Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News
Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News |
| Posted: 03 Oct 2011 06:48 AM PDT
DAP national chairman Karpal Singh should be commended for reiterating that his party is not in favour of PAS's proposition to implement the hudud, and for calling a spade a spade. The same, however, cannot be said of Pakatan Rakyat supremo Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim who has been reported as saying that at the personal level, he is supportive of the hudud. Thinking Malaysians should therefore probe deeper into what is the real basis of the working relationship between parties in Pakatan Rakyat. Ideological coherence is definitely not the answer. While all fingers point to marriage of convenience as a plausible explanation, we should not forget that the DAP had on more than one occasion requested a separation. Nevertheless, since the political climate prior to the run up to the 12th general election in 2008 was stacked against Barisan Nasional, PAS and the DAP had decided to put aside their differences by omitting PAS's Islamic state agenda in their 2008 election manifesto. PAS's partners in Pakatan Rakyat must be wondering how long this ad hoc alliance will last, now that the former's spiritual leader is insisting that hudud be implemented come what may. This is indeed mind boggling as PAS had decided in its recently concluded muktamar that the party is now struggling to set up a welfare state as opposed to an Islamic polity. While political pundits have offered various explanations for this sudden turn of events, we have yet to stumble upon a satisfactory answer. Why is PAS endangering Pakatan Rakyat's chances of winning the next general election by resorting to an old strategy that has been proven to be ineffective among moderate Muslims and non-Muslims? It could well be that PAS has come to a realisation that the party's image as an Islamic party has been bruised by its decision to embrace the welfare state agenda; but by going back to its original struggle to set up an Islamic polity, the party risks alienating moderates who had supported Pakatan Rakyat candidates in the last general election. This is the central dilemma that PAS has to deal with. PAS's identity as an Islamic party is pursued sub condicione – on condition that its pursuit does not jeopardise the party. In the course of articulating its goal, we have witnessed how PAS's stand vis-à-vis hudud has become more vague. The PAS ideology which was manifest becomes latent. More importantly, a permanent gap opens up between official aims and PAS's behaviour. The relationship between aims and behaviour never completely disappears; it attenuates. The correspondence of PAS's behaviour with its official aims is constantly reaffirmed by its leaders – amongst the many courses of action possible to achieve its official aims, those which are compatible with its stability will be selected. For instance, the recurrent pattern we find in the relationship between PAS and DAP – the split and reconciliation is better understood as the result of articulation, rather than a substitution of aims. On the one hand, PAS's original aim of implementing the hudud is constantly evoked as it is the basis of the party's identity, but on the other hand, the chosen courses of action guarantee organisational stability without taking credibility away from the notion that PAS is still "working" towards its original aim. By invoking hudud, PAS hopes to maintain its legitimacy in the eyes of its supporters. The implementation of hudud will continue to influence PAS, to play an essential role both in its internal processes and in the relationship between PAS and its environment for a long time. We are nonetheless left to wonder if its invocation of hudud this time around is a mere façade. Dr Azeem Fazwan Ahmad Farouk
|
| Freedom House Calls For Release of Egyptian Blogger Posted: 03 Oct 2011 06:39 AM PDT
On the eve of his appeal hearing, Freedom House condemns the unjust imprisonment of Egyptian blogger Maikel Nabil Sanad and calls for his immediate release. Mr. Sanad was sentenced to three years in prison as a result of his criticism of the military's brutal treatment of protestors. During his trial, he was accused of spreading false information and insulting the military. He was convicted in a summary procedure without the presence of a lawyer or the ability to contact his family. Makail Nabil began a hunger strike in August to protest his imprisonment and intends to continue this strike until he dies or is released. "Mikael's trial and hasty imprisonment by a military tribunal on charges of insulting the armed forces is a violation of his right to due process as well as a betrayal of the principles of democracy the Egyptian military claims it wants to uphold," said Charles Dunne, Freedom House's senior program manager for MENA. "The appeal hearing on October 4 is a clear opportunity for Egypt's ruling military council to set right a gross injustice." Egyptians have been the victims of an increasing crackdown on public debate, including the reinstatement of the Ministry of Information, a ministry that does not exist in most democracies and is viewed as restrictive by many activists. At least 12,000 civilians have been tried in military courts since February 2011, according to Human Rights Watch. Bloggers, journalists and those critical of the military have been arrested and restrictions have been placed on publication or broadcast of information or opinion about the military. In August 2011, activist and blogger Asmaa Mahfouz was arrested and charged with inciting violence against the military for her social networking posts. Egypt is ranked Not Free in Freedom in the World 2011, Freedom House's survey of political rights and civil liberties, and Not Free in Freedom of the Press 2011. For more information on Egypt, visit: Freedom House is an independent watchdog organization that supports democratic change, monitors the status of freedom around the world, and advocates for democracy and human rights.
|
| You are subscribed to email updates from Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |
0 ulasan:
Catat Ulasan