Isnin, 5 Disember 2011

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


M’sia-Qatar agree on RM6 billion investment fund

Posted: 04 Dec 2011 07:02 PM PST

(Bernama) - PUTRAJAYA: Malaysia and Qatar today agreed to work together to set up a RM6.3 billion Malaysia-Qatar fund, Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak said.

He said both countries agreed that the fund would help increase bilateral cooperation and investment.

"We both agreed that each country would set aside US$1 billion to begin with and look for investment opportunities in Malaysia, Qatar and also within the whole region," he said at a joint press conference with Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Hamad Jassim Jabr Al Thani here today.

Sheikh Hamad is on a three-day working visit to Malaysia, starting today.

Najib said both countries would be working out the details on the fund, including other general areas.

He also said both countries were confident the volume of total trade and the range of products sold would be further increased.

"Total trade between Malaysia and Qatar increased by almost 200 percent reaching RM3.3 billion for the first nine months of this year," he said.

Najib said Sheikh Hamad has responded positively to a request made by Petronas to buy natural gas from Qatar.

On when Malaysia would buy gas from Qatar, he said, the country was looking at Petronas' requirement and would disclose details later.

"As you know, we are in the midst of building the offshore gas terminal that will be ready in July next year. So, once the terminal is ready, there will be a requirement for more import of natural gas," he said.

Najib said they also discussed the involvement of Qataris in the development of Sungai Besi land, where the masterplan was being work out by 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB).

He said investment opportunities in the Iskandar region in Johor was also discussed.

Bernama

Police ready to face national polls

Posted: 04 Dec 2011 07:00 PM PST

(Bernama) - KUALA LUMPUR: The federal police logistics department is all geared up to face the 13th general election which is expected to be held in the near future.

The Bukit Aman director of logistics department Zulkifli Abdullah said the department was discussing with the Home Ministry to determine the equipment and adequate funds required to face the election.

"The Logistics Department and the other departments have also discussed among themselves the requirements for the general election. We have always been ready and waiting for the right signal when it (general election) will be held," he said.

He said this after the Logistics Department Assembly and Presentation of Excellent Service Awards 2010 to 110 police officers and other ranks as well as civilian staff at Bukit Aman, here, today.

When asked on the distribution of the budget allocated to the Police Logistics Department in the 2012 Budget tabled in Parliament by the Prime Minister, he declined comment except to say that new equipment would be obtained in June next year at the latest.

He said the department received RM2.8 million from the 2012 development allocation to provide a store for the Narcotics Department.

Earlier, Zulkifli said five reslutions had been acepted by the department at the conference of police chiefs recently.

"The five resolutions that must be understood by every member of the Logistics Department are the management of acquisitions for the modernisation of the Royal Malaysian Police (PDRM) and strengthening of investigations; to ensure that basic 'Head to Toe' equipment were provided based on the quality and time specified; diligent spending by emphasising value for money and avoiding wastage.

"In addition, we must ensure standard acquisition based on the best practice and adherence to all regulations and financial procedures and to determine the logistical requirements to face the 13th general election," he added.

-Bernama

Najib: Malay future at risk under Pakatan

Posted: 04 Dec 2011 06:57 PM PST

By Shannon Teoh, The Malaysian Insider

SHAH ALAM, Dec 5 — Datuk Seri Najib Razak warned today the future of Malays would be in doubt if his ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) does not remain in power after a general election expected soon.

After presiding over an Umno general assembly last weekend that saw delegates and leaders accusing Pakatan Rakyat (PR) of being anti-Malay and Islam, the prime minister today told a Malay NGO that claims a membership of over two million that their "responsibility is to defend the current government."

"The alternative choice, are they better than what is already in place? Can they guarantee our power is not dissolved or our position eroded? What about the dignity of Islam and Malays?

"We will not allow our people to be insulted. We will not back down by even an inch. We are warriors," he said to cheers at Pertubuhan Kebajikan dan Dakwah Islamiah Malaysia's (Pekida) gathering here before leading cries of "Hidup Melayu (long live the Malays)!"

Umno had sounded the alarm last weekend, warning that only BN will ensure that Islam remains an important aspect within the government administration.

Party delegates had cited events such as claimed proselytisation of Muslims since Election 2008, when PR took power in five states, as proof that the faith among Malays would be in jeopardy.

Najib said today if the Umno-led BN lost power, "all our ambitions will be buried and our future will be full of darkness."

"What will happen to Muslims if the government changes? What will happen to Islam if we lose our strength?

 

READ MORE HERE.

Wikileaks: Anwar said he would be PM or jailed

Posted: 04 Dec 2011 04:12 PM PST

(The Malay Mail) - Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim had two options when faced with sodomy charges three years ago, according to diplomatic transcripts revealed by whistleblower site Wikileaks on  Saturday.

He would either become "prime minister or end up in jail" in face of government attempts to use the charges to derail his political challenge when speaking to 40 diplomats assembled at the Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) headquarters on July 22, 2008, according to transcripts of US ambassador to Malaysia James R. Keith.

However, the cables quoted him as saying: "This time I'm not going to jail."

Anwar claimed he had new information that revealed his accuser, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan's, extensive contacts with senior police officers prior to the alleged sodomy incident, as well as a medical report that found no evidence of sodomy on the accuser's body.

Nevertheless, Anwar and his lawyer anticipated prosecutors would soon file formal charges.

"I would quickly announce my decision to run in by-election so as to become a member of Parliament by September. My entry into Parliament was 'critical' as a condition for those MPs who have agreed to defect to the Opposition," he said.

Anwar singled out the US for its concern and looked to the European Union (EU) to take a similar stand while urging other countries to at least raise privately their human rights concerns with Malaysian leaders.

In the 90-minute presentation, Anwar laid out a general proposition that, given political conditions in Malaysia, he would either become Prime Minister or go to jail.

He went through in detail the sodomy allegations and claimed political manipulation, drawing ready comparisons with his earlier prosecution for corruption and sodomy in 1998.

He also told the foreign diplomats of his accuser's links to the top leadership and the police, and made accusations of evidential tampering, hence, explaining his reluctance to provide DNA samples.

Anwar said he had forgiven those who acted against him in the 1998 corruption and sodomy cases.

On foreign affairs, Anwar said he would seek to maintain strong relations with the US and EU, while also pursuing close ties to all countries, including "Iran and Sudan". He expressed his strong objection to the US "occupation of Iraq'', while recognising the atrocities of Saddam Hussein.

The cable concludes: "It does seem that Anwar has put on a brave, defiant face on the current situation for his first gathering before diplomats since he returned to active political life in late 2006.

"However, there are only two possible outcomes, under current circumstances, it is far more likely that Anwar finds himself behind bars rather than sitting in the Prime Minister's office."

 

Register and vote or don’t complain, says MCCBCHST

Posted: 04 Dec 2011 03:44 PM PST

(The Malaysian Insider) - If you do not register and vote in the election, you have "no right" to complain about unfavourable government decisions, the Malaysian Consultative Council of Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Sikhism and Taoism (MCCBCHST) said today.

The non-Muslim inter-faith body added a person's failure to participate in the election was tantamount to saying he or she does not care about how the country is run.

"If you don't care, what gives you the right to complain when something happens that you don't like?" MCCBCHST president Daozhang Tan Hoe Chieow said today in a press conference.

He said in Election 2008, of the 15 million eligible voters in Malaysia, only eight million turned up to cast their voters. A total of 11 million were registered voters.

"Seven million (voters) were missing in action," he said.

Tan said the council plans to embark on a nationwide voter registration drive on Sunday, December 11, at places of worship in 11 states and one Federal Territory.

"Just from the statistics, we know there are 4.384 million eligible voters who are not registered.

"We hope we can choose a government that is clean and transparent and people-centric, a government that can continue this prosperity, stability and harmony," he said.

Tan denied the council's registration drive was politically-driven, saying that as a non-governmental organisation it was duty-bound to ensure voters are registered.

"This is non-political. It is more about awareness," he said.

READ MORE HERE

 

Perkasa wants MCA to retract hudud ‘slur’ or face polls wrath

Posted: 04 Dec 2011 03:41 PM PST

(The Malaysian Insider) - Perkasa will "teach MCA a lesson" in the general election if the party does not retract its remarks on hudud, Syed Hassan Syed Ali has said.

The Perkasa secretary-general charged that MCA president Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek was rude and clueless about hudud when he claimed that implementing it would bring about destruction of the country's economy.

Dr Chua (picture) had predicted investors would flee Malaysia if hudud was made federal law because hudud was not fair to all, in particular women, and also prescribed cruel punishments for crimes contrary to international convention.

In response, Syed Hassan said Umno needed to advise the MCA president to "watch his mouth."

"Soi Lek also said it is hard to attract investors because of Malaysia's poor human rights records and of cruel punishments, this will also make investors flee," the Perkasa leader said in a statement.

READ MORE HERE

 

Umno leader linked to Alstom bribery scandal, says Singapore daily

Posted: 04 Dec 2011 03:36 PM PST

Already on the backfoot over a national cattle farming scandal, Umno is now rocked by allegations that a former leader took kickbacks from French engineering giant Alstom for a power plant project in Perlis.

Singapore's Straits Times (ST) reported today that Malaysia's Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) officials raided last week the offices of Teknologi Tenaga Perlis Consortium (TTPC), which is partly controlled by former Dewan Negara president and ex-Perlis Mentri Besar Tan Sri Abdul Hamid Pawanteh (picture).

The newspaper said the Umno veteran was directly implicated in Alstom's indictment for bribery in securing foreign contracts.

Abdul Hamid is said to have been paid 7.5 million Swiss francs (RM25.5 million) to help Alstom secure a contract to build a power plant in Perlis in the late 1990s. He was the state's mentri besar from 1986 to 1995.

The Singapore daily said both Abdul Hamid and his former business partner, Ti Chee Liang, were singled out in the criminal summons against Alstom.

According to ST, Alstom was fined €31 million (RM130 million) by the Swiss Attorney-General two weeks ago for failing to implement proper controls to prevent bribery by company executives in Malaysia, Latvia and Tunisia, an offence under Swiss law.

Alstom is a major player in Malaysia in the power business, and is credited with supplying key equipment for nearly 7.5 gigawatts of the country's installed power generation capacity, the paper added.

Citing government sources familiar with the investigations, ST reported that the MACC will be questioning local Alstom executives in the days ahead.

Last month, Alstom's Malaysian office denied it was aware of local investigation regarding the RM133 million fine by Swiss authorities involving contracts awarded to the company here.

"There is no probe ongoing in Malaysia that we are aware of and Alstom have co-operated fully in Switzerland. The fine is for corporate negligence in the past and not for bribery," Alstom Malaysia president, Saji Raghavan, said in a statement.

"In fact, investigation confirms there is no systematic bribery and sufficient controls are in place," he pointed out.

READ MORE HERE

 

Karpal hits out at DAP warlords

Posted: 04 Dec 2011 03:26 PM PST

It's the CEC, the party supreme decision-making body, which decides on candidates and seats, says the DAP national chairman.

(Free Malaysia Today) - DAP national chairman Karpal Singh today warned certain party leaders against becoming political warlords by circumventing the leadership to promise and announce seats for their cronies on their own accord.

He said that no party leader or even member has the right to bypass the party top decision-making body, the central executive committee (CEC), to allot seats for their cronies.

"No one has the authority to choose or announce candidates and seats.

"Only the top leadership has the rightful privilege to do so," Karpal, the Bukit Gelugor MP, told FMT here today.

Firing a broadside against Penang Deputy Chief Minister II P Ramasamy, Karpal stressed that the party would not hesitate to take stern disciplinary action against the "warlords".

"There is no room for warlords in DAP.

"The party never had warlords and will never entertain it in future," he said.

He was commenting on a recent vernacular newspaper article quoting Ramasamy, a CEC member, as saying that the party had decided to field three Indian women – D Kamachi, Kasturi (daughter of the late DAP stalwart P Patto) , and an unknown lawyer from Penang, Mangleswari.

Ramasamy was also quoted as saying that parliamentarians M Kulasegaran (Ipoh Barat), Charles Santiago (Klang) and M Manogaran, and assemblyman A Sivanesan (Sungkai) were virtually certain of contesting in the coming general election.

According to the article, Ramasamy, the Penang DAP deputy chief, has also claimed that he would re-contest both his Prai state and Batu Kawan federal seats.

This has irked Karpal who has repeatedly said that the DAP would field one candidate for one seat in the next polls, albeit minor exemptions to the rule.

Dismissing Ramasamy's claim that the party had given him the green light to contest both seats, Karpal said the CEC was yet to decide on party candidates and their seats for the next general election.

He also pointed out that current incumbent elected representatives do not even have the luxury to choose their seat in next polls.

He said the incumbents would even be dropped altogether if found to be incompetent.

He added that it was for the CEC to decide on candidates and their seats based on performance and winning credentials.

READ MORE HERE

 

Usno links up with Jeffrey’s UBF

Posted: 04 Dec 2011 03:23 PM PST

Jeffrey meanwhile advised the crowd not to be misled again by the sweet talk of the so-called leaders of BN and to use their vote wisely.

(Free Malaysia Today) - Leaders of the once all-powerful United Sabah National Organization or Usno which disbanded in 1990 have joined up with the United Borneo Front (UBF) in its fight to restore Sabah's rights.

Usno protem vice-president, Abdullah Sani Salleh and protem secretary-general, Arifin Abdul Salam told supporters at a recent joint-gathering with UBF at the birthplace of Usno in Kampung Tanjung Kapur, near here, that the Barisan Nasional coalition government had betrayed Sabahans.

Abdullah Sani told the large crowd of Bajau, Suluk, Sungai, Dusun, Rungus, Kagayan and other sub-ethnic groups that the state government leaders and Umno in particular have failed to safeguard and protect the rights of Sabah and Sabahans.

"Usno leaders support UBF and Jeffrey Kitingan who is fighting for Sabah. Usno supporters should support the UBF and Jeffrey to restore the rights of Sabah," Abdullah Sani told villagers in Jeffrey's presence.

"Usno will work towards the unity of all races in Sabah regardless of whether they are Bajau, Suluk, KDM, Rungus, Brunei or others to reclaim the rights of Sabah and Sabahans in Malaysia," he added.

Abdullah Sani said that land-related problems are just some of the many examples of the state government failing the people and that the ruling party and its "wakil rakyat" have victimized the villagers by alienating the land to outsiders.

"Since the state government has done little to help, Sabahans should unite to change the state government," he said.

After reminding residents that Kampung Tanjung Kapur was the birthplace of Usno in 1961 and that Usno would defend their land rights, Abdullah Sani said that Usno founder, the late Tun Mustapha Harun had never betrayed Sabah.

He said Mustapha had never alienated taken an inch of the land of villagers other than the land for his own house which still stands today.

READ MORE HERE

 

Pakatan banks on NFC, corruption index to counter Umno attacks

Posted: 04 Dec 2011 10:02 AM PST

By Yow Hong Chieh, The Malaysian Insider

Under attack from Umno at its annual congress, Pakatan Rakyat (PR) last night fell back on its administrative track record in four states to hammer home its claim that the ruling party has failed to improve the lot of Malaysians.

Making full use of the alleged financial irregularities in a national cattle farming scheme and this year's dip in Malaysia's corruption score, PR leaders hit back at Umno in a concerted show of force after enduring five days of attacks during last week's Umno general assembly.

Pulling no punches, a fiery Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim pointed out that Umno has doubly wronged the people by first misusing public funds meant for the National Feedlot Centre (NFC) and then defending Datuk Seri Shahrizat Jalil.

The Wanita Umno chief, who is also the women, family and community minister, has been dogged by controversy over her family's role in the NFC ever since the Auditor-General labelled the project in November as a "mess" for failing to meet production targets.

PKR has alleged that Shahrizat's husband, Datuk Mohamed Salleh Ismail, who runs the NFC, used a multi-million ringgit federal loan to pursue unrelated ventures — including a RM13.8 million condominium buy — as well as to fund personal expenses.

"Only those with no morals can hurl abuse (at Pakatan), can steal RM250 million... and then defend themselves.

"Their first wrong was to misuse funds, and their second was to defend their actions," Anwar told over 2,000 supporters who had gathered in the car park next to Malawati Stadium here despite the drizzle.

The PKR de facto leader was joined by other top opposition leaders, including Datuk Nik Aziz Nik Mat, Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang, Lim Kit Siang, Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim and Azmin Ali.

Also present was national laureate Datuk A. Samad Said, who emerged as a fierce critic of the Najib administration earlier this year during the Bersih 2.0 rally for electoral reform.

PAS president Abdul Hadi similarly made reference to the NFC scandal in refuting Umno's charge that the Islamist party was the DAP's stooge and the MCA's claim that the DAP was under the thumb of PAS.

"PAS diperkudakan oleh DAP. DAP diperkudakan oleh PAS... Umno diperlembukan (PAS is being ridden like a horse by DAP. DAP is being ridden by PAS... Umno is made to look the cow)," he said to raucous laughter from the partisan crowd.

"Lebih baik diperkuda daripada diperlembukan kerana kuda untuk perjuangan, lembu untuk disembelih (It's better to be ridden like a horse than to be made to look the cow as horses are for fighting, cows are for slaughter)."

PAS spiritual leader Nik Aziz had earlier turned Barisan Nasional's (BN) accusations on its head, claiming instead that Umno had abandoned true Islamic principles on the MCA's account.

"Umno is forced to reject Islam because it wants to please MCA," he said.


READ MORE HERE.

 

 

 

Bar Council, Suhakam say A-G glossed over street protest ban

Posted: 04 Dec 2011 09:59 AM PST

By Debra Chong, The Malaysian Insider

Putrajaya's speed in passing a new law that bans street demonstrations has stunned the Bar Council and the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam) who revealed they were given a far different account of its contents at the draft stage.
The two statutory bodies disclosed too that Attorney-General Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail had sought their views over the controversial Peaceful Assembly Bill but failed to provide them with written copies of the draft before its tabling in Parliament last November 22.
"The Bar Council was not given a copy of the Peaceful Assembly Bill during the consultation stage," its president Lim Chee Wee told The Malaysian Insider when contacted over the weekend.

"It was read out to us, and even then there were differences between the two versions, during consultation and what was tabled in Parliament. Notably, during consultation we were told assemblies in motion were allowed," he said.

Assemblies in motion, better known as street demonstrations, are barred under the new law to replace section 27 of the Police Act.

It is one of the most controversial aspects of the new law, which was hastened after Datuk Seri Najib Razak's government was globally panned for its harsh treatment of thousands of demonstrators in the Bersih 2.0 street rally seeking to pressure the prime minister for cleaner and more honest elections.

Lawyer Syahredzan Johan, who also attended the consultation meeting, clarified that the A-G had "glossed over" some aspects in explaining the new law.

The A-G, who prohibited street protests but told the Bar Council he was referring to "riots", created a more positive impression of the new law, said Syahredzan.

"A riot is not a peaceful assembly, so we could understand why it was prohibited," said Syahredzan, who helms the Bar's constitutional law committee.

He added his Bar Council colleagues did not push the government for a black-and-white because they were given the impression there would be further meetings held to "fine tune" the draft.

"We didn't think it would be tabled so soon. The meeting was two to three weeks; definitely less than one month before the tabling," he said.

The Bar Council, which represents some 12,000 practising lawyers in the private sector, was taken aback at the government's haste in pushing the Bill through in the Dewan Rakyat on November 29, just a week after it was tabled.

Lim, who led a lawyers' march to protest the Bill on the day it was tabled, has urged the government against bulldozing through the plan and urged the Najib administration to set up a parliamentary panel to seek further public consultation.


READ MORE HERE.

PAS, DAP answer UMNO's stooge allegation

Posted: 04 Dec 2011 09:46 AM PST

(Harakah Daily) - PAS and DAP leaders have dismissed accusations by UMNO of their parties being undermined and acting as stooge for each other, with PAS president Tuan Guru Abdul Hadi Awang telling a gathering last night that it was better to ignore the taunts.
"It's time to change, just ignore the taunting of 'PAS being used as a horse' or 'DAP being exploited by PAS.

That is still better than UMNO which is like a cow awaiting slaughter," Hadi said to applause from some 10,000 people converged at the 'Rapat Rakyat' programme in Stadium Melawati, Shah Alam.

Hadi said that PAS, together with Pakatan Rakyat partners PKR and DAP, has a common objective to achieve justice and erase racism.

"We stay together to build a stronger racial relationship which has failed under UMNO-BN's 50 yearsrule. This has been due to UMNO culture of prioritising Malays and sidelining Islam. Their struggle is to safeguard their leaders by fanning racial sentiments, not to save the country," said Hadi.

DAP advisor Lim Kit Siang meanwhile pointed out that UMNO and MCA were adjusting their racist agenda for their respective audience.

This includes UMNO telling Malay that PAS was being exploited by DAP, and MCA, namely its president Chua Soi Lek, accusing the DAP of being a PAS stooge.

"Who has lied? Najib and Muhyiddin or Chua Soi Lek?" Lim asked in a statement, and said that Chua, UMNO president Najib Razak and his deputy Muhyiddin Yassin had all lied.

No 'Big Brother' in PR

Lim stressed that Pakatan Rakyat was a coalition of equal political parties based on mutual respect and political consensus founded on common policy programmes.

"In Pakatan Rakyat, no political party plays the role of Big Brother like UMNO in Barisan Nasional – which means that Najib, Muhyiddin and Chua have all been perpetuating lies in their struggle to keep their political parties alive in the next general election," he added.

On the now familiar allegation that Malays would lose power should Pakatan Rakyat wins the next general election, Lim countered by saying, "Those who will really lose power will be UMNO and UMNO-putras."

Put loyalty pledge on paper, says Mukhriz

Posted: 04 Dec 2011 09:17 AM PST

(The Star) - JITRA: All Umno members should be made to sign a letter swearing that they will remain loyal to the party and work hard to ensure the party's candidates win in the next general election, Datuk Mukhriz Mahathir said.

The Kedah Umno deputy liaision committee chairman said he was proposing the idea following the loyalty oath by Umno delegates during the party's general assembly which ended on Saturday.

"Making the oath verbally is not enough. We need to put it on paper so that it will be legally binding. Action can be taken against them if they break the oath.

"The letter will ensure that there's no backstabbing or sabotage of party candidates," he said after opening a 1Malaysia Shop in Padang Serai here.

Asked about winnable candidates for the next election, Mukhriz, who is also Deputy International Trade and Industry Minister, said the party should not focus only on young faces as there were still senior politicians who were much loved by young voters.

"Our candidates must include professionals with a good education background and they must be willing to give their best to the people.

"There is no point having professional candidates who are not willing to work hard and be on the ground with the people," he added.

Information, Communication and Culture Minister Datuk Seri Dr Rais Yatim said winnable candidates should be those well accepted by the rakyat.

"What if a candidate is young but not acceptable to the people?

"It is important for members to close ranks at all levels and focus on achieving victory for the party," he told reporters after opening the RTM Sports Festival in Merlimau, Malacca, yesterday.

Bernama quoted International Trade and Industry Minister Datuk Seri Mustapa Mohamed as saying that leaders, especially Barisan Nasional ones, should search within themselves to see if they were still acceptable to the people.

If they felt that the people had rejected them, they should allow the leadership to choose new candidates to replace them, he told reporters after opening the Kubang Kerian Agrobank branch and the handing over of tithe to Kelantan Islamic Religious and Malay Customs Council in Kota Baru yesterday.

Umno vice-president Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi said in Bagan Datoh that about half of the candidates' winning ability would be determined by their skills in solving problems faced by their constituents.

He said the party's three vice-presidents had been tasked with monitoring constituencies facing problems and working on solving them ahead of the next election.

Ex-IGP Musa may take legal action against bloggers for slander

Posted: 04 Dec 2011 09:11 AM PST

By Sira Habibu, The Star

PETALING JAYA: Former Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Musa Hassan is thinking of taking legal action against bloggers for reports slandering him that he married an artiste in a hush-hush RM15mil wedding.

Musa, who retired last year, said he did not have that much money to splurge.

"Every time the rumour-mongers make wild accusations, it will backfire on them when the allegations are proven baseless.

"The (then called) Anti-Corruption Agency investigated me over allegations of a RM2mil bribe from the underworld and I was cleared," he said yesterday.

He added that his wife Puan Sri Juriah Ahmad was not shocked by the marriage rumours because she knew they were not true.

"She knows I did not go anywhere to marry anyone because I was with her. I have only one wife, four children and six grandchildren.

"And if I ever marry again, I will certainly not keep it a secret as a wedding is a sacred affair. It is not like committing adultery," he added.

Allegations about the "lavish wedding" between Musa and local artiste Syella Kamaruddin surfaced in the blogsphere recently with claims that the ceremony cost RM15mil, with bridal gifts that included a RM5mil bungalow and an RM800,000 Audi R8.

Syella, who did not want to reveal the identity of her husband, had reportedly said her husband did not look like Musa, adding that he was younger and sturdier.

Photographs of Syella cutting a multi-layered cake with the groom are being circulated in the blogs and were published by the Chinese media.

Musa said he taught at the Centre for Media Warfare at Universiti Teknologi Mara.

He said he had turned down several other offers, including a diplomatic posting and teaching at the Anti-Terrorism Academy in Langkawi.

"I am content with my current post as a lecturer," he said.

Radar on Middle Rocks

Posted: 04 Dec 2011 09:08 AM PST

By Marhalim Abas, The Sun

PETALING JAYA: Malaysia will build a permanent installation on Middle Rocks, which the International Court of Justice had four years ago ruled as belonging to the country.

Sources said the RM70 million project will comprise two structures – a radar station and living quarters.

The two structures will be linked by a bridge as the rocky outcrops located on the western edge of the South China Sea are 250m apart.

The permanent installation, it is said, will be bigger and more prominent than the Horsburgh lighthouse on nearby Pulau Batu Putih (Pedra Branca) which the ICJ had ruled as belonging to Singapore.

A jetty and a helipad are also planned for the rocky outcrops, which stand only one metre above sea level, about 15km southeast of Johor and 1.1km away from Batu Putih.

Sources familiar with the matter told theSun that the National Security Council is the coordinating agency for the project and the Public Works Department will oversee the construction of the two structures.

It is understood that three companies have been shortlisted for the construction project from the nine invited for the restricted tender exercise.

Once completed, the station will be manned by Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency (MMEA) personnel.

With the Middle Rocks station operational, MMEA will have 10 radars to monitor the country's sea borders.

The new radar station is expected to enhance the surveillance of the waters of Tanjung Pengerang and the Singapore Straits.

Pengerang is only 30 minutes boat ride from Batam.

Currently, MMEA relies on the radar on its patrol boats for surveillance of the busy waterway.

The MMEA is also working with Singapore's Maritime Security Task Force (MSTF) to monitor and carry out surveillance off the Pengerang waters, as Singapore also operates a radar station at the lighthouse on Batu Putih.

Both Malaysia and Singapore had previously claimed Batu Putih, Middle Rocks and South Ledge as their territory.

After long negotiations, both countries agreed to take the matter to the ICJ, which began hearings in 2007.

In 2008, in a 15-to-one ruling, the ICJ awarded Middle Rocks to Malaysia, and Batu Putih or Pedra Branca to Singapore by a 12-to-four ruling. The status of South Ledge, however, remains unresolved.

A team from the Mapping and Survey Department constructed a flag pole, five markers and a monument on Middle Rocks between June 4 and 12, 2008 shortly after the ICJ ruling.

‘Pas’ hudud too narrow and destructive’

Posted: 04 Dec 2011 08:40 AM PST

A narrow interpretation and non-Muslims will suffer

(New Straits Times) - THE effects of hudud on non-Muslims is very real, said human rights activist Prof Dr Chandra Muzaffar yesterday.

The president of the International Movement for a Just World said most countries which had adopted hudud  had failed to protect  their people and their rights.

"Not a single hudud state can be an example to us.

"Non-Muslims  will suffer should Pas implement hudud laws," he said during a forum entitled "Hudud and the Legal Implications on non-Muslims".

The forum was organised by the Institute of Strategic Analysis and Policy Research (Insap).

Also present were Insap president Tan Sri Dr Fong Chan Onn and MCA president Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek.

Dr Chandra also hit out at Pas for its narrow interpretation of hudud,  which he said did not emphasise on forgiveness and reform as stated in the al-Quran.

"The emphasis should not be on prohibitions and punishment, as Islam is about  educating and enlightening. A narrow interpretation can destroy a nation."

Another speaker, Ustaz Mohd Kamal Saidin, who is religious adviser to the Terengganu menteri besar, criticised Kelantan's hudud  guidebook.

He claimed the enactment did not follow the proper Islamic hudud guidelines, including on sodomy and rape.

He also said it would be unfair to just implement  hudud  on Muslims but not on non-Muslims, as this would create confusion.


 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Race-based ideology and Islam: The Malaysian enigma

Posted: 04 Dec 2011 10:45 PM PST

It is remarkable that some Muslim politicians in our present day differ so much from their earliest religious leaders. The contemporary racist mentality displayed by local Malay supremacists who claim to be Muslims contradicts directly against the values held so dear by earlier Islamic rulers. There is inherent inconsistency to juxtapose the interest of the 'Muslims' with that of the 'Malays' and 'Bumiputeras'.

By Joshua Woo (New Mandala)

In the recent United Malays National Organisation's (UMNO) general assembly, the "Prime Minister and Umno President Datuk Seri Najib Razak launched a Bumiputera Economic Transformation Roadmap" as a gesture to inform the Malay community that his political party will continue to advance the Malay agenda.[1]

UMNO's Deputy President Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin further affirmed this race-based ideology by saying that "it is vital" to protect "Malay political power."[2] He justified such ideology by painting the picture that the interest of the Malay race, given its demography in the country, dictates the well being of the whole nation. "[W]hen we talk about Malay interest it does not mean we are racist because the largest group in the Malaysian society whether you like it or not is still Malays, Bumiputeras and Muslims."[3]

Seeing 'Malays', 'Bumiputeras', and 'Muslims' being juxtaposed next to each other certainly stirs up curiosity as to what actually has the third group (Muslims) to do with the other two:

Does Islam teach race-based ideology or race-favouritism? Is it true that Islam requires the advancement of 'Ketuanan Melayu' (Malay Supremacy)?

It is common understanding among theologians and scholars of comparative religions that Islam promotes racial equality. One of the clearest indications of this is in the fact that Allah's Prophets consist of individuals from different races. There is no distinction made among them:

"'Say: "We believe in God and what has been revealed to us, and what was revealed to Abraham and Ishmael, and Isaac, and Jacob and [his] children, and what was given to Moses and Jesus, and what was given to [all other] prophets from their Lord. We make no difference between any of them; and to Him we submit ourselves."' (Qur'an 2:136).

Not all of these messengers are Arab, yet all are considered equally authoritative. There is simply no relevance to their prophethood whether they came from the Jewish, Arabian, or any other race.

Besides the Prophets, there are also Qur'anic teachings concerning equality of humankind:

"O people! Be careful of (your duty to) your Lord, Who created you from a single being and created its mate of the same (kind) and spread from these two, many men and women; and be careful of (your duty to) Allah, by Whom you demand one of another (your rights), and (to) the ties of relationship [the wombs]; surely Allah ever watches over you." (Qur'an 4:1)

Here, the Islamic Scripture teaches that all ethnic groups are created in the same way, and bear close ties to one another.

Reflecting on this, Abd-al'Aziz 'Abd-al-Qadir Kamil, Professor at the University of Cairo and Minister of Waqfs and Azhar Affairs of Al-Azhar University, commented that: "God […] commands us to fear two things: God and 'the wombs' (al-arham). 'The wombs' refers here to the human bond that links all men, however remote they may be from each other in space or time, and however unlike they may be in language and colour, and however much they may differ in economic or social position. We are charged to fear God's commands, and this applies first and foremost to the observation of human brotherhood on the widest scale…"[4]

At another place of the Qur'an, we find similar teaching:

"O Humankind! We have created you from male and female and have made you into peoples (shu'ub) and tribes (qaba'il) that you may know one another; truly, the noblest (akram) among you before God are the most pious (atqa) among yourselves; indeed, is God the All-knowing, the All-seeing."

(Qur'an 49:13).

Although it is commonly interpreted that this passage is talking about race, some said that it actually refers to 'tribes' and not 'race'.

Responding to this, Paul A. Hardy, who lectured on Islamic thoughts at the School of Oriental and African Studies at the Universityof London, remarked that there is no difference between tribe and race in this passage. He pointed out two early Islamic commentators—the eighth century C.E. Sufyan ath-Thawri and the tenth century C.E. Tabari—who understood this verse as reference to genealogy.[5]

In other words, this verse is indeed referring to race. It describes the creation of the various ethnic groups with their own genealogy. No race or genealogical lineage is declared superior or should be favoured than others. The only superiority is that of piety, between those who are loyal to Allah and those who are not—Not between those who are Malay and non-Malay, Bumiputeras or non-Bumiputeras.

Besides, this verse also states that the diversity of races is intended for mutual learning ("that you may know one another"). The instruction to cultivate multi-racial learning is understood by Hardy as "a motivating force for mutual love."[6] If this is followed, then this further undermines the ideology that one race is or should be more favoured than others.

Turning to the Hadith, we find in Prophet Muhammad's Farewell Sermon his conviction of racial equality:

"All mankind is from Adam and Eve, an Arab has no superiority over a non-Arab nor a non-Arab has any superiority over an Arab; also a white has no superiority over black nor a black has any superiority over white except by piety and good action."[7]

The Prophet has a deep sense of racial impartiality. Probably this is the reason why he condemned those who claim supremacy over others because of their ancestral-racial lineage:

"Allah, Most High, has removed from you the pride of the pre-Islamic period and its boasting in ancestors. One is only a pious believer or a miserable sinner. You are sons of Adam, and Adam came from dust. Let the people cease to boast about their ancestors. They are merely fuel in Jahannam [hell]; or they will certainly be of less account with Allah than the beetle which rolls dung with its nose."[8]
"Your lineage is of no account… you are all the children of Adam… the pride you take in your forefathers transgresses the teaching of your Lord… no man is superior to another save in faith and fear of God."[9]

These Hadith accounts prompted Abd-al Aziz Abd-al-Qadir Kamil to conclude that, "Islam sees mankind as a large garden, in which there are flowers of many colours, but no one colour is superior to any other;"[10] and, "The diversity of tongues and colours is simply a manifestation of divine power, and does not imply any notion of preference or privilege. On the contrary, in Islamic thought, privilege is opposed to God's commands of love and brotherhood."[11]

Commenting on the Prophet's teachings on racial equality, Zakaria El-Berry, the then Minister of State for Wakfs and Head of the Higher Council for Islamic Affairs, who was also Professor of Sharia Law at Cairo University, wrote, "In this powerful style, the Prophet, peace be on him, has destroyed all racial and other discriminatory grounds artificially claimed by selfish and conceited forces."[12]

The implication of this to the Malaysian context is obvious: the Prophet opposes all race-based ideology, including 'Ketuanan Melayu'.

Among the Hadith accounts, there was an incident where the Prophet made clear that there should not be favouritism based on racial, cultural, economic, or even familial affinity in Muslims' handling of public policy:

 "During the Prophet's lifetime, a woman of the Banu Makhzum (a noble Arab clan) stole and was due to be punished. Some of the men of Quraish thought it intolerable that judgement should be executed upon the person of a woman of Makhzum and considered who would be able to speak to the Prophet and convey the people's intercession to him. Their choice fell on Usamah ibn-Zaid, who was near to the Prophet's heart and well loved by him, because of his own and his father's rank and standing. But the Prophet rejected Usamah's mediation, and rebuked him, saying: 'Would you intercede against a punishment ordained by God?' He then stood up and addressed the people: 'Verily those that came before you were destroyed. It was their wont, if a noble man stole, to let him go free and if a weak man stole, to execute judgement upon him. By God! Were even Fatimah the daughter of Muhammad a thief, she should have her hand severed."[13]

Such was the firmness of the Prophet's sense of impartiality. Probably due to his stern stand on this issue that subsequent Muslims continued to exemplify the same deep sense of racial equality. One example is seen in the trial presided by the second Caliph, Umar ibn-al-Khattab, which involved a Jew and Ali ibn-Abi Talib.

During the trial, the second Caliph called the Jew by his name and addressed Ali by his agnomen (Abu al-Hasan), because that was how the Caliph called Ali when they talk. As the trial proceeded, the Caliph noticed the angry expression on Ali's face. So the Caliph rebuked Ali, "Are you displeased that your opponent is a Jew and that you have appeared with him before the court!"

Ali said in reply, "No, but I take it amiss that you have not treated us equally but have displayed partiality in my favour, inasmuch as you addressed him by his name and me by my agnomen." (At that time, the use of the agnomen was a mark of esteem).[14]

In this account, Ali displayed the same fervency to uphold racial equality like the Prophet. Such was the admirable sensitivity of the first Muslim leaders with regard to racial differences. (We know that later on Ali assumed the caliphate as the fourth Caliph, ruling over the entire Islamic community of that time.)

The Qur'an stipulates that the concern of the people of Allah should not be dictated by race and kinship, but by justice and righteousness. "O you who believe! Be maintainers of justice, bearers of witness of Allah's sake, though it may be against your own selves or (your) parents or near relatives; if he be rich or poor, Allah is nearer to them both in compassion; therefore do not follow (your) low desires, lest you deviate; and if you swerve or turn aside, then surely Allah is aware of what you do." (Qur'an 4:135)

Therefore it is remarkable that some Muslim politicians in our present day differ so much from their earliest religious leaders. The contemporary racist mentality displayed by local Malay supremacists who claim to be Muslims contradicts directly against the values held so dear by earlier Islamic rulers. There is inherent inconsistency to juxtapose the interest of the 'Muslims' with that of the 'Malays' and 'Bumiputeras'.

Read more at: http://asiapacific.anu.edu.au/newmandala/2011/12/05/race-based-ideology-and-islam-the-malaysian-enigma/

Understanding our rights

Posted: 04 Dec 2011 09:23 AM PST

Rights are not something to be played with. It is not a political tool to be bandied about. It is fundamental and inherent. It exists in us simply because we are civilised men and women.

Related to human rights is democracy. When we choose our own leaders, we ensure that we are not led simply by someone who is going to force himself or herself onto us.

AZMI SHAROM, The Star

RIGHTS are the weapons of the powerless. And just who are the powerless? Well, in my view, it is most of us.

Ordinary folks who either do not hold the reins of government machinery or have the means to control those who hold the reins.

That is why only those who are powerless or who have been powerless can truly appreciate rights.

We only have to look at history to see that to be true. The Magna Carta was created because the nobility of Britain felt powerless against the King.

The American Declaration of Independence takes the shape that it does because the founding fathers wanted to ensure that they would never again be under the yoke of a distant king.

Our own leaders, during the early days of our existence as a nation also understood this need for rights, having been ruled by an oppressive force more powerful than them.

Of course there are those with short memories who belittle rights when they have power, bemoan the lack of them when they lose power and belittle them again when they have power once more.

But then, there will always be the utterly unprincipled in any community.

The human race has evolved. We have values which prevent the strong simply taking what they want from the weak.

Our laws are in place so that we can be assured a person who is bigger than us can't simply knock us out and take our wallets.

And just as we have laws to protect us against thieves and thugs, so too do we have principles which prevent the rulers from abusing us.

As a race we have come a long way from "only the strong will survive". And that is due to the civilising of human kind.

Rights therefore are the current pinnacle of this civilising process. It indicates that we are civilised.

Related to human rights is democracy. When we choose our own leaders, we ensure that we are not led simply by someone who is going to force himself or herself onto us.

Once again, we see a principle which empowers the powerless.

This is why I care so much about human rights and democracy.

This is why I get furious when those who do not understand or choose not to understand, take my rights away.

That is why I work on the premise that we must have as much rights as possible.

Of course I understand there are limitations to everything, including rights, but those limitations must be made with the aspiration that a complete right is the ideal.

It is only with these aspirations in place will we ensure that whatever limitations imposed are the barest minimum and with the smallest effect on our rights.

Rights are not something to be played with. It is not a political tool to be bandied about. It is fundamental, it is inherent. It is not something that can be given for it exists in us simply because we are civilised men and women.

The powerful do not wish to see this.

It is up to us, the powerless, to remind them.

 

Why fear a Malaysian Spring

Posted: 04 Dec 2011 08:56 AM PST

That is why Pakatan and Malaysia civil society are pushing passionately for the electoral reforms that the Bersih movement champions. Elections are the best and most legitimate way to bring change in a society. As John F. Kennedy once said: "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable."

Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad, The Malaysian Insider 

In his speech at the 2011 Umno general assembly, Datuk Mukhriz Mahathir claimed that Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim and Pakatan Rakyat are trying to topple the federal government through a form of democracy that is alien to Malaysia. This desperate statement illustrates how out of touch the Umno-BN government has become. 

Mukhriz justified his claim by referring to Anwar's interview with Bloomberg recently when the latter predicted that a "Malaysian Spring" would emerge to bring political change in the country. 

Mukhriz probably missed the part when Anwar told Bloomberg, "When will the Malaysian Spring be? The next elections."

While opposition parties in Malaysia have faced an uneven playing field for decades, most — including Pakatan Rakyat — have faithfully participated in the various elections. Disgruntled opposition parties sometimes resort to extra-parliamentary measures when they get disillusioned with unfair elections, but this has not and will never be the case in Malaysia.

That is why Pakatan and Malaysia civil society are pushing passionately for the electoral reforms that the Bersih movement champions. Elections are the best and most legitimate way to bring change in a society. As John F. Kennedy once said: "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable." 

Indeed, we believe that free and fair elections are crucial for any state to be legitimate. Unfortunately, Umno-BN has thus far resisted the most substantive measures advocated by the electoral reform movement. It is mind-boggling how a party that claims it is democratic can be so opposed to any effort to improve the electoral process. 

This came to a head during Bersih 2.0 when Malaysians from various backgrounds witnessed the crude and confused response of Datuk Seri Najib Razak's administration. How can a demand for clean and fair elections be controversial unless one does not subscribe to democracy, a principle that is enshrined in our Federal Constitution? The Bersih 2.0 committee was even willing to compromise by shifting the peaceful assembly to the stadium as first offered by Najib and then advised by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong when they were granted an audience with him. 

But as the record will show, Najib reneged on his promise and forced tens of thousands of Malaysians from all races and background to take to the streets. Thousands of Malaysians abroad also gathered across the world in solidarity with Bersih, an act that, banana republic-like, was deemed "illegal" in Malaysia. 

Thanks to the backlash from his indecisive handling of Bersih 2.0, Najib relented and formed a Parliamentary Select Committee on Electoral Reforms — an admission that Bersih, Pakatan Rakyat and the civil society were right all along: that there are deep and serious problems with our electoral system. The rationale of the PSC was supposedly to ensure the credibility of the upcoming elections. 

Two days later, however, the government appeared to dither, saying that Parliament can be dissolved any time and would not be subject to the result of the parliamentary select committee. 

Similarly, on Malaysia Day 2011, Najib announced plans to revoke the country's archaic Emergency laws, repeal the Internal Security Act and amend the Printing Presses and Publications Act as well as the Police Act, among other things. 

Interestingly, Najib's own Cabinet was not informed of the sweeping announcement, underlining the fact that at best our prime minister seems to be the only man in his Cabinet who believes in the need for reform — assuming of course he actually does so. Of course, the Cabinet publicly had to appear to be enthusiastic about the announcements.

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Canadian TV show on the Stop Timber Corruption Campaign

Posted: 04 Dec 2011 10:52 PM PST

Last Saturday, 3rd December, Canada's Global Television broadcast an extensive report on timber corruption in Sarawak and the Taib family's property business in Ottawa, Canada. The show features interviews with British journalist Clare Rewcastle Brown, Canadian linguist Ian Mackenzie, Canadian anthropologist Wade Davis, an anonymous Sarawakian and BMF director Lukas Straumann.

Taib's daughter Jamilah Taib Murray and her Canadian husband Sean Murray who are accused of laundering the proceeds of Sarawak logging in Canada refused to appear in the show.

Please watch the show yourself under the following link and inform your friends on this important piece of news:

http://www.globalnews.ca/16x9/video/family+trees/video.html?v=2173509506&p=1&s=dd#video

DR. J : USNO Supports UBF and Forms Alliance to Fight for Sabah’s Rights

Posted: 03 Dec 2011 11:54 PM PST

By Datuk Dr. Jeffrey G. Kitingan, UNITED BORNEO FRONT Chairman

The newly revived USNO became the latest entity to support the United Borneo Front (UBF) and the fight for the restoration of Sabah's rights in Malaysia. This was the message conveyed by protem USNO Vice-President, Abdullah Sani Hj. Salleh and protem Secretary-General, Datuk Arifin Datuk Abdul Salam in the presence of USNO die-hard supporters at a recent gathering at the birthplace of USNO in Kg. Tanjung Kapur, Kudat.

Abdullah Sani told the large and mixed crowd of Bajau, Suluk, Sungai, Dusun, Rungus, Kagayan and other races that the State Government leaders and UMNO in particular have failed to safeguard and protect the rights of Sabah and Sabahans.

"Pemimpin-pemimpin USNO menyokong UBF and perjuangan UBF serta pejuang tulen Sabah, Datuk Dr. Jeffrey Kitingan. Penyokong-penyokong USNO juga harus menyokong UBF dan Dr. Jeffrey demi mengembalikan hak-hak Sabah" advised Abdullah Sani to the villagers.

"USNO will work towards the unity of all races in Sabah regardless of whether they are Bajau, Suluk, KDM, Rungus, Brunei or others to reclaim the rights of Sabah and Sabahans in Malaysia" added Abdullah Sani.

Abdullah Sani told the villagers that their land problem was just one of the many examples of the State Government failing the people and that the State Government and the "wakil rakyat" have victimized the villagers by alienating the land where their homes to outsiders. Since the State Government has done little to help, Sabahans should unite to change the State Government.

The crowd was informed that Kg. Tanjung Kapor was the birthplace of USNO in 1961 and USNO will assist the villagers to defend their kampong land. Abdullah Sani further said that Tun Datu Mustapha although once the leader of the Sabah Government, the late leader had not taken an inch of the lands of the villagers other than the land for his own house which still stands today, although powerful as he was, unlike the present Barisan Nasional leaders who would do everything to alienate lands to their cronies and to the extent of "stealing" land from the local native villagers and evicting them.

Abdullah Sani then announced that "at its birthplace, USNO and its supporters will support UBF and the Borneo Agenda advocated by Dr. Jeffrey and will form an alliance with UBF and Dr. Jeffrey to change the State Government and "evict" UMNO and other Semenanjung parties from Sabah." The crowd roared in approval with shouts of "HIDUP USNO".

In a follow-up speech, Dr. Jeffrey told the crowd that their land problem was not unique to Kg. Tg. Kapor and that the State Government has failed to protect the rights of the natives to their own land throughout Sabah as can be seen in the recent cases of land grabs and demolition of the homes of natives and the destruction of crops and plants in Sukau and Tongod.

Dr. Jeffrey welcomed the support of USNO and added that "together with the cooperation of USNO, UBF will form an alliance for all Sabahans regardless of race and religion to stand united to protect and safeguard our interests and rights and follow the motto of UBF – KALAU BUKAN KITA, SIAPA LAGI! KALAU BUKAN SEKARANG, BILA LAGI! and "UNITY IS DUTY".

Dr. Jeffrey then advised the crowd not to be misled again by the sweet talk of the so-called leaders of Barisan Nasional and to use their vote wisely. "Sabahans do not need leaders who are pulled by their noses by leaders from West Malaysia or dictated by their political bosses from Kuala Lumpur." "Sabah needs genuine "pejuang-pejuang" for Sabah and Sabahans' rights and every patriotic Sabahan should be a "pejuang" for Sabah".

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan
Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Rakyat Voices 3: Firewall Your Vote

Posted: 04 Dec 2011 06:53 PM PST

The Election terrain is not flat, that much we know - Putrajaya has just over 6,000 voters, Kapar 112,000 or 17 Parliamentary seats difference between the two. Much has been reported of late about the suspicions over tampered electoral rolls, sudden spikes in the number of voters in certain constitutencies, and shifting forms of phantom votes. Those are issues being battled at the institutional level.

What about us as individuals, what can we do?

More importantly, on Election Day, how do you ensure your vote gets a safe passage all the way into the final count?

This Saturday, learn about your rights as a voter under the Election Laws. Tindak Malaysia, a voter's rights advocacy group, will present important facts about the General Elections and the pitfalls which may come in your way as a voter. What's fact and what's myth?

 

READ MORE HERE.

Najib’s Transformation Programme in fighting corruption a major wash-out

Posted: 04 Dec 2011 10:13 AM PST

The TI-M statement is incorrect. In fact, Malaysia's 2011 TI CPI ranking is the worst in 17 years since the introduction of TI's annual CPI in 1995.

In the nine years from 1995 to 2003, Tun Dr. Mahathir as Prime Minister saw Malaysia's TI CPI score stuck in the narrow groove between 4.8 in 2000 to 5.32 in 1996 while the CPI ranking fell 14 places from No. 23 in 1995 to No. 37 in 2003. (10 is highly clean while 0 is highly corrupt)

In the five-year premiership of Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, Malaysia's TI CPI ranking fell 10 places from 37 in 2003 to 47 placing in 2008, while the CPI score stuck between 5.0 to 5.1.

In his 2 ½ years as Prime Minister, Datuk Seri Najib Razak presided over the worst TI CPI ranking and score for Malaysia on many fronts, viz:

* worst single-year plunge in TI CPI ranking of nine placings. i.e. fall from No. 47 in 2008 to No. 56 in 2009.

* most precipitous fall in TI CPI ranking in 2 ½ years under Najib's premiership, falling 13 placings from No. 47 in 2008 to No. 60 in 2011; when in five years under Abdullah, Malaysia fell 10 places from No. 37 in 2003 to No. 47 in 2008 and in nine years under Mahathir, Malaysia fell 14 places from No. 23 in 1995 to No. 37 in 2003.

* In the past three years 2009 – 2011, the CPI score consistently falling below the score 5, when in first 14 years from 1995 to 2008, Malaysia had only twice fallen below the score of 5, viz: 4.8 in 2000 and 4.9 in 2002.

* Consecutively in the past three years 2009 – 2011, Malaysia's CPI score falling to ever new lows, i.e. 4.5 for 2009, 4.4 for 2010 and 4.3 for 2011.

There was no mention or reference to the worsening TI CPI ranking and worst TI CPI 2011 score for Malaysia by anyone, whether leader or delegate, in the UMNO General Assembly, although the results were announced on the same day as the UMNO Presidential Speech by Najib Razak last Thursday.

 

READ MORE HERE.

Who lied – Najib/Muhyiddin or Chua Soi Lek? Or all three?

Posted: 04 Dec 2011 10:11 AM PST

When these lies and poison failed to achieve the desired public and political impact with the approach of the 13th General Elections, UMNO strategists became more irresponsible, reckless and desperate.

In the past week, these lies and poison became the staple diet of UMNO leaders in the meetings preparatory to and during the sessions proper of the 65th UMNO General Assembly, with the Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak and Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin, in their capacities as UMNO President and UMNO Deputy President giving their personal stamp of approval by adopting and retailing these lies and poison to sway votes in favour of UMNO in the coming polls.

Culminating in Muhyiddin and Najib, one UMNO leader after another in the past week have taken to the public pulpit in a carefully-orchestrated campaign to demonise the DAP and frighten Malay voters with the lies that the Malays will lose their rights and power should Pakatan Rakyat win more federal seats in the next general election, or in the words of the UMNO information chief Datuk Ahmad Maslan, "the Malay language will be lost, say goodbye to the Malay Sultans, Say goodbye to Islam because they (DAP) are agents of Christianisation".

Muhyiddin was completely unabashed in playing the race card when he falsely accused the DAP of being anti-Malay, anti-Islam and anti-Malay Rulers, even telling the lie that the DAP's agenda is to establish a Republic in Malaysia.

Muhyiddin made history as the only Deputy Prime Minister in the world who was caught out telling a bare-faced lie, for he had been completely silent to my challenge to him to substantiate his allegation that the DAP wanted to abolish the constitutional monarchy and establish a Republic.

I had publicly said that Muhyiddin's "despicable, irresponsible, incendiary and seditious" allegation that the DAP's agenda is to form a republic is completely founded on a lie, particularly his rhetorical question to buttress his allegation:

"If not, do they dare to suggest the prime minister's position be selected based solely on elections and without being chosen by the Yang di Pertuan Agong? What is the meaning of this?" (Muhyiddin quote)

 

READ MORE HERE.

The UMNO General Assembly 2011

Posted: 04 Dec 2011 09:51 AM PST

At the moment I am more interested to write about the recently concluded UMNO GA2011. Some people thought I treated the GA as a nonevent. Of course it wasn't. It wasn't a congregation of minds meeting to discuss how the real Malay agenda of uplifting them, their economics, and their future are being discussed. It wasn't that event. It was just an event allowing mediocre and uncultured minds to let out their own frustrations and sense of absolute fear. UMNO fears for its future. It was speaking about the UMNO agenda. Not Malay agenda.

For those reasons- we must do the exact opposite. Deny these so called Malay leaders a chance to concentrate power. Its power which they shall apply to the misfortune of the majority of Malays and to the misfortune of this country. Give us power bellowed Najib because we want to continue with the agenda? Why wasn't the agenda, whatever it is, debated in that GA? Give us power intoned KJ so that the nikmat or tidings we enjoy with having power is kept. Nikmat to do what? To pillage and plunder?

Instead it's an event of love fest and blood fest. This delegate loves Najib. That delegate says more about how Najib is the savior and all that. The agenda of the GA was actually to whip delegates into frenzy about how to defend UMNO and defend the life as the leaders and UMNO warlords have always known. It's the life of the leeching aristocrat feeding off the fears and hopes of the silent Malay majority. It's a life of living a lie pretending to fight for the interests of the majority and the interests of the nation.

When KJ said that we have to defend UMNO because of tidings ( nikmat) that comes along with having power- that's the real weltanschauung of UMNO. That's its real raison-detre. UMNO exists to secure power so that through power they can do all the bad- corruption, pillage and plunder of the nation's wealth.  As far as the Malay agenda is concerned, yes, the GA2011 is a non-event. It wasn't worth my mental effort to exert.

Let me ask you why the real big issues are not and never discussed?  Why do UMNO leaders have this self-conceited idea that it is when we, good people like ourselves hold power we can do more good that those evil in DAP, PAS and PKR and whoever else.

The answer to this seeming paradox is this. I find it a pleasure repeating the seminal ideals of Milton Friedman in his preface to Hayek's The Road to Serfdom.  In the passages which I marked with highlighter:-

READ MORE HERE

 

Liberal, Muslim, feminist, and comfortable

Posted: 04 Dec 2011 08:45 AM PST

But controversy surrounds Marina also because of her lineage — she is the eldest child of Malaysia's longest serving and controversial Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad. In this exclusive interview with The Nut Graph in Kuala Lumpur on 23 March 2010, Marina talks about her childhood, her roots, and the Malaysia she wants to see in the future. The first version of this interview was published exclusively in Volume 1 of Found in Malaysia.

TNG: When and where were you born?

Marina Mahathir: I was born in Alor Setar, in 1957. I am just two months older than the country. [I was born in the] Alor Setar General Hospital and so were all my siblings.

We used to live in Jalan Maxwell. At the back [were] the padi fields and the railway road. We lived [in the government quarters] until I was 10.

We [then] moved to Jitra, [and we lived in government quarters] because [my mum] was the civil servant; my dad went into private practice quite early. In 1968 or 1969, we moved into our own house in Titi Gajah.

Did the violence of 13 May 1969 touch Alor Setar?

As far as I recall there were no riots. But there was fear. I remember the elections. I remember asking my dad, "So, did you win?" And he said, "No, I lost." And I couldn't believe it, because at that time he ran in Kota Setar Selatan. He lost to (former PAS chief) Haji Yusuf Rawa, who happens to be my mum's cousin, [but] not a first cousin.

Std 1A at St Nicholas Convent: Marina (second row, third from right), Standard One A at St Nicholas Convent, 1964.

Std 1A at St Nicholas Convent: Marina (second row, third from right), Standard One A at St Nicholas Convent, 1964

So you are related to PAS central committee member Muhajid Yusof Rawa?

Yes. But it's not like we've ever met lah. On my mum's side, my grandfather is Rawanese. He came from Sumatera. We still have relatives in Sumatera. In 1968, our first overseas holiday was to Medan. A couple of years ago, after the tsunami, [my parents] went to Medan and visited all these relatives as well. My mum is very keen on all this, and she will keep track.

So you can trace your ancestry on your mum's side. This is the million ringgit question: What about your dad's side?

We don't know. My dad had these two older sisters whom he was very close to. The second sister, Mak Bibi, had a very good memory [about] all sorts of family connections. But unfortunately, she passed away first. The older sister — she's 10 years older than my dad, who is the youngest — was hard of hearing. She passed away last year.

Marina Mahathir giving a talk (1998)

Marina Mahathir giving a talk (1998)

But there is a Malabari connection on your dad's side?

Well, actually this was news to me recently. I have another aunt, [a close family friend] who is not directly related, [who] once told me where the family came from. I was quite young, so I didn't really take note. But it formed the impression in my mind that we must have come from the Eastern coast of India. But I never checked it out.

It was only when I went for this aunt's funeral that I asked my cousins where they thought we came from. And that was the first time the word Kerala came up. I looked it up and I thought, "Eh, that's funny — it's on the Western coast [of India]." […]

But then with ports, what does it matter? You get on a boat and then you go. And there are a lot of Keralans here — Hindus, Muslims and Christians — so there is a long connection between Kerala and here. So it's possible [to trace], but I wouldn't know where to start. Because this would be my dad's grandfather, my great-grandfather Tok Iskandar. […]

Iskandar came over and married a local woman and had my grandfather, Mohamad, and at least one other female sibling…my father's auntie.

So, I only know of one sibling [of my grandfather's]. But we don't know what happened to my great-grandfather, or our great-grandmother. Nobody knows her name. It's all [because of] very poorly kept records, or nobody thought of [keeping records].

So all these people who keep saying my grandfather's name was Iskandar Kutty — we don't know where that comes from. We've never heard the name.

How does that make you feel, though, the way detractors discredit your dad by pulling this out? Many would consider it racist.

Of course it is. And I think that's why he's so sensitive about it, because it [questions] his Malay-ness. I had this ex-schoolmate who used think it was funny, who still thinks it's funny, to make jokes and tease us for being keling. So it's a sensitive thing, because you're subjected to so much racism.

[But] when I went back for my aunt's funeral, I looked at everyone around and it was quite clear that we all have sub-continental origins.

My grandfather's mother was Malay, and he was brought up by her. And then he married a Malay, my grandmother, who is a Wan. Wans were palace[-connected], so that Wan side is well-documented. My dad's mum was Wan Tempahwan.

Was Alor Setar very cosmopolitan [when you were growing up]?

We had a mixed group of friends. My first best friend when I was in kindergarten was Ann Wong, who lived across the road.

[I also went to] a convent [school]. A lot of Malays didn't want to send their daughters there, because takut jadi Kristian, kan? So in my class, I think there were no more than four Malay girls at any one time.

When I was in Form Four, I went off to TKC (Tunku Kurshiah College). In Form Five, I sent a postcard back to my old school: "Good luck for MCE (Malaysian Certificate of Education), hope to see you all here." And that was a big faux pas, because obviously I wasn't going to be seeing the Chinese ones there. So apparently I upset a lot of people. But I really didn't think of it in that way.

How has all of this, including the faux pas, shaped the kind of Malaysian you are today?

I'm very sad. I don't understand all this segregation. I went through it when [convent schools were] English medium, and I know, for instance, that there was no attempt to convert anyone either way.

At first I didn't want to go to TKC because it was single-race. And my dad got a bit upset about that. But [in the end] it was quite good in one thing. You know, early impressions can really get into your head. I had grown up with the impression that Malay [Malaysians] were not clever. I used to get first or second, but there's the impression that others are cleverer than you.

So when I went to TKC, I saw Malay girls who had gotten 7As, 8As. Adakah? It really did something to your head. It's possible [to achieve this] — we're not genetically backward. So the positive aspect of that was good.

The other idea I grew up with was that girls were not as clever as boys. It's only when I went to Sultan Abdul Hamid College (SAHC) — briefly in Form Four before going to TKC and then in Lower Six — that I realised that not all boys are smart. So sometimes you need this change of environment to open up the world for you.

In TKC, I was exposed to a whole variety of Malays — all classes and all type of faces. The hitam legam and the putih melepak. The Mat Salleh type pun ada. It was quite diverse.

READ MORE HERE

 

Will PR be better than BN?

Posted: 04 Dec 2011 08:32 AM PST

That's no different from the public criticisms against the Barisan Nasional (BN) government over its Peaceful Assembly Bill 2011, which was passed by the BN-controlled Dewan Rakyat on 29 Nov 2011.

Or is there a difference? Not just between the two political coalitions but also between how each understands basic human rights? Additionally, what does it all mean for us as citizens?

International standards lacking

The Penang FOI law has been criticised for not adopting internationally-accepted standards in guaranteeing freedom of information. For example, the law does not provide for proactive routine publications of information held by the government. Indeed, this is actually something that some government agencies under the BN federal government, such as the Statistics Department, the Department of Environment, and the Communications and Multimedia Commission  are already practising.

Six civil society groups have also pointed out that the Penang law has removed a clause that stipulates a penalty for any information officer who destroys, alters or withholds information or if she or he intentionally denies access to information. "Such a preventive clause is standard inclusion in most freedom of information bills worldwide, including the Selangor Freedom of Information Enactment," the groups said in a statement.

The lack of internationally-recognised standards is also apparent in the BN's Peaceful Assembly Bill. Among others, the Bill, which has now been passed despite public objections, prohibits street protests. And as we already know, it also prohibits the participation of children in rallies, places too much power in the hands of the police and too many restrictions on rally organisers.

What's the difference?

So, what's the difference, from a human rights perspective, of having either a BN or a PR coalition in government?

The difference, if I may venture to argue, is that with at least the PR governments of Selangor and Penang, there is some inkling about what human rights is about.

The fact is, even though both the Selangor and Penang FOI enactments are imperfect and fall short of civil society groups' expectations, the new laws were enacted to improve transparency. Citizens in Selangor and Penang now have recourse to a FOI law within the state. Prior to this, any information including about air quality, the causes for landslides, and water concession agreements could be and has been kept from public scrutiny under the federal government's Official Secrets Act.

Conversely at the federal level, the replacement of Section 27 of the Police Act with the Peaceful Assembly Bill is meant to make things worse. No matter if the federal government denies it repeatedly. For example, the Bill prohibits "street protests" when these kinds of protests are already legally recognised in Section 27 of the Police Act.

READ MORE HERE

 

Malaysia in the Era of Globalization #91

Posted: 04 Dec 2011 07:43 AM PST

The first were the large and entrenched foreign-owned corporations (usually British) that essentially corralled the major sectors (the "commanding heights"), from plantations and mining to manufacturing and banking. Through their sheer size and well-established network, these companies ensured that their dominance was never threatened. They neither welcomed nor tolerated new entrants and competitors. The second group was made up of ethnic Chinese and Indian "mom and pop" retailers and sundry merchants. Their enterprises were small family affairs. They too protected their economic turf ferociously. They effectively controlled their domain through their clan organizations, often using extralegal means to enforce their code. The "triad" organizations of secret societies are manifestations of this phenomenon.

Between the ethnic retailers and the major colonial corporations, the economy of Malaysia was essentially "locked up." They imposed stiff and insurmountable barriers to new entrants. In short, despite the government's commitment to a free market, the economy was far from being free. The game was rigged. Had there been enterprising and competent Malays, they would have been effectively shut out. Even a super entrepreneur like Ted Turner or someone with a Harvard MBA would have a tough time cracking in an honest way such a closed and rigged system.

Much had been written in the past on the supposed lack of business acumen of Malays. The residuum of that thinking still exists today. Had a careful analysis been done, the fault would lay more with the prevailing economic system. It had all the trappings of a free market but the reality was far different. As a result the system actually perpetrated and aggravated existing inequalities while protecting the prevailing monopolies and monopsonies. Apart from the ensuing inter racial hostilities, such inequities also retarded economic growth.

This was not unique to Malaysia. Forty years later the Harvard economist Robert Barro empirically showed that such high levels of inequality, especially in a poor country, reduce economic growth. Perversely, in rich countries like America, such inequities encourage growth. In the 1960s Malaysia was a poor country. Tunku's misguided strategy and his denial of the aggravating inequities culminated in the country's worse race riots of 1969. Tunku's knowledge of free enterprise was gleaned only from the lecture halls and libraries of Cambridge; he had no real life experience of the free market. His entire career before entering politics was in the civil service.

Fortunately for Malaysia, Tun Razak, Tunku's successor, intuitively knew what Barro and other economists would later discover. He ignored the conventional wisdom and intervened in the economy aggressively through his New Economic Policy. This massive social engineering initiative upended the entire economic and business scene in Malaysia, effectively leveling the economic playing field. His interventionist policies resulted in Malaysia becoming more of a true free market. Tun Razak's interventions succeeded because he did not take the economy away from free enterprise system and free market rather he pushed it towards those goals. As a consequent, the nation is far better of today than it was a generation ago.

Thus many of the criticisms leveled at the free enterprise system are in reality criticisms of highly controlled economy that are masquerading or having the veneer of a free market.

There are of course valid criticisms and imperfections of the free market. By appealing to the lowest common denominator (that is, the most profitable), capitalism threatens traditional values and indirectly also our freedom. American mass media, being commercial enterprises, depend on advertising for their revenue; the higher the ratings, the bigger the revenue. Thus programs that offend one's sensibilities continue to be aired because they garner high ratings. This coarsening of mass culture through the media may encourage some to argue for government intervention. However I prefer a market solution first, as illustrated by the following example.

A few years ago one of the popular comedy shows wanted to break new grounds. The producers wanted to "out" the hostess's homosexuality by showing her kissing her lesbian lover. An outraged public led by some church leaders initiated a mass boycott of not only the station but also the show's sponsors. It was very effective; the series was terminated and the star dumped.

READ MORE HERE

 

Richer Than The Queen! Top TV Coverage In Canada, As Taibs’ Wealth is Exposed

Posted: 04 Dec 2011 05:57 AM PST

During a prime-time slot aired on Saturday night's 16X9 programme, investigative reporter Sean O'Shea focused on the massive property portfolio that has been developed in Ottawa, London and the US under the name of Jamilah Taib, the Chief Minister's oldest daughter [see 'Family Trees' 16X9 Global TV]

Threats – Sean Murray has falsely accused Sarawak Report of being funded by Malaysian opposition parties !

This means that for the first time the questions about the money laundering of Taib's corrupt kickbacks have been publicly raised in North America.

In response Sean (Hisham) Murray, Jamilah's husband, threatened Sarawak Report.  he stated "Jamilah and I find these statements about ourselves and our business false, highly defamatory and very damaging."  However, the couple refused to be interviewed by the programme.

Devastating report on the Taib family's company ownerships

The show was aired just before the publication of a separate, devastating 'blacklist' of Taib family companies by Switzerland's Bruno Manswer Foundation, now available online.

BMF's Stop Timber Corruption Report  lays out extensive research into the Taib family's company ownerships in Sarawak, Malaysia and elsewhere.

It  establishes that Taib and his immediate family (his children, siblings and cousin Hamed Sepawi) have beneficial shares in more than 400 companies in Malaysia alone.  In many of these companies they also act as the controlling directors.

The Taibs also have a further 80 companies in 25 countries across the world including Australia, the UK, US, Canada, New Zealand, Jersey, Hong Kong, British Virgin Islands, Fiji, Cayman Islands, Indonesia, India, Jersey, Saudi Arabia, Labuan, Cambodia, Brunei, China, Philippines, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Thailand, United Arab Emirates and Vietnam !

Richer than the Queen – assets of at least one and a half billion US dollars !

BMF's 'Stop Timber Corruption' campaign is cornering Taib with allegations he has proved unable to anwer to a growing body of international critics

BMF acknowledges that this research only covers publicly available information from Malaysia's Register of Companies and other official company registers.

This means it is likely to represent just a fraction of the Taibs' actual wealth.  

However, by calculating just the share values of 14 of the major companies on this list, they have estimated a total worth of one and a half billion US dollars (4.6 billion Malaysian ringgit).  

Not counting their more hidden wealth, this puts the Taib family firmly into the category of one of the richest families in the world and makes them far richer than the Queen of England (whose assets are a mere half billion pounds).

Proceeds of corruption

Given that it can be clearly demonstrated that the majority of these Taib family companies have made their wealth from the receipt of contracts from the Sarawak State Government and land grants from the Sarawak State Government, it is impossible to deny that this wealth has come from the proceeds of corruption by Taib, who is Chief Minister, Finance Minister and Planning Minister of the Sarawak State Government!

READ MORE HERE

 

Race-based ideology and Islam: The Malaysian enigma

Posted: 04 Dec 2011 05:51 AM PST

UMNO's Deputy President Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin further affirmed this race-based ideology by saying that "it is vital" to protect "Malay political power."[2] He justified such ideology by painting the picture that the interest of the Malay race, given its demography in the country, dictates the well being of the whole nation. "[W]hen we talk about Malay interest it does not mean we are racist because the largest group in the Malaysian society whether you like it or not is still Malays, Bumiputeras and Muslims."[3]

Seeing 'Malays', 'Bumiputeras', and 'Muslims' being juxtaposed next to each other certainly stirs up curiosity as to what actually has the third group (Muslims) to do with the other two:

Does Islam teach race-based ideology or race-favouritism? Is it true that Islam requires the advancement of 'Ketuanan Melayu' (Malay Supremacy)?

It is common understanding among theologians and scholars of comparative religions that Islam promotes racial equality. One of the clearest indications of this is in the fact that Allah's Prophets consist of individuals from different races. There is no distinction made among them:

"'Say: "We believe in God and what has been revealed to us, and what was revealed to Abraham and Ishmael, and Isaac, and Jacob and [his] children, and what was given to Moses and Jesus, and what was given to [all other] prophets from their Lord. We make no difference between any of them; and to Him we submit ourselves."' (Qur'an 2:136).

Not all of these messengers are Arab, yet all are considered equally authoritative. There is simply no relevance to their prophethood whether they came from the Jewish, Arabian, or any other race.

Besides the Prophets, there are also Qur'anic teachings concerning equality of humankind:

"O people! Be careful of (your duty to) your Lord, Who created you from a single being and created its mate of the same (kind) and spread from these two, many men and women; and be careful of (your duty to) Allah, by Whom you demand one of another (your rights), and (to) the ties of relationship [the wombs]; surely Allah ever watches over you." (Qur'an 4:1)

Here, the Islamic Scripture teaches that all ethnic groups are created in the same way, and bear close ties to one another.

Reflecting on this, Abd-al'Aziz 'Abd-al-Qadir Kamil, Professor at the University of Cairo and Minister of Waqfs and Azhar Affairs of Al-Azhar University, commented that: "God […] commands us to fear two things: God and 'the wombs' (al-arham). 'The wombs' refers here to the human bond that links all men, however remote they may be from each other in space or time, and however unlike they may be in language and colour, and however much they may differ in economic or social position. We are charged to fear God's commands, and this applies first and foremost to the observation of human brotherhood on the widest scale…"[4]

At another place of the Qur'an, we find similar teaching:

"O Humankind! We have created you from male and female and have made you into peoples (shu'ub) and tribes (qaba'il) that you may know one another; truly, the noblest (akram) among you before God are the most pious (atqa) among yourselves; indeed, is God the All-knowing, the All-seeing."

(Qur'an 49:13).

Although it is commonly interpreted that this passage is talking about race, some said that it actually refers to 'tribes' and not 'race'.

Responding to this, Paul A. Hardy, who lectured on Islamic thoughts at the School of Oriental and African Studies at the Universityof London, remarked that there is no difference between tribe and race in this passage. He pointed out two early Islamic commentators—the eighth century C.E. Sufyan ath-Thawri and the tenth century C.E. Tabari—who understood this verse as reference to genealogy.[5]

In other words, this verse is indeed referring to race. It describes the creation of the various ethnic groups with their own genealogy. No race or genealogical lineage is declared superior or should be favoured than others. The only superiority is that of piety, between those who are loyal to Allah and those who are not—Not between those who are Malay and non-Malay, Bumiputeras or non-Bumiputeras.

Besides, this verse also states that the diversity of races is intended for mutual learning ("that you may know one another"). The instruction to cultivate multi-racial learning is understood by Hardy as "a motivating force for mutual love."[6] If this is followed, then this further undermines the ideology that one race is or should be more favoured than others.

Turning to the Hadith, we find in Prophet Muhammad's Farewell Sermon his conviction of racial equality:

"All mankind is from Adam and Eve, an Arab has no superiority over a non-Arab nor a non-Arab has any superiority over an Arab; also a white has no superiority over black nor a black has any superiority over white except by piety and good action."[7]

The Prophet has a deep sense of racial impartiality. Probably this is the reason why he condemned those who claim supremacy over others because of their ancestral-racial lineage:

READ MORE HERE

 

Why does Umno fear DAP so?

Posted: 04 Dec 2011 05:44 AM PST

The torrent of abuse that the DAP drew from speakers, both prominent and obscure, at the ongoing Umno general assembly testifies to this reality of leaders or parties weighing in the political balance in ways disproportionate to their strength in terms of membership or representation in legislatures.

Higher Education Minister Khaled Nordin (left), expected to be menteri besar of Johor after the general election, acknowledged this reality when he speculated on the reasons why speakers at the Umno assembly targeted the DAP with special venom.

Deputy Prime Minister and deputy president of Umno Muhyiddin Yassin led the way in his address to the youth and women wings of the party where he branded the DAP as anti-Malay, anti-Islam and anti-royals.

NONEThis trinity of the DAP's alleged antipathies sums up what Umno construes as its raison d'etat, although given what had happened as recently as two decades ago, Umno cannot really be said to be for the royals.

Umno's protection of royals has been proven to be expedient rather than principled.

Nevertheless, Muhyiddin had no hesitation in inducting them into the trinity of DAP's alleged abjurations because that way, it would make the opposition party especially worthy of Malay opprobrium.

Muhyiddin's strictures set the cue for the rest of Umno to engage in a round of DAP-bashing the like of which has seldom been seen before in Malaysia's race-warped politics.

Subterranean fear

Though Khaled offered reasons for the DAP-centred ire of Umno delegates – that the party is seen, realistically or imaginarily, as the dominant force in the Pakatan Rakyat coalition and that its partners, PAS and PKR, are viewed by Umno as beatable – he only touched the surface of the fears that Umno harbours towards the DAP.

NONELeft unspoken is the subterranean fear that in Lim Guan Eng (right in photo) at least, the DAP may have a leader that ordinary Malays would eventually acknowledge as worthy of support for reasons that help explain Umno's slumping popularity: he has run a frugal and clean government in Penang enabling the administration to adopt the welfare aspects of a social democracy that are bound to impact beneficently on poor Malays; and he is presiding over an impressive revival of the state's industry through increased FDIs.

In sum, he has been a success in the last three-and-a-half years of his tenure and, if things continue the way it promises, his success would be more undeniable and would resound throughout the country.

That would only do more good to the idea that a DAP-fueled Pakatan would not be what Umno want Malays to think it would, which is that is a disaster for the Malays, their religion and rulers.

The dispelling of that fear scares Umno stiff – for good reason.

READ MORE HERE

 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net
 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved