Rabu, 12 September 2012

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Reverse defections hurting BN

Posted: 11 Sep 2012 02:15 PM PDT

Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak's administration has made incredible efforts to change undemocratic laws but is that enough to swing votes in BN's favour?

Amir Ali, FMT

In Malaysian politics, there is no messing around with the powers-that-be.

But when members of the judiciary and those of the executive start abandoning those powers, something is definitely changing in the country.

Since 2008, it was a one-way traffic with the defections of several opposition MPs and YBs who either joined the majority or formed a so-called independent group in Parliament or the State Legislative Assemblies.

These defections hurt the opposition's ego and image a lot at that time but today, the defections of MPs from the majority is definitely hurting the Barisan National badly.

Before 2004 – the year when former deputy prime minister Anwar Ibrahim was freed following a reversal of a judgment in the Sodomy 1 case against him – the opposition leader could not win any case in the Malaysian courts.

During the heydays of the "reformasi" movement, this earned the Malaysian judiciary the title of "kangaroo" courts. "Reformasi" was a movement launched by Anwar on the eve of his arrest in 1998.

Are we now witnessing an erosion of the stranglehold of powers on the judiciary in Malaysia?

The opposition leader was jubilant in May this year when a former solicitor-general Yusof Zainal Abiden joined his legal team in the Bersih 3.0 case.

"This is a positive development… I think more lawyers are biding their time to join me as well," Anwar said at that time.

Erosion of power

The opposition has since then been reinforced with the presence of former chief justice, Salleh Abas, who said he was ready to provide legal advice to PKR strategy director, Rafizi Ramli, who is facing charges related to the controversial National Feedlot Corporation (NFCorp) project.

Rafizi confirmed he received a call from Salleh informing him of the latter's willingness to make suggestions on how to deal with the allegations he is facing under the Banking and Financial Institutions Act (Bafia) 1989.

In Malaysia, the "executive" body of the government, commonly known as the legislative body, is a vital element in the making of a government.

It is the majority that the government controls that keeps it in power. An erosion of this power – with members of Parliament leaving the majority – is sign of an impending crisis. And such crisis cannot be seen as a positive development by foreign investors and international backers.

It is common knowledge that if you are a supporter or a member of the ruling coalition, you will not be supporting or giving advice to the opposition and this is how Malaysia and most Westminster-style democracies work.

Needless to point out then that the additions from the judiciary to the opposition ranks signify a new trend in Malaysia.

It also obvious that the establishment, which is crucial to the good running of a government in power, is shifting away from the powers-that-be in Malaysia.

The efforts by the prime minister to offer a half-month bonus to the civil servants is a clear message that civil servants are probably shifting their support.

As a matter of fact, the Barisan National leadership was sent into disarray with the defection of two MPs from Sabah.

Trouble for BN

The holding of a mass rally by BN defectors on Aug 12 may altogether signal a definite downslope for the BN in the Borneo states.

And the descent into troubled waters did not end there for the BN.

Anwar, the dashing opposition leader and head of Pakatan Rakyat, won a case against S Nallakaruppan. The case – with that of his January victory in the tainted Sodomy 2 case – has opened a breach in the loyalty of the "justice" system towards the BN.

It is to be noted that amid all the accusations against Anwar, none of the accusers dared sue the opposition leader except in the sodomy case.

On the contrary, Anwar is suing his accusers and now that he is winning the cases, it is imperative for the BN to think of an alternative plan to counter Anwar.

Then came BN's idea of dragging Anwar and his close allies to court for the Bersih 3.0 demonstrations.

What will come out of these deliberations in court will surely decide the fate of the BN rather than that of the Pakatan or of Anwar himself. He can only come out bigger than life when the case is over.

The slipping away of this powers from the hands of the BN is certain. If there were any doubts, the massive support of the Bar Council for the opposition is a point to take into consideration.

Another point is the other massive entry of professionals into the ranks of the opposition parties.

PAS today can boast of the presence of several of the nation's scholars and lecturers or teachers as well as top former civil servants within its ranks. The same goes for the entire Pakatan grouping.

More and more leaders or former leaders of the judiciary and the executive are joining PAS, PKR and DAP and this cannot be ignored.

New impetus

What will the BN do to stem the exodus? Will the jailing of Anwar, Rafizi and their closest associates be the solution?

The government under Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak has made incredible efforts to change the laws that were regarded as undemocratic.

It has also opened up more space for constructive criticism of its work while it allowed the opposition to have more avenues (including demonstrations) to express its disagreement with the authorities.

But did these sacrifices work in favour of the government?

READ MORE HERE

 

Currency scandal: new files contradict Stevens

Posted: 11 Sep 2012 10:40 AM PDT

http://images.smh.com.au/2012/09/11/3626681/art-353-glenn-20stevens-300x0.jpg

Questions raised ... Glenn Stevens. Photo: Tamara Voninski

(Sydney Morning Herald) - The arms dealer's company wrote to Mr Campbell demanding further payments and stating that it had convinced the ''prime minister and the Malaysian cabinet'' to give out contracts.

NEW internal documents have contradicted parliamentary testimony by the Reserve Bank governor, Glenn Stevens, that the bank knew nothing about the Securency banknote scandal before it was revealed by a Fairfax investigation in 2009.

The scandal involves the Reserve Bank companies Securency and Note Printing Australia, which were charged last year with bribing foreign officials to win banknote contracts.

The sensitive documents, seen by the Fairfax, which contradict Mr Stevens's parliamentary testimony, come from the central bank's files.

They show that in 2007:

The assistant governor Frank Campbell was told that Securency engineered a dodgy business deal to hide a $492,000 payment to an allegedly corrupt Malaysian arms dealer;

The arms dealer's company wrote to Mr Campbell demanding further payments and stating that it had convinced the ''prime minister and the Malaysian cabinet'' to give out contracts.

Reserve Bank auditor John Klincke allegedly queried a Securency manager about payments to an agent working for Vietnam's spy agency, and was told in response: "Well, if I asked you if you worked for ASIO, you wouldn't tell me, would you".

The Herald can also reveal that the Reserve - unwittingly or otherwise - hampered the Australian Federal Police bribery inquiry by failing to inform it for several months in 2009 of incriminating documents it held regarding its subsidiaries' activities.

In response to 18 questions from the Fairfax, the Reserve released a statement saying:

''The bank has sought to deal appropriately with all the issues that have arisen. It has co-operated fully with the legal authorities, notifying them of the existence of relevant documents and providing documents when requested. There has been no attempt by the bank to hide information from the authorities.

''Even if it were ultimately to be concluded, with the benefit of hindsight, that incorrect conclusions were drawn from the various investigations, the bank and the NPA board relied on the information available at the time and external legal advice. The bank's executives acted in good faith and with integrity. It is completely without foundation to suggest otherwise.''

The fresh revelations have led to further calls for an inquiry into the bank's handling of the scandal.

 
Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

0 ulasan:

Catat Ulasan

 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved