Klik GAMBAR Dibawah Untuk Lebih Info

Sumber Asal Berita :-

Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News

---

The Untold Truth Behind The Sinking of Titanic Posted: 29 Sep 2012 03:29 PM PDT On April 10, 1912, the Titanic, largest ship afloat, left Southampton, England on her maiden voyage to New York City. The White Star Line had spared no expense in assuring her luxury. A legend even before she sailed, her passengers were a mixture of the world's wealthiest basking in the elegance of first class accommodations and immigrants packed into steerage. She was touted as the safest ship ever built, so safe that she carried only 20 lifeboats – enough to provide accommodation for only half her 2,200 passengers and crew. This discrepancy rested on the belief that since the ship's construction made her "unsinkable," her lifeboats were necessary only to rescue survivors of other sinking ships. Additionally, lifeboats took up valuable deck space. At the time of her construction, the Titanic was the largest ship ever built. She was nearly 900 feet long, stood 25 stories high, and weighed an incredible 46,000 tons. With turn-of-the-century design and technology, including sixteen major watertight compartments in her lower section that could easily be sealed off in the event of a punctured hull, the Titanic was deemed an unsinkable ship. According to her builders, even in the worst possible accident at sea, two ships colliding, the Titanic would stay afloat for two to three days, which would provide enough time for nearby ships to help. On April 14, 1912, however, the Titanic sideswiped a massive iceberg and sank in less than three hours. Damaging nearly 300 feet of the ship's hull, the collision allowed water to flood six of her sixteen major watertight compartments. She was on her maiden voyage to the United States, carrying more than 2200 passengers and crew, when she foundered. Only 705 of those aboard the Titanic ever reached their destination. After what seemed like a minor collision with an iceberg, the largest ship ever built sank in a fraction of the time estimated for her worst possible accident at sea. Two government investigations (U.S.A. & Britain) conducted immediately after the disaster agreed it was the iceberg, not any weakness in the ship itself, that caused the Titanic to sink. Both inquiries concluded the vessel had gone to the bottom intact. Blame for the incident fell on the ship's deceased captain, E. J. Smith, who was condemned for racing at 22 knots through a known ice field in the dark waters off the coast of Newfoundland. The case of the Titanic was considered closed. Hundreds upon hundreds of books. Two dozen movies. Plays, radio serials, poems, paintings, two Broadway musicals, comics, video games and a symphony were made to tell the story of Titanic. But is this the real true story of the sinking of the Titanic. Could the sinking of "unsinkable" Titanic be an inside job of some evil, sinister people ? Of course it is extremely hard to believe, but let's look and examine a little deeper and a little further. Shrouded in mystery and speculation, the sinking of the Titanic has many strange coincidences and strange occurrences surrounding it. One of the theories surrounding the Titanic sinking involves the highly debated Federal Reserve. Who shot JFK? Was 9-11 staged? Did aliens really crash at Roswell? All interesting theories that some would say absolutely yes to, while others would scoff and say, no way! Well, now you can add one more to the list of great mysteries with the 100th anniversary of the sinking of the Titanic. When we think of events that have transpired in history over the last one hundred to two hundred years, there are certain events that stand out as ones of great horror, great surprise and great sadness. Of the many that come to mind the most devastating have been the destruction of the World Trade Center in New York City and the sinking of the Titanic. What was the real story behind the sinking of the Titanic? The book 'The Secret Terrorists' printed by Truth Triumphant Ministries and reprinted by Tree of Life Resources places blame squarely on the Roman Catholic Order known as the Jesuits. 'The greatest tragedies in the last 200 years can be traced to the Jesuits.' We see how the Jesuits planned and executed the sinking of the Titanic, and we'll show you how they did it. READ MORE HERE

Lee Lam Thye, a Malaysian Posted: 29 Sep 2012 02:42 PM PDT * the word 'king' was deliberately (mis)spelt 'Kinng' on advice from an Indian numerologist . Not unlike Hong Kong film makers, Bollywood is fussy about good feng shui when starting or launching a film. The sad part of 'Lee Lam Thye was Kinng' lies in its grammatical tense, namely 'was'. Today, the younger ones, even DAP members (with no clue as to their party's history) hate him for no other reason than he chooses, since his publicly declared retirement from politics, to be a non-political non-partisan Malaysian. Whoooaa, that won't do in today's Malaysia for current politics has gone 'George Bush II', as per that low-brow Dubya-ish 'you're either with us or against us'. This (extract on Lee only) was what I wrote in an earlier post Gentlemen in ungentlemanly Malaysian politics in March 2010: … when I read readers' comments at various places – Malaysiakini, The Malaysian Insider, my matey Susan Loone's blog, etc – I seldom see a reasonable and balanced or civil comment. The comments would in general be feral, ferocious, and frightening, not unlike rabid salivating attack dogs unleashed ;-). It seems these are worse at RPK's Malaysia-Today wakakaka. […] They adopted George W Bush's doctrine of "either you're with us or against us", just black or white with no grey in between. Likewise the attacks against Lee Lam Thye were scurrilous, sleazy, sickening and by some scumbags whose pubic hair weren't yet in sight when Lee LT was already performing sterling services in KL. Lee was virtually a demigod in the eyes of his constituency and woe betide any political challenger for his seat – my uncle told me in each general election he actually felt sorry for those MCA pollies who were 'nominated' by MCA leaders to stand against Lee. They were probably unpopular members, good only as cannon fodders wakakaka. Maybe the following poem by kamikaze pilot, the late Matomi Ugaki, should be dedicated to those foolish or 'pushed forward' to stand against Lee Lam Thye: Flowers of the special attack are falling When the spring is leaving. Gone with the spring Are young boys like cherry blossoms. Gone are the blossoms, Leaving cherry trees only with leaves. MCA cherry blossoms? Totally crushed by Lee Lam Thye! Wakakaka! Poppy, MCA's Bukit Bintang cherry blossom Of course Lee retired from politics but these young punks couldn't, wouldn't respect his decision and let him be as he went about his Malaysian way. He was only 'acceptable' if he was like them, feral, ferocious and frighteningly moronic in blind hatred against anything and everything UMNO and BN. Same stuff happened to my matey Hsu Dar Ren in my post Gerakan hopes to snatch a new breath of life. Just because I refer to him as my matey, a commentator called him a 'running dog', just as some others had so termed Lee Lam Thye. Hsu Dar Ren Though I dislike the BN for its terrible governance and divisive antics, I do have friends in Gerakan, MCA, UMNO and wakakaka even MIC. I don't see the need to maul them as well though of course I would certainly challenge their political policies if these are not supportive of fairness, transparency, accountability, or just wasteful. In fact I was delighted to see that Hsu had written a letter to Malaysiakini titled The ascendancy of right wing politics. Read it if you think he is a 'running dog'. Some people like Lee Lam Thye and Hsu Dar Ren are gentlemen through and through, civil, soft spoken, well-mannered and treat even their political enemies as fellow Malaysians. In politics one doesn't have to assume one of the extreme positions like the general UMNO apparatchiks or anwaristas. And I am glad Lee and Hsu aren't. Also, in another much earlier post (October 2007) titled The necessary demonization of Lee Lam Thye I wrote (extracts only): Here is an outstanding former DAP stalwart who was the best performing opposition politician bar none. Neither my political hero Lim Kit Siang nor the late Tan Sri Dr Tan Chee Khoon could match his popularity and the respect the people of KL of an earlier generation have for him. Yet to today's political Johnnies & Ginny's-come-lately, he is a "hypocrite, a spineless turncoat who goes with the flow. His past actions have clearly shown he is a 'yes-man' and 'brown nose' and he is certainly not independent nor trustworthy" – see comments on the post. @font-face p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal div.Section1 So, on the above pseudo-logic, for Lee to be trustworthy in the amoebic minds of these J's-come-lately, he must, according to their tadpole worldviews, be a 'no-man'. Oh yes, he must buck the 'flow' in accordance with their wondrous views of which way the 'flow' has been going. Yes, Lee should bloody well conform to their dictates or 'de facto' assessments. What about the critics themselves? Certainly they would say 'no' to the establishment! But what would they say to the man who can walk on water. No, I wasn't referring to Yeshua ben Yusuf, but the bloke whom visitor informed me "Didn't you know the guy practically walks on water?" in an earlier post Guess who've been singing that old tune "I'd have been sacked ..."? Read the above post and see whether Lee Lam Thye or He who walks on water has been a 'spineless hypocrite'. READ MORE HERE

You are subscribed to email updates from Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.	Email delivery powered by Google
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610

Kredit: www.malaysia-today.net