Jumaat, 1 Mac 2013

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Populist policies will hit us hard

Posted: 28 Feb 2013 02:44 PM PST

Tay Tian Yan, TMI

There is a country well endowed with natural resources and boasting a highly efficient, incorrupt government. Her citizens nevertheless have to pay pretty hefty taxes. Income tax rate is as high as 40 per cent, not to mention an additional 10 per cent consumer tax.

This country is most positively rich. I'm not going to keep you in suspense. It's Australia.

But sorry, Australia doesn't provide free tertiary education. On the contrary, tuition fees are sky high, about A$30,000 (RM96,000) a year for an ordinary university, and this figure is growing at an annual rate of 10 per cent.

There are three ways young Australians can gain access to universities:

1. Their families provide part of the expenses, and some parents actually emphasise they have secured loans for their children's education.

2. Bank loans, which will have to be paid back upon graduation.

3. Part-time jobs such as restaurant waiters, apple pickers, etc.

It's hard indeed, but for the sake of better future prospects, exorbitant prices still have to be paid.

Australian students are a very practical lot. All that they can wish for is not-so-drastic increases in tuition fees and more humane bank interest rates. Alternatively, they can count on their parents to fork out a little more.

They don't take to the streets, demanding the government take over their burdens for the simple reason that they made the choice of attending the universities themselves, and should therefore not get the public to share their burdens.

The opposition parties never pledge free tertiary education as they know they won't be able to honour it anyway.

There is another country endowed with reasonable resources. The government is of mediocre efficiency and accountability levels.

The tax rate in this country is not that high, being capped at 26 per cent, but given the not-so-high income levels of ordinary wage earners, such a rate appears to be pretty unbearable.

This country is by no means a wealthy state, at best a middle-income country. You might have guessed it. It's Malaysia.

It won't be too hard for young Malaysians to attend universities. There are so many of them around, in fact way too many!

Tuition fees can be as low as RM2,000 to RM3,000 a year for public universities, RM30,000 to RM40,000 (non-medical courses) for private universities.

Young Malaysians need not beg for bank loans or work part-time to pay their tuition fees.

If they go to a government university, 90 per cent of the expenses have already been absorbed by the government (from taxpayers' pockets to be exact). The remaining 10 per cent can be settled with PTPTN loans (which many use to acquire the latest smartphones).

If they opt for a private university, they need both the PTPTN and family support.

READ MORE HERE

 

Silence is easy

Posted: 28 Feb 2013 12:08 PM PST

http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/dogg-300x168.jpg 

Let's start by speaking up. I am Muslim. And I love dogs.

Elza Irdalynna, Free Malaysia Today 

By now, many Malaysians are aware of Pak Mie and his heroic deeds of rescuing and caring for over 500 dogs in Alor Setar, Kedah.

Most of us are amazed by his spirit, and have even rallied together to help him in his cause.

Yet a note that keeps recurring in the articles and videos that feature Pak Mie and his wife is one that disgusts me, as I'm sure it has for anyone with a heart.

Despite Pak Mie's purest intentions, a majority of his Malay community has shunned and condemned him, labelling him as an infidel and morally corrupt.

Why are the Muslims of this country (particularly the Malay Muslim group) so filled with hate toward the canine species? Growing up, I was ill-informed and learned that Muslims weren't allowed to own dogs.

I later understood that this was a simplified version of the teachings, and untrue. Dogs are considered to be dirty, and there are specific ways to cleanse oneself according to Islam when touching a dog when it's wet or its feces and urine.

However, it was and had never been haram for a Muslim to own a dog.

Why the silence?

Yet it is common for many Malaysians to see dogs getting beaten, objects or hot boiling water thrown at them, and I've even heard of cases where razor blades are stuffed into sausages and fed to the dogs.

A friend of mine had his dog poisoned by his Malay neighbour. Dogs aren't just considered a nuisance by this group of people; they're a target for violence.

Still, what angers me most is not the cruelty of these misguided Malay Muslims. What makes me angry is the silence of other Muslim dog lovers.

I know there are plenty of us out there who not only are against cruelty towards dogs, but are also Muslims who own dogs. Yet whenever such disgusting acts take place, where is your voice?

Why must we keep our ownership a secret? We fear judgment and so we leave the fight for the rights of these animals to the non-Muslim community.

Last October, I lost my six-month-old Shetland Sheepdog in a hit-and-run. We were coming back from our morning walk, and his leash fell out of my hand. He ran back to the park near our house.

When I caught up to him, his dying body was twitching in the middle of the road, his head soaked in blood.

As I cradled my baby, neighbours rushed to my side. I was touched by their assistance – one ran back to her house to get some blankets, another went to get a bag, and two other dog owners walked me home, comforting me. I am forever grateful to them for their kindness.

Jaqen was a very friendly dog. He was popular among the kids and other dog owners at our park, and would show off his "fetching" skills when we played ball.

But I recall little kids who played with him, asking me, "Are you Malay?", and upon my reply would say, "My mother says Malays cannot have dogs." I would patiently correct each misinformed child but I was annoyed at how parents nonchalantly pass this information to their children.

It's bad enough you hate dogs; must you also teach your children to do the same?

Read more at: http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/opinion/2013/03/01/silence-is-easy/ 

 

A manifesto that hoodwinks voters

Posted: 28 Feb 2013 10:52 AM PST

http://www.nst.com.my/polopoly_fs/1.226485.1362065490!/image/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/landscape_454/image.jpg

People in a peaceful rally against the Selangor government for failing to provide preschool allowance as promised in the 12th general election manifesto. Selangor menteri besar has stated that a manifesto is not a promise.

NOT COST-EFFECTIVE: It's baffling why Pakatan is insisting on emulating bankrupt countries

Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad, NST 

PAKATAN Rakyat has unveiled its manifesto.  It is all about reducing government revenues and increasing spending.

This is to be achieved by lowering taxes, reducing the number of taxpayers by raising tax-free allowances, doing away with tolls, and more.

On the other hand, the salary bill will be increased because of an increase in minimum wage, there will be free education for everyone and roads and highways will be built and maintained.

With 1.1 million employees, the government's salary bill is very big. By increasing the minimum wage to RM1,100, not only will those drawing less than the minimum wage get an increase but those earning more must also be given a wage increase to maintain their status as superiors to those below them.

The salary scales of all grades will have to be increased in order to do this. It is not about raising the salaries and wages of those earning below the minimum wage only. This will be in addition to the RM2 billion because of the recent rise of the minimum pay to RM900.

The cost of education will also increase by more than RM2 billion because of free education.

The repair and maintenance of highways will also run into several billions of ringgit.

Currently, the cost of petrol subsidies is about RM18 billion. If petrol prices were to be lowered, then several more billions of ringgit will have to be added to government subsidy.

On the other hand, revenues will decrease by several billions of ringgit with taxes lowered, the number of people paying taxes reduced and highways made toll-free.

Revenues will also decrease as higher wages for the business sector are bound to reduce profits as well as the taxes paid to the government. Some businesses may have to close down or move to other countries. There will be less investment, both foreign and domestic. And more unemployment.

 

At one time, the manufactured goods sold in Malaysia carried European brands. Today, they are almost all from Japan, Korea and China. Except for German cars, all the motor vehicles on the roads are from Asian countries.

For decades, the Europeans and Americans have been increasing wages and providing perks to their workers. The prices of their products increased accordingly and could not compete in the market. They lost the market.

But they keep increasing their high cost of living. Today, they are facing an irreversible financial crisis. Greece, Spain, Portugal and even Italy are on the verge of bankruptcy or have become bankrupt. Even Britain and France are in financial trouble.

The United States is also in deep financial crisis. It faces the need to reduce government spending (sequestration) or increase taxes.

Sequestration will mean less money for education, healthcare and defence. The number of teachers would have to be reduced. Even the control towers at some airports would have to cease operations. Military bases, weapons and personnel would have to be reduced. An austerity programme will slow down growth and increase unemployment.

Like the Europeans, the Americans also do not like to reduce their spending. They refuse to pay more taxes. In fact, the rich are demanding tax reduction.

The financial crisis in Europe and America is basically because of overspending. Until they cut back on their spending and increase taxes, their economy will not recover.

Pakatan's manifesto advocates the very things that have bankrupted Europe and America.

If Pakatan is responsible, it should work out the cost. It is not too difficult to do this as government employees' salaries as well as developmental and maintenance needs are known.

We know the number of people who will get a pay increase; we know the cost of maintaining educational and healthcare institutions; we know the cost of maintaining roads and highways; and we know the cost of development.

Instead of merely commenting, economists and financiers should work out the mathematics. Then, the people will understand what the manifesto really represents.

But, on the other hand, Selangor Menteri Besar Tan Sri Abdul Khalid Ibrahim has said a manifesto is not a promise. Obviously, Pakatan is preparing to renege on its manifesto.

This is not surprising. In Selangor, the Pakatan government has failed to honour its promise, including providing free water and allowance for single mothers.

Pakatan's manifesto is obviously meant to hoodwink the electorate.


 

Busy fighting the enemy within

Posted: 28 Feb 2013 10:39 AM PST

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT1xGazTgQ5ABhka7ab2Y2iyTN9NyO58WfwsNSLkRkr1XdnPQtT7w 

Datuk Seri Azizan Abdul Razak has survived several health scares and is moving to secure his Mentri Besar post as well as to put in place his choice of successor in Kedah.

Joceline Tan, The Star 

IT is quite fortunate that Datuk Seri Azizan Abdul Razak has a great sense of humour given the periodic speculation about his health.

The Kedah Mentri Besar has grown quite used to people imagining that he is about to meet his maker.

For instance, there was a death in his house on the outskirts of Alor Setar last Sunday. His sister-in-law, the elder sibling of Azizan's first wife, had passed away and there were cars parked outside the house and people milling about.

When a reporter called to tell him that people had wondered what was going on, he quipped: "Is that why you phoned me? To ask if I had died?"

That is why many reporters like him he is terribly witty when in a good mood and sharp-tongued when feeling grouchy, but never boring.

Actually, Azizan is looking quite healthy these days. He seems to be responding to treatment after a series of health scares over the past year. He has put a bit of weight back on and looks like his old distinguished self.

However, curiosity over the activity at his house last weekend had more to do with his political health.

For the last week or so, PAS supporters had been staging protests against Azizan with some of them going to the extent of asking him to step down.

As such when people heard about the busy scene at Azizan's house, they thought he was bowing to the pressure to call it a day.

It was wishful thinking because that is the last thing on his mind. Azizan has made it clear that he will be leading his party into the general election. He intends to defend his Sungai Limau seat and he has not discounted the fact that he will still be Mentri Besar after the election.

His supporters argue that if Datuk Nik Abdul Aziz Nik Mat, who is 81 and sickly, is still contesting the election, Azizan who is 13 years younger can do the same.

But the problem is that Azizan is planning to put his opponents in PAS out of his way. He has submitted a fresh list of election candidates to the PAS central leadership that will effectively cut his opponents off from below the knee.

In the new list, Datuk Phahrolrazi Mohd Zawawi, who is Azizan's chief threat to the Mentri Besar post, will be sent from the Pengkalan Kundor state seat to the Jerlun parliamentary seat. Datuk Dr Ismail Salleh andDatuk Dr Hamdan Mohd Khalid, the two assemblymen aligned to Phahrolrazi, will be dropped.

It was as good as sending Phahrolrazi, who is the party's No 2 man in Kedah, into political exile. Phahrolrazi's state seat is located in the Kuala Kedah area where he is also the PAS division chief. Being sent to Jerlun is akin to being plucked from a tree in his own garden and chucked into a new and hostile backyard to grow anew.

But who can blame Azizan for wanting Phahrolrazi out of the way? Phahrolrazi's group had tried but failed to topple Azizan when he was lying on a hospital bed recovering from a heart attack.

Azizan would have to continually look over his shoulder if Phahrolrazi continues as an assemblyman.

Last year, Phahrolrazi declined to be reappointed as a state exco member. The PAS central leadership had to intervene and when Phahrolrazi relented and rejoined the state exco, Azizan demoted him to a less important portfolio and promoted another loyalist Datuk Taulan Mat Rasul over Phahrolrazi.

The state civil servants say the two men are barely talking. However, the two nemeses exchanged broad plastic smiles and even shook hands in front of their president Datuk Seri Hadi Awang during the Chinese New Year do in Alor Setar.

Phahrolrazi was on a talk show on Astro Awani last week during which he described his boss as a three-cylinder engine car. As everyone knows, a three-cylinder car is economical to maintain but it cannot go as fast as, say, the BMW, which has a six-cylinder engine.

Phahrolrazi is an engineer and it was his way of saying that the Mentri Besar was under-performing when he should be zooming ahead at the speed of a BMW car. And if that was not enough, he said he was prepared to take on the top job if that is what the top leadership wanted.

It was a touchy interview and the boss did not appreciate being described as a three-cylinder vehicle.

Read more at: http://thestar.com.my/columnists/story.asp?col=joceline&file=/2013/3/1/columnists/joceline/12774309&sec=Joceline 

 

Hey, where's my share?

Posted: 28 Feb 2013 10:31 AM PST

http://fz.com/sites/default/files/styles/1_landscape_slider_photo/public/wheres-my-share_0.jpg 

The irony is, all these goodies are coming out of my tax dollars. Yet, because I am single, over 30, earn a living income and already have purchased an apartment (closer to hovel when you consider property prices in PJ), I get zippo.
 
N. Shashi Kala, fz.com
 
I HAVE a confession to make... with all the talk of elections and goodies being handed out willy nilly, I'm feeling kinda left out.
 
I mean, there's BR1M for senior citizens and for those from poor households, RM200 smartphone rebate for youths under 30, RM200 book vouchers for students, RM100 school aid for each child, Kedai Makan 1Malaysia for cheap meals, KR1M for household goods, PR1MA for first-time house buyers, TR1M for taxi drivers and a host of other goodies.
 
The irony is, all these goodies are coming out of my tax dollars. Yet, because I am single, over 30, earn a living income and already have purchased an apartment (closer to hovel when you consider property prices in PJ), I get zippo.
 
Yes, I fall squarely in the middle class with high taxes and few reliefs or rebates (the yearly RM1,000 book rebate is one few I enjoy).
 
The rich – who usually have their own businesses – tend to find ways to avoid paying or at least substantially reduce the amount of taxes they pay (thanks to creative accounting and undeclared income stashed overseas).
 
But for salaried employees like me, the IRD gets first dibs on my money even before I do.
 
It has been years since the government has shown any kindness to those like me, for whom finishing a 7-year car loan is cause for celebration – never mind that the repairs bills have been on the up and up.
 
Also, I suspect that those in this group are among the more regular charitable donors, as they have more disposable income.
 
You could say that, hey, you're not exactly suffering, so why do you need help? But that's not quite true.
 
My generation bought our homes by ourselves – we did not have the luck of having our parents put down a hefty down payment for it. We left home right after school (to work or go to uni) and never moved back in.
 
When I wanted to buy my first car, I used my savings and took a loan to buy a small, second-hand Charade. The monthy loan repayment cost RM384, a huge sum for someone pulling slightly less than a thousand salary.
 
Nowadays, most of the twenty-somethings I know drive brand new Myvis or Protons paid for by their parents.
 
I guess the point I am trying to make is that nothing was given to us – we worked hard to get here. And cost of living increases strike us just as hard.
 
Escalating cost of private healthcare, and car prices that border on the ridiculous (seriously, paying 300K or more for a depreciating asset is ludicrous, unless you are very rich) are just some of the examples.
 
We are stuck in between the rich – for whom shelling out 20K for a handbag is just a shopping footnote - and the poor who end up diluting infant formula purchased at Kedai 1Malaysia to make it last longer.
 
We are stuck in middle class hell and it feels like all our hard-earned money is being siphoned off as handouts to special interest groups. But these kind of populist, one-off measures do nothing to improve the lot of the poor.

 

Read more at: http://fz.com/content/hey-wheres-my-share 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


GE13 Hotspot: Johor (aka How One Chinaman Will Lose Johor for UMNO)

Posted: 28 Feb 2013 11:12 AM PST

https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRNLsfMr4nzYwmS6ai6qRbHF3shMtZqblVZWWVycdna6ca4C8iC 

Azman A. Yahaya 

As many of us are aware, despite Pakatan Rakyat's growing popularity among voters in various states in Peninsular Malaysia, Johor has been widely acknowledged as Barisan Nasional's 'safe deposit'.

I am here to tell you: That is no longer the case.

A strong wave of disenchantment is brewing among us anak-anak Johor over the actions of one Chinaman from Sabah, the so-called 'Property King of JB' and 'de-facto Johor MB' Lim Kang Hoo who is being handed the assets of our beloved state of Johor on a silver platter, all thanks to his puppet MB Ghani Othman and fellow UMNO cronies.

 

1. KFC

In 2012, Johor Corporation Bhd (JCorp)'s controversial decision to sell its cash-cow KFC was met with resistance, especially the Malay community because we were worried that KFC would end up in the hands of non-Bumis.

JCorp's official reason for selling KFC was that immediate cash was needed to cover its RM3.6 billion debt. But then again, it shot down the Malay Chamber of Commerce's counter-offer, which was of 10 sen more per share. Major questions were raised and things went quiet after that.

And now, our worst fears have come true: Tan Sri Lim Kang Hoo has surfaced as the majority owner of KFC through his vehicles CVC Capital Partners, Credence Resources Sdn. Bhd. and Iskandar Waterfront Holdings Sdn. Bhd.

To get his slimy hands on KFC, Lim Kang Hoo used a complex system of layered deals, as shown below:

 

http://i893.photobucket.com/albums/ac131/admin-s/kfc.jpg

Looking at the flow of money in the diagram, it is obvious that the complicated layers of deals were used to cover Lim Kang Hoo's hand in the grab and mask the public's eye over the 'hanky panky' transactions involved.

 

2. JCORP'S PROPERTIES

The entire KFC 'restructuring exercise' includes the signing of questionable agreements with dubious terms and conditions between Lim Kang Hoo and JCorp. One of the hidden clauses in the agreements include a so-called 'safety net compensation' for Lim Kang Hoo whereby if Triple Platform Sdn. Bhd. is not listed within 4 years, he stands to grab more than RM600 million worth of 'pre-determined properties' from JCorp.

Considering the fact that JCorp owns key properties such as JB's Menara Ansar, Puteri Pan Pacific, Persada Convention Centre, KOMTAR and KL's Pusat Bandar Damansara, Lim Kang Hoo knows this deal is a finger-lickin' good one. Should this clause trigger however, the ramifications to JCorp's very existence is at stake.

Even a seasoned Chinaman developer like Lim Kang Hoo needs help to pull something like this off. This is where his puppet, JCorp Chairman and Menteri Besar Johor Abdul Ghani Othman comes in along with Ghani's cronies, including:

Dato' Ahmad Zaki Zahid, former member of Pak Lah's 'Fourth Floor Boys' and former JCorp man, current Ketua Pemuda UMNO Putrajaya and EXCO Pemuda UMNO. To no one's surprise, he has been appointed MD of Triple Platform Sdn. Bhd.

Wan Ahmad Firdaus Wan Ahmad Fuaad, drinking buddy and fellow BOD member of JCorp with Ahmad Zaki, who has since quit JCorp to join JP Morgan. To no one's surprise again, JP Morgan was the appointed advisor for this deal. To hell with any conflict of interests.

http://i893.photobucket.com/albums/ac131/admin-s/3stooges.jpg

Ghani, Zaki and Fridaus a.k.a. Lim Kang Hoo's Three Stooges – What's with the red baju and ties? Nak mintak Lim Kang Hoo kasi angpau ke?

 

My parents are born and bred Johoreans and they are old-school UMNO members. They worked very hard to send me to Australia for an education with the hope that one day I can contribute to our beloved state, party and community. Even as I am doing my best to fulfill my parents' wishes, I will not stand idly by while a Sabahan Chinaman, aided by 3 traitorous Malays, waltzes into JB and grabs our rightful Malay heritage land and forcing the locals to be displaced put into little flats for his convenience to steal our billions.

I thought UMNO is supposed to defend our Bumiputra rights. UMNO is not doing this but instead is helping a Chinaman rape our Malay assets. What happened to Janji Ditepati, Satu Malaysia and the New Economic Policy (NEP)? Has it become Janji Dilepasi, Sapu Malaysia and the Never Ending Penipu?

 

 

 

 

Letter from the Institute of Engineers, Malaysia

Posted: 27 Feb 2013 10:27 PM PST

LIFTS ARE DESIGNED TO BE "FAIL-SAFE"

-  Highlighting the basic safety features of lifts

We refer to the news reports on 20th February 2013 whereby a woman was killed when a lift plunged five floors after its cable snapped in a 10-storey apartment block at the Lumut naval base in Perak.

It is shocking to note that yet another public facility failed to function and killed a woman passenger. We should be thankful the lift was not fully occupied. The loss of a single life is horrible enough. The question that begs to be asked is why did this incident happen? Could we have taken necessary precaution to ensure such incidents do not occur?

The answer is a resounding yes and hinges on a good and committed maintenance programme. For centuries lifts have proven to be effective vertical transportation systems and as engineers we can attest to this.  We also know poor maintenance and even negligence can result in mishaps but we do have preventive measures that can save lives.

Let us take a closer look at the safety features of a lift. Each lift has a minimum of five hoisting cables and in the event one cable snaps the remainder four would ensure safe travel in the lift. So why did all five cables give way simultaneously? This wire rope must be properly installed, aligned and calibrated by an experienced technician to function effectively. Even with the snapped hoisting ropes the free falling lift car would be stopped by the mechanical brakes on the main guide rails as the last line of defence before it slammed on the buffer in the pit. What is baffling is how all these safety features failed to work.

The mechanical and material specialists will be able to give their professional and analytical views on this impulse force which was so powerful that all strands of wire rope failed instantly and all at the same time.

We can definitely speculate that poor maintenance or even no maintenance could be the cause for this incident. The persons assigned to conduct regular maintenance work should provide a definitive explanation on the level of maintenance that has been carried out. The question is whether the quality of maintenance service provided was below par.  Were skilled technicians assigned to carry out maintenance works? Were genuine spare parts used? If the answers are NO, it is only right that the appropriate action in accordance with the relevant regulations be taken against the maintenance supplier.

We also believe that that Department of Occupational Safety and Health (DOSH) should do their part to ensure that only authorised lift vendors are registered as maintenance companies to perform maintenance. We further urge the regulatory agency to oversee all such maintenance companies to ensure only competent and qualified individuals are appointed to carry out all maintenance work and to certify the work done at the site.

We understand that there is a shortage of competent and qualified persons specialising in lift installation and maintenance work. We strongly recommend for DOSH to certify more of such persons under a National Occupational Skill Standard (NOSS).

The IEM hopes that proper investigations will be carried out to determine the cause of the mishap.  If there is a need, the IEM will be pleased to offer its services.  

 

Ir. Prof. Dr Jeffrey Chiang Choong Luin

Honorary Secretary

THE INSTITUTION OF ENGINEERS, MALAYSIA

 

Pakatan’s manifesto: Populist or Reformist?

Posted: 27 Feb 2013 03:58 PM PST

However the manifesto is silent on how it is going to achieve its promises. It does not explain how this nation is going to be able to afford some new subsidies, grants, freebies and payouts. The coalition left details on revenue streams aside.

FMT LETTER: From Koo Kay Peng, via e-mail

Pakatan Rakyat's manifesto contains a lot of promises, goodies and freebies. It is not difficult to mistake as the latest budget. For a start, the coalition promises every Malaysian family a monthly take-home household income of at least RM4,000.

It sounds like almost Utopia and the nation's coffer is bottomless. It promises payment as small as RM50 per month to more significant allocation of RM2 billion to fund minimum wage.

However the manifesto is silent on how it is going to achieve its promises. It does not explain how this nation is going to be able to afford some new subsidies, grants, freebies and payouts. The coalition left details on revenue streams aside.

However, the manifesto is definitely a political document. It is designed to please housewives, undergraduates, civil servants, retired armed forces members and Felda settlers who are considered important constituents in the next GE.

Sabah and Sarawak appear clear winners too with promises of 20% share of oil royalty, pan-Borneo railways and better infrastructures. It offers protection of Orang Asli land rights and assistance.

However, it is going to be a bad news for big conglomerates. The manifesto has proposed an anti-monopoly law to curb and break up monopolies. Another question beckons, how are smaller companies going to be able to compete with larger foreign companies regionally?

The manifesto has failed to identify reforms needed in way the federal government conducts its business. Firstly, the federal government has to manage its on-going deficit. This country cannot continue spending beyond its means and expect money to drop from the sky. A cursory look at the PR manifesto does not suggest that they have a strategy in place to cut budget deficit.

Second, the manifesto touches very little about reforms and restructuring. It takes an antidote that money is the solution to all woes. This approach may not be too different compared to what PM Najib has done over the last 5 years.

As a result, both coalitions may end up trying to prove who is a better Santa Claus.

Let's look at some of the details:

1 Malaysian Women's Contribution Fund

PR intends to make legally compulsory for husbands to contribute between RM10-100. Government to provide RM50 per month for wives. It sounds great but RM10-100 is a tad too small a sum to even help pay anything. What about working couples? What about couples who are business partners? How does the government intend to enforce the contribution?

If the coalition wants to please housewives and full time moms, it should stick back to what it has preached – being need based. It should focus on single moms, health care for underprivileged women, capacity building and equal opportunities for all women. Inequality for women in some faiths should also be addressed to ensure that their rights are protected.

2 Senior Citizens' Bonus Scheme

Again, the coalition is exposing its populist tendency. Each senior citizen aged 60 and above will receive a bonus worth RM1,000 each year to help ease their financial burdens. Private sector retirement age has been raised to 60 years old. Not all of those who are 60 and above are going to need the assistance.

However, there are many who might need more than just RM1,000 a year to survive. The coalition should stick back to its old adage – focus on needs and not blanket welfare. A retired CEO, who has millions in his bank accounts, does not deserve the RM1,000. Meanwhile, those who really need assistance might also need a shelter, food, nursing care, healthcare and others. It would be better for PR to focus on providing a decent and dignified retirement to the deserving senior citizens.

3 Economic Policy

3.1 Monthly household take-home income of RM4,000

It would require the coalition to double our GDP per capita of almost RM22,000 to RM48,000 (assuming that there's a breadwinner per household). Doubling our GDP per capita is desirable but as easy as it sounds. It takes a systematic overhaul of the economy to ensure that better remuneration commensurates with better productivity and higher value of production. What is PR's strategy? Doubling of GDP per capita through subsidy or cash handout is not sustainable.

3.2 Add 1 million new jobs

Malaysians are no longer working in industries such as plantations, the construction sector and the service industry. Pakatan Rakyat will introduce a comprehensive package to ensure one million new job opportunities for Malaysians in these sectors by progressive reduction of one million foreign workers within five years of Pakatan Rakyat rule.

It is erroneous to assume that Malaysians are ready to fill up the vacancies vacated by the one million foreign workers. It is false to assume that local employers will be ready to replace these foreign workers with local ones. Granted, new jobs will have to be created but most of our foreign workers are low-to-semi skilled. We need to create higher value jobs for our workers and growing number of unemployed graduates. This can only be achieved with a total overhaul of our education system and our economic structure.

If the coalition reduces intake of foreign workers, a number of our local companies are just going to close shop and move on to less labour intensive industries or adopt automation. It is not going to create 1 million new jobs for Malaysians as claimed in the manifesto.

3.3 Minimum Wage of RM1,100

The Pakatan Rakyat administration will introduce a minimum wage, where every worker will be paid at least RM1,100 per month. The initial financial burden incurred by the employer in the early stages of the minimum wage implementation shall be equally borne by the government.

The Minimum Wage Implementation Facilitation Fund worth RM2 billion aims to provide automation incentives and minimum wage implementation grants to eligible companies, to ensure that the entire job market is not jeopardised by the implementation of minimum wage.

The question is why should taxpayers' money be used to help offset the financial burden incurred by employers? At present, there are already grants and subsidies available to help companies to automate and new technology adoption. MIDA has allocated RM2 billion to assist local companies. Some of these are matching grants.

It has been proven that more funds/grants do not help local companies especially SMEs to automate. A change of corporate mindset, more demanding consumers and more competitive business environment are needed to instill the survival instinct in them.

4 Education

The proposal to set up 5 technical universities and 25 vocational schools are made in the right direction. The manifesto calls for an establishment of a RCI for education reform. Honestly, we have had enough of RCI. The government needs to revamp both the education and higher education ministries so that people of calibre and quality educators are picked to manage our education system. RCIs seldom meet our expectations.

PR needs to understand that "free education" is not synonymous with "quality education". It is important to focus on quality education than free education. Its manifesto affirms that fees for higher education in all public institutions will be borne by the government.

Fees for students in private institutions will be subsidised by the government to be on par with the public institution's rate. This proposal is again problematic. There is no ceiling for fees in private institutions. Why should taxpayers' money be used to subsidized fees for students in private institutions?

PR manifesto affirms that all students in the public institutions will be provided with living cost allowance for food and lodging, books and transportation, except for those who are financially well-off.

Students in private institutions can borrow from a special fund to cover their living costs for the duration of their studies. How is this different from the PTPTN? It is just another form of PTPTN; which is probably going to end up with the same fate as the current one – not sustainable in the long run.

Most private institutions are not just offering education, they are also promoting lifestyle and consumerism. It is quite common to find designer outlets, eateries and cafes operating in their premises. Surely cost of living is higher in private institutions compared to public ones.

The coalition should focus its resources on upgrading the quality of public institutions to provide excellent education and make them the institutions of choice.

5 Social Well-Being

Pakatan Rakyat is committed to resolve the problem of traffic congestion in the Klang Valley and other major cities within 10 years of coming to power, with the aim of reducing congestion by 50% during its first term. Additional investment of RM2 billion in the first year to double the number of buses and bus routes in the Klang Valley. It is a noble promise but may be too optimistic.

The provision of public transport like buses alone does not help to reduce congestion if the government cannot change our mobility culture. Car is a social status symbol to many Malaysians. How many are willing to ditch their car and walk to the bus stop? It takes education, awareness and policy intervention to promote public transport.

RM2 billion is a lot of money but without a comprehensive policy intervention, it is money into the drain. The increased number of buses may end up contributing to more congestion!

Worse, the coalition is determine to lower the car prices to as low as RM25,000! Singapore imposes a high COE price (certificate of entitlement) for a reason – to discourage private car ownership! How can PR achieve lower congestion by making it cheaper and easier to own a car?

It proposes to abolish tolls. It sounds good for those of us who using the highways often. However, toll is used as an effective way to reduce congestion by making it expensive to drive during peak hours.

In sum, PR needs to get a bit more serious about its policy making capability to ensure that its solution to reduce congestion is well thought out and comprehensive.

It is easy to sound populist but some of these policies may end up contradicting each other and being rendered ineffective.

6 Civil Service

PR has appeared to be quite cautious in suggestion a comprehensive restructuring of the civil service. A number of PR leaders are aware of the problems faced by the civil service. It is bloated and soaking a lot of resources from the country's annual budget. But the 1.4 million strong civil service is an important vote bank for the coalition. It has to be done but do not count it on PR to announce major reforms of the civil service.

It has worded its manifesto quite diplomatically by promising to restore the prestige and honour of the civil service and to free them from undue political interference. It is left to be seen if any government of the day would willingly not impose any control and command over its civil service. Most of the top civil servants are reporting to the executives. The nexus between the government and the civil service has to be moderated by an independent check-and-balance mechanism e.g. anti-corruption agency and IPCMC.

Ironically, the PR manifesto is silent on the implementation of the IPCMC but promised an allocation of RM200 million per annum to the police force for modernisation. In summary, the PR manifesto may appeal to certain voter groups but it is hardly transformational. It does contain some heart warming promises to halt Lynas and to review the Pengerang projects but it has promises very little drastic reforms that are direly needed.

 

Pakatan's tolls policy: a polls ploy?

Posted: 27 Feb 2013 12:17 PM PST

Pakatan's highway tolls policy as announced in its Manifesto is a dishonest carrot dangled before unsuspecting voters. It is a fraud designed to trap voters into thinking that tolls will be abolished immediately. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Mohamed Tahir Ismail 

The pledge has no substance and what it promises is no different from the current practice.

 

The Manifesto reads: "The Pakatan Rakyat government will take over the highways in stages for the purpose of abolishing tolls. As promised in the Orange Book (Buku Jingga), Pakatan Rakyat will take over the highways with the intention of gradually abolishing tolls."

 

Under the existing 'build-operate-transfer' concession agreements, all highways will eventually revert to the Government at the end of the concession periods. The Government then is at liberty to abolish tolls if it so wishes. So, what Pakatan is promising is exactly what the BN government had been practising all along.

 

To hold Pakatan to its promise therefore, the people will have to wait until the expiry of the concession period which could be anything from 10 to 20 years from now!

 

So, Pakatan will not have to do anything for the next decade or two (assuming it assumes power and stays in power for that period of time).

 

Even if Pakatan wishes to abolish tolls (albeit in the far distant future), this promise is a red herring. Because, tolls are a fact of life and an accepted way of life all over the world. It is a more equitable method of taxation because it only taxes the users unlike income tax.

 

Tolls are a common practice in all countries that have privatised the construction, operation and maintenance of public infrastructure. Even decades after their operation and long after the end of concession periods, hefty highway tolls are collected in the US, Japan, UK as well as in newly-emerging economies.

 

Ha, Ha, Pakatan's tolls policy is a polls ploy!

 

Politics, Manifestos and the difference between a Sponsorship guy and a Marketing man

Posted: 27 Feb 2013 12:11 PM PST

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-6IhUTITFNB0/Tgid4ILJk3I/AAAAAAAAEB8/9hdB-GUFT8g/s1600/Zubedy.jpg 

Anas Zubedy 

 

Once I was asked to consult for a bank. 

 

The top management was to listen to a marketing plan prepared by the new Marketing Director. Within minutes I knew that this was a Sponsorship guy pretending to be a Marketer.

 

He spent the next 45 minutes showing his plan to build the Brand via sponsorship and giving away goodies to thousands and thousands of potential customers thus winning them over to the Brand.

 

Those in the meeting were non-marketing people and as such were somewhat impressed with the presentation, including the Bank's second in command – the person who employed the new Marketing Director.

 

The Second in Command (who did not agree that the MD engaged us) turned cockily towards me and asked, "Hah…Consultant, ada apa-apa nak komen ka? ".

 

I smiled and asked the new Marketing Director, "Brother, you have shown me how to spend money. Can you show me now how you are going to make them? "

 

The meeting was adjourned.

 

PR Manifesto has opened the doors wide for HINDRAF to talk to Najib

Posted: 27 Feb 2013 11:56 AM PST

http://hindraf.org/images/rubbertaper_thumb.jpg 

The HINDRAF blueprint was submitted to PR leaders who in general had agreed in 'principal' to it but it is rather surprising that they had not made a mention of it in their Election Manifesto.

Paraman Subramaniam

FELDA vs DISPLACED ESTATE WORKERS, TRANSCENDING RACIAL GROUPS?

FELDA (Federal Land Development Authority) which is one of the world's largest association of plantation owners and managers, covering over 2 million acres of rubber and palm oil plantation estate and having more than 115k families which some believe consists of more than 98% Malays/Muslims, is doing extremely well. Recently it was announced that as of Dec 2012, 112,635 FELDA settlers will receive a dividend of almost RM 1k.

Not only FELDA settlers are provided the best of facilities and technology to maintain and increase the productivity of their lands, they are also provided with an admirable support system in terms of facilities, healthcare, housing, education for their children and much more. Looking at it macroscopically, FELDA through federal aid provides 'cradle to grave' assistance to these settlers in their everyday needs.

In terms of education, facilities available like community rehabilitation centres, family literation centres, Permata, Semai Bakti Hostel, FELDA Tuition Schemes and Science Learning Centres, is truly remarkable. Children from age one onwards can be enrolled. Tuition for students in standards 5 and 6 and forms 3 and 5 numbering close to 59k are provided to assist them to get good grades for the government exams like UPSR,PMR and SPM.

370 schools which consist of 100 secondary schools and 270 primary schools have been provided for the convenience of FELDA settler's children.

Subsequently the government provides certificate courses (6 to 24 months), diploma courses (2 1/2 to 3 years) and major courses like Licensed Aircraft Maintenance Engineer (LAME), Trainees Junior Technician (TJT), cadet pilot etc.

FELDA scholars also get to enroll in top varsities of the world.

With just a minimum grade of at least 2A's in the SPM examination, they may be able to get scholarships from FELDA/PSD/MARA/Petronas to do degree courses in medicine, dentistry, actuary, computer science, engineering and accounting.

FELDA management also has started the FELDA Entrepreneurship Incentive Scheme (SIUF) whereby the younger generation of FELDA settlers are encouraged to get involved in non-farm activities such as processing or manufacturing poultry, seafood, fruits or vegetable businesses so that they can become future leaders and entrepreneurs. Some of these settlers claim they lead a very comfortable life, earning more than RM 5 k salaries per month which is even more than what junior doctors and lawyers earn in the govt.

In terms of housing, hundreds of millions of ringgit has been earmarked under the FELDA Family Housing Scheme (PWF), with its aim to provide the new generation of settlers a chance to own affordable and comfortable homes costing around RM 35-42k for a 3 room unit, where loans are easily available. 

Even with all these existing benefits, the PR Election Manifesto sees the need for 'Justice for Felda Settlers'. It goes on to state that PR will defend the dignity, performance and reputation of FELDA to ensure the economic position and land ownership of the settlers. PR will also review all compensation claims as a result of the Grade Extraction Rate (GER) and pay compensation to affected FELDA settlers. 

The HINDRAF blueprint which is based on social justice as the foundation, had proposed specific pointed and targeted program of rehabilitation measures to a specific group of community, Displaced Estate Workers (DEW),

An independent study from the Centre for Policy Studies concluded in 2000, that 600,000 estate workers had been forcibly displaced. This massive forced displacement is a direct result of state development programs operating in the milieu of Institutional Racism. It is the spurious outcome of the Malaysian socio-economic political system. That number of DEW is estimated to be more than 800,000 today. In being displaced, these estate workers lost everything from their jobs, homes, schools, communities, temples, social system, and opportunity for ancillary income. They now constitute a significant section of the urban poor. It is no wonder that the DEW who constitute the poorest section of the Indian community primarily, have the lowest demographic index in the country.

The measures advocated in the HINDRAF blueprint are: 1) DEW Land allocated farming program 2) DEW Housing Program 3) Rebuilding the DEW youth through retraining and reskilling 4) DEW places of worship and burial grounds.

The HINDRAF blueprint was submitted to PR leaders who in general had agreed in 'principal' to it but it is rather surprising that they had not made a mention of it in their Election Manifesto. It is even more distressing to note that PR can openly support the multi billion ringgit existing Felda settlers program for more assistance but cannot even begin a DEW program from scratch for the needier marginalized Indians. How could one accept that the PR Election manifesto transcends racial groups whereas in the DEW issue it very clearly does not?

 

Picture worth thousands of votes?

Posted: 27 Feb 2013 11:54 AM PST

http://www.mole.my/sites/default/files/images/IMG_8269.storyimage.JPG 

They say a picture is worth a thousand words.  Yes, this picture speaks for itself. In fact, it speaks volumes about the lack of adequate political representation in Pakatan Rakyat. Not only is this picture worth a thousand words, it is also worth thousands of votes. Thousands and thousands of votes, but not for Pakatan.  The votes will go to BN.
P.M. Sivalingam 

Why? These will be the protest votes by groups which have been marginalised by Pakatan.

For starters, the Indian community will not give Pakatan its vote. Why? Look at the picture again.  How many Indians do you see? This photo was taken during the recent Pakatan Rakyat Convention in Shah Alam.

Also, where are the natives of Sabah and Sarawak? Pakatan comprises three political parties while in the Barisan there are 13, representing all nationalities in the peninsular, Sabah and Sarawak. 

But the most glaring of all is the absence of Indians, despite Pakatan's claim to look after the interests of the Indian community. 

Surely Indians will teach Pakatan a lesson they will never forget, come GE-13. Having ridden on their backs to clinch crucial electoral gains in GE-12, Pakatan has effectively ditched Indians, as dramatically seen during the Kampung Buah Pala episode in 2009. 

Said an observer at the Pakatan convention: "Pakatan's slogan was Bersihkan Malaysia, and they are using the Indians as the broom. This is the ultimate insult". 

When asked why Indians were left out in the Pakatan Manifesto, Anwar Ibrahim offered a feeble response: He said their manifesto 'transcends racial groups'. How then does he explain the specific references to Orang Asli?  In that document, there are no less than nine references to Orang Asli but only one reference to Indians. 

Anwar is a master at deflecting questions by changing the subject. When pressed for an answer, he said Tamil and Chinese schools, along with mission schools, would be assisted. Hullo, what do you think the BN government, and before that, the Alliance, has been doing these past 55 years? 

Again he was quoted as saying: "This is the manifesto of the rakyat where we address issues of rising prices, commodities, lodging, good governance and support for all types of schools."  Hullo again, what do you think the BN government, and before that, the Alliance, has been doing these past 55 years? 

Then, typically, Anwar throws in the red herring: "I met leaders of the Indian community last night in Hulu Selangor and generally, they are very receptive as education is a major problem, issues of marginalisation of the community and crime had been raised," he said. How does this tie in with the question of ignoring Indians in the manifesto? 

The rainbow does not have enough colours for this chameleon that is now facing the toughest challenge of his political career.  And that challenge comes, not from outside, but from within the opposition coalition. 

Ever since his ouster from the Barisan Government in 1998, Anwar has been single-minded about his plans to Occupy Putrajaya.  With that aim, he cobbled together a coalition with DAP and PAS and went to the polls in 2008. He thinks he is now perched for his final political onslaught and onwards to the coveted Premiership. 

But then comes the spoiler - PAS.  PAS leaders have openly questioned Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim's candidacy as Prime Minister should Pakatan Rakyat win. 

"PAS top leaders said it was 'haram' (illegal) for Anwar to ask for the Prime Minister's post," a PR source told an online media recently, quoting discussions at a secret meeting between PAS and PKR leaders last Sunday. 

Anwar will have to bow not only to PAS sentiments but also to political realities.  Should Pakatan win, the chances are that there will be more PAS candidates in Parliament than PKR. Obviously since the choice of Prime Minister will not come from the DAP, the contender will have to come from either PAS or PKR. With more seats than PKR, PAS will have more clout if there is a showdown. 

When push comes to shove, Anwar will surely be the loser, unless he can persuade the rainbow to display more colours in its spectrum for another chameleonic change or shed his skin in the year of the snake.

 

Removal of Defamatory Links

Posted: 26 Feb 2013 03:41 PM PST

Your news articles contains defamatory content and defamatory headings which is illegal posting under the Malaysian Penal Court. You must delete these posts because it's a very serious issue otherwise a court order will be issued against your website. Kindly take this matter seriously and remove those links as earliest.

Riswan Habib   riswanhabib@brooklinshaw.com

I would like to bring a very serious matter to your attention. There has been several links on your website against "NAJIB TUN RAZAK" Honorable Prime Minister of Malaysia. These Links are consistently harming his reputation in a negative manner. It seems to be illegally posting under the defamation act of 1957 act no. 286 under the section 7. So, terminate these links before it moves to some large legal court action. 

The defamatory links on your website are:

http://www.malaysia-today.net/mtcolumns/newscommentaries/54253-its-too-late-for-sabah-umno-bn


http://malaysia-today.net/mtcolumns/newscommentaries/40515-wikileaks-releases-cables-on-najib-and-altantuya

http://www.malaysia-today.net/mtcolumns/newscommentaries/54332-shahrizat-blows-it-for-umno-in-swak

http://www.malaysia-today.net/mtcolumns/newscommentaries/54421-deepak-wants-najib-out-muhyiddin-in

http://www.malaysia-today.net/mtcolumns/guest-columnists/54183-kpru-najib-as-the-most-indecisive-prime-minister-of-malaysia

http://malaysia-today.net/archives/archives-2012/50454-yet-another-nail-in-najibs-coffin

http://www.malaysia-today.net/mtcolumns/guest-columnists/54354-the-decline-and-fall-of-najib


Advocate Riswan Habib,
Senior Legal Advisor,
Office of The Prime Minister Main Block,
Perdana Putra Building,
Federal Government Administrative Centre,
MALAYSIA

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


The lies and deceit by the NST: sue the bastards, Rosli!

Posted: 28 Feb 2013 07:44 PM PST

The Star had to eat the humble pie by admitting that the story posted in 2007 by their editor Dato' Lourdes Charles was a fabrication and a smear campaign against Lawyer Rosli Dahlan who was then defending Dato' Ramli Yusuff who was facing a trumped up charge  by AG Gani Patail, then IGP Musa Hassan and the MACC .

Yesterday, I was pleasantly surprised to read that Dato Ramli Yusuff has finally filed a legal suit against former IGP Musa Hassan for defamation. Musa had recently surfaced to reinvent his image as a crime crusader. He wanted to be a Batman whereas we all know that he is actually a Badman, the baddest IGP Malaysia ever had.

Musa was the IGP who brought total disrepute to the Polis DiRaja Malaysia. The IGP who was linked to the underworld and who brought criminal charges against 6 junior officers because they discovered his links with the triads. The IGP who made a false anonymous blog against Deputy Minister Dato Johari Baharom in order to ward off investigations against himself. And when that failed, Musa suspended and charged the Director of CCID, Dato' Ramli Yusuff so that his underworld link, the Chinaman known as Tengku Goh can be released.

I was also pleasantly surprised to receive in my mailbox a cd. When I sat down with my wife to watch the cd, I realised it was a recording of the court proceedings that has been going on since Tuesday and ended yesterday. It was the court proceedings where Lawyer Rosli Dahlan is suing The NST, its editors and the MACC and its editors. This has been going on for three days and not a single mainstream newspaper reported it.

As I continued watching the cd, I understood why there was no news report about this trial. The evidence against the NST and the MACC was so compelling damning. It showed the NST blaming the MACC for giving them false information to publish the "RM 27 Million Cop Story" which then became the RM 27 Million Lawyer story posted on 12th October 2007. It also showed the MACC trying to exculpate itself by claiming that the story the MACC posted on their official website was actually based on the excerpt of the NST news report. Gosh! Instead of defending the case together, they were actually blaming each other!

That is what thieves and liars do.  They steal together and when they get caught, they blame each other. That was the comical scene you can watch in this cd and more, of how the lawyers for the NST and the MACC fumbled through their way in this court case.

In this court proceeding, you see that Rosli Dahlan is represented by just one lawyer, Chetan Jethwani, while the NST have 2 lawyers from an UMNO law firm and the MACC have 4 senior government lawyers from the AG Chambers. You will see how the leader of the government team of lawyers is led by a shorty counsel, a goateed and bearded Tuan Haji Azizan, with a shrill shouting voice. You will see how disrespectful this Shorty Tuan Haji Azizan behaved towards Rosli's counsel and witnesses.

You will see how badly Shorty Tuan Haji Azizan's spoken English is that one shudders to think how worse is  his written English. With such bad English, it is no wonder why the AGC loses cases badly. But it is more worrisome to think that because of such bad English, these government lawyers may not have understood what they read in the law books and the statutes. Could they have misunderstood who is the good guy and who is the bad guy?

Was that why they brutally arrested Lawyer Rosli Dahlan who was just needed as a witness in this case but did not arrest Tan Sri Tajudin Ramli in the MAS case when Rosli was acting for MAS to recover the multi-billion  losses caused by Tajudin to MAS? Was that why they kept Rosli under continued detention in the MACC dungeon in this case but were so eager to release that criminal Tengku Goh from Restricted Residence exile?

There was also the comical scene of Shorty Tuan Hj Azizan scolding Rosli's witness, Dato Hj Hasanudin who is the Chairman of Masjid AlGhufran. Shorty Tuan Hj Azizan's English was so bad that he can't even be understood in his scolding. Usually, scolding or shouting expletives in English is so easy to do. I find it easier to F…someone in English than in Malay, if you know what I mean.

Shorty Tuan Hj Azizan was also very rude to another witness, Amir Hussin, who was merely telling his version of things which was not to Shorty's liking. It was gratifying that in one part, witness Amir Hussin testified that while he initially believed The NST and the other mainstream newspapers, he began to distrust their reports after reading Din Merican's Blog which presented facts and news in a more balanced way. Hearing this from a witness in a court proceeding is very motivating that my writings have achieved its purpose – the promotion of truth and justice.

READ MORE HERE

 

Penang's RM8 Billion Road & Underwater Tunnel Project is A Symptom of Dap-PR Inability to ...

Posted: 28 Feb 2013 07:41 PM PST

The project consists of a 6.5km Gurney Drive-Bagan Ajam undersea tunnel, a 4.2km Gurney Drive-Lebuhraya Tun Dr Lim Chong Eu bypass, a 4.6km Lebuhraya Tun Dr Lim Chong Eu-Bandar Baru Air Itam bypass and a 12km road connecting Tanjung Bungah and Teluk Bahang.

Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng said the construction company would be given 44.51ha of reclaimed land in Tanjung Pinang in phases.

One of the four conditions set by the state government is that the concession period for the third link will only be for 30 years and the toll charges must be similar to the second Penang bridge.

It is difficult to understand why the state government is insisting on going ahead with these projects although a number of parties have voiced their reservation that this is not a long term solution to solve congestion problem in Penang.

There are a whopping 2.4 million cars in Penang. More than 110,000 new cars are being registered annually in Penang. The construction of more highways are not going to contribute towards a gradual reduction of private cars and vehicles on the road. 


Lim's road and tunnel projects have created a dilemma for the Pakatan Rakyat. On one hand, the coalition is proposing to increase the number of public buses through a RM2 billion allocation. One the other hand, the Penang state government has approved road and tunnel projects worth a record high of RM8 billion to a vendor. There is definite a policy inconsistency. 

There are several serious issues with the award:

1. It appears that these projects have been awarded way before the launch of the Penang Paradigm. For something so significant, the state government should have incorporated these projects within the framework of the Penang Paradigm and allow the residents/stakeholders to evaluate and ponder over these projects. It is unfortunate that the government has chosen to award the project while the Penang Paradigm has just been released for public consultation. 

2. The state government should not have awarded the project until at least a new mandate has been given to them in the upcoming GE. Any government rushing through such significant public projects so near to a GE is unfair and unscrupulous. The next GE should be used as a referendum for these projects. Hence, it is prudent for the current state government to defer and retract its award announcement until after the GE.

3. The mode of payment/compensation to the vendor is most controversial. The state government is giving 4,791,016.5 acres of reclaimed land in Tanjung Pinang in phases to the developer. There are two major issues of using land to swap for infrastructure projects. Firstly, land is a scarce commodity in Penang especially on the island. The public can expect only expensive developments will be launched on the land. Rising property prices are going to make home ownership issue even more chronic and severe in the future. Second, infrastructures depreciate but land will appreciate over time. Hence, the state could be paying escalating future prices/costs for the projects.

4. Penang CM Lim Guan Eng said that the infrastructure project is estimated to cost less than RM8 billion. Hence, is the state paying a fair price for it? At present value, the land is expected to fetch over RM2.5 billion (RM520 per sq. ft.) and could escalate up to RM5 billion over the next 3-5 years. Some properties in the Tanjung Pinang area are already selling above RM1,000 per sq. ft. 

The state is giving a 30-year concession period to the developer for the third link (the Bagan Ajam-Gurney Drive underwater tunnel). Based on a rough calculation (100,000 vehicles average a day x 30 years x RM8 - without factoring in any increase in toll charges), the developer is expected to rake in RM8,760,000,000 or RM8.76 billion. 

Eventually, the estimated gross development value (GDV) of the Tanjung Pinang land could be well over RM50,000,000,000 or RM50 billion. 

In sum, for infrastructure projects worth less than RM8 billion the developer could end up raking in more than RM58.76 billion in revenue. 

It is crystal clear that using land swap, especially prime land, as a mode of payment for infrastructure projects is untenable and a bad financing option. 

5. The state government has not been able to provide any convincing evidence that these expensive projects could help solve Penang's traffic congestion problem in the long run. The reason is simple. Building more highways, roads or tunnels are not going to help solve our congestion problem. It can only be solved through prudent policy intervention to reduce the number of private cars and vehicles on the road. 

Sadly, the PR coalition - both at the federal and state levels - does not have a viable solution. The Penang state government's decision to build these expensive highways and underwater tunnel is not only going to burden the people financially but it is going to create deep social repercussion for the state too. If the number of new cars registration does not go down, it does not take us long to render these new highways helpless against congestion. Additional new cars every year is going to choke off these highways and render the secondary roads inaccessible.

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Wan Azizah tidak bertanding PRU13

Posted: 26 Feb 2013 01:49 PM PST

Perkara ini disahkan oleh Timbalannya, Azmin Ali walaupun mengakui wujud permintaan dan sokongan penuh akar umbi dan pimpinan tertinggi parti yang mahu Wan Azizah bertanding semula.

"Beliau dah buat keputusan. Terpulang kepada tuan empunya badan. Kita tak boleh nak paksa," katanya.

Berikutan itu, menurut Azmin nama Wan Azizah tidak disenarai sebagai calon PRU 13 dan menghormati hasrat bekas ahli parlimen Permatang Pauh itu yang mahu fokus kepada tanggungjawab sebagai Presiden parti.

"Jawatankuasa PKR Pusat akur dengan keputusan itu," katanya.

Wan Azizah yang juga bekas ketua pembangkang pertama kali terjun bertanding di kerusi parlimen Permatang Pauh pada tahun 1999 dan berjaya mempertahankannya selama tiga penggal berturut-turut.

Beliau kemudiannya melepaskan kerusi itu bagi memberi laluan kepada suaminya, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim bagi mengukuhkan kedudukan pembangkang di Parlimen dan juga dalam arena politik negara untuk menentang Barisan Nasional (BN).

Tindakan itu menyebabkan beliau dilarang daripada bertanding semula di kerusi parlimen, namun tidak menyekatnya daripada bertanding merebut kerusi Dewan Undangan Negeri (DUN).

READ MORE HERE

 

Anwar Anggap Siapa Calon PM Bukan Isu Besar

Posted: 26 Feb 2013 11:18 AM PST

Ketua Pembangkang, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim menegaskan siapa juga calon Perdana Menteri Malaysia bukan satu isu besar bagi Pakatan Rakyat (PR) sekiranya mereka berjaya membentuk kerajaan pada Pilihan Raya Umum ke-13(PRU-13) nanti.

Beliau berkata, pada PRU 2008 PR tidak pernah mengumumkan siapakah yang bakal menjadi menteri besar Selangor dan ketua menteri Pulau Pinang dalam manifesto mereka.

"Ia (isu siapa perdana menteri) bukan satu isu. Kami mahu memfokuskan tumpuan kepada agenda untuk membangunkan negara dan meningkatkan taraf hidup rakyat.

"Dalam manifesto Barisan Nasional (BN) pun mereka tidak ada umum siapa akan jadi perdana menteri sekiranya menang, kenapa PR perlu buat demikian," katanya kepada pemberita pada sidang media di ibu pejabat Parti Keadilan Rakyat, Selasa.

Beliau berkata demikian sebagai mengulas kenyataan Setiausaha Agung DAP, Lim Guan Eng pada Konvensyen PR yang berjanji Anwar akan dilantik sebagai perdana menteri sekiranya PR berjaya menawan Putrajaya.

Bagaimanapun, beberapa pemimpin kanan PR yang ditemui mengambil sikap mengunci mulut ketika diminta mengulas isu tersebut.

Mengulas lanjut, Anwar berkata beliau juga tidak ada masalah sekiranya tidak angkat sebagai Perdana Menteri kerana tujuan Konvensyen PR diadakan pada Isnin adalah untuk menerangkan mengenai polisi bersama dan manifesto PRU mereka.

"Perpaduan bersama lebih utama, kita bergerak sebagai satu pasukan," katanya.

Dalam perkembangan berkaitan, Anwar berkata manifesto PR yang diumumkan diyakini mampu memberikan kesejahteraan kepada rakyat.

"Kita yakin dapat memberikan apa yang kita janji dalam manifesto kita. Dengan pendapatan yang diumumkan oleh kerajaan Pusat, kita telah buat pengiraan.

"Apabila kita ambil alih ketirisan dan rasuah dalam ekonomi negara dapat dikurangkan dan sebanyak RM20 bilion dapat dijimatkan dengan penjimatan itu kita dapat berikan apa yang telah kita janjikan kepada rakyat," katanya ketika mengulas mengenai komen beberapa pemimpin Barisan Nasional (BN) yang menyifatkan manifesto PR sebagai populis, tidak terpeinci serta mustahil untuk dilaksanakan.

Mereka turut mencabar pembangkang agar mendedahkan kaedah perlaksanaan manifesto mereka, serta mengingatkan pengundi bahawa banyak janji pembangkang pada pilihan raya 2008 gagal dilaksanakan.

Antara manifesto pembangkang ialah untuk meningkatkan pendapatan isi rumah minimum sebanyak RM4,000 dalam tahun pertama selepas berkuasa, mengeluarkan sejuta pekerja asing dalam tempoh lima tahun, menaikkan gaji minimum kepada RM1,100 dan menghentikan loji nadir bumi Lynas di Gebeng.

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved