Selasa, 19 Julai 2011

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Ahmad Sarbani’s death: the lies and deceptions by the MACC (part 7)

Posted: 19 Jul 2011 01:00 AM PDT

Nervously, Ahmad Sarbaini climbed onto the windowsill as ordered by Mohd Fauzi who continued taunting and abusing him with insults. Sheikh Niza merely looked on. In that split second, Ahmad Sarbaini's belt got stuck on the outer part of the window and he lost his balance and his life. And, horror of horrors, what happened to Teoh Beng Hock happened to Ahmad Sarbaini when he fell to his death onto the badminton court below.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

THE TIME HAS COME TO EXPOSE THE KILLERS OF AHMAD SARBAINI MOHAMED

D Day: 6th April

On the morning of 6th April 2011, Ahmad Sarbaini went to the Subang mosque for his dawn (Subuh) prayers. There, he met his good friend, Azman, and told him that he would be amending his earlier statement given to the MACC. In retrospect, he thought that would not be a problem because he had come to regard Sheikh Niza as a friend. 

By 8.30 am, Ahmad Sarbaini was already at the KL MACC office. Within minutes, he was speaking to Sheikh Niza who was eager to record a further Cautioned Statement from Ahmad Sarbaini.

Sheikh Niza panicked when Ahmad Sarbaini told him he wished to retract his earlier confession as  it was procured through fraud and deceit. Of course, Sheikh Niza hit the roof and stated clearly that it was absolutely impossible!

Ahmad Sarbaini was upset and became agitated when Sheikh Niza rejected his request outright. He pleaded desperately with Sheikh Niza and explained that he had misunderstood what the confession was about. However, Sheikh Niza flatly dismissed him and told him to report the matter to KUS Mohd Fauzi.

Then Sheikh Niza made Ahmad Sarbaini wait while he discussed this crucial turn of events with Mohd Fauzi. By then, Sheikh Niza's tone was beginning to sound ominous to Ahmad Sarbaini.

As expected, Mohd Fauzi flipped when he was told that Ahmad Sarbaini wanted to retract his earlier statement. He warned Sheikh Niza that this would ruin both their careers as their HQ was already over the moon about Ahmad Sarbaini's 'extracted confession'.

Since IO Abd Ghani was sceptical when he first saw the confession, Mohd Fauzi then asked if he had spoken to Ahmad Sarbaini about this confession.

Abd Ghani was approaching retirement age and had been disillusioned when despite his seniority, bypassed for promotion and with the recent happenings in the MACC.  Hence, the ambitious Mohd Fauzi -- who by now had become IO Abd Ghani's superior was stricken with fear that IO Abd Ghani might jeopardise the investigation as Ketua Unit Siasatan (KUS).

The cause of death

KUS Mohd Fauzi directed Abd Ghani to track down Wan Zainal while he and Sheikh Niza would 'straighten out' Ahmad Sarbaini. Sheikh Niza was also ordered to seize Ahmad Sarbaini's mobile phone.

Sheikh Niza brought Ahmad Sarbaini to KUS Mohd Fauzi's office, which was next door to the pantry (remember what happened to Teoh Beng Hock). Here, he was verbally abused. KUS Mohd Fauzi called Ahmad Sarbaini a disgrace to the Royal Malaysian Customs, that he was not fit to wear their uniform. Rather shaken up, Ahmad Sarbaini pleaded for pity and a drink of water.

Shockingly, they brought Ahmad Sarbaini to the pantry. Incredibly, as punishment for attempting to retract his 'confession', Mohd Fauzi ordered him to climb out of the window and forced him to stand on the ledge. 

KUS Mohd Fauzi wanted Ahmad Sarbaini to ponder and reflect on his actions while standing on the edge as "orang macam kau ni lebih baik mati dari hidup menyusahkan orang lain".

Nervously, Ahmad Sarbaini climbed onto the windowsill as ordered by Mohd Fauzi who continued taunting and abusing him with insults. Sheikh Niza merely looked on. In that split second, Ahmad Sarbaini's belt got stuck on the outer part of the window and he lost his balance and his life.

And, horror of horrors, what happened to Teoh Beng Hock happened to Ahmad Sarbaini when he fell to his death onto the badminton court below.

KUS Mohd Fauzi was in a dizzy panic when what was supposed to be a threat had now turned fatal. He feared his career and future went up in smoke the moment Ahmad Sarbaini lost his balance. In shock and panic, he ran from the pantry back to his room. 

Sheikh Niza immediately ran downstairs to the lobby in a state of shock and disbelief. He was at the verge of tears, regretting this tragic death.

Concocting a story

Without further delay, KUS Mohd Fauzi called everyone into his room to brainstorm and to concoct the most plausible story. Abd Ghani, Henrietta, Khalid, Kamal and also Sheikh Niza finally agreed the best storyline was that Ahmad Sarbaini had committed suicide as he was depressed that his confession could not be retracted.The Director, Hj Mohd Yusof, was also brought into the loop and the approval from HQ sought.

The script seemed good enough for a press conference that would be called by Dato' Mustafar Ali later that day. That would be the storyline they would all narrate to anyone asking about the death.

And that would be the same story they would give when making the 911 phone call to the Police and in summoning an ambulance. And that was also why not one of these officers went downstairs to confirm whether the dead man on the badminton court was indeed Ahmad Sarbaini.

They already knew who was lying dead on the badminton court. They did not need to go downstairs to verify the identity of the dead person. They all admitted that immediately upon discovering the dead body, they huddled into KUS Mohd Fauzi's room for a 'conference'.

They would later rehearse this script over and over again and say that they were too afraid and were in a state of shock.

To ensure that there was no evidence as to what really happened, they erased the CCTV recordings. That was why the police audio-visual forensics analyst, ASP Fauziah Che Mat, told the Coroner that the CCTV recordings had been tampered with.

According to ASP Fauziah, more than 22 hours of recordings from the three-dozen CCTV cameras in the building were 'interrupted by someone who has expertise in using CCTVs' by 'changing of operation on the set, manually'.

ASP Fauziah: very definite that the CCTV at KL MACC's office were tampered by an expert 

Concealing the true cause of death

However, after running this story past that brilliant legal mind, Dato Seri Mohd Shafee Abdullah, MACC was told that the suicide story would not go down well with the Malaysian public.

Firstly, another  suicide theory would be too close to the Teoh Beng Hock 'suicide'. 

Secondly, other than the 'confession', there was no other evidence of Ahmad Sarbaini's involvement in any corrupt activities. Confessions are mostly procured through torture and intimidation. Without any tangible evidence, the story would not be plausible.

The Police collaborated with the MACC in their attempt to conceal the real cause of Ahmad Sarbaini's death. The scratch marks on Ahmad Sarbaini's belt and the paint stains on his pants would be used as 'evidence' to explain that he was trying to make a hasty escape by jumping onto the roof from the pantry.

Unfortunately, the Coroner had visited the site and anyone who has been to that building would know that jumping onto that roof would lead nowhere. As such, that could not ever have been an escape route!

The Killers and the Conspirators

We now know the identities of Ahmad Sarbaini's killers and conspirators. It is for the Coroner to make that finding of the cause of death and thereafter for AG Gani Patail as the Public Prosecutor to charge these people.

In the meantime, to do justice to this poor deceased man and his family, let it be known that other than the so-called 'confession' -- which was obtained through deception and threats -- there is no evidence to show that the late Ahmad Sarbaini was involved in any corrupt practices. 

All of the MACC witnesses have admitted that fact in court during the Inquest. Also, the MACC's own investigations and audit on his and his family's assets did not disclose any extraordinary wealth -- as what we may have found in recent disclosures of the assets of our politicians and leaders.

So let us allow the soul of Ahmad Sarbaini to rest in peace and offer his grief-stricken widow some respite and respect. 

GRIEF-STRICKEN: Ahamad sarbani's wife, Marziah

TO BE CONTINUED

ADDENDUM

Ahmad Sarbani's death: the lies and deceptions by the MACC (part 1)

http://malaysia-today.net/mtcolumns/no-holds-barred/40947-ahmad-sarbanis-death-the-lies-and-deceptions-by-the-macc-part-1

Ahmad Sarbani's death: the lies and deceptions by the MACC (part 2)

http://www.malaysia-today.net/mtcolumns/no-holds-barred/40949-ahmad-sarbanis-death-the-lies-and-deceptions-by-the-macc-part-2

Ahmad Sarbani's death: the lies and deceptions by the MACC (part 3)

http://malaysia-today.net/mtcolumns/no-holds-barred/40951-ahmad-sarbanis-death-the-lies-and-deceptions-by-the-macc-part-3

Ahmad Sarbani's death: the lies and deceptions by the MACC (part 4)

http://malaysia-today.net/mtcolumns/no-holds-barred/40952-ahmad-sarbanis-death-the-lies-and-deceptions-by-the-macc-part-4

Ahmad Sarbani's death: the lies and deceptions by the MACC (part 5)

http://www.malaysia-today.net/mtcolumns/no-holds-barred/42134-ahmad-sarbanis-death-the-lies-and-deceptions-by-the-macc-part-5

Ahmad Sarbani's death: the lies and deceptions by the MACC (part 6)

http://www.malaysia-today.net/mtcolumns/no-holds-barred/42153-ahmad-sarbanis-death-the-lies-and-deceptions-by-the-macc-part-6

 

Let’s focus

Posted: 18 Jul 2011 05:41 PM PDT

Let's accept one fact. Umno is the problem. And the problem can never become the solution. And if Ku Li thinks that the solution to the problem is to reform Umno, then he is barking up the wrong tree. And this would mean AMANAH is going to fail.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

On Friday, Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah (Ku Li) is going to launch a new movement called Angkatan Amanah Merdeka (AMANAH), according to Free Malaysia Today (you can read the full news coverage below).

Some are probably going to say that this is in response to the 9th July 2011 BERSIH rally or that the success of BERSIH has inspired certain people into making this move. Now, before anyone jumps to conclusions, AMANAH was actually in the cards since last year and was an idea that was not only a long time in making but also a long time in waiting.

However, just as BERSIH has been accused of being a vehicle or tool of the opposition Pakatan Rakyat (or of Anwar Ibrahim), so will AMANAH be accused of being a vehicle or tool of Umno (or of Ku Li). This is mainly because of the personalities behind, or perceived to be behind, the movement (in BERSIH's case it is 'perceived to be behind').

Ku Li is probably one of the last of the better people in Umno. I would be quite prepared to follow Ku Li. But I would find it difficult to follow him if he remains in Umno.

And that is the problem I am facing.

In his hati kecik (small heart), Ku Li wants to reform Umno. He still believes that Umno can be reformed. But I do not share this view. The only way Umno can be reformed would be to kick it out of office and let it remain a decade or two as an opposition party. Only then will it see the need to reform.

It will reform only because it wants to get back into power.

To be fair, Ku Li is not holding any senior party position in Umno. But that does not mean he is no longer significant to Umno. There are still many people in Umno who look up to him and place hopes in him in bringing reforms to Umno, although that group may be a minority rather than a majority.

Ku Li is never going to become the President of Umno. And this means he is not going to become the Prime Minister either if he is trying to do that as the President of Umno.

If Ku Li is hoping that by reforming Umno this can ensure he becomes the President of the party, and therefore the Prime Minister of Malaysia, then his perjuangan (struggle) will be seen as very narrow indeed. And he is going to face the same problem that Anwar Ibrahim is facing -- in that people view his perjuangan as being about becoming the Prime Minister of Malaysia.

Ku Li has to decide whether what he is doing is about reforming Umno or about reforming the country. And he also has to decide whether what he is doing is about serving the rakyat or about serving his own interest (to become Prime Minister).

This is the criticism that Anwar is facing. And it is going to be the same criticism that Ku Li is going to face as well. This is inevitable.

How is Ku Li going to convince everyone that AMANAH is not about Umno and what he is doing is not about ensuring he becomes Prime Minister? This is the task ahead of him. This is the obstacle Anwar is facing and is going to be the obstacle that Ku Li will face as well.

In the meanwhile, I am prepared to give Ku Li the benefit of the doubt unless proven otherwise. We shall support AMANAH until it is proven that AMANAH is not about the rakyat's agenda but about a personal agenda.

Ku Li, however, will need to do some hard selling. Is he prepared to go all the way by even resigning from Umno to prove that this is not about Umno or about his personal quest to become Prime Minister?

Let's accept one fact. Umno is the problem. And the problem can never become the solution. And if Ku Li thinks that the solution to the problem is to reform Umno, then he is barking up the wrong tree. And this would mean AMANAH is going to fail.

***********************************

Ku Li wants to rekindle spirit of founding fathers
Syed Jaymal Zahiid, Free Malaysia Today

Umno veteran Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah will launch a new group to rekindle spirit of national unity.

KUALA LUMPUR: Respected Umno veteran Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah, popularly known as Ku Li, is set to launch his new outfit Angkatan Amanah Merdeka (Amanah) aimed at nurturing unity as espoused by the country's founding fathers.

Amid a more racially divided Malaysia, Amanah said in a statement today the group bids "to reaffirm, inculcate and re-ignite the sense of togetherness and true family spirit that prevailed among all Malaysians during the time of our common struggle for national independence".

It also said it wants to rekindle the legacy, promise and ideals of Bapa Malaysia and the founding fathers so that all Malaysians may live together as members of a truly just, fair, progressive, united and happy nation community.

Its other objectives are:

    * To earnestly acknowledge, affirm and respect the sovereignty of the constituent states of the Malaysian Federation, consistent with the principles of federalism, democratic principles and in the true spirit of the Federal Constitution.

    * To ensure that our national institutions respect and uphold the rule of law, democratic principles, rights and universal values.

    * To support a government and administration that is transparent and accountable, truly competent, efficient, free of corruption and cronyism, clean and honest, fair and trustworthy, and that will be fully able to serve its functions and meet its responsibilities, freely and fairly; an administration that will always be mindful of the rights and interests of the people in whose name and cause it is appointed to serve.

    * To promote the socio-economic well-being of the people, so that all Malaysians may enjoy truly advanced, progressive, fair and equitable lives – individually upholding filial piety and other noble values and collectively joined together in sincere family kinship as members of our national community and as stakeholders in our common national destiny.

    * To support an economic policy that will help achieve and sustain a high standard of living for the people, based on the principle of justice, fairness and balance, consistent with the constitution and under a stable monetary condition.

Razaleigh, who is the group's founding president, will deliver his keynote speech on Friday at the Memorial Tunku Abdul Rahman Putra here.

The Kelantan prince, said to be the "last statesman", has been very critical towards his own party Umno, the Malay linchpin in the Barisan Nasional.

He has often called for Umno, whose image is badly tarnished by its racial politics, to return to the party's original struggles – the guardian of all races in the country.
 

Ahmad Sarbani’s death: the lies and deceptions by the MACC (part 6)

Posted: 18 Jul 2011 01:00 AM PDT

Sheikh Niza had to do what was necessary to pin this rap on Ahmad Sarbaini. There was no turning back now. They had already committed themselves and so they had to make this 'Malaysian Book of Records' case stick, by hook or by crook if necessary.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

THE TIME HAS COME TO EXPOSE THE KILLERS OF AHMAD SARBAINI MOHAMED

Ahmad Sarbaini's Second Cautioned Statement

Ahmad Sarbaini's first Cautioned Statement (part 5 of this report) became a serious problem for the MACC KL senior officers when there was nothing in that statement which could be used against the Customs Deputy Director.

The assignment the MACC HQ gave them was to 'detect and detain'. However, based on what had transpired thus far, the MACC KL office could neither detect nor detain Ahmad Sarbaini -- or any of the other more than 60 Customs Department officers 'on the list' for that matter.

This posed a dilemma for the MACC, which had earlier announced a 'Malaysian Book of Records' investigation into a so-called super-dynamite RM108 billion Customs Department scam -- more than the Perwaja, PKFZ and Scorpène submarines scandals combined. 

MACC KL's Director, Hj Mohd Yusof Akope, was not about to risk his KPI (Key Performance Index)  just because his Deputy Director, KUS Mohd Fauzi Bin Hussin, was an ineffective Ketua Unit Siasatan. He also blasted Fauzi for asking IO Mohd Rosly to record that first Cautioned Statement whereas it was Sheikh Niza who was deemed to have made that successful arrest. Fauzi did that to cover up for the MACC's false arrest against Ahmad Sarbaini.

Feeling infuriated just like Hitler when told he was losing the war, Hj Mohd Yusof demanded to see the 'evidence' of corruption against Ahmad Sarbaini as soon as possible.

In turn, Mohd Fauzi, pounced on Sheikh Niza who had arrested Ahmad Sarbaini on 1st April -- but had achieved nothing in the first Cautioned Statement.

Sheikh Niza had to do what was necessary to pin this rap on Ahmad Sarbaini. There was no turning back now. They had already committed themselves and so they had to make this 'Malaysian Book of Records' case stick, by hook or by crook if necessary.

Sheikh Niza summoned Ahmad Sarbaini back to the MACC KL Office to give a second Cautioned Statement. Contrary to normal procedures where written notices are issued, this order was given verbally.

Sheikh Niza decided that he could not tackle Ahmad Sarbaini by playing hardball. He realized that Ahmad Sarbaini was a God-fearing man who feared no mortal. He never missed praying five times a day -- whereas Sheikh Niza may have a pious name but he was nowhere near that pious name.

It was then he decided to use trickery, deception and inducement - something he had learned while serving as a prison warder.

Cunningly, Sheikh Niza told Ahmad Sarbaini that he (Sheikh) had aided in his release and that Ahmad Sarbaini was no longer regarded as a suspect.

Without batting an eyelid, Sheikh Niza convinced Ahmad Sarbaini that although this second statement was a continuation of the first one, Ahmad Sarbaini would be treated as a witness and not a suspect.

Subsequently, Sheikh Niza demonstrated to Ahmad Sarbaini that he was recording the second statement under section 30(3) of the MACC Act. That is why if you were to scrutinise the opening remarks of the second statement, which was supposed to be a continuation of the first statement, it was made under a different provision of the MACC Act.

It was all part of Sheikh Niza's and KUS Mohd Fuzi's sleight of hand or 'silap mata'.

Despite his 'soft' and persuasive approach to deceive Ahmad Sarbaini, Sheikh Niza became frustrated when, in spite of the long hours of interrogation, Ahmad Sarbaini was still not giving him the story that he wanted.

Sheikh Niza tried to intimidate Ahmad Sarbaini by placing the lockup uniform on the table in plain view for him to see while recording the final part of Ahmad Sarbaini's statement. Sheikh Niza then made distinctions between "wang imbuhan" and "wang ehsan". Deviously, he trapped Ahmad Sarbaini into believing that "wang ehsan" was like sedekah or a donation and that it was halal and purely legal to accept it. Sheikh also made various analogies to substantiate his deception.

By then the interview was already stretching into more than four hours.  Feeling tired, Ahmad Sarbaini was afraid he might be kept in the lockup again since it was already 6.30 pm. and was ready to accept any suggestion by Sheikh Niza. All he wanted was to return to his family. That was how Sheikh Niza deceived Ahmad Sarbaini into signing the second Cautioned Statement that contained his 'confession'.

Sheikh Niza admitted to the Coroner that the so-called Cautioned Statement merely provided answers to questions that he had posed to Ahmad Sarbaini. In fact, Abd Ghani, the IO assigned to the case, told the Coroner that he was surprised to see the 'confession' that Sheikh Niza had successfully extracted.

IO Abd Ghani had served in Anti-Corruption Agency before it became MACC - old wine in a new bag. He confided to close friends his reservation about the 'confession' and even told the court that it was the first ever in 20 odd years as an IO where he had seen anyone admitting to receiving kickbacks. He said, "Ini adalah sesuatu yang pelek" (This is very strange).

Recalling Ahmad Sarbaini

KUS Mohd Fauzi could not contain his elation when Sheikh reported that Ahmad Sarbaini had signed a confession. Immediately, he reported to his Director, Hj Mohd Yusof, who reported the same to the MACC HQ.

There was an incredible outburst of joy untold. MACC HQ's Director of Investigation, Dato Mustafar Ali, saw this as a vindication of the MACC -- especially since the on-going Teoh Beng Hock RCI was making embarrassing disclosures of MACC officers watching pornography during office hours not forgetting revelations of other dubious acts and acts of incompetence. 

MUSTAFAR ALI: Eager to use Ahmad Sarbaini's confession to vindicate MACC over the TBH RCI

Dato Mustafar directed Hj Yusof and Mohd Fauzi to recall Ahmad Sarbaini, re-arrest him, seek a remand order, and to record a third Cautioned Statement under s. 53(3) -- like the first statement and not under s. 30(3) of the MACC Act as was done for the second statement.

Sheikh Niza, now regarded as MACC's hero, again summoned Ahmad Sarbaini to the MACC office for his third statement to be recorded. Again, no written notice was given.

In fact, Sheikh Niza, and all the MACC senior officers both at KL and their HQ in Putrajaya, will later use this as an excuse to say that Ahmad Sarbaini had come to the KL MACC Office voluntarily and without any appointment.

The absence of a written notice made this lie possible. This was in fact the same trick they used in the Teoh Beng Hock case that enabled them to claim he was a mere witness and not a suspect in custody.

Events leading to 6th April

After he left Sheikh Niza that late evening of 4th April, Ahmad Sarbaini met up with some colleagues and narrated to them what had happened. They all told him that he had been tricked into giving a 'confession'.

Initially, Ahmad Sarbaini was in a state of denial. Since he had never accepted any bribe by whatever name, he felt that Sheikh Niza was a decent man who would not trick him. He believed that even if he had admitted to receiving 'wang ehsan', whereas he did not, that would at most tantamount to a donation in the manner explained by Sheikh Niza.

After all, Sheikh Niza was very encouraging when they spoke about religion and, to Ahmad Sarbaini, such a man would not resort to trickery.

To comfort himself, the next day, on 5th April, Ahmad Sarbaini met up with his freight forwarding friend, Wan Zainal, and told him that he had inadvertently mentioned Zainal's name to the MACC. He did not tell Wan Zainal that Sheikh Niza had tricked him into making that confession. 

Ahmad Sarbaini was a simple man who felt that a person must be accountable for his actions. To his mind, he would be accountable and retract that confession when he met the MACC the following day.

That was the same thing he had told his other close friends, the last time they ever saw him alive.

TO BE CONTINUED

ADDENDUM

Ahmad Sarbani's death: the lies and deceptions by the MACC (part 1)

http://malaysia-today.net/mtcolumns/no-holds-barred/40947-ahmad-sarbanis-death-the-lies-and-deceptions-by-the-macc-part-1

Ahmad Sarbani's death: the lies and deceptions by the MACC (part 2)

http://www.malaysia-today.net/mtcolumns/no-holds-barred/40949-ahmad-sarbanis-death-the-lies-and-deceptions-by-the-macc-part-2

Ahmad Sarbani's death: the lies and deceptions by the MACC (part 3)

http://malaysia-today.net/mtcolumns/no-holds-barred/40951-ahmad-sarbanis-death-the-lies-and-deceptions-by-the-macc-part-3

Ahmad Sarbani's death: the lies and deceptions by the MACC (part 4)

http://malaysia-today.net/mtcolumns/no-holds-barred/40952-ahmad-sarbanis-death-the-lies-and-deceptions-by-the-macc-part-4

Ahmad Sarbani's death: the lies and deceptions by the MACC (part 5)

http://www.malaysia-today.net/mtcolumns/no-holds-barred/42134-ahmad-sarbanis-death-the-lies-and-deceptions-by-the-macc-part-5

 

Ahmad Sarbani’s death: the lies and deceptions by the MACC (part 5)

Posted: 17 Jul 2011 08:44 AM PDT

Malaysia Today has been left with little choice but to now proceed with parts 5 to 8 on the lies and deceptions by the MACC. The truth will now have to be revealed and those slime-balls and scumbags who walk in the corridors of power will have to be stripped naked for all and sundry to see.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

THE TIME HAS COME TO EXPOSE THE KILLERS OF AHMAD SARBAINI MOHAMED

Do you remember last month Malaysia Today ran a four-part series on the lies and deceptions behind the death of Ahmad Sarbaini Mohamed, the Customs Deputy Director who was killed on 6th April 2011 while under the custody of the MACC?

We stopped at Part 4 because we wanted to give the MACC, the Police and AG Gani Patail a chance to redeem themselves and, for once, to come clean and tell the truth.



Police removing evidence of the cause of death of Ahmad Sarbaini from the MACC Office

Malaysia Today promised that Part 5 would only be published if they try to whitewash the Inquest and sweep everything under the carpet. It looks like the MACC and those in collaboration with them remain unrepentant after the fiasco of Teoh Beng Hock's death.



Police forensic fixing up Teoh Beng Hock's cause of death

Malaysia Today has been left with little choice but to now proceed with parts 5 to 8 on the lies and deceptions by the MACC. The truth will now have to be revealed and those slime-balls and scumbags who walk in the corridors of power will have to be stripped naked for all and sundry to see.

The Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) is trying to pull the wool over the eyes of Malaysians by getting DSP Sharul Othman Mansor of PDRM's Crime Scene Investigation (CSI) to say in the Inquest that Ahmad Sarbaini did not commit suicide and neither was his death a homicide.

To placate Ahmad Sarbaini's family and the powerful Customs Union, AG Gani Patail has used that Mr Fixit Lawyer Extraordinaire, Dato Seri Shafee Abdullah, to cook up a story that Ahmad Sarbaini was attempting to escape by jumping out of the window to a nearby concrete roof and ended up falling to his death instead.

In others words, Ahmad Sarbaini died while attempting to escape by flying out of the window like a little bird.

Well, this is not what our Little Bird tells us, our Deep Throats in the top echelons of the Royal Malaysian Police or PDRM. What they have told us is a very different story indeed.

Malaysia Today does not wish to be contemptuous of Coroner Aizatul Akmal Maharani. However, since the Coroner has already made a site visit to the MACC building at Jalan Cochrane, he can himself see how preposterous that theory of 'accidental death' will sound to the family, the Customs Union, and to all Malaysians who wish to see the name of an innocent dead man cleared and his murderers identified and brought to justice.



Coroner Aizatul Akmal making a site inspection of the MACC building in Jalan Cochrane


Now, first of all, allow Malaysia Today to help you recap and understand the facts and the evidence to this whole tragedy. Then we will reveal the identities of the killers. Hopefully, Coroner Aizatul Akmal will also arrive at the same finding or else he is going to look like one very silly dude.

Ops 3 B

On 28th March 2011, the MACC HQ launched a sensational Ops 3B. On 1st April (probably it was meant as an April Fool's joke), the MACC arrested 62 officers in Penang, Johor, Selangor and Pahang. The arrested Customs officers were supposed to have been part of a nationwide syndicate that had cheated the government of tax revenues in excess of RM108 billion.

How the MACC came up with that figure is a mystery and a candidate for an entry into Ripley's Believe it or Not. In any event, the MACC no longer cited that figure of RM108 billion in their official statements. They probably realised that this was just a figment of their imagination, a fantasy they created and ended up with them having to fix people to make it believable.

The task and objective given by the MACC HQ to the respective state offices, including MACC KL, was to detect and detain (kenal dan tahan). Thus, these raids and arrests were made without any prior investigations. After all, the MACC's modus operandi is to arrest first and conduct an investigation later.

The mainstream media was fed with leaked stories of Customs officers owning extraordinary wealth in their bank accounts and seizures of gold bars and bags of cash (like you see in the 'Ali Baba and the 40 Thieves' movie). This created a public frenzy.

However, until now, not a single one of these officers has been charged for any crime.

Ahmad Sarbaini's Arrest

On 1st April at 12 noon, MACC IO Sheikh Niza Khairy Bin Sheikh Mohamad went to Ahmad Sarbaini's office with several other MACC officers to arrest him. Although Ahmad Sarbaini was embarrassed, as a God-fearing man he remained calm and collected.

These MACC officers admitted in court that from the very beginning they noted that Ahmad Sarbaini was very co-operative and calm. When asked about his assets, without any hesitation Ahmad Sarbaini brought them to a house that he co-owned with his wife and which they had rented out, and to the house that he was staying in at that time (medium and low cost).

At his own house, he told his daughter to tell his wife that he would not be coming back that evening.

Ahmad Sarbaini also managed to compile and provide Sheikh Niza's team with all his and his wife's available bank statements. All this information was provided by Ahmad Sarbaini at the time he was arrested.

Because the MACC did not conduct any prior investigation on him, they did not know what questions to ask him after they had arrested him. So they kept him overnight at the police lockup in Bukit Jalil.

That is also part of the MACC's modus operandi to strike fear into the hearts of those arrested.

Ahmad Sarbaini's First Cautioned Statement

Although he was arrested at noon of 1st April, Ahmad Sarbaini spent much of that April Fool's Day in the lockup. By the next day, on 2nd April, as the permitted 24-hours detention period was up, the MACC realised they would have to release him or apply to remand him.

Since the MACC did not have any evidence of corruption against him, the MACC could not seek to remand him. So the Ketua Unit Siasatan (KUS) Mohd Fauzi Bin Hussin @ Che Mamat directed MACC IO Mohd Rosly Bin Mohd Saupy to record Ahmad Sarbaini's statement as an arrested/accused person. By doing so, Fauzi wanted to cover up for the MACC's false arrest against Ahmad Sarbaini.

That Cautioned Statement recorded under section 53(3) of the MACC Act was the first statement given by Ahmad Sarbaini and covered six pages where he gave a detailed description of all his and his family's assets. It was recorded in 45 minutes and Ahmad Sarbaini specifically denied having ever received any "wang imbuhan" while discharging his Customs duties.

Malaysia Today will publish a copy of that Cautioned Statement in Part 8 of this report and you will be able to see at the beginning of page 4 where he made that categorical denial.

TO BE CONTINUED

ADDENDUM
Ahmad Sarbani's death: the lies and deceptions by the MACC (part 1)
http://malaysia-today.net/mtcolumns/no-holds-barred/40947-ahmad-sarbanis-death-the-lies-and-deceptions-by-the-macc-part-1

Ahmad Sarbani's death: the lies and deceptions by the MACC (part 2)
http://www.malaysia-today.net/mtcolumns/no-holds-barred/40949-ahmad-sarbanis-death-the-lies-and-deceptions-by-the-macc-part-2

Ahmad Sarbani's death: the lies and deceptions by the MACC (part 3)
http://malaysia-today.net/mtcolumns/no-holds-barred/40951-ahmad-sarbanis-death-the-lies-and-deceptions-by-the-macc-part-3

Ahmad Sarbani's death: the lies and deceptions by the MACC (part 4)
http://malaysia-today.net/mtcolumns/no-holds-barred/40952-ahmad-sarbanis-death-the-lies-and-deceptions-by-the-macc-part-4
 

Déjà vu

Posted: 16 Jul 2011 06:57 PM PDT

Now you know why we need a Third Force. Sometimes politicians, even those from the opposition, forget what they promise us and go back on their word. And we, the voters who put them into office, have to suffer and pay the price for their forgetfulness.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

"Kedah entertainment ban resurrects Barisan Alternatif ghost," said Debra Chong in her article in The Malaysian Insider today. You can read the full text of the article below.

Anyway, the matter has since been resolved. The PAS-led Kedah state government will not be banning entertainment in the state during the Muslim holy month of Ramadhan after all. Instead, only Muslims would be banned from patronising these establishments. The rest can continue to enjoy themselves the whole year around instead of just 11 months in a year.

But I am sure the matter will not end here. The government-owned mainstream media will continue to talk about this to 'poke fire' in an attempt to create a rift between DAP and PAS. And PKR, who is caught in between, will continue to maintain a deafening silence.

What caught my attention was Debra's (or The Malaysian Insider's) choice of heading: "Kedah entertainment ban resurrects Barisan Alternatif ghost". She did not fully explain what she means by this other than state: "in what could be a repeat of the momentous split between the secular party and Islamist PAS in 2001".

Maybe some of you do not understand what this means or are not too clear about what happened ten years ago in 2001. Well, allow me to enlighten you.

Soon after the 1999 general election, the then Prime Minister, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, declared that Malaysia is already an Islamic country so we do not need PAS. Dr Mahathir also said that Umno is the largest Islamic party in the world, much larger than PAS, which is only a quarter or less the size of Umno in terms of membership.

This started the 'I am more Islamic than you' one-upmanship game between PAS and Umno.

Then Dr Mahathir goaded PAS by saying that the Islamic party promises all sorts of things before the elections, but now that they are running two states, Kelantan and Terengganu, they do not deliver on their promises. "Where is the promise of Islamic laws?" screams Dr Mahathir.

PAS sudah tak tahan. Dr Mahathir has been goading them and laughing at them and is calling the party a liar and a hypocrite. PAS had to demonstrate otherwise. So it unilaterally announced -- without the consensus of its other three coalition partners in Barisan Alternatif (PKN, DAP and PRM) -- that the Terengganu state government is going to introduce Islamic laws in the state.

And with that the Menteri Besar announced that they are going to introduce the ISD (Islamic State Document). This more or less replied to Dr Mahathir's allegations and proved that PAS is sincere about Islam and it is not mere lip service and political talk.

But what is the ISD? How is it going to work?

The ISD was only an aspiration (hasrat). There was no clear plan yet on how it was going to work. In other words, they had no blueprint on its implementation but were merely stating an intention.

What PAS was doing was merely to reply to Dr Mahathir in an attempt to silence him and win the 'I am more Islamic than you' argument. And this got DAP upset. So it left the opposition coalition in a huff and became an independent opposition party.

DAP felt that the move by PAS was going to hurt them big time. Certainly Chinese support would erode and DAP would lose votes. So DAP had to leave Barisan Alternatif to protect itself.

Ten years on and Kedah is doing what Terengganu once did -- make a unilateral decision without consultation with the other coalition members and without consensus.

If you can remember, Barisan Alternatif before this, and Pakatan Rakyat now, had announced that everything within the opposition coalition is done based on consensus. A simple majority is not enough, they said. It must be all or nothing. Now, PAS Kedah accuses DAP of 'interfering' in the state administration.

Back in 1999, the Menteri Besar of Terengganu said that the Terengganu state government is not a PAS government but a BA government (in spite of PAS dominating the State Assembly and DAP not having even one seat). Whenever Hadi Awang announced anything he would say, "Kerajaan Barisan Alternatif Terengganu….." He would never say, "Kerajaan PAS Terengganu….." 

But when they announced the ISD it was PAS and not BA that did so.

That was the bone of contention and which upset many people -- DAP in particular.

But then, should DAP keep making threats that they are going to leave Pakatan Rakyat every time things do not go their way? And should PAS keep saying that "we rule Kedah" or "we rule Kelantan" just because they have a majority in those two states? Would we be happy if Lim Guan Eng announces that DAP rules Penang so PKR and PAS just shut the fuck up and don't interfere in Penang?

I just want to know one thing. Is DAP running Penang, PKR running Selangor, and PAS running Kedah and Kelantan, or are these four states being run by Pakatan Rakyat? And do they run these states based on consensus and unanimous decisions (and not based on a simple majority) or can one party in the coalition do things with total disregard for the other coalition members?

Now you know why we need a Third Force. Sometimes politicians, even those from the opposition, forget what they promise us and go back on their word. And we, the voters who put them into office, have to suffer and pay the price for their forgetfulness. 

************************************

Kedah entertainment ban resurrects Barisan Alternatif ghost 

Debra Chong, The Malaysian Insider 

Despite warm and strong ties, DAP publicity chief Tony Pua has suggested his party pull out from the three-year-old Pakatan Rakyat (PR) pact, ostensibly over a spat with ally PAS' state-enforced entertainment ban in Kedah during the Muslim fasting month.

DAP leaders discussed the issue at a national leadership retreat yesterday, in what could be a repeat of the momentous split between the secular party and Islamist PAS in 2001 when both first joined forces under the short-lived Barisan Alternatif (BA) to counter the ruling Barisan Nasional (BN) coalition.

Pua aired the matter in a Twitter post yesterday, saying he "is of the view that we shouldn't be part of a coalition if our concerns are not heard or heeded. Don't want to become like MCA or Gerakan in BN."

Contacted by The Malaysian Insider, Pua declined at first to elaborate on his tweet except to say it was his personal opinion and not the party's official position.

But he admitted that the subject of cutting off ties with its political allies had been raised at the party's retreat in Seremban and will be discussed further when the PR leadership meets on Tuesday for its strategy session.

He also played coy when asked to elaborate if he was upset over the Kedah ban or if it was a build-up of frustration of working with PAS, posting a smiley icon of an angel with its eyes closed in the Blackberry messenger chat.

Muhammad Sanusi Md Nor, political secretary to Kedah Mentri Besar Datuk Seri Azizan Abdul Razak, issued a strongly-worded statement yesterday that the state government will not withdraw the ruling despite opposition, saying the government was just enforcing a 1997 law.

"Ustaz Azizan will not back down! That is his stand on this issue," said Sanusi in the statement carried by PAS website Harakahdaily.

However, the national PAS leadership has asked the Kedah leader to explain the ban in a meeting to be held later today.

Several other social media users, however, appeared to have formed their own conclusions about DAP-PAS ties as seen in their response to Pua on both Twitter and Facebook, where the debate carried on.

Replying to Pua on Facebook, Richard Yong remarked: "YB, i know which issue u referring to.. shld stress more on team work and get the respective top leaders to deliberate on it."

Another Facebooker, Simon Poon posted the following"but YB , how do u see the current problems surfaced at Kedah? Is the coalition going to have a joint conference as to provide a clearer guideline and picture so that the public understand well instead of just asking us to send u all to putrajaya".

On Twitter, a user going by the name "xyplyx xyplyx" challenged: "then how DAP wan 2 rule M'sia?" prompting Pua to shoot back "whts d point? If so desperate to rule, might as well join BN. Must win w/principles. Not win at all costs juz 2 become Minister".

The Petaling Jaya Utara MP later said to The Malaysian Insider that it would not be the first time DAP has broken off ties with its political allies, in a nod to the Chinese-majority party's withdrawal from the BA in 2001, after a similar falling out with PAS over the latter's insistence on setting up an Islamic state in then PAS-ruled Terengganu

The DAP last locked horns with PAS in January this year over Selangor's proposed ban on Muslims from working in premises that sell alcohol.

The Selangor government later claimed the ban was merely a guideline before withdrawing the ruling pending further study. Following that debacle, PR leaders have promised to consult each other on issues that could affect their pact which has survived three years.

DAP and PAS are in the PR pact together with PKR that was formed after the three parties won four more states and more than one-third of the federal parliament. The three parties have applied to form a coalition but the Registrar of Societies (RoS) has yet to give his nod.

PR parties received a boost in the past week after the BN government clamped down hard on the Bersih 2.0 rally calling for free and fair elections. Analysts and diplomats agreed the harsh security move cut some of Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak's popularity especially in the urban areas and among the middle-class, a key voting demographic in the country.

But the pact could suffer if DAP and PAS continue to bicker over the Kedah ban, several PR leaders conceded to The Malaysian Insider.

 

Don’t look at me

Posted: 16 Jul 2011 12:33 AM PDT

What would be even better would be to hear what Umno and Najib have to say. Umno claims it is the largest Islamic party in the world. That was what Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamd once said. So, since this is a matter involving Islam, and since Umno is the archenemy of PAS, it is only fair that they say something about it.

NO HOLDS BARRED

Raja Petra Kamarudin

I have been receiving messages from quite a number of people who want me to comment on the decision by the PAS-led Kedah state government to ban entertainment in the state during the month of Ramadhan.

To be fair, I have not spoken to any of the Pakatan Rakyat people yet. However, from what I have read on the news thus far, it appears like it is a PAS decision, or probably the Menteri Besar's decision, rather than a Pakatan Rakyat decision.

Whatever it may be though, why do so many people want me to comment on the matter? Who am I to comment? I am not a member of any of the component parties within Pakatan Rakyat. Furthermore, if I do comment, I would be whacked for criticising the opposition. I would be accused of giving ammunition to Barisan Nasional to undermine Pakatan Rakyat. Is it wise for me to comment?

Time and time again I have been asked to not criticise the opposition. When I do criticise the opposition they allege that I am a turncoat or Trojan horse. They say that I have been bought off and am now on Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak's payroll, and whatnot. Is it not better that I just remain silent and not comment? Why send me so many messages asking me to comment?

Anyway, Anwar Ibrahim is the leader of the opposition. He heads Pakatan Rakyat. Would it not be better, as leader of the opposition or Pakatan Rakyat, that he comment on the matter?

I have not yet read what he said about the matter. Maybe I missed it. Or maybe he is drafting his comment and will issue it in a day or two. So let us wait and see what Anwar says about the matter first.

What would be even better would be to hear what Umno and Najib have to say. Umno claims it is the largest Islamic party in the world. That was what Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamd once said. So, since this is a matter involving Islam, and since Umno is the archenemy of PAS, it is only fair that they say something about it.

In fact, I would be most interested in hearing what Anwar and Najib have to say about this; or at latest their parties, PKR and Umno. Then we will know whether the Kedah Menteri Besar and PAS stand alone on this issue or whether this move is supported (or opposed) by both PKR and Umno (or Anwar and Najib).

What PKR-UMNO and/or Anwar-Najib have to say is more important than what I have to say.

So there will be no comment from me. I am not going to say whether I support or oppose this move by the Kedah state government to ban entertainment in the state during the month of Ramadhan. I will leave it to the politicians to state their stand.

But then maybe PKR and Umno (or Anwar and Najib) are going to remain silent. Maybe they find this issue too sensitive to comment seeing that they are also Muslims and would not want to be seen as going against Islam. So maybe it will be DAP and MCA who would be asked to comment instead.

DAP and MCA are not Malay-based parties. So it is not sensitive for them to comment on the matter or speak out against the move by Kedah to ban entertainment in the state during the month of Ramadhan.

Then PKR and Umno (or Anwar and Najib) can play safe and say nothing. Then no one can accuse them of being bad Muslims by supporting vice during what Muslims consider the holy month of Ramdhan. This would be the politically correct thing to do.

And I would not be accused of hurting the opposition by offering negative comments. If I say I support the move then the Chinese would get angry with me and the Malays would love me. If I say I oppose the move then the Malays would get angry with me and the Chinese would love me.

So I say nothing. So neither the Chinese nor the Malays would get angry with me. And no one can say I am sabotaging the opposition by giving ammunition to Barisan Nasional.

However, if I remain silent will that help the opposition? Will that serve the opposition cause?

Should I be concerned about that? Should I not be more concerned that by remaining silent no one can now say that I have been bought off by Najib and that I am on his payroll?

No, as I have been time and time again advised, the opposition knows what it is doing. I do not need to teach the opposition how it should run the state governments under its control. Who am I to tell them how they should run the states? It is not that they are going to listen to me anyway. So, as so many have told me in very loud and clear terms, just shut the fuck up and leave Pakatan Rakyat alone to run the states the way they see fit.
 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

0 ulasan:

Catat Ulasan

 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved