Isnin, 21 Oktober 2013

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

Allah issue: One too many lies for Borneo

Posted: 20 Oct 2013 04:11 PM PDT

Christians in Sabah and Sarawak were being convinced they can practice their faith in peace, but history tells a different tale.

Pushparani Thilaganathan and Winston Way, FMT

KUCHING: Christians in Sabah and Sarawak are skeptical and uncertain about the reassurances being mouthed by their elected leaders in Putrajaya and in Borneo.

Both states have been assured that the perceived contentious ruling barring the use of the term 'Allah' in the Catholic publication, The Herald, would not affect them.

But history has a different tale.

Assurance and re-assurances aside, Borneo Christians have seen a litany of anti-Christian actions.

Among them the Home Ministry seizing bibles and 'criminalising' them with a "Christian only" and serialised numbers stamp.

They've heard calls to burn the bible and remove the term 'Allah' from its Bahasa Malaysia versions.

They've also read about acts of arson aimed at their churches and the alleged mass forced conversions for the sake of citizenry and to prop up a Muslim Umno-led government dating back to the late 1980s.

All this against a silent Umno-led Barisan Nasional federal leadership, which today sits in Putrajaya because of Borneo's support.

Borneo contributed 47 MP seats to enable Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak to retain his hold on Putrajaya. Borneo is predominantly Christians. Sarawak has a Christian majority and Sabah a sizeable closet Christian population.

The double-standard is decidedly obvious. The flexing and implementation of relevant laws bias.

The so-called social contract binding the communities interest by the founding federal fathers and the spirit and terms of the Malaysia Agreement 1963 have long since been overtaken by 'political expedience' and now buried.

The Court of Appeal's decision last Monday overruling a December 2009 High Court judgment allowing Catholic publication The Herald to use the term 'Allah' in their Bahasa Malaysia version is being perceived as the "last straw".

'Judgment influenced by bigots'

While some see the judgment as peculiar to Herald publication, in that it was based on a Dec 5, 1986 Home Ministry directive anchored in the Printing Presses and Publications Act, others opined that the court ruling was too "wide" and allowed various interpretations, which incidentally the 'ultras' in peninsula have already latched on, pushing ahead with their Ketuanan Melayu and Islam agenda.

The written judgment, an observer summarised, had focused on Herald's use of the term 'Allah' which had already been 'outlawed' by the Home Ministry in 1986 as part of its precondition to issuing publication permits.

The judgment by Justice Mohamad Apandi Ali ruled that Herald on record is 14-years-old and was privy to this knowledge.

The Herald, it deemed was not the bible and as such subject to the terms of the Printing Presses and Publications Act.

The judgment also noted that Herald had received an admonition in 1998 for use of the term. In 2002 it received a warning letter and in 2006 a second admonition.

Herald received three warning letters before a show-cause was issued in 2007 and the word Allah banned in 2008.

Irrespective of the socio-legal views expressed, the opportunistic reactions of the Malay 'ultras' and the politicians in the peninsular has driven a deep wedge between the communities in the country.

It has not only pushed away thinking rational Malaysians but also the "fixed deposit" native Christians here and its brethrens in Sabah majority of whom voted in Barisan Nasional in the state and parliamentary polls.

Senior lawyer and Ba Kelalan assemblyman Baru Bian said although the Christians had been assured that they would be free to practice their faith, he doubted if they "depended" on the government's words.

"Do not for one instant believe that this (assurances by the government) is the truth of the matter.

"We have learned that even the words, assurance and undertaking by the prime minister himself does not hold water anymore.

"We know the government's judgment may be influenced by the provocation and pressure from religious bigots like Perkasa.

"I find it absolutely mind-boggling that certain groups and individuals have responded to the court decision with apparent nonchalance, saying that the decision is confined to The Herald or to West Malaysia.

"It's a naive view… the issue involving the use of 'Allah' has been affecting Sabahans and Sarawakians even before Herald case was mentioned in court," Bian said.



Uncommon Sense with Wong Chin Huat: On the “Allah” judgement

Posted: 20 Oct 2013 01:28 PM PDT 

By this logic, curbs on using the Malay language can be extended beyond "Allah" or any of the other words that the Home Ministry and various state laws have declared are exclusive to Muslims. Now, if the use of Malay for religious purposes is meant for Muslims only, can Malay still be the national language? How can a language be a national language if its use can be limited to a particular racial or religious group?

By Jacqueline Ann Surin, The Nut Graph 

THE 14 Oct 2013 Court of Appeal ruling that upheld the ban on the Catholic Church from using "Allah" in its publication, The Herald, wasn't unexpected. And it has been criticised both nationally and internationally, including by Muslims.

Barisan Nasional (BN) component parties and leaders from Sabahand Sarawak have also cried foul over the government's actions and the court's decision. And in what can only be described as confused, the cabinet has decided that despite the Court of Appeal's ruling, "Allah" can still be used in Christian worship and in the Bahasa Malaysia bibles in Sabah and Sarawak.

The Catholic Church can still appeal the appelate court's decision at the Federal Court and several quarters believe that would be the right thing to do because much is at stake. Dr Wong Chin Huat expounds on the implications of the Court of Appeal ruling, how Malaysia has come to this, and what needs to happen for the mess to be undone.

TNG: What are the implications of the Court of Appeal decision? 

Firstly, Judge Mohamed Apandi Ali has attempted to redefine our nationhood with implications more far-reaching than Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad's 2001 "Islamic state" declaration. How so? The judge makes the guarantee of fundamental liberties dependent on a peculiar and expansionist reading of Article 3(1) of the Federal Constitution. Article 3(1) states that, "Islam is the religion of the federation but other religions may be practiced in peace and harmony in any part of the federation".

What's problematic is that Mohamed Apandi ruled that the intention of "in peace and harmony" in Article 3(1) was to "protect the sanctity of Islam" and to "insulate" it against any threat. The judge also claimed that this was part of the social contract intended by the nation's founding leaders. However, it is well-known that the original purpose of Article 3(1) was to provide a ceremonial role for Islam while ensuring that Malaysia remained a secular state where other faith groups could worship in peace and harmony. It was not meant to do what the judge claims it is supposed to do.

The judgement's second implication is it affirms a culture of impunity. In effect, the judgment is saying that the state can curb your constitutional rights if by exercising these rights, you upset others who decide to act violently because they are confused. Judge Abdul Aziz Abdul Rahim cites the arson attacks on churches and mosques after the 2009 High Court judgement which overturned the ban on "Allah" to justify the ban among non-Muslims. By doing so, the judge completely relieves the state of any responsibility to ensure law and order.

The third implication concerns the status of Malay as the national language. Making an explicit reference to Article 160, Mohamed Apandi further justifies his judgement by stressing that the constitutional definition of Malay is "a person who professes the religion of Islam" and "habitually speaks the Malay language". Hence, the judge drives home the point that since Malays, who are by default Muslims, speak the Malay language and "Allah" is deemed to be from the Malay language, then the use of "Allah" by non-Muslims may disrupt peace and harmony.

Read more at: 



0 ulasan:

Catat Ulasan


Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved