Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News
Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News |
- Maddening hike in house prices
- The Sabah factor in Umno’s GE battle
- Making Dewan Rakyat effective
- MCA and hudud: Final part
| Maddening hike in house prices Posted: 23 Oct 2011 05:24 PM PDT The spiralling costs of houses are making life for the lower- and middle-income earners difficult to endure. He said the middle- and lower-income groups are forced to purchase their homes out-of -town since they cannot sustain the high cost of living in the urban areas. B Nantha Kumar, Free Malaysia Today What is the cost of a 480-sq-ft studio apartment, which is half the size of a PPR (People Housing Project) flat? If your guess is less than RM200,00 then you got it wrong. The real cost of such a place of dwelling is RM230,000 and this does not include car park charges, maintenance fees and other additional bills. But bear in mind this studio apartment is not in the centre of Kuala Lumpur or even at up-market locations like Taman Tun Dr Ismail, Hartamas or Kenny Hills. Instead, it is in Seri Kembangan, near Balakong, some 15km away from the federal capital. Parti Sosialis Malaysia (PSM) chairman Dr Mohd Nasir Hashim, who had been critical of the maddening hike in house prices, said that the problem was affecting Malaysians, especially the lower- and middle-income groups which make the bulk of the population. The problem is further complicated by the government "which appears to favour housing developers", he said. "The federal and state governments never monitor house prices, allowing the developers to set exorbitant prices. "Although house prices are set according to land value, environment and facilities provided, developers still charge high prices, saying that there is an increase in the cost of raw materials… but the hike in price of these materials is not in tandem with the high house prices," he added. Nasir, who is also Kota Damansara state assemblyman, said developers were not interested in building low-cost houses due to the thin profit margin. "Their main aim is profit ," he said, adding that more than 140 abandoned projects in Selangor were mostly for low-cost houses. "This is because the government always favours developers… claiming that the prices of houses are dependent on market forces," said Nasir. He said the middle- and lower-income groups are forced to purchase their homes out-of -town since they cannot sustain the high cost of living in the urban areas. "As a result, they will have to spend more on transport… and this is a new financial burden for them," he added. Unable to save for rainy day
Those who wish to buy these "luxury" houses in the city will also have to fork out more to repay their housing loans. According to statistics, a person who buys an expensive home spends nearly 50% of his total income servicing his housing loan. "Thus he is not able to save for a rainy day or for old age or for a child's education," said Nasir. Nasir said the migration of the middle and lower income groups to the outskirts has also resulted in foreign workers taking up renting space in the cities. "I can say that there is no political will to solve this problems." He suggested that the government, be it federal or state, form a housing commission to monitor house prices and curb excessive profiteering by developers. "The commission can work as a watchdog so that the people would be able to buy houses at a more reasonable price as opposed to the current open market system," he added. He also suggested that the government build more good quality low-cost houses so that those who need homes would get "value for money" homes. He said the middle-income group in the country shuns low-cost houses because of their poor quality. "The government should come up with houses that are spacious, and not pigeon-holes with one or two rooms for a family of five or six," said Nasir.
|
| The Sabah factor in Umno’s GE battle Posted: 22 Oct 2011 06:20 PM PDT In Sabah politics, the real battle for power is between the Bajau Muslims and the Umno Malays. If Sabah and Sarawak were left out from the calculation, it is BN with only 86 seats against the Pakatan Rakyat coalition with 82 seats. With this slim seat difference, BN would have risked losing power in the event of crossovers. Clearly, without the 54 seats from Sabah and Sarawak, BN would not be able to form a stable government. By Arnold Puyok, Free Malaysia Today Much attention has been given to Sabah after the 2008 general election. This is understandable as Sabah contributed a substantial number of parliamentary seats to the national parliament. In fact without Sabah, Barisan Nasional would have lost power. In order to see this clearly, it is important to look at Sabah's electoral contribution in a proper perspective. There were 222 seats contested in the 2008 elections. BN won 140 seats. But it was eight seats short of a two-thirds majority in parliament. For BN, having a two-thirds majority is a "prerequisite" for establishing a strong and stable government – a "standard" set by former Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad. Given Malaysia's political convention, having two parties forming a coalition government is almost impossible. Of the 140 seats BN won, Sabah and Sarawak contributed 54 seats thus giving BN the advantage of a simple majority. Umno's 'bank' With this slim seat difference, BN would have risked losing power in the event of crossovers. Clearly, without the 54 seats from Sabah and Sarawak, BN would not be able to form a stable government. With the 2008 election results, Sabah and Sarawak are BN's fixed deposits and hold the key for BN's survival. Sabah, however, is given more attention than Sarawak due to Umno's strong presence in the state. Aside from Sabah receiving the largest financial allocation of RM16 billion under the Ninth Malaysia Plan, it also has four Sabahans as federal ministers in the national cabinet. Sarawak on the other hand has only two. Bajau challenge Although conflict have begun to resurface following allegations of dominance by Musa's allies, Musa's skillful political maneuverings is keeping the "rebels" tamed. In Sabah, Musa's strongest challenge comes from the Bajau community, the second largest ethnic group in the state. Even though a substantial number of the Bajaus are Sabah Umno members, some are not happy with the alledged domination of the "Malays" led by Musa. The three Bajau leaders who pose a threat to Musa's leadership are Salleh Said Keruak, Amirkahar Mustapha and Pandikar Amin Mulia—also known as the"big three" in USBO (United Sabah Bajau Organisation). Except for Amirkahar, Salleh and Pandikar wield a significance influence among the Bajau community. Sabah Umno is anxious about the rise of USBO whose re-branding in 2006 was seen as an attempt to replace Sabah Umno as a party to represent the Muslims in Sabah. When Musa decided to drop all three as candidates in the 2008 elections, it was seen as an attempt to chip away the Bajau influence in Sabah Umno. Musa, however, was quick to prevent dissatisfaction among the Bajau community. He quickly gave Salleh and Pandikar important roles in government. The Bajau factor will remain an important political challenge for Musa to overcome. Kadazandusun factor The voice of the Kadazandusun community is essentially coming from PBS (Parti Bersatu Sabah) which is the largest Kadazandusun-based party in the state. In its party congress, PBS suggested that the power sharing arrangement in Sabah should be based on 70:30 ratio. This means, if there are 10 vacant political positions in a PBS-controlled constituency, seven should be appointed among its members while the rest from other parties. While no visible changes could be seen arising from this demand, Musa however seems to be continuing to enjoy the Kadazandusun support through the 'Huguan Siou' Joseph Pairin Kitingan, who is also deputy chief minister. PBS, while synonymous with the fight for state rights and autonomy, has however been criticized for being too "soft" on issues such as illegal immigrants, regional autonomy and economic imbalance between East and West Malaysia. But PBS supporters argue that it is more politically viable to talk about these issue behind close doors. Pairin, it seems, prefers not to use a confrontational approach in pursuing the Sabah issues. Nonetheless as far as Musa is concerned, the Kadazandusun support for him remains intact and will not pose a serious challenge to Sabah Umno.
|
| Posted: 22 Oct 2011 01:47 PM PDT By Patrick Lee, FMT PETALING JAYA: With political rhetoric and agenda-spewing on a daily basis, many MPs on both sides of the political divide believe that Parliament has a long way to go. Instead of talking about national or local issues, many MPs, according to Cameron Highlands MP (MIC) SK Devamany, prefer to sensationalise. "Issues are simply created, and this spinning culture should be checked. It's happening so much that the House Speaker has to interfere too many times." "You get people who are simply interrupting, don't follow the Standing Orders or the debate topics set aside for the rakyat," he told FMT. Devamany said that while the Dewan Rakyat allowed for both humourous and serious moments, a number of MPs preferred to target their political rivals with "cheap shots". "These are things that will give a wrong image of the Dewan to the masses," he lamented. Agreeing with him was Klang MP (DAP) Charles Santiago who said that important policies were often ignored because of political bickering. "It is a failure, because you (as an MP) are elected with a mandate to discuss and evaluate policies that are good for the rakyat." "(Because) a lot of people debate on rhetoric and political agenda, policy issues are thrown under the carpet…Compared to other parts of the world, we have a very long way to go," he said. Heated arguments, complete with name-calling and all types of slurs are a common sight in the Dewan Rakyat, with MPs regularly tossing jabs at each other. Some appear to do it out of fun, while others have been known to take it too far. Lack of time cited
|
| Posted: 21 Oct 2011 10:58 AM PDT By Stanley Koh, FMT At a 2006 forum to discuss problems that non-Muslims face as Malaysian officialdom continues to assert the predominance of Islam in the country, a prominent scholar acknowledged – "with "sadness", he said – that there was great confusion about the religion, especially among Muslims themselves. Syed Ali Tawfik al-Attas, director-general of the Institute of Islamic Understanding (Ikim), said that Muslim administrators and Islamic activists generally had a poor understanding of the Islamic view of "knowledge" even as they examined the religion with a fine-tooth comb. "That is the problem with the Muslim world," he declared. He explained that in Islamic scholarship, knowledge is generally separated into three types: interpretation of the meaning of what is perceived, revealed knowledge, and derived knowledge that is beneficial. This effectively means that non-beneficial knowledge is not construed as knowledge. He stressed the importance of having the correct understanding of such terminologies as "freedom", "democracy" and "Islamisation" and the equal importance of recognising that they were open to different conceptualisations. Citing an example, he said the word the Arabs use for "democracy" could be translated as "preservation of the mind", which implies a wealth of meanings. "Yet, this preservation is today limited to halal-haram issues," he said, adding that this was one symptom of "the truncation and tragedy of Islam". The forum that Syed Ali addressed, which was organised by a group of think-tanks, shed much light on issues raised during the 2001 forum that MCA held following Dr Mahathir Mohamad's declaration that Malaysia was an Islamic state. Many of those issues centred around the unhappiness of non-Muslims with the arrogance of the civil service in deciding on and implementing policies that affected the religious practices of non-Muslims. Syed Ali's presentation made it quite clear that such arrogance was born of ignorance. The Moorthy controversy Referring to the case of Everest climber Maniam Moorthy, who died in 2005 and was buried as a Muslim in the face of his family's objections, Syed Ali said it would not have been such a big issue if the officials in charge had been more knowledgeable and less arrogant. He explained that in Islam it does not matter where one is buried. He said the Moorthy controversy illustrated how it was the mind of Muslims, and not Islam itself, that was limited. At the MCA forum, representatives from the Inter-Religious Council of Christianity, Hinduism, Sikhism and Buddhism spoke of difficulties in getting approval for land on which to build places of worship and even for the renovation of those places. Rev Wong Kheng Kong said civil servants carried out their work with a clear bias for Islam instead of sticking to the constitutional provisions on religious rights. He feared that Mahathir's declaration would make matters worse.
|
| You are subscribed to email updates from Malaysia Today - Your Source of Independent News To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |
0 ulasan:
Catat Ulasan