Rabu, 1 Mei 2013

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info
Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News


Kadazans (KDMs) to Decide the Course of Malaysian History

Posted: 30 Apr 2013 02:40 PM PDT

https://fbcdn-profile-a.akamaihd.net/hprofile-ak-ash4/c136.29.368.368/s160x160/404752_101306813365350_691019411_n.jpg

As you may be aware of, it was the KDMs in PBS-UPKO-PBRS who slavishly propped up the UMNO led Sabah government for the past decade. It will largely be the KDMs in those parties who decide if UMNO continue to rule Sabah and, or help ensure BN secure an overall majority nationwide. 

Jaikol Situn, Barrister-at-Law (Grays Inn); LLM; LLB; BA(Hons)

I happened to bump into this West Malaysian friend of mine a couple of days ago at an airport terminal while waiting for my flight to KL. Having renewed our acquaintance, our topic quickly moved to politics, although we picked our words carefully for fear of giving away our true political identity, as it were, lest the other was on the opposite side.

We tried to be professional about it as we both took a somewhat neutral stance or can't-care-less attitude so that our conversation remained pleasant and civil. My friend then told me something that has dwelt in my mind ever since. He said:


"Jack, it looks like the Kadazans will decide the course of Malaysian history this election."


What? A mere 2% of the Malaysian population with the ability to do that? On second thought, the Kadazans, at this present moment, are in an astonishingly rare position to determine which way Malaysian politics and governance are headed. By the way, whenever I mention Kadazans, I also mean  to say Kadazandusun-Murut or KDMs which include all the 40 or so Dusunic tribes totalling more than half a million or about 30% of the "official" population of Sabah


Recent developments seem to corroborate my friend's assessment. For the first time in a decade, the leaders of the three KDM-based parties of PBS, UPKO and PBRS in Sabah BN came out together to proclaim their full support for BN and Najib's continued leadership. Then, Najib's last week's visit to Sabah covered predominantly KDM areas underscoring the crucial role this community now plays in politics and nation building.


As you may be aware of, it was the KDMs in PBS-UPKO-PBRS who slavishly propped up the UMNO led Sabah government for the past decade. It will largely be the KDMs in those parties who decide if UMNO continue to rule Sabah and, or help ensure BN secure an overall majority nationwide. On the opposition side, again, it will be the KDMs who determine if the locally-based parties of STAR and SAPP fare well in the election, and should they do well, they would go on to press for new terms and conditions for Sabah's membership in the Malaysian federation. So you see, the KDMs now command formidable clout on both sides of the political divide.


What about the more than 800,000 illegal immigrants in possession of genuine Mykads on the electoral rolls? We know they have been traditional BN and UMNO supporters, but after the Lahad Datu conflict, nobody is so sure which party they would be voting for in this election. The opposition particularly STAR and SAPP would like to think that many would now support them while those in BN and UMNO are confident their loyalty remains intact.  However, due to some damming revelations during the now adjourned Royal Commission on Inquiry (RCI) on illegal immigrants, political parties are for the time being, taking a cautious approach on this issue to avoid any suggestions that they are in cahoots with these newcomers.


We would know which party or parties these so-called illegal immigrants supported come May 6th.  Should BN and UMNO retain many seats, we would know that these people are quite happy with the status quo. If STAR and SAPP managed to wrest control of seats in traditional UMNO strongholds, we would know these illegals have switched sides, thus setting a trend for an unlikely Sabahans/KDMs-illegal immigrants' alliance against the "neo-colonial power" in the years ahead. This would cause shivers down KL's spine.


So how would KL prevent the possibility of a Sabahans/KDMs-illegal immigrants' link up in the not so distant future? KL cannot just drive away hundreds of thousands back to the Philippines and Indonesia as they are now Malaysian citizens in their own right with genuine Mykads. KL might carry out various measures to ensure that the discord and enmity between them persist and try to convince Sabahans that these illegals are the enemy and KL are the ally. At the same time, KL would endeavour to placate the KDMs by whatever means and manner necessary thus, creating a win-win-scenario for KDMs again. Whatever happens, you can bet your life that it will mainly be the KDMs with overriding native rights who would serve as the catalyst for any geo-political change in Sabah that would have far reaching consequences in neighbouring Sarawak and subsequently throughout Malaysia.


There have been quite a few derogatory remarks that are annoyingly true about the KDMs, such as, "Dusun senang disusun" (Dusuns are easily fixed) or "Orang KDM macam kerbau kena tarik hidung" (KDMs are like buffaloes that can be pulled by the nose). In the light of recent developments, these demeaning remarks no longer hold much water. Indeed, the KDMs will be the sculptors, navigators, and kingmakers of Malaysian politics in this election and beyond. So for once, if you are a KDM, be proud of your roots. Search your soul and use your wisdom to decide the course of Malaysian history on 5th May 2013.

 

Najib, what happens after 5 May? How do Malaysians survive?

Posted: 30 Apr 2013 02:35 PM PDT

http://i2.wp.com/aliran.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/BR1M-recipients-at-Bayan-Baru-Penang.jpg?resize=520%2C373 

P Ramakrishnan asks Najib what will happen to the poor until the next BR1M they receive. How do the poor carry on with their lives in the meantime?

You have bribed the entire country with your BR1M. You have thrown money recklessly and wantonly.

You did it not because you suddenly became generous; not because you genuinely felt the suffering of the poor; not because you are compassionate and caring for the disadvantaged.

You did it to win the elections! That is all!! That is the simple truth!!!

What will happen to the poor suffering people after the election is over? How are they going to survive without your BR1M?

You promised them RM1,200 next year to induce and dupe them into voting for you. But how do they carry on with their suffering and struggling lives from 6 May until they receive your promised RM1,200 next year? 

Part 3 - BN and Hindraf MOU

Posted: 30 Apr 2013 12:40 PM PDT

https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjLIHeTopRc3eZSUlGFboD0xHgS2yAxFdUFhwjtA5DxSIaafcbrilDN933ViddeXwEAF2e5n6QMBoLAnf56IHlNRi39grwOTlvuN-4RdWqcSb-xs5pwoN3Vym5lbGspm3Ztv3qIAC2St5RD/s1600/memo.jpg

This is the third article in a series which aims to set a standard of reference for what needs to be done to uplift the Indian poor in Malaysia. 

Hindraf Economic Unit

There are not many occasions where the average Malaysian voter will take the time to consider his fellow citizen who comes from a Low Income Indian Household, aka the people whose interests Hindraf represents. This is simply because the Indian poor does not work where the average Malaysian works, or eats where the average voter eats, or shops with him or lives in the same neighbourhood.

Even though the Indian poor who has been displaced to the urban areas goes about his life amongst the more affluent Malaysians, he is usually invisible, except when the two worlds collide. The collisions are sometimes violent when crime is involved, and at other times are of the benign sort, like when the Alam Flora trucks come trundling along. For example, how many middle class voters would have noticed that 90% of Alam Flora workers are from the ranks of the Indian poor, in stark contrast to the usual 0% that the Indian poor occupy in most other industries and businesses?

On the same note, the problems that afflict the Indian poor are also vastly different to those that concern the average Malaysian voter. That is why, come election, one of the few times where the Indian poor cannot be ignored because they will actually be there queuing up at the voting centres amongst the rest of the voters, no one seemed to know how to get them to vote one way or another beyond the usual rice packet and instant noodles, tray of eggs and RM 50 in an ang pao packet.

It will not be wrong to say that for the current elections, both coalitions would have not enjoyed having to talk to Hindraf in order to ensure that they will get the lion's share of the support from the Indian poor. The only difference among the two coalitions is that BN was willing to commit itself in writing and actually have the decency to offer an apology to the Indian poor along the way, while Pakatan at times seemed unable to tell its arse from its elbow.

But signing an MOU with anyone does not mean that the problems of the Indian poor will disappear. The only way the problems of the Indian poor will ever go away is if the rest of society does what is needed to ensure that marginalisation becomes a thing of the past for all Malaysians.

Foremost amongst those who can make a difference in the lives of the Indian poor are the other Indian voters, who are actually the main targets of these articles. But what has become evident over the days and weeks since the signing of the MOU is that a significant portion of the Indian middle and upper classes have as poor an understanding of the problems of the Indian poor as the rest of Malaysia does.

Perhaps it is time to spell things out so that the Indian voters out there, regardless of who they vote for, will have an idea on how to help their less fortunate brethren improve their lot.

First of all, there is no Malaysian Malaysia (PR) or Satu Malaysia that makes an iota of difference in the lives of the Indian poor. Slogans do not create jobs or opportunities, only targeted policies do. As long as jobs are advertised as Chinese only or Malay only, that is the real Malaysia for the rest of the country.

Secondly, while the chances are that BN will hold on to Putrajaya, there is always an outside possibility that Pakatan will do the impossible and march into Putrajaya. If this does happen, it is up to the pro Pakatan Indian voter, to ensure that Pakatan implements the policies that will uplift the Indian poor. Do not worry about figuring out what to do and how, just take the 5 year Hindraf blueprint as well as the steps outlined in the BN-Hindraf MOU and run with it.

Third, and this is the most probable outcome, Pakatan will continue to form the State governments in a few states. If the pro Pakatan Indian voter does not want a repeat of what has transpired in GE 13, then get your respective state governments to implement policies that will actually target and reach the Indian poor in your respective states.

A word to the wise, it may seem like Hindraf has become the favourite target of the pro Pakatan cyber supporters of late, but that is not the case. Hindraf has always been one of the favourite targets of the pro Pakatan cyber troopers, the only difference being that most of the attacks of yesterday came from the Chinese Pakatan supporter. Now, it is the Indian Pakatan supporter who carries the ball.

The attacks against Hindraf are at best a nuisance to us, and all we can say is that you will be better off spending your time actually doing something useful. Anyone that thinks that ad hominem attacks or allegations of being bought will do anything but get Hindraf and subsequently BN even more support from the Indian poor, has got another think coming.

 

Hindraf Economic Unit

 

Red Tape of stupidity knows no bounds at the NRD

Posted: 30 Apr 2013 12:04 PM PDT

https://encrypted-tbn2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSE0xVGec96fs7NWGA4lYANffwV0tqhgELDdqQbLkme-gPcyM-9dQ 

No country in the world has an IC system.

The IC system, introduced to combat communism terrorism in Malaya, should be scrapped because there's no need for such documentation. The birth certificate will suffice to prove citizenship status, whether Malaysian or foreigner, and in the case of the former, whether one is an Orang Asal or otherwise. 

Joe Fernandez 

The National Registration Department (NRD) cannot refer non-Muslims, non-practising Muslims, murtads, fallen Muslims, and those who had no choice in the matter when they were declared Muslim, to the Syariah Court. Any such reference is unconstitutional and the matter should be brought before the Federal Court, the King and the Conference of Rulers.

According to the local media in Kota Kinabalu on Tues, a lawyer's Client, a Chinese and Buddhist, has been referred to the Syariah Court by the NRD Sabah to change the status of his son in the MyKad from Muslim to Buddhist.

The lawyer has resorted to filing an Application for Leave to obtain a Judicial Review of the NRD decision. If almost every MyKad applicant has to go through this arduous and expensive process, that means the NRD is making them run the gauntlet for no rhyme or reason. No wonder there are 350, 000 stateless people among the Indians alone in Malaya. The Penan in Sarawak, among others, are also running around half naked in the jungle, stateless.

The NRD Director General should be hauled up for incompetence and sacked for refusing to exercise his prerogative and discretionary powers in running his Department.

Why the need, for example, for a BN-Hindraf MOU to address the problem of statelessness in Malaya? Were the stateless in Malaya destined to rot till thy kingdom come in a legal twilight zone in the absence of an MOU? Does the MOU have the status of a constitutional document?

What about the non-Indian stateless in Malaya, Sabah and Sarawak? No need for another MOU to resolve their status and give them an identity? Or will they continue to remain in a legal twilight zone as a domestic pool of slave labour?

Non-Muslims in Sabah with a bin or binte in their name are also referred to the Syariah Court by the NRD when they apply for their MyKad. They have to get a declaration from the Syariah Court that they "are not Muslims and/or no longer Muslims".

This is called creeping Islamisation, a point raised so often by Hindraf Makkal Sakthi in the pre-MOU (Memorandum of Understanding) days.

The NRD has no business deciding on the religion of an applicant for the MyKad.

When I got my MyKad, my son and I were listed as Hindus.

When I queried the NRD, they replied that if there's no information in the data bank, Indians are classified as Hindus.

I replied: "In that case, you should classify Mahathir and Sheikh as Hindus since they are Indians. Have you ever come across any Hindu with the name Joseph?"

I asked for my MyKad and my son's to be changed.

They asked for my baptism certificate.

I told them: "When you listed me as Hindu, there was no need for any proof. Now that I tell you that I am a Christian, you want proof. Next you will ask me to bring the Bishop, then the Archbishop and finally the Pope. If I tell you that I am a Christian, I am a Christian. I don't have to prove to you that I am Christian. Why should I claim to be a Christian if I am not one? If I am a Hindu, I would be proud to be one. I would not claim to be something else. I want to see your Director."

Needless to say they quickly gave me and my son a form each to do the necessary rectifications.

I obtained a replacement MyKad within a week, my son a month later.

It seems that the older we are, the quicker we get our MyKad.

Otherwise, we might not be able to enter heaven.

In Sarawak, the NRD refers applicants from half-Natives -- born of non-Native fathers -- for Native status MyKads to the Native Court in defiance of the late 2010 Policy Circular from the Chief Secretary to the Government. They should be recognised as Natives as per the said Circular.

The sexist Native Court in Sarawak will never in a million years declare a half-Native with a non-Native father as Native. This is blatant discrimination. Children born of Native fathers and non-Native mothers are considered Natives.

In Sabah, the Sino-Natives born of Chinese parentage on the father's side want to play politics with their status. They want to have their cake and eat it too i.e. they want to be Chinese and Native at the same time. They also claim that if they opt for Native status, they will still not be recognised by the Land Department when it comes to Native Land because of their Chinese names. Is there a law on what is a Native name or how a Native should look like?

I have personally witnessed Sino-Natives being given the treatment at Amanah Saham Bumiputera (ASN) counters apparently because they look "suspiciously too Chinese". Even if they are the first to arrive at the ASB counter, they are the last to be cleared as checks are conducted into their background. Why would any self-respecting Chinaman claim to be part Native when he hasn't even a drop of Native blood in him beats me!

At the same time, even black as charcoal Indian Muslims -- i.e. those yet to bleach themselves into a Malay brown -- loudly conversing in Tamil among themselves face no problems whatsoever at ASB because they come under the Malay category. This proves that Malaysia is indeed under the vice-like grip of the mamaks with a few Kakas (Malayalee Muslims), Pakistanis and Bangladeshis thrown in for company.

Elsewhere, as the Royal Commission of Inquiry has revealed, the NRD has been in cahoots with rogue elements to register illegal immigrants as Orang Asal (Original People), Native and Bumiputera in order to marginalise and disenfranchisement the Orang Asal in particular. This is High Treason and a heinous crime against the people of Sabah.

No country in the world has an IC system.

The IC system, introduced to combat communism terrorism in Malaya, should be scrapped because there's no need for such documentation. The birth certificate will suffice to prove citizenship status, whether Malaysian or foreigner, and in the case of the former, whether one is an Orang Asal or otherwise.

The terms Bumiputera and Native should be scrapped.

All citizens by operation of law who are issues of citizens by operation of law are Bumiputera but since many people are denied this status, it would be politically correct to abolish the controversial term.

The term Native serves no purpose since many people who are not Orang Asal have the status.

The Government could consider the following guidelines:

(1) All Orang Asal are Native and Bumiputera.

(2) Not all Natives are Orang Asal but they are Bumiputera.

(3) Not all Bumiputera are Orang Asal or Native.

Natives and Bumiputera should not be eligible to own Tanah Adat or Customary Rights land.

Malay Reservation Land should not be considered Orang Asal or Customary Rights land but land which the British earmarked in Malaya on sovereign Thai territory to get squatters from Nusantara out of the way so that they could plant rubber and mine tin.

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net

0 ulasan:

Catat Ulasan

 

Malaysia Today Online

Copyright 2010 All Rights Reserved