Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News
Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News |
- Wow !! 3 olang apek cina masuk Masjid apa hal??
- PAS man wants to know Christians’ 9% secret
- The Havoc Education Reform Inflicts (Part 5 of 5)
- Much ado about PJ’s mayor: Another case for local council elections
- Freedom or Fanaticism?
- Exposed: Federal Govt is Umno propaganda unit
- Is Kit Siang senile too, Tony Pua (Part 2)
- The Rise and Rapid Fall of Suaram’s Cynthia Gabriel
| Wow !! 3 olang apek cina masuk Masjid apa hal?? Posted: 15 Oct 2012 01:15 PM PDT Pada zaman Umno/Bn kuat orang orang cina cukup takut dengan gerakan islam seperti Pas, mereka di perbodoh bodoh oleh Umno dengan dakyah yang serong terhadap gerakan islam seperi isu hudud, kalau sokong pas nanti kamu akan dipotong ~ anu~dan sebagainya.. Tetapi kini alhamdulilah segalanya telah berubah, mereka dilihat semakin berani serta sudah faham apa itu agama islam semenjak mereka berdamping dengan parti Pas. Mereka tau apa pantang larang agama islam serta yang mana baek atau buruknya. Janganlah pula kita bersangka buruk tujuan mereka hadir ke majlis itu, kena berfikiran positif jangan sempitkan minda kita dengan benda yang negatif. Diharap mereka akan di beri hidayah oleh Allah supaya mereka mendapat petunjuk tentang kebenaran agama islam. insyaallah. Read more at: http://batuvskayu.blogspot.com/2012/10/wow-3-olang-apek-cina-masuk-masjid-apa.html | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| PAS man wants to know Christians’ 9% secret Posted: 15 Oct 2012 12:34 PM PDT » Outnumbered, outvoted, outgunned, and wanting to take over?Mujahid Yusof Rawa, head of national unity in Parti Islam (PAS) and son of a party founder, wants to know the Malaysian Christians' secret formula for taking over the country. Speaking in Penang on Sunday, Mujahid derided recent claims that DAP politicians and Christian leaders were conspiring to set up a Christian state in Malaysia by asking: "How can only 9.2 percent of the population, a minority group, set up a Christian state? Tell me how in the world this could happen?" Quoting official statistics, he said Malaysia also had more Buddhists than Christians. "They should be saying that Buddhists want to create a Buddhist state as they constitute about 16 percent of the country's population." His remarks were lauded by the Catholic Bishop of Melaka-Johor, Rev Fr Paul Tan, who said Mujahid had made a "mathematics-based exorcism" of the Christian bogeyman. The controversy had been created by the Umno-friendly former PAS deputy president Nasharuddin Mat Isa, who had accused DAP leader Lim Guan Eng of planning a Christian state. "The gentleman from Parit Buntar (Mujahid) has offered the simple explanation that the notion of nine percent of Malaysians that are Christian trying to make over the rest of the population in their own image is inherently — mathematically — absurd," the bishop said. SEE ALSO: » Outnumbered, outvoted, outgunned, and wanting to take over?
In other remarks at the forum, Mujahid also urged national political leaders to ensure that, as much as a Muslim has the right to pray in the mosque, Christians, Buddhists and Hindus must have the same rights to pray in their own places of worship. A prayer with the new bishop A prayer of peace: chief ulama of Penang PAS, Soib Mohd Amin, leading a prayer with Bishop Sebastian Francis during a courtesy call on the bishop at his bishop's office at Holy Spirit Cathedral, Penang, in September. Photo: Anil Netto "Saying this does not make me less of a Muslim. This is the new politics we are talking about," said Mujahid, who is MP for Parit Buntar and chairman of the PAS national unity committee. In his party capacity, Mujahid has led PAS delegations to visit four Catholic churches in Penang and also paid a courtesy call on the new Catholic Bishop of Penang, Rev Fr Stephen Francis, who was installed last month. PAS team shows no fear of the cross Specially for you: Mujahid Yusuf Rawa, MP for Parit Buntar, and Abdul Rahman Kasim of Tasik Gelugor PAS present a cake to the new Bishop of Penang, Rev Fr Stephen Francis, in a courtesy call last month. Photo: Anil Netto Samad was the first elected Muslim wakil rakyat to visit the church since it was completed in 2005 — after 28 years of controversy, during which the Barisan Nasional-run state and city council revoked planning permission, halted building works, moved the location several times, resulting in a suit by the church, and its final location in Hicom-Glenmarie Industrial Park on the outskirts of Shah Alam city. Islamisation by Umno and BN frightened of the cross Barisan Nasional frightened of the cross In contrast to the approach taken by Khalid and Mujahid, most of the Muslim leaders of Barisan Nasional have been hesitant at being seen with Christian clergy. A Christmas tea party last year, attended by the prime minister, was embroiled in controversy after it was revealed that his aides had requested that crosses and other religious items not be displayed. Read more at: http://uppercaise.wordpress.com/2012/10/16/pas-wants-to-know-christians-secret/
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Havoc Education Reform Inflicts (Part 5 of 5) Posted: 14 Oct 2012 02:49 PM PDT The greatest weakness of this reform effort is its exclusive dependence on in-house or MOE staff, the very personnel responsible for the current rot with our schools. These individuals have been part of the problem for far too long; they cannot now be expected suddenly and magically to be part of the solution. That would take an exceptional ability to be flexible, innovative, and have the willingness or at least capacity to learn. Those are the very traits not valued in or associated with our civil service. The Blueprint's local consultants included Air Asia's Tony Fernandez, Khazanah's Azman Mokthar, and Sunway's Jeffrey Cheah, presumably representing the three major communities. These individuals are terribly busy. Unless they took time off from their considerable corporate responsibilities, they could not possibly do justice to this important national assignment. The international consultants were equally impressive. Again here I wonder how much time they actually spent talking to teachers, students and headmasters. Another significant flaw is this: With the possible exception of the Canadian, the others are from systems not burdened with the Malaysian dilemma of low educational achievements identifiable with specific ethnic or geographical groups. In Ontario, Canada, only the Toronto School System which is separate from the provincial has significant experience with the "Malaysian" problem. The Canadian is with the provincial system. Many of those impressive consultants were conspicuously absent during the many public sessions leading one to conclude that they were more window dressing. As for the public meetings, there were few formal or well thought-out presentations. Far too often those meetings quickly degenerated into "bitch" sessions, or to put it into local lingo, cakap kosong kopi-o (coffee shop empty talk), with a few vociferous and frustrated individuals hogging the discussions. Worse, there were no records of those hearings for preview, except for those amateurish low-quality recordings posted on Youtube. Consequently, opportunities for learning from those sessions were minimal. The reform has its own website (myedureview.com) and uses the social media (Facebook and Twitter) extensively. Those dialogues in cyberspace were no better; the comments were un-moderated and simply the spouting of anger and frustrations. As for the few serious ones, the panel never engaged their contributors. The cyber forums, like the public hearings, gave few insights; the signal-to-noise ratio was low. There was no shortage of passion and strong views, reflecting the angst Malaysians have of their school system. A Superior Approach There is a better approach. To begin with, dispense with the current or past personnel of MOE; they are or have been part of the problem. Consider that the most consequential reform in medical education, The Flexner Report of 1910 was produced not by a doctor or even an educator but an insurance salesman! It still is the foundation of modern American medical education. In Malaysia, the Razak Report of 1956 transformed Malaysian education, yet its author was no educator or teacher. The only qualification I seek in those undertaking reform would be a respectable education (meaning, they have earned rather than bought their degrees), a proven record of success in any endeavor, and the necessary commitment, especially time, intellect, and energy. Meaning, these individuals would have to take a sabbatical from their regular duties. I would have no more than five members, with one designated as leader. Then I would give them a generous budget to hire the best independent professional staff, from clerks to answer the phones efficiently to IT personnel to design and maintain an effective website, to scholars, statisticians and data analysts. The budget should also provide for travel to visit exemplary school systems elsewhere. I would also have those panelists spend most of their time talking to students, parents and teachers rather than ministry officials. The panel should also have sufficient resources to hire consultants from countries with demonstrably superior school systems. I would choose two in particular – Finland and America. Both have sufficient experiences in dealing with children of marginalized communities; Finland with its new immigrants, America its minorities. Yes, American public schools do not enjoy favorable reputation but there are islands of excellence for us to emulate. I would avoid consultants from Korea and other East Asian countries for at least two reasons. One, they are ethnically and culturally homogenous; they have no experience dealing with diverse groups; the Malaysian dilemma is alien to them. For another, while the Koreans regularly excel in international comparisons, they do not think highly of their own cram-school-plagued system. Those who can, avoid it. I would also look beyond the advanced countries to, for example Mexico for its Progressa Program, and Rwanda with its ambitious and highly successful One-Laptop-Per-Child (OLPC) scheme. If poor Rwanda could have such an imaginative initiative, Malaysia could do even more. Rwanda demonstrates that an enlightened government approach could actually bring down prices. Rwanda's computers cost under RM500 per unit! It could do that because the program is under the management of competent and honest foreign experts, not local inertia-laden bureaucrats and corrupt politicians on the take. Rwandan leaders are self confident and fully aware that they lack local expertise; they are not hesitant in calling in foreigners and do not worry about being "neo-colonized" or whatever. Rwanda offers many other useful lessons. Foremost is that children from even the most physically and socially challenged environments could leapfrog the technological gap. That is pertinent for our children in Ulu Kelantan and Interior Sarawak. For another, reform in the classrooms spills into the wider community, spurring further reforms and developments there. Those Rwandan children dragged along their parents and grandparents into the digital age. Those elders are now open to the wider world; consequently they demand more of their leaders, like their villages having electricity so they could use their computers longer. They view those machines as agents of liberation and emancipation; now they can find out the price of the commodities they sell and the goods they buy directly from the market instead of being captive to the middlemen. The only time I would call for ministry's input is to have the staff enumerate the problems and challenges faced under the current system. This would also show whether they are indeed aware of those problems and whether their assessments match those of parents. I would arrange the public participation component differently and also encourage input from all, individuals as well as groups. The initial submissions however, would have to be in writing. That would force presenters to think through their ideas. For groups I would stipulate that their report be accompanied by an attestation that it had been endorsed by their executive committees or general membership. All submissions would be in Malay or English, with a translation in the other language. For those exceeding 300 words there would have to be an accompanying executive summary not more than 200 words, again in both languages. All these submissions would be posted on the panel's website, with readers free to post their comments. Those comments as well as the original submissions would have to be edited (again by the panel's professional staff) for clarity, brevity and accuracy, as well as to avoid embarrassing grammatical and spelling errors. That would lend some gravitas to the website as well as provide useful learning opportunities for those who surf it. The website as well as other media outlets must reflect the professionalism and excellence of the reform effort. One does not get this impression now on reading the Blueprint or perusing the reform's website. The panel would then select from those submissions the few that are worthy for further exploration in an open public hearing. The purpose of those structured open hearings is to give the panel opportunities to elucidate greater details from the submitters, and for them to expand on their ideas. Those hearings are not meant to hear from new or on-the-spur commentators. Such a scheme would effectively cut out the grandstanders. Again, those proceedings, their transcripts as well as the video and audio recordings, would be posted on the website. Only after all the public hearings have been completed would the panel gather to write their final recommendations, with freedom for each member to produce his or her own separate or dissenting comment. That is the only way to be credible. The current process produces nothing more than a sanitized press release of MOE, embellished with the imprimaturs of those impressive corporate and international consultants.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Much ado about PJ’s mayor: Another case for local council elections Posted: 14 Oct 2012 02:38 PM PDT ON 1 Oct 2012, Petaling Jaya mayor Datuk Mohamad Roslan Sakiman was transferred out of his post to a new post by the Public Services Department (PSD) without warning. A day later, the Selangor Menteri Besar Tan Sri Khalid Ibrahim ordered the mayor to stay put. On 3 Oct, the PSD agreed to postpone the transfer to 1 Dec, but said that the transfer was agreed to by the Selangor government. On 4 Oct, the Selangor government responded by saying that while there had been a discussion on the appointment of officers, no agreement had been reached on the subject. The state government insisted that the position of mayor is the prerogative of the state authority and not the PSD. Both sides have not budged from their position. When 1 Dec comes, who shall Mohamad Roslan obey? And what are the long-term solutions if such transfers were to be repeated in the future? Legality Petaling Jaya City Council (MBPJ) councillor Derek Fernandez has rightly pointed out that Section 10 of the Local Government Act 1976 allows the state authority the sole and exclusive power to determine the mayor's tenure. "PSD cannot override a statutory appointment. So, he has to report for duty and perform his function as a mayor," said Fernandez, as reported in The Star. What Fernandez failed to mention however, is that the PSD also has the jurisdiction to direct where their officers serve. In the event there is a conflict of orders, who should Mohamad Roslan obey? Indeed, as an officer who draws his salary from the federal government and with a pension programme to look forward to when he retires, it would seem unlikely that Mohamad Roslan would even dare disobey the PSD. All this could be resolved if the state government would just appoint a politician to the post of mayor, as nothing in the Local Government Act stipulates that the mayor must be a PSD officer to begin with. So why is the state authority fighting so hard to keep Mohamad Roslan on the job? Blame game An excuse often used by the Pakatan Rakyat government when the MBPJ does not perform its duties properly is that they are being internally sabotaged by their own officers.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Posted: 14 Oct 2012 02:08 PM PDT Violence is fueled by ignorance. And ignorance about "human rights' as much as ignorance about Islam (not to mention Christianity) is rife in the Western mass media. Fundamentalist secularists, paradoxically joined by some American fundamentalist preachers, can only see the issue as one of "freedom of speech". In a pluralist society people have the right to make movies and print cartoons which other people may find offensive. No subject should be taboo. But the most difficult decisions we make are not about right and wrong, but choosing between competing rights. Error has its right of expression, but every person, including the dead, has the right not to be misrepresented or vilified. Laws against libel and slander recognize this in every civilized society. And publicly insulting those who cannot answer us back (especially the dead, children, the mentally disabled, and those in other societies) is the hallmark of the coward. Those who replace debate with insults are every bit as fanatical as those who resort to violence instead of counter-argument. The language of "tolerance" is selectively applied in the US and Europe today. Anti-Islamic rhetoric is tolerated, but not anti-Gay rhetoric, for example. Indeed, anybody even expressing a personal opinion that he or she believes that homosexual acts are expressions of a disordered sexuality are hounded out of a job or refused an opportunity to express their views in the media an even in academic fora. As for anybody who expresses mockery at blacks or women, there is no way he can run for public office. The media outrage will be deafening. Why, then this self-righteous hypocrisy when it come to hate speech against Muslims or Christians? (Jews in the US, being the benefactors of many universities and owners of media cannot, of course, be touched) Furthermore, one can enjoy a right and yet choose not to exercise it. Wise newspaper editors do this all the time. Some article, cartoon or photograph may not be in the public interest, or run counter to the paper's own views, or fan the flames of social conflict by exposing a particularly vulnerable community to derision and contempt. And that is the position many Muslims find themselves in, especially in the US and parts of Western Europe, after Sept 11 2001. At the height of the controversy about the Danish cartoons a few years ago, a Danish woman theologian, Lissi Rasmussen, wrote: "The fact that almost on a daily basis the media portray one-sided, negative stories about immigrants in general and Muslims in particular (reproduced by politicians and by public opinion), affects the Muslim minorities who feel unwanted, insecure and unconfident. This may lead to detachment also among well-educated, second-generation immigrants and become an excuse for avoiding responsibility. It has resulted in an ingrained mistrust of the media and political processes, a lack of interest to integrate into the Danish society and taken away the energy to reflect critically and contextually on Islam."
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Exposed: Federal Govt is Umno propaganda unit Posted: 14 Oct 2012 01:46 PM PDT A propaganda booklet produced by the Federal Government exposed by Malaysiakini on Saturday provides further evidence of how Umno politicians and civil servants use taxpayer funds and facilities to serve their own personal and party ends. Called Panduan Penjelasan Isu Semasa, or a guidebook to current affairs, it was produced by JASA (Jabatan Hal Ehwal Khas) or "Special Affairs Department" — in political terms, that usually means "dirty tricks department".  JASA kotor – the anti-Bersih campaign The Bersih public rally for electoral reforms are attacked in one chapter with a headline that repeats a slogan used by the Information Minister Rais Yatim at the time the rally was held. Even though the guidebook is an official federal publication, and bears the federation coat-of-arms, it makes no attempt to keep the federal government out of party politics, In fact, it explicitly names Pakatan Rakyat, Anwar Ibrahim, and the Pakatan's policy document Buku Jingga, as targets of criticism. The explanation for Bersih't its objectives are a blatant Umno attack on Pakatan Rakyat — not unsurprising, but the documents is an official federal government publication. It bears the federation coat-of-arms, and the taxpayer (among whom are DAP, PAS and PKR members as well as ordinary civilians) has every right to expect his government to show neutrality in the tussle between parties. But Umno long ago abandoned any principles it may have had (if ever). For example, western political philosophies are highlighted for criticism — and no wonder, because civil service neutrality is one of the basic principles of parliamentary democracy. Malaysiakini editor Fathi Aris Omar wrote on Saturday that the recent propaganda attacks on Malaysiakini by the government and Umno politician had been part of the campaign outlined in the information ministry guidebook. International financier and philanthropist George Soros, his alleged links to Zionism, and his links to Anwar Ibrahim were specifically mentioned in the guidebook.  Umno dirty tricks by the Information Ministry Fuad was a two-term Selangor assemblyman for Hulu Kelang until defeated in 1999 by PKR's Azmin Ali, now deputy president of the party. The guidebook is nothing more than an propaganda booklet, produced by federal government civil servants using public funds, to get civil servants and the public to follow the current thinking of Umno polticians. Besides having produced the guidebook, JASA also held an exhibition at Umno Kuala Pilah's delegates meeting on Sept 22 — the division is headed by Umno's information chief Ahmad Maslan, who is a deputy minister in the Prime Minister's Department.  Federal government Information Ministry or Umno propaganda division? Read more at: http://uppercaise.wordpress.com/2012/10/15/exposed-federal-govt-is-umno-propaganda-unit/
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Is Kit Siang senile too, Tony Pua (Part 2) Posted: 11 Oct 2012 04:18 PM PDT It does not matter that he is the Division Head for Tasek Gelugor. He is bad news and should not be a winnable candidate of BN. After all, he got that post by dishonouring a gentleman's agreement with Dato Sharif Omar who gave way the MP seat for him.
In 1994, Nor Mohamed and his then boss, BNM Governor the late Tan Sri Jaafar Hussein were gentlemen enough to accept responsibility for making that mother of all losses in the spot currency market. The market practitioner then justify such activities as taking an active reserve management over a passive reserve management. Before BNM, it was the Russian that steamroll against any market trend. The person responsible to monitor this activity was the then Finance Minister, Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim. He gets various reports on reserve, activities and development of program regularly. Lim Kit Siang identified Anwar as also responsible for the loss from putting together his official statements. [Read previous posting here.] Anwar should resign for his negligence. Why didn't he resign? Why didn't Kit Siang kept demanding on him till today? Perhaps he is too old and senile to remember he said those words, and to repeat and make ruckus over the same issue. Or perhaps he conveniently senile at the right time and political opportunity.
When Wong Choon Mei's Malaysia Chronicle reported an attempt to deviate responsibility from Anwar to Tun Dr Mahathir, that is wrong. Right is right even if it involves Nor Mohamed. The then Nor Mohamed, I mean. The except of the report here, below: Opposition Leader Anwar Ibrahim dropped a bombshell on Monday revealing that the central Bank Negara not only lost RM30 billion trading in the currency markets but that it was former premier Mahathir Mohamad who had ordered him not to punish Nor Mohamed Yakcop, who was then in charge of the bank's treasury. Anwar's revelation bolsters the view that Mahathir had knowledge of and even encouraged Nor to gamble in the global markets, racking up enormous losses that made Malaysia vulnerable to the sharp slowdown of the mid 1990s. "Dr Mahathir ordered, 'don't touch him (Nor)'. The prime minister at the time did not agree with taking action because he said, 'If we make profits, you praise him (Nor), when we make losses, you want to torture him'," Anwar told a press conference in Parliament today. Nor Mohamed had indeed shocked the international markets with his huge deals and buy-sell orders in the 1990s. In his book Malaysian Maverick, author Barry Wain had also written that Mahathir knew of and encouraged Nor to speculate. Nor Mohamad has never pointed the finger at Mahathir or implicated the older man. However, the fact that Mahathir has consistently refused to punish Nor has stirred suspicion. He even promoted Nor to Special Economic Adviser and gave him a key role to play in Malaysia's controversial implementation of currency control measures during the 1997-98 Asian financial crisis. Tun Dr Mahathir did not bother to reply or is delaying in order to give a snap back at Tony Pua first for calling him senile. There is an answer to it without him having to say anything.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Rise and Rapid Fall of Suaram’s Cynthia Gabriel Posted: 11 Oct 2012 01:25 PM PDT After all, at the height of the Scorpene saga it was suggested mysteriously that Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak was set to be whisked off to France to testify at a trial. If he didn't go, said Suaram's media friends, our trade with the European Union would suffer. It was total fiction but for Suaram and Pakatan Rakyat they were happy days as the story dominated the media. They went on with their spin and stories. Except as we now know, there is not and never has been any trial. A visiting French lawyer Yves Charpenel, who also happens to be a former French prosecutor, torpedoed that story in a five minute press conference in Kuala Lumpur this week. This has left Suaram reeling. Far more than the revelations about the web of foreign interests that funds this politicised and Pakatan-backed "human rights" group, the "no trial" revelation harmed Suaram because it struck at the heart of its integrity. Gabriel knew this when she shuffled forward to face the music Wednesday. Asked why her organisation let everyone believe that the Scorpene submarine deal was the subject of a trial in France she answered weakly: "Suaram has no control on how (the) media are reporting this matter." But as The Choice has reminded her, this isn't actually true. At any time Suaram could have corrected the false story doing the rounds but chose not to do so. Nor did it suit its friends in Pakatan Rakyat and the phalanx of foreign interests happy to see cleverly crafted untruths undermine our political independence. Now that Gabriel has suffered such a painful come down her opponents are on the attack. Without naming Suaram, Independent MP Datuk Seri Zahrain Mohamed Hashim told the Dewan Rakyat: "The people were hoodwinked by these group of people who collected donations from the public for the so-called trial." "I believe the government has a solid ground take up a defamation suit against the perpetrators." He also proposed a law to "monitor the activities of suspected foreign agents who interfere in the internal affairs of the country". Again, he didn't name anyone but he might as well have been carrying a photo of Suaram donor George Soros. But another press briefing in KL definitely did name Suaram accusing it of the "biggest lie in the country's political history." Young Journalists Club President Dzulkarnain Taib produced a court document from France showing that French judges Roger Le Loire and Serge Tournaire rejected Suaram as a plaintiff in the case on March 13 this year. "This means that the case by Suaram in relation to Scorpene has been thrown out by the French court since March 2012," he said. This will further embarrass Gabriel personally because in her defence of Suaram this week she said: "There is no confusion on our part that the case is on the second stage, at the criminal inquiry process when Suaram is accepted as a civil party in March this year."
|
| You are subscribed to email updates from Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |
0 ulasan:
Catat Ulasan