Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info

Sumber Asal Berita :-

Posted: 24 Jul 2011 03:00 PM PDT

By Ben Packham, The Australian

The government had pledged to process all asylum-seekers arriving after May 7 in a third country.

But Malaysia refused to make the agreement retrospective and a hoped-for deal with Papua New Guinea has stalled.

A total of 568 asylum-seekers have arrived by boat since May 7.

The Prime Minister said asylum-seekers sent to Malaysia would be treated humanely and would not be sent back to the country from which they had fled.

"The arrangement reaffirms Malaysia's commitment that transferees will be treated with dignity and respect in accordance with human rights standards," she said in a statement.

All refugees sent to Malaysia under the agreement will face pre-transfer fitness tests and biometric identity checks.

They will considered "lawful" in Malaysia and moved into the community after initial accommodation in a Malaysian transit centre.

Malaysia will have complete control over the asylum-seekers they accept onto their soil. Anyone "not provided consent" will be ineligible to be transferred.

Asylum-seekers found not to be refugees will be returned to their country of origin at Australia's cost.

Asylum-seekers sent to Malaysia will receive no preferential treatment over other asylum-seekers in Australia in terms of processing or resettlement.

In a statement today the UNHCR said it was not a signatory to the agreement but "it appreciates that both governments have consulted with the office".

The UNHCR said it would have preferred Australia to deal with its own asylum-seeker arrivals.

"UNHCR's preference has always been an arrangement which would enable all asylum-seekers arriving by boat into Australian territory to be processed in Australia. This would be consistent with general practice," it said.

It said the "critical test" would be in the agreement's implementation, particularly its protection and vulnerability assessment procedures.

Ms Gillard confirmed the government would back down on its initial commitment that all new arrivals after May 7 would be processed in a third country.

"Under the arrangement signed today, those who arrived in Australia before 25 July will not be transferred to Malaysia.

"Consequently, the people who arrived prior to today's announcement, currently being detained on Christmas Island, will now be processed in Australia," she said.

FULL TEXT OF ARRANGEMENT BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT OF AUSTRALIA AND THE GOVERNMENT OF MALAYSIA ON TRANSFER AND RESETTLEMENT (pdf)

MALAYSIA DEAL OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES

Malaysia's Political Awakening

Posted: 23 Jul 2011 09:41 PM PDT

By John Mallot, East-West Centre

Malaysia's government may assert otherwise, but the evidence is overwhelmingly on Bersih's side. Malaysia is not a full democracy, and its elections are neither free nor fair. Malaysian citizens have awakened to that fact. Now the world's democracies need to stand on the right side of Malaysia's future.

A Malaysian recently wrote to me, "Most Americans don't know or even care where Malaysia is."

Even among the so-called foreign policy elite, little attention is paid to Malaysia. There are few American academics who specialise in domestic Malaysian politics, and except for hosting visits by senior Malaysian leaders, think-tanks and universities hold few Malaysia-themed programmes.

US newspaper and magazine reports are few, with most articles focusing on tourism and the delights of Malaysian cuisine. As a result, there is a tendency among Americans to hold an idealised (and outdated) image of Malaysia as a successful multi-racial and multi-religious paradise, an Asian economic dynamo, and a stable and moderate Muslim democracy.

As a result of this deficit of informed analysis of Malaysia, there has been a failure to notice the internal political and economic changes unfolding within Malaysia over the past few years.

The reality today, as one Australian expert puts it, is that the situation is the "most fluid and dangerous" in Malaysia's history.

A date for the history books

Because of this attention shortfall, the events of July 9 came as a surprise. On that day, tens of thousands of Malaysians - who have been ranked on Hofstede's Power Distance Index as the most submissive to authority of any people in the world - chose to defy their government and join a 'Walk for Democracy'.

They heeded the call of Bersih 2.0, a coalition of 62 non-governmental organisations that calls for free and fair elections. In the days before the rally, the Malaysian government cracked down. It rounded up 200 leaders associated with the movement, claiming that they were "waging war against the king" and planning to overthrow the government.

It declared both the Bersih coalition and the planned rally illegal, and in a truly bizarre action, it declared the colour yellow - Bersih's signature colour - illegal.

Malaysian citizens were arrested for possessing Bersih literature or wearing yellow T-shirts. The police established roadblocks around the city and banned 91 Bersih and opposition leaders from entering Kuala Lumpur. By the morning of July 9, the city was in total lockdown.

Then something remarkable happened. As Ambiga Sreenevasan, the distinguished lawyer who leads Bersih put it, the Malaysian people showed that they no longer would be intimidated by their government. They chose to march, knowing that they would be met by tear gas, chemical-laced water cannon and police batons.

Even after Bersih's leadership was arrested, Malaysians of all ages, races and religions continued their 'Walk for Democracy' through the streets of Kuala Lumpur. They locked arms, they sang their national anthem, they blew bubbles and carried flowers.

They were peaceful. The only muscle seen that day was the heavy hand of the police. Human Rights Watch later called the use of force excessive, the 1,670 arrests unwarranted, and the police attacks on marchers unprovoked.

This repression by Prime Minister Najib Razak and his government drew international condemnation, and it also put a lie to Najib's two-year effort to portray himself as a modern, liberal-minded leader.

More importantly, and of greater concern to Najib and his Umno party - the main party that has ruled Malaysia continuously since independence in 1957 - is that it awakened a new generation of Malaysians.

It is too soon to know whether the movement for electoral reform and the establishment of true democracy in Malaysia will be sustained. If it is, then July 9 will be remembered as a turning point in Malaysia's history.

A flawed democracy

Why should a government be so afraid of a call for fair elections? Like his predecessors, Najib claims that demonstrations will lead to chaos, even though the right of assembly is guaranteed by the nation's constitution and is commonplace in any true democracy.

As for free and fair elections, Najib says that Malaysia already has them; if not, then opposition parties would not have achieved the gains they made in the 2008 elections, when they received 47 percent of the popular vote and took control of five states. Opposition parties counter that if elections truly were fair and free, they would form the government and not the Umno-led coalition.

Political rhetoric aside, Malaysia's electoral system has been analysed by academics in Australia, Malaysia, the United States, and elsewhere. In addition, the state of Malaysia's political freedom has been assessed by many international groups.

The Economist Intelligence Unit, for example, labels Malaysia a "flawed democracy" in its Democracy Index. Freedom House says that Malaysia is only "partly free". Reporters Without Borders places Malaysia 141st out of the 178 countries in its Press Freedom Index.

On elections, the US Department of State Country Reports on Human Rights Practices declares that Malaysian opposition parties are unable to compete on equal terms with the governing Umno-dominated coalition because of restrictions on campaigning and freedom of assembly and association.

"News of the opposition," the report says, is "tightly restricted and reported in a biased fashion."

Academics point to the Election Commission's gerrymandering, which creates highly imbalanced constituencies that favour the ruling party, where the number of voters per seat can range from 7,000 to over 100,000.

Over the years, there have been numerous credible reports of the use of phantom voters, stuffed ballot boxes, vote-buying, and abuse of government resources to attract votes.

In Sarawak's state elections this past April, Najib was caught on video, blatantly telling a village gathering that his government would give them US$1.5 million for a local project, but only if they elected his candidate.

Lukewarm response

Malaysia's government may assert otherwise, but the evidence is overwhelmingly on Bersih's side. Malaysia is not a full democracy, and its elections are neither free nor fair. Malaysian citizens have awakened to that fact. Now the world's democracies need to stand on the right side of Malaysia's future.

The United States has a multitude of interests in Malaysia, one of which is to help strengthen democracy and the rule of law.

Human rights groups have condemned what they call the US government's "lukewarm" response to the events of July 9. This is a moment when the United States, which named Bersih's leader Ambiga an International Woman of Courage in 2009, can show the same courage and make a difference in the life of a nation.

JOHN R MALOTT was the US Ambassador to Malaysia, 1995-1998, and continues to follow developments in that country closely.

The above appeared in Asia Pacific Bulletin (APB) series, published by the East-West Center, which promotes better relations and understanding among the people and nations of the United States, Asia, and the Pacific through cooperative study, research, and dialogue. The article can be downloaded at the site.

RM800m pride of the nation in disgraceful state

Posted: 23 Jul 2011 01:34 PM PDT

By Haresh Deol, Malay Mail

BUKIT JALIL: It was supposed to be the pride of the nation.

A concept first dreamed up during the days of second Prime Minister Tun Abdul Razak, the National Sports Complex in Bukit Jalil was touted the crown jewel of Malaysian sports where an array of world-class arenas side-by-side.

However, the facilities and stadiums within the RM800 million complex now lie in deplorable state.

Even as the Olympic-class National Stadium hosted a sterling showcase of football matches pitting Liverpool, Arsenal and Chelsea against Malaysia, visitors to the complex, both foreign and local, were subjected to less than world-class facilities.

The Malay Mail's checks at the sprawling 120-hectare complex revealed several displays of poor maintenance, ranging from a polluted lake, pathways with broken tiles and even an open dumping site.

Visitors to the lake at Commonwealth Hill were treated to the sight of polystyrene food containers and plastic bottles floating in murky green water.

This appears to be the result of waste being channeled into the lake by a restaurant at the park entrance.

At the opposite end of the restaurant, several damaged facilities were seen including vandalised rubbish bins, broken seats and a huge crack in the jogging path that could potentially cause injuries to unwary joggers.

A jogger, who only wished to be known as David, described the area as "appalling".

"I like jogging here but I wish it was properly maintained. This crack is big and if I were to fall, I would smash my face into the ground," he said.

BROKEN: Phone booths with missing and vandalised telephones

Another jogger claimed a strong stench emanated from the lake.

"The water's so murky. This is not reflective of a venue that once hosted the Commonwealth Games. Such things cannot be taken lightly."

There were many loose tiles around the National Stadium and Putra Stadium. There was also an open space filled with old rubbish bins, used tiles, signboards and other rusty metal pieces at the large space between the National Aquatic Centre and the Putra Stadium. Even weeds dot this site, suggesting the unused materials have been left there for a long time.

SOAKED THROUGH: The leaky roof in the National Squash Centre

The phone booths are either devoid of phones entirely or busted. These include public phones near the Bukit Jalil LRT station, in front of the National Aquatic Centre and Putra Stadium.

A visitor told The Malay Mail this was an inconvenience, as telecommunication lines are usually congested during major events forcing some to rely on public phones to make calls.

The public toilets, meanwhile, were in bad shape, an embarrassment as we played host to several major events in the past two weeks.

DISGUSTING: The clogged sinks in a toilet within the complex

Apart from the football matches with the Barclays Premier League teams at the National Stadium, the Putra Stadium hosted a concert by Malaysian singer Gary Chaw, as well as the ongoing Malaysia Open squash tournament at the National Squash Centre.

The National Stadium is set to host the upcoming pre-World Cup second round return leg match between Malaysia and Singapore on July 28.

Even the ceiling of several venues at the National Squash Centre has rotted away, with several asbestos pieces missing.

However, contractors were seen laying new tiles on the sidewalks of the road between the Bukit Jalil Sports School and National Sports Council training venue.

New trees were seen being planted in front of Putra Stadium.

The management had come under fire for various reasons in the past including the leaking roof at the Putra Stadium, the poor condition of the diving boards at the National Aquatic Centre and the laying of new turf at the National Hockey Stadium.

Money – or rather lack of it – had previously been cited as the reason the National Stadiums were turning into a national shame.

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

Isnin, 25 Julai 2011

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

0 ulasan:

Catat Ulasan