Rabu, 10 Julai 2013

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-
Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Ku Nan: Cops just scapegoats for corrupt enforcers

Posted: 09 Jul 2013 08:33 PM PDT

(The Malay Mail) - The corruption menace involved "not only the police", Datuk Seri Tengku Adnan Tengku Mansor said today, suggesting the force was being blamed for bribery involving other enforcement agencies.

Graft watchdog Transparency International's Global Corruption Barometer 2013 survey showed that 76 per cent of local respondents considered the police corrupt, compared to 69 per cent who saw politicians as guilty of graft.

 

The force was also viewed as the most corrupt of all local institutions, scoring four out of five on the extent of corruption.

"It's not fair that you say the police are most corrupt," Tengku Adnan told reporters at Parliament here today," said the Federal Territories minister.

"It could be my enforcement officer Bandaraya (city council), could be enforcement officer Majlis Daerah (local council). It's not only the police, you must remember."


Tengku Adnan also stressed that the dip in public confidence in the government's efforts to battle corruption was a "perception problem".



"We're fighting a perception war," he said.

The Global Corruption Barometer survey showed that 30 per cent of Malaysian respondents believed Putrajaya's graft-fighting efforts were effective, compared to 49 per cent that felt the same in 2011.


"Main thing is if there's no giver, there won't be any taker. The giver should stop," added the Umno secretary-general.


Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Datuk Paul Low, however, pledged yesterday to bring the survey's findings to the Cabinet, saying: "The GCB results have made it clear that it is now a global menace that must be recognised and addressed before it is too late."

Today, Tengku Adnan said the government was "putting all efforts to ensure this corruption is eradicated".

The Putrajaya MP added that the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) was educating citizens against giving bribes.

"The enforcement officers need to be educated," said Tengku Adnan.

"If I speak to DBKL, I advise them 'please refrain from all untoward practices'," he added, referring to the Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) officers under his purview.

On the GCB survey, Malaysian respondents rated the police and politicians four and 3.8 respectively on a scale of one to five, with one considered "Not at all corrupt" and five being "Extremely corrupt".

Akhbar Satar, president of the Malaysian chapter of Transparency International, reportedly said yesterday that the government's failure to catch "big fish" in high-profile graft cases may have affected Malaysians' confidence in the war on corruption.

The 2013 Global Corruption Barometer is the biggest ever conducted by the Berlin-based watchdog, with 114,000 people respondents in 107 countries in the opinion survey on corruption and the institutions considered the most corrupt.

 

Read more here: http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/ku-nan-cops-just-scapegoats-for-corrupt-enforcers?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter#sthash.UuQ4foxl.dpuf

 

The corruption menace involved "not only the police", Datuk Seri Tengku Adnan Tengku Mansor said today, suggesting the force was being blamed for bribery involving other enforcement agencies.

Graft watchdog Transparency International's Global Corruption Barometer 2013 survey showed that 76 per cent of local respondents considered the police corrupt, compared to 69 per cent who saw politicians as guilty of graft.

The force was also viewed as the most corrupt of all local institutions, scoring four out of five on the extent of corruption.

"It's not fair that you say the police are most corrupt," Tengku Adnan told reporters at Parliament here today," said the Federal Territories minister.

"It could be my enforcement officer Bandaraya (city council), could be enforcement officer Majlis Daerah (local council). It's not only the police, you must remember."


Tengku Adnan also stressed that the dip in public confidence in the government's efforts to battle corruption was a "perception problem".



"We're fighting a perception war," he said.

The Global Corruption Barometer survey showed that 30 per cent of Malaysian respondents believed Putrajaya's graft-fighting efforts were effective, compared to 49 per cent that felt the same in 2011.


"Main thing is if there's no giver, there won't be any taker. The giver should stop," added the Umno secretary-general.


Minister in the Prime Minister's Department Datuk Paul Low, however, pledged yesterday to bring the survey's findings to the Cabinet, saying: "The GCB results have made it clear that it is now a global menace that must be recognised and addressed before it is too late."

Today, Tengku Adnan said the government was "putting all efforts to ensure this corruption is eradicated".

The Putrajaya MP added that the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) was educating citizens against giving bribes.

"The enforcement officers need to be educated," said Tengku Adnan.

"If I speak to DBKL, I advise them 'please refrain from all untoward practices'," he added, referring to the Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) officers under his purview.

On the GCB survey, Malaysian respondents rated the police and politicians four and 3.8 respectively on a scale of one to five, with one considered "Not at all corrupt" and five being "Extremely corrupt".

Akhbar Satar, president of the Malaysian chapter of Transparency International, reportedly said yesterday that the government's failure to catch "big fish" in high-profile graft cases may have affected Malaysians' confidence in the war on corruption.

The 2013 Global Corruption Barometer is the biggest ever conducted by the Berlin-based watchdog, with 114,000 people respondents in 107 countries in the opinion survey on corruption and the institutions considered the most corrupt.

- See more at: http://www.themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/ku-nan-cops-just-scapegoats-for-corrupt-enforcers?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter#sthash.UuQ4foxl.dpuf

 

Five lawyers, activist win suit against government over arrest

Posted: 09 Jul 2013 08:10 PM PDT

(Bernama) - Five human rights lawyers and an activist today won their suit against the police and the government over their arrest, detention and malicious prosecution during a walk to mark World Human Rights Day on Dec 9, 2007.

The court awarded R. Sivarasa, N. Surendran, Latheefa Beebi Koya, Eric Paulsen, Amer Hamzah Arshad and activist Johny Andu @ Abu Bakar Adnan each with RM10,000 in damages, and ordered the defendants to pay a total of RM60,000 in costs to all the plaintiffs.

On Dec 8, 2010, they filed a civil suit against then-Dang Wangi police deputy chief Superintendent Che Hamzah Che Ismail, inspector-general of police, home ministry and the government over their arrest, detention and prosecution.

In allowing their claim, High Court judge Datuk John Louis O'hara held that their arrests and detention by the defendants were unlawful.

O'hara said he had the opportunity to view the video and photographs taken from what transpired and took place during the incident.

"From the video, I find that first defendant Superintendent Che Hamzah had given conflicting, confusing and contradictory instructions over the hailer for the plaintiffs to disperse," he said.

Futhermore, he said, Che Hamzah was not decisive in his words over the disperse orders.

In his decision, the judge also found that the defendants had denied the plaintiffs' right to the legal access after they were arrested.

However, he found that the prosecution on the plaintiffs at the criminal Sessions Court was not made in bad faith and it was the Attorney-General's prerogative power under the Federal Constitution to prosecute them.

"The Attorney-General is doing his job and exercises his duty to prosecute them... this is not malicious prosecution," he said, adding that the plaintiffs had correctly named the parties in the suit.

On Dec 10, 2007, the six were charged with being in an unlawful assembly and failing to adhere to police orders to disperse, allegedly committed a day before (Dec 9, 2007) in front of Kamdar building in Jalan Tuanku Abdul Rahman.

On April 16, 2009, they were acquitted and discharged by the Sessions Court, without being called to make their defence on those charges.

Following that, they filed the suit seeking for a declaration that their rights under the Federal Constitution were violated and also claimed their arrest and detention were unlawful.

They also sought general damages, aggravated damages and exemplary damages and special damages, interest and cost.

In the suit, the six claimed they participated in and/or organised a peaceful rally and march, in conjunction with World Human Rights Day which was celebrated worldwide on Dec 10, every year.

They contended that they were subsequently allowed to continue to participate in the march within 10 minutes, but before the 10 minutes expired, they found that they were surrounded by a large group of police personnel.

They alleged the police then gave orders to disperse but while attempting to do so (to disperse), they were arrested.

After the proceedings, counsel Edmund Bon, representing the six, told reporters that today's ruling was a great victory for democracy and human rights. 

 

Police to come down hard on Red Bean Army

Posted: 09 Jul 2013 05:41 PM PDT

The Red Bean Army and its ilk will face criminal and civil action for spreading lies about the police through the Internet, says the Home Minister. 

Anisah Shukry, FMT

The police will use the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998; the Penal Code; and Facebook to counter the 'Red Bean Army' and others who use the Internet to defame the men in blue, said Ahmad Zahid Hamidi.

"There are two ways to take action against cases of defamation. One, criminal action, two, civil action," the Home Minister told the Dewan Rakyat today during question session.

"In this case, seeing as the libel [about the police] is made through social media, we will take action using the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 and Section 504 of the Penal Code.

"And because we must counter libel spread through social media with social media, we will use Facebook to fight them."

But he said that the 416,500 Facebook fans and 113,000 Twitter followers for the Police force's official pages were still not enough.

"But we will stick with this approach to counter defamation against the police," he said.

Ahmad Zahid said this in response to Ikmal Hisham Abdul Aziz (Tanah Merah – BN) question on what action the police would take against the Red Bean Army – an alleged group of opposition-funded cyber troopers – and its ilk for reportedly spreading lies about the police on the Internet.

"It is unfortunate that there are some quarters in this country who do not know how to be grateful, who purposefully mock and discredit the police force, particularly through social media such as Facebook and blogs," Ikmal had said earlier.

"Does the police force intend to set up a special team to investigate the slander hurled against them, and to answer every allegation thrown their way through the social media…including the endless slander from the Red Bean Army cyber troopers?"

His question elicited loud groans from Pakatan Rakyat MPs, who, despite having denied the existence of such an army multiple times, have been subjected to daily taunts over the Red Bean Army since parliament convened two weeks ago.

READ MORE HERE

 

Former senior cop sues six mainstream newspapers

Posted: 09 Jul 2013 03:16 PM PDT

(Daily Express) - A former senior police officer has filed a defamation suit against six mainstream newspapers alleging he was a "victim" of a smear campaign.

Former Commercial Crimes Investigation Department chief Datuk Ramli Yusuff filed the suit against six media publishers - New Straits Times, The Star, Berita Harian, Utusan Malaysia, Daily Express and Borneo Post - at the Kuala Lumpur High Court recently.

He also named the editors and reporters of The New Straits Times Press (M) Bhd, Star Publications (Malaysia) Bhd, Berita Harian Sdb Bhd, Utusan Melayu (Malaysia) Bhd, Sabah Publishing House Sdn Bhd and See Hua Marketing as defendants.

According to the statement of claim, Ramli said his name was tarnished following reports in 2007 over the development of an area in Lahad Datu, Sabah.

He said the articles referred to him as the "senior officer who had amassed RM27 million and had failed to declare his assets".

Ramli said there was no other officer who was being investigated for abuse of power at that time.

He alleged that the articles implied he was a corrupt officer, had abused his power, had failed to declare his assets, had amassed RM27 million and had gathered it through illegal means.

One of the articles had also implied that he was akin to a "godfather", a term often used to refer to any infamous leader of the underworld.

Ramli said the articles had tarnished his reputation and character, ridiculed him and had lowered his esteem in the eyes of the public.

He denied owning such assets and being involved in any corrupt practices.

Ramli also claimed the reports had caused him to suffer anxiety and that he had to call for a press conference, contrary to normal police procedure, to clear his name.

Ramli is seeking an amount of general, special exemplary and punitive damages, interest, cost and relief deemed fit by the court.

 

Ku Nan: Opposition are ‘shit stirrers’

Posted: 09 Jul 2013 01:48 PM PDT

Tengku Adnan today also said he was in support of introducing a new law to replace the Emergency Ordinance (EO) as a means of deterrence.

Tarani Palani, fz.com

Another minister has alluded that the Sedition Act 1948 should be maintained.

Speaking to reporters at the Parliament lobby today, Federal Territories Minister Datuk Seri Tengku Adnan Tengku Mansor said the law was needed as they were many "shit stirrers" now.
 
"We have got (many) shit stirrers now. The opposition are the shit stirrers. They will stir until things turn chaotic," he said.
 
Tengku Adnan said Malaysia is a multi-racial and multi-religious society where relations have to be maintained.
 
"Our forefathers taught (us) how to be tolerant. We need to teach the younger generation (this as well)," he said.
 
Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak had announced last July that the act will be repealed for greater democratic society and that the National Harmony Act will be put in place to manage race relations.
 
Despite this public announcement, some government leaders have openly called for the act to be retained, one of them being Home Minister Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi.
 
To add to the confusion, Health Minister Datuk Seri Dr S Subramaniam said the previous cabinet had not made any decision on whether the legislation should be maintained, repealed or amended.
 
However, Tourism and Culture Minister Datuk Seri Mohamad Nazri Aziz, who was previously the de facto law minister, has said that the cabinet was still committed to repealing the act.
 
Tengku Adnan today also said he was in support of introducing a new law to replace the Emergency Ordinance (EO) as a means of deterrence.
 
"We need another plan because since we abolished the EO and the Internal Security Act ISA, we have been worrying with what has been happening.
 
"We need laws not just to punish but to deter. Deterrence is better than punishment," he said.
 
The BN secretary-general said Najib and the cabinet would review the proposed new law to ensure that it does not encroach upon citizens' democratic rights.
 
He, however, added: "People want freedom, we have given freedom. But sometimes freedom also makes live hard for some people".
 
On the question of whether detention without trial will feature in the new law, Tengku Adnan said it will be left to the Attorney General's Chambers to decide.
 
 

MCA in a dilemma over president Soi Lek

Posted: 09 Jul 2013 11:42 AM PDT

http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTtckaVX_5szzpY_ZnPnspRy0RtnooUA9pRhkhmSsOIUSoz-4Krzg 

Can MCA's political doldrums be reversed? 

(The Malay Mail) - After the ninth general election in 1995, there were 100 Yang Berhormat in the party, comprising 30 MPs and 70 assemblymen. In GE10 (1999), the MCA secured 28 out of 35 parliamentary seats and 68 out of 77 state seats contested, delivering a total of 96 elected representatives.

This was topped in GE11 (2004) with 31 MPs and 76 assemblymen.

With the automatic qualification of the elected representatives as delegates, the following year's party annual general meeting was a riotous gathering of central delegates, a deluge of elected representatives (including Senators), ex-MPs and assemblymen, municipal and district councillors, political secretaries and the sort.

The party never had so many members holding public positions. By GE12, however, there were only 46 elected representatives — 15 MPs and 31 assemblymen.

Today, the elected representatives only number 18 — seven MPs and 11 assemblymen (7-11). In a space of nine years, the party's wakil rakyat dropped from 107 to 18 — a mere shell of 16.8 per cent.

Now, the party makes news over its disputed interpretations of "declining all government positions".

The latest is the explanation by its president Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek on the party's nod over Datuk Seri Dr Ng Yen Yen's acceptance as chairman of the Malaysian Tourism Promotion Board (MTPB).

Dr Chua says the 2012 resolution does not cover recommendations made from outside the party. It was clarified that the MTPB chair was proposed by the current minister and agreed to by the prime minister, hence it kept with the resolution. Similarly, the Johore exco episode.

Tan Sri Lim Ah Lek, former deputy president and long-serving Pahang state exco member (1974-89) and cabinet member (1989-99) said the right thing to do as a loyal Johor subject and party chief was to seek an audience and request time to reverse the party stand.

Simply put: call an EGM and explain why the party should rescind the contentious resolution.

Lim reminded that Dr Chua's recommended expulsion by the disciplinary committee in August 2009 had been annulled by an extraordinary general meeting, requisitioned by his supporters, two months later.

An EGM can be requisitioned by the president or by one-third of the CC or one-third of the AGM delegates.

Lim opines that perhaps this EGM route was not exercised because it does not provide any "direct benefit". Besides, leaving the resolution intact would continue to constrain his rivals' influence.

Political analysts insist that a minimum of 10-15 years would be necessary to rebuild the party's support, provided there was tremendous political will, energy and financial resources.  

Past and current leaders and keen observers believe Dr Chua would most likely offer himself, this December, despite his announcement to the contrary.

This same lot also believes he wouldn't be there for the long haul.

The constitution limits the tenure of the presidency to a maximum of nine years.

Dr Chua is 66 years old and has been president since March 2010, leaving him a maximum of five-and-a-half years to lead the party.

So what is his game plan?

Meanwhile, the aborted Matang Holdings sales did nothing to endear the party to the community it professes to serve.

The activated disposal of a block of office lots in Megan Avenue and the eight-acre Bangi land is causing anxiety among long-serving members.

Megan Avenue has a sales price tag of RM20.6million. It was purchased at RM14.6m. The question is: "does the party need to sell"?

On the Bangi land, why the urgency? Why should the party agree to sell it for RM5.5m cash? In addition, a Cyberjaya building valued at RM2.5million?

The party is in no "forced sale" situation as far as its financial position is concerned, quite unlike its political position.

The party needs critical attention in the latter position. Where is our priority, asks a retired deputy minister?

It is common knowledge that during Tan Sri Lau Yin Pin's time as treasurer-general (2003-08) — serving under president Tan Sri Ong Ka Ting — he cleared party debts of  RM200 million.

He even realised 100 per cent party ownership of Wisma MCA by buying up the remainder 20 per cent.

The headquarters is estimated to be worth RM150 million. With the sprucing up, rental income annually was about RM2 million.

Datuk Alex Wong, a long-serving party man, ex-Senator and CC member, was clearly exercising restraint in offering his views: "Looks like the party is kaput (finished). I don't know what the present leadership is doing. Anyway, I don't think I really want to know!"

On the asset sale agenda, he could only say that the party should have adopted the formation of the Central Board of Trustees (CBOT) strongly proposed by Lau before he stepped down.

The proposal was expected to be executed when Datuk Seri Ong Tee Keat became president.

It calls for the CBOT to be wholly in charge of party assets. Members are to be elected by central delegates and the board accountable directly to the AGM.

An audit committee under the CBOT would ensure that available funds are properly utilised for the party and the community's benefit. The president is to have no authority over party assets.

An obviously miffed ex-CC member said principal officers of the party may think they are "covered" under section 18 © of the Societies Act, which stipulates ".... on any matter relating to the affairs of the party shall be final and conclusive and such decision shall not be challenged, appealed against, reviewed, quashed or called in question in any court on any ground, and no court shall have the jurisdiction to  entertain ..."

He argues that there is the Trustees Act 1949 to contend with.

Of course, the jewel in the crown is the around 41 per cent stake or 300 million shares in The Star and the tens of millions of ringgit in annual dividends.

So, would Dr Chua be the candidate to reverse the MCA's political doldrums?

Tan Sri Lim and a number of 60+year-old gentlemen (who have direct, indirect and sentimental links with the party) almost in unison responded with: "Dr Chua must step down immediately", for any hope for the MCA.

 

Changing shades of Transparency International bad for Malaysia

Posted: 09 Jul 2013 11:39 AM PDT

http://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Paul-low-and-transparency-internation.jpg 

(TMI) - When you can't manage leadership in an organisation, how can we manage the fight against corruption?

Perception is everything and the presence of officials from government agencies Pemandu and the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) at a Transparency International press conference yesterday set tongues wagging and drew the ire of a veteran anti-graft crusader.

Outgoing TI-M secretary-general Josie Fernandez said that the independence of any non-governmental organisation was important.

"Once independence is compromised, we lose the citizens' voice against corruption... what was the NKRA, Pemandu and MACC doing here? Is this an NGO press conference or government press conference," she said after TI-M released its latest survey on corruption.

In addition to the press corps, Datuk Nordin Hashim, a director at NKRA, Ravindran Devagunam, a director from the government's performance management delivery unit and  several communications officers from MACC were present at the press conference – a rarity even in Malaysia where there is often a symbiotic relationship between NGOs and government agencies.

The Malaysian chapter of TI has been in turmoil since its former head, Datuk Paul Low left in May to become a senator and a member of Prime Minister Najib Razak's Cabinet.

He was replaced by Datuk Akhbar Satar, a former MACC officer while Prof Datuk Mohamad Ali Hasan and Lio Kheng Min were appointed as deputy president and secretary-general respectively.

Fernandez  disagreed with the manner in which the current leadership was chosen, noting that the selection was done by eight exco members.

The last annual general meeting ended in turmoil with Fernandez being asked to leave after disagreeing with the manner the current leadership was chosen.

"The decision on leadership should not be left to a few people. All the members should be involved in the voting process. That was how it has been previously," she told The Malaysian Insider.

"When you can't manage leadership in an organisation, how can we manage the fight against corruption?

"Because of Paul's sudden appointment and unexpected departure, there's a vacuum. He should have set the next line of leadership. There should have been discussions on this."

The tussle for the secretary-general's position will be decided on July 20 at an extra-ordinary general meeting. But of more immediate concern is whether TI-M remains a non-partisan body, or whether it has become an establishment body.

Not helping matters for the watchdog body is the criticisms being leveled against Low as a minister and to a lesser extent, his replacement at TI-M.

Since being appointed minister in charge of integrity, good governance and human rights, Low has been attacked by DAP's Tony Pua and other critics as an apologist for the administration.

He did not do himself any favours last night when reacting to the survey results that showed that the public's confidence in the government's anti-corruption effort had dropped sharply in 2012. Low said that corruption is a global menace and not unique to Malaysia.

The latest poll also showed that the police and political parties were perceived to be the two most corrupt institutions in Malaysia.

Low's reply: "The Malaysian finding is consistent with the worldwide results where 36 countries viewed the police as the most corrupt...."

These answers are in sharp contrast to his statements when commenting on graft surveys in his capacity as TI-M president.

Read more at: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/changing-shades-of-transparency-bad-for-malaysia/ 

Don't try me in absentia, says Clare Brown of Sarawak Report

Posted: 09 Jul 2013 11:23 AM PDT

http://www.thestar.com.my/~/media/Images/TSOL/Photos-Gallery/Nation/2013/07/10/Clare%20Rewcastle%20Brown.ashx?w=620&h=413&crop=1& 

(The Star) - Sarawak Report founder Clare Rewcastle Brown has described as unfair attempts to push through a case in the Malaysian courts in her absence.

"My position is that I do not accept the 'out of jurisdiction' order granted to try the case in Sarawak as being appropriate, especially as it was done in a state I am not even allowed to enter," said Brown, who was denied entry to Sarawak at the Kuching International Airport last Wednesday.

"I do not think it is fair to push the case through and win it in my absence because of my failure to defend myself and then to try and enforce such a judgement in the UK," said Brown, the sister-in-law of former British Prime Minister Gordon Brown.

She has been a verhement critic of Sarawak Chief Minister Tan Sri Taib Mahmud and has published numerous reports of alleged corruption under his administration.

The Sarawak-born Brown is facing a civil suit over her article published on May 1 titled "Dirty Dayak Datuks — BN's Crony Candidates".

Taking legal action against Brown are Kapit MP Datuk Alexander Nanta Linggi, Tan Sri Datuk Amar Leonard Linggi Jugah, Greame Iaan Brown, Asian Plantations (Sarawak) Sdn Bhd, Keresa Plantations Sdn Bhd and Rajang Wood Sdn Bhd.

The state government's ban on Brown from entering Sarawak to defend herself in court has attracted global media attention. 

To the international media, Brown has described the plaintiffs as members of a transnational corporation, which is on the British and European stock exchanges.

The suit, filed a day after the article was posted at Sarawak Report, sought, among others, to have the article removed. Hearings are on going in Sarawak. 

On Monday, although the defendant was not in court, she was represented by See Chee How, PKR's Batu Lintang assemblyman.

So far, a duplicate of an injunction against Brown has been struck out while a date in August has been set to hear Brown's application to strike out the entire lawsuit. 

The plaintiffs had applied for two injunctions against the alleged defamatory article.

In an email interview with The Star, Brown said the plaintiffs had also hired lawyers in the UK.

"This strengthens the point that they are conceding that that (UK court) is the appropriate jurisdiction," she said from London where she has returned to.

"My lawyer has informed me there is a hearing in August to consider our application to have the whole case struck out in Sarawak and the 'out of jurisdiction' order removed."

Brown recently won the International Press Institute award for her work on Radio Free Sarawak.

When held at the Kuching airport last week, prior to deportation, Brown made a YouTube video accusing individuals of colluding with the political establishment to abuse their powers in order to silence their critics.

Other notables barred from Sarawak include activists Maria Chin Abdullah, Datuk Ambiga Sreenevasan, Wong Chin Huat, Ong Boon Kiong and Kua Kia Soong. 

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

0 ulasan:

Catat Ulasan

 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved