda to sway the political momentum in Pakatan Rakyat's favour and if the opposition coalition is truly serious about reforms, then isn't three days of losses a small price to pay for a corrupt-free, transparent and equitable business environment in the future?

RK Anand, Free Malaysia Today

If the allegation that Bersih 2.0 has a hidden agenda is true, then kudos to its leaders, for it seems that the goal has been achieved.

All it required was a press conference to announce the date and venue for a rally. As expected, Barisan Nasional leaders took the bait and turned it into a roaring success even before it hit the streets.

And if it is true that Bersih chairperson Ambiga Sreenevasan harbours political ambitions and plotted to use the rally to make herself famous, this objective too has been achieved.

With all the publicity given to her by the media, including the likes of Utusan Malaysia and TV3, the former Bar Council president is now a household name.

Even foreigners have taken notice of the media blitz as illustrated by an incident where a Burmese restaurant worker pointed to her photograph and remarked to the surprised patron holding the Tamil newspaper, "Ini perempuan banyak berani, macam itu Aung San Suu Kyi."

However, he stopped short of saying if the BN government is behaving like the Burmese junta.

Running yellow over Bersih

The powers-that-be are running yellow because they fear that a massive turnout similar to the Bersih and Hindraf rallies of the past will shift the political tectonic plates again, creating another tsunami, perhaps one even more powerful than its predecessor, and submerge Putrajaya.

Then again, if BN is convinced that Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak is on the right track and that the public have lost faith in the opposition as claimed, it should allow this rally with a "hidden agenda" to proceed and exploit the dismal numbers to its advantage and silence the critics.

It will prove that Malaysians believe the Election Commission has been executing its duties without fear and favour, while all those allegations of electoral fraud in the past are hogwash.

Perhaps, intelligence reports indicate otherwise and this prompted BN to pull all the stops to ensure that the rally does not take place, especially when memories from the Middle East are still fresh.

But the government claims that it is an issue of national security and the livelihood of taxi drivers and businessmen will be affected.

One MCA minister argued that people will lock themselves up in their homes for no less than three days – the day before, on the day of the rally and the next day. In dollars and cents, she said, this will be nothing short of a financial catastrophe.

So in other words, protests, no matter how just the cause, are wrong because it is bad for business. It is indeed a shame that leaders like Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King and Nelson Mandela were not privy to such pearls of wisdom.

But if Bersih has a hidden agenda to sway the political momentum in Pakatan Rakyat's favour and if the opposition coalition is truly serious about reforms, then isn't three days of losses a small price to pay for a corrupt-free, transparent and equitable business environment in the future?

The MCA minister also appealed to the people not to participate in the rally for it will tarnish the country's image.

To her, the police's crackdown, the use of draconian laws, groups baying for blood and those urging the King to strip Ambiga of her citizenship have done nothing to affect the nation's pride.

Locking up the wrong people

As for the rally being a security threat, it is because of the likes of Perkasa, which never fails to stoke fears of violence, and a martial art exponent who has vowed to wage war because he considers himself the third line of defence and therefore feels duty-bound to stop this enemy, armed with dangerous yellow T-shirts, banners and placards, calling for free and fair elections.

And while those who propagate violence continue to roam free, others campaigning for a peaceful march to safeguard their rights enshrined under the Federal Constitution are locked up for wearing yellow T-shirts.

Perkasa's chief Ibrahim Ali warned that Bersih stands on the verge of committing treason but stressed, in his usual warped logic, that if the movement forges ahead with its rally despite the King's advice, then he will do the same.

Ibrahim is nothing more than a political opportunist exploiting a vacuum left behind by the post-2008 Umno, which decided to leave the keris in its scabbard to entice Indian and Chinese voters.

READ MORE HERE

 

What does Bersih do now?

Posted: 04 Jul 2011 02:20 PM PDT

What if the King does not grant Bersih 2.0 an audience soon enough? This would then pose a quandary for the NGO. Should it then proceed with the rally on July 9? When it comes to that, Bersih 2.0 would have to answer the ultimate question: Does it listen to the King or to the rakyat? 

By Kee Thuan Chye

THE King has issued a statement on the developments surrounding the proposed Bersih 2.0 rally for free and fair elections. What do we make of it?

 

It is quite clear that he is not in favour of the rally proceeding on July 9, although he does say that the original intentions of street demonstrations can be good. This, read together with his acknowledgement of "the political fervour of a section of the people to bring about a healthy democracy (menyuburkan demokrasi) in our country", indicates he is not condemning Bersih 2.0. He is aware that the people are involved (even though it constitutes "a section"), and what they desire is something positive, i.e. menyuburkan demokrasi.

 

He is, however, concerned that "street demonstrations bring more bad than good" and he wants it ensured that the people's democratic demand "does not bring destruction to the country".

 

He advocates that whenever a problem arises, "we as a civilised society should (hendaklah) resolve it through consultations".

 

What has been the effect of the King's statement on the parties involved?

 

Prime Minister Najib Razak's first reaction is to offer Bersih 2.0 the opportunity to protest in a stadium. This is the most accommodating posture he has struck since the controversy began. In doing so, he has now come to 'legitimise' Bersih 2.0 without openly saying so, although only a few days ago, his Home Minister, Hishammuddin Hussein, had declared Bersih 2.0 an illegal organisation effective July 1.

 

Najib's offer indicates he has lost the battle of wills against the movement for electoral reform and is now scrambling to save face by making this offer. But it's not good enough. He has done too much damage; he has used an atom bomb to annihilate ants through his unreasonable, even maniacal arrests of people in the past week. The worst is alleging that the 30 Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM) members arrested in Kepala Batas were waging war against the King, and subjecting six of them to detention under the Emergency Ordinance.

 

The King has not, figuratively speaking, slapped Najib's face but he has tapped him on the shoulder by saying in his statement, "I also urge the Government to carry out everything that is entrusted to it by the people in a just and wise (bijaksana) manner". The words "just and wise" can be read as a reminder to the Government that it has been using unfair and sometimes inane tactics over the past week. The most inane would be either alleging that the PSM 30 were resurrecting Communism or declaring Bersih 2.0 illegal.

 

Najib is like the head prefect who has been caught out by the headmaster and is now being told to carry out his duties within the school rules.

 

It is noteworthy that the King uses the line, "entrusted to it by the people". It issues a very important reminder to a government that has become arrogant and unmindful of the rule of law, which is evident in its arbitrary arrests of people over the past week, in one case for simply wearing a yellow T-shirt.

 

It is further significant that the King says he does "not want to see animosity develop between the communities in our plural society or a section of the people being enemies with the Government, on whatever grounds". This could be alluding generally to the racial drumming of Perkasa, Utusan Malaysia and even Mahathir Mohamad that has contributed to racial tension of late, and specifically to Perkasa's role in inflaming the Bersih 2.0 rally by wanting to counter it and issuing veiled threats of violence.

 

The reaction on the part of Bersih 2.0 is to seek an audience with the King. Opposition political parties have indicated that they want to be included, but on no account must Bersih 2.0 allow this. It has all this while maintained that it is a movement that is led and initiated by civil society; it should remain so. If the King grants the audience, what Bersih 2.0 might request is for him to advise the Prime Minister to initiate negotiations with it and the Election Commission on carrying out electoral reform. If this is not forthcoming, Bersih 2.0 should still have the option of holding its rally on July 9.

 

But what if the King does not grant Bersih 2.0 an audience soon enough? This would then pose a quandary for the NGO. Should it then proceed with the rally on July 9? When it comes to that, Bersih 2.0 would have to answer the ultimate question: Does it listen to the King or to the rakyat?

 

Ours is a constitutional monarchy; on political matters, the King can offer advice but it is up to the listener to accept it or not. However, many Malaysians are still infected with a feudal mentality and to them, going against the King's advice is tantamount to derhaka. It is this that Bersih 2.0 will have to guard against, because if it were to be branded penderhaka, a fair part of the sympathy it has been getting so far through the Government crackdown will be obliterated.

 

On the other hand, it could be comforted by the thought that Perkasa and Umno Youth have said that if Bersih 2.0 goes ahead with its rally, they would also go ahead with theirs. This would expose them to accusations of menderhaka as well, so Bersih 2.0 would not be alone.

 

The best course for everyone, however, might well be negotiation, at which a timetable should be set for the electoral reform process to take place, before the next general election is held. But before going to the negotiating table, Bersih 2.0 should be given due recognition, which means Hishammuddin must revoke his order of illegalising it. This is a prerequisite; otherwise it will make the Govt look silly negotiating with an "illegal" organisation. But even if Hishammuddin refuses to admit his high-handed mistake, Bersih 2.0 may have already been legitimised by the King's call for "consultations", and of course by Najib's offer of holding the rally in a stadium.

 

Furthermore, the six PSM detainees should be released immediately, and the charges against the other 23 PSM members dropped. As it is, charging them with associating with an illegal society does not seem right. Bersih 2.0 was declared illegal several days after they were arrested; how could they have looked into the future to predict it would become illegal?

 

The next few days will be interesting to watch. The clash of wills between Bersih 2.0 and the Government (with Perkasa and Umno Youth as secondary players) may now be raised to a higher level. Najib may not want to give in for fear of appearing weak, and Bersih 2.0 may feel it has right and the rakyat on its side. It would take an impartial referee who has the country's best interests at heart to arbitrate the matter and bring about a satisfying solution.

Fascist Threats - The Same UMNO Modus Operandi

Posted: 04 Jul 2011 02:18 PM PDT

By Dr Kua Kia Soong, Director of SUARAM

The repression by the UMNO-led regime leading up to the Bersih rally of 9 July should serve as an eye opener for the youth of today who have not lived through the other orchestrated crises they have created in the past. Every time the regime has faced a challenge from within UMNO itself, such as in 1987 or from without, such as in 1998, the regime has invented a crisis.

Build-up to Operasi Lalang

It was the same during the build-up to Operation Lalang in 1987 when UMNO Youth threatened to hold a 500,000 strong rally in Kuala Lumpur to build on the rally in Kampung Baru where there were banners calling for racial bloodletting. The UMNO Youth leader at the time who excelled at breast-beating was none other than the present prime minister. This was the response to the completely peaceful assembly at the Tian Hou Temple called by the Chinese associations to protest the unreasonable posting of unqualified administrators to the Chinese schools. Operation Lalang was unleashed soon after.

During my detention under Operation Lalang, the Special Branch maintained that the response by UMNO Youth was reasonable because they had been provoked by the Chinese associations. That's right, UMNO Youth has the state backing for any fascist violence they may choose to unleash against any protests or assemblies even if they are completely peaceful assemblies. They did the same when NGOs organised perfectly peaceful forums on the freedom of religion.

The Selective Efficiency of the Police

Thus, UMNO (and now their alter-ego, Perkasa) threaten violence whenever it is convenient for them. And the police, who are usually pretty efficient at putting down peaceful assemblies, can be selective in keeping order whenever these fascist mobs strike.

For example, it took the Malaysian police just twenty minutes to break up the peaceful Kesas Highway demonstration by thousands during the Reformasi years. But the police arrived one hour late during the peaceful East Timor conference in 1996 when it was disrupted by a mob organised by UMNO Youth. They were late again in restraining the mob that harassed the anti-Lynas protest in Kuantan recently.

During the racial violence in Kampung Medan in 2001, the police took nearly a week to restore order. They took an even longer time to restore order after the pogrom of May 13 in 1969 – something like two months!

The Suqiu Appeals

Again in 1999, UMNO Youth threatened to burn down the Selangor Chinese Assembly Hall if the Chinese associations did not withdraw their Suqiu appeals that had already been accepted by even the BN before the general elections that year. The leaders of the Chinese associations surrendered to these threats by agreeing to keep in abeyance those appeals that UMNO had objected to. The UMNO Youth leader who distinguished himself in terrorising Suqiu was none other than the present Home Minister, famed for his keris-wielding machismo at UMNO general assemblies.

Detention Without Trial: Easy to Use...Just Lock Them Up!

The most convenient method of repression has always been to use detention without trial after the "crisis" created by UMNO Youth's threat of fascist violence. The ISA (Internal Security Act) is the most well-known of these repressive apparatuses but in fact of late, more people have been detained through the use of the Emergency Ordinance(EO).

The detention of Dr Kumar and other PSM activists under the EO reflects a new trend in the BN government's use of detention without trial. For years, the EO has been used against alleged gangsters and others involved in criminal activities while the ISA has been the favoured instrument to terrorise dissidents.

Do you see now why the BN government will cling on to the use of detention without trial as long as they can and all the more reason why justice-loving Malaysians must make the abolition of detention without trial top of the democratic agenda?

Must We Live in Perpetual Fear of UMNO's Threats?

The leaders in Bersih have said they will be seeking audience with the King and will abide by his wisdom. Do we really expect the King to say "Yea, rave on with the rally?" Of course, not! Everyone knows he's going to counsel the Bersih leaders against going through with the July 9th rally. And the Bersih leaders will use it as the reason for calling off the rally.

But since when has the King had to be consulted on the people's struggles? Is this some new insight our constitutional lawyers have recently acquired into our system of constitutional monarchy?

So, what's the learning in this episode of Malaysian struggles?

Should the rally be called off without any concessions by the BN government toward free and fair elections? If the YDP Agung is to be used as a climb-down accessory, some concession toward free and fair elections must be forthcoming by the BN government. Otherwise, the Bersih leaders must tell us what has been the purpose of planning this rally in the first place.

No, they cannot say they did not anticipate the fascist threats by UMNO Youth and Perkasa nor can they say they did not expect the use of detention without trial by the BN government. If no concession by the BN government is forthcoming while the rally is called off, I dare say we have been led up the garden path to July 9th!

 

TNB should engage customers

Posted: 04 Jul 2011 10:34 AM PDT

By Terence Fernandez, The Sun

RECENT reports in this paper on overbilling by Tenaga Nasional Bhd (TNB) resurrect the argument against monopolistic agreements that may not benefit the consumer.

Two exposes on consumers saddled with inflated bills and TNB's lethargy in addressing them head on to quell public concern do not augur well for what is the corporate responsibility of the sole power supplier in the country.

Granted that Chong Sook Tak had his RM31,000 "arrears" reduced to RM900 following this paper's involvement, but TNB has yet to explain how his bill was calculated and how it had come to that figure.

Inquiries by this paper only proved TNB's high-handedness in addressing complaints overall when we were tersely told that the matter would be resolved directly with Chong.

The question is how many other Chong Sook Tak's are out there? Here is one consumer who took the initiative to question the company and bring the matter to the public's attention.

How many others suffer in silence and just pay up without checking – due to ignorance or simple lethargy in dealing with profit-oriented corporate bodies?

Just how much has TNB made from overcharging its customers? Now with the so-called tampering with meters, the national power company is introducing new devices, which in the experience of some customers mean higher charges.

One example is Lee Siow Eng who blew the lid off the infallibility of these meters. He was charged RM10,000 in arrears after his meter was replaced due to alleged tampering.

According to TNB, Lee's meter reading showed "lower charges" which the former decreed was incorrect.

There had been several other similar complaints – albeit regarding lesser amounts – to the media on higher charges once the new meters are in place.

The question is how is it when the readings are low, the device is deemed to have been tampered with or faulty, but never when the readings are high?

Can TNB honestly tell us that it had, on its own initiative, looked up customers with unusually high meter readings and adjusted their bills? Or are such efforts reserved only for low readings?

In the same breath, in the case of Lee, why did TNB wait five years before informing him? The National Consumer Complaints Centre had stated that billing issues form the bulk of complaints that come to its door.

Random checks show that accusations of "tampering with meters" are among the main excuses given by TNB when consumers cry foul. This is akin to adding insult to injury.

Perhaps it is about time that the Energy Commission of Malaysia steps in – after all consumer protection and dispute resolutions are among its responsibilities.

As I am writing this, TNB is in crisis mode, holding meeting after meeting with its ground crew and technical advisers.

This is good. But it is not enough if the people are left in the dark. Media inquiries are also given scant regard, with the poor corporate communications guys being made to face the wolf pack.

Just like it spends money on "awareness campaigns" – in one case "silencing" at least one consumer group with generous grants – TNB should take the initiative to engage with its customers and explain the switch to new meters and how readings are conducted.

What constitutes "lower readings" and when can we get a reasonable explanation on estimations? It is ridiculous for a person who has been away for a month to be charged the same amount he usually pays when he is at home.

But the truth is we the consumers are to be blamed. Big corporations, including ones with bullying tendencies, only thrive when people are indifferent to their own welfare.

"Just pay and get on with life" seems to be the mantra many Malaysians live by, until the likes of Chong and Lee blow the fish out of the water. It also does not help when so-called consumer groups compromise their agenda for the almighty ringgit.

It is perhaps time for people to be more aware of what they are paying for and ensure that they get the service that is expected. Tell me, how many of you actually know how to read your electricity bill?

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


36 bom petrol dirampas, dipercayai ada kaitan dengan Bersih

Posted: 04 Jul 2011 03:07 PM PDT

Dalam serbuan itu, polis turut menemui 44 baju T berlambang Bersih 2.0 dan sejumlah lilitan kepala berwarna merah serta kuning yang kesemuanya disimpan di dalam lima buah beg pakaian dan dua beg plastik.

Ketua Polis Selangor, Datuk Tun Hisan Hamzah berkata, taktik digunakan oleh mereka terlibat sama dengan golongan komunis semasa zaman darurat.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


UMNO – Malaysia’s scourge

Posted: 04 Jul 2011 05:10 PM PDT

The children were among democracy activists who were jointly charged under the Societies Act in connection with the BERSIH 2.0 rally scheduled for this Saturday, 9 July, in Malaysia's  capital city, Kuala Lumpur.

The court action is the latest in a widening government crackdown on the rally organisers, who have also received unsourced death threats and suffered harassment and intimidation by Malaysian police and government authorities.

Hundreds of thousands of Malaysians are nevertheless readying to rally this Saturday, despite the government banning all BERSIH 2.0 rallies and declaring the organising NGO group, BERSIH 2.0, illegal.

Worldwide, Malaysians and their supporters will take to the streets of capital cities on the same day, supporting the call for electoral reform amid mass arrests in Malaysia and in defiance of the 'ban' and 'illegal organisation' edicts.

Global solidarity walks and demonstrations will be led by Malaysians residing abroad in London, Paris, Geneva, Hong Kong, Taipei, Seoul, Tokyo, Sydney, Melbourne, Canberra, Brisbane, Adelaide, Perth, Auckland, Los Angeles, San Francisco, New York and Washington next Saturday.

More than 100 activists have been arrested or questioned by police in Malaysia this past week, for their roles in helping to organise Saturday's KL rally.

In a late development on July 2, six officers of Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM – Socialist Party of Malaysia), who had been released after their June 25 detentions in the island state of Penang for supporting the rally, were re-arrested under the Emergency Ordinance (EO).

The activists were reportedly charged with "inciting national unrest" and "waging war against the king" – the latter a charge that is tantamount to treason and punishable by death.

By late evening on July 3, more arrests were being conducted in Malaysia, and Sungei Siput Opposition MP Dr Michael Jeyakumar and the other 5 PSM activists were taken to police headquarters in Bukit Aman, KL.

The EO allows for indefinite detention without trial and was described by a well placed official in Malaysian politics as "a cousin of the Internal Security Act", which also allows the government to detain citizens without the need to present them in court.

Referring to the ongoing arrests and statements from Malaysia's highest offices, the source said: "This is now a no-holds-barred situation."

Donna Guest, Deputy Asia-Pacific Director at Amnesty International, said: "The Malaysian authorities are muzzling calls for electoral reform by throwing peaceful protesters in jail.

"We have not seen such a crackdown on political activists across Malaysia in many years.

"Malaysia is undermining its claim to be a moderate democracy through this campaign of repression."

READ MORE HERE

 

YB Kota Belud, electoral roll is not your child's buku salinan

Posted: 04 Jul 2011 02:25 PM PDT

YB Abdul Rahman Dahlan of Kota Belud wrote in length on his blog in defence of the Election Commission (EC), "Sorry, you don't convince me Ambiga". YB Khairy Jamaluddin of Rembau, who currently is conspicuously absent from the country on some flotilla mission, quickly tweeted "Fantastic article. Intellectually demolishes Bersih".

It would be fine if YB Rembau actually tweeted "funtastic", because YB Kota Belud seemed having fun writing the article by taking the electoral roll lightly. If these two YBs are the remaining intellectual YBs left in the ruling class UMNO, producing such intellectually deficient article, no wonder the sorry state of Malaysia in all fronts. (And adding in the endemic, Malaysia is an aspiring Zimbabwe in the making.)

YB Kota Belud effectively saw the electoral roll like his child's buku salinan, where one practises new words, repeats them (in the case of the electoral roll, literally) and crosses out mistakes. The electoral roll is the very foundation of our democracy. It requires almost impeccable accuracy and quality, in order to build confidence and faith in the electoral system. Almost, because honest mistakes and errors in rare occasions are bound to happen for a register of a few million records.

It is therefore the prerogative and mission of the EC to achieve such high standard. YB Kota Belud wrote like the spokesperson of the EC, stating that it is the responsibility of Malaysians to inform the EC when their family members pass away and should be removed from the electoral roll. To be fair, it is impossible to expect the EC to ensure zero dead voters on the roll. But it is in its interest to institute mechanisms that will help to ensure that. If the EC is indeed honest and discharges its responsibility honourably, it would have come out with such mechanisms years ago. The truth is, none.

YB Kota Belud, nobody is asking the EC to remove dead voters unilaterally. That would be illegal, as you rightly pointed out. But it takes a mechanism as simple as flagging out voters age 100 and above and subjecting these records for further follow-up and verification with other official records, etc. The world is never perfect and perfect solution is nowhere to be found. But as the saying goes, hendak seribu daya, tak hendak seribu dalih. Actions speak volume than defences and counter-accusation.

I am not an expert in electoral systems, nor am I experienced in poll monitoring. So I am not in the position to comment on your points in support of the current postal vote system. But I have been reading enough on reliable sources of reports that practice on the ground is far from what you described. Examples include non-BN party observers disallowed from observing the polling process, officers casting votes on behalf of their subordinates, and discrepancies between the official number of postal voters and the actual votes cast. We shall not generalise based on these reports, but the number of reports and seriousness of such irregularities are a genuine cause for concern, hence the call for reform of the postal vote system.

True to his colour of an UMNO politician, YB Kota Belud conveniently swept aside the claim by his opposite counterpart YB Azmin Ali that six voters of different ethnicity are registered using the address belonging to Azmin's mother. Don't belittle any claims of irregularity, be it from Azmin Ali, or Ahmad, Ah Kow or Muthusamy, for that matter. Especially in this case, the claim is verified true by the EC official. Again, it takes only a simple mechanism to flag out addresses with abnormally high number of voters registered to them and follow up the cases accordingly.

Let me add my own case of different flavour. My parents' family has been residing on the same address for more than 40 years. We have been voting for Segamat constituency, until another new constituency, Sekijang, was created. Our family was forced to split, literally. Only my eldest sister and my mother remain voters of Segamat, while the rest of us have been conveniently assigned to the new Sekijang seat. How funny it is that when a candidate visit our home, he or she needs to be reminded that some of us are not in his/her constituency. Incidentally, Segamat seat has now become almost an impossibility for the Opposition.

Of course not to forget the 739 double postal voter records that I have uncovered in 2008. Mind you, I am not a full-time programmer or professional data mining expert with access to the full EC database. If I could uncover 278 double records by working on my laptop on a three-hour journey, what could the EC has achieved with a proper data mining exercise against its full database? Talking about EC competency...

Read more at: https://airkosong.com/_/2011/07/05/yb-kota-belud-electoral-roll-is-not-your-childs-buku-salinan/

Bye-bye, Star! Bye-bye NST!

Posted: 04 Jul 2011 02:09 PM PDT

I made one, and my family another stupendous decision today.

First, I decided to go yellow on the blog. ROS and Kerismudin, please take note!

My family then spoke to our daily newspaper delivery boy this morning and gave him the bad news. We decided to cancel with immediate effect our subscriptions to the Star, Sunday Star and the Sunday Times (NST Group).

We felt nothing but regret and sorrow. For the delivery boy, that is. We'd known him for over 10 years.

For the spinmeisters, we felt nothing but contempt, loathing and disgust.

I was particularly incensed after reading excerpts in these cat litterliners that DSAI was guilty of a crime, er..., what exactly I don't know.

It had been alleged by the AG, his deputy AND Defence Counsel in open court that certain unknown "experts" in USA and/or Korea had identified DSAI 99.99% as a participant in an a sex video by using high tech facial and body identification techniques.

Hard evidence was not presented by anyone since DSAI was nowhere named as a party to the case! Oh, you beauty!

(About a year or two ago, it was for that precise reason that the Court of Appeals expunged certain statements from a judgement made by Judge Sri Ram that mentioned Tun Daim Zainuddin - that Tun  was not a party to the relevant court case and should not have been been implicated when he could not legally defend himself! That's my amateur interpretation of that matter).

Certain choice expressions leap to mind:

1. Kangaroo Court ( I mean, why did the Honourable judge allow it or not expunge wild flying allegations?)
2. Trial by Innuendo
3. Trial by Media
4. Conspiracy

What's even more beautiful is that a defence lawyer expressed being mega impressed with a former CM's credentials. That former CM was once accused of having sex with a minor, which constitutes STATUTORY RAPE. In that instance, the Government through the AG later withdrew the charges.

I could be wrong, but I vaguely recall that several others were charged and convicted of having sex with the same minor!

It was also the instance when a DAP politician, now CM of Penang, was sent to prison. Here is the summary of that sordid episode in M'sian legal history when a man was sent to prison for defending an under-aged Malay girl on a matter of principle. Refer Wikipedia at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lim_Guan_Eng:

"Lim was arrested by Malaysian police in 1994, following his criticism of the government's handling of allegations of statutory rape of one of his constituents by former Chief Minister of the state of Melaka, Tan Sri Abdul Rahim Thamby Chik

Consequently, while the Attorney General decided not to charge Rahim Thamby Chik, Lim was charged under Section 4(1) (b) of the Sedition Act 1948 for causing 'disaffection with the administration of justice in Malaysia'. 

Lim was also charged under Section 8A (1) of the Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984 for 'maliciously printing' a pamphlet containing allegedly 'false information' because he had described the alleged rape victim as an 'imprisoned victim' because she was initially detained by Malaysian police without parental consent for 10 days.

During the judicial procedure, Lim was quoted saying:

" If I fail and have to go to jail, I have no regrets. I have no regrets of going down fighting for the principles of truth and justice. And pursuit of human rights, especially women's rights. There can be no women's rights if women rape victims are considered equally responsible, and even detained, whilst the accused remain free. "
 

After a series of appeals, Lim was sentenced to 18 months imprisonment. He was, however, released after 12 months on August 25, 1999. Due to his incarceration he was disallowed from standing for election to public office for a period of 5 years, and he was therefore ineligible to contest in the 2004 Malaysian General Election."

I am not so naive as to think that all newspapers embrace the middle path. British newspapers like Times, Guardian and Daily Telegraph  all lean towards one political party or another and such is also the case with dailies in USA, Singapore, Australia, you name it.

But I am also reminded of how our some years ago our NST tried to influence voters by front paging a photo of Tengku Razaleigh wearing a Kadazan hat which was spun as him promoting Christianity! That was really scraping the barrel. So, there is a limit that must not be crossed!

Oh for sure too, the STAR and NST are not going to file for bankruptcy from my cancelling my  subscription to their publications.

But, it's my and my wife's hard earned money. We've had enough of lies, lies and more lies.
 

Do You Not Sense Stupidity At Its best?

Posted: 04 Jul 2011 10:10 AM PDT

Not a day is without a statement from an UMNO/BN leader condemning the intended Bersih rally as a real threat to national security. What threat to national security are they talking about when the rally is all about the expression and demands of the people's rights to free and fair elections? Even SUHAKAM deemed the rally as within the bounds of the people's rights. The legal fraternity echoes a similar view. 

Threat to national security is the 'tag line' the government has been saying all along; contrary to the claims made by Bersih which the government denounces. Now who are we to believe? The latest and the most unthinkable and outrageous statement came from none other than Malacca Chief Minister Ali Rustam. He had suggested that Ambiga's citizenship be stripped off or that she is declared a restricted resident and her movements curtailed. Do we not see the stupidity in Ali Rustam? What reasoning is this? Like all others, Ali Rustam reasoned that the Bersih rally is all about causing apprehension, fear and untold destruction to the country. Now, to counter this perceived fear, PESAKA a Malay martial arts organization is ready to deploy 4 million of its members to join the rally to act against Bersih provocateurs'. This is unbelievable; 4 million and where is that number coming from, I wonder?

Now, who is Ali Rustam trying to lie? May I ask him who the provocateurs are?

 

READ MORE HERE.

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Royal Intervention in the Bersih Rally

Posted: 04 Jul 2011 09:33 PM PDT

Dear Sir,

The timely intervention of His Majesty Yang Dipertuan Agong in the wake of the escalating tensions in the country over the planned BERSIH rally was met with divergent opinions as to the motivation of His Majesty for doing so. I look upon the His Majesty's intervention as fair and logical and it has reaffirmed my views about the role of a constitutional monarch in our democratic nation. It is in moments of heightened tension with a potential for violence and racial conflagration, which to a large extent is politically engineered, that a monarch can play a vital role in bringing the nation from the brink due to his authority, as conferred by the Federal Constitution of Malaysia.

The BERSIH rally is an important test-case as to the validity and respect we have for the Malaysian Constitution. The aims of BERSIH are to uphold and entrench the democratic process via constitutional means. What more noble aim could there be than this? The Police are obliged to provide security and safe passage for the participants who are proud and loyal Malaysians. 

Let us hope politicians on both sides of the political divide will not be allowed to hijack the rally. Even though Pakatan Rakyat supporters are going to provide the bulk of the numbers, BERSIH must be seen as a serious call for reforms from the Rakyat. The message would be more powerful and germane if civil society leaders were seen to be running the show and speaking at the event. The politicians, on this occasion, should take a back seat and not turn it into an 'Opposition' party political rally.

I think things have potentially turned out for the good. Now BERSIH can no longer be viewed as an 'illegal' organisation as Dato Ambiga has had an audience with His Highness the Agong.  BERSIH T-shirts  which have been arbitrarily declared 'illegal' can now be worn legitimately because of 'Royal' dispensation. Dato Ambiga and BERSIH should use the Royal 'approval' to have the rally in a stadium judiciously and strategically in their negotiations with the government.

The Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak's readiness to meet BERSIH in the aftermath of His Hghness the Agong's audience with BERSIH should be welcomed and applauded.

It is times like these that I am proud to be Malaysian.

Dr Peter Jesudason

 

Press statement by concerned academicians on the Bersih march

Posted: 04 Jul 2011 03:54 PM PDT

We, the undersigned academicians, wish to express our concern at the deepening political crisis in the country. It is unfortunate that such a crisis is emerging out of a legitimate campaign, initiated by a large number of non-governmental organizations, to institute reforms through their campaign, Bersih, to ensure the conduct of truly free and fair elections in Malaysia.  Since the pursuit of such a campaign is undeniably noble, and timely, we are extremely perturbed that the government has resorted to harsh measures and use of draconian legislation to prevent the organizers from mounting a public rally.

We see the need for the leaders of Bersih to persist with dialogue with the bodies responsible for overseeing free and fair elections.  However, we also appreciate the argument by the campaign's leaders that such an assembly is necessary since discussions have long taken place, with little progress - thus the need for the government to take serious heed of the campaign's recommendations for free and fair elections for which there is considerable support from the country's citizenry.

We note too that public assemblies and marches in support of causes that have attracted widespread public concern are a common feature of all democratic systems.  They are a legitimate expression of the freedom and rights of the citizens of a country.  A government that uses the laws, institutions and resources of the state to suppress or repress such activities undermines its own credibility and claim to practicing democracy.  The actions of the Government to curb this Bersih campaign will only hurt public perception of the Government's commitment to the freedoms enshrined in the Federal Constitution.  Further actions such as the use of the Emergency Ordinance on Bersih supporters will only result in the enhanced perception of a government that refuses to institute free and fair elections for fear of losing power, an impression we are certain the government does not want to create.

We urge the following steps to resolve the crisis and restore public confidence in the Government's ability to govern the country fairly and justly.

  1. Release all political activists held under the Emergency Ordinance.

  2. Drop all charges against those arrested by the police for Bersih-related offences.

  3. Permit Bersih the right to a peaceful march, if the organizers decide to do so. All other public marches should be allowed but with the timing and routes agreed to in advance to prevent any untoward consequences

  4. Both Government and Opposition parties, as well as NGOs, to commit their supporters participating in marches and other public assemblies to a code of peaceful and civil conduct

  5. Assurance by the relevant authorities that serious consideration is being given to ensure free and fair elections in the country.

 

Signatories

Associate Prof. Dr. Andrew Aeria

Associate Prof. Dr. Azmi Sharom

Dr. Christopher Chong

Associate Prof. Dr. Sharmani Gabriel

Prof. Terence Gomez

Prof. Lim Teck Ghee

Dr. Lee Hwok Aun

Prof. Francis Loh

Assoc Prof Dr Mustafa K Anuar

Dr. Ooi Kee Beng

Janet Pillai

Dr. Johan Saravanamuttu

Prof. Tan Sooi Beng

Associate Prof. Dr. Yeoh Seng Guan

Prof. Diana Wong

Prof. Zaharom Nain

 

Traffic in KL City

Posted: 04 Jul 2011 02:43 PM PDT

By Jam and Butter

I just reached home at 9.20am after sending my wife to work. Her office is 12 km away and we left home at 7.30am. With the aid of a supercomputer, I calculated that it took me 110 minutes to travel 24km.

This evening, I will leave home at 5.30 and will be grateful if we can make it for dinner at home by 7.45. That means it will take me 135 minutes to travel the same distance. 

And I have been doing this for years. Everyday, from Monday to Friday, except when it's a public holiday or when we are on vacation.

The reason I spend so much time on the road is because of the chaotic traffic condition, with or without the presence of the police.

Sometimes, the police are there to ensure that there is a clear lane for an approaching convoy of outriders and police cars and other cars and other people on motorbikes who will not hesitate to kick your car if you do not stop. And you must stop at the extreme either end of the road. These people are on a do-or-die mission to accompany a person who needs to get from Point A to Point B. And you ignore their orders at your own risk.

Someone somewhere has determined that the person who needs to get from Point A to Point B requires priority over every other motorist on the road along the route.

Like what happened this morning.

I drove into Jalan Sultan Ismail at 8.20. Just then, I heard the blare of police siren. The sole outrider was directing traffic to clear a path for an approaching vehicle. The morning rush-hour traffic had to come to a complete standstill so that the person in the vehicle led by this outrider could get from Point A to Point B. As the vehicle drove past, I noticed a small sign above the vehicle number plate. It was a car paid for by Malaysian taxpayers meant for the exclusive use by a person elected by Malaysian voters. I thought: how lucky that person was in the car. Here I am, nudging along slowly with the traffic everyday so my wife can reach her office and earn an income. If not, how on earth was she to contribute funds for Felda through EPF and finance this person's lifestyle through the taxes she has to pay?

I feel truly sorry for my fellow rakyat who are forced to use their own means of transportation to get to work and back. Public transportation in Malaysia (and probably Zimbabwe) is not designed for the comfort and convenience of the public. Infrastructure for the public, like a continuous five-foot way away from mat rempit bag-snatchers, is not yet a feature considered by the planners.

Just tune in to the radio station and listen to the daily traffic report. From Penang right down to the south in Johor, there is traffic jam somewhere and everyday. Sometimes, it's because of an accident that had caused a 3km-jam. Sometimes it's a 3-car pile up that is causing a bumper-to-bumper crawl. This is an everyday part of our life.

Nearly everybody who travel by car to work don't work on Saturdays. So, why is the Star warning the rakyat to expect traffic jams this Saturday? Whatt do the police hope to achieve with the road blocks on Saturday? Perhaps the police will be there to carry out the orders of the elected govt. They are to ensure as much inconvenience to the rakyat so you will be discouraged from sitting in your car in a jam dressed in your yellow t-shirts.

I remember during the 50s, there were road blocks everywhere set up by the police to check and remove food carried in the car. This was their strategy to starve the communists. However, if you have children in the car, the police would allow a reasonable amount to be carried as they know children needed to eat and there was no R&R along the way between Taiping and Ipoh. The police were fair, reasonable and polite.

If you have endured traffic jams all your life or are willing to spend 5 hours to travel to your kampung once a year, what is so scary about a traffic jam that is about to happen a second time (hopefully that's all it takes to bring about changes in our country) in your life?

 

What about HARTAL for BERSIH?

Posted: 04 Jul 2011 02:16 PM PDT

http://www.kochivibe.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/hartal.jpg

By Bluesyworms Jazzyworms

Personally I believe the reason why the Government is doing this 'overkill' towards BERSIH supporters is because Najib is not in control. 'Somebody' from UMNO itself want to remove him from PMship and as UMNO President and so thats why you see all this arrest and mindless provocation. They want to heat things up so that riot will occur, and then ask Najib to declare emergency. Then after that, they'll remove him like what happen to Tunku, blaming him for the riots. That's what I believe.

In short its a power struggle. And whether you all like it or not, BERSIH is being used by politicians. As it is now even some PR supporters have turned this march into a street demo demanding change of government rather than just to send the memo. The mindless provocation for the past 2 weeks, has worked. But the real person who will benefit is this one faction in UMNO, whom in 2007 also used BERSIH as a catalyst to overthrow Pak Lah. In the end everyone, from BERSIH organisers, to NGOs and PR is being used by this fella for his own purposes. There was no real electoral reform after the BERSIH demo in 2007, Anwar did not become PM except for PR controlling some states, but Pak Lah was overthrown. The saying 'better to lose some battles but win the war' have never been clearer.

Now  the Agong himself, whether His Highness realise it or not, have thrown a spanar in 'his' plans, asking BERSIH and Putrajaya to negotiate. But 'he' and his goons still keep on the provocation via Utusan and such. Najib now may have realised his errors falling into this fella's trap, and now making a 'U-Turn' trying to give BERSIH a chance to rally in any stadium. Strange because his own cousin Hishamuddin the Home Minister have recently declared BERSIH as an illegal organisation. Unless Najib realised something he wasn't aware before, he would not make such a blatant U-Turn and make a fool out of his own cousin.

 

As to Najib's suggestion rallying in a stadium, anything can happen at that rally too. He is not in control of PERKASA and other like minded NGO's. Heck, he is not even in control of UMNO. Recently he advised UMNO members to stop factional politicking. A riot can still happen at the stadium unless Najib gonna order the police to provide security. And that will in turn make the IGP, his deputy and other police officers into fools, especially after those mind boggling arrests and statements against BERSIH. Whether Najib likes it or not, his U-Turn is starting to turn out as a nightmare.

The rally actually, was a non-starter from earlier on. We must remember, was there any reform after the 2007 rally. Nope. There was that indelible ink suggestion by EC, but it was revoked later by the EC themselves mind you. Somebody got the ink from Thailand or abroad it seems. Going by that experience, another memo to the King would be useless anyway because the government will find ways to overturned any of His Highness suggestions or opinions as usual. Therefor it is basically just a show of force. And this time the other side decide to fight with all their might instead of combining forces like in 2007. Even HINDRAF is giving BERSIH 2.0 a rain check.

Its time for us to be more creative in the way we fight. Its time to be not only non-violent, but more non-cooperative. Remember street demos and rallies are not just the only methods used in Gandhi's Satyagraha....

So now the ball is in BERSIH's court. If my theory is true, do you wanna walk and become this fella guinea pigs, become another tool for UMNO's internal power struggle like in 13th May 1969 or find another way to carry on the Rakyat's fight? I'd say lets call off the rally and do something quite opposite instead like a HARTAL. They don't want the rally, fine, lets just stay home all together. End it with turning off the lights or something...

The best thing about a HARTAL is that no one is the leader. Anybody can do it. No politician be it from PR or BN can hijack such a show of force. And police can't force people out of their homes for no valid reasons.

Of course some in the business community would cry wolf. Well take that day to clean up your premises or something. DBKL, DBKK etc can for once clean up most of the rubbish. Let's give our city a break once in a while. Days before the rally many have decided to stock up on food etc anyway, so you businessmen would have covered the cost you suffered on 9th July. People can spend time at home with their family. People can take the time to pray to clean their soul. Its a day to contemplate, take a breather. Its good also for the environment. Make it a day for spring cleaning. Ramadhan is coming soon, so why not 'BERSIH'kan the house now. I got to bersihkan my longkang from those lalang that I have been delaying for two months.... 

As A Samad Said said in his poem;
"Tak diperlu gempita sorak yang gebu,
diperlu hanya unggun api yang syahdu."

Remember we have made our point anyway. The rally was to show the strength of people's support to BERSIH, but its not just the only method. A HARTAL or just a Spring Cleaning Day would be just as powerful as we turn all major cities in Malaysia into clean or 'BERSIH' ghost towns for one day.....

The Bersih 2.0 Global Telephone Campaign

Posted: 04 Jul 2011 02:06 PM PDT

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhYkKkYcWT7elnZc6lCcs7zDqGkQtQBXoBCEp0jCvmy0ncYC5xNnLmuv0tJiaMRKK3H0ETL859As-A87lqg7Y2D-P8T_-AJzz16Jp_kY9nF_7jXoBKtNiztb4KHnCHhQQKZDGvscwrk2sg/s320/world_globe_south_east_asia-0x600.jpg+GLOBAL.jpg

By Bersih 2.0 Global Network

Calling ALL concerned Malaysians around the world to pick up the phone and call your local high commission or embassy this week to voice your concern over the way the Malaysian government is grossly mishandling the Bersih 2.0 rally for free and fair elections and violating the basic human rights of many of its citizens. This action will only take 5 minutes of your time, but it could make the Malaysian government sit up and seriously think twice about its heavy handed approach and crack down on civil liberties in recent weeks.

It could also help prevent further abuse if the Malaysian government gets the clear and loud message that the entire world is watching and this sort of response to legitimate and peaceful calls for free and fair elections in Malaysia is hardly befitting of a member of the UN Human Rights Council and is extremely counterproductive to their efforts to be seen as an open and mature democracy.

For further information on the background to events of recent weeks, please read our accompanying online petition (and even better- sign it too!). When you call the high commission or embassy, remember to remain calm and polite and state that you are a concerned Malaysian (although non-Malaysians are very welcome to participate too. Se just need as many callers as possible!) and that Bersih 2.0 Global is calling on the Malaysian government to do the following:

    Release all activists who have been arrested immediately and unconditionally and drop all unfounded charges against them;

   Ensure all those detained have access to lawyers, their family members and any medical care they may require;

   Stop the use of repressive laws such as the Police Act and Sedition law to criminalize peaceful political activities;

   Respect the right to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly.

Please email any responses or feedback on your encounters to bersih2.0global@gmail.com which will help us track the impact the international Malaysian community is making. We have only 5 days to do this is but there are over 1 million Malaysians living abroad, so let's show the world that we are standing in solidarity with our brothers and sisters back home in Malaysia. Let's unite to join in the global solidarity walks around the world on July the 9thbecause we care, and for many of us who are fortunate to live in real democracies, because WE CAN…

 

Thank you for taking action

 

In Solidarity
Bersih 2.0 Global Network

 

Online petition

http://www.PetitionOnline.com/Bersih2/petition.html

Why The Sledgehammer?

Posted: 04 Jul 2011 10:49 AM PDT

By Aliran Executive Committee 

It looks like if they don't get you under one law, they will get you under another law. That seems to be the case as far as Dr Jeyakumar Devaraj and his colleagues are concerned. But this time they used a sledge-hammer just to make sure that they get them.

Jeyakumar and colleagues arrested under the Emergency Ordinance. During the seven days' remand the police did not unearth any incriminating evidence to justify their action against 30 Parti Socialis activists for allegedly "waging war against the king". That was the reason stated for remanding these people. Before that, there was talk they could be investigated for sedition.

On the seventh day of their remand, six of them were freed from the Kepala Batas Police Station. The implication of this action was very explicit: the police had actually cleared them of whatever they were originally suspected of being involved in.

In other words, there was no case against them and therefore there was no reason to seek a further remand to continue with the police investigation or to charge them. It was the end of the case and the matter was closed to the satisfaction of the police.

But lo and behold, at the very moment Jeyakumar and his colleagues were freed, police personnel from Bukit Aman immediately re-arrested them! This time they were being arrested under the Emergency (Public Order and Prevention of Crime) Ordinance 1969. This time they used the sledge-hammer approach. This Ordinance doesn't give you a chance to challenge the arrest and detention.
But this Ordinance is meant for suspected goons and gangsters and criminals who habitually indulge in crime and violence; suspected criminals who pose imminent danger to citizens and remain a constant threat to public order.

The activities of Jeyakumar and his colleagues come nowhere near to this conceived potential danger to the nation. Their activities were never violent or criminal. In fact, they are very concerned and compassionate people who only want to do good that will benefit the discarded and marginalised sectors of our community.

Jeyakumar is noted for devoting his entire life to the care of the less privileged and discriminated urban poor, the neglected estate communities and the largely ignored Orang Asli. His ways are gentle, his approach is gentlemanly. He has never advocated any violence in the pursuit of justice for the poor, the weak and the meek. It was always persuasion and reasoning that he deployed to seek justice.

Reasoning and rational Malaysians cannot accept any insinuation that he is a danger to public order. In their eyes Jeyakumar is a victim of gross injustice.

Aliran has known Jeyakumar for many years. He is one of our loyal members committed to the aspirations of Aliran. His concerns are exemplary and inspiring. He is a tireless worker for the good of the nation. We reject any allegation of criminal intent on his part. Detaining him under the EO is a terrible injustice to this man of peace.

Aliran calls upon the Barisan Nasional government to be fair and just and free Jeyakumar and his colleagues immediately. Their continued detention does not speak well of our notion of justice or our respect for the rule of law.

 

It looks like if they don't get you under one law, they will get you under another law. That seems to be the case as far as Dr Jeyakumar Devaraj and his colleagues are concerned. But this time they used a sledge-hammer just to make sure that they get them.

Jeyakumar and colleagues arrested under the Emergency Ordinance. During the seven days' remand the police did not unearth any incriminating evidence to justify their action against 30 Parti Socialis activists for allegedly "waging war against the king". That was the reason stated for remanding these people. Before that, there was talk they could be investigated for sedition.

On the seventh day of their remand, six of them were freed from the Kepala Batas Police Station. The implication of this action was very explicit: the police had actually cleared them of whatever they were originally suspected of being involved in.

In other words, there was no case against them and therefore there was no reason to seek a further remand to continue with the police investigation or to charge them. It was the end of the case and the matter was closed to the satisfaction of the police.

But lo and behold, at the very moment Jeyakumar and his colleagues were freed, police personnel from Bukit Aman immediately re-arrested them! This time they were being arrested under the Emergency (Public Order and Prevention of Crime) Ordinance 1969. This time they used the sledgehammer approach. This Ordinance doesn't give you a chance to challenge the arrest and detention.

But this Ordinance is meant for suspected goons and gangsters and criminals who habitually indulge in crime and violence; suspected criminals who pose imminent danger to citizens and remain a constant threat to public order.

The activities of Jeyakumar and his colleagues come nowhere near to this conceived potential danger to the nation. Their activities were never violent or criminal. In fact, they are very concerned and compassionate people who only want to do good that will benefit the discarded and marginalised sectors of our community.

Jeyakumar is noted for devoting his entire life to the care of the less privileged and discriminated urban poor, the neglected estate communities and the largely ignored Orang Asli. His ways are gentle, his approach is gentlemanly. He has never advocated any violence in the pursuit of justice for the poor, the weak and the meek. It was always persuasion and reasoning that he deployed to seek justice.

Reasoning and rational Malaysians cannot accept any insinuation that he is a danger to public order. In their eyes Jeyakumar is a victim of gross injustice.

Aliran has known Jeyakumar for many years. He is one of our loyal members committed to the aspirations of Aliran. His concerns are exemplary and inspiring. He is a tireless worker for the good of the nation. We reject any allegation of criminal intent on his part. Detaining him under the EO is a terrible injustice to this man of peace.

Aliran calls upon the Barisan Nasional government to be fair and just and free Jeyakumar and his colleagues immediately. Their continued detention does not speak well of our notion of justice or our respect for the rule of law.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved