Jumaat, 10 Jun 2011

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Now it’s a ‘Mat Sabu’ video

Posted: 10 Jun 2011 02:04 AM PDT

(Free Malaysia Today) - PKR has urged the police to form a special unit to investigate the distribution of a sex DVD aimed at portraying Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim as an immoral person.

Zuraida Kamaruddin, leader of the party's women's wing, made the call today after making a police report following the discovery in her residential mailbox of a DVD in a package that also had obscene literature with screenshots from the now famous video that shows a man resembling Anwar having sex with a prostitute.

However, the DVD Zuraidah received had the title "Skandal Sex Mat Sabu" and bore a picture of the PAS deputy president. A video with the same title was clandestinely distributed in 1999. It featured only voices in sexually charged conversation.

Zuraida said she believed many of her neighbours in Ampang had received similar packages.

She criticised police for their failure to make headway in the case despite several reports in recent weeks.

In a media statement released today, she also urged Shahrizat Abdul Jalil, the Women, Family and Community Development Minister, to state her stand on the matter.

She said Shahrizat should be concerned because the obscene materials were making their way into households with women and children.

 

‘Forget inquest, just book them for murder’

Posted: 10 Jun 2011 02:01 AM PDT

LFL and PKR officials note inconsistencies between the police version of the Glenmarie shooting and the post mortem report.

(Free Malaysia Today) - Lawyers for Liberty (LFL) and two PKR officials have rejected the Selangor police chief's call for an inquest into the last year's fatal shooting of three young men in Glenmarie, saying the authorities should go ahead and charge the policemen involved.

The Selangor top cop, Tun Hisan Tun Hamzah, in suggesting an inquest into the death of Mohd Shamil Hafiz, Hairul Nizam Tuah and Mohd Hanafi Omar last Nov 13, also dismissed allegations that they died in an execution-style killing by police.

"There is absolutely no necessity for an inquest as there is clear and incontrovertible evidence that the three young victims were deliberately shot to death by the police," Fadiah Nadwa Fikri of LFL said in a press statement, which was also signed by PKR vice-presidents Nurul Izzah Anwar and N Surendran.

The statement said there were inconsistencies between the police version of the incident and the post-mortem report of the deaths.

"The police had claimed that the victims had been shot dead when they rushed at police with machetes. This is inconsistent with the post-mortem finding of 45 degree angle bullet trajectory, indicating the victims were taken into custody and were kneeling before being shot," it said.

READ MORE HERE

 

Anwar tanked economy in bid to oust Dr M, says Najib

Posted: 09 Jun 2011 10:43 PM PDT

 

(The Malaysia Insider) - Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim deliberately mismanaged the economy as finance minister during the Asian financial crisis in 1997 and 1998 in order to hasten Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad's exit, Datuk Seri Najib Razak said today.

The prime minister told residents at a Selangor suburb that Anwar, who was also the then deputy prime minister, raised interest rates and cut public allocations in an attempt to force then-prime minister Dr Mahathir out of government and take his place.

"I was in Cabinet, I know the story," Najib told Lembah AU5D residents here during a walkabout today.

"He raised interest rates by 20 per cent and cut (public) allocations to ruin the economy all because he wanted to be prime minister, because he wanted to push Dr Mahathir out," he added.

Anwar's PKR party and two allies, DAP and PAS, won Selangor from the Barisan Nasional (BN) in Election 2008 but Najib, who is Umno president and heads the party's Selangor chapter, is working the ground to win the country's wealthiest state in the next general elections.

Taking another dig at Anwar's time in government, Najib pointed out it was useless to talk big but not live up to one's promises when in power.

He added that Anwar's alleged failure to manage the economy then meant that voters now should not trust claims by Pakatan Rakyat (PR) that it can keep the price of fuel low if it wins federal power.

The billions of ringgit needed to maintain fuel subsidies in the face of rising global crude oil prices would have to come from allocations meant for public goods, he said.

READ MORE HERE

 

Ex-cop claims AG concealed billion-ringgit scandals

Posted: 09 Jun 2011 08:18 PM PDT

 

(The Malaysian Insider) - A senior ex-cop has accused Attorney-General Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail of burying evidence of corruption by senior government leaders between 1994 and 1996, involving losses of at least RM12 billion in public funds.

Datuk Mat Zain Ibrahim said Abdul Gani, then a senior public prosecutor heading the prosecution division in 1994, was involved in covering up the roles of "ministers and chief ministers" in scandals such as the RM8 billion and RM4 billion losses incurred by Malaysia Airlines (MAS) and Perwaja Steel respectively.

"Between 1994 and 1996, Gani Patail was busy playing his role in closing cases or burying information that linked ministers or chief ministers who could be proven to have abused power or were corrupt. This includes the Perwaja case and also the one related to Tan Sri Tajuddin Ramli," the former Kuala Lumpur criminal investigation chief said in an open letter to the prime minister today.

Mat Zain was referring to MAS's claim that Tajuddin was responsible for RM8 billion in losses during his tenure as executive chairman of the national carrier from 1994 to 2001.

In the letter, he added that Tajuddin, who he refers to as TRI, used a similar modus operandi of "signing long-term and lopsided contracts" similarly used by Perwaja Steel as well as Tenaga Nasional Berhad in its power deals with independent power producers (IPP) that is said to cost taxpayers RM20 billion a year.

"There are similarities in the MO used by all three companies. A common factor may be found and we cannot ignore the possibility that the persons involved in all the agreements are the same," said Mat Zain, who headed the 1998 police probe into former deputy prime minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's black-eye case.

READ MORE HERE

 

Kit Siang wants parliament to debate Sarbaini

Posted: 09 Jun 2011 04:46 PM PDT

 

(The Malaysian Insider) - Lim Kit Siang wants Parliament to discuss the death of Customs officer Ahmad Sarbaini Mohamed, following allegations that the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) was trying to tarnish Sarbaini's name.

Lim said today that he had given notice to Speaker Tan Sri Pandikar Amin to move a motion next week during Parliament, and added that motion for the debate will focus on Raja Petra Kamarudin's claims of a conspiracy.

Raja Petra, in a post on his Malaysia Today website yesterday, claimed the police had conducted a thorough check on Sarbaini's assets and found no unusual or extraordinary wealth.

Raja Petra (picture) has also accused MACC of trying to tarnish Sarbaini's name following his death.

"My motion for an urgent parliamentary debate will also focus on the revelation by blogger Raja Petra Kamarudin that the police had conducted a thorough check on Ahmad Sarbaini's assets and found no "unusual or extraordinary" wealth," Lim said in a statement today.

The DAP parliamentary leader said that the motion also demanded that the police comply to the requests  made by the late Sarbaini's family.

"The police (should) reveal its probe into Sarbaini's unusual death at MACC premises and to allow Sarbaini's family to decide whether to have an inquest or a Royal Commission of Inquiry into the causes of Sarbaini's death," he added.

READ MORE HERE

 

Don't worry about 'power crazy' tag: Sabu to PAS

Posted: 09 Jun 2011 02:43 PM PDT

(Harakah Daily) - KUALA LUMPUR, Jun 10: PAS leaders have been told not to be defensive over the claim by UMNO that the Islamic party was "power crazy".

Speaking during a pre-recording session for Harakahdaily's 'Persepsi' programme at its office, deputy president Mohamad Sabu (pic) said it was justified to be "power crazy" in the bid to drive out the present "power crazy" group in Putrajaya.

Saying the BN's long rule should be immediately ended, Mat Sabu said the people had been made to pay for its follies, the latest being a spate of price hikes on necessary items.

"At the same time, our crime rate continues to rise to the point that people have been living in fear," he added.

As such, Mat Sabu said there was nothing wrong in wanting to wrest power from UMNO and BN in order to bring about reforms and better governance.

"So if they accuse us of being power crazy, then indeed we are, because we want to overthrow those power crazy people who should not be allowed to continue ruling the country," said the outspoken Mat Sabu, whose election as the party's deputy president last week generated a spate of critical comments from UMNO leaders on PAS.

Kazakhstan trip

According to Mat Sabu, in realising Pakatan Rakyat's goal to assume power, PAS has pledged a 'benevolent state' in line with the Islamic call to defend the masses at all levels.

"The people can judge for themselves our actions based on this pledge. Should we fail to uphold that pledge and Pakatan Rakyat is seen as no different than UMNO-BN, the people can throw out the PR government," added Mat Sabu.

Mat Sabu also referred to a report that prime minister Najib Razak's official trip to Kazakhstan is to among others finalise matters pertaining to his daughter's marriage to a Kazakh.

"They use the country's wealth for their self interests, including to arrange the engagement of (Najib's) daughter in Kazakhstan, when money for such trips should not have come from public funds," he said.

 

 

READ MORE HERE.

Nursery row taking a toll on a growing business

Posted: 09 Jun 2011 02:32 PM PDT

The Star Says

Yes, these nurseries are sitting on a gold mine.

Not surprisingly, the nursery operators are suspicious of this "land grab" by Yayasan Selangor and rejected the state's move to make the foundation their new landlord.

Yayasan Selangor, after all, specialises in distributing and managing scholarships, not land.

TO most people in the Klang Valley, Sungai Buloh is synonymous with flowers and potted plants because of the many nurseries that dot the road.

Historically, many of these nurseries got their supply from the leper colony at the old Sungai Buloh Hos­pital.

Over time, as leprosy became a curable disease, the inmates left and many of the nurseries started growing their own plants.

When Pakatan Rakyat took over the Selangor Government after the March 2008 elections, the nursery operators applied for their own Temporary Occupation Licence (TOL) for the land they were occupying.

From 1999 to 2008, the Selangor Agricultural Development Corpo­ration held the TOLs of the 72 lots, collecting a monthly rental that was progressively increased from RM400 to RM800 per lot.

The operators were unhappy and insecure as they did not have any legal right to the land they had occupied for years.

In previous years, various groups and individuals had fought evictions or the right to continue using state or reserved land under TOLs.

The pomelo growers of Tambun, for example, faced the same problem in the 1990s. Because they were major contributors to the Perak economy, The Star campaigned successfully for them to be given the titles to the land.

Under the National Land Code, a per­­son can only acquire an interest in a piece of land upon the land being alienated to him by the state, either on the basis of a grant in perpetuity or a lease or a sublease derived from it.

An individual may be allowed to occupy state or reserved land under a TOL. However, such a licence is strictly to enable occupation, such as for living or agricultural purposes.

This is for a specified period, which is usually on a year-to-year basis and always on the payment of a fee. However, there is no guarantee that renewals will be granted.

Historically, land is a state matter and under the National Land Code, the Selangor government has the power to issue the TOL for the Sungai Buloh land to Yayasan Selangor. That cannot be disputed.

But the manner in which it was done that is questionable.

It is no secret that the Federal Government is planning to develop the 1,200ha Rubber Research Insti­tute and the land has already been given to the EPF for this purpose.

Many of the nurseries are located just next to the fence of what will be the biggest property development project in the country.

Yes, these nurseries are sitting on a gold mine.

Not surprisingly, the nursery operators are suspicious of this "land grab" by Yayasan Selangor and rejected the state's move to make the foundation their new landlord.

Yayasan Selangor, after all, specialises in distributing and managing scholarships, not land.

Furthermore, Mentri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim did not allay suspicions by offering the explanation that the foundation was well-qualified to manage the land because its general manager was an engineer.

In light of the Federal Government's development plans for the area, it makes financial sense for the foundation to take control of the land.

The state government should take note of what happened with the Tambum pomelo farmerss.

These people are looking for security in a business that requires long-term investments. Growing plants take time and the operators need to know for sure that their investments will indeed bear fruit.

A simple TOL might just be the fertiliser the nurseries need to bloom.

Never be number one, second wives told

Posted: 09 Jun 2011 02:26 PM PDT

By Nurhidayah Rmli, The Star

"When they are courting couples, they pay so much attention and are naughty with each other; why not spice up the marriage by still being naughty?" she asked.

"When a wife does not fulfil the needs of her husband, including sex, the husband will be inclined to find a naughtier' one outside," she said.

KUALA LUMPUR: Single mothers who re-marry as the second, third or fourth wife should not try to take the first wife's place, said Malaysian Council of Single Mothers Association (MPITM) president Nor Aini Juffrey.

"Do not try to be number one," she said.

Nor Aini noted that the first wife might have family demands which the second or third wife might not have like children.

This being the case, she said the second or third wife should be willing to accommodate the husband's need to pay more attention to the first wife and her children.

She felt that being considerate would help the wives respect and be in peace with each other.

Nor Aini also commented about the Obedient Wives Club vice-president's statement where the wife had to be like a "first class prostitute" to keep the husband from straying.

"When they are courting couples, they pay so much attention and are naughty with each other; why not spice up the marriage by still being naughty?" she asked.

"When a wife does not fulfil the needs of her husband, including sex, the husband will be inclined to find a naughtier' one outside," she said.

She also said a good marriage should not be confined to bedroom activities alone.

"Couples should also look at outdoor activities like going for family picnics together."

Ministry: PM’s trip to Kazakhstan was reciprocal, not for leisure

Posted: 09 Jun 2011 02:19 PM PDT

(Bernama) KUALA LUMPUR: The Prime Minister's trip to Kazakhstan was to fulfil a long-standing invitation from President Nursultan Nazarbayev to visit the country, the Foreign Ministry said.


The ministry's Department of Information and Public Diplomacy in a statement to Bernama yesterday refuted a news portal report titled "PM's use of public funds for wedding trip morally wrong".

The ministry said the claims by some quarters that the visit was for the wedding of Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak's daughter was unfounded.

The statement clarified that Najib's visit to Kazakhstan on June 5 and 6 was the Prime Minister's first official visit to the country and reciprocated the visit by Nazarbayev to Malaysia in June 2006.
Warm welcome: Najib shaking hands with members of the public at the Bunga Raya Complex, KL International Airport in Sepang. Najib returned to Malaysia Thursday after a four-day trip to Kazakhstan. With him is Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor.

The ministry said during the visit, Najib had paid a courtesy call on Nazarbayev and also held bilateral consultations with Kazakhstan Prime Minister Karim Massimov.

"The visit did not just elevate bilateral relations between the two countries but also generated many opportunities for the Malaysian business community."

The ministry added that Kazakhstan was also Malaysia's biggest trading partner among Central Asian countries.

The statement also said the Prime Minister's visit coincided with the 7th World Islamic Economic Forum (WIEF) from June 7 to 9 at Astana and that Najib had attended the forum in his capacity as a head of government, representing Malaysia and as patron of WIEF.

The decision by Kazakhstan to host the 7th WIEF on these dates was reached more than a year ago, when Malaysia hosted the sixth series of the WIEF in May, 2010, the ministry statement added.

"On the whole, the visit brought about a substantial development in Malaysia-Kazakhstan bilateral relations which is mutually rewarding," said the ministry. - Bernama

Obedient wives’ anger PBB women

Posted: 09 Jun 2011 12:11 PM PDT

By Joseph Tawie, FMT

KUCHING: The controversy-ridden Obedient Wives' Club (OWC) appears to have already driven a wedge within the Barisan Nasional lead-party,Parti Pesaka Bumiputra (PBB).

The club, which encourages women to be submissive and perform better in bed, has triggered a conflict among the Youth and Women wings of the party.

PBB Youth chief Fadillah Yusof is not only supporting the club, but will also officiate at the setting up of a branch of OWC at MJC Batu Kawah.

But PBB woman leader, Fatimah Abdullah, who is also the minister in the chief minister's office, is dead against the formation of OWC.

National PKR vice-president, Voon Shiak Ni said that Sarawak PKR women were shocked and disappointed with the stance displayed by PBB leaders.

"Their inconsistent stance is clearly calculated to mislead and confuse the people in the state," she said.

Voon was commenting on a recent report disclosing that the OWC is to set up a branch in a new township in Kuching.

The promoter of the club revealed that PBB Youth chief and science, technologies and innovation deputy minister Fadillah Yusof will be officiating at the launch of the OWC.

Last week, OWC vice-president Dr Rohaya Mohamad shocked Malaysians when she reportedly said that the club would give sex lessons to women so that they could "serve" their husbands better and to ensure that they do not look for prostitutes.

Like their counterparts in peninsular Malaysia, the Sarawak women are against the setting of such club.

Confusing signals

Voon said: "They are confusing the people. While Fadillah is said to be supportive of the OWC, Fatimah Abdullah is saying that the OWC should be scrapped."

She said the state BN component parties must make clear their stance on the setting up of the OWC branch in Sarawak.

"It is embarrassing for Fatimah to announce her objection to the setting up of OWC, but for her BN and PBB colleague to act otherwise.

"While it is the OWC promoters and organisers' rights to freedom of association, they should also take heed that their announcement to set up the club has triggered objections and adverse comments from the men, women and the civil societies.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Malacca to boost security at historical sites, says CM

Posted: 09 Jun 2011 11:38 AM PDT

By R.S.N. Murali, The Star

MALACCA: The state government has initiated measures to protect its historical sites following the theft of wheels from ancient Portuguese cannons on top of St John's Hill at Bandar Hilir on Wednesday.

Describing the theft as a threat to the state's artefacts, Chief Minister Datuk Seri Mohd Ali Rustam said he would immediately see to it that all historical sites in the state have CCTV facilities.

"We have to seriously consider beefing up security at these sites after the recent theft including placing guards, especially at sites in the World Heritage Zone," he told reporters after the groundbreaking ceremony for Malacca's Hard Rock Cafe yesterday.

Mohd Ali said he would direct the relevant authorities to secure outdoor artefacts with locks and chains to prevent thieves from carting away items like cannons.
Lighting up: Workers conducting immediate remedial work to light up St John's Hill after Wednesday's theft.

He said CCTVs should be installed inside museums and other enclosed historical sites to prevent such occurrence in the future.

"This (thefts) should not have happened in the first place but I believe it's the work of drug addicts," he said.

He said the state would work with the police to nab those responsible for the theft.

"I hope scrap metal dealers will inform us or the police if they come across anyone attempting to dispose of these wheels," he said.

Twenty solid cast iron wheels that supported five ancient Portuguese cannons on top of the hill went missing on Wednesday each cannon with four wheels weighs between 500kg and 600kg.

Malacca has several historical sites, including the A Famosa, Stadhuys, St Paul's Church, Bukit Cina, Cheng Hoon Teng Temple, Dol Said's Grave, Hang Li Poh and Hang Tuah wells.

This is the second theft involving state artefacts.

In March 2008, eight Malay keris and three Dutch-era pistols were stolen from the Malacca Ethnography Museum.

Key resignation, resentment hits new national innovation initiative

Posted: 09 Jun 2011 11:34 AM PDT

By Lee Wei Lian, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, June 10 — Unik, the prime minister's initiative tasked with restructuring the country's public innovation ecosystem has hit a setback with the resignation of its technical advisor N Danaraj who was in charge of putting together the National Innovation Policy (NIP).

His resignation earlier this week could come as a blow to Unik due to the loss of experience as Danaraj has a masters degree in public administration from Harvard, a doctorate from Oxford and was also technical advisor to the National Economic Advisory Council (NEAC), a senior fellow at Khazanah Nasional and a research fellow at the Malaysian Institute of Economic Research.

His departure, which sources say was due to various disagreements with Unik CEO Dr Kamaljit Singh over the NIP, comes as several innovation agencies have been privately expressing concern over the Unik chief's leadership style.

The innovation agencies are understood to be frustrated that their issues over proposed changes to the way federal grants are disbursed have not been adequately addressed and their growing resentment over the uncertainty could hamper Unik's efforts to implement initiatives.

Their unhappiness came to a head when they learnt that Kamaljit had proposed a freeze on funding by innovation agencies by July at the Economic Council (EC) meeting earlier this month without consulting them.

Sources say that a decision on the proposed freeze was postponed following objections from several other members of the  EC, which is chaired by the prime minister.

Kamaljit is understood to be in favour of implementing a competitive bidding system where both government agencies and ministries that disburse technology related grants such as Biotech Corp, the Ministry of Science Technology and Innovation (Mosti) and the Multimedia Development Corporation (MDeC) bid against each other for the funds which will be put in a common pool, but agencies say it is unfair for agencies under the ministry to bid against the ministry itself.

One industry veteran familiar with the situation said that while some people might appear to "play ball" with Kamaljit because they believe he has the prime minister's ear, the opposition might get more serious if he doesn't get buy-in from the agencies.

"If you push things through without getting agreement, do you think the agencies will help you?" said the industry veteran.

One industry player said Unik is a good initiative but the main issue is lack of clarity from the top and claimed that the affected parties were being asked to trust Kamaljit without knowing all the details.

"Nobody's afraid of competition," said the industry player when asked about competitive bidding. "If we don't perform, shut us down."

"But you can't put parents and children in the same basket and ask them to compete (for grant money budget), that's not market forces," he added referring to the concept of agencies competing against their parent ministries.

Some industry observers say however that Kamaljit may be trying to push things through because he feels that things will not get done otherwise.

"Unik has an ambitious agenda and when you are short of time, you may be forced to step on the toes of those more used to a drawn out consultative process," said one observer. "That's why Unik is under the prime minister's department."

When contacted, Danaraj confirmed the resignation but declined to comment further.

Kamaljit also declined to comment for the story when contacted.

Unik, which stands for Unit Inovasi Khas or Special Innovations Unit, was established by Datuk Seri Najib Razak to develop and implement strategies to stimulate and support innovation in Malaysia. 

Its website states that it is a special-purpose body designed to focus on two core priorities - improving Malaysia's innovation eco-system and directly cultivating innovation.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Wikileaks: Malaysian firm tried to buy China missile parts

Posted: 09 Jun 2011 11:18 AM PDT

 

By Shannon Teoh, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, June 10 — A Malaysian company with links to Iran tried to buy gyroscopes used for guiding missiles from China, according to a leaked United States diplomatic cable.

According to the cable released by whistleblower website Wikileaks, the US Department of State asked China in December 2009 to block the sale of TRS-500 gyroscopes from China firm VibTel Industrial to Electronics Component Limited (ECL).

The cable, which was published today on news portal Malaysia Today, said that the US embassy in Beijing was ordered to share information with Chinese officials to assist "your ability to prevent the transfer of these gyroscopes by VibTel Industrial Co. to ECL."

"ECL is associated with a network of Iranian-controlled front companies that procure sensitive goods on behalf of a number of Iranian entities of proliferation concern," said the document classified by the US State Department's director of missile threat reduction Pam Durham.

According to the cable, China had agreed to look into the matter but asked for additional information on ECL's relationship to Iranian firms.

The US said that ECL was linked to Iranian firms "Shahid Hemmat Industrial Group (SHIG), which is Iran's primary developer of liquid propellant ballistic missiles, and Heavy Metal Industries, a front company for the tactical missile developer Ya Mahdi Industries."

"Both SHIG and Ya Mahdi Industries are sanctioned under United Nations Security Council Resolution (UNSCR) 1737," the cable said, adding that the gyroscopes, used in ballistic and cruise missiles as well as unmanned aircraft, are prohibited for export to Iran under the same resolution.

It also said that ECL had links with another Malaysia-based front company Skylife Worldwide Sdn Bhd.

It is the second time in recent years that a Malaysian company has been linked to Iran's nuclear and missile ambitions. 

READ MORE HERE

 

Umno a hypocrite for anti-PAS welfare state stand, says Muslim cleric

Posted: 09 Jun 2011 11:15 AM PDT

By G Manimaran, The Malaysian Insider

KUALA LUMPUR, June 10 — Former Perlis mufti Mohd Asri Zainul Abidin has labelled Umno a hypocritical party for slamming its political foe's pro-welfare state stand raised at the PAS annual general assembly last week.

The popular Muslim cleric said Umno, as the ruling Barisan Nasional's (BN) lynchpin which is also supposed to represent the Malay voice, should have supported the Islamist party's idea instead of slamming it as conservative and fanatical.

"I don't know Umno's actual stand. Previously, Umno criticised PAS for being controlled by the ulamas, now with the professionals in charge they are still whacking the party.

"I see Umno as a hypocrite... Previously, it (Umno) said PAS is jumud, so I don't think this attitude is right," he told The Malaysian Insider.

The vocal Asri (picture) said Umno's attack on PAS was uncalled, noting it had transformed into a more open and inclusive party.

"If before the non-Muslims were fearful of an Islamic state, now PAS is more open, more progressive than Umno," he said.

Last Friday, PAS president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang had raised the concept of a welfare state in a developing country in his speech at the 57th muktamar.

The party's spiritual adviser Datuk Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat had backed the idea yesterday, saying the welfare state as pushed for by the opposition Pakatan Rakyat (PR) pact, especially PAS, was in line with Islam.

Nik Aziz explained the welfare concept did not mean it had to be material benefits and gave as an example the Kelantan government's action to shutter nightclubs to prevent social ills.

The Kelantan mentri besar said welfare was something that can assure citizens of their safety in the material world and the hereafter.

 

READ MORE HERE.

930 tonnes of food being thrown away every day

Posted: 09 Jun 2011 10:46 AM PDT

By P Aruna, The Star

KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysians can afford to eat less because they are either overeating or wasting food, throwing away up to 930 tonnes of unconsumed food daily, say experts.

This is equivalent to us throwing away 93,000 10kg bags of rice each day.

The experts warn that people must change or adapt their eating habits in the light of rising prices and a looming food shortage, adding that the country was already experiencing a food crisis.

Universiti Malaya Prof Dr P. Agamuthu said wastage was a growing trend, adding that almost 50% of the 31,000 tonnes of waste produced daily by Malaysians comprised organic kitchen waste such as leftover food.

"Malaysians discard about 930 tonnes of unconsumed food daily. Wastage of unconsumed food alone in Malaysia has doubled over the past three years. This does not even include leftover food," he said, adding that the unconsumed waste mostly consisted of expired bread, eggs and old or rotten fruit.

Dr Agamuthu, who specialises in solid and hazardous waste management, said Malaysia was close to developed country status in terms of waste generated compared to developing nations like India and Bangladesh, which had almost zero unconsumed food.

He said food wastage was higher in urban areas due to the difference in income levels over rural areas.

Nutrition Society of Malaysia president Dr Tee Ee Siong said many Malaysians tended to overeat, usually taking more food than they should.

He said it was a common sight to see Malaysians pile too much food on their plates, especially during meals at restaurants and buffets.

"It could be because they don't want the hassle of going back for a second helping or they are worried that the food will finish before they can return.

"When we have too much food on our plates, we tend to overeat," he said, adding that overeating was also the main reason for obesity among Malaysians.

According to Health Ministry statistics, 30% of Malaysians are obese while another 30% are overweight.

Dr Tee said those preparing food in households should be more accurate in their estimations on how much they needed to cook to avoid wastage.

"Parents need to be more sensitive about the wastage of food and teach their children by example," he said.

Marditech Corporation Sdn Bhd group CEO Anas Ahmad Nasarudin said non-alcoholic foodstuff had registered an average of 4.7% increase in prices from last year.

He said an investigation by the body showed that the price of meat had increased by 7.6%, milk and eggs by 7.9%, vegetables by 11.4%, jam and sweetened products by 10.9%, fruits by 6.8% and fish by 3.8%.

Marditech consultant Ahmad Zamzam Mohamed said the country was already in a food crisis and Malaysians would have to change their eating habits to lessen its impact.

"The Government has been shielding Malaysians from the real impact of the crisis with various subsidies," he said, adding that they would soon face reality as subsidies were slowly removed.

"We should learn to eat accordingly and not over-indulge," he said during a press conference on the 7th Malaysia International Agro-Bio Business Conference here yesterday.

The two-day conference, which will gather experts to discuss the challenges of the emerging global food crisis, begins on July 13.

Malaysia may get more boat people

Posted: 09 Jun 2011 10:34 AM PDT

More than the proposed 800 boat people could be sent to Malaysia as the Gillard Government looks to nail down the last details of its asylum-seeker swap deal with Kuala Lumpur.

Immigration Minister Chris Bowen has also signalled boat people sent to Malaysia will be issued special identity tags which it is hoped will safeguard them from caning and other harsh local punishments.

By Nick Butterfly and Andrew Probyn, The West Australian

Giving further details about the deal yesterday, Mr Bowen said while the current arrangement was for Australia to send only 800 asylum seekers to Kuala Lumpur in exchange for 4000 certified refugees, that swap could eventually be expanded.

"The Malaysian Government have said themselves that if the arrangement works they would be happy to look at extending it further," Mr Bowen said.

The Government announced its plan to swap boat people for certified refugees with Malaysia almost five weeks ago, however it is yet to officially sign off on the scheme or release details about how the exchange will work.

The deal is expected to be finalised within days and the terms could be announced on Monday.

Officials have spent weeks thrashing out the details of the agreement, with the Australian delegation seeking assurances that asylum seekers sent to Malaysia will be safeguarded from caning and other harsh punishments that asylum seekers are sometimes subjected to.

The plan has sparked unrest among some Labor backbenchers, with a number of left-wing MPs warning unaccompanied asylum seeker children should not be sent to Malaysia.

Under the yet-to-be-finalised deal, the asylum seekers will be housed in Australian taxpayer-funded accommodation for six weeks during which they will undergo security, identification and health checks.

Once released into the community they will be required to wear special identity tags which will exempt them from Malaysia's draconian punishments meted out to illegal immigrants.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Soi Lek’s impossible dream

Posted: 09 Jun 2011 06:57 PM PDT

Since the March 2008 general election, there has been a taxonomic group of very educated, progressive, professional and youthful politicians in the DAP, led by the relatively young but veteran political maverick Lim Guan Eng. The highly intellectual and articulate young elected representatives of the DAP are making waves in Parliament and at the various state assemblies, as well as in the public arena, where the battle for the hearts and minds of the people is taking place.

Comment By Thomas Lee Seng Hock

MCA president Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek has appealed to the Chinese to review their perception of the party and reevaluate its past and present contributions, especially on matters affecting the community.

In an apparent desperate endeavour to try to redeem whatever remains of the party's credibility, integrity and authenticity among the Chinese, Chua claims indirectly that the community has never rejected the party, but just went uncontrollably overboard in voting for a strong opposition in the last general election.

In an interview with Malaysiakini on Wednesday 8 June 2011, Chua claims that the Chinese want some representatives in the government to articulate their frustrations, and also want a strong opposition to keep a check on the government, but "sometimes, when they do this balancing act, they go haywire."

Chua claims that, deep down, the Chinese still want to be represented in the Barisan Nasional government, but since the community could not coordinate among themselves, they had ended up with more elected representatives in the opposition.

"In their heart, they said: 'Oh, we want to have a stronger opposition'. But in the end, everybody voted for the opposition, resulting in nobody in the government," he said.

In other words, Chua thinks that the results of the last general election, when the MCA was totally wiped out in Penang and sent packing in Selangor, Perak and elsewhere, are merely a freak electoral caprice and do not reflect the actual sentiment of the Chinese community.

During the last general election in March 2008, the MCA won only 15 of the 40 parliamentary seats it contested and succeeded in merely 31 of the 90 state seats, losing them mainly to the DAP. The MCA was totally wiped out in Penang, losing every seat it contested at both federal and state level.

Chua, apparently still in a reverie, thinks that the MCA still has a soft spot in the heart of the community, and that the party would bounce back into favour with the Chinese community at the next general election.

He cited various so-called achievements of the party, claiming credit for getting more federal funding for Chinese primary schools, getting better recognition for the United Examination Certificate of the Chinese independent schools, and helping to develop mutual recognition of university degrees between Malaysia and China.

Chua may think that the Chinese are fools for buying his so-called achievements. Any person with a bit of common sense knows that had not the alternative coalition of the DAP, PAS and PKR caused a massive electoral cataclysm at the last general election, the Umno-controlled Barisan Nasional government would not have granted such concessions to allow the MCA a safe-face reprieve to claim credit for them.

Anyway, the matters Chua claims that the MCA managed to "fight" for the Chinese are matters of essential rights which the community must be accorded without any need to ask or bargain for. To say to say that the community needs the MCA to negotiate for them is to admit the lack of power of the party within the ruling Barisan Nasional administration and its failure in being the true community representative in the government. Its position and relevance in the government are certainly suspect.

And in order to project the MCA in good light, Chua resorted to a smear campaign against the state administrations controlled by the alternative coalition Pakatan Rakyat, especially Penang and Selangor.

Chua cashed in on the current land disputes in Selangor involving the Sungai Buloh nursery and the Kampung Kerandang land, and alleged that the Pakatan Rakyat state government made a mess of the matters. He doesn't seem to really understand the logistic and long-term practical implications involved, but just wants to score political points by exploiting the disputes.

Chua also claimed that the Pakatan Rakyat Selangor state government allowed "thousands" of reflexology and entertainment outlets to flourish in Klang, implying that the alternative coalition is causing moral decline in the royal town.

He also alleges that the Pakatan Rakyat state administrations in Kedah and Penang have allowed the water tariff to increase by 20%.

Chua has given a misrepresentation on the Penang water tariff, claiming that the tariff had increased by 20%.

The fact is that the Guan Eng administration has not increased the heavily-subsidized rates for domestic consumers, but only imposed a water conservation charge to reduce water wastage.

Actually, only water tariffs for business have been increased to meet the production cost. Penang, meanwhile, still has the lowest water tariffs in the country for both domestic and business users.

To make a sweeping claim that the Guan Eng administration had increased the water tariff by 20% is to tell a very despicable lie, unbecoming of a national political leader.

The most outrageous claim, however, is Chua's statement that Penang under Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng of the DAP is now running on a deficit budget, which the MCA boss says would get worse next year.

Chua is either shockingly nescient and ignoramus, or a deliberate liar. The facts and figures are out in the open for all and sundry to see.

Since the Pakatan Rakyat took control of the Penang state government from the Barisan Nasional after the March 2008 general election, the state has recorded the biggest surpluses in the nation's history with RM88 million in 2008, RM77 million in 2009 and RM33 million in 2010, as certified by the Auditor-General in his report.

The solid and sound financial management by the Guan Eng administration also resulted in the heavily deficit-ridden Seberang Perai Municipal Council (MPSP) being saved from bankruptcy within just a year of financial rejuvenation.

The Guan Eng administration, guided by the principles of competency, accountability and transparency (CAT), managed to lead the MPSP to post RM41 million in budget surpluses since 2008 compared to the big deficits it recorded from 2000 to 2007 under the Barisan Nasional administration, which amounted to a whopping RM230 million.

It should also be noted that the Guan Eng administration is the only government in Malaysia, whether state or federal, to be highly commended by Transparency International for its anti-corruption efforts.

Chua Soi Lek's current attempt to woo the Chinese to support the MCA by attacking the Pakatan Rakyat, especially the DAP, is obviously and action in futility. The community in general has lost complete faith in the MCA, especially when its present set of leaders are found wanting.

In a commentary on the MCA I wrote in March 2011 when I was still chief editor of mysinchew.com, I made several observations of the party which I believe are still relevant. I am repeating them here.

Although Chua and the MCA are attempting to regain the middle ground lost en masse by the party in 2008, the party faces two big obstacles – one internal, and the other external.

The internal obstacle is surely its current leadership, which is composed of out-dated and spent political players, some with very weird and bizarre ideas like the one who proposed setting up a "Chinese Perkasa" to challenge the Malay rights group Perkasa, and some whose public comments of vital issues show their height of folly.

I think almost none of the current leaders will be able to do well if they are to contest in the next general election. The ground zero perception of them is generally negative. According to a Merdeka Center survey in 2010, only 9% of the Chinese voters have any respect for Chua, which is actually much better than that of Gerakan president Tan Sri Dr Koh Tsu Koon who received only 1%. The survey only listed these two Chinese leaders, but I believe it is a general reflection of the Chinese support for the MCA and Gerakan leaders.

The external obstacle in their way is the rejuvenated, regenerated, and reformed DAP.

Since the March 2008 general election, there has been a taxonomic group of very educated, progressive, professional and youthful politicians in the DAP, led by the relatively young but veteran political maverick Lim Guan Eng. The highly intellectual and articulate young elected representatives of the DAP are making waves in Parliament and at the various state assemblies, as well as in the public arena, where the battle for the hearts and minds of the people is taking place.

The DAP can boast of an army of very bright, well-educated, well-trained, and morally upright young politicians to spearhead the thrust for the transformation of the nation into a new and better Malaysia. Among the young leaders are the likes of Teresa Kok, Chow Koon Yeow, Anthony Loke, Fong Po Kuan, Lim Lip Eng, Teo Nie Ching, Tony Pua, Jenice Lee, Gobind Singh, Boo Cheng Hua, Hannah Yeoh, Violent Yong, Liew Chin Tong, Jeff Ooi, Thomas Su, and many more.

Can the MCA beat off such an impressive formidable challenge from its diehard political opponent DAP?

To regain the trust and confidence of the Chinese community and to remain relevant, the MCA must undergo a total revamp of its leadership, getting rid of those who had overstayed their usefulness, and those who intelligence are found wanting. The practice of cronyism and nepotism must be eliminated.

Otherwise, what Chua claims about regaining the confidence and support of the Chinese community is merely an illusion – an impossible dream.

I rest my case.

[Note: Thomas Lee has been a newspaper editor and socio-economic and political analyst for over 35 years. He is currently a media consultant.]

 

Society’s conscience they are not

Posted: 09 Jun 2011 10:41 AM PDT

By Terence Fernandez, The Sun

THE do-gooders of society have always been on the receiving end of brickbats and the butt of jokes and cynicism for their passion, principles and causes. They are the conscience of society. The public and private sectors have recognised them as a "necessary nuisance" to keep public officials in check and private enterprise honest.

The annual grants to many of these groups which have been elevated from street-fighters to respectable, structured organisations, is testament to their importance in society.

Unfortunately, not all of them are there for noble reasons. Now that there is money to be made from setting up NGOs, there have been the mushrooming of many self-acclaimed campaigners and experts who are eyeing the generous coffers of the government and private sector which exceed RM100 million for civil society and NGOs.

They issue press releases like a mill, churning out statement after statement. One individual is linked to at least a dozen organisations, hence his name appears in the papers almost daily.

We had once approached some of these groups to open the books. Only Transparency International and the WWF obliged. The rest were protective of their earnings although some received government grants – concerned perhaps, as in one case, that the public would discover that the head of the organisation pays herself almost RM30,000 a month.

Not a bad way to make a living. Don't get me wrong. If it is commensurate with the amount of work done and the results, then one would say she is most deserving of it.

However, the government has become more discerning now. Ditto some private firms which have doled out millions of tax-exempt ringgit as CSR initiatives.

Speaking about this to Domestic Trade, Cooperatives and Consumerism Minister Datuk Seri Ismail Sabri Yaakob some time back, he wondered what taxpayers got out of the millions spent on grants to some of these NGOs.

"We want them to educate the public, but issuing press statements alone is insufficient. I also can issue statements all the time and it doesn't cost the public anything!"

Ismail was concerned about the "return on investment" from a RM2 million annual grant that the ministry has been awarding a consumer group. "They must start accounting for what they have received," he said.

I was reminded of Ismail's words from this conversation we had over a year ago, following the power tariff hikes which was reported on Tuesday. As usual, reporters are asked to call consumer groups for a response on a price hike and its effects on inflation and the pricing of consumer groups.

One NGO – the same one mentioned by Ismail – was uncharacteristically silent. Moreover, the president of the organisation was evasive and non-committal when approached. He kept pushing the reporter to his other exco members and even other consumer groups.

Our younger reporters were stumped, but those of us who had been in the newsroom longer were not surprised. "Of course lah that fellow won't talk. TNB (Tenaga Nasional Bhd) gave his organisation RM1.5 million two years ago," I said.

Continued research also revealed that both TNB and this organisation had been partners in various campaigns – money from the former in return for awareness projects from the latter.

Whether RM1.5 million is a lot to print posters and booklets on energy conservation is for the people privy to the books to answer.

But this is a sad reflection of the state of consumer activism and NGOs. Granted that they need funding to keep afloat, but here is an example of how one's principles and cause can be compromised by the power of money.

Likewise those who give out grants should also give them out freely without expectations if they are sincere – but to expect this would be naïve.

In any case, the rise in tariffs must be looked at comprehensively. No one is asking anyone to solely blame TNB. The deals the government entered into with independent power producers (IPPs), the pricing of natural gas, which is heavily subsidised, and the disparity in demand and supply in power generation are issues that bona fide consumer groups have touched on.

So too should have this consumer advocate and his organisation, but they chose to be coy, perhaps worried that their cash cow will stop doling out the dough if it were unhappy with statements and suggestions that this group makes.

But what they fail to understand is that if we in the press feel there is no substance in what is said by these organisations or their leaders, or if there is vested interest involved, then their precious statements will most likely find their way into the waste bin!

Longing For A Free Mind (Concluding piece)

Posted: 08 Jun 2011 06:47 PM PDT

I do not judge a leader by his lifestyle rather by how effective he or she is. Much as I admire Nik Aziz's piety and modest lifestyle, as a state leader he has failed miserably.

By M. Bakri Musa

[Presented at the Fifth Annual Alif Ba Ta Conference at Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, organized by UMNO Club of New York-New Jersey, January 29, 2011.]

Q&A (Cont'd) Contemporary Leaders

Q13: We have leaders who surround themselves with opulence while millions of our citizens are mired in poverty. Should Nik Aziz (leader of the opposition PAS) who lives modestly be the more appropriate model? Further, should a leader sacrifice everything – his career, wealth and family life – for the sake of the nation?

A13: Although I do not care for opulence, I have no problem with those who do, including our leaders. In fact I prefer that our leaders be rich. In that way when they assume power they would not look upon that as an opportunity to enrich themselves. Also, the world being what it is, wealth is often a measure of your success and talent, and I want successful and talented leaders. I am here assuming that the wealth is not inherited or acquired though illicit means. I am only against leaders using the public treasury to enrich or indulge themselves. If it is their money I could not care less if they have gold toilet faucets or travel in luxury jets, as with California Governor Schwarzenegger.

Having said that, the constraint for a busy leader is time; for that reason I have no problem with and indeed encourage our leaders to travel in corporate jets rather than lining up and wasting time at the airport. Now there is a difference between a small corporate jet versus an Airbus of the type that Abdullah Badawi fancied.

I do not judge a leader by his lifestyle rather by how effective he or she is. Much as I admire Nik Aziz's piety and modest lifestyle, as a state leader he has failed miserably. Unfortunately it is the people of Kelantan who are paying for that failure. He has been chief minister for decades yet cholera is still endemic in his state. The burden of his leadership failure far outweighs whatever pahla (religious brownie points) he may have accumulated through his piety and modest lifestyle.

To the second part of your question, no, I do not believe that our leaders should unduly sacrifice everything just to serve us. I am suspicious of leaders who claim to do just that. On the contrary we should pay our leaders well, but not well enough that the monetary rewards become the only goal for serving.

The Sudanese-born mobile phone entrepreneur Mo Ibrahim established the Ibrahim Prize to reward honest, competent and effective African leaders. The funny thing is that those leaders really do not need the extra generous financial rewards from the prize because their expertise would be widely sought and generously compensated after they retire. The gesture however, is worthy of praise. Unfortunately it would not persuade the likes of Robert Mugabe.

I also believe in moderation, and I like my leaders to have other interests. It helps broaden their experience and perspective. That can only be good, quite apart from making them more human.

Q14: You have given us examples of free minds from our legends and history. Can you give us some personal examples?

A14: I have been fortunate to have lived in many cultures, had broad-based liberal education, and traveled widely. It would not surprise you to find me to be open-minded. The surprise would be if were to be insular. So my personal examples would not be particularly interesting.

Instead I will give you examples from my father. Unlike me, he did not go to university, only to the Sultan Idris Teachers' Training College in Tanjong Malim. He never lived in or experienced a different culture, and had never traveled outside the state where he was born, Negri Sembilan, except for the trip to Tanjong Malim Yet he was remarkably free minded.

I grew up in the 1950s, a period of intense nationalism, anticipating merdeka, and with that a resurgence of interest in Malay as it would be the national language of our new nation. Malay teachers in particular were at the vanguard of this movement. Tun Razak, the first Minister of Education, had expanded Malay schools to secondary level, with promises of further extension right up to the university level.

I was enrolled in an English school in the period just before the resurgence of this intense nationalism. My father went through great effort and expense to secure for me a slot in an English school. Soon after, Malay leaders including Tun Razak were exhorting everyone to support our national language by removing their children from English schools and to enroll them into these newly established Malay schools.

Being Malay school teachers, my parents were subjected to intense peer and community pressures to take my siblings and me out of English school. After all, if Malay teachers did not demonstrate their commitment, who would? As a Malay school teachers however, my parents were only too aware of the limitations of the Malay stream, in particular the lack of textbooks and teachers. So against all odds he resisted those intense social and professional pressures.

What strengthened my father's conviction was not that he could tell the future or that he had any particular brilliant insight rather that while Tun Razak and the other leaders were urging Malay parents to send their children to Malay schools, they were quietly sending theirs to English schools. Tun Razak in particular went further; he sent his to schools in England! You could say that my father heard the braying of the donkey (Tun Razak's children attending schools in England), and ignored the words of the Mullah, including the top Mullah, Tun Razak.

Many years ago I was visiting my old village and met one of my former kampong mates whose parents had followed our leaders' advice and taken my friend out of English school. On seeing where I am today, his only comment was that my father was wiser than his!

Q15: If you were given an opportunity for a private meeting with Prime Minister Najib, what three pieces of advice would you give?

A15: Najib has a short attention span so I will offer him only two. Even if I were to give him three, he would forget the third (or first) anyway!

One is not an advice but merely to elicit from him his vision of Malaysia, and then to inquire what his greatest fear is, politically. The two are related. I think I know what his answer would be to the second part of my question but as to the first, I have no clue. This despite his much-ballyhooed 1Malaysia public relations exercise, and its attendant extravagantly expensive international consultants!

The greatest fear of Barisan, and thus Najib as its leader, is that it would not regain its traditional two-third majority in the next general election. You know the fate of Najib's immediate predecessor, Abdullah Badawi, when he failed to deliver in the 2008 elections.

If that were to be his greatest fear, then I would advice Najib that the most effective way to deal with a fear, as I indicated earlier, is to imagine the worst case possible and then prepare for that eventuality. If things were to turn out less worse, then you would be relieved and have more confidence in tackling the crisis.

What could be worse than losing the supra-majority? Barisan failing to gain even a simple majority, and with that, the right to rule Malaysia. To add insult to an already unbearable injury, I would have him imagine UMNO winning fewer parliamentary seats than PAS. That would definitely and irreversibly shatter the myth that UMNO is Melayu, and Melayu, UMNO. If that scenario would not be scary enough, then I would add his losing his Pekan seat, as he nearly did in the 1999 elections.

The next election is due no later than March 8, 2013, so Najib has exactly 768 days from today to prepare for that eventual political catastrophe. Add a day more if there were to be a leap year till then!

There would be only two choices for Najib. One, knowing that he would lose everything come 2013, he should seize this short opportunity to enrich himself and his family. Then when he would be booted out he could charter a private jet to whisk him and his family out of the country. This unfortunately is the well trodden path followed by many Third World leaders, the latest being the Tunisian leader, soon to be joined by Egypt's Mubarak. If Najib were to pursue that course, he would of course deserve the wrath and curse of all Malaysians. Worse, that ill feeling would spill over and despoil the fond memories Malaysians have of his late father.

The other would be to execute his grand vision of a clean, efficient and meritocratic nation, as encapsulated in his 1Malaysia aspiration, and to propel Malays onto the global arena, his so-called glokal Malay agenda. Many, including Najib, have already forgotten that slogan.

He could do this by getting rid of all those tainted UMNO characters in his cabinet and party. So what if they were to rebel and plot against him; the result would not be any worse than the earlier scenario I painted.

Then there are those juicy government contracts. Put them out to competitive bidding and invite international bidders. If an American company were to win it, so what? At least the roofs would not leak or collapse. Yes, those pseudo UMNO entrepreneurs would be ticked off, like a hungry bear whose honey jar is suddenly taken away.

To demonstrate his commitment to meritocracy, visit the top universities of the world and invite those Malaysians there for a private dinner. They might not fall for his cajoling to return but they might just give him some useful advice and brilliant ideas. Who knows, one or two might return. It would be certainly be more productive than meeting a Petronas University flunkee lobbying for a scholarship.

If Najib were to opt for this second course, he would literally transform Malaysia come 2013. Voters, seeing the tangible results, may well enthusiastically endorse his leadership. If not, then Najib would at least have the satisfaction knowing that he has given his best for Malaysia.

My second advice to Najib is real one, not merely a question for him. It is also very short: Get rid of your wife from the public arena! [Spontaneous enthusiastic applause!] As you can see, I am not the only one who would like to throw him that advice!

If Najib's wife has the itch to involve herself in the affairs of the state (she has certainly given every indication of her itchiness for that), then lobby her husband to nominate her as a candidate in the next election.

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Can UN stop China from starting a war over the Spratly Islands dispute?

Posted: 09 Jun 2011 10:31 AM PDT

Apart from a humongous oil and gas reserve of an estimated 17.7 billion tonnes, making it the fourth* largest reserve in the world, the Spratly Islands are strategically located in the pathways of commercial shipping and also fishing.

*Kuwait, as an oil producing country, has an oil and gas reserve of 13 billion tonnes.

Although the six nations had staked claims to the islands, China, Vietnam and the Philippines were the most aggressive, whereby they had physically occupied some of the islands in the archipelago.

All claims to the islands were peaceful exchanges at first, until the China navy sank a Vietnamese armed transport ship over the possession of Johnson Reef in 1988.

Since then, Vietnam and China had been at loggerheads with each other.

Recently, China was also flexing its military muscles at the Philippines, forcefully taking over Mischief Reef several days ago on top of firing warning shots at fishing vessels from the Philippines in February this year.ChinaNavyMissileLaunch

Philippines president Benigno Aquino III condemned China for the use of excessive force and warned that China could possibly start an Asian arms race if hostility continues.

China and the Philippines had first clashed in 1995, and ASEAN stepped in to calm the tension by proposing a peaceful solution to the dispute by having China sign an accord with ASEAN countries in 2002 to exercise restraint and to stop occupying new areas.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Petronas tires of being piggy bank

Posted: 09 Jun 2011 10:23 AM PDT

Shamsul Azhar Abbas, chief executive, disclosed to local reporters in Kuala Lumpur that Petronas is in talks with ministers over proposals for a dramatic shift in the way it pays dividends to its sole owner.

Up to now, the government has taken a flat M$30bn ($9.9bn) a year in dividends from Petronas, whatever its performance. That is a hefty contribution to federal government revenues, which last year amounted to M$199bn.

However, it is only a fraction of the oil company's total bill. On top of the dividend, Petronas also pays petroleum income tax, corporate income tax, export duties and royalties.

It's not clear how much all that will amount to this year. But Hassan Merican, Shamsul's predecessor, said in mid-2008 that the total for the 12 month to March of that year amounted to a staggering 44 per cent of government revenues.

When you take account of the oil company's additional role in financing prestige projects such as the twin towers building in Kuala Lumpur and the new national administrative capital at Putrajaya, it's not hard to see that the government would be hard pressed to continue without its oil-generated revenues.

Yet, according to Shamsul, ministers are discussing a switch from the flat divident payment to a system under which Petronas would hand over 30 per cent of its net profit.

That would not be a small sum. The company's net profit soared 36 per cent to M$54.9bn for the year to March, which would have prompted a payment of $16.2bn to the government under the proposed system. But the question is, how would the government make up for M$13.bn in lost revenue?

 

READ MORE HERE.

Anwar will be convicted – come what may!

Posted: 09 Jun 2011 01:43 AM PDT

Nobody is surprised by High Court Judge Zabidin Mohamed Diah's ruling refusing to recuse himself from hearing Anwar's case. He was right on the mark, as expected!

The funny thing about Anwar's court trial is that the judgments are predictable. From Day One it was very apparent that the apparatus of the state would be used stringently to put away Anwar for good. A free Anwar, as perceived by many observers, would sound the death-knell for the BN.

Every step and every action taken during the course of his trial – all point to the inevitable conclusion that Anwar will be convicted, come what may.

He had to be arrested even though he had given his word that he would be reporting to the police station as required. He was waylaid and arrested like a common criminal and detained for the night – even though it was indicated earlier that he would be released that evening – because it is very apparent that his fresh DNA was urgently needed to implicate him. They had to create a situation so that the DNA could be obtained. That was exactly what happened.

They extracted his DNA from the water bottle, towel and tooth brush which he had to use as he was detained overnight. Strict orders were given that these items should not be removed. He was tricked to leave behind his DNA.

The pertinent question is: why couldn't they use his earlier DNA obtained in 1998? This clearly exposes the plot. Fresh DNA was required to implicate Anwar. If the 1998 DNA was used, the plot would have been exposed and therefore it could not be planted to implicate him, according to thinking Malaysians.

Apart from the police, many believe that even the court conspired to deny him certain documents that were crucial to his defence. When a man claims that he was a victim of political intrigue in order to convict him, the court should have allowed him access to vital information to defend himself. Contrary to the dictates of justice, the court denied him this information.

It is the duty of the court in any civil society to ensure that the accused is entitled to a fair trial. A fair trial would entail access to information that would help him in his defence. When the court does not assist in this respect, it becomes a sham trial and the court is guilty of contributing to this sham.

According to the medical report in the possession of Malaysiakini, Saiful was never sodomised by anyone, least of all by Anwar Ibrahim. Dr Mohamed Osman Hamid from the Hospital Pusrawi had confirmed this fact after physically examining Saiful on 28 June 2008. Is this the evidence that is being suppressed because it would have helped Anwar to mount a vigorous defence?

Why did the doctor who took the stand refuse to refer to his own notes? After all they are his observations and conclusions and he was there to give evidence based on those notes. But he refused to refer to those notes in spite of Karpal Singh prompting him several times. If he had referred to those notes, then the defence would have had a right to those notes. The doctor was aware of this technicality. He stubbornly refused to refer to his notes because he did not want to hand over his notes to the defence.

How would it have affected the doctor and his profession if his notes were made available to the defence? What was his interest in cooperating with the prosecution to disallow this information to Anwar? Was he scared that his notes could clear Anwar? Was he fearful that the scrutiny of the notes by Anwar's experts would punch holes in his testimony?

There are many other instances and examples to confirm the existence of a plot. All these have been highlighted but to no avail.

Notwithstanding all this, what is puzzling is the judge's refusal to recuse himself from the trial. As long as a bias is perceived by the accused that alone should disqualify him in the interest of justice. You don't even have to prove bias, but the mere perception is reason enough to disqualify himself to ensure a fair trial.

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


MCMC censors websites, under request from the US government to stop Wikileaks network of file ...

Posted: 09 Jun 2011 02:32 PM PDT

By Yong Ming Hui

If everyone's been reading news on the net lately, we all know that the MCMC has been directing ISPs to censor P2P and many many other file sharing and hosting websites.

Malaysia, in general, has no interests to ban these sites. There're many other sites worth banning, especially those obvious porn web sites.

But we're not here to talk about the obvious banning of porn web sites.

This is global governance on the horizon, global dictatorship rearing it's ugly head soon.

The Malaysian government is under the order/direction of the US government. If you've read recently, US government legislated new laws to ban P2P and other file sharing/hosting websites.

http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100920/12460811083/us-senators-propose-bill-to-censor-any-sites-the-justice-depatement-declares-pirate-sites-worldwide.shtml

This is after the Wikileaks incident.

Couple that with the memorandum of understanding between Malaysia-Today and Wikileaks, it would be no surprise the Malaysian government would also start to realize the importance of obeying the request by Barack Hussein Obama to censor these sites which has the potential to host explosive information that could be leaked by both Wikileaks and Malaysia-Today.

This also means, censorhip of Malaysia-Today could soon be on the horizon.

Global governance is declaring war on freedom.

Raja Petra is also right when he posted information that Najib is a Freemason. http://www.malaysia-today.net/archives/archives-2008/13997-manifesto-dato-seri-mohd-najib-tun-razak

As these people are all in the same elite circle of Luciferian worship, they will do things that help each other to achieve world governance and strip public freedom.

The Malaysian government not only works with these war mongering evil cult of bankers and luciferian worshippers. It is a matter of time before the wealth of Malaysians get stripped away with USA style ponzi financial schemes.

Najib Abdul Razak, the Ahli Kehormat Freemason, will sell out this country to the Zionist Freemason-run global government. Their handiwork now starts with MCMC banning P2P/torrent sites and soon to be targeting Wikileaks and Malaysia-Today.

Connect the dots, and you will see there's a war against humanity going on...

It is time everyone wakes up and see who are the traitors in this country. And the first task is to flush out the Freemasons.

Bersih 2.0 triggers early fever for UMNO

Posted: 09 Jun 2011 02:25 PM PDT

Bersih 2.0 is asking for justice, fairness and transperancy in the execution of the elections. But UMNO is asking that its everyday business interests should not be disrupted.

By J. D. Lovrenciear

The planned Bersih 2.0 rally for July 9 has already set a running fever for UMNO. This is diagnosed from the numerous police reports being lodged by UMNO followers so early.

The rational for those from UMNO is that the rally would 'disrupt businesses'. And that very telling rational is also not doing any favor for their leaders within UMNO. Why?

Simply because what Bersih 2.0 stands for and what UMNO reps are asking for clearly indicates that the very fundamentals within UMNO are not rightly placed as has always been claimed by the opposition members and various NGOs as well as the rakyat.

Bersih 2.0 is asking for justice, fairness and transperancy in the execution of the elections. But UMNO is asking that its everyday business interests should not be disrupted.

Now which is a nobler intent – self interest and daily profiteering or long term fundamentals that are consistent with democracy and good for the whole nation?

It would have earned UMNO millions of kudos if their reps maintained that the authorities must safeguard the peaceful protest march so that both protestors and business operators at the protest venue are not adversely affected.

In maintaining so they would have actually helped their business people whom they claim to represent. Given the hundreds of thousands present, can you imagine how much and how many business operators would profit from the captive market?

Unfortunately, the advisors of UMNO must be totally blinkered. Or they cannot help thinking inside the box. And so the Bersih 2.0 rally has set a fever running inside UMNO.

In all likelihood, the other component members of UMNO within the BN fold would jump the plank too. And soon the PDRM will compound UMNO's vulnerability further by issuing a stern warning to the organizers and threaten to arrest those taking part in the rally. And like it or otherwise, there will be mammoth road blocks all over the country.

It is the same old strategy hatched and re-hatched. And in the end, instead of helping BN and UMNO resusitate, the members themselves are only digging a deeper grave for their parties.

It beats the daylight out of many thinking citizens who are asking why can't the leaders and followers of BN think strategically and spin the Bersih 2.0 rally to their advantage and thereby fortify the quicksand beneath their feet?

In fact even PDRM can salvage its battered image by saying that they will ensure that the protest is held peacefully and any mischief maker at the scene will be nabbed by our world-class SB personnel. That would immediately absolve all their past sins and sins of omissions instantly.

Just imagine what the world would be like if the Egyptians, Tunisians, and others talked like UMNO each time people wanted to hold a peaceful protest? Or where would India be if the 'Salt march' led by Gandhi was banned? Or what would Indonesia be if the public outcry was killed off in the bud? Sigh!

 

The PM's Kazakh debacle

Posted: 09 Jun 2011 02:16 PM PDT

This exactly is the problem with Malaysian work culture. It permeates the entire government machinery and today even some private organizations are guilty of taking piggy-back rides on company / organizational expenditure and time. 

By J. D. Lovrenciear

The public is asking if the PM and his First Lady have abused their positions vis-a-vis attending their child's wedding while having gone to Kazakstan on official business.

Meanwhile many have rushed to rescue the PM and his First Lady giving evasive and agitated explanations and even sneering at the very question that the rakyat are asking.

What makes it all a debacle is the way the rebuttals are forthcoming from the defenders of the PM and his First Lady.

The point of contention is very simple really. The logic is when you go to a foreign land on official business, the rakyat pay for the trip and expenses included. It is approved because you are doing your job given to you by the rakyat.

You complete the assignment, come back and report on the success. And the rakyat will sing praises for you.

But when you go on official business and along the loop also attend a family function - in this case your child's wedding, and then return on an all expenses paid for flight, it certainly raises ethical questions.

The right thing to do is that you go on official business at national cost, return, then apply for leave and go off to do your private thing and return when the leave expires. And that you do at your private expense and in your private and personal capacity as Mr. Najib and Madam Rosmah.

In fact, if you place a separation between official duties and personal matters you would not even have the wedding fixed to coincide with your business calender. That is the way how it works for all rakyat who are employed or conduct their official businesses.

Business and personal matters do not mix!

But when you sambung sambung sambil buat kerja, ahh that becomes an ethical issue. Got it?

To make matters worse, the entire entourage who also happened to be on the band wagon of official business and happened to be also attending the wedding 'by the way' are also guilty of mixing duties with personal social obligations.

This exactly is the problem with Malaysian work culture. It permeates the entire government machinery and today even some private organizations are guilty of taking piggy-back rides on company / organizational expenditure and time.

They are guilty of flying to some destination for work related matters, extend their leave and continue to enjoy a seemingly 'well earned' holiday and then return on company paid return ticket.

To some Malaysians this is smart thinking. They do not realize how unethical they have been. They bat not an eyelid at this compromised virtue.

And so BN will accuse the rakyat of making a fuss about a 'simple' matter.

But this is no simple matter. It involves the Number One of the nation. In fact if you study the nine challenges enshrined in Wawasan 2020, this 'tumpang' mindset and attitude runs foul of at least four of the nine challenges.

Then how on earth are we going to be a world class citizen and nation?

Should the PM and his First Lady not be setting the highest moral code of behavior and examplary ethical values so that the entire nation can emulate and transform its compromised values?

 

FLOM gets into the news yet again

Posted: 09 Jun 2011 02:11 PM PDT

By J. D. Lovrenciear

Why does Prime Minister Najib's current wife always get into the news circuit for all the wrong reasons and all the time?

Indeed it is mind boggling. Could it be that she was born under an unlucky star and the rakyat are absolutely wicked devils?

If she carries out a task, there is a flaw. If she opens her mouth - be it in response to a global-scale disaster or at some local political rally, she fouls up easily. If she goes on an overseas trip she trips all the time. And now even her million-Ringgit handbag has riled up the struggling rakyat.

When and where in the five-dacade history of Malaysia did we witness the Prime Minsiter's wife facing so much of criticism and ridicule? Yes, none. And so why is Rosmah seen to be saying and doing all the wrong things and on that account also not seen to be saying and doing all the right or widely accepted things?

Take the branded handbag that Malaysia Today has made a leak on. The point is the rakyat never issued any edict that the PM's wife must only carry a Petaling Street fake bag. They never said that our officials' wives must dress like a pauper.

In fact throughout our history, the rakyat had always praised a VVIP for his or her adorable dress sense and mannerisms. But why, when Rosmah walks the corridors of the wealthy, powerful and famous, the rakyat always cannot miss a pot shot at her?

Well the First Lady and all her pretending loyalists can dismiss all these as 'oh just ignore the stupid Malaysians okay'. But surely one cannot ignore the truth, that is, none of our past Primie Ministers' wives were so despiced and mauled by the rakyat.

None of them earned any brick brats whatsoever even when it came to the choice of dress, jewelry and accessories including handbags. But the same is not with the case of Najib's current wife. Sad. Very sad. Not sad for Najib. Not sad for Rosmah.

But truly very sad for the nation. But you see there are and there always will be people like the Marcos'. Fortunately the Filipinos knew when to say enough is enough.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved